1
|
van de Weijer T, Bemer F, de Vos-Geelen J, Hermans B, Mitea C, van der Pol JAJ, Lodewick T, Wildberger JE, Mottaghy FM. Altered biodistribution of [ 68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC during somatostatin analogue treatment. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2024; 51:2420-2427. [PMID: 38403723 PMCID: PMC11178651 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-024-06659-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2023] [Accepted: 02/15/2024] [Indexed: 02/27/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The need for an interval between the administration of long-acting Somatostatin Receptor Analogues (SSA) and the [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE PET has been questioned based on recent literature in the new EANM guidelines. Here an earlier studies showed that SSA injection immediately before SSTR PET had minimal effect on normal organ and tumor uptake (1). However, data are scarce and there are (small) differences between [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE and [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC binding affinity, and it remains unknown whether these findings can be directly translated to scans with [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC as well. The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of SSA use on the biodistribution in a subsequent [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC PET/CT and compare this intra-individually across several cycles of SSA treatments. METHODS Retrospectively, 35 patients with NENs were included. [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC PET at staging and after the 1st and 2nd cycle of SSA were included. SUVmean and SUVmax of blood, visceral organs, primary tumor and two metastases were determined. Also, the interval between SSA therapy and the PET scan was registered. RESULTS Treatment with SSA resulted in a significantly higher bloodpool activity and lower visceral tracer uptake. This effect was maintained after a 2nd cycle of SSA therapy. Furthermore, there was an inverse relationship between bloodpool tracer availability and visceral tracer binding and a positive correlation between bloodpool tracer availability and primary tumor tracer uptake. With an interval of up to 5 days, there was a significantly higher bloodpool activity than at longer intervals. CONCLUSION Absolute comparison of the SUV on [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC PET should be done with caution as the altered biodistribution of the tracer after SSA treatment should be taken into account. We recommend not to perform a scan within the first 5 days after the injection of lanreotide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T van de Weijer
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, ENETS Center of Excellence, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), P. Debeylaan 25, P.O. Box 5800, 6202, 6229 HX, AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism (NUTRIM), University of Maastricht (UM), P. Debeylaan 25, P.O. Box 5800, 6202, 6229 HX, AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - F Bemer
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, ENETS Center of Excellence, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), P. Debeylaan 25, P.O. Box 5800, 6202, 6229 HX, AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - J de Vos-Geelen
- Department of Medical Oncology, ENETS Center of Excellence, MUMC+, P. Debeylaan 25, P.O. Box 5800, 6202, 6229 HX, AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- School for Oncology and Reproduction (GROW), UM, P. Debeylaan 25, P.O. Box 5800, 6202, 6229 HX, AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - B Hermans
- Department of Medical Oncology, ENETS Center of Excellence, MUMC+, P. Debeylaan 25, P.O. Box 5800, 6202, 6229 HX, AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- School for Oncology and Reproduction (GROW), UM, P. Debeylaan 25, P.O. Box 5800, 6202, 6229 HX, AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - C Mitea
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, ENETS Center of Excellence, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), P. Debeylaan 25, P.O. Box 5800, 6202, 6229 HX, AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- School for Oncology and Reproduction (GROW), UM, P. Debeylaan 25, P.O. Box 5800, 6202, 6229 HX, AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - J A J van der Pol
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, ENETS Center of Excellence, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), P. Debeylaan 25, P.O. Box 5800, 6202, 6229 HX, AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- School for Cardiovascular Diseases (CARIM), UM, P. Debeylaan 25, P.O. Box 5800, 6202, 6229 HX, AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - T Lodewick
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, ENETS Center of Excellence, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), P. Debeylaan 25, P.O. Box 5800, 6202, 6229 HX, AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - J E Wildberger
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, ENETS Center of Excellence, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), P. Debeylaan 25, P.O. Box 5800, 6202, 6229 HX, AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- School for Cardiovascular Diseases (CARIM), UM, P. Debeylaan 25, P.O. Box 5800, 6202, 6229 HX, AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - F M Mottaghy
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, ENETS Center of Excellence, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), P. Debeylaan 25, P.O. Box 5800, 6202, 6229 HX, AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
- School for Oncology and Reproduction (GROW), UM, P. Debeylaan 25, P.O. Box 5800, 6202, 6229 HX, AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital RWTH Aachen University, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhou L, Lu Y, Liu W, Wang S, Wang L, Zheng P, Zi G, Liu H, Liu W, Wei S. Drug conjugates for the treatment of lung cancer: from drug discovery to clinical practice. Exp Hematol Oncol 2024; 13:26. [PMID: 38429828 PMCID: PMC10908151 DOI: 10.1186/s40164-024-00493-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2024] [Accepted: 02/21/2024] [Indexed: 03/03/2024] Open
Abstract
A drug conjugate consists of a cytotoxic drug bound via a linker to a targeted ligand, allowing the targeted delivery of the drug to one or more tumor sites. This approach simultaneously reduces drug toxicity and increases efficacy, with a powerful combination of efficient killing and precise targeting. Antibody‒drug conjugates (ADCs) are the best-known type of drug conjugate, combining the specificity of antibodies with the cytotoxicity of chemotherapeutic drugs to reduce adverse reactions by preferentially targeting the payload to the tumor. The structure of ADCs has also provided inspiration for the development of additional drug conjugates. In recent years, drug conjugates such as ADCs, peptide‒drug conjugates (PDCs) and radionuclide drug conjugates (RDCs) have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The scope and application of drug conjugates have been expanding, including combination therapy and precise drug delivery, and a variety of new conjugation technology concepts have emerged. Additionally, new conjugation technology-based drugs have been developed in industry. In addition to chemotherapy, targeted therapy and immunotherapy, drug conjugate therapy has undergone continuous development and made significant progress in treating lung cancer in recent years, offering a promising strategy for the treatment of this disease. In this review, we discuss recent advances in the use of drug conjugates for lung cancer treatment, including structure-based drug design, mechanisms of action, clinical trials, and side effects. Furthermore, challenges, potential approaches and future prospects are presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ling Zhou
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, National Health Commission (NHC) Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Yunlong Lu
- Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center of Chinese Medicinal Resources Industrialization, School of Medicine, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, 210023, China
| | - Wei Liu
- Department of Geriatrics, Key Laboratory of Vascular Aging, Ministry of Education, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China
| | - Shanglong Wang
- Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center of Chinese Medicinal Resources Industrialization, School of Medicine, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, 210023, China
| | - Lingling Wang
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, National Health Commission (NHC) Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Pengdou Zheng
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, National Health Commission (NHC) Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Guisha Zi
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, National Health Commission (NHC) Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Huiguo Liu
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, National Health Commission (NHC) Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Wukun Liu
- Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center of Chinese Medicinal Resources Industrialization, School of Medicine, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, 210023, China.
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences, Tongji Shanxi Hospital, Third Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, 030000, China.
