Lipoprotein (a): a risk factor for peripheral vascular disease

Association of Lipoprotein(a) Levels With Incidence of Major Adverse Limb Events

IMPORTANCE

High lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) levels are involved in the development of cardiovascular events, particularly in myocardial infarction, stroke, and peripheral artery disease. Studies assessing the Lp(a) levels associated with adverse lower-limb events are lacking.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the association between Lp(a) levels and incidence of major adverse limb events in unselected hospitalized patients.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This large retrospective monocentric cohort study was conducted from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2020. Data were derived from the clinical information system of the Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou, a Paris-based university hospital. Patients who underwent at least 1 Lp(a) measurement at the center during the study period were included. Patients who had no follow-up data or who had the first Lp(a) measurement after the study outcome had occurred were excluded. Data analyses were performed from May 2021 to January 2022.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was the first inpatient major adverse limb event, defined as a major amputation, peripheral endovascular revascularization, or peripheral surgical revascularization, during follow-up. Secondary outcomes included individual components of the primary outcome. Lipoprotein(a) levels were categorized as follows: normal (<50 mg/dL), high (50 to <134 mg/dL), and very high (≥134 mg/dL); to convert Lp(a) values to milligrams per liter, multiply by 0.1.

RESULTS

A total of 16 513 patients (median [IQR] age, 58.2 [49.0-66.7] years; 9774 men [59.2%]) were included in the cohort. The median (IQR) Lp(a) level was 24 (10.0-60.0) mg/dL. The 1-year incidence of major adverse limb event was 2.44% in the overall population and 4.54% among patients with very high Lp(a) levels. High (adjusted accelerated failure time [AFT] exponential estimate: 0.43; 95% CI, 0.24-0.78; Benjamini-Hochberg-corrected P = .01) and very high (adjusted AFT exponential estimate: 0.17; 95% CI, 0.07-0.40; Benjamini-Hochberg-corrected P < .001) Lp(a) levels were independently associated with an increased risk of major adverse limb event.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Results of this study showed that higher Lp(a) levels were independently associated with an increased risk of a major adverse limb event in hospitalized patients. The Lp(a) measurement needs to be taken into account to improve lower-limb vascular risk assessment.

Impact of serum lipoprotein(a) on endothelium-dependent coronary vasomotor response assessed by intracoronary acetylcholine provocation

BACKGROUND

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is an independent risk factor for atherosclerotic vascular disease. However, there are limited data regarding the impact of Lp(a) levels on the incidence and severity of endothelium-dependent coronary vasomotor response.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 2416 patients without significant coronary artery lesion (<50% stenosis) by coronary angiography and underwent acetylcholine (ACh) provocation test were enrolled and categorized according to their serum Lp(a) level into four quartile groups: less than 6.70, 6.70-13.30, 13.30-26.27, and more than 26.27 mg/dl. The aim of this study is to estimate the incidence and severity of endothelium-dependent positive ACh provocation test in each group; moreover, to access the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events, the composite of total death, myocardial infarction, and de novo percutaneous coronary intervention were compared between the four groups up to 5 years.

RESULTS

The group with higher Lp(a) had a higher incidence of coronary heart disease, myocardial infarction, and peripheral arterial disease history. However, there was no difference among the four groups as regards the incidence of positive ACh provocation test, spasm severity, spasm extent, and location. However, at up to 5 years of clinical follow-up, the higher-Lp(a) group showed higher total death, de novo percutaneous coronary intervention, recurrent angina, and total major adverse cardiovascular events compared with the lower-Lp(a) groups.

CONCLUSION

In our study, there was no relationship between the elevated Lp(a) level and the vasospastic response to the intracoronary ACh provocation test; however, higher Lp(a) levels were associated with poor clinical outcomes up to 5 years.

Lp(a) and cardiovascular risk: Investigating the hidden side of the moon

AIMS

This article reports current evidence on the association between Lp(a) and cardiovascular (CV) disease and on pathophysiological mechanisms. The available information on therapy for reduction of lipoprotein(a) is also discussed.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Although some evidence is conflicting, Lp(a) seems to increase CV risk through stimulation of platelet aggregation, inhibition of tissue factor pathway inhibitor, alteration of fibrin clot structure and promotion of endothelial dysfunction and phospholipid oxidation. Lp(a) 3.5-fold higher than normal increases the risk of coronary heart disease and general CV events, particularly in those with LDL cholesterol ≥ 130 mg/dl. High Lp(a) values represent also an independent risk factor for ischemic stroke (more relevant in young stroke patients), peripheral artery disease (PAD) and aortic and mitral stenosis. Furthermore, high Lp(a) levels seem to be associated with increased risk of cardiovascular events in patients with chronic kidney disease, particularly in those undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) seems to significantly influence the risk of cardiovascular events. The effects of statins and fibrates on Lp(a) are limited and extremely variable. Nicotinic acid was shown effective in reducing Lp(a) but, due to its side effects and serious adverse events during clinical trials, it is no longer considered a possible option for treatment. To date, the treatment of choice for high levels of Lp(a) in high CV risk patients is represented by LDL-Apheresis. Thanks to innovative technologies, new selectively inhibiting LPA drugs are being developed and tested.

