Automatic opportunistic osteoporosis screening using low-dose chest computed tomography scans obtained for lung cancer screening

Artificial intelligence assisted automatic screening of opportunistic osteoporosis in computed tomography images from different scanners

OBJECTIVES

It is feasible to evaluate bone mineral density (BMD) and detect osteoporosis through an artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted system by using quantitative computed tomography (QCT) as a reference without additional radiation exposure or cost.

METHODS

A deep-learning model developed based on 3312 low-dose chest computed tomography (LDCT) scans (trained with 2337 and tested with 975) achieved a mean dice similarity coefficient of 95.8% for T1-T12, L1, and L2 vertebral body (VB) segmentation on test data. We performed a model evaluation based on 4401 LDCT scans (obtained from scanners of 3 different manufacturers as external validation data). The BMD values of all individuals were extracted from three consecutive VBs: T12 to L2. Line regression and Bland‒Altman analyses were used to evaluate the overall detection performance. Sensitivity and specificity were used to evaluate the diagnostic performance for normal, osteopenia, and osteoporosis patients.

RESULTS

Compared with the QCT results as the diagnostic standard, the BMD assessed had a mean error of (- 0.28, 2.37) mg/cm3. Overall, the sensitivity of a normal diagnosis was greater than that of a diagnosis of osteopenia or osteoporosis. For the diagnosis of osteoporosis, the model achieved a sensitivity > 86% and a specificity > 98%.

CONCLUSION

The developed tool is clinically applicable and helpful for the positioning and analysis of VBs, the measurement of BMD, and the screening of osteopenia and osteoporosis.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

The developed system achieved high accuracy for automatic opportunistic osteoporosis screening using low-dose chest CT scans and performed well on CT images collected from different scanners.

KEY POINTS

Osteoporosis is a prevalent but underdiagnosed condition that can increase the risk of fractures. This system could automatically and opportunistically screen for osteoporosis using low-dose chest CT scans obtained for lung cancer screening. The developed system performed well on CT images collected from different scanners and did not differ with patient age or sex.

Opportunistic prognostication by computerized tomography (CT) in the emergency department: analysis on 1920 patients and creation of a simple and fast scoring system

PURPOSE

To use simple CT measurements of musculoskeletal and cardiovascular systems to create a CT-based score to predict mortality in patients admitted to the Emergency Department (ED).

METHODS

The study received IRB approval. Non-contrast abdominal CT of > 18 year old patients admitted to the ER between January 2019 and January 2020 were evaluated by a team of twelve radiologists to calculate: (1) diameter of the infrarenal aorta in millimeter; (2) cross sectional area and composition (Hounsfield units) of the psoas muscle at the third lumbar vertebra (LV); (3) bone density, as quantified at the first lumbar vertebra (LV); (4) presence or absence of dilated abdominal aorta. Thirty-day all-cause mortality (ACM) was determined through hospital and electronic records.

RESULTS

N = 1920 unique patients were evaluated. The mean age was 65 ± 19 years and 46% were female. Death occurred in 7.9% of patients by 30 days from admission. The derivation dataset comprised 1462 patients. At multivariable analysis, age (OR 1.02, 95% CI: 1.007-1.04, p = 0.005), psoas cross sectional area (OR 0.99, 95% CI: 0.997-0.999, p < 0.001) and density (OR 0.96, 95% CI: 0.95-0.98, p < 0.001), and dilated infrarenal aorta (OR 1.85, 95% CI: 1-3.28, p = 0.04) were predictors of the outcome. We accordingly derived a 4-item risk score. In the derivation dataset, the score yielded moderate-high discrimination, with an AUC of 0.73 and excellent diagnostic agreement. In the validation dataset (N = 458), discrimination was high (AUC = 0.83).

CONCLUSION

Simple measurements gathered during a standard CT may allow determining the risk of mortality in the heterogeneous patient population admitted to the ED in a cost- and time-effective manner.

Automated vertebral compression fracture detection and quantification on opportunistic CT scans: a performance evaluation

AIM

Since the majority of vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) are asymptomatic, they often go undetected on opportunistic CT scans. To reduce rates of undiagnosed osteoporosis, we developed a deep learning (DL)-based algorithm using 2D/3D U-Nets convolutional neural networks to opportunistically screen for VCF on CT scans. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of the algorithm using external real-world data.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

CT scans acquired for various indications other than a suspicion of VCF from January 2019 to August 2020 were retrospectively and consecutively collected. The algorithm was designed to label each vertebra, detect VCF, measure vertebral height loss (VHL) and calculate mean Hounsfield Units (mean HU) for vertebral bone attenuation. For the ground truth, two board-certified radiologists defined if VCF was present and performed the measurements. The algorithm analyzed the scans and the results were compared to the experts' assessments.

RESULTS

A total of 100 patients (mean age: 76.6 years ± 10.1[SD], 72% women) were evaluated. The overall labeling agreement was 94.9% (95%CI: 93.7%-95.9%). Regarding VHL, the 95% limits of agreement (LoA) between the algorithm and the radiologists was [-9.3, 8.6]; 94.1% of the differences lay within the radiologists' LoA and the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.854 (95%CI: 0.822-0.881). For the mean HU, Pearson's correlation was 0.89 (95%CI: 0.84-0.92; p-value <0.0001). Finally, the algorithm's VCF screening sensitivity and specificity were 92.3% (95%CI: 81.5%-97.9%) and 91.7% (95%CI: 80.0%-97.7%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This automated tool for screening and quantification of opportunistic VCF demonstrated high reliability and performance that may facilitate radiologists' task and improve opportunistic osteoporosis assessments.

Automated Fast Prediction of Bone Mineral Density From Low-dose Computed Tomography

BACKGROUND

Low-dose chest CT (LDCT) is commonly employed for the early screening of lung cancer. However, it has rarely been utilized in the assessment of volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) and the diagnosis of osteoporosis (OP).

PURPOSE

This study investigated the feasibility of using deep learning to establish a system for vBMD prediction and OP classification based on LDCT scans.

METHODS

This study included 551 subjects who underwent both LDCT and QCT examinations. First, the U-net was developed to automatically segment lumbar vertebrae from single 2D LDCT slices near the mid-vertebral level. Then, a prediction model was proposed to estimate vBMD, which was subsequently employed for detecting OP and osteopenia (OA). Specifically, two input modalities were constructed for the prediction model. The performance metrics of the models were calculated and evaluated.

RESULTS

The segmentation model exhibited a strong correlation with manual segmentation, achieving a mean Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of 0.974, sensitivity of 0.964, positive predictive value (PPV) of 0.985, and Hausdorff distance of 3.261 in the test set. Linear regression and Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated strong agreement between the predicted vBMD from two-channel inputs and QCT-derived vBMD, with a root mean square error of 8.958 mg/mm3 and an R2 of 0.944. The areas under the curve for detecting OP and OA were 0.800 and 0.878, respectively, with an overall accuracy of 94.2%. The average processing time for this system was 1.5 s.

CONCLUSION

This prediction system could automatically estimate vBMD and detect OP and OA on LDCT scans, providing great potential for the osteoporosis screening.

A novel hybrid deep learning framework based on biplanar X-ray radiography images for bone density prediction and classification

This study utilized deep learning for bone mineral density (BMD) prediction and classification using biplanar X-ray radiography (BPX) images from Huashan Hospital Medical Checkup Center. Results showed high accuracy and strong correlation with quantitative computed tomography (QCT) results. The proposed models offer potential for screening patients at a high risk of osteoporosis and reducing unnecessary radiation and costs.

PURPOSE

To explore the feasibility of using a hybrid deep learning framework (HDLF) to establish a model for BMD prediction and classification based on BPX images. This study aimed to establish an automated tool for screening patients at a high risk of osteoporosis.

METHODS

A total of 906 BPX scans from 453 subjects were included in this study, with QCT results serving as the reference standard. The training-validation set:independent test set ratio was 4:1. The L1-L3 vertebral bodies were manually annotated by experienced radiologists, and the HDLF was established to predict BMD and diagnose abnormality based on BPX images and clinical information. The performance metrics of the models were calculated and evaluated.

RESULTS

TheR 2 values of the BMD prediction regression model in the independent test set based on BPX images and multimodal data (BPX images and clinical information) were 0.77 and 0.79, respectively. The Pearson correlation coefficients were 0.88 and 0.89, respectively, with P-values < 0.001. Bland-Altman analysis revealed no significant difference between the predictions of the models and QCT results. The classification model achieved the highest AUC of 0.97 based on multimodal data in the independent test set, with an accuracy of 0.93, sensitivity of 0.84, specificity of 0.96, and F1 score of 0.93.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that deep learning neural networks applied to BPX images can accurately predict BMD and perform classification diagnoses, which can reduce the radiation risk, economic consumption, and time consumption associated with specialized BMD measurement.

Utilizing artificial intelligence to determine bone mineral density using spectral CT

BACKGROUND

Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) has demonstrated the feasibility of using HAP-water to respond to BMD changes without requiring dedicated software or calibration. Artificial intelligence (AI) has been utilized for diagnosising osteoporosis in routine CT scans but has rarely been used in DECT. This study investigated the diagnostic performance of an AI system for osteoporosis screening using DECT images with reference quantitative CT (QCT).

METHODS

This prospective study included 120 patients who underwent DECT and QCT scans from August to December 2023. Two convolutional neural networks, 3D RetinaNet and U-Net, were employed for automated vertebral body segmentation. The accuracy of the bone mineral density (BMD) measurement was assessed with relative measurement error (RME%). Linear regression and Bland-Altman analyses were performed to compare the BMD values between the AI and manual systems with those of the QCT. The diagnostic performance of the AI and manual systems for osteoporosis and low BMD was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.

RESULTS

The overall mean RME% for the AI and manual systems were - 15.93 ± 12.05 % and - 25.47 ± 14.83 %, respectively. BMD measurements using the AI system achieved greater agreement with the QCT results than those using the manual system (R2 = 0.973, 0.948, p < 0.001; mean errors, 23.27, 35.71 mg/cm3; 95 % LoA, -9.72 to 56.26, -11.45 to 82.87 mg/cm3). The areas under the curve for the AI and manual systems were 0.979 and 0.933 for detecting osteoporosis and 0.980 and 0.991 for low BMD.

