Accuracy of acetabular cup placement in computer-assisted, minimally-invasive THR in a lateral decubitus position

Accuracy of Cup Placement Angle, Leg Lengthening, and Offset Measurement Using an AR-Based Portable Navigation System: Validation in Supine and Lateral Decubitus Positions for Total Hip Arthroplasty

Background and Objectives: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) requires accurate implant placement to ensure optimal outcomes. In this study, the AR Hip navigation system, an imageless portable navigation tool using augmented reality (AR), was evaluated for measuring radiographic inclination (RI), anteversion (RA), leg lengthening (LL), and offset (OS) changes in supine and lateral decubitus THA. Notably, this is the first report to assess the accuracy of LL and OS measurements using AR technology. Methods: We analyzed 48 hips from primary THA patients: 17 in the supine (S) group and 31 in the lateral (L) group. RI, RA, LL, and OS were measured intraoperatively using AR Hip and postoperatively using Zed Hip 3D software (Version 18.0.0.0). The absolute errors and outlier rates (≥5° for RI/RA and ≥5 mm for LL/OS) were compared between groups. Results: The mean intraoperative RI values with AR Hip were 40.1 ± 0.6° (S), 40.2 ± 1.2° (L), and 40.1 ± 1.0° (total), while the postoperative RI values with Zed Hip were 39.7 ± 2.9° (S), 39.5 ± 2.5° (L), and 39.6 ± 2.6° (total). The absolute errors were 1.8 ± 1.7° (total), with no significant group differences (p = 0.957). For RA, the errors were 2.0 ± 1.2° (total) (p = 0.771). The LL errors were 2.3 ± 2.2 mm (total) (p = 0.271), and the OS errors were 3.5 ± 2.8 mm (total) (p = 0.620). The outlier rates for RI were 11.8% (S) and 3.2% (L); for RA, 0% (S) and 3.2% (L); for LL, 29.4% (S) and 6.5% (L) with a significant difference (p = 0.031); and for OS, 23.5% (S) and 25.8% (L). No significant differences were observed for RI, RA, or OS. Conclusions: AR Hip provided accurate measurements of cup orientation, LL, and OS in both supine and lateral THA. Importantly, this study is the first to report the accuracy of LL and OS measurements using AR technology, demonstrating the potential of AR Hip for improving THA precision.

Techniques and Technologies for the Intraoperative Assessment of Component Positioning, Leg Lengths, and Offset in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review

Background

Many techniques and technologies exist for the intraoperative assessment of component positioning, leg lengths, and offset in total hip arthroplasty, but with limited comparative data. We conducted a systematic review of the available literature to evaluate the range of techniques and technologies for the intraoperative assessment of component position as well as leg lengths and offset in terms of accuracy, precision, surgical time, cost, and relationship to clinical outcomes.

Methods

A comprehensive search of the Embase and Medline databases from 1974 to 2023 was performed. We included controlled or comparative prospective clinical studies. Cochrane's risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials and Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies - of Interventions tools were used by 2 independent reviewers to evaluate each study for risk of bias. We conducted both qualitative and quantitative analyses of the studies included. However, a meta-analysis was deemed not to be feasible due to heterogeneity.

Results

Our review included 25 studies with 52 intraoperative techniques and technologies. Mechanical guides and computerized navigation were most frequently evaluated in the included studies. Computerized navigation systems consistently showed the greatest accuracy and precision across all measures, at the cost of longer mean operative time. In contrast, freehand techniques demonstrated the poorest accuracy and precision. Insufficient data were found to reach any meaningful conclusions in terms of differences in overall surgical cost or clinical outcomes.

Conclusions

Evidence shows that computerized navigation systems are most accurate and precise in positioning components during total hip arthroplasty. Further research is needed to determine their health and economic impact and whether the accuracy and precision of navigated techniques are justified in terms of clinical outcomes.

Improving Acetabular Component Positioning in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Cadaveric Study of an Inertial Navigation Tool and a Novel Registration Method

Background: Incorrect acetabular component positioning in total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been associated with poor outcomes. Computer-assisted hip arthroplasty increases accuracy and consistency of cup positioning compared to conventional methods. Traditional navigation units have been associated with problems such as bulkiness of equipment and reproducibility of anatomical landmarks, particularly in obese patients or the lateral position. Purpose: We sought to evaluate the accuracy of a novel miniature inertial measurement system, the Navbit Sprint navigation device (Navbit, Sydney, Australia), to navigate acetabular component positioning in both the supine and lateral decubitus positions. We also aimed to validate a new method of patient registration that does not require acquisition of anatomical landmarks for navigation. Methods: We performed THA in a cadaveric study in supine and lateral positions using Navbit navigation to record cup position and compared mean scores from 3 Navbit devices for each cup position on post-implantation CT scans. Results: A total of 11 cups (5 supine and 6 lateral) were available for comparison. A difference of 2.34° in the supine direct anterior approach when assessing acetabular version was deemed to be statistically but not clinically significant. There was no statistically significant difference between CT and navigation measurements of cup position in the lateral position. Conclusion: This cadaveric study suggests that a novel inertial-based navigation tool is accurate for cup positioning in THA in the supine and lateral positions. Furthermore, it validates a novel registration method that does not require the identification of anatomical landmarks.

Image-Less THA Cup Navigation in Clinical Routine Setup: Individual Adjustments, Accuracy, Precision, and Robustness

Background and Objectives: Even after the ‘death’ of Lewinnek’s safe zone, the orientation of the prosthetic cup in total hip arthroplasty is crucial for success. Accurate cup placement can be achieved with surgical navigation systems. The literature lacks study cohorts with large numbers of hips because postoperative computer tomography is required for the reproducible evaluation of the acetabular component position. To overcome this limitation, we used a validated software program, HipMatch, to accurately assess the cup orientation based on an anterior-posterior pelvic X-ray. The aim of this study were to (1) determine the intraoperative ‘individual adjustment’ of the cup positioning compared to the widely suggested target values of 40° of inclination and 15° of anteversion, and evaluate the (2) ‘accuracy’, (3) ‘precision’, and (4) robustness, regarding systematic errors, of an image-free navigation system in routine clinical use. Material and Methods: We performed a retrospective, accuracy study in a single surgeon case series of 367 navigated primary total hip arthroplasties (PiGalileoTM, Smith+Nephew) through an anterolateral approach performed between January 2011 and August 2018. The individual adjustments were defined as the differences between the target cup orientation (40° of inclination, 15° of anteversion) and the intraoperative registration with the navigation software. The accuracy was the difference between the intraoperative captured cup orientation and the actual postoperative cup orientation determined by HipMatch. The precision was analyzed by the standard deviation of the difference between the intraoperative registered and the actual cup orientation. The outliers were detected using the Tukey method. Results: Compared to the target value (40° inclination, 15° anteversion), the individual adjustments showed that the cups are impacted in higher inclination (mean 3.2° ± 1.6°, range, (−2)−18°) and higher anteversion (mean 5.0° ± 7.0°, range, (−15)−23°) (p < 0.001). The accuracy of the navigated cup placement was −1.7° ± 3.0°, ((−15)−11°) for inclination, and −4.9° ± 6.2° ((−28)−18°) for anteversion (p < 0.001). Precision of the system was higher for inclination (standard deviation SD 3.0°) compared to anteversion (SD 6.2°) (p < 0.001). We found no difference in the prevalence of outliers for inclination (1.9% (7 out of 367)) compared to anteversion (1.63% (6 out of 367), p = 0.78). The Bland-Altman analysis showed that the differences between the intraoperatively captured final position and the postoperatively determined actual position were spread evenly and randomly for inclination and anteversion. Conclusion: The evaluation of an image-less navigation system in this large study cohort provides accurate and reliable intraoperative feedback. The accuracy and the precision were inferior compared to CT-based navigation systems particularly regarding the anteversion. However the assessed values are certainly within a clinically acceptable range. This use of image-less navigation offers an additional tool to address challenging hip prothesis in the context of the hip−spine relationship to achieve adequate placement of the acetabular components with a minimum of outliers.

Imageless navigation for primary total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis study

BACKGROUND

There has been a growing interest in imageless navigation for primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). Its superiority over standard THA is debated. This meta-analysis compared surgical duration, implant positioning, Harris Hip Score and rate of dislocation of imageless navigation versus conventional THA.

METHODS

The present study was conducted according to the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. All the clinical trials comparing imageless navigation versus conventional for primary THA were accessed. In January 2022, the following databases were accessed: PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar and Embase. No time constraints were used for the search. The outcomes of interest were to compare cup inclination and anteversion, leg length discrepancy, surgical duration, Harris Hip Score and rate of dislocation of imageless navigation versus conventional THA.

