Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: current management and future strategies : Expert opinion on the behalf of the Nucleus of the "Heart Failure Working Group" of the German Society of Cardiology (DKG)

Study the relationship between left atrial (LA) volume and left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction and LV hypertrophy: Correlate LA volume with cardiovascular risk factors

Heart failure (HF) with normal ejection fraction - the isolated diastolic heart failure, depicts increasing prevalence and health care burden in recent times. Having less mortality rate compared to systolic heart failure but high morbidity, it is evolving as a major cardiac concern. With increasing clinical use of Left atrial volume (LAV) quantitation in clinical settings, LAV has emerged as an important independent predictor of cardiovascular outcome in HF with normal ejection fraction. This article is intended to review the diastolic and systolic heart failure, their association with left atrial volume, in depth study of Left atrial function dynamics with determinants of various functional and structural changes.

Expert proposal to characterize cardiac diseases with normal or preserved left ventricular ejection fraction and symptoms of heart failure by comprehensive echocardiography

Currently, the term "heart failure with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (HFpEF)" is based on echocardiographic parameters and clinical symptoms combined with elevated or normal levels of natriuretic peptides. Thus, "HFpEF" as a diagnosis subsumes multiple pathophysiological entities making a uniform management plan for "HFpEF" impossible. Therefore, a more specific characterization of the underlying cardiac pathologies in patients with preserved ejection fraction and symptoms of heart failure is mandatory. The present proposal seeks to offer practical support by a standardized echocardiographic workflow to characterize specific diagnostic entities associated with "HFpEF". It focuses on morphological and functional cardiac phenotypes characterized by echocardiography in patients with normal or preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). The proposal discusses methodological issues to clarify why and when echocardiography is helpful to improve the diagnosis. Thus, the proposal addresses a systematic echocardiographic approach using a feasible algorithm with weighting criteria for interpretation of echocardiographic parameters related to patients with preserved ejection fraction and symptoms of heart failure. The authors consciously do not use the diagnosis "HFpEF" to avoid misunderstandings. Central illustration: Scheme illustrating the characteristic echocardiographic phenotypes and their combinations in patients with "HFpEF" symptoms with respect to the respective cardiac pathology and pathophysiology as well as the underlying typical disease.

Reviewing the Modern Therapeutical Options and the Outcomes of Sacubitril/Valsartan in Heart Failure

Sacubitril/valsartan (S/V) is a pharmaceutical strategy that increases natriuretic peptide levels by inhibiting neprilysin and regulating the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone pathway, blocking AT1 receptors. The data for this innovative medication are mainly based on the PARADIGM-HF study, which included heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF)-diagnosed patients and indicated a major improvement in morbidity and mortality when S/V is administrated compared to enalapril. A large part of the observed favorable results is related to significant reverse cardiac remodeling confirmed in two prospective trials, PROVE-HF and EVALUATE-HF. Furthermore, according to a subgroup analysis from the PARAGON-HF research, S/V shows benefits in HFrEF and in many subjects having preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), which indicated a decrease in HF hospitalizations among those with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 57%. This review examines the proven benefits of S/V and highlights continuing research in treating individuals with varied HF characteristics. The article analyses published data regarding both the safeness and efficacy of S/V in patients with HF, including decreases in mortality and hospitalization, increased quality of life, and reversible heart remodeling. These benefits led to the HF guidelines recommendations updating and inclusion of S/V combinations a key component of HFrEF treatment.

Management strategies in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

The diagnosis and therapy of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remain challenging. Currently, there are ongoing discussions on whether the diagnosis of HFpEF should be based solely on left ventricular ejection fraction, which may not account for the heterogeneity of HFpEF syndrome. This aspect has been addressed by the recently proposed HFA-PEFF and the H2FPEF algorithms, which take numerous diagnostic modalities into account to establish the diagnosis of HFpEF. Moreover, this review focuses on the adequate treatment of comorbidities and risk factors in HFpEF that should be an essential part of any HFpEF therapy. Furthermore, the management of fluid level in HFpEF patients is pointed out, as it plays an important role in symptom control. In addition, the value of LCZ696 therapy in HFpEF is discussed. Although LCZ696 had neutral effects in the large PARAGON-HF trial, it had previously been granted an extended indication by the Food and Drug Administration. Since the publication of the EMPEROR-Preserved trial, empagliflozin now represents the first drug to significantly improve the prognosis of HFpEF patients. Therefore, the role of SGLT2 inhibitors in HFpEF management is highlighted. Overall, this review aims to enhance the knowledge on the diagnostic processes and best treatments available for HFpEF patients.

