Physiological 68Ga-RM2 uptake in patients with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer: an atlas of semi-quantitative measurements

Gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPR) as a novel biomarker and therapeutic target in prostate cancer

Aim: This comprehensive review aims to explore the potential applications of Gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPR) in the diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer. Additionally, the study investigates the role of GRPR in prognostic assessment for individuals afflicted with prostate cancer.Methods: The review encompasses a thorough examination of existing literature and research studies related to the upregulation of GRPR in various tumor types, with a specific focus on prostate. The review also evaluates the utility of GRPR as a molecular target in prostate cancer research, comparing its significance to the well-established Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA). The integration of radionuclide-targeted therapy with GRPR antagonists is explored as an innovative therapeutic approach for individuals with prostate cancer.Results: Research findings suggest that GRPR serves as a promising molecular target for visualizing low-grade prostate cancer. Furthermore, it is demonstrated to complement the detection of lesions that may be negative for PSMA. The integration of radionuclide-targeted therapy with GRPR antagonists presents a novel therapeutic paradigm, offering potential benefits for individuals undergoing treatment for prostate cancer.Conclusions: In conclusion, this review highlights the emerging role of GRPR in prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment. Moreover, the integration of radionuclide-targeted therapy with GRPR antagonists introduces an innovative therapeutic approach that holds promise for improving outcomes in individuals dealing with prostate cancer. The potential prognostic value of GRPR in assessing the disease's progression adds another dimension to its clinical significance in the realm of urology.

Prospective Comparison of 68Ga-NeoB and 68Ga-PSMA-R2 PET/MRI in Patients with Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) and gastrin-releasing peptide receptors are both overexpressed in prostate cancer (PC) but may provide complementary information.68Ga-PSMA-R2 and 68Ga-NeoB (DOTA-p-aminomethylaniline-diglycolic acid-DPhe-Gln-Trp-Ala-Val-Gly-His-NH-CH[CH2-CH(CH3)2]2) are novel PET radiopharmaceuticals that were developed for theranostic use. In this phase II imaging study, we assessed the feasibility, safety, and diagnostic performance of 68Ga-NeoB and 68Ga-PSMA-R2 PET/MRI for detection of biochemically recurrent PC. Methods: We prospectively enrolled 27 men with suspected biochemically recurrent PC after initial treatment but noncontributory conventional imaging results (negative or equivocal findings on MRI, CT, and/or bone scan). Participants underwent 68Ga-NeoB and 68Ga-PSMA-R2 PET/MRI within 2 wk in noncontrolled order. The SUVmax of putative PC lesions was measured and compared with a composite reference standard (histopathology, follow-up imaging, prostate-specific antigen change). The SUVmax and SUVmean of background organs were measured. Vital signs were recorded before injection of the radiopharmaceuticals and after the scans. Adverse events were recorded up to 72 h after each scan. Results: The prostate-specific antigen level at enrollment was 3.5 ± 3.9 ng/mL (range, 0.3-13.5 ng/mL). 68Ga-NeoB PET/MRI detected 31 lesions in 18 patients (66.7%), whereas 68Ga-PSMA-R2 identified 20 lesions in 15 participants (55.6%). 68Ga-NeoB PET/MRI showed higher sensitivity (85.7% vs. 71.4%), accuracy (88.9% vs. 77.8%), and negative predictive value (66.7% vs. 50.0%) than 68Ga-PSMA-R2, whereas specificity and positive predictive value were equally high (100.0% for both). In 6 patients, 68Ga-NeoB PET/MRI identified 14 lesions that were false-negative on 68Ga-PSMA-R2 PET/MRI. The mean lesion SUVmax was 6.6 ± 3.2 (range, 2.9-13.2) for 68Ga-NeoB and 4.4 ± 1.5 (range, 2.6-8.8) for 68Ga-PSMA-R2 (P = 0.019). Overall lower uptake was noted in tumors and background organs for 68Ga-PSMA-R2. There were no significant changes in vital signs before and after the scans. No adverse events were reported in the 72-h period after scans. Conclusion: 68Ga-NeoB and 68Ga-PSMA-R2 are safe for diagnostic imaging. 68Ga-NeoB PET/MRI showed better diagnostic performance than 68Ga-PSMA-R2. 68Ga-PSMA-R2 showed overall lower uptake, equally in background organs and tumors, and might therefore not be an ideal theranostic compound. Further evaluation in larger cohorts is needed to confirm our preliminary data.

68Ga-RM2 PET-MRI versus MRI alone for evaluation of patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer: a single-centre, single-arm, phase 2/3 imaging trial

BACKGROUND

National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines include prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted PET for detection of biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer. However, targeting a single tumour characteristic might not be sufficient to reflect the full extent of disease. Gastrin releasing peptide receptors (GRPR) have been shown to be overexpressed in prostate cancer. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the GRPR-targeting radiopharmaceutical 68Ga-RM2 in patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer.

