Remission over 3 years in patients with Paget disease of bone treated with a single intravenous infusion of 5 mg zoledronic acid

Long-Term Efficacy of Intensive Zoledronate Therapy and Predictors of Retreatment in Paget's Disease of Bone

Despite the current debate on the best therapeutic approach, i.e. symptomatic vs intensive strategy, one zoledronate (Zol) infusion is effective in most patients with Paget's disease of bone (PDB), whereas few need retreatment, whose predictors are not well established. We aimed to evaluate long-term efficacy of intensive Zol therapy and predictors of retreatment in PDB. Pagetic complications, clinical and biochemical response to Zol together with frequency of retreatment were retrospectively assessed in forty-seven PDB patients (age, mean ± SD: 72.5 ± 8.9 years, M/F: 24/23; symptomatic/asymptomatic: 16/31). Statistical analysis for retreatment prediction were based on Mann-Whitney U test, Pearson's Χ2 and ROC curve analysis. During seven-year follow-up, all patients achieved pain relief and only one underwent arthroplasty. Bone alkaline phosphatase (BAP) detected three non-responder (6%) and six relapsing (13%) patients needing retreatment. Retreated patients had less old age (66.1 ± 11.2 vs 74.0 ± 7.7 years), higher frequency of polyostotic disease (78% vs 40%) and higher baseline (96.5 ± 24.8 vs 44.9 ± 27.7 mcg/l) and post-Zol nadir BAP levels (24.7 ± 24.1 vs 8.1 ± 4.1 mcg/l) than patients treated once (p < 0.05 for all comparisons). In multivariate analysis both serum baseline and post-Zol nadir BAP significantly predicted retreatment (OR 1.09, 95%CI 1.01-1.17 and 1.29, 1.03-1.62, respectively), with ROC curve analysis showing the greatest accuracies for threshold values of 75.6 and 9.9 mcg/l (sensitivity 88 and 90%, specificity 94 and 86%, AUC 0.92 and 0.93, respectively). Our data in mostly asymptomatic, metabolically active PDB patients treated with intensive Zol therapy show a negligible incidence of pagetic complications and long-term optimal disease control, with BAP being the best predictor of retreatment.

Paget’s disease of bone: Report of 11 cases

BACKGROUND

Paget’s disease of bone (PDB) is a rare metabolic bone disease in China and is characterized by increased bone resorption and disorganized bone formation. The main clinical symptoms of PDB are focal or multiple bone pain and deformity with high disability. The disease has high missed diagnosis and misdiagnosis rates. This report summarizes the clinical manifestations, imaging and pathological features, and treatments of 11 patients with PDB at our hospital from 1993 to 2020 in order to improve the recognition and prognosis of PDB.

CASE SUMMARY

There were eight male and three female patients whose average age was 48.7 ± 11.0 years with a PDB course of 1-16 years. Nine patients had bone pain and bone deformities in different parts of the body, the majority of which involved the long bones. Laboratory examinations revealed elevated serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP) in all patients with an average of 618 ± 460 IU/L (normal range 0-130 IU/L), and serum calcium and phosphorus levels were in the normal range. Imageology showed that osteolysis was usually combined with osteosclerosis and/or bone deformities in single or multiple bones. ^99mTc-methylene diphosphonate bone scintigraphy revealed increased radionuclide uptake in the bone lesions. Six patients underwent bone tissue biopsy, and the typical pathological changes were a mosaic structure of the bone trabeculae with irregularly arranged cement lines and multinuclear osteoclasts. Ten of the 11 patients were effectively treated with bisphosphonates.

CONCLUSION

Early diagnosis of the rare disease PDB can be made through elevated ALP levels and typical presentations on bone X-ray and from bone tissue biopsy.

