1
|
Poupaud M, Antoine-Moussiaux N, Dieuzy-Labaye I, Peyre M. An evaluation tool to strengthen the collaborative process of the public-private partnership in the veterinary domain. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0252103. [PMID: 34048436 PMCID: PMC8162688 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2021] [Accepted: 05/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Public-private partnerships (PPPs) in the veterinary domain are widely implemented worldwide and can help to strengthen the capacities of Veterinary Services. Few analyses have been made of these initiatives. This study is aimed at developing an evaluation tool based on participatory approaches and focusing on the quality of PPP processes in the veterinary domain. The tool was divided into ten sections relevant to PPP process organisation and activities. The 44 evaluation criteria and six quality attributes (operationality, relevance, acceptability, inclusiveness, adaptability, and stability) were identified based on literature review and case-study application. The tool was adjusted during four regional PPP training workshops bringing together stakeholders from both public and private sectors. Finally, the tool was validated through an experts' elicitation process and applied in the field in Paraguay. The tool was developed in a non-normative perspective to help the partners adapt the PPP to their specific context, to maximize the opportunities and minimize the risks of such collaborations, and to formulate adapted recommendations to strengthen and improve the PPP collaborative process and thus the outcomes. In an ex-ante perspective, this tool would also help public and private actors to engage and develop a PPP process following the best possible practices. The aim of this tool is to help decision making in terms of PPP development and implementation in the veterinary domain to ensure the added value and relevance of such a collaborative approach in different countries worldwide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariline Poupaud
- UMR ASTRE, Univ Montpellier, CIRAD, INRAE, Montpellier, France
- Fundamental and Applied Research for Animals and Health (FARAH), University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
- * E-mail: ,
| | - Nicolas Antoine-Moussiaux
- Fundamental and Applied Research for Animals and Health (FARAH), University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | | | - Marisa Peyre
- UMR ASTRE, Univ Montpellier, CIRAD, INRAE, Montpellier, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
De Garine-Wichatitsky M, Binot A, Ward J, Caron A, Perrotton A, Ross H, Tran Quoc H, Valls-Fox H, Gordon IJ, Promburom P, Ancog R, Anthony Kock R, Morand S, Chevalier V, Allen W, Phimpraphai W, Duboz R, Echaubard P. "Health in" and "Health of" Social-Ecological Systems: A Practical Framework for the Management of Healthy and Resilient Agricultural and Natural Ecosystems. Front Public Health 2021; 8:616328. [PMID: 33585387 PMCID: PMC7876377 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.616328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2020] [Accepted: 12/02/2020] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
The past two decades have seen an accumulation of theoretical and empirical evidence for the interlinkages between human health and well-being, biodiversity and ecosystem services, and agriculture. The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the devastating impacts that an emerging pathogen, of animal origin, can have on human societies and economies. A number of scholars have called for the wider adoption of “One Health integrated approaches” to better prevent, and respond to, the threats of emerging zoonotic diseases. However, there are theoretical and practical challenges that have precluded the full development and practical implementation of this approach. Whilst integrated approaches to health are increasingly adopting a social-ecological system framework (SES), the lack of clarity in framing the key concept of resilience in health contexts remains a major barrier to its implementation by scientists and practitioners. We propose an operational framework, based on a transdisciplinary definition of Socio-Ecological System Health (SESH) that explicitly links health and ecosystem management with the resilience of SES, and the adaptive capacity of the actors and agents within SES, to prevent and cope with emerging health and environmental risks. We focus on agricultural transitions that play a critical role in disease emergence and biodiversity conservation, to illustrate the proposed participatory framework to frame and co-design SESH interventions. Finally, we highlight critical changes that are needed from researchers, policy makers and donors, in order to engage communities and other stakeholders involved in the management of their own health and that of the underpinning ecosystems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michel De Garine-Wichatitsky
- Animals, health, Territories, Risks and Ecosystem (ASTRE), University of Montpellier, Agricultural research for Development (CIRAD), National Research Institute for Agriculture, Food and the Environment (INRAE), Montpellier, France.,Agricultural research for Development (CIRAD), UMR ASTRE, Bangkok, Thailand.,Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Aurélie Binot
- Animals, health, Territories, Risks and Ecosystem (ASTRE), University of Montpellier, Agricultural research for Development (CIRAD), National Research Institute for Agriculture, Food and the Environment (INRAE), Montpellier, France
| | - John Ward
- Mekong Region Futures Institute, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Alexandre Caron
