Tolerance to kidney allograft transplanted into Type I diabetic patients persists after in vivo challenge with pancreatic islet allografts that express repeated mismatches

A scalable human islet 3D-culture platform maintains cell mass and function long-term for transplantation

Present-day islet culture methods provide short-term maintenance of cell viability and function, limiting access to islet transplantation. Attempts to lengthen culture intervals remain unsuccessful. A new method was developed to permit the long-term culture of islets. Human islets were embedded in polysaccharide 3D-hydrogel in cell culture inserts or gas-permeable chambers with serum-free CMRL 1066 supplemented media for up to 8 weeks. The long-term cultured islets maintained better morphology, cell mass, and viability at 4 weeks than islets in conventional suspension culture. In fact, islets cultured in the 3D-hydrogel retained β cell mass and function on par with freshly isolated islets in vitro and, when transplanted into diabetic mice, restored glucose balance similar to fresh islets. Using gas-permeable chambers, the 3D-hydrogel culture method was scaled up over 10-fold and maintained islet viability and function, although the cell mass recovery rate was 50%. Additional optimization of scale-up methods continues. If successful, this technology could afford flexibility and expand access to islet transplantation, especially single-donor islet-after-kidney transplantation.

The need and benefit of immune monitoring to define patient and disease heterogeneity, mechanisms of therapeutic action and efficacy of intervention therapy for precision medicine in type 1 diabetes

The current standard of care for type 1 diabetes patients is limited to treatment of the symptoms of the disease, insulin insufficiency and its complications, not its cause. Given the autoimmune nature of type 1 diabetes, immunology is critical to understand the mechanism of disease progression, patient and disease heterogeneity and therapeutic action. Immune monitoring offers the key to all this essential knowledge and is therefore indispensable, despite the challenges and costs associated. In this perspective, I attempt to make this case by providing evidence from the past to create a perspective for future trials and patient selection.

Immune monitoring of islet and pancreas transplant recipients

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is an autoimmune disease in which the insulin-producing beta-cells are destroyed. Islet or pancreas transplantation can restore insulin secretion and are established therapies for subgroups of T1D patients. Long-term insulin-independence is, however, hampered by recurrent autoimmunity and rejection. Accurate monitoring of these immune events is therefore of critical relevance for the timely detection of deleterious immune responses. The identification of relevant immune biomarkers of allo- and autoreactivity has allowed a more accurate monitoring of disease progression and responses to therapy at early stages, allowing proper therapeutic intervention, and possibly improvements in the success rate of islet and pancreas transplantation. This review describes the tools established and validated to monitor immune correlates of auto- and alloreactivity that associate with clinical outcome and identifies challenges that current immunosuppression strategies trying to preserve islet graft function face.

Biomarkers for immune intervention trials in type 1 diabetes

After many efforts to improve and standardize assays for detecting immune biomarkers in type 1 diabetes (T1D), methods to identify and monitor such correlates of insulitis are coming of age. The ultimate goal is to use these correlates to predict disease progression before onset and regression following therapeutic intervention, which would allow performing smaller and shorter pilot clinical trials with earlier endpoints than those offered by preserved β-cell function or improved glycemic control. Here, too, progress has been made. With the emerging insight that T1D represents a heterogeneous disease, the next challenge is to define patient subpopulations that qualify for personalized medicine or that should be enrolled for immune intervention, to maximize clinical benefit and decrease collateral damage by ineffective or even adverse immune therapeutics. This review discusses the current state of the art, setting the stage for future efforts to monitor disease heterogeneity, progression and therapeutic intervention in T1D.

Impact of the number of infusions on 2-year results of islet-after-kidney transplantation in the GRAGIL network

BACKGROUND

Insulin independence after islet transplantation is generally achieved after multiple infusions. However, single infusion would increase the number of recipients. Our aim was to evaluate the results of islet-after-kidney transplantation according to the number of infusions.

