1
|
Lee S, Zide BS, Palm ST, Drew WJ, Sperling RA, Jacobs HIL, Siddiqi SH, Donovan NJ. Specific Association of Worry With Amyloid-β But Not Tau in Cognitively Unimpaired Older Adults. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2024; 32:1203-1214. [PMID: 38763835 DOI: 10.1016/j.jagp.2024.04.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2024] [Revised: 04/29/2024] [Accepted: 04/30/2024] [Indexed: 05/21/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Anxiety disorders and subsyndromal anxiety symptoms are highly prevalent in late life. Recent studies support that anxiety may be a neuropsychiatric symptom during preclinical Alzheimer's disease (AD) and that higher anxiety is associated with more rapid cognitive decline and progression to cognitive impairment. However, the associations of specific anxiety symptoms with AD pathologies and with co-occurring subjective and objective cognitive changes have not yet been established. METHODS Baseline data from the A4 and Longitudinal Evaluation of Amyloid Risk and Neurodegeneration studies were analyzed. Older adult participants (n = 4,486) underwent assessments of anxiety (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-6 item version [STAI]), and cerebral amyloid-beta (Aβ; 18F-florbetapir) PET and a subset underwent tau (18F-flortaucipir) PET. Linear regressions estimated associations of Aβ in a cortical composite and tau in the amygdala, entorhinal, and inferior temporal regions with STAI-Total and individual STAI item scores. Models adjusted for age, sex, education, marital status, depression, Apolipoprotein ε4 genotype, and subjective and objective cognition (Cognitive Function Index-participant; Preclinical Alzheimer Cognitive Composite). RESULTS Greater Aβ deposition was significantly associated with higher STAI-Worry, adjusting for all covariates, but not with other STAI items or STAI-Total scores. In mediation analyses, the association of Aβ with STAI-Worry was partially mediated by subjective cognition with a stronger direct effect. No associations were found for regional tau deposition with STAI-Total or STAI-Worry score. CONCLUSION Greater worry was associated with Aβ but not tau deposition, independent of subjective and objective cognition in cognitively unimpaired (CU) older adults. These findings implicate worry as an early, specific behavioral marker and a possible therapeutic target in preclinical AD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soyoung Lee
- Division of Geriatric Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital (SL, BSZ, NJD), Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Center for Brain Circuit Therapeutics, Brigham and Women's Hospital (SL, STP, WJD, SHS), Boston, MA.
| | - Benjamin S Zide
- Division of Geriatric Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital (SL, BSZ, NJD), Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Stephan T Palm
- Center for Brain Circuit Therapeutics, Brigham and Women's Hospital (SL, STP, WJD, SHS), Boston, MA; Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital (STP, WJD, RAS, NJD), Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - William J Drew
- Center for Brain Circuit Therapeutics, Brigham and Women's Hospital (SL, STP, WJD, SHS), Boston, MA; Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital (STP, WJD, RAS, NJD), Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Reisa A Sperling
- Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital (STP, WJD, RAS, NJD), Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital (RAS, NJD), Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Heidi I L Jacobs
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital (HILJ), Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Alzheimer Centre Limburg (HILJ), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Shan H Siddiqi
- Center for Brain Circuit Therapeutics, Brigham and Women's Hospital (SL, STP, WJD, SHS), Boston, MA; Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital (SHS), Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Nancy J Donovan
- Division of Geriatric Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital (SL, BSZ, NJD), Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital (STP, WJD, RAS, NJD), Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital (NJD), Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Streiber AM, Neitzel J, Nguyen Ho PT, Vernooij MW, Bos D. Intracranial arteriosclerosis is not associated with cerebral amyloid deposition. ALZHEIMER'S & DEMENTIA (AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS) 2024; 16:e70005. [PMID: 39360005 PMCID: PMC11444050 DOI: 10.1002/dad2.70005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2024] [Revised: 07/18/2024] [Accepted: 08/18/2024] [Indexed: 10/04/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intracranial arteriosclerosis and cerebral amyloid beta (Aβ) are both involved in the etiology of Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia, but the direct link between these two pathologies remains elusive. METHODS In 633 participants (mean age 69 years, 51% women) from the population-based Rotterdam Study, we quantified cerebral Aβ accumulation on amyloid positron emission tomography (PET). We assessed calcification of the intracranial internal carotid (ICAC) and vertebrobasilar arteries (VBAC) as proxies of arteriosclerosis on non-enhanced computed tomography (CT). Using logistic and linear regression, we studied the relationship of presence, burden, and type of calcification with the presence and burden of Aβ. RESULTS We found no associations of ICAC [odds ratio (OR): 0.85, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.43, 1.72] or VBAC [OR: 0.59, CI: 0.26, 1.24] with cerebral Aβ. The results did not vary across ICAC subtypes. DISCUSSION Intracranial arteriosclerosis was not associated with cerebral Aβ, underscoring their independence in the etiology of AD dementia. Highlights Comprehensive assessment of intracranial arteriosclerosis (e.g., including subtypes).Intracranial arteriosclerosis in different arteries and cerebral Aβ are not related.Arteriosclerosis and Aβ likely influence Alzheimer's disease dementia independently.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna M Streiber
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine Erasmus MC Rotterdam the Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology Erasmus MC Rotterdam the Netherlands
| | - Julia Neitzel
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine Erasmus MC Rotterdam the Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology Erasmus MC Rotterdam the Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health Boston Massachusetts USA
| | | | - Meike W Vernooij
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine Erasmus MC Rotterdam the Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology Erasmus MC Rotterdam the Netherlands
| | - Daniel Bos
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine Erasmus MC Rotterdam the Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology Erasmus MC Rotterdam the Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health Boston Massachusetts USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Takenaka A, Nihashi T, Sakurai K, Notomi K, Ono H, Inui Y, Ito S, Arahata Y, Takeda A, Ishii K, Ishii K, Ito K, Toyama H, Nakamura A, Kato T. Interrater agreement and variability in visual reading of [18F] flutemetamol PET images. Ann Nucl Med 2024:10.1007/s12149-024-01977-7. [PMID: 39316332 DOI: 10.1007/s12149-024-01977-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2024] [Accepted: 09/04/2024] [Indexed: 09/25/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to validate the concordance of visual ratings of [18F] flutemetamol amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) images and to investigate the correlation between the agreement of each rater and the Centiloid (CL) scale. METHODS A total of 192 participants, clinically classified as cognitively normal (CN) (n = 59), mild cognitive impairment (MCI) (n = 65), Alzheimer's disease (AD) (n = 55), or non-AD dementia (n = 13), participated in this study. Three experts conducted visual ratings of the amyloid PET images for all 192 patients, assigning a confidence level to each rating on a three-point scale (certain, probable, or neither). The positive or negative determination of amyloid PET results was made by majority vote. The CL value was calculated using the CapAIBL pipeline. RESULTS Overall, 101 images were determined to be positive, and 91 images were negative. Of the 101 positive images, the three raters were in complete agreement for 92 images and in disagreement for 9 images. Of the 91 negative images, the three raters were in complete agreement for 75 images and in disagreement for 16 images. Interrater reliability among the three experts was particularly high, with both Fleiss' kappa and Conger's kappa measuring 0.83 (0.76-0.89). The CL values of the unanimous positive group were significantly greater than those of the other groups, whereas the CL values of the unanimous negative group were significantly lower than those of the other groups. Images with rater disagreement had intermediate CLs. In cases with a high confidence level, the positive or negative visual ratings were in almost complete agreement. However, as confidence levels decreased, experts' visual ratings became more variable. The lower the confidence level was, the greater the number of cases with disagreement in the visual ratings. CONCLUSION Three experts independently rated 192 amyloid PET images, achieving a high level of interrater agreement. However, in patients with intermediate amyloid accumulation, visual ratings varied. Therefore, determining positive and negative decisions in these patients should be performed with caution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akinori Takenaka
- Department of Radiology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan
- Department of Radiology, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Obu, Japan
| | - Takashi Nihashi
- Department of Radiology, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Obu, Japan
| | - Keita Sakurai
- Department of Radiology, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Obu, Japan
| | | | - Hokuto Ono
- Micron Inc. Imaging Service Dept., Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoshitaka Inui
- Department of Radiology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan
- Department of Radiology, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Obu, Japan
| | - Shinji Ito
- Department of Radiology, Anjo Kosei Hospital, Anjo, Japan
| | - Yutaka Arahata
- Department of Neurology, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Obu, Japan
| | - Akinori Takeda
- Department of Neurology, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Obu, Japan
| | - Kazunari Ishii
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University, Osakasayama, Japan
| | - Kenji Ishii
- Team for Neuroimaging Research, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kengo Ito
- Department of Radiology, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Obu, Japan
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Neuroimaging, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Obu, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Toyama
- Department of Radiology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan
| | - Akinori Nakamura
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Neuroimaging, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Obu, Japan
- Department of Biomarker Research, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Obu, Japan
| | - Takashi Kato
- Department of Radiology, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Obu, Japan.
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Neuroimaging, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Obu, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kim S, Wang SM, Kang DW, Um YH, Han EJ, Park SY, Ha S, Choe YS, Kim HW, Kim REY, Kim D, Lee CU, Lim HK. A Comparative Analysis of Two Automated Quantification Methods for Regional Cerebral Amyloid Retention: PET-Only and PET-and-MRI-Based Methods. Int J Mol Sci 2024; 25:7649. [PMID: 39062892 PMCID: PMC11276670 DOI: 10.3390/ijms25147649] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2024] [Revised: 07/06/2024] [Accepted: 07/10/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Accurate quantification of amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) is essential for early detection of and intervention in Alzheimer's disease (AD) but there is still a lack of studies comparing the performance of various automated methods. This study compared the PET-only method and PET-and-MRI-based method with a pre-trained deep learning segmentation model. A large sample of 1180 participants in the Catholic Aging Brain Imaging (CABI) database was analyzed to calculate the regional standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) using both methods. The logistic regression models were employed to assess the discriminability of amyloid-positive and negative groups through 10-fold cross-validation and area under the receiver operating characteristics (AUROC) metrics. The two methods showed a high correlation in calculating SUVRs but the PET-MRI method, incorporating MRI data for anatomical accuracy, demonstrated superior performance in predicting amyloid-positivity. The parietal, frontal, and cingulate importantly contributed to the prediction. The PET-MRI method with a pre-trained deep learning model approach provides an efficient and precise method for earlier diagnosis and intervention in the AD continuum.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sunghwan Kim
- Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, Yeouido St. Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, 222 Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul 06591, Republic of Korea
| | - Sheng-Min Wang
- Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, Yeouido St. Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, 222 Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul 06591, Republic of Korea
| | - Dong Woo Kang
- Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, 222 Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul 06591, Republic of Korea
| | - Yoo Hyun Um
- Department of Psychiatry, St. Vincent’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222 Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul 06591, Republic of Korea
| | - Eun Ji Han
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Yeouido St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222 Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul 06591, Republic of Korea
| | - Sonya Youngju Park
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Yeouido St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222 Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul 06591, Republic of Korea
| | - Seunggyun Ha
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, 222 Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul 06591, Republic of Korea
| | - Yeong Sim Choe
- Research Institute, Neurophet Inc., Seoul 06234, Republic of Korea (R.E.K.)
| | - Hye Weon Kim
- Research Institute, Neurophet Inc., Seoul 06234, Republic of Korea (R.E.K.)
| | - Regina EY Kim
- Research Institute, Neurophet Inc., Seoul 06234, Republic of Korea (R.E.K.)
| | - Donghyeon Kim
- Research Institute, Neurophet Inc., Seoul 06234, Republic of Korea (R.E.K.)
| | - Chang Uk Lee
- Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, 222 Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul 06591, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyun Kook Lim
- Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, Yeouido St. Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, 222 Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul 06591, Republic of Korea
- CMC Institute for Basic Medical Science, The Catholic Medical Center of The Catholic University of Korea, 222 Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul 06591, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Shang C, Sakurai K, Nihashi T, Arahata Y, Takeda A, Ishii K, Ishii K, Matsuda H, Ito K, Kato T, Toyama H, Nakamura A. Comparison of consistency in centiloid scale among different analytical methods in amyloid PET: the CapAIBL, VIZCalc, and Amyquant methods. Ann Nucl Med 2024; 38:460-467. [PMID: 38512444 PMCID: PMC11108942 DOI: 10.1007/s12149-024-01919-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2023] [Accepted: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 03/23/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The Centiloid (CL) scale is a standardized measure for quantifying amyloid deposition in amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. We aimed to assess the agreement among 3 CL calculation methods: CapAIBL, VIZCalc, and Amyquant. METHODS This study included 192 participants (mean age: 71.5 years, range: 50-87 years), comprising 55 with Alzheimer's disease, 65 with mild cognitive impairment, 13 with non-Alzheimer's dementia, and 59 cognitively normal participants. All the participants were assessed using the three CL calculation methods. Spearman's rank correlation, linear regression, Friedman tests, Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, and Bland-Altman analysis were employed to assess data correlations, linear associations, method differences, and systematic bias, respectively. RESULTS Strong correlations (rho = 0.99, p < .001) were observed among the CL values calculated using the three methods. Scatter plots and regression lines visually confirmed these strong correlations and met the validation criteria. Despite the robust correlations, a significant difference in CL value between CapAIBL and Amyquant was observed (36.1 ± 39.7 vs. 34.9 ± 39.4; p < .001). In contrast, no significant differences were found between CapAIBL and VIZCalc or between VIZCalc and Amyquant. The Bland-Altman analysis showed no observable systematic bias between the methods. CONCLUSIONS The study demonstrated strong agreement among the three methods for calculating CL values. Despite minor variations in the absolute values of the Centiloid scores obtained using these methods, the overall agreement suggests that they are interchangeable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cong Shang
- Department of Radiology, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, 7-430 Morioka-Cho, Obu, Aichi, 474-8511, Japan
- Department of Radiology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan
| | - Keita Sakurai
- Department of Radiology, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, 7-430 Morioka-Cho, Obu, Aichi, 474-8511, Japan
| | - Takashi Nihashi
- Department of Radiology, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, 7-430 Morioka-Cho, Obu, Aichi, 474-8511, Japan
| | - Yutaka Arahata
- Department of Neurology, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Obu, Japan
| | - Akinori Takeda
- Department of Neurology, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Obu, Japan
| | - Kazunari Ishii
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University, Osakasayama, Japan
| | - Kenji Ishii
- Team for Neuroimaging Research, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Matsuda
- Department of Biofunctional Imaging, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan
- Drug Discovery and Cyclotron Research Center, Southern Tohoku Research Institute for Neuroscience, Koriyama, Japan
| | - Kengo Ito
- Department of Radiology, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, 7-430 Morioka-Cho, Obu, Aichi, 474-8511, Japan
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Neuroimaging, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Obu, Japan
| | - Takashi Kato
- Department of Radiology, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, 7-430 Morioka-Cho, Obu, Aichi, 474-8511, Japan.
