Radiomics can predict tumour response in patients treated with Nivolumab for a metastatic renal cell carcinoma: an artificial intelligence concept

Imaging in Renal Cell Carcinoma Detection

INTRODUCTION

Imaging in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a constantly evolving landscape. The incidence of RCC has been rising over the years with the improvement in image quality and sensitivity in imaging modalities resulting in "incidentalomas" being detected. We aim to explore the latest advances in imaging for RCC.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted using Medline and Google Scholar, up to May 2024. For each subsection of the manuscript, a separate search was performed using a combination of the following key terms "renal cell carcinoma", "renal mass", "ultrasound", "computed tomography", "magnetic resonance imaging", "18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT", "prostate-specific membrane antigen PET/CT", "technetium-99m sestamibi SPECT/CT", "carbonic anhydrase IX", "girentuximab", and "radiomics". Studies that were not in English were excluded. The reference lists of selected manuscripts were checked manually for eligible articles.

RESULTS

The main imaging modalities for RCC currently are ultrasound, computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Contrast-enhanced US (CEUS) has emerged as an alternative to CT or MRI for the characterisation of renal masses. Furthermore, there has been significant research in molecular imaging in recent years, including FDG PET, PSMA PET/CT, 99mTc-Sestamibi, and anti-carbonic anhydrase IX monoclonal antibodies/peptides. Radiomics and the use of AI in radiology is a growing area of interest.

CONCLUSIONS

There will be significant change in the field of imaging in RCC as molecular imaging becomes increasingly popular, which reflects a shift in management to a more conservative approach, especially for small renal masses (SRMs). There is the hope that the improvement in imaging will result in less unnecessary invasive surgeries or biopsies being performed for benign or indolent renal lesions.

RCC-Supporter: supporting renal cell carcinoma treatment decision-making using machine learning

BACKGROUND

The population diagnosed with renal cell carcinoma, especially in Asia, represents 36.6% of global cases, with the incidence rate of renal cell carcinoma in Korea steadily increasing annually. However, treatment options for renal cell carcinoma are diverse, depending on clinical stage and histologic characteristics. Hence, this study aims to develop a machine learning based clinical decision-support system that recommends personalized treatment tailored to the individual health condition of each patient.

RESULTS

We reviewed the real-world medical data of 1,867 participants diagnosed with renal cell carcinoma between November 2008 and June 2021 at the Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital in South Korea. Data were manually divided into a follow-up group where the patients did not undergo surgery or chemotherapy (Surveillance), a group where the patients underwent surgery (Surgery), and a group where the patients received chemotherapy before or after surgery (Chemotherapy). Feature selection was conducted to identify the significant clinical factors influencing renal cell carcinoma treatment decisions from 2,058 features. These features included subsets of 20, 50, 75, 100, and 150, as well as the complete set and an additional 50 expert-selected features. We applied representative machine learning algorithms, namely Decision Tree, Random Forest, and Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM). We analyzed the performance of three applied machine learning algorithms, among which the GBM algorithm achieved an accuracy score of 95% (95% CI, 92-98%) for the 100 and 150 feature sets. The GBM algorithm using 100 and 150 features achieved better performance than the algorithm using features selected by clinical experts (93%, 95% CI 89-97%).

CONCLUSIONS

We developed a preliminary personalized treatment decision-support system (TDSS) called "RCC-Supporter" by applying machine learning (ML) algorithms to determine personalized treatment for the various clinical situations of RCC patients. Our results demonstrate the feasibility of using machine learning-based clinical decision support systems for treatment decisions in real clinical settings.

Radiomics and Artificial Intelligence: Renal Cell Carcinoma

There is a clinical need for accurate diagnosis and prognostication of kidney cancer using imaging. Radiomics and deep learning methods applied to imaging have shown promise in tasks such as tumor segmentation, classification, staging, and grading, as well as assessment of preoperative scores and correlation with tumor biomarkers. Artificial intelligence is also expected to play a significant role in advancing personalized medicine for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma.

Radiomics and Artificial Intelligence in Renal Lesion Assessment

Radiomics, the extraction and analysis of quantitative features from medical images, has emerged as a promising field in radiology with the potential to revolutionize the diagnosis and management of renal lesions. This comprehensive review explores the radiomics workflow, including image acquisition, feature extraction, selection, and classification, and highlights its application in differentiating between benign and malignant renal lesions. The integration of radiomics with artificial intelligence (AI) techniques, such as machine learning and deep learning, can help patients' management and allow the planning of the appropriate treatments. AI models have shown remarkable accuracy in predicting tumor aggressiveness, treatment response, and patient outcomes. This review provides insights into the current state of radiomics and AI in renal lesion assessment and outlines future directions for research in this rapidly evolving field.