METHODS

This single-centre, single-arm, phase 2/3 trial was done at Stanford University (USA). Adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer, a Karnofsky performance status of 50 or higher, increasing prostate-specific antigen concentration 0·2 ng/mL or more after prostatectomy or 2 ng/mL or more above nadir after radiotherapy, and non-contributory conventional imaging (negative CT or MRI, and bone scan) were eligible. All participants underwent 68Ga-RM2 PET-MRI. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with PET-positive findings on 68Ga-RM2 PET-MRI compared with MRI alone after initial therapy, at a per-patient and per-lesion level. The primary outcome would be considered met if at least 30% of patients had one or more lesions detected by 68Ga-RM2 PET-MRI and the detection by 68Ga-RM2 PET-MRI was significantly greater than for MRI. Each PET scan was interpreted by three independent masked readers using a standardised evaluation criteria. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02624518, and is complete.

FINDINGS

Between Dec 12, 2015, and July 27, 2021, 209 men were screened for eligibility, of whom 100 were included in analyses. Median follow-up was 49·3 months (IQR 36·7-59·2). The primary endpoint was met; 68Ga-RM2 PET-MRI was positive in 69 (69%) patients and MRI alone was positive in 40 (40%) patients (p<0·0001). In the per-lesion analysis 68Ga-RM2 PET-MRI showed significantly higher detection rates than MRI alone (143 vs 96 lesions; p<0·0001). No grade 1 or worse events were reported.

INTERPRETATION

68Ga-RM2 PET-MRI showed better diagnostic performance than MRI alone in patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer. Further prospective comparative studies with PSMA-targeted PET are needed to gain a better understanding of GRPR and PSMA expression patterns in these patients.

FUNDING

The US Department of Defense.

Diagnostic accuracy of fully hybrid [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI and [68Ga]Ga-RM2 PET/MRI in patients with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer: a prospective single-center phase II clinical trial

PURPOSE

To compare the diagnostic accuracy and detection rates of PET/MRI with [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 and [68Ga]Ga-M2 in patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer (PCa).

METHODS

Sixty patients were enrolled in this prospective single-center phase II clinical trial from June 2020 to October 2022. Forty-four/60 completed all study examinations and were available at follow-up (median: 22.8 months, range: 6-31.5 months). Two nuclear medicine physicians analyzed PET images and two radiologists interpreted MRI; images were then re-examined to produce an integrated PET/MRI report for both [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 and [68Ga]Ga-RM2 examinations. A composite reference standard including histological specimens, response to treatment, and conventional imaging gathered during follow-up was used to validate imaging findings. Detection rates, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive value were assessed. McNemar's test was used to compare sensitivity and specificity on a per-patient base and detection rate on a per-region base. Prostate bed, locoregional lymph nodes, non-skeletal distant metastases, and bone metastases were considered. p-value significance was defined below the 0.05 level after correction for multiple testing.

RESULTS

Patients' median age was 69.8 years (interquartile range (IQR): 61.8-75.1) and median PSA level at time of imaging was 0.53 ng/mL (IQR: 0.33-2.04). During follow-up, evidence of recurrence was observed in 31/44 patients. Combining MRI with [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET and [68Ga]Ga-RM2 PET resulted in sensitivity = 100% and 93.5% and specificity of 69.2% and 69.2%, respectively. When considering the individual imaging modalities, [68Ga]Ga-RM2 PET showed lower sensitivity compared to [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET and MRI (61.3% vs 83.9% and 87.1%, p = 0.046 and 0.043, respectively), while specificity was comparable among the imaging modalities (100% vs 84.6% and 69.2%, p = 0.479 and 0.134, respectively).

CONCLUSION

This study brings further evidence on the utility of fully hybrid PET/MRI for disease characterization in patients with biochemically recurrent PCa. Imaging with [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET showed high sensitivity, while the utility of [68Ga]Ga-RM2 PET in absence of a simultaneous whole-body/multiparametric MRI remains to be determined.

Future Imaging of Prostate Cancer: Do We Need More Than PSMA PET/CT?

In the setting of prostate cancer (PCa), many different imaging modalities are available to correctly assess staging, restaging, treatment response and radio-ligand therapy recruitment. The introduction of fluoride or gallium-labelled prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) made a revolution in PCa management, also due to its possible theragnostic use. Nowadays PSMA-PET/CT is a fundamental tool for staging and restaging PCa. This review discusses the latest findings in PSMA imaging in PCa patients and the impact of PSMA imaging on the patients' management in primary staging, biochemical recurrence and in advanced prostate cancer, always keeping in mind the important theragnostic role of PSMA. This review tries also to assess the current role of other radiopharmaceuticals as Choline, FACBC or other radiotracers like gastrin-releasing peptide receptor targeting tracers and FAPI in different PCa settings.