| | - Shuang Wei
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, National Health Commission (NHC) Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences, Tongji Shanxi Hospital, Third Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, 030000, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Low HC, Tay YS, Ong SYK, Tham WY, Yan SX. Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy Performed Shortly After Administration of Long-Acting Octreotide. Clin Nucl Med 2023; 48:1086-1088. [PMID: 37844418 DOI: 10.1097/rlu.0000000000004906] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACT We present a case of a 68-year-old man with metastatic small bowel neuroendocrine tumor who underwent 4 cycles of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with 177 Lu-DOTATATE. For his first 3 cycles, therapy was performed approximately 4 weeks after his last dose of octreotide LAR. Because of miscommunication in scheduling, his fourth cycle was performed only 48 hours after his last full dose of octreotide LAR. Despite this, we found that the tumoral uptake was not reduced at all, which may add to the increasing evidence on the nonnecessity of stopping somatostatin analogs before peptide receptor radionuclide therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Han Chung Low
- From the Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Singapore General Hospital
| | - Young Soon Tay
- From the Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Singapore General Hospital
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wang R, Guo L, Shen G. Letter to the editor regarding "The effect of long-acting somatostatin analogs on the uptake of [ 177Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE". Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2023; 51:180-182. [PMID: 37561142 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-023-06375-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2023] [Accepted: 07/29/2023] [Indexed: 08/11/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Rang Wang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 37 Guoxue Alley, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China
| | - Linlin Guo
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 37 Guoxue Alley, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China
| | - Guohua Shen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 37 Guoxue Alley, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chahid Y, Hashimi K, van de Garde EM, Klümpen HJ, Hendrikse NH, Booij J, Verberne HJ. The Influence of Long-Acting Somatostatin Analogs on 68 Ga-DOTATATE Uptake in Patients With Neuroendocrine Tumors. Clin Nucl Med 2023; 48:757-762. [PMID: 37486312 PMCID: PMC10417218 DOI: 10.1097/rlu.0000000000004776] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2023] [Revised: 06/05/2023] [Indexed: 07/25/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE A high SUV max tumor-to-liver ratio (TLR) of 68 Ga-DOTATATE can be used to select patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). In addition, an SUV max TLR ≥ 8.1 is associated with increased progression-free survival in NET patients treated with somatostatin analogs (SSAs). To avoid a theoretical interaction, several guidelines recommend performing PET/CT just before the monthly administration of long-acting SSAs. We aimed to investigate the effect of SSA on the SUV max of 68 Ga-DOTATATE in patients with NET and to identify independent predictors for high SUV max TLR. PATIENTS AND METHODS For this retrospective study, 192 68 Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT scans of 165 patients without (n = 115) and with (n = 77) SSA (octreotide or lanreotide) in the 3 months before PET/CT were collected and reviewed. The effect of SSA on SUV max values was analyzed by a maximum likelihood mixed model. RESULTS Patients with SSA had a significantly higher median SUV max TLR than patients without SSA (4.7 [IQR], 3.1-7.7) versus 3.2 [IQR, 2.0-5.4]; P < 0.001). Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that SSA use was an independent predictor for SUV max TLR ≥ 8.1 (odds ratio, 2.91; 95% confidence interval, 1.26-6.72; P = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS Our data suggest that higher SSA concentrations do not have a negative effect on 68 Ga-DOTATATE uptake in tumor lesions. In addition, we found that only SSA use was associated with SUV max TLR ≥ 8.1. Our results are consistent with previously conducted studies and in line with the recently published guideline that suggests that the relatively recent use of SSA does not necessitate any delay in 68 Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Youssef Chahid
- From the Departments of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine
- Clinical Pharmacy, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam
| | | | - Ewoudt M.W. van de Garde
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht
| | | | - N. Harry Hendrikse
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jan Booij
- From the Departments of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Veerman CHAM, Siebinga H, de Vries-Huizing DMV, Tesselaar MET, Hendrikx JJMA, Stokkel MPM, Aalbersberg EA. The effect of long-acting somatostatin analogues on the uptake of [ 177Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2023; 50:1434-1441. [PMID: 36598536 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-022-06094-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2022] [Accepted: 12/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE According to IAEA/EANM/SNMMI guidelines, long-acting somatostatin analogues (LA-SSAs) should be discontinued 4-6 weeks prior to peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) to prevent somatostatin receptor saturation. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of continued use of long-acting SSAs during PRRT on the uptake of [177Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE on SPECT/CT. METHODS Consecutive patients with neuroendocrine tumours who were treated with PRRT receiving 7.4 GBq of [177Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE were included. Patients were divided into 3 groups: (1) control (LA-SSA stopped > 6 weeks prior to PRRT), or continued treatment with (2) long-acting octreotide < 6 weeks prior to PRRT, or (3) long-acting lanreotide < 6 weeks prior to PRRT. The uptake of [177Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE was quantified in healthy tissues (spleen, liver, kidneys, bone marrow) and tumour lesions on SPECT/CT performed 24 h after PRRT. A Mann-Whitney U test was used to determine differences in uptake between the long-acting octreotide and long-acting lanreotide groups compared to the control group. RESULTS Forty-two patients with 135 cycles of PRRT were included: 28 with lanreotide, 50 with octreotide, and 57 cycles without LA-SSAs. Uptake of [177Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE was significantly decreased in liver parenchyma in patients with lanreotide (p < 0.001) and in the spleen in patients with either octreotide or lanreotide (both p < 0.001). No differences were observed for uptake in kidneys, bone marrow, and blood pool. Uptake of [177Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE in tumours was the same in patients with lanreotide compared to the control (p = 0.862) and in patients with octreotide compared to the control (p = 0.201), independent of tumour location. CONCLUSION Long-acting octreotide and lanreotide do not interfere with the uptake of [177Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE in tumour lesions 24 h post-injection. Uptake in healthy liver parenchyma significantly decreases after lanreotide administration prior to PRRT, while uptake in healthy spleen tissue significantly decreases with both octreotide and lanreotide administration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chayenne H A M Veerman
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hinke Siebinga
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Pharmacy & Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Daphne M V de Vries-Huizing
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Margot E T Tesselaar
- Department of Medical and Gastrointestinal Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jeroen J M A Hendrikx
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Pharmacy & Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marcel P M Stokkel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Else A Aalbersberg
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kandathil A, Subramaniam RM. Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor Diagnosis: DOTATATE PET/CT. PET Clin 2023; 18:189-200. [PMID: 36585339 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpet.2022.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors(NETs), which arise from the small intestine, rectum, colon, appendix, or pancreas, have variable malignant potential with clinical behavior determined by proliferative activity according to the Ki-67 index and tumor differentiation. Somatostatin receptor (SSTR) expression by NETs allows SSTR imaging using 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/computed tomography (CT) and treatment with octreotide or SSTR-targeted peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT is indicated for localization of the primary tumor in select cases, staging patients with known NET, and selecting patients for PRRT. NCCN guidelines consider imaging with 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT appropriate for staging and receptor status assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Asha Kandathil
- Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, TX 75390-9316, USA.
| | - Rathan M Subramaniam
- Duke University Medical Center, Department of Radiology, 2301 Erwin Road Box 3808, Durham, NC 27710, USA; Department of Medicine, Otago Medical School, University of Otago, First Floor, Dunedin Hospital, 201 Great King Street, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Siebinga H, de Wit-van der Veen BJ, Beijnen JH, Dorlo TPC, Huitema ADR, Hendrikx JJMA. A physiologically based pharmacokinetic model for [ 68Ga]Ga-(HA-)DOTATATE to predict whole-body distribution and tumor sink effects in GEP-NET patients. EJNMMI Res 2023; 13:8. [PMID: 36735114 PMCID: PMC9898489 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-023-00958-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2022] [Accepted: 01/26/2023] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Little is known about parameters that have a relevant impact on (dis)similarities in biodistribution between various 68Ga-labeled somatostatin analogues. Additionally, the effect of tumor burden on organ uptake remains unclear. Therefore, the aim of this study was to describe and compare organ and tumor distribution of [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE and [68Ga]Ga-HA-DOTATATE using a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model and to identify factors that might cause biodistribution and tumor uptake differences between both peptides. In addition, the effect of tumor burden on peptide biodistribution in gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine tumor (NET) patients was assessed. METHODS A PBPK model was developed for [68Ga]Ga-(HA-)DOTATATE in GEP-NET patients. Three tumor compartments were added, representing primary tumor, liver metastases and other metastases. Furthermore, reactions describing receptor binding, internalization and recycling, renal clearance and intracellular degradation were added to the model. Scan data from GEP-NET patients were used for evaluation of model predictions. Simulations with increasing tumor volumes were performed to assess the tumor sink effect. RESULTS Data of 39 and 59 patients receiving [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE and [68Ga]Ga-HA-DOTATATE, respectively, were included. Evaluations showed that the model adequately described image-based patient data and that different receptor affinities caused organ uptake dissimilarities between both peptides. Sensitivity analysis indicated that tumor blood flow and blood volume impacted tumor distribution most. Tumor sink predictions showed a decrease in spleen uptake with increasing tumor volume, which seemed clinically relevant for patients with total tumor volumes higher than ~ 550 mL. CONCLUSION The developed PBPK model adequately predicted tumor and organ uptake for this GEP-NET population. Relevant organ uptake differences between [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE and [68Ga]Ga-HA-DOTATATE were caused by different affinity profiles, while tumor uptake was mainly affected by tumor blood flow and blood volume. Furthermore, tumor sink predictions showed that for the majority of patients a tumor sink effect is not expected to be clinically relevant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hinke Siebinga
- grid.430814.a0000 0001 0674 1393Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands ,grid.430814.a0000 0001 0674 1393Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Berlinda J. de Wit-van der Veen
- grid.430814.a0000 0001 0674 1393Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jos H. Beijnen
- grid.430814.a0000 0001 0674 1393Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Thomas P. C. Dorlo
- grid.430814.a0000 0001 0674 1393Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands ,grid.8993.b0000 0004 1936 9457Department of Pharmacy, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Alwin D. R. Huitema
