Serotonergic function during lithium augmentation of refractory depression

Lithium addition in antidepressant-resistant depression: effects on platelet 5-HT, plasma 5-HT and plasma 5-HIAA concentration

The efficacy of the addition of lithium to an established course of antidepressant treatment can be explained by a synergistic effect of the two drugs on central 5-HT neurotransmission. In the present study we investigated the effect of lithium addition on the 5-HT concentration in plasma and platelets and the concentration of 5-HIAA. Thirty-nine depressed inpatients who fulfilled the DSM-IV criteria for major depressive disorder and who did not respond to monotherapy with either imipramine or fluvoxamine participated in this study. Concentration of 5-HT in both plasma and platelets did not change significantly during lithium addition. The 5-HT ratio (plasma concentration/platelet concentration) shows a small non-significant increase after 3 weeks lithium addition. The mean concentration of 5-HIAA shows a significant increase during lithium addition; with no difference between the imipramine and the fluvoxamine sample. The increments in 5-HIAA concentration during lithium addition are indicative of an increased 5-HT turnover.

Fünfundzwanzig Jahre Lithiumaugmentation

Twenty-five years ago the research group of the Canadian psychiatrist de Montigny reported treating antidepressant-refractory depressive patients successfully by adding lithium to their antidepressant. The report, published in 1981 as an open-label uncontrolled observation of only eight patients, falls short of today's methodological standards, but the treatment method, subsequently known as lithium augmentation, nonetheless was to change profoundly the pharmacological strategies for depressive disorders. The story of its development is remarkable, starting with a strictly theoretical idea conceived by Montigny and his colleagues after animal experiments in the 1970s had revealed that pretreatment with an antidepressant over several weeks led to sensitization of central nervous serotonin receptors. The team postulated that the proserotonergic characteristics of lithium, which had been systematically used as a psychotropic drug since 1949, could thus be used specifically to stimulate these receptors. Lithium augmentation demonstrated its effectiveness in the 1980s and 1990s, first in open-label and later in randomized and placebo-controlled studies. In the late 1990s studies aimed at optimizing its clinical application indicated that lithium augmentation must be administered for at least 2 weeks, with lithium serum levels within the range established for prophylactic treatment and assuming patient response, and that the combination of lithium and antidepressant must be continued as a maintenance therapy for 6 to 12 months. Research has yet to clarify how lithium augmentation actually works. Current results show that in addition to the idea postulated by Montigny, lithium could also have an activating effect on the cortisol axis. Thanks to the sound body of evidence which has accrued in the meantime, lithium augmentation is recommended in most guidelines and treatment algorithms as a main strategy for patients who do not respond to antidepressant monotherapy.

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors combined with venlafaxine in depressed patients who had partial response to venlafaxine: four cases

One third of depressive patients show partial or no response to antidepressant treatment. With partial or nonresponders, treatment strategies are as follows: switching to another antidepressant, augmenting with other psychotropic agents, or combining antidepressants. There are no data in the literature about the positive effect of combining venlafaxine with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). In this report, the presented cases had been on at least two different classes of antidepressant medication (or combination of antidepressants) for an adequate time and dose. They showed only a partial response to high dose of venlafaxine but improved after the addition of an SSRI (sertraline, citalopram, or paroxetine) to venlafaxine. The combination treatment was well tolerated in all of the cases.

Lithium augmentation therapy in refractory depression: clinical evidence and neurobiological mechanisms

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review examines the evidence and discusses the clinical relevance of lithium augmentation as a treatment strategy for refractory major depressive episodes. It also examines hypotheses on the mode of action of lithium augmentation, with a focus on serotonin (5-HT) and neuroendocrine systems, and proposes recommendations for future research.

METHOD

We searched the Medline computer database and the Cochrane Library for relevant original studies published in English from January 1966 to February 2003. The key words were as follows: lithium, augmentation strategies, lithium augmentation, major depression, refractory depression, treatment-resistant depression, neuroendocrinology, and serotonin.

