1
|
Maspero M, Hull TL. State of the Art: Pouch Surgery in the 21st Century. Dis Colon Rectum 2024; 67:S1-S10. [PMID: 38441240 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000003326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/08/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND An ileoanal pouch with IPAA is the preferred method to restore intestinal continuity in patients who require a total proctocolectomy. Pouch surgery has evolved during the past decades thanks to increased experience and research, changes in the medical management of patients who require an ileal pouch, and technological innovations. OBJECTIVE To review the main changes in pouch surgery over the past 2 decades, with a focus on staging, minimally invasive and transanal approaches, pouch design, and anastomotic configuration. RESULTS The decision on the staging approach depends on the patient's conditions, their indication for surgery, and the risk of anastomotic leak. A minimally invasive approach should be performed whenever feasible, but open surgery still has a role in this technically demanding operation. Transanal IPAA may be performed in experienced centers and may reduce conversion to open surgery in the hostile pelvis. The J-pouch is the easiest, fastest, and most commonly performed design, but other designs may be used when a J-pouch is not feasible. A stapled anastomosis without mucosectomy can be safely performed in the majority of cases, with a low incidence of rectal cuff neoplasia and better functional outcomes than handsewn. Finally, Crohn's disease is not an absolute contraindication to an ileoanal pouch, but pouch failure may be higher compared to other indications. CONCLUSIONS Many technical nuances contribute to the success of an ileoanal pouch. The current standard of care is a laparoscopic J-pouch with double-stapled anastomosis, but this should not be seen as a dogma, and the optimal approach and design should be tailored to each patient. See video from symposium.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marianna Maspero
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kelm M, Widder A, Zwack C, Schöttker K, Reibetanz J, Meining A, Germer CT, Flemming S. Two-step versus three-step proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis: a comparative study on nutritional status, immunosuppressive therapy, and long-term outcome. Tech Coloproctol 2024; 28:62. [PMID: 38824195 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-024-02931-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2024] [Accepted: 04/03/2024] [Indexed: 06/03/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite novel medical therapies, rates of surgery in ulcerative colitis remain relevant. While various surgical approaches for multistep proctocolectomy are available, overall evidence is low and robust recommendations are lacking for individual procedures especially in case of refractory inflammation and signs of malnutrition. METHODS All patients who received multistep proctocolectomy between 2010 and 2021 for ulcerative colitis were evaluated and divided into two groups (two-step/2-IPAA [ileal pouch-anal anastomosis] versus three-step/3-IPAA proctocolectomy). Patient characteristics as well as short- and long-outcomes were individually analyzed. RESULTS Surgical techniques were explained in detail. Fifty patients were included in the study with 27 patients receiving 2-IPAA and 23 patients 3-IPAA. Rates of postoperative complications were comparable for both groups. While patients receiving 2-IPAA were more often suffering from malignancy, 3-IPAA resulted in a significant increase of hemoglobin and albumin levels as well as a reduction of immunosuppressive medication. Rates of stoma reversal trended to be reduced for 3-IPAA compared to 2-IPAA (52.2% vs. 77.8%, p = 0.06). CONCLUSION Three-step proctocolectomy with creation of sigmoidostomy is a safe procedure and reasonable surgical approach in patients with preoperatively high dosages of immunosuppressive medication or risk factors such as persistent active inflammation and anemia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Kelm
- Department for General, Visceral, Transplant, Vascular and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital of Wuerzburg, Oberduerrbacher Str. 6, 97080, Würzburg, Germany
| | - A Widder
- Department for General, Visceral, Transplant, Vascular and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital of Wuerzburg, Oberduerrbacher Str. 6, 97080, Würzburg, Germany
| | - C Zwack
- Department for General, Visceral, Transplant, Vascular and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital of Wuerzburg, Oberduerrbacher Str. 6, 97080, Würzburg, Germany
| | - K Schöttker
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Wuerzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - J Reibetanz
- Department for General, Visceral, Transplant, Vascular and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital of Wuerzburg, Oberduerrbacher Str. 6, 97080, Würzburg, Germany
| | - A Meining
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Wuerzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - C-T Germer
- Department for General, Visceral, Transplant, Vascular and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital of Wuerzburg, Oberduerrbacher Str. 6, 97080, Würzburg, Germany
| | - S Flemming
