Osteoradionecrosis of the Mandible

Prognostic Factors of Mandibular Osteoradionecrosis Including Accurate Colocalization of Avulsions and Dosimetric Dental Mapping Software, a Case-control Study

PURPOSE

Osteoradionecrosis (ORN) of the mandible remains a significant complication in the intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) era. Dental dose cannot be predicted from heterogeneous IMRT dose distributions; mandibular dose metrics cannot guide dentist avulsion decisions in high-risk ORN situations. Using a mapping tool to report dental root dose, avulsions, and ORN sites, we re-examined ORN risk factors in a case-control study.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From 2008 to 2019, 897 consecutive patients with oral cavity/oropharynx or unknown primary cancer undergoing IMRT were analyzed to identify ORN cases. These were matched (1 ORN/2 controls) retrospectively for tumor location, surgery, and tobacco consumption in a monocentric case-control study. Univariate and multivariate analyses integrated ORN factors and accurate dental dose data (grouped into 4 mandibular sectors). Generalizability was investigated in a simulated population database.

RESULTS

A total of 171 patients were included. The median follow-up was 5.2 and 4.5 years in the ORN and control groups, respectively. The median time to ORN was 12 months. In univariate analysis, post-IMRT avulsions at the ORN site (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.6; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.5-8.9; P = .005), tumor laterality (HR, 4.4; 95% CI, = 1.4-14, P = .01), mean mandibular dose (HR, 1.1; 95% CI, = 1.01-1.1; P = .018) and mean dose to the ORN site (HR, 1.1; 95% CI, = 1.1-1.2; P < .001) correlated with higher ORN risk. In multivariate analysis, mean dose to the ORN site (HR, 1.1; 95% CI, = 1.1-1.2; P < .001) and post-IMRT avulsions at the ORN site (HR, 4.6; 95% CI, = 1.5-14.7; P = .009) were associated with ORN. For each increase in gray in dental dose, the ORN risk increased by 12%. Simulations confirmed study observations.

CONCLUSIONS

Dental dose and avulsions are associated with ORN, with a 12% increase in risk with each additional gray. Accurate dose information can help dentists in their decisions after IMRT.

The extent of unnecessary tooth loss due to extractions prior to radiotherapy based on radiation field and dose in patients with head and neck cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Prior to radiotherapy (RT), teeth with poor prognosis that pose a risk for post-RT osteoradionecrosis (ORN) are removed. To allow enough time for adequate wound healing prior to RT, decisions are made based on the estimated radiation dose. This study aimed to gain insight into (1) the overall number of teeth extracted and (2) the patient and tumor characteristics associated with the number of redundantly extracted teeth.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with head and neck cancer (HNC), treated with RT between 2015 and 2019, were included in this cross-sectional study. For each extracted tooth the radiation dose was calculated retrospectively. The cut-off point for valid extraction was set at ≥ 40 Gy in accordance with the national protocol. Potential factors for doses ≥ 40 Gy were identified, including age, sex, tumor location, tumor (T) and nodal stage (N), overall tumor stage and number of teeth extracted.

RESULTS

A total of 1759 teeth were removed from 358 patients. Of these 1759 teeth, 1274 (74%) appeared to have been removed redundantly, based on the mean dose (Dmean) of < 40 Gy. Using the maximum dose (Dmax) of < 40 Gy, 1080 teeth (61%) appeared to have been removed redundantly. Tumor location and N-classification emerged as the most important associative variables in the multivariable regression analysis.

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge this is the first study to provide insight into the amount of teeth redundantly extracted prior to RT and represents a step forward in de-escalating the damage to the masticatory system prior to RT.

Contouring quality assurance methodology based on multiple geometric features against deep learning auto-segmentation

BACKGROUND

Contouring error is one of the top failure modes in radiation treatment. Multiple efforts have been made to develop tools to automatically detect segmentation errors. Deep learning-based auto-segmentation (DLAS) has been used as a baseline for flagging manual segmentation errors, but those efforts are limited to using only one or two contour comparison metrics.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this research is to develop an improved contouring quality assurance system to identify and flag manual contouring errors.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

DLAS contours were used as a reference to compare with manually segmented contours. A total of 27 geometric agreement metrics were determined from the comparisons between the two segmentation approaches. Feature selection was performed to optimize the training of a machine learning classification model to identify potential contouring errors. A public dataset with 339 cases was used to train and test the classifier. Four independent classifiers were trained using five-fold cross validation, and the predictions from each classifier were ensembled using soft voting. The trained model was validated on a held-out testing dataset. An additional independent clinical dataset with 60 cases was used to test the generalizability of the model. Model predictions were reviewed by an expert to confirm or reject the findings.

RESULTS

The proposed machine learning multiple features (ML-MF) approach outperformed traditional nonmachine-learning-based approaches that are based on only one or two geometric agreement metrics. The machine learning model achieved recall (precision) values of 0.842 (0.899), 0.762 (0.762), 0.727 (0.842), and 0.773 (0.773) for Brainstem, Parotid_L, Parotid_R, and mandible contours, respectively compared to 0.526 (0.909), 0.619 (0.765), 0.682 (0.882), 0.773 (0.568) for an approach based solely on Dice similarity coefficient values. In the external validation dataset, 66.7, 93.3, 94.1, and 58.8% of flagged cases were confirmed to have contouring errors by an expert for Brainstem, Parotid_L, Parotid_R, and mandible contours, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed ML-MF approach, which includes multiple geometric agreement metrics to flag manual contouring errors, demonstrated superior performance in comparison to traditional methods. This method is easy to implement in clinical practice and can help to reduce the significant time and labor costs associated with manual segmentation and review.

Association between tooth extraction during radiotherapy and the risk of osteoradionecrosis in patients with head and neck cancers

PURPOSE

It is commonly recommended that tooth extraction should be performed prior to radiotherapy (RT) in patients with head neck cancer to prevent osteoradionecrosis (ORN). However, doctors still occasionally encounter patients who require tooth extraction during RT. This study aimed to determine the risk of ORN in patients who undergo tooth extraction during RT.

METHODS

Data were collected from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database. We retrospectively enrolled 24,412 patients with head and neck cancer treated with radiotherapy between 2011 and 2017. The associations between ORN and demographic characteristics, timing of tooth extraction, and treatments were examined using univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models.

