Clozapine serum levels and side effects during steady state treatment of schizophrenic patients: a cross-sectional study

Optimisation of pharmacotherapy in psychiatry through therapeutic drug monitoring, molecular brain imaging and pharmacogenetic tests: focus on antipsychotics

BACKGROUND

For psychotic disorders (i.e. schizophrenia), pharmacotherapy plays a key role in controlling acute and long-term symptoms. To find the optimal individual dose and dosage strategy, specialized tools are used. Three tools have been proven useful to personalize drug treatments: therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of drug levels, pharmacogenetic testing (PG), and molecular neuroimaging.

METHODS

In these Guidelines, we provide an in-depth review of pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacogenetics for 50 antipsychotics. Over 30 international experts in psychiatry selected studies that have measured drug concentrations in the blood (TDM), gene polymorphisms of enzymes involved in drug metabolism, or receptor/transporter occupancies in the brain (positron emission tomography (PET)).

RESULTS

Study results strongly support the use of TDM and the cytochrome P450 (CYP) genotyping and/or phenotyping to guide drug therapies. Evidence-based target ranges are available for titrating drug doses that are often supported by PET findings.

CONCLUSION

All three tools discussed in these Guidelines are essential for drug treatment. TDM goes well beyond typical indications such as unclear compliance and polypharmacy. Despite its enormous potential to optimize treatment effects, minimize side effects and ultimately reduce the global burden of diseases, personalized drug treatment has not yet become the standard of care in psychiatry.

A population pharmacokinetic model to guide clozapine dose selection, based on age, sex, ethnicity, body weight and smoking status

AIMS

Guidance on clozapine dosing in treatment-resistant schizophrenia is based largely on data from White young adult males. This study aimed to investigate the pharmacokinetic profiles of clozapine and N-desmethylclozapine (norclozapine) across the age range, accounting for sex, ethnicity, smoking status and body weight.

METHODS

A population pharmacokinetic model, implemented in Monolix, that linked plasma clozapine and norclozapine via a metabolic rate constant, was used to analyse data from a clozapine therapeutic drug monitoring service, 1993-2017.

RESULTS

There were 17 787 measurements from 5960 patients (4315 male) aged 18-86 years. The estimated clozapine plasma clearance was reduced from 20.2 to 12.0 L h-1 between 20 and 80 years. Model-based dose predictions to attain a predose plasma clozapine concentration of 0.35 mg L-1 was 275 (90% prediction interval 125, 625) mg day-1 in nonsmoking, White males weighing 70 kg and aged 40 years. The corresponding predicted dose was increased by 30% in smokers, decreased by 18% in females, and was 10% higher and 14% lower in otherwise analogous Afro-Caribbean and Asian patients, respectively. Overall, the predicted dose decreased by 56% between 20 and 80 years.

CONCLUSION

The large sample size and wide age range of the patients studied allowed precise estimation of dose requirements to attain predose clozapine concentration of 0.35 mg L-1 . The analysis was, however, limited by the absence of data on clinical outcome and future studies are required to determine optimal predose concentrations specifically in those aged over 65 years.

[Therapeutic drug monitoring of clozapine]

Clozapine is a prototypical atypical antipsychotic used to treat severe schizophrenia and for which a therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is quite commonly proposed. Clozapine is rapidly absorbed (maximum concentration reached within 1 to 4hours), and is extensively metabolized in the liver by CYP1A2 to an active metabolite (and to a lesser extent, to inactive metabolites via other enzymes). Its half-life is 8 to 16h. A therapeutic range has been proposed for clozapine as some studies have reported both a relationship between low plasmatic concentrations and resistance to treatment (threshold level is likely between 250 and 400μg/L), and a relationship between high plasmatic concentrations and an increase in the occurrence of toxicity (alert level=1000μg/L). Given the data obtained in different studies, the TDM was evaluated for this molecule, to recommended.

Seventy Years of Antipsychotic Development: A Critical Review

Since the mid-1950s discovery of the first effective antipsychotic medications (APM), we have only been able to improve the tolerability but not the overall efficacy of currently available APMs, as reflected by effectiveness trials in Europe and the United States. This inability to develop more effective APMs is attributable to multiple factors, including failure to create and use assessment tools to assess core symptom domains in schizophrenia, move beyond the dopaminergic hypothesis and to develop "me too" drugs, imposing ill-defined research domain criteria, and lacking federal funding for clinical trials. The classification of APMs is also confusing, including second-generation, partial agonists, and multimodal APMs in the same class of APMs, despite significant differences in their mechanisms of action. Other factors stagnating drug development include inadequate sample sizes to address heterogeneity, lack of statistical measures correlating with clinical significance, using the atheoretical basis of psychiatric diagnoses, failure to control placebo response, and high cost of newer and perhaps more tolerable APMs. Furthermore, there has been a failure to develop early predictors of antipsychotic response and various tools to optimize an APM response. Finally, some mental health providers are also responsible for the suboptimal use of APMs, by using excessive maintenance doses, often with irrational polypharmacy, further compromising effectiveness and medication adherence. However, some bright spots in antipsychotic development include improved tolerability of APMs and long-acting injectables to address the high prevalence of medication nonadherence. This review critically reviews 70 years of antipsychotic development, the reasons behind the failure to develop more effective APMs, and suggestions for future direction.

Adverse Drug Reactions in Relation to Clozapine Plasma Levels: A Systematic Review

Clozapine is the gold standard for treatment-resistant schizophrenia. Serious and even life-threatening adverse effects, mostly granulocytopenia, myocarditis, and constipation, are of great clinical concern and constitute a barrier to prescribing clozapine, thus depriving many eligible patients of a lifesaving treatment option. Interestingly, clozapine presents variable pharmacokinetics affected by numerous parameters, leading to significant inter- and intra-individual variation. Therefore, therapeutic drug monitoring of plasma clozapine levels confers a significant benefit in everyday clinical practice by increasing the confidence of the prescribing doctor to the drug and the adherence of the patient to the treatment, mainly by ensuring effective treatment and limited dose-related side effects. In the present systematic review, we aimed at identifying how a full range of adverse effects relates to plasma clozapine levels, using the Jadad grading system for assessing the quality of the available clinical evidence. Our findings indicate that EEG slowing, obsessive-compulsive symptoms, heart rate variability, hyperinsulinemia, metabolic syndrome, and constipation correlate to plasma clozapine levels, whereas QTc, myocarditis, sudden death, leucopenia, neutropenia, sialorrhea, are rather unrelated. Rapid dose escalation at the initiation of treatment might contribute to the emergence of myocarditis, or leucopenia. Strategies for managing adverse effects are different in these conditions and are discussed accordingly.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the association between clozapine and norclozapine serum levels and peripheral adverse drug reactions

RATIONALE

Clozapine is the most effective antipsychotic for treatment-refractory schizophrenia for reducing positive psychotic symptoms. It is associated with a reduction in hospitalisation and overall mortality. In spite of this, clozapine remains underutilised due to its complex adverse drug reaction (ADR) profile.

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review aims to investigate the association of clozapine and norclozapine serum levels, and peripheral ADRs.

METHODS

Studies were searched from four electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO and CINAHL) from inception to 12 June 2020. Studies were included if they had adult patients, provided data on steady-state trough clozapine or norclozapine levels and reported on clozapine-associated ADRs. Pregnant women, case reports and series were excluded.

