Calcium channel antagonists. Part II: Use and comparative properties of the three prototypical calcium antagonists in ischemic heart disease, including recommendations based on an analysis of 41 trials

Diltiazem to treat sinus tachycardia in critically ill patients: a four-year experience

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether an intravenous infusion of the calcium channel blocker diltiazem was effective and safe in treating sinus tachycardia in critically ill adult patients with contraindications to beta-blockers or in whom beta-blockers were ineffective.

DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

SETTING

University medical center.

PATIENTS

The records of 171 surgical intensive care unit patients with sinus tachycardia treated with intravenous diltiazem were evaluated.

INTERVENTIONS

In all patients with sinus tachycardia (heart rate >100 beats/min), heart rate control with intravenous diltiazem was attempted after adequate intravascular volume expansion, pain, and anxiety control. In all patients, beta-blockade either was contraindicated or (in 7%) had failed. Intravenous diltiazem was administered as a slow 10-mg bolus dose (0.1-0.2 mg/kg ideal body weight), and then an infusion was started at 5 or 10 mg/hr and increased up to 30 mg/hr, as needed, to decrease heart rate to <100 beats/min. Variables retrospectively collected included demographic data, preinfusion blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, and preinfusion pressure-rate quotients (pressure-rate quotient = mean arterial pressure / heart rate). Intravenous bolus dose, when given, and diltiazem infusion rate and time necessary to achieve the target heart rate also were recorded. The lowest heart rate recorded within 24 hrs from the initiation of the infusion and the time necessary to achieve the lowest heart rate after beginning the infusion were recorded.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Of 171 patients studied, 97 (56%) were classified as responders. Multiple linear regression suggested that response could be predicted by age, pressure-rate quotients, baseline mean arterial pressure, and central nervous system failure. In the responders, a heart rate <100 beats/min was achieved in an average of 2 hrs, at a mean diltiazem infusion of 13.3 mg/hr. The lowest rate reached by the responders in a 24-hr period averaged 86 beats/min and was achieved in 4.8 hrs with a mean infusion rate of 14.8 mg/hr. Both target and lowest rate values were statistically different from baseline heart rate.

CONCLUSION

Diltiazem was effective in achieving short-term control of heart rate in 56% of the patients, virtually without adverse effects, where beta-blockade was contraindicated or ineffective.

Diversity of calcium antagonists

Calcium antagonists (CAs) are widely used in the management of hypertension and chronic stable angina pectoris. Currently available CAs fall into three distinct structural classes--the dihydropyridines, the benzothiazepines, and the phenylalkylamines. The diversity of these agents, even among drugs within a structural group, is apparent in their pharmacology, physiologic effects, and therapeutic uses. Traditional CAs produce their effects through blockade of the L-type calcium channel. Recently, a new CA has been developed. Mibefradil, the first member of a new class of CAs, is a tetralol derivative. It is characterized by its selective blockade of T-type calcium channels. It differs from existing CAs and may offer important therapeutic advantages.

Pharmacologic and therapeutic differences among calcium channel antagonists: profile of mibefradil, a new calcium antagonist

Calcium antagonists are a heterogeneous group of drugs, each with a different chemical structure and cardiovascular profile. Distinguishing factors include pharmacokinetics, mode of calcium mobilization affected, class and subclass of calcium channel inhibited, state-dependent interactions, and effect of disease on the drug's activity. A new calcium antagonist, mibefradil, has a unique chemical structure and cardiovascular profile compared with those currently available, and it appears to represent a new class of calcium antagonists.

Calcium channel antagonists in the treatment of coronary artery disease: fundamental pharmacological properties relevant to clinical use

Calcium channel antagonists are a diverse group of drugs with clinical antianginal and antihypertensive properties. They have as a common property the capacity to lessen the rate of calcium ion entry through a specific type of calcium channel, namely the voltage-gated L-type channel. They do not bind to all the pore molecules; therefore, there is still some residual entry of calcium ions. Variables determining the clinical efficacy of the different drugs include the binding sites involved, the tissue specificity of the drug, the duration of action, and (closely related) the degree of counter-regulatory neurohumoral activation. Inhibitory effects on the calcium channels of vascular smooth muscle explain the antihypertensive effect and the reduction of afterload, one of the antianginal mechanisms common to all of the drugs. In general, the dihydropyridines, such as nifedipine, are more vascular-selective than the non-dihydropyridines, such as verapamil and diltiazem. The latter owe part of their antianginal activity to more prominent effects on the calcium channels in the sinoatrial node (decreased heart rate) and the myocardium (negative inotropic effect). In addition, calcium channel antagonists are coronary artery vasodilators. Whether the latter effect confers on these drugs any specific advantage in the therapy of anginal syndromes is controversial.