RESULTS

A total of 24,412 head and neck cancer patients were enrolled; 133 patients underwent tooth extraction during RT and 24,279 patients did not undergo tooth extraction during RT. Tooth extraction during RT was not associated with a significantly higher risk of ORN (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.303, P = 0.4862). Tumor site, RT dose ≥ 60 Gy, age < 55 y/o, mandibulectomy, chronic periodontitis, and chemotherapy were significantly associated with a higher risk of ORN.

CONCLUSION

The risk of ORN in head and neck cancer is not significantly different between patients who undergo tooth extraction during RT and patients who do not undergo tooth extraction during RT.

Overview of radiotherapy-induced chronic pain in childhood cancer survivors: A narrative review

Radiotherapy is an important aspect of oncological treatment in several childhood cancers. However, radiotherapy is known to have numerous side effects, including detrimental effects on growth, neurocognitive impairment, and the development of secondary malignancies. One less studied long-term side effect of pediatric radiotherapy treatment is chronic pain. While the short-term toxicities of radiotherapy resolve over a few weeks to months, the chronic pain caused by radiotherapy-induced tissue damage can significantly affect children's quality of life. As long-term childhood cancer survivors age into adulthood, they are typically followed up by a wide variety of doctors, not all of whom may be familiar with radiotherapy-induced chronic pain and its management. The aim of this review is to discuss the various common manifestations of radiotherapy-related pain in children, as well as ways to identify and manage these. Common radiotherapy-related side effects leading to chronic pain symptoms include radiation fibrosis, enteritis, dermatitis, lymphedema, neuropathic pain, and effects on bone development. The pathophysiology, evaluation and management of these are briefly summarized in this review. This is followed by an overview of radiotherapy techniques that allow greater sparing of normal tissue, minimizing future painful side effects. Finally, the assessment of pain in children is described, as well as strategies for management, and red flag symptoms that should prompt urgent specialist referral. In conclusion, a good understanding of the long-term side effects of radiotherapy treatment in children is essential for the various medical professionals that follow-up the child in the years after treatment. For young children, the evaluation of pain is in itself a challenge, and effects on growth, development, and learning are crucial. For older children, social and psychological factors become increasingly important. As radiation therapy techniques continue to advance, the spectrum and incidence of chronic pain syndromes may change over time.

Osteoradionecrosis rate in oropharynx cancer treated with dose volume histogram based constraints

OBJECTIVES

Mandibular dose constraints are designed to limit high dose to small volumes to avoid osteoradionecrosis (ORN). Based upon a published experience, intermediate-dose constraints were introduced but have not been independently validated. We hypothesize that these constraints lower ORN rate without compromising other organs at risk (OAR).

METHODS

Oropharyngeal cancer patients treated with standard fractionation adjuvant/definitive VMAT from 01/2014-08/2020 were included. In 09/2017, mandibular dose constraint was changed from historical constraint (HC) of D 0.1 cc < 70 Gy to modified constraints (MC) of V 44 Gy < 42%, V 58 Gy < 25%, D 0.5 cc < 70 Gy. OAR dosimetric changes and ORN development were evaluated. Regression modelling predicted long-term ORN cases in MC group.

RESULTS

There were 174 patients, 71 in MC group. Seven cases of ORN in HC group at a median follow up (FU) of 39 months and 1 case of ORN in MC group at a median FU of 11 months were observed. More patients in the MC group met V 44 Gy (87% vs 62%, p < 0.01) and V 58 Gy constraints (92% vs 73%, p < 0.01). Mean doses to OARs did not rise. Mandible V 44 Gy and V 58 Gy were significantly associated with ORN (p < 0.01 and p = 0.03, respectively) across all patients. In the HC group, V 44 Gy was independently associated with ORN (p = 0.01). To account for shorter FU in MC group, logistic regression of ORN based on V 44 Gy in HC patients was performed. This predicts 3.2 ORN cases in the MC group (95% CI: 0.00-6.4).

CONCLUSION

Achieving V 44 Gy and V 58 Gy was successful in 87% of cases without sacrificing target coverage or OARs and resulted in non-significant ORN decrease.

Factors Associated with Treatment Outcomes and Pathological Features in Patients with Osteoradionecrosis: A Retrospective Study

A standard treatment for osteoradionecrosis (ORN) has not yet been established because of the diversity. Therefore, identifying the risk factors for a poor prognosis is essential. This study retrospectively investigated the factors associated with the prognosis of ORN in 68 patients. Relevant clinical data of all patients were obtained. Of the patients, 16 who underwent extensive surgery underwent histopathological analysis. The necrotic changes of the anterior and posterior margins in the cortical and cancellous bones were investigated. Multivariate analyses showed statistically significant associations between poor prognosis in patients with ORN and high radiation dose (hazard ratio [HR] 1.15), orocutaneous fistula (HR 2.93), and absence of sequestration (HR 2.49). Histopathological analysis showed a viable anterior margin of the middle portion of the cortical bone for all recovered cases; in contrast, most cases (75%) with a poor prognosis showed necrotic changes. The anterior margin of the cancellous bone was viable and resilient to high irradiation, regardless of the prognosis. These results suggest that patients with orocutaneous fistula should receive early surgical intervention, even if the affected area is limited or asymptomatic. In extensive surgery, a sufficient safety margin of necrotic bone, particularly in the anterior region, is required to improve the prognosis.

Three-Dimensional Evaluation of Isodose Radiation Volumes in Cases of Severe Mandibular Osteoradionecrosis for the Prediction of Recurrence after Segmental Resection

Background: Pre-operative margin planning for the segmental resection of affected bone in mandibular osteoradionecrosis (ORN) is difficult. The aim of this study was to identify a possible relation between the received RT dose, exposed bone volume and the progression of ORN after segmental mandibular resection. Method: Patients diagnosed with grade 3-4 ORN for which a segmental resection was performed were included in the study. Three-dimensional reconstructions of RT isodose volumes were fused with postoperative imaging. The primary outcome was the recurrence of ORN after segmental resection. Subsequently, RT exposed mandibular bone volumes were calculated and the location of the bone cuts relative to the isodose volumes were assessed. Results: Five out of thirty-three patients developed recurrent ORN after segmental mandibular resection. All cases with recurrent ORN were resected inside an isodose volume of ≥56 Gy. The absolute mandibular volume radiated with 56 Gy was significantly smaller in the recurrent group (10.9 mL vs. 30.7 mL, p = 0.006), as was the proportion of the mandible radiated with 56 Gy (23% vs. 45%, p = 0.013). Conclusion: The volume of radiated bone was not predictive for risk of progression. The finding that recurrent ORN occurred with bone resection margins within the 56 Gy isodose volume suggests that this could serve as a starting point for the pre-operative planning of reducing the risk of ORN recurrence.