Modified PROMISE criteria for standardized interpretation of gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPR)-targeted PET

PURPOSE

There are image interpretation criteria to standardize reporting prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted positron emission tomography (PET). As up to 10% of prostate cancer (PC) do not express PSMA, other targets such as gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPR) are evaluated. Research on GRPR-targeted imaging has been slowly increasing in usage at staging and biochemical recurrence (BCR) of PC. We therefore propose a modification of the Prostate Cancer Molecular Imaging Standardized Evaluation (PROMISE) criteria (mPROMISE) for GRPR-targeted PET.

METHODS

[68 Ga]Ga-RM2 PET data from initially prospective studies performed at our institution were retrospectively reviewed: 44 patients were imaged for staging and 100 patients for BCR PC. Two nuclear medicine physicians independently evaluated PET according to the mPROMISE criteria. A third expert reader served as standard reference. Interreader reliability was computed for GRPR expression, prostate bed (T), lymph node (N), skeleton (Mb), organ (Mc) metastases, and final judgment of the scan.

RESULTS

The interrater reliability for GRPR PET at staging was moderate for GRPR expression (0.59; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.40, 0.78), substantial for T-stage (0.78; 95% CI 0.63, 0.94), and almost perfect for N-stage (0.97; 95% CI 0.92, 1.00) and final judgment (0.92; 95% CI 0.82, 1.00). The interreader agreement at BCR showed substantial agreement for GRPR expression (0.70; 95% CI 0.59, 0.81) and final judgment (0.65; 95% CI 0.53, 0.78), while almost perfect agreement was seen across the major categories (T, N, Mb, Mc). Acceptable performance of the mPROMISE criteria was found for all subsets when compared to the standard reference.

CONCLUSION

Interpreting GRPR-targeted PET using the mPROMISE criteria showed its reliability with substantial or almost perfect interrater agreement across all major categories. The proposed modification of the PROMISE criteria will aid clinicians in decreasing the level of uncertainty, and clinical trials to achieve uniform evaluation, reporting, and comparability of GRPR-targeted PET.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT03113617 and NCT02624518.

Novel GRPR-Targeting Peptide for Pancreatic Cancer Molecular Imaging in Orthotopic and Liver Metastasis Mouse Models

Despite advancements in pancreatic cancer treatment, it remains one of the most lethal malignancies with extremely poor diagnosis and prognosis. Herein, we demonstrated the efficiency of a novel peptide GB-6 labeled with a near-infrared (NIR) fluorescent dye 3H-indolium, 2-[2-[2-[(2-carboxyethyl)thio]-3-[2-[1,3-dihydro-3,3-dimethyl-5-sulfo-1-(3-sulfopropyl)-2H-indol-2-ylidene]ethylidene]-1-cyclohexen-1-yl]ethenyl]-3,3-dimethyl-5-sulfo-1-(3-sulfopropyl)-, inner salt (MPA) and radionuclide technetium-99m (99mTc) as targeting probes using the gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPR) that is overexpressed in pancreatic cancer as the target. A short linear peptide with excellent in vivo stability was identified, and its radiotracer [99mTc]Tc-HYNIC-PEG4-GB-6 and the NIR probe MPA-PEG4-GB-6 exhibited selective and specific uptake by tumors in an SW1990 pancreatic cancer xenograft mouse model. The favorable biodistribution of the tracer [99mTc]Tc-HYNIC-PEG4-GB-6 in vivo afforded tumor-specific accumulation with high tumor-to-muscle and -bone contrasts and renal body clearance at 1 h after injection. The biodistribution analysis revealed that the tumor-to-pancreas and -intestine fluorescence signal ratios were 5.2 ± 0.3 and 6.3 ± 1.5, respectively, in the SW1990 subcutaneous xenograft model. Furthermore, the high signal accumulation in the orthotopic pancreatic and liver metastasis tumor models with tumor-to-pancreas and -liver fluorescence signal ratios of 7.66 ± 0.48 and 3.94 ± 0.47, respectively, enabled clear tumor visualization for intraoperative navigation. The rapid tumor targeting, precise tumor boundary delineation, chemical versatility, and high potency of the novel GB-6 peptide established it as a high-contrast imaging probe for the clinical detection of GRPR, with compelling additional potential in molecular-targeted therapy.

Preliminary Findings of the Role of FAPi in Prostate Cancer Theranostics

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most frequently diagnosed cancer worldwide and the second most common cause of cancer-related deaths among men. Progress in molecular imaging has magnified its clinical management; however, an unmet clinical need involves the identification of new imaging biomarkers that complement the gold standard of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) in cases of clinically significant PCa that do not express PSMA. Fibroblast activation protein (FAP) is a type II transmembrane serine overexpressed in many solid cancers that can be imaged through quinoline-based PET tracers derived from an FAP inhibitor (FAPi). Preliminary results of FAPi application in PCa (in PSMA-negative lesions, and in comparison with fluorodeoxyglucose—FDG) are now available in the literature. FAP-targeting ligands for PCa are not limited to detection, but could also include therapeutic applications. In this preliminary review, we provide an overview of the clinical applications of FAPi ligands in PCa, summarising the main results and highlighting contemporary strengths and limitations.