- Department for General, Visceral, Transplant, Vascular and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital of Wuerzburg, Oberduerrbacher Str. 6, 97080, Würzburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lauricella S, Brucchi F, Cavalcoli F, Rausa E, Cassini D, Miccini M, Vitellaro M, Cirocchi R, Costa G. Current Management of Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis: New Insights on the Surgical Approaches. J Pers Med 2024; 14:580. [PMID: 38929801 PMCID: PMC11204779 DOI: 10.3390/jpm14060580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2024] [Revised: 05/16/2024] [Accepted: 05/27/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is a life-threatening medical emergency with considerable morbidity. Despite recent advances in medical IBD therapy, colectomy rates for ASUC remain high. A scoping review of published articles on ASUC was performed. We collected data, such as general information of the disease, diagnosis and initial assessment, and available medical and surgical treatments focusing on technical aspects of surgical approaches. The most relevant articles were considered in this scoping review. The management of ASUC is challenging; currently, personalized treatment for it is unavailable. Sequential medical therapy should be administrated, preferably in high-volume IBD centers with close patient monitoring and indication for surgery in those cases with persistent symptoms despite medical treatment, complications, and clinical worsening. A total colectomy with end ileostomy is typically performed in the acute setting. Managing rectal stump is challenging, and all individual and technical aspects should be considered. Conversely, when performing elective colectomy for ASUC, a staged surgical procedure is usually preferred, thus optimizing the patients' status preoperatively and minimizing postoperative complications. The minimally invasive approach should be selected whenever technically feasible. Robotic versus laparoscopic ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) has shown similar outcomes in terms of safety and postoperative morbidity. The transanal approach to ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (Ta-IPAA) is a recent technique for creating an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis via a transanal route. Early experiences suggest comparable short- and medium-term functional results of the transanal technique to those of traditional approaches. However, there is a need for additional comparative outcomes data and a better understanding of the ideal training and implementation pathways for this procedure. This manuscript predominantly explores the surgical treatment of ASUC. Additionally, it provides an overview of currently available medical treatment options that the surgeon should reasonably consider in a multidisciplinary setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Lauricella
- Colorectal Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy
| | | | - Federica Cavalcoli
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy
| | - Emanuele Rausa
- Colorectal Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy
| | - Diletta Cassini
- General and Emergency Surgery, Sesto San Giovanni Hospital, 20099 Milan, Italy
| | | | - Marco Vitellaro
- Colorectal Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy
| | - Roberto Cirocchi
- Digestive and Emergency Surgery Unit, S. Maria Hospital Trust, 05100 Terni, Italy
| | - Gianluca Costa
- Department of Life Science, Health, and Health Professions, Link Campus University, 00165 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Stephens IJB, Byrnes KG, Burke JP. Transanal ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of technical approaches and clinical outcomes. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2024; 409:153. [PMID: 38705912 PMCID: PMC11070401 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-024-03343-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2023] [Accepted: 04/29/2024] [Indexed: 05/07/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Transanal minimally invasive surgery has theoretical advantages for ileal pouch-anal anastomosis surgery. We performed a systematic review assessing technical approaches to transanal IPAA (Ta-IPAA) and meta-analysis comparing outcomes to transabdominal (abd-IPAA) approaches. METHODS Three databases were searched for articles investigating Ta-IPAA outcomes. Primary outcome was anastomotic leak rate. Secondary outcomes included conversion rate, post operative morbidity, and length of stay (LoS). Staging, plane of dissection, anastomosis, extraction site, operative time, and functional outcomes were also assessed. RESULTS Searches identified 13 studies with 404 unique Ta-IPAA and 563 abd-IPAA patients. Anastomotic leak rates were 6.3% and 8.4% (RD 0, 95% CI -0.066 to 0.065, p = 0.989) and conversion rates 2.5% and 12.5% (RD -0.106, 95% CI -0.155 to -0.057, p = 0.104) for Ta-IPAA and abd-IPAA. Average LoS was one day shorter (MD -1, 95% CI -1.876 to 0.302, p = 0.007). A three-stage approach was most common (47.6%), operative time was 261(± 60) mins, and total mesorectal excision and close rectal dissection were equally used (49.5% vs 50.5%). Functional outcomes were similar. Lack of randomised control trials, case-matched series, and significant study heterogeneity limited analysis, resulting in low to very low certainty of evidence. CONCLUSIONS Analysis demonstrated the feasibility and safety of Ta-IPAA with reduced LoS, trend towards less conversions, and comparable anastomotic leak rates and post operative morbidity. Though results are encouraging, they need to be interpreted with heterogeneity and selection bias in mind. Robust randomised clinical trials are warranted to adequately compare ta-IPAA to transabdominal approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ian J B Stephens
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9, Ireland.
- School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, Royal College of Surgeons Ireland, 123 St. Stephens Green, Dublin, Ireland.