CONCLUSION

This AI system could achieve relatively high accuracy for automated BMD measurement on DECT scans, providing great potential for the follow-up of BMD in osteoporosis screening.

Assessment of trabecular bone Hounsfield units in the lumbar spine for osteoporosis evaluation in individuals aged 65 and above: a review

Osteoporosis is a prevalent condition that significantly increases fracture risk, particularly in the elderly population. Despite its widespread occurrence, osteoporosis is often underdiagnosed and inadequately managed. Traditional diagnostic methods, such as dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), have limitations in terms of accessibility and accuracy, necessitating exploration of alternative diagnostic approaches.This review aims to evaluate the diagnostic potential of Hounsfield Unit (HU) values derived from abdominal computed tomography (CT) scans, specifically focusing on the trabecular bone of the lumbar spine, for osteoporosis assessment in individuals aged 65 and older. The review seeks to assess the sensitivity, specificity, and overall diagnostic performance of HU values in distinguishing between normal bone density, osteopenia, and osteoporosis, and to identify areas for further investigation to establish standardized diagnostic criteria.This review compiles existing studies on the use of HU values from abdominal CT scans for osteoporosis diagnosis. It examines the relationship between HU values and DXA T-scores, analyzes optimal HU thresholds for classifying bone density categories, and explores the potential of CT scans as a viable alternative to DXA.The findings indicate that HU values from abdominal CT scans show strong correlations with DXA T-scores, suggesting a promising diagnostic tool for assessing bone density and quality. HU values have demonstrated the ability to differentiate between osteopenia, osteoporosis, and normal bone density, with varying sensitivity and specificity depending on the established HU threshold. CT scans are identified as a scalable, cost-effective alternative to DXA, with the added benefit of utilizing routine abdominal CT scans, which are often conducted for other clinical reasons, thereby reducing additional costs and radiation exposure.HU values derived from abdominal CT scans represent a promising approach for osteoporosis screening, offering a potential solution for routine, cost-effective, and accurate diagnosis, especially in older adults. However, there is a need for standardized HU thresholds and further research to refine diagnostic criteria and enhance the accuracy of osteoporosis detection. Establishing standardized guidelines would improve diagnostic consistency and facilitate early intervention, potentially improving patient outcomes and reducing healthcare burdens.

The Pivotal Role of Baseline LDCT for Lung Cancer Screening in the Era of Artificial Intelligence

In this narrative review, we address the ongoing challenges of lung cancer (LC) screening using chest low-dose computerized tomography (LDCT) and explore the contributions of artificial intelligence (AI), in overcoming them. We focus on evaluating the initial (baseline) LDCT examination, which provides a wealth of information relevant to the screening participant's health. This includes the detection of large-size prevalent LC and small-size malignant nodules that are typically diagnosed as LCs upon growth in subsequent annual LDCT scans. Additionally, the baseline LDCT examination provides valuable information about smoking-related comorbidities, including cardiovascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and interstitial lung disease (ILD), by identifying relevant markers. Notably, these comorbidities, despite the slow progression of their markers, collectively exceed LC as ultimate causes of death at follow-up in LC screening participants. Computer-assisted diagnosis tools currently improve the reproducibility of radiologic readings and reduce the false negative rate of LDCT. Deep learning (DL) tools that analyze the radiomic features of lung nodules are being developed to distinguish between benign and malignant nodules. Furthermore, AI tools can predict the risk of LC in the years following a baseline LDCT. AI tools that analyze baseline LDCT examinations can also compute the risk of cardiovascular disease or death, paving the way for personalized screening interventions. Additionally, DL tools are available for assessing osteoporosis and ILD, which helps refine the individual's current and future health profile. The primary obstacles to AI integration into the LDCT screening pathway are the generalizability of performance and the explainability.

Automated deep learning-based bone mineral density assessment for opportunistic osteoporosis screening using various CT protocols with multi-vendor scanners

This retrospective study examined the diagnostic efficacy of automated deep learning-based bone mineral density (DL-BMD) measurements for osteoporosis screening using 422 CT datasets from four vendors in two medical centers, encompassing 159 chest, 156 abdominal, and 107 lumbar spine datasets. DL-BMD values on L1 and L2 vertebral bodies were compared with manual BMD (m-BMD) measurements using Pearson's correlation and intraclass correlation coefficients. Strong agreement was found between m-BMD and DL-BMD in total CT scans (r = 0.953, p < 0.001). The diagnostic performance of DL-BMD was assessed using receiver operating characteristic analysis for osteoporosis and low BMD by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and m-BMD. Compared to DXA, DL-BMD demonstrated an AUC of 0.790 (95% CI 0.733-0.839) for low BMD and 0.769 (95% CI 0.710-0.820) for osteoporosis, with sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 80.8% (95% CI 74.2-86.3%), 56.3% (95% CI 43.4-68.6%), and 74.3% (95% CI 68.3-79.7%) for low BMD and 65.4% (95% CI 50.9-78.0%), 70.9% (95% CI 63.8-77.3%), and 69.7% (95% CI 63.5-75.4%) for osteoporosis, respectively. Compared to m-BMD, DL-BMD showed an AUC of 0.983 (95% CI 0.973-0.993) for low BMD and 0.972 (95% CI 0.958-0.987) for osteoporosis, with sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 97.3% (95% CI 94.5-98.9%), 85.2% (95% CI 78.8-90.3%), and 92.7% (95% CI 89.7-95.0%) for low BMD and 94.4% (95% CI 88.3-97.9%), 89.5% (95% CI 85.6-92.7%), and 90.8% (95% CI 87.6-93.4%) for osteoporosis, respectively. The DL-based method can provide accurate and reliable BMD assessments across diverse CT protocols and scanners.

Feasibility study of opportunistic osteoporosis screening on chest CT using a multi-feature fusion DCNN model

A multi-feature fusion DCNN model for automated evaluation of lumbar vertebrae L1 on chest combined with clinical information and radiomics permits estimation of volumetric bone mineral density for evaluation of osteoporosis.

PURPOSE

To develop a multi-feature deep learning model based on chest CT, combined with clinical information and radiomics to explore the feasibility in screening for osteoporosis based on estimation of volumetric bone mineral density.

METHODS

The chest CT images of 1048 health check subjects were retrospectively collected as the master dataset, and the images of 637 subjects obtained from a different CT scanner were used for the external validation cohort. The subjects were divided into three categories according to the quantitative CT (QCT) examination, namely, normal group, osteopenia group, and osteoporosis group. Firstly, a deep learning-based segmentation model was constructed. Then, classification models were established and selected, and then, an optimal model to build bone density value prediction regression model was chosen.

RESULTS

The DSC value was 0.951 ± 0.030 in the testing dataset and 0.947 ± 0.060 in the external validation cohort. The multi-feature fusion model based on the lumbar 1 vertebra had the best performance in the diagnosis. The area under the curve (AUC) of diagnosing normal, osteopenia, and osteoporosis was 0.992, 0.973, and 0.989. The mean absolute errors (MAEs) of the bone density prediction regression model in the test set and external testing dataset are 8.20 mg/cm3 and 9.23 mg/cm3, respectively, and the root mean square errors (RMSEs) are 10.25 mg/cm3 and 11.91 mg/cm3, respectively. The R-squared values are 0.942 and 0.923, respectively. The Pearson correlation coefficients are 0.972 and 0.965.

CONCLUSION

The multi-feature fusion DCNN model based on only the lumbar 1 vertebrae and clinical variables can perform bone density three-classification diagnosis and estimate volumetric bone mineral density. If confirmed in independent populations, this automated opportunistic chest CT evaluation can help clinical screening of large-sample populations to identify subjects at high risk of osteoporotic fracture.

3D U-Net Neural Network Architecture-Assisted LDCT to Acquire Vertebral Morphology Parameters: A Vertebral Morphology Comprehensive Analysis in a Chinese Population

To evaluate the feasibility of acquiring vertebral height from chest low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) images using an artificial intelligence (AI) system based on 3D U-Net vertebral segmentation technology and the correlation and features of vertebral morphology with sex and age of the Chinese population. Patients who underwent chest LDCT between September 2020 and April 2023 were enrolled. The Altman and Pearson's correlation analyses were used to compare the correlation and consistency between the AI software and manual measurement of vertebral height. The anterior height (Ha), middle height (Hm), posterior height (Hp), and vertebral height ratios (VHRs) (Ha/Hp and Hm/Hp) were measured from T1 to L2 using an AI system. The VHR is the ratio of Ha to Hp or the ratio of Hm to Hp of the vertebrae, which can reflect the shape of the anterior wedge and biconcave vertebrae. Changes in these parameters, particularly the VHR, were analysed at different vertebral levels in different age and sex groups. The results of the AI methods were highly consistent and correlated with manual measurements. The Pearson's correlation coefficients were 0.855, 0.919, and 0.846, respectively. The trend of VHRs showed troughs at T7 and T11 and a peak at T9; however, Hm/Hp showed slight fluctuations. Regarding the VHR, significant sex differences were found at L1 and L2 in all age bands. This innovative study focuses on vertebral morphology for opportunistic analysis in the mainland Chinese population and the distribution tendency of vertebral morphology with ageing using a chest LDCT aided by an AI system based on 3D U-Net vertebral segmentation technology. The AI system demonstrates the potential to automatically perform opportunistic vertebral morphology analyses using LDCT scans obtained during lung cancer screening. We advocate the use of age-, sex-, and vertebral level-specific criteria for the morphometric evaluation of vertebral osteoporotic fractures for a more accurate diagnosis of vertebral fractures and spinal pathologies.

Artificial intelligence-enhanced opportunistic screening of osteoporosis in CT scan: a scoping Review

PURPOSE

This scoping review aimed to assess the current research on artificial intelligence (AI)--enhanced opportunistic screening approaches for stratifying osteoporosis and osteopenia risk by evaluating vertebral trabecular bone structure in CT scans.