Lipoprotein (a) as a cause of cardiovascular disease: insights from epidemiology, genetics, and biology

Human epidemiologic and genetic evidence using the Mendelian randomization approach in large-scale studies now strongly supports that elevated lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] is a causal risk factor for cardiovascular disease, that is, for myocardial infarction, atherosclerotic stenosis, and aortic valve stenosis. The Mendelian randomization approach used to infer causality is generally not affected by confounding and reverse causation, the major problems of observational epidemiology. This approach is particularly valuable to study causality of Lp(a), as single genetic variants exist that explain 27-28% of all variation in plasma Lp(a). The most important genetic variant likely is the kringle IV type 2 (KIV-2) copy number variant, as the apo(a) product of this variant influences fibrinolysis and thereby thrombosis, as opposed to the Lp(a) particle per se. We speculate that the physiological role of KIV-2 in Lp(a) could be through wound healing during childbirth, infections, and injury, a role that, in addition, could lead to more blood clots promoting stenosis of arteries and the aortic valve, and myocardial infarction. Randomized placebo-controlled trials of Lp(a) reduction in individuals with very high concentrations to reduce cardiovascular disease are awaited. Recent genetic evidence documents elevated Lp(a) as a cause of myocardial infarction, atherosclerotic stenosis, and aortic valve stenosis.

Acute lower limb ischemia due to thrombo-embolic arterial occlusions in two previously healthy men with markedly elevated Lp(a)

Lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)) is a well-documented risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Its role in acute thrombo-embolic occlusions of peripheral arteries is not known. We describe two cases of multiple, acute, peripheral arterial occlusions in two previously healthy men with markedly elevated Lp(a). Both cases had unsatisfactory results after percutaneous and surgical revascularization procedures. Experience yielded in these two cases suggests that when an unfavorable out-come occurs in a peripheral artery disease patient in the absence of the regular risk factors, Lp(a) should be determined and its role investigated.

[Extracardiac manifestation of elevated lipoprotein(a) levels--cumulative incidence of peripheral arterial disease and stenosis of the carotid artery]

BACKGROUND

Elevated lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) levels are an accepted risk factor for coronary heart disease. The role of Lp(a) in the development of extracardiac arteriosclerosis like peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and stenosis of the arteria carotis (ACIS) has hardly been documented so far. We aimed to investigate the incidence of extracardiac arteriosclerosis in individuals with elevated Lp(a) values.

METHODIK

In our center, we measured Lp(a) levels in 31,734 consecutive patients over 5 years. Of these, 1411 patients were selected retrospectively for the presented analysis. Patients were matched according to age, sex, and other accepted cardiovascular risk factors and were assigned to 6 groups according to their Lp(a) values. Retrospectively, we analysed the incidence of PAD and ACIS.

RESULTS

In the group with Lp(a) values < 2 mg/dl the incidence of PAD was 1.9 % (ACIS 2.8 %), in the group with Lp(a) 23-29 mg/dl 7.3 % (6.1 %), 30-60 mg/dl 9.0 % (8.3 %), 60-91 mg/dl 11.4 % (7.9 %), 91-110 mg/dl 8.6 % (6.0 %) and > 110 mg/dl 12.7 % (10.9 %). None of the patients had LDL levels > 130 mg/dl or HbA1c 6.1 %.

CONCLUSION

Elevated Lp(a) levels seem to be associated with an increased incidence of PAD and ACIS. Even Lp(a) concentrations between 23 and 29 mg/dl show a threefold increased risk of PAD when compared to patients with Lp(a) < 2 mg/dl. However, these findings have to be verified in large prospective studies. In this context cut-off values have to be reevaluated as well.

One of the most urgent vascular circumstances: Acute limb ischemia

Acute limb ischemia is a sudden decrease in limb perfusion that threatens limb viability and requires urgent evaluation and management. Most of the causes of acute limb ischemia are thrombosis of a limb artery or bypass graft, embolism from the heart or a disease artery, dissection, and trauma. Assessment determines whether the limb is viable or irreversibly damaged. Prompt diagnosis and revascularization by means of catheter-based thrombolysis or thrombectomy and by surgery reduce the risk of limb loss and mortality. Amputation is performed in patients with irreversible damage. Despite urgent revascularization, amputation rate is 10%–15% in patients during hospitalization, mostly above the knee, and mortality within 1 year is 10%–15% due to the coexisting conditions.

Oxidation-specific biomarkers and risk of peripheral artery disease

OBJECTIVES

The goal of this study was to examine the prospective association between oxidation-specific biomarkers, primarily oxidized phospholipids (OxPL) on apolipoprotein B-100-containing lipoproteins (OxPL/apoB) and lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)], and risk of peripheral artery disease (PAD). We examined, as secondary analyses, indirect measures of oxidized lipoproteins, including autoantibodies to malondialdehyde-modified low-density lipoprotein (MDA-LDL) and apolipoprotein B-100 immune complexes (ApoB-IC).

BACKGROUND

Biomarkers to predict the development of PAD are lacking. OxPL circulate in plasma, are transported by Lp(a), and deposit in the vascular wall and induce local inflammation.

METHODS

The study population included 2 parallel nested case-control studies of 143 men within the Health Professionals Follow-up Study (1994 to 2008) and 144 women within the Nurses' Health Study (1990 to 2010) with incident confirmed cases of clinically significant PAD, matched 1:3 to control subjects.

