Acute hepatitis C virus superinfection followed by spontaneous HBeAg seroconversion and HBsAg elimination

Hepatitis B Virus X Protein Stimulates Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Replication by Protecting HCV Core Protein from E6AP-Mediated Proteasomal Degradation

Most clinical and experimental studies have suggested that hepatitis C virus (HCV) is dominant over hepatitis B virus (HBV) during coinfection, although the underlying mechanism remains unclear. In this study, we found that the HBV X protein (HBx) upregulates the levels of the HCV core protein to stimulate HCV replication during coinfection in human hepatoma cells. For this purpose, HBx upregulated both the protein levels and enzyme activities of cellular DNA methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1) and DNMT3b, and this subsequently reduced the expression levels of the E6-associated protein (E6AP), an E3 ligase of the HCV core protein, via DNA methylation. The ubiquitin-dependent proteasomal degradation of the HCV core protein was severely impaired in the presence of HBx, whereas this effect was not observed when E6AP was either ectopically expressed or restored by treatment with 5-aza-2'dC or DNMT1 knockdown. The effect of HBx on the HCV core protein was accurately reproduced in HBV/HCV coinfection systems, which were established by either monoinfection by HCV in Huh7D cells transfected with a 1.2-mer HBV replicon or coinfection by HBV and HCV in Huh7D-Na+-taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide cells, providing evidence for the stimulation of HCV replication by HBx. The present study may provide insights into understanding HCV dominance during HBV/HCV coinfection in patients. IMPORTANCE Hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) are major human pathogens that cause a substantial proportion of liver diseases worldwide. As the two hepatotropic viruses have the same modes of transmission, coinfection is often observed, especially in areas and populations where HBV is endemic. High-risk populations include people who inject drugs. Both clinical and experimental studies have shown that HCV is more dominant than HBV during coinfection, but the underlying mechanism remains unclear. In this study, we show that HBV X protein (HBx) stimulates HCV replication by inhibiting the expression of E6-associated protein (E6AP) via DNA methylation, thereby protecting the HCV core protein from proteasomal degradation, which can contribute to HCV dominance during HBV/HCV coinfection.

Pharmacotherapeutic strategies for hepatitis B and hepatitis C coinfection

INTRODUCTION

Hepatitis B (HBV) and Hepatitis C (HCV) infection place a significant burden on the global health system, with chronic carriage leading to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. HBV/HCV coinfection can be seen in highly endemic areas and present a heterogenous group given varying virologic profiles. Coinfected patients have a greater risk of advanced liver disease; hence, diagnosis and early antiviral therapy (AVT) should be a priority. Optimal treatment regimens for coinfected patients remain unknown with differing recommendations, particularly relating to the risk of HBV reactivation whilst on AVT for HCV.

AREAS COVERED

This article summarizes the available data on HBV/HCV coinfection with regards to epidemiology, virologic interactions, and risk of HBV reactivation. The authors also provide a framework for the assessment and treatment of coinfected patients.

EXPERT OPINION

There is a moderate risk of HBV reactivation in hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) positive patients undergoing HCV direct-acting antiviral (DAA) treatment; however, clinically significant events are rare. The risk of HBV reactivation in HBsAg negative patients undergoing HCV DAA treatment is negligible. Thus, prophylactic HBV treatment in both groups is not required. The authors recommend close monitoring with HBV treatment if there is evidence of HBV reactivation or elevated alanine aminotransferase levels.

Hepatitis C virus core protein inhibits hepatitis B virus replication by downregulating HBx levels via Siah-1-mediated proteasomal degradation during coinfection

Most clinical and experimental studies have suggested that hepatitis C virus (HCV) is dominant over hepatitis B virus (HBV) during coinfection, although the mechanism remains unclear. Here, we found that HCV core protein inhibits HBV replication by downregulating HBx levels during coinfection in human hepatoma cells. For this effect, HCV core protein increased reactive oxygen species levels in the mitochondria and activated the ataxia telangiectasia mutated-checkpoint kinase two pathway in the nucleus, resulting in an upregulation of p53 levels. Accordingly, HCV core protein induced p53-dependent activation of seven in absentia homolog one expression, an E3 ligase of HBx, resulting in the ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation of HBx. The effect of the HCV core protein on HBx levels was accurately reproduced in both a 1.2-mer HBV replicon and in vitro HBV infection systems, providing evidence for the inhibition of HBV replication by HCV core protein. The present study may provide insights into the mechanism of HCV dominance in HBV- and HCV-coinfected patients.

Management of hepatitis B and hepatitis C coinfection: an expert review

INTRODUCTION

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections share common routes of transmission. HBV/HCV coinfection can lead to interactions affecting mechanisms of infection and therapy.

AREAS COVERED

In the review, we present epidemiology of HBV/HCV coinfection and current therapeutic options for both viruses. The possibility of drug-drug interactions during the treatment of coinfected patients is discussed. However, the major part of the review is dedicated to interactions between viruses and risk of HBV reactivation during HCV treatment with direct-acting antivirals (DAA). Finally, we analyze available international and national guidelines for the management of HBV reactivations related to DAA administration.

EXPERT OPINION

The most important international societies' guidelines include comments on HBV/HCV coinfection, but due to their inconsistency we present a proposal of management for HBV/HCV coinfected patients focusing mostly on HBV reactivation in patients treated for HCV. We provide some advice that should be considered in future guidelines for the management of HBV/HCV coinfection.

Seroconversion of HBsAG coincides with hepatitis A super-infection: A case report

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) is a hepatotropic virus that can cause acute and chronic liver damage. According to the world health organization 257 million people are infected with chronic HBV infection worldwide. Super-infection with other hepadnaviruses, including hepatitis A virus (HAV), hepatitis C virus, hepatitis D virus, and hepatitis E virus is associated with increased risk of acute liver failure in patients with chronic HBV.

CASE SUMMARY

Here, we report a case of a 47-year old male patient with HBV-related compensated Child A cirrhosis, who presented with general fatigue, malaise and laboratory signs of acute hepatitis. Although the patient was regularly seen at a specialized university liver unit, the HAV vaccination status was unclear. Acute HAV super-infection was diagnosed by positive serological and polymerase chain reaction analysis. Following acute HAV super-infection, spontaneous HBsAg elimination and development of an anti-HBs titer were observed.

CONCLUSION

This case illustrates the importance of carefully checking the vaccination status. In our patient, unspecific immunological responses to HAV led to functional cure of HBV.

Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) Reactivation Following Pharmacological Eradication of Hepatitis C Virus (HCV)

The US Food and Drug Administration issued a black box warning related to the risk of reactivation of overt/occult hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection during direct acting-antivirals (DAA) treatment. This review evaluated the prevalence of HBV reactivation after hepatitis C virus (HCV) pharmacological suppression and hypothesized the management and prevention of this reactivation. During and after DAA-based treatment, reactivation of HBV infection is common in patients with detectable serum HBsAg (from 2% to 57%) and very low (less than 3%) in individuals with isolated anti-HBc antibodies. The severity of hepatic damage may range from HBV reactivation without hepatitis to fulminant hepatic failure requiring liver transplantation. Thus, HBsAg-positive patients should receive nucleo(s)tide analog (NA) treatment or prophylaxis at the same time as DAA therapy. For those patients with occult B infection, there are no sufficient recommendations to start prophylactic treatment. Reactivation of overt or occult HBV infection during or after eradication of HCV infection is an issue to consider, and additional studies would help to determine the best management of this virological and clinical event.

Hepatitis B reactivation during or after direct acting antiviral therapy - implication for susceptible individuals

INTRODUCTION

The FDA issued a warning following 24 cases of HBV reactivation during DAA therapy for HCV, including individuals with inactive, occult and past HBV infection. Clinical presentations ranged from asymptomatic fluctuations in HBV DNA to fulminant hepatic failure, liver transplantation and death. The mechanism is unknown. Areas covered: HCV/HBV coinfection is common, particularly in regions endemic for HBV. HCV and HBV utilize host factors to support replication; both viruses evade/impair host immunity. Clinical presentations of HBV reactivation during DAAs are summarized. Other causes of HBV reactivation are revisited and recent data regarding HBV reactivation are presented. Expert opinion: HBV reactivation during DAAs for HCV occurs, with life-threatening consequences in some individuals. The risk of HBV reactivation is observed in all HBV stages. The rapid removal of HCV likely alters and liberates host-viral ± viral-viral interactions that lead to increased HBV replication. As immune reconstitution occurs with HCV removal, host recognition of HBV DNA likely ensues followed by vigorous host immune responses leading to liver injury (HBV flare). These cases highlight the importance of HBV testing prior to initiating DAA therapy, the need for close monitoring of HBV during therapy and timely administration of anti-HBV therapy to prevent serious sequelae.

Replication Inhibition of Hepatitis B Virus and Hepatitis C Virus in Co-Infected Patients in Chinese Population

Background

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) co-infections contributes to a substantial proportion of liver disease worldwide. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical and virological features of HBV-HCV co-infection.

Methods

Demographic data were collected for 3238 high-risk people from an HCV-endemic region in China. Laboratory tests included HCV antibody and HBV serological markers, liver function tests, and routine blood analysis. Anti-HCV positive samples were analyzed for HCV RNA levels and subgenotypes. HBsAg-positive samples were tested for HBV DNA.

Results

A total of 1468 patients had chronic HCV and/or HBV infections. Among them, 1200 individuals were classified as HCV mono-infected, 161 were classified as HBV mono-infected, and 107 were classified as co-infected. The HBV-HCV co-infected patients not only had a lower HBV DNA positive rate compared to HBV mono-infected patients (84.1% versus 94.4%, respectively; P<0.001). The median HCV RNA levels in HBV-HCV co-infected patients were significantly lower than those in the HCV mono-infected patients (1.18[Interquartile range (IQR) 0–5.57] versus 5.87[IQR, 3.54–6.71] Log₁₀ IU/mL, respectively; P<0.001). Furthermore, co-infected patients were less likely to have detectable HCV RNA levels than HCV mono-infected patients (23.4% versus 56.5%, respectively; P<0.001). Those HBV-HCV co-infected patients had significantly lower median HBV DNA levels than those mono-infected with HBV (1.97[IQR, 1.3–3.43] versus 3.06[IQR, 2–4.28] Log₁₀ IU/mL, respectively; P<0.001). The HBV-HCV co-infection group had higher ALT, AST, ALP, GGT, APRI and FIB-4 levels, but lower ALB and total platelet compared to the HBV mono-infection group, and similar to that of the HCV mono-infected group.

Conclusion

These results suggest that co-infection with HCV and HBV inhibits the replication of both viruses. The serologic results of HBV-HCV co-infection in patients suggests more liver injury compared to HBV mono-infected patients, but is similar to HCV mono-infection.

MiR-122 in hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus dual infection

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections are the most common causes of chronic liver diseases and hepatocelluar carcinomas. Over the past few years, the liver-enriched microRNA-122 (miR-122) has been shown to differentially regulate viral replication of HBV and HCV. It is notable that the level of miR-122 is positively and negatively regulated by HCV and HBV, respectively. Consistent with the well-documented phenomenon that miR-122 promotes HCV accumulation, inhibition of miR-122 has been shown as an effective therapy for the treatment of HCV infection in both chimpanzees and humans. On the other hand, miR-122 is also known to block HBV replication, and HBV has recently been shown to inhibit miR-122 expression; such a reciprocal inhibition between miR-122 and HBV suggests an intriguing possibility that miR-122 replacement may represent a potential therapy for treatment of HBV infection. As HBV and HCV have shared transmission routes, dual infection is not an uncommon scenario, which is associated with more advanced liver disease than either HBV or HCV mono-infection. Thus, there is a clear need to further understand the interaction between HBV and HCV and to delineate the role of miR-122 in HBV/HCV dual infection in order to devise effective therapy. This review summarizes the current understanding of HBV/HCV dual infection, focusing on the pathobiological role and therapeutic potential of miR-122.

Treatment of patients with dual hepatitis C and B by peginterferon α and ribavirin reduced risk of hepatocellular carcinoma and mortality

OBJECTIVE

Whether peginterferon α and ribavirin combination therapy reduces risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or improves survival in patients dual-infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) is unknown. Since it is ethically impossible to conduct a randomised trial to learn the long-term efficacy, we rely upon the large database to explore the effectiveness of combination therapy among dual-infected patients.

DESIGN

Data for this population-based retrospective cohort study were obtained from the treatment programme, Cancer Registry, National Health Insurance and death certification. We examined the risk of HCC, mortality and adverse events in 1096 treated and 18 988 untreated HCV-HBV dually-infected patients. Outcomes were analysed using the bias corrected inverse probability weighting (IPW) by propensity scores. Outcomes of HCV-HBV dually-infected and HCV mono-infected patients receiving the same treatment were compared using new user design with IPW estimators to adjust for confounding.

