1
|
Metzger CE, Olayooye P, Tak LY, Culpepper O, LaPlant AN, Jalaie P, Andoh PM, Bandara W, Reul ON, Tomaschke AA, Surowiec RK. Estrogen deficiency induces changes in bone matrix bound water that do not closely correspond with bone turnover. Bone 2024; 186:117173. [PMID: 38906519 DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2024.117173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2024] [Revised: 06/12/2024] [Accepted: 06/17/2024] [Indexed: 06/23/2024]
Abstract
Postmenopausal osteoporosis, marked by estrogen deficiency, is a major contributor to osteoporotic fractures, yet early prediction of fractures in this population remains challenging. Our goal was to explore the temporal changes in bone-specific inflammation, oxidative stress, bone turnover, and bone-matrix water, and their relationship with estrogen deficiency-induced modifications in bone structure and mechanical properties. Additionally, we sought to determine if emerging clinically translatable imaging techniques could capture early bone modifications prior to standard clinical imaging. Two-month-old female Sprague Dawley rats (n = 48) underwent ovariectomy (OVX, n = 24) or sham operations (n = 24). A subgroup of n = 8 rats per group was sacrificed at 2-, 5-, and 10-weeks post-surgery to assess the temporal relationships of inflammation, oxidative stress, bone turnover, bone matrix water, mechanics, and imaging outcomes. OVX rats exhibited higher body weight compared to sham rats at all time points. By 5-weeks, OVX animals showed elevated markers of inflammation and oxidative stress in cortical bone, which persisted throughout the study, while cortical bone formation rate did not differ from sham until 10-weeks. DXA outcomes did not reveal differences between OVX and sham at any time point. Bound water, assessed using ultrashort echo time magnetic resonance imaging (UTE MRI), was lower in OVX at the earliest time point (2-weeks) and reduced again at 10-weeks with no difference at 5-weeks. These data demonstrate that bound water assessment using novel UTE MRI technology was lower at the earliest time point following OVX. However, no temporal relationship with bone turnover, inflammation, or oxidative stress was observed at the time points assessed in this study. These findings underscore both the increased need to understand bone hydration changes and highlight the usefulness of UTE MRI for non-invasive bone hydration measurements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Corinne E Metzger
- Dept. of Anatomy, Cell Biology, and Physiology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
| | - Peter Olayooye
- Weldon School of Biomedical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA
| | - Landon Y Tak
- Dept. of Anatomy, Cell Biology, and Physiology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Oli Culpepper
- Dept. of Biomedical Engineering, Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Alec N LaPlant
- Dept. of Anatomy, Cell Biology, and Physiology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA; Dept. of Biomedical Engineering, Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Peter Jalaie
- Weldon School of Biomedical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA
| | - Pearl-Marie Andoh
- Dept. of Biomedical Engineering, Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Wikum Bandara
- Weldon School of Biomedical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA
| | - Olivia N Reul
- Dept. of Biomedical Engineering, Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Andrew A Tomaschke
- Dept. of Biomedical Engineering, Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Rachel K Surowiec
- Weldon School of Biomedical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA; Dept. of Biomedical Engineering, Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, USA; Dept. of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lan Z, Lin X, Xue D, Yang Y, Saad M, Jin Q. Can Bisphosphonate Therapy Reduce Overall Mortality in Patients With Osteoporosis? A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2024:00003086-990000000-01698. [PMID: 39172899 DOI: 10.1097/corr.0000000000003204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2024] [Accepted: 07/05/2024] [Indexed: 08/24/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND For patients with osteoporosis, bisphosphonate therapy can reduce the risk of fractures, but its effect on reducing mortality remains unclear. Previous studies on this topic have produced conflicting results and generally have been too small to definitively answer the question of whether bisphosphonate therapy reduces mortality. Therefore, a meta-analysis may help us arrive at a more conclusive answer. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES In a large meta-analysis of placebo-controlled randomized controlled trials (RCTs), we asked: (1) Does bisphosphonate use reduce mortality? (2) Is there a subgroup effect based on whether different bisphosphonate drugs were used (zoledronate, alendronate, risedronate, and ibandronate), different geographic regions where the study took place (Europe, the Americas, and Asia), whether the study was limited to postmenopausal female patients, or whether the trials lasted 3 years or longer? METHODS We conducted a systematic review using multiple databases, including Embase, Web of Science, Medline (via PubMed), Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov, with each database searched up to November 20, 2023 (which also was the date of our last search), following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We included randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials with participants diagnosed with osteoporosis and receiving bisphosphonate treatment. We excluded papers posted to preprint servers, other unpublished work, conference abstracts, and papers that were registered on ClinicalTrials.gov but were not yet published. We collected 2263 records. After excluding records due to study type, study content not meeting the inclusion criteria, and duplicates, our meta-analysis included 47 placebo-controlled RCTs involving 59,437 participants. Data extraction, quality assessment, and statistical analyses were performed. The evaluation of randomized trials for potential bias was conducted using the revised Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. This assessment encompassed factors such as sequence generation, allocation concealment, subject blinding, outcome assessor blinding, incomplete outcome data, and reporting bias. Some studies did not provide explicit details regarding random sequence generation, leading to a high risk of selection bias. A few studies, due to their open-label nature, were unable to achieve double-blind conditions for both the subjects and the researchers, resulting in intermediate performance bias. Nevertheless, the overall study quality was high. Due to the low heterogeneity among the studies, as evidenced by the low statistical heterogeneity (that is, a low I2 statistic), we opted for a fixed-effects model, indicating that the effect size is consistent across the studies. In such cases, the fixed-effects model can provide more precise estimates. According to the results of the funnel plot, we did not find evidence of publication bias. RESULTS The use of bisphosphonates did not reduce the overall risk of mortality in patients with osteoporosis (risk ratio 0.95 [95% CI 0.88 to 1.03]). Subgroup analyses involving different bisphosphonate drugs (zoledronate, alendronate, risedronate, and ibandronate), regions (Europe, the Americas, and Asia), diverse populations (postmenopausal female patients and other patients), and trials lasting 3 years or longer revealed no associations with reduced overall mortality. CONCLUSION Based on our comprehensive meta-analysis, there is high-quality evidence suggesting that bisphosphonate therapy for patients with osteoporosis does not reduce the overall risk of mortality despite its effectiveness in reducing the risk of fractures. The primary consideration for prescribing bisphosphonates to individuals with osteoporosis should continue to be centered on reducing fracture risk, aligning with clinical guidelines. Long-term studies are needed to investigate potential effects on mortality during extended treatment periods. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level I, therapeutic study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhibin Lan
- The Third Ward of Orthopaedic Department, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, PR China
| | - Xue Lin
- The Third Ward of Orthopaedic Department, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, PR China
- Institute of Osteoarthropathy, Ningxia Key Laboratory of Clinical and Pathogenic Microbiology, Institute of Medical Sciences, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, PR China
| | - Di Xue
- The Third Ward of Orthopaedic Department, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, PR China
- Institute of Osteoarthropathy, Ningxia Key Laboratory of Clinical and Pathogenic Microbiology, Institute of Medical Sciences, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, PR China
| | - Yang Yang
- The Third Ward of Orthopaedic Department, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, PR China
| | - Muhammad Saad
- The Third Ward of Orthopaedic Department, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, PR China
| | - Qunhua Jin
- The Third Ward of Orthopaedic Department, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, PR China
- Institute of Osteoarthropathy, Ningxia Key Laboratory of Clinical and Pathogenic Microbiology, Institute of Medical Sciences, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, PR China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Schini M, Vilaca T, Lui LY, Ewing SK, Thompson A, Vittinghoff E, Bauer DC, Bouxsein ML, Black DM, Eastell R. Pre-treatment bone mineral density and the benefit of pharmacologic treatment on fracture risk and BMD change: analysis from the FNIH-ASBMR SABRE project. J Bone Miner Res 2024; 39:867-876. [PMID: 38691441 PMCID: PMC11301522 DOI: 10.1093/jbmr/zjae068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2023] [Revised: 04/04/2024] [Accepted: 04/20/2024] [Indexed: 05/03/2024]
Abstract
Some osteoporosis drug trials have suggested that treatment is more effective in those with low BMD measured by DXA. This study used data from a large set of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to determine whether the anti-fracture efficacy of treatments differs according to baseline BMD. We used individual patient data from 25 RCTs (103 086 subjects) of osteoporosis medications collected as part of the FNIH-ASBMR SABRE project. Participants were stratified into FN BMD T-score subgroups (≤-2.5, > -2.5). We used Cox proportional hazard regression to estimate treatment effect for clinical fracture outcomes and logistic regression for the radiographic vertebral fracture outcome. We also performed analyses based on BMD quintiles. Overall, 42% had a FN BMD T-score ≤ -2.5. Treatment with anti-osteoporosis drugs led to significant reductions in fractures in both T-score ≤ -2.5 and > -2.5 subgroups. Compared to those with FN BMD T-score > -2.5, the risk reduction for each fracture outcome was greater in those with T-score ≤ -2.5, but only the all-fracture outcome reached statistical significance (interaction P = .001). Results were similar when limited to bisphosphonate trials. In the quintile analysis, there was significant anti-fracture efficacy across all quintiles for vertebral fractures and with greater effects on fracture risk reduction for non-vertebral, all, and all clinical fractures in the lower BMD quintiles (all interaction P ≤ .03). In summary, anti-osteoporotic medications reduced the risk of fractures regardless of baseline BMD. Significant fracture risk reduction with treatment for 4 of the 5 fracture endpoints was seen in participants with T-scores above -2.5, though effects tended to be larger and more significant in those with baseline T-scores <-2.5.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marian Schini
- Division of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S10 2TN, United Kingdom
| | - Tatiane Vilaca
- Division of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S10 2TN, United Kingdom
| | - Li-Yung Lui
- California Pacific Medical Center, Research Institute, San Francisco, 94158, CA, United States
| | - Susan K Ewing
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, 94158, CA, United States
| | - Austin Thompson
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, 94158, CA, United States
| | - Eric Vittinghoff
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, 94158, CA, United States
| | - Douglas C Bauer
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, 94158, CA, United States
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, 94158, CA, United States
| | - Mary L Bouxsein
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Center for Advanced Orthopedic Studies, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, 02215, MA, United States
| | - Dennis M Black
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, 94158, CA, United States
| | - Richard Eastell
- Division of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S10 2TN, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Deans C, Zitsch B, Kildow BJ, Garvin KL. Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty: Is it Safe in Demineralized Bone? Orthop Clin North Am 2024; 55:333-343. [PMID: 38782505 DOI: 10.1016/j.ocl.2024.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/25/2024]
Abstract
There is concern for cementless total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in patients with decreased bone mineral density (BMD) due to the potential increase in complications, namely failed in-growth or future aseptic loosening. Some data suggest that advances in cementless prostheses mitigate these risks; however this is not yet born out in long-term registry data. It is crucial to expand our understanding of the prevalence and etiology of osteoporosis in TKA patients, survivorship of cementless implants in decreased BMD, role of bone-modifying agents, indications and technical considerations for cementless TKA in patients with decreased BMD. The purpose of this study is to review current literature and expert opinion on such topics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Deans
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 985640 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198, USA.
| | - Bradford Zitsch
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 985640 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198, USA
| | - Beau J Kildow
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 985640 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198, USA
| | - Kevin L Garvin
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 985640 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Keaveny TM, Adams AL, Orwoll ES, Khosla S, Siris ES, McClung MR, Bouxsein ML, Fatemi S, Lee DC, Kopperdahl DL. Osteoporosis treatment prevents hip fracture similarly in both sexes: the FOCUS observational study. J Bone Miner Res 2024:zjae090. [PMID: 38861422 DOI: 10.1093/jbmr/zjae090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2023] [Revised: 02/21/2024] [Accepted: 04/03/2024] [Indexed: 06/13/2024]
Abstract
Randomized trials have not been performed, and may never be, to determine if osteoporosis treatment prevents hip fracture in men. Addressing that evidence gap, we analyzed data from an observational study of new hip fractures in a large integrated healthcare system to compare the reduction in hip fractures associated with standard-of-care osteoporosis treatment in men versus women. Sampling from 271 389 patients age ≥ 65 who had a hip-containing computed tomography scan during care between 2005-2018, we selected all who subsequently had a first hip fracture (cases) after the CT scan (start of observation) and a sex-matched equal number of randomly selected patients. From those, we analyzed all who tested positive for osteoporosis (DXA-equivalent hip bone mineral density T-score ≤ -2.5, measured from the CT scan using VirtuOst). We defined "treated" as at least six months of any osteoporosis medication by prescription fill data during follow up; "not-treated" was no prescription fill. Sex-specific odds ratios of hip fracture for treated versus not-treated patients were calculated by logistic regression; adjustments included age, BMD T-score, a BMD-treatment interaction, body mass index, race/ethnicity, and seven baseline clinical risk factors. At two-year follow-up, 33.9% of the women (750/2211 patients) and 24.0% of the men (175/728 patients) were treated, primarily with alendronate; 51.3% and 66.3%, respectively, were not-treated; and 721 and 269, respectively, had a first hip fracture since the CT scan. Odds ratio of hip fracture for treated versus not-treated was 0.26 (95% confidence interval: 0.21-0.33) for women and 0.21 (0.13-0.34) for men; the ratio of these odds ratios (men:women) was 0.81 (0.47-1.37), indicating no significant sex effect. Various sensitivity and stratified analyses confirmed these trends, including results at five-year follow-up. Given these results and considering the relevant literature, we conclude that osteoporosis treatment prevents hip fracture similarly in both sexes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tony M Keaveny
- Departments of Mechanical Engineering and Bioengineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA
| | - Annette L Adams
- Department of Research & Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA
| | - Eric S Orwoll
- Bone and Mineral Unit, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR
| | - Sundeep Khosla
- Kogod Center on Aging and Division of Endocrinology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Ethel S Siris
- Toni Stabile Osteoporosis Center, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Mary L Bouxsein
- Center for Advanced Orthopedic Studies, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Shireen Fatemi
- Department of Endocrinology, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Panorama City, CA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Schini M, Vilaca T, Vittinghoff E, Lui LY, Ewing SK, Thompson AR, Bauer DC, Bouxsein ML, Black DM, Eastell R. Influence of age on the efficacy of pharmacologic treatments on fracture risk reduction and increases in BMD: RCT results from the FNIH-ASBMR-SABRE project. J Bone Miner Res 2024; 39:544-550. [PMID: 38501786 PMCID: PMC11262139 DOI: 10.1093/jbmr/zjae040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2023] [Revised: 02/20/2024] [Accepted: 03/15/2024] [Indexed: 03/20/2024]
Abstract
There is a common belief that antiosteoporosis medications are less effective in older adults. This study used data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to determine whether the anti-fracture efficacy of treatments and their effects on BMD differ in people ≥70 compared to those <70 yr. We used individual patient data from 23 RCTs of osteoporosis medications collected as part of the FNIH-ASBMR SABRE project. We assessed the following fractures: radiographic vertebral, non-vertebral, hip, all clinical, and all fractures. We used Cox proportional hazard regression to estimate treatment effect for clinical fracture outcomes, logistic regression for the radiographic vertebral fracture outcome, and linear regression to estimate treatment effect on 24-mo change in hip and spine BMD in each age subgroup. The analysis included 123 164 (99% female) participants; 43% being ≥70 yr. Treatment with anti-osteoporosis drugs significantly and similarly reduced fractures in both subgroups (eg, odds ratio [OR] = 0.47 and 0.51 for vertebral fractures in those below and above 70 yr, interaction P = .19; hazard ratio [HR] for all fractures: 0.72 vs 0.70, interaction P = .20). Results were similar when limited to bisphosphonate trials with the exception of hip fracture risk reduction which was somewhat greater in those <70 (HR = 0.44) vs ≥70 (HR = 0.79) yr (interaction P = .02). Allocation to anti-osteoporotic drugs resulted in significantly greater increases in hip and spine BMD at 24 mo in those ≥70 compared to those <70 yr. In summary, anti-osteoporotic medications similarly reduced the risk of fractures regardless of age, and the few small differences in fracture risk reduction by age were of uncertain clinical significance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marian Schini
- Division of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S10 2TN, United Kingdom
| | - Tatiane Vilaca
- Division of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S10 2TN, United Kingdom
| | - Eric Vittinghoff
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158, United States
| | - Li-Yung Lui
- California Pacific Medical Center Research Institute, San Francisco, CA 94158, United States
| | - Susan K Ewing
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158, United States
| | - Austin R Thompson
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158, United States
| | - Douglas C Bauer
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158, United States
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158, United States
| | - Mary L Bouxsein
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Center for Advanced Orthopedic Studies, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA 02215330, United States
| | - Dennis M Black
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158, United States
| | - Richard Eastell
- Division of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S10 2TN, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Alam F, Alsaed O, Abdulla N, Abdulmomen I, Lutf A, Al Emadi S. Guidelines for fracture risk assessment and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women and men above the age of 50 in Qatar. Arch Osteoporos 2024; 19:34. [PMID: 38698101 PMCID: PMC11065783 DOI: 10.1007/s11657-024-01389-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2024] [Accepted: 04/12/2024] [Indexed: 05/05/2024]
Abstract
We present comprehensive guidelines for osteoporosis management in Qatar. Formulated by the Qatar Osteoporosis Association, the guidelines recommend the age-dependent Qatar fracture risk assessment tool for screening, emphasizing risk-based treatment strategies and discouraging routine dual-energy X-ray scans. They offer a vital resource for physicians managing osteoporosis and fragility fractures nationwide. PURPOSE Osteoporosis and related fragility fractures are a growing public health issue with an impact on individuals and the healthcare system. We aimed to present guidelines providing unified guidance to all healthcare professionals in Qatar regarding the management of osteoporosis. METHODS The Qatar Osteoporosis Association formulated guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women and men above the age of 50. A panel of six local rheumatologists who are experts in the field of osteoporosis met together and conducted an extensive review of published articles and local and international guidelines to formulate guidance for the screening and management of postmenopausal women and men older than 50 years in Qatar. RESULTS The guidelines emphasize the use of the age-dependent hybrid model of the Qatar fracture risk assessment tool for screening osteoporosis and risk categorization. The guidelines include screening, risk stratification, investigations, treatment, and monitoring of patients with osteoporosis. The use of a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scan without any risk factors is discouraged. Treatment options are recommended based on risk stratification. CONCLUSION Guidance is provided to all physicians across the country who are involved in the care of patients with osteoporosis and fragility fractures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fiaz Alam
- Rheumatology Section, Department of Medicine, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
| | - Omar Alsaed
- Rheumatology Section, Department of Medicine, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
| | - Nabeel Abdulla
- Rheumatology Section, Department of Medicine, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
| | - Ibrahim Abdulmomen
- Rheumatology Section, Department of Medicine, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
| | - Abdo Lutf
- Rheumatology Section, Department of Medicine, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
| | - Samar Al Emadi
- Rheumatology Section, Department of Medicine, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
di Filippo L, Ulivieri FM, Nuti R, Giustina A. Use of vitamin D with anti-osteoporotic drugs: are available clinical trials telling us the whole story? Endocrine 2024; 83:342-348. [PMID: 37815744 DOI: 10.1007/s12020-023-03551-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2023] [Accepted: 09/23/2023] [Indexed: 10/11/2023]
Abstract
There is a strong rationale for using vitamin D in combination with anti-osteoporotic drugs. Still, available trials do not give clear indications in this setting, presenting a suboptimal and heavily inhomogeneous experimental design. Health authorities should revise requirements for using vitamin D in anti-osteoporotic drug trials to maximise their effect and produce reliable indications for clinical practice in this setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luigi di Filippo
- Institute of Endocrine and Metabolic Sciences, San Raffaele Vita-Salute University and IRCCS Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Fabio Massimo Ulivieri
- Institute of Endocrine and Metabolic Sciences, San Raffaele Vita-Salute University and IRCCS Hospital, Milan, Italy.