RESULTS

Twenty-one studies (2706 procedures) were retrieved. Fifty-two percent of patients were women. There was between-group comparability at baseline in terms of age, body mass index (BMI), visual analogue scale, Harris Hip Score and leg length discrepancy (P > 0.1). Compared with conventional THA, the navigated group demonstrated slightly lower leg length discrepancy (P = 0.02) but longer duration of the surgical procedure (P < 0.0001). Cup anteversion (P = 0.6) and inclination (P = 0.5), Harris Hip Score (P = 0.1) and rate of dislocation (P = 0.98) were similar between the two interventions.

CONCLUSION

Imageless navigation may represent a viable option for THA.

The Anterior Lateral Decubitus Intermuscolar and the Postero-Lateral approaches in total hip arthroplasty: a comparative study

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Recently a modification of the DAA in lateral decubitus, called ALDI, has been proposed to obtain a better surgical exposure and to facilitate surgeons accustomed to the other hip approach. In this paper we report our early experience with the ALDI approach for total hip arthroplasty (THA) and to compare outcomes between ALDI and posterolateral approach (PLA) in a retrospective investigation.

METHODS

We have identified THA performed from September 2017 to January 2020. We collected patients demographic, clinical and radiographic data by our electronic hospital database. The ALDI group included 60 hips and the PLA group included 219 hips. These patients underwent to strict follow-up in the first 3 post-operative months.

RESULTS

Compared to the PLA, the ALDI approach showed clinical outcomes significantly higher in the first month of follow-up. The PLA group has a lower operative time and a greater mean hospital length of stay. No blood transfusions were administered in the ALDI group while the 1.4% of patients in the PLA group needed blood transfusion. Cup anteversion and inclination angles were significantly wider in the PLA group. THA dislocation occurred in seven patients of the PLA group. No femoral cutaneus nerve palsy was recorded in the ALDI group.

CONCLUSIONS

The ALDI approach can represent a quickly and safe solution for surgeons who are accustomed to the PLA who want to perform THA in DAA. Our preliminary experience is encouraging in terms of clinical and radiographic parameters although the operative time needs to be improved.

Novel Measure of Acetabular Cup Inclination and Anteversion During Total Hip Arthroplasty

PURPOSE

The purposes of the present research were to assess the accuracy and usability of the inertial navigation system (INS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The accuracy of the device navigation subsystem was assessed using benchtop testing. The usability was assessed through simulated use with surgeons. These results were compared to recent cadaveric results for the same system.

RESULTS

The navigation subsystem had an overall mean absolute error of 1.21° and a maximum absolute error across all devices of 4.79°. The device was found to be usable and to add an estimated 7 minutes to surgery time.

CONCLUSION

The INS uses a novel approach to provide the surgeon with accurate and fast acetabular cup inclination and anteversion angles during THA.

Comparison of the accuracies of computed tomography-based navigation and image-free navigation for acetabular cup insertion in total hip arthroplasty in the lateral decubitus position

Image-free navigation has been proven as reliable as that using computed tomography (CT) in positioning the acetabular cup in total hip arthroplasty (THA), but previous studies rarely included hip dysplasia cases. The purpose of the present study was to determine the accuracies of CT-based navigation and image-free navigation for acetabular cup insertion, including hip dysplasia cases. Sixty-three hips were studied, including 57 with hip dysplasia. The hips were divided into two groups based on the registration point of image-free navigation. In Group I, the ipsilateral anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS) and the L5 spinous process were registered in 31 hips. In Group II, bilateral ASIS points were registered in 32 hips. Final component orientation was measured from postoperative CT scans. The accuracy of cup orientation was compared between CT-based and image-free navigation. In Group I, the cup inclination was more accurate with CT-based navigation (1.9°) than with image-free navigation (4.4°, p=.009). Cup anteversion was also more accurate with CT-based navigation (2.9°) than with image-free navigation (7.1°, p<.001). In Group II, the accuracies of cup inclination and anteversion showed no differences between CT-based and image-free navigation. The accuracy of cup positioning was better with CT-based navigation than with image-free navigation when the ipsilateral ASIS and L5 spinous process were digitized. However, accuracy was similar when bilateral ASIS points were digitized.

Evaluating Alternate Registration Planes for Imageless, Computer-Assisted Navigation During Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Imageless computer navigation improves component placement accuracy in total hip arthroplasty (THA), but variations in the registration process are known to impact final accuracy measurements. We sought to evaluate the registration accuracy of an imageless navigation device during THA performed in the lateral decubitus position.

METHODS

A prospective, observational study of 94 patients undergoing a primary THA with imageless navigation assistance was conducted. Patient position was registered using 4 planes of reference: the patient's coronal plane (standard method), the long axis of the surgical table (longitudinal plane), the lumbosacral spine (lumbosacral plane), and the plane intersecting the greater trochanter and glenoid fossa (hip-shoulder plane). Navigation measurements of cup position for each plane were compared to measurements from postoperative radiographs.

RESULTS

Mean inclination from radiographs (41.5° ± 5.6°) did not differ significantly from inclination using the coronal plane (40.9° ± 3.9°, P = .39), the hip-shoulder plane (42.4° ± 4.7°, P = .26), or the longitudinal plane (41.2° ± 4.3°, P = .66). Inclination measured using the lumbosacral plane (45.8° ± 4.3°) differed significantly from radiographic measurements (P < .0001). Anteversion measured from radiographs (mean: 26.1° ± 5.4°) did not differ significantly from the hip-shoulder plane (26.6° ± 5.2°, P = .50). All other planes differed significantly from radiographs: coronal (22.6° ± 6.8°, P = .001), lumbosacral (32.5° ± 6.4°, P < .0001), and longitudinal (23.7° ± 5.2°, P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

Patient registration using any plane approximating the long axis of the body provided a frame of reference that accurately measured intraoperative cup position. Registration using a plane approximating the hip-shoulder axis, however, provided the most accurate and consistent measurement of acetabular component position.

Iliac Bone Corridors to Host the Transiliac Internal Fixator-An Experimental CT Based Analysis

Background: The transiliac internal fixator (TIFI) is a novel minimally invasive surgical procedure to stabilize posterior pelvic ring fractures. Two bone corridors with different lengths, widths, and angulations are suitable to host screws in the posterior iliac wing. While the length and the width have been described previously, the angulation has not been determined yet. Methods: We created a computer tomography-based 3D-model of 40 patients (20 women, 20 men). The possible bone corridors to host the ilium screws for the TIFIcc (cranio-caudal) and the TIFIdv (dorso-ventral) procedure were identified. After reaching the optimal position, the angles in relation to the sagittal and axial plane were measured. The anterior pelvic plane was chosen as the reference plane. Results: The mean angle of the TIFIcc screws related to the axial plane was 63.4° (±1.8°) and to the sagittal plane was 12.3° (±1.5°). The mean angle of the TIFIdv screws related to the axial plane was 16.1° (±1.2°) and to the sagittal plane was 20.1° (±2.0°). In each group, a high constancy was apparent irrespective of the age or physical dimension of the patient, although a significant gender-dependent difference was observed”. Conclusions: Due to a high inter-individual constancy in length, width, and angulation, bone corridors in the posterior iliac wing are reliable to host screws for posterior pelvic ring fixation irrespective of each individual patient’s anatomy.

Obesity does not influence acetabular component accuracy when using a 3D optical computer navigation system

INTRODUCTION

Improper cup positioning and leg length discrepancy (LLD) are two of the most common errors following total hip arthroplasty (THA) and are associated with potentially significant consequences. Obesity is associated with increased risk of mechanical complications, including dislocations, which may be secondary to cup malposition and failure to restore leg length and offset. 3D Optical Camera computerassisted navigation (CAN) system may reduce the risk of component malposition and LLD with real time intraoperative feedback. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the use of CAN influences acetabular component placement (CP) accuracy and leg length restoration in obese (body mass index(BMI)≥35kg/m 2 ) patients undergoing primary THA.

METHODS

A multi-center retrospective review was conducted identifying consecutive THA cases with BMI > 35kg/m 2 using CAN (Intellijoint Hip, Waterloo, CA) from 2015-2019. These patients were then matched with patients undergoing conventional THA (control) at a 1:1 ratio according to BMI, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, and gender. TraumaCad™ software (Brainlab, Chicago, IL) was used to measure cup anteversion, inclination, and change (Δ) in LLD between pre- and postoperative radiographic images. The safety target zones used as reference for precision analysis of CP were 15°-30° for anteversion and 30°-50° for inclination.

RESULTS

176 patients were included: 88 CAN and 88 control cases. CAN cases were found to have a lower ΔLLD than controls (3.53±2.12mm vs. 5.00±4.05mm; p=0.003). Additionally, more CAN cases fell within the target safe zone than controls (83% vs.60%, p=0.00083).

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that the use of a CAN system may be more precise in component placement, and useful in facilitating the successful restoration of preoperative leg length following THA than conventional methodology.