RESULTS

After adjustment, combination therapy significantly reduced the risk of HCC (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.97), liver-related mortality (HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.6) and all-cause mortality (HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.52). Nevertheless, the underlying HBV infection was still a risk factor for HCC and mortality after treatment. Treatment was associated with an increase in the incidence of thyroid dysfunction (HR 1.9, p<0.001) and mood disorders (HR 1.81, p=0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first evidence showing that combination therapy decreased the risk of HCC and improved survival in HCV-HBV dually-infected patients despite a slight increase in the incidence of thyroid and mood disorders.

Systematic review: Asian patients with chronic hepatitis C infection

BACKGROUND

Chronic hepatitis C (CHC) infection is a risk factor for both the development of end-stage liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Globally, approximately 170 million people are chronically infected with the hepatitis C virus (HCV), and the majority of these individuals come from the western Pacific and Southeast Asia regions (94.6 million persons combined). CHC is an understudied and underappreciated health problem in many Asian countries and in the US, where Asians represent one of the fastest growing groups of new Americans.

AIM

To perform a systematic review of the current literature on the epidemiology, diagnosis and screening, clinical characteristics and response to anti-viral therapy of Asians with CHC.

METHODS

Using a PubMed search of 'hepatitis C' and 'Asia,' 341 original manuscripts published in peer-reviewed journals were identified, and 99 were selected based on their relevance.

RESULTS

Many Asian CHC patients do not have easily identifiable risk factors and may be underdiagnosed. Rates of HCV infection in Asians on community screening in the US are unexpectedly high, and there is a high prevalence of HCV genotype 6 in Southeast Asia and Southern China. HCV-infected Asians tend to present at older age and may have higher risk of HCC; however, they respond better to anti-viral therapy than non-Asians across all HCV genotypes.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the high HCV endemicity in Asia, lack of identifiable risk factors and favourable treatment response rates in Asians, we advocate the screening for HCV infection of all Asians who come from areas where HCV prevalence is ≥2%.

Hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus co-infection: a therapeutic challenge

Hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus are the two most common causes of chronic liver disease in the world. Dual infection with hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus, whose prevalence is underestimated, is characterized by a more severe liver injury, a higher probability of liver cirrhosis and a higher incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma. Treatment of these patients represents a therapeutic challenge. We report the case of an hepatitis B virus-hepatitis C virus co-infected patient, which particularly illustrates the interactions between these two viruses and therapeutic problems caused by the dual infection. HCV was initially dominant, which indicated a combination therapy by pegylated interferon and ribavirin. This treatment was associated with an early virological response of the HCV but an increase of HBV DNA occurred, requiring the use of a nucleoside analogue. A good response was obtained for the HBV but a relapse of HCV was noted, posing a problem for therapeutic decision.

Inhibition of the HCV core protein on the immune response to HBV surface antigen and on HBV gene expression and replication in vivo

The hepatitis C virus (HCV) core protein is a multifunctional protein that can interfere with the induction of an immune response. It has been reported that the HCV core protein inhibits HBV replication in vitro. In this study, we test the effect of the HCV core gene on the priming of the immune response to hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and on the replication of HBV in vivo. Our results showed that the full-length HCV core gene inhibits the induction of an immune response to the heterogeneous antigen, HBsAg, at the site of inoculation when HCV core (pC191) and HBsAg (pHBsAg) expression plasmids are co-administered as DNA vaccines into BALB/c mice. The observed interference effect of the HCV core occurs in the priming stage and is limited to the DNA form of the HBsAg antigen, but not to the protein form. The HCV core reduces the protective effect of the HBsAg when the HBsAg and the HCV core are co-administered as vaccines in an HBV hydrodynamic mouse model because the HCV core induces immune tolerance to the heterogeneous HBsAg DNA antigen. These results suggest that HCV core may play an important role in viral persistence by the attenuation of host immune responses to different antigens. We further tested whether the HCV core interfered with the priming of the immune response in hepatocytes via the hydrodynamic co-injection of an HBV replication-competent plasmid and an HCV core plasmid. The HCV core inhibited HBV replication and antigen expression in both BALB/c (H-2d) and C57BL/6 (H-2b) mice, the mouse models of acute and chronic hepatitis B virus infections. Thus, the HCV core inhibits the induction of a specific immune response to an HBsAg DNA vaccine. However, HCV C also interferes with HBV gene expression and replication in vivo, as observed in patients with coinfection.

Clinical features and treatment efficacy of peginterferon alfa plus ribavirin in chronic hepatitis C patients coinfected with hepatitis B virus

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Cross-sectional studies have documented that 2-10% of patients who are chronically infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) are also positive for hepatitis B virus (HBV) surface antigen (HBsAg). Data related to HCV-HBV coinfection are lacking in Korea. This study evaluated the clinical characteristics, the treatment efficacy of peginterferon alfa plus ribavirin, and the changes induced by such treatment in HBV status in chronic hepatitis C (CHC) patients coinfected with HBV.

METHODS

Eighteen (2.37%) HBsAg-positive CHC patients were selected from among the 758 subjects from the K(G)yeonggi-Incheon Peginterferon alfa and ribavirin in chronic hepatitis C Treatment (KIPECT) study, which evaluated the treatment efficacy and safety of peginterferon alfa plus ribavirin in CHC patients. Data on changes in the status of HBV infections were obtained.

RESULTS

HCV genotype 1b was the most common (44%). The overall sustained virologic response rate was 72% in all patients, and 60% and 87.5% in genotypes 1 and 2, respectively. Two of the 18 patients were positive for HBeAg, and 15 had baseline HBV DNA level of less than 2,000 IU/mL. Two of the three whose levels exceeded this threshold showed no detectable DNA after treatment. After the completion of treatment, serum HBV DNA levels were increased in the two patients whose baseline HBV DNA levels were less than 2,000 IU/mL.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of HBV coinfection in CHC patients was 2.37% and most of the patients were inactive carriers. The treatment efficacy was similar to that of HCV mono-infection. Reactivation of HBV replication was observed in some patients after CHC treatment.

Antiviral treatment of hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus co-infection

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections are among the most common causes of advanced chronic liver disease worldwide. HBV/HCV co-infection is not uncommon with an estimated 7-20 million individuals affected worldwide. Patients with HBV/HCV co-infection have an increased risk of cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and even death. The pathophysiology of HBV/HCV co-infection is complex, as different patterns of virological dominance may occur, which can even fluctuate over time. Recently, combination of pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) plus ribavirin has been explored in HBV/HCV-coinfected patients who are positive for HCV-RNA. In this paper, we summarize the epidemiology, viral interaction and clinical features of HBV/HCV co-infection and the available treatment options. Detailed serological and virological evaluations are required for HBV/HCV-co-infected patients before initiation of antiviral therapy. At present, PEG-IFN-a plus ribavirin should be the treatment of choice in patients with dominant HCV replication. However, HBV rebound may occur after elimination of HCV, and thus close monitoring for both viruses is recommended even for patients with initially suppressed HBV DNA.

