1
|
Runarsson TG, Bergmann A, Erlingsdottir G, Petursdottir V, Heitmann LA, Johannesson A, Asbjornsson V, Axelsson T, Hilmarsson R, Gudbjartsson T. An epidemiological and clinicopathological study of type 1 vs. type 2 morphological subtypes of papillary renal cell carcinoma- results from a nation-wide study covering 50 years in Iceland. BMC Urol 2024; 24:105. [PMID: 38741053 DOI: 10.1186/s12894-024-01494-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2023] [Accepted: 05/02/2024] [Indexed: 05/16/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC) is the second most common histology of renal cell carcinoma (RCC), accounting for 10-15% of cases. Traditionally, pRCC is divided into type 1 and type 2, although this division is currently debated as a prognostic factor of survival. Our aim was to investigate the epidemiology and survival of the pRCC subtypes in a whole nation cohort of patients during a 50-year period. MATERIALS AND METHODS A Population based retrospective study including consecutive cases of RCC in Iceland from 1971-2020. Comparisons were made between histological classifications of RCC, with emphasis on pRCC subtypes (type 1 vs. 2) for outcome estimation. Changes in RCC incidence were analyzed in 5-year intervals after age standardization. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression were used for outcome analysis. RESULTS A total of 1.725 cases were identified, with 74.4%, 2.1% and 9.2% having clear cell (ccRCC), chromophobe (chRCC), and pRCC, respectively. The age standardized incidence (ASI) of pRCC was 1.97/100.000 for males and 0.5/100.000 for females, and the proportion of pRCC increased from 3.7% to 11.5% between the first and last intervals of the study (p < 0.001). Age standardized cancer specific mortality (ASCSM) of pRCC was 0.6/100.000 and 0.19/100.000 for males and females, respectively. The annual average increase in ASI was 3.6% for type 1 pRCC, but the ASI for type 2 pRCC and ASCSM for both subtypes did not change significantly. Male to female ratio was 4.4 for type 1 pRCC and 2.3 for type 2. The average tumor size for type 1 and 2 was 58.8 and 73.7 mm, respectively. Metastasis at diagnosis was found in 8.7% in the type 1 pRCC, compared to 30.0% of patients with type 2 pRCC (p < 0.001). Estimated 5-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) were 94.4%, 80.7%, and 69.3% for chRCC, pRCC and ccRCC, respectively (p < 0.001). For the pRCC subtypes, type 1 was associated with better 5-year CSS than type 2 (86.3% vs. 66.0%, p < 0.001), although this difference was not significant after adjusting for cancer stage and grading. CONCLUSIONS pRCC histology was slightly less common in Iceland than in other countries. Males are more than three times more likely to be diagnosed with pRCC, compared to other RCC histologies. The subtype of pRCC was not found to be an independent risk factor for worse survival, and as suggested by the most recent WHO Classification of Urinary Tumors, grade and TNM-stage seem to be the most important factors for estimation of survival for pRCC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Andreas Bergmann
- Department of Urology and Surgery in Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - Gigja Erlingsdottir
- Department of Pathology in Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - Vigdis Petursdottir
- Department of Pathology in Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | | | - Aevar Johannesson
- Department of Statistics in University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | | | - Tomas Axelsson
- Department of Urology in Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Rafn Hilmarsson
- Department of Urology and Surgery in Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - Tomas Gudbjartsson
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland.
- Department of Urology and Surgery in Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland.
- Department of Surgery and Urology, Landspitali University Hospital, University of Iceland, Hringbraut IS-101, Reykjavik, Iceland.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Erdem S, Bertolo R, Campi R, Capitanio U, Amparore D, Anceschi U, Mir MC, Roussel E, Pavan N, Carbonara U, Kara O, Klatte T, Marchioni M, Pecoraro A, Muselaers S, Marandino L, Diana P, Borregales L, Palumbo C, Warren H, Wu Z, Calio A, Ciccarese C, Degirmenci E, Aydin R, Rebez G, Schips L, Simone G, Minervini A, Serni S, Ozcan F. The prognostic role of histomorphological subtyping in nonmetastatic papillary renal cell carcinoma after curative surgery: is subtype really irrelevant? A propensity score matching analysis of a multi-institutional real life data. Urol Oncol 2024; 42:163.e1-163.e13. [PMID: 38443238 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.01.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2023] [Revised: 12/10/2023] [Accepted: 01/25/2024] [Indexed: 03/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM The role of histomorphological subtyping is an issue of debate in papillary renal cell carcinoma (papRCC). This multi-institutional study investigated the prognostic role of histomorphological subtyping in patients undergoing curative surgery for nonmetastatic papRCC. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 1,086 patients undergoing curative surgery were included from a retrospectively collected multi-institutional nonmetastatic papRCC database. The patients were divided into 2 groups based on histomorphological subtyping (type 1, n = 669 and type 2, n = 417). Furthermore, a propensity score-matching (PSM) cohort in 1:1 ratio (n = 317 for each subtype) was created to reduce the effect of potential confounding variables. The primary outcome of the study, the predictive role of histomorphological subtyping on the prognosis (recurrence free survival [RFS], cancer specific survival [CSS] and overall survival [OS]) in nonmetastatic papRCC after curative surgery, was investigated in both overall and PSM cohorts. RESULTS In overall cohort, type 2 group were older (66 vs. 63 years, P = 0.015) and more frequently underwent radical nephrectomy (37.4% vs. 25.6%, P < 0.001) and lymphadenectomy (22.3% vs. 15.1%, P = 0.003). Tumor size (4.5 vs. 3.8 cm, P < 0.001) was greater, and nuclear grade (P < 0.001), pT stage (P < 0.001), pN stage (P < 0.001), VENUSS score (P < 0.001) and VENUSS high risk (P < 0.001) were significantly higher in type 2 group. 5-year RFS (89.6% vs. 74.2%, P < 0.001), CSS (93.9% vs. 84.2%, P < 0.001) and OS (88.5% vs. 78.5%, P < 0.001) were significantly lower in type 2 group. On multivariable analyses, type 2 was a significant predictor for RFS (HR:1.86 [95%CI:1.33-2.61], P < 0.001) and CSS (HR:1.91 [95%CI:1.20-3.04], P = 0.006), but not for OS (HR:1.27 [95%CI:0.92-1.76], P = 0.150). In PSM cohort balanced with age, gender, symptoms at diagnosis, pT and pN stages, tumor grade, surgical margin status, sarcomatoid features, rhabdoid features, and presence of necrosis, type 2 increased recurrence risk (HR:1.75 [95%CI: 1.16-2.65]; P = 0.008), but not cancer specific mortality (HR: 1.57 [95%CI: 0.91-2.68]; P = 0.102) and overall mortality (HR: 1.01 [95%CI: 0.68-1.48]; P = 0.981) CONCLUSIONS: This multiinstitutional study suggested that type 2 was associated with adverse histopathologic outcomes, and predictor of RFS and CSS after surgical treatment of nonmetastatic papRCC, in overall cohort. In propensity score-matching cohort, type 2 remained the predictor of RFS. Eventhough 5th WHO classification for renal tumors eliminated histomorphological subtyping, these findings suggest that subtyping is relevant from the point of prognostic view.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Selcuk Erdem
- Division of Urologic Oncology, Department of Urology, Istanbul University Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey; European Association of Urology (EAU), Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Renal Cancer Working Group, Arnhem, Netherlands.