METHODS

PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were systematically searched for studies published between 2018 and December 2023. Inclusion criteria encompassed articles focusing on AI techniques for classifying osteoporosis/osteopenia or determining bone mineral density using CT scans of vertebral bodies. Data extraction included study characteristics, methodologies, and key findings.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Three main approaches were identified: fully automated deep learning solutions, hybrid approaches combining deep learning and conventional machine learning, and non-automated solutions using manual segmentation followed by AI analysis. Studies demonstrated high accuracy in bone mineral density prediction (86-96%) and classification of normal versus osteoporotic subjects (AUC 0.927-0.984). However, significant heterogeneity was observed in methodologies, workflows, and ground truth selection.

CONCLUSIONS

The review highlights AI's promising potential in enhancing opportunistic screening for osteoporosis using CT scans. While the field is still in its early stages, with most solutions at the proof-of-concept phase, the evidence supports increased efforts to incorporate AI into radiologic workflows. Addressing knowledge gaps, such as standardizing benchmarks and increasing external validation, will be crucial for advancing the clinical application of these AI-enhanced screening methods. Integration of such technologies could lead to improved early detection of osteoporotic conditions at a low economic cost.

Automated Opportunistic Osteoporosis Screening Using Low-Dose Chest CT among Individuals Undergoing Lung Cancer Screening in a Korean Population

Opportunistic osteoporosis screening using deep learning (DL) analysis of low-dose chest CT (LDCT) scans is a potentially promising approach for the early diagnosis of this condition. We explored bone mineral density (BMD) profiles across all adult ages and prevalence of osteoporosis using LDCT with DL in a Korean population. This retrospective study included 1915 participants from two hospitals who underwent LDCT during general health checkups between 2018 and 2021. Trabecular volumetric BMD of L1-2 was automatically calculated using DL and categorized according to the American College of Radiology quantitative computed tomography diagnostic criteria. BMD decreased with age in both men and women. Women had a higher peak BMD in their twenties, but lower BMD than men after 50. Among adults aged 50 and older, the prevalence of osteoporosis and osteopenia was 26.3% and 42.0%, respectively. Osteoporosis prevalence was 18.0% in men and 34.9% in women, increasing with age. Compared to previous data obtained using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, the prevalence of osteoporosis, particularly in men, was more than double. The automated opportunistic BMD measurements using LDCT can effectively predict osteoporosis for opportunistic screening and identify high-risk patients. Patients undergoing lung cancer screening may especially profit from this procedure requiring no additional imaging or radiation exposure.

Effect of fully automatic classification model from different tube voltage images on bone density screening: A self-controlled study

PURPOSE

To develop two bone status prediction models combining deep learning and radiomics based on standard-dose chest computed tomography (SDCT) and low-dose chest computed tomography (LDCT), and to evaluate the effect of tube voltage on reproducibility of radiomics features and predictive efficacy of these models.

METHODS

A total of 1508 patients were enrolled in this retrospective study. LDCT was conducted using 80 kVp, tube current ranging from 100 to 475 mA. On the other hand, SDCT was performed using 120 kVp, tube current ranging from 100 to 520 mA. We developed an automatic thoracic vertebral cancellous bone (TVCB) segmentation model. Subsequently, 1184 features were extracted and two classifiers were developed based on LDCT and SDCT images. Based on the diagnostic results of quantitative computed tomography examination, the first-level classifier was initially developed to distinguish normal or abnormal BMD (including osteoporosis and osteopenia), while the second-level classifier was employed to identify osteoporosis or osteopenia. The Dice coefficient was used to evaluate the performance of the automated segmentation model. The Concordance Correlation Coefficients (CCC) of radiomics features were calculated between LDCT and SDCT, and the performance of these models was evaluated.

RESULTS

Our automated segmentation model achieved a Dice coefficient of 0.98 ± 0.01 and 0.97 ± 0.02 in LDCT and SDCT, respectively. Alterations in tube voltage decreased the reproducibility of the extracted radiomic features, with 85.05 % of the radiomic features exhibiting low reproducibility (CCC < 0.75). The area under the curve (AUC) using LDCT-based and SDCT-based models was 0.97 ± 0.01 and 0.94 ± 0.02, respectively. Nonetheless, cross-validation with independent test sets of different tube voltage scans suggests that variations in tube voltage can impair the diagnostic efficacy of the model. Consequently, radiomics models are not universally applicable to images of varying tube voltages. In clinical settings, ensuring consistency between the tube voltage of the image used for model development and that of the acquired patient image is critical.

CONCLUSIONS

Automatic bone status prediction models, utilizing either LDCT or SDCT images, enable accurate assessment of bone status. Tube voltage impacts reproducibility of features and predictive efficacy of models. It is necessary to account for tube voltage variation during the image acquisition.

Vertebral HU value and the pectoral muscle index based on chest CT can be used to opportunistically screen for osteoporosis

BACKGROUND

Existing studies have shown that computed tomography (CT) attenuation and skeletal muscle tissue are strongly associated with osteoporosis; however, few studies have examined whether vertebral HU values and the pectoral muscle index (PMI) measured at the level of the 4th thoracic vertebra (T4) are strongly associated with bone mineral density (BMD). In this study, we demonstrate that vertebral HU values and the PMI based on chest CT can be used to opportunistically screen for osteoporosis and reduce fracture risk through prompt treatment.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 1000 patients who underwent chest CT and DXA scans from August 2020-2022. The T4 HU value and PMI were obtained using manual chest CT measurements. The participants were classified into normal, osteopenia, and osteoporosis groups based on the results of dual-energy X-ray (DXA) absorptiometry. We compared the clinical baseline data, T4 HU value, and PMI between the three groups of patients and analyzed the correlation between the T4 HU value, PMI, and BMD to further evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of the T4 HU value and PMI for patients with low BMD and osteoporosis.

RESULTS

The study ultimately enrolled 469 participants. The T4 HU value and PMI had a high screening capacity for both low BMD and osteoporosis. The combined diagnostic model-incorporating sex, age, BMI, T4 HU value, and PMI-demonstrated the best diagnostic efficacy, with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.887 and 0.892 for identifying low BMD and osteoporosis, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The measurement of T4 HU value and PMI on chest CT can be used as an opportunistic screening tool for osteoporosis with excellent diagnostic efficacy. This approach allows the early prevention of osteoporotic fractures via the timely screening of individuals at high risk of osteoporosis without requiring additional radiation.

Semi-automatic proximal humeral trabecular bone density assessment tool: technique application and clinical validation

PURPOSE

This study aimed to apply a newly developed semi-automatic phantom-less QCT (PL-QCT) to measure proximal humerus trabecular bone density based on chest CT and verify its accuracy and precision.

METHODS

Subcutaneous fat of the shoulder joint and trapezius muscle were used as calibration references for PL-QCT BMD measurement. A self-developed algorithm based on a convolution map was utilized in PL-QCT for semi-automatic BMD measurements. CT values of ROIs used in PL-QCT measurements were directly used for phantom-based quantitative computed tomography (PB-QCT) BMD assessment. The study included 376 proximal humerus for comparison between PB-QCT and PL-QCT. Two sports medicine doctors measured the proximal humerus with PB-QCT and PL-QCT without knowing each other's results. Among them, 100 proximal humerus were included in the inter-operative and intra-operative BMD measurements for evaluating the repeatability and reproducibility of PL-QCT and PB-QCT.

RESULTS

A total of 188 patients with 376 shoulders were involved in this study. The consistency analysis indicated that the average bias between proximal humerus BMDs measured by PB-QCT and PL-QCT was 1.0 mg/cc (agreement range - 9.4 to 11.4; P > 0.05, no significant difference). Regression analysis between PB-QCT and PL-QCT indicated a good correlation (R-square is 0.9723). Short-term repeatability and reproducibility of proximal humerus BMDs measured by PB-QCT (CV: 5.10% and 3.41%) were slightly better than those of PL-QCT (CV: 6.17% and 5.64%).

CONCLUSIONS

We evaluated the bone quality of the proximal humeral using chest CT through the semi-automatic PL-QCT system for the first time. Comparison between it and PB-QCT indicated that it could be a reliable shoulder BMD assessment tool with acceptable accuracy and precision. This study developed and verify a semi-automatic PL-QCT for assessment of proximal humeral bone density based on CT to assist in the assessment of proximal humeral osteoporosis and development of individualized treatment plans for shoulders.

The Suitable Population for Opportunistic Low Bone Mineral Density Screening Using Computed Tomography

Objective

To explore the suitable population of CT value for predicting low bone mineral density (low-BMD).

Methods

A total of 1268 patients who underwent chest CT examination and DXA within one-month period retrospectively analyzed. The CT attenuation values of trabecular bone were measured in mid-sagittal plane from thoracic vertebra 7 (T7). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to evaluate the ability to diagnose low-BMD.

Results

The AUC for diagnosing low BMD was larger in women than in men (0.894 vs 0.744, p < 0.05). The AUC increased gradually with the increase of age but decreased gradually with the increase in height and weight (p < 0.05). In females, when specificity was adjusted to approximately 90%, a threshold of 140.25 HU has a sensitivity of 69.3%, which is higher than the sensitivity of 36.5% in males for distinguishing low-BMD from normal. At the age of 70 or more, when specificity was adjusted to approximately 90%, a threshold of 126.31 HU has a sensitivity of 76.1%, which was higher than that of other age groups.

Conclusion

For patients who had completed chest CTs, the CT values were more effective in predicting low-BMD in female, elderly, lower height, and lower weight patients.

Simplified S1 Vertebral Bone Quality Score in the Assessment of Patients with Vertebral Fragility Fractures

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of the S1 vertebral bone quality (VBQ) score in assessing bone quality among patients with vertebral fragility fractures (VFF). Additionally, whether the combination of S1 VBQ and Hounsfield unit (HU) values improves the predictive accuracy of VFF.

METHODS

Using lumbar noncontrast computed tomography and T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging, we measured L1 HU values, S1 VBQ, and L1-L4 VBQ. To assess their predictive performance for VFF, we constructed receiver operating characteristic curves. We also compared the diagnostic efficacy of HU values with that of S1 VBQ and L1--L4 VBQ values for the joint diagnosis of VFF. The Delong test was used to compare the value of individual or combined predictions of VFF.

