A meta-analysis of short-term outcomes of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and BMI ≤ 35 kg/m2 undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

Metabolic and bariatric surgery in patients with class I obesity; a two-year follow-up

BACKGROUND

Patients with class I obesity may need metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) in the presence of obesity-associated medical problems, but MBS in this class of obesity is under debate. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of MBS in patients with class I obesity.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This study was a historical cohort carried out on 112 patients with class I obesity with body mass index (BMI) of 30-35 kg/m2 with a 24-month follow-up underwent MBS at Rasoul-e-Akram Hospital. The required data were extracted through the Iran National Obesity Surgery Database. The data required for the study consisted of demographic information such as age, gender, and obesity-associated medical problems like type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), hypertension, obstructive sleep apnea, and dyslipidemia before surgery, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery.

RESULTS

Mean age of the patients was 38.10 ± 10.04 years; mean BMI was 32.96 ± 1.35 kg/m2 and 83.9% (n = 94) of patients were female. Out of 18 patients with T2DM, 11 patients (61.11%) had complete remission and seven patients (38.88%) had partial remission. Obstructive sleep apnea, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and gastroesophageal reflux disease were observed in 18 (16.07%), 23 (20.53%), 43 (38.39%), and 13 patients (11.60%) before surgery and resolved at 24-month follow-up. Post-operative complications during the 24-month follow-up were checked to assess safety and there were no De novo gastroesophageal reflux disease, intolerance, leakage, pulmonary thromboembolism, deep vein thrombosis, incisional hernia, hypoalbuminemia (Albumin < 3.5 g/dl), excessive weight loss (BMI < 18.5 kg/m2) at any time during 24-months follow-ups and mortality. Early complications occurred as splenic injury in one case (0.89%), wound infection in one patient (0.89%), and extra-luminal bleeding in 10 (8.92%) after surgery, without any mortality.

CONCLUSION

MBS is safe and effective in class I obesity and can be considered in selected patients with obesity-associated medical problems.

Diabetes remission of bariatric surgery and nonsurgical treatments in type 2 diabetes patients who failure to meet the criteria for surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of bariatric surgery in moderate and severe obesity patients to reach diabetes remission is clear, but for mild obesity patients, the choice of surgical and non-surgical treatment is still unclear. This study we aim to compare the effect of surgical and nonsurgical treatment on patients BMI < 35 kg/m² to reach diabetes remission.

METHOD

We searched relevant articles publish between Jan 1,2010 and Jan 1, 2023 in the following databases: Embase, PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane Library. We got the OR, MD and P-value using random effect model to compare the efficiency between bariatric surgery and nonsurgical treatment on diabetes remission, the reduction of BMI, Hb1Ac and FPG.

RESULTS

In 7 included studies including 544 participants, bariatric surgery is more effective than non-surgical treatment to reach diabetes remission [OR 25.06, 95%CL 9.58-65.54]. Bariatric surgery more likely resulted in significant reductions in HbA1c [MD -1.44, 95%CL (-1.84)-(-1.04)] and FPG [MD -2.61, 95%CL (-3.20)-(-2.20)]. Bariatric surgery may resulted in reductions in BMI [MD -3.14, 95%CL (-4.41)-(-1.88)], which more significant in Asian.

CONCLUSION

In type 2 diabetes patients who BMI < 35 kg/m², bariatric surgery is more likely to achieve diabetes remission and better blood glucose control than nonsurgical treatment.

Sleeve gastrectomy with transit bipartition in a series of 883 patients with mild obesity: early effectiveness and safety outcomes

BACKGROUND

At least 25 metabolic/bariatric procedures have been proposed globally, 5 formally endorsed. A newer procedure, sleeve gastrectomy with transit bipartition (SG + TB), appears to markedly reduce weight and improve metabolic syndrome while being relatively simple technically and protective of long-term nutritional stability. We aimed to investigate SG + TB effectiveness and safety.

METHODS

In a single-center retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data, SG + TB patients were followed through 12 months. Primary outcomes were changes in weight [body mass index (BMI), total weight loss (TWL)], metabolic parameters [HbA1_C, LDL cholesterol, triglycerides (TG), hypertension], and nutritional status. Repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to assess changes in weight and metabolic parameters at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after surgery.

RESULTS

Between 2015 and 2019, 883 patients (mean age 51.8 yrs, BMI 34.1 ± 5.0 kg/m²) underwent SG + TB. Mean operative time was 124 ± 25.4 min; hospitalization, 4.0 ± 2.5 days. ANOVA indicated significant reductions in weight and metabolic parameters (p < 0.005). In 646 patients with complete weight data at 12 months, mean BMI was reduced to 27.2 ± 3.4 kg/m² (p < 0.001), TWL 19.8 ± 6.0%. HbA1_C was normalized in 83.3% of SG + TB patients; hyperlipidemia, hypertension, and hypertriglyceridemia were significantly reduced (p < 0.001). Also, there was a significant reduction in the proportion of patients outside normal nutritional reference ranges. The overall complication rate was 10.2%. There was no mortality.

CONCLUSION

In a series of 833 lower-BMI patients who underwent SG + TB and were followed through 12 months (73.2% follow-up), significant weight loss, comorbidity reduction, and nutritional stability were attained with few major complications and no mortality.