METHODS

Islets were isolated at the Geneva University, shipped, and transplanted into French patients from the Swiss-French GRAGIL network, on the "Edmonton" immunosuppression protocol between 2004 and 2010.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients were transplanted with 33 preparations. Fifteen patients reached 24 months follow-up; eight subjects were single-graft recipients and seven were double-graft recipients. Finally, single-graft recipients received a median of 5312 islet equivalents/kg (5186-6388) vs. 10,564 (10,054-11,375) for double-graft recipients (P=0.0003) with similar islet mass at first infusion. Insulin independence was achieved in five of eight single-graft subjects (62.5%) versus five of seven in double-graft subjects (71.4%), not significant. Median insulin independence duration was 4.7 (3.1-15.2) months after one infusion vs. 19 (9.6-20.8) months after two infusions (not significant). At 24 months posttransplant, comparing single- with double-graft patients, insulin doses were 0.23 (0.11-0.34) U/kg vs. 0.02 (0.0-0.23) U/kg, P=0.11; HbA1c was 6.5% (5.9%-6.8%) vs. 6.2% (5.9%-6.3%), P=0.16; and basal C-peptide was 302 (143-480) pmol/L vs. 599 (393-806) pmol/L, P=0.05. Only 37.5% of single-graft patients had a β-score ≥4 compared with 100% of double-graft patients (P=0.03). Two recipients experienced postinfusion bleeding, and two patients (13%) showed renal dysfunction in the absence of biopsy-proven rejection.

CONCLUSIONS

One infusion achieves good glycemic control and sometimes insulin independence. However, double-graft patients remain insulin-free longer, tend to have lower HbA1c, and show better graft function 24 months after transplant.

Immune monitoring of pancreatic islet graft: towards a better understanding, detection and treatment of harmful events

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

Long-term clinical outcomes of islet transplantation are hampered by rejection and recurrence of autoimmunity, which lead to a gradual decrease in islet function usually taking place over the first five years after transplantation. An accurate monitoring strategy could allow for the detection and treatment of harmful immune events, potentially resulting in higher rates of insulin-independence.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

This article provides a critical review of the various assays currently available for the assessment of allo- and autoimmunity both prior to and after islet transplantation. The accuracy in predicting clinical outcome is specifically addressed.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

Most current tests based on the assessment of allo- and auto-immune antibody are of minimal help in clinical practice. Cell-based tests (including the assessment of cytotoxic T lymphocyte precursors, proliferation tests, enzyme-linked immunospot) have the potential to allow earlier and more accurate detection of harmful events.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

A specific and accurate immune monitoring has the potential to significantly improve islet transplant outcomes. The development and use of such tests (favouring cell-based tests) should be promoted.

Cellular islet autoimmunity associates with clinical outcome of islet cell transplantation

Background

Islet cell transplantation can cure type 1 diabetes (T1D), but only a minority of recipients remains insulin–independent in the following years. We tested the hypothesis that allograft rejection and recurrent autoimmunity contribute to this progressive loss of islet allograft function.

Methodology/Principal Findings

Twenty-one T1D patients received cultured islet cell grafts prepared from multiple donors and transplanted under anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) induction and tacrolimus plus mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) maintenance immunosuppression. Immunity against auto- and alloantigens was measured before and during one year after transplantation. Cellular auto- and alloreactivity was assessed by lymphocyte stimulation tests against autoantigens and cytotoxic T lymphocyte precursor assays, respectively. Humoral reactivity was measured by auto- and alloantibodies. Clinical outcome parameters - including time until insulin independence, insulin independence at one year, and C-peptide levels over one year- remained blinded until their correlation with immunological parameters. All patients showed significant improvement of metabolic control and 13 out of 21 became insulin-independent. Multivariate analyses showed that presence of cellular autoimmunity before and after transplantation is associated with delayed insulin-independence (p = 0.001 and p = 0.01, respectively) and lower circulating C-peptide levels during the first year after transplantation (p = 0.002 and p = 0.02, respectively). Seven out of eight patients without pre-existent T-cell autoreactivity became insulin-independent, versus none of the four patients reactive to both islet autoantigens GAD and IA-2 before transplantation. Autoantibody levels and cellular alloreactivity had no significant association with outcome.