| | - Riccardo Bertolo
- European Association of Urology (EAU), Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Renal Cancer Working Group, Arnhem, Netherlands; Department of Urology, San Carlo Di Nancy Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Riccardo Campi
- European Association of Urology (EAU), Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Renal Cancer Working Group, Arnhem, Netherlands; Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Umberto Capitanio
- Department of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Daniele Amparore
- European Association of Urology (EAU), Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Renal Cancer Working Group, Arnhem, Netherlands; School of Medicine, Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Umberto Anceschi
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Eduard Roussel
- European Association of Urology (EAU), Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Renal Cancer Working Group, Arnhem, Netherlands; Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Nicola Pavan
- European Association of Urology (EAU), Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Renal Cancer Working Group, Arnhem, Netherlands; Urology Clinic, Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Science, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Umberto Carbonara
- European Association of Urology (EAU), Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Renal Cancer Working Group, Arnhem, Netherlands; Unit of Andrology and Kidney Transplantation, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation-Urology, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Onder Kara
- Department of Urology, Kocaeli University School of Medicine, Kocaeli, Turkey
| | - Tobias Klatte
- Department of Urology, Helios Klinikum Bad Saarow, Bad Saarow, Germany
| | - Michele Marchioni
- European Association of Urology (EAU), Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Renal Cancer Working Group, Arnhem, Netherlands; Department of Urology, SS. Annunziata Hospital, G. D'Annunzio University, Chieti, Italy
| | - Angela Pecoraro
- European Association of Urology (EAU), Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Renal Cancer Working Group, Arnhem, Netherlands; Division of Urology, Pederzoli Hospital, Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy
| | - Stijn Muselaers
- European Association of Urology (EAU), Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Renal Cancer Working Group, Arnhem, Netherlands; Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Laura Marandino
- European Association of Urology (EAU), Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Renal Cancer Working Group, Arnhem, Netherlands; Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Pietro Diana
- European Association of Urology (EAU), Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Renal Cancer Working Group, Arnhem, Netherlands; Department of Urology, IRCCS Humanitas Clinic, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Leonardo Borregales
- European Association of Urology (EAU), Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Renal Cancer Working Group, Arnhem, Netherlands; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medicine/New York-Presbyterian, New York, NY
| | - Carlotta Palumbo
- European Association of Urology (EAU), Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Renal Cancer Working Group, Arnhem, Netherlands; Division of Urology, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont, Maggiore della Carità Hospital, Novara, Italy
| | - Hannah Warren
- European Association of Urology (EAU), Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Renal Cancer Working Group, Arnhem, Netherlands; Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Zhenjie Wu
- European Association of Urology (EAU), Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Renal Cancer Working Group, Arnhem, Netherlands; Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Anna Calio
- European Association of Urology (EAU), Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Renal Cancer Working Group, Arnhem, Netherlands; Department of Diagnostic and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Chiara Ciccarese
- European Association of Urology (EAU), Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Renal Cancer Working Group, Arnhem, Netherlands; Medical Oncology Unit, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Enes Degirmenci
- Department of Urology, Istanbul University Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Resat Aydin
- Medical Oncology Unit, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Giacomo Rebez
- Urology Clinic, Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Science, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Luigi Schips
- Department of Urology, SS. Annunziata Hospital, G. D'Annunzio University, Chieti, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Simone
- School of Medicine, Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Andrea Minervini
- Unit of Urological Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Robotic Surgery and Andrology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Sergio Serni
- Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Faruk Ozcan
- Division of Urologic Oncology, Department of Urology, Istanbul University Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ma W, Zhang F, Huang H, Wang W, Zhu Y, Lu Y, Guo H, Gan W. Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Features of Adult Xp11.2 Translocation Renal Cell Carcinoma: Differential Diagnosis With Three Main Renal Cell Carcinoma Subtypes. JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE : OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE 2022; 41:2673-2685. [PMID: 35103338 PMCID: PMC9788209 DOI: 10.1002/jum.15951] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2021] [Revised: 01/17/2022] [Accepted: 01/19/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate the sonographic features in Xp11.2 translocation renal cell carcinoma (Xp11.2 tRCC) using both conventional ultrasound (US) and contrast-enhanced US (CEUS) and evaluate the usefulness of sonographic imaging characteristics to differentiate between Xp11.2 tRCC and the three common RCC subtypes. METHODS Thirty-four adult Xp11.2 tRCC patients who preoperatively underwent both conventional US and CEUS and had solitary renal lesions and pathological confirmation after surgery were enrolled. Control matched patients included 131 with clear cell RCC (ccRCC), 48 with papillary RCC (pRCC), and 35 with chromophobe RCC (chRCC). Conventional US and CEUS data of all patients were retrospectively analyzed and compared. RESULTS Xp11.2 tRCC was more common in young women. The echogenicity of Xp11.2 tRCC lesions was hypo- and isoechoic relative to the adjacent renal cortex. A higher frequency of calcification within tumors was detected in Xp11.2 tRCC, but the presence of color flow signal (26.5%, 9/34) was much lower. Regarding CEUS features relative to the adjacent renal cortex, synchronous wash-in (61.8%, 21/34), iso-enhancement at peak (55.9%, 19/34), and fast wash-out (50.0%, 17/34) were more common in Xp11.2 tRCC. Moreover, an integrated variables model based on these features could differentiate Xp11.2 tRCC from ccRCC, pRCC, and chRCC (area under the curve, sensitivity, and specificity: 0.934, 92.0%, and 86.0%; 0.907, 88.0%, and 87.0%; and 0.808, 65.0%, and 99.0%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Combining conventional US and CEUS lesion features with clinical information may provide a feasible and effective method to differentiate Xp11.2 tRCC from ccRCC, pRCC, and chRCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenliang Ma