RESULTS

In comparison to the nonfracture group, all patients exhibited markedly elevated S1 VBQ and L1--L4 VBQ and notably reduced HU values (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that elevated S1 VBQ, increased L1--L4 VBQ, and decreased HU values independently correlated with VFF development. The areas under the curve for VFF prediction were 0.806 for S1 VBQ, 0.799 for L1--L4 VBQ, and 0.820 for HU values. According to the Delong test, the combination of HU values with S1 VBQ/L1--L4 VBQ significantly improved the diagnostic accuracy.

CONCLUSIONS

The simplified S1 VBQ is a valuable tool for predicting the occurrence of VFF and can be used as an alternative to the L1--L4 VBQ. In addition, the combination of S1 VBQ and HU values can significantly improve the predictive value of VFF.

Applying Machine Learning Analysis Based on Proximal Femur of Abdominal Computed Tomography to Screen for Abnormal Bone Mass in Femur

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the performance of machine learning analysis based on proximal femur of abdominal computed tomography (CT) scans in screening for abnormal bone mass in femur.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

222 patients aged 50 years or older who underwent abdominal CT and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans within 14 days were retrospectively enrolled. The patients were randomly assigned to a training cohort (n = 155) and a testing cohort (n = 67) in a ratio of 7:3. A total of 2288 candidate radiomic features were extracted from the volume region of interest - the left proximal femur of the abdominal CT scans. The most valuable radiomic features were selected using minimum-Redundancy Maximum-Relevancy and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator to construct the radiomics model. The predictive performance was assessed with receiver operating characteristic curve.

RESULTS

13 features were chosen to establish the radiomics model. The radiomics model using logistic regression displayed excellent prediction performance in distinguishing normal bone mass and abnormal bone mass, with the area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of 0.917 (95% CI, 0.867-0.967), 0.826, 0.935 and 0.780 in the training cohort. The testing cohort indicated a better performance with AUC, accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of 0.963 (95% CI, 0.919-0.999), 0.851, 0.923 and 0.889.

CONCLUSION

The radiomics model based on proximal femur of abdominal CT scans had a high predictive performance to identify abnormal bone mass in femur, which can be used as a tool for opportunistic osteoporosis screening.

Fully automated deep learning system for osteoporosis screening using chest computed tomography images

Background

Osteoporosis, a disease stemming from bone metabolism irregularities, affects approximately 200 million people worldwide. Timely detection of osteoporosis is pivotal in grappling with this public health challenge. Deep learning (DL), emerging as a promising methodology in the field of medical imaging, holds considerable potential for the assessment of bone mineral density (BMD). This study aimed to propose an automated DL framework for BMD assessment that integrates localization, segmentation, and ternary classification using various dominant convolutional neural networks (CNNs).

Methods

In this retrospective study, a cohort of 2,274 patients underwent chest computed tomography (CT) was enrolled from January 2022 to June 2023 for the development of the integrated DL system. The study unfolded in 2 phases. Initially, 1,025 patients were selected based on specific criteria to develop an automated segmentation model, utilizing 2 VB-Net networks. Subsequently, a distinct cohort of 902 patients was employed for the development and testing of classification models for BMD assessment. Then, 3 distinct DL network architectures, specifically DenseNet, ResNet-18, and ResNet-50, were applied to formulate the 3-classification BMD assessment model. The performance of both phases was evaluated using an independent test set consisting of 347 individuals. Segmentation performance was evaluated using the Dice similarity coefficient; classification performance was appraised using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Furthermore, metrics such as the area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, and precision were meticulously calculated.

Results

In the first stage, the automatic segmentation model demonstrated excellent segmentation performance, with mean Dice surpassing 0.93 in the independent test set. In the second stage, both the DenseNet and ResNet-18 demonstrated excellent diagnostic performance in detecting bone status. For osteoporosis, and osteopenia, the AUCs were as follows: DenseNet achieved 0.94 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.91-0.97], and 0.91 (95% CI: 0.87-0.94), respectively; ResNet-18 attained 0.96 (95% CI: 0.92-0.98), and 0.91 (95% CI: 0.87-0.94), respectively. However, the ResNet-50 model exhibited suboptimal diagnostic performance for osteopenia, with an AUC value of only 0.76 (95% CI: 0.69-0.80). Alterations in tube voltage had a more pronounced impact on the performance of the DenseNet. In the independent test set with tube voltage at 100 kVp images, the accuracy and precision of DenseNet decreased on average by approximately 14.29% and 18.82%, respectively, whereas the accuracy and precision of ResNet-18 decreased by about 8.33% and 7.14%, respectively.

Conclusions

The state-of-the-art DL framework model offers an effective and efficient approach for opportunistic osteoporosis screening using chest CT, without incurring additional costs or radiation exposure.

Differences in Vertebral Morphology and bone Mineral Density between Grade 1 Vertebral Fracture and Non-Fractured Participants in the Chinese Population

PURPOSE

To investigate the difference in vertebral morphology and bone mineral density (BMD) between grade 1 VFs and non-fractured participants in the Chinese population to shed light on the clinical significance of grade 1 VFs from various perspectives.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included patients who received a chest low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) scan for health examination and visited the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan, China, from October 2019 to August 2022. Data were analyzed from March 2023 to July 2023. The main outcome of this study was the difference in morphological parameters and BMD between grade 1 VFs and non-fractured participants. The prevalence of grade 1 VFs in China populations was calculated. The difference in BMD of three fracture types in the Grade 1 group was also evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 3652 participants (1799 males, 54.85 ± 9.02 years, range, 40-92 years; 1853 females, 56.00 ± 9.08 years, range, 40-93 years) were included. The prevalence of grade 2 and 3 increase with age. The prevalence of grade 1 VFs gradually increases ≤ 50y to 60-69y group, but there is a decrease in the ≥ 70 years male group (6.6%) and a rise in the female group (25.5%). There was no significant statistical difference observed in vertebral shape indices (VSI) and BMD between the Grade 1 group and the no-fractured group aged < 50 years old except the wedge index in male. The biconcavity index did not differ between the non-fractured group and the Grade 1 group in men aged 50-59 years, whereas a significant statistical difference was observed in women. Additionally, the results of BMD were consistent with these findings. For the 40-59 years age group, there were significant differences between the compression deformity group and the other groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The grade 1 group had higher VSI and lower BMD than the non-fractured group, suggesting an association between the Grade 1 group and osteoporosis in individuals aged over 50 for women and over 60 for men. Different fracture types have significant variations in BMD among middle-aged people. The prevalence of grade 1 VFs exhibits an age-related increase in both genders, with opposite trends observed between older males and females. We suggested VSI can aid physicians in the diagnosis of grade 1 VFs.

Deep learning in the radiologic diagnosis of osteoporosis: a literature review

OBJECTIVE

Osteoporosis is a systemic bone disease characterized by low bone mass, damaged bone microstructure, increased bone fragility, and susceptibility to fractures. With the rapid development of artificial intelligence, a series of studies have reported deep learning applications in the screening and diagnosis of osteoporosis. The aim of this review was to summary the application of deep learning methods in the radiologic diagnosis of osteoporosis.

METHODS

We conducted a two-step literature search using the PubMed and Web of Science databases. In this review, we focused on routine radiologic methods, such as X-ray, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging, used to opportunistically screen for osteoporosis.

RESULTS

A total of 40 studies were included in this review. These studies were divided into three categories: osteoporosis screening (n = 20), bone mineral density prediction (n = 13), and osteoporotic fracture risk prediction and detection (n = 7).

CONCLUSIONS

Deep learning has demonstrated a remarkable capacity for osteoporosis screening. However, clinical commercialization of a diagnostic model for osteoporosis remains a challenge.

Validation of Opportunistic Artificial Intelligence-Based Bone Mineral Density Measurements in Coronary Artery Calcium Scans

BACKGROUND

Previously we reported a manual method of measuring thoracic vertebral bone mineral density (BMD) using quantitative CT in noncontrast cardiac CT scans used for coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring. In this report, we present validation studies of an artificial intelligence-based automated BMD measurement (AutoBMD) that recently received FDA approval as an opportunistic add-on to CAC scans.

METHODS

A deep learning model was trained to detect vertebral bodies. Subsequently, signal processing techniques were developed to detect intervertebral discs and the trabecular components of the vertebral body. The model was trained using 132 CAC scans comprising 7,649 slices. To validate AutoBMD, we used 5,785 cases of manual BMD measurements previously reported from CAC scans in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis.

RESULTS

Mean ± SD for AutoBMD and manual BMD were 166.1 ± 47.9 mg/cc and 163.1 ± 46 mg/cc, respectively (P = .006). Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis cases were 47.5% male and 52.5% female, with age 62.2 ± 10.3. A strong correlation was found between AutoBMD and manual measurements (R = 0.85, P < .0001). Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for AutoBMD-based detection of osteoporosis were 99.6%, 96.7%, 97.7%, 99.7% and 99.8%, respectively. AutoBMD averaged 15 seconds per report versus 5.5 min for manual measurements (P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

AutoBMD is an FDA-approved, artificial intelligence-enabled opportunistic tool that reports BMD with Z-scores and T-scores and accurately detects osteoporosis and osteopenia in CAC scans, demonstrating results comparable to manual measurements. No extra cost of scanning and no extra radiation to patients, plus the high prevalence of asymptomatic osteoporosis, make AutoBMD a promising candidate to enhance patient care.

DeepmdQCT: A multitask network with domain invariant features and comprehensive attention mechanism for quantitative computer tomography diagnosis of osteoporosis

In the medical field, the application of machine learning technology in the automatic diagnosis and monitoring of osteoporosis often faces challenges related to domain adaptation in drug therapy research. The existing neural networks used for the diagnosis of osteoporosis may experience a decrease in model performance when applied to new data domains due to changes in radiation dose and equipment. To address this issue, in this study, we propose a new method for multi domain diagnostic and quantitative computed tomography (QCT) images, called DeepmdQCT. This method adopts a domain invariant feature strategy and integrates a comprehensive attention mechanism to guide the fusion of global and local features, effectively improving the diagnostic performance of multi domain CT images. We conducted experimental evaluations on a self-created OQCT dataset, and the results showed that for dose domain images, the average accuracy reached 91%, while for device domain images, the accuracy reached 90.5%. our method successfully estimated bone density values, with a fit of 0.95 to the gold standard. Our method not only achieved high accuracy in CT images in the dose and equipment fields, but also successfully estimated key bone density values, which is crucial for evaluating the effectiveness of osteoporosis drug treatment. In addition, we validated the effectiveness of our architecture in feature extraction using three publicly available datasets. We also encourage the application of the DeepmdQCT method to a wider range of medical image analysis fields to improve the performance of multi-domain images.