Clinical Effect Analysis of Laparoscopic Surgery for Gastric Tumor under Data Mining

This paper mainly analyzes the feasibility of laparoscopic local gastrectomy for the treatment of benign gastric tumors, evaluating its curative effect, and the use of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) such as Hedyotis diffusa, Radix Pseudostellariae, yi, Pinellia ternata, Ophiopogon japonicus, wood fragrance, Perilla, Scutellaria baicalensis, Yuzhu, hawthorn, Artemisia annua, chicken yellow film, nail, and turtle, and clinical symptoms of statistical analysis of data mining. A total of 86 patients with gastric benign tumor were selected as the research object and were divided into observation group and control group with 43 cases in each by the random number table method. The control group received radical gastrectomy for benign tumor under laparoscopy, while the observation group received local gastrectomy under laparoscopy. Perioperative indexes such as operative time, intraoperative blood loss, and length of hospital stay were recorded in the two groups. Serum C-reactive protein (CRP) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels were analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and the incidence of complications was compared. Based on the clinical analysis of the drug used, the results of association significance were selected, and the top ten results were selected in order of confidence and grouped according to clinical symptoms, respectively, as follows: (1) abdominal distension: Hedyotis diffusa, Radix Pseudostellariae, Poria cocos, Huckleberry, and Coix seed; (2) dry mouth: Poria cocos, Radix Radix Pseudostellariae, Coix seed, Pinellia tuber, and Radix Ophiopogonis. The results showed that the minimum operation time in the observation group was 159.7 ± 13.07 min and the maximum was 172.57 ± 2.47 min, which was lower than that in the control group (the minimum was 172.46 ± 12.45 min and the maximum was 186.49 ± 24.32 min). The length of hospital stay (6.51 ± 1.29 days) was lower than that in the control group (7.56 ± 1.42 days) (P < 0.05). The CEA and CRP levels decreased significantly in both groups after treatment (P < 0.05). However, the observation group's CEA was (4.21 ± 1.05) mg/L and CRP was (8.46 ± 1.25) μg/L. In the control group, CEA was (4.18 ± 1.02) mg/L and CRP was (8.39 ± 1.24) μg/L. There were no significant differences (P < 0.05). The incidence of complications in the observed group was 4.7% lower than 7.0% in the control group (P < 0.05). Therefore, laparoscopic local gastric resection for benign gastric tumors can effectively reduce the incidence of CEA and CRP level and complications and improve the perioperative indicators, which is worth popularizing in clinical practice.

Are Chinese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and a Body Mass Index of 27.5-32.5 kg/m2 Suitable for Metabolic Surgery? A One-Year Post-Surgery Study

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to clarify the efficacy and safety of metabolic surgery in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and a body mass index (BMI) of 27.5-32.5 kg/m².

METHODS

A total of 99 patients with T2DM were enrolled in this retrospective cohort study. Of these patients, 53 had a BMI of 27.5-32.5 kg/m² and had undergone metabolic surgery (n = 21) or were on conventional antidiabetic therapy (n = 32)]; 46 had a BMI ≥ 32.5 kg/m² and all had undergone metabolic surgery. Primary endpoints included the triple endpoint [hemoglobin A1c < 6.5%, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) < 2.6 mmol/L, and systolic blood pressure (SBP) < 130 mmHg] and successful weight loss 1 year later. Remission of diabetes, glucose and lipid metabolism, medication usage, and adverse events were evaluated.

RESULTS

Of patients with BMI 27.5-32.5 kg/m² undergoing metabolic surgery, 33.33% achieved the composite endpoints, and 100% achieved successful weight loss. This result was similar to that in patients with BMI ≥ 32.5 and better than those with BMI 27.5-32.5 kg/m² receiving conventional antidiabetic therapy. A significant and similar reduction in BMI, waist circumference, SBP, serum LDL-C, hemoglobin A1c, and uric acid, as well as similar frequency postoperative adverse events, were confirmed in both metabolic surgery groups. Patients with BMI 27.5-32.5 kg/m² who had undergonemetabolic surgery showed more metabolic improvement than those only receiving medications but they experienced more adverse events.

CONCLUSION

A BMI cutoff of 27.5 kg/m² for metabolic surgery may be suitable for Chinese patients with T2DM.

Effect of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass for Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and a BMI < 32.5 kg/m2: a 6-Year Study in Chinese Patients

BACKGROUND

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is an effective treatment for morbidly obese patients to improve type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Recently, T2DM patients with a lower body mass index (BMI) have been receiving more attention, and these patients could benefit from RYGB.

METHODS

Fifty-two patients with T2DM underwent RYGB between October 2008 and December 2012 in our hospital. Weight, BMI, oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), insulin release test (IRT), C-peptide release test (CRT), glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), and lipid metabolic parameters were measured at baseline and at 3 and 6 months and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 years after surgery.

RESULTS

The mean age of the 52 patients was 46.8 ± 9.5 years, and 57.7% were male. The mean duration of T2DM was 6.5 ± 4.6 years. Compared with the baseline values, weight and BMI were significantly decreased at several time points after surgery. HbA1c decreased from 8.2 ± 1.7% at baseline to 6.5 ± 1.4% at 3 months, 6.5 ± 1.4% at 6 months, 7.2 ± 1.3% at 4 years, and 7.5 ± 1.2% at 6 years. OGTT, OGTT-IRT, and OGTT-CRT improved after surgery. There was a decrease in triglycerides (TGs), total cholesterol (TC), and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and an increase in high-density lipoprotein (HDL). At 6 years after surgery, 16.7% of patients achieved complete remission of T2DM, and 66.7% achieved improvement in T2DM.

CONCLUSION

RYGB may be a safe and effective treatment for T2DM patients with a BMI < 32.5 kg/m² in China. However, a long-term study without loss to follow-up is necessary for better evaluation.

Primary SADI-S in Chinese with Diabetes and BMI < 35 kg/m2: a Retrospective Study with 2-Year Follow-up

BACKGROUND

Single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) is a bariatric procedure based on the standard duodenal switch surgery. It was first introduced in 2007 as a procedure for individuals with clinically severe obesity. Till date, primary SADI-S has not been used on Chinese with diabetes and body mass index (BMI) < 35 kg/m².