- grid.430814.a0000 0001 0674 1393Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands ,grid.5477.10000000120346234Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands ,grid.487647.eDepartment of Pharmacology, Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jeroen J. M. A. Hendrikx
- grid.430814.a0000 0001 0674 1393Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands ,grid.430814.a0000 0001 0674 1393Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hope TA, Allen-Auerbach M, Bodei L, Calais J, Dahlbom M, Dunnwald LK, Graham MM, Jacene HA, Heath CL, Mittra ES, Wright CL, Fendler WP, Herrmann K, Taïeb D, Kjaer A. SNMMI Procedure Standard/EANM Practice Guideline for SSTR PET: Imaging Neuroendocrine Tumors. J Nucl Med 2023; 64:204-210. [PMID: 36725249 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.122.264860] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2022] [Revised: 08/30/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas A Hope
- Department of Radiology, San Francisco VA Medical Center, San Francisco, California; .,Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Martin Allen-Auerbach
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| | - Lisa Bodei
- Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York
| | - Jeremie Calais
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| | - Magnus Dahlbom
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| | - Lisa K Dunnwald
- Department of Radiology, Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Michael M Graham
- Department of Radiology, Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Heather A Jacene
- Department of Imaging, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Courtney Lawhn Heath
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Erik S Mittra
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - Chadwick L Wright
- Wright Center of Innovation and Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Wolfgang P Fendler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Ken Herrmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - David Taïeb
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, La Timone University Hospital, CERIMED, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France; and
| | - Andreas Kjaer
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine & PET and Cluster for Molecular Imaging, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Rigshospitalet and University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Eschbach RS, Hofmann M, Späth L, Sheikh GT, Delker A, Lindner S, Jurkschat K, Wängler C, Wängler B, Schirrmacher R, Tiling R, Brendel M, Wenter V, Dekorsy FJ, Zacherl MJ, Todica A, Ilhan H, Grawe F, Cyran CC, Unterrainer M, Rübenthaler J, Knösel T, Paul T, Boeck S, Westphalen CB, Spitzweg C, Auernhammer CJ, Bartenstein P, Unterrainer LM, Beyer L. Comparison of somatostatin receptor expression in patients with neuroendocrine tumours with and without somatostatin analogue treatment imaged with [ 18F]SiTATE. Front Oncol 2023; 13:992316. [PMID: 36793617 PMCID: PMC9924143 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.992316] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2022] [Accepted: 01/09/2023] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Somatostatin analogues (SSA) are frequently used in the treatment of neuroendocrine tumours. Recently, [18F]SiTATE entered the field of somatostatin receptor (SSR) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) imaging. The purpose of this study was to compare the SSR-expression of differentiated gastroentero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP-NET) measured by [18F]SiTATE-PET/CT in patients with and without previous treatment with long-acting SSAs to evaluate if SSA treatment needs to be paused prior to [18F]SiTATE-PET/CT. Methods 77 patients were examined with standardised [18F]SiTATE-PET/CT within clinical routine: 40 patients with long-acting SSAs up to 28 days prior to PET/CT examination and 37 patients without pre-treatment with SSAs. Maximum and mean standardized uptake values (SUVmax and SUVmean) of tumours and metastases (liver, lymphnode, mesenteric/peritoneal and bones) as well as representative background tissues (liver, spleen, adrenal gland, blood pool, small intestine, lung, bone) were measured, SUV ratios (SUVR) were calculated between tumours/metastases and liver, likewise between tumours/metastases and corresponding specific background, and compared between the two groups. Results SUVmean of liver (5.4 ± 1.5 vs. 6.8 ± 1.8) and spleen (17.5 ± 6.8 vs. 36.7 ± 10.3) were significantly lower (p < 0.001) and SUVmean of blood pool (1.7 ± 0.6 vs. 1.3 ± 0.3) was significantly higher (p < 0.001) in patients with SSA pre-treatment compared to patients without. No significant differences between tumour-to-liver and specific tumour-to-background SUVRs were observed between both groups (all p > 0.05). Conclusion In patients previously treated with SSAs, a significantly lower SSR expression ([18F]SiTATE uptake) in normal liver and spleen tissue was observed, as previously reported for 68Ga-labelled SSAs, without significant reduction of tumour-to-background contrast. Therefore, there is no evidence that SSA treatment needs to be paused prior to [18F]SiTATE-PET/CT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ralf S. Eschbach
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Markus Hofmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Lukas Späth
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Gabriel T. Sheikh
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Astrid Delker
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Simon Lindner
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Klaus Jurkschat
- Fakultät für Chemie und Chemische Biologie, Technische Universität Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany
| | - Carmen Wängler
- Biomedical Chemistry, Clinic of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty Mannheim of Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Björn Wängler
- Medical Faculty Mannheim of Heidelberg University, Molecular Imaging and Radiochemistry, Clinic of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Ralf Schirrmacher
- Department of Oncology, Division of Oncological Imaging, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Reinhold Tiling
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Matthias Brendel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Vera Wenter
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Franziska J. Dekorsy
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Mathias J. Zacherl
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Andrei Todica
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- ENETS Centre of Excellence, Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumours of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System at the University Hospital of Munich (GEPNET-KUM), University Hospital of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Harun Ilhan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- ENETS Centre of Excellence, Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumours of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System at the University Hospital of Munich (GEPNET-KUM), University Hospital of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Freba Grawe
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Clemens C. Cyran
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Marcus Unterrainer
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Thomas Knösel
- ENETS Centre of Excellence, Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumours of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System at the University Hospital of Munich (GEPNET-KUM), University Hospital of Munich, Munich, Germany
- Institute of Pathology, LMU, Munich, Germany
| | - Tanja Paul
- ENETS Centre of Excellence, Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumours of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System at the University Hospital of Munich (GEPNET-KUM), University Hospital of Munich, Munich, Germany
- Institute of Pathology, LMU, Munich, Germany
| | - Stefan Boeck
- ENETS Centre of Excellence, Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumours of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System at the University Hospital of Munich (GEPNET-KUM), University Hospital of Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Internal Medicine 3, University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Christoph Benedikt Westphalen
- ENETS Centre of Excellence, Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumours of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System at the University Hospital of Munich (GEPNET-KUM), University Hospital of Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Internal Medicine 3, University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Christine Spitzweg
- ENETS Centre of Excellence, Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumours of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System at the University Hospital of Munich (GEPNET-KUM), University Hospital of Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Internal Medicine 4, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christoph J. Auernhammer
- ENETS Centre of Excellence, Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumours of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System at the University Hospital of Munich (GEPNET-KUM), University Hospital of Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Internal Medicine 4, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Peter Bartenstein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- ENETS Centre of Excellence, Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumours of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System at the University Hospital of Munich (GEPNET-KUM), University Hospital of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Lena M. Unterrainer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Leonie Beyer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- ENETS Centre of Excellence, Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumours of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System at the University Hospital of Munich (GEPNET-KUM), University Hospital of Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
A personal acquisition time regimen of 68Ga-DOTATATE total-body PET/CT in patients with neuroendocrine tumor (NET): a feasibility study. Cancer Imaging 2022; 22:78. [PMID: 36578034 PMCID: PMC9798642 DOI: 10.1186/s40644-022-00517-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2022] [Accepted: 12/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The injection activity of tracer, acquisition time, patient-specific photon attenuation, and large body mass, can influence on image quality. Fixed acquisition time and body mass related injection activity in clinical practice results in a large difference in image quality. Thus, this study proposes a patient-specific acquisition time regimen of 68 Ga-DOTATATE total-body positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) to counteract the influence of body mass (BM, kg) on image quality, and acquire an acceptable and constant image of patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). METHODS The development cohort consisting of 19 consecutive patients with full activity (88.7-204.9 MBq, 2.0 ± 0.1 MBq/kg) was to establish the acquisition time regimen. The liver SNR (signal-to-noise ratio, SNRL) was normalized (SNRnorm) by the product of injected activity (MBq) and acquisition time (min). Fitting of SNRnorm against body mass (BM, kg) in linear correlation was performed. Subjective assessment of image quality was performed using a 5-point Likert scale to determine the acceptable threshold of SNRL, and an optimized acquisition regimen based on BM was proposed, and validated its feasibility through the validation cohort of 57 consecutive NET patients with half activity (66.9 ± 11.3 MBq, 1.0 ± 0.1 MBq/kg) and a fixed acquisition time regimen. RESULTS The linear correlation (R2 = 0.63) between SNRnorm and BM (kg) was SNRnorm = -0.01*BM + 1.50. The threshold SNRL of acceptable image quality was 11.2. The patient-specific variable acquisition time regimen was determined as: t (min) = 125.4/(injective activity)*(-0.01*BM + 1.50)2. Based on that proposed regimen, the average acquisition time for acceptable image quality in the validation cohort was 2.99 ± 0.91 min, ranging from 2.18 to 6.35 min, which was reduced by 36.50% ~ 78.20% compared with the fixed acquisition time of 10 min. Subjective evaluation showed that acceptable image quality could be obtained at 3.00 min in the validation group, with an average subjective score of 3.44 ± 0.53 (kappa = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.96 ~ 0.98). Bland-Altman analysis revealed good agreement between the proposed regimen and the fixed acquisition time cohort. CONCLUSION A patient-specific acquisition time regimen was proposed in NET patients in development cohort and validated its feasibility in patients with NETs in validation cohort by 68 Ga-DOTATATE total-body PET/CT imaging. Based on the proposed regimen, the homogenous image quality with optimal acquisition time was available independent of body mass.