Current Concepts of HBV/HCV Coinfection: Coexistence, but Not Necessarily in Harmony

Hepatitis B and hepatitis C are important causes of chronic liver disease globally. Although HBV/HCV coinfection is not uncommon, its epidemiology is poorly defined. Numerous studies provided evidence that coinfection accelerates liver disease progression and increases the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma. By applying new cell culture models to examine the interaction of both viruses, investigators concluded that HBV and HCV replicate in the same hepatocyte without interference. The roles of innate and adaptive immunity in determining the viral replication and disease outcomes still need rigorous investigation. To date, no standard-of-care recommendation exists for HBV/HCV coinfection. Pegylated interferon and ribavirin combination therapy demonstrated similar efficacy in suppressing HCV RNA in coinfection and HCV monoinfection. However, HBV reactivation during therapy can be a challenge. Future clinical trials evaluating the addition of a nucleoside/nucleotide analog for selective patients with HBV/HCV coinfection are essential for successful management of HBV/HCV coinfection.

Hepatitis B surface antigen seroclearance during chronic HBV infection

Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) seroclearance in chronic HBV infection occurs at an annual incidence of 1-2%. The long-term outcome after HBsAg seroclearance is excellent if there is no pre-existing cirrhosis or viral superinfection. For this reason, HBsAg seroclearance has attracted recent interest in both long-term studies of the natural history of HBV infection and in patients receiving antiviral therapy. Here, we review a diverse range of studies investigating spontaneous HBsAg seroclearance in varied groups of patients and consider the many predictive factors - of both viral and host origin - for seroclearance. Studies to assess the effects of antiviral therapy, and in particular interferon treatment, are also discussed together with virological, biochemical and histological profiles following HBsAg seroclearance and the long-term outcomes.

Treatment of HBV/HCV coinfection

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

Hepatitis B (HBV) and hepatitis C (HCV) virus infections are among the most common causes of advanced chronic liver disease worldwide. HBV/HCV coinfection is not uncommon with an estimated 7 - 20 million individuals affected worldwide. Patients with HBV/HCV coinfection have an increased risk for cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and even death.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

The pathophysiology of HBV/HCV coinfection is complex, as different patterns of virological dominance may occur, which can even fluctuate over time. Recently, combination of pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) plus ribavirin has been explored in HBV/HCV coinfected patients who are positive for HCV-RNA. HBV polymerase inhibitors may be indicated if HBV-DNA concentrations are above 2000 IU/ml. In this review, we summarize the epidemiology, viral interaction, its clinical features and the available treatment options.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

Insights into viral interaction of HBV/HCV coinfection and treatment individualization strategies are provided in the review.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Detailed serological and virological evaluations are required for HBV/HCV coinfected patients before initiation of antiviral therapy. At present, PEG-IFN-alpha plus ribavirin should be the treatment of choice in patients with dominant HCV replication. However, HBV rebound may occur after elimination of HCV, and thus close monitoring for both viruses is recommended even for patients with initially suppressed HBV-DNA.

Dual chronic hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus infection

Dual hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection are common in HBV or HCV endemic areas. However, several clinical and pathogenetic issues remain unresolved. First, clinical and in vitro studies suggest the interactions between two viruses. The dynamics of the interaction in untreated setting versus treated setting and its influence on the long-term outcomes await further studies. A key issue regarding viral interactions is whether modulation of infection occurs in the same dually infected individual hepatocyte of the liver. Clarifying this issue may help to understand the reciprocal interference between HCV and HBV and provide clues for future immunopathogenetic studies. Second, the prevalence and clinical significance of coexisting occult HBV infection in patients with chronic HCV infection need further investigations. Third, combination therapy of peginterferon alfa-2a and ribavirin appears to be just as effective and safe for the treatment of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive patients chronically infected with active chronic hepatitis C as it is in patients with HCV monoinfection. Nevertheless, one-third of dually infected patients with nondetectable serum HBV DNA-level pretreatment developed HBV reactivation posttreatment. How to prevent and treat this reactivation should be clarified. Furthermore, about 10% of the dually infected patients lost HBsAg. Underlying mechanisms await further investigations. Finally, the optimal treatment strategies for dually infected patients with hepatitis B e antigen-positive chronic hepatitis B should be identified in future clinical trials.

Occult hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus infections

Occult HBV infection is a well-recognised clinical entity characterised by the detection of HBV-DNA in serum and/or in liver in the absence of detectable hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg). Occult HBV infection has been described not only in patients who have resolved an acute or chronic HBV infection but also in patients without any serological markers of a past HBV infection. Occult HBV infection in patients with chronic HCV infection may induce more severe liver disease and lower response rate to interferon treatment. The existence of occult HCV infections has been also reported more recently. Occult HCV infection is characterised by the presence of HCV-RNA in liver and peripheral blood mononuclear cells in the absence of detectable serum HCV-RNA. Occult HCV infection may occur under two different clinical situations: in hepatitis C antibody-(anti-HCV) negative and serum HCV-RNA-negative patients with abnormal liver function tests and in anti-HCV-positive patients who have no detectable serum HCV-RNA and who have normal liver enzymes. The clinical relevance of occult HCV infections is still under investigation.

Hepatitis B virus/hepatitis C virus coinfection: epidemiology, clinical features, viral interactions and treatment

Because of the shared modes of transmission, hepatitis B virus (HBV)/hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfection is not uncommon in highly endemic areas and among subjects with a high risk of parenteral infections. The worldwide prevalence of HBV/HCV coinfection is unknown and might be underestimated with the phenomenon of silent (occult) HBV infection. HCV superinfection in patients with chronic HBV infection was the most common clinical features of coinfection in Asia-Pacific countries. Further, most, but not all, clinical observations suggested that interference between the two viruses was more frequently characterized by an inhibition of HBV replication exerted by HCV. However, longitudinal follow-up studies have demonstrated that the virological patterns in coinfection cases are widely divergent and have dynamic profiles over time. As compared with monoinfected patients, HBV/HCV coinfected persons tend to have more severe liver injury, a higher probability of liver cirrhosis and hepatic decompensation, and a higher incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma. Detailed serological and virological evaluations are required for coinfected patients before initiation of antiviral therapy. Previous studies demonstrated that HBV/HCV coinfected patients responded poorly to interferon (IFN) monotherapy. Currently, for patients with dominant HCV infection and low level HBV viremia (<10(4) IU/mL), IFN or pegylated IFN plus ribavirin can achieve comparable sustained virus response as expected with HCV monoinfection. However, phenomenon of reciprocal viral interference can happen, and resultant "flare" of hepatitis activity may cause liver function deterioration. For coinfected patients with dually-active HBV/HCV, the optimal regimen for therapy remains unclear although adding oral nucleos(t)ide analogs to pegylated IFN and ribavirin seems a reasonable empiric option.