Calcium channel antagonists in the management of anginal syndromes: changing concepts in relation to the role of coronary vasospasm

Despite the increasing evidence that alterations in coronary vascular tone can and do occur in patients with anginal syndromes, only in a minority of such patients with Prinzmetal's angina is there decisive evidence that the coronary vasodilation induced by calcium channel antagonists (CCAs) plays a specific therapeutic role. CCAs may also give therapeutic benefit in a number of conditions in which coronary vasoconstriction may contribute to ischemia, such as hyperventilation, cold-induced angina, or silent ischemia not caused by an increase in heart rate. Thus, the decision of whether or not to use CCAs in angina syndromes will often have to be made on grounds other than what appears to be a minor role of vasospasm in the overall spectrum of angina. There are preliminary indications that the long-term prognosis may be different among different categories of CCAs.

Pharmacological profile of semotiadil fumarate, a novel calcium antagonist, in rat experimental angina model

1. The aim of the present study was to determine whether antianginal efficacy of semotiadil fumarate (SD-3211), a structurally novel calcium antagonist, is distinct from those of diltiazem, nifedipine and nisoldipine. 2. First, the duration of the inhibitory effects of semotiadil was compared with that of other Ca2+ antagonists in rat experimental angina evoked by vasopressin. Semotiadil (10 mg kg-1, p.o.) was effective for at least 9 h in the anginal model and those effects of semotiadil were longer-lasting than those of diltiazem (30 mg kg-1, p.o.), nifedipine (10 mg kg-1, p.o.), and nisoldipine (3 mg.kg-1, p.o.). 3. Second, the selectivity of actions of these Ca2+ antagonists for the coronary arteries and myocardium was evaluated in rat isolated perfused hearts. Diltiazem (10(-6) M) reduced cardiac contractility without inhibiting the elevation of perfusion pressure evoked by acetylcholine. Semotiadil (10(-7) M) significantly suppressed cardiac contractility and inhibited the coronary response to acetylcholine. In contrast, nifedipine (3 x 10(-9)-3 x 10(-8) M) and nisoldipine (3 x 10(-10)-10(-8) M) did not reduce cardiac contractility at concentrations which significantly inhibited the increase in perfusion pressure to acetylcholine. 4. The selectivity of semotiadil for coronary artery and myocardium is intermediate between diltiazem and dihydropyridines tested in the present study. 5. These findings suggest that semotiadil has an advantage of diltiazem, nifedipine, and nisoldipine in the treatment of angina with regard to long-lasting action and selectivity for coronary artery and myocardium.

Comparison of efficacy of nisoldipine, metoprolol, and isosorbide dinitrate in patients with stable exertional angina: a randomized, cross-over, placebo-controlled study

We evaluated the acute antianginal effect of oral nisoldipine (10 mg), metoprolol (40 mg), and long-acting isosorbide dinitrate (20 mg) in 15 patients with stable exertional angina. The patients performed symptom-limited treadmill exercise at 2 h after the administration of placebo (Placebo stages 1 and 2) and each of the active drugs. After Placebo stage 1, the patients were randomized for cross-over evaluation of the acute effect of a single oral dose of placebo (Placebo stage 2), nisoldipine, metoprolol, or long-acting isosorbide dinitrate. All 15 patients developed angina during all of exercise tests and their exercise tests were terminated at the onset of angina. The time until development of 0.1 mV ST segment depression was increased by all three drugs compared to placebo, and it was significantly longer with metoprolol than with isosorbide dinitrate. Similarly, the time to ceasing exercise because of angina was also prolonged by all three drugs. The exercise time was longer with nisoldipine and metoprolol compared to isosorbide dinitrate, but there was no significant difference between nisoldipine and metoprolol. In conclusion, metoprolol and nisoldipine more effectively prolonged exercise compared to long-acting isosorbide dinitrate in patients with stable exertional angina.

