Factors and values at admission that predict a fulminant course of acute myocarditis: data from Tokyo CCU network database

Diagnostic accuracy, clinical characteristics, and prognostic differences of patients with acute myocarditis according to inclusion criteria

INTRODUCTION

The diagnosis of acute myocarditis (AM) is complex due to its heterogeneity and typically is defined by either Electronic Healthcare Records (EHRs) or advanced imaging and endomyocardial biopsy, but there is no consensus. We aimed to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of these approaches for AM.

METHODS

Data on ICD 10th Revision(ICD-10) codes corresponding to AM were collected from two hospitals and compared to cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR)-confirmed or clinically suspected (CS)-AM cases with respect to diagnostic accuracy, clinical characteristics, and all-cause mortality. Next, we performed a review of published AM studies according to inclusion criteria.

RESULTS

We identified 291 unique admissions with ICD-10 codes corresponding to AM in the first three diagnostic positions. The positive predictive value of ICD-10 codes for CMR-confirmed or CS-AM was 36%, and patients with CMR-confirmed or CS-AM had a lower all-cause mortality than those with a refuted diagnosis (P = 0.019). Using an unstructured approach, patients with CMR-confirmed and CS-AM had similar demographics, comorbidity profiles and survival over a median follow-up of 52 months (P = 0.72). Our review of the literature confirmed our findings. Outcomes for patients included in studies using CMR-confirmed criteria were favourable compared to studies with endomyocardial biopsy-confirmed AM cases.

CONCLUSION

ICD-10 codes have poor accuracy in identification of AM cases and should be used with caution in clinical research. There are important differences in management and outcomes of patients according to the selection criteria used to diagnose AM. Potential selection biases must be considered when interpreting AM cohorts and requires standardization of inclusion criteria for AM studies.

Fulminant myocarditis proven by early biopsy and outcomes

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

While endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) is recommended in adult patients with fulminant myocarditis, the clinical impact of its timing is still unclear.

METHODS

Data were collected from 419 adult patients with clinically suspected fulminant myocarditis admitted to intensive care units across 36 tertiary centres in 15 countries worldwide. The diagnosis of myocarditis was histologically proven in 210 (50%) patients, either by EMB (n = 183, 44%) or by autopsy/explanted heart examination (n = 27, 6%), and clinically suspected cardiac magnetic resonance imaging confirmed in 96 (23%) patients. The primary outcome of survival free of heart transplantation (HTx) or left ventricular assist device (LVAD) at 1 year was specifically compared between patients with early EMB (within 2 days after intensive care unit admission, n = 103) and delayed EMB (n = 80). A propensity score-weighted analysis was done to control for confounders.

RESULTS

Median age on admission was 40 (29-52) years, and 322 (77%) patients received temporary mechanical circulatory support. A total of 273 (65%) patients survived without HTx/LVAD. The primary outcome was significantly different between patients with early and delayed EMB (70% vs. 49%, P = .004). After propensity score weighting, the early EMB group still significantly differed from the delayed EMB group in terms of survival free of HTx/LVAD (63% vs. 40%, P = .021). Moreover, early EMB was independently associated with a lower rate of death or HTx/LVAD at 1 year (odds ratio of 0.44; 95% confidence interval: 0.22-0.86; P = .016).

CONCLUSIONS

Endomyocardial biopsy should be broadly and promptly used in patients admitted to the intensive care unit for clinically suspected fulminant myocarditis.

Development and Validation of a Prediction Model on Adult Emergency Department Patients for Early Identification of Fulminant Myocarditis

OBJECTIVE

It is difficult to predict fulminant myocarditis at an early stage in the emergency department. The objective of this study was to construct and validate a simple prediction model for the early identification of fulminant myocarditis.

METHODS

A total of 61 patients with fulminant myocarditis and 160 patients with acute myocarditis were enrolled in the training and internal validation cohorts. LASSO regression and multivariate logistic regression were selected to develop the prediction model. The selection of the model was based on overall performance and simplicity. A nomogram based on the optimal model was built, and its clinical usefulness was evaluated by decision curve analysis. The predictive model was further validated in an external validation group.