Collapse
|
12
|
Somatostatin receptor saturation after administration of high peptide amounts of [ 177Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE: when enough is enough. EJNMMI Res 2022; 12:74. [PMID: 36515683 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-022-00946-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2022] [Accepted: 12/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Receptor saturation during peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) could result in altered [177Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE uptake in tumors and organs. Therefore, receptor expression status and effects of different (unlabeled) administered peptide amounts during PRRT need to be evaluated. The aim of this study was to assess potential receptor saturation during PRRT by comparing organ and tumor uptake after administration of [177Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE with low, standard and high administered peptide amounts in patients with advanced metastatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). METHODS Data of NET patients that received 7.4 GBq 177-Lutetium labeled to a low or high amount of HA-DOTATATE were retrospectively included. From included patients other PRRT cycles, containing standard administered peptide amounts, were included for intra-patient comparison. Uptake quantification was performed for spleen, liver, kidney, bone marrow, blood pool and tumor lesions on post-treatment SPECT/CT scans. A paired Wilcoxon signed-rank test was performed to determine uptake differences between two adjacent cycles for each patient. RESULTS Thirteen patients received [177Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE with a high administered peptide amount (mean 346 µg vs 178 µg standard peptide amount). Low peptide amounts were administered to fifteen patients (mean 109 µg vs 202 µg standard peptide amount). High administered peptide amount resulted in significantly lower [177Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE uptake in the spleen (p = 0.00012), kidney (p = 0.013) and tumor lesions (p < 0.0001) versus standard peptide amounts. For low administered peptide amount, uptake was increased in the spleen (p = 0.015), while tumor uptake was significantly reduced (p = 0.015) compared to uptake after administration of standard peptide amounts. CONCLUSIONS These findings confirmed a peptide amount-dependent organ and tumor accumulation for [177Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE, with receptor saturation in spleen for high and standard peptide amounts, while tumor and kidney receptor saturation occur only with high administered peptide amounts. A high peptide amount (~ 350 µg) is not recommended for standard-dose PRRT and standard amounts (~ 200 µg) seem more suitable to achieve optimal tumor accumulation with limited organ uptake.
Collapse
|
13
|
Diagnosis in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: From Molecular Biology to Molecular Imaging. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14102514. [PMID: 35626118 PMCID: PMC9139608 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14102514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2022] [Revised: 04/26/2022] [Accepted: 04/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Neuroendocrine neoplasms are a small group of malignancies with a diverse prognosis and behaviour. In order to offer an adequate treatment, physicians need to perform a proper diagnosis, staging and stratification. This review aims to help to integrate the information from pathology, immunohistochemistry, molecular biology and imaging to guide this process. Abstract Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are a heterogeneous group of tumours with a diverse behaviour, biology and prognosis, whose incidence is gradually increasing. Their diagnosis is challenging and a multidisciplinary approach is often required. The combination of pathology, molecular biomarkers, and the use of novel imaging techniques leads to an accurate diagnosis and a better treatment approach. To determine the functionality of the tumour, somatostatin receptor expression, differentiation, and primary tumour origin are the main determining tumour-dependent factors to guide treatment, both in local and metastatic stages. Until recently, little was known about the biological behaviour of these tumours. However, in recent years, many advances have been achieved in the molecular characterization and diagnosis of NENs. The incorporation of novel radiotracer-based imaging techniques, such as 68Gallium-DOTATATE PET-CT, has significantly increased diagnostic sensitivity, while introducing the theragnosis concept, offering new treatment strategies. Here, we will review current knowledge and novelties in the diagnosis of NENs, including molecular biology, pathology, and new radiotracers.
Collapse
|
14
|
Syguła A, Ledwon A, Hasse-Lazar K, Jurecka-Lubieniecka B, Michalik B, Paliczka-Cieślik E, Zeman M, Chmielik E, Sczasny J, Jarzab B, Handkiewicz-Junak D. In patients with well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumours, there is no apparent benefit of somatostatin analogues after disease control by peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2022; 49:3841-3851. [PMID: 35503379 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-022-05792-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2021] [Accepted: 04/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) and somatostatin analogues (SSAs) are commonly combined as primary treatment for neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN), and SSAs given as maintenance. We sought to evaluate whether sequential therapy with PRRT followed by SSAs has progression or survival benefits in patients with NEN after disease control by PRRT. METHODS This prospective, randomised, single-centre study had as principal eligibility criteria: unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic, histologically confirmed well-differentiated NEN; no symptoms/biochemical diagnosis of carcinoid syndrome; no SSAs or ≤ 3 months of SSAs before PRRT; and stable disease or partial or complete response after PRRT. Altogether, 115 patients were randomised 2:1 to an SSA group (n = 74) given octreotide acetate LAR every 4 weeks, or a control group (n = 41) receiving only best supportive care. Octreotide treatment was to stop upon intolerable toxicity or patient refusal, or, at physician/patient discretion, upon NEN progression. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), the secondary endpoint, and overall survival (OS). RESULTS Median (25th-75th percentile) follow-up from the first PRRT activity to death or latest observation was 6.6 (3.18-10.22) years. During that time, 71/115 patients (62%) progressed, 52/74 (70%) in the SSA group, and 19/41 (46%) in the control group (p = 0.01). Eighty-eight/115 patients (76%) died, 58/74 (78%) in the SSA group, and 30/41 (73%) in the control group (p = 0.52). Median (95% CI) PFS was 4.7 (2.8-7.7) years in the SSA group, and 6.4 (4.1-not reached) years in controls. Overall, median OS was 6.6 years. Neither PFS nor OS differed between groups (p = 0.129, p = 0.985, respectively). CONCLUSIONS In patients with disease control after PRRT, subsequent SSA treatment appeared not to be associated with better PFS or OS. Whether to continue SSA administration upon progression after PRRT requires evaluation in a prospective, randomised, controlled multicentre study with a relatively homogeneous sample.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aleksandra Syguła
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Endocrine Oncology, Gliwice Branch, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Wybrzeże Armii Krajowej 16, 44-101, Gliwice, Poland
| | - Aleksandra Ledwon
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Endocrine Oncology, Gliwice Branch, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Wybrzeże Armii Krajowej 16, 44-101, Gliwice, Poland
| | - Kornelia Hasse-Lazar
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Endocrine Oncology, Gliwice Branch, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Wybrzeże Armii Krajowej 16, 44-101, Gliwice, Poland
| | - Beata Jurecka-Lubieniecka
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Endocrine Oncology, Gliwice Branch, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Wybrzeże Armii Krajowej 16, 44-101, Gliwice, Poland
| | - Barbara Michalik
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Endocrine Oncology, Gliwice Branch, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Wybrzeże Armii Krajowej 16, 44-101, Gliwice, Poland
| | - Ewa Paliczka-Cieślik
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Endocrine Oncology, Gliwice Branch, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Wybrzeże Armii Krajowej 16, 44-101, Gliwice, Poland
| | - Marcin Zeman
- The Oncologic and Reconstructive Surgery Clinic, Gliwice Branch, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice, Poland
| | - Ewa Chmielik
- Tumor Pathology Department, Gliwice Branch, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice, Poland
| | - Joanna Sczasny
- Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging Department, Gliwice Branch, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice, Poland
| | - Barbara Jarzab
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Endocrine Oncology, Gliwice Branch, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Wybrzeże Armii Krajowej 16, 44-101, Gliwice, Poland
| | - Daria Handkiewicz-Junak
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Endocrine Oncology, Gliwice Branch, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Wybrzeże Armii Krajowej 16, 44-101, Gliwice, Poland.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Zhou J, Zhao R, Pan Y, Ju H, Huang X, Jiang Y, Jin J, Zhang Y. The Diagnostic and Grading Accuracy of 68Ga-DOTATATE and 18F-FDG PET/MR for Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms. Front Oncol 2022; 12:796391. [PMID: 35273910 PMCID: PMC8901996 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.796391] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2021] [Accepted: 01/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Accurate diagnosis and grading are critical for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm (pNEN) management. This study compares the diagnostic and grading value of 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/MR and 18F-FDG PET/MR for pNENs separately as well as in combination. A total of 36 patients with histologically confirmed pNENs, who underwent both 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/MR and 18F-FDG PET/MR within 2 weeks from 2020 to 2021, were retrospectively collected and analyzed. The maximum standardized uptake values of 68Ga-DOTATATE (G-SUVmax) and 18F-FDG (F-SUVmax) on PET and the minimum values of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADCmin) on MR were measured on the lesions with known histological grading (25 by surgery, 11 by biopsy). Receiver-operating characteristic analysis was applied to determine the cutoffs of these parameters or their combinations for differentiation between G1 and G2, as well as between low-grade and high-grade pNENs. The Spearman rank correlation coefficient was used to assess the correlation between the imaging parameters and the maximum tumor diameters. The detection rate of 68Ga-DOTATATE PET imaging alone was 95%, 87.5%, and 37.5% for G1, G2, and G3, respectively. Adding 18F-FDG PET or MR sequences of PET/MR increased the detection rate to 100% in all grades. Among the three parameters, G-SUVmax had the highest diagnostic rate in predicting tumor grade. It presented a sensitivity of 87.5% and a specificity of 80.0% with a cutoff value of 42.75 for differentiating G2 from G1 pNETs and a sensitivity and specificity of 100% and 71.4% with a cutoff value of 32.75 in predicting high-grade pNENs. The ratio of G-SUVmax to F-SUVmax (G-SUVmax/F-SUVmax) showed slight improvement in the diagnostic rate, while the product of G-SUVmax and ADCmin (G-SUVmax*ADCmin) did not improve the diagnostic rate. 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/MR alone is sufficient for the diagnosis of pNENs and the prediction of various grades.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinxin Zhou
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Runze Zhao
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Yu Pan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Huijun Ju
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Xinyun Huang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Yu Jiang
- Department of General Surgery, Pancreatic Disease Center, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Jiabin Jin
- Department of General Surgery, Pancreatic Disease Center, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Yifan Zhang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Rogasch JMM, Hofheinz F, van Heek L, Voltin CA, Boellaard R, Kobe C. Influences on PET Quantification and Interpretation. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:451. [PMID: 35204542 PMCID: PMC8871060 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12020451] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2021] [Revised: 01/06/2022] [Accepted: 02/08/2022] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Various factors have been identified that influence quantitative accuracy and image interpretation in positron emission tomography (PET). Through the continuous introduction of new PET technology-both imaging hardware and reconstruction software-into clinical care, we now find ourselves in a transition period in which traditional and new technologies coexist. The effects on the clinical value of PET imaging and its interpretation in routine clinical practice require careful reevaluation. In this review, we provide a comprehensive summary of important factors influencing quantification and interpretation with a focus on recent developments in PET technology. Finally, we discuss the relationship between quantitative accuracy and subjective image interpretation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julian M. M. Rogasch
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany;
- Berlin Institute of Health at Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10178 Berlin, Germany
| | - Frank Hofheinz
- Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Helmholtz Center Dresden-Rossendorf, 01328 Dresden, Germany;
| | - Lutz van Heek
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany; (L.v.H.); (C.-A.V.)
