1
|
Bousquet J, Bourret R, Camuzat T, Augé P, Domy P, Bringer J, Best N, Jonquet O, de la Coussaye JE, Noguès M, Robine JM, Avignon A, Blain H, Combe B, Dray G, Dufour V, Fouletier M, Giraudeau N, Hève D, Jeandel C, Laffont I, Larrey D, Laune D, Laurent C, Mares P, Marion C, Pastor E, Pélissier JY, Radier-Pontal F, Reynes J, Royère E, Ychou M, Bedbrook A, Granier S, Abecassis F, Albert S, Adnet PA, Alomène B, Amouyal M, Arnavielhe S, Asteriou T, Attalin V, Aubas P, Azevedo C, Badin M, Bakhti, Baptista G, Bardy B, Battesti MP, Bénézet O, Bernard PL, Berr C, Berthe J, Bobia X, Bockaert J, Boegner C, Boichot S, Bonnin HY, Boulet P, Bouly S, Boubakri C, Bourdin A, Bourrain JL, Bourrel G, Bouix V, Breuker C, Bruguière V, Burille J, Cade S, Caimmi D, Calmels MV, Camu W, Canovas G, Carre V, Cavalli G, Cayla G, Chiron R, Claret PG, Coignard P, Coroian F, Costa DJ, Costa P, Cottalorda, Coulet B, Coupet AL, Courrouy-Michel MC, Courtet P, Cristol JP, Cros V, Cuisinier F, Daien C, Danko M, Dauenhauer P, Dauzat M, David M, Davy JM, Delignières D, Demoly P, Desplan J, Dhivert-Donnadieu H, Dujols P, Dupeyron A, Dupeyron G, Engberink O, Enjalbert M, Fattal C, Fernandes J, Fesler P, Fraisse P, Froger J, Gabrion P, Galano E, Gellerat-Rogier M, Gellis A, Goucham AY, Gouzi F, Gressard F, Gris JC, Guillot B, Guiraud D, Handweiler V, Hantkié H, Hayot M, Hérisson C, Heroum C, Hoa D, Jacquemin S, Jaber S, Jakovenko D, Jorgensen C, Journot L, Kaczorek M, Kouyoudjian P, Labauge P, Landreau L, Lapierre M, Leblond C, Léglise MS, Lemaitre JM, Le Moing V, Le Quellec A, Leclercq F, Lehmann S, Lognos B, Lussert JM, Makinson A, Mandrick K, Marmelat V, Martin-Gousset P, Matheron A, Mathieu G, Meissonnier M, Mercier G, Messner P, Meunier C, Mondain M, Morales R, Morel J, Morquin D, Mottet D, Nérin P, Nicolas P, Ninot G, Nouvel F, Ortiz JP, Paccard D, Pandraud G, Pasdelou MP, Pasquié JL, Patte K, Perrey S, Pers YM, Picot MC, Pin JP, Pinto N, Porte E, Portejoie F, Pujol JL, Quantin X, Quéré I, Raffort N, Ramdani S, Ribstein J, Rédini-Martinez I, Richard S, Ritchie K, Riso JP, Rivier F, Rolland C, Roubille F, Sablot D, Savy JL, Schifano L, Senesse P, Sicard R, Soua B, Stephan Y, Strubel D, Sultan A, Taddei-Ologeanu, Tallon G, Tanfin M, Tassery H, Tavares I, Torre K, Touchon J, Tribout V, Uziel A, Van de Perre P, Vasquez X, Verdier JM, Vergne-Richard C, Vergotte G, Vian L, Viarouge-Reunier C, Vialla F, Viart F, Villain M, Villiet M, Viollet E, Wojtusciszyn A, Aoustin M, Bourquin C, Mercier J. Introduction. Presse Med 2015; 44 Suppl 1:S1-5. [DOI: 10.1016/j.lpm.2015.07.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022] Open
|
2
|
Wojtusciszyn A, Mourad G, Bringer J, Renard E. Continuous glucose monitoring after kidney transplantation in non-diabetic patients: early hyperglycaemia is frequent and may herald post-transplantation diabetes mellitus and graft failure. Diabetes Metab 2013; 39:404-10. [PMID: 23999231 DOI: 10.1016/j.diabet.2012.10.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2012] [Revised: 10/23/2012] [Accepted: 10/23/2012] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES New onset of diabetes after transplantation (NODAT) is a known complication of renal transplantation, but early glycaemic status after transplantation has not been described prospectively. This study aimed to assess blood glucose (BG) levels immediately following kidney transplantation in non-diabetic subjects and to explore their relationship to later graft outcomes and NODAT occurrence. PATIENTS AND METHODS Over a 9-month period, 43 consecutive non-diabetic patients who received a kidney transplant were prospectively investigated. During the first 4 days after