Conclusions/Significance

In this cohort study, cellular islet-specific autoimmunity associates with clinical outcome of islet cell transplantation under ATG-tacrolimus-MMF immunosuppression. Tailored immunotherapy targeting cellular islet autoreactivity may be required. Monitoring cellular immune reactivity can be useful to identify factors influencing graft survival and to assess efficacy of immunosuppression.

Trial Registration

Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00623610

Correlation between beta cell mass and glycemic control in type 1 diabetic recipients of islet cell graft

Islet grafts can induce insulin independence in type 1 diabetic patients, but their function is variable with only 10% insulin independence after 5 years. We investigated whether cultured grafts with defined beta cell number help standardize metabolic outcome. Nonuremic C-peptide-negative patients received an intraportal graft with 0.5-5.0 x 10(6) beta cells per kilogram of body weight (kg BW) under antithymocyte globulin and mycophenolate mofetil plus tacrolimus. Metabolic outcome at posttransplant (PT) month 2 was used to decide on a second graft under maintenance mycophenolate mofetil/tacrolimus. Graft function was defined by C-peptide >0.5 ng/ml and reduced insulin needs, metabolic control by reductions in HbA(1c), glycemia coefficient of variation, and hypoglycemia. At PT month 2, graft function was present in 16 of 17 recipients of >2 x 10(6) beta cells per kg BW versus 0 of 5 with lower number. The nine patients with C-peptide >1 ng/ml and glycemia coefficient of variation of <25% did not receive a second graft; five of them were insulin-independent until PT month 12. The 12 others received a second implant; it achieved insulin-independence at PT month 12 when the first and second graft contained >2 x 10(6) beta cells per kg BW. Of the 20 recipients of at least one graft with >2 x 10(6) beta cells per kg BW, 17 maintained graft function and metabolic control up to PT month 12. At PT month 12, beta cell function in insulin-independent patients ranged around 25% of age-matched control values. Thus, 1-year metabolic control can be reproducibly achieved and standardized by cultured islet cell grafts with defined beta cell number.

Sequential kidney/islet transplantation: efficacy and safety assessment of a steroid-free immunosuppression protocol

The aim of this study was to assess the efficiency and safety of the Edmonton immunosuppression protocol in recipients of islet-after-kidney (IAK) grafts. Fifteen islet infusions were administered to 8 patients with type 1 diabetes and a functioning kidney graft. Immunosuppression was switched on the day of transplantation to a regimen associating sirolimus-tacrolimus-daclizumab. Insulin-independence was achieved in all patients for at least 3 months, with an actual rate of 71% at 1 year after transplantation (5 of 7 patients). After 24-month mean follow-up, five have ongoing insulin independence, 11-34 months after transplantation, with normal HbA1c, fructosamine and mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE) values. Results of arginine-stimulation tests improved over time, mostly after the second islet infusion. Severe adverse events included bleeding after percutaneous portal access (n=2), severe pneumonia attributed to sirolimus toxicity (n=1), kidney graft loss after immunosuppression discontinuation (n=1), reversible humoral kidney rejection (n=1) and fever of unknown origin (n=1). These data indicate that the Edmonton approach can be successfully applied to the IAK setting. This procedure is associated with significant side effects and only patients with stable function of the kidney graft should be considered. The net harm versus benefit has not yet been established and will require further studies with larger numbers of enrolled subjects.