RESULTS

A statistically significant correlation was found for clozapine serum levels and triglycerides (n = 70; r = 0.303, 95% CI 0.0119-0.546, p = 0.042), heart rate (n = 137; r = 0.269, 95% CI 0.0918-0.486, p = 0.035), and overall combined ADRs (n = 160; r = 0.264, 95% CI 0.110-0.405, p = 0.001), but not for absolute neutrophil count (n = 223; r = - 0.164, 95% CI - 0.529-0.253, p = 0.444) or total white cell count (n = 18; r = 0.0176, 95% CI - 0.203-0.237, p = 0.878). Interestingly, norclozapine serum levels were found to be statistically correlated to triglycerides (n = 120; r = 0.211, 95% CI 0.0305-0.378, p = 0.022), total cholesterol (n = 120; r = 0.272, 95% CI 0.0948-0.432, p = 0.003) and weight gain (n = 118; r = 0.208, 95% CI 0.0261-0.377, p = 0.025).

CONCLUSIONS

Heart rate, triglycerides and combined ADRs are significantly correlated with clozapine levels, and triglycerides, total cholesterol and weight gain with norclozapine levels. Future prospective, randomised controlled studies are needed to identify the cause-effect relationship between clozapine levels and peripheral ADRs.

Comprehensive assessment of exposure to clozapine in association with side effects among patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia: a population pharmacokinetic study

BACKGROUND

There have been scarce data on the distribution of clozapine concentrations in comparison with the recommended range (350-600 ng/ml) or their relationship with side effects among patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia. Furthermore, no studies have assessed the association between side effects and overall exposure to the drug by calculating the 24-h area-under-curve (AUC).

METHODS

In- and outpatients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder (ICD-10) who were receiving a stable dose of clozapine for ⩾2 weeks were included. Side effects were assessed using the Glasgow antipsychotic side-effects scale for clozapine (GASS-C). Using two collected plasma samples, plasma clozapine and norclozapine concentrations at peak and trough and their 24-h AUC were estimated using population pharmacokinetic models.

RESULTS

A total of 108 patients completed the study (mean ± SD age, 43.0 ± 10.1 years; clozapine dose, 357.5 ± 136.9 mg/day); 33 patients (30.6%) showed estimated trough concentrations of clozapine within the recommended range (350-600 ng/ml) whereas the concentrations were higher and lower than this range among 37 (43.5%) and 28 (25.9%) patients (%), respectively. There were no significant correlations between estimated peak or trough concentrations or 24-h AUC of both clozapine or norclozapine, and GASS-C total or individual scores. No significant differences were found between GASS-C total or individual item scores between the patients with estimated trough concentrations of clozapine of >600 ng/ml and the other subjects.

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that clozapine or norclozapine concentrations are not linked directly to the extent of side effects experienced in clozapine-treated patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia while the cross-sectional study design limits the interpretation of any causal relationships. These findings indicate that side effects associated with clozapine may occur at any dose or concentration.

A Chitosan-Carbon Nanotube-Modified Microelectrode for In Situ Detection of Blood Levels of the Antipsychotic Clozapine in a Finger-Pricked Sample Volume

The antipsychotic clozapine is the most effective medication available for schizophrenia and it is the only antipsychotic with a known efficacious clinical range. However, it is dramatically underutilized due to the inability to test clozapine blood levels in finger-pricked patients' samples. This prevents obtaining immediate blood levels information, resulting in suboptimal treatment. The development of an electrochemical microsensor is presented, which enables, for the first time, clozapine detection in microliters volume whole blood. The sensor is based on a microelectrode modified with micrometer-thick biopolymer chitosan encapsulating carbon nanotubes. The developed sensor detects clozapine oxidation current, in the presence of other electroactive species in the blood, which generate overlapping electrochemical signals. Clozapine detection, characterized in whole blood from healthy volunteers, displays a sensitivity of 32 ± 3.0 µA cm^-2 µmol^-1 L and a limit-of-detection of 0.5 ± 0.03 µmol L^-1 . Finally, the developed sensor displays a reproducible electrochemical signal (0.6% relative standard deviation) and high storage stability (9.8% relative standard deviation after 8 days) in serum samples and high repeatability (9% relative standard deviation for the 5th repetition) in whole blood samples. By enabling the rapid and minimally invasive clozapine detection at the point-of-care, an optimal schizophrenia treatment is provided.

Association between electroencephalogram changes and plasma clozapine levels in clozapine-treated patients

This retrospective observational study was performed to investigate electroencephalogram abnormalities in clozapine-treated patients with refractory schizophrenia or bipolar disorder. The electroencephalogram and plasma clozapine and norclozapine levels in 71 patients were measured on the same day. Fifty-nine patients (85.9%) had a diagnosis of schizophrenia, and 12 patients (14.1%) had a diagnosis of bipolar disorder. The mean daily clozapine dose was 242.9 ± 105.5 mg (range 25-500 mg), and the mean plasma clozapine and norclozapine levels were 429.4 ± 264.1 and 197.8 ± 132.6 ng/ml, respectively. Twenty-five patients (35.2%) were taking valproate in combination with clozapine. electroencephalogram abnormalities were found in 51 (71.8%) patients. No patient reported clinical seizures. Plasma clozapine level was significantly associated with electroencephalogram abnormalities and was identified as a significant predictor of electroencephalogram abnormalities in a logistic regression analysis. The plasma norclozapine levels of patients taking both clozapine and valproic acid were significantly lower than those of patients treated with clozapine alone. These results demonstrate that electroencephalogram abnormalities are closely correlated with plasma clozapine levels. Valproate reduced plasma norclozapine levels. Simultaneous monitoring of electroencephalogram and plasma clozapine levels was useful for adjusting clozapine doses, improving clinical efficacy, and preventing the side effects of clozapine treatment.

Electroencephalogram Modifications Associated With Atypical Strict Antipsychotic Monotherapies

BACKGROUND

Antipsychotics produce electroencephalogram (EEG) modifications and increase the risk of epileptic seizure. These modifications remain sparsely studied specifically for atypical antipsychotics. In this context, our study focuses on EEG modifications associated with atypical strict antipsychotic monotherapies.

METHODS

Electroencephalogram recordings of 84 psychiatric patients treated with atypical antipsychotics in strict monotherapy (clozapine, n = 22; aripiprazole, n = 22; olanzapine, n = 17; risperidone, n = 9; quetiapine, n = 8; risperidone long-acting injection, n = 4; and paliperidone long-acting injection, n = 2) were analyzed. The modifications were ranked according to both slowing and excitability scores.

RESULTS

Electroencephalogram modifications (in 51 subjects, 60.71%) were graded according to 4 stages combining general slowing and sharp slow waves and/or epileptiform activities. The presence of sharp or epileptiform activities was significantly greater for clozapine (90.9%) compared with other second-generation antipsychotics (aripiprazole, 50%; olanzapine, 58.8%; quetiapine, 37.5%; risperidone, 44.4%). Age, duration of disease progression, and diagnosis were not associated as risk factors. Electroencephalogram modifications were associated with lower doses for treatment with quetiapine but not for specific antipsychotics. Electroencephalogram modifications and severe excitability were associated with higher chlorpromazine equivalent doses.