OBJECTIVES

Here, we account the use of this novel surgery in Chinese with diabetes and BMI < 35 kg/m².

METHODS

All relevant medical information, involving patients with diabetes and BMI < 35 kg/m², who received primary SADI-S at Beijing Shijitan Hospital from June 2017 to December 2018, was retrospectively assessed.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients were selected for evaluation, and all of them completed a 2-year follow-up. The age, diabetic duration, and preoperative BMI were 35.5 (range 20-63) years, 3.5 (range 0.5-18) years, and 34.40 (range 28.74-34.96) kg/m², respectively. At 24 months, the percentage of total body weight loss (%TWL) and BMI were 26.26 (range 13.33-43.88) and 24.72 (range 17.96-29.07) kg/m², respectively. There were no serious complications or sequelae within a 2-year follow-up. In addition, for diabetes, 20/23 people achieved complete remission, whereas 3 achieved partial remission.

CONCLUSION

SADI-S is a highly effective and feasible bariatric surgery for Chinese having diabetes and BMI < 35 kg/m². However, care must be taken to follow a strict criteria for patient selection and to monitor patients carefully for the detection of postoperative nutritional sequelae.

Early Weight Loss after Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Predicts Sustained Weight Maintenance Among Chinese Individuals with a BMI < 35 kg/m2

OBJECTIVES

This study assessed the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) in Chinese individuals with a body mass index (BMI) under 35 kg/m² and to explore the association between early weight loss and sustained weight maintenance.

METHODS

Patients whose BMI < 35 kg/m² were recruited. Changes in BMI, total weight loss (%TWL), and excess weight loss (%EWL) were evaluated, with successful weight loss being a %EWL of > 50% and a %TWL of > 25%. Binary logistic regression was employed to assess relationships between %EWL and %TWL and to calculate a joint predictor. The association between early weight loss and sustained weight maintenance was assessed as a function of %EWL, %TWL, and this joint predictor, with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves being used for optimal cutoff threshold identification.

RESULTS

In total, 143 individuals with average preoperative weight and BMI values of 88 (82, 95) kg and 31.99 (29.41, 33.15) kg/m², respectively, were enrolled in present study. At 5 years, 48.00% of patients achieved successful weight loss. Both 3-month %EWL and %TWL were significantly related to sustained weight loss at 5 years (P < 0.05). ROC curves were used to identify %TWL of 19.54% at 3 months as the most reliable predictor of weight loss at a 5-year follow-up (sensitivity: 61.11%, specificity: 76.92%).

CONCLUSION

LSG had long-term safety and efficacy, and %TWL at 3 months can predict sustained 5-year weight loss in Chinese individuals with BMI < 35 kg/m².

Impact of Metabolic Surgery on Type-2 Diabetes Remission

Diabetes Mellitus is characterized by numerous metabolic disorders, which have in common the serum elevation of glucose, caused for a pancreatic malfunction in insulin secretion and / or its action. It is a non-communicable disease, considered major public health problems and generalized growth worldwide, being a chronic disease, which can generate a high treatment cost. Metabolic surgery is a safe treatment, regulated by the Federal Council of Medicine and useful in treating people with BMI over 30 years of age, who are unable to control pathologies associated with obesity, primarily type 2 diabetes. The general objective of this study is to understand through a literature review the main impacts of metabolic surgery about the remission of DM 2. This present study it is an exploratory and descriptive study carried out through a literature review. Data were collected through research in virtual health databases, at the Virtual Health Library - VHL, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Information System, LILACS, National Library of Medicine - MEDLINE, Scielo, USP database, PUBMED theses and books. Metabolic surgery proof be a good and effective treatment for having and maintaining good weight loss, as well as a significant clinical and metabolic improvement that extends beyond weight loss. Metabolic surgery is a satisfactory way of achieving long-term weight reduction in obese individuals, increasing survival for these patients. Obese patients with DM2 have a long-term remission of DM2 after bariatric / metabolic surgery. Therefore, it concludes that such procedure is effective in the treatment of the disease and other diseases associated with obesity.

Metabolic Efficacy and Diabetes Remission Predictors Following 'Sleeve Gastrectomy with Loop Duodenojejunal Bypass' Surgery

PURPOSE

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with loop duodenojejunal bypass (SLDJB) is a novel metabolic surgery that is a modification of the single anastomosis duodenoileal bypass with sleeve. Compared to conventional surgeries, SLDJB is highly effective in inducing diabetes remission. This study analyzed the metabolic efficacy of SLDJB.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventy-eight patients with obesity and diabetes who underwent SLDJB between May 2013 and October 2017 were retrospectively analyzed to investigate the efficacy of their surgery and diabetes remission predictors. Complete diabetes remission was defined as an HbA1_c level <6% with cessation of insulin and oral hypoglycemic agents.

RESULTS

Complete diabetes remission occurred in 80.52% and 76.71% of patients at 1- and 3-year follow-ups, respectively. There was no significant difference in the rates of complete diabetes remission between the groups based on gender, preoperative body mass index (BMI), diabetes duration or preoperative insulin use. There was a significantly higher rate of complete remission in patients <50 years of age at the 1-year follow-up. Additionally, the rate of complete remission was significantly less when preoperative glycemic control was poor. Preoperative HbA1_c levels negatively predicted complete remission, but was significant only at the 3-year follow-up.

CONCLUSION

SLDJB is highly effective in treating obesity with type 2 diabetes, and preoperative glycemic control was found to predict complete remission. Patients under 50 years of age had a better short-term response rate; however, the surgery was effective regardless of gender, preoperative BMI, duration of diabetes or preoperative insulin use.