Hyperbaric oxygen treatment of mandibular osteoradionecrosis: Combined data from the two randomized clinical trials DAHANCA-21 and NWHHT2009-1

PURPOSE

Osteoradionecrosis (ORN) of the mandible is a serious complication of head and neck radiotherapy. This study aims to investigate the effect of hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) treatment on ORN in two randomized, controlled multicentre trials.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients with ORN with indication for surgical treatment were randomised to either group 1: surgical removal of necrotic mandibular bone supplemented by 30 pre- and 10 postoperative HBO exposures at 243 kPa for 90 min each, or group 2: surgical removal of necrotic bone only. Primary outcome was healing of ORN one year after surgery evaluated by a clinically adjusted version of the Common Toxicity Criteria of Adverse Events (CTCAE) v 3.0. Secondary outcomes included xerostomia, unstimulated and stimulated whole salivation rates, trismus, dysphagia, pain, Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and quality of life according to EORTC. Data were combined from two separate trials. Ninety-seven were enrolled and 65 were eligible for the intent-to-treat analysis. The 33% drop-out was equally distributed between groups.

RESULTS

In group 1, 70% (21/30) healed compared to 51% (18/35) in group 2. HBO was associated with an increased chance of healing independent of baseline ORN grade or smoking status as well as improved xerostomia, unstimulated whole salivary flow rate, and dysphagia. Due to insufficient recruitment, none of the endpoints reached a statistically significant difference between groups. ADL data could only be obtained from 50 patients.

CONCLUSION

Hyperbaric oxygen did not significantly improve the healing outcome of osteoradionecrosis after surgical removal of necrotic bone as compared to standard care (70% vs. 51%). This effect is not statistically significant due to the fact that the study was underpowered and is therefore prone to type II error.

Dose escalation in advanced floor of the mouth cancer: a pilot study using a combination of IMRT and stereotactic boost

PURPOSE

We evaluated the efficiency and toxicity of stereotactic hypofractionated boost in combination with conventionally fractionated radiotherapy in the treatment of advanced floor of the mouth cancer.

METHODS

Thirty-seven patients with advanced stage of the floor of the mouth cancer, histologically confirmed squamous cell carcinoma (p16 negative) ineligible for surgical treatment, were indicated for radiochemotherapy or hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy (HART). The radiotherapy protocol combined external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and a stereotactic hypofractionated boost to the primary tumor. The dose delivered from EBRT was 70-72.5 Gy in 35/50 fractions. The hypofractionated boost followed with 10 Gy in two fractions. For the variables-tumor volume, stage and grade a multivariate analysis was performed to find the relationship between overall survival, local progression and metastasis. Toxicity was evaluated according to CTCAE scale version 4.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 16 months, 23 patients (62%) achieved complete remission. The median time to local progression and metastasis was 7 months. Local control (LC) at 2 and 5-years was 70% and 62%, respectively. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 57% and 49% at 2 years and 41% and 27% at 5 years, respectively. Statistical analysis revealed that larger tumors had worse overall survival and a greater chance of metastasis. Log-Rank GTV > 44 ccm (HR = 1.96; [95% CI (0.87; 4.38)]; p = 0.11). No boost-related severe acute toxicity was observed. Late osteonecrosis was observed in 3 patients (8%).

CONCLUSION

The combination of EBRT and stereotactic hypofractionated boost is safe and seems to be an effective option for dose escalation in patients with advanced floor of the mouth tumors who are ineligible for surgical treatment and require a non-invasive approach.

Platelet-rich fibrin as a treatment option for osteoradionecrosis: A literature review

The aim of this review is to establish the usefulness and effectiveness of using platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) in the treatment of osteoradionecrosis (ORN) lesions. A review of the literature was performed using keywords through the PubMed-Medline and Cochrane Library search engine. Inclusion criteria were: (1) original publication in either the French or the English language, (2) studies conducted in humans, (3) presence of ORN lesions following head and neck radiotherapy (RT), (4) use of PRF or derivates in the treatment of ORN lesions, (5) clinical variables and outcomes mentioned in the study. Overall, four case reports were retained. Two publications were removed from the initial seven results after application of the inclusion criteria. A recent randomised clinical trial was not considered since the group analysed the effectiveness of leukocyte-enriched Plasmas-Rich-Fibrin (LPRF) in preventing ORN, but not in treating it. Therefore, four publications were retained for analysis. Results suggest that using PRF as an adjunct to surgical therapy is beneficial in treating ORN lesions although no controlled studies were found. Therefore, additional controlled clinical studies are warranted to better define the effectiveness and recommendation of this approach.

Association between dental extraction after radiotherapy and osteoradionecrosis: A multi-centre retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

Radiotherapy (RT) carries a substantial risk for the development of osteoradionecrosis (ORN) of the jaw. This study was performed to investigate the relationship between dental extractions after RT and the development of ORN.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Thirty-two patients with head and neck cancer who underwent tooth extraction after RT were investigated for correlations between the development of ORN and various factors.

RESULTS

Postextraction ORN was diagnosed in 12 (12.1%) teeth of 9 patients. The RT dose against the site of tooth extraction was 62.0 and 37.4 Gy in the ORN and Non-ORN groups, respectively (p < .001). The duration from RT to tooth extraction was 41.2 and 28.2 months in the ORN and Non-ORN groups, respectively (p = .025). Tooth extraction was significantly associated with ORN in patients with a high RT dose against the site (odds ratio = 1.231) and a longer duration of time from RT (odds ratio = 1.084).

CONCLUSIONS

Extraction of non-restorable teeth and those with a poor prognosis should not necessarily be postponed even when patients are undergoing RT. However, clinicians should pay special attention to postoperative management after tooth extraction in patients with a high RT dose and longer time from RT.

Tumor subsites and risk of osteoradionecrosis of the jaw in patients with oral cavity cancer: a national-based cohort study

PURPOSE

The association between the tumor subsites of the oral cavity and the risk of osteoradionecrosis of the jaw (ORNJ) remains unclear. We study the correlation between oral cavity tumor subsites and the risk of ORNJ in a nationwide population-based database.