Correlation of 68Ga-RM2 PET with Postsurgery Histopathology Findings in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Intermediate- or High-Risk Prostate Cancer

⁶⁸Ga-RM2 targets gastrin-releasing peptide receptors (GRPRs), which are overexpressed in prostate cancer (PC). Here, we compared preoperative ⁶⁸Ga-RM2 PET to postsurgery histopathology in patients with newly diagnosed intermediate- or high-risk PC. Methods: Forty-one men, 64.0 ± 6.7 y old, were prospectively enrolled. PET images were acquired 42-72 min (median ± SD, 52.5 ± 6.5 min) after injection of 118.4-247.9 MBq (median ± SD, 138.0 ± 22.2 MBq) of ⁶⁸Ga-RM2. PET findings were compared with preoperative multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) (n = 36) and ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA11 PET (n = 17) and correlated to postprostatectomy whole-mount histopathology (n = 32) and time to biochemical recurrence. Nine participants decided to undergo radiation therapy after study enrollment. Results: All participants had intermediate- (n = 17) or high-risk (n = 24) PC and were scheduled for prostatectomy. Prostate-specific antigen was 8.8 ± 77.4 (range, 2.5-504) and 7.6 ± 5.3 ng/mL (range, 2.5-28.0 ng/mL) when participants who ultimately underwent radiation treatment were excluded. Preoperative ⁶⁸Ga-RM2 PET identified 70 intraprostatic foci of uptake in 40 of 41 patients. Postprostatectomy histopathology was available in 32 patients in which ⁶⁸Ga-RM2 PET identified 50 of 54 intraprostatic lesions (detection rate = 93%). ⁶⁸Ga-RM2 uptake was recorded in 19 nonenlarged pelvic lymph nodes in 6 patients. Pathology confirmed lymph node metastases in 16 lesions, and follow-up imaging confirmed nodal metastases in 2 lesions. ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA11 and ⁶⁸Ga-RM2 PET identified 27 and 26 intraprostatic lesions, respectively, and 5 pelvic lymph nodes each in 17 patients. Concordance between ⁶⁸Ga-RM2 and ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA11 PET was found in 18 prostatic lesions in 11 patients and 4 lymph nodes in 2 patients. Noncongruent findings were observed in 6 patients (intraprostatic lesions in 4 patients and nodal lesions in 2 patients). Sensitivity and accuracy rates for ⁶⁸Ga-RM2 and ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA11 (98% and 89% for ⁶⁸Ga-RM2 and 95% and 89% for ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA11) were higher than those for mpMRI (77% and 77%, respectively). Specificity was highest for mpMRI with 75% followed by ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA11 (67%) and ⁶⁸Ga-RM2 (65%). Conclusion: ⁶⁸Ga-RM2 PET accurately detects intermediate- and high-risk primary PC, with a detection rate of 93%. In addition, ⁶⁸Ga-RM2 PET showed significantly higher specificity and accuracy than mpMRI and a performance similar to ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA11 PET. These findings need to be confirmed in larger studies to identify which patients will benefit from one or the other or both radiopharmaceuticals.

Prostate Cancer Biochemical Recurrence Resulted Negative on [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 but Positive on [18F]Fluoromethylcholine PET/CT

For prostate cancer (PCa) biochemical recurrence (BCR), the primarily suggested imaging technique by the European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines is prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computer tomography (PET/CT). Indeed, the increased detection rate of PSMA PET/CT for early BCR has led to a fast and wide acceptance of this novel technology. However, PCa is a very heterogeneous disease, not always easily assessable with the highly specific PSMA PET with around 10% of cases occuring without PSMA expression. In this paper, we present the case of a patient with PCa BCR that resulted negative on [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT, but positive on [¹⁸F]Fluoromethylcholine (Choline) PET/CT.

PET Imaging Using Gallium-68 (68Ga) RM2

Molecular imaging is advancing rapidly with promising new molecular targets emerging for theragnostic, ie, imaging and treatment with the same compound, to provide targeted, personalized medicine. Gastrin-releasing peptide receptors (GRPR) are overexpressed in prostate cancer. Gallium-68 (68Ga) RM2 is a GRPR antagonist and shows high sensitivity and specificity for the detection of primary prostate cancer and recurrent disease. However, compared with the widely used 68Ga-PSMA11 and 18F-DCFPyL, a discordance in uptake pattern is seen reflecting the heterogeneity in tumor biology of prostate cancer. In this review, we present the background, current status, and future perspectives of PET imaging using 68Ga-RM2.

Radiomics and artificial intelligence in prostate cancer: new tools for molecular hybrid imaging and theragnostics

In prostate cancer (PCa), the use of new radiopharmaceuticals has improved the accuracy of diagnosis and staging, refined surveillance strategies, and introduced specific and personalized radioreceptor therapies. Nuclear medicine, therefore, holds great promise for improving the quality of life of PCa patients, through managing and processing a vast amount of molecular imaging data and beyond, using a multi-omics approach and improving patients’ risk-stratification for tailored medicine. Artificial intelligence (AI) and radiomics may allow clinicians to improve the overall efficiency and accuracy of using these “big data” in both the diagnostic and theragnostic field: from technical aspects (such as semi-automatization of tumor segmentation, image reconstruction, and interpretation) to clinical outcomes, improving a deeper understanding of the molecular environment of PCa, refining personalized treatment strategies, and increasing the ability to predict the outcome. This systematic review aims to describe the current literature on AI and radiomics applied to molecular imaging of prostate cancer.