RESULTS

Levels of OxPL/apoB were positively associated with risk of PAD in men and women: pooled relative risk: 1.37, 95% confidence interval: 1.19 to 1.58 for each 1-SD increase after adjusting age, smoking, fasting status, month of blood draw, lipids, body mass index, and other cardiovascular disease risk factors. Lp(a) was similarly associated with risk of PAD (pooled adjusted relative risk: 1.36; 95% confidence interval: 1.18 to 1.57 for each 1-SD increase). Autoantibodies to MDA-LDL and ApoB-IC were not consistently associated with risk of PAD.

CONCLUSIONS

OxPL/apoB were positively associated with risk of PAD in men and women. The major lipoprotein carrier of OxPL, Lp(a), was also associated with risk of PAD, reinforcing the key role of OxPL in the pathophysiology of atherosclerosis mediated by Lp(a).

Lipoprotein(a) and risk of coronary, cerebrovascular, and peripheral artery disease: the EPIC-Norfolk prospective population study

OBJECTIVE

Although the association between circulating levels of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and risk of coronary artery disease (CAD) and stroke is well established, its role in risk of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) remains unclear. Here, we examine the association between Lp(a) levels and PAD in a large prospective cohort. To contextualize these findings, we also examined the association between Lp(a) levels and risk of stroke and CAD and studied the role of low-density lipoprotein as an effect modifier of Lp(a)-associated cardiovascular risk.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Lp(a) levels were measured in apparently healthy participants in the European Prospective Investigation of Cancer (EPIC)-Norfolk cohort. Cox regression was used to quantify the association between Lp(a) levels and risk of PAD, stroke, and CAD outcomes. During 212 981 person-years at risk, a total of 2365 CAD, 284 ischemic stroke, and 596 PAD events occurred in 18 720 participants. Lp(a) was associated with PAD and CAD outcomes but not with ischemic stroke (hazard ratio per 2.7-fold increase in Lp(a) of 1.37, 95% CI 1.25-1.50, 1.13, 95% CI 1.04-1.22 and 0.91, 95% CI 0.79-1.03, respectively). Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels did not modify these associations.

CONCLUSIONS

Lp(a) levels were associated with future PAD and CAD events. The association between Lp(a) and cardiovascular disease was not modified by low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels.

Novel markers of peripheral arterial disease

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD), a relatively common manifestation of atherosclerotic vascular disease, is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Although conventional risk factors contribute to the onset and progression of PAD, the role of 'novel' biomarkers in pathways of inflammation, thrombosis, lipoprotein metabolism, and oxidative stress in determining susceptibility to PAD is being increasingly recognized. Validation of novel risk factors for PAD may allow earlier detection, an improved understanding of disease etiology and progression, and the development of new therapies. In this review, we discuss available evidence for associations between novel circulating markers and several aspects of PAD including disease susceptibility, progression, functional limitation, and adverse outcomes.

Plasma Lipoprotein(a) Indicates Risk for 4 Distinct Forms of Vascular Disease

Background: Increased lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] concentrations are predictive for coronary artery disease (CAD). The risk conferred by Lp(a) for other types of vascular disease compared with CAD has not been investigated within a single population. This study aimed to investigate Lp(a) risk association for 4 different types of vascular disease (including CAD) within a predominantly white population.

Methods: We used an Lp(a) ELISA that measures Lp(a) independently of apolipoprotein(a) size to measure plasma Lp(a) in patients [384 CAD, 262 peripheral vascular disease, 184 ischemic stroke (stroke), 425 abdominal aortic aneurysm] and 230 disease-free controls. We then conducted association studies with logistic regression, integrating the potential confounding effects of age, sex, diabetes, plasma lipids, and a history of previous hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, and smoking.

Results: Multivariate analyses with Lp(a) concentrations of &gt;45 nmol/L (the 75th percentile value for controls) as the clinical cutoff showed increased Lp(a) concentrations to be a risk factor for all disease groups, with adjusted odds ratios ranging from 1.96 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.24–3.08] for CAD to 2.33 (95% CI 1.39–3.89) for PVD. The risk conferred by Lp(a) appeared to be independent of other confounders, including exposure to statin/fibrate therapies. Similar odds ratios and CIs between disease groups indicated that increased Lp(a) conferred a similar risk for all groups studied.

Conclusions: Lp(a) constitutes a stable risk factor of similar magnitude for 4 major forms of vascular disease. This association was not altered by exposure to standard lipid-lowering therapy.

Lipoprotein(a), type 2 diabetes and vascular risk in coronary patients

BACKGROUND

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is an important cardiovascular risk factor in the general population. However, prospective data on the vascular risk conferred by Lp(a) in patients with diabetes mellitus are scarce and controversial. It is not known whether the diabetic state affects the association of Lp(a) with vascular events among coronary patients.

DESIGN

We measured Lp(a) in 587 consecutive patients undergoing coronary angiography for the evaluation of coronary artery disease. The incidence of vascular events was recorded over 4 years.

RESULTS

At baseline, Lp(a) was significantly lower in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) (n = 136) than in nondiabetic individuals (11 (0.8-30) mg dL(-1) vs. 16 (0.8-51) mg dL(-1); P = 0.025). Prospectively, Lp(a) was a strong and independent predictor of vascular events in nondiabetic patients (standardized adjusted hazard ratio (HR) = 1.461 (1.121-1.904); P = 0.005), but not in patients with T2DM [HR = 0.812 (0.539-1.223); P = 0.320]. An interaction term diabetes x Lp(a) was significant (P = 0.008), indicating that Lp(a) was a significantly stronger predictor of vascular events in nondiabetic patients than in patients with T2DM.