| | - Ranuccio Nuti
- Emeritus Professor of Internal Medicine, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Andrea Giustina
- Institute of Endocrine and Metabolic Sciences, San Raffaele Vita-Salute University and IRCCS Hospital, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Gani LU, Sritara C, Blank RD, Chen W, Gilmour J, Dhaliwal R, Gill R. Follow-up Bone Mineral Density Testing: 2023 Official Positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry. J Clin Densitom 2024; 27:101440. [PMID: 38007875 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2023.101440] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2023]
Abstract
Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the gold standard method for measuring bone mineral density (BMD) which is most strongly associated with fracture risk. BMD is therefore the basis for the World Health Organization's densitometric definition of osteoporosis. The International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) promotes best densitometry practices and its official positions reflect critical review of current evidence by domain experts. This document reports new official positions regarding follow-up DXA examinations based on a systematic review of literature published through December 2022. Adoption of official positions requires consensus agreement from an expert panel following a modified RAND protocol. Unless explicitly altered by the new position statements, prior ISCD official positions remain in force. This update reflects increased consideration of the clinical context prompting repeat examination. Follow-up DXA should be performed with pre-defined objectives when the results would have an impact on patient management. Testing intervals should be individualized according to the patient's age, sex, fracture risk and treatment history. Incident fractures and therapeutic approach are key considerations. Appropriately ordered and interpreted follow-up DXA examinations support diagnostic and therapeutic decision making, thereby contributing to excellent clinical care. Future research should address the complementary roles of clinical findings, imaging and laboratory testing to guide management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linsey U Gani
- Department of Endocrinology, Changi General Hospital, Singapore.
| | - Chanika Sritara
- Nuclear Medicine Division, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Radiology. Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | | | - WeiWen Chen
- Department of Endocrinology, St Vincent's Hospital Sydney, Australia
| | - Julia Gilmour
- Division of Endocrinology, St Michael's Hospital, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto
| | - Ruban Dhaliwal
- Endocrine Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School
| | - Ranjodh Gill
- Department of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Rentzeperi E, Pegiou S, Tsakiridis I, Kalogiannidis I, Kourtis A, Mamopoulos A, Athanasiadis A, Dagklis T. Diagnosis and Management of Osteoporosis: A Comprehensive Review of Guidelines. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2023; 78:657-681. [PMID: 38134337 DOI: 10.1097/ogx.0000000000001181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2023]
Abstract
Importance Osteoporosis causes increased morbidity and mortality, and thus poses a significant economic burden to the health systems worldwide. Objective The aim of this study was to review and compare the most recently published major guidelines on diagnosis and management of this common medical entity. Evidence Acquisition A thorough comparative review of the most influential guidelines from the RACGP (Royal Australian College of General Practitioners), the ESCEO-IOF (European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis-International Osteoporosis Foundation), the NOGG (National Osteoporosis Guideline Group), the NAMS (North American Menopause Society), the ES (Endocrine Society), and the ACOG (American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists) was conducted. Results The reviewed guidelines generally agree on the definition, the criteria, and investigations used to diagnose osteoporosis. They also concur regarding the risk factors for osteoporosis and the suggested lifestyle modifications (calcium and vitamin D intake, normal body weight, reduction of alcohol consumption, and smoking cessation). However, there is lack of consensus on indications for fracture risk assessment in the general population and the exact indications for bone mineral density assessment. Referral to a bone specialist is reserved for complex cases of osteoporosis (NOGG, NAMS, and ACOG) or in case of inadequate access to care (RACGP). The use of hip protectors to reduce the risk of fractures is supported by RACGP, NOGG, and NAMS, solely for high-risk elderly patients in residential care settings. All guidelines reviewed recognize the efficacy of the pharmacologic agents (ie, bisphosphonates, denosumab, hormone therapy, and parathyroid hormone analogs). Nonetheless, recommendations regarding monitoring of pharmacotherapy differ, primarily in the case of bisphosphonates. The proposed intervals of repeat bone mineral density testing after initiation of drug therapy are set at 2 years (RACGP), 1-3 years (NAMS, ES, and ACOG), or 3-5 years (ESCEO-IOF and NOGG). All guidelines agree upon the restricted use of bone turnover markers only in bone specialist centers for treatment monitoring purposes. Finally, the definition of treatment failure varies among the reviewed guidelines. Conclusions Osteoporosis is a distressing condition for women, mainly those of postmenopausal age. Thus, it seems of paramount importance to develop consistent international practice protocols for more cost-effective diagnostic and management techniques, in order to improve women's quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Themistoklis Dagklis
- Assistant Professor, Third Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kline GA, Morin SN, Lix LM, Leslie WD. A Population-Based Registry Study of Extended Bisphosphonate Use: Minimal Shift After Landmark Publications About Shorter Treatment Duration. J Bone Miner Res 2023; 38:1435-1442. [PMID: 37462900 DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.4885] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2023] [Revised: 06/27/2023] [Accepted: 07/14/2023] [Indexed: 08/15/2023]
Abstract
Optimal duration of bisphosphonate therapy was unknown until the FLEX study was published in 2006 showing a 5-year course to be adequate for most women. In 2008, a link between long-term bisphosphonate and atypical femoral fractures was reported and confirmed in later studies. We hypothesized these landmark observations should have led to a decrease in use of bisphosphonates for >5 or 10 years, from 2010 onward. The Manitoba Bone Mineral Density (BMD) Registry with linkage to provincial pharmacy data was used to determine the percentage of long- and very long-term bisphosphonate users from therapy start. The cohort comprised women aged >50 years with BMD between 1995 and 2018 with oral bisphosphonate first prescribed for >90 days with adherence >75% in the first year. For each calendar year of continued therapy, the percentage of patients and medication possession rate was tabulated. The percentage of users beyond 5 years was compared among patients who started therapy in 1998-2004 (those taking 5 years of therapy still finish before 2010) versus 2005-2012 (all new therapy starts overlap 2010 in those taking ≥5 years of treatment). The cohort included 2991 women with mean follow-up 8.8 (1.3) years, 64.9% of whom took continuous oral bisphosphonate for >5 years and 41.9% for >10 years. In the earlier versus later era, there were 74.4% versus 70.2% who completed 5 years. With respect to longer treatment, there were 68.0% and 60.5% of patients treated for 6 or more years (p < 0.0001) and 46.6% versus 33.5% treated for >10 years (p = 0.08). Medication possession rate was >79% in every year of therapy. Landmark studies leading to more limited bisphosphonate courses may have slightly reduced longer-term treatment, but up to one-third of adherent patients in the modern era still receive continuous bisphosphonate therapy for >10 years. © 2023 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory A Kline
- Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | | | - Lisa M Lix
- Department of Community Health Science, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - William D Leslie
- Department of Community Health Science, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
- Departments of Medicine and Radiology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Lin SM, Lin JY, Tu YK, Wu CH, Peng CCH, Munir KM, Bukhari K, Jaggon K, Fu Y, Loh CH, Huang HK. Association between bisphosphonate use and stroke risk: a meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int 2023; 34:1625-1636. [PMID: 37249610 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-023-06781-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2022] [Accepted: 04/28/2023] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
Previous studies have suggested that bisphosphonates may reduce stroke risk. This meta-analysis, which included 21 studies with 741,274 participants, revealed that bisphosphonates might be associated with lower stroke risk. However, evidence derived from randomized controlled trials identified no statistically significant association. Future high-quality studies are still required to determine causality. PURPOSE Whether bisphosphonates may reduce the risk of stroke remains inconclusive. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the association between bisphosphonate use and the risk of stroke based on up-to-date evidence. METHODS We searched for studies evaluating the effects of bisphosphonate on the risk of stroke from inception until January 3, 2022, on PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane libraries and updated our search until August 22, 2022, using PubMed to identify any new potential published studies. Two or more reviewers independently screened articles, extracted data, and assessed the study quality. We retrieved the data to synthesize the pooled relative risk (RR) of stroke associated with bisphosphonate use compared with controls; random-effects models were used for meta-analysis. RESULTS A total of 21 studies (7 randomized controlled trials [RCTs] and 14 observational studies) involving 741,274 participants were included in our meta-analysis. Overall, bisphosphonate use was associated with a lower risk of stroke, but the result was only borderline significant (pooled RR = 0.87, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.76-0.99, p = 0.048), and high between-study heterogeneity was found (I2 = 83.7%). Subgroup analyses showed that the evidence derived from RCTs suggested no significant association between bisphosphonate use and stroke risk (pooled RR = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.76-1.13, p = 0.462; I2 = 13.4%). CONCLUSION Our results suggest that bisphosphonate use is associated with a lower risk of stroke. However, the current evidence does not lead to a definite conclusion due to the borderline statistical significance and high between-study heterogeneity. Future studies, especially RCTs, are necessary to assess causality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shu-Man Lin
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Hualien, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
| | - Jhe-Yi Lin
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Kang Tu
- Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Dentistry, National Taiwan University Hospital and School of Dentistry, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chih-Hsing Wu
- Department of Family Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
- Department of Family Medicine, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
- Institute of Gerontology, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Carol Chiung-Hui Peng
- Section of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Nutrition & Weight Management, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
- Center for Aging and Health, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Hualien, Taiwan
| | - Kashif M Munir
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Nutrition, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Khulood Bukhari
- University of Maryland Medical Center Midtown Campus, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Kory Jaggon
- University of Maryland Medical Center Midtown Campus, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Yunting Fu
- Health Sciences and Human Services Library, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ching-Hui Loh
- School of Medicine, Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan.
- Center for Aging and Health, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Hualien, Taiwan.
| | - Huei-Kai Huang
- School of Medicine, Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan.
- Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
- Department of Family Medicine, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Hualien, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Foessl I, Dimai HP, Obermayer-Pietsch B. Long-term and sequential treatment for osteoporosis. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2023; 19:520-533. [PMID: 37464088 DOI: 10.1038/s41574-023-00866-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/21/2023] [Indexed: 07/20/2023]
Abstract
Osteoporosis is a skeletal disorder that causes impairment of bone structure and strength, leading to a progressively increased risk of fragility fractures. The global prevalence of osteoporosis is increasing in the ageing population. Owing to the chronic character of osteoporosis, years or even decades of preventive measures or therapy are required. The long-term use of bone-specific pharmacological treatment options, including antiresorptive and/or osteoanabolic approaches, has raised concerns around adverse effects or potential rebound phenomena after treatment discontinuation. Imaging options, risk scores and the assessment of bone turnover during initiation and monitoring of such therapies could help to inform individualized treatment strategies. Combination therapies are currently used less often than 'sequential' treatments. However, all patients with osteoporosis, including those with secondary and rare causes of osteoporosis, as well as specific patient populations (for example, young adults, men and pregnant women) require new approaches for long-term therapy and disease monitoring. New pathophysiological aspects of bone metabolism might therefore help to inform and revolutionize the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ines Foessl
- Division of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Hans P Dimai
- Division of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Barbara Obermayer-Pietsch
- Division of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Mondo I, Hannou S, D'Amelio P. Using sequential pharmacotherapy for the treatment of osteoporosis: an update of the literature. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2023; 24:2175-2186. [PMID: 38100542 DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2023.2296543] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2023] [Accepted: 12/14/2023] [Indexed: 12/17/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Osteoporosis, which is characterized by compromised bone density and heightened susceptibility to fractures, is a substantial public health concern, especially among the aging population. Underdiagnosis, undertreatment, and therapy non-adherence contribute to its impact. Anabolic and dual-action agents like teriparatide, abaloparatide, and romosozumab have emerged as effective treatments, allowing rapid gains in bone mineral density (BMD) and reducing fracture risk. However, administering treatments in the correct order is paramount, with an 'anabolic first' approach gaining traction for patients at high risk of fractures. This strategy involves starting anabolic therapies, followed by antiresorptive agents as maintenance therapy. It is important to note that the effectiveness of anabolic agents differs between treatment-naive and previously treated patients: tailored treatment approaches are therefore necessary. This comprehensive strategy adheres to clinical guidelines, emphasizing individualized care, early intervention, and patient-centered management to mitigate the burden of osteoporosis and enhance patients' quality of life. AREA COVERED The aim of this review is to summarize recent evidence on the sequential treatment of osteoporosis and to provide recommendations on the best treatment strategies. EXPERT OPINION Effective treatments, such as anabolic agents, are key in high-risk patients, who require an 'anabolic first' approach. Sequential therapy, specifically tailored to a patient's history, can help to optimize prevention and management of fractures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilaria Mondo
- Department of Geriatrics and Geriatric Rehabilitation, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Sophia Hannou
- Department of Geriatrics and Geriatric Rehabilitation, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Patrizia D'Amelio
- Department of Geriatrics and Geriatric Rehabilitation, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Schroeder RJ, Staszkiewicz J, O'Quin C, Carroll B, Doan N, Patel S, Ahmadzadeh S, Kallurkar A, Viswanath O, Varrassi G, Shekoohi S, Kaye AD. Oral Therapeutics Post Menopausal Osteoporosis. Cureus 2023; 15:e42870. [PMID: 37664395 PMCID: PMC10474253 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.42870] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2023] [Accepted: 08/02/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Osteoporosis affects a significant number of postmenopausal women in the United States. Screening is performed using clinical assessments and bone mineral density scans via dual x-ray absorptiometry. Oral therapy is indicated to prevent pathologic fractures in those deemed at increased risk following screening. Bisphosphonates including alendronate, ibandronate, and risedronate are currently first-line oral therapeutics in fracture prevention following the diagnosis of osteoporosis. Hormonal therapies include estrogen-containing therapies, selective estrogen receptor modulators, and other compounds that mimic the effects of estrogen such as tibolone. Lifestyle modifications such as supplementation and physical activity may also contribute to the prevention of osteoporosis and are used as adjuncts to therapy following diagnosis. These therapeutics are limited primarily by their adverse effects. Treatment regimens should be tailored based on significant risk factors demonstrated by patients, adverse effects, and clinical response to treatment. The most severe risk factors relevant to pharmacological selection involve hormone replacement therapies, where concern for venous thrombosis, coronary artery disease, breast, and uterine cancer exist. Bisphosphonates are most commonly associated with gastrointestinal discomfort which may be mitigated with proper administration. Although adverse effects exist, these medications have proven to be efficacious in the prevention of vertebral and non-vertebral fractures in post-menopausal women. Fracture risk should be weighed against the risk of adverse events associated with each of the regimens, with clinical judgment dictating the treatment approach centered around patient goals and experiences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan J Schroeder
- Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center New Orleans, New Orleans, USA
| | - Julia Staszkiewicz
- Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, USA
| | - Collyn O'Quin
- School of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, USA
| | - Brandon Carroll
- Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center New Orleans, New Orleans, USA
| | - Nicolette Doan
- Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, USA
| | - Sagar Patel
- Anaesthesiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, USA
| | - Shahab Ahmadzadeh
- Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, USA
| | - Anusha Kallurkar
- Anaesthesiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, USA
| | - Omar Viswanath
- Pain Management, Valley Pain Consultants - Envision Physician Services, Phoenix, USA
| | | | - Sahar Shekoohi
- Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, USA
| | - Alan D Kaye
- Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ong TIW, Lim LL, Chan SP, Chee WSS, Ch’ng ASH, Chong EGM, Damodaran P, Hew FL, Ibrahim LB, Khor HM, Lai PSM, Lee JK, Lim AL, Lim BP, Paramasivam SS, Ratnasingam J, Siow YS, Tan ATB, Thiagarajan N, Yeap SS. A summary of the Malaysian Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis, 2022. Osteoporos Sarcopenia 2023; 9:60-69. [PMID: 37496985 PMCID: PMC10366466 DOI: 10.1016/j.afos.2023.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2023] [Revised: 05/01/2023] [Accepted: 06/04/2023] [Indexed: 07/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives The aim of these Clinical Practice Guidelines is to provide evidence-based recommendations to assist healthcare providers in the screening, diagnosis and management of patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis (OP). Methods A list of key clinical questions on the assessment, diagnosis and treatment of OP was formulated. A literature search using the PubMed, Medline, Cochrane Databases of Systematic Reviews, and OVID electronic databases identified all relevant articles on OP based on the key clinical questions, from 2014 onwards, to update from the 2015 edition. The articles were graded using the SIGN50 format. For each statement, studies with the highest level of evidence were used to frame the recommendation. Results This article summarizes the diagnostic and treatment pathways for postmenopausal OP. Risk stratification of patients with OP encompasses clinical risk factors, bone mineral density measurements and FRAX risk estimates. Non-pharmacological measures including adequate calcium and vitamin D, regular exercise and falls prevention are recommended. Pharmacological measures depend on patients' fracture risk status. Very high-risk individuals are recommended for treatment with an anabolic agent, if available, followed by an anti-resorptive agent. Alternatively, parenteral anti-resorptive agents can be used. High-risk individuals should be treated with anti-resorptive agents. In low-risk individuals, menopausal hormone replacement or selective estrogen receptor modulators can be used, if indicated. Patients should be assessed regularly to monitor treatment response and treatment adjusted, as appropriate. Conclusions The pathways for the management of postmenopausal OP in Malaysia have been updated. Incorporation of fracture risk stratification can guide appropriate treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Terence Ing Wei Ong
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Lee Ling Lim
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Siew Pheng Chan
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
- Subang Jaya Medical Centre, Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia
| | | | | | | | | | - Fen Lee Hew
- Subang Jaya Medical Centre, Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia
| | | | - Hui Min Khor
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Pauline Siew Mei Lai
- Department of Primary Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | | | - Ai Lee Lim
- Hospital Pulau Pinang, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia
| | - Boon Ping Lim
- Subang Jaya Medical Centre, Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia
| | | | - Jeyakantha Ratnasingam
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Yew Siong Siow
- Subang Jaya Medical Centre, Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia
| | | | | | - Swan Sim Yeap
- Subang Jaya Medical Centre, Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Charatcharoenwitthaya N, Jaisamrarn U, Songpatanasilp T, Kuptniratsaikul V, Unnanuntana A, Sritara C, Nimitphong H, Wattanachanya L, Chotiyarnwong P, Amphansap T, Phruetthiphat OA, Valleenukul T, Chaiamnuay S, Petchlorlian A, Srinonprasert V, Tejavanija S, Kitisomprayoonkul W, Dajpratham P, Chaikittisilpa S, Somboonporn W. Summary of the Thai Osteoporosis Foundation (TOPF) Clinical Practice Guideline on the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis 2021. Osteoporos Sarcopenia 2023; 9:45-52. [PMID: 37496989 PMCID: PMC10366425 DOI: 10.1016/j.afos.2023.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2023] [Revised: 05/26/2023] [Accepted: 06/02/2023] [Indexed: 07/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives The Thai Osteoporosis Foundation (TOPF) is an academic organization that consists of a multidisciplinary group of healthcare professionals managing osteoporosis. The first clinical practice guideline for diagnosing and managing osteoporosis in Thailand was published by the TOPF in 2010, then updated in 2016 and 2021. This paper presents important updates of the guideline for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Thailand. Methods A panel of experts in the field of osteoporosis was recruited by the TOPF to review and update the TOPF position statement from 2016. Evidence was searched using the MEDLINE database through PubMed. Primary writers submitted their first drafts, which were reviewed, discussed, and integrated into the final document. Recommendations are based on reviews of the clinical evidence and experts' opinions. The recommendations are classified using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation classification system. Results The updated guideline comprises 90 recommendations divided into 12 main topics. This paper summarizes the recommendations focused on 4 main topics: the diagnosis and evaluation of osteoporosis, fracture risk assessment and indications for bone mineral density measurement, fracture risk categorization, management according to fracture risk, and pharmacological management of osteoporosis. Conclusions This updated clinical practice guideline is a practical tool to assist healthcare professionals in diagnosing, evaluating, and managing osteoporosis in Thailand.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natthinee Charatcharoenwitthaya
- Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University, 99/209 Pahonyothin Road., Pathumthani, 12120, Thailand
| | - Unnop Jaisamrarn
- Menopause Research Group, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, 1873 Rama 4 Road, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand
| | - Thawee Songpatanasilp
- Department of Orthopaedics, Phramongkutklao Hospital and College of Medicine, 315 Ratchawithi Road, Thung Phaya Thai, Ratchathewi, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand
| | - Vilai Kuptniratsaikul
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, 2 Wanglang Road, Bangkok-Noi, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand
| | - Aasis Unnanuntana
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, 2 Wanglang Road, Bangkok-Noi, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand
| | - Chanika Sritara
- Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Radiology, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, 270 Rama VI Road, Thung Phaya Thai, Ratchathewi, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand
| | - Hataikarn Nimitphong
- Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, 270 Rama VI Road, Thung Phaya Thai, Ratchathewi, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand
| | - Lalita Wattanachanya
- Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, 1873 Rama 4 Road, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand
| | - Pojchong Chotiyarnwong
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, 2 Wanglang Road, Bangkok-Noi, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand
| | - Tanawat Amphansap
- Osteoporosis and Geriatric Excellence Center, Department of Orthopaedics, Police General Hospital, 492/1 Police General Hospital, Rama1 road, Prathumwan, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand
| | - Ong-Art Phruetthiphat
- Department of Orthopaedics, Phramongkutklao Hospital and College of Medicine, 315 Ratchawithi Road, Thung Phaya Thai, Ratchathewi, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand
| | - Thanut Valleenukul
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Bhumibol Adulyadej Hospital, 171 Phahonyothin Road, Bangkok, 10220, Thailand
| | - Sumapa Chaiamnuay
- Rheumatic Disease Unit, Department of Medicine, Phramongkutklao Hospital and College of Medicine, 315 Ratchawithi Road, Thung Phaya Thai, Ratchathewi, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand
| | - Aisawan Petchlorlian
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, 1873 Rama 4 Road, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand
- Geriatric Excellence Center, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, The Thai Red Cross Society, 1873 Rama 4 Road, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand
| | - Varalak Srinonprasert
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, 2 Wanglang Road, Bangkok-Noi, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand
- Siriraj Health Policy Unit, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, 2 Wanglang Road, Bangkok-Noi, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand
| | - Sirakarn Tejavanija
- Clinical Nutrition Unit, Department of Medicine, Phramongkutklao Hospital and College of Medicine, 315 Ratchawithi Road, Thung Phaya Thai, Ratchathewi, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand
| | - Wasuwat Kitisomprayoonkul
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, 1873 Rama 4 Road, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand
| | - Piyapat Dajpratham
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, 2 Wanglang Road, Bangkok-Noi, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand
| | - Sukanya Chaikittisilpa
- Menopause Research Group, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, 1873 Rama 4 Road, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand
| | - Woraluk Somboonporn
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, 123 Mittraphap Road, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Händel MN, Cardoso I, von Bülow C, Rohde JF, Ussing A, Nielsen SM, Christensen R, Body JJ, Brandi ML, Diez-Perez A, Hadji P, Javaid MK, Lems WF, Nogues X, Roux C, Minisola S, Kurth A, Thomas T, Prieto-Alhambra D, Ferrari SL, Langdahl B, Abrahamsen B. Fracture risk reduction and safety by osteoporosis treatment compared with placebo or active comparator in postmenopausal women: systematic review, network meta-analysis, and meta-regression analysis of randomised clinical trials. BMJ 2023; 381:e068033. [PMID: 37130601 PMCID: PMC10152340 DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2021-068033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To review the comparative effectiveness of osteoporosis treatments, including the bone anabolic agents, abaloparatide and romosozumab, on reducing the risk of fractures in postmenopausal women, and to characterise the effect of antiosteoporosis drug treatments on the risk of fractures according to baseline risk factors. DESIGN Systematic review, network meta-analysis, and meta-regression analysis of randomised clinical trials. DATA SOURCES Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library to identify randomised controlled trials published between 1 January 1996 and 24 November 2021 that examined the effect of bisphosphonates, denosumab, selective oestrogen receptor modulators, parathyroid hormone receptor agonists, and romosozumab compared with placebo or active comparator. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES Randomised controlled trials that included non-Asian postmenopausal women with no restriction on age, when interventions looked at bone quality in a broad perspective. The primary outcome was clinical fractures. Secondary outcomes were vertebral, non-vertebral, hip, and major osteoporotic fractures, all cause mortality, adverse events, and serious cardiovascular adverse events. RESULTS The results were based on 69 trials (>80 000 patients). For clinical fractures, synthesis of the results showed a protective effect of bisphosphonates, parathyroid hormone receptor agonists, and romosozumab compared with placebo. Compared with parathyroid hormone receptor agonists, bisphosphonates were less effective in reducing clinical fractures (odds ratio 1.49, 95% confidence interval 1.12 to 2.00). Compared with parathyroid hormone receptor agonists and romosozumab, denosumab was less effective in reducing clinical fractures (odds ratio 1.85, 1.18 to 2.92 for denosumab v parathyroid hormone receptor agonists and 1.56, 1.02 to 2.39 for denosumab v romosozumab). An effect of all treatments on vertebral fractures compared with placebo was found. In the active treatment comparisons, denosumab, parathyroid hormone receptor agonists, and romosozumab were more effective than oral bisphosphonates in preventing vertebral fractures. The effect of all treatments was unaffected by baseline risk indicators, except for antiresorptive treatments that showed a greater reduction of clinical fractures compared with placebo with increasing mean age (number of studies=17; β=0.98, 95% confidence interval 0.96 to 0.99). No harm outcomes were seen. The certainty in the effect estimates was moderate to low for all individual outcomes, mainly because of limitations in reporting, nominally indicating a serious risk of bias and imprecision. CONCLUSIONS The evidence indicated a benefit of a range of treatments for osteoporosis in postmenopausal women for clinical and vertebral fractures. Bone anabolic treatments were more effective than bisphosphonates in the prevention of clinical and vertebral fractures, irrespective of baseline risk indicators. Hence this analysis provided no clinical evidence for restricting the use of anabolic treatment to patients with a very high risk of fractures. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42019128391.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mina Nicole Händel
- Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research, Odense Patient Data Explorative Network, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Isabel Cardoso
- Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark
| | - Cecilie von Bülow
- Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark
- Occupational Science, User Perspectives and Community-Based Interventions, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense C, Denmark
| | - Jeanett Friis Rohde
- Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark
| | - Anja Ussing
- Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark
| | - Sabrina Mai Nielsen
- Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark
- Research Unit of Rheumatology, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Robin Christensen
- Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark
- Research Unit of Rheumatology, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Jean-Jacques Body
- Department of Medicine, CHU Brugmann, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Adolfo Diez-Perez
- Department of Internal Medicine, Institut Hospital del Mar of Medical Investigation, Autonomous University of Barcelona and CIBERFES (Frailty and Healthy Aging Research Network), Instituto Carlos III, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Peyman Hadji
- Frankfurt Centre of Bone Health, Frankfurt and Philipps-University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Muhammad Kassim Javaid
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology, and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Xavier Nogues
- IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Parc de Salut Mar, Pompeu Fabra University, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Christian Roux
- INSERM U 1153, Hospital Paris-Centre, University of Paris, Paris, France
| | - Salvatore Minisola
- Department of Clinical, Internal, Anaesthesiologic, and Cardiovascular Sciences, Rome University, Rome, Italy
| | - Andreas Kurth
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Marienhaus Klinikum Mainz, Major Teaching Hospital, University Medicine Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Thierry Thomas
- Université Jean Monnet Saint-Étienne, CHU de Saint-Etienne, Rheumatology Department, INSERM U1059, F-42023, Saint-Etienne, France
| | - Daniel Prieto-Alhambra
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology, and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Department of Medical Informatics, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Bente Langdahl
- Departments of Clinical Medicine and of Endocrinology and Internal Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Bo Abrahamsen
- Department of Clinical Research, Odense Patient Data Explorative Network, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology, and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Department of Medicine, Holbæk Hospital, Holbæk, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Brent MB. Pharmaceutical treatment of bone loss: From animal models and drug development to future treatment strategies. Pharmacol Ther 2023; 244:108383. [PMID: 36933702 DOI: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2023.108383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2022] [Revised: 02/18/2023] [Accepted: 03/09/2023] [Indexed: 03/17/2023]
Abstract
Animal models are fundamental to advance our knowledge of the underlying pathophysiology of bone loss and to study pharmaceutical countermeasures against it. The animal model of post-menopausal osteoporosis from ovariectomy is the most widely used preclinical approach to study skeletal deterioration. However, several other animal models exist, each with unique characteristics such as bone loss from disuse, lactation, glucocorticoid excess, or exposure to hypobaric hypoxia. The present review aimed to provide a comprehensive overview of these animal models to emphasize the importance and significance of investigating bone loss and pharmaceutical countermeasures from perspectives other than post-menopausal osteoporosis only. Hence, the pathophysiology and underlying cellular mechanisms involved in the various types of bone loss are different, and this might influence which prevention and treatment strategies are the most effective. In addition, the review sought to map the current landscape of pharmaceutical countermeasures against osteoporosis with an emphasis on how drug development has changed from being driven by clinical observations and enhancement or repurposing of existing drugs to today's use of targeted anti-bodies that are the result of advanced insights into the underlying molecular mechanisms of bone formation and resorption. Moreover, new treatment combinations or repurposing opportunities of already approved drugs with a focus on dabigatran, parathyroid hormone and abaloparatide, growth hormone, inhibitors of the activin signaling pathway, acetazolamide, zoledronate, and romosozumab are discussed. Despite the considerable progress in drug development, there is still a clear need to improve treatment strategies and develop new pharmaceuticals against various types of osteoporosis. The review also highlights that new treatment indications should be explored using multiple animal models of bone loss in order to ensure a broad representation of different types of skeletal deterioration instead of mainly focusing on primary osteoporosis from post-menopausal estrogen deficiency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mikkel Bo Brent
- Department of Biomedicine, Aarhus University, Denmark, Wilhelm Meyers Allé 3, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Cheng J, Ju S, Zhang Z. Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures caused by Cushing's syndrome in young women: case report and literature review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2023; 24:167. [PMID: 36879208 PMCID: PMC9987057 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-023-06253-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2022] [Accepted: 02/19/2023] [Indexed: 03/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cushing's syndrome is known as an important cause of secondary osteoporosis, characterized by reduction of bone mineral density and potential occurrence of fragility fractures before diagnosis in young population. Therefore, for young patients with fragility fractures, especially in young women, more attention should be paid on glucocorticoid excess caused by Cushing's syndrome, due to relatively higher rate of misdiagnosis, distinct pathological characteristics and different treatment strategies compared with violent fractures and primary osteoporosis related fractures. CASE PRESENTATION We presented an unusual case of a 26-year-old woman with multiple vertebral compression fractures and pelvis fractures, subsequently diagnosed as Cushing's syndrome. On admission, the radiographic results showed fresh second lumbar vertebra fracture, and old fourth lumbar vertebra and pelvic fractures. The dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of lumbar spine revealed marked osteoporosis, and her plasm cortisol was extremely high. Then, Cushing's syndrome, caused by left adrenal adenoma, was diagnosed by further endocrinological and radiographic examinations. After receiving left adrenalectomy, her plasma ACTH and cortisol values returned to normal level. In term of OVCF, we adopted conservative treatments, including pain management, brace treatment, and anti-osteoporosis measures. Three months after discharge, the patient's low back pain was in complete remission without new onset of pain, and returned to normal life and work. Furthermore, we reviewed the literatures on advancements in the treatment of OVCF caused by Cushing's syndrome, and based on our experiences, proposed some additional perspectives to guide treatment. CONCLUSION In term of OVCF secondary to Cushing's syndrome without neurological damage, we prefer systematic conservative treatments, including pain management, brace treatment, and anti-osteoporosis measures, to surgical treatment. Among them, anti-osteoporosis treatment has the highest priority because of the reversibility of osteoporosis caused by Cushing's syndrome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jie Cheng
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, 149 Dalian Road, Huichuan District, Zunyi, 563000, Guizhou, China.