Similarities and Differences Between HFmrEF and HFpEF

The new guidelines classify heart failure (HF) into three subgroups based on the ejection fraction (EF): HF with reduced EF (HFrEF), HF with mid-range EF (HFmrEF), and HF with preserved EF (HFpEF). The new guidelines regarding the declaration of HFmrEF as a unique phenotype have achieved the goal of stimulating research on the basic characteristics, pathophysiology, and treatment of HF patients with a left ventricular EF of 40-49%. Patients with HFmrEF have more often been described as an intermediate population between HFrEF and HFpEF patients; however, with regard to etiology and clinical indicators, they are more similar to the HFrEF population. Concerning clinical prognosis, they are closer to HFpEF because both populations have a good prognosis and quality of life. Meanwhile, growing evidence indicates that HFmrEF and HFpEF show heterogeneity in presentation and pathophysiology, and the emergence of this heterogeneity often plays a crucial role in the prognosis and treatment of the disease. To date, the exact mechanisms and effective treatment strategies of HFmrEF and HFpEF are still poorly understood, but some of the current evidence, from observational studies and post-hoc analyses of randomized controlled trials, have shown that patients with HFmrEF may benefit more from HFrEF treatment strategies, such as beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, and sacubitril/valsartan. This review summarizes available data from current clinical practice and mechanistic studies in terms of epidemiology, etiology, clinical indicators, mechanisms, and treatments to discuss the potential association between HFmrEF and HFpEF patients.

Adipose tissue-heart crosstalk as a novel target for treatment of cardiometabolic diseases

Cardiometabolic disorders, such as diabetes, obesity, or metabolic syndrome, are often considered as key comorbidities, leading to the development of different forms of cardiovascular diseases such as heart failure or diabetic cardiomyopathy. Although the causal relationship between the pathophysiological status of white adipose tissue (WAT) and cardiac lipotoxicity is still elusive, elevated lipolytic rate in WAT has been demonstrated to participate in the overall augmentation of plasma lipid levels, as observed in most of the patients suffering from heart failure. In the present overview, we discuss current therapeutic approaches, as well as new treatment options targeting lipolysis and cardiac lipid metabolism in different forms of heart failure and diabetic cardiomyopathy.

[Update on diagnostics and treatment of heart failure]

Inzidenz und Prävalenz der Herzinsuffizienz steigen weltweit. Trotz zahlreicher wissenschaftlicher und klinischer Innovationen ist sie weiterhin mit einer hohen Morbidität und Mortalität behaftet, sodass eine leitliniengerechte Diagnostik und Therapie von entscheidender Bedeutung sind. Die kardiale Dekompensation zählt zu den häufigsten Aufnahmegründen in deutschen Krankenhäusern. Somit stellt die Behandlung herzinsuffizienter Patienten eine erhebliche Herausforderung für das deutsche Gesundheitssystem dar. Dieser Artikel fasst die neuesten wissenschaftlichen Erkenntnisse zur akuten und chronischen Herzinsuffizienz der Jahre 2018 bis 2020 zusammen.

Identification of 6-hydroxy-5-phenyl sulfonylpyrimidin-4(1H)-one APJ receptor agonists

Heart failure (HF) treatment remains a critical unmet medical need. Studies in normal healthy volunteers and HF patients have shown that [Pyr¹]apelin-13, the endogenous ligand for the APJ receptor, improves cardiac function. However, the short half-life of [Pyr¹]apelin-13 and the need for intravenous administration have limited the therapeutic potential for chronic use. We sought to identify potent, small-molecule APJ agonists with improved pharmaceutical properties to enable oral dosing in clinical studies. In this manuscript, we describe the identification of a series of pyrimidinone sulfones as a structurally differentiated series to the clinical lead (compound 1). Optimization of the sulfone series for potency, metabolic stability and oral bioavailability led to the identification of compound 22, which showed comparable APJ potency to [Pyr¹]apelin-13 and exhibited an acceptable pharmacokinetic profile to advance to the acute hemodynamic rat model.