Understanding the pathogenesis and management of hepatitis B/HIV and hepatitis B/hepatitis C virus coinfection

The approach to the hepatitis B virus (HBV)-infected patient who is also infected with HIV or hepatitis C virus (HCV) is very different from the approach to the patient with only one virus infection. HBV/HIV coinfection is common. Agents that have dual activity against HBV and HIV should be considered as treatment of choice in combination regimens in HBV/HIV-coinfected patients beginning antiretroviral therapy. In HBV/HCV coinfection HCV usually tends to predominate over HBV. More investigation is needed into the mechanisms by which viral pathogenesis is altered and the optimal treatment modalities for coinfected patients.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) can coinfect the same hepatocyte in the liver of patients with chronic HCV and occult HBV infection

In this work, we have shown that hepatitis C virus (HCV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) can coexist in the same hepatocyte using double fluorescent in situ hybridization in liver biopsy samples from patients with chronic HCV infection with occult HBV infection. Digital image analysis of hybridization signals showed that the HBV DNA levels in coinfected hepatocytes were lower than those in cells infected only with HBV. This finding supports the hypothesis of inhibition of HBV replication by HCV. Furthermore, HCV RNA levels were lower in coinfected cells than in cells infected only with HCV, suggesting that HBV may also inhibit HCV replication.

Natural history and treatment of hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus coinfection

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfection is not uncommon as a result of similar routes of infection. Patients who are coinfected represent a unique group with diverse serologic profiles. Combined chronic hepatitis B and C leads to more severe liver disease and an increased risk of hepatocellular carcinoma. Furthermore, coinfected patients represent a treatment challenge. No standard recommendations exist for treatment of viral hepatitis due to dual HBV/HCV infection, and therefore treatment must be individualized based on patient variables such as serologic and virologic profiles, patient's prior exposure to antiviral treatment, and the presence of other parenterally transmitted viruses such as hepatitis D virus and human immunodeficiency virus. The natural history and treatment of patients with HBV and HCV coinfection is reviewed.

Hepatitis C virus superinfection in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection

Because hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) have the same transmission routes, dual infection may occur and even persist in the same patient. The reported series on seroprevalence of HCV indicate that HCV is found in more than 10% of HBV-infected patients worldwide. HCV superinfection in patients with chronic HBV infection tends to cause severe and progressive liver disease that is resistant to interferon therapy. Paradoxically, HCV exerts a suppressive effect on HBV and may enhance seroclearance of HBV antigens, or even usurp the role of HBV as the agent for continuing hepatitis. In view of the complex dynamism of viral interaction, the importance of HCV assay and the necessity of monitoring patients with chronic HBV infection in clinical studies cannot be overemphasized. The basic mechanisms that regulate the viral interactions largely remain to be investigated.

Co-infection by serologically-silent hepatitis B virus may contribute to poor interferon response in patients with chronic hepatitis C by down-regulation of type-I interferon receptor gene expression in the liver

Intrahepatic mRNA levels of type-I interferon (IFN) receptor genes have been shown to correlate with the clinical efficacy of IFN therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Recently, co-infection by serologically-silent hepatitis B virus (HBV) has been assumed to be associated with the poor IFN response in patients with chronic hepatitis C. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between the co-infection of serologically-silent HBV and type-I IFN receptor gene expression in the liver of patients with chronic hepatitis C. The intrahepatic mRNA levels of IFNAR2, one of the two subunits of the type-I IFN receptor, were quantified and compared with both the prevalence of HBV DNA and the hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype in 45 patients with chronic hepatitis C, who were negative for hepatitis B surface antigen. Co-infection, as evaluated by a nested polymerase chain reaction, was present in 22 patients (48.9%), with dominance of the HCV genotype 1b (65.2%) over genotype 2a (31.8%). Co-infection was associated with lower IFNAR2 mRNA levels, higher levels of serum HCV RNA, and a poor IFN response, regardless of the HCV genotype. The findings suggest the possibility that co-infection by serologically-silent HBV is one of the factors that can lead to an unfavorable IFN response in chronic hepatitis C by down-regulation of IFN receptor gene expression in the liver.

Serological pattern "anti-HBc alone": report on a workshop

In areas with low hepatitis B virus (HBV) endemicity such as most parts of Europe and the United States "anti-HBc alone" is found in 10-20% of all individuals with HBV markers, i.e., 1-4% of the population. In about 10% of these individuals HBV DNA is detected by PCR, the proportions varying greatly depending on the population studied, being highest in individuals coinfected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) (above 35%) and HIV (above 85%). A small proportion of individuals with "anti-HBc alone" are in the window phase of an HBV infection or in a stage of late HBV immunity. For the large proportion of these individuals this is not the case and they are thought to have an unresolved HBV-infection or a chronic infection in a late or "low grade" productive state. Currently, limited studies have been performed concerning the clinical aspects of individuals with "anti-HBc alone" and suspected chronic HBV infection. The majority of these individuals seem to be healthy. Some chronic carriers with "anti-HBc alone," however, do present signs of chronic hepatitis. Individuals with "anti-HBc alone" are potentially infectious. This is exemplified by a few case reports of HBV transmission to sexual contacts, perinatal transmission between mother and newborns and in blood recipients. Recommendations are given in relation to both the diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in the individuals with "anti-HBc alone" and in the blood banking and transplantation services.

Virologic and clinical expressions of reciprocal inhibitory effect of hepatitis B, C, and delta viruses in patients with chronic hepatitis

We studied 648 hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)- and/or anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV)-positive patients to evaluate the virologic and clinical characteristics of multiple hepatitis viral infection. We defined as Case B-C an HBsAg/anti-HCV positive patient and as Case b-C an anti-HCV/anti-HBc-positive, HBsAg/anti-HBs-negative patient. For each Case B-C we scheduled as Control-B an HBsAg positive and anti-HCV negative patient and as Control-C an HBsAg/anti-HBs/anti-hepatitis B core antigen (HBc)-negative and anti-HCV-positive patient. Control group C was used as the control also for Case group b-C. Serum HBV DNA by molecular hybridization was found more frequently in Control group B (54% of 161 patients) than in Case group B-C (35.7% of 84, P <.01). The prevalence of HBV wild type was similar in Case group B-C (14. 3%) and in Control group B (17.4%), whereas the e-minus strain was less frequent in Case group B-C (10.7% vs. 33%; P <.01). HBV DNA by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was detected in 40.8% of 71 patients in Case group b-C. HCV RNA was detected more frequently in Control group C (90.7% of 130 patients) than in Case group B-C (65.2% of 69, P <.0001). Moderate or severe chronic hepatitis or cirrhosis were more frequent in Case group B-C (62.9% of 65 patients) than in Control group B (46.7% of 90, P <.05) or C (40.8% of 98, P <.005), and in Case group b-C (71.1% of 76) than in Control group C. Thus, in multiple hepatitis we observed a reciprocal inhibition of the viral genomes and a more severe liver disease. In Case group b-C, serum HBV DNA was frequent and the clinical presentation was severe.