CONCLUSIONS

Atypical antipsychotics (clozapine, aripiprazole, quetiapine, olanzapine, and risperidone) induce EEG modifications, and these are significantly greater for clozapine and appear dependent on chlorpromazine equivalent dose. No encephalopathy was observed in these antipsychotic monotherapies, whatever dose.

Effects of the antipsychotics haloperidol, clozapine, and aripiprazole on the dendritic spine

Three types of antipsychotics, typical (e.g. haloperidol), atypical (e.g. clozapine), and dopamine partial agonist (e.g. aripiprazole), are administered for treatment of schizophrenia. These antipsychotics have different efficacy and side-effect profiles. We investigated whether aripiprazole, clozapine, and haloperidol differentially regulate the dendritic spine through the AKT-GSK-3 beta cascade. Dissociated cortical neurons from Sprague-Dawley rats were prepared and cultured for 28 days. Aripiprazole, clozapine, or haloperidol was administered to the rat cortical neurons. The levels of PSD95 protein and AKT-GSK-3 beta cascade-related proteins were investigated by Western blot. The number of spines and PSD95 puncta were investigated by immunofluorescence cell staining. Aripiprazole (1 µM or 10 µM) and clozapine (1 µM) increased the levels of PSD95 protein, the number of spines, phosphorylated Akt Thr308 and Ser473, and phosphorylated GSK-3 beta Ser9. On the other hand, haloperidol (1 µM or 10 µM) or an inappropriate concentration of clozapine (10 µM) decreased them. A GSK inhibitor also increased the levels of PSD-95 protein and caused the same morphology. Aripiprazole, clozapine, and haloperidol differentially regulate the dendritic spine, and this effect may occur through the AKT-GSK-3 beta cascade. Selection and appropriate dose of these antipsychotics may be important for the protection of dendritic spines in patients with schizophrenia.

Enhanced disease reduction using clozapine, an atypical antipsychotic agent, and glatiramer acetate combination therapy in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis

BACKGROUND

Atypical antipsychotic agents (AAP) alleviate the symptoms of severe mental health disorders, such as schizophrenia, by antagonizing dopamine and serotonin receptors. Recently, AAP have also been shown to exhibit immunomodulatory properties in the central nervous system (CNS).

OBJECTIVE

Building on research which demonstrated the ability of the AAP risperidone and clozapine to modify the disease course of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), an animal model of multiple sclerosis (MS), we aimed to more fully investigate the potential of clozapine as a possible treatment for MS.

RESULTS

We report that orally administered clozapine significantly reduced the disease severity of EAE in a dose-dependent manner and was effective when administered prophylactically and therapeutically. In comparison to risperidone, quetiapine, and olanzapine, clozapine was the best at reducing disease severity. While clozapine-treated mice had only modest changes to peripheral leukocytes and cytokine responses, these animals had significantly fewer CNS-infiltrating CD4 T cells and myeloid cells. Furthermore, the CNS myeloid cells displayed a less activated phenotype in mice treated with clozapine. Finally, we found that co-administration of clozapine with glatiramer acetate enhanced disease protection compared to either treatment alone.

CONCLUSION

These studies indicate that clozapine is an effective immunomodulatory agent with the potential to treat immune-mediated diseases such as MS.

The atypical antipsychotics clozapine and olanzapine promote down-regulation and display functional selectivity at human 5-HT7 receptors

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Classically, ligands of GPCRs have been classified primarily upon their affinity and efficacy to activate a signal transduction pathway. Recent reports indicate that the efficacy of a particular ligand can vary depending on the receptor-mediated response measured (e.g. activating G proteins, other downstream responses, internalization). Previously, we reported that inverse agonists induce both homo- and heterologous desensitization, similar to agonist stimulation, at the Gs -coupled 5-HT7 receptor. The primary objective of this study was to determine whether different inverse agonists at the 5-HT7 receptor also induce internalization and/or degradation of 5-HT7 receptors.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

HEK293 cells expressing 5-HT7(a, b or d) receptors were pre-incubated with 5-HT, clozapine, olanzapine, mesulergine or SB269970 and their effects upon receptor density, AC activity, internalization, recruitment of β-arrestins and lysosomal trafficking were measured.

KEY RESULTS

The agonist 5-HT and three out of four inverse agonists tested increased internalization independently of β-arrestin recruitment. Among these, only the atypical antipsychotics clozapine and olanzapine promoted lysosomal sorting and reduced 5-HT7 receptor density (∼60% reduction within 24 h). Inhibition of lysosomal degradation with chloroquine blocked the clozapine- and olanzapine-induced down-regulation of 5-HT7 receptors. Incubation with SB269970 decreased both 5-HT7(b) constitutive internalization and receptor density but increased 5-HT7(d) receptor density, indicating differential ligand regulation among the 5-HT7 splice variants.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Taken together, we found that various ligands differentially activate regulatory processes governing receptor internalization and degradation in addition to signal transduction. Thus, these data extend our understanding of functional selectivity at the 5-HT7 receptor.

A review of the clinical utility of serum clozapine and norclozapine levels

Treatment refractory schizophrenia is a serious issue affecting at least 30% of all patients with schizophrenia despite the continued emergence of new agents aimed at treating this disease. Clozapine therapy remains the most efficacious treatment for patients with schizophrenia who have failed two prior antipsychotics or those deemed an imminent harm to themselves or others. Because data are lacking on how to proceed if a patient should prove nonresponsive to clozapine therapy, the utmost care should be taken to ensure the optimization of clozapine. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is used with many other psychoactive agents to ensure the optimal therapeutic efficacy while minimizing adverse effects. The unique pharmacology of clozapine and the inter- and intraindividual variations in its pharmacokinetics make it a difficult agent with which to use TDM. The consensus is that 350 ng/mL is the lower threshold of therapeutic efficacy to define an adequate trial of clozapine. As of this writing, no clearly defined threshold exists for the upper limit of therapeutic efficacy or toxicity. TDM of clozapine can be useful in the following circumstances: when a clozapine-induced central nervous system toxicity is suspected, a medication that can inhibit or induce the metabolism of clozapine is being added or withdrawn, a change in smoking status has occurred, concerns for medication nonadherence are present, or decompensation while on a previously effective clozapine dosage is observed. The psychiatric pharmacist may play a crucial role in the interpretation and effective utilization of serum clozapine and norclozapine levels. This review will examine the current evidence for the clinical utility of monitoring serum levels of clozapine and its metabolites.

Clozapine and therapeutic drug monitoring: is there sufficient evidence for an upper threshold?

RATIONALE

Clozapine levels are advocated in the monitoring of patients on this drug and have now been used for a number of years. A safety-related threshold has also been proposed, as well as therapeutic lower and upper thresholds. While there has been reasonable consensus regarding a lower therapeutic threshold, this is not the case for the upper thresholds.

OBJECTIVES

Our aim was to review available evidence related to upper thresholds.