GRPr Theranostics: Current Status of Imaging and Therapy using GRPr Targeting Radiopharmaceuticals

Addressing molecular targets, that are overexpressed by various tumor entities, using radiolabeled molecules for a combined diagnostic and therapeutic (theranostic) approach is of increasing interest in oncology. The gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPr), which is part of the bombesin family, has shown to be overexpressed in a variety of tumors, therefore, serving as a promising target for those theranostic applications. A large amount of differently radiolabeled bombesin derivatives addressing the GRPr have been evaluated in the preclinical as well as clinical setting showing fast blood clearance and urinary excretion with selective GRPr-binding. Most of the available studies on GRPr-targeted imaging and therapy have evaluated the theranostic approach in prostate and breast cancer applying bombesin derivatives tagged with the predominantly used theranostic pair of ⁶⁸Ga/¹⁷⁷Lu which is the focus of this review.

Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of novel 1, 3, 4-oxadiazole PD176252 analogues as potential GRPR inhibitors

Background:

GRPR is over-expressed in cancer cells and is a potential drug target for the treatment of cancer. PD176252, as the most representative non-peptide inhibitor of GRPR, can inhibit the growth of cancer cells, but its low selectivity to cancer cells and normal cells limits its further application.

Objective:

The aim of this study was to design and synthesize novel GRPR inhibitor with stronger anti-cancer activity and higher affinity with GRPR than the lead compound PD176252.

Methods:

A series of 1, 3, 4-oxadiazole derivatives as PD176252 analogues (4a-4j, 6a-6q) were synthesized and investigated their cytotoxic activity on four cancer lines with high expression of GRPR (gastric (HGC-27), colon (HCT-116), prostate (PC-3), and lung (A549)) and one human cell line (gastric mucosal epithelial (GES-1)) by MTT assay. Flow cytometry analysis and Western Blot were used to determine whether the compound induced programmed apoptosis of cancer cells. Competitive binding experiment was used to verify the affinity between GRPR and the optimal compound.

Results:

Compound 6m exhibited significant growth inhibition on all tested cancer cell lines, especially gastric cancer cells (HGC-27 cellular IC50 0.37±0.04μM). Also, the selectivity of 6m to HGC-27 was much higher than that of PD176252. Flow cytometric analysis and Western Blot proved that 6m significantly promoted the apoptosis of HGC-27 cells. Moreover, competitive binding experiment confirmed the close binding of 6m with GRPR, which indicated 6m with a higher affinity than lead compound PD176252.

Conclusion:

Our results suggested that 6m, as a novel GRPR inhibitor, had a higher affinity with GRPR and potential anti-cancer effect than PD176252, which can be used as a template for further optimization.

68Ga-PSMA and 68Ga-DOTA-RM2 PET/MRI in Recurrent Prostate Cancer: Diagnostic Performance and Association with Clinical and Histopathological Data

Simple Summary

Prostate cancer (PCa) relapse occurs in up to 50% of patients after radical treatment. Once PCa recurrence is detected, a precise identification of the number and sites of recurrence is necessary to tailor the treatment on the patient’s needs. Positron emission tomography (PET) plays a pivotal role in this clinical setting and new radiotracers have been developed to improve its performance. While ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA is a well-established radiotracer for PCa recurrence detection, ⁶⁸Ga-DOTA-RM2 is a recently proposed tracer that targets the gastrin-releasing peptide receptors that are overexpressed in prostate cancer. In this work, the performance of ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA and ⁶⁸Ga-DOTA-RM2 PET/MRI in identifying recurrent disease were compared on the same cohort, using the same study protocol, as this is the only way to assess whether one outperforms the other and therefore should be preferred in clinical practice. Furthermore, the association between PET findings and clinical and histopathological characteristics was investigated to find potential biomarkers.