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Neuroimaging, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Obu, Japan.
| | - Hiroshi Toyama
- Department of Radiology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan
| | - Akinori Nakamura
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Neuroimaging, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Obu, Japan
- Department of Biomarker Research, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Obu, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Jagust WJ, Mattay VS, Krainak DM, Wang SJ, Weidner LD, Hofling AA, Koo H, Hsieh P, Kuo PH, Farrar G, Marzella L. Quantitative Brain Amyloid PET. J Nucl Med 2024; 65:670-678. [PMID: 38514082 PMCID: PMC11064834 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.123.265766] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2023] [Revised: 02/13/2024] [Indexed: 03/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Since the development of amyloid tracers for PET imaging, there has been interest in quantifying amyloid burden in the brains of patients with Alzheimer disease. Quantitative amyloid PET imaging is poised to become a valuable approach in disease staging, theranostics, monitoring, and as an outcome measure for interventional studies. Yet, there are significant challenges and hurdles to overcome before it can be implemented into widespread clinical practice. On November 17, 2022, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, and Medical Imaging and Technology Alliance cosponsored a public workshop comprising experts from academia, industry, and government agencies to discuss the role of quantitative brain amyloid PET imaging in staging, prognosis, and longitudinal assessment of Alzheimer disease. The workshop discussed a range of topics, including available radiopharmaceuticals for amyloid imaging; the methodology, metrics, and analytic validity of quantitative amyloid PET imaging; its use in disease staging, prognosis, and monitoring of progression; and challenges facing the field. This report provides a high-level summary of the presentations and the discussion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Venkata S Mattay
- Division of Imaging and Radiation Medicine, Office of Specialty Medicine, Office of New Drugs, Center of Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland;
| | - Daniel M Krainak
- Division of Radiological Imaging and Radiation Therapy Devices, Office of Radiological Health, Office of Product Evaluation and Quality, Centers for Devices and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Sue-Jane Wang
- Division of Biometrics I, Office of Biostatistics, Office of Translational Sciences, Center of Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Lora D Weidner
- Division of Radiological Imaging and Radiation Therapy Devices, Office of Radiological Health, Office of Product Evaluation and Quality, Centers for Devices and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - A Alex Hofling
- Division of Imaging and Radiation Medicine, Office of Specialty Medicine, Office of New Drugs, Center of Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Hayoung Koo
- Division of Imaging and Radiation Medicine, Office of Specialty Medicine, Office of New Drugs, Center of Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | | | | | | | - Libero Marzella
- Division of Imaging and Radiation Medicine, Office of Specialty Medicine, Office of New Drugs, Center of Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Meyer MR, Kirmess KM, Eastwood S, Wente‐Roth TL, Irvin F, Holubasch MS, Venkatesh V, Fogelman I, Monane M, Hanna L, Rabinovici GD, Siegel BA, Whitmer RA, Apgar C, Bateman RJ, Holtzman DM, Irizarry M, Verbel D, Sachdev P, Ito S, Contois J, Yarasheski KE, Braunstein JB, Verghese PB, West T. Clinical validation of the PrecivityAD2 blood test: A mass spectrometry-based test with algorithm combining %p-tau217 and Aβ42/40 ratio to identify presence of brain amyloid. Alzheimers Dement 2024; 20:3179-3192. [PMID: 38491912 PMCID: PMC11095426 DOI: 10.1002/alz.13764] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2023] [Revised: 01/25/2024] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 03/18/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND With the availability of disease-modifying therapies for Alzheimer's disease (AD), it is important for clinicians to have tests to aid in AD diagnosis, especially when the presence of amyloid pathology is a criterion for receiving treatment. METHODS High-throughput, mass spectrometry-based assays were used to measure %p-tau217 and amyloid beta (Aβ)42/40 ratio in blood samples from 583 individuals with suspected AD (53% positron emission tomography [PET] positive by Centiloid > 25). An algorithm (PrecivityAD2 test) was developed using these plasma biomarkers to identify brain amyloidosis by PET. RESULTS The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) for %p-tau217 (0.94) was statistically significantly higher than that for p-tau217 concentration (0.91). The AUC-ROC for the PrecivityAD2 test output, the Amyloid Probability Score 2, was 0.94, yielding 88% agreement with amyloid PET. Diagnostic performance of the APS2 was similar by ethnicity, sex, age, and apoE4 status. DISCUSSION The PrecivityAD2 blood test showed strong clinical validity, with excellent agreement with brain amyloidosis by PET.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Lucy Hanna
- Center for Statistical SciencesBrown University School of Public HealthProvidenceRhode IslandUSA
| | | | | | | | - Charles Apgar
- American College of RadiologyPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Tim West
- C2N DiagnosticsSt. LouisMissouriUSA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Thompson E, Schroder A, He T, Shand C, Soskic S, Oxtoby NP, Barkhof F, Alexander DC. Combining multimodal connectivity information improves modelling of pathology spread in Alzheimer's disease. IMAGING NEUROSCIENCE (CAMBRIDGE, MASS.) 2024; 2:1-19. [PMID: 38947941 PMCID: PMC11211996 DOI: 10.1162/imag_a_00089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2023] [Revised: 12/07/2023] [Accepted: 01/02/2024] [Indexed: 07/02/2024]
Abstract
Cortical atrophy and aggregates of misfolded tau proteins are key hallmarks of Alzheimer's disease. Computational models that simulate the propagation of pathogens between connected brain regions have been used to elucidate mechanistic information about the spread of these disease biomarkers, such as disease epicentres and spreading rates. However, the connectomes that are used as substrates for these models are known to contain modality-specific false positive and false negative connections, influenced by the biases inherent to the different methods for estimating connections in the brain. In this work, we compare five types of connectomes for modelling both tau and atrophy patterns with the network diffusion model, which are validated against tau PET and structural MRI data from individuals with either mild cognitive impairment or dementia. We then test the hypothesis that a joint connectome, with combined information from different modalities, provides an improved substrate for the model. We find that a combination of multimodal information helps the model to capture observed patterns of tau deposition and atrophy better than any single modality. This is validated with data from independent datasets. Overall, our findings suggest that combining connectivity measures into a single connectome can mitigate some of the biases inherent to each modality and facilitate more accurate models of pathology spread, thus aiding our ability to understand disease mechanisms, and providing insight into the complementary information contained in different measures of brain connectivity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elinor Thompson
- UCL Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Computer Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Anna Schroder
- UCL Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Computer Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Tiantian He
- UCL Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Computer Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Cameron Shand
- UCL Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Computer Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sonja Soskic
- UCL Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Neil P. Oxtoby
- UCL Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Computer Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Frederik Barkhof
- UCL Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Computer Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, the Netherlands
- UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Daniel C. Alexander
- UCL Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Computer Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Aguero C, Dhaynaut M, Amaral AC, Moon SH, Neelamegam R, Scapellato M, Carazo-Casas C, Kumar S, El Fakhri G, Johnson K, Frosch MP, Normandin MD, Gómez-Isla T. Head-to-head comparison of [ 18F]-Flortaucipir, [ 18F]-MK-6240 and [ 18F]-PI-2620 postmortem binding across the spectrum of neurodegenerative diseases. Acta Neuropathol 2024; 147:25. [PMID: 38280071 PMCID: PMC10822013 DOI: 10.1007/s00401-023-02672-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2023] [Revised: 12/19/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/29/2024]
Abstract
We and others have shown that [18F]-Flortaucipir, the most validated tau PET tracer thus far, binds with strong affinity to tau aggregates in Alzheimer's (AD) but has relatively low affinity for tau aggregates in non-AD tauopathies and exhibits off-target binding to neuromelanin- and melanin-containing cells, and to hemorrhages. Several second-generation tau tracers have been subsequently developed. [18F]-MK-6240 and [18F]-PI-2620 are the two that have garnered most attention. Our recent data indicated that the binding pattern of [18F]-MK-6240 closely parallels that of [18F]-Flortaucipir. The present study aimed at the direct comparison of the autoradiographic binding properties and off-target profile of [18F]-Flortaucipir, [18F]-MK-6240 and [18F]-PI-2620 in human tissue specimens, and their potential binding to monoamine oxidases (MAO). Phosphor-screen and high resolution autoradiographic patterns of the three tracers were studied in the same postmortem tissue material from AD and non-AD tauopathies, cerebral amyloid angiopathy, synucleopathies, transactive response DNA-binding protein 43 (TDP-43)-frontotemporal lobe degeneration and controls. Our results show that the three tracers show nearly identical autoradiographic binding profiles. They all strongly bind to neurofibrillary tangles in AD but do not seem to bind to a significant extent to tau aggregates in non-AD tauopathies pointing to their limited utility for the in vivo detection of non-AD tau lesions. None of them binds to lesions containing β-amyloid, α-synuclein or TDP-43 but they all show strong off-target binding to neuromelanin and melanin-containing cells, as well as weaker binding to areas of hemorrhage. The autoradiographic binding signals of the three tracers are only weakly displaced by competing concentrations of selective MAO-B inhibitor deprenyl but not by MAO-A inhibitor clorgyline suggesting that MAO enzymes do not appear to be a significant binding target of any of them. These findings provide relevant insights for the correct interpretation of the in vivo behavior of these three tau PET tracers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cinthya Aguero
- MassGeneral Institute for NeuroDegenerative Disease, Charlestown, MA, USA
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, WACC Suite 715, 15th Parkman St., Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Maeva Dhaynaut
- Gordon Center for Medical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ana C Amaral
- MassGeneral Institute for NeuroDegenerative Disease, Charlestown, MA, USA
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, WACC Suite 715, 15th Parkman St., Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - S-H Moon
- Gordon Center for Medical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ramesh Neelamegam
- Gordon Center for Medical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Margaret Scapellato
- MassGeneral Institute for NeuroDegenerative Disease, Charlestown, MA, USA
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, WACC Suite 715, 15th Parkman St., Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Carlos Carazo-Casas
- MassGeneral Institute for NeuroDegenerative Disease, Charlestown, MA, USA
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, WACC Suite 715, 15th Parkman St., Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Sunny Kumar
- MassGeneral Institute for NeuroDegenerative Disease, Charlestown, MA, USA
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, WACC Suite 715, 15th Parkman St., Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Georges El Fakhri
- Gordon Center for Medical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Keith Johnson
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, WACC Suite 715, 15th Parkman St., Boston, MA, 02114, USA
- Gordon Center for Medical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Matthew P Frosch
- MassGeneral Institute for NeuroDegenerative Disease, Charlestown, MA, USA
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, WACC Suite 715, 15th Parkman St., Boston, MA, 02114, USA
- C.S. Kubik Laboratory for Neuropathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Marc D Normandin
- Gordon Center for Medical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Teresa Gómez-Isla
- MassGeneral Institute for NeuroDegenerative Disease, Charlestown, MA, USA.
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, WACC Suite 715, 15th Parkman St., Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Jovalekic A, Roé-Vellvé N, Koglin N, Quintana ML, Nelson A, Diemling M, Lilja J, Gómez-González JP, Doré V, Bourgeat P, Whittington A, Gunn R, Stephens AW, Bullich S. Validation of quantitative assessment of florbetaben PET scans as an adjunct to the visual assessment across 15 software methods. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2023; 50:3276-3289. [PMID: 37300571 PMCID: PMC10542295 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-023-06279-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2023] [Accepted: 05/19/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) with [18F]florbetaben (FBB) is an established tool for detecting Aβ deposition in the brain in vivo based on visual assessment of PET scans. Quantitative measures are commonly used in the research context and allow continuous measurement of amyloid burden. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the robustness of FBB PET quantification. METHODS This is a retrospective analysis of FBB PET images from 589 subjects. PET scans were quantified with 15 analytical methods using nine software packages (MIMneuro, Hermes BRASS, Neurocloud, Neurology Toolkit, statistical parametric mapping (SPM8), PMOD Neuro, CapAIBL, non-negative matrix factorization (NMF), AmyloidIQ) that used several metrics to estimate Aβ load (SUVR, centiloid, amyloid load, and amyloid index). Six analytical methods reported centiloid (MIMneuro, standard centiloid, Neurology Toolkit, SPM8 (PET only), CapAIBL, NMF). All results were quality controlled. RESULTS The mean sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 96.1 ± 1.6%, 96.9 ± 1.0%, and 96.4 ± 1.1%, respectively, for all quantitative methods tested when compared to histopathology, where available. The mean percentage of agreement between binary quantitative assessment across all 15 methods and visual majority assessment was 92.4 ± 1.5%. Assessments of reliability, correlation analyses, and comparisons across software packages showed excellent performance and consistent results between analytical methods. CONCLUSION This study demonstrated that quantitative methods using both CE marked software and other widely available processing tools provided comparable results to visual assessments of FBB PET scans. Software quantification methods, such as centiloid analysis, can complement visual assessment of FBB PET images and could be used in the future for identification of early amyloid deposition, monitoring disease progression and treatment effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Vincent Doré
- Department of Molecular Imaging & Therapy, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Pemberton HG, Buckley C, Battle M, Bollack A, Patel V, Tomova P, Cooke D, Balhorn W, Hegedorn K, Lilja J, Brand C, Farrar G. Software compatibility analysis for quantitative measures of [ 18F]flutemetamol amyloid PET burden in mild cognitive impairment. EJNMMI Res 2023; 13:48. [PMID: 37225974 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-023-00994-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2022] [Accepted: 05/05/2023] [Indexed: 05/26/2023] Open
Abstract
RATIONALE Amyloid-β (Aβ) pathology is one of the earliest detectable brain changes in Alzheimer's disease pathogenesis. In clinical practice, trained readers will visually categorise positron emission tomography (PET) scans as either Aβ positive or negative. However, adjunct quantitative analysis is becoming more widely available, where regulatory approved software can currently generate metrics such as standardised uptake value ratios (SUVr) and individual Z-scores. Therefore, it is of direct value to the imaging community to assess the compatibility of commercially available software packages. In this collaborative project, the compatibility of amyloid PET quantification was investigated across four regulatory approved software packages. In doing so, the intention is to increase visibility and understanding of clinically relevant quantitative methods. METHODS Composite SUVr using the pons as the reference region was generated from [18F]flutemetamol (GE Healthcare) PET in a retrospective cohort of 80 amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) patients (40 each male/female; mean age = 73 years, SD = 8.52). Based on previous autopsy validation work, an Aβ positivity threshold of ≥ 0.6 SUVrpons was applied. Quantitative results from MIM Software's MIMneuro, Syntermed's NeuroQ, Hermes Medical Solutions' BRASS and GE Healthcare's CortexID were analysed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), percentage agreement around the Aβ positivity threshold and kappa scores. RESULTS Using an Aβ positivity threshold of ≥ 0.6 SUVrpons, 95% agreement was achieved across the four software packages. Two patients were narrowly classed as Aβ negative by one software package but positive by the others, and two patients vice versa. All kappa scores around the same Aβ positivity threshold, both combined (Fleiss') and individual software pairings (Cohen's), were ≥ 0.9 signifying "almost perfect" inter-rater reliability. Excellent reliability was found between composite SUVr measurements for all four software packages, with an average measure ICC of 0.97 and 95% confidence interval of 0.957-0.979. Correlation coefficient analysis between the two software packages reporting composite z-scores was strong (r2 = 0.98). CONCLUSION Using an optimised cortical mask, regulatory approved software packages provided highly correlated and reliable quantification of [18F]flutemetamol amyloid PET with a ≥ 0.6 SUVrpons positivity threshold. In particular, this work could be of interest to physicians performing routine clinical imaging rather than researchers performing more bespoke image analysis. Similar analysis is encouraged using other reference regions as well as the Centiloid scale, when it has been implemented by more software packages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hugh G Pemberton
- GE Healthcare, Pollards Wood, Chalfont St Giles, Amersham, HP8 4SP, UK.