METHODS

We carried out an electronic search of different databases and a manual search of articles between 1960 and 2011, cross-referencing the following terms with clozapine-interactions, monitoring, pharmacokinetics, plasma levels, serum levels, and toxicity.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine articles met our search criteria and these could be divided into reviews (11), studies (24), and case reports (35). Study quality was evaluated, and none met criteria for a prospective, randomized controlled trial specifically addressing higher plasma levels, e.g., >500 ng/ml. Case reports emphasize in particular the impact of interactions, e.g., antidepressants and smoking. There is clear evidence indicating a dose-related increased risk of seizures, at least to 500-600 mg/day, but a lack of data to suggest such a relationship between plasma levels, dose, and side effects linked to safety, e.g., seizures, myocarditis, and agranulocytosis. The very limited evidence addressing an upper threshold related to clinical response suggests a "ceiling effect" in the range of 600-838 ng/ml.

CONCLUSIONS

It appears that the current safety-related threshold is not supported by evidence. There may be an upper threshold for clinical response, beyond which chance of response falls off, although further studies are warranted.

Optimizing clozapine treatment

OBJECTIVE

Clozapine treatment remains the gold standard for treatment-resistant schizophrenia, but treatment with clozapine is associated with several side-effects that complicate the use of the drug. This clinical overview aims to provide psychiatrists with knowledge about how to optimize clozapine treatment. Relevant strategies for reducing side-effects and increasing the likelihood of response are discussed.

METHOD

Studies of clozapine available in MEDLINE were reviewed.

RESULTS

A slow up-titration of clozapine is recommended in order to reach the optimal dosage of clozapine and diminish the risk of dose-dependent side-effects. Particularly, in case of partial response or non-response, the use of therapeutic drug monitoring of clozapine is recommended. Plasma levels above the therapeutic threshold of 350-420 ng/ml are necessary to determine non-response to clozapine. To ease the burden of dose-dependent side-effects, dose reduction of clozapine should be tried and combination with another antipsychotic drug may facilitate further dose reduction. For most side-effects, counteracting medication exists. Augmentation with lamotrigine, antipsychotics, or electroconvulsive therapy may be beneficial in case of partial response to clozapine.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with clozapine should be optimized in order to increase the rate of response and to minimize side-effects, thus diminishing the risk of discontinuation and psychotic relapse.

Pimozide augmentation of clozapine inpatients with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder unresponsive to clozapine monotherapy

Despite its superior efficacy, clozapine is helpful in only a subset of patients with schizophrenia unresponsive to other antipsychotics. This lack of complete success has prompted the frequent use of various clozapine combination strategies despite a paucity of evidence from randomized controlled trials supporting their efficacy. Pimozide, a diphenylbutylpiperidine, possesses pharmacological and clinical properties distinct from other typical antipsychotics. An open-label trial of pimozide adjunctive treatment to clozapine provided promising pilot data in support of a larger controlled trial. Therefore, we conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-designed 12-week trial of pimozide adjunctive treatment added to ongoing optimal clozapine treatment in 53 patients with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder partially or completely unresponsive to clozapine monotherapy. An average dose of 6.48 mg/day of pimozide was found to be no better than placebo in combination with clozapine at reducing Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total, positive, negative, and general psychopathology scores. There is no suggestion from this rigorously conducted trial to suggest that pimozide is an effective augmenting agent if an optimal clozapine trial is ineffective. However, given the lack of evidence to guide clinicians and patients when clozapine does not work well, more controlled trials of innovative strategies are warranted.

Clozapine-related EEG changes and seizures: dose and plasma-level relationships

Clozapine is a widely used atypical antipsychotic with a unique effectiveness in treatment-resistant schizophrenia. An important adverse effect is seizures, which have been observed at all stages of clozapine treatment. Valproate has traditionally been considered the drug of choice for the prophylaxis of clozapine seizures, however it may not be the most suitable choice for all patients. There is disagreement as to the best point to prescribe valproate or a suitable antiepileptic: as seizure prophylaxis at a certain clozapine dose or level, or only as remedial treatment. In this review, we examine the relevant literature with an aim to evaluate the following relationships: clozapine dose and electroencephalogram (EEG) abnormalities, plasma levels and EEG abnormalities, dose and occurrence of seizures and plasma levels and occurrence of seizures. Weighted linear regression models were fitted to investigate these relationships. There was a strong relationship between clozapine dose and plasma level and occurrence of clozapine-induced EEG abnormalities. However, a statistically significant relationship between dose and occurrence of seizures was not found. A relationship between clozapine plasma level and occurrence of seizures was not established because of the scarcity of useful data although our review found three case reports which suggested that there is a very substantial risk of seizures with clozapine plasma levels exceeding 1300 μg/l. Seizures are more common during the initiation phase of clozapine treatment, suggesting a slow titration to target plasma levels is desirable. An antiepileptic drug should be considered when the clozapine plasma level exceeds 500 μg/l, if the EEG shows clear epileptiform discharges, if seizures, myoclonic jerks or speech difficulties occur and when there is concurrent use of epileptogenic medication. The antiepileptics of choice for the treatment and prophylaxis of clozapine-induced seizures are valproate (particularly where there is mood disturbance) and lamotrigine (where there is resistance to clozapine).

Agonist activity of N-desmethylclozapine at delta-opioid receptors of human frontal cortex

The clozapine metabolite N-desmethylclozapine (NDMC) has been recently shown to act at different neurotransmitter receptors and to display both antagonist and agonist activities. We have previously reported that in cells over-expressing the recombinant delta-opioid receptor NDMC behaved as partial agonist with high intrinsic activity, but its action at the receptors naturally expressed in human brain remained to be investigated. In the present study, we examined whether NDMC was able to bind to and activate delta-opioid receptors in membranes of post-mortem human frontal cortex. In radioligand binding assays, NDMC competition curves displayed high- (K(i)=26 nM) and low-affinity (K(i)=3 microM) components, whose proportion was regulated by guanine nucleotides in an agonist-like fashion. In functional assays, NDMC stimulated [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding (EC(50)=905 nM) and inhibited cyclic AMP formation (EC(50)=590 nM) as effectively as delta-opioid agonists, whereas clozapine was much less potent and efficacious and clozapine N-oxide was completely inactive. The NDMC agonist activity was potently antagonized by the delta-opioid antagonist naltrindole, but not by the micro-opioid receptor antagonist CTAP (D-phe-Cys-Tyr-D-Trp-Arg-Thr-Pen-Thr-NH(2)) or the kappa-opioid antagonist nor-binaltorphimine. Moreover, blockade of either acetylcholine muscarinic, dopamine D(2) or serotonin 5HT(1A) receptors failed to affect NDMC agonist activity. These data demonstrate that at clinically relevant concentrations NDMC behaves as an efficacious agonist at delta-opioid receptors of human frontal cortex.