RESULTS

The resulting prediction model was based on 4 factors: systolic blood pressure, troponin I, left ventricular ejection fraction, and ventricular wall motion abnormality. The Brier scores of the final model were 0.078 in the training data set and 0.061 in the internal testing data set, respectively. The C-indexes of the training data set and the testing data set were 0.952 and 0.968, respectively. Decision curve analysis showed that the nomogram model developed based on the 4 predictors above had a positive net benefit for predicting probability thresholds. In the external validation cohort, the model also showed good performance (Brier score=0.007, and C-index=0.989).

CONCLUSION

We developed and validated an early prediction model consisting of 4 clinical factors (systolic blood pressure, troponin I, left ventricular ejection fraction, and ventricular wall motion abnormality) to identify potential fulminant myocarditis patients in the emergency department.

Ultra Short Heart Rate Variability Predicts Clinical Outcomes in Patients with a Clinical Presentation Consistent with Myocarditis: A Derivation Cohort Analysis

Myocarditis prognosis varies substantially, hence identification of novel prognostic factors is crucial. The prognostic role of ultra-short heart-rate variability (HRV) in myocarditis remains unknown. In a retrospective study, adult patients admitted to a tertiary hospital due to clinically suspected myocarditis were included. Clinical, laboratory and HRV parameters were assessed as predictors of severe short term complications (heart failure (HF), dilated cardiomyopathy—DCM, ventricular arrhythmia—VA and death), utilizing logistic regression (LR). Accuracy was evaluated with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve area under the curve (AUC). HRV indices included standard deviation of normal beat intervals (SDNN) and root mean square of successive differences (RMSSD). 115 patients, aged 34 (±13) years old, were examined. Six patients (5%) developed severe HFrEF. RMSSD was included in a multivariate LR model (RMSSD < 10.72 ms adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 14.056, p-value 0.024). Model classification accuracy was very good, with an AUC of 86%. Eight patients (7%) developed DCM. RMSSD < 10.72 ms was included in a multivariate classification model (AOR 8.826, p-value 0.013); model classification AUC of 82%. HRV did not predict development of VA or death. SDNN and especially RMSSD may be prognostic indicators in myocarditis.

Clinical and electrocardiographic characteristics in patients with fulminant myocarditis

Background

The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical and electrocardiographic characteristics in patients with fulminant myocarditis.

Methods

A total of 72 patients were divided into three groups: pericarditis (control: n = 25), acute myocarditis (n = 27), and fulminant myocarditis (n = 20). Patients' characteristics and electrocardiograms on admission were retrospectively analyzed in the three groups.

Results

BNP levels in the fulminant group were significantly higher than those in the other two groups. ST elevation was observed at lead aVR in the fulminant myocarditis group, whereas ST depression was observed at lead aVR in the other groups (p = .001). The maximum degree of ST elevation among the three groups was similar. However, the number of ST‐elevation leads in the fulminant myocarditis group was significantly lower than that in the other groups (p = .004). The voltage of R wave in lead V5 in the fulminant myocarditis group was significantly lower than that in the other groups (p = .005). Moreover, in the Cabrera sequence, the prevalence of ST elevation in the inferior leads, aVR, and V3–V6 in the fulminant myocarditis group was significantly or nearly significantly lower than that in the other groups.

Conclusions

In fulminant myocarditis, ST‐segment elevation was observed in lead aVR, and contrarily, the number and extent of ST‐segment elevation and R wave voltage were smaller than those in the other groups. These results suggest that the number of myocytes with maintained action potential may be reduced following progressive myocardial damage and interstitial edema due to severe inflammation.

The use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in children with acute fulminant myocarditis

Acute fulminant myocarditis (AFM) occurs as an inflammatory response to an initial myocardial insult. Its rapid and deadly progression calls for prompt diagnosis with aggressive treatment measures. The demonstration of its excellent recovery potential has led to increasing use of mechanical circulatory support, especially extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Arrhythmias, organ failure, elevated cardiac biomarkers, and decreased ventricular function at presentation predict requirement for ECMO. In these patients, ECMO should be considered earlier as the clinical course of AFM can be unpredictable and can lead to rapid haemodynamic collapse. Key uncertainties that clinicians face when managing children with AFM such as timing of initiation of ECMO and left ventricular decompression need further investigation.