Biomarkers of Body Composition

The importance and impact of imaging biomarkers has been increasing over the past few decades. We review the relevant clinical and imaging terminology needed to understand the clinical and research applications of body composition. Imaging biomarkers of bone, muscle, and fat tissues obtained with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and ultrasonography are described.

The Significance of Combined OSTA, HU Value and VBQ Score in Osteoporosis Screening Before Spinal Surgery

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the utility of a combined assessment using the Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool for Asians (OSTA), Hounsfield unit (HU) value, and vertebral bone quality (VBQ) score for preoperative osteoporosis (OP) screening in patients scheduled for spinal surgery.

METHODS

This study encompassed 288 participants, including 128 males and 160 females. Patients were stratified into 2 groups: the OP group (T-score ≤ -2.5) and the non-OP group (T-score > -2.5), determined by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). Binary logistic regression was used to construct a combined diagnostic model, and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve evaluated the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of these metrics individually or in combination to screen for OP.

RESULTS

Osteoporosis patients exhibited significantly lower OSTA and HU values in comparison to non-OP patients, while their VBQ scores were significantly higher (P < 0.001). The ROC curve analysis results indicated that within the male group, the combined diagnosis had a sensitivity of 93.8%, specificity of 82.3%, accuracy of 85.2%, PPV of 63.8%, and NPV of 97.5%. In the female group, the combined diagnosis had a sensitivity of 93.9%, specificity of 87.4%, accuracy of 90.0%, PPV of 83.6%, and NPV of 95.4%.

CONCLUSIONS

The combined use of OSTA, HU values, and VBQ scores in preoperative OP screening for spinal surgery demonstrates significantly higher accuracy and superior screening value compared to individual assessments. These results establish a robust scientific foundation for conducting preoperative OP screening in patients undergoing spinal surgery.

Automatic Osteoporosis Screening System Using Radiomics and Deep Learning from Low-Dose Chest CT Images

OBJECTIVE

Develop two fully automatic osteoporosis screening systems using deep learning (DL) and radiomics (Rad) techniques based on low-dose chest CT (LDCT) images and evaluate their diagnostic effectiveness.

METHODS

In total, 434 patients who underwent LDCT and bone mineral density (BMD) examination were retrospectively enrolled and divided into the development set (n = 333) and temporal validation set (n = 101). An automatic thoracic vertebra cancellous bone (TVCB) segmentation model was developed. The Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) was used to evaluate the segmentation performance. Furthermore, the three-class Rad and DL models were developed to distinguish osteoporosis, osteopenia, and normal bone mass. The diagnostic performance of these models was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and decision curve analysis (DCA).

RESULTS

The automatic segmentation model achieved excellent segmentation performance, with a mean DSC of 0.96 ± 0.02 in the temporal validation set. The Rad model was used to identify osteoporosis, osteopenia, and normal BMD in the temporal validation set, with respective area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values of 0.943, 0.801, and 0.932. The DL model achieved higher AUC values of 0.983, 0.906, and 0.969 for the same categories in the same validation set. The Delong test affirmed that both models performed similarly in BMD assessment. However, the accuracy of the DL model is 81.2%, which is better than the 73.3% accuracy of the Rad model in the temporal validation set. Additionally, DCA indicated that the DL model provided a greater net benefit compared to the Rad model across the majority of the reasonable threshold probabilities Conclusions: The automated segmentation framework we developed can accurately segment cancellous bone on low-dose chest CT images. These predictive models, which are based on deep learning and radiomics, provided comparable diagnostic performance in automatic BMD assessment. Nevertheless, it is important to highlight that the DL model demonstrates higher accuracy and precision than the Rad model.

A study on whether deep learning models based on CT images for bone density classification and prediction can be used for opportunistic osteoporosis screening

This study utilized deep learning to classify osteoporosis and predict bone density using opportunistic CT scans and independently tested the models on data from different hospitals and equipment. Results showed high accuracy and strong correlation with QCT results, showing promise for expanding osteoporosis screening and reducing unnecessary radiation and costs.

PURPOSE

To explore the feasibility of using deep learning to establish a model for osteoporosis classification and bone density value prediction based on opportunistic CT scans and to verify its generalization and diagnostic ability using an independent test set.

METHODS

A total of 1219 cases of opportunistic CT scans were included in this study, with QCT results as the reference standard. The training set: test set: independent test set ratio was 703: 176: 340, and the independent test set data of 340 cases were from 3 different hospitals and 4 different CT scanners. The VB-Net structure automatic segmentation model was used to segment the trabecular bone, and DenseNet was used to establish a three-classification model and bone density value prediction regression model. The performance parameters of the models were calculated and evaluated.

RESULTS

The ROC curves showed that the mean AUCs of the three-category classification model for categorizing cases into "normal," "osteopenia," and "osteoporosis" for the training set, test set, and independent test set were 0.999, 0.970, and 0.933, respectively. The F1 score, accuracy, precision, recall, precision, and specificity of the test set were 0.903, 0.909, 0.899, 0.908, and 0.956, respectively, and those of the independent test set were 0.798, 0.815, 0.792, 0.81, and 0.899, respectively. The MAEs of the bone density prediction regression model in the training set, test set, and independent test set were 3.15, 6.303, and 10.257, respectively, and the RMSEs were 4.127, 8.561, and 13.507, respectively. The R-squared values were 0.991, 0.962, and 0.878, respectively. The Pearson correlation coefficients were 0.996, 0.981, and 0.94, respectively, and the p values were all < 0.001. The predicted values and bone density values were highly positively correlated, and there was a significant linear relationship.

CONCLUSION

Using deep learning neural networks to process opportunistic CT scan images of the body can accurately predict bone density values and perform bone density three-classification diagnosis, which can reduce the radiation risk, economic consumption, and time consumption brought by specialized bone density measurement, expand the scope of osteoporosis screening, and have broad application prospects.

Traumatic rib fracture patterns associated with bone mineral density statuses derived from CT images

Background

The impact of decreased bone mineral density (BMD) on traumatic rib fractures remains unknown. We combined computed tomography (CT) and artificial intelligence (AI) to measure BMD and explore its impact on traumatic rib fractures and their patterns.

Methods

The retrospective cohort comprised patients who visited our hospital from 2017-2018; the prospective cohort (control group) was consecutively recruited from the same hospital from February-June 2023. All patients had blunt chest trauma and underwent CT. Volumetric BMD of L1 vertebra was measured by using an AI software. Analyses were done by using BMD categorized as osteoporosis (<80 mg/cm3), osteopenia (80-120 mg/cm3), or normal (>120 mg/cm3). Pearson's χ2, Fisher's exact, or Kruskal-Wallis tests and Bonferroni correction were used for comparisons. Negative binomial, and logistic regression analyses were used to assess the associations and impacts of BMD status. Sensitivity analyses were also performed.

Findings

The retrospective cohort included 2,076 eligible patients, of whom 954 (46%) had normal BMD, 806 (38.8%) had osteopenia, and 316 (15.2%) had osteoporosis. After sex- and age-adjustment, osteoporosis was significantly associated with higher rib fracture rates, and a higher likelihood of fractures in ribs 4-7. Furthermore, both the osteopenia and osteoporosis groups demonstrated a significantly higher number of fractured ribs and fracture sites on ribs, with a higher likelihood of fractures in ribs 1-3, as well as flail chest. The prospective cohort included 205 eligible patients, of whom 92 (44.9%) had normal BMD, 74 (36.1%) had osteopenia, and 39 (19.0%) had osteoporosis. The findings observed within this cohort were in concurrence with those in the retrospective cohort.

Interpretation

Traumatic rib fractures are associated with decreased BMD. CT-AI can help to identify individuals who have decreased BMD and a greater rib fracture rate, along with their fracture patterns.

Automated vertebral bone mineral density measurement with phantomless internal calibration in chest LDCT scans using deep learning

OBJECTIVE

To develop and evaluate a fully automated method based on deep learning and phantomless internal calibration for bone mineral density (BMD) measurement and opportunistic low BMD (osteopenia and osteoporosis) screening using chest low-dose CT (LDCT) scans.

METHODS

A total of 1175 individuals were enrolled in this study, who underwent both chest LDCT and BMD examinations with quantitative computed tomography (QCT), by two different CT scanners (Siemens and GE). Two convolutional neural network (CNN) models were employed for vertebral body segmentation and labeling, respectively. A histogram technique was applied for vertebral BMD calculation using paraspinal muscle and surrounding fat as references. 195 cases (by Siemens scanner) as fitting cohort were used to build the calibration function. 698 cases as validation cohort I (VCI, by Siemens scanner) and 282 cases as validation cohort II (VCII, by GE scanner) were performed to evaluate the performance of the proposed method, with QCT as the standard for analysis.

RESULTS

The average BMDs from the proposed method were strongly correlated with QCT (in VCI: r = 0.896, in VCII: r = 0.956, p < 0.001). Bland-Altman analysis showed a small mean difference of 1.1 mg/cm3, and large interindividual differences as seen by wide 95% limits of agreement (-29.9 to +32.0 mg/cm3) in VCI. The proposed method measured BMDs were higher than QCT measured BMDs in VCII (mean difference = 15.3 mg/cm3, p < 0.001). Osteoporosis and low BMD were diagnosed by proposed method with AUCs of 0.876 and 0.903 in VCI, 0.731 and 0.794 in VCII, respectively. The AUCs of the proposed method were increased to over 0.920 in both VCI and VCII after adjusting the cut-off.