METHODS

We enrolled 16,701 adult patients with oral cavity cancers who were treated with radiotherapy between 2000 and 2013. The subsites of the oral tumor, treatments of oral cavity cancers, and the timing of tooth extraction were examined for their association with ORNJ in oral cancer patients.

RESULTS

903 patients (5.40%) developed ORNJ. Of the relevant variables, pre-RT mandible surgery, tooth extraction either before or after RT, and tumor sites were associated with the risk of ORNJ. The adjusted HRs for ORNJ in the mouth floor, gums, retromolar, and buccal cancer were 2.056 (1.490-2.837), 1.909 (1.552-2.349), 1.683 (1.105-2.562), and 1.303 (1.111-1.528), respectively, compared with the risk of tongue cancer. There was no significant difference in the risk of ORNJ between the pre-RT extraction group, the during-RT extraction group, and the post-RT extraction (less than 6 months) group; the post-RT extraction (more than 6 months) group had a significantly higher risk of ORNJ.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that oral cavity tumor subsite is an independent risk factor of ORNJ after RT. Post-RT extraction (less than 6 months) group did not carry a significantly higher risk of ORNJ compared with pre-RT extraction group or during RT extraction group.

Assessment of risk factors associated with development of oronasal fistula as a late complication after carbon-ion radiotherapy for head and neck cancer

BACKGROUND

Oronasal fistulae (ONF) are one of the rare but serious complications of conventional photon radiotherapy. This study aimed to identify the risk factors for the development of ONF after carbon-ion radiotherapy (C-ion RT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The data of 62 cases of sinonasal and oral cavity cancers treated with C-ion RT and followed-up in excess of 5 years were retrospectively reviewed. The correlation between the clinical and dosimetric parameters and the development of ONF was analysed.

RESULTS

A total of 80.6% cases had sinonasal malignancies, and most tumours had advanced T stages (96.8%). Maxillary invasion was observed in 16 cases (25.8%), and malignant melanoma was the most common histology (46.8 %). All the cases received a dose of between 57.6 Gy (RBE) and 64 Gy (RBE) in 16 fractions over 4 weeks. At a median follow up of 88.8 months, 23 cases (37.1%) developed small localised ONF; however, none were of grade III severity. On separate multivariate analyses of clinical parameters in the entire cohort and in cases without maxillary invasion, the number of teeth irradiated with more than 50 Gy (RBE) was found to be the common significant independent risk factor for development of ONF.

CONCLUSION

The number of teeth irradiated with more than 50 Gy (RBE) is a significant independent risk factor for the development of ONF, which is a late complication of C-ion RT delivered in 16 fractions.

A nomogram to predict osteoradionecrosis in oral cancer after marginal mandibulectomy and radiotherapy

OBJECTIVE

There is no useful tool to clinically predict the occurrence of osteoradionecrosis (ORN) of the mandible quantitatively. The aim was to investigate the risk factors, including different modalities of radiotherapy, for developing mandibular ORN in patients undergoing marginal mandibulectomy and postoperative radiotherapy.

METHODS

Between January 2006 and December 2012, 167 subjects who underwent marginal mandibulectomy and postoperative radiotherapy with different modalities were enrolled. The association of ORN with mandibular bone measurements and patient variables was analyzed, and a nomogram was established.

RESULTS

Fifteen (8.98%) of the 167 patients developed ORN during the follow-up period, and ORN was significantly associated with diabetes mellitus (DM), body mass index (BMI), remaining bone height, remaining bone height to original bone height ratio, resected bone height to original bone height ratio, and mandibular dose (P: < 0.001, 0.004, 0.042, 0.018, 0.010, 0.020, respectively). Interestingly, the risk of ORN had no significant difference between conformal and intensity modulation radiation therapy (P = 0.407). Multivariate analysis revealed that DM and resected bone height to original bone height ratio ≥ 50% were independent risk factors for postoperative ORN. A nomogram consisting of BMI, DM, resected bone height to original bone height ratio, mandibulotomy, and mandibular dose for predicting the ORN-free probability was established; and the c-index of the nomogram for ORN status was 0.803.

CONCLUSION

A nomogram based on the risk factors was plotted to strengthen the prediction of ORN quantitatively. Surgeons should be more discrete regarding the treatment plan for patients with higher probability of ORN.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3b Laryngoscope, 130:101-107, 2020.

Second infield re-irradiation with a resulting cumulative equivalent dose (EQD2max ) of >180 Gy for patients with recurrent head and neck cancer

BACKGROUND

For locally recurrent head and neck cancer, re-irradiation with modern techniques like stereotactic body radiotherapy is a promising, possibly curative alternative to palliative systemic therapy.

METHODS

We report on 1 patient with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) and 1 patient with cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Both patients received full dose primary treatment (>66 Gy, EQD2), full dose re-irradiation (>50 Gy, EQD2), and a second course of re-irradiation via robotic radiosurgery (CyberKnife) for a second local recurrence.

RESULTS

Both treatments resulted in adequate tumor response. No grade III-IV acute or late toxicities occurred. Follow-up at 6 months after third irradiation showed partial remission for the patient with NPC. In the second case (SCC), no toxicities occurred and the tumor was in remission 18 months after last treatment.

CONCLUSION

These cases show that a second course of re-irradiation utilizing modern techniques like robotic radiosurgery might be feasible for carefully selected patients with head and neck cancer.

Periodontal therapy for patients before and after radiotherapy: A review of the literature and topics of interest for clinicians

Background

To review and discuss important topics regarding periodontal treatment pre- and post-radiotherapy for head and neck cancer in human patients; to discuss the references for adequate techniques, the appropriate moment for tooth extractions and periodontal management; and to discuss the prevention of osteoradionecrosis.

Material and Methods

Thirty-nine studies including original studies, randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and reviews were searched in online databases MEDLINE (PubMed) and the Cochrane library. No year of publication restriction was applied.

Results

Language was restricted to English, and the following Medical Subject Heading terms were used: radiotherapy, radiation therapy and periodontal treatment. Studies regarding periodontal treatment and tooth extraction that involved clinical management of irradiated patients were selected.

Conclusions

The treatment of periodontal diseases before radiotherapy is mainly required to avoid future dental extraction and to reduce the development of osteoradionecrosis. Periodontal treatment in irradiated patients mostly includes scaling and root planing, extraction of condemned teeth and topical and systemic antimicrobial therapy. Tooth removal should be planned at least 14 days before the first day of radiation treatment. Particular care and mouthwashes should be taken during and after radiation.