Histopathology of HCV infection

The basic morphologic features of acute and chronic viral hepatitis C are similar to those of other hepatitides; however, hepatitis C is characterized by the histologic triad of lymphoid aggregates in portal tracts, epithelial damage of small bile ducts and microvesicular and macrovesicular steatosis of hepatocytes. Significant progress has been made in the demonstration of HCV in infected liver tissues by immunohistochemical and in situ hybridization techniques. The new classification of chronic hepatitis, based on etiology, grading (extent of necroinflammatory activity) and staging (extent of fibrosis) has been widely accepted and will lead to a better understanding of the variable course and response to therapy of this enigmatic disease.

Histopathology and pathobiology of hepatotropic virus-induced liver injury

The present report concerns current knowledge regarding immunopathogenesis that can be applied in the interpretation of histopathological changes in acute and chronic viral hepatitis. The histopathological features of viral hepatitis have not been changed and light microscopic examination remains essential for making a diagnosis and classification of chronic hepatitis and for the provision of objective parameters on grading and staging. However, new understanding and knowledge of viral pathogenesis, host immune responses, the biological behaviour of the causative viral agents and, in particular, viral interference in multiple hepatotropic viral infections must be taken into consideration in the interpretation of histopathological and immunopathological findings of liver tissues. This report also presents some histopathological analyses on multiple hepatotropic viral infections. It can be concluded that the diagnostic histological criteria for acute hepatitis remain applicable in such settings. However, the cause of acute flare up in chronic hepatitis could not be determined without clinical, virological and serological information. Routine histopathology cannot distinguish a new infection from an acute exacerbation due to a high level of viral replication or mutant virus. A repertoire of immunocytochemical stainings for viral antigens is helpful, but caution must be exercised in suggesting a specific viral aetiology due to the fact that suppression of pre-existing viral antigens can be pronounced when the new or concurrent infection is hepatitis C virus related.

Viral replication in patients with concomitant hepatitis B and C virus infections

The aim of this study was to assess the implications of dual infection with hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV). The HBV and HCV status in 100 patients with chronic hepatitis was analysed. HBV DNA was studied using liquid hybridization and the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). HCV viremia was measured using qualitative and quantitative PCR. The HCV genotype was determined by PCR. Patients were divided into three groups according to their HCV-RNA and HBsAg status: group I consisted of 40 patients with chronic hepatitis caused by HBV; group II, 40 patients with chronic hepatitis caused by HCV; and group III, 20 patients infected with both viruses. The HBV-DNA level was higher in group I than in group III (66.4 vs. 11.5 pg/ml; p < 0.05). Quantification of HCV viremia revealed mean values of 36.9 copies x 10(5)/ml in group II and 5.5 copies/ml x 10(5) in group III (p < 0.05). The mean aminotransferase level and histological activity were higher in group III. HCV genotype lb was the predominant type. The data suggest that there is reciprocal inhibition of viral replication in patients with dual HBV and HCV infection. Liver disease appears to be more severe in patients with chronic hepatitis B and C.

Spontaneous hepatitis B surface antigen clearance in a long-term follow-up study of patients with chronic type B hepatitis. Lack of correlation with hepatitis C and D virus superinfection

We investigated the frequency of HBsAg clearance and the possible role of viral superinfection in a long-term follow-up of 184 patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). Our subjects were 184 patients with chronic hepatitis B and the follow-up was 12-216 months (mean 66.2 +/- 53.7 months). The investigative methods used were: immunoenzymatic assays for HBV, HCV, HDV, and HIV markers; polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for HBV DNA; and liver biopsy and immunoperoxidase. During the follow-up, 20 of the 184 patients cleared serum HBsAg. A comparison of patients with persistent HBsAg(group I) and of those who cleared this marker (group II) showed a significant difference in mortality (P = 0.002) between the two groups and a tendency to a more severe exacerbation (flare) in group II (P = 0.07). Antibodies to hepatitis C and D virus as well as antibodies to HIV were equally distributed in both groups. Thirteen patients (7.9%) from group I, but none from group II, subsequently developed hepatocellular carcinoma. These results suggest that the frequency of spontaneous clearance of HBsAg during chronic HBV infection is low. No determinant factor for the clearance was found, including the presence of liver cirrhosis. Serum HBV DNA was undetectable by PCR after clearance in 16 out of 17 patients.

Independent and additive effect modification of hepatitis C and B viruses infection on the development of chronic hepatitis

BACKGROUND/AIMS

This study aimed to assess the effects and interaction between hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus infection on the development of chronic hepatitis.

METHODS

Anti-HCV and HBsAg were detected in 125 histology-proven chronic hepatitis and 250 sex-matched and age-matched healthy controls.

RESULTS

The prevalences of anti-HCV (24.8%) and HBsAg (68.0%) in patients were higher than in controls (2.4% and 18.0%, respectively; each p < 0.0001). Univariate analysis showed that anti-HCV and HBsAg were strongly associated with the development of chronic hepatitis. Calculation of synergy index and Mantel extension test for trend indicated that there was additive effect modification between HCV and HBV. Multivariate analysis indicated that anti-HCV (odds ratio, 46.1; 95% confidence interval, 9.1-233.2) and HBsAg (odds ratio, 25.8; 95% confidence interval (9.3-67.2) were independent risk factors of chronic hepatitis. The population-attributable risk was estimated as 15.6% for anti-HCV alone, 52.4% for HBsAg alone and 6.8% for both anti-HCV and HBsAg. The frequency of chronic active hepatitis in patients with anti-HCV alone (100%) was higher than in patients with HBsAg alone (75%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

HCV and HBV infections are risk factors of chronic hepatitis. They act independently and probably with additive effect modification.