N-Desmethylclozapine, a major clozapine metabolite, acts as a selective and efficacious delta-opioid agonist at recombinant and native receptors

The present study examined the effects of N-desmethylclozapine (NDMC), a biologically active metabolite of the atypical antipsychotic clozapine, at cloned human opioid receptors stably expressed in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells and at native opioid receptors present in NG108-15 cells and rat brain. In CHO cells expressing the delta-opioid receptor (CHO/DOR), NDMC behaved as a full agonist both in stimulating [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding (pEC(50)=7.24) and in inhibiting cyclic AMP formation (pEC(50)=6.40). NDMC inhibited [(3)H]naltrindole binding to CHO/DOR membranes with competition curves that were modulated by guanine nucleotides in an agonist-like manner. Determination of intrinsic efficacies by taking into consideration both the maximal [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding stimulation and the extent of receptor occupancy at which half-maximal effect occurred indicated that NDMC had an efficacy value equal to 82% of that of the full delta-opioid receptor agonist DPDPE, whereas clozapine and the other clozapine metabolite clozapine N-oxide displayed much lower levels of agonist efficacy. NDMC exhibited poor agonist activity and lower affinity at the kappa-opioid receptor and was inactive at mu-opioid and NOP receptors. In NG108-15 cells, NDMC inhibited cyclic AMP formation and stimulated the phosphorylation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 by activating the endogenously expressed delta-opioid receptor. Moreover, in membranes of different brain regions, NDMC stimulated [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding and regulated adenylyl cyclase activity and the effects were potently antagonized by naltrindole. These data demonstrate for the first time that NDMC acts as a selective and efficacious delta-opioid receptor agonist and suggest that this unique property may contribute, at least in part, to the clinical actions of the atypical antipsychotic clozapine.

Possible levomepromazine-clozapine interaction: two case reports

OBJECTIVE

To report and comment upon two cases of suspected pharmacological interaction between the "classical" neuroleptic levomepromazine (LMP) and the "atypical" antipsychotic clozapine (CLZ).

CASE SUMMARY

The patients who simultaneously took the two drugs had unusually low plasma levels of CLZ and its metabolites, even though they took high doses of CLZ. The patients were considered "non-responders" to the treatment by the psychiatrist. When LMP was withdrawn from the therapy, plasma concentrations of CLZ returned to therapeutic levels and one of the two patients experienced the anticipated therapeutic response.

DISCUSSION

No information can be found in the literature regarding possible interactions between LMP and CLZ. However, the results of the two cases reported herein point out to a possible lack of therapeutic efficacy of CLZ therapy during this kind of polypharmacy.

CONCLUSION

While two cases are too few to draw any conclusion, it would be prudent on the part of psychiatrists to consider a possible drug interaction in patients receiving both CLZ and LMP who fail to respond to the therapy.

Targeting the dopamine D2 receptor in schizophrenia

After a 12-year search for the antipsychotic receptor, the binding site was discovered and labelled by [3H]haloperidol in 1975. Of the various neurotransmitters, dopamine was the most potent in inhibiting the binding of [3H]haloperidol, indicating that the antipsychotic receptor was a dopamine receptor, now named the dopamine D2 receptor, a major targeting site in schizophrenia. All antipsychotic drugs, including traditional and newer antipsychotics, either bind to D2 in direct relation to their clinical potencies or hinder normal dopamine neurotransmission, as in the case of partial dopamine agonists. In fact, the antipsychotic concentrations found in the plasma water of treated patients closely match the predicted therapeutic absolute concentrations, adjusted for the 60-75% D2 occupancy needed for clinical efficacy. Antipsychotics that elicit low or no Parkinsonism or prolactinaemia are loosely attached to D2 and rapidly dissociate from D2, whereas those eliciting Parkinsonism stay tightly attached to D2 for many hours. Because animal models of psychosis (amfetamine sensitisation, brain lesions) all show a marked elevation in the number of high-affinity states of D2, the antipsychotics are thought to specifically target these D2High states in psychosis in general and schizophrenia in particular.

Simultaneous determination of the antipsychotic drugs levomepromazine and clozapine and their main metabolites in human plasma by a HPLC-UV method with solid-phase extraction

A HPLC method with UV detection has been developed for the simultaneous determination of levomepromazine, clozapine and their main metabolites: N-desmethyl-levomepromazine, levomepromazine sulphoxide, O-desmethyl-levomepromazine, N-desmethylclozapine and clozapine N-oxide. The analytes were separated on a C8 reversed-phase column using a mobile phase composed of acetonitrile and a pH 2.0, 34 mM phosphate buffer containing 0.3% triethylamine (29:71, v/v). Loxapine was used as the internal standard. A reliable biological sample pre-treatment procedure by means of solid-phase extraction on C1 cartridges was implemented, which allows to obtain good extraction yields (>91%) for all analytes and appropriate sample purification from endogenous interference. The method was validated in terms of extraction yield, precision and accuracy. These assays gave RSD% values for precision always lower than 4.9% and mean accuracy values higher than 92%. The method is suitable for the therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of patients undergoing polypharmacy with levomepromazine and clozapine.

Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Atypical Antipsychotics

In the past, the information about the dose-clinical effectiveness of typical antipsychotics was not complete and this led to the risk of extrapyramidal adverse effects. This, together with the intention of improving patients' quality of life and therapeutic compliance, resulted in the development of atypical or second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs). This review will concentrate on the pharmacokinetics and metabolism of clozapine, risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine, amisulpride, ziprasidone, aripiprazole and sertindole, and will discuss the main aspects of their pharmacodynamics. In psychopharmacology, therapeutic drug monitoring studies have generally concentrated on controlling compliance and avoiding adverse effects by keeping long-term exposure to the minimal effective blood concentration. The rationale for using therapeutic drug monitoring in relation to SGAs is still a matter of debate, but there is growing evidence that it can improve efficacy, especially when patients do not respond to therapeutic doses or when they develop adverse effects. Here, we review the literature concerning the relationships between plasma concentrations of SGAs and clinical responses by dividing the studies on the basis of the length of their observation periods. Studies with clozapine evidenced a positive relationship between plasma concentrations and clinical response, with a threshold of 350-420 ng/mL associated with good clinical response. The usefulness of therapeutic drug monitoring is well established because high plasma concentrations of clozapine can increase the risk of epileptic seizures. Plasma clozapine concentrations seem to be influenced by many factors such as altered cytochrome P450 1A4 activity, age, sex and smoking. The pharmacological effects of risperidone depend on the sum of the plasma concentrations of risperidone and its 9-hydroxyrisperidone metabolite, so monitoring the plasma concentrations of the parent compound alone can lead to erroneous interpretations. Despite a large variability in plasma drug concentrations, the lack of studies using fixed dosages, and discrepancies in the results, it seems that monitoring the plasma concentrations of the active moiety may be useful. However, no therapeutic plasma concentration range for risperidone has yet been clearly established. A plasma threshold concentration for parkinsonian side effects has been found to be 74 ng/mL. Moreover, therapeutic drug monitoring may be particularly useful in the switch between the oral and the long-acting injectable form. The reviewed studies on olanzapine strongly indicate a relationship between clinical outcomes and plasma concentrations. Olanzapine therapeutic drug monitoring can be considered very useful in assessing therapeutic efficacy and controlling adverse events. A therapeutic range of 20-50 ng/mL has been found. There is little evidence in favour of the existence of a relationship between plasma quetiapine concentrations and clinical responses, and an optimal therapeutic range has not been identified. Positron emission tomography studies of receptor blockade indicated a discrepancy between the time course of receptor occupancy and plasma quetiapine concentrations. The value of quetiapine plasma concentration monitoring in clinical practice is still controversial. Preliminary data suggested that a therapeutic plasma amisulpride concentration of 367 ng/mL was associated with clinical improvement. A therapeutic range of 100-400 ng/mL is proposed from non-systematic clinical experience. There is no direct evidence concerning optimal plasma concentration ranges of ziprasidone, aripiprazole or sertindole.