| | - Kevin G Byrnes
- Havering and Redbridge University Trust, Greater London, UK
| | - John P Burke
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ochoa B, McMahon L. Surgery for ulcerative colitis. Semin Pediatr Surg 2024; 33:151404. [PMID: 38615424 DOI: 10.1016/j.sempedsurg.2024.151404] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/16/2024]
Abstract
Ulcerative colitis (UC) has a more severe presentation and rapid progression in pediatric patients, resulting in a greater need for surgical intervention compared to adults. Though medical management of UC has advanced with new biologic therapies, surgery continues to play an important role when disease progresses in the form of worsened or persistent symptoms, hemodynamic instability, or sepsis. The goals of surgical management are to restore intestinal continuity with a functional pouch when possible. While the literature has been growing regarding studies of pediatric patients with UC, high level of evidence studies are limited and most recommendations are based on adult studies. Similar to adults, pediatric patients who have ileal pouches created require surveillance for recurrent disease and cancer surveillance. Unique issues for pediatric patients include monitoring of growth and appropriate transition to adult care after adolescence. This review includes indications for surgical management, overview of staged surgical approaches, and the technical details of the three-stage approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brielle Ochoa
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Phoenix Children's, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Lisa McMahon
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Phoenix Children's, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hashash JG, Mourad FH, Odah T, Farraye FA, Kroner P, Stocchi L. Ethnic Variation Trends in the Use of Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis. CROHN'S & COLITIS 360 2023; 5:otad072. [PMID: 38034883 PMCID: PMC10686008 DOI: 10.1093/crocol/otad072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2023] [Indexed: 12/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Approximately 15%-20% of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) will require surgery during their lifetime. Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the preferred surgical option, which typically requires access to a specialist experienced in surgery for inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). Methods The aims of this study are the assessment of the comparative use of IPAA for UC among different racial/ethnic groups and observe trends over the past decade in the United States as well as the comparative assessment of their respective postoperative outcomes. This was an observational retrospective study using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) 2009-2018 dataset. All patients with ICD-9/10CM codes for UC were included. The primary outcome was comparative trends in IPAA construction across races/ethnicities in the past decade, which was compared to White patients as reference. Multivariate regression analyses were used to adjust for age, gender, Charlson comorbidity index, income in patient zip code, insurance status, hospital region, location, size, and teaching status. Results The number of patients discharged from US hospitals with an associated diagnosis of UC increased between 2009 and 2018, but the number of patients undergoing an IPAA decreased during that time period. Of 1 153 363 admissions related to UC, 60 688 required surgery for UC, of whom 16 601 underwent IPAA in the study period. Of all the patients undergoing surgery for UC, 2862 (4.7%) were Black, while 44 351 were White. This analysis indicated that Black patients were less likely to undergo IPAA both in 2009 and in 2018 compared to Whites. Hispanic patients were significantly less likely to receive IPAA in 2009 but were no longer less likely to receive IPAA in 2018 when compared to Whites. Conclusions The use of IPAA among Black patients requiring surgery for UC remains less common than amongst their White counterparts. Further research is needed to determine if racial disparity is a factor in decreased access to specialized care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jana G Hashash
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Fadi H Mourad
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Tarek Odah
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Francis A Farraye
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Paul Kroner
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Luca Stocchi
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Le Berre C, Honap S, Peyrin-Biroulet L. Ulcerative colitis. Lancet 2023; 402:571-584. [PMID: 37573077 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(23)00966-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 107] [Impact Index Per Article: 107.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2023] [Revised: 05/03/2023] [Accepted: 05/08/2023] [Indexed: 08/14/2023]
Abstract
Ulcerative colitis is a lifelong inflammatory disease affecting the rectum and colon to a variable extent. In 2023, the prevalence of ulcerative colitis was estimated to be 5 million cases around the world, and the incidence is increasing worldwide. Ulcerative colitis is thought to occur in people with a genetic predisposition following environmental exposures; gut epithelial barrier defects, the microbiota, and a dysregulated immune response are strongly implicated. Patients usually present with bloody diarrhoea, and the diagnosis is based on a combination of clinical, biological, endoscopic, and histological findings. The aim of medical management is, first, to induce a rapid clinical response and normalise biomarkers and, second, to maintain clinical remission and reach endoscopic normalisation to prevent long-term disability. Treatments for inducing remission include 5-aminosalicylic acid drugs and corticosteroids. Maintenance treatments include 5-aminosalicylic acid drugs, thiopurines, biologics (eg, anti-cytokines and anti-integrins), and small molecules (Janus kinase inhibitors and sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulators). Although the therapeutic options are expanding, 10-20% of patients still require proctocolectomy for medically refractory disease. The keys to breaking through this therapeutic ceiling might be the combination of therapeutics with precision and personalised medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine Le Berre
- Institut des Maladies de l'Appareil Digestif, Hépato-Gastro-Entérologie et Assistance Nutritionnelle, Inserm CIC 1413, Inserm UMR 1235, Nantes Université, CHU Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Sailish Honap
- Department of Gastroenterology, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London UK
| | - Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet
- Department of Gastroenterology, INFINY Institute, FHU-CURE, INSERM NGERE, Nancy University Hospital, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Addison P, Keshinro AO, Schwartzberg DM. The Benefits and Drawbacks of Staging Pelvic Pouches. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2022; 35:445-452. [PMID: 36591400 PMCID: PMC9797283 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1758217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Since the mid-20th century, physicians have searched for way to improve the lives of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). Early attempts of curative resection left the patients with a permanent stoma with only primitive stoma appliances available. Gradually, stoma care improved and operations were devised to give the patient bowel continuity without the need for a permanent ostomy. As these operations were evolving, benefits and drawbacks related to fertility, ease of small bowel reach to the pelvis, and postoperative pelvic sepsis were observed. In this article, we will elucidate the various ways pelvic pouches are used to treat UC and the rationale for the timing of surgery as well as the evolution of stoma care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Poppy Addison
- Department of Surgery, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Ajaratu O. Keshinro
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - David M. Schwartzberg
- Division of Colorectal Surgery and Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Department of Surgery, New York–Presbyterian/Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Flemming S, Kelm M, Germer CT, Wiegering A. [Ileal pouch after restorative coloproctectomy]. CHIRURGIE (HEIDELBERG, GERMANY) 2022; 93:1030-1036. [PMID: 36036850 DOI: 10.1007/s00104-022-01708-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/02/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
The continuous development of pouch surgery has enabled continence-preserving treatment after coloproctectomy. The ileoanal J‑pouch is nowadays the standard reconstruction after restorative coloproctectomy with excellent functional long-term results. Taking the relative contraindications and a suitable patient selection into consideration, pouch placement can be indicated not only for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis, but also for patients with nonfistular Crohn's disease. Due to a high treatment density with immunosuppressants, the surgical treatment regimen should be subdivided into a multistage procedure, whereby according to current data a modified two-stage procedure should be favored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Flemming
- Klinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral‑, Transplantations‑, Gefäß- und Kinderchirurgie, Zentrum für Operative Medizin (ZOM), Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Str. 6, 97080, Würzburg, Deutschland
| | - M Kelm
- Klinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral‑, Transplantations‑, Gefäß- und Kinderchirurgie, Zentrum für Operative Medizin (ZOM), Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Str. 6, 97080, Würzburg, Deutschland
| | - C-T Germer
- Klinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral‑, Transplantations‑, Gefäß- und Kinderchirurgie, Zentrum für Operative Medizin (ZOM), Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Str. 6, 97080, Würzburg, Deutschland
| | - A Wiegering
- Klinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral‑, Transplantations‑, Gefäß- und Kinderchirurgie, Zentrum für Operative Medizin (ZOM), Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Str. 6, 97080, Würzburg, Deutschland.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Sherrill GC, Esckilsen S, Hudson J, Kochar B, Herfarth HH, Barnes EL. Relationship Between Stages of Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis, Timing of Restoration of Fecal Continuity, and Pouchitis. Dig Dis Sci 2022; 67:5220-5226. [PMID: 35246803 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-022-07440-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2021] [Accepted: 02/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The most common complication following ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) is pouchitis. AIMS We aimed to investigate whether a shorter period between pouch creation and restoration of fecal flow through an IPAA was associated with an increased risk of development of pouchitis within the first 2 years after IPAA. METHODS We performed a retrospective cohort study evaluating patients undergoing colectomy with IPAA for UC between January 1, 2004 and December 31, 2016. We used Kaplan-Meier testing and Cox Proportional Hazards Modeling to evaluate the relationship between the time between restoration of fecal continuity and time to subsequent development of pouchitis, adjusting for other clinical and demographic factors. RESULTS We identified 624 patients who underwent proctocolectomy with IPAA for UC, of whom 246 (39%) developed pouchitis within the first 2 years after IPAA. There was no difference when comparing the median time to restoration of continuity among those patients who developed pouchitis and those who did not (49 days vs. 49 days, p = 0.85) or in multivariable analysis. Primary sclerosing cholangitis (Hazard Ratio [HR] 2.14, 95% CI 1.12-4.08), family history of inflammatory bowel disease (HR 1.49, 95% CI 1.08-2.06), and delayed pouch creation (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.57-1.00) were significantly associated with time to development of pouchitis. CONCLUSION Although a staged approach to IPAA may have benefits in the surgical management of UC, the timing interval between pouch creation and restoration of continuity did not impact the subsequent development of early pouchitis in this cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gary C Sherrill
- University of North Carolina School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 321 S. Columbia St., Chapel Hill, NC, 27516, USA
| | - Scott Esckilsen
- Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 126 Macnider Hall, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - Joshua Hudson
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Campus Box #7080, 130 Mason Farm Road, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7080, USA
| | - Bharati Kochar
- Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, MGH Crohn's & Colitis Center, 165 Cambridge Street, 9th Floor, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.,Clinical Translational Epidemiology Unit, The Mongan Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Hans H Herfarth
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Campus Box #7080, 130 Mason Farm Road, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7080, USA.,Multidisciplinary Center for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.,Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Edward L Barnes