Zoledronate

Zoledronate is the most potent and most long-acting bisphosphonate in clinical use, and is administered as an intravenous infusion. Its major uses are in osteoporosis, Paget's disease, and in myeloma and cancers to reduce adverse skeletal related events (SREs). In benign disease, it is a first- or second-line treatment for osteoporosis, achieving anti-fracture efficacy comparable to that of the RANKL blocker, denosumab, over 3 years, and it reduces fracture risk in osteopenic older women. It is the preferred treatment for Paget's disease, achieving higher rates of remissions which are much more prolonged than with any other agent. Some trials have suggested that it reduces mortality, cardiovascular disease and cancer, but these findings are not consistent across all studies. It is nephrotoxic, so should not be given to those with significant renal impairment, and, like other potent anti-resorptive agents, can cause hypocalcemia in patients with severe vitamin D deficiency, which should be corrected before administration. Its most common adverse effect is the acute phase response, seen in 30-40% of patients after their first dose, and much less commonly subsequently. Clinical trials in osteoporosis have not demonstrated increases in osteonecrosis of the jaw or in atypical femoral fractures. Observational databases are currently inadequate to determine whether these problems are increased in zoledronate users. Now available as a generic, zoledronate is a cost-effective agent for fracture prevention and for management of Paget's disease, but wider provision of infusion facilities is important to increase patient access. There is a need to further explore its potential for reducing cancer, cardiovascular disease and mortality, since these effects could be substantially more important than its skeletal actions.

Long term effects on biochemical bone markers of a single infusion of zoledronic acid in Paget disease of bone

BACKGROUND

The aim of the present study is to evaluate long term biochemical response to a single dose of zoledronic acid in patients with Paget disease of bone, as well as evaluating the value of bone turnover markers in diagnosis and follow-up.

METHODS

This is an observational, descriptive and prospective study. Included patients received a single-dose intravenous infusion of 5 mg zoledronic acid. Bone turnover markers were measured at baseline, and in every follow up visit.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients with a mean follow-up of 56.49 months were included. At the time Paget disease was diagnosed, all of the patients (100%) had high serum procollagen type 1 amino-terminal propeptide values, but not all patients had high serum C-terminal telopeptide and alkaline phosphatase values (85% and 89% respectively). Biochemical response to therapy occurred in 38 out of 39 patients (97%). Two patients had partial response at 6 months but complete response thereafter. Only one patient relapsed (nadir procollagen type 1 amino-terminal propeptide 35.06 μg/l, value at relapse 75.2 μg/l) 4.5 years after treatment. Values of serum C-terminal telopeptide and alkaline phosphatase of this patient were normal despite P1NP relapse.

CONCLUSIONS

We hence conclude that zoledronic acid is effective in inducing and maintaining biochemical remission and that procollagen type 1 amino-terminal propeptide is a better diagnostic and prognostic marker in PDB when compared to C-terminal telopeptide and alkaline phosphatase.

Management of Paget's disease of bone

Paget's disease is a progressive focal bone condition which can result in pain, low quality of life, deformity and other complications. Disease progression can be halted with potent bisphosphonates, resulting in improvement in both quality of life and pain, and normalisation of scintigraphy, plain radiographs and bone histology. Zoledronate has transformed the treatment of Paget's disease, producing sustained remissions in almost all patients. Thus, it is now possible to normalise bone cell activity and prevent disease progression at low cost, with one or two intravenous injections of zoledronate, greatly reducing follow-up costs. Patients with Paget's disease who are symptomatic or at risk of complications should have the opportunity to reap these therapeutic benefits. Potent bisphosphonates are highly effective in halting disease progression in Paget's disease, but guidelines disagree about treatment indications. The efficacy, safety and low cost of zoledronate recommend its use in any patient who is symptomatic or judged to be at risk of complications from Paget's disease.

Response to Zoledronic Acid in Patients with Active Paget's Disease of Bone: A Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Traditionally, bisphosphonates are used to treat active Paget's disease of bone (PDB). Intravenous zoledronic acid (ZA) is the most effective treatment option leading to sustained remission.

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective of this study was to analyze the effect of intravenous ZA in patients with active PDB in a tertiary care center of India.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective data of 13 patients with active PDB who received a single dose of 4 mg intravenous ZA at our institute from January 2011 to June 2017 were reviewed. Response to therapy was monitored clinically, biochemically by serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and scintigraphically by 99m-Technetium methylene diphosphonate bone scan.