CONCLUSIONS

Lp(a) in diabetic coronary patients is low and not associated with the incidence of vascular events. Although measurement of Lp(a) provides useful information in nondiabetic coronary patients, it is of little value in coronary patients with T2DM.

Risk factors for peripheral arterial disease incidence in persons with diabetes: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study

BACKGROUND

Some risk factors for peripheral arterial disease (PAD) have been identified, but little information is available on PAD risk factors in individuals with diabetes.

METHODS

Using data from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study, we assessed the relation of traditional and non-traditional risk factors with the risk of PAD in 1651 participants with diabetes, but not PAD, at baseline. Incident PAD was defined as an ankle-brachial index (ABI)<0.9 assessed at regular examinations; hospital discharge codes for PAD, amputation, or leg revascularization; or claudication assessed by annual questionnaire.

RESULTS

Over a mean of 10.3 years of follow-up, 238 persons developed incident PAD identified, yielding a PAD event rate of 13.9 per 1000 person years. Adjusted for sex, age, race, and center, the risk of developing PAD was increased 1.87-fold (95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.36-2.57) in persons who were current smokers versus non-smokers, 2.27-fold (95% CI: 1.57-3.26) for baseline coronary heart disease (CHD) versus no baseline CHD, and 1.75-fold (95% CI: 1.18-2.60) for the highest quartile versus lowest quartile of triglycerides. We found no evidence of an association with other blood lipids or hypertension. Compared with the lowest quartiles, comparably-adjusted relative risks for the highest quartiles were 1.60 (95% CI: 1.10-2.33) for waist-to-hip ratio, 2.52 (95% CI: 1.70-3.73) for fibrinogen, 1.70 (95% CI: 1.17-2.47) for factor VIII, 1.73 (95% CI: 1.18-2.54) for von Willebrand factor, 2.15 (95% CI: 1.43-3.24) for white blood cell count, 1.81 (95% CI: 1.19-2.74) for serum creatinine, 0.55 (95% CI: 0.37-0.83) for serum albumin, and 2.73 (95% CI: 1.77-4.22) for carotid intima-media thickness. Persons who had a prior history of diabetes and were taking insulin had a relative risk of 1.97 (95% CI: 1.35-2.87) for future PAD events, compared with those with newly identified diabetes at baseline. In our final multivariable model, current smoking, prevalent CHD, elevated fibrinogen and carotid IMT, and a prior history of diabetes with insulin treatment were independently associated with greater PAD incidence.

CONCLUSION

These markers might be useful to identify individuals with diabetes at particular risk for PAD.

Lipoprotein(a): an emerging cardiovascular risk factor

Lipoprotein(a) is a cholesterol-enriched lipoprotein, consisting of a covalent linkage joining the unique and highly polymorphic apolipoprotein(a) to apolipoprotein B100, the main protein moiety of low-density lipoproteins. Although the concentration of lipoprotein(a) in humans is mostly genetically determined, acquired disorders might influence synthesis and catabolism of the particle. Raised concentration of lipoprotein(a) has been acknowledged as a leading inherited risk factor for both premature and advanced atherosclerosis at different vascular sites. The strong structural homologies with plasminogen and low-density lipoproteins suggest that lipoprotein(a) might represent the ideal bridge between the fields of atherosclerosis and thrombosis in the pathogenesis of vascular occlusive disorders. Unfortunately, the exact mechanisms by which lipoprotein(a) promotes, accelerates, and complicates atherosclerosis are only partially understood. In some clinical settings, such as in patients at exceptionally low risk for cardiovascular disease, the potential regenerative and antineoplastic properties of lipoprotein(a) might paradoxically counterbalance its athero-thrombogenicity, as attested by the compatibility between raised plasma lipoprotein(a) levels and longevity.

Combination of therapeutic apheresis and therapeutic ventricular assistance for end-stage heart failure patients

Dilated cardiomyopathy is a cardiac disease of unknown origin which is characterized by the gradual development of cardiac failure associated with four-chamber dilatation of the heart. Heart transplantation has been considered as the last resort for this disease. However, some patients who received support with a ventricular assist device (VAD) as a bridge-to-transplantation and then recovered without transplantation have been reported. This new concept of treating heart failure is termed bridge-to-recovery. A VAD can inhibit the heart failure compensatory mechanisms by extreme ventricular unloading. Also, heart failure is a complex neurohormonal/autocrine-paracrine syndrome, and these mechanisms consecutively lead to inflammatory response by proinflammatory cytokines; interleukin-1 alpha (IL-1 alpha), interleukin-1 beta (IL-1 beta), interleukin-2 (IL-2), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha). Furthermore, the existence of anti-beta1-adrenoceptor autoantibodies (A-beta1-AABs) in a patient with dilated cardiomyopathy has been reported. These proinflammatory cytokines and this antibody accelerate a ventricular remodeling and a contractile dysfunction over the long term. Apheresis can also inhibit the vicious cycle in heart failure by removing the factors that are produced by activated neurohormonal/autocrine-paracrine compensatory mechanisms. Therefore, we propose that the combined therapies, therapeutic VAD and therapeutic apheresis, will provide a prominent outcome for a patient who is suffering from end-stage heart failure.