Comparison of the efficacy of atenolol and its combination with slow-release nifedipine in chronic stable angina

There is still uncertainty of whether combined therapy with a beta-blocker and calcium-channel antagonist provides additive or synergistic clinical benefits in most patients with stable angina pectoris. The comparative antianginal effect of atenolol 50 mg and atenolol 50 mg and slow release nifedipine (20 mg) twice a day was assessed in 27 patients with chronic stable angina in a randomized, double-blind, crossover study. After a 4 week run-in period on atenolol, patients were randomly allocated to receive either atenolol alone or its combination with nifedipine and then crossed over to the alternative treatment for a further 4 weeks. Symptom-limited exercise treadmill tests were performed according to the Naughton protocol. The major endpoints in this study were (a) exercise time to pain; (b) exercise time to > or = 1 mm ST depression; (c) total exercise time; (d) maximal ST-segment depression; (e) number of anginal attacks; and (f) nitrate consumption. The preexercise systolic blood pressure was lower on the combination treatment than on atenolol alone, but heart rate was lower on atenolol compared with the combination treatment. There was no difference in the systolic blood pressure at the onset of pain or at 1 mm ST depression, while heart rate was lower on both occasions with atenolol compared to the combination treatment. There was no difference between the two treatments in terms of the rate-pressure product at the onset of pain or at 1 mm ST depression. Twice as many patients experienced pain later with the combination treatment than with atenolol alone.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Double-blind, dose-response, placebo-controlled multicenter study of nisoldipine. A new second-generation calcium channel blocker in angina pectoris

BACKGROUND

Nisoldipine is a potent 1:4 dihydropyridine calcium channel antagonist, and doses of 5 or 10 mg administered either once or twice daily have been claimed to exert antianginal effects. There is, however, little information regarding the dose-response relation and whether the drug exerts any consistent effects throughout the dosing interval. In this placebo-controlled, parallel-design study, the dose-response relation of monotherapy with nisoldipine administered twice daily was studied in patients with stable angina pectoris.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Two hundred thirty-one patients received single-blind placebo for 2 weeks; of these, 185 patients who reproducibly stopped treadmill exercise because of angina of moderate severity and had greater than or equal to 1 mm ST segment depression during exercise and experienced an average of three episodes of anginal attacks per week were randomized in a double-blind manner to one of the four treatment groups: placebo (n = 48), nisoldipine 2.5 mg (n = 47), nisoldipine 5 mg (n = 44), or nisoldipine 10 mg (n = 46). Nisoldipine or placebo was administered twice daily for 4 weeks and symptom-limited exercise tests were repeated at 2 and 10-14 hours after the double-blind medication. One hundred sixty-eight patients completed the study and 181 patients were valid for efficacy analysis. Compared with double-blind placebo, there were marginally significant trends toward increases for time to onset of angina for the 10-mg-b.i.d. group (83 versus 108 seconds, p = 0.08), time to 1 mm ST segment depression for the 5-mg-b.i.d. group (54 versus 83 seconds, p = 0.08), and total exercise time for the 5- (30 versus 50 seconds, p = 0.10) and 10-mg-b.i.d. (30 versus 58 seconds, p = 0.06) groups at 2 hours after the dose (peak effect) after 4 weeks of therapy. At 10-14 hours after the dose (trough effect), no differences between placebo and any of the nisoldipine doses on any of the exercise parameters were found after 4 weeks of therapy. A subset analysis of patients who stopped exercise within 10 minutes because of angina of moderate severity during single-blind placebo therapy (n = 123) revealed significant increase in total exercise duration and time to 1 mm ST segment depression at 2 hours after the dose in the 5- and 10-mg-b.i.d. dose groups compared with double-blind placebo (p less than 0.04). No significant trough effects, however, were observed even in this subgroup after any of the doses of nisoldipine. The frequency of anginal attacks decreased by 44%, 41%, 30%, and 41% after twice-daily therapy with 2.5 mg, 5 mg, 10 mg nisoldipine, and placebo groups, respectively (p = NS, nisoldipine versus placebo). The incidence of adverse events (minor and major) was 43.8% in the placebo group and 42.6%, 45.5%, and 56.5% in the nisoldipine 2.5-, 5-, and 10-mg-b.i.d. groups, respectively (p = NS compared with placebo). However, four patients developed unstable angina while on nisoldipine therapy (two in the 2.5-mg, one in the 5-mg, and one in the 10-mg-b.i.d. group) and two patients died suddenly in the nisoldipine 10-mg-b.i.d. group.

CONCLUSIONS

Monotherapy with 2.5, 5, and 10 mg nisoldipine twice a day was not superior to placebo therapy in treating patients with angina pectoris, and the 10-mg-b.i.d. therapy resulted in a statistically insignificant but clinically important increase in the incidence of serious adverse events.