- Centre for Medical Image Computing (CMIC), Department of Medical Physics and Bioengineering, University College London, London, UK.
- UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.
| | | | - Mark Battle
- GE Healthcare, Pollards Wood, Chalfont St Giles, Amersham, HP8 4SP, UK
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Ariane Bollack
- Centre for Medical Image Computing (CMIC), Department of Medical Physics and Bioengineering, University College London, London, UK
| | - Vrajesh Patel
- GE Healthcare, Pollards Wood, Chalfont St Giles, Amersham, HP8 4SP, UK
| | - Petya Tomova
- GE Healthcare, Pollards Wood, Chalfont St Giles, Amersham, HP8 4SP, UK
| | | | | | | | | | - Christine Brand
- GE Healthcare, Pollards Wood, Chalfont St Giles, Amersham, HP8 4SP, UK
| | - Gill Farrar
- GE Healthcare, Pollards Wood, Chalfont St Giles, Amersham, HP8 4SP, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kotari V, Southekal S, Navitsky M, Kennedy IA, Lu M, Morris A, Zimmer JA, Fleisher AS, Mintun MA, Devous MD, Pontecorvo MJ. Early tau detection in flortaucipir images: validation in autopsy-confirmed data and implications for disease progression. Alzheimers Res Ther 2023; 15:41. [PMID: 36855201 PMCID: PMC9972744 DOI: 10.1186/s13195-023-01160-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2022] [Accepted: 01/01/2023] [Indexed: 03/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is an increasing interest in utilizing tau PET to identify patients early in Alzheimer's disease (AD). In this work, a temporal lobe composite (Eτ) volume of interest (VOI) was evaluated in a longitudinal flortaucipir cohort and compared to a previously described global neocortical VOI. In a separate autopsy-confirmed study, the sensitivity of the Eτ VOI for identifying intermediate (B2) neurofibrillary tangle (NFT) pathology was evaluated. METHODS A total of 427 subjects received flortaucipir, florbetapir, MRI, and cognitive evaluation at baseline and 18 months. In a separate autopsy study, 67 subjects received ante-mortem flortaucipir scans, and neuropathological findings were recorded according to NIA-AA recommendations by two experts. Two VOIs: Eτ comprising FreeSurfer volumes (bilateral entorhinal cortex, fusiform, parahippocampal, and inferior temporal gyri) transformed to MNI space and a previously published global AD signature-weighted neocortical VOI (ADsignature) (Devous et al., J Nucl Med 59:937-43, 2018), were used to calculate SUVr relative to a white matter reference region (PERSI) (Southekal et al., J Nucl Med Off Publ Soc Nucl Med 59:944-51, 2018). SUVr cutoffs for positivity were determined based on a cohort of young, cognitively normal subjects. Subjects were grouped based on positivity on both VOIs (Eτ+/ADsignature+; Eτ+/ADsignature-; Eτ-/ADsignature-). Groupwise comparisons were performed for baseline SUVr, 18-month changes in SUVr, neurodegeneration, and cognition. For the autopsy study, the sensitivity of Eτ in identifying intermediate Braak pathology (B2) subjects was compared to that of AD signature-weighted neocortical VOI. The average surface maps of subjects in the Eτ+/ADsignature- group and B2 NFT scores were created for visual evaluation of uptake. RESULTS Sixty-four out of 390 analyzable subjects were identified as Eτ+/ADsignature-: 84% were Aβ+, 100% were diagnosed as MCI or AD, and 59% were APOE ε4 carriers. Consistent with the hypothesis that Eτ+/ADsignature- status reflects an early stage of AD, Eτ+/ADsignature- subjects deteriorated significantly faster than Eτ-/ADsignature- subjects, but significantly slower than Eτ+/ADsignature+ subjects, on most measures (i.e., change in ADsignature SUVr, Eτ ROI cortical thickness, and MMSE). The ADsignature VOI was selective for subjects who came to autopsy with a B3 NFT score. In the autopsy study, 12/15 B2 subjects (including 10/11 Braak IV) were Eτ+/ADsignature-. Surface maps showed that flortaucipir uptake was largely captured by the Eτ VOI regions in B2 subjects. CONCLUSION The Eτ VOI identified subjects with elevated temporal but not global tau (Eτ+/ADsignature-) that were primarily Aβ+, APOE ε4 carriers, and diagnosed as MCI or AD. Eτ+/ADsignature- subjects had greater accumulation of tau, greater atrophy, and higher decline on MMSE in 18 months compared to Eτ-/ADsignature- subjects. Finally, the Eτ VOI identified the majority of the intermediate NFT score subjects in an autopsy-confirmed study. As far as we know, this is the first study that presents a visualization of ante-mortem FTP retention patterns that at a group level agree with the neurofibrillary tangle staging scheme proposed by Braak. These findings suggest that the Eτ VOI may be sensitive for detecting impaired subjects early in the course of Alzheimer's disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vikas Kotari
- Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, 46285, USA.
| | - Sudeepti Southekal
- grid.417540.30000 0000 2220 2544Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN 46285 USA
| | - Michael Navitsky
- grid.417540.30000 0000 2220 2544Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN 46285 USA
| | - Ian A. Kennedy
- grid.417540.30000 0000 2220 2544Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN 46285 USA
| | - Ming Lu
- grid.417540.30000 0000 2220 2544Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN 46285 USA
| | - Amanda Morris
- grid.417540.30000 0000 2220 2544Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN 46285 USA
| | - Jennifer Ann Zimmer
- grid.417540.30000 0000 2220 2544Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN 46285 USA
| | - Adam S. Fleisher
- grid.417540.30000 0000 2220 2544Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN 46285 USA
| | - Mark A. Mintun
- grid.417540.30000 0000 2220 2544Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN 46285 USA
| | - Michael D. Devous
- grid.417540.30000 0000 2220 2544Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN 46285 USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
van Arendonk J, Neitzel J, Steketee RME, van Assema DME, Vrooman HA, Segbers M, Ikram MA, Vernooij MW. Diabetes and hypertension are related to amyloid-beta burden in the population-based Rotterdam Study. Brain 2022; 146:337-348. [PMID: 36374264 PMCID: PMC9825526 DOI: 10.1093/brain/awac354] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2022] [Revised: 08/01/2022] [Accepted: 09/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Higher vascular disease burden increases the likelihood of developing dementia, including Alzheimer's disease. Better understanding the association between vascular risk factors and Alzheimer's disease pathology at the predementia stage is critical for developing effective strategies to delay cognitive decline. In this work, we estimated the impact of six vascular risk factors on the presence and severity of in vivo measured brain amyloid-beta (Aβ) plaques in participants from the population-based Rotterdam Study. Vascular risk factors (hypertension, hypercholesterolaemia, diabetes, obesity, physical inactivity and smoking) were assessed 13 (2004-2008) and 7 years (2009-2014) prior to 18F-florbetaben PET (2018-2021) in 635 dementia-free participants. Vascular risk factors were associated with binary amyloid PET status or continuous PET readouts (standard uptake value ratios, SUVrs) using logistic and linear regression models, respectively, adjusted for age, sex, education, APOE4 risk allele count and time between vascular risk and PET assessment. Participants' mean age at time of amyloid PET was 69 years (range: 60-90), 325 (51.2%) were women and 190 (29.9%) carried at least one APOE4 risk allele. The adjusted prevalence estimates of an amyloid-positive PET status markedly increased with age [12.8% (95% CI 11.6; 14) in 60-69 years versus 35% (36; 40.8) in 80-89 years age groups] and APOE4 allele count [9.7% (8.8; 10.6) in non-carriers versus 38.4% (36; 40.8) to 60.4% (54; 66.8) in carriers of one or two risk allele(s)]. Diabetes 7 years prior to PET assessment was associated with a higher risk of a positive amyloid status [odds ratio (95% CI) = 3.68 (1.76; 7.61), P < 0.001] and higher standard uptake value ratios, indicating more severe Aβ pathology [standardized beta = 0.40 (0.17; 0.64), P = 0.001]. Hypertension was associated with higher SUVr values in APOE4 carriers (mean SUVr difference of 0.09), but not in non-carriers (mean SUVr difference 0.02; P = 0.005). In contrast, hypercholesterolaemia was related to lower SUVr values in APOE4 carriers (mean SUVr difference -0.06), but not in non-carriers (mean SUVr difference 0.02). Obesity, physical inactivity and smoking were not related to amyloid PET measures. The current findings suggest a contribution of diabetes, hypertension and hypercholesterolaemia to the pathophysiology of Alzheimer's disease in a general population of older non-demented adults. As these conditions respond well to lifestyle modification and drug treatment, further research should focus on the preventative effect of early risk management on the development of Alzheimer's disease neuropathology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Daniëlle M E van Assema
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands,Department of Medical Imaging, Nuclear Medicine, Northwest Clinics, Alkmaar, The Netherlands
| | - Henri A Vrooman
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marcel Segbers
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M Arfan Ikram
- Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Meike W Vernooij
- Correspondence to: Prof. Dr Meike W. Vernooij Erasmus MC University Medical Center Office ND-544, Wytemaweg 80 3015 CN Rotterdam, The Netherlands E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Pemberton HG, Collij LE, Heeman F, Bollack A, Shekari M, Salvadó G, Alves IL, Garcia DV, Battle M, Buckley C, Stephens AW, Bullich S, Garibotto V, Barkhof F, Gispert JD, Farrar G. Quantification of amyloid PET for future clinical use: a state-of-the-art review. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2022; 49:3508-3528. [PMID: 35389071 PMCID: PMC9308604 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-022-05784-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 30.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2021] [Accepted: 03/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Amyloid-β (Aβ) pathology is one of the earliest detectable brain changes in Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathogenesis. The overall load and spatial distribution of brain Aβ can be determined in vivo using positron emission tomography (PET), for which three fluorine-18 labelled radiotracers have been approved for clinical use. In clinical practice, trained readers will categorise scans as either Aβ positive or negative, based on visual inspection. Diagnostic decisions are often based on these reads and patient selection for clinical trials is increasingly guided by amyloid status. However, tracer deposition in the grey matter as a function of amyloid load is an inherently continuous process, which is not sufficiently appreciated through binary cut-offs alone. State-of-the-art methods for amyloid PET quantification can generate tracer-independent measures of Aβ burden. Recent research has shown the ability of these quantitative measures to highlight pathological changes at the earliest stages of the AD continuum and generate more sensitive thresholds, as well as improving diagnostic confidence around established binary cut-offs. With the recent FDA approval of aducanumab and more candidate drugs on the horizon, early identification of amyloid burden using quantitative measures is critical for enrolling appropriate subjects to help establish the optimal window for therapeutic intervention and secondary prevention. In addition, quantitative amyloid measurements are used for treatment response monitoring in clinical trials. In clinical settings, large multi-centre studies have shown that amyloid PET results change both diagnosis and patient management and that quantification can accurately predict rates of cognitive decline. Whether these changes in management reflect an improvement in clinical outcomes is yet to be determined and further validation work is required to establish the utility of quantification for supporting treatment endpoint decisions. In this state-of-the-art review, several tools and measures available for amyloid PET quantification are summarised and discussed. Use of these methods is growing both clinically and in the research domain. Concurrently, there is a duty of care to the wider dementia community to increase visibility and understanding of these methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hugh G Pemberton
- GE Healthcare, Amersham, UK.
- Centre for Medical Image Computing (CMIC), Department of Medical Physics and Bioengineering, University College London, London, UK.
- UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.
| | - Lyduine E Collij
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neurocience, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Fiona Heeman
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neurocience, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ariane Bollack
- Centre for Medical Image Computing (CMIC), Department of Medical Physics and Bioengineering, University College London, London, UK
| | - Mahnaz Shekari
- Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
- IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Gemma Salvadó
- Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Isadora Lopes Alves
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neurocience, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Brain Research Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - David Vallez Garcia
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neurocience, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mark Battle
- GE Healthcare, Amersham, UK
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | | | | | | | - Valentina Garibotto
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
- NIMTLab, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Frederik Barkhof
- Centre for Medical Image Computing (CMIC), Department of Medical Physics and Bioengineering, University College London, London, UK
- UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neurocience, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Juan Domingo Gispert
- Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
- IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Bioingeniería, Biomateriales y Nanomedicina, Madrid, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Grober E, Lipton RB, Sperling RA, Papp KV, Johnson KA, Rentz DM, Veroff AE, Aisen PS, Ezzati A. Associations of Stages of Objective Memory Impairment With Amyloid PET and Structural MRI: The A4 Study. Neurology 2022; 98:e1327-e1336. [PMID: 35197359 PMCID: PMC8967421 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000200046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2021] [Accepted: 01/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES The goal of this work was to investigate the neuroimaging correlates of the Stages of Objective Memory Impairment (SOMI) system operationalized with the Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test (FCSRT), a widely used episodic memory measure. METHODS The FCSRT begins with a study phase in which items (e.g., grapes) are identified in response to unique semantic cues (e.g., fruit) that are used in the test phase to prompt recall of items not retrieved by free recall. There are 3 test trials of the 16 items (maximum 48). Data from 4,484 cognitively unimpaired participants from the Anti-Amyloid Treatment in Asymptomatic Alzheimer's (A4) study were used. All participants had amyloid PET imaging, and a subset of 1,262 β-amyloid (Aβ)-positive had structural MRIs. We compared the Aβ mean cortical standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) and volumetric measures of hippocampus, parahippocampal gyrus, entorhinal cortex, and inferior temporal cortex between the 5 SOMI stages. RESULTS Participants had a mean age of 71.3 (SD 4.6) years; 40.6% were male; and 34.6% were APOE ε4 positive. Half had no memory impairment; the other half had retrieval deficits, storage limitations, or both. Analysis of covariance in the entire sample while controlling for age, sex, education, and APOE ε4 showed that individuals in higher SOMI stages had higher global amyloid SUVR (p < 0.001). Both SOMI-4 and -3 subgroups had higher amyloid SUVR than SOMI-0 and SOMI-1 subgroups. Individuals in higher SOMI stages had smaller hippocampal volume (p = 0.003), entorhinal cortex (p < 0.05), and inferior temporal lobes (p < 0.05), but there was no difference between parahippocampal gyrus volume of different SOMI stages. Pairwise comparison of SOMI subgroups showed that the SOMI-4, -3, and -2 subgroups had smaller hippocampal volume than the SOMI-0 and -1 subgroup. The SOMI-4 subgroup had significantly smaller entorhinal cortex and smaller inferior temporal lobe compared to all other groups. DISCUSSION Presence of Alzheimer disease pathology is closely related to memory impairment according to SOMI stages in the cognitively unimpaired sample of A4. Results from structural MRIs suggest that memory storage impairment (SOMI-3 and -4) is present when there is widespread medial temporal lobe atrophy. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02008357. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE This study provides Class I evidence that, in normal older individuals, higher stages of memory impairment assessed with FCSRT were associated with higher amyloid imaging burden and lower volume of hippocampus, entorhinal cortex, and inferior temporal lobes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ellen Grober
- From the Department of Neurology (E.G., R.B.L., A.E.V., A.E.), Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Harvard Aging Brain Study (R.A.S., K.V.P., K.A.J., D.M.R.), Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School; Center for Alzheimer Research and Treatment (R.A.S., K.V.P., K.A.J., D.M.R.), Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; and Alzheimer's Therapeutic Research Institute (P.S.A.), University of Southern California, San Diego.