- Department of UrologyNanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical SchoolNanjingChina
| | - Fan Zhang
- Department of UrologyNanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical SchoolNanjingChina
- Department of Urogenital UltrasoundNanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical SchoolNanjingChina
| | - Haifeng Huang
- Department of UrologyNanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical SchoolNanjingChina
- Department of Urogenital UltrasoundNanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical SchoolNanjingChina
| | - Wei Wang
- Department of UrologyNanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical SchoolNanjingChina
- Department of Urogenital UltrasoundNanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical SchoolNanjingChina
| | - Yiqi Zhu
- Department of UrologyNanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical SchoolNanjingChina
| | - Yanwen Lu
- Department of UrologyNanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical SchoolNanjingChina
| | - Hongqian Guo
- Department of UrologyNanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical SchoolNanjingChina
- Department of Urogenital UltrasoundNanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical SchoolNanjingChina
| | - Weidong Gan
- Department of UrologyNanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical SchoolNanjingChina
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Clinical, pathological and long-term oncologic outcomes of papillary type I vs. type II renal cell carcinoma. Urol Oncol 2022; 40:384.e15-384.e21. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.05.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2021] [Revised: 03/26/2022] [Accepted: 05/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
5
|
Erdem S, Capitanio U, Campi R, Mir MC, Roussel E, Pavan N, Kara O, Klatte T, Kriegmair MC, Degirmenci E, Aydin R, Minervini A, Serni S, Berni A, Rebez G, Ozcan F. External validation of the VENUSS prognostic model to predict recurrence after surgery in non-metastatic papillary renal cell carcinoma: A multi-institutional analysis. Urol Oncol 2022; 40:198.e9-198.e17. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2021] [Revised: 12/26/2021] [Accepted: 01/11/2022] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
6
|
Qian X, Wan J, Qian C, Zhang J. Clinicopathological Features and Prognostic Outcomes of Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma. Int J Gen Med 2021; 14:7523-7531. [PMID: 34754225 PMCID: PMC8572091 DOI: 10.2147/ijgm.s340569] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2021] [Accepted: 10/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Although papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC) is the second common renal malignant tumor, the current understanding of pRCC is poor. This study aims to explore the clinicopathological features and prognostic factors of pRCC. Methods From August 2007 and August 2017, 87 patients diagnosed with pRCC by postoperative pathology were enrolled. The clinicopathological features between type1 pRCC and type2 pRCC were compared by Chi-square test, Fisher’s exact test, or t-test. The Kaplan–Meier method was performed to estimate progression-free survival (PFS). Univariate and multivariate cox regression models were used to verify the prognostic factors. Results Of the 87 cases, the median tumor diameter was 5.3cm. Twenty-nine patients were diagnosed with type1 pRCC and 58 patients with type2 pRCC. According pathological stage, 59 (67.8%) cases were in pT1 stage, 19 (21.8%) in pT2 stage, and 9 (10.4%) in pT3 stage. WHO/ISUP pathological grade revealed that 56 (64.4%) patients were in grade I, 17 (19.5%) in grade II, 7 (8.05%) in grade III, and 7 (8.05%) in grade IV. The median follow-up time was 57.0months, and the 1-, 3-year PFS was 95.4%, and 80.8%, respectively. For type1 and type2 pRCC, 3-years PFS was 93.0% and 74.9%, respectively. Survival of type1 pRCC was better than that of type2 (P= 0.027). Patients with late pT stage, lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis, high pathological grade, and large size exhibited worse survival. pTNM stage, pathological grade, and tumor types were potentially related to prognosis for PFS. However, an independent prognostic factor affecting PFS was not found in multivariate regression models. For patients with the pT1 stage, nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) and radical nephrectomy (RN) did not affect the PFS, ignoring tumor types (P=0.45). Conclusion Type2 pRCC is more than type1 pRCC and has an advanced TNM stage and a higher pathological grade. For patients with pRCC with the pT1 stage, the outcome of NSS is not inferior to that of RN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoyuan Qian
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, People's Republic of China
| | - Junlai Wan
- Department of Orthopedics, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, People's Republic of China
| | - Can Qian
- Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Rheumatology, Southwest Hospital, Army Military Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China
| | - Jiaqiao Zhang