| | - Conrad-Amadeus Voltin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany; (L.v.H.); (C.-A.V.)
| | - Ronald Boellaard
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam (CCA), Amsterdam University Medical Center, Free University Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - Carsten Kobe
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany; (L.v.H.); (C.-A.V.)
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy Targeting the Somatostatin Receptor: Basic Principles, Clinical Applications and Optimization Strategies. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 14:cancers14010129. [PMID: 35008293 PMCID: PMC8749814 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14010129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2021] [Revised: 12/13/2021] [Accepted: 12/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is a systemic treatment consisting of the administration of a tumor-targeting radiopharmaceutical into the circulation of a patient. The radiopharmaceutical will bind to a specific peptide receptor leading to tumor-specific binding and retention. This will subsequently cause lethal DNA damage to the tumor cell. The only target that is currently used in widespread clinical practice is the somatostatin receptor, which is overexpressed on a range of tumor cells, including neuroendocrine tumors and neural-crest derived tumors. Academia played an important role in the development of PRRT, which has led to heterogeneous literature over the last two decades, as no standard radiopharmaceutical or regimen has been available for a long time. This review focuses on the basic principles and clinical applications of PRRT, and discusses several PRRT-optimization strategies. Abstract Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) consists of the administration of a tumor-targeting radiopharmaceutical into the circulation of a patient. The radiopharmaceutical will bind to a specific peptide receptor leading to tumor-specific binding and retention. The only target that is currently used in clinical practice is the somatostatin receptor (SSTR), which is overexpressed on a range of tumor cells, including neuroendocrine tumors and neural-crest derived tumors. Academia played an important role in the development of PRRT, which has led to heterogeneous literature over the last two decades, as no standard radiopharmaceutical or regimen has been available for a long time. This review provides a summary of the treatment efficacy (e.g., response rates and symptom-relief), impact on patient outcome and toxicity profile of PRRT performed with different generations of SSTR-targeting radiopharmaceuticals, including the landmark randomized-controlled trial NETTER-1. In addition, multiple optimization strategies for PRRT are discussed, i.e., the dose–effect concept, dosimetry, combination therapies (i.e., tandem/duo PRRT, chemoPRRT, targeted molecular therapy, somatostatin analogues and radiosensitizers), new radiopharmaceuticals (i.e., SSTR-antagonists, Evans-blue containing vector molecules and alpha-emitters), administration route (intra-arterial versus intravenous) and response prediction via molecular testing or imaging. The evolution and continuous refinement of PRRT resulted in many lessons for the future development of radionuclide therapy aimed at other targets and tumor types.
Collapse
|
18
|
Jahn U, Ilan E, Velikyan I, Fröss-Baron K, Lubberink M, Sundin A. Receptor depletion and recovery in small-intestinal neuroendocrine tumors and normal tissues after administration of a single intravenous dose of octreotide measured by 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT. EJNMMI Res 2021; 11:118. [PMID: 34822040 PMCID: PMC8617112 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-021-00860-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2021] [Accepted: 11/03/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Low-grade neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are characterized by an abundance of somatostatin receptors (SSTR) that can be targeted with somatostatin analogs (SSA). When activated with a single dose of SSA, the receptor-ligand complex is internalized, and the receptor is by default recycled within 24 h. Ongoing medication with long-acting SSAs at 68Ga-DOTA-SSA-PET has been shown to increase the tumor-to-normal organ contrast. This study was performed to investigate the time-dependent extended effect (7 h) of a single intravenous dose of 400 µg short-acting octreotide on the tumor versus normal tissue uptake of 68Ga-DOTATOC. METHODS Patients with small-intestinal NETs received a single intravenous dose of 400 µg octreotide and underwent dynamic abdominal 68Ga-DOTATOC-PET/CT at three sessions (0, 3 and 6 h) plus static whole-body (WB) PET/CT (1, 4 and 7 h), starting each PET/CT session by administering 167 ± 21 MBq, 23.5 ± 4.2 µg (mean ± SD, n = 12) of 68Ga-DOTATOC. A previously acquired clinical whole-body 68Ga-DOTATOC scan was used as baseline. SUV and net uptake rate Ki were calculated in tumors, and SUV in healthy organs. RESULTS Tumor SUV decreased significantly from baseline to 1 h post-injection but subsequently increased over time and became similar to baseline at 4 h and 7 h. The tumor net uptake rate, Ki, similarly increased significantly over time and showed a linear correlation both with SUV and tumor-to-blood ratio. By contrast, the uptake in liver, spleen and pancreas remained significantly below baseline levels also at 7 h and the receptor turn-over in tumors thus exceeded that in the normal tissue, with restitution of tumor 68Ga-DOTATOC uptake mainly completed at 7 h. These results however differed depending on tumor size, with significant increases in Ki and SUV between the 1st and 2nd PET, in large tumors (≥ 4 mL) but not in small (> 1 to < 4 mL) tumors. CONCLUSION SSTR recycling is faster in small-intestinal NETs than in liver, spleen and pancreas. This opens the possibility to protect normal tissues during PRRT by administering a single dose of cold peptide hours before peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT), and most likely additionally improve the availability and uptake of the therapeutic preparation in the tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ulrika Jahn
- Radiology and Molecular Imaging, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. .,Uppsala University Hospital, 75185, Uppsala, Sweden.