Serum apolipoprotein AI levels in atherosclerotic and diabetic patients

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association between Apolipoprotein AI (ApoAI), Apolipoprotein B100 (ApoB) and the presence of lower limb atherosclerotic occlusive disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Serum lipids, lipoprotein fractions, ApoAI, ApoB and Lp(a) were measured in 52 patients (28 diabetics and 24 non-diabetics) with lower limb occlusive disease. They were evaluated according to patients' glucose and compared with those in 75 healthy controls.

RESULTS

There was a significant decrease in HDL-cholesterol and ApoAI serum levels (p = 0.000001) and an increase in Lp(a) (p = 0.000001) in patients as compared to controls. No difference was observed in total cholesterol, non HDL-cholesterol or triglycerides. Multiple regression analysis revealed a significant association between low ApoAI (or HDL) levels and the disease as well as between high Lp(a) levels and the disease. ApoAI (p = 0.0003), HDL-cholesterol (p = 0.00005) and total cholesterol (p = 0.01) levels were significantly lower in diabetic patients compared to non-diabetic patients. Lp(a) levels did not correlate with fasting glucose concentration. Multiple regression analysis revealed a significant association between low ApoAI (or HDL) levels and diabetes.

CONCLUSION

Decreased ApoAI appears to be a main component of the dyslipidaemic serum profile observed in patients with atherosclerotic occlusive disease of the lower extremities. Increased Lp(a) levels is an independent risk factor. Decreased HDL-cholesterol is also involved in the dyslipidaemic profile.

Influence of lipoprotein(a) on restenosis after femoropopliteal percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in Type 2 diabetic patients

OBJECTIVE

The influence of vascular morphology and metabolic parameters including lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) on restenosis after peripheral angioplasty has been compared in Type 2 diabetes (DM) vs. non-diabetic patients (ND).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

The clinical course and risk profile of 132 (54 DM vs. 78 ND) patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAD) were observed prospectively following femoropopliteal angioplasty (PTA). Clinical examination, oscillometry, ankle brachial blood pressure index (ABI) and the toe systolic blood pressure index (TSPI) were used during follow-up. Duplex sonography and reangiography were also used to verify suspected restenosis or reocclusion.

RESULTS

At the time of intervention patients with DM had a lower median Lp(a) of 9 vs. 15 mg/dl (P < 0.01) in patients without diabetes. Recurrence within 1 year after PTA occurred in 25 diabetic (= 46%, Lp(a) 12 mg/dl) and 30 non-diabetic (= 38%, Lp(a) 48 mg/dl) patients. DM patients with 1 year's patency had a median Lp(a) of 7 vs. 11 mg/dl in non-diabetic patients (P < 0.05). However, 12 months after angioplasty Lp(a) correlated negatively with the ABI (r = -0.44, P < 0.01) in diabetic and in non-diabetic patients (r = -0.20, P < 0.05). The probability of recurrence after PTA continuously increased with higher levels of Lp(a) in each subgroup of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data indicate that Lp(a) is generally lower in those with peripheral arterial occlusive disease and Type 2 diabetes than in non-diabetic individuals. The increased risk for restenosis with rising levels of Lp(a) is set at a lower Lp(a) in diabetes and may be more harmful for diabetic patients.

Lipoprotein (a) level and mortality in patients with critical lower limb ischaemia

OBJECTIVE

to investigate if serum lipoprotein (a) level is a predictor of survival in patients with lower limb atherosclerotic occlusive disease.

DESIGN

prospective follow up study.

METHODS

demographic, biochemical and disease variables were collected prospectively in 441 patients with lower limb arterial occlusive disease. Survival data were obtained at a mean follow up of 44 months, and significant risk factors identified by the life table method and multivariate Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

the cumulative survival for all patients at three and five years was 79% and 63%. Lipoprotein (a) level was the only significant independent biochemical predictor for all deaths and cardiorespiratory deaths on multivariate analysis, along with age, diabetes mellitus, renal impairment, cardiac diseases and major amputation. An elevated Lipoprotein(a) level of >24 mg/dl incurred a 107% and 45% increase in mortality at three and five years respectively. The higher mortality associated with elevated Lipoprotein (a) was particularly evident in patients with critical ischemia, in whom three and five year survival was reduced from 85% to 63% and 67% to 53% (p=0.0064). In claudicants a survival discrepancy was manifested only after five years (73% vs 62%), and the overall association did not reach statistic significance (p=0.52).

CONCLUSIONS

lipoprotein (a) level is a reliable biochemical marker for survival in patients with critical ischemia where traditional atherosclerosis risk factors were prevalent.

Lipoprotein(a) and cognitive performances in an elderly white population: Cross-sectional and follow-up data

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] serum levels have been associated with an increased risk of vascular diseases, and preliminary observations suggest that they are a risk factor for vascular dementia. The relationship between Lp(a) levels and cognitive performances in the general population has never been investigated. Our aim was to evaluate the effect of elevated Lp(a) levels on cognitive functions in the elderly.

METHODS

Cognitive performances were assessed by means of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), the Babcock Short Story, and the Matrix Test in a population sample of 435 white subjects aged 65 to 84 years who were evaluated at baseline and after 3 years. Lp(a) levels were determined by ELISA.