| | - Songli Ju
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, 149 Dalian Road, Huichuan District, Zunyi, 563000, Guizhou, China
| | - Zihan Zhang
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, 149 Dalian Road, Huichuan District, Zunyi, 563000, Guizhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Kravvariti E, Kasdagli MI, Diomatari KM, Mouratidou P, Daskalakis K, Mitsikostas DD, Sfikakis PP, Yavropoulou MP. Meta-analysis of placebo-arm dropouts in osteoporosis randomized-controlled trials and implications for nocebo-associated discontinuation of anti-osteoporotic drugs in clinical practice. Osteoporos Int 2023; 34:585-598. [PMID: 36596944 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-022-06658-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2022] [Accepted: 12/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
UNLABELLED Dropout from placebo arms in randomized-controlled trials is a surrogate for nocebo responses, resulting from patients' negative expectations to treatment. Among 16,460 placebo-treated patients in oral anti-osteoporotic drug trials, nocebo dropouts were 8% on average, being higher in older patients. This implies that nocebo may contribute to the osteoporosis treatment gap in clinical practice. PURPOSE Osteoporosis is a common disease requiring long-term treatment. Despite the availability of effective anti-osteoporotic drugs, adherence to treatment is low. Nocebo, a behavior mostly related to the negative expectations to a certain treatment, decreases adherence and negatively affects treatment outcomes and health-related care costs in chronic diseases. Since in double-blind placebo-controlled randomized trials any unfavorable outcome leading to discontinuation in placebo arms is considered as nocebo, we aimed to investigate the size of nocebo response in patients participating in osteoporosis trials. METHODS We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and Cochrane databases for dropouts due to reported adverse events in the placebo arms (nocebo dropouts) in all double-blind trials investigating anti-osteoporotic drugs published between January 1993 and March 2022. Only data on bisphosphonates and selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) were analyzed (Prospero registration number CRD42020212843). RESULTS Data from 44 trials were extracted. In 16,460 placebo-treated patients, the pooled nocebo-dropout was 8% both for bisphosphonates (average: 0.08; range 0.01-0.27; 95%CI 0.06-0.10) and SERMs (average: 0.08; range 0.03-0.15; 95%CI 0.05-0.13). Nocebo-dropouts were higher in bisphosphonate trials enrolling individuals ≥ 65 years (11%) (n = 18) compared to trials enrolling younger individuals (6%) (n = 18) (average: 0.11; 95%CI 0.08-0.13 vs. average: 0.06; 95%CI 0.05-0.08, respectively, p = 0.001). Participants' sex, dosing-intervals, publication year, or severity of osteoporosis had no impact on the nocebo-dropouts. CONCLUSION Almost 1 in 10 osteoporosis patients receiving placebo in trials of bisphosphonates and SERMs experiences AEs leading to dropout, implying that nocebo contributes to treatment-discontinuation in clinical practice. Efforts to identify and minimize nocebo, especially in older patients, are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evrydiki Kravvariti
- 1st Propaedeutic and Internal Medicine Clinic, Joint Academic Rheumatology Program, Laikon General Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527, Athens, Greece.
- Postgraduate Medical Studies in the Physiology of Aging and Geriatric Syndromes, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527, Athens, Greece.
| | - Maria-Iosifina Kasdagli
- Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527, Athens, Greece
| | - Konstantina Maria Diomatari
- Postgraduate Medical Studies in the Physiology of Aging and Geriatric Syndromes, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527, Athens, Greece
| | - Pelagia Mouratidou
- Postgraduate Medical Studies in the Physiology of Aging and Geriatric Syndromes, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527, Athens, Greece
| | - Kosmas Daskalakis
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, 701 85, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Dimos D Mitsikostas
- 1st Neurology Department, Aeginition Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528, Athens, Greece
| | - Petros P Sfikakis
- 1st Propaedeutic and Internal Medicine Clinic, Joint Academic Rheumatology Program, Laikon General Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527, Athens, Greece
- Postgraduate Medical Studies in the Physiology of Aging and Geriatric Syndromes, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527, Athens, Greece
| | - Maria P Yavropoulou
- Endocrinology Unit, 1st Department of Propaedeutic and Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Laikon General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Mai H, Mc Evoy L, Wilson C, Marov L, Kelly A, Haddad CE, Chroinin DN, Hassett G, Frost SA. Frailty and risk of subsequent fracture among older adults presenting to hospital with a minimal trauma fracture. Osteoporos Int 2023; 34:399-404. [PMID: 36472657 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-022-06630-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2022] [Accepted: 11/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
UNLABELLED We investigated frailty and refracture risk among older adults with a minimal trauma fracture. After adjusting for age, sex, and site of initial fracture, increasing frailty was associated with an increased risk subsequent fracture. These results indicate the need to routinely screen for frailty following an initial fracture among older adults. INTRODUCTION Minimal trauma fractures are common among older adults, and frailty increases risk of an initial minimal trauma fracture. This study was undertaken to estimate the risk of subsequent fracture based on frailty status at the time of an initial fracture. METHODS The study population was older adults presenting to hospital, aged 60 years or more, with a minimal trauma fracture. Frailty was estimated using a cumulative deficit approach. The risk of subsequent fracture based on increasing cumulative frailty deficit item group, adjusted for sex, age, and site of initial fracture, was estimated using Cox's proportional hazard model. RESULTS Between January 2014 and December 2020, 12,115 older adults presented to hospital (8371 women [69%]), with an initial minimal trauma fracture. The average age was 80 years (SD 9.5). Subsequent fractures identified during the follow-up period occurred in 1137 (9.4%) of study participants. The incidence of subsequent fracture ranged from 25.0 per 1000 older adults (95% confidence interval (CI) 22.4 to 27.8) among the lowest frailty deficit group (1 deficit item) to 31.8 per 1000 (95% CI 28.0 to 35.8) among the highest frailty deficit group (4 to 12 deficit items). After adjusting for age, sex, and site of initial fracture, an increasing number of frailty deficit items was associated with increased risk subsequent fracture (p-value for trend = 0.008). CONCLUSION Our results indicate that following an initial minimal trauma fracture, frailty independently increases the risk of a subsequent fracture. Therefore, it is important at the time of an initial fracture that older women and men are screened for the presence of frailty, and models of care are implemented to reduce the risk of subsequent fracture among this vulnerable group of older adults.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ha Mai
- South Western Sydney Nursing and Midwifery Research Alliance, Ingham Institute of Applied Medical Research, 1-3 Campbell Street Liverpool, Liverpool, 2170, Australia
| | | | - Carol Wilson
- Bankstown-Lidcombe Hospital, Bankstown, Australia
| | - Lynda Marov
- Campbelltown Hospital, Campbelltown, Australia
| | - Ayano Kelly
- Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, Australia
- SPHERE MSK Clinical Academic Group, Sydney, Australia
| | - Carlos El Haddad
- Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, Australia
- SPHERE MSK Clinical Academic Group, Sydney, Australia
- South Western Sydney Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Danielle Ni Chroinin
- Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, Australia
- South Western Sydney Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Geraldine Hassett
- Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, Australia
- SPHERE MSK Clinical Academic Group, Sydney, Australia
- South Western Sydney Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Steven A Frost
- South Western Sydney Nursing and Midwifery Research Alliance, Ingham Institute of Applied Medical Research, 1-3 Campbell Street Liverpool, Liverpool, 2170, Australia.
- Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, Australia.
- SPHERE MSK Clinical Academic Group, Sydney, Australia.
- University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Jin W, Chen F, Fang Q, Mao G, Bao Y. Oligosaccharides from Sargassum thunbergii inhibit osteoclast differentiation via regulation of IRF-8 signaling. Exp Gerontol 2023; 172:112057. [PMID: 36513214 DOI: 10.1016/j.exger.2022.112057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2022] [Revised: 12/05/2022] [Accepted: 12/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Osteoporosis (OP) is a systemic bone degenerative disease characterized by low bone mass and deteriorated microarchitecture of bone tissue, causing high morbidity and mortality rates. Bone resorption by overactivated osteoclasts (OCs) is the main cause of osteoporosis. Glucuronomannan and its oligomers (Gs) and their sulfated derivatives (SGs) were previously prepared. The anti-osteoporosis activities of these glycans were evaluated. Firstly, we determined the viability of RAW264.7 by CCK-8 test. Nextly, we investigated the inhibitory effects of Gs and SGs on the differentiation of RAW264.7 cells into OCs using tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) staining, F-actin ring staining, qualitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction(qRT-PCR) and western blotting. TRAP staining revealed that Gs significantly blocked RANKL-induced OC generation while SGs did not exhibit this ability. F-actin staining assays demonstrated that Gs inhibits RANKL-induced actin ring formation. qRT-PCR analyses indicated that Gs dose-dependently inhibited the expression of OCs marker genes including Trap, NFATc1, c-Fos, DC-Stamp and ATP60 during the differentiation process, while SGs did not suppress. Regarding the mechanism of Gs, it was found that Gs suppressed osteoclastogenesis via inhibiting the degradation of IRF-8 and interfering with NF-κB pathway activation. Together, these results suggest that Gs have the ability to inhibit osteoclastogenesis by modulating IRF-8 signaling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weihua Jin
- College of Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310014, PR China..
| | - Fen Chen
- College of Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310014, PR China
| | - Qiufu Fang
- College of Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310014, PR China
| | - Genxiang Mao
- Zhejiang Provincial Key Lab of Geriatrics, Department of Geriatrics, Zhejiang Hospital, Hangzhou 310013, PR China.
| | - Yizhong Bao
- Zhejiang Provincial Key Lab of Geriatrics, Department of Geriatrics, Zhejiang Hospital, Hangzhou 310013, PR China.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Ayers C, Kansagara D, Lazur B, Fu R, Kwon A, Harrod C. Effectiveness and Safety of Treatments to Prevent Fractures in People With Low Bone Mass or Primary Osteoporosis: A Living Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis for the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med 2023; 176:182-195. [PMID: 36592455 DOI: 10.7326/m22-0684] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 46.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The prevalence of osteoporosis is increasing in the United States. PURPOSE To evaluate low bone mass and osteoporosis treatments to prevent fractures. DATA SOURCES Ovid MEDLINE ALL, Ovid Evidence Based Medicine Reviews: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and ClinicalTrials.gov from 2014 through February 2022. STUDY SELECTION Adults receiving eligible interventions for low bone mass or osteoporosis. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for fracture outcomes, and RCTs and large observational studies (n ≥1000) for harms. DATA EXTRACTION Abstracted by 1 reviewer and verified by a second. Independent, dual assessments of risk of bias and certainty of evidence (CoE). DATA SYNTHESIS We included 34 RCTs (in 100 publications) and 36 observational studies. Bisphosphonates and denosumab reduced hip, clinical and radiographic vertebral, and other clinical fractures in postmenopausal females with osteoporosis (moderate to high CoE). Bisphosphonates for 36 months or more may increase the risk for atypical femoral fractures (AFFs) and osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ), but the absolute risks were low. Abaloparatide and teriparatide reduced clinical and radiographic vertebral fractures but increased the risk for withdrawals due to adverse events (WAEs; moderate to high CoE). Raloxifene and bazedoxifene for 36 months or more reduced radiographic vertebral but not clinical fractures (low to moderate CoE). Abaloparatide, teriparatide, and sequential romosozumab, then alendronate, may be more effective than bisphosphonates in reducing clinical fractures for 17 to 24 months in older postmenopausal females at very high fracture risk (low to moderate CoE). Bisphosphonates may reduce clinical fractures in older females with low bone mass (low CoE) and radiographic vertebral fractures in males with osteoporosis (low to moderate CoE). LIMITATION Few studies examined participants with low bone mass, males, or Black-identifying persons, sequential therapy, or treatment beyond 3 years. CONCLUSION Bisphosphonates, denosumab, abaloparatide, teriparatide, and romosozumab, followed by alendronate, reduce clinical fractures in postmenopausal females with osteoporosis. Abaloparatide and teriparatide increased WAEs; longer duration bisphosphonate use may increase AFF and ONJ risk though these events were rare. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE American College of Physicians. (PROSPERO: CRD42021236220).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chelsea Ayers
- Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care (CIVIC), VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, Oregon (C.A.)
| | - Devan Kansagara
- Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care (CIVIC), VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, and Division of General Internal Medicine & Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (D.K.)
| | - Brittany Lazur
- Center for Evidence-based Policy, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (B.L.)
| | - Rongwei Fu
- Oregon Health & Science University-Portland State University School of Public Health, Portland, Oregon (R.F.)
| | - Amy Kwon
- Division of General Internal Medicine & Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (A.K.)
| | - Curtis Harrod
- Division of General Internal Medicine & Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, and Center for Evidence-based Policy, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (C.H.)