Therapeutic Monitoring of Clozapine in Australia: The Need for Consensus

In the absence of well-defined guidelines for the monitoring of plasma concentrations of clozapine, this study examined the practices of seven laboratories from four states in Australia. Laboratories analyzed 5 freeze-dried serum samples containing a mixture of clozapine and norclozapine in varying concentrations and the measurement data were analyzed for accuracy and precision. Additional information on laboratory practices was obtained through questionnaire responses. Measurement precision amongst the laboratories was good but there were significant differences in the accuracy of measurements from one laboratory. There were differences in the ranges for which assays had been validated and in suggested therapeutic ranges. These differences could have a significant impact on the interpretation of measured concentrations and patient care, and emphasize the need for consensus in this area. Repeat concentration measurements are recommended in the case of drug concentration measurements that are inconsistent with clinical observations or previous measurements.

Plasma clozapine levels and clinical response in treatment-refractory Chinese schizophrenic patients

PURPOSE

To evaluate clinical efficacy of clozapine in relation with its plasma level in a group of Chinese patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia. In addition, the relationship between plasma level and side effects were examined.

METHOD

Fifty-one patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia were put on a fixed dose of clozapine at 300 mg/day for 6 weeks. Non-responders to week 6 received 500 mg/day in subsequent 6 weeks. Responders to week 6 continued to receive 300 mg/day. Clozapine plasma levels were checked at weeks 6 and 12.

FINDINGS

No association was found between clozapine plasma level, response and side effects. Sodium valproate was found to elevate clozapine plasma level while lowering norclozapine/clozapine ratio.

CONCLUSION

Clozapine plasma level was not found to be associated with response and side effect in Chinese treatment-resistant schizophrenic patients. Various explanations were postulated for the lack of relationship observed between clozapine plasma level and response in this population.

Time course of dopamine D2 receptor occupancy by clozapine with medium and high plasma concentrations

Most antipsychotics were thought to induce antipsychotic action at an excess of 70% striatal dopamine D2 receptor occupancy, while the clinical dose of clozapine was reported to show less than 60% occupancy. High-dose clozapine could occupy as high as 80% of striatal dopamine D2 receptor in monkey PET studies. Although the time course of dopamine D2 receptor occupancy is an important property of antipsychotics, that by clozapine has not been investigated in a clinical setting. We measured the time course of extrastriatal dopamine D2 receptor occupancy with different doses of clozapine and evaluated whether the measured occupancies fitted the binding theory. Three consecutive PET scans with [11C]FLB 457 were performed for two patients with schizophrenia, chronically taking 600 mg/day and 200 mg/day of clozapine, respectively. Series of occupancies were also measured in combination with fluvoxamine or paroxetine in one patient. Dopamine D2 receptor occupancies were also simulated using individual clozapine plasma data and previously determined in vivo ED50 value. The occupancy of one patient with high plasma concentration (1207 ng/ml at peak time) was around 75% at peak and around 60% after 26 h. Another patient with medium plasma concentration (649 ng/ml at peak time) showed less than 50% occupancy at peak, decreasing to 15% after 25 h. The measured occupancy values fitted well with the simulated occupancy values. At high plasma concentration, clozapine can induce high extrastriatal dopamine D2 receptor occupancy in the human brain, and this finding fitted well with the theoretical estimation.

Predictors and markers of clozapine response

RATIONALE

With other atypical antipsychotics now available, having predictors of clozapine response would be of considerable value, offering clinicians guidance in their decision as to when, and if, a trial of clozapine is warranted.

OBJECTIVES

The aim was to review existing evidence regarding identified predictors and markers of clozapine response.

METHODS

Relevant studies were identified through PUBMED searches (1975-June 2004) and cross-referencing of reviews and included studies. The data were summarized under two main categories: clinical (general, neurological, cognitive/neuropsychological, clozapine levels) and biological (biochemical, endocrine, genetic, metabolic, morphological, dopamine D2 receptor occupancy). 'Reliable' predictors/markers were defined a priori as those with support of at least two independent reports that addressed overall response, with no contradictory findings to date. 'Potential' predictors/markers had the support of a single report that addressed overall response and at least one other evaluating treatment outcome but not directly addressing response status.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Higher baseline clinical symptoms and functioning in the previous years and low cerebrospinal homovanillic acid/5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid levels were identified as reliable. Three potential measures were identified: reduction of frontal cortex metabolic activity, reduction of caudate volume, and improvement in P50 sensory gating.

What is an adequate trial with clozapine?: therapeutic drug monitoring and time to response in treatment-refractory schizophrenia

Clozapine is the gold standard and 'last resort' in treatment of refractory schizophrenia. It is important to know whether a trial with clozapine is adequate or not. Six studies show a significantly higher response rate at clozapine plasma trough levels above a therapeutic threshold of 350-400 micro g/L. The absolute risk reduction is about 40%. An additional study found best results with plasma levels between 300 and 700 micro g/L, and one (probably too small) study could not detect a significantly different response rate for 350-450 micro g/L in comparison to 200-300 micro g/L. In addition, two extension studies showed conversion from nonresponders to responders if plasma levels increased above the threshold. Investigations on time to response in treatment with clozapine are often hampered by not controlling for time until plateau of dose titration or clozapine concentration. One of the better studies found 34 responders within 8 weeks after the last dose escalation. The remaining 16 non-responding patients did not change their status during a mean follow-up of 75 weeks. A second 1 year trial found a superior differential response rate for clozapine in comparison to haloperidol only during the first 6 weeks. A third study combined regular clozapine plasma level assays with assessment of response status. At the time of response 17 out of 19 responders showed clozapine concentrations above 350 micro g/L. The nine non-responders remained below this threshold throughout the rest of the year. These results favour an approach of raising the clozapine plasma level in treatment-refractory schizophrenic patients who do not respond to an initial low-to-medium dose treatment with clozapine. Some patients, especially young male smokers, will need dosages higher than 900 mg/day. Addition of low-dose fluvoxamine while closely monitoring clozapine levels can help decrease the high number of necessary pills. An adequate trial with clozapine should last at least 8 weeks on a plasma trough level above 350-400 micro g/L.

Serum clozapine levels: a review of their clinical utility

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is frequently utilized in the treatment of psychiatric conditions, but its clinical application concerning the use of clozapine is unclear. We present three case reports of patients taking clozapine, review the relevant literature, and propose guidelines to aid the clinical use of TDM of clozapine. Due to its complex metabolism, there are significant inter- and intra-individual variations in clozapine serum levels, for a given dose. However, the range of serum levels that corresponds with toxicity remains unclear. Although central nervous system side-effects may correlate with serum level, many adverse effects of clozapine appear to be unrelated, including haematological and cardiac events. There are numerous clinically significant interactions between clozapine and other substances, including prescribed medications, nicotine and caffeine. TDM of clozapine may be of clinical value in certain situations, such as poor clinical response; signs of toxicity; onset of seizures; changes in concurrent medication, caffeine or nicotine; liver disease; and suspected non-compliance. The current literature does not support the routine testing of serum clozapine levels in everyday clinical practice.