Clinical Significance

The management of irradiated patients represents a challenge for health professionals, including dentists. It is important to establish recommendations for clinicians concerning dental and periodontal management in irradiated patients before, during and after treatment.

Key words:Head and neck cancer, radiotherapy, periodontal treatment, periodontitis.

Pre-irradiation dental care: Ready-to-use templates for oropharyngeal cancers

Aim

To develop a tool in order to guide pre-irradiation dental care (PIDC) for patients with oropharyngeal cancers.

Background

Osteoradionecrosis of the jaws is a potential complication of radiotherapy (RT) for head and neck cancers. To prevent this complication, PIDC can involve multiple dental extractions as a preventative measure to avoid post-RT complications. However, there is no standardized tool to guide PIDC.

Materials and methods

From January 2005 to October 2015, 120 head and neck cancer patients were prospectively included in a study investigating dysgeusia after RT. From this cohort, patients were enrolled according to the following inclusion criteria: histopathological confirmation of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma; stage T1-4 N1-3 M0; ≤10 missing teeth. Individual teeth were retrospectively delineated on planning computed tomography and doses to dentition were assessed to generate templates.

Results

Thirty-three patients were included. Molars received highest doses with a mean dose of 50 Gy (range; 19-75 Gy). Ipsi-lateral and contralateral wisdom teeth received RT dose superior to 50 Gy in 92% and 56% of cases, respectively. Patients with advanced disease (T4 or N2c-3) received higher mean doses on inferior and ipsi-lateral dental arches compared to other patients (T1-3 N0-2b): 42 Gy vs. 39 Gy and 44 Gy vs. 39 Gy (p < 0.05), respectively.

Conclusion

Pre-RT dose distribution templates are an objective way to prepare PIDC. Further studies with a larger cohort are needed to validate these templates.

Synchronous Reconstruction of a Total Mandibulectomy Defect With a Single Fibula Osteocutaneous Free Flap

Osteoradionecrosis (ORN) is a well-known and usually late complication of radiation therapy in the treatment of head and neck cancer. Although the therapy can be life extending, it also produces tissue toxicity in ipsilateral and contralateral tissues in an acute and chronic fashion. In the most severe cases of ORN, such as the one presented in this report, bilateral disease results in the need for total mandibulectomy and creates a tremendous reconstructive challenge. The advent of microvascular surgery and free tissue transfer has caused an evolution of the management protocol for severe ORN cases. This report describes a unique case of total mandibulectomy with synchronous reconstruction using a single vascularized fibula osteocutaneous flap with subsequent dental implant reconstruction and prosthetic rehabilitation.

Combined surgery and radiation improves survival of tonsil squamous cell cancers

Objective

The study evaluated the addition of surgery (S) to radiation (RT) on survival of squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) of tonsillar-fossa (TF) in a modern cohort with similar epidemiology and treatment as current patients.

Study Design

Retrospective analysis utilizing Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program data.

Results

For all stages combined TF patients who received S+RT had superior OS (p < 0.01) and DSS (p < 0.01). For each stage OS and DSS was superior for S+RT (p < 0.05). In multivariate analysis, HRs for OS were statistically significantly higher for TF patients (stage 2, 3, and 4) receiving RT alone (p < 0.001).

Materials and Methods

TF SCC patients treated with either S+RT or RT alone between 2004 and 2011 were examined (n = 6,476). Primary outcome measures included overall survival (OS) and disease specific survival (DSS). Cox proportional hazard ratios (HR) were estimated for patients treated with S+RT compared to RT alone.

Conclusions

OS and DSS were superior for all stages combined and for stages 2, 3, and 4 in TF patients who received S+RT compared to RT alone.

Dose-volume correlates of mandibular osteoradionecrosis in Oropharynx cancer patients receiving intensity-modulated radiotherapy: Results from a case-matched comparison

PURPOSE

To determine dosimetric parameters associated with osteoradionecrosis (ORN) in oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) patients in the IMRT era.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Subsequent to institutional review board approval, we identified ORN in OPC patients treated with IMRT from 2002 to 2013. 1:2 case-control matching was implemented. Mandibular dose-volume histograms (DVH) were extracted. Dosimetric parameters were compared using non-parametric stats. Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) was done to identify DVH correlates of ORN.

RESULTS

68 ORN cases and 131 controls were matched. Median follow-up was 41months and median time to development of ORN was 16months. Mandibular mean dose was significantly higher in the ORN cohort (48.1 vs 43.6Gy, p<0.0001). However, the maximum dose was not statistically different. DVH bins from V35 to V73 were all significantly higher in the ORN cohort compared with controls (p<0.0006). Two DVH parameters were identified in RPA analysis, V43 and V58. The majority (81%) of ORN cases were observed with both V44≥42% and V58≥25%.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data demonstrate that a wide range of DVH parameters in the intermediate and high beam path were all significantly higher in ORN patients. Mandibular V44<42% and V58<25% represent reasonable DVH constraints for IMRT plan acceptability, when tumor coverage is not compromised.

Risk factors for osteonecrosis of the jaw in oral cancer patients after surgery and eventual adjuvant treatment: The potential role of chemotherapy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To identify the risk factors for osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) in oral cancer patients after surgery with and without adjuvant therapy in a nationwide, population-based study.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Using the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Dataset, we recruited patients with newly diagnosed oral cancer between 1997 and 2011. All of them underwent primary surgery. Data regarding demographic characteristics; tooth extractions; medications; and cancer treatments, including types of mandibular surgery, radiotherapy and platinum-based chemotherapy, were collected for analysis.

RESULTS

We identified 25,858 patients who suffered 2802 ONJ events. The ONJ incidence rate was 3.45 per 100 person-years. Lip cancer was associated with the highest risk of ONJ, followed by buccal mucosa, gum, mouth floor and tongue cancer. Using a time-dependent Cox regression model, multivariable analysis demonstrated that mandibulotomy (hazard ratio (HR), 1.25; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.01-1.55; p<0.001), radiotherapy (HR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.26-1.54; p<0.001) and platinum-based chemotherapy (HR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.56-2.41; p<0.001) were significant risk factors for ONJ. In the subgroup analysis of patients receiving radiotherapy and patients not receiving radiotherapy, platinum-based chemotherapy remained a risk factor for ONJ.