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Campus Box #7080, 130 Mason Farm Road, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7080, USA. .,Multidisciplinary Center for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. .,Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Zhang T, Zhang B, Tian W, Wang F, Zhang J, Ma X, Wei Y, Tang X. Research trends in ulcerative colitis: A bibliometric and visualized study from 2011 to 2021. Front Pharmacol 2022; 13:951004. [PMID: 36199683 PMCID: PMC9529236 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.951004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2022] [Accepted: 08/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/07/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Ulcerative colitis (UC) is an idiopathic inflammatory bowel disease with repeated relapses and remissions. Despite decades of effort, numerous aspects, including the initiating event and pathogenesis of UC, still remain ambiguous, which requires ongoing investigation. Given the mass of publications on UC, there are multidimensional challenges to evaluating the scientific impact of relevant work and identifying the current foci of the multifaceted disease. Accordingly, herein, we aim to assess the global growth of UC research production, analyze patterns of research areas, and evaluate trends in this area. Methods: The Web of Science Core Collection of Clarivate Analytics was searched for articles related to UC published from 2011 to 2021. Microsoft Office Excel 2019 was used to visualize the number of publications over time. Knowledge maps were generated using CiteSpace and VOSviewer to analyze collaborations among countries, institutions, and authors and to present the journey of UC research as well as to reveal the current foci of UC research. Results: A total of 5,088 publications were evaluated in the present study. China had the most publications (1,099, 22.5%). Univ Calif San Diego was the most productive institution (126, 2.48%). William J Sandborn published the greatest number of articles (100, 1.97%). Toshifumi Hibi was the most influential author in the field with a betweenness centrality of 0.53. Inflammatory bowel diseases was identified as the most prolific journal (379, 7.45%). Gastroenterology was the most co-cited journal (3,730, 4.02%). “Vedolizumab,” “tofacitinib,” “Faecalibacterium prausnitzii,” “fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT),” “toll-like receptor 4,” and “nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-like receptor protein 3 inflammasome” were considered the hot topics. Conclusion: In UC research, manuscripts that had high impacts on the scientific community provided an evidence base. UC therapy has entered the era of personalized and precision therapy. As research on FMT, anti-integrin antibodies, Janus kinase inhibitors, and anti-tumor necrosis factor drugs continues to grow, their use in the clinical setting may also expand.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tai Zhang
- Xiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
- Department of Gastroenterology, Xiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Traditional Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Beihua Zhang
- Xiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
- Department of Gastroenterology, Xiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Traditional Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Wende Tian
- Xiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Chinese Medicine Cardiology, Xiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Fengyun Wang
- Xiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
- Department of Gastroenterology, Xiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Traditional Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Jiaqi Zhang
- Xiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
- Department of Gastroenterology, Xiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Traditional Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Xiangxue Ma
- Xiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
- Department of Gastroenterology, Xiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Traditional Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Yuchen Wei
- Xiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
- Department of Gastroenterology, Xiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Traditional Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Xudong Tang
- China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
- *Correspondence: Xudong Tang,
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Restorative Proctocolectomy for Ulcerative Colitis: Different Strategies for Different Situations. Dis Colon Rectum 2022; 65:e916. [PMID: 35616491 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000002505] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
|
13
|
Juliao-Baños F, Grillo-Ardila CF, Alfaro I, Andara-Ramírez MT, Avelar-Escobar O, Barahona-Garrido J, Bautista-Martínez S, Bosques-Padilla FJ, De Paula JA, Ernest-Suárez K, Galiano MT, Iade-Vergara B, Patricio-Ibañez, Jara-Alba ML, Kotze PG, Miranda-Ojeda MC, Ortuño-Escalante R, Otoya-Moreno G, Piñol-Jiménez FN, Ramos-Polo IC, Sambuelli A, Toro M, Torres EA, Veitia-Velásquez GR, Yamamoto-Furusho JK, Zaltman C, Steinwurz F, Vallejo-Ortega M, Torres-Castillo JI, Hamon-Pinilla C, Calderon-Franco CH, Escobar-Villegas AM. Update of the PANCCO clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of ulcerative colitis in the adult population. REVISTA DE GASTROENTEROLOGIA DE MEXICO (ENGLISH) 2022; 87:342-361. [PMID: 35879225 DOI: 10.1016/j.rgmx.2022.04.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2022] [Accepted: 04/06/2022] [Indexed: 09/19/2023]
Abstract
Ulcerative colitis (US) is a chronic disease of unknown etiology. It is incurable and its clinical course is intermittent, characterized by periods of remission and relapse. The prevalence and incidence of the disease has been increasing worldwide. The update presented herein includes the participation of healthcare professionals, decision-makers, and a representative of the patients, all of whom declared their conflicts of interest. Answerable clinical questions were formulated, and the outcomes were graded. The information search was conducted on the Medline/PubMed, Embase, Epistemonikos, and LILACS databases, and covered grey literature sources, as well. The search was updated on November 30, 2020, with no restrictions regarding date or language. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) classification system was implemented to establish the strength of the recommendation and quality of evidence. A formal consensus was developed, based on the RAND/UCLA methodology and the document was peer reviewed. The short version of the Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis in the Adult Population is presented herein, together with the supporting evidence and respective recommendations. In mild-to-moderate UC, budesonide MMX is an option when treatment with 5-ASA fails, and before using systemic steroids. In moderate-to-severe UC, infliximab, adalimumab, vedolizumab, ustekinumab, and tofacitinib can be used as first-line therapy. If there is anti-TNF therapy failure, ustekinumab and tofacitinib provide the best results. In patients with antibiotic-refractory pouchitis, anti-TNFs are the treatment of choice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Juliao-Baños
- Clínica de Enfermedad Inflamatoria Intestinal, Unidad de Gastroenterología, Hospital Pablo Tobón Uribe, Medellín, Colombia.