Artificial Intelligence in Urooncology: What We Have and What We Expect

INTRODUCTION

Artificial intelligence is transforming healthcare by driving innovation, automation, and optimization across various fields of medicine. The aim of this study was to determine whether artificial intelligence (AI) techniques can be used in the diagnosis, treatment planning, and monitoring of urological cancers.

METHODOLOGY

We conducted a thorough search for original and review articles published until 31 May 2022 in the PUBMED/Scopus database. Our search included several terms related to AI and urooncology. Articles were selected with the consensus of all authors.

RESULTS

Several types of AI can be used in the medical field. The most common forms of AI are machine learning (ML), deep learning (DL), neural networks (NNs), natural language processing (NLP) systems, and computer vision. AI can improve various domains related to the management of urologic cancers, such as imaging, grading, and nodal staging. AI can also help identify appropriate diagnoses, treatment options, and even biomarkers. In the majority of these instances, AI is as accurate as or sometimes even superior to medical doctors.

CONCLUSIONS

AI techniques have the potential to revolutionize the diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring of urologic cancers. The use of AI in urooncology care is expected to increase in the future, leading to improved patient outcomes and better overall management of these tumors.

Radiogenomics in Renal Cancer Management-Current Evidence and Future Prospects

Renal cancer management is challenging from diagnosis to treatment and follow-up. In cases of small renal masses and cystic lesions the differential diagnosis of benign or malignant tissues has potential pitfalls when imaging or even renal biopsy is applied. The recent artificial intelligence, imaging techniques, and genomics advancements have the ability to help clinicians set the stratification risk, treatment selection, follow-up strategy, and prognosis of the disease. The combination of radiomics features and genomics data has achieved good results but is currently limited by the retrospective design and the small number of patients included in clinical trials. The road ahead for radiogenomics is open to new, well-designed prospective studies, with large cohorts of patients required to validate previously obtained results and enter clinical practice.

Radiomics-guided checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy for precision medicine in cancer: A review for clinicians

Immunotherapy using immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is a breakthrough in oncology development and has been applied to multiple solid tumors. However, unlike traditional cancer treatment approaches, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) initiate indirect cytotoxicity by generating inflammation, which causes enlargement of the lesion in some cases. Therefore, rather than declaring progressive disease (PD) immediately, confirmation upon follow-up radiological evaluation after four-eight weeks is suggested according to immune-related Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (ir-RECIST). Given the difficulty for clinicians to immediately distinguish pseudoprogression from true disease progression, we need novel tools to assist in this field. Radiomics, an innovative data analysis technique that quantifies tumor characteristics through high-throughput extraction of quantitative features from images, can enable the detection of additional information from early imaging. This review will summarize the recent advances in radiomics concerning immunotherapy. Notably, we will discuss the potential of applying radiomics to differentiate pseudoprogression from PD to avoid condition exacerbation during confirmatory periods. We also review the applications of radiomics in hyperprogression, immune-related biomarkers, efficacy, and immune-related adverse events (irAEs). We found that radiomics has shown promising results in precision cancer immunotherapy with early detection in noninvasive ways.

Artificial intelligence and radiomics in evaluation of kidney lesions: a comprehensive literature review

Radiomics and artificial intelligence (AI) may increase the differentiation of benign from malignant kidney lesions, differentiation of angiomyolipoma (AML) from renal cell carcinoma (RCC), differentiation of oncocytoma from RCC, differentiation of different subtypes of RCC, to predict Fuhrman grade, to predict gene mutation through molecular biomarkers and to predict treatment response in metastatic RCC undergoing immunotherapy. Neural networks analyze imaging data. Statistical, geometrical, textural features derived are giving quantitative data of contour, internal heterogeneity and gray zone features of lesions. A comprehensive literature review was performed, until July 2022. Studies investigating the diagnostic value of radiomics in differentiation of renal lesions, grade prediction, gene alterations, molecular biomarkers and ongoing clinical trials have been analyzed. The application of AI and radiomics could lead to improved sensitivity, specificity, accuracy in detecting and differentiating between renal lesions. Standardization of scanner protocols will improve preoperative differentiation between benign, low-risk cancers and clinically significant renal cancers and holds the premises to enhance the diagnostic ability of imaging tools to characterize renal lesions.