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Xiong S, Zhu W, Li X, Yu Y, Yang K, Zhang L, Mi Y, Li X, Zhou L. Whether histologic subtyping affect the oncological outcomes of patients with papillary renal cell carcinoma: evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis. Transl Androl Urol 2021; 10:3255-3266. [PMID: 34532250 PMCID: PMC8421816 DOI: 10.21037/tau-21-329] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2021] [Accepted: 06/29/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Whether the histologic subtype (type 1 and type 2) of papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC) is a tool to predict the prognosis is of great debate. This study is aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of histologic subtype in patients with pRCC after surgery through a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods We searched PubMed, the Web of Science, Cochrane library and EMBASE databases to identify studies published until January 20, 2021 according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Studies were deemed eligible if they compared the overall survival (OS), cancer specific survival (CSS), recurrence-free survival (RFS) or disease-free survival (DFS) between patients with type 1 or type 2 pRCC. And the corresponding hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% conference intervals (CIs) were collected for meta-analysis and further subgroup analysis. Results Overall 22 studies with a total of 4,494 patients were considered eligible and included for the systematic review and meta-analysis. The pooled results showed that type 2 pRCC was associated with a worse OS (pooled HR 1.61, 95% CI: 1.10–2.36, P=0.02) and CSS (pooled HR 1.59, 95% CI: 1.00–2.51, P=0.05). However, the subgroup analysis yielded the same result as the initial analysis only when the HRs were extracted from univariate analysis. In studies with multivariate analysis, type 2 pRCC was not statistically associated with a worse OS (pooled HR 1.22, 95% CI: 0.97–1.53, P=0.27), CSS (pooled HR 1.16, 95% CI: 0.67–2.00, P=0.60), and DFS (pooled HR 1.33, 95% CI: 0.93–1.91, P=0.12) compared to type 1 pRCC. Discussion Histologic subtype is not an independent prognostic factor for patients with pRCC, although the result needs to be taken with caution. And studies with retrospective study design, larger sample size and longer follow-up period are required to verify these results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shengwei Xiong
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Centre, Beijing, China
| | - Weijie Zhu
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Centre, Beijing, China
| | - Xinfei Li
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Centre, Beijing, China
| | - Yanfei Yu
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Centre, Beijing, China
| | - Kunlin Yang
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Centre, Beijing, China
| | - Lei Zhang
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Centre, Beijing, China
| | - Yue Mi
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Centre, Beijing, China
| | - Xuesong Li
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Centre, Beijing, China
| | - Liqun Zhou
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Centre, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Su X, Hou NN, Yang LJ, Li PX, Yang XJ, Hou GD, Gao XL, Ma SJ, Guo F, Zhang R, Zhang WH, Qin WJ, Wang FL. The first competing risk survival nomogram in patients with papillary renal cell carcinoma. Sci Rep 2021; 11:11835. [PMID: 34088935 PMCID: PMC8178392 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-91217-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2020] [Accepted: 05/24/2021] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
There is still a lack of competing risk analysis of patients with papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC) following surgery. We performed the cumulative incidence function (CIF) to estimate the absolute risks of cancer-specific mortality (CSM) and other-cause mortality (OCM) of pRCC over time, and constructed a nomogram predicting the probability of 2-, 3- and 5-year CSM based on competing risk regression. A total of 5993 pRCC patients who underwent nephrectomy between 2010 and 2016 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The 2-, 3-, 5-year CSM rates were 3.2%, 4.4% and 6.5%, respectively, and that of OCM were 3.2%, 5.0% and 9.3%, respectively. The estimates of 5-year cumulative mortality were most pronounced among patients aged > 75 years in OCM (17.0%). On multivariable analyses, age, tumor grade, T stage, N stage, and with or without bone, liver and lung metastases were identified as independent predictors of CSM following surgery and were integrated to generate the nomogram. The nomogram achieved a satisfactory discrimination with the AUCt of 0.730 at 5-year, and the calibration curves presented impressive agreements. Taken together, age-related OCM is a significant portion of all-cause mortality in elderly patients and our nomogram can be used for decision-making and patient counselling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xing Su
- Department of Urology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, 710032, China
| | - Niu-Niu Hou
- Department of Thyroid, Breast and Vascular Surgery, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, 710032, China
| | - Li-Jun Yang
- Department of Urology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, 710032, China
| | - Peng-Xiao Li
- Department of Cardiology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, 710032, China
| | - Xiao-Jian Yang
- Department of Urology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, 710032, China
| | - Guang-Dong Hou
- Department of Urology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, 710032, China
| | - Xue-Lin Gao
- Department of Urology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, 710032, China
| | - Shuai-Jun Ma
- Department of Urology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, 710032, China
| | - Fan Guo
- Department of Urology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, 710032, China
| | - Rui Zhang
- Department of Urology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, 710032, China
| | - Wu-He Zhang
- Department of Urology, The 986th Hospital of Air Force, Xi'an, 710054, China
| | - Wei-Jun Qin
- Department of Urology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, 710032, China.
| | - Fu-Li Wang
- Department of Urology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, 710032, China.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Papillary renal cell carcinoma: Review. Urol Oncol 2021; 39:327-337. [PMID: 34034966 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.04.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2020] [Revised: 04/06/2021] [Accepted: 04/11/2021] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
Kidney cancer is the 13th most common malignancy globally, and the incidence is rising. Papillary renal cell carcinoma is the second most common subtype, comprising 10-15% of renal cell carcinomas. Though the histologic features of this subtype were initially described in the 1990's, our understanding of the genetic and molecular characteristics of this disease have rapidly evolved over the past decade. In this review, we summarize the contemporary understanding of the clinical, morphologic, radiographic, and genetic characteristics of papillary renal cell carcinoma, as well as clinical considerations, current options for management, and prognosis.