transplantation, fasting BG was measured and the 24-h BG profile assessed by continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). Capillary BG was measured on hospital admittance and at least four times a day for CGM calibration thereafter. All adverse events were recorded, and fasting BG and HbA1c were assessed at 3, 6 and 12 months and at the last visit to our centre. RESULTS Immediately following renal transplantation, capillary BG was 12.2 ± 3.8 mmol/L. On day 1 (D1), fasting BG was 9.9 ± 4.3 mmol/L and decreased to 6.0 ± 1.5 mmol/L on D3. The CGM-reported mean 24-h BG (mmol/L) was 10.2±2.4 on D1, 7.7 ± 1.3 on D2 and 7.5 ± 1.1 on D3. From D1 to D4, 43% of patients spent>12h/day with BG levels>7.7 mmol/L. While morbidity during the 3 months following transplantation appeared unrelated to BG, the first post-transplantation capillary BG measurement and fasting BG on D1 tended to be higher in patients who developed diabetes 3 months later. Tacrolimus treatment was associated with a higher incidence of dysglycaemia at 3 and 6 months. After a mean follow-up of 72 months, NODAT was frequently seen (18.6%), and was associated with tacrolimus medication (P<0.01) and a higher rate of renal transplantation failure (RR: 3.6, P<0.02). CONCLUSION Hyperglycaemia appears to be a nearly constant characteristic immediately following transplantation in non-diabetic kidney recipients. Higher BG values could identify patients at risk for later post-transplant diabetes and graft failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Wojtusciszyn
- Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Nutrition, Lapeyronie Hospital, CHU Montpellier, 391, avenue du Doyen-Giraud, 34295 Montpellier cedex 5, France; Institute of Functional Genomics, UMR CNRS 5203, Inserm U661, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Institute of Research in Biotherapies, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Wojtusciszyn A, Bosco D, Morel P, Baertschiger R, Armanet M, Kempf MC, Badet L, Toso C, Berney T. A Comparison of Cold Storage Solutions for Pancreas Preservation Prior to Islet Isolation. Transplant Proc 2005; 37:3396-7. [PMID: 16298605 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2005.09.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several solutions are used to preserve the pancreas prior to islet isolation. This study sought to assess whether the type of solution had an impact on the isolation outcome. METHODS We reviewed data from 125 islet isolation procedures performed from January 2002 to January 2005. Pancreata were preserved in University of Wisconsin (UW) (n = 101), Celsior (CS) (n = 19), or IGL-1 (n = 5) solutions. Islet isolation results and transplantation rates were compared between groups. RESULTS UW, CS, and IGL-1 groups were similar according to donor's age, weight, and body mass index. Weight of undigested pancreas was 20 +/- 13.1, 21.4 +/- 15.7, and 17.4 +/- 8.7 g for UW, CS, and IGL-1, respectively (P > .2). Final total number of IEQ was 267,000 +/- 132,000, 277,000 +/- 155,000, and 311,000 +/- 163,000, respectively (P > .4). Success rate (defined as >250,000 IEQ) was 55.5%, 52.9%, and 60% for UW, Celsior, and IGL-1 (P > .9); the transplantation rate was 42.2% for UW, 36.8% for Celsior, and 80% for IGL-1 preservation (P > .2). CONCLUSIONS In this preliminary study, UW, Celsior, and IGL-1 solutions demonstrated similar islet isolation results. The new IGL-1 solution appears promising.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Wojtusciszyn
- Surgery, Islet Isolation and Transplantation Center, 1 rue Michel Servet, 1211 Genèva 4, Switzerland.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|