| | - C F Grillo-Ardila
- Departamento de Ginecología y Obstetricia, Universidad Nacional de Colombia; Grupo de Investigación Clínica y Epidemiológica del Cáncer, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - I Alfaro
- Servicio Medicina Interna Hospital Regional de Concepción, Departamento de Medicina Interna, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, Chile
| | - M T Andara-Ramírez
- Servicio de Gastroenterología, Instituto Hondureño de Seguridad Social, Tegucigalpa, Honduras
| | - O Avelar-Escobar
- Servicio de Gastroenterología, Instituto Salvadoreño del Seguro Social, San Salvador. El Salvador
| | - J Barahona-Garrido
- Servicio de Gastroenterología, Enfermedades Digestivas de Guatemala, Ciudad de Guatemala, Guatemala
| | - S Bautista-Martínez
- CEDIMAT Plaza de la salud, Departamento Gastroenterología, Clínica EII, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
| | - F J Bosques-Padilla
- Servicio de Gastroenterología, Hospital Universitario Dr. José Eleuterio González, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León (UANL), Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico
| | - J A De Paula
- Servicio de Gastroenterología del Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Equipo de Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestinales del Servicio de Gastroenterología del Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - K Ernest-Suárez
- Servicio de Gastroenterología y Endoscopía Digestiva, Hospital México, Caja Costarricense de Seguro Social, Escuela de Medicina de la Universidad de Costa Rica, San José, Costa Rica
| | - M T Galiano
- Gastroenteróloga y Endoscopista Gastrointestinal, Clínica de Marly, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - B Iade-Vergara
- Departamento de Gastroenterología de CASMU, Asociación de Crohn's y Colitis Uruguay (ACCU), ECCO y PANCCO, Montevideo, Uruguay
| | - Patricio-Ibañez
- Programa Enfermedad Inflamatoria Intestinal, Departamento de Gastroenterología, Clínica Las Condes, Facultad de Medicina Universidad de Chile, Campus CLC, Santiago de Chile, Chile
| | - M L Jara-Alba
- Grupo Ecuatoriano de Estudio de Enfermedad Inflamatoria Intestinal, Hospital Teodoro Maldonado Carbo, Clínica de Enfermedad Inflamatoria Intestinal, Hospital Teodoro Maldonado Carbo, Guayaquil, Ecuador
| | - P G Kotze
- Profesor Asistente de Cirugía, Clínica de Enfermedad Inflamatoria Intestinal, Universidad Católica de Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil
| | - M C Miranda-Ojeda
- Servicio de Gastroenterología, Hospital de Clínicas, San Lorenzo, Paraguay
| | - R Ortuño-Escalante
- Instituto de Gastroenterología Boliviano-Japonés, Ciudad de la Paz, Bolivia
| | - G Otoya-Moreno
- Servicio de Gastroenterología Hospital Nacional "Guillermo Almenara I", Lima, Peru
| | - F N Piñol-Jiménez
- Sociedad Cubana de Gastroenterología, Centro Nacional de Cirugía de Mínimo Acceso (CNCMA), La Habana, Cuba
| | - I C Ramos-Polo
- Servicio y de la Unidad de Endoscopia del Complejo Hospitalario Metropolitano Dr. Arnulfo Arias Madrid, Clínica Hospital San Fernando, Ciudad de Panamá, Panama
| | - A Sambuelli
- Sección de Enfermedades Inflamatorias Intestinales, Hospital Bonorino Udaondo, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - M Toro
- Gastroenterología y Endoscopía Digestiva, Grupo de Trabajo en Enfermedades Inflamatorias Intestinales de Clínica HIGEA, Mendoza, Argentina
| | - E A Torres
- Departamento de Medicina, Escuela de Medicina de la Universidad de Puerto Rico (UPR), Unidad de Investigación en Gastroenterología, Centro para Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino, UPR, San Juan, Puerto Rico
| | | | - J K Yamamoto-Furusho
- Clínica de Enfermedad Inflamatoria Intestinal (EII), Departamento de Gastroenterología, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - C Zaltman
- Departamento de Clínica Médica, Universidad de Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Ambulatorio de Doença Inflamatoria Intestinal, HUCFF-UFRJ, Río de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - F Steinwurz
- Gastroenterólogo del Hospital israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - M Vallejo-Ortega
- Instituto de Investigaciones, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Grupo de Investigación Clínica y Epidemiológica del Cáncer, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - J I Torres-Castillo
- Servicio de Medicina de Emergencias, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - C Hamon-Pinilla
- Departamento de Ginecología y Obstetricia, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - C H Calderon-Franco
- Departamento de Medicina Interna, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad El Bosque, Bogotá, Colombia
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Update of the PANCCO clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of ulcerative colitis in the adult population. REVISTA DE GASTROENTEROLOGÍA DE MÉXICO (ENGLISH EDITION) 2022; 87:342-361. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rgmxen.2022.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2022] [Accepted: 04/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
15
|
Kröner PT, Merchea A, Colibaseanu D, Picco MF, Farraye FA, Stocchi L. The use of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with ulcerative colitis from 2009 to 2018. Colorectal Dis 2022; 24:308-313. [PMID: 34743378 DOI: 10.1111/codi.15985] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2021] [Revised: 10/31/2021] [Accepted: 11/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
AIM The existing literature was updated, assessing the use of surgery in patients with ulcerative colitis in more recent years. METHODS This was a retrospective observational study identifying all patients with ulcerative colitis within the National Inpatient Sample, years 2009-2018. All patients with International Classification of Diseases, Ninth and Tenth Revisions, Clinical Modification diagnostic codes for ulcerative colitis were included. The primary outcome was the trend in total number of total abdominal colectomy, proctocolectomy and simultaneous versus delayed pouch construction. RESULTS A total of 1 184 711 ulcerative-colitis-related admissions were identified. An increase of 18.6% in the number of patients was observed, while the number of surgeries decreased. A total of 40 499 patients underwent total colectomy, annually decreasing from 5241 to 3185. The number of proctocolectomies without pouch decreased from 1191 to 530, while the number of patients undergoing pouch construction decreased from 2225 to 1284. The proportion of patients undergoing initial pouch at time of proctocolectomy decreased from 995 (45%) to 265 (21%), while the proportion of patients undergoing delayed pouch construction in 2018 was 79% (n = 1120). CONCLUSION Surgery use in ulcerative colitis has decreased in the last decade despite increasing numbers of hospital admissions in patients with this condition. While the overall proportion of patients undergoing pouch construction remained stable, the majority of patients were initially treated with total colectomy and their ileal pouches werre constructed in a delayed fashion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul T Kröner