RESULTS

No statistically significant difference was found in neuropsychological test scores between subjects with and without elevated Lp(a) levels, although subjects with elevated Lp(a) levels had slightly better cognitive performances. This difference reached a statistical significance level only in a subscore of the Matrix Test (number of correct responses) when adjusted for age, sex, education, smoking, and history of stroke. At follow-up, no statistically significant difference was found in cognitive performances between subjects with and without elevated Lp(a) serum levels in either univariate or multivariate analyses. Subjects with and without elevated Lp(a) showed a similar decline rate during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

In this sample of elderly white subjects, elevated Lp(a) levels were not associated with poorer cognitive performances or with an increased rate of cognitive decline. Elevated Lp(a) levels do not appear to be a major determinant of cognitive impairment in the elderly.

Lipoprotein(a) serum levels and vascular diseases in an older Caucasian population cohort. Italian Longitudinal Study on Aging (ILSA)

OBJECTIVE

To investigate elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] levels as a risk factor for stroke, myocardial infarction, angina, intermittent claudication, and combination of the above in a cohort of unselected older individuals.

DESIGN

Population cohort from one of the eight centers participating in the Italian Longitudinal Study on Aging (ILSA).

SETTING

General community.

PARTICIPANTS

A subsample of 446 subjects (M/F: 231/ 215, mean age: 74.5 +/- 5.7 years) of the original, randomly selected, population cohort of 704 individuals, 65 to 84 years of age, free-living or institutionalized in the Impruneta Municipality, area of Florence, Italy.

MEASUREMENTS

Conventional vascular risk factors and vascular diseases defined following a two-step procedure (screening phase and confirmation on positives) using standard and validated criteria. Lp(a) levels determined by an ELISA method.

RESULTS

No association was observed between elevated Lp(a) levels alone and any of the examined vascular diseases (stroke, myocardial infarction, angina, and intermittent claudication). In contrast, examining the interactions between elevated Lp(a) and conventional vascular risk factors, when elevated Lp(a) was combined with a history of smoking, a marked increase in the risk of vascular diseases combined (odds ratio [OR]: 4.12; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.27-13.40) was observed, much higher than that expected based on the additive effect of smoking and elevated Lp(a) alone.

CONCLUSIONS

With the cautions due to the cross-sectional design of the study and the limited statistical power, these results suggest a possible synergistic effect between elevated Lp(a) levels and other pro-atherogenic factors such as smoking on the risk of vascular diseases in older individuals.

Influence of systemic factors on pre-existing intimal hyperplasia and their effect on the outcome of infrainguinal arterial reconstruction with vein

BACKGROUND

The association between raised levels of homocysteine, fibrinogen and lipoprotein (a), and the presence of pre-existing intimal hyperplasia (IH) in vein has not been assessed. The positive association between such hyperplasia and graft failure following infrainguinal arterial reconstruction, and between lipoprotein (a) and graft failure, is disputed. The influence of homocysteine on outcome has not been investigated prospectively.

METHODS

Fifty-seven patients (63 grafts) undergoing infrainguinal arterial reconstruction with saphenous vein were studied. Homocysteine, fibrinogen and lipoprotein (a) levels were measured, and a vein biopsy was taken at operation. Patients underwent graft surveillance and outcome at 12 months was determined.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven per cent of patients had hyperhomocysteinaemia. Patients with pre-existing IH had significantly higher homocysteine levels. There was no association between homocysteine and outcome, or between fibrinogen and pre-existing IH or outcome. Lipoprotein (a) levels were significantly lower in patients with pre-existing disease, and were lower, but not significantly, in those whose grafts failed. The correlation between pre-existing IH and vein graft failure was highly significant.

CONCLUSION

Hyperhomocysteinaemia is associated with peripheral vascular disease and the development of pre-existing IH in vein, which itself is associated with vein graft failure.

Lipid levels and peripheral vascular disease in diabetic and non-diabetic subjects

Non-insulin dependent diabetes (NIDDM) is associated with an increased risk of peripheral vascular disease (PVD), but within the diabetic population the relationship between lipid profile and PVD has not been clearly defined. In this study we examined the association of lipid parameters and in particular low density lipoprotein (LDL) particle size, with the presence of PVD in subjects with and without NIDDM. 41 NIDDM patients and 31 non-diabetic subjects with PVD in the absence of rest pain or ulceration, defined by ankle-brachial index measurements and duplex scanning, were compared with 41 NIDDM and 31 euglycemic control subjects of comparable age and sex, without PVD. In both groups those with PVD were found to have significantly elevated triglycerides (2.7 [2.2-3.3] versus 1.9 [1.6-2.2] mmol/l; P < 0.05 in the diabetic group and 2.0 [1.6-2.3] versus 1.4 [1.1-1.5] mmol/l; P < 0.05 in the non-diabetic group), decreased apolipoprotein A1 (124 +/- 3 versus 139 +/- 5 mg/dl; P < 0.01 in the diabetic group and 133 +/- 4 versus 147 +/- 4 mg/dl; P < 0.05 in the non-diabetic group) and decreased LDL particle size (25.4 +/- 0.1 versus 25.8 +/- 0.1 nm; P < 0.01 in the diabetic group and 26.0 +/- 0.1 versus 26.3 +/- 0.1 nm; P < 0.05 in the non diabetic group). In the non-diabetic group apolipoprotein[a] (365 [239-554] versus 184 [17-266] U/l; P < 0.01), total cholesterol (6.3 +/- 0.2 versus 5.6 +/- 0.2 mmol/l; P < 0.05), LDL cholesterol (4.1 +/- 0.2 versus 3.6 +/- 0.2 mmol/l; P < 0.05) and apolipoprotein B (146 +/- 8 versus 117 +/- 5 mg/dl; P < 0.05) were also found to be associated with PVD although these associations were not observed in the group with diabetes. In addition, 11 NIDDM subjects and 11 non-diabetic subjects with rest pain or ulceration were compared to the corresponding groups with uncomplicated PVD and had lipid profiles with significantly lower levels of total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol. We conclude that the dyslipidemic profile characterized by increased triglyceride level, decreased apolipoprotein A1 level and small dense LDL is associated with uncomplicated PVD in both NIDDM and non-diabetic subjects.