Serum level of clozapine and relapse

The case of a young female patient is reported who was diagnosed as having her first manifestation of a paranoid schizophrenic psychosis and who was treated, mainly with clozapine, at the university psychiatric clinic for 3 years, i.e. subsequent episodes are included. Serum levels of clozapine were measured 29 times. Thus, a rather narrow-meshed schedule of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of clozapine was applied. It was found that relapses occurred repeatedly at low serum levels of 48, 109, and 138 ng/mL because of noncompliance by the patient during outpatient treatment, and also because the dose was lowered too hastily after partial response during inpatient treatment. Intoxication was evident at a high serum level of clozapine of 1158 ng/mL during a trial with a dose of 800 mg/d, although moderate serum levels had been found at the same dose some months before. It is concluded that TDM should be considered as being an adjunct to the treatment of schizophrenic and schizoaffective patients with clozapine, not only during inpatient treatment, but also during maintenance outpatient treatment.

The new genetics of schizophrenia

Despite the genetic and phenotypic complexity of schizophrenia, much progress has been made. Research has largely excluded the possibility that genes of major effect exist; linkage analysis has provided independently replicated evidence for genes of moderate effect on several chromosomal regions. Association studies suggest that alleles of at least two genes, those encoding D3 and 5HT2A, confer a small rise in susceptibility to schizophrenia, and there are convergent findings from several different lines of research implicating regions such as 22q11, although no specific causative genes for schizophrenia have been definitively identified yet. There are strong grounds for optimism as larger samples are collected to increase the power of studies, and novel methods of statistical analysis and large-scale genotyping of SNPs are developed and refined. Although the difficulties and challenges of genetics research into schizophrenia are formidable, the devastating personal and social consequences of the illness make it imperative that these challenges are faced, because the identification of susceptibility genes for schizophrenia would result in further productive neurobiologic research and ultimately improvements in the prevention and treatment of schizophrenia.

CYP1A2 activity as measured by a caffeine test predicts clozapine and active metabolite steady-state concentrationin patients with schizophrenia

Clozapine is an atypical antipsychotic drug and displays efficacy in 30% to 60% of patients with schizophrenia who do not respond to traditional antipsychotics. A clozapine concentration greater than 1,150 nmol/L increases the probability of antipsychotic efficacy. However, plasma clozapine concentration can vary more than 45-fold during long-term treatment. The aim of this study was to assess the contribution of CYP1A2 to variability in steady-state concentration of clozapine and its active metabolite norclozapine. Patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder were prospectively monitored during clozapine treatment (N = 18). The in vivo CYP1A2 activity was measured using the caffeine metabolic ratio (CMR) in overnight urine. Trough plasma samples were drawn after at least 5 days of treatment with a constant regimen of clozapine. A significant negative association was found between the CMR and the dose-corrected clozapine (r(s) = -0.87,p < 0.01) and norclozapine (r(s) = -0.76,p < 0.01) concentrations. Nonsmokers displayed a higher clozapine (3.2-fold) and norclozapine (2.3-fold) concentration than smokers (p < 0.05). Furthermore, there was marked person-to-person variation in CYP1A2 activity during multiple-dose clozapine treatment (coefficient of variation = 60%). Age, weight, serum creatinine, and grapefruit juice consumption did not significantly contribute to variability in clozapine and norclozapine concentration (p > 0.05). In conclusion, CYP1A2 is one of the important contributors to disposition of clozapine during multiple-dose treatment. Although further in vitro experiments are necessary, the precise metabolic pathways catalyzed by CYP1A2 seem to be subsequent to the formation of norclozapine, hitherto less recognized quantitatively important alternate disposition routes, or both. From a clinical perspective, an environmentally induced or constitutively high CYP1A2 expression can lead to a decrease in steady-state concentration of clozapine as well as its active metabolite norclozapine. Thus, interindividual variability in CYP1A2 activity may potentially explain treatment resistance to clozapine in some patients. CYP1A2 phenotyping with a simple caffeine test may contribute to individualization of clozapine dosage and differentiate between treat ment noncompliance and high CYP1A2 activity.

Clozapine pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics studied with Cyp1A2-null mice

The aim of this study was to use the CYP1A2-null mouse to investigate the in-vivo contribution of CYP1A2 to clozapine pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. An intraperitoneal injection of 10 mg/kg clozapine was administered to four male CYP1A2 -/- mice and four male wild-type mice. Clozapine, desmethylclozapine, and clozapine N-oxide concentrations in sequential tail blood samples were measured by HPLC with UV detection. Behavioural parameters were recorded at each time point. The area under the curve (AUC) of clozapine was 2.6 times greater, the clearance of clozapine was 2.6 times slower, and the half-life was 1.2 times longer in the CYP1A2 -/- mice (p = 0.0143) as compared to the wild-type mice. Sixty-one percent of the clozapine clearance in wild-type mice was calculated to be mediated by CYP1A2. The AUC of desmethylclozapine was 1.6 times lower in the CYP1A2 -/- mice compared to the wild-type mice (p = 0.0286), while there was a trend for the AUC of clozapine N-oxide to be greater in the CYP1A2 -/- mice (p = 0.0571). The CYP1A2 -/- mice were significantly more drowsy and showed more motor impairment (p = 0.0145) and myoclonus than the wild-type mice. Our results indicate that, in vivo, CYP1A2 is the major determinant of clozapine clearance, contributes significantly to the demethylation of clozapine, and has a negligible contribution to the N-oxidation. Our data also indicate that CYP1A2 poor metabolizers might be more susceptible than extensive metabolizers to dose-related adverse effects of clozapine, such as sedation, myoclonus and seizures.

Rapid capillary electrophoretic method for the determination of clozapine and desmethylclozapine in human plasma

A rapid and sensitive high-performance capillary electrophoretic method for the determination of clozapine and its main metabolite desmethylclozapine in human plasma was developed. The separation of the two analytes was carried out in an untreated fused-silica capillary [33 cm (8.5 cm effective length) x 50 microm I.D.] filled with a background electrolyte at pH 2.5 containing beta-cyclodextrin. Baseline separation of clozapine and desmethylclozapine was recorded in less than 3 min. An accurate sample pretreatment by means of solid-phase extraction and subsequent concentration allows for reliable quantitation of clozapine in the plasma of schizophrenic patients under treatment with the drug. The method showed good precision (mean RSD = 4.0%) as well as satisfactory extraction yields (approximately 88%) and a good sensitivity (limit of quantitation = 0.075 microg ml(-1), limit of detection = 0.025 microg ml(-1)).

Therapeutic drug monitoring of clozapine: an unexpected outcome

A patient is described who died with the diagnosis of septicemia. After her death the delayed results of a clozapine determination for TDM were sent to the clinician. The clozapine serum level was 4034 microg/L, which was considered to be the primary cause of death. However, a forensic autopsy revealed unexpected metastases of unknown origin with gross liver involvement. Thus the high clozapine levels were judged to be secondary to liver failure. This case is an example of an unexpected outcome of TDM.