RESULTS

Of 27 prospective clinical studies published since 1981, 10 were double-blind, placebo-controlled trials, 4 were randomized comparator trials, and 13 were open-label trials. Five of 9 acute-phase placebo-controlled trials demonstrated that lithium augmentation had substantial efficacy. In the acute-treatment trials, the average response rate in the lithium group was 45%, and in the placebo group, 18% (P < 0.001). One placebo-controlled trial showed the efficacy of lithium augmentation in the continuation-phase treatment. Summarizing the open and controlled data, approximately 50% of patients responded to lithium augmentation within 2 to 6 weeks. Animal studies offer robust evidence that lithium augmentation increases 5-HT neurotransmission, possibly by a synergistic action of lithium and the antidepressant on brain 5-HT pathways.

CONCLUSIONS

Augmentation of antidepressants with lithium is the best-documented augmentation therapy in the treatment of refractory depression. Emerging data from animal studies suggest that the 5-HTergic system is involved in the augmentatory effect of lithium.

Changes in quantitatively assessed tremor during treatment of major depression with lithium augmented by paroxetine or amitriptyline

Tremor is a relatively frequent side effect of lithium and of antidepressants with serotonergic properties. It can be expected that combinations of lithium (which is itself serotonergic) with such antidepressants will enhance not only efficacy, but also the incidence of side effects, including tremor. To quantitatively monitor the effect of antidepressant augmentation of ongoing lithium therapy on tremor, lithium-maintained patients with a breakthrough episode of major depression were randomly assigned under double-blind conditions to receive paroxetine 20 mg/day (N = 14) or amitriptyline 75 mg/day (N = 17). The initial dosages could be increased after 2 weeks to 40 mg/day and 150 mg/day, respectively, and the patients were treated for 6 weeks. Tremor activity was assessed weekly, quantitatively by accelerometry and qualitatively with the Dosage Record and Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale. Statistical analysis detected no significant difference between the treatment groups with respect to changes in mean tremor activity relative to baseline. However, analysis of the pooled data showed that tremor increased significantly during the course of combined lithium and antidepressant therapy, with the greatest increments occurring independent of dosage approximately 3 weeks after initiation of combination treatment. Although the mean tremor activity subsided toward the end of treatment, tremor activity on the whole was still significantly greater after 6 weeks of combined lithium and antidepressant treatment than at the start of combination therapy. Increased tremor was not associated with decreased medication compliance, and no patient discontinued treatment because of increased tremor. Tremor frequency was not affected by the study treatments.

Tryptophan and 5-hydroxytryptophan for depression

BACKGROUND

5 Hydroxytryptophan (5-HTP) and tryptophan are so-called natural alternatives to traditional antidepressants, used to treat unipolar depression and dysthymia.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether 5-HTP and tryptophan are more effective than placebo, and whether they are safe to use to treat depressive disorders in adults.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Trials were searched in computerized general (Medline, Psychlit, and Embase) and specialized databases (Cochrane Controlled Clinical Trials Register, Cochrane Collaboration Depression, Anxiety and Neurosis Controlled Trial Register); by checking reference lists of relevant articles; by handsearching relevant specialist journals; and by contacting relevant authors where appropriate. Publications in all languages were sought.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Trials were included if they were randomized, included patients with unipolar depression or dysthymia, compared preparations of 5-HTP or tryptophan with placebo, and included clinical outcomes assessed by scales assessing depressive symptoms.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data was extracted independently by the three reviewers, onto data collection forms. Inclusion criteria were applied to all potential studies independently and a coefficient of agreement (Kappa) was calculated for them. Disagreement was resolved by reaching consensus. Trial quality was scored according to risk of bias. Analysis for 5-HTP and tryptophan were combined due to the small number of included trials.

MAIN RESULTS

108 trials were located using the specified search strategy. Of these, only two trials, involving a total of 64 patients, were of sufficient quality to meet inclusion criteria. The available evidence suggests these substances were better than placebo at alleviating depression (Peto Odds Ratio 4.10; 95% confidence interval 1.28-13.15; RD 0.36; NNT 2.78). However, the evidence was of insufficient quality to be conclusive.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

A large number of studies appear to address the research questions, but few are of sufficient quality to be reliable. Available evidence does suggest these substances are better than placebo at alleviating depression. Further studies are needed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 5-HTP and tryptophan before their widespread use can be recommended. The possible association between these substances and the potentially fatal Eosinophilia-Myalgia Syndrome has not been elucidated. Because alternative antidepressants exist which have been proven to be effective and safe the clinical usefulness of 5-HTP and tryptophan is limited at present.