Collapse
|
10
|
Pan H, Ye L, Zhu Q, Yang Z, Hu M. The effect of the papillary renal cell carcinoma subtype on oncological outcomes. Sci Rep 2020; 10:21073. [PMID: 33273677 PMCID: PMC7713298 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-78174-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2020] [Accepted: 11/17/2020] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
The study aimed to compare the clinicopathological features and prognosis between type I and type II papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC) and to investigate whether the subtypes of PRCC would affect oncological outcomes. A total of 102 patients with PRCC were recruited, of which 42 were type I PRCC and 60 type II. The clinicopathological features and oncologic outcomes of the patients were evaluated. The type II cases had a higher WHO/ISUP grading (P < 0.001), T (P = 0.003), N (P = 0.010) stage and stage grouping (P = 0.011) than the type I. During a median follow-up period of 61.4 months, 1-year cancer specific survival (CSS) of the type I was 100%, 5-year CSS was 95.2%, the 1-year CSS of the type II was 96.2%, and 5-year CSS was 75.7%. The univariate analysis showed that subtype, symptoms, TNM, stage grouping, WHO/ISUP grading and surgical methods appeared to affect prognosis of the patients with PRCC. However, multivariate analysis revealed that only stage grouping was the independent risk factor. After the stage grouping factor was adjusted for the analysis, there were no statistically significant differences in CSS (P = 0.214) and PFS (P = 0.190) between the localized type I and type II PRCC groups. Compared with type I PRCC, type II had higher pathological T, N stage and WHO/ISUP grading. However, it was the Stage grouping that made a great difference to oncological outcomes, rather than the subtype of PRCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Honghong Pan
- Shengli Clinical Medical College, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350001, China.,Department of Urology, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, 350001, China
| | - Liefu Ye
- Shengli Clinical Medical College, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350001, China. .,Department of Urology, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, 350001, China. .,Department of Urology, Jinshan Branch of Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, 350028, China.
| | - Qingguo Zhu
- Shengli Clinical Medical College, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350001, China
| | - Zesong Yang
- Department of Urology, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, 350001, China
| | - Minxiong Hu
- Department of Urology, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, 350001, China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Al Salhi Y, Fuschi A, Velotti G, Capone L, Aversa S, de Nunzio C, Porta N, Petrozza V, Carbone A, Pastore AL. Robot-assisted retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy in patient with type I papillary renal cancer recurrence after 5 years of follow-up. J Surg Case Rep 2020; 2020:rjaa336. [PMID: 33072251 PMCID: PMC7546679 DOI: 10.1093/jscr/rjaa336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2020] [Accepted: 07/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC) is a rare cancer and is the second most frequent histologic type among all renal cell carcinoma, accounting for up to 15%. A 72-year-old man underwent a right radical nephrectomy 7 years ago with final histopathology diagnosis of type 1 PRCC with negative surgical margins. Five years after surgery, computed tomography scan imaging showed the presence of multiple masses suspicious for node recurrences disease localized in the renal lodge, in the inter-aorto-caval space, at the iliac vessels bifurcation and right common iliac vessels. Patient underwent a robotic retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy. The histopathological examination confirmed the recurrence of type I papillary renal cancer in all the specimens. No further recurrences have been observed at 24-month follow-up after surgery. This report is the first describing a robot-assisted minimally invasive surgical excision for type I papillary renal cancer nodal and renal fossa recurrences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yazan Al Salhi
- Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, "La Sapienza" University of Rome, Urology Unit ICOT, Latina, Italy
| | - Andrea Fuschi
- Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, "La Sapienza" University of Rome, Urology Unit ICOT, Latina, Italy
| | - Gennaro Velotti
- Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, "La Sapienza" University of Rome, Urology Unit ICOT, Latina, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Capone
- Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, "La Sapienza" University of Rome, Urology Unit ICOT, Latina, Italy
| | - Sara Aversa
- Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, "La Sapienza" University of Rome, Pathology Unit ICOT, Latina, Italy
| | - Cosimo de Nunzio
- Department of Urology, La Sapienza University of Rome, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Natale Porta
- Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, "La Sapienza" University of Rome, Pathology Unit ICOT, Latina, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Petrozza
- Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, "La Sapienza" University of Rome, Pathology Unit ICOT, Latina, Italy
| | - Antonio Carbone
- Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, "La Sapienza" University of Rome, Urology Unit ICOT, Latina, Italy
| | - Antonio Luigi Pastore
- Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, "La Sapienza" University of Rome, Urology Unit ICOT, Latina, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Rosiello G, Palumbo C, Knipper S, Pecoraro A, Luzzago S, St-Hilaire PA, Tian Z, Capitanio U, Montorsi F, Shariat SF, Saad F, Briganti A, Karakiewicz PI. Comparison of survival outcomes in patients with metastatic papillary vs. clear-cell renal cell carcinoma: a propensity-score analysis. World J Urol 2020; 39:461-472. [PMID: 32253579 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-020-03187-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2019] [Accepted: 03/27/2020] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To compare survival outcomes of metastatic patients harbouring either papillary (pRCC) or clear-cell (ccRCC) renal cell carcinoma in overall population and according to treatment modality. METHODS Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database (2006-2015), we identified 6800 patients (585 papillary and 6215 clear-cell) with metastatic RCC. Propensity-score (PS) matching, Kaplan-Meier plots and multivariable Cox-regression models (CRMs) were used. RESULTS Overall, 585 (8.6%) patients harboured pRCC. Rates of nodal metastases were higher in patients with pRCC (49.7 vs. 23.3%; p < 0.001). Median overall survival (OS) was 13 vs. 18 months for pRCC vs. ccRCC patients. After multivariable adjustments, no difference in OS was recorded. Furthermore, after propensity-score matching, virtually the same results were recorded. Median OS of pRCC vs. ccRCC was 8 vs. 4 months for no treatment (NT), 11 vs. 12 months for targeted therapy alone (TT), 17 vs. 35 months for cytoreductive nephrectomy alone (CN) and 18 vs. 25 months for combination of CN with TT. CONCLUSIONS Metastatic pRCC patients exhibit poor survival, regardless of treatment received. Moreover, pRCC patients are more likely to present nodal metastases, compared to ccRCC patients, as demonstrated by twofold higher rates of lymph node invasion at diagnosis. These observations indicate that papillary variant represents more prognostically unfavorable tumor histology, in the context of metastatic RCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Rosiello
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada.