Abstract

The aim of the present study is to investigate and compare the performances of ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA and ⁶⁸Ga-DOTA-RM2 PET/MRI in identifying recurrent prostate cancer (PCa) after primary treatment and to explore the association of dual-tracer PET findings with clinical and histopathological characteristics. Thirty-five patients with biochemical relapse (BCR) of PCa underwent ⁶⁸Ga PSMA PET/MRI for restaging purpose, with 31/35 also undergoing ⁶⁸Ga-DOTA-RM2 PET/MRI scan within 16 days (mean: 3 days, range: 2–16 days). Qualitative and quantitative image analysis has been performed by comparing ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA and ⁶⁸Ga-DOTA-RM2 PET/MRI findings both on a patient and lesion basis. Clinical and instrumental follow-up was used to validate PET findings. Fisher’s exact test and Mann-Whitney U test were used to investigate the association between dual-tracer PET findings, clinical and histopathological data. p-value significance was defined below the 0.05 level. Patients’ mean age was 70 years (range: 49–84) and mean PSA at time of PET/MR scans was 1.88 ng/mL (range: 0.21–14.4). A higher detection rate was observed for ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA PET/MRI, with more lesions being detected compared to ⁶⁸Ga-DOTA-RM2 PET/MRI (26/35 patients, 95 lesions vs. 15/31 patients, 41 lesions; p = 0.016 and 0.002). ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA and ⁶⁸Ga-DOTA-RM2 PET/MRI findings were discordant in 11/31 patients; among these, 10 were ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA positive (9/10 confirmed as true positive and 1/10 as false positive by follow-up examination). Patients with higher levels of PSA and shorter PSA doubling time (DT) presented more lesions on ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA PET/MRI (p = 0.006 and 0.044), while no association was found between PET findings and Gleason score. ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA has a higher detection rate than ⁶⁸Ga-DOTA-RM2 in detecting PCa recurrence. The number of ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA PET positive lesions is associated with higher levels of PSA and shorter PSA DT, thus representing potential prognostic factors.

Non-conventional and Investigational PET Radiotracers for Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review

Breast cancer is one of the most common malignancies in women, with high morbidity and mortality rates. In breast cancer, the use of novel radiopharmaceuticals in nuclear medicine can improve the accuracy of diagnosis and staging, refine surveillance strategies and accuracy in choosing personalized treatment approaches, including radioligand therapy. Nuclear medicine thus shows great promise for improving the quality of life of breast cancer patients by allowing non-invasive assessment of the diverse and complex biological processes underlying the development of breast cancer and its evolution under therapy. This review aims to describe molecular probes currently in clinical use as well as those under investigation holding great promise for personalized medicine and precision oncology in breast cancer.

Reduced Acquisition Time per Bed Position for PET/MRI Using 68Ga-RM2 or 68Ga-PSMA-11 in Patients With Prostate Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis

BACKGROUND. Growing clinical adoption of PET/MRI for prostate cancer (PC) evaluation has increased interest in reducing PET/MRI scanning times. Reducing acquisition time per bed position below current times of at least 5 minutes would allow shorter examination lengths. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of different reduced PET acquisition times in patients with PC who underwent ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 or ⁶⁸Ga-RM2 PET/MRI using highly sensitive silicon photomultiplier-based PET detectors. METHODS. This study involved retrospective review of men with PC who underwent PET/MRI as part of one of two prospective trials. Fifty men (mean [± SD] age, 69.9 ± 6.8 years) who underwent ⁶⁸Ga-RM2 PET/MRI and 50 men (mean age, 66.6 ± 5.7 years) who underwent ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI were included. PET/MRI used a time-of-flight-enabled system with silicon photomultiplier-based detectors. The acquisition time was 4 minutes per bed position. PET data were reconstructed using acquisition times of 30 seconds, 1 minute, 2 minutes, 3 minutes, and 4 minutes. Three readers independently assessed image quality for each reconstruction using a 5-point Likert scale (with 1 denoting nondiagnostic and 5 indicating excellent quality). One reader measured SUV_max for up to six lesions per patient. Two readers independently assessed lesion conspicuity using a a 3-point Likert scale (with 1 indicating that lesions were not visualized and 3 denoting that they were definitely visualized). RESULTS. Mean image quality across readers at 30 seconds, 1 minutes, 2 minutes, 3 minutes, and 4 minutes was, for ⁶⁸Ga-RM2 PET/MRI, from 1.0 ± 0.2 to 1.7 ± 0.7, 2.0 ± 0.3 to 2.6 ± 0.8, 3.1 ± 0.5 to 3.9 ± 0.8, 4.6 ± 0.6 to 4.7 ± 0.6, and 4.8 ± 0.4 to 4.8 ± 0.5, respectively, and for ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI it was from 1.2 ± 0.4 to 1.8 ± 0.6, 2.2 ± 0.4 to 2.8 ± 0.7, 3.6 ± 0.6 to 4.1± 0.8, 4.8 ± 0.4 to 4.9 ± 0.4, and 4.9 ± 0.3 to 5.0 ± 0.2, respectively. The mean lesion SUV_max for ⁶⁸Ga-RM2 PET/MRI was 11.1 ± 12.4, 10.2 ± 11.7, 9.6 ± 11.3, 9.5 ± 11.6, and 9.4 ± 11.6, respectively, and for ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI it was 14.7 ± 8.2, 12.9 ± 7.4, 12.1 ± 7.8, 11.7 ± 7.9, and 11.6 ± 7.9, respectively. Mean lesion conspicuity (reader 1/reader 2) was, for ⁶⁸Ga-RM2 PET/MRI, 2.4 ± 0.5/2.7 ± 0.5, 2.9 ± 0.3/2.9 ± 0.3, 3.0 ± 0.0/3.0 ± 0.0, 3.0 ± 0.0/3.0 ± 0.0, and 3.0 ± 0.0/3.0 ± 0.0, respectively, and for ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI it was 2.6 ± 0.5/2.8 ± 0.4, 3.0 ± 0.2/2.9 ± 0.3, 3.0 ± 0.1/3.0 ± 0.2, 3.0 ± 0.0/3.0 ± 0.0, and 3.0 ± 0.0/3.0 ± 0.0, respectively. CONCLUSION. Our data support routine 3-minute acquisitions, which provided results very similar to those for 4-minute acquisitions. Two-minute acquisitions, although they lowered quality somewhat, provided acceptable performance and warrant consideration. CLINICAL IMPACT. When PC is evaluated using modern PET/MRI equipment, time per bed position may be reduced compared with historically used times. TRIAL REGISTRATION. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02624518 and NCT02678351.