Healthcare Expenditures Associated with Heart Failure in Saudi Arabia: A Cost of Illness Study

Heart failure (HF) is considered to be a global health problem that generates a significant economic burden. Despite the growing prevalence in Saudi Arabia, the economic burden of HF is not well studied. The aim of this study was to estimate the health care expenditures associated with HF in Saudi Arabia from a social perspective. We conducted a multicenter cost of illness (COI) study in two large governmental centers in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia using 369 HF patients. A COI model was developed in order to estimate the direct medical costs associated with HF. The indirect costs of HF were estimated based on a human capital approach. Descriptive and inferential statistics were analyzed. The direct medical cost per HF patient was $9563. Hospitalization costs were the major driver in total spending, followed by medication and diagnostics costs. The cost significantly increased in line with the disease progression, ranging from $3671 in class I to $16,447 in class IV. The indirect costs per working HF patient were $4628 due to absenteeism, and $6388 due to presenteeism. The economic burden of HF is significantly high in Saudi Arabia. Decision makers need to focus on allocating resources towards strategies that prevent frequent hospitalizations and improve HF management and patient outcomes in order to lower the growing economic burden.

Myocardial Tissue Characterization in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: From Histopathology and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Findings to Therapeutic Targets

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a complex clinical syndrome responsible for high mortality and morbidity rates. It has an ever growing social and economic impact and a deeper knowledge of molecular and pathophysiological basis is essential for the ideal management of HFpEF patients. The association between HFpEF and traditional cardiovascular risk factors is known. However, myocardial alterations, as well as pathophysiological mechanisms involved are not completely defined. Under the definition of HFpEF there is a wide spectrum of different myocardial structural alterations. Myocardial hypertrophy and fibrosis, coronary microvascular dysfunction, oxidative stress and inflammation are only some of the main pathological detectable processes. Furthermore, there is a lack of effective pharmacological targets to improve HFpEF patients' outcomes and risk factors control is the primary and unique approach to treat those patients. Myocardial tissue characterization, through invasive and non-invasive techniques, such as endomyocardial biopsy and cardiac magnetic resonance respectively, may represent the starting point to understand the genetic, molecular and pathophysiological mechanisms underlying this complex syndrome. The correlation between histopathological findings and imaging aspects may be the future challenge for the earlier and large-scale HFpEF diagnosis, in order to plan a specific and effective treatment able to modify the disease's natural course.

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction based on aging and comorbidities

Heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a leading cause of hospitalizations and mortality when diagnosed at the age of ≥ 65 years. HFpEF represents multifactorial and multisystemic syndrome and has different pathophysiology and phenotypes. Its diagnosis is difficult to be established based on left ventricular ejection fraction and may benefit from individually tailored approaches, underlying age-related changes and frequent comorbidities. Compared with the rapid development in the treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, HFpEF presents a great challenge and needs to be addressed considering the failure of HF drugs to improve its outcomes. Further extensive studies on the relationships between HFpEF, aging, and comorbidities in carefully phenotyped HFpEF subgroups may help understand the biology, diagnosis, and treatment of HFpEF. The current review summarized the diagnostic and therapeutic development of HFpEF based on the complex relationships between aging, comorbidities, and HFpEF.