Significant interaction between clozapine and cocaine in cocaine addicts

Because clozapine may be prescribed to cocaine abusing patients with schizophrenia, we studied cocaine-clozapine interactions in a controlled setting. Eight male cocaine addicts underwent four oral challenges with ascending doses of clozapine (12.5, 25 and 50 mg) and placebo followed 2 h later by a 2-mg/kg dose of intranasal cocaine. Subjective and physiological responses, and serum cocaine levels were measured over a total 4-h period. Clozapine pretreatment increased cocaine levels during the study and significantly increased the peak serum cocaine levels in a dose dependent manner. In spite of this elevation in blood levels, clozapine pretreatment had a significant diminishing effect upon subjective responses to cocaine, including 'expected high', 'high' and 'rush', notably at the 50 mg dose. There was also a significant effect upon 'sleepiness', 'paranoia' and 'nervous'. Clozapine caused a significant near-syncopal episode in one subject in the study, requiring his removal from the study. Clozapine had no significant effect on baseline pulse rate and systolic blood pressure, but it attenuated the significant pressor effects of the single dose of intranasal cocaine. These data suggested a possible therapeutic role for clozapine in the treatment of cocaine addiction in humans, but also suggests caution due to the near-syncopal event and the increase in serum cocaine levels.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of psychotropic medications

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of a number of psychotropic medications has proven to be of value, enabling minimization of the limitations of considerable genetic variability in their metabolism and the high rates of poor compliance with many psychiatric disorders. Therapeutic ranges have been established for lithium, some of the tricyclic antidepressants, and clozapine. TDM has also been shown to be useful in avoiding toxicity (as many psychotropics have narrow therapeutic indices), particularly that due to interactions with other compounds.

Tolerability of atypical antipsychotics

Atypical antipsychotics are expected to be better tolerated than older antipsychotics because of their lower propensity to cause certain adverse effects. All atypical drugs have been shown to cause fewer acute extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) than a standard typical agent (usually haloperidol) and some (clozapine, sertindole and quetiapine) appear to cause these effects no more often than placebo. In the longer term, clozapine, olanzapine and (less robustly) other atypical antipsychotics are thought to cause less tardive dyskinesia than typical antipsychotics. Problems caused by hyperprolactinaemia occur less often with some atypical antipsychotics than with typical drugs although risperidone and amisulpride appear to have no advantages in this respect. Other adverse effects may occur as frequently with some atypical antipsychotics as with some typical drugs. Clozapine, risperidone and quetiapine are known to cause postural hypotension; clozapine, olanzapine and quetiapine are clearly sedative; and anticholinergic effects are commonly seen with clozapine, and, much less frequently, with olanzapine. Some adverse effects are more frequent with atypical drugs. Idiosyncratic effects seem particularly troublesome with clozapine and, to a lesser extent, sertindole, olanzapine and zotepine. Bodyweight gain is probably more problematic with atypical antipsychotics than with typical drugs. Overall tolerability, as judged by withdrawals from therapy, is not clearly proven to be better with atypical drugs, although some individual trials do indicate an advantage with atypical agents. Differences in tolerability between individual atypical antipsychotics have not been clearly shown. The tolerability profile of atypical drugs certainly benefits from a lower incidence of acute EPS effects, along with less certain or less uniform benefits in symptomatic hyperprolactinaemia or tardive dyskinesia. Other, perhaps more trivial, adverse effects militate against their good tolerability, and effects such as bodyweight gain may severely reduce tolerability. Without clear advantages in tolerability in patient groups used in trials, drug choice in regard to adverse effects should continue to be on a patient to patient basis.

Cytochrome P450 and therapeutic drug monitoring with respect to clozapine

Clozapine is an atypical antipsychotic drug that is mainly used for the treatment of refractory schizophrenia. Clozapine is eliminated by oxidation in the liver, predominantly by cytochrome P4501A2 (CYP1A2). Due to the influence of inhibitors, inducers and genetic factors on CYP1A2-activity, several studies have reported a very large interindividual variability in clozapine plasma concentrations at a fixed dose. A number of methods have been published for the measurement of clozapine and metabolites in plasma. Plasma concentrations are most frequently measured by high-performance liquid chromatography. Most methods measure clozapine and the main metabolite, norclozapine, whereas two methods measure clozapine and two metabolites. Several studies suggest that a minimum effective clozapine plasma concentration of >350 microg/l must be achieved in order to ensure acceptable clinical response, whereas the upper limit of the therapeutic interval not yet has been clearly defined. The occurrence of agranulocytosis, the most serious side-effect of clozapine treatment does not seem to be dose-related and it is not possible to predict which patients are at risk of developing agranulocytosis. The risk of central nervous system side-effects seems to increase with concentrations above 1300 microg/l. Monitoring of clozapine plasma concentrations is recommended during concomitant use of other drugs that are known to interact with the oxidation of clozapine, such as carbamazepine (inducer) or fluvoxamine (inhibitor). Overall, it is concluded that therapeutic drug monitoring may be of value in the clinical management of clozapine.

Distribution of clozapine and desmethylclozapine between blood and brain in rats

Desmethylclozapine is the major metabolite of clozapine in serum. Although the metabolite is pharmacologically active in vitro, the occurrence of desmethylclozapine in brain under steady-state conditions and its role for clinical actions of clozapine are unclear. In this study 20 male Sprague-Dawley rats received five oral doses of clozapine 20 mg/kg at 1.5-h intervals. At 0.5, 1, 2 and 5 h after the last administration, at a time four animals were killed for analysis of clozapine and desmethylclozapine concentrations in serum and brain. The treatment yielded steady-state serum concentrations of clozapine that are considered as therapeutically effective in man. Desmethylclozapine concentrations exceeded those of clozapine at 2-5 h after drug application. In brain, drug concentrations were 15.8-fold higher for clozapine than in serum, but only 2.7-fold higher for desmethylclozapine. The brain clozapine concentrations exceeded those of desmethylclozapine by about 3 times. These data indicate that desmethylclozapine is unlikely to play a role for CNS-mediated effects.

Pharmacoclinical strategy in neuroleptic resistant schizophrenic patients treated by clozapine: clinical evolution, concentration of plasma and red blood cell clozapine and desmethylclozapine, whole blood serotonin and tryptophan

1. The aim of the study was to determine if a more rational therapeutic approach could be devised for neuroleptic resistant psychotic patients treated for months and years with clozapine. Clozapine is an atypical antipsychotic medication, but its therapeutic benefit has been limited by a high incidence of agranulocytosis and seizures. 2. The study has been performed in an open setting and included 12 patients. Some of them developed a secondary depression and were treated with fluoxetine. 3. Pharmacokinetic analysis were conducted at the same time as clinical evaluations, grading using the BPRS, the PDS, and QLS, and determinations of plasma and red blood cell clozapine and desmethylclozapine, plasma and RBC fluoxetine and norfluoxetine, whole blood serotonin and tryptophan. 4. A positive linear correlation was found only between RBC concentration and the evolution of the QLS. 5. Clozapine is efficacious both on positive and negative symptoms but its mechanism of action remains unclear. Positive symptoms disappear more quickly, sometimes followed by a post psychotic depression. Negative symptoms improve more slowly but regularly. They seem to be correlated with serotoninergic mechanisms. For whole blood 5HT, an important increase was seen about 4 weeks after Cloza administration, and then a decrease. 6. Therapeutic drug monitoring (on the same sample drawn for haematological monitoring providing) could play a useful role in the management of patients treated by clozapine: compliance, lowest dose, possible toxicity, drug interaction, lack of efficacy, relapse predictivity.