Artificial Intellgence in the Era of Precision Oncological Imaging

Rapid-paced development and adaptability of artificial intelligence algorithms have secured their almost ubiquitous presence in the field of oncological imaging. Artificial intelligence models have been created for a variety of tasks, including risk stratification, automated detection, and segmentation of lesions, characterization, grading and staging, prediction of prognosis, and treatment response. Soon, artificial intelligence could become an essential part of every step of oncological workup and patient management. Integration of neural networks and deep learning into radiological artificial intelligence algorithms allow for extrapolating imaging features otherwise inaccessible to human operators and pave the way to truly personalized management of oncological patients.Although a significant proportion of currently available artificial intelligence solutions belong to basic and translational cancer imaging research, their progressive transfer to clinical routine is imminent, contributing to the development of a personalized approach in oncology. We thereby review the main applications of artificial intelligence in oncological imaging, describe the example of their successful integration into research and clinical practice, and highlight the challenges and future perspectives that will shape the field of oncological radiology.

Imaging to predict checkpoint inhibitor outcomes in cancer. A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Checkpoint inhibition has radically improved the perspective for patients with metastatic cancer, but predicting who will not respond with high certainty remains difficult. Imaging-derived biomarkers may be able to provide additional insights into the heterogeneity in tumour response between patients. In this systematic review, we aimed to summarise and qualitatively assess the current evidence on imaging biomarkers that predict response and survival in patients treated with checkpoint inhibitors in all cancer types.

METHODS

PubMed and Embase were searched from database inception to 29th November 2021. Articles eligible for inclusion described baseline imaging predictive factors, radiomics and/or imaging machine learning models for predicting response and survival in patients with any kind of malignancy treated with checkpoint inhibitors. Risk of bias was assessed using the QUIPS and PROBAST tools and data was extracted.

RESULTS

In total, 119 studies including 15,580 patients were selected. Of these studies, 73 investigated simple imaging factors. 45 studies investigated radiomic features or deep learning models. Predictors of worse survival were (i) higher tumour burden, (ii) presence of liver metastases, (iii) less subcutaneous adipose tissue, (iv) less dense muscle and (v) presence of symptomatic brain metastases. Hazard rate ratios did not exceed 2.00 for any predictor in the larger and higher quality studies. The added value of baseline fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography parameters in predicting response to treatment was limited. Pilot studies of radioactive drug tracer imaging showed promising results. Reports on radiomics were almost unanimously positive, but numerous methodological concerns exist.

CONCLUSIONS

There is well-supported evidence for several imaging biomarkers that can be used in clinical decision making. Further research, however, is needed into biomarkers that can more accurately identify which patients who will not benefit from checkpoint inhibition. Radiomics and radioactive drug labelling appear to be promising approaches for this purpose.

Radiomic analysis of liver grafts from brain-dead donors can predict early allograft dysfunction following transplantation: a proof-of-concept study

BACKGROUND

Selection of liver grafts suitable for transplantation (LT) mainly depends on a surgeon's subjective assessment. This study aimed to investigate the role of radiomic analysis of donor-liver CTs after brain death (DBD) to predict the occurrence of early posttransplant allograft dysfunction (EAD).

METHODS

We retrospectively extracted and analyzed the left lobe radiomic features from CT scans of DBD livers in training and validation cohorts. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify predictors of EAD.

RESULTS

From 126 LTs included in the study in the training cohort, 27 (21.4%) had an EAD. For each patient, 279 radiomic features were extracted of which 5 were associated with EAD (AUC = 0.81) (95% CI 0.72-0.89). Among donor and recipient clinical characteristics, cardiac arrest, steatosis on donor's CT, cold ischemic time and age of recipient were also identified as independent risk factors for EAD. Combined radiomic signature and clinical risk factors showed a strong predictive performance for EAD with a C-index of 0.90 (95% CI 0.84-0.96). A validation cohort of 23 patients confirmed these results.

CONCLUSION

Radiomic signatures extracted from donor CT scan, independently or combined with clinical risk factors is an objective and accurate biomarker for prediction of EAD after LT.

Imaging approaches and radiomics: toward a new era of ultraprecision radioimmunotherapy?

Strong rationale and a growing number of preclinical and clinical studies support combining radiotherapy and immunotherapy to improve patient outcomes. However, several critical questions remain, such as the identification of patients who will benefit from immunotherapy and the identification of the best modalities of treatment to optimize patient response. Imaging biomarkers and radiomics have recently emerged as promising tools for the non-invasive assessment of the whole disease of the patient, allowing comprehensive analysis of the tumor microenvironment, the spatial heterogeneity of the disease and its temporal changes. This review presents the potential applications of medical imaging and the challenges to address, in order to help clinicians choose the optimal modalities of both radiotherapy and immunotherapy, to predict patient's outcomes and to assess response to these promising combinations.