- Division of Gastroenterology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Amit Merchea
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Dorin Colibaseanu
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Michael F Picco
- Division of Gastroenterology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Francis A Farraye
- Division of Gastroenterology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Luca Stocchi
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Spinelli A, Bonovas S, Burisch J, Kucharzik T, Adamina M, Annese V, Bachmann O, Bettenworth D, Chaparro M, Czuber-Dochan W, Eder P, Ellul P, Fidalgo C, Fiorino G, Gionchetti P, Gisbert JP, Gordon H, Hedin C, Holubar S, Iacucci M, Karmiris K, Katsanos K, Kopylov U, Lakatos PL, Lytras T, Lyutakov I, Noor N, Pellino G, Piovani D, Savarino E, Selvaggi F, Verstockt B, Doherty G, Raine T, Panis Y. ECCO Guidelines on Therapeutics in Ulcerative Colitis: Surgical Treatment. J Crohns Colitis 2022; 16:179-189. [PMID: 34635910 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjab177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 36.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
This is the second of a series of two articles reporting the European Crohn's and Colitis Organisation [ECCO] evidence-based consensus on the management of adult patients with ulcerative colitis [UC]. The first article is focused on medical management, and the present article addresses medical treatment of acute severe ulcerative colitis [ASUC] and surgical management of medically refractory UC patients, including preoperative optimisation, surgical strategies, and technical issues. The article provides advice for a variety of common clinical and surgical conditions. Together, the articles represent an update of the evidence-based recommendations of the ECCO for UC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonino Spinelli
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, and Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefanos Bonovas
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, and IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Johan Burisch
- Gastrounit, Medical Division, and Copenhagen Center for Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Children, Adolescents and Adults, Hvidovre Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Torsten Kucharzik
- Department of Gastroenterology, Lüneburg Hospital, University of Hamburg, Lüneburg, Germany
| | - Michel Adamina
- Department of Surgery, Clinic of Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Zurich.,Department of Biomedical Engineering, Clinical Research and Artificial Intelligence in Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Allschwil, Switzerland
| | - Vito Annese
- Department of Gastroenterology, Fakeeh University Hospital, Dubai, UAE
| | - Oliver Bachmann
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Siloah St. Trudpert Hospital, Pforzheim.,Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Dominik Bettenworth
- University Hospital Munster, Department of Medicine B - Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Munster, Germany
| | - Maria Chaparro
- Gastroenterology Unit, IIS-IP, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid [UAM], CIBEREHD, Madrid, Spain
| | - Wladyslawa Czuber-Dochan
- King's College London, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, London, UK
| | - Piotr Eder
- Department of Gastroenterology, Dietetics and Internal Medicine, Poznań University of Medical Sciences, and Heliodor Święcicki University Hospital, Poznań, Poland
| | - Pierre Ellul
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Mater Dei Hospital, Msida, Malta
| | - Catarina Fidalgo
- Gastroenterology Division, Hospital Beatriz Ângelo, Loures, Portugal
| | - Gionata Fiorino
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, and IBD Center, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Gionchetti
- IBD Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna DIMEC, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Javier P Gisbert
- Gastroenterology Unit, IIS-IP, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid [UAM], CIBEREHD, Madrid, Spain
| | - Hannah Gordon
- Department of Gastroenterology, Barts Health NHS Trust, Royal London Hospital, London, UK
| | - Charlotte Hedin
- Karolinska Institutet, Department of Medicine Solna, and Karolinska University Hospital, Department of Gastroenterology, Dermatovenereology and Rheumatology, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Stefan Holubar
- Department of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Marietta Iacucci
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, and Division of Gastroenterology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Konstantinos Katsanos
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Division of Internal Medicine, University and Medical School of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
| | - Uri Kopylov
- Department of Gastroenterology, Tel-HaShomer Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, and Sackler Medical School, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Peter L Lakatos
- Division of Gastroenterology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.,1st Department of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Theodore Lytras
- School of Medicine, European University Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Ivan Lyutakov
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital 'Tsaritsa Yoanna - ISUL', Medical University Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Nurulamin Noor
- Department of Gastroenterology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Gianluca Pellino
- Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, Universitá degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy, and Colorectal Surgery, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Daniele Piovani
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, and IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Edoardo Savarino
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Francesco Selvaggi
- Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, Universitá degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - Bram Verstockt
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, and Department of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism and Ageing, TARGID - IBD, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Glen Doherty
- Department of Gastroenterology and Centre for Colorectal Disease, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Tim Raine