CONCLUSIONS

Mandibulotomy, radiotherapy and platinum-based chemotherapy were associated with an increased ONJ risk. Chemotherapy was a risk factor regardless of whether radiotherapy was administered.

IMRT for head and neck cancer: Cost implications

OBJECTIVES

Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is a dose-delivery technology allowing for a reduction in radiotherapy side effects. It has been rapidly adopted despite the lack of prospective studies showing improved outcomes. We sought to compare the cost through Medicare reimbursement patterns of surgery, IMRT, and conventional XRT in treating head and neck cancer. We then identified factors that correlate with these differences.

METHODS

Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare linked data were examined to determine treatment patterns for 47,237 patients with head and neck carcinoma from 2000 to 2007. We identified 14,748 patients that met our inclusion criteria. We then compared cost related to head and neck cancer treatments on the basis of Medicare payments.

RESULTS

From 2000 to 2007, the usage of IMRT increased from 1.5% to 48.6% while the usage of conventional XRT decreased from 98.5% to 51.4% (p<0.0001). During this time, patients undergoing IMRT had a mean cost of $101,099 compared to $42,843 for XRT. For patients with early stage tumors, surgery alone cost $18,140, traditional XRT $32,296 while IMRT cost $95,047 (p<0.0001). When removing patients who underwent concomitant chemotherapy, patients treated with IMRT cost $67,576 compared to $24,955 for non-IMRT patients (p<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

IMRT has become widely adopted as a primary treatment modality in head and neck cancer. We demonstrated that IMRT is significantly more costly than traditional treatment for head and neck cancers. Prospective studies investigating the comparative efficacy of IMRT will be needed in order to determine if this increased cost correlates with patient outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2b.

Osteoradionecrosis and intensity modulated radiation therapy: An overview

Osteoradionecrosis (ORN) is an ongoing topic, especially about its definition, pathogenesis, staging system and management algorithm. But what about its real incidence in intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) era? This paper discusses the mandible in radiation therapy planning as organ at risk and reviews the literature for evidence of radiation damage, discussing likely dose constraints and the use of IMRT to reduce radiation dose to this structure. PubMed search was performed.

Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI detects acute radiotherapy-induced alterations in mandibular microvasculature: prospective assessment of imaging biomarkers of normal tissue injury

Normal tissue toxicity is an important consideration in the continued development of more effective external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) regimens for head and neck tumors. The ability to detect EBRT-induced changes in mandibular bone vascularity represents a crucial step in decreasing potential toxicity. To date, no imaging modality has been shown to detect changes in bone vascularity in real time during treatment. Based on our institutional experience with multi-parametric MRI, we hypothesized that DCE-MRI can provide in-treatment information regarding EBRT-induced changes in mandibular vascularity. Thirty-two patients undergoing EBRT treatment for head and neck cancer were prospectively imaged prior to, mid-course, and following treatment. DCE-MRI scans were co-registered to dosimetric maps to correlate EBRT dose and change in mandibular bone vascularity as measured by K_trans and V_e. DCE-MRI was able to detect dose-dependent changes in both K_trans and V_e in a subset of patients. One patient who developed ORN during the study period demonstrated decreases in K_trans and V_e following treatment completion. We demonstrate, in a prospective imaging trial, that DCE-MRI can detect dose-dependent alterations in mandibular bone vascularity during chemoradiotherapy, providing biomarkers that are physiological correlates of acute of acute mandibular vascular injury and recovery temporal kinetics.

Potential risk factors for jaw osteoradionecrosis after radiotherapy for head and neck cancer

INTRODUCTION

To identify potential risk factors for the development of jaw osteoradionecrosis (ORN) after 3D-conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) among patients with newly diagnosed head and neck cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This study included 776 patients who underwent 3D-CRT or IMRT for head and neck cancer at the Department of Radiotherapy at the University Hospital Halle-Wittenberg between 2003 and 2013. Sex, dental status prior to radiotherapy, tumor site, bone surgery during tumor resection, concomitant chemotherapy, and the development of advanced ORN were documented for each patient. ORN was classified as grade 3, 4, or 5 according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer classification or grade 3 or 4 according to the late effects in normal tissues/subjective, objective, management, and analytic scale. The cumulative incidence of ORN was estimated. Cox regression analysis was used to identify prognostic risk factors for the development of ORN.

RESULTS

Fifty-one patients developed advanced ORN (relative frequency 6.6 %, cumulative incidence 12.4 %). The highest risk was found in patients who had undergone primary bone surgery during tumor resection (hazard ratio [HR] = 5.87; 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 3.09-11.19) and in patients with tumors located in the oral cavity (HR = 4.69; 95 % CI: 1.33-16.52). Sex, dentition (dentulous vs. edentulous), and chemotherapy had no clinically relevant influence.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

In contrast to most previous studies, we noted a low cumulative incidence of advanced ORN. Patients with tumors located in the oral cavity and those who undergo bone surgery during tumor resection prior to RT may be considered a high-risk group for the development of ORN.

Current Concepts in Osteoradionecrosis after Head and Neck Radiotherapy

Osteoradionecrosis (ORN) of the jaws is a feared complication of head and neck radiotherapy. ORN causes significant morbidity for patients and controversy among clinicians. This overview considers the variations in definition and classification of the condition that affect estimates of incidence and also the interpretation of evidence. The influence of newer radiotherapy techniques in reducing ORN through reduced dose and xerostomia is balanced against a probable increase in a vulnerable population through a rising head and neck cancer incidence. Theories of pathophysiology of ORN include radiation-induced osteomyelitis, hypoxic and hypovascular theory and fibroatrophic theory. Prevention strategies include restorative dentistry and radiation planning techniques. Treatments range from conservative 'watch and wait' through to more radical surgical strategies. Newer medical management strategies are available with a limited evidence base. The use of hyperbaric oxygen therapy remains controversial and the background and need for newer hyperbaric oxygen trials is discussed.

Comparison of the incidence of osteoradionecrosis with conventional radiotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

Modern techniques of radiotherapy are supposed to decrease the incidence of osteoradionecrosis of the mandible (ORNM). The purpose of this study was to compare the incidence of ORNM after intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in comparison to conventional 3D conformal radiotherapy techniques (conventional RT).

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of consecutive unselected patients treated in a single institution between 2002 and 2012. To minimize confounding effects, only patients with oropharyngeal carcinoma without surgery of the primary site were included.