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy.
| | - Carlotta Palumbo
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Urology Unit, ASST Spedali Civili of Brescia, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Science and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Sophie Knipper
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Angela Pecoraro
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Department of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Stefano Luzzago
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Department of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Pierre-Antoine St-Hilaire
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Zhe Tian
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Umberto Capitanio
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Institute of Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Fred Saad
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Klatte T, Gallagher KM, Afferi L, Volpe A, Kroeger N, Ribback S, McNeill A, Riddick ACP, Armitage JN, 'Aho TF, Eisen T, Fife K, Bex A, Pantuck AJ, Stewart GD. The VENUSS prognostic model to predict disease recurrence following surgery for non-metastatic papillary renal cell carcinoma: development and evaluation using the ASSURE prospective clinical trial cohort. BMC Med 2019; 17:182. [PMID: 31578141 PMCID: PMC6775651 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-019-1419-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2019] [Accepted: 09/04/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The current World Health Organization classification recognises 12 major subtypes of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Although these subtypes differ on molecular and clinical levels, they are generally managed as the same disease, simply because they occur in the same organ. Specifically, there is a paucity of tools to risk-stratify patients with papillary RCC (PRCC). The purpose of this study was to develop and evaluate a tool to risk-stratify patients with clinically non-metastatic PRCC following curative surgery. METHODS We studied clinicopathological variables and outcomes of 556 patients, who underwent full resection of sporadic, unilateral, non-metastatic (T1-4, N0-1, M0) PRCC at five institutions. Based on multivariable Fine-Gray competing risks regression models, we developed a prognostic scoring system to predict disease recurrence. This was further evaluated in the 150 PRCC patients recruited to the ASSURE trial. We compared the discrimination, calibration and decision-curve clinical net benefit against the Tumour, Node, Metastasis (TNM) stage group, University of California Integrated Staging System (UISS) and the 2018 Leibovich prognostic groups. RESULTS We developed the VENUSS score from significant variables on multivariable analysis, which were the presence of VEnous tumour thrombus, NUclear grade, Size, T and N Stage. We created three risk groups based on the VENUSS score, with a 5-year cumulative incidence of recurrence equalling 2.9% in low-risk, 15.4% in intermediate-risk and 54.5% in high-risk patients. 91.7% of low-risk patients had oligometastatic recurrent disease, compared to 16.7% of intermediate-risk and 40.0% of high-risk patients. Discrimination, calibration and clinical net benefit from VENUSS appeared to be superior to UISS, TNM and Leibovich prognostic groups. CONCLUSIONS We developed and tested a prognostic model for patients with clinically non-metastatic PRCC, which is based on routine pathological variables. This model may be superior to standard models and could be used for tailoring postoperative surveillance and defining inclusion for prospective adjuvant clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tobias Klatte
- Department of Urology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
- Department of Surgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
- Department of Urology, The Royal Bournemouth and Christchurch Hospitals, Castle Lane East, Bournemouth, BH7 7DW, UK.
| | | | - Luca Afferi
- Division of Urology, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont, Novara, Italy
| | - Alessandro Volpe
- Division of Urology, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont, Novara, Italy
| | - Nils Kroeger
- Department of Urology, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-University, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Silvia Ribback
- Institute of Pathology, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-University, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Alan McNeill
- Department of Urology, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | | | - Tevita F 'Aho
- Department of Urology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Tim Eisen
- Department of Oncology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
- Astra Zeneca, Cambridge, UK
| | - Kate Fife
- Department of Oncology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Axel Bex
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Allan J Pantuck
- Institute of Urologic Oncology, Department of Urology, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Grant D Stewart
- Department of Urology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Surgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Tu X, Wang F, Chang T, Zhang C, Zhang M, Liu Z, Qiu S, Yang L, Wei Q. Predictive value of preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in non-metastatic papillary renal cell carcinoma patients after receiving curative surgery. Cancer Manag Res 2019; 11:7515-7524. [PMID: 31496809 PMCID: PMC6689659 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s211727] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2019] [Accepted: 07/28/2019] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective To determine the predictive value of preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) for disease-free survival (DFS) in non-metastatic papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC) patients following partial or radical nephrectomy. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 315 non-clear cell RCC patients who received curative surgery in our hospital from 2013 to 2018, from which 76 pRCC patients without metastasis (T1-3N0M0) were selected. The receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve was drawn and an NLR cut-off of 2.5 was set to achieve maximum diagnostic accuracy for predicting DFS. Kaplan-Meier method and the Cox regression model was used to determine the relationship of NLR with DFS. Results During a median follow-up of 28.0 months (IQR 15.9-42.1, mean 31.4), disease recurred in 12 patients (15.8%) recording a median duration of 14.4 months (IQR 8.6-22.9, mean 16.6). The 5-year DFS was 85.5% and 61.6% for the low (<2.5) and high (≥2.5) NLR groups respectively. According to Kaplan-Meier analysis, DFS was significantly lower in the high NLR group compared with that in the low NLR group (p=0.03). Univariate analysis revealed that high NLR level (HR 3.3, p=0.041), advanced pathological T stage (HR 10.1, p<0.001), larger tumor size (HR 1.2, p=0.008) and radical nephrectomy (HR 5.7, p=0.025) were associated with poor DFS, while multivariate analysis indicated that only advanced pathological T stage (HR 6.9, p=0.010) and high NLR level (HR 3.8, p=0.028) remained as the independent prognostic factors for poor DFS. Conclusion A high preoperative NLR level was an independent prognostic marker for DFS in the patients of non-metastatic pRCC (pT1-3N0M0) following curative surgery. This can be used as an adjuvant tool to select patients for clinical trials or more frequent follow-up strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiang Tu
