Improvements in the lifestyle of patients who have had type 1 diabetes for 50 years: an optimistic message

Nutritional Status, Dietary Intake, and Nutrition-Related Interventions Among Older Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Call for More Evidence Toward Clinical Guidelines

There is an emerging population of older adults (≥65 years) living with type 1 diabetes. Optimizing health through nutrition during this life stage is challenged by multiple and ongoing changes in diabetes management, comorbidities, and lifestyle factors. There is a need to understand nutritional status, dietary intake, and nutrition-related interventions that may maximize well-being throughout the life span in type 1 diabetes, in addition to nutrition recommendations from clinical guidelines and consensus reports. Three reviewers used Cochrane guidelines to screen original research (January 1993-2023) and guidelines (2012-2023) in two databases (MEDLINE and CENTRAL) to characterize nutrition evidence in this population. We found limited original research explicitly focused on nutrition and diet in adults ≥65 years of age with type 1 diabetes (six experimental studies, five observational studies) and meta-analyses/reviews (one scoping review), since in the majority of analyses individuals ≥65 years of age were combined with those age ≥18 years, with diverse diabetes durations, and also individuals with type 1 and type 2 diabetes were combined. Further, existing clinical guidelines (n = 10) lacked specificity and evidence to guide clinical practice and self-management behaviors in this population. From a scientific perspective, little is known about nutrition and diet among older adults with type 1 diabetes, including baseline nutrition status, dietary intake and eating behaviors, and the impact of nutrition interventions on key clinical and patient-oriented outcomes. This likely reflects the population's recent emergence and unique considerations. Addressing these gaps is foundational to developing evidence-based nutrition practices and guidelines for older adults living with type 1 diabetes.

The JUBILE cohort: Quality of life after more than 40 years with type 1 diabetes

AIM

The incidence of type 1 diabetes is increasing, and more people are going to live many years with the disease. Quality of life might become the most challenging long-term complication. The JUBILE study describes the quality of life of people living with type 1 diabetes for more than 40 years.

METHODS

Patients were recruited from 35 French regional or university hospitals: patients and physicians completed questionnaires, validated by the Delphi method. From 1200 questionnaires circulated, 808 patients and their physicians returned questionnaires.

RESULTS

The duration of type 1 diabetes was 49 ± 6 years (mean±SD), age at diagnosis 15 ± 10 years, HbA1c 7.4 ± 0.9% [58 ± 10 mmol/mol] and 52% were men. Macrovascular disease was present in 32%, 46% had no or only mild non proliferative retinopathy. Insulin pumps were used by 25% and insulin pen/syringe users injected 3.9 ± 2.1 times per day. Blood glucose was self monitored at least five times per day by 67% of patients. Men had 1.8 ± 1.2 children, women 1.4 ± 1.0. More than half (55%) of this population was working, 38% had a university degree. Patients still had a busy life, going out (59%), eating out (82%), playing sports (38%) and travelling (66%). No differences appeared based on age, duration of diabetes, demography or social features.

CONCLUSIONS

Living a long and pleasant life is possible with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes does not prevent people from having children, working at highly qualified jobs, travelling abroad: a message of hope that is comforting for patients, their family, relatives and the medical teams.

Discoveries from the study of longstanding type 1 diabetes

Award programmes that acknowledge the remarkable accomplishments of long-term survivors with type 1 diabetes have naturally evolved into research programmes to determine the factors associated with survivorship and resistance to chronic complications. In this review, we present an overview of the methodological sources of selection bias inherent in survivorship research (selection of those with early-onset diabetes, incidence-prevalence bias and bias from losses to follow-up in cohort studies) and the breadth and depth of literature focusing on this special study population. We focus on the learnings from the study of longstanding type 1 diabetes on discoveries about the natural history of insulin production loss and microvascular complications, and mechanisms associated with them that may in future offer therapeutic targets. We detail descriptive findings about the prevalence of preserved insulin production and resistance to complications, and the putative mechanisms associated with such resistance. To date, findings imply that the following mechanisms exist: strategies to maintain or recover beta cells and their function; activation of specific glycolytic enzymes such as pyruvate kinase M2; modification of AGE production and processing; novel mechanisms for modification of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system activation, in particular those that may normalise afferent rather than efferent renal arteriolar resistance; and activation and modification of processes such as retinol binding and DNA damage checkpoint proteins. Among the many clinical and public health insights, research into this special study population has identified putative mechanisms that may in future serve as therapeutic targets, knowledge that likely could not have been gained without studying long-term survivors.