WITHDRAWN: Comparison of the accuracy between imageless navigation and manual freehand approaches for total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

This article has been withdrawn at the request of the author(s) and/or editor. The Publisher apologizes for any inconvenience this may cause. The full Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal can be found at https://www.elsevier.com/about/our-business/policies/article-withdrawal.

[Intraoperative assessment of pelvic tilt and cup position in total hip arthroplasty: the relevance of navigation and robotics]

The optimal 3D positioning of the prosthesis components is of great importance for the stability and function of a total hip endoprosthesis. Pelvic tilt has a particular influence on the position of the implant. In order to use intraoperatively the knowledge on pelvic kinematics gained through preoperative imaging procedures and movement analyses, "image-based" and "image-free" robotic and navigation procedures are available. With the "image-based" procedures, a 3D CT scan serves as the surgeon's basis for operative planning. The "image-free" procedures are based on the principles of stereotaxy. In the future, information about static and dynamic pelvic tilt will be conntected with navigation and robotic systems for total hip arthroplasty. Along with intraoperative data a patientindividual optimized implant position can be achieved.

A review of computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery systems

BACKGROUND

Computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery systems have great potential, but no review has focused on computer-assisted surgery systems for the spine, hip, and knee.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed in Web of Science and PubMed. We searched the literature on computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery systems from 2008 to the present and focused on three aspects of systems: training, planning, and intraoperative navigation.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

In this review study, we reviewed 34 surgical training systems, 31 surgical planning systems, and 41 surgical navigation systems. The functions and characteristics of the surgical systems were compared and analysed, and the current concerns about and the impact of the surgical systems on doctors and surgery were clarified.

CONCLUSION

Computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery systems are still in the development stage. Future surgical training systems should include synthetic models with patient anatomy. Surgical planning systems with automatic planning should be developed, and surgical navigation systems with multimodal fusion, robotic assistance and imaging should be developed.

3D Printed Patient-Specific Acetabular Jig for Cup Placement in Total Hip Arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

Acetabular cup placement is an important modifiable factor determining complication rates like aseptic loosening and hip dislocation related to faulty cup placement, which by standard method is largely dependent upon eyeballing and surgeon's judgment. We evaluated a self-designed, low-cost, patient-specific acetabular jig to guide cup placement in total hip arthroplasty in comparison to conventional technique.

METHODS

It was a prospective randomized control study. Thirty-six patients were categorized into group-A & group-B. In group-A, virtually designed acetabular jig was 3 Dimensional (3D) printed and used intra-operatively to guide cup placement. In group-B, the standard method of cup placement was used. Acetabular cup placement was evaluated on post-operative x-rays and compared between two groups.

RESULTS

In group-A, angle of anteversion were significantly in centre of range of safe zone as compared to group B in which hip is maximally stable with more precision in creating hip centre as compared to group-B without any significant(p = 0.325) increase in surgical time or blood loss.

CONCLUSION

Computed tomography (CT) scan based virtual pre-operative templating and cup placement guided by virtually designed, patient-specific acetabular jig is a low-cost tool with a short learning curve which can be designed and made available easily. It is a useful tool in decreasing chances of malpositioning of cup and recreates hip centre close to anatomical one especially in cases where anatomy has been distorted such as bony ankylosis and developmental dysplasia of hip.

Acetabular positioning is more consistent with the use of a novel miniature computer-assisted device

INTRODUCTION

Computer-assisted surgery (CAS) relying on registration of the anterior pelvic plane (APP) allows precise acetabular component placement. We determined the variability of cup placement in patients who underwent THA with and without the use of CAS that does not rely on the registration of APP.

METHODS

Fifty-one patients who underwent staged-bilateral THAs, one without CAS (control), and a subsequent one with CAS (study group), were included. Acetabular inclination and anteversion were measured on standardized post-operative radiographs. Variance in cup position and Lewinnek's zone proportionality were compared between the groups. Multiple regressions were performed to identify factors affecting variability in acetabular component placement.

RESULTS

The mean inclination for the control and study group was 42.7° (SD 4.5) and 42.5° (SD 2.9), respectively. The inclination variance was 20.5° and 8.2° respectively (p = < 0.001). Cup inclination was more consistent in the study than in the control group (deviation from the mean: 2.3° vs. 3.8°, p < 0.001). The mean anteversion for the control and the study group was 25.5° (SD 7.4) and 26.8° (SD 4.3), respectively. The anteversion variance was 54.2° and 18.2° respectively (p = <0.001). Consistency in cup anteversion was significantly improved with CAS (deviation from the mean: 3.4° vs. 5.8°; p = 0.002). Lewinnek's zone proportionality was not affected by the use of  CAS. In the linear regression analysis, CAS significantly increased consistency in cup inclination (p = 0.01). Patient's factors including BMI and laterality affected consistency of cup placement.

CONCLUSION

CAS without referencing the APP allows a more consistent orientation of the acetabular component when compared to freehand placement.

Portable Accelerometer-Based Navigation System for Cup Placement of Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study

BACKGROUND

Malposition of the acetabular component during total hip arthroplasty (THA) is associated with increased risk of dislocation, reduced range of motion, and accelerated wear. The purpose of this study is to compare cup positioning with a portable, accelerometer-based hip navigation system and conventional surgical technique.

METHODS

In a prospective, randomized, clinical study, cups were implanted with a portable, accelerometer-based hip navigation system (navigation group; n = 55) or conventional technique (conventional group; n = 55). THA was conducted in the lateral position and through posterior approach. The cup position was determined postoperatively on pelvic radiograph and computed tomography scans.

RESULTS

An average cup abduction of 39.2° ± 4.6° (range, 27° to 50°) and an average cup anteversion of 14.6° ± 6.1° (range, 1° to 27.5°) were found in the navigation group, and an average cup abduction of 42.9° ± 8.0° (range, 23° to 73°) and an average cup anteversion of 11.6° ± 7.7° (range, -12.1° to 25°) in the conventional group. A smaller variation in the navigation group was indicated for cup abduction (P = .001). The deviations from the target cup position were significantly lower in the navigation group (P = .001, .016). While only 37 of 55 cups in the conventional group were inside the Lewinnek safe zone, 51 of 55 cups in the navigation group were placed inside this safe zone (P = .006). The navigation procedure took a mean of 10 minutes longer than the conventional technique.

CONCLUSION

Use of the portable, accelerometer-based hip navigation system can improve cup positioning in THA.

Which one is more affected by navigation-assisted cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty: Anteversion or inclination? A retrospective matched-pair cohort study in Asian physique

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to compare acetabular cup positioning using an imageless navigation-assisted total hip arthroplasty (THA) to a case-matched control group using the conventional technique in Asian physique.

METHODS

Case matching controlled study using retrospectively collected data for THAs was done. Matching criteria were gender, age ± 5 years, and body mass index ± 5 kg/m². Thirty patients who had navigation THAs were manually matched to a conventional group of 30 patients. After measuring anteversion and inclination on 3-D CT, final cup anteversion was calculated using the mathematical formula (anteversion = arctan [tan (anatomic anteversion) × sin (inclination)]).

RESULTS

No significant difference was observed between mean inclination ( p = 0.420), anteversion ( p = 0.697), and the mean deviation from 15° for anteversion ( p = 0.649). However, there was a statistical significant difference for mean deviation from 40° for inclination ( p = 0.027). There was a significant difference in the percentage of correctly placed acetabular cup in safe zones with inclination ( p = 0.039).

CONCLUSIONS

Although soft tissue overlying the pubic tubercle interfered with registration of the bony landmark and thereby induced inaccuracy of anteversion angles in the navigation group, the use of imageless navigation-assisted technique increases the placement within the safe zone for inclination and enhances the accuracy and the precision of inclination of the acetabular cup relative to the conventional THA rather than anteversion. This finding may be due to the effect of the patient's physique on the anterior pelvic plane (APP)-based reference system of imageless navigation.

ALDI (Anterior Lateral Decubitus Intermuscular) approach to the hip: Comprehensive description of the surgical technique with operative video

The direct anterior approach to the hip is judged to be difficult and even after many solutions, such as special operating tables, have been proposed to perform it, in some reports the complication rate remains high. The complications reported are nerve lesions, dislocation, muscles damages, intraoperative fractures. We describe a modification of the anterior approach, undertaken keeping the patient in lateral decubitus, in order to gain a better range of leg movement and a significant reduction of the force applied to the retractors, the technique was named ALDI (anterior lateral decubitus intermuscular) approach. The surgeon starts behind the patient as in all the other traditional approaches, to maintain unchanged the acetabular view and the dexterity in cup implantation. For the femoral preparation, he moves in front of the patient to have a better visualization. In a series of 150 patients, with a mean operative time of 51.38minutes (range, 40-112), we had no intraoperative fractures, one (0.6%) lateral femoral cutaneous nerve temporary neurapraxia, one (0.8%) posttraumatic dislocation four years after the operation and, no revisions for aseptic loosening or infection. At the 5 years follow-up, the mean Oxford Hip score was 45.2 (range, 38-48; SD 2.6), the mean Harris Hip Score was 96,7 (range, 76-100; SD 2.8), and the mean UCLA score was 7 (range, 5-10; SD 1.4). The possibility to always obtain the optimal position of the surgical window with reduced tension on the muscles, and the unchanged initial surgeon position, could make the ALDI approach the ideal technique for the surgeons that decide to perform an anterior approach.