CONCLUSION

Without manual selection of the region of interest of body tissues, the proposed method based on deep learning and phantomless internal calibration has the potential for preliminary screening of patients with low BMD using chest LDCT scans. However, the agreement between the proposed method and QCT is insufficient to allow them to be used interchangeably in BMD measurement.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

This study proposed an automated vertebral BMD measurement method based on deep learning and phantomless internal calibration with paraspinal muscle and fat as reference.

Artificial Intelligence Applications for Osteoporosis Classification Using Computed Tomography

Osteoporosis, marked by low bone mineral density (BMD) and a high fracture risk, is a major health issue. Recent progress in medical imaging, especially CT scans, offers new ways of diagnosing and assessing osteoporosis. This review examines the use of AI analysis of CT scans to stratify BMD and diagnose osteoporosis. By summarizing the relevant studies, we aimed to assess the effectiveness, constraints, and potential impact of AI-based osteoporosis classification (severity) via CT. A systematic search of electronic databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov) was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A total of 39 articles were retrieved from the databases, and the key findings were compiled and summarized, including the regions analyzed, the type of CT imaging, and their efficacy in predicting BMD compared with conventional DXA studies. Important considerations and limitations are also discussed. The overall reported accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of AI in classifying osteoporosis using CT images ranged from 61.8% to 99.4%, 41.0% to 100.0%, and 31.0% to 100.0% respectively, with areas under the curve (AUCs) ranging from 0.582 to 0.994. While additional research is necessary to validate the clinical efficacy and reproducibility of these AI tools before incorporating them into routine clinical practice, these studies demonstrate the promising potential of using CT to opportunistically predict and classify osteoporosis without the need for DEXA.

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Lung Cancer Screening

Recent advances in artificial intelligence and machine learning (AI/ML) hold substantial promise to address some of the current challenges in lung cancer screening and improve health equity. This article reviews the status and future directions of AI/ML tools in the lung cancer screening workflow, focusing on determining screening eligibility, radiation dose reduction and image denoising for low-dose chest computed tomography (CT), lung nodule detection, lung nodule classification, and determining optimal screening intervals. AI/ML tools can assess for chronic diseases on CT, which creates opportunities to improve population health through opportunistic screening.

Ten reasons to screen women at risk of lung cancer

This opinion piece reviews major reasons for promoting lung cancer screening in at-risk women who are smokers or ex-smokers, from the age of 50. The epidemiology of lung cancer in European women is extremely worrying, with lung cancer mortality expected to surpass breast cancer mortality in most European countries. There are conflicting data as to whether women are at increased risk of developing lung cancer compared to men who have a similar tobacco exposure. The sharp increase in the incidence of lung cancer in women exceeds the increase in their smoking exposure which is in favor of greater susceptibility. Lung and breast cancer screening could be carried out simultaneously, as the screening ages largely coincide. In addition, lung cancer screening could be carried out every 2 years, as is the case for breast cancer screening, if the baseline CT scan is negative.As well as detecting early curable lung cancer, screening can also detect coronary heart disease and osteoporosis induced by smoking. This enables preventive measures to be taken in addition to smoking cessation assistance, to reduce morbidity and mortality in the female population. Key points • The epidemiology of lung cancer in European women is very worrying.• Lung cancer is becoming the leading cause of cancer mortality in European women.• Women benefit greatly from screening in terms of reduced risk of death from lung cancer.

Smoking index and COPD duration as potential risk factors for development of osteoporosis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer - A retrospective case control study evaluated by CT Hounsfield unit

Objective

To investigate the effect of smoking index (calculated as number of cigarettes per day × smoking years) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) duration on osteoporosis (OP)evaluated by opportunistic chest CT in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

A total of 101 patients diagnosed with NSCLC were included in our cohort study. Among them, 50 patients with a history of smoking and COPD were assigned to the experimental group, while 51 patients without a history of smoking and COPD were assigned to the control group. Hounsfield unit (HU) value was measured by conventional chest CT to investigate the bone mineral density; and the mean values of axial HU value in the upper, middle and lower parts of T4, T7, T10 and L1 vertebral bodies were measured as the study variables.

Results

There were no significant differences in gender, age, body mass index, type of lung cancer, clinical stage of lung cancer and comorbidities between the two groups (P = 0.938，P = 0.158，P = 0.722,P = 0.596,P = 0.813,P = 0.655). The overall mean HU values of T4, T7, T10, L1 in the experimental group were 116.60 ± 30.67, 110.56 ± 30.03, 109.18 (96.85-122.95), 94.63 (85.20-104.12) and 106.86 ± 22.26, respectively, which were significantly lower than those in the control group (189.55 ± 34.57, 174.54 ± 35.30, 172.73 (156.33-199.50), 158.20 (141.60-179.40) and 177.50 ± 33.49) (P ＜0.05). And in the experimental group, smoking index and COPD duration were significantly and negatively correlated with HU values (r = -0.627, -0.542, P ＜0.05, respectively).

Conclusion

Patients with NSCLC who have a history of smoking and COPD exhibit a notably lower HU value compared to the control groups. Additionally, it has been observed that the smoking index and duration of COPD may be influential factors affecting bone mineral density in NSCLC patients.

The axial and sagittal CT values of the 7th thoracic vertebrae in screening for osteoporosis and osteopenia

AIM

To evaluate the difference in computed tomography (CT) attenuation value of different planes of the 7th thoracic vertebra and investigate the efficacy of axial and sagittal vertebral CT measurements in predicting osteoporosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent routine chest CT and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) within 1 month were included in this retrospective study. The CT attenuation values of different planes were compared. Logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) were used to analyse the difference of each plane in the diagnosis of osteoporosis.

RESULTS

The study included 1,338 patients (mean age of 61.9±11.9; 54% female). The CT attenuation values decreased successively in the normal group, osteopenia group, and osteoporosis group. The paired t-test results showed that the mid-axial measurements were greater than mid-sagittal measurements, with a mean difference of 9 HU, the difference was statistically significant (p<0.001, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 7.8-10.1). For each one-unit reduction in mid-sagittal CT attenuation value, the risk of osteopenia or osteoporosis increased by 3.6%. To distinguish osteoporosis from non-osteoporosis (osteopenia + normal), the sensitivity was 90% and the specificity was 52.4% at the mid-sagittal threshold of 113.7 HU.

CONCLUSIONS

The CT attenuation values of mid-sagittal plane have higher diagnostic efficacy than axial planes in predicting osteoporosis. For patients with a sagittal CT attenuation value of <113.7 HU in the T7, further DXA examination is warranted.

The promise and limitations of artificial intelligence in musculoskeletal imaging

With the recent developments in deep learning and the rapid growth of convolutional neural networks, artificial intelligence has shown promise as a tool that can transform several aspects of the musculoskeletal imaging cycle. Its applications can involve both interpretive and non-interpretive tasks such as the ordering of imaging, scheduling, protocoling, image acquisition, report generation and communication of findings. However, artificial intelligence tools still face a number of challenges that can hinder effective implementation into clinical practice. The purpose of this review is to explore both the successes and limitations of artificial intelligence applications throughout the muscuskeletal imaging cycle and to highlight how these applications can help enhance the service radiologists deliver to their patients, resulting in increased efficiency as well as improved patient and provider satisfaction.

Development and validation of a fully automated system using deep learning for opportunistic osteoporosis screening using low-dose computed tomography scans

Background

Bone density measurement is an important examination for the diagnosis and screening of osteoporosis. The aim of this study was to develop a deep learning (DL) system for automatic measurement of bone mineral density (BMD) for osteoporosis screening using low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) images.

Methods

This retrospective study included 500 individuals who underwent LDCT scanning from April 2018 to July 2021. All images were manually annotated by a radiologist for the cancellous bone of target vertebrae and post-processed using quantitative computed tomography (QCT) software to identify osteoporosis. Patients were divided into the training, validation, and testing sets in a ratio of 6:2:2 using a 4-fold cross validation method. A localization model using faster region-based convolutional neural network (R-CNN) was trained to identify and locate the target vertebrae (T12-L2), then a 3-dimensional (3D) AnatomyNet was trained to finely segment the cancellous bone of target vertebrae in the localized image. A 3D DenseNet was applied for calculating BMD. The Dice coefficient was used to evaluate segmentation performance. Linear regression and Bland-Altman (BA) analyses were performed to compare the calculated BMD values using the proposed system with QCT. The diagnostic performance of the system for osteoporosis and osteopenia was evaluated with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

Results

Our segmentation model achieved a mean Dice coefficient of 0.95, with Dice coefficients greater than 0.9 accounting for 96.6%. The correlation coefficient (R2) and mean errors between the proposed system and QCT in the testing set were 0.967 and 2.21 mg/cm3, respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) of the ROC was 0.984 for detecting osteoporosis and 0.993 for distinguishing abnormal BMD (osteopenia and osteoporosis).

Conclusions

The fully automated DL-based system is able to perform automatic BMD calculation for opportunistic osteoporosis screening with high accuracy using LDCT scans.

Automatic segmentation and radiomic texture analysis for osteoporosis screening using chest low-dose computed tomography

OBJECTIVE

This study developed a diagnostic tool combining machine learning (ML) segmentation and radiomic texture analysis (RTA) for bone density screening using chest low-dose computed tomography (LDCT).

METHODS

A total of 197 patients who underwent LDCT followed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry were analyzed. First, an autosegmentation model was trained using LDCT to delineate the thoracic vertebral body (VB). Second, a two-level classifier was developed using radiomic features extracted from VBs for the hierarchical pairwise classification of each patient's bone status. All the patients were initially classified as either normal or abnormal, and all patients with abnormal bone density were then subdivided into an osteopenia group and an osteoporosis group. The performance of the classifier was evaluated through fivefold cross-validation.

RESULTS

The model for automated VB segmentation achieved a Sorenson-Dice coefficient of 0.87 ± 0.01. Furthermore, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve scores for the two-level classifier were 0.96 ± 0.01 for detecting abnormal bone density (accuracy = 0.91 ± 0.02; sensitivity = 0.93 ± 0.03; specificity = 0.89 ± 0.03) and 0.98 ± 0.01 for distinguishing osteoporosis (accuracy = 0.94 ± 0.02; sensitivity = 0.95 ± 0.03; specificity = 0.93 ± 0.03). The testing prediction accuracy levels for the first- and second-level classifiers were 0.92 ± 0.04 and 0.94 ± 0.05, respectively. The overall testing prediction accuracy of our method was 0.90 ± 0.05.