| | - Richard B Lipton
- From the Department of Neurology (E.G., R.B.L., A.E.V., A.E.), Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Harvard Aging Brain Study (R.A.S., K.V.P., K.A.J., D.M.R.), Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School; Center for Alzheimer Research and Treatment (R.A.S., K.V.P., K.A.J., D.M.R.), Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; and Alzheimer's Therapeutic Research Institute (P.S.A.), University of Southern California, San Diego
| | - Reisa A Sperling
- From the Department of Neurology (E.G., R.B.L., A.E.V., A.E.), Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Harvard Aging Brain Study (R.A.S., K.V.P., K.A.J., D.M.R.), Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School; Center for Alzheimer Research and Treatment (R.A.S., K.V.P., K.A.J., D.M.R.), Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; and Alzheimer's Therapeutic Research Institute (P.S.A.), University of Southern California, San Diego
| | - Kathryn V Papp
- From the Department of Neurology (E.G., R.B.L., A.E.V., A.E.), Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Harvard Aging Brain Study (R.A.S., K.V.P., K.A.J., D.M.R.), Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School; Center for Alzheimer Research and Treatment (R.A.S., K.V.P., K.A.J., D.M.R.), Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; and Alzheimer's Therapeutic Research Institute (P.S.A.), University of Southern California, San Diego
| | - Keith A Johnson
- From the Department of Neurology (E.G., R.B.L., A.E.V., A.E.), Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Harvard Aging Brain Study (R.A.S., K.V.P., K.A.J., D.M.R.), Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School; Center for Alzheimer Research and Treatment (R.A.S., K.V.P., K.A.J., D.M.R.), Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; and Alzheimer's Therapeutic Research Institute (P.S.A.), University of Southern California, San Diego
| | - Dorene M Rentz
- From the Department of Neurology (E.G., R.B.L., A.E.V., A.E.), Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Harvard Aging Brain Study (R.A.S., K.V.P., K.A.J., D.M.R.), Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School; Center for Alzheimer Research and Treatment (R.A.S., K.V.P., K.A.J., D.M.R.), Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; and Alzheimer's Therapeutic Research Institute (P.S.A.), University of Southern California, San Diego
| | - Amy E Veroff
- From the Department of Neurology (E.G., R.B.L., A.E.V., A.E.), Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Harvard Aging Brain Study (R.A.S., K.V.P., K.A.J., D.M.R.), Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School; Center for Alzheimer Research and Treatment (R.A.S., K.V.P., K.A.J., D.M.R.), Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; and Alzheimer's Therapeutic Research Institute (P.S.A.), University of Southern California, San Diego
| | - Paul S Aisen
- From the Department of Neurology (E.G., R.B.L., A.E.V., A.E.), Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Harvard Aging Brain Study (R.A.S., K.V.P., K.A.J., D.M.R.), Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School; Center for Alzheimer Research and Treatment (R.A.S., K.V.P., K.A.J., D.M.R.), Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; and Alzheimer's Therapeutic Research Institute (P.S.A.), University of Southern California, San Diego
| | - Ali Ezzati
- From the Department of Neurology (E.G., R.B.L., A.E.V., A.E.), Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Harvard Aging Brain Study (R.A.S., K.V.P., K.A.J., D.M.R.), Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School; Center for Alzheimer Research and Treatment (R.A.S., K.V.P., K.A.J., D.M.R.), Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; and Alzheimer's Therapeutic Research Institute (P.S.A.), University of Southern California, San Diego
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Decreased imaging time of amyloid PET using [ 18F]florbetapir can maintain quantitative accuracy. Radiol Phys Technol 2022; 15:116-124. [PMID: 35239129 DOI: 10.1007/s12194-022-00653-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2021] [Revised: 02/17/2022] [Accepted: 02/17/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
Shortening the amount of time required to acquire amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) brain images while maintaining the accuracy of quantitative evaluation would help to overcome motion artifacts associated with Alzheimer's disease patients. The present study aimed to validate the quantitative accuracy of [18F]florbetapir ([18F]FBP) imaging over a shorter acquisition duration. Forty participants were injected with [18F]FBP, and PET images were acquired for 50-55, 50-60, and 50-70 min after injection. Three physicians visually assessed the reprocessed [18F]FBP images using a binary scale to classify them as amyloid β (Aβ) negative or positive. A mean composite standard uptake value ratio (cSUVR) > 1.075 was defined as Aβ-positive based on receiver operating characteristic curves. Inter-reader and inter-acquisition duration agreements with visual assessment were evaluated using Cohen's kappa (κ). Binary visual discrimination of 102 for the 120 [18F]FBP images, was consistent among the three readers. Sixteen, sixteen, and fourteen of the 40 [18F]FBP images acquired for 50-55, 50-60, and 50-70 min after injection, respectively, were deemed Aβ-positive by visual assessment. The inter-rater agreement was high, and the inter-acquisition duration agreement was almost perfect. The cSUVR did not change significantly among the acquisition durations, and the acquisition duration did not affect the outcome of discrimination based on the cSUVR cutoff. A shorter acquisition duration changed the visual assessment outcomes. Stable quantitative values were derived from [18F]FBP images acquired within 5 min. cSUVR helped to improve the performance and confidence in the outcomes of visual assessment.
Collapse
|
17
|
Bischof GN, Bartenstein P, Barthel H, van Berckel B, Doré V, van Eimeren T, Foster N, Hammes J, Lammertsma AA, Minoshima S, Rowe C, Sabri O, Seibyl J, Van Laere K, Vandenberghe R, Villemagne V, Yakushev I, Drzezga A. Toward a Universal Readout for 18F-Labeled Amyloid Tracers: The CAPTAINs Study. J Nucl Med 2021; 62:999-1005. [PMID: 33712532 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.120.250290] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Revised: 06/09/2020] [Accepted: 10/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
To date, 3 18F-labeled PET tracers have been approved for assessing cerebral amyloid plaque pathology in the diagnostic workup of suspected Alzheimer disease (AD). Although scanning protocols are relatively similar across tracers, U.S. Food and Drug Administration- and the European Medicines Agency-approved visual rating protocols differ among the 3 tracers. This proof-of-concept study assessed the comparability of the 3 approved visual rating protocols to classify a scan as amyloid-positive or -negative, when applied by groups of experts and nonexperts to all 3 amyloid tracers. Methods: In an international multicenter approach, both expert (n = 4) and nonexpert raters (n = 3) rated scans acquired with 18F-florbetaben, 18F-florbetapir and 18F-flutemetamol. Scans obtained with each tracer were presented for reading according to all 3 approved visual rating protocols. In a randomized order, every single scan was rated by each reader according to all 3 protocols. Raters were blinded for the amyloid tracer used and asked to rate each scan as positive or negative, giving a confidence judgment after each response. Percentage of visual reader agreement, interrater reliability, and agreement of each visual read with binary quantitative measures (fixed SUV ratio threshold for positive or negative scans) were computed. These metrics were analyzed separately for expert and nonexpert groups. Results: No significant differences in using the different approved visual rating protocols were observed across the different metrics of agreement in the group of experts. Nominal differences suggested that the 18F-florbetaben visual rating protocol achieved the highest interrater reliability and accuracy especially under low confidence conditions. For the group of nonexpert raters, significant differences between the different visual rating protocols were observed with overall moderate-to-fair accuracy and with the highest reliability for the 18F-florbetapir visual rating protocol. Conclusion: We observed high interrater agreement despite applying different visual rating protocols for all 18F-labeled amyloid tracers. This implies that the results of the visual interpretation of amyloid imaging can be well standardized and do not depend on the rating protocol in experts. Consequently, the creation of a universal visual assessment protocol for all amyloid imaging tracers appears feasible, which could benefit especially the less-experienced readers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gérard N Bischof
- University Hospital Cologne, Multimodal Neuroimaging Group, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cologne, Germany;
| | | | - Henryk Barthel
- University Hospital of Leipzig, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Bart van Berckel
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location VUmc Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Vincent Doré
- CSIRO Health and Biosecurity, Parkville 3052, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Molecular Imaging & Therapy, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Thilo van Eimeren
- University Hospital Cologne, Multimodal Neuroimaging Group, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cologne, Germany
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- German Center of Neurodegenerative Disease (DZNE), Bonn, Germany
| | - Norman Foster
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Jochen Hammes
- University Hospital Cologne, Multimodal Neuroimaging Group, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cologne, Germany
| | - Adriaan A Lammertsma
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location VUmc Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Satoshi Minoshima
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Chris Rowe
- CSIRO Health and Biosecurity, Parkville 3052, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Molecular Imaging & Therapy, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Osama Sabri
- University Hospital of Leipzig, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Leipzig, Germany
| | - John Seibyl
- Institute for Neurodegenerative Disorders, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Koen Van Laere
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Hospital Leuven and Department of Imaging and Pathology KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Rik Vandenberghe
- Memory Clinic, University Hospital Leuven and Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | - Victor Villemagne
- CSIRO Health and Biosecurity, Parkville 3052, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Molecular Imaging & Therapy, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Igor Yakushev
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Germany; and
| | - Alexander Drzezga
- University Hospital Cologne, Multimodal Neuroimaging Group, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cologne, Germany
- German Center of Neurodegenerative Disease (DZNE), Bonn, Germany
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-2), Molecular Organization of the Brain, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Bucci M, Savitcheva I, Farrar G, Salvadó G, Collij L, Doré V, Gispert JD, Gunn R, Hanseeuw B, Hansson O, Shekari M, Lhommel R, Molinuevo JL, Rowe C, Sur C, Whittington A, Buckley C, Nordberg A. A multisite analysis of the concordance between visual image interpretation and quantitative analysis of [ 18F]flutemetamol amyloid PET images. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2021; 48:2183-2199. [PMID: 33844055 PMCID: PMC8175298 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-021-05311-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2020] [Accepted: 03/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND [18F]flutemetamol PET scanning provides information on brain amyloid load and has been approved for routine clinical use based upon visual interpretation as either negative (equating to none or sparse amyloid plaques) or amyloid positive (equating to moderate or frequent plaques). Quantitation is however fundamental to the practice of nuclear medicine and hence can be used to supplement amyloid reading methodology especially in unclear cases. METHODS A total of 2770 [18F]flutemetamol images were collected from 3 clinical studies and 6 research cohorts with available visual reading of [18F]flutemetamol and quantitative analysis of images. These were assessed further to examine both the discordance and concordance between visual and quantitative imaging primarily using thresholds robustly established using pathology as the standard of truth. Scans covered a wide range of cases (i.e. from cognitively unimpaired subjects to patients attending the memory clinics). Methods of quantifying amyloid ranged from using CE/510K cleared marked software (e.g. CortexID, Brass), to other research-based methods (e.g. PMOD, CapAIBL). Additionally, the clinical follow-up of two types of discordance between visual and quantitation (V+Q- and V-Q+) was examined with competing risk regression analysis to assess possible differences in prediction for progression to Alzheimer's disease (AD) and other diagnoses (OD). RESULTS Weighted mean concordance between visual and quantitation using the autopsy-derived threshold was 94% using pons as the reference region. Concordance from a sensitivity analysis which assessed the maximum agreement for each cohort using a range of cut-off values was also estimated at approximately 96% (weighted mean). Agreement was generally higher in clinical cases compared to research cases. V-Q+ discordant cases were 11% more likely to progress to AD than V+Q- for the SUVr with pons as reference region. CONCLUSIONS Quantitation of amyloid PET shows a high agreement vs binary visual reading and also allows for a continuous measure that, in conjunction with possible discordant analysis, could be used in the future to identify possible earlier pathological deposition as well as monitor disease progression and treatment effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Bucci
- Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Center for Alzheimer Research, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Irina Savitcheva
- Medical Radiation Physics and Nuclear Medicine, Section for Nuclear Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Gill Farrar
- Pharmaceutical Diagnostics, GE Healthcare, Amersham, UK
| | - Gemma Salvadó
- Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain.,IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Lyduine Collij
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan, 1117, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Vincent Doré
- Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.,Health and Biosecurity, CSIRO, Parkville, Australia
| | - Juan Domingo Gispert
- Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain.,IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain.,Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain.,Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Bioingenieriá, Biomateriales y Nanomedicina, (CIBER-BBN), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Roger Gunn
- Invicro, London, UK.,Division of Brain Sciences, Department of Medicine, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - Bernard Hanseeuw
- Neurology and Nuclear Medicine Departments, Saint-Luc University Hospital, Av. Hippocrate, 10, 1200, Brussels, Belgium.,Gordon Center for Medical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Oskar Hansson
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmo, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Mahnaz Shekari
- Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain.,IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain.,Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Renaud Lhommel
- Neurology and Nuclear Medicine Departments, Saint-Luc University Hospital, Av. Hippocrate, 10, 1200, Brussels, Belgium
| | - José Luis Molinuevo
- Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC), Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain.,IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain.,Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain.,Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Fragilidad y Envejecimiento Saludable (CIBERFES), Madrid, Spain
| | - Christopher Rowe
- Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.,Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | | | | | - Agneta Nordberg
- Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Center for Alzheimer Research, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. .,Department of Aging, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Devous MD, Fleisher AS, Pontecorvo MJ, Lu M, Siderowf A, Navitsky M, Kennedy I, Southekal S, Harris TS, Mintun MA. Relationships Between Cognition and Neuropathological Tau in Alzheimer's Disease Assessed by 18F Flortaucipir PET. J Alzheimers Dis 2021; 80:1091-1104. [PMID: 33682705 DOI: 10.3233/jad-200808] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tau neurofibrillary tangle burden increases with Alzheimer's disease (AD) stage and correlates with degree of cognitive impairment. Tau PET imaging could facilitate understanding the relationship between tau pathology and cognitive impairment. OBJECTIVE Evaluate the relationship between 18F flortaucipir uptake patterns and cognition across multiple cognitive domains. METHODS We acquired flortaucipir PET scans in 84 amyloid-positive control, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and AD subjects. Flortaucipir standardized uptake value ratio (SUVr) values were obtained from a neocortical volume of interest (VOI), a precuneus VOI, and VOIs defined by the correlation between flortaucipir SUVr images and domain-specific cognitive tests. Cognitive assessments included Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE), Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-cog), and a neuropsychological test battery (i.e., Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised Logical Memory (WMS-R), Trail Making Test, Boston Naming Test, Digit Symbol Substitution Test, Animal List Generation, WMS-R Digit Span, American National Adult Reading Test, Clock Drawing Test, Judgment of Line Orientation, and WMS-R Logical Memory II (Delayed Recall)) and the Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ). Correlation analyses compared regional and voxel-wise VOIs to cognitive scores. RESULTS Subjects included 5 controls, 47 MCI, and 32 AD subjects. Significant correlations were seen between both flortaucipir and florbetapir SUVrs and MMSE, ADAS-Cog, and FAQ. Cognitive impairment was associated with increased flortaucipir uptake in regionally specific patterns consistent with the neuroanatomy underlying specific cognitive tests. CONCLUSION Flortaucipir SUVr values demonstrated significant inverse correlations with cognitive scores in domain-specific patterns. Findings support the hypothesis that PET imaging of neuropathologic tau deposits may reflect underlying neurodegeneration in AD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Ming Lu
- Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, Inc., Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Andrew Siderowf
- Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Ian Kennedy
- Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, Inc., Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | | | - Mark A Mintun
- Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, Inc., Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Smith R, Strandberg O, Mattsson-Carlgren N, Leuzy A, Palmqvist S, Pontecorvo MJ, Devous MD, Ossenkoppele R, Hansson O. The accumulation rate of tau aggregates is higher in females and younger amyloid-positive subjects. Brain 2021; 143:3805-3815. [PMID: 33439987 PMCID: PMC7805812 DOI: 10.1093/brain/awaa327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2020] [Revised: 05/21/2020] [Accepted: 08/06/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The development of tau-PET allows paired helical filament tau pathology to be visualized in vivo. Increased knowledge about conditions affecting the rate of tau accumulation could guide the development of therapies halting the progression of Alzheimer’s disease. However, the factors modifying the rate of tau accumulation over time in Alzheimer’s disease are still largely unknown. Large-scale longitudinal cohort studies, adjusting for baseline tau load, are needed to establish such risk factors. In the present longitudinal study, 419 participants from four cohorts in the USA (Avid 05e, n = 157; Expedition-3, n = 82; ADNI, n = 123) and Sweden (BioFINDER, n = 57) were scanned repeatedly with tau-PET. The study participants were cognitively unimpaired (n = 153), or patients with mild cognitive impairment (n = 139) or Alzheimer’s disease dementia (n = 127). Participants underwent two to four tau-PET (18F-flortaucipir) scans with a mean (± standard deviation) of 537 (±163) days between the first and last scan. The change in tau-PET signal was estimated in temporal meta- and neocortical regions of interest. Subject specific tau-PET slopes were predicted simultaneously by age, sex, amyloid status (determined by amyloid-β PET), APOE ε4 genotype, study cohort, diagnosis and baseline tau load. We found that accelerated increase in tau-PET signal was observed in amyloid-β-positive mild cognitive impairment (3.0 ± 5.3%) and Alzheimer’s disease dementia (2.9 ± 5.7%), respectively, when compared to either amyloid-β-negative cognitively unimpaired (0.4 ± 2.7%), amyloid-β-negative mild cognitive impairment (−0.4 ± 2.3%) or amyloid-β-positive cognitively unimpaired (1.2 ± 2.8%). Tau-PET uptake was accelerated in females (temporal region of interest: t = 2.86, P = 0.005; neocortical region of interest: t = 2.90, P = 0.004), younger individuals (temporal region of interest: t = −2.49, P = 0.013), and individuals with higher baseline tau-PET signal (temporal region of interest: t = 3.83, P < 0.001; neocortical region of interest: t = 5.01, P < 0.001). Tau-PET slopes decreased with age in amyloid-β-positive subjects, but were stable by age in amyloid-β-negative subjects (age × amyloid-β status interaction: t = −2.39, P = 0.018). There were no effects of study cohort or APOE ε4 positivity. In a similar analysis on longitudinal amyloid-β-PET (in ADNI subjects only, n = 639), we found significant associations between the rate of amyloid-β accumulation and APOE ε4 positivity, older age and baseline amyloid-β positivity, but no effect of sex. In conclusion, in this longitudinal PET study comprising four cohorts, we found that the tau accumulation rate is greater in females and younger amyloid-β-positive individuals, while amyloid-β accumulation is greater in APOE ε4 carriers and older individuals. These findings are important considerations for the design of clinical trials, and might improve our understanding of factors associated with faster tau aggregation and spread.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruben Smith
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.,Department of Neurology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Olof Strandberg
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Niklas Mattsson-Carlgren
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.,Department of Neurology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.,Wallenberg Centre for Molecular Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Antoine Leuzy
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Sebastian Palmqvist
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.,Memory Clinic, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | | | | | - Rik Ossenkoppele
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.,Amsterdam University Medical Center, Alzheimercenter, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Oskar Hansson
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.,Memory Clinic, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Sperling RA, Donohue MC, Raman R, Sun CK, Yaari R, Holdridge K, Siemers E, Johnson KA, Aisen PS. Association of Factors With Elevated Amyloid Burden in Clinically Normal Older Individuals. JAMA Neurol 2021; 77:735-745. [PMID: 32250387 DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.0387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 195] [Impact Index Per Article: 65.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Importance The Anti-Amyloid Treatment in Asymptomatic Alzheimer disease (A4) Study is an ongoing prevention trial in clinically normal older individuals with evidence of elevated brain amyloid. The large number of participants screened with amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) and standardized assessments provides an unprecedented opportunity to evaluate factors associated with elevated brain amyloid. Objective To investigate the association of elevated amyloid with demographic and lifestyle factors, apolipoprotein E (APOE), neuropsychological testing, and self- and study partner reports of cognitive function. Design, Setting, and Participants This cross-sectional study included screening data in the Anti-Amyloid Treatment in Asymptomatic Alzheimer Disease (A4) Study collected from April 2014 to December 2017 and classified by amyloid status. Data were was analyzed from 2018 to 2019 across 67 sites in the US, Canada, Australia, and Japan and included 4486 older individuals (age 65-85 years) who were eligible for amyloid PET (clinically normal [Clinical Dementia Rating = 0] and cognitively unimpaired [Mini-Mental State Examination score, ≥25; logical memory IIa 6-18]). Main Outcomes and Measures Screening demographics, lifestyle variables, APOE genotyping, and cognitive testing (Preclinical Alzheimer Cognitive Composite), self- and study partner reports of high-level daily cognitive function (Cognitive Function Index). Florbetapir amyloid PET imaging was used to classify participants as having elevated amyloid (Aβ+) or not having elevated amyloid (Aβ-). Results Amyloid PET results were acquired for 4486 participants (mean [SD] age, 71.29 [4.67] years; 2647 women [59%]), with 1323 (29.5%) classified as Aβ+. Aβ+ participants were slightly older than Aβ-, with no observed differences in sex, education, marital or retirement status, or any self-reported lifestyle factors. Aβ+ participants were more likely to have a family history of dementia (3320 Aβ+ [74%] vs 3050 Aβ- [68%]) and at least 1 APOE ε4 allele (2602 Aβ+ [58%] vs 1122 Aβ- [25%]). Aβ+ participants demonstrated worse performance on screening Preclinical Alzheimer Cognitive Composite results and reported higher change scores on the Cognitive Function Index. Conclusions and Relevance Among a large group of older individuals screening for an Alzheimer disease (AD) prevention trial, elevated brain amyloid was associated with family history and APOE ε4 allele but not with multiple other previously reported risk factors for AD. Elevated amyloid was associated with lower test performance results and increased reports of subtle recent declines in daily cognitive function. These results support the hypothesis that elevated amyloid represents an early stage in the Alzheimer continuum and demonstrate the feasibility of enrolling these high-risk participants in secondary prevention trials aimed at slowing cognitive decline during the preclinical stages of AD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reisa A Sperling
- Center for Alzheimer Research and Treatment, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Harvard Aging Brain Study, Departments of Neurology and Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - Michael C Donohue
- Alzheimer Therapeutic Research Institute, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, San Diego
| | - Rema Raman
- Alzheimer Therapeutic Research Institute, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, San Diego
| | - Chung-Kai Sun
- Alzheimer Therapeutic Research Institute, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, San Diego
| | - Roy Yaari
- Eli Lilly & Co, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | | | - Eric Siemers
- Eli Lilly & Co, Indianapolis, Indiana.,Siemers Integration LLC
| | - Keith A Johnson
- Center for Alzheimer Research and Treatment, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Harvard Aging Brain Study, Departments of Neurology and Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - Paul S Aisen
- Alzheimer Therapeutic Research Institute, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, San Diego
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Wagatsuma K, Miwa K, Sakata M, Ishibashi K, Ishii K. [Cross-validation of Quantitative Analytical Software Using 18F-florbetapir PET Imaging]. Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi 2021; 77:32-40. [PMID: 33473077 DOI: 10.6009/jjrt.2021_jsrt_77.1.32] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND 18F-florbetapir is an amyloid β (Aβ) -targeted 18F-labeled positron emission tomography (PET) tracer for the clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. The standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) serves as a tool with which to differentially diagnose. The present study aimed to cross-validate and compare SUVR derived from Amygo neuro and MIMneuro software. METHODS We injected 40 individuals with 18F-florbetapir and then acquired PET images from 50 to 60 minutes later. All images were separately normalized to the standard 18F-florbetapir PET template using Amygo neuro and MIMneuro. Volumes of interest (VOIs) were automatically placed on six target regions each in Amygo neuro and MIMneuro. The composite SUVR (cSUVR) and regional SUVR (rSUVR) were calculated from mean values measured in VOI. A cSUVR of>1.10 was defined as representing Aβ positivity. Correlation coefficients were calculated in the two types of software. RESULTS A cSUVR>1.10 was determined by Amygo neuro and MIMneuro in 15 of the 40 individuals. The rSUVR in the posterior cingulate, parietal lobe, precuneus, and temporal lobe significantly differed between Amygo neuro and MIMneuro, whereas the cSUVR did not. The SUVR calculated by the two types of software closely correlated to each other (R=0.89-0.96, P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS The cSUVR was not different between Amygo neuro and MIMneuro. We suggest that Amygo neuro is comparable to MIMneuro in quantitative analysis using SUVR for 18F-florbetapir imaging, thus facilitating the use of standardized quantitative approaches to amyloid PET imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kei Wagatsuma
- Research Team for Neuroimaging, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology
| | - Kenta Miwa
- School of Health Science, International University of Health and Welfare
| | - Muneyuki Sakata
- Research Team for Neuroimaging, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology
| | - Kenji Ishibashi
- Research Team for Neuroimaging, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology
| | - Kenji Ishii
- Research Team for Neuroimaging, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Leuzy A, Lilja J, Buckley CJ, Ossenkoppele R, Palmqvist S, Battle M, Farrar G, Thal DR, Janelidze S, Stomrud E, Strandberg O, Smith R, Hansson O. Derivation and utility of an Aβ-PET pathology accumulation index to estimate Aβ load. Neurology 2020; 95:e2834-e2844. [PMID: 33077542 PMCID: PMC7734735 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000011031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2020] [Accepted: 08/03/2020] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate a novel β-amyloid (Aβ)-PET-based quantitative measure (Aβ accumulation index [Aβ index]), including the assessment of its ability to discriminate between participants based on Aβ status using visual read, CSF Aβ42/Aβ40, and post-mortem neuritic plaque burden as standards of truth. METHODS One thousand one hundred twenty-one participants (with and without cognitive impairment) were scanned with Aβ-PET: Swedish BioFINDER, n = 392, [18F]flutemetamol; Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI), n = 692, [18F]florbetapir; and a phase 3 end-of-life study, n = 100, [18F]flutemetamol. The relationships between Aβ index and standardized uptake values ratios (SUVR) from Aβ-PET were assessed. The diagnostic performances of Aβ index and SUVR were compared with visual reads, CSF Aβ42/Aβ40, and Aβ histopathology used as reference standards. RESULTS Strong associations were observed between Aβ index and SUVR (R 2: BioFINDER 0.951, ADNI 0.943, end-of-life, 0.916). Both measures performed equally well in differentiating Aβ-positive from Aβ-negative participants, with areas under the curve (AUCs) of 0.979 to 0.991 to detect abnormal visual reads, AUCs of 0.961 to 0.966 to detect abnormal CSF Aβ42/Aβ40, and AUCs of 0.820 to 0.823 to detect abnormal Aβ histopathology. Both measures also showed a similar distribution across postmortem-based Aβ phases (based on anti-Aβ 4G8 antibodies). Compared to models using visual read alone, the addition of the Aβ index resulted in a significant increase in AUC and a decrease in Akaike information criterion to detect abnormal Aβ histopathology. CONCLUSION The proposed Aβ index showed a tight association to SUVR and carries an advantage over the latter in that it does not require the definition of regions of interest or the use of MRI. Aβ index may thus prove simpler to implement in clinical settings and may also facilitate the comparison of findings using different Aβ-PET tracers. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE This study provides Class III evidence that the Aβ accumulation index accurately differentiates Aβ-positive from Aβ-negative participants compared to Aβ-PET visual reads, CSF Aβ42/Aβ40, and Aβ histopathology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antoine Leuzy
