α-Particle-induced DNA damage tracks in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of [223Ra]RaCl2-treated prostate cancer patients

DNA Damage and Repair in PBMCs after Internal Ex Vivo Irradiation with [223Ra]RaCl2 and [177Lu]LuCl3 Mixtures

The combination of high and low LET radionuclides has been tested in several patient studies to improve treatment response. Radionuclide mixtures can also be released in nuclear power plant accidents or nuclear bomb deployment. This study investigated the DNA damage response and DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) after internal exposure of blood samples of 10 healthy volunteers to either no radiation (baseline) or different radionuclide mixtures of the α- and β-emitters [223Ra]RaCl2 and [177Lu]LuCl3, i.e., 25 mGy/75 mGy, 50 mGy/50 mGy and 75 mGy/25 mGy, respectively. DSB foci and γ-H2AX α-track enumeration directly after 1 h of exposure or after 4 h or 24 h of repair revealed that radiation-induced foci (RIF) and α-track induction in 100 cells was similar for mixed α/β and pure internal α- or β-irradiation, as were the repair rates for all radiation qualities. In contrast, the fraction of unrepaired RIF (Qβ) in PBMCs after mixed α/β-irradiation (50% 223Ra & 50% 177Lu: Qβ = 0.23 ± 0.10) was significantly elevated relative to pure β-irradiation (50 mGy: Qβ, pure = 0.06 ± 0.02), with a similar trend being noted for all mixtures. This α-dose-dependent increase in persistent foci likely relates to the formation of complex DNA damage that remains difficult to repair.

Micellar solution of [223Ra]RaCl2: Reaching renal excretion, potent efficacy in osteoblastic osteosarcoma in PDX model, biochemistry alterations and pharmacokinetics

Despite the successful use of the radiopharmaceutical radium-223 dichloride ([223Ra]RaCl2) for targeted alpha therapy of castration-resistant prostate cancer patients with bone metastases, some short-term side effects, such as diarrhea and vomiting, have been documented, causing patient discomfort. Hence, we prepared a nanosized micellar solution of [223Ra]RaCl2 and evaluated its biodistribution, pharmacokinetics, and induced biochemical changes in healthy mice up to 96 h after intraperitoneal administration as an alternative to overcome the previous limitations. In addition, we evaluated the bone specificity of micellar [223Ra]RaCl2 in patient-derived xenografts in the osteosarcoma model. The biodistribution studies revealed the high bone-targeting properties of the micellar [223Ra]RaCl2. Interestingly, the liver uptake remained significantly low (%ID/g = 0.1-0.02) from 24 to 96 h after administration. In addition, the micellar [223Ra]RaCl2 exhibited a significantly higher uptake in left (%ID/g = 0.85-0.23) and right (%ID/g = 0.76-0.24) kidneys than in small (%ID/g = 0.43-0.06) and large intestines (%ID/g = 0.24-0.09) over time, suggesting its excretion pathway is primarily through the kidneys into the urine, in contrast to the non-micellar [223Ra]RaCl2. The micellar [223Ra]RaCl2 also had low distribution volume (0.055 ± 0.003 L) and longer elimination half-life (28 ± 12 days). This nanosystem was unable to change the enzymatic activities of alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, gamma GT, glucose, and liquiform lipase in the treated mice. Finally, microscopic examination of the animals' osteosarcoma tumors treated with micellar [223Ra]RaCl2 indicated regression of the tumor, with large areas of necrosis. In contrast, in the control group, we observed tumor cellularity and cell anaplasia, mitotic figures and formation of neoplastic extracellular bone matrix, which are typical features of osteosarcoma. Therefore, our findings demonstrated the efficiency and safety of nanosized micellar formulations to minimize the gastrointestinal excretion pathway of the clinical radiopharmaceutical [223Ra]RaCl2, in addition to promoting regression of the osteosarcoma. Further studies must be performed to assess dose-response outcomes and organ/tissue dosimetry for clinical translation.