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Corrao G, Biffi A, Porcu G, Ronco R, Adami G, Alvaro R, Bogini R, Caputi AP, Cianferotti L, Frediani B, Gatti D, Gonnelli S, Iolascon G, Lenzi A, Leone S, Michieli R, Migliaccio S, Nicoletti T, Paoletta M, Pennini A, Piccirilli E, Rossini M, Tarantino U, Brandi ML. Executive summary: Italian guidelines for diagnosis, risk stratification, and care continuity of fragility fractures 2021. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2023; 14:1137671. [PMID: 37143730 PMCID: PMC10151776 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1137671] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2023] [Accepted: 03/27/2023] [Indexed: 05/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Fragility fractures are a major public health concern owing to their worrying and growing burden and their onerous burden upon health systems. There is now a substantial body of evidence that individuals who have already suffered a fragility fracture are at a greater risk for further fractures, thus suggesting the potential for secondary prevention in this field. Purpose This guideline aims to provide evidence-based recommendations for recognizing, stratifying the risk, treating, and managing patients with fragility fracture. This is a summary version of the full Italian guideline. Methods The Italian Fragility Fracture Team appointed by the Italian National Health Institute was employed from January 2020 to February 2021 to (i) identify previously published systematic reviews and guidelines on the field, (ii) formulate relevant clinical questions, (iii) systematically review literature and summarize evidence, (iv) draft the Evidence to Decision Framework, and (v) formulate recommendations. Results Overall, 351 original papers were included in our systematic review to answer six clinical questions. Recommendations were categorized into issues concerning (i) frailty recognition as the cause of bone fracture, (ii) (re)fracture risk assessment, for prioritizing interventions, and (iii) treatment and management of patients experiencing fragility fractures. Six recommendations were overall developed, of which one, four, and one were of high, moderate, and low quality, respectively. Conclusions The current guidelines provide guidance to support individualized management of patients experiencing non-traumatic bone fracture to benefit from secondary prevention of (re)fracture. Although our recommendations are based on the best available evidence, questionable quality evidence is still available for some relevant clinical questions, so future research has the potential to reduce uncertainty about the effects of intervention and the reasons for doing so at a reasonable cost.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni Corrao
- National Centre for Healthcare Research and Pharmacoepidemiology, Laboratory of the University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
- Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, Unit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Public Health, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
- *Correspondence: Giovanni Corrao, ; Maria Luisa Brandi,
| | - Annalisa Biffi
- National Centre for Healthcare Research and Pharmacoepidemiology, Laboratory of the University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
- Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, Unit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Public Health, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Gloria Porcu
- National Centre for Healthcare Research and Pharmacoepidemiology, Laboratory of the University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
- Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, Unit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Public Health, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Raffaella Ronco
- National Centre for Healthcare Research and Pharmacoepidemiology, Laboratory of the University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
- Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, Unit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Public Health, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Rosaria Alvaro
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | - Luisella Cianferotti
- Italian Bone Disease Research Foundation, Fondazione Italiana Ricerca sulle Malattie dell’Osso (FIRMO), Florence, Italy
| | - Bruno Frediani
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, Rheumatology Unit, University of Siena, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Senese, Siena, Italy
| | - Davide Gatti
- Rheumatology Unit, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Stefano Gonnelli
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, Policlinico Le Scotte, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Giovanni Iolascon
- Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties and Dentistry, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples, Italy
| | - Andrea Lenzi
- Department of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale del Policlinico, Rome, Italy
| | - Salvatore Leone
- AMICI Onlus, Associazione Nazionale per le Malattie Infiammatorie Croniche dell’Intestino, Milan, Italy
| | - Raffaella Michieli
- Italian Society of General Medicine and Primary Care Società Italiana di Medicina Generale e delle cure primarie (SIMG), Florence, Italy
| | - Silvia Migliaccio
- Department of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, Foro Italico University, Rome, Italy
| | - Tiziana Nicoletti
- CnAMC, Coordinamento nazionale delle Associazioni dei Malati Cronici e rari di Cittadinanzattiva, Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Paoletta
- Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties and Dentistry, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples, Italy
| | - Annalisa Pennini
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Eleonora Piccirilli
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Translational Medicine, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy
- Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, “Policlinico Tor Vergata” Foundation, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Umberto Tarantino
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Translational Medicine, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy
- Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, “Policlinico Tor Vergata” Foundation, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Luisa Brandi
- Italian Bone Disease Research Foundation, Fondazione Italiana Ricerca sulle Malattie dell’Osso (FIRMO), Florence, Italy
- *Correspondence: Giovanni Corrao, ; Maria Luisa Brandi,
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Bogoch E, Marcano-Fernández FA, Schemitsch EH, Zhou Q, Bzovsky S, Bhandari M, Schneider PS, Swiontkowski M, Sprague S. High Rates of Imminent Subsequent Fracture After Femoral Neck Fracture in the Elderly. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2022; 104:1984-1992. [PMID: 36017942 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.22.00088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fragility fractures of the hip are known to be followed frequently by subsequent fragility fractures, including second hip fractures. Data on subsequent fractures are available for aggregated index femoral neck and intertrochanteric femoral fractures, grouped generically as hip fractures, but not specifically for femoral neck fractures. There is increasing recognition that a subsequent fracture often occurs early after a hip fracture in the elderly, creating an emphasis on the concept of "imminent fracture risk." Since 2000, there have been many reports on the care gap in interventions after a fragility fracture, with concern regarding the slow uptake of appropriate systemic treatments designed to prevent a subsequent fracture in high-risk patients. METHODS As planned a priori, we performed an analysis of subsequent fractures after an index femoral neck fracture in 2 prospective clinical trials involving 2,520 patients from 90 sites on 5 continents. We recorded the incidence and time of occurrence of all secondary fragility fractures as well as the reported use of bone-protective medication in all subjects. RESULTS In the 24 months following the index femoral neck fracture, 226 (9.0%) of 2,520 patients sustained at least 1 subsequent fragility fracture, including 113 hip fractures (4.5%). The median interval from the index fracture to a subsequent fracture was approximately 9.0 months. Only 25.2% (634) of the 2,520 patients reported using bone-protective medications at any time during follow-up. Female patients, those with nondisplaced index fractures, and those treated with arthroplasty, were more likely to have received protective medication. CONCLUSIONS Subsequent fractures, including second hip fractures, occurred frequently and early following an index femoral neck fracture in 2 large global cohorts. Interventions to prevent a subsequent fracture were instituted in only 1 of 4 patients, even though a focused directive was included in both study protocols. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Prognostic Level II . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Earl Bogoch
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Francesc A Marcano-Fernández
- Orthopaedic Department, Parc Taulí Hospital Universitari, Institut d'Investigació i Innovació Parc Taulí I3PT, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Sabadell, Spain
| | - Emil H Schemitsch
- Department of Surgery, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Qi Zhou
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sofia Bzovsky
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mohit Bhandari
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.,Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Prism S Schneider
- Division of Orthopaedic Trauma, Department of Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Marc Swiontkowski
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Sheila Sprague
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.,Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Guillaumin M, Poirson B, Gerazime A, Puyraveau M, Tannou T, Mauny F, Toussirot É. Fractures reduction with osteoporotic treatments in patients over 75-year-old: A systematic review and meta-analysis. FRONTIERS IN AGING 2022; 3:845886. [PMID: 36404990 PMCID: PMC9667050 DOI: 10.3389/fragi.2022.845886] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2021] [Accepted: 10/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Background: Osteoporosis consists in the reduction of bone mineral density and increased risk of fracture. Age is a risk factor for osteoporosis. Although many treatments are available for osteoporosis, there is limited data regarding their efficacy in older people. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of osteoporosis treatments in patients over 75 years old. Methods: We reviewed all published studies in MEDLINE, Cochrane and EMBASE including patients over 75 years old, treated by osteoporosis drugs, and focused on vertebral fractures or hip fractures. Results: We identified 4,393 records for review; 4,216 were excluded after title/abstract review. After full text review, 19 records were included in the systematic review. Most studies showed a reduction in vertebral fracture with osteoporosis treatments, but non-significant results were observed for hip fractures. Meta-analysis of 10 studies showed that lack of treatment was significantly associated with an increased risk of vertebral fractures at one (OR = 3.67; 95%CI = 2.50–5.38) and 3 years (OR = 2.19; 95%CI = 1.44–3.34), and for hip fractures at one (OR = 2.14; 95%CI = 1.09–4.22) and 3 years (OR = 1.31, 95%CI = 1.12–1.53). Conclusion: A reduction in the risk of vertebral fractures with osteoporosis treatments was observed in most of the studies included and meta-analysis showed that lack of treatment was significantly associated with an increased risk of vertebral fractures. Concerning hip fractures, majority of included studies did not show a significant reduction in the occurrence of hip fractures with osteoporotic treatments, but meta-analysis showed an increased risk of hip fractures without osteoporotic treatment. However, most of the data derived from post hoc and preplanned analyses or observational studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michel Guillaumin
- Département de Gériatrie, CHU, Besançon, France
- *Correspondence: Michel Guillaumin,
| | | | - Aurélie Gerazime
- Unité de Méthodologie, INSERM CIC-1431 Centre Investigation Clinique CHU, Besançon, France
| | - Marc Puyraveau
- Unité de Méthodologie, INSERM CIC-1431 Centre Investigation Clinique CHU, Besançon, France
| | | | - Fréderic Mauny
- Unité de Méthodologie, INSERM CIC-1431 Centre Investigation Clinique CHU, Besançon, France
| | - Éric Toussirot
- INSERM CIC-1431 Centre d’Investigation Clinique, CHU, Besançon, France
- INSERM CIC-1431 Centre Investigation Clinique et Département de Rhumatologie, CHU, Besançon, France
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Fuggle N, Al-Daghri N, Bock O, Branco J, Bruyère O, Casado E, Cavalier E, Cortet B, de Wit M, Giusti A, Halbout P, Harvey NC, Hiligsmann M, Kaufman JM, Kurth A, Maggi S, Matijevic R, Minisola S, Palacios S, Radermecker RP, Thomasius F, Tuzun S, Veronese N, Kanis JA, Reginster JY, Rizzoli R, Cooper C. Novel formulations of oral bisphosphonates in the treatment of osteoporosis. Aging Clin Exp Res 2022; 34:2625-2634. [PMID: 36331798 PMCID: PMC9675642 DOI: 10.1007/s40520-022-02272-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2022] [Accepted: 10/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Oral bisphosphonates are a key intervention in the treatment of osteoporosis and in reducing the risk of fragility fractures. Their use is supported by over 3 decades of evidence; however, patient adherence to oral bisphosphonates remains poor in part due to complex dosing instructions and adverse events, including upper gastrointestinal symptoms. This problem has led to the development of novel oral bisphosphonate formulations. Buffered, effervescent alendronate is dissolved in water and so seeks to reduce upper gastro-intestinal adverse events, and gastro-resistant risedronate aims to reduce the complexity of dosing procedure (e.g. fasting prior to consumption) whilst still maintaining the efficacy of fracture risk reduction. Clinical trials and real-world data have been employed to demonstrate some benefits in terms of reduced upper gastro-intestinal adverse events, adherence, persistence and health economic outcomes. This report describes the result of an ESCEO (European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis) expert working group, which explores where oral bisphosphonates sit in current clinical practice guidelines, review their risk-benefit profile and the consequences of poor adherence before exploring novel oral bisphosphonate formulations and their potential clinical and health economic impact. Further research is required but there are signs that these novel, oral bisphosphonate formulations may lead to improved tolerance of oral bisphosphonates and thus, improved adherence and fracture outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas Fuggle
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Tremona Road, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Nasser Al-Daghri
- Chair for Biomarkers of Chronic Diseases, Biochemistry Department, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Olivier Bock
- Department of Osteoporosis, Inselspital-Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- International Osteoporosis Foundation, Nyon, Switzerland
| | - Jaime Branco
- Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Ocidental-Hospital Egas Moniz, CEDOC/NOVA Medical School, Nova University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Olivier Bruyère
- Division of Public Health, Epidemiology and Health Economics, WHO Collaborating Center for Public Health Aspects of Musculo-Skeletal Health and Ageing, University of Liège, Avenue Hippocrate 13, CHU B23, 4000, Liege, Belgium
| | - Enrique Casado
- Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital Parc Taulí, I3PT Research Institute (UAB), Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Etienne Cavalier
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, University of Liège, CIRM, CHU Sart-Tilman, 4000, Liège, Belgium
| | - Bernard Cortet
- Department of Rheumatology, Univ. Lille, CHU Lille, MABlab ULR 4490, 59000, Lille, France
| | - Maarten de Wit
- Department of Medical Humanities, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Andrea Giusti
- Metabolic Bone Diseases Unit and Fracture Liaison Service, Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medical Specialties, Local Health Trust 3, Via Missolungi 14, 16147, Genoa, Italy
| | | | - Nicholas C Harvey
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Tremona Road, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Tremona Road, Southampton, UK
| | - Mickaël Hiligsmann
- Department of Health Services Research, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Jean-Marc Kaufman
- Department of Endocrinology, Ghent University Hospital, 9000, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Andreas Kurth
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Community Clinics Middle Rhine, Campus Kemperhof, Koblenz, Germany
| | - Stefania Maggi
- Institute of Neuroscience, Aging Branch, CNR, Padua, Italy
| | - Radmila Matijevic
- Faculty of Medicine, Clinic for Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, Clinical Center of Vojvodina, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia
| | - Salvatore Minisola
- Department of Clinical, Internal, Anaesthesiology, and Cardiovascular Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Régis Pierre Radermecker
- Department of Diabetes, Nutrition and Metabolic Disorders, Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liège, CHU de Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | | | - Sansin Tuzun
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Cerrahpaşa Medical Faculty, Istanbul University Cerrahpaşa, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Nicola Veronese
- Department of Internal Medicine, Geriatrics Section, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - John A Kanis
- Mary McKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia
- Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Jean-Yves Reginster
- Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Ocidental-Hospital Egas Moniz, CEDOC/NOVA Medical School, Nova University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - René Rizzoli
- Department of Osteoporosis, Inselspital-Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Cyrus Cooper
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Tremona Road, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.
- Department of Rheumatology, Univ. Lille, CHU Lille, MABlab ULR 4490, 59000, Lille, France.