Protective effects of felodipine and verapamil against imipramine-induced lethal cardiac conduction disturbances in the anaesthetized rat

The effect of verapamil and felodipine on imipramine-induced cardiac toxicity was assessed in anaesthetized rats. Rats received either infusion of saline (n = 13), or non-hypotensive doses of felodipine (n = 36) or verapamil (n = 36) over 40 minutes. In saline-pretreated rats IV bolus injection of imipramine (10 mg/kg) resulted in severe hypotension, bradycardia, electromechanical dissociation, and death within 3 minutes. Rats pretreated with nonhypotensive doses of felodipine (1, 3, 6, and 10 micrograms/kg/min) or verapamil (10, 30, 100, and 300 micrograms/kg/min) survived throughout the experiment, despite an initial fall in blood pressure within the first 5 minutes after imipramine administration. Blood pressure returned to baseline levels within 15 minutes. Intermittent ECG monitoring showed significant prolongation of QRS duration after imipramine in both saline (by 138%) and verapamil-pretreated rats (by 63%), whereas in the rats pretreated with felodipine no prolongation was observed (+3%). We conclude that, in our experimental model, felodipine, more than verapamil, protects against the cardiac effects of imipramine intoxication.

Arterial vasodilator effects of the dihydropyridine calcium antagonist amlodipine alone and in combination with verapamil in systemic hypertension

The arterial vasodilator properties of the dihydropyridine calcium antagonist amlodipine were compared with the effects of vascular muscle cyclic guanosine monophosphate production by sodium nitroprusside and with the effects of a combined infusion of amlodipine and the nondihydropyridine calcium antagonist verapamil in 8 untreated patients with primary hypertension. Arterial vasodilation was assessed by measurement of changes of forearm blood flow by mercury in Silastic strain-gauge plethysmography during brachial artery drug infusions. Forearm blood flow increased during amlodipine infusions (0.4 to 45 micrograms/min/100 ml forearm tissue) from 2.9 +/- 1.7 to a maximum of 23.6 +/- 7.6 ml/min/100 ml (687%), while sodium nitroprusside caused an increase from 3.0 +/- 1.8 to 16.2 +/- 5.4 ml/min/100 ml (449%), attesting to the importance of transmembrane calcium influx for the maintenance of vascular tone. The addition of verapamil 40 micrograms/min/100 ml to an infusion of amlodipine 44.5 micrograms/min/100 ml resulted in a further increase of forearm blood flow, from 23.6 +/- 7.6 to 34.4 +/- 9.8 ml/min/100 ml (p less than 0.05). The precise mechanisms of this finding have yet to be elucidated but may be due to interactions of the effects of the binding of these 2 chemically and pharmacologically different calcium antagonists to distinct binding sites at calcium channels. The clinical relevance of this observation for the treatment of coronary artery disease and systemic hypertension needs further study.

Role of beta-adrenergic blockers after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty

Restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) cannot currently be prevented. Different medical regimens have been largely unsuccessful. Experimental studies suggest roles for beta-adrenergic blockers and calcium antagonists. Controlled clinical studies have failed to show any decrease in restenosis rate for calcium antagonists. Corresponding studies for beta blockers are lacking. This study evaluates 541 consecutive PTCA procedures, 455 (86%) in patients treated with beta blockers after PTCA (76% metoprolol, 14% atenolol, 4% sotalol, 6% others) and 86 (14%) in patients without beta blockers. Angiographic success was achieved in 483 of 620 lesions (78%), and was not significantly different with or without beta blockers (79 vs 73%, p greater than 0.05). The procedure success rate and the complication rates (myocardial infarction, emergency coronary artery bypass grafting, death) did not differ with or without beta blockers (p greater than 0.05). Follow-up angiograms for 426 of the 483 successfully dilated lesions (88%) revealed that a total of 155 stenoses had recurred (36%). The restenosis rate was not significantly different with (368) or without (58) beta blockers (36 vs 38%, p greater than 0.05). For beta blockers with calcium antagonists (84% nifedipine, 13% diltiazem, 2% verapamil, 1% others), the restenosis rate was 97 of 250 (39%) vs 36 of 118 (31%) (p greater than 0.05). This retrospective study indicates that treatment with beta-adrenergic blockers after PTCA, alone or in combination with calcium antagonists, does not influence either the success rate or the restenosis rate and can be continued if indicated from an antiischemic viewpoint.