Preliminary Results of an Ongoing Prospective Clinical Trial on the Use of 68Ga-PSMA and 68Ga-DOTA-RM2 PET/MRI in Staging of High-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients

The aim of the present study is to investigate the synergic role of ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA PET/MRI and ⁶⁸Ga-DOTA-RM2 PET/MRI in prostate cancer (PCa) staging. We present pilot data on twenty-two patients with biopsy-proven PCa that underwent ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA PET/MRI for staging purposes, with 19/22 also undergoing ⁶⁸Gaa-DOTA-RM2 PET/MRI. TNM classification based on image findings was performed and quantitative imaging parameters were collected for each scan. Furthermore, twelve patients underwent radical prostatectomy with the availability of histological data that were used as the gold standard to validate intraprostatic findings. A DICE score between regions of interest manually segmented on the primary tumour on ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA PET, ⁶⁸Ga-DOTA-RM2 PET and on T2 MRI was computed. All imaging modalities detected the primary PCa in 18/19 patients, with ⁶⁸Ga-DOTA-RM2 PET not detecting any lesion in 1/19 patients. In the remaining patients, ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA and MRI were concordant. Seven patients presented seminal vesicles involvement on MRI, with two of these being also detected by ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA, and ⁶⁸Ga-DOTA-RM2 PET being negative. Regarding extraprostatic disease, ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA PET, ⁶⁸Ga-DOTA-RM2 PET and MRI resulted positive in seven, four and five patients at lymph-nodal level, respectively, and at a bone level in three, zero and one patients, respectively. These preliminary results suggest the potential complementary role of ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA PET, ⁶⁸Ga-DOTA-RM2 PET and MRI in PCa characterization during the staging phase.

PSMA- and GRPR-Targeted PET: Results from 50 Patients with Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer

Novel radiopharmaceuticals for PET are being evaluated for the diagnosis of biochemical recurrence (BCR) of prostate cancer (PC). We compared the gastrin-releasing peptide receptor-targeting ⁶⁸Ga-RM2 with the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeting ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA11 and ¹⁸F-DCFPyL. Methods: Fifty patients underwent both ⁶⁸Ga-RM2 PET/MRI and ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA11 (n = 23) or ¹⁸F-DCFPyL (n = 27) PET/CT at an interval ranging from 1 to 60 d (mean ± SD, 15.8 ± 17.7 d). SUV_max was collected for all lesions. Results: ⁶⁸Ga-RM2 PET was positive in 35 and negative in 15 of the 50 patients. ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA11/¹⁸F-DCFPyL PET was positive in 37 and negative in 13 of the 50 patients. Both scans detected 70 lesions in 32 patients. Forty-three lesions in 18 patients were identified on only 1 scan: ⁶⁸Ga-RM2 detected 7 more lesions in 4 patients, whereas ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA11/¹⁸F-DCFPyL detected 36 more lesions in 13 patients. Conclusion: ⁶⁸Ga-RM2 remains a valuable radiopharmaceutical even when compared with the more widely used ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA11/¹⁸F-DCFPyL in the evaluation of BCR of PC. Larger studies are needed to verify that identifying patients for whom these 2 classes of radiopharmaceuticals are complementary may ultimately allow for personalized medicine.

New Frontiers in Molecular Imaging Using Peptide-Based Radiopharmaceuticals for Prostate Cancer

The high incidence of prostate cancer (PCa) increases the need for progress in its diagnosis, staging, and precise treatment. The overexpression of tumor-specific receptors for peptides in human cancer cells, such as gastrin-releasing peptide receptor, natriuretic peptide receptor, and somatostatin receptor, has indicated the ideal molecular basis for targeted imaging and therapy. Targeting these receptors using radiolabeled peptides and analogs have been an essential topic on the current forefront of PCa studies. Radiolabeled peptides have been used to target receptors for molecular imaging in human PCa with high affinity and specificity. The radiolabeled peptides enable optimal quick elimination from blood and normal tissues, producing high contrast for positron emission computed tomography and single-photon emission computed tomography imaging with high tumor-to-normal tissue uptake ratios. Owing to their successful application in visualization, peptide derivatives with therapeutic radionuclides for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy in PCa have been explored in recent years. These developments offer the promise of personalized, molecular medicine for individual patients. Hence, we review the preclinical and clinical literature in the past 20 years and focus on the newer developments of peptide-based radiopharmaceuticals for the imaging and therapy of PCa.