RESULTS

The cohorts included 145 patients in the conventional RT group and 89 patients in the IMRT group. Total incidence rate of ORNM was similar for both groups with rates of 11% versus 10% (n = 16 for conventional RT and n = 9 for IMRT; p = 1.0). Subanalysis revealed more ORNM in T4 classified lesions with IMRT (p = .007). Analysis of different risk factors showed no statistically significant difference between ORNM and no-ORNM patients.

CONCLUSION

We found no reduction in ORNM with IMRT. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 38: 1708-1716, 2016.

Jaw osteoradionecrosis and dental extraction after head and neck radiotherapy: A nationwide population-based retrospective study in Taiwan

OBJECTIVES

Osteoradionecrosis of the jaws (ORNJ) is painful for patients and relatively difficult to treat clinically. The high risk of ORNJ for post radiotherapy R/T dental extraction is known; however, many patients still have to have teeth extracted after head and neck R/T. The objective of the present study is to review post R/T dental extraction and determine the ORNJ risk.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We preformed a retrospective cohort study of 1759 patients with head and neck cancer s/p R/T from a random sample of 1,000,000 insurants in the National Health Insurance Research Database during 2000-2013 in Taiwan. Statistical methods included two-proportion Z-test.

RESULTS

We evaluated two cohorts: 522 patients with post R/T dental extraction and 1237 patients without post R/T extraction. Overall moderate-to-severe ORNJ after R/T was 2.22% (39/1759), and a total of 39 ORNJ cases were noted during an average of 3.02years (range: 0.62-8.89years, ±2.07). ORNJ prevalence in the overall post R/T extraction-exposed cohort (5.17%, 27/522) was significantly greater than that in the unexposed cohort (0.97%, 12/1237). In a group of patients with ⩽5 post R/T dental extractions (n=373), the ORNJ risk was 2.4% (ORNJ case n=9); in a group of patients with >5 dental extractions (n=149), the ORNJ risk was 12.1% (ORNJ case n=18) (Z-score=4.5062; p-value<0.0001). In the extraction-exposed cohort, the ORNJ risk is higher if the index day to first extraction day was ⩽0.5year (n=103) compared with the group with the index day to first extraction day >0.5year (n=419) (Z-score=-2.1506; p-value=0.0315).

CONCLUSION

A tooth extraction time less than half a year after R/T or during the head and neck R/T period, and extraction tooth number ⩽5 would significant lower the ORNJ prevalence.

Radiation treatment of head and neck cancer

Radiation therapy plays a central and continuously evolving role in the treatment of head and neck cancer. In this review, some basic principles of radiation oncology are explained and common clinical scenarios are addressed in which radiation therapy forms part of the treatment course, with a focus on issues most pertinent to the interaction of radiation oncology with surgical treatment. These issues include refinement of the indications guiding the choice of adjuvant radiation therapy or chemoradiotherapy, sequencing and timing of therapies before or after definitive surgical management, and scientific and technical advances with the potential to reduce radiation-related toxicity.

Tissue response after implantation of pure titanium and bioresorbable screws in scapula with postoperative irradiation: an experimental study on rats

OBJECTIVE

The study focuses on the comparison of tissue reaction to titanium and bioresorbable implants with and without postoperative irradiation on an animal model.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-nine LEW/W rats were randomly assigned to experimental or control groups. One titanium and one bioresorbable screw (poly-L-lactide [PLLA] and L- and D-lactide poly-L/D-lactide [PDLLA]) were implanted into the left scapulas of 24 rats. Half of them received 30 Gy to the operation site and the other half received 42 Gy. In the control groups, 3 rats received 30 Gy, and 6 rats received 42 Gy to the scapula area without operation; and 6 rats had implants inserted as in the experimental group, but received no postoperative irradiation. The scapulas were removed 14 or 30 days after irradiation and a histologic analysis was performed.

RESULTS

The host tissue reaction to titanium and PLLA-PDLLA screws without postoperative irradiation was of similar intensity. In irradiated animals, the inflammatory tissue reaction was more evident around the titanium screws than around the bioresorbable screws, irrespective of the radiation dose and of the time that elapsed from the irradiation. The reaction was more evident on the 14th day than on the 30th day after the last radiation dose (70 and 86 days after surgery, respectively). The intensity of the inflammatory tissue reaction, irrespective of the implant type, was more intense in the group irradiated with 42 Gy.

CONCLUSIONS

PLLA-PDLLA implants appear to cause less tissue reaction after irradiation and could be safer reconstructive devices than titanium implants for patients undergoing surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy for cancer.

Risk profile for osteoradionecrosis of the mandible in the IMRT era

Background

The risk for osteoradionecrosis (ORN) of the mandible is positively related to bone volume exposed to > ~ 60 Gy. We hypothesized that in combined treatment, surgery may also be a risk factor.

Patients and methods

The impact of mandibular surgery on ORN in locally disease-free IMRT cohorts was retrospectively analyzed.

Results

Between October 2002 and October 2013, 531 of 715 patients with oral cavity cancer (OCC), mesopharyngeal cancer (MC), or salivary gland tumor were treated with the mandible bone exposed to ~ > 60 Gy (mean follow-up, 38 months; 7–143 months). Of the 531 patients, 36 developed ORN (7 %; 1.5 % with grade 3–4). The ORN rate in definitive IMRT MC (16/227) and in postoperative IMRT OCC patients with no mandibular surgery (3/46) was 7 % each; in OCC patients with mandibular surgery the rate was 29 % (15/60, p = 0.002). Marginal or periosteal bone resection was found to be a high risk factor (39 %, vs. 7 % followed by segmental or no resection, p < 0.0001).

Conclusion

Marginal or periosteal bone resection of the mandible was identified as the highest ORN risk factor in our IMRT cohort.

New approach for the treatment of osteoradionecrosis with pentoxifylline and tocopherol

Osteoradionecrosis (ORN) of the jaw is a significant complication of radiotherapy for oral cavity cancer. In addition to antibiotic medication, treatment options such as hyperbaric oxygen therapy, surgical approaches, and combined therapy with pentoxifylline and tocopherol have been recently introduced. In this review article, we will discuss the definition and classifications of osteoradionecrosis, its etiology and pathophysiology, previous treatment options, oral and maxillofacial complications of radiotherapy, basic information on pentoxifylline and tocopherol, recent reports of pentoxifylline and tocopherol combined therapy, and, finally, ORN-induced animal models and future approaches.