- From the Clinical Memory Research Unit (A.L., J.L., R.O., S.P., S.J., E.S., O.S., R.S., O.H.), Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö; Department of Surgical Sciences, Nuclear Medicine and PET (J.L.), Uppsala University; Hermes Medical Solutions (J.L.), Stockholm, Sweden; GE Healthcare Life Sciences (C.J.B., M.B., G.F.), Amersham, UK; VU University Medical Center (R.O.), Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Neurology (S.P., R.S.) and Memory Clinic (E.S., O.H.), Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden; Department of Imaging and Pathology (D.R.T.), Laboratory of Neuropathology, and Leuven Brain Institute (D.R.T.), Campus Gasthuisberg; and Department of Pathology (D.R.T.), UZ-Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Johan Lilja
- From the Clinical Memory Research Unit (A.L., J.L., R.O., S.P., S.J., E.S., O.S., R.S., O.H.), Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö; Department of Surgical Sciences, Nuclear Medicine and PET (J.L.), Uppsala University; Hermes Medical Solutions (J.L.), Stockholm, Sweden; GE Healthcare Life Sciences (C.J.B., M.B., G.F.), Amersham, UK; VU University Medical Center (R.O.), Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Neurology (S.P., R.S.) and Memory Clinic (E.S., O.H.), Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden; Department of Imaging and Pathology (D.R.T.), Laboratory of Neuropathology, and Leuven Brain Institute (D.R.T.), Campus Gasthuisberg; and Department of Pathology (D.R.T.), UZ-Leuven, Belgium
| | - Christopher J Buckley
- From the Clinical Memory Research Unit (A.L., J.L., R.O., S.P., S.J., E.S., O.S., R.S., O.H.), Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö; Department of Surgical Sciences, Nuclear Medicine and PET (J.L.), Uppsala University; Hermes Medical Solutions (J.L.), Stockholm, Sweden; GE Healthcare Life Sciences (C.J.B., M.B., G.F.), Amersham, UK; VU University Medical Center (R.O.), Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Neurology (S.P., R.S.) and Memory Clinic (E.S., O.H.), Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden; Department of Imaging and Pathology (D.R.T.), Laboratory of Neuropathology, and Leuven Brain Institute (D.R.T.), Campus Gasthuisberg; and Department of Pathology (D.R.T.), UZ-Leuven, Belgium
| | - Rik Ossenkoppele
- From the Clinical Memory Research Unit (A.L., J.L., R.O., S.P., S.J., E.S., O.S., R.S., O.H.), Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö; Department of Surgical Sciences, Nuclear Medicine and PET (J.L.), Uppsala University; Hermes Medical Solutions (J.L.), Stockholm, Sweden; GE Healthcare Life Sciences (C.J.B., M.B., G.F.), Amersham, UK; VU University Medical Center (R.O.), Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Neurology (S.P., R.S.) and Memory Clinic (E.S., O.H.), Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden; Department of Imaging and Pathology (D.R.T.), Laboratory of Neuropathology, and Leuven Brain Institute (D.R.T.), Campus Gasthuisberg; and Department of Pathology (D.R.T.), UZ-Leuven, Belgium
| | - Sebastian Palmqvist
- From the Clinical Memory Research Unit (A.L., J.L., R.O., S.P., S.J., E.S., O.S., R.S., O.H.), Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö; Department of Surgical Sciences, Nuclear Medicine and PET (J.L.), Uppsala University; Hermes Medical Solutions (J.L.), Stockholm, Sweden; GE Healthcare Life Sciences (C.J.B., M.B., G.F.), Amersham, UK; VU University Medical Center (R.O.), Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Neurology (S.P., R.S.) and Memory Clinic (E.S., O.H.), Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden; Department of Imaging and Pathology (D.R.T.), Laboratory of Neuropathology, and Leuven Brain Institute (D.R.T.), Campus Gasthuisberg; and Department of Pathology (D.R.T.), UZ-Leuven, Belgium
| | - Mark Battle
- From the Clinical Memory Research Unit (A.L., J.L., R.O., S.P., S.J., E.S., O.S., R.S., O.H.), Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö; Department of Surgical Sciences, Nuclear Medicine and PET (J.L.), Uppsala University; Hermes Medical Solutions (J.L.), Stockholm, Sweden; GE Healthcare Life Sciences (C.J.B., M.B., G.F.), Amersham, UK; VU University Medical Center (R.O.), Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Neurology (S.P., R.S.) and Memory Clinic (E.S., O.H.), Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden; Department of Imaging and Pathology (D.R.T.), Laboratory of Neuropathology, and Leuven Brain Institute (D.R.T.), Campus Gasthuisberg; and Department of Pathology (D.R.T.), UZ-Leuven, Belgium
| | - Gill Farrar
- From the Clinical Memory Research Unit (A.L., J.L., R.O., S.P., S.J., E.S., O.S., R.S., O.H.), Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö; Department of Surgical Sciences, Nuclear Medicine and PET (J.L.), Uppsala University; Hermes Medical Solutions (J.L.), Stockholm, Sweden; GE Healthcare Life Sciences (C.J.B., M.B., G.F.), Amersham, UK; VU University Medical Center (R.O.), Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Neurology (S.P., R.S.) and Memory Clinic (E.S., O.H.), Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden; Department of Imaging and Pathology (D.R.T.), Laboratory of Neuropathology, and Leuven Brain Institute (D.R.T.), Campus Gasthuisberg; and Department of Pathology (D.R.T.), UZ-Leuven, Belgium
| | - Dietmar R Thal
- From the Clinical Memory Research Unit (A.L., J.L., R.O., S.P., S.J., E.S., O.S., R.S., O.H.), Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö; Department of Surgical Sciences, Nuclear Medicine and PET (J.L.), Uppsala University; Hermes Medical Solutions (J.L.), Stockholm, Sweden; GE Healthcare Life Sciences (C.J.B., M.B., G.F.), Amersham, UK; VU University Medical Center (R.O.), Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Neurology (S.P., R.S.) and Memory Clinic (E.S., O.H.), Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden; Department of Imaging and Pathology (D.R.T.), Laboratory of Neuropathology, and Leuven Brain Institute (D.R.T.), Campus Gasthuisberg; and Department of Pathology (D.R.T.), UZ-Leuven, Belgium
| | - Shorena Janelidze
- From the Clinical Memory Research Unit (A.L., J.L., R.O., S.P., S.J., E.S., O.S., R.S., O.H.), Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö; Department of Surgical Sciences, Nuclear Medicine and PET (J.L.), Uppsala University; Hermes Medical Solutions (J.L.), Stockholm, Sweden; GE Healthcare Life Sciences (C.J.B., M.B., G.F.), Amersham, UK; VU University Medical Center (R.O.), Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Neurology (S.P., R.S.) and Memory Clinic (E.S., O.H.), Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden; Department of Imaging and Pathology (D.R.T.), Laboratory of Neuropathology, and Leuven Brain Institute (D.R.T.), Campus Gasthuisberg; and Department of Pathology (D.R.T.), UZ-Leuven, Belgium
| | - Erik Stomrud
- From the Clinical Memory Research Unit (A.L., J.L., R.O., S.P., S.J., E.S., O.S., R.S., O.H.), Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö; Department of Surgical Sciences, Nuclear Medicine and PET (J.L.), Uppsala University; Hermes Medical Solutions (J.L.), Stockholm, Sweden; GE Healthcare Life Sciences (C.J.B., M.B., G.F.), Amersham, UK; VU University Medical Center (R.O.), Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Neurology (S.P., R.S.) and Memory Clinic (E.S., O.H.), Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden; Department of Imaging and Pathology (D.R.T.), Laboratory of Neuropathology, and Leuven Brain Institute (D.R.T.), Campus Gasthuisberg; and Department of Pathology (D.R.T.), UZ-Leuven, Belgium
| | - Olof Strandberg
- From the Clinical Memory Research Unit (A.L., J.L., R.O., S.P., S.J., E.S., O.S., R.S., O.H.), Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö; Department of Surgical Sciences, Nuclear Medicine and PET (J.L.), Uppsala University; Hermes Medical Solutions (J.L.), Stockholm, Sweden; GE Healthcare Life Sciences (C.J.B., M.B., G.F.), Amersham, UK; VU University Medical Center (R.O.), Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Neurology (S.P., R.S.) and Memory Clinic (E.S., O.H.), Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden; Department of Imaging and Pathology (D.R.T.), Laboratory of Neuropathology, and Leuven Brain Institute (D.R.T.), Campus Gasthuisberg; and Department of Pathology (D.R.T.), UZ-Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ruben Smith
- From the Clinical Memory Research Unit (A.L., J.L., R.O., S.P., S.J., E.S., O.S., R.S., O.H.), Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö; Department of Surgical Sciences, Nuclear Medicine and PET (J.L.), Uppsala University; Hermes Medical Solutions (J.L.), Stockholm, Sweden; GE Healthcare Life Sciences (C.J.B., M.B., G.F.), Amersham, UK; VU University Medical Center (R.O.), Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Neurology (S.P., R.S.) and Memory Clinic (E.S., O.H.), Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden; Department of Imaging and Pathology (D.R.T.), Laboratory of Neuropathology, and Leuven Brain Institute (D.R.T.), Campus Gasthuisberg; and Department of Pathology (D.R.T.), UZ-Leuven, Belgium
| | - Oskar Hansson
- From the Clinical Memory Research Unit (A.L., J.L., R.O., S.P., S.J., E.S., O.S., R.S., O.H.), Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö; Department of Surgical Sciences, Nuclear Medicine and PET (J.L.), Uppsala University; Hermes Medical Solutions (J.L.), Stockholm, Sweden; GE Healthcare Life Sciences (C.J.B., M.B., G.F.), Amersham, UK; VU University Medical Center (R.O.), Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Neurology (S.P., R.S.) and Memory Clinic (E.S., O.H.), Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden; Department of Imaging and Pathology (D.R.T.), Laboratory of Neuropathology, and Leuven Brain Institute (D.R.T.), Campus Gasthuisberg; and Department of Pathology (D.R.T.), UZ-Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Visual interpretation of [18F]Florbetaben PET supported by deep learning–based estimation of amyloid burden. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2020; 48:1116-1123. [DOI: 10.1007/s00259-020-05044-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2020] [Accepted: 09/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
|
25
|
Hanseeuw BJ, Malotaux V, Dricot L, Quenon L, Sznajer Y, Cerman J, Woodard JL, Buckley C, Farrar G, Ivanoiu A, Lhommel R. Defining a Centiloid scale threshold predicting long-term progression to dementia in patients attending the memory clinic: an [ 18F] flutemetamol amyloid PET study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2020; 48:302-310. [PMID: 32601802 PMCID: PMC7835306 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-020-04942-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2020] [Accepted: 06/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate cerebral amyloid-β(Aβ) pathology in older adults with cognitive complaints, visual assessment of PET images is approved as the routine method for image interpretation. In research studies however, Aβ-PET semi-quantitative measures are associated with greater risk of progression to dementia; but until recently, these measures lacked standardization. Therefore, the Centiloid scale, providing standardized Aβ-PET semi-quantitation, was recently validated. We aimed to determine the predictive values of visual assessments and Centiloids in non-demented patients, using long-term progression to dementia as our standard of truth. METHODS One hundred sixty non-demented participants (age, 54-86) were enrolled in a monocentric [18F] flutemetamol Aβ-PET study. Flutemetamol images were interpreted visually following the manufacturers recommendations. SUVr values were converted to the Centiloid scale using the GAAIN guidelines. Ninety-eight persons were followed until dementia diagnosis or were clinically stable for a median of 6 years (min = 4.0; max = 8.0). Twenty-five patients with short follow-up (median = 2.0 years; min = 0.8; max = 3.9) and 37 patients with no follow-up were excluded. We computed ROC curves predicting subsequent dementia using baseline PET data and calculated negative (NPV) and positive (PPV) predictive values. RESULTS In the 98 participants with long follow-up, Centiloid = 26 provided the highest overall predictive value = 87% (NPV = 85%, PPV = 88%). Visual assessment corresponded to Centiloid = 40, which predicted dementia with an overall predictive value = 86% (NPV = 81%, PPV = 92%). Inclusion of the 25 patients who only had a 2-year follow-up decreased the PPV = 67% (NPV = 88%), reflecting the many positive cases that did not progress to dementia after short follow-ups. CONCLUSION A Centiloid threshold = 26 optimally predicts progression to dementia 6 years after PET. Visual assessment provides similar predictive value, with higher specificity and lower sensitivity. TRIAL REGISTRATION Eudra-CT number: 2011-001756-12.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bernard J Hanseeuw
- Institute of Neuroscience, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium. .,Neurology Department, Saint-Luc University Hospital, Av. Hippocrate, 10, 1200, Brussels, Belgium. .,Gordon Center for Medical Imaging, Radiology Department, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Vincent Malotaux
- Institute of Neuroscience, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Laurence Dricot
- Institute of Neuroscience, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Lisa Quenon
- Neurology Department, Saint-Luc University Hospital, Av. Hippocrate, 10, 1200, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Yves Sznajer
- Genetics Department, Saint-Luc University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jiri Cerman
- Department of Neurology, Charles University, 2nd Faculty of Medicine and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - John L Woodard
- Institute of Neuroscience, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.,Department of Psychology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA
| | | | | | - Adrian Ivanoiu
- Institute of Neuroscience, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.,Neurology Department, Saint-Luc University Hospital, Av. Hippocrate, 10, 1200, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Renaud Lhommel
- Institute of Neuroscience, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.,Nuclear Medicine Department, Saint-Luc University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium.,Institute of Experimental and Clinical Research, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Hattori N, Sherwin P, Farrar G. Initial Physician Experience with [ 18F]Flutemetamol Amyloid PET Imaging Following Availability for Routine Clinical Use in Japan. J Alzheimers Dis Rep 2020; 4:165-174. [PMID: 32715277 PMCID: PMC7369136 DOI: 10.3233/adr-190150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Brain amyloid is a neuropathological hallmark of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). By visualizing brain amyloid, positron emission tomography (PET) may influence the diagnostic assessment and management of patients with cognitive impairment. Objective: As part of a Japanese post-approval study to measure the safety of [18F]flutemetamol PET, the association of amyloid PET results with changes in diagnosis and diagnostic confidence was assessed. Methods: Fifty-seven subjects were imaged for amyloid PET using [18F]flutemetamol at a single Japanese memory clinic. The cognitive diagnosis and referring physician’s confidence in the diagnosis were recorded before and after availability of PET results. Imaging started approximately 90 minutes after [18F]flutemetamol administration with approximately 185 MBq injected. PET images were acquired for 30 minutes. Results: Amyloid PET imaging led to change in diagnosis in 15/44 clinical subjects (34%). Mean diagnostic confidence increased by approximately 20%, from 73% pre-scan to 93% post-scan, and this rise was fairly consistent across the main patient subgroups (mild cognitive impairment, AD, and non-AD) irrespective of the pre-scan diagnosis and scan result. Conclusion: The study examined the utility of amyloid PET imaging in a Japanese clinical cohort and highlighted the use of an etiological diagnosis in the presence of the amyloid scan. [18F]Flutemetamol PET led to a change in diagnosis in over 30% of cases and to an increase in diagnostic confidence by approximately 20% consistent with other reports.