Defining remission of type 2 diabetes in research studies: A systematic scoping review

BACKGROUND

Remission has been identified as a top priority by people with type 2 diabetes. Remission is commonly used as an outcome in research studies; however, a widely accepted definition of remission of type 2 diabetes is lacking. A report on defining remission was published (but not formally endorsed) in Diabetes Care, an American Diabetes Association (ADA) journal. This Diabetes Care report remains widely used. It was the first to suggest 3 components necessary to define the presence of remission: (1) absence of glucose-lowering therapy (GLT); (2) normoglycaemia; and (3) for duration ≥1 year. Our aim is to systematically review how remission of type 2 diabetes has been defined by observational and interventional studies since publication of the 2009 report.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

Four databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL) were searched for studies published from 1 September 2009 to 18 July 2020 involving at least 100 participants with type 2 diabetes in their remission analysis, which examined an outcome of type 2 diabetes remission in adults ≥18 years and which had been published in English since 2009. Remission definitions were extracted and categorised by glucose-lowering therapy, glycaemic thresholds, and duration. A total of 8,966 titles/abstracts were screened, and 178 studies (165 observational and 13 interventional) from 33 countries were included. These contributed 266 definitions, of which 96 were unique. The 2009 report was referenced in 121 (45%) definitions. In total, 247 (93%) definitions required the absence of GLT, and 232 (87%) definitions specified numeric glycaemic thresholds. The most frequently used threshold was HbA1c<42 mmol/mol (6.0%) in 47 (20%) definitions. Time was frequently omitted. In this study, a total of 104 (39%) definitions defined time as a duration. The main limitations of this systematic review lie in the restriction to published studies written in English with sample sizes of over 100. Grey literature was not included in the search.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that there is substantial heterogeneity in the definition of type 2 diabetes remission in research studies published since 2009, at least partly reflecting ambiguity in the 2009 report. This complicates interpretation of previous research on remission of type 2 diabetes and the implications for people with type 2 diabetes. Any new consensus definition of remission should include unambiguous glycaemic thresholds and emphasise duration. Until an international consensus is reached, studies describing remission should clearly define all 3 components of remission.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42019144619.

Surgical resident training program to perform laparoscopic bariatric procedures: Are safety and postoperative outcomes compromised?

INTRODUCTION

Laparoscopic bariatric procedures such as laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) are technically demanding and require a long learning curve. Little is known about whether surgical resident (SR) training programs to perform these procedures are safe and feasible. This study aims to evaluate the results of our SR training program to perform LRYGB.

METHODS

We designed a retrospective study including patients with LRYGB between January 2014 and December 2018, comparing SR results to experienced bariatric surgeons (EBS). In our country, SR have a five-year surgical formative period, and in the fourth year they are trained for 6 months in our bariatric surgery unit, from January to June. In the beginning, they perform different steps of this procedure, to finally complete an LRYGB. We collected demographic data, comorbidities, intraoperative outcomes, and postoperative complications and outcomes after a one-year follow-up.

RESULTS

Two hundred and eight patients were eligible for inclusion: 67 in group I (SR), and 141 in group II (EBS). Both groups were comparable. There was no statistically significant difference in operating time (166.45min in group I vs. 156.69min in group II; P=0.156). Conversion to open surgery, hospital stay, postoperative complications, and short-term outcomes had no significant differences between the two groups. There was no mortality registered during this period.

CONCLUSION

Implementation of LRYGB stepwise learning as part of an SR training program is safe, and results are comparable to EBS, without loss of efficiency. Therefore, it is feasible to train SR in bariatric surgery under EBS supervision.

Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Perioperative Nutrition, Metabolic, and Nonsurgical Support of Patients Undergoing Bariatric Procedures - 2019 Update: Cosponsored by American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists/American College of Endocrinology, The Obesity Society, American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery, Obesity Medicine Association, and American Society of Anesthesiologists

OBJECTIVE

The development of these updated clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) was commissioned by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE), The Obesity Society (TOS), American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS), Obesity Medicine Association (OMA), and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Boards of Directors in adherence with the AACE 2017 protocol for standardized production of CPGs, algorithms, and checklists.

METHODS

Each recommendation was evaluated and updated based on new evidence from 2013 to the present and subjective factors provided by experts.

RESULTS

New or updated topics in this CPG include: contextualization in an adiposity-based chronic disease complications-centric model, nuance-based and algorithm/checklist-assisted clinical decision-making about procedure selection, novel bariatric procedures, enhanced recovery after bariatric surgery protocols, and logistical concerns (including cost factors) in the current health care arena. There are 85 numbered recommendations that have updated supporting evidence, of which 61 are revised and 12 are new. Noting that there can be multiple recommendation statements within a single numbered recommendation, there are 31 (13%) Grade A, 42 (17%) Grade B, 72 (29%) Grade C, and 101 (41%) Grade D recommendations. There are 858 citations, of which 81 (9.4%) are evidence level (EL) 1 (highest), 562 (65.5%) are EL 2, 72 (8.4%) are EL 3, and 143 (16.7%) are EL 4 (lowest).

CONCLUSIONS

Bariatric procedures remain a safe and effective intervention for higher-risk patients with obesity. Clinical decision-making should be evidence based within the context of a chronic disease. A team approach to perioperative care is mandatory, with special attention to nutritional and metabolic issues.

Predictive Model of Type 2 Diabetes Remission after Metabolic Surgery in Chinese Patients

INTRODUCTION

Metabolic surgery is an effective treatment for type 2 diabetes (T2D). At present, there is no authoritative standard for predicting postoperative T2D remission in clinical use. In general, East Asian patients with T2D have a lower body mass index and worse islet function than westerners. We aimed to look for clinical predictors of T2D remission after metabolic surgery in Chinese patients, which may provide insights for patient selection.