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China
| | - Fan Wang
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China
| | - Tiancong Chang
- West China School of Clinical Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China
| | - Chichen Zhang
- West China School of Clinical Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China
| | - Mengni Zhang
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory of Pathology, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, West China Medical School, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhenhua Liu
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China
| | - Shi Qiu
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China
| | - Lu Yang
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China
| | - Qiang Wei
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Prognostic factors for the survival of patients with papillary renal cell carcinoma after surgical management. Clin Transl Oncol 2019; 22:725-733. [PMID: 31317521 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-019-02181-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2019] [Accepted: 07/05/2019] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To examine the possible prognostic factors in patients with type 1 and type 2 papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC) after surgical management and to identify the independent predictive factors of the prognosis. METHODS From 2010 to 2017, 1405 patients underwent surgery for renal cell carcinoma, of whom 114 had type 1 or type 2 pRCC and follow-up data were available for 88 patients. Clinicopathological and prognostic parameters were compared between type 1 and type 2 pRCC. Possible prognostic factors were retrospectively analyzed by univariate and multivariate analyses with Cox regression. RESULTS The study included 63 males and 25 females with a mean age of 54.27 ± 12.91. 53 patients were diagnosed by regular physical examination and others presented with hematuria or lumbago. 53 (60.2%) underwent radical nephrectomy and 35 (39.8%) underwent nephron sparing surgery. After a mean follow-up of 46.08 ± 22.65 months, 16 patients died of pRCC metastasis and the 5-year disease-specific survival was 79.3%. The comparison of the 39 (44.3%) type 1 and 49 (55.7%) type 2 pRCCs revealed that type 2 pRCC had significantly higher grade and worse prognosis. Univariate analysis showed that symptomatic diagnosis, type, grade, and tumor stage were prognostic factors. Multivariate analysis identified that type and tumor stage were independent factors of the prognosis. CONCLUSIONS Pathological type and tumor stage could serve as independent factors for the prognosis of patients with pRCC.
Collapse
|
16
|
Prognostic factors and prognostic models for renal cell carcinoma: a literature review. World J Urol 2018; 36:1943-1952. [PMID: 29713755 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-018-2309-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 160] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2018] [Accepted: 04/24/2018] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Following curative treatment for localised renal cell carcinoma (RCC), up to 30% of patients develop tumour recurrence. Prognostic scores are essential to guide individualised surveillance protocols, patient counselling and potentially in the future to guide adjuvant therapy. In metastatic RCC, prognostic scores are routinely used for treatment selection in clinical practice as well as in all major trials. METHODS We performed a literature review on the current evidence based on prognostic factors and models for localised and metastatic RCC. RESULTS A number of prognostic factors have been identified, of which tumour node metastasis classification remains the most important. Multiple prognostic models and nomograms have been developed for localised disease, based on a combination of tumour stage, grade, subtype, clinical features, and performance status. However, there is poor level of evidence for their routine use. Prognostic scores for patients with metastatic RCC receiving targeted treatments are used routinely, but have limited accuracy. Molecular markers can improve the accuracy of established prognostic models, but frequently lack external, independent validation. CONCLUSION Several factors and models predict prognosis of localised and metastatic RCC. They represent valuable tools to provide estimates of clinically important endpoints, but their accuracy should be improved further. Validation of molecular markers is a future research priority.
Collapse
|
17
|
May M, Surcel C, Capitanio U, Dell'Oglio P, Klatte T, Shariat S, Ecke T, Wolff I, Vergho D, Wagener N, Huck N, Pahernik S, Zastrow S, Wirth M, Borgmann H, Haferkamp A, Musquera M, Krabbe LM, Herrmann E, Scavuzzo A, Mirvald C, Hutterer G, Zigeuner R, Stief CG, Waidelich R, Cindolo L, Kalusova K, Brookman-May SD. Prognostic and discriminative power of the 7th TNM classification for patients with surgically treated papillary renal cell carcinoma: results of a multi-institutional validation study (CORONA subtype project). Scand J Urol 2017; 51:269-276. [PMID: 28399699 DOI: 10.1080/21681805.2017.1300187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Studies on the prognostic reliability of the Union for International Cancer Control tumor, node, metastasis (TNM) staging system for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) predominantly focus on clear-cell RCC. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate whether the oncological prognosis of surgically treated papillary RCC (papRCC) patients is reliably given by the current TNM system, by analyzing the largest database reported to date. MATERIALS AND METHODS Data on 2325 papRCC patients who underwent surgical treatment in 1984- 2015 were collated from 17 international centers (median follow-up 47 months). Tumor stage was adapted to the 7th edition of the TNM system. Multivariable, bootstrap-corrected Cox regression models were applied to assess the independent impact of the TNM system on cancer-specific mortality (CSM) and all-cause mortality (ACM). RESULTS The median age at diagnosis was 63 years (interquartile range 54-70 years) and 77% of patients were male. Nephron-sparing surgery was performed in 42%, and 82% were with symptom free at diagnosis. In 6.7% (n = 156), organ metastasis (stage M1) was present at the time of surgery. On multivariable analysis, the TNM system and Fuhrman grade had an independent impact on both CSM and ACM, while patient age affected ACM only. The discriminative ability of the pT classification was significant for both endpoints: 5 year CSM rates were 5%, 17%, 36% and 56% for stages pT1, pT2, pT3 and pT4, respectively (each p < 0.001). The pT classification contributed significantly to the predictive accuracy of the CSM and ACM models by 6.3% and 2.5%, respectively (each p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS The 2010 TNM staging system can be reliably applied to papRCC patients and allows certain prognostic discrimination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias May