Collapse
|
27
|
Pontecorvo MJ, Devous MD, Kennedy I, Navitsky M, Lu M, Galante N, Salloway S, Doraiswamy PM, Southekal S, Arora AK, McGeehan A, Lim NC, Xiong H, Truocchio SP, Joshi AD, Shcherbinin S, Teske B, Fleisher AS, Mintun MA. A multicentre longitudinal study of flortaucipir (18F) in normal ageing, mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease dementia. Brain 2020; 142:1723-1735. [PMID: 31009046 PMCID: PMC6536847 DOI: 10.1093/brain/awz090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 145] [Impact Index Per Article: 36.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2018] [Revised: 01/11/2019] [Accepted: 02/06/2019] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
The advent of tau-targeted PET tracers such as flortaucipir (18F) (flortaucipir, also known as 18F-AV-1451 or 18F-T807) have made it possible to investigate the sequence of development of tau in relationship to age, amyloid-β, and to the development of cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer's disease. Here we report a multicentre longitudinal evaluation of the relationships between baseline tau, tau change and cognitive change, using flortaucipir PET imaging. A total of 202 participants 50 years old or older, including 57 cognitively normal subjects, 97 clinically defined mild cognitive impairment and 48 possible or probable Alzheimer's disease dementia patients, received flortaucipir PET scans of 20 min in duration beginning 80 min after intravenous administration of 370 MBq flortaucipir (18F). On separate days, subjects also received florbetapir amyloid PET imaging, and underwent a neuropsychological test battery. Follow-up flortaucipir scans and neuropsychological battery assessments were also performed at 9 and 18 months. Fifty-five amyloid-β+ and 90 amyloid-β- subjects completed the baseline and 18-month study visits and had valid quantifiable flortaucipir scans at both time points. There was a statistically significant increase in the global estimate of cortical tau burden as measured by standardized uptake value ratio (SUVr) from baseline to 18 months in amyloid-β+ but not amyloid-β- subjects (least squared mean change in flortaucipir SUVr : 0.0524 ± 0.0085, P < 0.0001 and 0.0007 ± 0.0024 P = 0.7850, respectively), and a significant association between magnitude of SUVr increase and baseline tau burden. Voxel-wise evaluations further suggested that the regional pattern of change in flortaucipir PET SUVr over the 18-month study period (i.e. which regions exhibited the greatest change) also varied as a function of baseline global estimate of tau burden. In subjects with lower global SUVr, temporal lobe regions showed the greatest flortaucipir retention, whereas in subjects with higher baseline SUVr, parietal and frontal regions were increasingly affected. Finally, baseline flortaucipir and change in flortaucipir SUVr were both significantly (P < 0.0001) associated with changes in cognitive performance. Taken together, these results provide a preliminary characterization of the longitudinal spread of tau in Alzheimer's disease and suggest that the amount and location of tau may have implications both for the spread of tau and the cognitive deterioration that may occur over an 18-month period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Ian Kennedy
- Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Ming Lu
- Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Hui Xiong
- Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Mark A Mintun
- Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis IN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Fantoni E, Collij L, Lopes Alves I, Buckley C, Farrar G. The Spatial-Temporal Ordering of Amyloid Pathology and Opportunities for PET Imaging. J Nucl Med 2019; 61:166-171. [PMID: 31836683 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.119.235879] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2019] [Accepted: 12/03/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Although clinical routine focuses on dichotomous and visual interpretation of amyloid PET, regional image assessment in research settings may yield additional opportunities. Understanding the regional-temporal evolution of amyloid pathology may enable earlier identification of subjects in the Alzheimer Disease pathologic continuum, as well as a finer-grained assessment of pathology beyond traditional dichotomous measures. This review summarizes current research in the detection of regional amyloid deposition patterns and its potential for staging amyloid pathology. Pathology studies, cross-sectional and longitudinal PET-only studies, and comparative PET and autopsy studies are included. Despite certain differences, cortical deposition generally precedes striatal pathology, and in PET-only studies, medial cortical regions are seen to accumulate amyloid earlier than lateral regions. Based on regional amyloid PET, multiple studies have developed and implemented models for staging amyloid pathology that could improve subject selection into secondary prevention trials and visual assessment in clinical routine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enrico Fantoni
- Pharmaceutical Diagnostics, GE Healthcare, Chalfont St. Giles, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom; and
| | - Lyduine Collij
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Isadora Lopes Alves
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Christopher Buckley
- Pharmaceutical Diagnostics, GE Healthcare, Chalfont St. Giles, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom; and
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Akamatsu G, Ikari Y, Ohnishi A, Matsumoto K, Nishida H, Yamamoto Y, Senda M. Voxel-based statistical analysis and quantification of amyloid PET in the Japanese Alzheimer's disease neuroimaging initiative (J-ADNI) multi-center study. EJNMMI Res 2019; 9:91. [PMID: 31535240 PMCID: PMC6751233 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-019-0561-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2019] [Accepted: 09/05/2019] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Amyloid PET plays a vital role in detecting the accumulation of in vivo amyloid-β (Aβ). The quantification of Aβ accumulation has been widely performed using the region of interest (ROI)-based mean cortical standardized uptake value ratio (mcSUVR). However, voxel-based statistical analysis has not been well studied. The purpose of this study was to examine the feasibility of analyzing amyloid PET scans by voxel-based statistical analysis. The results were then compared to those with the ROI-based mcSUVR. In total, 166 subjects who underwent 11C-PiB PET in the J-ADNI multi-center study were analyzed. Additionally, 18 Aβ-negative images were collected from other studies to form a normal database. The PET images were spatially normalized to the standard space using an adaptive template method without MRI. The mcSUVR was measured using a pre-defined ROI. Voxel-wise Z-scores within the ROI were calculated using the normal database, after which Z-score maps were generated. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to evaluate whether Z-sum (sum of the Z-score) and mcSUVR could be used to classify the scans into positive and negative using the central visual read as the reference standard. PET scans that were equivocal were regarded as positive. Results Sensitivity and specificity were respectively 90.8% and 100% by Z-sum and 91.8% and 98.5% by mcSUVR. Most of the equivocal scans were subsequently classified by both Z-sum and mcSUVR as false negatives. Z-score maps correctly delineated abnormal Aβ accumulation over the same regions as the visual read. Conclusions We examined the usefulness of voxel-based statistical analysis for amyloid PET. This method provides objective Z-score maps and Z-sum values, which were observed to be helpful as an adjunct to visual interpretation especially for cases with mild or limited Aβ accumulation. This approach could improve the Aβ detection sensitivity, reduce inter-reader variability, and allow for detailed monitoring of Aβ deposition. Trial registration The number of the J-ADNI study is UMIN000001374
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Go Akamatsu
- Division of Molecular Imaging, Institute of Biomedical Research and Innovation (IBRI), Kobe, Japan. .,Division of Molecular Imaging, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan. .,National Institute of Radiological Sciences (NIRS), National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology (QST), Chiba, Japan.
| | - Yasuhiko Ikari
- Division of Molecular Imaging, Institute of Biomedical Research and Innovation (IBRI), Kobe, Japan.,Division of Molecular Imaging, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan
| | - Akihito Ohnishi
- Division of Molecular Imaging, Institute of Biomedical Research and Innovation (IBRI), Kobe, Japan.,Division of Molecular Imaging, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan.,Department of Radiology, Kakogawa Central City Hospital, Kakogawa, Japan
| | - Keiichi Matsumoto
- Division of Molecular Imaging, Institute of Biomedical Research and Innovation (IBRI), Kobe, Japan.,Division of Molecular Imaging, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan.,Department of Radiological Technology, Faculty of Medical Science, Kyoto College of Medical Science, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Nishida
- Division of Molecular Imaging, Institute of Biomedical Research and Innovation (IBRI), Kobe, Japan.,Division of Molecular Imaging, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan
| | - Yasuji Yamamoto
- Division of Molecular Imaging, Institute of Biomedical Research and Innovation (IBRI), Kobe, Japan.,Division of Molecular Imaging, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan.,Department of Biosignal Pathophysiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan.,Medical Center for Student Health, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan
| | - Michio Senda
- Division of Molecular Imaging, Institute of Biomedical Research and Innovation (IBRI), Kobe, Japan.,Division of Molecular Imaging, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Identifying an Optimal Cutoff of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment to Predict Amyloid-PET Positivity in a Referral Memory Clinic. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 2019; 33:194-199. [PMID: 31305321 DOI: 10.1097/wad.0000000000000330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Brain amyloid- positron emission tomography (PET) imaging is highly sensitive for identifying Alzheimer disease. Currently, there is a lack of insight on the association between amyloid-PET status and the widely used Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA). Studying this relationship may optimize the clinical use of amyloid-PET imaging. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the relationship between amyloid-PET status and MoCA scores and to identify a MoCA score cutoff that translates to amyloid-PET positivity. METHODS Using retrospective chart review, patients from 2010 to 2017 with amyloid-PET scans (positive or negative) and MoCA test scores were included. We studied the relationship between amyloid-PET status and MoCA scores and the influence of age, sex, education, and race. A MoCA score cutoff for amyloid-PET positivity was estimated. RESULTS Among the 684 clinic patients with dementia, 99 fulfilled inclusion criteria. Amyloid-PET positivity was associated significantly with lower MoCA scores (median=19, U=847, P=0.01). The MoCA score cutoff (25) used for minimal cognitive impairment (MCI) predicted amyloid-PET positivity suboptimally (sensitivity=94.6%, specificity=13.9%). A MoCA score cutoff of 20 patients had optimal sensitivity (64.2%) and specificity (67.4%). CONCLUSIONS Amyloid-PET positivity is associated with lower MoCA scores. Clinical utility of amyloid-PET scan is likely to be suboptimal at the MoCA score cutoff for minimal cognitive impairment.
Collapse
|
31
|
Fakhry-Darian D, Patel NH, Khan S, Barwick T, Svensson W, Khan S, Perry RJ, Malhotra P, Carswell CJ, Nijran KS, Win Z. Optimisation and usefulness of quantitative analysis of 18F-florbetapir PET. Br J Radiol 2019; 92:20181020. [PMID: 31017465 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20181020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study investigates the usefulness of quantitative SUVR thresholds on sub types of typical (type A) and atypical (non-type A) positive (Aβ+) and negative (Aβ-) 18F-florbetapir scans and aims to optimise the thresholds. METHODS Clinical 18F-florbetapir scans (n = 100) were categorised by sub type and visual reads were performed independently by three trained readers. Inter-reader agreement and reader-to-reference agreement were measured. Optimal SUVR thresholds were derived by ROC analysis and were compared with thresholds derived from a healthy control group and values from published literature. RESULTS Sub type division of 18F-florbetapir PET scans improves accuracy and agreement of visual reads for type A: accuracy 90%, 96% and 70% and agreement κ > 0.7, κ ≥ 0.85 and -0.1 < κ < 0.9 for all data, type A and non-type A respectively. Sub type division also improves quantitative classification accuracy of type A: optimum mcSUVR thresholds were found to be 1.32, 1.18 and 1.48 with accuracy 86%, 92% and 76% for all data, type A and non-type A respectively. CONCLUSIONS Aβ+/Aβ- mcSUVR threshold of 1.18 is suitable for classification of type A studies (sensitivity = 97%, specificity = 88%). Region-wise SUVR thresholds may improve classification accuracy in non-type A studies. Amyloid PET scans should be divided by sub type before quantification. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE We have derived and validated mcSUVR thresholds for Aβ+/Aβ- 18F-florbetapir studies. This work demonstrates that division into sub types improves reader accuracy and agreement and quantification accuracy in scans with typical presentation and highlights the atypical presentations not suited to global SUVR quantification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Fakhry-Darian
- 1Radiological Sciences Unit, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Charing Cross Hospital, Fulham Palace Road, London, UK.,2Department of Nuclear Medicine, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Charing Cross Hospital, Fulham Palace Road, London, UK
| | - Neva Hiten Patel
- 1Radiological Sciences Unit, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Charing Cross Hospital, Fulham Palace Road, London, UK.,2Department of Nuclear Medicine, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Charing Cross Hospital, Fulham Palace Road, London, UK
| | - Sairah Khan
- 2Department of Nuclear Medicine, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Charing Cross Hospital, Fulham Palace Road, London, UK
| | - Tara Barwick
- 2Department of Nuclear Medicine, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Charing Cross Hospital, Fulham Palace Road, London, UK
| | - William Svensson
- 2Department of Nuclear Medicine, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Charing Cross Hospital, Fulham Palace Road, London, UK
| | - Sameer Khan
- 2Department of Nuclear Medicine, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Charing Cross Hospital, Fulham Palace Road, London, UK
| | - Richard J Perry
- 3Department of Neurology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Charing Cross Hospital, Fulham Palace Road, London, UK
| | - Paresh Malhotra
- 3Department of Neurology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Charing Cross Hospital, Fulham Palace Road, London, UK.,4Division of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, UK
| | - Christopher J Carswell
- 3Department of Neurology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Charing Cross Hospital, Fulham Palace Road, London, UK.,4Division of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, UK
| | - Kuldip S Nijran
- 1Radiological Sciences Unit, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Charing Cross Hospital, Fulham Palace Road, London, UK.,2Department of Nuclear Medicine, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Charing Cross Hospital, Fulham Palace Road, London, UK
| | - Zarni Win
- 2Department of Nuclear Medicine, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Charing Cross Hospital, Fulham Palace Road, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Manca C, Rivasseau Jonveaux T, Roch V, Marie PY, Karcher G, Lamiral Z, Malaplate C, Verger A. Amyloid PETs are commonly negative in suspected Alzheimer’s disease with an increase in CSF phosphorylated-tau protein concentration but an Aβ42 concentration in the very high range: a prospective study. J Neurol 2019; 266:1685-1692. [DOI: 10.1007/s00415-019-09315-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2019] [Revised: 04/02/2019] [Accepted: 04/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
|
33
|
Abstract
Written by associate editors of the Annals of Nuclear Medicine, this invited review article is intended to offer our readers a condensed global view on the high-quality research work that has been published in Europe last year. We have divided this article into five sections. The first three sections from the oncology category include "[18F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron-emission tomography (PET) for therapy monitoring in malignant lymphoma", "[18F]fluoromisonidazole (FMISO) PET for hypoxia", and "lymphoscintigraphy update". It is followed by a section on "amyloid PET for Alzheimer's disease" using [11C]Pittsburgh Compound B (PiB) and [18F]florbetapir from the neurology category. The final section reviews three original articles in the field of "basic and translational molecular imaging" regardless of the category, which investigated new PET tracers such as L-4-borono-2-[18F]fluoro-phenylalanine (FBPA), O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (FET) and 64Cu-NOTA-pertuzumab in small animals. We hope that this review article will arouse greater interest in our readers in recent European research trends in the field of nuclear medicine.