- Animals, health, Territories, Risks and Ecosystem (ASTRE), University of Montpellier, Agricultural research for Development (CIRAD), National Research Institute for Agriculture, Food and the Environment (INRAE), Montpellier, France.,Universidad E. Mondlane, Maputo, Mozambique
| | - Arthur Perrotton
- Stockholm Resilience Center, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.,UMR Eco&Sols, IRD, Agricultural Research for Development (CIRAD), Montpellier, France
| | - Helen Ross
- School of Agriculture and Food Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Hoa Tran Quoc
- Agricultural Research for Development (CIRAD), Research unit Fonctionnement écologique et gestion durable des agrosystèmes bananiers et ananas (GECO), Vientiane, Laos
| | - Hugo Valls-Fox
- Agricultural Research for Development (CIRAD), Research Unit Systèmes d'élevage méditerranéens et tropicaux (SELMET), PPZS, Dakar, Sénégal.,Research Unit Systèmes d'élevage méditerranéens et tropicaux (SELMET), Univ Montpellier, Agricultural Research for Development (CIRAD), National Research Institute for Agriculture, Food and the Environment (INRAE), Institut Agro, Montpellier, France
| | - Iain J Gordon
- Fenner School of Environment and Society, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia.,James Hutton Institute, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.,Central Queensland University, Townsville, QLD, Australia.,Land and Water, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Townsville, QLD, Australia
| | - Panomsak Promburom
- Center for Agricultural Resource System Research Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
| | - Rico Ancog
- School of Environmental Science and Management, University of the Philippines Los Baños, Philippines
| | - Richard Anthony Kock
- Department of Pathobiology and Population Sciences, Royal Veterinary College, London, United Kingdom
| | - Serge Morand
- Animals, health, Territories, Risks and Ecosystem (ASTRE), University of Montpellier, Agricultural research for Development (CIRAD), National Research Institute for Agriculture, Food and the Environment (INRAE), Montpellier, France.,Centre national de la recherche scientifique (CNRS), Institut des Sciences de l'Evolution de Montpellier (ISEM), Faculty of Veterinary Technology, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Véronique Chevalier
- Animals, health, Territories, Risks and Ecosystem (ASTRE), University of Montpellier, Agricultural research for Development (CIRAD), National Research Institute for Agriculture, Food and the Environment (INRAE), Montpellier, France.,Epidemiology Unit, Institut Pasteur du Cambodge, Phnom Penh, Cambodia
| | - Will Allen
- Learning for Sustainability, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | | | - Raphaël Duboz
- Animals, health, Territories, Risks and Ecosystem (ASTRE), University of Montpellier, Agricultural research for Development (CIRAD), National Research Institute for Agriculture, Food and the Environment (INRAE), Montpellier, France.,Sorbonne Université, IRD, UMMISCO, Bondy, France
| | - Pierre Echaubard
- School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS), University of London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Turner JA, Allen W, Fraser C, Fenemor A, Horita A, White T, Chen L, Atkinson M, Rush M. Navigating Institutional Challenges: Design to Enable Community Participation in Social Learning for Freshwater Planning. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 2020; 65:288-305. [PMID: 32036400 DOI: 10.1007/s00267-020-01256-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2018] [Accepted: 01/24/2020] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Social learning is a process suited to developing understanding and concerted action to tackle complex resource dilemmas, such as freshwater management. Research has begun to recognise that in practice social learning encounters a variety of institutional challenges from the shared habits and routines of stakeholders (organised by rules, norms and strategies) that are embedded in organisational structures and norms of professional behaviour. These institutional habits and routines influence the degree of willingness to engage with stakeholders, and expectations of behaviours in social learning processes. Considering this, there has been a call to understand how institutions influence social learning and emergent outcomes. We addresses this by presenting a heuristic for implementing social learning cognisant of institutional context to answer three questions: (i) How institutional influences impact implementation of social learning design; (ii) how implementation of social learning design modifies institutions influencing social learning; and (iii) how these changes in design and institutions together shape social learning outcomes? To answer these questions a freshwater planning exercise was designed, implemented and evaluated as a social learning process with community groups in two New Zealand catchments. Incorporating participatory reflection enabled the project team to modify social learning design to manage institutional influences hindering progress toward outcomes. Findings emphasise that social learning is underpinned by participants' changing assumptions about what constitutes the institution of learning itself-from instruction to a dynamic, collective and emergent process. Reflecting on these assumptions also challenged participants' expectations about their own and others' behaviours and roles in freshwater planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James A Turner
- AgResearch Ltd., Ruakura Research Centre, 10 Bisley Rd, Hamilton, 3214, New Zealand.