Lipoprotein(a) interactions with lipid and nonlipid risk factors in early familial coronary artery disease

An interaction between high plasma lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], unfavorable plasma lipids, and other risk factors may lead to very high risk for premature CAD. Plasma Lp(a), lipids, and other coronary risk factors were examined in 170 cases with early familial CAD and 165 control subjects to test this hypothesis. In univariate analysis, relative odds for CAD were 2.95 (P < .001) for plasma Lp(a) above 40 mg/dL. Nearly all the risk associated with elevated Lp(a) was found to be restricted to persons with historically elevated plasma total cholesterol (6.72 mmol/L [260 mg/dL] or higher) or with a total/HDL cholesterol ratio > 5.8. Nonlipid risk factors were also found to at least multiply the risk associated with Lp(a). When Lp(a) was over 40 mg/dL and plasma total/HDL cholesterol > 5.8, relative odds for CAD were 25 (P = .0001) in multiple logistic regression. If two or more nonlipid risk factors were also present (including hypertension, diabetes, cigarette smoking, high total homocysteine, or low serum bilirubin), relative odds were 122 (P < 1 x 10(-12)). The ability of nonlipid risk factors to increase risk associated with Lp(a) was dependent on at least a mildly elevated total/HDL cholesterol ratio. In conclusion, high Lp(a) was found to greatly increase risk only if the total/HDL cholesterol ratio was at least mildly elevated, an effect exaggerated by other risk factors. Aggressive lipid lowering in those with elevated Lp(a) therefore appears indicated.

Antibodies to cardiolipin may increase the risk of failure of peripheral vein bypasses

OBJECTIVES

To assess the association between antibodies to cardiolipin and infrainguinal vein graft patency.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Plasma levels of antibodies to cardiolipin, haemostatic factors, lipids and the smoking marker carboxyhaemoglobin were determined preoperatively and 6 weeks postoperatively in 80 patients undergoing infrainguinal vein bypass surgery. Bypass patency was assessed by ankle blood pressure measurements and ultrasound duplex scanning at 1 week, 6 weeks, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. A localised increase in the graft peak systolic velocity by a factor of 2.5 or more was considered to indicate a significant stenosis.

RESULTS

Antibodies to cardiolipin were identified in seven (9%) patients preoperatively. In four of these seven patients the bypasses thrombosed within 3 months after surgery and another two developed stenoses. At 6 months the primary bypass patency, i.e. patency without stenosis, was 14% (95% confidence interval (CI) 0-33%) in patients with antibodies to cardiolipin, as opposed to 57% (95% CI 45-69%) in patients without these antibodies (log rank test: p = 0.03). Diabetes mellitus was also associated with a reduced 6 months primary bypass patency (38% (95% CI 16-60%) vs. 58% (95% CI 45-71%), p = 0.006). A Cox regression analysis showed that both the presence of antibodies to cardiolipin and diabetes independently contributed towards predicting the overall risk of bypass failure.

CONCLUSION

Antibodies to cardiolipin were identified in 9% of patients undergoing infrainguinal vein bypass surgery and appeared to be associated with increased risk of bypass failure.

Lipoprotein (a) and its relationship to risk factors and severity of atherosclerotic peripheral vascular disease

OBJECTIVES

To determine the significance of Lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)) as a risk factor for atherosclerotic lower limb peripheral vascular disease (PVD), and its relationship to other demographic and biochemical variables and disease pattern and severity.

DESIGN

Prospective case-control study.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Demographic and biochemical risk factors, lipoprotein fractions and Lp(a) were measured in 200 patients with PVD and 200 age- and sex-matched control subjects. Lp(a) levels were correlated with traditional risk factors and clinical and vascular laboratory disease parameters.

RESULTS

Patients with PVD have a higher incidence of smoking, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus; and had significantly higher levels of serum cholesterol, triglycerides, LDL, VLDL, apolipoprotein B, fasting glucose, fibrinogen, plasminogen, haematocrit, white cell and platelet counts; but lower levels of HDL and apolipoprotein A1. Fasting Lp (a) concentration is an independent risk factor for PVD and is significantly higher in the patients (median = 26.1 mg/dl [4.8-195], mean = 36.5 +/- 32.6 mg/dl) than in controls (median = 18.2 mg/dl [5.4-216], mean = 27.2 +/- 28.1 mg/dl; p < 0.0001). In patients with PVD, Lp(a) correlated positively with plasma LDL, cholesterol, fibrinogen, renal disease, and apolipoprotein B. Fasting levels of > 24 mg/dl incurred a two-fold increase in risk of PVD. Patients with a higher Lp(a) have a significantly higher incidence of resting pain and ulcerations, and regression analysis confirmed smoking and Lp(a) level to be associated with the SVS category of disease severity.