Hypertension and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: position paper by the European Society of Hypertension

Hypertension constitutes a major risk factor for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). HFpEF is a prevalent clinical syndrome with increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Specific guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for HFpEF is not established due to lack of positive outcome data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and limitations of available studies. Although available evidence is limited, control of blood pressure (BP) is widely regarded as central to the prevention and clinical care in HFpEF. Thus, in current guidelines including the 2018 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and European Society of Hypertension (ESH) Guidelines, blockade of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) with either angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers provides the backbone of BP-lowering therapy in hypertensive patients. Although superiority of RAS blockers has not been clearly shown in dedicated RCTs designed for HFpEF, we propose that this core drug treatment strategy is also applicable for hypertensive patients with HFpEF with the addition of some modifications. The latter apply to the use of spironolactone apart from the treatment of resistant hypertension and the use of the angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor. In addition, novel agents such as sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors, currently already indicated for high-risk patients with diabetes to reduce heart failure hospitalizations, and finerenone represent promising therapies and results from ongoing RCTs are eagerly awaited. The development of an effective and practical classification of HFpEF phenotypes and GDMT through dedicated high-quality RCTs are major unmet needs in hypertension research and calls for action.

The Multifunctional Contribution of FGF Signaling to Cardiac Development, Homeostasis, Disease and Repair

The current focus on cardiovascular research reflects society’s concerns regarding the alarming incidence of cardiac-related diseases and mortality in the industrialized world and, notably, an urgent need to combat them by more efficient therapies. To pursue these therapeutic approaches, a comprehensive understanding of the mechanism of action for multifunctional fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signaling in the biology of the heart is a matter of high importance. The roles of FGFs in heart development range from outflow tract formation to the proliferation of cardiomyocytes and the formation of heart chambers. In the context of cardiac regeneration, FGFs 1, 2, 9, 16, 19, and 21 mediate adaptive responses including restoration of cardiac contracting rate after myocardial infarction and reduction of myocardial infarct size. However, cardiac complications in human diseases are correlated with pathogenic effects of FGF ligands and/or FGF signaling impairment. FGFs 2 and 23 are involved in maladaptive responses such as cardiac hypertrophic, fibrotic responses and heart failure. Among FGFs with known causative (FGFs 2, 21, and 23) or protective (FGFs 2, 15/19, 16, and 21) roles in cardiac diseases, FGFs 15/19, 21, and 23 display diagnostic potential. The effective role of FGFs on the induction of progenitor stem cells to cardiac cells during development has been employed to boost the limited capacity of postnatal cardiac repair. To renew or replenish damaged cardiomyocytes, FGFs 1, 2, 10, and 16 were tested in (induced-) pluripotent stem cell-based approaches and for stimulation of cell cycle re-entry in adult cardiomyocytes. This review will shed light on the wide range of beneficiary and detrimental actions mediated by FGF ligands and their receptors in the heart, which may open new therapeutic avenues for ameliorating cardiac complications.

Prognostic association of medication trajectories with 3-year mortality in heart failure and preserved ejection fraction: findings from the EPICAL2 cohort study

PURPOSE

The aims of this study were to describe combinations of beta-blockers (BB), renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockers, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) prescriptions and their trajectories in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) patients, and to assess their effect on the three-year all-cause and cardiovascular (CV)-mortality.

METHODS

We used data from the EPICAL2 cohort of 689 hospitalized HFpEF patients. Medication prescriptions were collected at hospital discharge and at 6, 12, and 24 months after discharge. A multi-trajectory approach was used to conjointly model groups of individuals following similar trajectories over medications prescriptions. We used Cox and Fine-Gray models, to evaluate respectively the associations between 3-year all-cause mortality and CV-mortality and the trajectory groups.

RESULTS

Multi-trajectory modelling revealed five distinct trajectory groups: group1 (N = 232, 33.6%) stable ACEI/ARB and BB prescriptions, group 2 (N = 199, 28.8%) stable ACEI/ARB prescription, group 3 (N = 133, 19.3%) stable BB prescriptions, group 4 (N = 78, 11.3%) stable prescriptions of none of the medications, and group 5 (N = 47, 6.8%) stable ACEI/ARB, BB, and MRA prescriptions. As compared to the group 4 of patients receiving none of the three medications, patients receiving a stable prescription of one or a combination of two or the three medications over 2 years) had a lower overall mortality over 3-year follow-up, i.e., group 1 (HR = 0.5, 95% CI 0.4-0.8), group 2 (HR = 0.6, 95% CI:0.4-0.8), group 3 (HR = 0.5, 95% CI:0.4-0.7), and group 5 (HR = 0.5, 95% CI:0.3-0.9). However, none of these trajectory groups was associated with a lower CV-mortality over 3 years.