Minimal Increase in Total Hip Arthroplasty Surgical Procedural Time with the Use of a Novel Surgical Navigation Tool

Background

Computer-assisted navigation has proven effective at improving the accuracy of component placement during Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA); however, the material costs, line-of-site issues and potential for significant time increases have limited their widespread use.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of an imageless navigation device on surgical time, when compared with standard mechanical guides.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed prospectively collected data from 61 consecutive primary unilateral THA cases (posterior approach) performed by a single surgeon. Procedural time (incision to closure) for THA performed with (intervention) or without (control) a computer-assisted navigation system was compared. In the intervention group, the additional time associated with the use of the device was recorded. Mean times were compared using independent samples t-tests with statistical significance set a priori at p<0.05.

Results

There was no statistically significant difference between procedural time in the intervention and control groups (102.3±28.3 mins vs. 99.1±14.7 mins, p=0.60). The installation and use of the navigation device accounted for an average of 2.9 mins (SD: 1.6) per procedure, of which device-related setup performed prior to skin incision accounted for 1.1 mins (SD: 1.1) and intra-operative tasks accounted for 1.6 mins (SD: 1.2).

Conclusion

In this series of 61 consecutive THAs performed by a single surgeon, the set-up and hands-on utilization of a novel surgical navigation tool required an additional 2.9 minutes per case. We suggest that the intraoperative benefits of this novel computer-assisted navigation platform outweigh the minimal operative time spent using this technology.

Trigonometric Algorithm Defining the True Three-Dimensional Acetabular Cup Orientation: Correlation Between Measured and Calculated Cup Orientation Angles

BACKGROUND

Acetabular cup orientation plays a key role in implant stability and the success of total hip arthroplasty. To date, the orientation has been measured with different imaging modalities and definitions, leading to lack of consensus on optimal cup placement. A 3-dimensional (3D) concept involving a trigonometric description enables unambiguous definitions. Our objective was to test the validity and reliability of a 3D trigonometric description of cup orientation.

METHODS

Computed tomographic scans of the pelvis, performed for vascular assessment of 20 patients with 22 primary total hip replacements in situ, were systematically collected. On multiplanar reconstructions, 3 observers independently measured cup orientation retrospectively in terms of coronal inclination, sagittal tilt, and transverse version. The angles measured in 2 planes were used to calculate the angle in the third plane via a trigonometric algorithm. For correlation and reliability analyses, intraobserver and interobserver differences between measured and calculated angles were evaluated with use of the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

RESULTS

Measured and calculated angles had ICCs of 0.953 for coronal inclination, 0.985 for sagittal tilt, and 0.982 for transverse version. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability had ICCs of 0.987 and 0.987, respectively, for coronal inclination; 0.979 and 0.981, respectively, for sagittal tilt; and 0.992 and 0.978, respectively, for transverse version.

CONCLUSIONS

The 3D concept with its trigonometric algorithm is a valid and reliable tool for the measurement of cup orientation.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

By calculating the transverse version of cups from coronal inclination and sagittal tilt measurements, the trigonometric algorithm enables a 3D definition of cup orientation, regardless of the imaging modality used. In addition, it introduces sagittal tilt that, like pelvic tilt, rotates around the transverse axis.

Total hip arthroplasty after a previous pelvic osteotomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

There are several reports regarding total hip arthroplasty (THA) after a previous pelvic osteotomy (PO). However, to our knowledge, until now there has been no formal systematic review and meta-analysis published to summarize the clinical results of THA after a previous PO. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of results of THA after a previous PO. We focus on these questions as follows: does a previous PO affect the results of subsequent THA, such as clinical outcomes, operative time, operative blood loss, and radiological parameters.

METHODS

Using PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library, we searched for relevant original papers. The pooling of data was performed using RevMan software (version 5.3, Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, UK). A p-value<0.05 was judged as significant. Standardized mean differences (SMD) were calculated for continuous data with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was reported. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed based on I² using standard χ² test. When I²>50%, significant heterogeneity was assumed and a random-effects model was applied for the meta-analysis. A fixed-effects model was applied in the absence of significant heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Eleven studies were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled results indicated that there was no significant difference in postoperative Merle D'Aubigne-Postel score (I²=0%, SMD=-0.15, 95% CI: -0.36 to 0.06, p=0.17), postoperative Harris hip score (I²=60%, SMD=-0.23, 95% CI: -0.50 to 0.05, p=0.10), operative time (I²=86%, SMD=0.37, 95% CI: -0.09 to 0.82, p=0.11), operative blood loss (I²=82%, SMD=0.23, 95% CI: -0.17 to 0.63, p=0.25), and cup abduction angle (I²=43%, SMD=-0.08, 95% CI: -0.25 to 0.09, p=0.38) between THA with and without a previous PO. However, cup anteversion angle of THA with a previous PO was significantly smaller than that of without a previous PO (I²=77%, SMD=-0.63, 95% CI: -1.13 to -0.13, p=0.01).

CONCLUSION

Systematic review and meta-analysis of results of THA after a previous PO was performed. A previous PO did not affect the results of subsequent THA, except for cup anteversion. Because of the low quality evidence currently available, high-quality randomized controlled trials are required.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, meta-analysis of case-control studies.

A guideline for placement of an infra-acetabular screw based on anatomic landmarks via an intra-pelvic approach

BACKGROUND

Due to demographic changes, more and more fracture patterns involving anterior acetabular structures occur. The infra-acetabular screw is seen a useful tool to increase stability in fixation of the acetabular cup. However, the exact position of this screw in relation to anatomic landmarks which are intra-operatively palpable via an intra-pelvic approach has not yet been determined.

METHODS

This biomorphometric experimental study references the ideal screw position of an infra-acetabular screw to anatomic landmarks palpable via an intra-pelvic approach. Therefore, we created a computer tomography-based 3D-model of 40 patients (20 women, 20 men) who received a computer tomography (CT) scan of the pelvis for any other reason than an acetabular fracture.

RESULTS

The entry point of an ideal infra-acetabular was of high constancy. At mean, this point was 10.2 mm caudal and 10.4 mm medial of the ilio-pubic/ilio-pectineal eminence. This reference is independent of age, gender, or physical dimensions. However, we found gender-dependent differences for the angulation and the length of the screw.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides a comprehensive guideline to determine the ideal entry point for an infra-acetabular screw via an intra-pelvic approach. The entry point is located 10.2 mm caudal and 10.4 mm medial of the ilio-pubic/ilio-pectineal eminence.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical Trial Registry University of Regensburg Z-2017-0930-1 . Registered 04. Dec 2017.

Effect of improved navigation performance on the accuracy of implant placement in total hip arthroplasty with a CT-based navigation system

A computed tomography (CT)-based navigation system is one of the support tools to place implant with appropriate alignment and position in total hip arthroplasty (THA). To determine whether the higher performance of the navigation would further improve the accuracy of implant placement in the clinical setting, we retrospectively compared the navigation accuracy of two different versions of a navigation system. The newer version of the navigation system had an upgraded optical sensor with superior positional accuracy. Navigation accuracy, defined as differences between postoperative measurements on CT images and intraoperative records on the navigation system, of 49 THAs performed with the newer version of the navigation system was compared with that of 49 THAs performed with the older version. With the newer version, the mean absolute accuracy (95% limits of agreement) of implant alignment was 1.2° (± 3.3°) for cup inclination, 1.0° (± 2.4°) for cup anteversion, 2.0° (± 4.9°) for stem anteversion, and 1.1° (± 2.4°) for stem valgus angle. The accuracy of the implant position was 1.5 mm (± 3.1 mm), 1.3 mm (± 3.0 mm), and 1.5 mm (± 3.1 mm) for cup x-, y-, and z-axes, respectively, 1.6 mm (± 3.2 mm), 1.4 mm (± 2.9 mm), and 1.5 mm (± 2.7 mm) for stem x-, y-, and z-axes, respectively, and 2.4 mm (± 4.5 mm) for leg length discrepancy. The values for the newer version were significantly more accurate with less variation compared to those of the older version. With upgraded navigation performance, more accurate implant placement was demonstrated in the clinical setting.