Risk factors analysis of prognosis of adult acute severe myocarditis

BACKGROUND

Adult severe myocarditis is primarily caused by infection with any number of a variety of viruses. It arises quickly, progresses rapidly, and may lead to severe heart failure or circulatory failure presenting as rapid-onset hypotension and cardiogenic shock with a high hospital mortality rate.

AIM

To analyze the risk factors affecting the short-term prognosis of adult acute severe myocarditis (ASM).

METHODS

Adult patients with ASM (ASM group, n = 218) and acute nonsevere myocarditis (ANSM group, n = 80) who came to our department from January 2014 to January 2020 were enrolled in this study. Patients with ASM were divided into the ASM survival group (n = 185) and ASM nonsurvival group (n = 33) according to the treatment results during hospitalization. The clinical symptoms, laboratory examinations, treatment methods, complications, and the relationship between the treatment results of the two groups were retrospectively compared and discussed. The risk factors for death in patients with severe myocarditis were analyzed by binary logistic regression. A follow-up to 5.5 years was conducted on patients in the ASM survival group and ANSM group after discharge, and the readmission rate and incidence rate of dilated cardiomyopathy were analyzed.

RESULTS

Compared with the ASM survival group, the ASM nonsurvival group had longer QRS complex, higher incidence of cardiogenic shock, higher serum creatinine (SCr, 235μmol/L vs 89 μmol/L, P < 0.05), higher sensitive cardiac troponin I (cTnI, 4.45 μg/L vs 1.66 μg/L, P < 0.05) and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP, 1756 pg/mL vs 401 pg/mL, P < 0.05). The binary logistic regression revealed that there were statistical differences between the two groups in SCr, cTnI, and BNP values (all P < 0.05). After discharging from the hospital, patients in the ASM group and ANSM group had no significant differences in the readmission rate and incidence rate of dilated cardiomyopathy.

CONCLUSION

Elevated SCr, cTnI, and BNP are independent predictors for poor prognosis in patients with ASM. The long-term prognosis of patients in the ASM survival group is good.

Clinical characteristics and treatment effects of astragalus injection in non-pediatric patients with acute fulminant myocarditis

To explore the clinical characteristics of non-pediatric patients with acute fulminant myocarditis (AFM) and evaluate the treatment effects of astragalus injection on this disease.A total of 54 AFM patients were screened out from 586 patients with acute myocarditis, admitted to the department of cardiology between January 2011 to June 2018. The demographic and clinical data, investigations, treatments, and short-term outcomes were collected and retrospectively analyzed.The mean age of the 54 AFM patients was 34 ± 16.5 years old (range: 13-70 years), including 24 (44.5%) men and 30 (55.5%) women, with a high incidence in 2 age groups: 13-19 and 40-49 years old, despite an inverse trend to the increase of age. All these cases were admitted in emergency conditions: 26 (48.1%) cardiogenic shock, 18 (33.4%) malignant arrhythmias, 8 (14.8%) severe heart failure, and 2 (3.7%) acute pericardial tamponade. Apart from first-aid measures, 37 (68.5%) patients received astragalus injection. During hospitalization, 11 (20.4%) patients died, and 4 (36.3%) of them were from astragalus group while 7 (63.7%) of them from without-astragalus group (P=0.03). Furthermore, the levels of cardiac injury biomarkers, renal function and left ventricular ejection fraction of astragalus group were significantly improved compared with those of without-astragalus group at discharge (all P < .05).Middle-aged people were also prone to AFM. And cardiac shock was the most common, while acute pericardial tamponade was a rare presentation in non-pediatric AFM patients. Astragalus was a potential adjuvant medicine for the treatment of AFM.

Management of Acute Myocarditis and Chronic Inflammatory Cardiomyopathy: An Expert Consensus Document