CONCLUSION

In an unselected population-based sample of HFpEF patients, the long-term stable use of the combination ACEI/ARB and BB, BB exclusively, ACEI/ARB exclusively, or the combination ACEI/ARB and BB and MRAs was associated with reduced three-year all-cause mortality.

Unconventional Natural Gas Development and Hospitalization for Heart Failure in Pennsylvania

BACKGROUND

Growing literature linking unconventional natural gas development (UNGD) to adverse health has implicated air pollution and stress pathways. Persons with heart failure (HF) are susceptible to these stressors.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to evaluate associations between UNGD activity and hospitalization among HF patients, stratified by both ejection fraction (EF) status (reduced [HFrEF], preserved [HFpEF], not classifiable) and HF severity.

METHODS

We evaluated the odds of hospitalization among patients with HF seen at Geisinger from 2008 to 2015 using electronic health records. We assigned metrics of UNGD activity by phase (pad preparation, drilling, stimulation, and production) 30 days before hospitalization or a frequency-matched control selection date. We assigned phenotype status using a validated algorithm.

RESULTS

We identified 9,054 patients with HF with 5,839 hospitalizations (mean age 71.1 ± 12.7 years; 47.7% female). Comparing 4th to 1st quartiles, adjusted odds ratios (95% confidence interval) for hospitalization were 1.70 (1.35 to 2.13), 0.97 (0.75 to 1.27), 1.80 (1.35 to 2.40), and 1.62 (1.07 to 2.45) for pad preparation, drilling, stimulation, and production metrics, respectively. We did not find effect modification by HFrEF or HFpEF status. Associations of most UNGD metrics with hospitalization were stronger among those with more severe HF at baseline.

CONCLUSIONS

Three of 4 phases of UNGD activity were associated with hospitalization for HF in a large sample of patients with HF in an area of active UNGD, with similar findings by HFrEF versus HFpEF status. Older patients with HF seem particularly vulnerable to adverse health impacts from UNGD activity.

Narrative review: the holy grail: update on pharmacotherapy for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is the presence of clinical signs and/or symptoms of heart failure with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥50%. Risk factors associated with this disease include hypertension, hyperlipidemia, atrial fibrillation (AF), obesity, diabetes and coronary artery disease (CAD). Despite the multiple risk factors identified for this condition, treatment and management remain challenging and a subject of ongoing research. Since a treatment approach that alters the natural course or lowers mortality for this disease has not been found, treating co-morbidities and symptom management is essential. From the comorbidities, hypertension is identified as the main risk factor for disease development. Thus, after congestive symptom control with diuretics, blood pressure (BP) management is considered one of the most important preventive measures and also a target for treatment. Amongst antihypertensives, angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) and aldosterone antagonists are the therapeutic agents used that have a role in reducing hospitalizations. Implantable monitoring devices have also been shown to reduce hospitalizations in comparison to standard heart failure therapies by allowing to tailor diuretic therapy based on ongoing hemodynamic data. In this manuscript we discuss pharmacologic strategies for HFpEF patients by risk factors, including those with and without a potential role.

Mortal Interaction Between Hemophagocytic Syndrome and Newly Developed Heart Failure

BACKGROUND

Hemophagocytic syndrome (HPS) ia s devastating hyperinflammatory syndrome. Heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) status is closely correlated with increased inflammation, both systemic and intramyocardial.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to determine mortality predictors and reliable follow-up parameters in HPS that developed HFpEF during the clinical course.

METHOD

Thirty-nine patients, diagnosed as HPS, according to HLH 2004 diagnostic criteria, with an HScore of ≥169 and proven bone marrow aspiration or biopsy, were recruited retrospectively. Both traditional, serum C-reactive protein, albumin and ferritin levels with lymphocyte, and platelet counts, as well as non-traditional risk factors, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte count (NLR), monocyte-to-lymphocyte count (MLR), mean platelet volume (MPV), and N-Terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NTproBNP), were investigated retrospectively. The relationship between time-changed laboratory values both among themselves and with mortality. The overall significance level was set at 5%.