Accuracy of Component Orientation and Leg Length Adjustment in Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Image-free Navigation

Purpose:

The purpose of this study was to examine the accuracy of implant orientation and leg length in total hip arthroplasty (THA) with an image-free navigation system based on a comparison of the intraoperative navigation and postoperative CT evaluations.

Material and Methods:

A consecutive series of 111 patients (118 hips) who underwent THA using the current version of the image-free navigation system constituted the basic study population. Subsequently, a total of 101 patients (108 hips) meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria were selected as study subjects for the analysis. THA was performed using an image-free navigation system that was capable of adjusting both the prosthetic position and leg length. Postoperative CT examination was performed for all study subjects, and the prosthetic position and leg length were measured on CT images using the image analysis software. Subsequently, the intraoperative navigation results and the corresponding values obtained from the postoperative CT measurements were compared to test the accuracy of the navigation system.

Results:

The average discrepancies between the intra- and postoperative assessments were 6.8°, 3.7°, and 5.7° for cup anteversion, cup inclination, and stem anteversion, respectively. The corresponding value in leg length averaged 4.1 mm.

Conclusion:

Average discrepancies between the intra- and postoperative measurements were less than 10° in all prosthetic alignment parameters and less than 5 mm in leg length. Intraoperative assessments with the use of the image-free navigation in THA could afford satisfactory result.

Improving registration accuracy during total hip arthroplasty: a cadaver study of a new, 3-D mini-optical navigation system

INTRODUCTION

Maintaining accuracy of component placement is an important step in ensuring the long-term stability of components during total hip arthroplasty (THA). Computer-assisted navigation has improved accuracy but errors associated with the registration process are known to impact the accuracy of final measurements. The purpose of this cadaver study was to determine the registration error associated with a novel mini-navigation system.

METHODS

3 board-certified orthopaedic surgeons performed 4 THA procedures each via the posterolateral approach on 6 cadavers (12 hips) using the mini-navigation tool. Pre- and post-operative radiographs and post-operative computed tomography (CT) images were obtained. Image analysis was performed by 2 radiologists not involved in the surgical procedures. During registration, surgeons aligned the alignment rod with the anterior pelvic plane (APP) to provide a reference plane for comparison with traditional navigation. Cup position from the device was compared with measurements gathered from post-op imaging.

RESULTS

The mean difference between CT and device measurements for inclination was -1.7° (standard deviation [SD] 4.9°), while the mean absolute difference was 4.2° (SD 3.2°). The mean difference between anteversion angles calculated from CT scans and from the device was -3.5° (SD 4.5°), with an absolute difference of 4.0° (SD 4.0°). 100% (12/12) of inclination measurements and 92% (11/12) of anteversion measurements fell within both the clinical and statistical limits of agreement when analyzed via the Bland-Altman technique.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that the registration error associated with this new mini-navigation system compares favourably with the known registration error associated with traditional navigation systems.

Quantification of Imaging Error in the Measurement of Cup Position: A Cadaveric Comparison of Radiographic and Computed Tomography Imaging

Postoperative radiographs remain the standard for assessment of component placement following total hip arthroplasty (THA), despite the known limitations of radiographs. Computed tomography (CT) scanning offers improved accuracy, but its costs and radiation exposure are prohibitive. The authors performed a cadaver study to compare the error associated with radiographs with that of CT scans following THA. The authors also compared imaging with a novel mini-navigation system. Three board-certified orthopedic surgeons each performed 4 THA procedures (6 cadavers, 12 hips) via the posterior approach using a mini-navigation tool to assist with component placement. Cup position from imaging was compared with corrected CT values for anteversion and inclination, created by correcting the initial scan to align the anterior pelvic plane coplanar with the CT table, thus representing cup position not distorted by imaging or positioning. Anteversion from standard CT scans was within 2.5° (standard deviation [SD], 1.5°) of reference values (P=.25); radiographs showed an average error of 7.8° (SD, 4.3°) vs reference values (all values absolute means) (P<.01). The mini-navigation system provided anteversion values within an average of 4.0° (SD, 4.0°) of reference anteversion (P<.01). Standard CT values for inclination were within 2.4° (SD, 2.0°) of reference values (P=.53), whereas radiographic inclination values were within 2.5° (SD, 2.3°) (P=.12). Mini-navigation values for inclination were within 3.9° (SD, 3.2°) of reference inclination (P=.26). This study demonstrated that cup position as measured by radiographs is significantly less accurate than CT scans and that the mini-navigation system provided anteversion measurements that were of comparable accuracy to CT scans. [Orthopedics. 2017; 40(6):e952-e958.].

Femur First navigation can reduce impingement severity compared to traditional free hand total hip arthroplasty

Impingement is a major source of dislocation and aseptic loosening in total hip arthroplasty (THA). We compared impingement free range of motion (ROM) using a novel computer navigated femur first approach to conventional THA. In addition, impingement between genders was also explored. In a retrospective analysis of 121 THA patients, subject-specific post-operative ROM was simulated using post-operative 3D-CT data, and compared with the benchmark ROM, essential for activities of daily living. Three parameters were defined to express both implant-to-implant (ITI) and bone-to-bone (BTB) impingement - coverage percentage, third angle, and impingement severity. Although coverage percentage was similar between the navigated and conventional group for both ITI (p = 0.69) and BTB (p = 0.82) impingement, third angle was significantly reduced in the navigation group for both ITI (p = 0.02) and BTB (p = 0.05) impingement. Impingement severity for both ITI (p = 0.01) and BTB (p = 0.05) was significantly decreased in the navigation group compared to the conventional. Impingement severity in men was considerably higher compared to women for both ITI (p = 0.002) and BTB (p = 0.02). Navigation guided femur first THA is able to improve alignment of ROM axis, and consequently, to reduce impingement in THA. Men seem to be more prone to impingement than women.

Navigation is Equal to Estimation by Eye and Palpation in Preventing Psoas Impingement in THA

BACKGROUND

Iliopsoas tendon impingement is one possible reason for persistent groin pain and diminished functional outcome after THA. So far, estimation by eye and palpation is the standard procedure to intraoperatively assess the distance of the cup to the anterior rim. However, novel technologies such as imageless navigation enable intraoperative measurements of the cup in relation to the psoas tendon and bony landmarks.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We asked whether psoas impingement (1) can be reduced using imageless navigation compared with the standard technique and (2) is associated with specific patient characteristics. Furthermore, we investigated (3) if anterior cup protrusion (overhang) is associated with lower outcome scores for pain and function.

METHODS

The current study is a reanalysis of data from a randomized controlled trial evaluating navigation for THA; 135 patients were randomized for surgery with or without the use of imageless navigation. The risk for anterior protrusion of the cup above the acetabular rim and thus potential psoas impingement, defined as an overhang of the cup above the anterior acetabular rim as measured on postoperative CT, was either controlled with the help of navigation or standard control by eye and palpation intraoperatively. Postoperatively, the anterior protrusion of the cup above the acetabular rim was measured on three-dimensional (3-D) CT by a blinded, external institute. In addition to patient-related outcome measures, the Harris hip score, Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, and EuroQol were obtained 1 year postoperatively. Altogether 123 data sets were available for primary analysis and 115 were available for 1-year followup.

RESULTS

There was no difference, with the numbers available, between the navigated and the control groups in terms of the mean distance of the cup below the anterosuperior acetabular rim (3.9 mm; -5.3 to 12.6 mm versus 4.4 mm; -7.9 to 13.7 mm; p = 0.72) or the anteroinferior acetabular rim (4.7 mm; -6.2 to 14.8 mm versus 4.2 mm; -7.1 to 16.3 mm; p = 0.29). There was no difference, with the numbers available, in terms of the proportion of cups with anterior overhang (7%, four of 57 versus, 15%, 10 of 66; p = 0.16), respectively. After controlling for potential confounding variables such as cup inclination, cup size, patient age, BMI, stage of arthritis, and length of skin incision, we found cup anteversion (hazard ratio [HR], 0.87; 95% CI, 0.81-0.93; p < 0.001) and female sex (HR, 3.88; 95% CI, 1.01-14.93; p = 0.049) were associated with a propensity to potential psoas impingement. With the numbers available, there were no differences observed in clinical scores between groups with and without anterior cup protrusion.

CONCLUSIONS

We found no differences between imageless navigation and estimation by eye and palpation in preventing potential psoas impingement. Despite the comparable clinical outcome for patients with and without cup protrusion, the orthopaedic surgeon should be especially aware of propensity for psoas impingement in women.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, therapeutic study.

Higher Acetabular Anteversion in Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Case-Control Study

BACKGROUND

Surgical approach is known as a risk factor that influences cup malposition while performing total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, no study has been conducted comparing cup positioning between the supine direct anterior (DA) and supine direct lateral (DL) THA approaches.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) Is there a difference in acetabular cup positioning between supine DA and supine DL THA approaches? (2) Are there differences in complications based on acetabular cup positioning between the two approaches?