Serotonin in mania and in the mechanism of action of mood stabilizers: a review of clinical studies

OBJECTIVES

Serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine, 5-HT) was implicated in the pathophysiology of manic-depressive illness as early as 1958. Although extensive evidence has accumulated since then to support 5-HT's role in depression, relatively fewer studies examined its role in mania. The purpose of this paper was to review and summarize the current state of knowledge on the role of 5-HT in mania and its treatment.

METHODS

We systemically reviewed clinical studies of 1) 5-HT function in mania and 2) 5-HT in the mechanism of action of mood stabilizers, including lithium and anticonvulsants.

RESULTS

Review showed that cerebrospinal fluid, postmortem, platelet, neuroendocrine challenge, and tryptophan depletion studies provided some evidence to support the hypothesis that a 5-HT deficit is involved in mania and that enhancement of 5-HT neurotransmission exerts a mood-stabilizing effect.

CONCLUSIONS

There is some evidence from clinical studies for the contribution of 5-HT in mania and in the mechanism of action of mood stabilizers. However, it is very likely that other neurotransmitters also play important roles. Future directions for research include 1) in vivo study of 5-HT receptor subtypes using positron emission tomography, 2) investigation of the interaction between 5-HT and other neurotransmitter systems, and 3) determination of the relationships between diagnostic subtypes of mania and 5-HT function and other neurotransmitter systems.

Ongoing lithium treatment prevents relapse after total sleep deprivation

Forty bipolar depressed inpatients underwent three consecutive cycles of total sleep deprivation (TSD). At the beginning of the study, 20 patients were free of psychotropic drugs and 20 had been receiving lithium medication for at least 6 months. Mood was rated on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression before and after TSD; perceived mood changes during treatment were evaluated with self-administered visual analog scales. Patients undergoing long-term lithium treatment showed a significantly better response to TSD as rated on both scales: 13 of 20 patients (vs. 2 of 20 patients without lithium) showed a sustained response during a follow-up period of 3 months. This preliminary evidence of a positive interaction of TSD and long-term lithium treatment could be explained by a synergistic effect of both treatments on brain serotonergic function, possibly via a desensitization of 5-hydroxytryptamine-1A inhibitory autoreceptors.

5-HT1A receptor antagonists neither potentiate nor inhibit the effects of fluoxetine and befloxatone in the forced swim test in rats

Recent clinical data suggest that coadministration of pindolol with an antidepressant, particularly the 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) reuptake inhibitor fluoxetine, can shorten the time to onset of clinical activity and increase the proportion of responders. We have examined the interaction of antidepressants with 5-HT1A receptors using the forced swim test in rats using both (+/-)-pindolol and the selective 5-HT1A receptor antagonist WAY 100,635 (N-[2-[4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl]ethyl]-N-(pyridinyl) cyclohexanecarboxamide trihydrochloride) in combination with either fluoxetine or the selective monoamine oxidase-A inhibitor befloxatone. 8-Hydroxy-dipropylaminotetralin (8-OH-DPAT; 0.125-1 mg/kg s.c.), used as a reference for 5-HT1A agonist activity, reduced immobility in the forced swim test and this effect was significantly antagonised by WAY 100,635. WAY 100,635 alone (0.01-0.1 mg/kg s.c.) was without effect, although a higher dose, 0.3 mg/kg s.c., had a nonsignificant tendency to increase immobility. In contrast, (+/-)-pindolol (1-16 mg/kg s.c.) significantly reduced immobility, but to a lesser extent than 8-OH-DPAT. As expected, the antidepressants fluoxetine (10-80 mg/kg p.o.) and befloxatone (0.03-1 mg/kg p.o.) dose-dependently reduced immobility time. When the antidepressants were combined with WAY 100,635 (0.1 mg/kg), WAY 100,635 either had no effect or, at relatively high doses, significantly reduced their activity in this test. Combination of the antidepressants with (+/-)-pindolol (2 or 4 mg/kg s.c.) failed to reveal a significant interaction. These results demonstrate that the anti-immobility effects of fluoxetine and befloxatone are neither facilitated nor antagonised by doses of WAY 100,635 that completely reverse the effects of 8-OH-DPAT. Furthermore, there was no evidence that coadministration of the antidepressants with (+/-)-pindolol was able to facilitate their antidepressant-like effects. Thus, whereas direct agonist activity at 5-HT1A receptors can modulate immobility in the forced swim test, this receptor subtype does not appear to play a major role in the antidepressant-like effects of fluoxetine or befloxatone under the conditions used in this study.