- NIHR Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Eastell R, Vittinghoff E, Lui LY, Ewing SK, Schwartz AV, Bauer DC, Black DM, Bouxsein ML. Diabetes Mellitus and the Benefit of Antiresorptive Therapy on Fracture Risk. J Bone Miner Res 2022; 37:2121-2131. [PMID: 36065588 PMCID: PMC10092457 DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.4697] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2022] [Revised: 08/05/2022] [Accepted: 08/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is associated with increased risk of fractures. However, it is unclear whether current osteoporosis treatments reduce fractures in individuals with diabetes. The aim of the study was to determine whether presence of T2D influences the efficacy of antiresorptive treatment for osteoporosis using the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (FNIH)-American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR)-Study to Advance Bone Mineral Density (BMD) as a Regulatory Endpoint (SABRE) cohort, which includes individual patient data from randomized trials of osteoporosis therapies. In this study we included 96,385 subjects, 6.8% of whom had T2D, from nine bisphosphonate trials, two selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) trials, two trials of menopausal hormone therapy, one denosumab trial, and one odanacatib trial. We used Cox regression to obtain the treatment hazard ratio (HR) for incident nonvertebral, hip, and all fractures and logistic regression to obtain the treatment odds ratio (OR) for incident morphometric vertebral fractures, separately for T2D and non-DM. We used linear regression to estimate the effect of treatment on 2-year change in BMD (n = 49,099) and 3-month to 12-month change in bone turnover markers (n = 12,701) by diabetes status. In all analyses, we assessed the interaction between treatment and diabetes status. In pooled analyses of all 15 trials, we found that diabetes did not impact treatment efficacy, with similar reductions in vertebral, nonvertebral, all, and hip fractures, increases in total hip and femoral neck BMD, and reductions in serum C-terminal cross-linking telopeptide (CTX), urinary N-telopeptide of type I collagen/creatinine (NTX/Cr) and procollagen type 1 N propeptide (P1NP) (all interactions p > 0.05). We found similar results for the pooled analysis of bisphosphonate trials. However, when we considered trials individually, we found a few interactions within individual studies between diabetes status and the effects of denosumab and odanacatib on fracture risk, change in BMD or bone turnover markers (BTMs). In sum, these results provide strong evidence that bisphosphonates and most licensed antiresorptive drugs are effective at reducing fracture risk and increasing BMD irrespective of diabetes status. © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Eastell
- Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Eric Vittinghoff
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Li-Yung Lui
- Research Institute, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Susan K Ewing
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Ann V Schwartz
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Douglas C Bauer
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Dennis M Black
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Mary L Bouxsein
- Center for Advanced Orthopedic Studies, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Al-Toma A, Herman A, Lems WF, Mulder CJJ. The Dietary and Non-Dietary Management of Osteoporosis in Adult-Onset Celiac Disease: Current Status and Practical Guidance. Nutrients 2022; 14:4554. [PMID: 36364816 PMCID: PMC9654202 DOI: 10.3390/nu14214554] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2022] [Revised: 10/14/2022] [Accepted: 10/26/2022] [Indexed: 12/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Impaired bone mineral density (BMD) is a frequent complication of adult-onset celiac disease (CeD). This is usually due to malabsorption of nutrients, changes in bone metabolism in association with inflammation, and to a lesser extent, decreased overall physical health and mobility. This review aims to highlight the current status concerning surveillance, prevention, and treatment strategies for bone disease in CeD. A practical guidance on these matters is suggested. The available published research on the prevention and treatment of decreased BMD in relation to CeD is scarce. In general, publications were based on expert opinions or extrapolation from studies on postmenopausal women or inflammatory bowel disease. Optimal dietary treatment and an adequate supply of calcium and vitamin D are the cornerstones for the reduction in fracture risk in patients with CeD. In adults with low BMD or fragility fractures, CeD needs to be considered and specifically approached. When osteoporosis is documented, start treatment with an antiresorptive agent; these agents are proven to result in a long-term reduction in fracture risk in high-risk individuals. However, there are some important differences between the management of male and female patients, particularly premenopausal women, that need to be addressed. In patients with persisting diarrhea and malabsorption, parenteral medications may be preferable. Future research specifically focusing on celiac disease and the associated disorders in bone mineralization is mandatory to provide evidence-based recommendations in this field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdulbaqi Al-Toma
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, St. Antonius Hospital, 3435 CM Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Amin Herman
- Department of Rheumatology, St. Antonius Hospital, 3435 CM Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Willem F. Lems
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Chris J. J. Mulder
- Department of Gastroenterology, Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
LeBoff MS, Greenspan SL, Insogna KL, Lewiecki EM, Saag KG, Singer AJ, Siris ES. The clinician's guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 2022; 33:2049-2102. [PMID: 35478046 PMCID: PMC9546973 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-021-05900-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 279] [Impact Index Per Article: 139.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2020] [Accepted: 02/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Osteoporosis is the most common metabolic bone disease in the USA and the world. It is a subclinical condition until complicated by fracture(s). These fractures place an enormous medical and personal burden on individuals who suffer from them and take a significant economic toll. Any new fracture in an adult aged 50 years or older signifies imminent elevated risk for subsequent fractures, particularly in the year following the initial fracture. What a patient perceives as an unfortunate accident may be seen as a sentinel event indicative of bone fragility and increased future fracture risk even when the result of considerable trauma. Clinical or subclinical vertebral fractures, the most common type of osteoporotic fractures, are associated with a 5-fold increased risk for additional vertebral fractures and a 2- to 3-fold increased risk for fractures at other sites. Untreated osteoporosis can lead to a vicious cycle of recurrent fracture(s), often resulting in disability and premature death. In appropriate patients, treatment with effective antifracture medication prevents fractures and improves outcomes. Primary care providers and medical specialists are critical gatekeepers who can identify fractures and initiate proven osteoporosis interventions. Osteoporosis detection, diagnosis, and treatment should be routine practice in all adult healthcare settings. The Bone Health and Osteoporosis Foundation (BHOF) - formerly the National Osteoporosis Foundation - first published the Clinician's Guide in 1999 to provide accurate information on osteoporosis prevention and treatment. Since that time, significant improvements have been made in diagnostic technologies and treatments for osteoporosis. Despite these advances, a disturbing gap persists in patient care. At-risk patients are often not screened to establish fracture probability and not educated about fracture prevention. Most concerning, the majority of highest risk women and men who have a fracture(s) are not diagnosed and do not receive effective, FDA-approved therapies. Even those prescribed appropriate therapy are unlikely to take the medication as prescribed. The Clinician's Guide offers concise recommendations regarding prevention, risk assessment, diagnosis, and treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women and men aged 50 years and older. It includes indications for bone densitometry as well as fracture risk thresholds for pharmacologic intervention. Current medications build bone and/or decrease bone breakdown and dramatically reduce incident fractures. All antifracture therapeutics treat but do not cure the disease. Skeletal deterioration resumes sooner or later when a medication is discontinued-sooner for nonbisphosphonates and later for bisphosphonates. Even if normal BMD is achieved, osteoporosis and elevated risk for fracture are still present. The diagnosis of osteoporosis persists even if subsequent DXA T-scores are above - 2.5. Ongoing monitoring and strategic interventions will be necessary if fractures are to be avoided. In addition to pharmacotherapy, adequate intake of calcium and vitamin D, avoidance of smoking and excessive alcohol intake, weight-bearing and resistance-training exercise, and fall prevention are included in the fracture prevention armamentarium. Where possible, recommendations in this guide are based on evidence from RCTs; however, relevant published data and guidance from expert clinical experience provides the basis for recommendations in those areas where RCT evidence is currently deficient or not applicable to the many osteoporosis patients not considered for RCT participation due to age and morbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M. S. LeBoff
- grid.38142.3c000000041936754XBrigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 221 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA 02115 USA
| | - S. L. Greenspan
- grid.412689.00000 0001 0650 7433University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 1110 Kaufmann Building, 3471 Fifth Ave, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
| | - K. L. Insogna
- grid.47100.320000000419368710Yale School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
| | - E. M. Lewiecki
- grid.266832.b0000 0001 2188 8502University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, 300 Oak St NE, Albuquerque, NM 87106 USA
| | - K. G. Saag
- grid.265892.20000000106344187University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1720 2nd Avenue South, FOT 820, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
| | - A. J. Singer
- grid.411663.70000 0000 8937 0972MedStar Georgetown University Hospital and Georgetown University Medical Center, 3800 Reservoir Road NW, 3rd Floor, Washington, DC 20007 USA
| | - E. S. Siris
- grid.21729.3f0000000419368729Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 180 Fort Washington Ave, Suite 9-903, New York, NY 10032 USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Bhatnagar A, Kekatpure AL. Postmenopausal Osteoporosis: A Literature Review. Cureus 2022; 14:e29367. [PMID: 36299953 PMCID: PMC9586717 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.29367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2022] [Accepted: 09/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
A substantial proportion of the population of females in India falls in the perimenopausal and postmenopausal age groups. One of the complications associated with older age in women is the weakening of bones and the fall in bone mineral density (BMD). This has a severe debilitating consequence in a woman’s life and leads to reduced quality of life along with a greater incidence of fractures. If the fracture involves the hip or the vertebrae, it can cause immobility and be devastating. Postmenopausal osteoporosis is linked with the deficiency of estrogen that occurs with the cessation of the function of the ovaries as age progresses. The function of estrogen in the bone remodeling process is very well understood after years of research; estrogen plays a part in both the formation of bone as well as the prevention of the resorption of bone. A diagnosis can be made by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). It is the gold standard and can spot low bone density at particular sites. The treatment options are selected according to the severity and rate of progression and factors pertaining to each patient. All postmenopausal women should be made aware of this disorder, and they should be encouraged to cultivate a healthy lifestyle through the implementation of a proper diet and inculcation of a regular exercise routine. Smoking and drinking alcohol should be limited, and calcium and vitamin D supplementation should be started in all women of the postmenopausal age group with or without osteoporosis. In patients who have been diagnosed with the disorder, pharmacological intervention is done. Drugs should be selected based on their side effects and contradictions. Follow-up is essential, and patient compliance should be carefully monitored. This article attempts to review the existing literature on this very prevalent disorder to spread awareness about it so that all postmenopausal women can take the necessary steps to prevent the weakening of their bones, and deal with its progression.
Collapse
|
33
|
Geusens P, Appelman-Dijkstra NM, Zillikens MC, Willems H, Lems WF, van den Bergh J. How to implement guidelines and models of care. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2022; 36:101759. [PMID: 35729036 DOI: 10.1016/j.berh.2022.101759] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
In subjects older than 50 years, the presence of clinical risk factors (CRFs) for fractures or a recent fracture is the cornerstone for case finding. In patients who are clinically at high short- and long-term risk of fractures (those with a recent clinical fracture or with multiple CRFs), further assessment with bone mineral density (BMD) measurement using dual-energy absorptiometry (DXA), imaging of the spine, fall risk evaluation and laboratory examination contributes to treatment decisions according to the height and modifiability of fracture risk. Treatment is available with anti-resorptive and anabolic drugs, and from the start of treatment a lifelong strategy is needed to decide about continuous, intermittent, and sequential therapy. Implementation of guidelines requires further initiatives for improving case finding, public awareness about osteoporosis and national policies on reimbursement of assessment and therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Piet Geusens
- Department of Rheumatology, Maastricht University, Minderbroedersberg 4-6, 6211 LK Maastricht, Netherlands.
| | - Natasha M Appelman-Dijkstra
- Department of Internal Medicine-Endocrinology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, Netherlands.
| | - M Carola Zillikens
- Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
| | - Hanna Willems
- Department of Geriatrics, Amsterdam University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117 1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands.
| | - Willem F Lems
- Department of Rheumatology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117 1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands.
| | - Joop van den Bergh
- Department of Internal Medicine, VieCuri Medisch Cenrum, Tegelseweg 210, 5912 BL Venlo, Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Osteoporosis and Fragility Fractures: currently available pharmacological options and future directions. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2022; 36:101780. [PMID: 36163230 DOI: 10.1016/j.berh.2022.101780] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Osteoporosis is a systemic skeletal disease characterized by low bone mass and microarchitectural deterioration of bone tissue, with a consequent increase in bone fragility and susceptibility to fracture. The average lifetime risk of a 50-year-old woman to suffer a fracture of the spine, hip, proximal humerus, or distal forearm has been estimated at close to 50%. In general, pharmacological treatment is recommended in patients who suffered a fragility fracture because their risk of suffering a subsequent fracture is increased dramatically. Therefore, many guidelines recommend pharmacological treatment in patients without a prevalent fracture if their fracture probability is comparable to or higher than that of a person of the same age with a prevalent fracture. The present review aims to highlight currently available pharmacological treatment options and their antifracture efficacy including safety aspects. Drug classes discussed comprise bisphosphonates, selective estrogen receptor modulators, parathyroid hormone peptides and derivatives, humanized monoclonal antibodies, and estrogens and gestagens and their combinations. Furthermore, a brief glimpse is provided into a potentially promising treatment option that involves mesenchymal stem cells.
Collapse
|
35
|
Two-year risedronate treatment for osteoporosis in patients with esophageal varices: a non-randomized clinical trial. Hepatol Int 2022; 16:1458-1467. [PMID: 35767173 DOI: 10.1007/s12072-022-10366-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2022] [Accepted: 05/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bisphosphonates are the mainstay of osteoporosis treatment, but their use for patients with esophageal varices has been avoided due to the risk of esophagitis, which may cause variceal bleeding. Since most clinical trials assessing osteoporosis treatment last 2-3 years, this study aimed to evaluate a 2-year risedronate treatment for patients with esophageal varices and liver cirrhosis. METHODS The study received Institutional Review Board approval, and the sample was divided into two groups according to bone mineral density (BMD). Cirrhosis severity and endoscopic findings at baseline were similar between the groups. The intervention group had 51 patients with osteoporosis, who received oral risedronate 35 mg weekly plus calcium and vitamin D supplements. The control group had 51 patients with osteopenia, receiving only the supplements. Scheduled esophagogastroduodenoscopies and BMD measurements were carried out. RESULTS The adjusted esophagitis risk was higher in the intervention group; however, none of the subjects had digestive bleeding. Lumbar spine BMD increased in the intervention group (- 3.06 ± 0.71 to - 2.33 ± 0.90; p < 0.001) and in the control group (- 1.38 ± 0.77 to - 1.10 ± 1.05; p = 0.012). Femoral neck BMD did not change in the intervention group (- 1.64 ± 0.91 to - 1.71 ± 0.95; p = 0.220), but tended to decrease in the control group (- 1.00 ± 0.74 to - 1.09 ± 0.82; p = 0.053). CONCLUSION Oral risedronate was effective and did not cause gastrointestinal bleeding in cirrhotic patients with esophageal varices under endoscopic surveillance.
Collapse
|
36
|
González Macías J, Olmos Martínez JM. Aminobisphosphonates: Reconsideration 25 years after their approval for the treatment of osteoporosis. Med Clin (Barc) 2022; 159:336-343. [PMID: 35738929 DOI: 10.1016/j.medcli.2022.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2022] [Revised: 04/18/2022] [Accepted: 04/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Aminobisphosphonates are widely used in the treatment of osteoporosis. They have a high affinity for hydroxyapatite, binding primarily to resorbing surfaces, but also to forming surfaces and to some extent to resting surfaces. They inhibit osteoclasts, thereby decreasing remodelling units. Consequently, they increase bone mass and reduce stress risers. This decreases the risk of fractures. If this decrease is sufficient, they can be temporarily withdrawn (drug holidays), which prevents serious complications (atypical femoral fracture). They probably reduce mortality. Virtually all patients with osteoporosis can benefit from them at some point in the course of their disease (at the beginning of treatment or after the administration of anabolics, selective estrogen receptor modulators or denosumab). If well tolerated orally, alendronate and risedronate are preferable. Otherwise, zoledronate is preferred. Their efficacy vs. cost-safety-convenience ratio makes aminobisphosphonates reference drugs in the field of osteoporosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jesús González Macías
- Departamento de Medicina y Psiquiatría, Universidad de Cantabria, Santander, Cantabria, España.
| | - José Manuel Olmos Martínez
- Departamento de Medicina y Psiquiatría, Universidad de Cantabria, Santander, Cantabria, España; Servicio de Medicina Interna, Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Cantabria, España
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Cardiovascular Safety and Effectiveness of Bisphosphonates: From Intervention Trials to Real-Life Data. Nutrients 2022; 14:nu14122369. [PMID: 35745099 PMCID: PMC9227734 DOI: 10.3390/nu14122369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2022] [Revised: 05/26/2022] [Accepted: 06/02/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Both osteoporosis with related fragility fractures and cardiovascular diseases are rapidly outspreading worldwide. Since they are often coexistent in elderly patients and may be related to possible common pathogenetic mechanisms, the possible reciprocal effects of drugs employed to treat these diseases have to be considered in clinical practice. Bisphosphonates, the agents most largely employed to decrease bone fragility, have been shown to be overall safe with respect to cardiovascular diseases and even capable of reducing cardiovascular morbidity in some settings, as mainly shown by real life studies. No randomized controlled trials with cardiovascular outcomes as primary endpoints are available. While contradictory results have emerged about a possible BSP-mediated reduction of overall mortality, it is undeniable that these drugs can be employed safely in patients with high fracture risk, since no increased mortality has ever been demonstrated. Although partial reassurance has emerged from meta-analysis assessing the risk of cardiac arrhythmias during bisphosphonates treatment, caution is warranted in administering this class of drugs to patients at risk for atrial fibrillation, possibly preferring other antiresorptives or anabolics, according to osteoporosis guidelines. This paper focuses on the complex relationship between bisphosphonates use and cardiovascular disease and possible co-management issues.