RESULTS

All of our patients reported relief of bone pain. The mean duration of follow-up in our study was 35.2 ± 16.8 months. Serum ALP levels reduced significantly from 1190.9 ± 666.1 IU/L (n = 13) at baseline to 200.5 ± 68.4 IU/L (n = 13) at 6 months (P < 0.001). ALP level at 1 year was 174 ± 33.6 IU/L (n = 12), which remained stable till 36 months at 176.5 ± 50 IU/L (n = 8). This indicates that remission achieved by 6 months post ZA is sustained for at least 3 years. Scintigraphic ratio reduced from 9.6 [interquartile range (IQR) 5.25-18.2] at baseline to 2.7 (IQR 1.20-4.05) at follow-up (P < 0.001). Similarly, scintigraphic index of involvement reduced from 9.9 (IQR 5.6-28.5) at baseline to 3 (IQR 2-4) at follow-up (P = 0.018).

CONCLUSION

A 4 mg single dose of intravenous ZA results in clinical, biochemical, and scintigraphic response that is sustained for at least 3 years.

Acquired resistance to pamidronate treated effectively with zoledronate in juvenile Paget's disease

Juvenile Paget's disease (JPD) is a rare autosomal recessive osteopathy. There is still a question about the most effective treatment modality in long-term prognosis. A 9-month-old boy who suffered from bone pain and deformities with a very high alkaline phosphatase level was diagnosed as JPD by radiographic findings. Genetic analysis showed a homozygous large deletion in TNFRSF11B gene encoding osteoprotegerin. Clinical improvement was observed with intravenous pamidronate therapy. However, the effect of drug reduced in time so the annual dose per kilogram body weight was increased after 2 years. Despite this increment, bone fractures developed and bone pain recurred with high-ALP levels, which suggested resistance to pamidronate. Switching to zoledronate resulted a significant improvement in bone findings radiographically and ALP level. Severe hypocalcemia requiring intravenous calcium treatment complicated the first dose of zoledronate, but not recurred thereafter. Intravenous pamidronate therapy is effective in reducing bone pain, improving bone deformities and motor development in infantile onset JPD. However, this effect can be transient. Switching to another bisphosphonate like zoledronate may provide long-term clinical and biochemical improvement as an alternative treatment in case of resistance to pamidronate therapy.