RESULTS

This study showed that temporal change of cardiothoracic ratio (CTR), serum NTproBNP, ferritin, CRP, and albumin levels were detected as mortality predictors (p<0.05, for all) in the univariate analysis. Lymphocyte and platelet counts with NLR and MPV values were also significant (p<0.05). The relationship between NT-proBNP and increased systemic inflammatory markers proved to be significant. In addition to traditional risk factors, serum ferritin levels, NLR, MLR, and MPV levels also proved to be significantly correlated with each other.

CONCLUSION

Accompanied by reliable follow-up parameters, rapid diagnosis and aggressive anti-inflammatory treatment with tight volume control can be life-saving in HPS patients who suffer from HFpEF. Close monitoring of inflammation may predict the outcome of patients suffering from HFpEF.

Use of angiotensin II receptor blocker during pregnancy: A case report

BACKGROUND

Drugs that affect the renin-angiotensin system, such as angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors are not typically recommended for pregnant women because of their potential fetal toxicity.

CASE STUDY

A 32-year-old pregnant woman with nephrotic syndrome lasting more than 5 years became pregnant for the first time. She had been taking losartan tablets before and during pregnancy. Ultrasound at 24+2 weeks of pregnancy showed oligohydramnios, and the maximum vertical depth of amniotic fluid volume was 1.4 cm. Follow-up ultrasound examinations every 2 weeks showed persistent oligohydramnios [amniotic fluid volume: 1.1-3.4 cm, amniotic fluid index 1.9-6.9 cm]. B-ultrasound at 30+2 weeks showed slightly enhanced fetal renal cortex echo. The patient was treated at 32+2 weeks of pregnancy at our hospital.

DIAGNOSES

Nephrotic syndrome and oligohydramnios.

INTERVENTIONS

Losartan was discontinued and replaced by nifedipine controlled-release tablets to lower blood pressure. The amount of amniotic fluid gradually increased to normal levels within 8 days. The patient was discharged at 33+2 weeks of pregnancy for follow-up. At 34+4 weeks, blood pressure had increased to 177/113 mm Hg and the patient was re-hospitalized with nephrotic syndrome complicated by preeclampsia. Due to progression of severe preeclampsia, elective cesarean section was performed at 35+3 weeks. After delivery, losartan and nifedipine were prescribed to continue lowering blood pressure. The patient was discharged 4 days after surgery.

OUTCOMES

Losartan use was terminated at 32+2 weeks of pregnancy. Amniotic fluid returned to normal after 8 days and the baby was delivered after 22 days. At last follow-up, the infant was 24 months old and healthy.

CONCLUSION

Although ARBs are effective for treating hypertension, they should be replaced by other classes of anti-hypertensive drugs in pregnant women. Pregnant women who elect to continue using ARBs should be informed about risks, they should be carefully monitored during pregnancy, and their pregnancy should be allowed to proceed as long as clinically feasible in order to optimize maternal and infant outcomes.

Shear wave cardiovascular MR elastography using intrinsic cardiac motion for transducer-free non-invasive evaluation of myocardial shear wave velocity

Changes in myocardial stiffness may represent a valuable biomarker for early tissue injury or adverse remodeling. In this study, we developed and validated a novel transducer-free magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) approach for quantifying myocardial biomechanics using aortic valve closure-induced shear waves. Using motion-sensitized two-dimensional pencil beams, septal shear waves were imaged at high temporal resolution. Shear wave speed was measured using time-of-flight of waves travelling between two pencil beams and corrected for geometrical biases. After validation in phantoms, results from twelve healthy volunteers and five cardiac patients (two left ventricular hypertrophy, two myocardial infarcts, and one without confirmed pathology) were obtained. Torsional shear wave speed in the phantom was 3.0 ± 0.1 m/s, corresponding with reference speeds of 2.8 ± 0.1 m/s. Geometrically-biased flexural shear wave speed was 1.9 ± 0.1 m/s, corresponding with simulation values of 2.0 m/s. Corrected septal shear wave speeds were significantly higher in patients than healthy volunteers [14.1 (11.0-15.8) m/s versus 3.6 (2.7-4.3) m/s, p = 0.001]. The interobserver 95%-limits-of-agreement in healthy volunteers were ± 1.3 m/s and interstudy 95%-limits-of-agreement - 0.7 to 1.2 m/s. In conclusion, myocardial shear wave speed can be measured using aortic valve closure-induced shear waves, with cardiac patients showing significantly higher shear wave speeds than healthy volunteers. This non-invasive measure may provide valuable insights into the pathophysiology of heart failure.