Collapse
|
38
|
Kleinermans D, Joyson A, Wray H. An open-label randomized study of the relative absorption of gastro-resistant risedronate taken fasted or with food versus immediate-release risedronate. Pharmacol Res Perspect 2022; 10:e00957. [PMID: 35526121 PMCID: PMC9079914 DOI: 10.1002/prp2.957] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2021] [Accepted: 04/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Patients with osteoporosis often take oral bisphosphonates with food, rendering these medications ineffective. This study compared the relative absorption of four formulations of gastro‐resistant (GR; formulations 1–4) risedronate 35 mg versus immediate‐release (IR) risedronate 35 mg taken fasted. Secondarily, it compared the relative absorption of GR formulations administered fed and fasted, and determined the site of disintegration. Healthy participants (N = 160) were randomized to one of nine treatment groups: IR risedronate taken fasted (group A) or formulations 1–4 taken fasted or fed (groups B–I). Fasted groups fasted for 8 h pre‐dose and 4 h post‐dose. Fed groups fasted for 7.5 h, then took risedronate with breakfast. Urine was collected until 72 h post‐dose and analyzed using liquid chromatography. From each group, up to seven participants underwent scintigraphic monitoring to assess tablet disintegration. The percentage of total dose recovered in urine (A’e) was ~0.5% for group A. The A’e of formulations 1–4 taken fasted was 0.220% (90% confidence interval 0.124–0.389), 0.298% (0.122–0.730), 0.154% (0.090–0.264), and 0.108% (0.051–0.231), respectively. With food, the A’e of formulation 1 decreased least versus fasted (−27%) compared with the A’e of formulations 2, 3, and 4 (−73%, −80%, and −65%, respectively). Formulations 1–3 disintegrated in the small intestine, formulation 4 closer to the large intestine. All GR formulations were well tolerated and in line with the known safety profile for IR risedronate. Formulation 2 had the highest absorption when taken fasted, whereas the absorption of formulation 1 was least affected by food.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Andrew Joyson
- Formerly Pharmaceutical Profiles Ltd, Ruddington, UK
| | - Heather Wray
- Formerly Pharmaceutical Profiles Ltd, Ruddington, UK
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Bisphosphates for Osteoporosis: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Most Cited Articles. EVIDENCE-BASED COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE 2022; 2022:4565069. [PMID: 35646145 PMCID: PMC9132659 DOI: 10.1155/2022/4565069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2021] [Revised: 10/27/2021] [Accepted: 04/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Osteoporosis has become a major public health problem and bisphosphates treatment for osteoporosis is a rapidly developing research field. Every year, plenty of studies devoted to the treatment of osteoporosis are published, giving clinicians a new perspective on bisphosphates treatment for osteoporosis. However, the quality of the scientific papers in this area is unclear. The aim of the present study was to characterize the 100 top-cited articles regarding bisphosphates treatment for osteoporosis. This analysis provides an accessible list for practitioners of endocrinology, pharmacy, epidemiology, imaging, surgery, and scientific research to identify the most frequently cited literature and better understand the future direction.
Collapse
|
40
|
Wells GA, Hsieh SC, Zheng C, Peterson J, Tugwell P, Liu W. Risedronate for the primary and secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2022; 5:CD004523. [PMID: 35502787 PMCID: PMC9062986 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd004523.pub4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Osteoporosis is an abnormal reduction in bone mass and bone deterioration leading to increased fracture risk. Risedronate belongs to the bisphosphonate class of drugs which act to inhibit bone resorption by interfering with the activity of osteoclasts. This is an update of a Cochrane Review that was originally published in 2003. OBJECTIVES We assessed the benefits and harms of risedronate in the primary and secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures for postmenopausal women at lower and higher risk for fractures, respectively. SEARCH METHODS With broader and updated strategies, we searched the Cochrane Central Register of Control Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE and Embase. A grey literature search, including the online databases ClinicalTrials.gov, International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP), and drug approval agencies, as well as bibliography checks of relevant systematic reviews was also performed. Eligible trials published between 1966 to 24 March 2021 were identified. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials that assessed the benefits and harms of risedronate in the prevention of fractures for postmenopausal women. Participants must have received at least one year of risedronate, placebo or other anti-osteoporotic drugs, with or without concurrent calcium/vitamin D. Major outcomes were clinical vertebral, non-vertebral, hip and wrist fractures, withdrawals due to adverse events, and serious adverse events. In the interest of clinical relevance and applicability, we classified a study as secondary prevention if its population fulfilled more than one of the following hierarchical criteria: a diagnosis of osteoporosis, a history of vertebral fractures, low bone mineral density (BMD)T score ≤ -2.5, and age ≥ 75 years old. If none of these criteria was met, the study was considered to be primary prevention. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standard methodology expected by Cochrane. We pooled the relative risk (RR) of fractures using a fixed-effect model based on the expectation that the clinical and methodological characteristics of the respective primary and secondary prevention studies would be homogeneous, and the experience from the previous review suggesting that there would be a small number of studies. The base case included the data available for the longest treatment period in each placebo-controlled trial and a >15% relative change was considered clinically important. The main findings of the review were presented in summary of findings tables, using the GRADE approach. In addition, we looked at benefit and harm comparisons between different dosage regimens for risedronate and between risedronate and other anti-osteoporotic drugs. MAIN RESULTS Forty-three trials fulfilled the eligibility criteria, among which 33 studies (27,348 participants) reported data that could be extracted and quantitatively synthesized. We had concerns about particular domains of risk of bias in each trial. Selection bias was the most frequent concern, with only 24% of the studies describing appropriate methods for both sequence generation and allocation concealment. Fifty per cent and 39% of the studies reporting benefit and harm outcomes, respectively, were subject to high risk. None of the studies included in the quantitative syntheses were judged to be at low risk of bias in all seven domains. The results described below pertain to the comparisons for daily risedronate 5 mg versus placebo which reported major outcomes. Other comparisons are described in the full text. For primary prevention, low- to very low-certainty evidence was collected from four studies (one to two years in length) including 989 postmenopausal women at lower risk of fractures. Risedronate 5 mg/day may make little or no difference to wrist fractures [RR 0.48 ( 95% CI 0.03 to 7.50; two studies, 243 participants); absolute risk reduction (ARR) 0.6% fewer (95% CI 1% fewer to 7% more)] and withdrawals due to adverse events [RR 0.67 (95% CI 0.38 to 1.18; three studies, 748 participants); ARR 2% fewer (95% CI 5% fewer to 1% more)], based on low-certainty evidence. However, its preventive effects on non-vertebral fractures and serious adverse events are not known due to the very low-certainty evidence. There were zero clinical vertebral and hip fractures reported therefore the effects of risedronate for these outcomes are not estimable. For secondary prevention, nine studies (one to three years in length) including 14,354 postmenopausal women at higher risk of fractures provided evidence. Risedronate 5 mg/day probably prevents non-vertebral fractures [RR 0.80 (95% CI 0.72 to 0.90; six studies, 12,173 participants); RRR 20% (95% CI 10% to 28%) and ARR 2% fewer (95% CI 1% fewer to 3% fewer), moderate certainty], and may reduce hip fractures [RR 0.73 (95% CI 0.56 to 0.94); RRR 27% (95% CI 6% to 44%) and ARR 1% fewer (95% CI 0.2% fewer to 1% fewer), low certainty]. Both of these effects are probably clinically important. However, risedronate's effects are not known for wrist fractures [RR 0.64 (95% CI 0.33 to 1.24); three studies,1746 participants); ARR 1% fewer (95% CI 2% fewer to 1% more), very-low certainty] and not estimable for clinical vertebral fractures due to zero events reported (low certainty). Risedronate results in little to no difference in withdrawals due to adverse events [RR 0.98 (95% CI 0.90 to 1.07; eight studies, 9529 participants); ARR 0.3% fewer (95% CI 2% fewer to 1% more); 16.9% in risedronate versus 17.2% in control, high certainty] and probably results in little to no difference in serious adverse events [RR 1.00 (95% CI 0.94 to 1.07; six studies, 9435 participants); ARR 0% fewer (95% CI 2% fewer to 2% more; 29.2% in both groups, moderate certainty). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS This update recaps the key findings from our previous review that, for secondary prevention, risedronate 5 mg/day probably prevents non-vertebral fracture, and may reduce the risk of hip fractures. We are uncertain on whether risedronate 5mg/day reduces clinical vertebral and wrist fractures. Compared to placebo, risedronate probably does not increase the risk of serious adverse events. For primary prevention, the benefit and harms of risedronate were supported by limited evidence with high uncertainty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- George A Wells
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Shu-Ching Hsieh
- Cardiovascular Research Methods Center, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Carine Zheng
- University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Canada
- Statistics Canada, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Joan Peterson
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Ottawa Civic Hospital / Loeb Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Peter Tugwell
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Knowledge Translation and Health Technology Assessment in Health Equity, Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Wenfei Liu
- Cardiovascular Research Methods Center, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Iida H, Sakai Y, Seki T, Watanabe T, Wakao N, Matsui H, Imagama S. Bisphosphonate treatment is associated with decreased mortality rates in patients after osteoporotic vertebral fracture. Osteoporos Int 2022; 33:1147-1154. [DOI: https:/doi.org/10.1007/s00198-021-06264-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2021] [Accepted: 12/03/2021] [Indexed: 08/30/2023]
|
42
|
Iida H, Sakai Y, Seki T, Watanabe T, Wakao N, Matsui H, Imagama S. Bisphosphonate treatment is associated with decreased mortality rates in patients after osteoporotic vertebral fracture. Osteoporos Int 2022; 33:1147-1154. [PMID: 35022813 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-021-06264-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2021] [Accepted: 12/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
UNLABELLED The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of bisphosphonate (BP) on mortality after osteoporotic vertebral fracture (OVF). BP medication (hazard ratios = 0.593; 95%CI: 0.361-0.976) was significantly associated with reduced all-cause mortality after OVF. PURPOSE Osteoporotic vertebral fracture (OVF) is the most common type of fragility fracture. Bisphosphonate (BP) medication was suggested to have positive effects on both fracture prevention and recovery outcomes. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of BP on mortality after OVF. METHODS This cohort study involved 535 patients (170 males and 365 females), aged ≥ 65 years (mean age: 82.6 ± 7.0 years, mean follow-up periods: 33.0 ± 25.8 months) who were hospitalized after OVF from January 2011 to December 2019 at a public hospital. Patients treated with PTH (parathyroid hormone), PTH or PTHrp analogues, denosumab, and selective estrogen receptor modulators were excluded. Kaplan-Meier survival curves on mortality of patients with OVF with and without BP treatment were prepared, and log-rank tests were performed. Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify factors associated with mortality after OVF. RESULTS This study included 163 (30.5%) patients treated with BP. Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed that the mortality rate after OVF was significantly lower in patients treated with BP (P < 0.001). Cox proportional hazards model showed that older age (hazard ratios [HR] = 1.066; 95%CI:1.035-1.103), male sex (HR = 2.248; 95%CI:1.427-3.542), malnutrition (geriatric nutritional risk index < 92) (HR = 1.691; 95%CI:1.005-2.846), BP medication (HR = 0.593; 95%CI: 0.361-0.976), and Japanese Orthopaedic Association score at discharge (HR = 0.941; 95%CI: 0.892-0.993) were significantly associated with all-cause mortality after OVF. CONCLUSIONS BP medication is beneficial not only for fracture prevention but also for mortality after OVF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroki Iida
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.
| | - Yoshihito Sakai
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Obu, Japan
| | - Taisuke Seki
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Tsuyoshi Watanabe
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Obu, Japan
| | - Norimitsu Wakao
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Obu, Japan
| | - Hiroki Matsui
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Obu, Japan
| | - Shiro Imagama
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Liu D, Li PY, Wang SJ, Gong B, Lu T, Li GY. Steric hindrance effect on the excited-state proton transfer process: TDDFT study on the fluorescent sensing mechanism of a fluoride sensor. SPECTROCHIMICA ACTA. PART A, MOLECULAR AND BIOMOLECULAR SPECTROSCOPY 2022; 271:120872. [PMID: 35042045 DOI: 10.1016/j.saa.2022.120872] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2021] [Revised: 01/03/2022] [Accepted: 01/06/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
An understanding of the excited-state process and the sensing mechanism for specific anions can be helpful for the design and synthesis of fluorescent sensors in analytical chemistry and biotechnology. Here, we theoretically investigated the fluorescent response mechanism of a reported acylhydrazone-based fluorescent sensor (Soft Matter, 2019, 15, 6690) for fluoride recognition using the time-dependent density functional theory approach. At the M06/TZVP/SCM level, the vertical excitation energies, which were calculated based on the ground state and first singlet-state geometries of the sensor molecule, agreed well with the experimental ultraviolet-visible and fluorescence spectra. Therefore, the time-dependent density functional theory method was considered reasonable and effective. According to the frontier orbital analysis and an excited-state potential energy scan, we proposed an excited-state proton transfer mechanism for the sensor-fluorine complex, where the steric hindrance leads to a high potential barrier. The excited-state proton transfer process facilitates sensor molecule deprotonation, alleviates its steric hindrance effect and expands its conjugated system. As a result, the fluorescence emission band of the sensor molecule was red-shifted significantly with the addition of fluoride anion. Based on this fluorescence difference, the sensor could be used for fluoride anion identification. This work provides a strategy to study sensor-analyte interactions in the excited state and offers an approach to tune the fluorescence emission wavelength of sensor molecules in anionic environments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dong Liu
- College of Chemical Engineering, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan 063210, PR China
| | - Peng-Yuan Li
- College of Chemical Engineering, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan 063210, PR China
| | - Si-Jia Wang
- College of Chemical Engineering, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan 063210, PR China
| | - Bo Gong
- College of Chemical Engineering, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan 063210, PR China
| | - Ting Lu
- College of Chemical Engineering, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan 063210, PR China.
| | - Guang-Yue Li
- College of Chemical Engineering, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan 063210, PR China.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Gregson CL, Armstrong DJ, Bowden J, Cooper C, Edwards J, Gittoes NJL, Harvey N, Kanis J, Leyland S, Low R, McCloskey E, Moss K, Parker J, Paskins Z, Poole K, Reid DM, Stone M, Thomson J, Vine N, Compston J. UK clinical guideline for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Arch Osteoporos 2022; 17:58. [PMID: 35378630 PMCID: PMC8979902 DOI: 10.1007/s11657-022-01061-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 163] [Impact Index Per Article: 81.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2021] [Accepted: 01/03/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
The National Osteoporosis Guideline Group (NOGG) has revised the UK guideline for the assessment and management of osteoporosis and the prevention of fragility fractures in postmenopausal women, and men age 50 years and older. Accredited by NICE, this guideline is relevant for all healthcare professionals involved in osteoporosis management. INTRODUCTION The UK National Osteoporosis Guideline Group (NOGG) first produced a guideline on the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis in 2008, with updates in 2013 and 2017. This paper presents a major update of the guideline, the scope of which is to review the assessment and management of osteoporosis and the prevention of fragility fractures in postmenopausal women, and men age 50 years and older. METHODS Where available, systematic reviews, meta-analyses and randomised controlled trials were used to provide the evidence base. Conclusions and recommendations were systematically graded according to the strength of the available evidence. RESULTS Review of the evidence and recommendations are provided for the diagnosis of osteoporosis, fracture-risk assessment and intervention thresholds, management of vertebral fractures, non-pharmacological and pharmacological treatments, including duration and monitoring of anti-resorptive therapy, glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis, and models of care for fracture prevention. Recommendations are made for training; service leads and commissioners of healthcare; and for review criteria for audit and quality improvement. CONCLUSION The guideline, which has received accreditation from the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE), provides a comprehensive overview of the assessment and management of osteoporosis for all healthcare professionals involved in its management. This position paper has been endorsed by the International Osteoporosis Foundation and by the European Society for the Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Celia L Gregson
- Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Bristol Medical School, Learning and Research Building, University of Bristol, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, BS10 5NB, UK.