Oral surgery in patients undergoing chemoradiation therapy

Oral health care in patients undergoing chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy can be complex. Care delivered by a multidisciplinary approach is timely and streamlines the allocation of resources to provide prompt care and to attain favorable outcomes. A hospital dentist, oral and maxillofacial surgeon, and a maxillofacial prosthodontist must be involved early to prevent avoidable oral complications. Prevention and thorough preparation are vital before the start of chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Oral complications must be addressed immediately and, even with the best management, can cause delays and interruption in treatment, with serious consequences for the outcome and prognosis.

Effects of the dose-volume relationship on and risk factors for maxillary osteoradionecrosis after carbon ion radiotherapy

Background

Osteoradionecrosis (ORN) is a critical complication after carbon ion (C-ion) or photon radiotherapy (RT) for head and neck tumors. However, the risk factors for ORN after C-ion RT remain unclear. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the effects of the dose-volume relationship on and risk factors for ORN development after C-ion RT. We, however, focused on the maxillary bone because most tumors treated with C-ion RT were primarily located in the sinonasal cavity.

Methods

The patients enrolled in this study received more than 10% of the prescribed total dose of 57.6 Gy equivalent (GyE) in 16 fractions to their maxilla. All patients were followed up for more than 2 years after C-ion RT. Those with tumor invasion to the maxilla before C-ion RT or local recurrence after the treatment were excluded from the study to accurately evaluate the effects of irradiation on the bone. Sixty-three patients were finally selected. The severity of ORN was assessed according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. The correlation between clinical and dosimetric parameters and ORN incidence was retrospectively analyzed.

Results

The median follow-up period was 79 months. Of the 63 enrolled patients, 26 developed ORN of grade ≥1. Multivariate analysis revealed that the maxilla volume receiving more than 50 GyE (V50) and the presence of teeth within the planning target volume were significant risk factors for ORN. Dose-volume histogram analysis revealed that V10 to V50 parameters were significantly higher in patients with ORN than in those without ORN.

Conclusions

V50 and the presence of teeth within the planning target volume were independent risk factors for the development of ORN after C-ion RT using a 16-fraction protocol.

The influence of radiation therapy on dental implantology

Patients with a history of head and neck cancer resection require extensive prosthodontic rehabilitation following cancer treatment. The oral anatomy drastically changes from ablative therapy, and the oral tissue response becomes altered as a consequence of radiation and chemotherapy. Successful restoration of oral function in this specific patient population was increasingly difficult before the widespread use of dental implants. Implant-borne prosthetics are now often used. However, surgical guidelines remain unclear with regard to oncology-related parameters. In this article, guidelines are introduced for implant therapy in the cancer patients according to radiation dosage and timing. Indications for hyperbaric oxygen treatment are highlighted along with risk assessment associated with implant placement. These guidelines are intended to augment knowledge obtained through oncology consultation; moreover, provide a rationale for implant therapy within the course of cancer treatment.

Late term tolerance in head neck cancer patients irradiated in the IMRT era

Background

The aim was to quantify severe transient and persisting late term effects in our single institution head neck cancer (HNC) cohort treated with curatively intended intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Hypothesis was if a 2-year follow up (FU) is sufficient to estimate the long term tolerance in HNC irradiated in the IMRT era.

Methods

Between 01/2002-8/2012, 707/1211 (58%) consecutively treated IMRT patients met the inclusion criteria of a FU time >12 months and loco-regional disease control (LRC). 45% presented with loco-regionally advanced disease; 55% were referred for curative definitive IMRT (66 Gy-72 Gy in 30–35 fractions), 45% underwent postoperative IMRT (60-66 Gy in 30–33 fractions). Systemic concomitant therapy was administered in 85%. Highly consistent treatment procedures were performed with respect to contouring processes, dose constraints, radiation schedules, and the use of systemic therapy. Grade 3/4 late term effects were prospectively assessed and analyzed with respect to subgroups at particular risk for specific late effects.

Results

Mean/median FU of the cohort was 41/35 months (15–124). 13% of the patients (92/707) experienced any grade 3/4 late effects (101 events in 92/707 patients), 81% in the first 12 months after radiation. 4% of all developed persisting late grade 3/4 effects (25 events in 25/707 patients).

Conclusions

IMRT led to a high late term tolerance in loco-regionally disease free HNC patients. The onset of any G3/4 effects showed a plateau at 2 years. The question of the cervical vessel tolerance in disease free long time survivors is still open and currently under evaluation at our institution.

Evaluating the impact of patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics on the development of jaw complications in patients treated for oral cancers: a SEER-Medicare analysis

BACKGROUND

Jaw complications, including osteoradionecrosis, are significant sequelae of radiation therapy (RT) for oral cancers. This study identifies the impact of patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics on the development of jaw complications in patients treated with RT.

METHODS

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database was used to identify patients treated with RT for oral cancers from 1999 to 2007. Jaw complications were identified by International Classification of Diseases 9th revision (ICD-9) diagnosis codes and/or related procedures using Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) and ICD-9 codes.

RESULTS

A total of 1848 patients were identified. With a median follow-up of 2.5 years, 297 patients (16.1%) developed jaw complications: 226 patients had a diagnosis, 41 patients had a procedure, and 30 patients had both. On multivariate analysis, female sex, lack of chemotherapy use, and fewer comorbidities were associated with a statistically significant increase in jaw complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Even with modern techniques, jaw complications are a notable and potentially devastating side effect of RT for oral cancers.

A novel setup approach for helical tomotherapy in head and neck cancer: A case report

Head and neck cancers that are associated with high-risk factors have a poor prognosis. In such patients, post-operative radiochemotherapy is mandatory. The present study describes the case of a 71-year-old high-risk head and neck cancer patient who was not able to tolerate the supine position for the radiotherapy setup. A lateral immobilization with a head mask and a vacuum cushion was performed. The patient underwent daily computed tomography (CT)-guided radiation therapy [image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT)]. At nine months post-radiotherapy, the patient had no xerostomia and no swallowing dysfunction. However, the patient suffered a local recurrence and succumbed due to bleeding of the tumor a number of weeks after the recurrence. A recalculation of the actual delivered dose, taking the daily delivered dose into account, was performed. The recurrence occurred within the high-dose region. In selected cases of patients with head and neck cancers who are unable to tolerate the supine position, lateral positioning and high precision treatment is possible using daily IGRT.