METHODS

Patients with T2D who underwent metabolic surgery at the Third Xiangya Hospital between October 2008 and March 2017 were enrolled. T2D remission was defined as an HbA1c level below 6.5% and an FPG concentration below 7.1 mmol/L for at least one year in the absence of antidiabetic medications.

RESULTS

(1) Independent predictors of short-term T2D remission (1-2 years) were age and C-peptide area under the curve (C-peptide AUC); independent predictors of long-term T2D remission (4-6 years) were C-peptide AUC and fasting plasma glucose (FPG). (2) The optimal cutoff value for C-peptide AUC in predicting T2D remission was 30.93 ng/ml, with a specificity of 67.3% and sensitivity of 75.8% in the short term and with a specificity of 61.9% and sensitivity of 81.5% in the long term, respectively. The areas under the ROC curves are 0.674 and 0.623 in the short term and long term, respectively. (3) We used three variables (age, C-peptide AUC, and FPG) to construct a remission prediction score (ACF), a multidimensional 9-point scale, along which greater scores indicate a better chance of T2D remission. We compared our scoring system with other reported models (ABCD, DiaRem, and IMS). The ACF scoring system had the best distribution of patients and prognostic significance according to the ROC curves.

CONCLUSION

Presurgery age, C-peptide AUC, and FPG are independent predictors of T2D remission after metabolic surgery. Among these, C-peptide AUC plays a decisive role in both short- and long-term remission prediction, and the optimal cutoff value for C-peptide AUC in predicting T2D remission was 30.93 ng/ml, with moderate predictive values. The ACF score is a simple reliable system that can predict T2D remission among Chinese patients.

Does Metabolic Surgery Lead to Diabetes Remission in Patients with BMI < 30 kg/m2?: a Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Bariatric surgery has demonstrated to be effective in remission of type 2 diabetes in obese patients, but it is unclear in non-obese patients. The aim of this study is to investigate if metabolic surgery is effective in diabetes resolution in patients with BMI < 30 kg/m².

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic review was performed and the content of the PubMed, Ovid, and the Cochrane Library databases covering the period January 2008 to April 2018 was searched. Studies with metabolic surgery performed in patients with type 2 diabetes, BMI < 30 kg/m² and a follow-up ≥ 6 months were included. Type 2 diabetes remission rate and metabolic parameters changes were measured. A meta-analysis was conducted with the selected studies.

RESULTS

Twenty-six studies were included in the meta-analysis (1105 patients). The mixed-effects meta-analysis model for overall diabetes remission rate produced an estimate of 43% (95% IC 34-53%, p < 0.001). Moderator effects of the variables race, preoperative HbA1c, BMI, months of follow-up, duration of diabetes, and age on diabetes remission were also assessed, with no significant effects being found in any of them. A reduction in BMI (- 3.57 kg/m²), fasting blood glucose (- 55.93 mg/dL) and HbA1c (- 2.08%) was observed after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Metabolic surgery could be effective in remission of type 2 diabetes in BMI < 30 kg/m² patients but randomized and long-term studies are necessary. The scientific community should agree in a single definition of type 2 diabetes remission, in order to know the real effect of metabolic surgery in this group of patients.

Quality Assessment of Systematic Review of the Bariatric Surgery for Diabetes Mellitus

OBJECTIVE

Using the AMSTAR tool, this study evaluated the quality of systematic reviews (SRs) that assessed the efficacy of bariatric surgery in diabetic patients. We aimed to identify studies that can be used as clinical references.

METHODS

Medline (via PubMed), EMBASE, Epistemonikos, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CBM, CNKI, and Wanfang Data were systematically searched from inception to December 31, 2017. Two reviewers independently selected SRs and extracted data. Disagreements were solved by discussions or through consultation with a third reviewer. Reviewers extracted data (characteristics of included SRs, e.g., publication year, language, and number of authors) into the predefined tables in the Microsoft Excel 2013 sheet. Data were visualized using the forest plot in RevMan 5.3 software.

RESULTS

A total of 64 SRs were included. The average AMSTAR score was 7.4 ± 1.7. AMSTAR scores of 7 (n = 21, 32.8%) and 8 (n = 14, 28.1%) were most common. The AMSTAR scores of SRs published before 2016 (n = 46, 71.9%) were compared with SRs published after 2016 (n = 18, 28.1%), and no significant differences were observed (MD = -0.79, 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.65-0.07, P = 0.07). For SRs published in Chinese (n = 17, 26.6%) compared to those published in English (n = 47, 73.4%), the AMSTAR scores significantly differed (MD = 0.21, 95% CI (-0.55, 0.97), P = 0.59). For SRs published in China (n = 33, 51.6%) compared to those published outside of China (n = 31, 48.4%), significant differences in the AMSTAR scores were observed (MD = 1.10, 95% CI (0.29, 1.91), P = 0.008). For SRs with an author number ≤ 6 (n = 31, 48.4%) compared to SRs with authors ≥ 6 (n = 33, 51.6%), no significant differences were observed (MD = -0.36, 95% CI (-1.22, 0.50), P = 0.41). For high-quality SRs published after 2016 (n = 11, 17.2%) compared to other SRs (n = 53, 82.8%), statistically significant differences were noted (MD = 1.75, 95% CI (1.01, 2.49), P < 0.00001).

CONCLUSIONS

The number of SRs assessing the efficacy of bariatric surgery in diabetic patients is increasing by year, but only a small number meet the criteria to support guideline recommendations. Study protocols not being registered, grey literature not retrieved, incorporation of grey literature as exclusion criteria, and failure to evaluate publication bias and report a conflict of interest were the main causes of low AMSTAR scores.