METHODS

From 2012 to 2014, 186 patients who underwent primary THAs using DA approach were matched with 186 patients using DL approach by body mass index, age, and gender. Cup anteversion and abduction angles were measured from standing anteroposterior pelvis radiographs by two blinded observers. The Lewinnek safe zone was used as the standard for cup positioning. Cup anteversion, abduction angles, and complications were recorded and compared.

RESULTS

Cup anteversion was on average 3° higher in the DA approach compared to the DL approach. The abduction angle for the DA approach was equivalent to the DL approach both averaging 46° to 47°. There were more DA hips outside of the safe zone (10%) for anteversion than DL (3%) hips. There were no differences in complications between DA and DL approaches.

CONCLUSION

There is a tendency to antevert the acetabular cup when performing THAs using the DA approach, and one must be mindful of this when implanting the acetabular component.

A Smart Tool for Intraoperative Leg Length Targeting in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Leg length discrepancies following total hip arthroplasty (THA) may necessitate subsequent interventions, from heel lifts to revision surgery. Current intraoperative methods of determining leg length are either inaccurate or expensive and invasive.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the current study was to investigate the ability of a novel, intraoperative smart tool (Intellijoint HIP^®, Intellijoint Surgical^®, Inc., Waterloo, ON) to provide accurate, real-time leg length measurements during THA.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 25 patients who underwent THA utilizing the Intellijoint HIP smart tool between February and August 2014. Intraoperative leg length data was compared with radiographic leg length calculations. Two observers blinded to the Intellijoint HIP findings independently assessed all post-procedure radiographs.

RESULTS

The mean difference between smart tool and radiographic measurements was 1.3 mm [CI: -0.1, 2.7]. 88% (22/25) of intraoperative measurements were within 5 mm of radiographic measurements; 100% (25/25) were within 10 mm. A Bland-Altman analysis showed excellent agreement, with 96% (24/25) of measurements within the statistical limit for acceptable agreement, and 84% (21/25) within the clinically acceptable range (± 5 mm). Removal of the first 13 procedures (surgeon training) decreased the mean difference between methods to 0.6 mm [-0.6, 1.9]. All post-training procedures were associated with a difference of <5 mm. There were no reported adverse events related to the use of the smart tool.

CONCLUSION

The Intellijoint HIP smart tool is a safe and accurate tool for providing intraoperative measurements of leg length in real-time.

Native femoral anteversion should not be used as reference in cementless total hip arthroplasty with a straight, tapered stem: a retrospective clinical study

Backround

Improper femoral and acetabular component positioning can be associated with instability, impingement, component wear and finally patient dissatisfaction in total hip arthroplasty (THA). The concept of “femur first”/“combined anteversion”, incorporates various aspects of performing a functional optimization of the prosthetic stem and cup position of the stem relative to the cup intraoperatively.

In the present study we asked two questions: (1) Do native femoral anteversion and anteversion of the implant correlate? (2) Do anteversion of the final broach and implant anteversion correlate?

Methods

In a secondary analysis of a prospective controlled trial, a subgroup of 55 patients, who underwent computer-assisted, cementless THA with a straight, tapered stem through an anterolateral, minimally invasive (MIS) approach in a lateral decubitus position were examined retrospectivly. Intraoperative fluoroscopy was used to verify a “best-fit” position of the final broach. An image-free navigation system was used for measurement of the native femoral version, version of the final broach and the final implant. Femoral neck resection height was measured in postoperative CT-scans. This investigation was approved by the local Ethics Commission (No.10-121-0263) and is a secondary analysis of a larger project (DRKS00000739, German Clinical Trials Register May-02–2011).

Results

The mean difference between native femoral version and final implant was 1.9° (+/− 9.5), with a range from −20.7° to 21.5° and a Spearman’s correlation coefficient of 0.39 (p < 0.003). In contrast, we observed a mean difference between final broach and implant version of −1.9° (+/− 3.5), with a range from −12.7° to 8.7° and a Spearman’s correlation coefficient of 0.89 (p < 0.001). In 83.6 % (46/55) final stem version was outside the normal range as defined by Tönnis (15-20°). The mean femoral neck resection height was 7.3 mm (+/− 5.6). There was no correlation between resection height and version of the implant (Spearman’s correlation coefficient 0.14).

Conclusion

Native femoral version significantly differs from the final anteversion of a cementless, straight, tapered stem and therefore is not a reliable reference in cementless THA. Measuring anteversion of the final “fit and fill” broach is a feasible assistance in order to predict final stem anteversion intraoperatively. There is no correlation between femoral neck resection height and version of the implant.

Significantly Poor Outcomes of Total Hip Arthroplasty After Failed Periacetabular Osteotomy

BACKGROUND

Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is an effective treatment for preosteoarthritis and early osteoarthritis in young and active patients with hip dysplasia. However, conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA) for failed PAO is difficult owing to morphologic changes. The objective of the present study was to investigate outcomes of patients who underwent THA for failed PAO.

METHODS

We performed a case-control study. The participants were 48 patients (52 hips) who underwent THA after PAO (the osteotomy group); type of PAO was eccentric rotational acetabular osteotomy in 36 hips and rotational acetabular osteotomy in 16 hips. These patients had a mean age at surgery of 56.5 years and underwent postoperative follow-up for a mean period of 5.4 years. For the control group, after matching age, gender, and time of surgery, we included 96 patients (104 joints) who underwent primary THA for hip dysplasia.

RESULTS

The 2 groups demonstrated no significant difference in the preoperative Harris Hip Score. However, the osteotomy group demonstrated a significantly poor Harris Hip Score at the last follow-up, with particularly low scores for gait and activity. The osteotomy group demonstrated significantly poor range of motion at the last follow-up. Although neither group had any cases of revision surgery, both groups had 1 case of postoperative dislocation. Considering socket placement in Lewinnek's safe zone, the osteotomy group had significantly poorer results compared to that obtained after primary THA.

CONCLUSION

The therapeutic outcomes and socket positioning for THA after PAO were poorer compared to those of primary THA.

Identifying the procedural gap and improved methods for maintaining accuracy during total hip arthroplasty

Osteoarthritis is a ubiquitous condition, affecting 26 million Americans each year, with up to 17% of adults over age 75 suffering from one variation of arthritis. The hip is one of the most commonly affected joints and while there are conservative options for treatment, as symptoms progress, many patients eventually turn to surgery to manage their pain and dysfunction. Early surgical options such as osteotomy or arthroscopy are reserved for younger, more active patients with less severe disease and symptoms. Total hip arthroplasty offers a viable solution for patients with severe degenerative changes; however, post-surgical discrepancies in leg length, offset and component malposition are common and cause significant complications. Such discrepancies are associated with consequences such as low back pain, neurological deficits, instability and overall patient dissatisfaction. Current methods for managing leg length and offset during hip arthroplasty are either inaccurate and susceptible to error or are cumbersome, expensive and lengthen surgical time. There is currently no viable option that provides accurate, real-time data to surgeons regarding leg length, offset and cup position in a cost-effective manner. As such, we hypothesize that a procedural gap exists in hip arthroplasty, a gap into which fall a large majority of arthroplasty patients who are at increased risk of complications following surgery. These complications and associated treatments place significant stress on the healthcare system. The costs associated with addressing leg length and offset discrepancies can be minor, requiring only heel lifts and short-term rehabilitation, but can also be substantial, with revision hip arthroplasty costs of up to $54,000 per procedure. The need for a cost-effective, simple to use and unobtrusive technology to address this procedural gap in hip arthroplasty and improve patient outcomes is of increasing importance. Given the aging of the population, the projected increases in the volume of procedures over the coming decades and the economic pressures associated with downward pricing pressure and bundled payments, the need to address this gap is underscored.

EOS-based cup navigation: Randomised controlled trial in 78 total hip arthroplasties

BACKGROUND

Minimising the risk of cup implantation outside the safe zone is among the objectives of navigation during total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, given the technical challenges raised by navigation when the patient is lying on the side, many surgeons still use the freehand technique. We conducted a randomised controlled trial to evaluate the new navigation system NAVEOS in the iliac plane, which is easily identified in the lateral decubitus position, with the objective of determining whether NAVEOS navigation decreased the frequency of cup implantation outside the safe zone compared to freehand cup positioning, without increasing the operative time or the frequency of complications.

HYPOTHESIS

NAVEOS navigation decreases the frequency of cup positioning outside the safe zone compared to freehand positioning.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This randomised controlled trial compared cup positioning using NAVEOS navigation versus the freehand technique in patients undergoing primary THA. The safe zone was defined according to Lewinnek as 15±10° of radiological anteversion and 40±10° of radiological inclination. Cup position parameters were measured on computed tomography images obtained 3months after THA. The images were read by two independent observers who were blinded to group assignment. The primary evaluation criterion was cup position within the safe zone.