| | - Ezgi Ilan
- Radiology and Molecular Imaging, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.,Uppsala University Hospital, 75185, Uppsala, Sweden.,Medical Physics, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Irina Velikyan
- Radiology and Molecular Imaging, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.,Uppsala University Hospital, 75185, Uppsala, Sweden.,Medical Imaging Centre, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Katarzyna Fröss-Baron
- Radiology and Molecular Imaging, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.,Uppsala University Hospital, 75185, Uppsala, Sweden.,Medical Imaging Centre, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Mark Lubberink
- Radiology and Molecular Imaging, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.,Uppsala University Hospital, 75185, Uppsala, Sweden.,Medical Physics, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Anders Sundin
- Radiology and Molecular Imaging, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.,Uppsala University Hospital, 75185, Uppsala, Sweden.,Medical Imaging Centre, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Zhu W, Cheng Y, Jia R, Zhao H, Bai C, Xu J, Yao S, Huo L. A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Study to Evaluate the Safety, Biodistribution, and Dosimetry of 68Ga-NODAGA-LM3 and 68Ga-DOTA-LM3 in Patients with Well-Differentiated Neuroendocrine Tumors. J Nucl Med 2021; 62:1398-1405. [PMID: 33579804 PMCID: PMC8724897 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.120.253096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2020] [Accepted: 01/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
68Ga-NODAGA-LM3 (where LM3 is p-Cl-Phe-cyclo(d-Cys-Tyr-d-4-amino-Phe(carbamoyl)-Lys-Thr-Cys)d-Tyr-NH2) and 68Ga-DOTA-LM3 are somatostatin receptor subtype 2 (SSTR2)-specific antagonists used for PET/CT imaging. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety, biodistribution, and dosimetry of 68Ga-NODAGA-LM3 and 68Ga-DOTA-LM3 in patients with well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors. Methods: Patients were equally randomized into 2 arms, with arm A receiving 68Ga-NODAGA-LM3 and arm B receiving 68Ga-DOTA-LM3. Serial PET scans were acquired at 5, 15, 30, 45, 60, and 120 min after 68Ga-NODAGA-LM3 (200 MBq ± 11 MBq/40 μg of total peptide mass) or 68Ga-DOTA-LM3 (172 MBq ± 21 MBq/40 μg of total peptide mass) injection. The biodistribution in normal organs, tumor uptake, and safety were assessed. Radiation dosimetry was calculated using OLINDA/EXM (version 1.0). Results: Sixteen patients, 8 in each arm, were recruited in the study. Both tracers were well tolerated in most patients. Two patients in arm B had nausea (grade 2), and one of them had vomiting (grade 1). The PET images of the other 14 patients were further analyzed. Significantly lower organ uptake was observed in the pituitary, parotids, liver, spleen, pancreas, adrenal, stomach, small intestine, and kidneys with 68Ga-DOTA-LM3 than with 68Ga-NODAGA-LM3. In total, 38 lesions were analyzed, including 18 with 68Ga-NODAGA-LM3 and 20 with 68Ga-DOTA-LM3. Both tracers showed good tumor uptake and retention. With 68Ga-NODAGA-LM3, the tracer accumulation in tumor lesions increased by 138%, from an average SUVmax of 31.3 ± 19.7 at 5 min to 74.6 ± 56.3 at 2 h. With 68Ga-DOTA-LM3, the tumor uptake rapidly reached a high level at 5 min after injection, with an average SUVmax of 36.6 ± 23.6, and continued to increase to 45.3 ± 29.3 until 30 min after injection. The urinary bladder wall was the organ receiving the highest absorbed dose in both arms. The mean effective dose was 0.026 ± 0.003 mSv/MBq for 68Ga-NODAGA-LM3 and 0.025 ± 0.002 mSv/MBq for 68Ga-DOTA-LM3. Conclusion: Both 68Ga-NODAGA-LM3 and 68Ga-DOTA-LM3 show favorable biodistribution, high tumor uptake, and good tumor retention, resulting in high image contrast. The dosimetric data are comparable to those for other 68Ga-labeled SSTR2 antagonists. Further studies are required to look into the potential antagonistic effects of 68Ga-NODAGA-LM3 and 68Ga-DOTA-LM3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenjia Zhu
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Beijing Key Laboratory of Molecular Targeted Diagnosis and Therapy in Nuclear Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, CAMS and PUMC, Beijing, China
| | - Yuejuan Cheng
- Department of Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Ru Jia
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Fifth Medical Center, General Hospital of PLA, Beijing, China
| | - Hong Zhao
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China; and
| | - Chunmei Bai
- Department of Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Jianming Xu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Fifth Medical Center, General Hospital of PLA, Beijing, China
| | - Shaobo Yao
- Department Nuclear Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Li Huo
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Beijing Key Laboratory of Molecular Targeted Diagnosis and Therapy in Nuclear Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, CAMS and PUMC, Beijing, China;
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Combination Therapies with PRRT. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2021; 14:ph14101005. [PMID: 34681229 PMCID: PMC8538931 DOI: 10.3390/ph14101005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2021] [Revised: 09/26/2021] [Accepted: 09/27/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is a successful targeted radionuclide therapy in neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). However, complete responses remain elusive. Combined treatments anticipate synergistic effects and thus better responses by combining ionizing radiation with other anti-tumor treatments. Furthermore, multimodal therapies often have a balanced toxicity profile. To date, few studies have evaluated the effect of combination therapies with PRRT, some of them phase I/II trials. This review will focus on several clinically tested, tailored approaches to improving the effects of PRRT. The aim is to help clinicians in the treatment planning of NETs to choose the most effective and safe treatment for each patient in the sense of personalized medicine. Current promising combination partners of PRRT are somatostatin analogues (SSAs), chemotherapy, molecular targeted treatment, liver radioembolization, and dual radionuclide PRRT (Lutetium-177-PRRT combined with Yttrium-90-PRRT).
Collapse
|
21
|
Carrasquillo JA, Chen CC, Jha A, Pacak K, Pryma DA, Lin FI. Systemic Radiopharmaceutical Therapy of Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma. J Nucl Med 2021; 62:1192-1199. [PMID: 34475242 PMCID: PMC8882896 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.120.259697] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2020] [Accepted: 02/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Whereas benign pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas are often successfully cured by surgical resection, treatment of metastatic disease can be challenging in terms of both disease control and symptom control. Fortunately, several options are available, including chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and surgical debulking. Radiolabeled metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) and somatostatin receptor imaging have laid the groundwork for use of these radiopharmaceuticals as theranostic agents. 131I-MIBG therapy of neuroendocrine tumors has a long history, and the recent approval of high-specific-activity 131I-MIBG for metastatic or inoperable pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has resulted in general availability of, and renewed interest in, this treatment. Although reports of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy of pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma with 90Y- or 177Lu-DOTA conjugated somatostatin analogs have appeared in the literature, the approval of 177Lu-DOTATATE in the United States and Europe, together with National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines suggesting its use in patients with metastatic or inoperable pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma, has resulted in renewed interest. These agents have shown evidence of efficacy as palliative treatments in patients with metastatic or inoperable pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma. In this continuing medical education article, we discuss the therapy of pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma with 131I-MIBG and 90Y- or 177Lu-DOTA-somatostatin analogs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jorge A Carrasquillo
- Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York;
- Molecular Imaging Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Clara C Chen
- Department of Radiology, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Abhishek Jha
- Section on Medical Neuroendocrinology, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland; and
| | - Karel Pacak
- Section on Medical Neuroendocrinology, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland; and
| | - Daniel A Pryma
- Department of Radiology, Hospital of University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Frank I Lin
- Molecular Imaging Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
|
23
|
Schütz MB, Renner AM, Ilyas S, Lê K, Guliyev M, Krapf P, Neumaier B, Mathur S. 18F-Labeled magnetic nanovectors for bimodal cellular imaging. Biomater Sci 2021; 9:4717-4727. [PMID: 34032225 DOI: 10.1039/d1bm00616a] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Surface modification of nanocarriers enables selective attachment to specific molecular targets within a complex biological environment. Besides the enhanced uptake due to specific interactions, the surface ligands can be utilized for radiolabeling applications for bimodal imaging ensured by positron emission topography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) functions in one source. Herein, we describe the surface functionalization of magnetite (Fe3O4) with folic acid as a target vector. Additionally, the magnetic nanocarriers were conjugated with appropriate ligands for subsequent copper-catalyzed azide-alkyne cycloaddition or carbodiimide coupling reactions to successfully achieve radiolabeling with the PET-emitter 18F. The phase composition (XRD) and size analysis (TEM) confirmed the formation of Fe3O4 nanoparticles (6.82 nm ± 0.52 nm). The quantification of various surface functionalities was performed by Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) and ultraviolet-visible microscopy (UV-Vis). An innovative magnetic-HPLC method was developed in this work for the determination of the radiochemical yield of the 18F-labeled NPs. The as-prepared Fe3O4 particles demonstrated high radiochemical yields and showed high cellular uptake in a folate receptor overexpressing MCF-7 cell line, validating bimodal imaging chemical design and a magnetic HPLC system. This novel approach, combining folic acid-capped Fe3O4 nanocarriers as a targeting vector with 18F labeling, is promising to apply this probe for bimodal PET/MR-studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Markus B Schütz
- Institute of Inorganic Chemistry, University of Cologne, D-50939 Cologne, Germany.
| | - Alexander M Renner
- Institute of Inorganic Chemistry, University of Cologne, D-50939 Cologne, Germany.
| | - Shaista Ilyas
- Institute of Inorganic Chemistry, University of Cologne, D-50939 Cologne, Germany.
| | - Khan Lê
- Institute of Inorganic Chemistry, University of Cologne, D-50939 Cologne, Germany.