A pilot study investigating the feasibility of using a fully automatic software to assess the RENAL and PADUA score

PURPOSE

Image-based morphometric scoring systems such as the RENAL and PADUA scores are useful to evaluate the complexity of partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The main aim of this study was to develop a new imaging software to enable an automatic detection and a 3D visualization of RCC from CT angiography (CTA) and to address the feasibility to use it to evaluate the features of the RENAL and the PADUA scores.

METHODS

A training dataset of 210 patients CTA-scans manually segmented was used to train a deep learning algorithm to develop the automatic detection and 3D-visualization of RCC. A trained operator blindly assessed the RENAL and PADUA scores on a testing dataset of 41 CTA from patients with RCC using a commercialized semi-automatic software (ground truth) and the new automatic software. Concordance between the two methods was evaluated.

RESULTS

The median PADUA score was 9 (7-11) and the renal score was 8 (5.5-9). The automatic software enabled to automatically detect the tumoral kidney and provided a 3D-visualization in all cases, with a computational time less than 20 seconds. Concordances for staging the anatomical features of the RENAL scores were respectively: 87.8% for radius, 85.4% for exophytic rate, 82.9% for location to the polar lines and 92.7% for the antero-posterior location. For the PADUA scores, concordances were 90.2% for tumor size, 85.4% for exophytic rate, 87.8% for polar location and 100% for renal rim.

CONCLUSION

By enabling an automatic 3D-visualization of tumoral kidney, this software could help to calculate morphometric scores, save time and improve reproducibility for clinicians.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4

Inhibitory Effect of Ursolic Acid on Proliferation and Migration of Renal Carcinoma Cells and Its Mechanism

Background

Renal carcinoma is one of the most common malignant tumors in the urinary system. Autophagy can be both activated and inhibited in renal carcinoma, and it plays a double-edged role in the development of renal carcinoma. In the early stage of cancer, autophagy can suppress tumors. In the late stage, autophagy contributes to the survival of tumor cells in an unfavorable environment, and some autophagy-related proteins P62, LC3B, and beclin-1 have become indicators of the prognosis of patients with renal carcinoma.

Aim

To demonstrate that ursolic acid activates autophagy in renal carcinoma 786-O cells by inhibiting the hedgehog signaling pathway.

Methods

The effect of ursolic acid on the viability of 786-O cells was determined by the MTT method; the effect of ursolic acid on the proliferation and migration of 786-O cells was examined by crystalline violet staining and scratch assay, respectively. For the study of autophagy, we firstly screened the time points. Western blot assay was used to detect the expression level of autophagic protein P62 at different time points of ursolic acid on 786-O. Then, the Cell MeterTM Autophagy Assay Kit was used to detect the effect of different doses of ursolic acid on the autophagic fluorescence intensity of 786-O cells; the Western blot method was used to detect the effect of different doses of ursolic acid on the expression levels of LC3II and P62 proteins in 786-O cells. Further, AdPlus-mCherry-GFP-LC3B adenovirus transfection was used to detect the effect of ursolic acid on the autophagic flow of 786-O cells; ursolic acid was combined with the autophagy inhibitor chloroquine (CQ) to detect the expression level of autophagy protein LC3II by Western blot. In terms of mechanism, the effect of ursolic acid on hedgehog signaling pathway-related proteins in 786-O cells was detected by Western blot.

Results

Ursolic acid inhibited the activity, proliferation, and migration of 786-O cells, enhanced the fluorescence intensity of autophagosomes in 786-O cells, increased the expression level of autophagy marker protein LC3II, and inhibited the expression level of P62 in a time and dose-dependent manner; ursolic acid activated the autophagic flow in 786-O cells, which showed that ursolic acid caused the accumulation of autophagic fluorescent spots and enhanced the fluorescence intensity of autophagosomes. Ursolic acid activated the autophagic flow in 786-O cells, as evidenced by the accumulation of autophagic fluorescent spots and enhanced fluorescence intensity of autophagosomes, and the combined use of the autophagy inhibitor CQ increased the expression level of LC3II compared to ursolic acid alone; ursolic acid decreased the expression levels of PTCH1, GLI1, SMO, SHH, and c-Myc and increased the expression level of Sufu in the hedgehog signaling pathway.

Conclusion

Ursolic acid activates autophagy in renal carcinoma 786-O cells, probably by inhibiting hedgehog signaling pathway activity.