Clinical practice guidelines for the perioperative nutrition, metabolic, and nonsurgical support of patients undergoing bariatric procedures - 2019 update: cosponsored by American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists/American College of Endocrinology, The Obesity Society, American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery, Obesity Medicine Association, and American Society of Anesthesiologists

OBJECTIVE

The development of these updated clinical practice guidelines (CPG) was commissioned by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, The Obesity Society, the American Society of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery, the Obesity Medicine Association, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists boards of directors in adherence to the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists 2017 protocol for standardized production of CPG, algorithms, and checklists.

METHODS

Each recommendation was evaluated and updated based on new evidence from 2013 to the present and subjective factors provided by experts.

RESULTS

New or updated topics in this CPG include contextualization in an adiposity-based, chronic disease complications-centric model, nuance-based, and algorithm/checklist-assisted clinical decision-making about procedure selection, novel bariatric procedures, enhanced recovery after bariatric surgery protocols, and logistical concerns (including cost factors) in the current healthcare arena. There are 85 numbered recommendations that have updated supporting evidence, of which 61 are revised and 12 are new. Noting that there can be multiple recommendation statements within a single numbered recommendation, there are 31 (13%) Grade A, 42 (17%) Grade B, 72 (29%) Grade C, and 101 (41%) Grade D recommendations. There are 858 citations, of which 81 (9.4%) are evidence level (EL) 1 (highest), 562 (65.5%) are EL 2, 72 (8.4%) are EL 3, and 143 (16.7%) are EL 4 (lowest).

CONCLUSIONS

Bariatric procedures remain a safe and effective intervention for higher-risk patients with obesity. Clinical decision-making should be evidence-based within the context of a chronic disease. A team approach to perioperative care is mandatory with special attention to nutritional and metabolic issues.

Preserving Duodenal-Jejunal (Foregut) Transit Does Not Impair Glucose Tolerance and Diabetes Remission Following Gastric Bypass in Type 2 Diabetes Sprague-Dawley Rat Model

BACKGROUND

Possible mechanisms underlying diabetes remission following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) include eradication of putative factor(s) with duodenal-jejunal bypass.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to observe the effects of duodenal-jejunal transit on glucose tolerance and diabetes remission in gastric bypass rat model.

METHOD

In order to verify the effect of duodenal-jejunal transit on glucose tolerance and diabetes remission in gastric bypass, 22 type 2 diabetes Sprague-Dawley rat models established through high-fat diet and low-dose streptozotocin (STZ) administered intraperitoneally were assigned to one of three groups: gastric bypass with duodenal-jejunal transit (GB-DJT n = 8), gastric bypass without duodenal-jejunal transit (RYGB n = 8), and sham (n = 6). Body weight, food intake, blood glucose, as well as meal-stimulated insulin, and incretin hormone responses were assessed to ascertain the effect of surgery in all groups. Oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and insulin tolerance test (ITT) were conducted three and 7 weeks after surgery.

RESULTS

Comparing our GB-DJT to the RYGB group, we saw no differences in the mean decline in body weight, food intake, and blood glucose 8 weeks after surgery. GB-DJT group exhibited immediate and sustained glucose control throughout the study. Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) and gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) levels were also significantly increased from preoperative level in the GB-DJT group (p < 0.05). Insulin and GLP-1 area under curve (AUC) as well as improved glycemic excursion on OGTT did not differ between GB-DJT and RYGB groups. Outcomes with sham operation did not differ from preoperative level.

CONCLUSION

Preserving duodenal-jejunal transit does not impede glucose tolerance and diabetes remission after gastric bypass in type-2 diabetes Sprague-Dawley rat model.

Exposing the Causal Effect of Body Mass Index on the Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Mendelian Randomization Study

Introduction: High body mass index (BMI) is a positive associated phenotype of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Abundant studies have observed this from a clinical perspective. Since the rapid increase in a large number of genetic variants from the genome-wide association studies (GWAS), common SNPs of BMI and T2DM were identified as the genetic basis for understanding their associations. Currently, their causality is beginning to blur. Materials and Methods: To classify it, a Mendelian randomisation (MR), using genetic instrumental variables (IVs) to explore the causality of intermediate phenotype and disease, was utilized here to test the effect of BMI on the risk of T2DM. In this article, MR was carried out on GWAS data using 52 independent BMI SNPs as IVs. The pooled odds ratio (OR) of these SNPs was calculated using inverse-variance weighted method for the assessment of 5 kg/m2 higher BMI on the risk of T2DM. The leave-one-out validation was conducted to identify the effect of individual SNPs. MR-Egger regression was utilized to detect potential pleiotropic bias of variants. Results: We obtained the high OR (1.470; 95% CI 1.170 to 1.847; P = 0.001), low intercept (0.004, P = 0.661), and small fluctuation of ORs {from -0.039 [(1.412 - 1.470) / 1.470)] to 0.075 [(1.568- 1.470) / 1.470)] in leave-one-out validation. Conclusion: We validate the causal effect of high BMI on the risk of T2DM. The low intercept shows no pleiotropic bias of IVs. The small alterations of ORs activated by removing individual SNPs showed no single SNP drives our estimate.