Effect of the versatile bifunctional chelator AAZTA5 on the radiometal labelling properties and the in vitro performance of a gastrin releasing peptide receptor antagonist

Background

Gastrin Releasing Peptide receptor (GRPr)-based radioligands have shown great promise for diagnostic imaging of GRPr-positive cancers, such as prostate and breast.

The present study aims at developing and evaluating a versatile GRPr-based probe for both PET/SPECT imaging as well as intraoperative and therapeutic applications. The influence of the versatile chelator AAZTA⁵ on the radiometal labelling properties and the in vitro performance of the generated radiotracers were thoroughly investigated.

The GRPr-based antagonist D-Phe-Gln-Trp-Ala-Val-Gly-His-Sta-Leu-NH₂ was functionalized with the chelator 6-[Bis (carboxymethyl)amino]-1,4-bis (carboyxmethyl)-6-methyl-1,4-diazepane (AAZTA⁵) through the spacer 4-amino-1-carboxymethyl-piperidine (Pip) to obtain AAZTA⁵-Pip-D-Phe-Gln-Trp-Ala-Val-Gly-His-Sta-Leu-NH₂ (LF1). LF1 was radiolabelled with gallium-68 (PET), indium-111 (SPECT, intraoperative applications) and lutetium-177 (therapy, SPECT). In vitro evaluation included stability studies, determination of lipophilicity, protein-binding studies, determination of K_d and B_max as well as internalization studies using the epithelial human prostate cancer cell line PC3. In vitro monotherapy as well as combination therapy studies were further performed to assess its applicability as a theranostic compound.

Results

LF1 was labelled with gallium-68, indium-111 and lutetium-177 within 5 min at room temperature (RT). The apparent molar activities (A_m) were ranging between 50 and 60 GBq/μmol for the ⁶⁸Ga-labelled LF1, 10–20 GBq/μmol for the ¹¹¹In- and ¹⁷⁷Lu-labelled LF1. The radiotracers were stable for a period of 4 h post labeling exhibiting a hydrophilic profile with an average of a LogD_octanol/PBS of − 3, while the bound activity to the human serum protein was approximately 10%. ^68/natGa-LF1, ^177/natLu-LF1 and ^111/natIn-LF1 exhibited high affinity for the PC3 cells, with K_d values of 16.3 ± 2.4 nM, 10.3 ± 2.73 nM and 5.2 ± 1.9 nM, respectively, and the required concentration of the radiotracers to saturate the receptors (B_max) was between 0.5 and 0.8 nM which corresponds to approximately 4 × 10⁵ receptors per cell. Low specific internalization rate was found in cell culture, while the total specific cell surface bound uptake always exceeded the internalized activity. In vitro therapy studies showed that inhibition of PC3 cells growth is somewhat more efficient when combination of ¹⁷⁷Lu-labelled LF1 with rapamycin is applied compared to ¹⁷⁷Lu-laballed LF1 alone.

Conclusion

Encouraged by these promising in vitro data, preclinical evaluation of the LF1 precursor are planned in tumour models in vivo.

Exploitation of CD133 for the Targeted Imaging of Lethal Prostate Cancer

PURPOSE

Aggressive variant prostate cancer (AVPC) is a nonandrogen receptor-driven form of disease that arises in men in whom standard-of-care therapies have failed. Therapeutic options for AVPC are limited, and the development of novel therapeutics is significantly hindered by the inability to accurately quantify patient response to therapy by imaging. Imaging modalities that accurately and sensitively detect the bone and visceral metastases associated with AVPC do not exist.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

This study investigated the transmembrane protein CD133 as a targetable cell surface antigen in AVPC. We evaluated the expression of CD133 by microarray and IHC analysis. The imaging potential of the CD133-targeted IgG (HA10 IgG) was evaluated in preclinical prostate cancer models using two different imaging modalities: near-infrared and PET imaging.

RESULTS

Evaluation of the patient data demonstrated that CD133 is overexpressed in a specific phenotype of AVPC that is androgen receptor indifferent and neuroendocrine differentiated. In addition, HA10 IgG was selective for CD133-expressing tumors in all preclinical imaging studies. PET imaging with [⁸⁹Zr]Zr-HA10 IgG revealed a mean %ID/g of 24.30 ± 3.19 in CD133-positive metastatic lesions as compared with 11.82 ± 0.57 in CD133-negative lesions after 72 hours (P = 0.0069). Ex vivo biodistribution showed similar trends as signals were increased by nearly 3-fold in CD133-positive tumors (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, this is the first study to define CD133 as a targetable marker of AVPC. Similarly, we have developed a novel imaging agent, which is selective for CD133-expressing tumors, resulting in a noninvasive PET imaging approach to more effectively detect and monitor AVPC.