Seroepidemiological survey of hepatitis B and C virus infections in Ghanaian children

The seroprevalences of hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) markers were evaluated in a random sample of 803 children attending school in Ashanti-Akim North district in Ghana in order to gain a better understanding of transmission patterns of these viruses, particularly horizontal transmission of HBV. This rural district is typical of 70% of the Ghanaian population. The overall seroprevalence of at least one marker of HBV infection was 61.2%, with rates increasing from 48% to 80% between the ages of 6-18 years (P < 0.001). The overall HBsAg seroprevalence was 15.8%, with the proportion of HBsAg positives amongst those with anti-HBc increasing from 39.3% in 6-7-year-olds to 51.8% in 12-13-year-olds. It appears that horizontal transmission during this age period was accompanied by a high rate of HBsAg carriage. Among those infected but not carriers, i.e., those HBsAg negative and anti-HBc positive, > 50% lacked detectable levels of anti-HBs, an unusual pattern of convalescent immune response to HBV. The overall seroprevalence of anti-HCV was 5.4% and did not differ significantly by age or gender. Anti-HCV seroprevalence was not associated with the presence of any HBV marker. A better understanding of the unusually high prevalences of HBV and HCV infections demonstrated in this population is likely to influence vaccination and blood transfusion policies and to stimulate further evaluations of these infections and their vehicles of spread in highly endemic regions such as sub-Saharan Africa.

Hepatitis C genotypes in patients with dual hepatitis B and C virus infection

In patients with chronic hepatitis B and C virus (HBV, HCV) infection, an inverse relationship in the replicative activity of the two viruses has been reported. In the present study the genotype of HCV was evaluated in 34 consecutive cases found with hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and anti-HCV in the serum, in order to identify its possible influence in determining the pattern of HBV/HCV interaction. Nineteen patients were HCV-RNA positive and could be genotyped: 8 were infected by HCV-1 (3 by HCV-1a and 5 by HCV-1b), 10 by HCV-2, and only 1 by HCV-3. Among these, 3 were HBV-DNA positive, compared to 10 of 15 HCV-RNA-negative patients (P = 0.003), and all 3 were coinfected with HCV-2. Mean alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels were similar between patients infected with HCV-1 and HCV-2. Among 7 patients with cirrhosis 5 were infected by HCV-2, while 6 of 12 of those without cirrhosis had HCV-1 infection. In conclusion, HBV replication was inhibited more efficiently by HCV-1 than by HCV-2. Cirrhosis was frequently found in patients with dual HBV and HCV-2 infection.

Role of hepatitis C virus in dual and triple hepatitis virus infection

Hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), and hepatitis delta virus (HDV) share same transmission routes, thus dual or triple infection may occur and even persist in the same patients. A significant amount of literature has accumulated since the advent of HCV assays. It is pertinent to review and evaluate the clinical and virological significance of HCV in multiple hepatotropic viral infection. The reported series on seroprevalence of HCV indicate that HCV is found in more than 10% of HBV- or HDV-infected patients worldwide. Of the patients with dual or triple infection involving HCV, those having coreplication of viruses tend to have severe and progressive liver disease that is resistant to interferon therapy, in contrast with patients having a single virus infection. Paradoxically, dual or triple hepatitis virus infections are associated with viral interference. In particular, HCV exerts a suppressive effect on HBV and HDV and may enhance seroclearance of HBV antigens or even usurp the role of preexisting virus as the agent for continuing hepatitis. Although HBV and HDV may also suppress HCV, it appears to be less effective. These findings clearly suggest the necessity of monitoring patients with HBV or HDV infections. In view of complex dynamism of viral interaction in multiple hepatotropic virus infection, the importance of HCV assay in the clinical studies can not be overemphasized. The basic mechanisms that regulate the viral interactions, in particular the impact of HCV in dual or triple virus infections, remain to be investigated.

Individuals with antibodies against hepatitis B core antigen as the only serological marker for hepatitis B infection: high percentage of carriers of hepatitis B and C virus

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Several reports have unequivocally demonstrated that some individuals with antibodies against hepatitis B core antigen as the only serological marker for hepatitis B infection are chronic carriers of the hepatitis B virus. Nevertheless, conflicting data exist about the frequency of this phenomenon; its cause is unknown.

METHODS

In a prospective study we tested individuals who were positive for anti-HBc alone for HBV-DNA as well as for coexisting infections with human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis C virus.

RESULTS

Using polymerase chain reaction with primer pairs from three different regions of the hepatitis B virus genome, we found 54 of 164 individuals (32.9%) with anti-HBc alone to be positive for hepatitis B virus, the majority of them showing very low hepatitis B virus concentrations. 14.3% were human immunodeficiency virus positive; half of them were also hepatitis B virus carriers. Surprisingly, 62 of 153 participants (40.5%) in this study showed antibodies against hepatitis C virus, and about two thirds of the latter were also positive for HCV-RNA. This finding could be confirmed by a retrospective analysis of all people tested for hepatitis B virus markers and anti-HCV in our institution during the 2 years before the prospective study was begun. Again, a high correlation was found between the presence of anti-HCV and anti-HBc alone: 49.2% of individuals with anti-HBc only were anti-HCV positive also, compared to 26.8% of HBsAg carriers and only 10% of individuals showing the serological pattern of past hepatitis B.

CONCLUSIONS

Thus our study of individuals positive for anti-HBc alone revealed a high number of carriers of hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus among them; furthermore, we found some evidence that hepatitis C virus infection may favour this unusual hepatitis B virus marker pattern.

Early detection of anti-HCc antibody in acute hepatitis C virus (HCV) by western blot (immunoblot) using a recombinant HCV core protein fragment

Crude extract from Escherichia coli which expressed a recombinant protein containing amino acids 2 to 127 of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) core protein was used to detect the antibody against HCV core protein (anti-HCc). After electrophoretic separation of proteins from the extract, Western blot (immunoblot) analysis was performed with the serum samples. This method was compared with a commercially available second-generation enzyme immunoassay (EIA) which employed synthetic peptides corresponding to highly antigenic segments of both structural and nonstructural portions of HCV. Also, reverse transcription PCR for HCV RNA was used for comparison. Seventy-two serum samples from three groups of patients were tested. Groups I and II represented healthy subjects and subjects with acute hepatitis A or B, respectively. Group III included patients with newly acquired acute hepatitis C. By Western blot analysis, 31 of 31 (100%) samples from group I were negative for anti-HCc antibody, whereas 4 of 22 (18%) samples from group II were positive for anti-HCc. One of these four samples was also positive for anti-HCV antibody by the second-generation EIA (1 of 22 [4.5%]). Among 19 patients diagnosed with newly acquired acute hepatitis C, 4 (21%) were positive for anti-HCV by the second-generation EIA, whereas 12 of 19 (63%) were positive for anti-HCc by Western blot analysis. Of EIA-positive subjects, 4 of 4 (100%) were also positive for anti-HCc by Western blot analysis, whereas among EIA-negative subjects, 8 of 15 (53%) were positive. For HCV RNA detected by reverse transcription PCR, 15 of 19 (80%) of this group of samples were positive. Strikingly, the peak bilirubin level for patients with EIA-negative and Western blot-positive results is significantly higher than that for patients with consistent EIA and Western blot results (22.7 versus 7.2 mg/dl). A series of serum samples from a patient with concurrent hepatitis B and C viral infection was also studied by both tests. Although anti-HCc persisted throughout the course of infection, anti-HCV by EIA converted from negative to positive 20 days after admission and then converted back to negative 30 days later.