Bisphosphonates for Paget's disease of bone in adults

BACKGROUND

Bisphosphonates are considered to be the treatment of choice for people with Paget's disease of bone. However, the effects of bisphosphonates on patient-centred outcomes have not been extensively studied. There are insufficient data to determine whether reducing and maintaining biochemical markers of bone turnover to within the normal range improves quality of life and reduces the risk of complications.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefits and harms of bisphosphonates for adult patients with Paget's disease of bone.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, ISI Web of Knowledge and trials registers up to March 2017. We searched regulatory agency published information for rare adverse events.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of bisphosphonates as treatment for Paget's disease in adults.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently screened search results, extracted data and assessed studies for risk of bias. We used standard methodological procedures expected by The Cochrane Collaboration.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 20 trials (25 reports, 3168 participants). Of these, 10 trials (801 participants) compared bisphosphonates (etidronate, tiludronate, ibandronate, pamidronate, olpadronate, alendronate, risedronate, zoledronate) versus placebo, seven compared two bisphosphonates (992 participants), one trial compared a bisphosphonates with a bisphosphonate plus calcitonin (44 participants), and two studies, the largest trial (1331 participants) and its interventional extension study (502 participants), compared symptomatic treatment and intensive treatment where the goal was to normalise alkaline phosphatase.Most studies were assessed at low or unclear risk of bias. Six of 10 studies comparing bisphosphonates versus placebo were assessed at high risk of bias, mainly around incomplete outcome data and selective outcome reporting.Participant populations were reasonably homogeneous in terms of age (mean age 66 to 74 years) and sex (51% to 74% male). Most studies included participants who had elevated alkaline phosphatase levels whether or not bone pain was present. Mean follow-up was six months.Bisphosphonates versus placeboBisphosphonates tripled the proportion (31% versus 9%) of participants whose bone pain disappeared (RR 3.42, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.31 to 8.90; 2 studies, 205 participants; NNT 5, 95% CI 1 to 31; moderate-quality evidence). This result is clinically important. Data were consistent when pain change was measured as any reduction (RR 1.97, 95% CI 1.29 to 3.01; 7 studies, 481 participants).There was uncertainty about differences in incident fractures: 1.4% fractures occurred in the bisphosphonates group and none in the placebo group (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.18 to 4.31; 4 studies, 356 participants; very low-quality evidence).None of the studies reported data on orthopaedic surgery, quality of life or hearing thresholds.Results regarding adverse effects and treatment discontinuation were uncertain. There was a 64% risk of mild gastrointestinal adverse events in intervention group participants and 48% in the control group (RR 1.32, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.92; 6 studies, 376 participants; low-quality evidence). The likelihood of study participants discontinuing due to adverse effects was slightly higher in intervention group participants (4.4%) than the control group (4.1%) (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.41 to 2.52; 6 studies, 517 participants; low-quality evidence). Zoledronate was associated with an increased risk of transient fever or fatigue (RR 2.57, 95% CI 1.21 to 5.44; 1 study, 176 participants; moderate-quality evidence).Bisphosphonates versus active comparatorMore participants reported pain relief with zoledronate than pamidronate (RR 1.30, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.53; 1 study, 89 participants; NNT 5, 95% CI 3 to 11) or risedronate (RR 1.36, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.74; 1 study, 347 participants; NNT 7, 95% CI 4 to 24; very low quality evidence). This result is clinically important.There was insufficient evidence to confirm or exclude differences in adverse effects of bisphosphonates (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.76; 2 studies, 437 participants; low-quality evidence) and treatment discontinuation (2 studies, 437 participants) (RR 2.04, 95% CI 0.43 to 9.59; 2 studies, 437 participants; very low-quality evidence).Intensive versus symptomatic treatmentThere was no consistent evidence of difference to response in bone pain, bodily pain or quality of life in participants who received intensive versus symptomatic treatment.Inconclusive results were observed regarding fractures and orthopaedic procedures for intensive versus symptomatic treatment (intensive treatment for fracture: RR 1.84, 95% CI 0.76 to 4.44; absolute risk 8.1% versus 5.2%; orthopaedic procedures: RR 1.58, 95% CI 0.80 to 3.11; absolute risk 5.6% versus 3.0%; 1 study, 502 participants; low-quality evidence).There was insufficient evidence to confirm or exclude an important difference in adverse effects between intensive and symptomatic treatment (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.41; low-quality evidence).There was insufficient evidence to confirm or exclude an important difference of risk of rare adverse events (including osteonecrosis of the jaw) from the regulatory agencies databases.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We found moderate-quality evidence that bisphosphonates improved pain in people with Paget's disease of bone when compared with placebo. We are uncertain about the results of head-to-head studies investigating bisphosphonates. We found insufficient evidence of benefit in terms of pain or quality of life from intensive treatment. Information about adverse effects was limited, but serious side effects were rare, and rate of withdrawals due to side effects was low.

[Paget's disease of bone: Diagnostic and therapeutic updates]

Paget's disease of bone is the second most common metabolic bone disease after osteoporosis. Its pathogenesis is not yet clearly understood. Geographic distribution and epidemiological variations suggest a role of genetic and environmental factors in its pathophysiology. The frequency of the Paget's disease of bone increases with age. Its discovery can be fortuitous. Prognosis mainly depends on the occurrence of complications involving bones and joints, neurological, cardiovascular or metabolic systems. Treatment of symptomatic forms currently relies on bisphosphonates that have transformed its prognosis.

Long-Term Bone Scintigraphy Results After Intravenous Zoledronate in Paget's Disease of Bone

Zoledronate produces long-term normalization of biochemical markers in Paget's disease but whether this implies the absence of active disease is unknown. We have determined whether bone scintigraphy, a more sensitive index of disease activity, is also normalized ≥5 years after treatment with zoledronate. A consecutive case series of 11 individuals with Paget's disease treated with zoledronate 5 mg ≥5 years previously is reported. Eight patients received a single zoledronate infusion and were assessed 55-120 months later. Bone scintigraphy showed no evidence of active disease in four of these patients, and there was minimal residual disease activity in the other four. Three other patients required second infusions because of evidence of ongoing disease activity. In two of these, scintigraphy was normal ~90 months after their second infusions. In the third, further follow-up is not available. Procollagen-I N-terminal propeptide and total alkaline phosphatase were normal in all subjects at the time of bone scintigraphy. This case series confirms the high rate of response of Paget's disease to zoledronate, demonstrates the much greater sensitivity of scintigraphy compared with biochemical markers in detecting ongoing disease activity, and indicates that about one-third may be scintigraphically "cured" after one infusion; one-third have scintigraphically trivial disease activity subsequently, and the balance may require a second infusion. Scintigraphic "cure" is achievable after second infusions. Scintigraphy has an important place in the long-term management of Paget's patients following zoledronate, and should guide follow-up decisions in those with normal biochemical markers.