Combination therapy with nefazodone and lithium: Safety and tolerability in fourteen patients

Fourteen patients with major depression, resistant to previous pharmacotherapies, were treated by the addition of lithium (target range 0.6-0.8 mmol/l) to nefazodone (≥400 mg/day) and were prospectively monitored for 6 weeks to assess safety and tolerability. There were 42 emergent adverse events-most commonly headache, nausea, gastro-intestinal disturbances, tremor, polyuria/polydipsia, dry mouth and tiredness. Information on ten additional patients receiving combined treatment with lithium and nefazodone was collected by retrospective chart review, and it was found that similar adverse events (tremor, dry mouth and tiredness) had occurred in these patients. We conclude that when lithium is added to nefazodone, new adverse events do occur, but that the treatment is safe and tolerable.

Effects of subchronic treatment with valproate on L-5-HTP-induced cortisol responses in mania: evidence for increased central serotonergic neurotransmission

The mechanisms underlying the acute and prophylactic antimanic properties of valproate have remained elusive. There are some reports that treatment with valproic acid may increase brain serotonergic neurotransmission in the rodent. This study was carried out in order to investigate the effects of subchronic therapy with valproate on central serotonin metabolism in manic patients. Toward this end, the authors examined plasma cortisol responses to 200 mg (orally) L-5-hydroxy-tryptophan (L-5-HTP) in 10 manic patients both before and after subchronic treatment with valproate. Administration of L-5-HTP resulted in significantly increased cortisol responses both before and after treatment with valproate. The L-5-HTP-induced cortisol responses were significantly higher after treatment with valproate than before treatment. It is suggested that valproate may increase central serotonergic neurotransmission and that this stimulation may play a role in the antimanic effects of valproate.

Serotonin and gender-specific psychiatric disorders

The serotonergic system has been linked to the etiology of several, albeit disparate, psychiatric disorders. The accumulation of many lines of evidence support the view that there are gender differences in the serotonergic system in humans. It is further proposed that a gender differentiated serotonergic system acts as the nidus for the development of gender-specific psychiatric disorders. Depression, anxiety and eating disorders are largely seen in females, whereas alcoholism, aggressivity and suicide predominate in males. Evidence from both animal and human studies suggesting that the serotonergic system mediates between social-environmental experience and biological states is presented and reviewed. A reconceptualization of the serotonergic system as a gender-specific psychobiological interface is proposed. (Int J Psych Clin Prac 1997; 1: 3-13).

A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of citalopram with and without lithium in the treatment of therapy-resistant depressive patients: a clinical, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacogenetic investigation

Sixty-nine depressive patients (DSM III criteria: 296.2, 296.3, 296.5, 300.4) were treated with 40 to 60 mg citalopram (CIT) daily for 4 weeks. Among them, 45 responded to treatment (improvement > 50% on the 21-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression [HAM-D]) and continued their treatment for another week before being released from the study. The 24 nonresponders were randomized and comedicated under double-blind conditions with lithium carbonate (Li) (2 x 400 mg/day) (CIT-Li group) or with placebo (CIT-Pl group) from days 29 to 35. For days 36 to 42, the patients of both subgroups were treated openly with Li (800 mg/day) in addition to the ongoing CIT treatment. On day 35, 6 of 10 patients responded to the CIT-Li combination, whereas 2 of 14 patients only responded to the CIT-Pl combination. This group difference reached significance (p < 0.05) on day 35 with lower HAM-D total scores in the CIT-Li group. No evidence was seen of a pharmacokinetic interaction between CIT and Li, and this combination was well tolerated. Patients were phenotyped with dextromethorphan and mephenytoin at baseline and at day 28. As evaluated at baseline, three patients (responders) were poor metabolizers of dextromethorphan and six patients (three responders and three nonresponders) of mephenytoin. On day 28, the ratio CIT/N-desmethylCIT (DCIT) in plasma was significantly higher in poor than in extensive metabolizers of mephenytoin (p = 0.0001), and there was a significant positive correlation between the metabolic ratio of dextromethorphan and the ratio DCIT/N-didesmethylCIT in plasma (p < 0.001). These findings illustrate the role of CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 in the metabolism of CIT. It can be concluded that Li addition to CIT is effective in patients not responding to CIT alone without any evidence of an accentuation or provocation of adverse events.