CONCLUSION

The combination of ML segmentation and RTA for automated bone density prediction based on LDCT scans is a feasible approach that could be valuable for osteoporosis screening during lung cancer screening.

KEY POINTS

• This study developed an automatic diagnostic tool combining machine learning-based segmentation and radiomic texture analysis for bone density screening using chest low-dose computed tomography. • The developed method enables opportunistic screening without quantitative computed tomography or a dedicated phantom. • The developed method could be integrated into the current clinical workflow and used as an adjunct for opportunistic screening or for patients who are ineligible for screening with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

Feasibility of Bone Mineral Density and Bone Microarchitecture Assessment Using Deep Learning With a Convolutional Neural Network

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated the feasibility of using deep learning with a convolutional neural network for predicting bone mineral density (BMD) and bone microarchitecture from conventional computed tomography (CT) images acquired by multivendor scanners.

METHODS

We enrolled 402 patients who underwent noncontrast CT examinations, including L1-L4 vertebrae, and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) examination. Among these, 280 patients (3360 sagittal vertebral images), 70 patients (280 sagittal vertebral images), and 52 patients (208 sagittal vertebral images) were assigned to the training data set for deep learning model development, the validation, and the test data set, respectively. Bone mineral density and the trabecular bone score (TBS), an index of bone microarchitecture, were assessed by DXA. BMDDL and TBSDL were predicted by deep learning with a convolutional neural network (ResNet50). Pearson correlation tests assessed the correlation between BMDDL and BMD, and TBSDL and TBS. The diagnostic performance of BMDDL for osteopenia/osteoporosis and that of TBSDL for bone microarchitecture impairment were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.

RESULTS

BMDDL and BMD correlated strongly (r = 0.81, P < 0.01), whereas TBSDL and TBS correlated moderately (r = 0.54, P < 0.01). The sensitivity and specificity of BMDDL for identifying osteopenia or osteoporosis were 93% and 90%, and 100% and 94%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of TBSDL for identifying patients with bone microarchitecture impairment were 73% for all values.

CONCLUSIONS

The BMDDL and TBSDL derived from conventional CT images could identify patients who should undergo DXA, which could be a gatekeeper tool for detecting latent osteoporosis/osteopenia or bone microarchitecture impairment.

Opportunistic screening for osteoporosis by abdominal CT in a British population

BACKGROUND

It has previously been shown that CT scans performed for other indications can be used to identify patients with osteoporosis. This has not yet been tested in a British population. We sought to evaluate the use of vertebral CT attenuation measures for predicting osteoporosis in a British cohort, using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) as a reference standard.

METHODS

Patients who underwent abdominal CT in 2018 and concomitantly underwent DEXA within a six-month interval were retrospectively included. CT attenuation values in Hounsfield units (HU) were measured by placement of a region-of-interest at the central portion of the L1 vertebral body and then compared to their corresponding DEXA score. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to evaluate the performance of a logistic regression model and to determine sensitivity and specificity thresholds.

RESULTS

536 patients (394 females, mean age 65.8) were included, of which 174 had DEXA-defined osteoporosis. L1 attenuation measures were significantly different (p < 0.01) between the three DEXA-defined groups of osteoporosis (118 HU), osteopenia (143 HU) and normal bone density (178 HU). The area under the ROC curve was 0.74 (95% CI 0.69-0.78). A threshold of 169 HU was 90% sensitive, and a threshold of 104 HU was 90% specific for diagnosing osteoporosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Routine abdominal CT can be used to opportunistically screen for osteoporosis without additional cost or radiation exposure. The thresholds identified in this study are comparable with previous studies in other populations. We recommend radiologists engage with primary care and rheumatology providers to determine appropriate cut-off values for further investigation.

Opportunistic screening for low bone density using abdominopelvic computed tomography scans

BACKGROUND

While low bone density is a major burden on US health system, current osteoporosis screening guidelines by the US Preventive Services Task Force are limited to women aged ≥65 and all postmenopausal women with certain risk factors. Even within recommended screening groups, actual screening rates are low (<26%) and vary across socioeconomic groups. The proposed model can opportunistically screen patients using abdominal CT studies for low bone density who may otherwise go undiagnosed.

PURPOSE

To develop an artificial intelligence (AI) model for opportunistic screening of low bone density using both contrast and non-contrast abdominopelvic computed tomography (CT) exams, for the purpose of referral to traditional bone health management, which typically begins with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).

METHODS

We collected 6083 contrast-enhanced CT imaging exams paired with DXA exams within ±6 months documented between May 2015 and August 2021 in a single institution with four major healthcare practice regions. Our fusion AI pipeline receives the coronal and axial plane images of a contrast enhanced abdominopelvic CT exam and basic patient demographics (age, gender, body cross section lengths) to predict risk of low bone mass. The models were trained on lumbar spine T-scores from DXA exams and tested on multi-site imaging exams. The model was again tested in a prospective group (N = 344) contrast-enhanced and non-contrast-enhanced studies.

RESULTS

The models were evaluated on the same test set (1208 exams)-(1) Baseline model using demographic factors from electronic medical records (EMR) - 0.7 area under the curve of receiver operator characteristic (AUROC); Imaging based models: (2) axial view - 0.83 AUROC; (3) coronal view- 0.83 AUROC; (4) Fusion model-Imaging + demographic factors - 0.86 AUROC. The prospective test yielded one missed positive DXA case with a hip prosthesis among 23 positive contrast-enhanced CT exams and 0% false positive rate for non-contrast studies. Both positive cases among non-contrast enhanced CT exams were successfully detected. While only about 8% patients from prospective study received a DXA exam within 2 years, about 30% were detected with low bone mass by the fusion model, highlighting the need for opportunistic screening.

CONCLUSIONS

The fusion model, which combines two planes of CT images and EMRs data, outperformed individual models and provided a high, robust diagnostic performance for opportunistic screening of low bone density using contrast and non-contrast CT exams. This model could potentially improve bone health risk assessment with no additional cost. The model's handling of metal implants is an ongoing effort.

Opportunistic Screening Techniques for Analysis of CT Scans

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Opportunistic screening is a combination of techniques to identify subjects of high risk for osteoporotic fracture using routine clinical CT scans prescribed for diagnoses unrelated to osteoporosis. The two main components are automated detection of vertebral fractures and measurement of bone mineral density (BMD) in CT scans, in which a phantom for calibration of CT to BMD values is not used. This review describes the particular challenges of opportunistic screening and provides an overview and comparison of current techniques used for opportunistic screening. The review further outlines the performance of opportunistic screening.

RECENT FINDINGS

A wide range of technologies for the automatic detection of vertebral fractures have been developed and successfully validated. Most of them are based on artificial intelligence algorithms. The automated differentiation of osteoporotic from traumatic fractures and vertebral deformities unrelated to osteoporosis, the grading of vertebral fracture severity, and the detection of mild vertebral fractures is still problematic. The accuracy of automated fracture detection compared to classical radiological semi-quantitative Genant scoring is about 80%. Accuracy errors of alternative BMD calibration methods compared to simultaneous phantom-based calibration used in standard quantitative CT (QCT) range from below 5% to about 10%. The impact of contrast agents, frequently administered in clinical CT on the determination of BMD and on fracture risk determination is still controversial. Opportunistic screening, the identification of vertebral fracture and the measurement of BMD using clinical routine CT scans, is feasible but corresponding techniques still need to be integrated into the clinical workflow and further validated with respect to the prediction of fracture risk.

Interpretable Deep-Learning Approaches for Osteoporosis Risk Screening and Individualized Feature Analysis Using Large Population-Based Data: Model Development and Performance Evaluation

BACKGROUND

Osteoporosis is one of the diseases that requires early screening and detection for its management. Common clinical tools and machine-learning (ML) models for screening osteoporosis have been developed, but they show limitations such as low accuracy. Moreover, these methods are confined to limited risk factors and lack individualized explanation.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to develop an interpretable deep-learning (DL) model for osteoporosis risk screening with clinical features. Clinical interpretation with individual explanations of feature contributions is provided using an explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) technique.

METHODS

We used two separate data sets: the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data sets from the United States (NHANES) and South Korea (KNHANES) with 8274 and 8680 respondents, respectively. The study population was classified according to the T-score of bone mineral density at the femoral neck or total femur. A DL model for osteoporosis diagnosis was trained on the data sets and significant risk factors were investigated with local interpretable model-agnostic explanations (LIME). The performance of the DL model was compared with that of ML models and conventional clinical tools. Additionally, contribution ranking of risk factors and individualized explanation of feature contribution were examined.

RESULTS

Our DL model showed area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.851 (95% CI 0.844-0.858) and 0.922 (95% CI 0.916-0.928) for the femoral neck and total femur bone mineral density, respectively, using the NHANES data set. The corresponding AUC values for the KNHANES data set were 0.827 (95% CI 0.821-0.833) and 0.912 (95% CI 0.898-0.927), respectively. Through the LIME method, significant features were induced, and each feature's integrated contribution and interpretation for individual risk were determined.

CONCLUSIONS

The developed DL model significantly outperforms conventional ML models and clinical tools. Our XAI model produces high-ranked features along with the integrated contributions of each feature, which facilitates the interpretation of individual risk. In summary, our interpretable model for osteoporosis risk screening outperformed state-of-the-art methods.

Routine chest CT combined with the osteoporosis self-assessment tool for Asians (OSTA): a screening tool for patients with osteoporosis

INTRODUCTION

The osteoporosis self-assessment tool for Asians (OSTA) is a common screening tool for osteoporosis. The seventh thoracic CT (CT-T7) Hounsfield unit (HU) measured by chest CT correlates with osteoporosis. This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic value of OSTA alone, CT-T7 alone, or the combination of OSTA and CT-T7 in osteoporosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this study, 1268 participants were grouped into 586 men and 682 women. We established multiple linear regression models by combining CT-T7 and OSTA. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to evaluate the ability to diagnose osteoporosis.