Prediction of Type 2 Diabetes Remission after Bariatric or Metabolic Surgery

Bariatric surgery has evolved from a surgical measure for treating morbid obesity to an epochal remedy for treating metabolic syndrome as a whole, which is represented by type 2 diabetes mellitus. Numerous clinical trials have advocated bariatric or metabolic surgery over nonsurgical interventions because of markedly superior metabolic outcomes in morbidly obese patients who satisfy traditional criteria for bariatric surgery (body mass index [BMI] >35 kg/m2) and in less obese or simply overweight patients. Nevertheless, not all diabetes patients achieve the most desirable outcomes; i.e., diabetes remission after metabolic surgery. Thus, candidates for metabolic surgery should be carefully selected based on comprehensive preoperative assessments of the risk-benefit ratio. Predictors for diabetes remission after metabolic surgery may be classified into two groups based on mechanism of action. The first is indices for preserved pancreatic beta-cell function, including younger age, shorter duration of diabetes, and higher C-peptide level. The second is the potential for an insulin resistance reduction, including higher baseline BMI and visceral fat area. Several prediction models for diabetes remission have been suggested by merging these two to guide the joint decision-making process between clinicians and patients. Three such models, DiaRem, ABCD, and individualized metabolic surgery scores, provide an intuitive scoring system and have been validated in an independent external cohort and can be utilized in routine clinical practice. These prediction models need further validation in various ethnicities to ensure universal applicability.

Laparoscopic metabolic surgery for the treatment of type 2 diabetes in Asia: a scoping review and evidence-based analysis

Background

Laparoscopic metabolic surgery has been previously shown to be an effective treatment for obese patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM). The objective of this scoping review is to determine the impact of metabolic surgery for the treatment of type 2 diabetes in Asia and perform an evidence-based analysis.

Methods

We performed a literature search in PubMed for research on laparoscopic metabolic surgery for the treatment of T2DM in Asia region. We classified the included studies based on the Oxford Center for Evidence Based Medicine guidelines. And performed and evidence analysis.

Results

In total, 205 articles were identified. 62.9% of the studies were from East Asia. The evidence of 26 studies are level I, 59 are level II. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) was the most commonly reported surgical procedure (63.1%) in Asia. The number of laparoscopic metabolic surgery for T2DM in Asian countries has increased rapidly over the last 8 years. We identified 16 studies which showed that laparoscopic metabolic surgery is an effective and safe treatment for T2DM in patients with a BMI of > 25 kg/m² to < 35 kg/m² in Asia.

Conclusions

Our results suggest that laparoscopic metabolic surgery might be an effective and safe treatment for T2DM patients with BMI < 35 kg/m², and that LSG is the most commonly performed surgical procedure for this in Asia.

Mid-Term Remission of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus After Laparoscopic Roux En-Y Gastric Bypass

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic Roux en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) is an established therapeutic modality for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, there is paucity of data on the outcomes of LRYGB on T2DM beyond 2 years. This study aimed to examine the medium-term effects of LRYGB on T2DM and determine the predictors of T2DM resolution.

METHODS

Prospective data were collected for all consecutive LRYGB performed from September 2009 to November 2010. The American Diabetes Association guidelines were used to define complete (CR) or partial (PR) remission of diabetes. Diabetes status was considered improved when there was >50 % reduction in the dose of medications or when glycaemic control was achieved after stopping insulin. The effects of baseline characteristics, diabetes data and weight loss data at 4 years on T2DM remission were studied.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients with T2DM underwent LRYGB with mean ± SD age and body mass index (BMI) of 48.6 ± 9.6 years and 50.4 ± 6.5 kg/m², respectively. Median (IQR, interquartile range) duration of T2DM preoperatively was 60 (36-126) months. Median (IQR) follow-up was 52 (50-57) months. T2DM remission was achieved in 64 % of patients (44 % CR, 20 % PR), and a further 28 % of patients had improvement in their diabetes status. Multivariate analyses demonstrated significant excess weight loss (EWL) [P = 0.008] and lower BMI [P = 0.04] at 4 years to be the only independent predictors of T2DM medium-term outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The medium-term effects of LRYGB on T2DM remission/improvement were maintained in 92 % of patients. EWL and lower BMI at 4 years were independent predictors of T2DM remission.

Postoperative Early Major and Minor Complications in Laparoscopic Vertical Sleeve Gastrectomy (LVSG) Versus Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (LRYGB) Procedures: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) and laparoscopic vertical sleeve gastrectomy (LVSG) have been proposed as cost-effective strategies to manage obesity-related chronic disease. The aim of this meta-analysis and systematic review was to compare the "early postoperative complication rate i.e. within 30-days" reported from randomized control trials (RCTs) comparing these two procedures.

METHODS

RCTs comparing the early complication rates following LVSG and LRYGB between 2000 and 2015 were selected from PubMed, Medline, Embase, Science Citation Index, Current Contents, and the Cochrane database. The outcome variables analyzed included 30-day mortality, major and minor complications and interventions required for their management, length of hospital stay, readmission rates, operating time, and conversions from laparoscopic to open procedures.

RESULTS

Six RCTs involving a total of 695 patients (LVSG n = 347, LRYGB n = 348) reported on early major complications. A statistically significant reduction in relative odds of early major complications favoring the LVSG procedure was noted (p = 0.05). Five RCTs representing 633 patients (LVSG n = 317, LRYGB n = 316) reported early minor complications. A non-statically significant reduction in relative odds of 29 % favoring the LVSG procedure was observed for early minor complications (p = 0.4). However, other outcomes directly related to complications which included reoperation rates, readmission rate, and 30-day mortality rate showed comparable effect size for both surgical procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis and systematic review of RCTs suggests that fewer early major and minor complications are associated with LVSG compared with LRYGB procedure. However, this does not translate into higher readmission rate, reoperation rate, or 30-day mortality for either procedure.

Revisional Bariatric/Metabolic Surgery: What Dictates Its Indications?