A potential biomarker of radiosensitivity in metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer patients treated with combination external beam radiotherapy and radium-223

PURPOSE

The ADRRAD trial reported the safety and feasibility of the combination of external beam radiotherapy and radium-223 in the treatment of de novo bone metastatic prostate. This study aimed to determine if any biomarkers predictive of response to these treatments could be identified.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

30 patients with newly diagnosed bone metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer were recruited to the ADRRAD trial. Blood samples were taken pre-treatment, before cycles 2 to 6 of radium-223, and 8 weeks and 6 months after treatment. Mononuclear cells were isolated and DNA damage was assessed at all timepoints.

RESULTS

DNA damage was increased in all patients during treatment, with bigger increases in foci observed in patients who relapsed late compared to those who relapsed early. Increases in DNA damage during the radium-223 only cycles of treatment were specifically related to response in these patients. Analysis of hematology counts also showed bigger decreases in red blood cell and hemoglobin counts in patients who experienced later biochemical relapse.

CONCLUSIONS

While some patients responded to this combination treatment, others relapsed within one year of treatment initiation. This study identifies a biomarker based approach that may be useful in predicting which patients will respond to treatment, by monitoring both increases in DNA damage above baseline levels in circulating lymphocytes and decreases in red blood cell and hemoglobin counts during treatment.

DNA Damage by Radiopharmaceuticals and Mechanisms of Cellular Repair

DNA is an organic molecule that is highly vulnerable to chemical alterations and breaks caused by both internal and external factors. Cells possess complex and advanced mechanisms, including DNA repair, damage tolerance, cell cycle checkpoints, and cell death pathways, which together minimize the potentially harmful effects of DNA damage. However, in cancer cells, the normal DNA damage tolerance and response processes are disrupted or deregulated. This results in increased mutagenesis and genomic instability within the cancer cells, a known driver of cancer progression and therapeutic resistance. On the other hand, the inherent instability of the genome in rapidly dividing cancer cells can be exploited as a tool to kill by imposing DNA damage with radiopharmaceuticals. As the field of targeted radiopharmaceutical therapy (RPT) is rapidly growing in oncology, it is crucial to have a deep understanding of the impact of systemic radiation delivery by radiopharmaceuticals on the DNA of tumors and healthy tissues. The distribution and activation of DNA damage and repair pathways caused by RPT can be different based on the characteristics of the radioisotope and molecular target. Here we provide a comprehensive discussion of the biological effects of RPTs, with the main focus on the role of varying radioisotopes in inducing direct and indirect DNA damage and activating DNA repair pathways.

Radiation-induced double-strand breaks by internal ex vivo irradiation of lymphocytes: Validation of a Monte Carlo simulation model using GATE and Geant4-DNA

This study describes a method to validate a radiation transport model that quantifies the number of DNA double-strand breaks (DSB) produced in the lymphocyte nucleus by internal ex vivo irradiation of whole blood with the radionuclides 90Y, 99mTc, 123I, 131I, 177Lu, 223Ra, and 225Ac in a test vial using the GATE/Geant4 code at the macroscopic level and the Geant4-DNA code at the microscopic level.

METHODS

The simulation at the macroscopic level reproduces an 8 mL cylindrical water-equivalent medium contained in a vial that mimics the geometry for internal ex vivo blood irradiation. The lymphocytes were simulated as spheres of 3.75 µm radius randomly distributed, with a concentration of 125 spheres/mL. A phase-space actor was attached to each sphere to register all the entering particles. The simulation at the microscopic level for each radionuclide was performed using the Geant4-DNA tool kit, which includes the clustering example centered on a density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise (DBSCAN) algorithm. The irradiation source was constructed by generating a single phase space from the sum of all phase spaces. The lymphocyte nucleus was defined as a water sphere of a 3.1 µm radius. The absorbed dose coefficients for lymphocyte nuclei (dLymph) were calculated and compared with macroscopic whole blood absorbed dose coefficients (dBlood). The DBSCAN algorithm was used to calculate the number of DSBs. Lastly, the number of DSB∙cell-1∙mGy-1 (simulation) was compared with the number of radiation-induced foci per cell and absorbed dose (RIF∙cell-1∙mGy-1) provided by experimental data for gamma and beta emitting radionuclides. For alpha emitters, dLymph and the number of α-tracks∙100 cell-1∙mGy-1 and DBSs∙µm-1 were calculated using experiment-based thresholds for the α-track lengths and DBSs/track values. The results were compared with the results of an ex vivo study with 223Ra.