RESULTS

A 1:1 randomisation scheme was used to assign 78 patients (mean age, 68years; age range, 44-91years) to NAVEOS navigation or freehand cup positioning. The two groups were comparable for age, gender distribution, body mass index, and preoperative functional scores. In the NAVEOS group, navigation was discontinued prematurely in 6 patients, because of technical difficulties (n=2) or a marked discrepancy with clinical findings (n=4); however, the intention-to-treat approach was used for the analysis. The proportion of cups in the safe zone was 67% (28/39) in the NAVEOS group and 38% (17/39) in the freehand group (P=0.012). Anteversion was within the 5-25° range for 72% (28/39) cups in the NAVEOS group and 46% (18/39) in the freehand group (P=0.021). Inclination was within the 30-50° range for 95% (37/39) of cups with NAVEOS navigation and 85% (33/39) with freehand positioning (P=0.135). The odds ratio for cup implantation outside the safe zone was significantly lower with NAVEOS compared to freehand positioning (0.54; 95% confidence interval, 0.31-0.91). Mean operative time was 74 (range, 45-115) minutes with NAVEOS navigation and 70 (range, 40-105) minutes with freehand positioning (P=0.382). Complications consisted of 1 case each of anterior dislocation and infection, both in the freehand group.

DISCUSSION

Compared to freehand positioning, NAVEOS navigation significantly lowered the risk of cup positioning outside the safe zone, chiefly via improved achievement of the anteversion target. NAVEOS was not associated with increases in operative time or morbidity.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II, randomised controlled trial with limited statistical power.

Decreased femoral periprosthetic bone mineral density: a comparative study using DXA in patients after cementless total hip arthroplasty with osteonecrosis of the femoral head versus primary osteoarthritis

INTRODUCTION

Trabecular properties in osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) are altered for bone volume and structure in the femoral head and proximal femoral canal. We analysed the periprosthetic bone mineral density (BMD) as a correlate to bony ingrowth in patients with ONFH who received a cementless THA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a matched-pair analysis of 100 patients with ONFH (n = 50) and primary osteoarthritis (n = 50) who received the same, unilateral cementless THA. We compared the periprosthetic BMD 5 years after surgery by means of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) analysing the seven femoral regions of interest (ROIs) according to Gruen.

RESULTS

Within the ONFH group, significantly lower BMD values were found in the ROI 1 and 7 (p < 0.05). No statistically significant difference was found for ROIs 2-6.

CONCLUSIONS

An altered periprosthetic bone stock in the proximal femur in patients with prior ONFH might be a possible risk factor for premature loosening of the femoral stem in THA. Surgeons need to consider coating and fixation philosophy of cementless implants when choosing the right stem for patients with ONFH.

A Kirschner wire as a transverse-axis guide to improve acetabular cup positioning

PURPOSE

To compare cup-positioning accuracy in total hip arthroplasty (THA) with or without use of a Kirschner wire as a transverse-axis guide for pelvic alignment.

METHODS

Records of 18 men and 73 women (mean age, 60 years) who underwent primary THA with (n=49) or without (n=42) use of a Kirschner wire as a transverse-axis guide for pelvic alignment were reviewed. A 2.4-mm Kirschner wire as a transversea-xis guide was inserted to the anterior superior iliac spine and was parallel to a line linking the left and right anterior superior iliac spine. The safe zone for cup positioning was defined as 30º to 50° abduction and 10º to 30º anteversion. Of the 5 operative surgeons, 2 were classified as experienced (total surgical volume >300) and 3 as inexperienced (total surgical volume of <50). The proportion of patients with the cup in the safe zone was compared in patients with or without use of the transverse-axis guide and in experienced and inexperienced surgeons.

RESULTS

For inexperienced surgeons, the use of the transverse-axis guide significantly improved the proportion of patients with the cup in the safe zone from 90% to 100% for abduction, from 50% to 82.4% for anteversion, and from 40% to 82.4% for both. Patients with the cup inside or outside the safe zone were comparable in terms of body height, weight, BMI, subcutaneous fat thickness, incision length, and acetabular cup size.

CONCLUSION

The use of the transverse-axis guide improved the accuracy of cup positioning by inexperienced surgeons.

Initial Results of an Acetabular Center Axis Registration Technique in Navigated Hip Arthroplasty with Deformed Acetabular Rims

Background

In cementless total hip arthroplasty, imageless computer-assisted navigation is usually used to register the anterior pelvic plane (APP). The accuracy of this method is influenced by the subcutaneous tissues overlying the registration landmarks. On the other hand, the acetabular center axis (ACA) is determined from the acetabular rim. Precise registration of the ACA is possible because of direct palpation using a pointer. Imageless navigation using the ACA usually targets patients with normal acetabular morphology. The aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy of imageless navigation using the ACA instead of the APP in patients with normal or deformed acetabular rims.

Methods

The intraoperative cup position was compared with that obtained from the postoperative computed tomography (CT) images in 18 cases.

Results

The inclination angle derived from the navigation system was 3.4 ± 5.3 degrees smaller and the anteversion angle was 1.4 ± 3.1 degrees larger than those derived from the CT images.

Conclusion

The inclination cup angle of the navigation system was significantly inferior to the true value, particularly in cases with large anterior osteophytes.

Anteroposterior Radiographs Are More Accurate than Cross-Table Lateral Radiographs for Acetabular Anteversion Assessment: a Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Measuring acetabular anteversion is relevant to routine follow-up of total hip arthroplasties (THAs) and for malfunctioning THAs. Imageless navigation facilitates acetabular component orientation relative to the anterior pelvic plane (APP) or to the APP adjusted for sagittal pelvic tilt (PT). The optimal plain radiographic method for the postoperative assessment of anteversion is not agreed upon.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) Do anteversion measurements on plain radiographs correlate more with APP anteversion or PT-adjusted anteversion? (2) Do measurements of anteversion performed on supine anteroposterior (AP) radiographs more accurately reflect intraoperative anteversion values for navigated THA compared to anteversion measured on cross-table lateral (CL) radiographs?

METHODS

Seventy patients receiving primary navigated THA were included. APP and PT-adjusted anteversion were recorded; the latter defined the intraoperative target for anteversion. Postoperative anteversion was measured on supine AP pelvis radiographs with computer software and CL radiographs with conventional methods. Intraoperative measurements were used as the reference standards for comparisons.

RESULTS

Mean intraoperative APP anteversion was 20.6° ± 5.6°. Mean intraoperative PT-adjusted anteversion was 22.9° ± 4.5°. Mean anteversion was 22.7° ± 4.7° on AP radiographs and 27.2° ± 4.2° on CL radiographs (p < 0.001). Only correlations between PT-adjusted anteversion and radiographic assessments of anteversion were significant. The mean difference between PT-adjusted anteversion and anteversion on AP radiographs was -0.2° ± 4.3°, while the mean difference between the PT-adjusted anteversion and anteversion measured on CL radiographs was 4.3 ± 5.1° (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Plain film assessment of anteversion was more accurate on supine AP radiographs than on CL radiographs, which overestimated acetabular anteversion.

Difference in periprosthetic acetabular bone mineral density: Prior total hip arthroplasty: Osteonecrosis of the femoral head versus primary osteoarthritis

BACKGROUND

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) could be associated with a higher failure rate in patients after osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) compared to a patient population with primary osteoarthritis prior THA, especially regarding the acetabular component. One major reason could be the compromised acetabular bone quality. Therefore, we performed a retrospective case matched study to assess: 1) Is there a difference in periprosthetic bone mineral density between patients with an ONFH prior THA and controls? 2) Do patients with an ONFH prior THA have a lower bone mineral density compared to controls? 3) Which region in the periprosthetic bone stock is more likely to present differences in periprosthetic bone mineral density between both groups?

HYPOTHESIS

We hypothesized that there is a poorer bone mineral density (BMD) in the periacetabular bone stock in patients with an ONFH prior THA compared to controls receiving a THA due to primary osteoarthritis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We compared the BMD of 50 patients with ONFH to 50 controls with primary osteoarthritis prior THA using the same implant in mean 5 years after surgery by means of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). We analysed 3 acetabular ROIs according to DeLee and Charnley in a modified measurement technique.

RESULTS

In ROI 3, representing acetabulum's upper aspect, statistically significant lower BMD values for the ONFH group could be found (P < 0.05). No difference was found for the modified ROIs 1 and 2 (respectively medial and lower acetabulum).

DISCUSSION

The results indicate a poorer periacetabular BMD in patients with ONFH prior THA, which might be responsible for premature loosening of the acetabular cup in THA. Due to a lack of literature, further clinical investigations are required to confirm our results.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III: retrospective case-control study.