Displacement of hepatitis B virus by hepatitis C virus as the cause of continuing chronic hepatitis

BACKGROUND/AIMS

It has been shown that hepatitis C virus (HCV) superinfection may suppress hepatitis B virus (HBV) leading to hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) clearance and that hepatitis may persist after HBsAg clearance in a few patients. The role of HCV in continuing hepatitis after termination of chronic HBsAg antigenemia remains to be explored in a series of patients.

METHODS

HCV markers were studied using second generation enzyme immunoassay and polymerase chain reaction with reverse transcription and were compared between 41 patients with persistent alanine aminotransferase (ALT) elevation (hepatitis group) and 82 age/sex-matched patients with normal ALT (control group) after HBsAg clearance.

RESULTS

Twenty-six (63%) of the 41 hepatitis group patients were seropositive for antibodies to HCV (anti-HCV) compared with only 4 (5%) of 82 controls (P < 0.0001). Six patients of the hepatitis group and 1 control had an episode of acute hepatitis C with seroconversion of anti-HCV 1-68 months before HBsAg clearance. Of those seropositive for anti-HCV, serum HBV DNA was not detectable, and serum HCV RNA was detected in 23 (88.5%) of the 26 hepatitis patients but none of the 4 controls (P < 0.001). Liver biopsy in 6 anti-HCV positive patients with continuing hepatitis showed features compatible with chronic hepatitis C. HCV RNA, but not HBV DNA, was detected in liver tissues of these 6 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that HCV may usurp the role of HBV in chronic hepatitis and act as the major cause of continuing hepatitis or ALT elevation after HBV/HBsAg clearance.

Beneficial effect of prednisolone withdrawal followed by human lymphoblastoid interferon on the treatment of chronic type B hepatitis in Asians: a randomized controlled trial

To evaluate the effect of interferon and the benefit of prednisolone pretreatment in Oriental patients with chronic active hepatitis B, 120 male Chinese patients were randomly allocated to receive: 1) group A: a 4-week course of prednisolone followed by 2 weeks of no treatment and then a 12-week course of human lymphoblastoid interferon, 4 to 6 MU/m2 intramuscularly; 2) group B: as group A, but with placebo given instead of prednisolone; 3) group C: an 18-week course of placebo. Clearance of serum hepatitis B virus-DNA and HBeAg (complete response) was achieved in 21% of group A, 5% of group B and none of group C at the end of therapy (A vs B: p = 0.054; A vs C: p < 0.01). When assessed 12 months after the end of therapy, the complete response rate was 46% in group A, 24% in group B and 25% in group C (p < 0.05). Those with baseline alanine transaminase < or = 200 U/l showed a better response to interferon following prednisolone withdrawal (48%) than with interferon therapy alone (20%, p = 0.056) and no treatment (9%, p < 0.01). Those with a baseline serum hepatitis B virus-DNA < or = 1000 pg/ml also showed a higher complete response rate when pretreated with prednisolone (59%) than when treated with interferon alone (29%, p = 0.084) or untreated (22%, p < 0.03). The strongest independent predictor of a response to treatment was prednisolone withdrawal (p < 0.05). None of the responders lost hepatitis B surface antigen.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Clinical and virological profiles in patients with multiple hepatitis virus infections

BACKGROUND

The "in vivo" interplay between hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) both in terms of replication activity and cytopathic effect on liver cells is poorly understood. The aim of the study was to investigate their reciprocal influence in patients with HBV and HCV coinfection.

METHODS

HBV and HCV genomic sequences in the serum and liver of 55 patients with chronic liver disease who were positive for anti-HCV and for markers of HBV were studied.

RESULTS

Twenty-five hepatitis B surface antigen-positive patients, without markers of hepatitis D virus (HDV) infection, showed an inverse relation between seropositivity for HCV RNA and for HBV DNA (P < 0.001). HCV genomic sequences were detected in the liver of all patients positive for HBV DNA but negative for HCV RNA in serum. The biochemical activity and the histological severity of liver disease were lower in HCV RNA-positive/HBV DNA-negative patients, compared with HCV RNA (serum)-negative/HBV DNA-positive cases (P < 0.005). Nine of 10 patients with concurrent HDV infection were negative for serum and liver HCV RNA. None of 20 hepatitis B surface antigen-negative/HCV RNA-positive patients with antibodies to HBV had HBV DNA detectable in serum or liver.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings indicate a reciprocal inverse relation between HBV and HCV replication. Patients positive for antibody to HCV with antibodies to HBV usually have no evidence of HBV DNA persistence in the liver.

Concurrent hepatitis C virus and hepatitis delta virus superinfection in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection

Since hepatitis C virus (HCV) and hepatitis delta virus (HDV) are transmitted by the same routes as hepatitis B virus (HBV), simultaneous or concurrent HCV and HDV infection in patients with chronic HBV infection may occur. To test this hypothesis and to examine the clinicohistological and immunopathological presentations of such multiple hepatitis virus infections, acute and/or convalescent serum specimens from 86 patients with acute HDV superinfection were tested by enzyme immunoassay for antibodies to HCV. Of the 86 patients, 18 (20.9%) were associated with HCV infection. Although patients with early mortality cannot be evaluated by the HCV markers used in this study, the results showed that the clinical and histologic features were similar except that patients with HCV infection were older than those without HCV infection (P less than 0.01). Immunopathological studies carried out within 2 months after the onset of acute HDV superinfection demonstrated that hepatitis B core antigen (HBcAg) was not detected in any patient and HDV antigen was detected in 18.2% of the patients with HCV infection whereas HBcAg and HDAg were found in 7% and 65.1%, respectively, of those without HCV coinfection (P less than 0.02). It is concluded that concurrent HCV and HDV superinfections can and do occur in patients with chronic HBV infection. In these triple viral infections, HCV may even transiently suppress HDV and HBV.