Osteoclasts are not activated in middle ear cholesteatoma

It is unclear whether osteoclasts are present and activated in cholesteatomas. We explored the expression of messenger RNA (mRNA) for osteoclast biomarkers and regulating factors in middle ear cholesteatomas to elucidate the level of osteoclast activity in this disease. Bone powder was collected from 14 patients with cholesteatomatous and noncholesteatomatous chronic otitis media during tympanomastoidectomy, separately from cortical bone of the mastoid (clean bone powder), from bone neighboring cholesteatoma (cholesteatomatous bone powder), and from bone of the air cells and antrum of noncholesteatomatous chronic otitis media patients (noncholesteatomatous bone powder). The samples collected were soaked in TRIzol reagent, and total RNA was extracted and purified by the acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform method, followed by the use of magnetic bead technology. The sample was then subjected to quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction for receptor activator of nuclear factor κB (RANK), tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP), cathepsin K (CTSK), osteoclast-associated receptor (OSCAR), calcitonin receptor (CALCR), matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP9), receptor activator of nuclear factor κB ligand (RANKL), and osteoprotegerin (OPG). There was no significant difference in the expression of TRAP, CTSK, OSCAR, CALCR, MMP9, or OPG among the clean, cholesteatomatous, and noncholesteatomatous bone powder. On the other hand, the expression of RANK and RANKL was significantly lower in the cholesteatomatous bone powder than in the noncholesteatomatous bone powder (P = 0.003 and P = 0.028, respectively). The RANKL mRNA/OPG mRNA ratio did not differ among the three samples. These results indicate that osteoclasts are unlikely to be activated in cholesteatomas. Bone resorption mechanisms not mediated by osteoclasts may need to be reappraised in cholesteatoma research in future studies.

Surgical treatment in spine Paget's disease: a systematic review

Paget's disease of bone (PDB) is a disease characterized by a disorder in the bone metabolism. The spine is the second region affected after the pelvis. Surgical treatment is reserved for cases refractory to medical treatment. We performed a systematic review of patients with Paget disease of bone affecting the spine, treated surgically in the last 30 years. The main objective of the review is to find out indications for surgery, outcomes of these patients and also the standard perioperative management.

Biological response to prosthetic debris

Joint arthroplasty had revolutionized the outcome of orthopaedic surgery. Extensive and collaborative work of many innovator surgeons had led to the development of durable bearing surfaces, yet no single material is considered absolutely perfect. Generation of wear debris from any part of the prosthesis is unavoidable. Implant loosening secondary to osteolysis is the most common mode of failure of arthroplasty. Osteolysis is the resultant of complex contribution of the generated wear debris and the mechanical instability of the prosthetic components. Roughly speaking, all orthopedic biomaterials may induce a universal biologic host response to generated wear débris with little specific characteristics for each material; but some debris has been shown to be more cytotoxic than others. Prosthetic wear debris induces an extensive biological cascade of adverse cellular responses, where macrophages are the main cellular type involved in this hostile inflammatory process. Macrophages cause osteolysis indirectly by releasing numerous chemotactic inflammatory mediators, and directly by resorbing bone with their membrane microstructures. The bio-reactivity of wear particles depends on two major elements: particle characteristics (size, concentration and composition) and host characteristics. While any particle type may enhance hostile cellular reaction, cytological examination demonstrated that more than 70% of the debris burden is constituted of polyethylene particles. Comprehensive understanding of the intricate process of osteolysis is of utmost importance for future development of therapeutic modalities that may delay or prevent the disease progression.