| | - Will Allen
- Will Allen & Associates, Canterbury, New Zealand
| | - Caroline Fraser
- Aqualinc Research Ltd., 1 Bolt Place, Christchurch, 8543, New Zealand
- Landwaterpeople, Unit 13, 212 Antigua Street, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Andrew Fenemor
- Manaaki Whenua - Landcare Research Ltd., 24 Nile St, Nelson, 7010, New Zealand
| | - Akiko Horita
- AgResearch Ltd., Ruakura Research Centre, 10 Bisley Rd, Hamilton, 3214, New Zealand
| | - Toni White
- AgResearch Ltd., Ruakura Research Centre, 10 Bisley Rd, Hamilton, 3214, New Zealand
| | - Lan Chen
- AgResearch Ltd., Ruakura Research Centre, 10 Bisley Rd, Hamilton, 3214, New Zealand
| | - Maggie Atkinson
- Manaaki Whenua - Landcare Research Ltd., 24 Nile St, Nelson, 7010, New Zealand
| | - Michelle Rush
- Participatory Techniques Ltd, Wellington, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Errecaborde KM, Macy KW, Pekol A, Perez S, O’Brien MK, Allen I, Contadini F, Lee JY, Mumford E, Bender JB, Pelican K. Factors that enable effective One Health collaborations - A scoping review of the literature. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0224660. [PMID: 31800579 PMCID: PMC6892547 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224660] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2018] [Accepted: 10/18/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Advocates for a One Health approach recognize that global health challenges require multidisciplinary collaborative efforts. While past publications have looked at interdisciplinary competency training for collaboration, few have identified the factors and conditions that enable operational One Health. Through a scoping review of the literature, a multidisciplinary team of researchers analyzed peer-reviewed publications describing multisectoral collaborations around infectious disease-related health events. The review identified 12 factors that support successful One Health collaborations and a coordinated response to health events across three levels: two individual factors (education & training and prior experience & existing relationships), four organizational factors (organizational structures, culture, human resources and, communication), and six network factors (network structures, relationships, leadership, management, available & accessible resources, political environment). The researchers also identified the stage of collaboration during which these factors were most critical, further organizing into starting condition or process-based factors. The research found that publications on multisectoral collaboration for health events do not uniformly report on successes or challenges of collaboration and rarely identify outputs or outcomes of the collaborative process. This paper proposes a common language and framework to enable more uniform reporting, implementation, and evaluation of future One Health collaborations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaylee Myhre Errecaborde
- Veterinary Population Medicine Department, One Health Division, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota, United States of America
- Veterinary Population Medicine Department, Center for Animal Health and Food Safety, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota, United States of America
| | - Katelyn Wuebbolt Macy
- Veterinary Population Medicine Department, One Health Division, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota, United States of America
| | - Amy Pekol
- Veterinary Population Medicine Department, One Health Division, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota, United States of America
| | - Sol Perez
- Veterinary Population Medicine Department, Center for Animal Health and Food Safety, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota, United States of America
| | - Mary Katherine O’Brien
- Veterinary Population Medicine Department, Center for Animal Health and Food Safety, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota, United States of America
| | - Ian Allen
- Veterinary Population Medicine Department, One Health Division, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota, United States of America
| | - Francesca Contadini
- Department of Veterinary Epidemiology and Public Health, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom
| | - Julia Yeri Lee
- City of Minneapolis Health Department, Food, Lodging and Pools, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America
| | - Elizabeth Mumford
- One Health Country Operations Team, Department of Country Health Emergency Preparedness and IHR, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Jeff B. Bender
- Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America
| | - Katharine Pelican
- Veterinary Population Medicine Department, One Health Division, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Durant K, Knight AR. Science and Practice in
NRM
: Insights from connectivity restoration in the south west slopes of
NSW. ECOLOGICAL MANAGEMENT & RESTORATION 2019. [DOI: 10.1111/emr.12372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
6
|
Knight AR. How can the social sciences work with ecology in informing feral horse policy and management in south‐eastern Australia? ECOLOGICAL MANAGEMENT & RESTORATION 2019. [DOI: 10.1111/emr.12366] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
7
|