- Royal United Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Bath, UK.
| | - David J Armstrong
- Western Health and Social Care Trust (NI), Nutrition Innovation Centre for Food and Health, Ulster University, and Visiting Professor, Belfast, Northern Ireland
| | - Jean Bowden
- Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Bristol Medical School, Learning and Research Building, University of Bristol, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, BS10 5NB, UK
| | - Cyrus Cooper
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
- NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - John Edwards
- Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Staffordshire, and Wolstanton Medical Centre, Newcastle under Lyme, UK
| | - Neil J L Gittoes
- Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham & University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Nicholas Harvey
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - John Kanis
- Mary McKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia and Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | | | - Rebecca Low
- Abingdon and Specialty Doctor in Metabolic Bone Disease, Marcham Road Health Centre, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford, UK
| | - Eugene McCloskey
- Department of Oncology & Metabolism, MRC Versus Arthritis Centre for Integrated Research in Musculoskeletal Ageing (CIMA), Mellanby Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Katie Moss
- St George's University Hospital, London, UK
| | - Jane Parker
- Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Bristol Medical School, Learning and Research Building, University of Bristol, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, BS10 5NB, UK
| | - Zoe Paskins
- School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, Haywood Academic Rheumatology Centre, Haywood Hospital, Midlands Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Stoke-on-Trent, UK
| | - Kenneth Poole
- Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Mike Stone
- University Hospital Llandough, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Llandough, UK
| | | | - Nic Vine
- Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Bristol Medical School, Learning and Research Building, University of Bristol, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, BS10 5NB, UK
| | - Juliet Compston
- University of Cambridge, School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Lorentzon M, Johansson H, Harvey NC, Liu E, Vandenput L, McCloskey EV, Kanis JA. Osteoporosis and fractures in women: the burden of disease. Climacteric 2022; 25:4-10. [PMID: 34319208 DOI: 10.1080/13697137.2021.1951206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 33.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2021] [Accepted: 06/17/2021] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
Osteoporosis is a disease characterized by impaired bone microarchitecture and reduced bone mineral density (BMD) resulting in bone fragility and increased risk of fracture. In western societies, one in three women and one in five men will sustain an osteoporotic fracture in their remaining lifetime from the age of 50 years. Fragility fractures, especially of the spine and hip, commonly give rise to increased morbidity and mortality. In the five largest European countries and Sweden, fragility fractures were the cause of 2.6 million disability-adjusted life years in 2016 and the fracture-related costs increased from €29.6 billion in 2010 to €37.5 billion in 2017. In the European Union and the USA, only a small proportion of women eligible for pharmacological treatment are being prescribed osteoporosis medication. Secondary fracture prevention, using Fracture Liaison Services, can be used to increase the rates of fracture risk assessment, BMD testing and use of osteoporosis medication in order to reduce fracture numbers. Additionally, established primary prevention strategies, based on case-finding methods utilizing fracture prediction tools, such as FRAX, to identify women without fracture but with elevated risk, are recommended in order to further reduce fracture numbers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Lorentzon
- Sahlgrenska Osteoporosis Centre, Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Nutrition, Institute of Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Region Västra Götaland, Department of Geriatric Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden
- Mary MacKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - H Johansson
- Sahlgrenska Osteoporosis Centre, Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Nutrition, Institute of Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Mary MacKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - N C Harvey
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - E Liu
- Sahlgrenska Osteoporosis Centre, Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Nutrition, Institute of Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - L Vandenput
- Sahlgrenska Osteoporosis Centre, Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Nutrition, Institute of Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Mary MacKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - E V McCloskey
- Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, UK
- MRC and Arthritis Research UK Centre for Integrated Research in Musculoskeletal Ageing, Mellanby Centre for Bone Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - J A Kanis
- Mary MacKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia
- Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Chen L, Liu XP, Zhou B, Guo TY, Yuan F, Abdelrahim MEA, Jiang ZH. Relationship between Change in Bone Mineral Density of Lumbar Spine and Risk of New Vertebral and Nonvertebral Fractures: A Meta-Analysis. Orthop Surg 2022; 14:199-206. [PMID: 34985187 PMCID: PMC8867431 DOI: 10.1111/os.13184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2021] [Revised: 10/27/2021] [Accepted: 11/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Studies have shown that the change in lumbar spine bone mineral density with different osteoporosis drugs had a beneficial effect on the frequency of new vertebral and nonvertebral fractures in postmenopausal females, but their results were conflicting. This meta‐analysis was performed to evaluate this relationship. A systematic literature search up to May 2020 was performed and 20 studies with 73,390 postmenopausal females were included; of them, a total of 41,980 were treated with osteoporosis drugs and 31,410 with placebo. They reported relationships between the change in lumbar spine bone mineral density and the frequency of new vertebral and nonvertebral fractures in postmenopausal females. Odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was calculated comparing the osteoporosis drugs to placebo effect on the frequency of new vertebral and nonvertebral fractures in postmenopausal females using the dichotomous method with a random or fixed‐effect model. Treatment with osteoporosis drugs had significantly lower frequency of new vertebral fractures (OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.45–0.63, P < 0.001) and nonvertebral fractures (OR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.78–0.87, P < 0.001) compared to placebo in postmenopausal females. Treatment with osteoporosis drugs had a significantly lower frequency of new vertebral and nonvertebral fractures compared to placebo in postmenopausal females. This relationship forces us to recommend osteoporosis drugs in postmenopausal females to avoid any possible new fractures. A cost‐effective study is recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liang Chen
- Department of Orthopaedics, Yixing People's Hospital, Yixing, China
| | - Xiao-Ping Liu
- Department of Orthopaedics, Suzhou Kowloon Hospital Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Suzhou, China
| | - Bo Zhou
- Department of Orthopaedics, Yixing People's Hospital, Yixing, China
| | - Tong-Ya Guo
- Department of Bone and Joint Surgery, Xuzhou Central Hospital, Xuzhou, China
| | - Feng Yuan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, 200233, China
| | - Mohamed E A Abdelrahim
- Clinical Pharmacy Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef, Egypt
| | - Zhen-Huan Jiang
- Department of Orthopaedics, Yixing People's Hospital, Yixing, China
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Deardorff WJ, Cenzer I, Nguyen B, Lee SJ. Time to Benefit of Bisphosphonate Therapy for the Prevention of Fractures Among Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials. JAMA Intern Med 2022; 182:33-41. [PMID: 34807231 PMCID: PMC8609461 DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.6745] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2021] [Accepted: 10/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Importance The clinical decision to initiate bisphosphonate therapy for the treatment of osteoporosis requires balancing shorter-term harms and burdens (eg, gastroesophageal irritation or severe musculoskeletal pain) with longer-term benefits in reducing potential fractures. Objective To assess the time to benefit (TTB) of bisphosphonate therapy for the prevention of nonvertebral and other fractures among postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Data Sources Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were identified from systematic reviews commissioned by the US Preventive Services Task Force (1 review), the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (1 review), the Cochrane Library (2 reviews), and the Endocrine Society (1 review). Study Selection Studies selected were RCTs involving postmenopausal women with a diagnosis of osteoporosis based on existing vertebral fractures or bone mineral density T scores of -2.5 or lower. The selection process was focused on studies of alendronate, risedronate, and zoledronic acid because they are guideline-recommended first-line agents for reducing nonvertebral fractures. Studies were excluded if they did not focus on women with a primary diagnosis of osteoporosis, had no placebo arm, or had a lack of data on time to fracture. Data Extraction and Synthesis Random-effects Weibull survival curves were fitted and Markov chain Monte Carlo methods were used to estimate the absolute risk reduction (ARR) and TTB for each study. These estimates were pooled using a random-effects meta-analysis model. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was the time to 3 different ARR thresholds (0.002, 0.005, and 0.010) for the first nonvertebral fracture. Secondary outcomes included the time to 4 ARR thresholds (0.001, 0.002, 0.005, and 0.010) for hip fracture, any clinical fracture, and clinical vertebral fracture. Results Of 67 full-text articles identified, 10 RCTs comprising 23 384 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis were included either as the original RCT or part of subsequently published pooled analyses. Among the studies, the number of participants ranged from 994 to 7765, with mean (SD) age ranging from 63 (7) years to 74 (3) years and follow-up duration ranging from 12 to 48 months. The pooled meta-analysis found that 12.4 months (95% CI, 6.3-18.4 months) were needed to avoid 1 nonvertebral fracture per 100 postmenopausal women receiving bisphosphonate therapy at an ARR of 0.010. To prevent 1 hip fracture, 200 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis would need to receive bisphosphonate therapy for 20.3 months (95% CI, 11.0-29.7 months) at an ARR of 0.005. In addition, 200 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis would need to receive bisphosphonate therapy for 12.1 months (95% CI, 6.4-17.8 months) to avoid 1 clinical vertebral fracture at an ARR of 0.005. Conclusions and Relevance This meta-analysis found that the TTB of bisphosphonate therapy was 12.4 months to prevent 1 nonvertebral fracture per 100 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. These results suggest that bisphosphonate therapy is most likely to benefit postmenopausal women with osteoporosis who have a life expectancy greater than 12.4 months.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William James Deardorff
- Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco
- Geriatrics, Palliative and Extended Care Service Line, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Health Care System, San Francisco, California
| | - Irena Cenzer
- Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco
- Geriatrics, Palliative and Extended Care Service Line, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Health Care System, San Francisco, California
| | - Brian Nguyen
- Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco
- Geriatrics, Palliative and Extended Care Service Line, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Health Care System, San Francisco, California
| | - Sei J. Lee
- Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco
- Geriatrics, Palliative and Extended Care Service Line, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Health Care System, San Francisco, California
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Mevius A, Heidbrede T, Gille P, Pannen HD, Wilke T. Real-world treatment and fracture incidence in postmenopausal women with severe osteoporosis at high risk of fracture: a retrospective claims data analysis. GERMAN MEDICAL SCIENCE : GMS E-JOURNAL 2021; 19:Doc15. [PMID: 35110980 PMCID: PMC8778936 DOI: 10.3205/000302] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2020] [Revised: 03/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Background: Osteoporosis (OP) and its associated fractures have a significant impact on patients' quality of life and are impacting their morbidity and mortality. For OP patients at high risk of fracture, guidelines recommend a pharmacological OP treatment. The aim of this study was to describe the real-world medication treatment of postmenopausal women with severe OP at high risk of fracture, their risk to experience a new fracture after having at least one previous fracture, and to assess the associated healthcare resource use (HCRU). Methods: This retrospective cohort study was based on anonymized German claims data (AOK PLUS). All included OP patients were female, ≥55 years old, and had a vertebral and/or femoral fracture. We conducted a cross-sectional analysis in 2018 and a longitudinal analysis, starting with an incident vertebral/femoral fracture (after or simultaneously with the first observed OP diagnosis). In both analyses, patient characteristics, rate of new incident fractures, OP treatment patterns, and HCRU associated with the treatment of patients were investigated. Results: In the cross-sectional setting, 12,180 patients with a mean age of 83.59 years were observed. Of these patients, 14.30% sustained at least one new incident fracture and 34.54% received a pharmaceutical OP treatment during 2018. In this year, 58.50% of the patients had at least one OP-related outpatient visit, and 26.35% had a fracture-related visit. In 160 patients (1.31%), at least one OP-related hospitalization was documented, and in 1,293 patients (10.62%) a fracture-related hospitalization in 2018. In the longitudinal setting, 10,323 patients with a mean age of 83.22 years were included. Of these, 18.96% experienced at least one new incident fracture within the first 12 months after the index fracture, and in total 30.85% in the entire follow-up period (mean 2.03 years). During the 12-month baseline period, 22.12% of the patients received an OP treatment. Three months after the index fracture, the proportion of treated patients remained at 22.30%. During the total follow-up time, 35.54% were prescribed with an OP treatment. Conclusion: We observed a considerable proportion of untreated patients and a high rate of subsequent fractures. The awareness for a proper risk assessment and the appropriate use of available treatments should be increased.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antje Mevius
- Institute for Pharmacoeconomics and Medication Logistics (IPAM) e.V., University of Wismar, Germany,*To whom correspondence should be addressed: Antje Mevius, Institute for Pharmacoeconomics and Medication Logistics (IPAM) e.V., University of Wismar, Alter Holzhafen 19, 23966 Wismar, Germany, Phone: +49 3841 7581020, E-mail:
| | | | | | | | - Thomas Wilke
- Institute for Pharmacoeconomics and Medication Logistics (IPAM) e.V., University of Wismar, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Benini C, Esposito D, Adami G, Vantaggiato E, Gatti D, Rossini M, Fassio A. Calcium and vitamin D supplementation: when and why. Minerva Obstet Gynecol 2021; 73:704-713. [PMID: 34905876 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-606x.20.04682-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
Osteoporosis is a common disease, with fragility fractures representing its dreaded complications. The role of calcium and vitamin D supplementation needs to be addressed in the context of a heavy health burden, with a massive impact on individuals, healthcare systems, and societies as a whole. Calcium and vitamin D are often discussed together as interventions for promoting bone health. Still, it is essential to remember that they are quite distinct entities that play different roles in mineral metabolism. Insufficient calcium intake and vitamin D deficiency are common and widespread. Furthermore, a strong association between vitamin D deficiency and extra-skeletal outcomes has emerged over the last decades. When dietary intake is insufficient, with little room for improvement, several supplementation strategies have proved to be effective and safe. Adequate calcium intake and vitamin D serum levels should be pursued efficiently in the general population, and deficiency should be considered unacceptable in subsets particularly at risk. The aim of this narrative review was to present an overview of calcium and vitamin D intake and their supplementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camilla Benini
- Unit of Rheumatology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Giovanni Adami
- Unit of Rheumatology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Davide Gatti
- Unit of Rheumatology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Angelo Fassio
- Unit of Rheumatology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy -
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Zhao S, Zhao W, Du D, Zhang C, Zhao T, Zheng L, Jin L, Gu M, Xu J, Yang Z. Effect of bisphosphonate on hip fracture in patients with osteoporosis or osteopenia according to age: a meta-analysis and systematic review. J Investig Med 2021; 70:837-843. [PMID: 34893517 DOI: 10.1136/jim-2021-001961] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/05/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
This meta-analysis and systematic review investigated the efficacy of bisphosphonates on the incidence of hip fracture (IHF) in patients of different ages with osteoporosis or osteopenia. We searched Web of Science, Embase, the Cochrane Database, and PubMed from inception to January 10, 2021, for trials reporting the effects of bisphosphonates on the IHF. We included only randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials. We pooled data using a random-effects meta-analysis with risk ratios (RRs) and reported 95% CIs. We also used the Cochran Q and I² statistics to assess the heterogeneity in the results of individual studies. The primary endpoints were the total numbers of people in the bisphosphonates and placebo groups and the numbers of IHFs during the follow-up periods. Bisphosphonates reduced the IHF with an overall effect (RR: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.56 to 0.77; zoledronic acid: RR: 0.60; 95% CI: 0.46 to 0.78; risedronate: RR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.59 to 0.94, and alendronate: RR: 0.61; 95% CI: 0.40 to 0.95). The result of the heterogeneity assessment was I²=0, p=0.97. In all age groups (all ages, ≥55 years old, ≥65 years old), bisphosphonates reduced the IHF. In the ≥55 years old and ≥65 years old age groups, the RR and 95% CI were 0.63 and 0.43 to 0.93, and 0.60 and 0.44 to 0.81, respectively. Bisphosphonate reduced the IHF in the general population and all age groups (≥55 years old and ≥65 years old). Zoledronic acid, risedronate and alendronate reduced the IHF in osteoporosis or osteopenia populations. The association between bisphosphonate and the IHF does not appear to be influenced by age.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sichun Zhao
- Department of Orthopedics, Chengdu BOE Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Wen Zhao
- Department of Clinical Immunology, The Affiliated Hospital of Northwest University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Dongpeng Du
- Department of Orthopedics, Chengdu BOE Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Chunhao Zhang
- Department of Orthopedics, Chengdu BOE Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Tao Zhao
- Department of Orthopedics, Chengdu BOE Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Liwen Zheng
- Department of Orthopedics, Chengdu BOE Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Leiming Jin
- Department of Orthopedics, Chengdu BOE Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Minghao Gu
- Department of Orthopedics, Chengdu BOE Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Junfeng Xu
- Department of Orthopedics, Chengdu BOE Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Zhonghua Yang
- Department of Geriatrics, Sichuan University West China Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| |
Collapse
|