Bariatric/metabolic surgery is currently the only effective long-term treatment for morbid obesity- and obesity-related diseases such as diabetes, heart disease, hypertension, obstructive sleep apnea, and dyslipidemia. In addition, bariatric/metabolic surgery has been shown to significantly reduce the incidence of diabetes and cancer and prolong life when compared to non-surgical therapies. However, as obesity is a chronic disease, recidivism of weight and comorbid conditions can occur. In addition, the surgical construct can lead to long-term consequences such as marginal ulceration, bowel obstruction, reflux, and nutritional deficiencies. Despite these drawbacks, prospective randomized controlled studies and long-term longitudinal population-based comparative studies greatly favor surgical intervention as opposed to traditional lifestyle, diet, and exercise programs. Revisional surgery can be quite complex and technically challenging and may offer the patient a wide variety of solutions for treatment of weight recidivism and complications after primary operations. Given the paucity of high quality published data, we have endeavored to provide indications for revisions after bariatric surgery.

Using the hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp to assess insulin sensitivity at 3 months following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery in type 2 diabetes patients with BMI <35 kg/m2 in China

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to describe short-time effect of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) on insulin sensitivity (IS) of Chinese diabetes patients with body mass index (BMI) <35 kg/m² by hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We studied 15 type 2 diabete mellitus (T2DM) patients with BMI <35 kg/m², who underwent laparoscopical Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB). Hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp were performed at baseline and at 3 months after LRYGB.

RESULTS

The glucose disposal rate (M value) increased significantly at 3 months after RYGB (from 3.36 ± 1.26 mg kg^-1 min^-1 to 6.30 ± 1.3 mg kg^-1 min^-1, p < 0.001). The time to reach euglycemia at the hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp reduced remarkably from baseline to 3 months after RYGB (from 114.40 ± 6.11 min to 97.93 ± 8.57 min, p < 0.001). There was a marked reduction in value of HOMA-IR (from 4.47 ± 2.20 mg kg^-1 min^-1 to 2.10 ± 0.75 mg kg^-1 min^-1, p < 0.001). The parameters of body fat distribution (body weight, BMI, waist circumference, waist to hip radio) changed obviously after surgery. RYGB caused a significant improvement in fasting and postprandial plasma glucose and insulin, HbAc1. Preoperative M value and the time to reach steady-state correlated with changes of M and the time to reach steady-state at 3 months after RYGB.

CONCLUSION

Peripheral and hepatic IS improved remarkably at 3 months following RYGB, as an important mechanism for early improvement in T2DM patients with low BMI. And the time to reach euglycemia at the hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp may be an useful index of assessing insulin sensitivity. It is more reasonal to combine the time to reach euglycemia with M value for assessing IS.

Bariatric/Metabolic Surgery to Treat Type 2 Diabetes in Patients With a BMI <35 kg/m2

OBJECTIVE

Global usage of bariatric surgery has been dictated for the past quarter century by National Institutes of Health recommendations restricting these operations to individuals with a BMI ≥35 kg/m(2). Strong evidence now demonstrates that bariatric procedures markedly improve or cause remission of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), in part through weight-independent mechanisms, and that baseline BMI does not predict surgical benefits on glycemic or cardiovascular outcomes. This impels consideration of such operations as "metabolic surgery," which is used expressly to treat T2DM, including among patients with a BMI <35 kg/m(2) who constitute the majority of people with diabetes worldwide. Here, we review available evidence to inform that consideration.

RESULTS

A meta-analysis of the 11 published randomized clinical trials (RCTs) directly comparing bariatric/metabolic surgery versus a variety of medical/lifestyle interventions for T2DM provides level 1A evidence that surgery is superior for T2DM remission, glycemic control, and HbA1c lowering. Importantly, this is equally true for patients whose baseline BMI is below or above 35 kg/m(2). Similar conclusions derive from meta-analyses of high-quality nonrandomized prospective comparisons. Meta-analysis of all pertinent published studies indicates that T2DM remission rates following bariatric/metabolic surgery are comparable above and below the 35 kg/m(2) BMI threshold. The safety, antidiabetes durability, and benefits on other cardiovascular risk factors from bariatric/metabolic surgery appear roughly comparable among patients with a BMI below or above 35 kg/m(2). Further studies are needed to extend long-term findings and measure "hard" macrovascular/microvascular outcomes and mortality in RCTs.

CONCLUSIONS

Extant data, including level 1A evidence from numerous RCTs, support new guidelines from the 2nd Diabetes Surgery Summit that advocate for the consideration of bariatric/metabolic surgery as one option, along with lifestyle and medical therapy, to treat T2DM among patients with a BMI <35 kg/m(2).

Surgical cure for type 2 diabetes by foregut or hindgut operations: a myth or reality? A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Bariatric surgery results in remission of type 2 diabetes mellitus in a significant proportion of patients. Animal research has proposed the foregut and hindgut hypotheses as possible mechanisms of remission of T2DM independent of weight loss. These hypotheses have formed the basis of investigational procedures designed to treat T2DM in non-obese (in addition to obese) patients. The aim of this study was to review the procedures that utilise the foregut and hindgut hypotheses to treat T2DM in humans.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted to identify the investigational procedures performed in humans that are based on the foregut and hindgut hypotheses and then to assess their outcomes.

RESULTS

Twenty-four studies reported novel procedures to treat T2DM in humans; only ten utilised glycated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) in their definition of remission. Reported remission rates were 20-40 % for duodenal-jejunal bypass (DJB), 73-93 % for duodenal-jejunal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (DJB-SG), 62.5-100 % for duodenal-jejunal bypass sleeve (DJBS) and 47-95.7 % for ileal interposition with sleeve gastrectomy (II-SG). When using a predetermined level of HbA1c to define remission, the remission rates were lower (27, 63, 0 and 65 %) for DJB, DJB-SG, DJBS and II-SG.

CONCLUSIONS

The outcomes of the foregut- and hindgut-based procedures are not better than the outcomes of just one of their components, namely sleeve gastrectomy. The complexity of these procedures in addition to their comparable outcomes to a simpler operation questions their utility.