CONCLUSIONS

Lipoprotein (a) is a significant independent risk factor for PVD. Lp(a) levels correlated with LDL, cholesterol, fibrinogen, apolipoprotein B and disease severity. An elevated Lp(a) level may be associated with more severe forms of PVD.

Elevated lipoprotein(a) and increased incidence of restenosis after femoropopliteal PTA. Rationale for the higher risk of recurrence in females?

It has been shown that the incidence of recurrent stenosis following successful percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) is correlated with serum Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] levels. The aim of the present study was to examine the influence of Lp(a) on restenosis after primary successful femoropopliteal PTA. One hundred and thirty nine consecutive patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD) and successful femoropopliteal PTA were studied. Follow-up included clinical examination and non-invasive laboratory testing (pulse volume recordings, ankle-brachial arterial pressure measurement) in every patient before and after 1, 3, 6 and 12 months following intervention. Duplex sonography was performed 1 year after PTA. Suspicion of restenosis (> or = 50% diameter reduction) was verified by angiography. Lp(a) was determined using ELISA technique (mg/dl). Twelve months after successful PTA no restenosis was found in 82 patients (59%: group A). The one-year recurrence rate of 41% (group B) was due to significant restenosis in 35 patients (25%) and reocclusion in 22 patients (16%). The corresponding mean values +/- S.E.M. for Lp(a) were as follows: group A, 28 +/- 5.3; group B 59 +/- 11 (P < 0.01). Women showed a higher frequency of recurrences (55%) versus men (30%, P < 0.01) also corresponding with a high Lp(a) level (51.8 +/- 8 versus 32.7 +/- 5; P < 0.05). Furthermore Lp(a) aggravated the well known increased risk for recurrence in multiple stenoses or occlusions of > or = 5 cm in length. There were no significant differences between groups A and B with respect to age, diabetes, hyperlipidaemia, obesity and cigarette smoking. The results support the view that Lp(a) is an independent risk factor for recurrence after PTA in the femoropopliteal area. It might also be a causal basis for the higher incidence of recurrences in female PAOD patients.

Evaluation of the coagulation and fibrinolytic systems in men with intermittent claudication

The authors evaluated elements of the coagulation and fibrinolytic systems in 18 male patients with intermittent claudication vs 19 men matched for risk factors who served as controls. Prothrombin time and activated partial thromboplastin time did not significantly differ in the patients and the controls. The plasminogen level in the two groups was not significantly different. The level of lipoprotein(a) was significantly higher in the patients than in the controls. The levels of antigen and the activity of protein C did not differ significantly between the two groups. The thrombomodulin level was significantly higher in the patients than in the controls. There were no significant differences between the two groups in the levels of alpha 2-macroglobulin, C1-inactivator, or antithrombin III. The levels of fibrinogen and alpha 1-antitrypsin were significantly higher in the patients vs the controls. Significantly lower levels of alpha 2-plasmin inhibitor and higher levels of alpha 2-plasmin inhibitor/plasmin complex and thrombin/antithrombin III complex were found in the patients vs the controls. These findings suggest that the levels of thrombin/antithrombin III complex, alpha 2-plasmin inhibitor/plasmin complex, and thrombomodulin may perhaps serve as indicators for injury to the peripheral endothelium and that the coagulation and fibrinolytic systems may be activated in patients with intermittent claudication.

Low-density lipoprotein removal methods by membranes and future perspectives

Since the application by Thompson et al. in 1975 of plasma exchange for the treatment of 2 patients with familial hyperlipidemia, plasma purification techniques for selective low-density lipoprotein (LDL) removal (i.e., LDL apheresis) have been developed and adopted for the management of this disease. Thermofiltration is one of the LDL apheresis systems that utilizes membrane techniques developed by Nose and Malchesky's group in 1985. This article reviews its rationale, in vitro studies, animal studies, and clinical investigation. Thermofiltration effectively and selectively removes LDL cholesterol while retaining in the plasma physiologically important macromolecules such as albumin and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol. Based on the global view of the treatment of atherosclerosis by LDL apheresis, membrane techniques are as effective, safe, and simpler to apply than other methods. Additionally, these methods are effective for the removal of lipoprotein (a) and fibrinogen; thus, they can address the needs in these application areas.

The long-term effect of eicosapentaenoic acid on serum levels of lipoprotein (a) and lipids in patients with vascular disease

The effects of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) on serum lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)) and other lipid levels in patients with vascular disease were examined. The serum levels of Lp(a), total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) were measured in 24 patients with vascular disease. An elevated serum Lp(a) level (39 +/- 22 mg/dl) was noted in 9 patients, elevated total cholesterol level (263 +/- 31 mg/dl) in 12 patients, elevated triglyceride level (240 +/- 98 mg/dl) in 10 patients and elevated LDL level (651 +/- 88 mg/dl) in 6 patients before administration of EPA. EPA (1,800 mg/day) was given to these patients for long periods ranging from 6 to 24 months. The serum levels of Lp(a), TC, TG and LDL were lowered significantly (p < 0.05) after EPA administration for 12 and 18 months, for 6, 12, 18 and 24 months, for 18 months and for 12 and 18 months, respectively. These findings indicated that long-term administration of EPA may lower Lp(a) and serum lipids, which is beneficial for patients with various arterial diseases in terms of preventing progression of the disease.