Duboz R, Echaubard P, Promburom P, Kilvington M, Ross H, Allen W, Ward J, Deffuant G, de Garine-Wichatitsky M, Binot A. Systems Thinking in Practice: Participatory Modeling as a Foundation for Integrated Approaches to Health. Front Vet Sci 2018; 5:303. [PMID: 30619895 PMCID: PMC6305083 DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2018.00303] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2018] [Accepted: 11/16/2018] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
One Health (OH), EcoHealth (EH), and Planetary Health (PH) share an interest in transdisciplinary efforts that bring together scientists, citizens, government and private sectors to implement contextualized actions that promote adaptive health management across human, animal and ecosystem interfaces. A key operational element underlying these Integrated Approaches to Health (IAH) is use of Systems Thinking as a set of tools for integration. In this paper we discuss the origins and epistemology of systems thinking and argue that participatory modeling, informed by both systems theory and expertise in facilitating engagement and social learning, can help ground IAH theoretically and support its development. Participatory modeling is iterative and adaptive, which is necessary to deal with complexity in practice. Participatory modeling (PM) methods actively involve affected interests and stakeholders to ground the field of inquiry in a specific social-ecological context. Furthermore, PM processes act to reconcile the diverse understandings of the empirical world that stem from divergent discipline and community viewpoints. In this perspective article, we argue that PM can support systems thinking in practice and is essential for IAH implementation. Accordingly we invite PH, OH, and EH practitioners to systematically incorporate specialists in systems science and social engagement and facilitation. This will enable the appropriate contextualization of research practice and interventions, and ensure a balanced representation of the roles and relationships of medical, biological, mathematical, and social disciplines. For completeness, funding schemes supporting IAH need to follow the same iterative, adaptive, and participative processes to accompany IAH projects throughout their implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raphaël Duboz
- ASTRE, CIRAD, INRA, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier, France.,Institut Pasteur du Cambodge, Phnom Penh, Cambodia
| | | | - Panomsak Promburom
- Center for Agricultural Resource System Research (CARSR), Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
| | - Margaret Kilvington
- ISREF-Independent Social Research, Evaluation & Facilitation, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Helen Ross
- School of Agriculture and Food Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Will Allen
- Learning for Sustainability, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - John Ward
- Mekong Region Futures Institute, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Guillaume Deffuant
- National Research Institute of Science and Technology for Environment and Agriculture, Antony, France
| | - Michel de Garine-Wichatitsky
- ASTRE, CIRAD, INRA, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier, France.,Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Aurélie Binot
- ASTRE, CIRAD, INRA, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Transdisciplinary Research: Collaborative Leadership and Empowerment Towards Sustainability of Push–Pull Technology. SUSTAINABILITY 2018. [DOI: 10.3390/su10072378] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
9
|
Mitchell M, Moore SA, Clement S, Lockwood M, Anderson G, Gaynor SM, Gilfedder L, Rowe R, Norman B, Lefroy EC. Biodiversity on the brink: Evaluating a transdisciplinary research collaboration. J Nat Conserv 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jnc.2017.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
10
|
Eason CT, Shapiro L, Ogilvie S, King C, Clout M. Trends in the development of mammalian pest control technology in New Zealand. NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY 2017. [DOI: 10.1080/03014223.2017.1337645] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Charles T. Eason
- Cawthron Institute, Nelson, New Zealand
- Centre for Wildlife Management and Conservation Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Department of Ecology, Lincoln University, Canterbury, New Zealand
| | | | | | - Carolyn King
- Environmental Research Institute, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand
| | - Mick Clout
- Centre for Biodiversity and Biosecurity, School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Allen W, Cruz J, Warburton B. How Decision Support Systems Can Benefit from a Theory of Change Approach. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 2017; 59:956-965. [PMID: 28280913 DOI: 10.1007/s00267-017-0839-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2016] [Accepted: 02/17/2017] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