- a Department of Urology , Klinikum St. Elisabeth Straubing , Straubing , Germany
| | - Cristian Surcel
- b Centre of Urological Surgery, Dialysis and Renal Transplantation , Fundeni Clinical Institute , Bucharest , Romania
| | - Umberto Capitanio
- c Department of Urology , Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute , Milan , Italy
| | - Paolo Dell'Oglio
- c Department of Urology , Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute , Milan , Italy
| | - Tobias Klatte
- d Department of Urology , Medical University of Vienna , Vienna , Austria
| | - Shahrokh Shariat
- d Department of Urology , Medical University of Vienna , Vienna , Austria
| | - Thorsten Ecke
- e Department of Urology , Hospital Bad Saarow , Bad Saarow , Germany
| | - Ingmar Wolff
- f Department of Urology , Carl-Thiem-Klinikum Cottbus , Cottbus , Germany
| | - Daniel Vergho
- g Department of Urology and Paediatric Urology , Julius-Maximilians-University Medical Centre of Wuerzburg , Wuerzburg , Germany
| | - Nina Wagener
- h Department of Urology , University Hospital Mannheim , Mannheim , Germany
| | - Nina Huck
- h Department of Urology , University Hospital Mannheim , Mannheim , Germany
| | - Sascha Pahernik
- i Department of Urology , Klinikum Nürnberg , Nürnberg, Germany
| | - Stefan Zastrow
- j Department of Urology , Carl Gustav Carus University Dresden, University Hospital , Germany
| | - Manfred Wirth
- j Department of Urology , Carl Gustav Carus University Dresden, University Hospital , Germany
| | - Hendrik Borgmann
- k Department of Urology , University Hospital Mainz , Mainz , Germany
| | - Axel Haferkamp
- k Department of Urology , University Hospital Mainz , Mainz , Germany
| | - Mireia Musquera
- l Department of Nephrology and Urology , University of Barcelona , Barcelona , Spain
| | - Laura M Krabbe
- m Department of Urology , University of Muenster Medical Center , Muenster , Germany
| | - Edwin Herrmann
- m Department of Urology , University of Muenster Medical Center , Muenster , Germany
| | - Anna Scavuzzo
- n Department of Urology , Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia-INCan , Mexico City , Mexico
| | - Cristian Mirvald
- b Centre of Urological Surgery, Dialysis and Renal Transplantation , Fundeni Clinical Institute , Bucharest , Romania
| | - Georg Hutterer
- o Department of Urology , Medical University Graz , Graz , Austria
| | - Richard Zigeuner
- o Department of Urology , Medical University Graz , Graz , Austria
| | - Christian G Stief
- p Department of Urology , Ludwig-Maximilians University, Campus Grosshadern , Munich , Germany
| | - Raphaela Waidelich
- p Department of Urology , Ludwig-Maximilians University, Campus Grosshadern , Munich , Germany
| | - Luca Cindolo
- q Department of Urology , Pio Da Pietrelcina Hospital , Vasto , Italy
| | - Krystina Kalusova
- r Department of Urology , Faculty of Medicine, Charles University , Pilsen , Czech Republic
| | - Sabine D Brookman-May
- p Department of Urology , Ludwig-Maximilians University, Campus Grosshadern , Munich , Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Daugherty M, Sedaghatpour D, Shapiro O, Vourganti S, Kutikov A, Bratslavsky G. The metastatic potential of renal tumors: Influence of histologic subtypes on definition of small renal masses, risk stratification, and future active surveillance protocols. Urol Oncol 2017; 35:153.e15-153.e20. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2016.11.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2016] [Revised: 11/06/2016] [Accepted: 11/13/2016] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
|
19
|
Corral de la Calle M, Encinas de la Iglesia J, Martín López M, Fernández Pérez G, Águeda del Bas D. The radiologist's role in the management of papillary renal cell carcinoma. RADIOLOGIA 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rxeng.2017.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
20
|
Maranchie JK. Basic/Translational Science Survey Section: Kidney Cancer. Urol Oncol 2017; 35:158-159. [PMID: 28214284 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.01.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
21
|
Corral de la Calle MÁ, Encinas de la Iglesia J, Martín López MR, Fernández Pérez GC, Águeda Del Bas DS. The radiologist's role in the management of papillary renal cell carcinoma. RADIOLOGIA 2017; 59:100-114. [PMID: 28160948 DOI: 10.1016/j.rx.2016.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2016] [Revised: 11/05/2016] [Accepted: 11/08/2016] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Papillary carcinoma is the second most common renal cell carcinoma. It has a better prognosis than the more frequent clear cell carcinoma, although this does not hold true for advanced cases, because no specific treatment exists. It presents as a circumscribed peripheral tumor (small and homogeneously solid or larger and cystic/hemorrhagic) or as an infiltrating lesion that invades the veins, which has a worse prognosis. Due to their low vascular density, papillary renal cell carcinomas enhance less than other renal tumors, and this facilitates their characterization. On computed tomography, they might not enhance conclusively, and in these cases they are impossible to distinguish from hyperattenuating cysts. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging are more sensitive for detecting vascularization. Other characteristics include a specific vascular pattern, hypointensity on T2-weighted images, restricted water diffusion, and increased signal intensity in opposed phase images. We discuss the genetic, histologic, clinical, and radiological aspects of these tumors in which radiologists play a fundamental role in management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - M R Martín López
- Servicio de Anatomía Patológica, Complejo Asistencial de Ávila, Ávila, España
| | - G C Fernández Pérez
- Servicio de Radiodiagnóstico, Hospital Universitario del Río Hortega, Valladolid, España
| | - D S Águeda Del Bas
- Servicio de Radiodiagnóstico, Complejo Asistencial de Ávila, Ávila, España
| |
Collapse
|