Collapse
|
34
|
Nobili F, Cagnin A, Calcagni ML, Chincarini A, Guerra UP, Morbelli S, Padovani A, Paghera B, Pappatà S, Parnetti L, Sestini S, Schillaci O. Emerging topics and practical aspects for an appropriate use of amyloid PET in the current Italian context. THE QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE ITALIAN ASSOCIATION OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE (AIMN) [AND] THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF RADIOPHARMACOLOGY (IAR), [AND] SECTION OF THE SOCIETY OF RADIOPHARMACEUTICAL CHEMISTRY AND BIOLOGY 2018; 63:83-92. [PMID: 29697220 DOI: 10.23736/s1824-4785.18.03069-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
In May 2017 some representatives of the Italian nuclear medicine and neurological communities spontaneously met to discuss the issues emerged during the first two years of routine application of amyloid PET with fluorinated radiopharmaceuticals in the real world. The limitations of a binary classification of scans, the possibility to obtain early images as a surrogate marker of regional cerebral bloos flow, the need for (semi-)quantification and, thus, the opportunity of ranking brain amyloidosis, the correlation with Aβ42 levels in the cerebrospinal fluid, the occurrence and biological meaning of uncertain/boderline scans, the issue of incidental amyloidosis, the technical pittfalls leading to false negative/positive results, the position of the tool in the diagnostic flow-chart in the national reality, are the main topics that have been discussed. Also, a card to justify the examination to be filled by the dementia specialist and a card for the nuclear medicine physician to report the exam in detail have been approved and are available in the web, which should facilitate the creation of a national register, as previewed by the 2015 intersocietal recommendation on the use of amyloid PET in Italy. The content of this discussion could stimulate both public institutions and companies to support further research on these topics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Flavio Nobili
- Department of Neuroscience (DINOGMI), University of Genoa and Neurology Clinic, San Martino Polyclinic Hospital, Genoa, Italy -
| | - Annachiara Cagnin
- Department of Neurosciences (DNS), University of Padua, Padua, Italy.,San Camillo IRCCS Hospital, Venice, Italy
| | - Maria L Calcagni
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.,Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Chincarini
- National Institute for Nuclear Physics (INFN), Genoa Section, Genoa, Italy
| | - Ugo P Guerra
- Unit of Nuclear Medicine, Poliambulanza Fundation, Brescia, Italy
| | - Silvia Morbelli
- Unit of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), Polyclinic San Martino Hospital, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Alessandro Padovani
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.,Neurology Clinic, Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy
| | - Barbara Paghera
- Unit of Nuclear Medicine, ASST-Spedali Civili, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Sabina Pappatà
- Institute of Biostructure and Bioimaging, National Research Council, Naples, Italy
| | - Lucilla Parnetti
- Center for Memory Disorders, Laboratory of Clinical Neurochemistry, Neurology Clinic, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Stelvio Sestini
- Unit of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, N.O.P. - S. Stefano, U.S.L. Toscana Centro, Prato, Italy
| | - Orazio Schillaci
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.,IRCCS Neuromed, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Southekal S, Devous MD, Kennedy I, Navitsky M, Lu M, Joshi AD, Pontecorvo MJ, Mintun MA. Flortaucipir F 18 Quantitation Using Parametric Estimation of Reference Signal Intensity. J Nucl Med 2017; 59:944-951. [PMID: 29191858 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.117.200006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2017] [Accepted: 11/03/2017] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
PET imaging of tau pathology in Alzheimer disease may benefit from the use of white matter reference regions. These regions have shown reduced variability compared with conventional cerebellar regions in amyloid imaging. However, they are susceptible to contamination from partial-volume blurring of tracer uptake in the cortex. We present a new technique, PERSI (Parametric Estimation of Reference Signal Intensity), for flortaucipir F 18 count normalization that leverages the advantages of white matter reference regions while mitigating potential partial-volume effects. Methods: Subjects with a clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer disease, mild cognitive impairment, or normal cognition underwent T1-weighted MRI and florbetapir imaging (to determine amyloid [Aβ] status) at screening and flortaucipir F 18 imaging at single or multiple time points. Flortaucipir F 18 images, acquired as 4 × 5 min frames 80 min after a 370-MBq injection, were motion-corrected, averaged, and transformed to Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) space. The PERSI reference region was calculated for each scan by fitting a bimodal gaussian distribution to the voxel-intensity histogram within an atlas-based white matter region and using the center and width of the lower-intensity peak to identify the voxel intensities to be included. Four conventional reference regions were also evaluated: whole cerebellum, cerebellar gray matter, atlas-based white matter, and subject-specific white matter. SUVr (standardized uptake value ratio) was calculated for a statistically defined neocortical volume of interest. Performance was evaluated with respect to test-retest variability in a phase 2 study of 21 subjects (5-34 d between scans). Baseline variability in controls (SD of SUVr and ΔSUVr) and effect sizes for group differences (Cohen d; Aβ-positive impaired vs. Aβ-negative normal) were evaluated in another phase 2 study with cross-sectional data (n = 215) and longitudinal data (n = 142/215; 18 ± 2 mo between scans). Results: PERSI showed superior test-retest reproducibility (1.84%) and group separation ability (cross-sectional Cohen d = 9.45; longitudinal Cohen d = 2.34) compared with other reference regions. Baseline SUVr variability and ΔSUVr were minimal in Aβ control subjects with no specific flortaucipir F 18 uptake (SUVr, 1.0 ± 0.04; ΔSUVr, 0.0 ± 0.02). Conclusion: PERSI reduced variability while enhancing discrimination between diagnostic cohorts. Such improvements could lead to more accurate disease staging and robust measurements of changes in tau burden over time for the evaluation of putative therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sudeepti Southekal
- Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, Inc. (a wholly owned subsidiary of Eli Lilly and Company), Philadelphia Pennsylvania
| | - Michael D Devous
- Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, Inc. (a wholly owned subsidiary of Eli Lilly and Company), Philadelphia Pennsylvania
| | - Ian Kennedy
- Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, Inc. (a wholly owned subsidiary of Eli Lilly and Company), Philadelphia Pennsylvania
| | - Michael Navitsky
- Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, Inc. (a wholly owned subsidiary of Eli Lilly and Company), Philadelphia Pennsylvania
| | - Ming Lu
- Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, Inc. (a wholly owned subsidiary of Eli Lilly and Company), Philadelphia Pennsylvania
| | - Abhinay D Joshi
- Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, Inc. (a wholly owned subsidiary of Eli Lilly and Company), Philadelphia Pennsylvania
| | - Michael J Pontecorvo
- Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, Inc. (a wholly owned subsidiary of Eli Lilly and Company), Philadelphia Pennsylvania
| | - Mark A Mintun
- Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, Inc. (a wholly owned subsidiary of Eli Lilly and Company), Philadelphia Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Chen YJ, Nasrallah IM. Brain amyloid PET interpretation approaches: from visual assessment in the clinic to quantitative pharmacokinetic modeling. Clin Transl Imaging 2017. [DOI: 10.1007/s40336-017-0257-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
|
37
|
Ceccaldi M, Jonveaux T, Verger A, Krolak‐Salmon P, Houzard C, Godefroy O, Shields T, Perrotin A, Gismondi R, Bullich S, Jovalekic A, Raffa N, Pasquier F, Semah F, Dubois B, Habert M, Wallon D, Chastan M, Payoux P, Ceccaldi M, Guedj E, Ceccaldi M, Felician O, Didic M, Gueriot C, Koric L, Kletchkova‐Gantchev R, Guedj E, Godefroy O, Andriuta D, Devendeville A, Dupuis D, Binot I, Barbay M, Meyer M, Moullard V, Magnin E, Chamard L, Haffen S, Morel O, Drouet C, Boulahdour H, Goas P, Querellou‐Lefranc S, Sayette V, Cogez J, Branger P, Agostini D, Manrique A, Rouaud O, Bejot Y, Jacquin‐Piques A, Dygai‐Cochet I, Berriolo‐Riedinger A, Moreaud O, Sauvee M, Crépin CG, Pasquier F, Bombois S, Lebouvier T, Mackowiak‐Cordoliani M, Deramecourt V, Rollin‐Sillaire A, Cassagnaud‐Thuillet P, Chen Y, Semah F, Petyt G, Krolak‐Salmon P, Federico D, Danaila KL, Guilhermet Y, Magnier C, Makaroff Z, Rouch I, Xie J, Roubaud C, Coste M, David K, Sarciron A, Waissi AS, Scheiber C, Houzard C, Gabelle‐Deloustal A, Bennys K, Marelli C, Touati L, Mariano‐Goulart D, Verbizier‐Lonjon D, Jonveaux T, Benetos A, Kearney‐Schwartz A, Perret‐Guillaume C, Verger A, Vercelletto M, Boutoleau‐Bretonniere C, Pouclet‐Courtemanche H, Wagemann N, Pallardy A, Hugon J, Paquet C, Dumurgier J, Millet P, Queneau M, Dubois B, Epelbaum S, Levy M, Habert M, Novella J, Jaidi Y, Papathanassiou D, Morland D, Belliard S, Salmon A, Lejeune F, Hannequin D, Wallon D, Martinaud O, Zarea A, Chastan M, Pariente J, Thalamas C, Galitzky‐Gerber M, Tricoire Ricard A, Calvas F, Rigal E, Payoux P, Hitzel A, Delrieu J, Ousset P, Lala F, Sastre‐Hengan N, Stephens A, Guedj E. Added value of
18
F‐florbetaben amyloid PET in the diagnostic workup of most complex patients with dementia in France: A naturalistic study. Alzheimers Dement 2017; 14:293-305. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2017.09.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2017] [Revised: 08/29/2017] [Accepted: 09/06/2017] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Mathieu Ceccaldi
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Thérèse Jonveaux
- Geriatric Department CHRU de Nancy–Hôpital Brabois Vandoeuvre‐les‐Nancy France
| | - Antoine Verger
- INSERM U947 Unité d'Imagerie Adaptative Diagnostique et Interventionnelle Nancy France
| | - Pierre Krolak‐Salmon
- Clinical and Research Memory Center of Lyon Hospices civils de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 Inserm 1028 Lyon France
| | | | - Olivier Godefroy
- Neurology Department CHU Amiens Picardie–Hôpital Sud Amiens France
| | - Trevor Shields
- Nuclear Medicine Department CHU Amiens Picardie–Hôpital Sud Amiens France
| | - Audrey Perrotin
- Piramal Imaging Clinical Research and Development Berlin Germany
| | | | - Santiago Bullich
- AP‐HP–Hôpital Pitié Salpétrière Memory and Alzheimer Disease Institute IM2A Paris France
| | - Aleksandar Jovalekic
- Laboratoire d'Imagerie Biomédicale Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, Inserm U 1146, CNRS UMR 7371 Paris France
| | - Nicola Raffa
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Florence Pasquier
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Franck Semah
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Bruno Dubois
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Marie‐Odile Habert
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - David Wallon
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Mathieu Chastan
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Pierre Payoux
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Mathieu Ceccaldi
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Eric Guedj
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Mathieu Ceccaldi
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Olivier Felician
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Mira Didic
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Claude Gueriot
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Lejla Koric
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Radka Kletchkova‐Gantchev
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Eric Guedj
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Olivier Godefroy
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Daniela Andriuta
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Agnès Devendeville
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Diane Dupuis
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Ingrid Binot
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Mélanie Barbay
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Marc‐Etienne Meyer
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Véronique Moullard
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Eloi Magnin
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Ludivine Chamard
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Sophie Haffen
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Olivier Morel
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Clément Drouet
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Hatem Boulahdour
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Philippe Goas
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Solène Querellou‐Lefranc
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Vincent Sayette
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Julien Cogez
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Pierre Branger
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Denis Agostini
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Alain Manrique
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Olivier Rouaud
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Yannick Bejot
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Agnès Jacquin‐Piques
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Inna Dygai‐Cochet
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Alina Berriolo‐Riedinger
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Olivier Moreaud
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Mathilde Sauvee
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Céline Gallazzani Crépin
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Florence Pasquier
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Stéphanie Bombois
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Thibaud Lebouvier
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Marie‐Anne Mackowiak‐Cordoliani
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Vincent Deramecourt
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Adeline Rollin‐Sillaire
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Pascaline Cassagnaud‐Thuillet
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Yaohua Chen
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Franck Semah
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Grégory Petyt
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Pierre Krolak‐Salmon
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Denis Federico
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Keren Liora Danaila
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Yves Guilhermet
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Christophe Magnier
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Zaza Makaroff
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Isabelle Rouch
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Jing Xie
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Caroline Roubaud
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Marie‐Hélène Coste
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Kenny David
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Alain Sarciron
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Aziza Sediq Waissi
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Christian Scheiber
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Claire Houzard
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Audrey Gabelle‐Deloustal
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Karim Bennys
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Cecilia Marelli
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Lynda Touati
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Denis Mariano‐Goulart
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Delphine Verbizier‐Lonjon
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Thérèse Jonveaux
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Athanase Benetos
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Anna Kearney‐Schwartz
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Christine Perret‐Guillaume
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Antoine Verger
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Martine Vercelletto
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Claire Boutoleau‐Bretonniere
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Hélène Pouclet‐Courtemanche
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Nathalie Wagemann
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Amandine Pallardy
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Jacques Hugon
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Claire Paquet
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Julien Dumurgier
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Pascal Millet
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Mathieu Queneau
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Bruno Dubois
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Stéphane Epelbaum
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Marcel Levy
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | | | - Jean‐Luc Novella
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Yacine Jaidi
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Dimitri Papathanassiou
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | | | - Serge Belliard
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Anne Salmon
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Florence Lejeune
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Didier Hannequin
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - David Wallon
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Olivier Martinaud
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Aline Zarea
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Mathieu Chastan
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | | | - Claire Thalamas
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | | | | | - Fabienne Calvas
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Emilie Rigal
- ToNIC, Toulouse NeuroImaging Center Université de Toulouse, Inserm, UPS Toulouse France
| | - Pierre Payoux
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Anne Hitzel
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Julien Delrieu
- Neurology Department CHU de Rouen–Hôpital Charles Nicolle Rouen France
| | - Pierre‐Jean Ousset
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Françoise Lala
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Nathalie Sastre‐Hengan
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Andrew Stephens
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Neurology and Neuropsychology Department Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes Marseille France
| | - Eric Guedj
- AP‐HM–Hôpital de la Timone, Nuclear Medicine Department Aix‐Marseille University, CERIMED, CNRS, INT, Institut de Neurosciences de la Timone Marseille France
| | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Barthel H, Sabri O. Clinical Use and Utility of Amyloid Imaging. J Nucl Med 2017; 58:1711-1717. [PMID: 28818990 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.116.185017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2017] [Accepted: 08/10/2017] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Currently, 3 amyloid PET tracers are approved and commercially available for clinical use. They allow for the accurate in vivo detection of amyloid plaques, one hallmark of Alzheimer disease. Here, we review the current knowledge on the clinical use and utility of amyloid imaging. Appropriate use criteria for the clinical application of amyloid imaging are established, and most currently available data point to their validity. Visual amyloid image analysis is highly standardized. Disclosure of amyloid imaging results is desired by many cognitively impaired subjects and seems to be safe once appropriate education is delivered to the disclosing clinicians. Regarding clinical utility, increasing evidence points to a change in diagnosis via amyloid imaging in about 30% of cases, to an increase in diagnostic confidence in about 60% of cases, to a change in patient management in about 60% of cases, and specifically to a change in medication in about 40% of cases. Also, amyloid imaging results seem to have a relevant impact on caregivers. Further, initial simulation studies point to a potential positive effect on patient outcome and to cost effectiveness of amyloid imaging. These features, however, will require confirmation in prospective clinical trials. More work is also required to determine the clinical utility of amyloid imaging specifically in subjects with mild cognitive impairment and in comparison with or in conjunction with other Alzheimer disease biomarkers. In summary, the clinical use of amyloid imaging is being studied, and the currently available data point to a relevant clinical utility of this imaging technique. Ongoing research will determine whether this accurate and noninvasive approach to amyloid plaque load detection will translate into a benefit to cognitively impaired subjects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henryk Barthel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Osama Sabri
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
|