Current Imaging Evaluation of Tumor Response to Advanced Medical Treatment in Metastatic Renal-Cell Carcinoma: Clinical Implications

The present review is focused on the role of diagnostic tomographic imaging such as computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging to assess and predict tumor response to advanced medical treatments in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients. In this regard, antiangiogenic agents and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have developed as advanced treatment options replacing the conventional therapy based on interferon-alpha and interleuchin-2 which had unfavorable toxicity profile and low response rates. In clinical practice, the imaging evaluation of treatment response in cancer patients is based on dimensional changes of tumor lesions in sequential scans; in particular, Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) have been defined for this purpose and also applied in patients with metastatic RCC. However, these new drugs with predominant cytostatic effect make RECIST insufficient to realize an adequate response imaging evaluation. Therefore, new imaging criteria (mCHOI and iRECIST) have been proposed to assess tumor response to advanced medical treatments of metastatic RCC, they correlate better than RECIST with the progression-free survival and overall survival. Finally, a potential role of radiomics and machine learning models has been suggested to predict tumor response.

Artificial intelligence in functional urology: how it may shape the future

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of the present manuscript is to provide an overview on the current state of artificial intelligence (AI) tools in either decision making, diagnosis, treatment options, or outcome prediction in functional urology.

RECENT FINDINGS

Several recent studies have shed light on the promising potential of AI in functional urology to investigate lower urinary tract dysfunction pathophysiology but also as a diagnostic tool by enhancing the existing evaluations such as dynamic magnetic resonance imaging or urodynamics. AI may also improve surgical education and training because of its automated performance metrics recording. By bringing prediction models, AI may also have strong therapeutic implications in the field of functional urology in the near future. AI may also be implemented in innovative devices such as e-bladder diary and electromechanical artificial urinary sphincter and could facilitate the development of remote medicine.

SUMMARY

Over the past decade, the enthusiasm for AI has been rising exponentially. Machine learning was well known, but the increasing power of processors and the amount of data available has provided the platform for deep learning tools to expand. Although the literature on the applications of AI technology in the field of functional urology is relatively sparse, its possible uses are countless especially in surgical training, imaging, urodynamics, and innovative devices.

Kidney cancer management 3.0: can artificial intelligence make us better?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Artificial intelligence holds tremendous potential for disrupting clinical medicine. Here we review the current role of artificial intelligence in the kidney cancer space.

RECENT FINDINGS

Machine learning and deep learning algorithms have been developed using information extracted from radiomic, histopathologic, and genomic datasets of patients with renal masses.

SUMMARY

Although artificial intelligence applications in medicine are still in their infancy, they already hold immediate promise to improve accuracy of renal mass characterization, grade, and prognostication. As algorithms become more robust and generalizable, artificial intelligence is poised to significantly disrupt kidney cancer care.

Radiomics for Renal Cell Carcinoma: Predicting Outcomes from Immunotherapy and Targeted Therapies-A Narrative Review

T-cell immunotherapy and molecular targeted therapies have become standard-of-care treatments for renal cell carcinoma (RCC). There is a need to develop robust biomarkers that predict patient outcomes to targeted therapies to personalise treatment. In recent years, quantitative analysis of imaging features, termed radiomics, has been used to extract tumour features. This narrative mini review summarises the evidence for radiomics prediction of immunotherapy and molecular targeted therapy outcomes in RCC. Radiomics may predict survival, treatment response, and disease progression in RCC treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (eg, sunitinib) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (eg, nivolumab). Further validation is necessary in large-scale studies. PATIENT SUMMARY: We summarise evidence on the ability of features extracted from CT (computed tomography) scans to predict patient outcomes from new treatments for kidney cancer. Although these features can predict treatment outcomes for patients, including survival, treatment response, and cancer progression, further research is necessary before this technology can be applied clinically.

Defining best practices for tissue procurement in immuno-oncology clinical trials: consensus statement from the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer Surgery Committee

Immunotherapy is now a cornerstone for cancer treatment, and much attention has been placed on the identification of prognostic and predictive biomarkers. The success of biomarker development is dependent on accurate and timely collection of biospecimens and high-quality processing, storage and shipping. Tumors are also increasingly used as source material for the generation of therapeutic T cells. There have been few guidelines or consensus statements on how to optimally collect and manage biospecimens and source material being used for immunotherapy and related research. The Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer Surgery Committee has brought together surgical experts from multiple subspecialty disciplines to identify best practices and to provide consensus on how best to access and manage specific tissues for immuno-oncology treatments and clinical investigation. In addition, the committee recommends early integration of surgeons and other interventional physicians with expertise in biospecimen collection, especially in clinical trials, to optimize the quality of tissue and the validity of correlative clinical studies in cancer immunotherapy.