Decision support systems are now mostly computer and internet-based information systems designed to support land managers with complex decision-making. However, there is concern that many environmental and agricultural decision support systems remain underutilized and ineffective. Recent efforts to improve decision support systems use have focused on enhancing stakeholder participation in their development, but a mismatch between stakeholders' expectations and the reality of decision support systems outputs continues to limit uptake. Additional challenges remain in problem-framing and evaluation. We propose using an outcomes-based approach called theory of change in conjunction with decision support systems development to support both wider problem-framing and outcomes-based monitoring and evaluation. The theory of change helps framing by placing the decision support systems within a wider context. It highlights how decision support systems use can "contribute" to long-term outcomes, and helps align decision support systems outputs with these larger goals. We illustrate the benefits of linking decision support systems development and application with a theory of change approach using an example of pest rabbit management in Australia. We develop a theory of change that outlines the activities required to achieve the outcomes desired from an effective rabbit management program, and two decision support systems that contribute to specific aspects of decision making in this wider problem context. Using a theory of change in this way should increase acceptance of the role of decision support systems by end-users, clarify their limitations and, importantly, increase effectiveness of rabbit management. The use of a theory of change should benefit those seeking to improve decision support systems design, use and, evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Will Allen
- Learning for Sustainability, PO Box 3018, Christchurch, 8244, New Zealand.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
|
13
|
Abstract
Eradications of invasive species from over 1000 small islands around the world have created conservation arks, but to truly address the threat of invasive species to islands, eradications must be scaled by orders of magnitude. New Zealand has eradicated invasive predators from 10% of its offshore island area and now proposes a vision to eliminate them from the entire country. We review current knowledge of invasive predator ecology and control technologies in New Zealand and the biological research, technological advances, social capacity and enabling policy required. We discuss the economic costs and benefits and conclude with a 50-year strategy for a predator-free New Zealand that is shown to be ecologically obtainable, socially desirable, and economically viable. The proposal includes invasive predator eradication from the two largest offshore islands, mammal-free mainland peninsulas, very large ecosanctuaries, plus thousands of small projects that will together merge eradication and control concepts on landscape scales.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James C Russell
- James Russell ( ) is a senior lecturer in conservation biology at the University of Auckland, in Auckland, New Zealand, whose research focuses on island conservation and rat eradication. John Innes is a wildlife ecologist at Landcare Research, in Hamilton, New Zealand, studying pest control in urban and mainland environments, and the development of ecosanctuaries. Pike Brown is a senior economist and capability leader of the Economics and Land Use Modelling group at Landcare Research. Andrea Byrom is a wildlife ecologist and research portfolio leader for managing invasive weeds, pests, and diseases at Landcare Research in Lincoln, New Zealand
| | - John G Innes
- James Russell ( ) is a senior lecturer in conservation biology at the University of Auckland, in Auckland, New Zealand, whose research focuses on island conservation and rat eradication. John Innes is a wildlife ecologist at Landcare Research, in Hamilton, New Zealand, studying pest control in urban and mainland environments, and the development of ecosanctuaries. Pike Brown is a senior economist and capability leader of the Economics and Land Use Modelling group at Landcare Research. Andrea Byrom is a wildlife ecologist and research portfolio leader for managing invasive weeds, pests, and diseases at Landcare Research in Lincoln, New Zealand
| | - Philip H Brown
- James Russell ( ) is a senior lecturer in conservation biology at the University of Auckland, in Auckland, New Zealand, whose research focuses on island conservation and rat eradication. John Innes is a wildlife ecologist at Landcare Research, in Hamilton, New Zealand, studying pest control in urban and mainland environments, and the development of ecosanctuaries. Pike Brown is a senior economist and capability leader of the Economics and Land Use Modelling group at Landcare Research. Andrea Byrom is a wildlife ecologist and research portfolio leader for managing invasive weeds, pests, and diseases at Landcare Research in Lincoln, New Zealand
| | - Andrea E Byrom
- James Russell ( ) is a senior lecturer in conservation biology at the University of Auckland, in Auckland, New Zealand, whose research focuses on island conservation and rat eradication. John Innes is a wildlife ecologist at Landcare Research, in Hamilton, New Zealand, studying pest control in urban and mainland environments, and the development of ecosanctuaries. Pike Brown is a senior economist and capability leader of the Economics and Land Use Modelling group at Landcare Research. Andrea Byrom is a wildlife ecologist and research portfolio leader for managing invasive weeds, pests, and diseases at Landcare Research in Lincoln, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|