Myocarditis is an inflammatory disease of the heart that may occur because of infections, immune system activation, or exposure to drugs. The diagnosis of myocarditis has changed due to the introduction of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. We present an expert consensus document aimed to summarize the common terminology related to myocarditis meanwhile highlighting some areas of controversies and uncertainties and the unmet clinical needs. In fact, controversies persist regarding mechanisms that determine the transition from the initial trigger to myocardial inflammation and from acute myocardial damage to chronic ventricular dysfunction. It is still uncertain which viruses (besides enteroviruses) cause direct tissue damage, act as triggers for immune-mediated damage, or both. Regarding terminology, myocarditis can be characterized according to etiology, phase, and severity of the disease, predominant symptoms, and pathological findings. Clinically, acute myocarditis (AM) implies a short time elapsed from the onset of symptoms and diagnosis (generally <1 month). In contrast, chronic inflammatory cardiomyopathy indicates myocardial inflammation with established dilated cardiomyopathy or hypokinetic nondilated phenotype, which in the advanced stages evolves into fibrosis without detectable inflammation. Suggested diagnostic and treatment recommendations for AM and chronic inflammatory cardiomyopathy are mainly based on expert opinion given the lack of well-designed contemporary clinical studies in the field. We will provide a shared and practical approach to patient diagnosis and management, underlying differences between the European and US scientific statements on this topic. We explain the role of histology that defines subtypes of myocarditis and its prognostic and therapeutic implications.

Management perspectives from the 2019 Wuhan international workshop on fulminant myocarditis

Fulminant myocarditis (FM) is a form of acute myocardial inflammation leading to rapid-onset hemodynamic instability due to cardiogenic shock or life-threatening arrhythmias. As highlighted by recent registries, FM is associated with high rates of death and heart transplantation, regardless of the underlying histology. Because of a paucity of evidence-based management strategies exists for this disease, an International workshop on FM was held in Wuhan, China, in October 2019, in order to share knowledge on the disease and identify areas of consensus. The present report highlights both agreements and controversies in FM management across the world, focusing the attention on areas of opportunity, FM definition, the use of endomyocardial biopsy and viral identification on heart specimens, treatment algorithms including immunosuppression and the timing of circulatory support escalation. This report incorporates the most recent recommendations from national and international professional societies. Main areas of interest and aims of future prospective observational registries and randomized controlled trials were finally identified and suggested.

Early characteristics of fulminant myocarditis vs non-fulminant myocarditis: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Fulminant myocarditis (FM) is a sub-category myocarditis. Its primary characteristic is a rapidly progressive clinical course that necessitates hemodynamic support. FM can be difficult to predict at the onset of myocarditis. The aim of this meta-analysis was to identify the early characteristics in FM compared to those of non-fulminant myocarditis (NFM).

METHODS

We searched the databases of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, for studies comparing FM with acute NFM from January 1, 2000 to June 1, 2018. The baseline variables were compared in each study. Mean differences (MD) and relative ratios (RR) were calculated.

RESULTS

Seven studies (158 FM patients and 388 NFM patients) were included in the analysis. The FM group had significantly lower systolic blood pressure (SBP), higher creatine kinase (CK), wider QRS duration, lower left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), thicker left ventricular posterior wall diameter (LVPWd), higher incidence of ST depression, ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation (Vt/Vf) and syncope, less incidence of chest pain than the NFM groups. There was no difference in terms of heart rate (HR), c-reactive protein (CRP), fever, dyspnea, white blood cells (WBC), atrioventricular block (AVB), Q waves, ST elevation, interventricular septum diameter (IVSd), or end-diastolic left ventricular diameter (LVEDd) between FM and NFM.

CONCLUSION

We found that the lower SBP, higher CK, wider QRS duration, lower LVEF, thicker LVPWd, higher incidence of ST depression, Vt/Vf and syncope as well as lower incidence of chest pain were early characteristics of FM.

Fulminant myocarditis: Characteristics, treatment, and outcomes

Myocarditis is an inflammatory disease of the myocardium with a broad spectrum of clinical presentations, ranging from mild symptoms to severe heart failure. The course of patients with myocarditis is heterogeneous, varying from partial or full clinical recovery in few days to advanced low cardiac output syndrome requiring mechanical circulatory support or heart transplantation. Fulminant myocarditis (FM) is a peculiar clinical condition and is an acute form of myocarditis, whose main characteristic is a rapidly progressive clinical course with the need for hemodynamic support. Despite the common medical belief of the past decades, recent comprehensive data, including a recent registry that compared FM with acute non-FM, highlighted that FM has a poor inhospital outcome, often requires advanced hemodynamic support, and may result in residual left ventricular dysfunction in survivors. This review aimed to provide an updated practical definition of FM, including essentials in the diagnosis and management of the disease. Finally, the outcome of FM was critically revised according to the current published registries focusing on the topic.