Alloreactivity Against Repeated HLA Mismatches of Sequential Islet Grafts Transplanted in Non-Uremic Type 1 Diabetes Patients

BACKGROUND

Islet transplantation can restore insulin production in type 1 diabetes patients. However, survival of the islet allografts will face rejection or recurrence of autoimmunity or a combination of both. In a study on islet-after-kidney transplants, we previously reported that islet cell recipients presented low T-cell alloresponses for HLA mismatches that were shared by the islet cell graft and the prior kidney graft, that is, repeated mismatch, while vigorous responses were measured against novel HLA mismatches.

METHODS

We now investigated T-cell alloreactivity to repeated HLA-mismatches in three non-uremic type 1 diabetic patients each receiving three sequential islet cell implants.

RESULTS

These islet-after-islet recipients patients exhibited low or absent responses to repeated mismatches to the first graft which was accompanied by sustained graft function, and reduced responsiveness towards subsequent grafts. In one patient, T-cell responses towards these mismatches were noticed following new mismatches in subsequent grafts, with loss of graft function.

CONCLUSION

These case reports further support the view that subsequent islet implantations can reduce alloreactivity for repeated HLA mismatches. They demonstrate the usefulness of monitoring T-cell reactivity against islet allografts to correlate immune function with graft survival and to identify conditions for preservation of beta-cell function.

1α,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 or analogue treated dendritic cells modulate human autoreactive T cells via the selective induction of apoptosis

Epidemiological evidence indicates that the vitamin D status after birth modulates the risk for development of type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). We previously demonstrated that the biologically active form of vitamin D, 1alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (1,25(OH)2D3), as well as its analogue TX527 permanently alter the morphology and T cell stimulatory function of human dendritic cells (DC). Here, we studied the mechanism of T cell modulation by 1,25(OH)2D3 or analogue treated DC. By using CFSE-labelled autoreactive T cells, we observed that T cell proliferation is hampered upon coculture with modulated DCs, i.e. T cells underwent fewer cycles of cell divisions when compared to T cells stimulated by nontreated DCs. Moreover, 1,25(OH)2D3 or analogue modulated DCs induced significantly higher numbers of early apoptotic (annexin V+/PI-) and/or late apoptotic (annexin V+/PI+) T cells. Apoptosis was selectively induced in T cells activated by modulated DC, since other T cells present in the same cultures, either resting or activated by control untreated DC, were unaffected. Thus, in vitro preconditioning of DC with 1,25(OH)2D3 or analogue yields regulatory DC that may interfere with ongoing autoimmunity in vivo without affecting T cells with other specificities.

The role of T-cells in the pathogenesis of Type 1 diabetes: from cause to cure

Type 1 diabetes mellitus results from a T-cell mediated autoimmune destruction of the pancreatic beta cells in genetically predisposed individuals. The knowledge of the immunopathogenesis has increased enormously in the last two decades. The contribution of T-cells in the pathogenesis is beyond doubt. Therapies directed against T-cells have been shown to halt the disease process and prevent recurrent beta-cell destruction after islet transplantation. Less is known about the nature and function of these T-cells, the cause of the loss of tolerance to islet autoantigens, why the immune system apparently fails to suppress autoreactivity, and whether (or which) autoantigen(s) are critically involved in the initiation or progression of the disease. The contribution of dendritic cells in directing the immune response is clear, while the contribution of B-cells and autoantibodies is subject to reconsideration. Autoreactive T-cells have proven to be valuable tools to study pathogenic or diabetes-related processes. Measuring T-cell autoreactivity has also provided critical information to determine the fate of islet allografts transplanted to Type 1 diabetic patients. Cellular autoimmunity is a difficult study subject, but it has been a worthwhile quest to unravel the role of T-cells in the pathogenesis of Type 1 diabetes. The challenge for the future is to determine which factors contribute to the loss of tolerance to beta-cell antigens, and to define what measures T-cells can provide to suppress autoreactivity, since it is becoming increasingly evident that T-cells provide a two-edged sword: some T-cells could be pathogenic, but others can regulate the disease process and thus form new targets for immunointervention.