Imageless navigation versus traditional method in total hip arthroplasty: A meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Accuracy of acetabular component orientation is improved with computer navigation in THA. In recent years, imageless navigation has become more commonplace, whereas there still exist different arguments about this technique.

METHODS

We conducted a meta-analysis to assess the accuracy of imageless navigation for acetabular implantation in total hip arthroplasty. The computer based online search strategy covered the major medical databases (Cochrane Library, Medline, Pubmed, and EmbaseI) from January 2004 to December 2014. Data of selected clinical trials were analysed using Revman 5.1 software.

RESULTS

7 clinical trials enrolling 485 patients were included. Mean cup inclination and anteversion were not statistically significantly different between the conventional groups and the imageless computer navigated groups (P = 0.83 and P = 0.89 respectively). Deviation from the desired position of inclination shows no significant differences (P = 0.06), whereas deviation from the desired position of anteversion was smaller in computer navigated group (P<0.0001). Only one study gave useful information about operation time which is significantly increased (MD = 23.00, P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Current literature generally hold the opinion that navigation is a reliable tool to optimize cup placement, but still there are some different voices about imageless navigation system. This meta-analysis emphasizing more on the accuracy of cup-positioning with imageless navigation reveals that imageless navigation is preferable compared with traditional method.

Impingement-free range of movement, acetabular component cover and early clinical results comparing ‘femur-first’ navigation and ‘conventional’ minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty

We report the kinematic and early clinical results of a patient- and observer-blinded randomised controlled trial in which CT scans were used to compare potential impingement-free range of movement (ROM) and acetabular component cover between patients treated with either the navigated ‘femur-first’ total hip arthroplasty (THA) method (n = 66; male/female 29/37, mean age 62.5 years; 50 to 74) or conventional THA (n = 69; male/female 35/34, mean age 62.9 years; 50 to 75). The Hip Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, the Harris hip score, the Euro-Qol-5D and the Mancuso THA patient expectations score were assessed at six weeks, six months and one year after surgery. A total of 48 of the patients (84%) in the navigated ‘femur-first’ group and 43 (65%) in the conventional group reached all the desirable potential ROM boundaries without prosthetic impingement for activities of daily living (ADL) in flexion, extension, abduction, adduction and rotation (p = 0.016). Acetabular component cover and surface contact with the host bone were > 87% in both groups. There was a significant difference between the navigated and the conventional groups’ Harris hip scores six weeks after surgery (p = 0.010). There were no significant differences with respect to any clinical outcome at six months and one year of follow-up. The navigated ‘femur-first’ technique improves the potential ROM for ADL without prosthetic impingement, although there was no observed clinical difference between the two treatment groups.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015; 97-B:890–8.

No difference in clinical outcome, bone density and polyethylene wear 5-7 years after standard navigated vs. conventional cementfree total hip arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this investigation was to compare clinical outcome, component loosening, polyethylene cup wear and periprosthetic bone mineral density between "cup first" navigated and conventional cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA) 5-7 years after surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty patients who received THA with (n = 25) or without (n = 25) the use of an image-free navigation system by a single surgeon were investigated after a mean follow-up of 6.4 (4.8-7.4) years. The Hip Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) and the Harris Hip Score (HHS) were obtained; range-of-motion (ROM) was evaluated by a blinded examiner. Radiographic cup inclination, signs of radiographic loosening and polyethylene wear were analysed with the help of digital analysis software on anterio-posterior radiographs by a blinded examiner. Acetabular and femoral periprosthetic bone density was evaluated with the help of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

RESULTS

We were unable to find any statistical significant or clinically relevant difference for the HOOS, HHS, ROM and polyethylene wear between the navigated and the conventional THA group 5-7 years after surgery. Cup inclination was more precise in the navigated THA group in relation to the target value of 45°.

CONCLUSIONS

Standard "cup first" THA navigation does not improve mid-term functional outcome, bony ingrowth and/or polyethylene wear. New concepts in computer-assisted THA, considering cup and stem as coupled biomechanical partners are needed to justify the effort of navigation in routine operations.

A new method of registration in navigated hip arthroplasty without the need to register the anterior pelvic plane

A prospective clinical study of 50 patients was conducted to validate a new method of imageless computer navigated hip arthroplasty. The new method enables the surgeon to acquire all registration points with the patient positioned and draped in lateral decubitus position. The final component orientation was measured from post-operative CT scans. The mean error in component position was -1.1° (SD 3.1°) for inclination and 0.9° (SD 4.3°) for anteversion. This compared favourably with the error of -1.8° (SD 1.8°) for inclination and -4.8° (SD 2.7°) for anteversion when using the traditional APP registration. Results show that one can expect the acetabular component to be within a safe zone of ±10° in 99.8% for inclination and 97.7% for anteversion when using the new lateral registration method. Level of Evidence Level II, Prognostic study.

A novel non-invasive mechanical technique of cup and stem placement and leg length adjustment in total hip arthroplasty for dysplastic hips

PURPOSE

This study assessed the accuracy of cup and stem positioning and limb length adjustment for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) using our new mechanical technique compared with imageless navigation or a computed tomography (CT)-based navigation system.

METHODS

One hundred thirteen primary total hip arthroplasties (THAs) for DDH were evaluated. At pre-operative positioning, patients were placed in a precise lateral decubitus position by tilting the surgical table using simple ready-made devices (two shot pipe, metal chain, level gauge and goniometer). During surgery, cups were intentionally placed at 45° inclination and 15° anteversion on radiograph by using a level gauge and goniometer.

RESULTS

Cup inclination was 44.2° ± 3.4° (range, 32.0-51.2°), cup anteversion was 19.6° ± 6.1° (range, 3.0-33.1°), stem alignment was 0.04° ± 0.8° valgus (range, 2.1° varus to 1.9° valgus), and leg length discrepancy was -0.37 ± 3.7 mm (range, -12.8 to 8.8 mm) in postoperative radiographs. Outliers (outside ±10° from intentional position) occurred in 15 cases (13.3 %) in inclination or anteversion. Postoperative dislocation did not occur in any cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Cup and stem positioning in THAs with our new mechanical technique yielded satisfactory results compared with previously reported imageless navigation or CT-based navigation. Our results were superior with regard to being non-invasive and low cost and involving minimum radiation exposure.

A complete-pelvis segmentation framework for image-free total hip arthroplasty (THA): methodology and clinical study

BACKGROUND

Complete-pelvis segmentation in antero-posterior pelvic radiographs is required to create a patient-specific three-dimensional pelvis model for surgical planning and postoperative assessment in image-free navigation of total hip arthroplasty.

METHODS

A fast and robust framework for accurately segmenting the complete pelvis is presented, consisting of two consecutive modules. In the first module, a three-stage method was developed to delineate the left hemi-pelvis based on statistical appearance and shape models. To handle complex pelvic structures, anatomy-specific information processing techniques were employed. As the input to the second module, the delineated left hemi-pelvis was then reflected about an estimated symmetry line of the radiograph to initialize the right hemi-pelvis segmentation. The right hemi-pelvis was segmented by the same three-stage method,

RESULTS

Two experiments conducted on respectively 143 and 40 AP radiographs demonstrated a mean segmentation accuracy of 1.61±0.68 mm. A clinical study to investigate the postoperative assessment of acetabular cup orientations based on the proposed framework revealed an average accuracy of 1.2°±0.9° and 1.6°±1.4° for anteversion and inclination, respectively. Delineation of each radiograph costs less than one minute.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite further validation needed, the preliminary results implied the underlying clinical applicability of the proposed framework for image-free THA.

Acetabular component positioning in primary THA via an anterior, posterolateral, or posterolateral-navigated surgical technique

The purpose of this study was to compare the acetabular component alignment in patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) via 3 surgical techniques: direct anterior using intraoperative fluoroscopy, posterolateral using an external alignment guide (posterolateral conventional), and posterolateral using computer navigation (posterolateral navigated). Two surgeons performed the direct, anterior THAs; 2 surgeons performed the posterolateral-conventional THAs; and 1 surgeon performed the posterolateral-navigated THAs. The most recent 110 THAs performed using each approach were reviewed, and Einsel-Bild-Roentgen analysis software was used to measure the acetabular component abduction and anteversion. One-way analysis of variance showed the anterior cohort to have a more horizontal alignment of the acetabular component (P,.001); 90.9% of the acetabular components in the posterolateral- navigated cohort were within 40°610° and 15°610° for both acetabular abduction and anteversion, respectively, vs 70% in the posterolateral-conventional (P,.001), and 68.2% in the anterior cohort (P,.001). The anterior technique using intraoperative fluoroscopy does not improve acetabular positioning compared with the conventional, posterolateral technique.