| | - Mehrab Guliyev
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine-Nuclear Chemistry (INM-5), Forschungszentrum Jülich, D-52428 Jülich, Germany
| | - Philipp Krapf
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine-Nuclear Chemistry (INM-5), Forschungszentrum Jülich, D-52428 Jülich, Germany
| | - Bernd Neumaier
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine-Nuclear Chemistry (INM-5), Forschungszentrum Jülich, D-52428 Jülich, Germany
| | - Sanjay Mathur
- Institute of Inorganic Chemistry, University of Cologne, D-50939 Cologne, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Lodge MA, Solnes LB, Chaudhry MA, Wahl RL. Prospective Within-Patient Assessment of the Impact of an Unlabeled Octreotide Pre-dose on the Biodistribution and Tumor Uptake of 68Ga DOTATOC as Assessed by Dynamic Whole-body PET in Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors: Implications for Diagnosis and Therapy. Mol Imaging Biol 2021; 23:766-774. [PMID: 33829361 DOI: 10.1007/s11307-021-01600-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2021] [Revised: 03/15/2021] [Accepted: 03/29/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP NETs) are often associated with high expression of somatostatin receptors (SSTRs) which allows for PET/CT imaging with radiolabeled somatostatin analogs such as 68Ga-DOTATOC. The interplay between 68Ga-DOTATOC and the synthetic somatostatin analogs commonly used to manage patient symptoms may lead to competition between the labelled and unlabeled peptides for receptor binding sites and current product labelling recommends patients be taken off somatostatin analogs before imaging. In this study, we prospectively investigated in human patients the effect of a pre-dose of octreotide, a short-acting somatostatin analog, on the distribution of 68Ga-DOTATOC in GEP NETs and normal organs. PROCEDURE Research participants with GEP NETs were studied on two occasions using dynamic whole-body 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT. The two imaging studies were performed within 21 days of each other, using an identical acquisition protocol except for the administration of 50 μg of short-acting octreotide (pre-dose) immediately before the second PET/CT. Paired t-tests were used to compare tracer uptake with and without octreotide, for tumor and various normal organs. RESULTS Seven participants with a mean age of 53 ± 10 years were studied. Octreotide pre-dosing decreased radiotracer uptake in the normal liver and spleen by 25 % (p = 0.04) and 47 % (p = 0.05) respectively but did not significantly change uptake in tumor (p = 0.53), red marrow (p = 0.12), kidneys (p =0.57), or pituitary gland (p = 0.27). CONCLUSIONS Our data indicate SSTR imaging can be improved with a pre-dose of unlabeled octreotide given just prior to injection of the radiotracer. These data suggest there may be no need to discontinue somatostatin analog therapy prior to PET/CT with 68Ga-DOTATOC, allowing for a simpler, less disruptive patient protocol. This approach warrants further study in a variety of settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin A Lodge
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
| | - Lilja B Solnes
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Muhammad A Chaudhry
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Richard L Wahl
- The Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Minczeles NS, Hofland J, de Herder WW, Brabander T. Strategies Towards Improving Clinical Outcomes of Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy. Curr Oncol Rep 2021; 23:46. [PMID: 33721105 PMCID: PMC7960621 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-021-01037-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/26/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with [177Lu-DOTA0,Tyr3] octreotate is an effective and safe second- or third-line treatment option for patients with low-grade advanced gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN). In this review, we will focus on possible extensions of the current use of PRRT and on new approaches which could further improve its treatment efficacy and safety. RECENT FINDINGS Promising results were published regarding PRRT in other NENs, including lung NENs or high-grade NENs, and applying PRRT as neoadjuvant or salvage therapy. Furthermore, a diversity of strategic approaches, including dosimetry, somatostatin receptor antagonists, somatostatin receptor upregulation, radiosensitization, different radionuclides, albumin binding, alternative renal protection, and liver-directed therapy in combination with PRRT, have the potential to improve the outcome of PRRT. Also, novel biomarkers are presented that could predict response to PRRT. Multiple preclinical and early clinical studies have shown encouraging potential to advance the clinical outcome of PRRT in NEN patients. However, at this moment, most of these strategies have not yet reached the clinical setting of randomized phase III trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N S Minczeles
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Endocrinology, Erasmus MC and Erasmus MC Cancer Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- ENETS Center of Excellence Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J Hofland
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Endocrinology, Erasmus MC and Erasmus MC Cancer Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- ENETS Center of Excellence Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - W W de Herder
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Endocrinology, Erasmus MC and Erasmus MC Cancer Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- ENETS Center of Excellence Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - T Brabander
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
- ENETS Center of Excellence Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Mirzaei S, Lipp RW. Peptide and pseudo-peptide. THE QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE ITALIAN ASSOCIATION OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE (AIMN) [AND] THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF RADIOPHARMACOLOGY (IAR), [AND] SECTION OF THE SOCIETY OF RADIOPHARMACEUTICAL CHEMISTRY AND BIOLOGY 2020; 64:364-370. [DOI: 10.23736/s1824-4785.20.03311-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
|
27
|
Sundlöv A, Sjögreen-Gleisner K. Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy - Prospects for Personalised Treatment. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2020; 33:92-97. [PMID: 33189510 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2020.10.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2020] [Revised: 10/03/2020] [Accepted: 10/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy is a type of molecular radiotherapy that has been used in the treatment of patients with neuroendocrine tumours for over two decades. It is not until recently, however, that it has achieved regulatory approval. The currently approved treatment regimen is a one-size-fits-all scheme, i.e. all patients receive a fixed activity of the radiopharmaceutical (177Lu-DOTATATE) and a fixed number of treatment cycles. Several research groups around the world have studied different approaches of further improving on the results of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, with many promising retrospective and prospective clinical studies having been published over the years. In this overview, we summarise some of the most promising strategies identified so far.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Sundlöv
- Department of Oncology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden; Department of Medical Radiation Physics, Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
| | - K Sjögreen-Gleisner
- Department of Medical Radiation Physics, Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Huizing DMV, Aalbersberg EA, Versleijen MWJ, Tesselaar MET, Walraven I, Lahaye MJ, de Wit-van der Veen BJ, Stokkel MPM. Early response assessment and prediction of overall survival after peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. Cancer Imaging 2020; 20:57. [PMID: 32778165 PMCID: PMC7418334 DOI: 10.1186/s40644-020-00335-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2020] [Accepted: 07/29/2020] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Response after peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) can be evaluated using anatomical imaging (CT/MRI), somatostatin receptor imaging ([68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT), and serum Chromogranin-A (CgA). The aim of this retrospective study is to assess the role of these response evaluation methods and their predictive value for overall survival (OS). Methods Imaging and CgA levels were acquired prior to start of PRRT, and 3 and 9 months after completion. Tumour size was measured on anatomical imaging and response was categorized according to RECIST 1.1 and Choi criteria. [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE uptake was quantified in both target lesions depicted on anatomical imaging and separately identified PET target lesions, which were either followed over time or newly identified on each scan with PERCIST-based criteria. Response evaluation methods were compared with Cox regression analyses and Log Rank tests for association with OS. Results A total of 44 patients were included, with median follow-up of 31 months (IQR 26–36 months) and median OS of 39 months (IQR 32mo-not reached)d. Progressive disease after 9 months (according to RECIST 1.1) was significantly associated with worse OS compared to stable disease [HR 9.04 (95% CI 2.10–38.85)], however not compared to patients with partial response. According to Choi criteria, progressive disease was also significantly associated with worse OS compared to stable disease [HR 6.10 (95% CI 1.38–27.05)] and compared to patients with partial response [HR 22.66 (95% CI 2.33–219.99)]. In some patients, new lesions were detected earlier with [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT than with anatomical imaging. After 3 months, new lesions on [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT which were not visible on anatomical imaging, were detected in 4/41 (10%) patients and in another 3/27 (11%) patients after 9 months. However, no associations between change in uptake on 68Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT or serum CgA measurements and OS was observed. Conclusions Progression on anatomical imaging performed 9 months after PRRT is associated with worse OS compared to stable disease or partial response. Although new lesions were detected earlier with [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT than with anatomical imaging, [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE uptake, and serum CgA after PRRT were not predictive for OS in this cohort with limited number of patients and follow-up time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daphne M V Huizing
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute, ENETS Center of Excellence, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Else A Aalbersberg
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute, ENETS Center of Excellence, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michelle W J Versleijen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute, ENETS Center of Excellence, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Margot E T Tesselaar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, ENETS Center of Excellence, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Iris Walraven
- Department of Radiotherapy, Netherlands Cancer Institute, ENETS Center of Excellence, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Max J Lahaye
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, ENETS Center of Excellence, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Marcel P M Stokkel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute, ENETS Center of Excellence, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Patient Selection and Toxicities of PRRT for Metastatic Neuroendocrine Tumors and Research Opportunities. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2020; 21:25. [PMID: 32172368 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-020-0711-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are a heterogenous group of neoplasms characterized by varied biological hallmarks and behavior, ranging from indolent to aggressive. For many decades, somatostatin analogues and few targeted therapies were available for NETs and these therapies had minimal response rates. However, there have been a number of recent treatment advances. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is a novel approach to treatment of NETs and has changed the landscape of treatment for NETs. It is a form of targeted therapy in which a radiolabeled somatostatin analogue delivers radiation specifically to tumor cells expressing the somatostatin receptor.