- Department of Gastroenterology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Yves Panis
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Beaujon Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Clichy and Université of Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Risto A, Abdalla M, Myrelid P. Staging Pouch Surgery in Ulcerative Colitis in the Biological Era. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2022; 35:58-65. [PMID: 35069031 PMCID: PMC8763463 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1740039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Restorative proctocolectomy, or ileal pouch anal anastomosis, is considered the standard treatment for intractable ulcerative colitis. When the pelvic pouch was first introduced in 1978, a two-stage procedure with proctocolectomy, construction of the pelvic pouch, and a diverting loop with subsequent closure were suggested. Over the decades that the pelvic pouch has been around, some principal technical issues have been addressed to improve the method. In more recent days the laparoscopic approach has been additionally introduced. During the same time-period the medical arsenal has developed far more with the increasing use of immune modulators and the introduction of biologicals. Staging of restorative proctocolectomy with a pelvic pouch refers to how many sessions, or stages, the procedure should be divided into. The main goal with restorative proctocolectomy is a safe operation with optimal short- and long-term function. In this paper we aim to review the present knowledge and views on staging of the pouch procedure in ulcerative colitis, especially with consideration to the treatment with biologicals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anton Risto
- Department of Surgery, Linköping University Hospital and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Maie Abdalla
- Department of Surgery, Vrinnevi Hospital, Norrköping and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Pär Myrelid
- Department of Surgery, Linköping University Hospital and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden,Address for correspondence Pär Myrelid, MD, PhD Department of Surgery, Linköping University HospitalSE-581 85 LinköpingSweden
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Liu S, Eisenstein S. State-of-the-art surgery for ulcerative colitis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2021; 406:1751-1761. [PMID: 34453611 PMCID: PMC8481179 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-021-02295-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2021] [Accepted: 08/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Ulcerative colitis (UC) is an autoimmune-mediated colitis which can present in varying degrees of severity and increases the individual’s risk of developing colon cancer. While first-line treatment for UC is medical management, surgical treatment may be necessary in up to 25–30% of patients. With an increasing armamentarium of biologic therapies, patients are presenting for surgery much later in their course, and careful understanding of the complex interplay of the disease, its management, and the patient’s overall health is necessary when considering he appropriate way in which to address their disease surgically. Surgery is generally a total proctocolectomy either with pelvic pouch reconstruction or permanent ileostomy; however, this may need to be spread across multiple procedures given the complexity of the surgery weighed against the overall state of the patient’s health. Minimally invasive surgery, employing either laparoscopic, robotic, or transanal laparoscopic approaches, is currently the preferred approach in the elective setting. There is also some emerging evidence that appendectomy may delay the progression of UC in some individuals. Those who treat these patients surgically must also be familiar with the numerous potential pitfalls of surgical intervention and have plans in place for managing problems such as pouchitis, cuffitis, and anastomotic complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shanglei Liu
- Department of Surgery, UC San Diego Health System, 3855 Health Sciences Dr. #0987, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA
| | - Samuel Eisenstein
- Department of Surgery, UC San Diego Health System, 3855 Health Sciences Dr. #0987, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Toritani K, Kimura H, Fukuoka H, Watanabe J, Ishibe A, Kunisaki R, Endo I. Preoperative risk factors of incisional surgical site infection in severe or intractable ulcerative colitis. Surg Today 2021; 52:475-484. [PMID: 34387734 DOI: 10.1007/s00595-021-02354-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2021] [Accepted: 06/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The present study explored preoperative risk factors (predictors) of incisional surgical site infection (I-SSI) in severe or intractable ulcerative colitis (UC). METHODS This was a retrospective study of 230 consecutive patients who underwent primary surgery for UC. Patients whose surgical indications were UC with cancer or dysplasia were excluded. SSI was defined as an infection according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Guidelines. Preoperative variables were examined by univariate, receiver operating characteristic curve, and multivariate analyses. RESULTS We analyzed 208 patients in this study. In a multivariate logistic analysis, C-reactive protein (CRP) ≥ 1.7 mg/dl [odds ratio (OR) 5.35; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.50-19.06; p = 0.01), albumin ≤ 2.4 g/dl (OR 5.77; 95% CI 1.41-23.57; p = 0.02), and preoperative blood transfusion (OR 3.21; 95% CI 1.04-9.96; p = 0.04) were predictors of I-SSI. Patients with all predictors had a more than 50% incidence of I-SSI, a higher incidence of all severe complications (13.6% vs. 3.2%; p = 0.02), and a longer postoperative hospital stay (19.5 vs. 17.0 days, p = 0.04) than the other patients. CONCLUSIONS CRP ≥ 1.7 mg/dl, albumin ≤ 2.4 g/dl, and transfusion are predictors of I-SSI in severe or intractable UC. Clinician should carefully evaluate the surgical options before these predictors appear.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenichiro Toritani
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.,Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, 4-57, Urafune-cho, Minami-ku, Yokohama, 232-0024, Japan
| | - Hideaki Kimura
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, 4-57, Urafune-cho, Minami-ku, Yokohama, 232-0024, Japan.
| | - Hironori Fukuoka
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Jun Watanabe
- Department of Surgery, Gastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Atsushi Ishibe
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Reiko Kunisaki
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, 4-57, Urafune-cho, Minami-ku, Yokohama, 232-0024, Japan
| | - Itaru Endo
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|