Dissociation of exercise tolerance and total myocardial ischemic burden in chronic stable angina pectoris

Exercise treadmill tests and ambulatory monitoring were used in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, double-dummy crossover comparison of nifedipine (10 mg, 3 times daily) and transdermal nitroglycerin (15 mg). All patients (n = 20) had chronic stable angina with symptomatic and silent events. All patients had 3 episodes of angina/week and 3 episodes of ischemia/24 hr. The protocol was made up of 2 weeks of placebo followed by 2 weeks of active drug, then crossed over for 2 weeks of placebo followed by the other active drug. At the end of each 2-week period, patients had ambulatory monitoring and exercise treadmill testing. All ambulatory monitoring reports were read blind and entered into an independent data base. The results were the following: on transdermal nitroglycerin, the duration of ischemia decreased by 57% from 140 min/24 hr to 60 min/24 hr (p = 0.0054). The exercise time increased by 5.5% from 4.8 to 5.0 minutes (p = 0.16). With nifedipine, the duration of ischemia decreased by 22% from 175 min/24 hr to 137 min/24 hr (p = 0.16). The exercise tolerance time increased by 13% from 4.5 to 5.0 minutes (p = 0.0264). Nifedipine increased exercise time without altering total ischemic time, while transdermal nitroglycerin decreased total ischemic time without increasing exercise time. Thus, changes in exercise time do not necessarily predict changes in total ischemic time.

Acute myocardial infarction: initial manifestations, management, and prognosis

In patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction (AMI), obtaining a thorough history is important for identifying both the cause of chest pain and any concurrent conditions that may complicate the management. Physical examination--including cardiac auscultation and determining the status of the peripheral vasculature--is important as a guide to immediate management and as a baseline for future comparison. The differential diagnosis of AMI is extensive, and various laboratory tests, such as electrocardiography, cardiac enzymes, radionuclide techniques, echocardiography, and cardiac catheterization, can aid in the diagnosis. The routine management of patients with AMI can include medical therapy with antithrombotic agents, nitrates, beta-adrenergic blockers, or calcium channel blocking agents. The major differences between Q-wave and non-Q-wave infarction are discussed. Some factors that affect early and late prognosis in patients with AMI are age of the patient, residual left ventricular function, residual myocardial ischemia, and substrates for sustained ventricular arrhythmias. Although much of the current enthusiasm in management of AMI is related to revascularization strategies, other important aspects of diagnosis and treatment should not be overlooked.

Pharmacology of acute effort angina

From the pharmacologic point of view, each of the major types of antianginal agents--calcium antagonists, beta-blockers, and nitrates--seem to act at least in part by an improvement of the myocardial blood supply. The recently elucidated mechanism of action of nitrates, acting on a common pathway with the endothelium-derived relaxation factor (EDRF), suggests an important role for guanylate cyclase and cyclic GMP in maintaining coronary artery patency in patients with coronary atheroma. The efficacy of calcium antagonists, even in effort-induced angina, is in accord with a current hypothesis that physical exercise in the presence of coronary stenosis can cause relative coronary vasoconstriction, or at the least, failure of full dilation. Therefore, calcium antagonists all act, at least in part, on the "supply" side of the supply-demand equation. Beta-adrenergic blockers appear to have as their major mode of action a reduction of heart rate, which not only reduces the oxygen demand but, through an anti-ischemic effect, also appears to improve the endocardial blood supply (in relation to the heart rate). Thus beta-blockade indirectly enhances the supply side of the equation. The intriguing situation arises whereby all three major types of antianginal compounds may also act by a common mechanism of anginal relief, namely, improvement in the coronary blood supply, in addition to the diverse mechanisms specific to each type of compound. That conclusion does not mean the the "demand" side of the equation can be ignored. Rather, the critical importance of a reduced myocardial blood supply in the production of anginal syndromes is highlighted.

Homologous regulation of voltage-dependent calcium channels by 1,4-dihydropyridines

Chronic treatment of PC 12 cells with the 1,4-dihydropyridine Ca2+ channel antagonist nifedipine [5 x 10-8M/5 days] and the activator S Bay K 8644 [5 x 10-7 M/5 days] resulted in up- and down-regulation of 1,4-dihydropyridine binding site density by 29 and 24%, respectively, without change in affinity. These changes in binding site density represent functional changes as indicated by the corresponding changes in K+ depolarization-induced 45Ca2+ uptake and in whole cell currents carried by Ba2+ ions. This homologous regulation of voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels [VDCC] by potent and specific ligands parallels that observed for other classes of membrane receptors.