RESULTS

The dLymph values differed from the dBlood values by -1.0% (90Y), -5.2% (99mTc), -22.3% (123I), 0.35% (131I), 2.4% (177Lu), -5.6% (223Ra) and -6.1% (225Ac). The number of DSB∙cell-1∙mGy-1 for each radionuclide was 0.015 DSB∙cell-1∙mGy-1 (90Y), 0.012 DSB∙cell-1∙mGy-1 (99mTc), 0.014DSB∙cell-1∙mGy-1 (123I), 0.012 DSB∙cell-1∙mGy-1 (131I), and 0.016 DSB∙cell-1∙mGy-1 (177Lu). These values agree very well with experimental data. The number of α-tracks∙100 cells-1∙mGy-1 for 223Ra and 225Ac where 0.144 α-tracks∙100 cells-1∙mGy-1 and 0.151 α-tracks∙100 cells-1∙mGy-1, respectively. These values agree very well with experimental data. Moreover, the linear density of DSBs per micrometer α-track length were 11.13 ± 0.04 DSB/µm and 10.86 ± 0.06 DSB/µm for 223Ra and 225Ac, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This study describes a model to simulate the DNA DSB damage in lymphocyte nuclei validated by experimental data obtained from internal ex vivo blood irradiation with radionuclides frequently used in diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in nuclear medicine.

Biodosimetry, can it find its way to the nuclear medicine clinic?

Personalised dosimetry based on molecular imaging is a field that has grown exponentially in the last decade due to the increasing success of Radioligand Therapy (RLT). Despite advances in imaging-based 3D dose estimation, the administered dose of a therapeutic radiopharmaceutical for RLT is often non-personalised, with standardised dose regimens administered every 4-6 weeks. Biodosimetry markers, such as chromosomal aberrations, could be used alongside image-based dosimetry as a tool for individualised dose estimation to further understand normal tissue toxicity and refine the administered dose. In this review we give an overview of biodosimetry markers that are used for blood dose estimation, followed by an overview of their current results when applied in RLT patients. Finally, an in-depth discussion will provide a perspective on the potential for the use of biodosimetry in the nuclear medicine clinic.

GATE/Geant4-based dosimetry for ex vivo in solution irradiation of blood with radionuclides

To establish a dose-response relationship between radiation-induced DNA damage and the corresponding absorbed doses in blood irradiated with radionuclides in solution under ex vivo conditions, the absorbed dose coefficient for 1 ml for 1 h internal ex vivo irradiation of peripheral blood (d_Blood) must be determined. d_Blood is specific for each radionuclide, and it depends on the irradiation geometry. Therefore, the aim of this study is to use the Monte Carlo radiation transport code GATE/Geant4 to calculate the mean absorbed dose rates for ex vivo irradiation of blood with several radionuclides used in Nuclear Medicine.

METHODS

The Monte Carlo simulation reproduces the irradiation geometry of a blood sample of 7 ml mixed with 1 ml of a water equivalent radioactive solution in an 8 ml vial. The simulation was performed for ten different radionuclides: ¹⁸F, ⁶⁸Ga, ⁹⁰Y, ^99mTc, ¹²³I, ¹²⁴I, ¹³¹I, ¹⁷⁷Lu, ²²³Ra, and ²²⁵Ac. Two sets of simulations for each radionuclide were performed with 1x10⁹ histories. The first set was simulated with a mass density of 1.0525 g/cm³ of the blood plus water mixture. The second set of simulations was performed with a mass density of 1 g/cm³ for comparison with previous studies.

RESULTS

The values of d_Blood for ten radionuclides were calculated. The values range from 10.23 mGy∙ml∙MBq^-1 for ^99mTc to 15632.02 mGy∙ml∙MBq^-1 for ²²⁵Ac. The maximum relative change compared to previous studies was 13.0% for ¹²⁴I.

CONCLUSION

This study provides a comprehensive set of absorbed dose coefficients for 1 ml for 1 h internal ex vivo irradiation of peripheral blood in a special vial geometry and radionuclides typically used in Nuclear Medicine. Furthermore, the method proposed by this work can be easily adapted to a variety of internal irradiation conditions and serve as a reference for future studies.