Collapse
|
30
|
Boertien TM, Booij J, Majoie CBLM, Drent ML, Pereira AM, Biermasz NR, Simsek S, Veldman RG, Stokkel MPM, Bisschop PH, Fliers E. 68Ga-DOTATATE PET imaging in clinically non-functioning pituitary macroadenomas. Eur J Hybrid Imaging 2020; 4:4. [PMID: 34191241 PMCID: PMC8218160 DOI: 10.1186/s41824-020-0073-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2019] [Accepted: 01/21/2020] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Clinically non-functioning pituitary macroadenomas (NFMA) have been reported to express somatostatin receptors (SSTR), but results are inconsistent across different studies. This may be related to limited sensitivity and specificity of techniques used to date, i.e. immunohistochemistry in surgical specimens and 111In-DTPA-octreotide scintigraphy in vivo. The aim of this study was to assess SSTR expression in NFMA in vivo using 68Ga-DOTATATE PET, which offers superior sensitivity and spatial resolution as compared with planar scintigraphy or SPECT. Methods Thirty-seven patients diagnosed with NFMA underwent 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT of the head in the framework of a randomised controlled trial assessing the effect of the somatostatin analogue lanreotide on NFMA size. Individual co-registered T1-weighted pituitary MRIs were used to assess 68Ga-DOTATATE uptake (SUVmean) in the adenoma. An SUVmean of > 2 was considered positive. Results 68Ga-DOTATATE uptake was positive in 34/37 patients (92%), with SUVmean of positive adenomas ranging from 2.1 to 12.4 (mean ± SD 5.8 ± 2.6). Conclusions This is the first report of 68Ga-DOTATATE PET performed in NFMA patients, demonstrating in vivo SSTR expression in the vast majority of cases. The high positivity rate when compared with results obtained with 111In-DTPA-octreotide scintigraphy probably reflects the superior sensitivity of PET imaging. Trial registration Netherlands Trial Register, NL5136, registered on 18 August 2015; EudraCT, 2015-001234-22, registered on 10 March 2015, https://eudract.ema.europa.eu/
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tessel M Boertien
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Jan Booij
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Charles B L M Majoie
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Madeleine L Drent
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Endocrinology, Amsterdam UMC, VU University, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Alberto M Pereira
- Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, and Center for Endocrine Tumors Leiden (CETL), Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Nienke R Biermasz
- Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, and Center for Endocrine Tumors Leiden (CETL), Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Suat Simsek
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Endocrinology, Amsterdam UMC, VU University, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Internal Medicine, Northwest Clinics, Alkmaar, the Netherlands
| | | | - Marcel P M Stokkel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Peter H Bisschop
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Eric Fliers
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy. Clin Nucl Med 2020. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-39457-8_32] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|
32
|
Long-acting octreotide treatment has no impact on tumor uptake of 99mTc-HYNIC-TOC in patients with neuroendocrine tumors. Nucl Med Commun 2019; 40:1005-1010. [DOI: 10.1097/mnm.0000000000001075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
33
|
Biodistribution and first clinical results of 18F-SiFAlin-TATE PET: a novel 18F-labeled somatostatin analog for imaging of neuroendocrine tumors. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2019; 47:870-880. [DOI: 10.1007/s00259-019-04501-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2019] [Accepted: 08/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
|
34
|
Pignata SA, Ferrantelli A, Baldari S. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy plus somatostatin analogues for a neuroendocrine tumour combined and maintenance treatment. Clin Transl Imaging 2019. [DOI: 10.1007/s40336-019-00342-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
|
35
|
Leisser A, Lukic K, Nejabat M, Wadsak W, Mitterhauser M, Mayerhöfer M, Karnaikas G, Raderer M, Hacker M, Haug A. Sex-differences in [68Ga]Ga-DOTANOC biodistribution. Nucl Med Biol 2019; 76-77:15-20. [DOI: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2019.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2019] [Revised: 08/21/2019] [Accepted: 08/22/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
|
36
|
Taïeb D, Hicks RJ, Hindié E, Guillet BA, Avram A, Ghedini P, Timmers HJ, Scott AT, Elojeimy S, Rubello D, Virgolini IJ, Fanti S, Balogova S, Pandit-Taskar N, Pacak K. European Association of Nuclear Medicine Practice Guideline/Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Procedure Standard 2019 for radionuclide imaging of phaeochromocytoma and paraganglioma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2019; 46:2112-2137. [PMID: 31254038 PMCID: PMC7446938 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-019-04398-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 195] [Impact Index Per Article: 39.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2019] [Accepted: 06/10/2019] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Diverse radionuclide imaging techniques are available for the diagnosis, staging, and follow-up of phaeochromocytoma and paraganglioma (PPGL). Beyond their ability to detect and localise the disease, these imaging approaches variably characterise these tumours at the cellular and molecular levels and can guide therapy. Here we present updated guidelines jointly approved by the EANM and SNMMI for assisting nuclear medicine practitioners in not only the selection and performance of currently available single-photon emission computed tomography and positron emission tomography procedures, but also the interpretation and reporting of the results. METHODS Guidelines from related fields and relevant literature have been considered in consultation with leading experts involved in the management of PPGL. The provided information should be applied according to local laws and regulations as well as the availability of various radiopharmaceuticals. CONCLUSION Since the European Association of Nuclear Medicine 2012 guidelines, the excellent results obtained with gallium-68 (68Ga)-labelled somatostatin analogues (SSAs) in recent years have simplified the imaging approach for PPGL patients that can also be used for selecting patients for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy as a potential alternative or complement to the traditional theranostic approach with iodine-123 (123I)/iodine-131 (131I)-labelled meta-iodobenzylguanidine. Genomic characterisation of subgroups with differing risk of lesion development and subsequent metastatic spread is refining the use of molecular imaging in the personalised approach to hereditary PPGL patients for detection, staging, and follow-up surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Taïeb
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, La Timone University Hospital, CERIMED, Aix-Marseille University, 264 rue Saint-Pierre, 13005, Marseille Cedex 05, France.
| | - Rodney J Hicks
- Centre for Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Elif Hindié
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, Bordeaux University Hospitals, Pessac, France
| | - Benjamin A Guillet
- Department of Radiopharmacy, La Timone University Hospital, CERIMED, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France
| | - Anca Avram
- Nuclear Medicine/Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Pietro Ghedini
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Medicina Nucleare Metropolitana, University Hospital S.Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy
| | - Henri J Timmers
- Department of Endocrinology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Saeed Elojeimy
- Department of Radiology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Domenico Rubello
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Radiology, Neuroradiology, Medical Physics, Clinical Laboratory, Microbiology, Pathology, Transfusional Medicine, Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Rovigo, Italy
| | - Irène J Virgolini
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Stefano Fanti
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Medicina Nucleare Metropolitana, University Hospital S.Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy
| | - Sona Balogova
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Comenius University and St. Elisabeth Oncology Institute, Heydukova 10, 81250, Bratislava, Slovakia
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hôpital Tenon Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris and Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Neeta Pandit-Taskar
- Department of Radiology, Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Karel Pacak
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institutes of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Gålne A, Almquist H, Almquist M, Hindorf C, Ohlsson T, Nordenström E, Sundlöv A, Trägårdh E. A Prospective Observational Study to Evaluate the Effects of Long-Acting Somatostatin Analogs on 68Ga-DOTATATE Uptake in Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors. J Nucl Med 2019; 60:1717-1723. [PMID: 31000584 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.119.226332] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2019] [Accepted: 04/10/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are often treated with somatostatin analogs (SSAs) for control of symptoms and tumor growth. Such therapy could theoretically lead to misinterpretation of somatostatin receptor imaging with 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT by interfering with tracer-receptor binding. Guidelines recommend an interval of 3-4 wk between the last dose and imaging. The aim of this study was to evaluate if long-acting (LA) SSA treatment changes the uptake of 68Ga-DOTATATE in patients with NETs. Methods: From 2013 to 2016, 296 patients with, or under evaluation for, NETs were included in this prospective observational study. The effect of LA SSA on tracer uptake was evaluated in 2 main patient populations: those undergoing 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT before starting LA SSA treatment and at least once afterward, and those receiving ongoing LA SSA therapy, in whom the effect of the interval between the last dose of LA SSA and the PET/CT exam was analyzed. A third, explorative, analysis was performed to evaluate if clinical disease progression, regression, or stable tumor status changed the uptake of 68Ga-DOTATATE. In the 3 analyses, measurements of SUVmax in normal liver and tumor lesions were compared. Results: The median SUVmax in normal liver was significantly higher before treatment (8.6; interquartile range, 7.4-10.2) than after treatment initiation (6.0; 4.7-8.0) (P < 0.001). No significant changes in SUVmax were seen in tumor lesions after treatment initiation. No significant differences in SUVmax were found in normal liver or tumor lesions dependent on the interval between last dose of LA SSA and PET/CT. Conclusion: Treatment with LA SSA does not change SUVmax in tumor lesions, whereas SUVmax in normal liver is significantly lower after treatment. The findings have implications for interpretation of 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT for response assessment after SSA therapy and for guidelines on discontinuation of treatment before PET/CT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anni Gålne
- Department of Medical Imaging and Physiology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund and Malmö, Sweden .,Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Helen Almquist
- Department of Medical Imaging and Physiology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund and Malmö, Sweden
| | - Martin Almquist
- Department of Surgery, Institution for Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.,Department of Surgery, Endocrine-Sarcoma Unit, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Cecilia Hindorf
- Department of Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Tomas Ohlsson
- Department of Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Erik Nordenström
- Department of Surgery, Institution for Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.,Department of Surgery, Endocrine-Sarcoma Unit, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Anna Sundlöv
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, Institution for Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden; and.,Department of Oncology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Elin Trägårdh
- Department of Medical Imaging and Physiology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund and Malmö, Sweden.,Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|