RESULTS

In the male group, the mean age was 59.02 years, and 108 patients (18.4%) had osteoporosis. In the female group, the mean age was 63.23 years, and 308 patients (45.2%) had osteoporosis. By ROC curve comparison, the CT-T7 (male, AUC = 0.789, 95% CI 0.745-0.832; female, AUC = 0.835, 95% CI 0.805-0.864) in the diagnosis of osteoporosis was greater than the OSTA (male, AUC = 0.673, 95% CI 0.620-0.726; female, AUC = 0.775, 95% CI 0.741-0.810) in both the male and female groups (p < 0.001). When OSTA was combined with CT, the equation of multiple linear regression (MLR) was obtained as follows: female = 3.020-0.028*OSTA-0.004*CT-T7. In the female group, it was found that the AUC of MLR (AUC = 0.853, 95% CI 0.825-0.880) in the diagnosis of osteoporosis was larger than that of CT-T7 (p < 0.01). When the MLR was 2.65, the sensitivity and specificity were 53.9% and 90%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

For a patient who has completed chest CT, CT-T7 (HU) combined with OSTA is recommended to identify the high-risk population of osteoporosis, and it has a higher diagnostic value than OSTA alone or CT-T7 alone, especially among females. For a female with MLR greater than 2.65, further DXA examination is needed.

Opportunistic osteoporosis screening using chest CT with artificial intelligence

Osteoporosis has a high incidence and a low detection rate. If it is not detected in time, it will cause osteoporotic fracture and other serious consequences. This study showed that the attenuation values of vertebrae on chest CT could be used for opportunistic screening of osteoporosis. This will be beneficial to improve the detection rate of osteoporosis and reduce the incidence of adverse events caused by osteoporosis.

INTRODUCTION

To explore the value of the attenuation values of all thoracic vertebrae and the first lumbar vertebra measured by artificial intelligence on non-enhanced chest CT to do osteoporosis screening.

METHODS

On base of images of chest CT, using artificial intelligence (AI) to measure the attenuation values (HU) of all thoracic and the first vertebrae of patients who underwent CT examination for lung cancer screening and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) examination during the same period. The patients were divided into three groups: normal group, osteopenia group, and osteoporosis group according to the results of DXA. Clinical baseline data and attenuation values were compared among the three groups. The correlation between attenuation values and BMD values was analyzed, and the predictive ability and diagnostic efficacy of attenuation values of thoracic and first lumbar vertebrae on osteopenia or osteoporosis risk were further evaluated.

RESULTS

CT values of each thoracic vertebrae and the first lumbar vertebrae decreased with age, especially in menopausal women and presented high predictive ability and diagnostic efficacy for osteopenia or osteoporosis. After clinical data correction, with every 10 HU increase of CT values, the risk of osteopenia or osteoporosis decreased by 32 ~ 44% and 61 ~ 80%, respectively. And the combined diagnostic efficacy of all thoracic vertebrae was higher than that of a single vertebra. The AUC of recognizing osteopenia or osteoporosis from normal group was 0.831and 0.972, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The routine chest CT with AI is of great value in opportunistic screening for osteopenia or osteoporosis, which can quickly screen the population at high risk of osteoporosis without increasing radiation dose, thus reducing the incidence of osteoporotic fracture.

The Prevalence of Osteoporosis in the Thoracic Surgery Patient Population: An Opportunity Assessment from Thorax CT Scans

Aim: To investigate the prevalence of osteoporosis in thoracic surgery patients and highlight the clinical significance for physicians. Methods: Thoracic computed tomographies(CT) of 306 patients were examined for medullary density of T12 vertebra. Hounsfield units (HU) between men and women; under the age of 70 and those who are "70 years and older" groups were compared. To evaluate the diagnostic performance of the age parameter in predicting osteoporosis, ROC analysis, and logistic regression analysis were used. The rib cortical defects identified in this study group and their causes were explained. Results: HUs of 51 subjects (or 16.7%) was less than 110 (osteoporosis); of 177 people (57.8%) was higher than 160 (normal). HU values ranged from 111 to 159 (borderline) for 78 individuals (25.5%). There was no significant difference between males and females. It was discovered that the difference between the population under 70 and the population over 70 was statistically significant (p

Application of machine learning model to predict osteoporosis based on abdominal computed tomography images of the psoas muscle: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

With rapid economic development, the world's average life expectancy is increasing, leading to the increasing prevalence of osteoporosis worldwide. However, due to the complexity and high cost of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) examination, DXA has not been widely used to diagnose osteoporosis. In addition, studies have shown that the psoas index measured at the third lumbar spine (L3) level is closely related to bone mineral density (BMD) and has an excellent predictive effect on osteoporosis. Therefore, this study developed a variety of machine learning (ML) models based on psoas muscle tissue at the L3 level of unenhanced abdominal computed tomography (CT) to predict osteoporosis.

METHODS

Medical professionals collected the CT images and the clinical characteristics data of patients over 40 years old who underwent DXA and abdominal CT examination in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University database from January 2017 to January 2021. Using 3D Slicer software based on horizontal CT images of the L3, the specialist delineated three layers of the region of interest (ROI) along the bilateral psoas muscle edges. The PyRadiomics package in Python was used to extract the features of ROI. Then Mann-Whitney U test and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) algorithm were used to reduce the dimension of the extracted features. Finally, six machine learning models, Gaussian naïve Bayes (GNB), random forest (RF), logistic regression (LR), support vector machines (SVM), Gradient boosting machine (GBM), and Extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), were applied to train and validate these features to predict osteoporosis.

RESULTS

A total of 172 participants met the inclusion and exclusion criteria for the study. 82 participants were enrolled in the osteoporosis group, and 90 were in the non-osteoporosis group. Moreover, the two groups had no significant differences in age, BMI, sex, smoking, drinking, hypertension, and diabetes. Besides, 826 radiomic features were obtained from unenhanced abdominal CT images of osteoporotic and non-osteoporotic patients. Five hundred fifty radiomic features were screened out of 826 by the Mann-Whitney U test. Finally, 16 significant radiomic features were obtained by the LASSO algorithm. These 16 radiomic features were incorporated into six traditional machine learning models (GBM, GNB, LR, RF, SVM, and XGB). All six machine learning models could predict osteoporosis well in the validation set, with the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) values greater than or equal to 0.8. GBM is more effective in predicting osteoporosis, whose AUROC was 0.86, sensitivity 0.70, specificity 0.92, and accuracy 0.81 in validation sets.

CONCLUSION

We developed six machine learning models to predict osteoporosis based on psoas muscle images of abdominal CT, and the GBM model had the best predictive performance. GBM model can better help clinicians to diagnose osteoporosis and provide timely anti-osteoporosis treatment for patients. In the future, the research team will strive to include participants from multiple institutions to conduct external validation of the ML model of this study.

The Potential Role of Artificial Intelligence in Lung Cancer Screening Using Low-Dose Computed Tomography

Two large randomized controlled trials of low-dose CT (LDCT)-based lung cancer screening (LCS) in high-risk smoker populations have shown a reduction in the number of lung cancer deaths in the screening group compared to a control group. Even if various countries are currently considering the implementation of LCS programs, recurring doubts and fears persist about the potentially high false positive rates, cost-effectiveness, and the availability of radiologists for scan interpretation. Artificial intelligence (AI) can potentially increase the efficiency of LCS. The objective of this article is to review the performances of AI algorithms developed for different tasks that make up the interpretation of LCS CT scans, and to estimate how these AI algorithms may be used as a second reader. Despite the reduction in lung cancer mortality due to LCS with LDCT, many smokers die of comorbid smoking-related diseases. The identification of CT features associated with these comorbidities could increase the value of screening with minimal impact on LCS programs. Because these smoking-related conditions are not systematically assessed in current LCS programs, AI can identify individuals with evidence of previously undiagnosed cardiovascular disease, emphysema or osteoporosis and offer an opportunity for treatment and prevention.

Current Applications of Machine Learning in Spine: From Clinical View

STUDY DESIGN

Narrative review.

OBJECTIVES

This review aims to present current applications of machine learning (ML) in spine domain to clinicians.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive PubMed search of peer-reviewed articles that were published between 2006 and 2020 using terms (spine, spinal, lumbar, cervical, thoracic, machine learning) to examine ML in spine. Then exclude research of other domain, case report, review or meta-analysis, and which without available abstract or full text.

RESULTS

Total 1738 articles were retrieved from database, and 292 studies were finally included. Key findings of current applications were compiled and summarized in this review. Main clinical applications of those techniques including image processing, diagnosis, decision supporting, operative assistance, rehabilitation, surgery outcomes, complications, hospitalization and cost.

CONCLUSIONS

ML had achieved excellent performance and hold immense potential in spine. ML could help clinical staff to improve medical level, enhance work efficiency, and reduce adverse events. However more randomized controlled trials and improvement of interpretability are essential to clinicians accepting models' assistance in real work.

CT-Derived Body Composition Assessment as a Prognostic Tool in Oncologic Patients: From Opportunistic Research to Artificial Intelligence-Based Clinical Implementation

CT-based body composition measures are well established in research settings as prognostic markers in oncologic patients. Numerous retrospective studies have shown the role of objective measurements extracted from abdominal CT images of skeletal muscle, abdominal fat, and bone mineral density in providing more accurate assessments of frailty and cancer cachexia in comparison with traditional clinical methods. Quantitative CT-based measurements of liver fat and aortic atherosclerotic calcification have received relatively less attention in cancer care but also provide prognostic information. Patients with cancer routinely undergo serial CT examinations for staging, treatment response, and surveillance, providing the opportunity for quantitative body composition assessment to be performed as part of routine clinical care. The emergence of fully automated artificial intelligence-based segmentation and quantification tools to replace earlier time-consuming manual and semiautomated methods for body composition analysis will allow these opportunistic measures to transition from the research realm to clinical practice. With continued investigation, the measurements may ultimately be applied to achieve more precise risk stratification as a component of personalized oncologic care.