Comparing absorbed doses and radiation risk of the α-emitting bone-seekers [223Ra]RaCl2 and [224Ra]RaCl2

[²²³Ra]RaCl₂ and [²²⁴Ra]RaCl₂ are bone seekers, emitting high LET, and short range (< 100 μm) alpha-particles. Both radionuclides show similar decay properties; the total alpha energies are comparable (²²³Ra: ≈28 MeV, ²²⁴Ra: ≈26 MeV). [²²⁴Ra]RaCl₂ has been used from the mid-1940s until 1990 for treating different bone and joint diseases with activities of up to approximately 50 MBq [²²⁴Ra]RaCl₂. In 2013 [²²³Ra]RaCl₂ obtained marketing authorization by the FDA and by the European Union for the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer with an activity to administer of 0.055 MBq per kg body weight for six cycles. For intravenous injections in humans a model calculation using the biokinetic model of ICRP67 shows a ratio of organ absorbed dose coefficients (²²⁴Ra:²²³Ra) between 0.37 (liver) and 0.97 except for the kidneys (2.27) and blood (1.57). For the red marrow as primary organ-at-risk, the ratio is 0.57. The differences are mainly caused be the differing half-lives of the decay products of both radium isotopes. Both radionuclides show comparable DNA damage patterns in peripheral blood mononuclear cells after internal ex-vivo irradiation. Data on the long-term radiation-associated side effects are only available for treatment with [²²⁴Ra]RaCl₂. Two epidemiological studies followed two patient groups treated with [²²⁴Ra]RaCl₂ for more than 25 years. One of them was the "Spiess study", a cohort of 899 juvenile patients who received several injections of [²²⁴Ra]RaCl₂ with a mean specific activity of 0.66 MBq/kg. Another patient group of ankylosing spondylitis patients was treated with 10 repeated intravenous injections of [²²⁴Ra]RaCl₂, 1 MBq each, 1 week apart. In total 1,471 of these patients were followed-up in the "Wick study". In both studies, an increased cancer mortality by leukemia and solid cancers was observed. Similar considerations on long-term effects likely apply to [²²³Ra]RaCl₂ as well since the biokinetics are similar and the absorbed doses in the same range. However, this increased risk will most likely not be observed due to the much shorter life expectancy of prostate cancer patients treated with [²²³Ra]RaCl₂.

Repair of α-particle-induced DNA damage in peripheral blood mononuclear cells after internal ex vivo irradiation with 223Ra

Purpose

As α-emitters for radiopharmaceutical therapies are administered systemically by intravenous injection, blood will be irradiated by α-particles that induce clustered DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). Here, we investigated the induction and repair of DSB damage in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) as a function of the absorbed dose to the blood following internal ex vivo irradiation with [²²³Ra]RaCl₂.

Methods

Blood samples of ten volunteers were irradiated by adding [²²³Ra]RaCl₂ solution with different activity concentrations resulting in absorbed doses to the blood of 3 mGy, 25 mGy, 50 mGy and 100 mGy. PBMCs were isolated, divided in three parts and either fixed directly (d-samples) or after 4 h or 24 h culture. After immunostaining, the induced γ-H2AX α-tracks were counted. The time-dependent decrease in α-track frequency was described with a model assuming a repair rate R and a fraction of non-repairable damage Q.

Results

For 25 mGy, 50 mGy and 100 mGy, the numbers of α-tracks were significantly increased compared to baseline at all time points. Compared to the corresponding d-samples, the α-track frequency decreased significantly after 4 h and after 24 h. The repair rates R were (0.24 ± 0.05) h⁻¹ for 25 mGy, (0.16 ± 0.04) h⁻¹ for 50 mGy and (0.13 ± 0.02) h⁻¹ for 100 mGy, suggesting faster repair at lower absorbed doses, while Q-values were similar.

Conclusion

The results obtained suggest that induction and repair of the DSB damage depend on the absorbed dose to the blood. Repair rates were similar to what has been observed for irradiation with low linear energy transfer.

Dose estimation after a mixed field exposure: Radium-223 and intensity modulated radiotherapy

INTRODUCTION

Radium-223 dichloride ([²²³Ra]RaCl₂), a radiopharmaceutical that delivers α-particles to regions of bone metastatic disease, has been proven to improve overall survival of men with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). mCRPC patients enrolled on the ADRRAD clinical trial are treated with a mixed field exposure comprising radium-223 (²²³Ra) and intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). While absorbed dose estimation is an important step in the characterisation of wider systemic radiation risks in nuclear medicine, uncertainties remain for novel radiopharmaceuticals such as ²²³Ra.

METHODS

24-Colour karyotyping was used to quantify the spectrum of chromosome aberrations in peripheral blood lymphocytes of ADRRAD patients at incremental times during their treatment. Dicentric equivalent frequencies were used in standard models for estimation of absorbed blood dose. To account for the mixed field nature of the treatment, existing models were used to determine the ratio of the component radiation types. Additionally, a new approach (M-FISH_LET), based on the ratio of cells containing damage consistent with high-LET exposure (complex chromosomal exchanges) and low-LET exposure (simple exchanges), was used as a pseudo ratio for ²²³Ra:IMRT dose.

RESULTS

Total IMRT estimated doses delivered to the blood after completion of mixed radiotherapy (after 37 IMRT fractions and two [²²³Ra]RaCl₂ injections) were in the range of 1.167 ± 0.092 and 2.148 ± 0.096 Gy (dose range across all models applied). By the last treatment cycle analysed in this study (four [²²³Ra]RaCl₂ injections), the total absorbed ²²³Ra dose to the blood was estimated to be between 0.024 ± 0.027 and 0.665 ± 0.080 Gy, depending on the model used. Differences between the models were observed, with the observed dose variance coming from inter-model as opposed to inter-patient differences. The M-FISH_LET model potentially overestimates the ²²³Ra absorbed blood dose by accounting for further PBL exposure in the vicinity of metastatic sites.

CONCLUSIONS

The models presented provide initial estimations of cumulative dose received during incremental IMRT fractions and [²²³Ra]RaCl₂ injections, which will enable improved understanding of the doses received by individual patients. While the M-FISH_LET method builds on a well-established technique for external exposures, further consideration is needed to evaluate this method and its use in assessing non-targeted exposure by ²²³Ra after its localization at bone metastatic sites.

Dosimetry for Radiopharmaceutical Therapy: The European Perspective

This review presents efforts in Europe over the last few years with respect to standardization of quantitative imaging and dosimetry and comprises the results of several European research projects on practices regarding radiopharmaceutical therapies (RPTs). Because the European Union has regulatory requirements concerning dosimetry in RPTs, the European Association of Nuclear Medicine released a position paper in 2021 on the use of dosimetry under these requirements. The importance of radiobiology for RPTs is elucidated in another position paper by the European Association of Nuclear Medicine. Furthermore, how dosimetry interacts with clinical requirements is described, with several clinical examples. In the future, more efforts need to be undertaken to increase teaching and standardization efforts and to incorporate radiobiology for further individualizing patient treatment, with the aim of improving the outcome and safety of RPTs.

EANM position paper on the role of radiobiology in nuclear medicine

With an increasing variety of radiopharmaceuticals for diagnostic or therapeutic nuclear medicine as valuable diagnostic or treatment option, radiobiology plays an important role in supporting optimizations. This comprises particularly safety and efficacy of radionuclide therapies, specifically tailored to each patient. As absorbed dose rates and absorbed dose distributions in space and time are very different between external irradiation and systemic radionuclide exposure, distinct radiation-induced biological responses are expected in nuclear medicine, which need to be explored. This calls for a dedicated nuclear medicine radiobiology. Radiobiology findings and absorbed dose measurements will enable an improved estimation and prediction of efficacy and adverse effects. Moreover, a better understanding on the fundamental biological mechanisms underlying tumor and normal tissue responses will help to identify predictive and prognostic biomarkers as well as biomarkers for treatment follow-up. In addition, radiobiology can form the basis for the development of radiosensitizing strategies and radioprotectant agents. Thus, EANM believes that, beyond in vitro and preclinical evaluations, radiobiology will bring important added value to clinical studies and to clinical teams. Therefore, EANM strongly supports active collaboration between radiochemists, radiopharmacists, radiobiologists, medical physicists, and physicians to foster research toward precision nuclear medicine.