Sirt1 Activity in PBMCs as a Biomarker of Different Heart Failure Phenotypes

Heart Failure (HF) is a syndrome, which implies the existence of different phenotypes. The new categorization includes patients with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), mid-range EF (HFmrEF), and reduced EF (HFrEF) but the molecular mechanisms involved in these HF phenotypes have not yet been exhaustively investigated. Sirt1 plays a crucial role in biological processes strongly related to HF. This study aimed to evaluate whether Sirt1 activity was correlated with EF and other parameters in HFpEF, HFmrEF, and HFrEF. Seventy patients, HFpEF (n = 23), HFmrEF (n = 23) and HFrEF (n = 24), were enrolled at the Cardiology Unit of the University Hospital of Salerno. Sirt1 activity was measured in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 (ACE2) activity, Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha (TNF-α) and Brain Natriuretic Peptide (BNP) levels were quantified in plasma. HFpEF showed lower Sirt1 and ACE2 activities than both HFmrEF and HFrEF (p < 0.0001), without difference compared to No HF controls. In HFmrEF and HFrEF a very strong correlation was found between Sirt1 activity and EF (r² = 0.899 and r² = 0.909, respectively), and between ACE2 activity and Sirt1 (r² = 0.801 and r² = 0.802, respectively). HFrEF showed the highest TNF-α levels without reaching statistical significance. Significant differences in BNP were found among the groups, with the highest levels in the HFrEF. Determining Sirt1 activity in PBMCs is useful to distinguish the HF patients’ phenotypes from each other, especially HFmrEF/HFrEF from HFpEF.

How to diagnose heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: the HFA-PEFF diagnostic algorithm: a consensus recommendation from the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)

Making a firm diagnosis of chronic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains a challenge. We recommend a new stepwise diagnostic process, the 'HFA-PEFF diagnostic algorithm'. Step 1 (P=Pre-test assessment) is typically performed in the ambulatory setting and includes assessment for HF symptoms and signs, typical clinical demographics (obesity, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, elderly, atrial fibrillation), and diagnostic laboratory tests, electrocardiogram, and echocardiography. In the absence of overt non-cardiac causes of breathlessness, HFpEF can be suspected if there is a normal left ventricular ejection fraction, no significant heart valve disease or cardiac ischaemia, and at least one typical risk factor. Elevated natriuretic peptides support, but normal levels do not exclude a diagnosis of HFpEF. The second step (E: Echocardiography and Natriuretic Peptide Score) requires comprehensive echocardiography and is typically performed by a cardiologist. Measures include mitral annular early diastolic velocity (e'), left ventricular (LV) filling pressure estimated using E/e', left atrial volume index, LV mass index, LV relative wall thickness, tricuspid regurgitation velocity, LV global longitudinal systolic strain, and serum natriuretic peptide levels. Major (2 points) and Minor (1 point) criteria were defined from these measures. A score ≥5 points implies definite HFpEF; ≤1 point makes HFpEF unlikely. An intermediate score (2-4 points) implies diagnostic uncertainty, in which case Step 3 (F1: Functional testing) is recommended with echocardiographic or invasive haemodynamic exercise stress tests. Step 4 (F2: Final aetiology) is recommended to establish a possible specific cause of HFpEF or alternative explanations. Further research is needed for a better classification of HFpEF.

Protease-activated receptor 2 deficiency mediates cardiac fibrosis and diastolic dysfunction

AIMS

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and pathological cardiac aging share a complex pathophysiology, including extracellular matrix remodelling (EMR). Protease-activated receptor 2 (PAR2) deficiency is associated with EMR. The roles of PAR1 and PAR2 have not been studied in HFpEF, age-dependent cardiac fibrosis, or diastolic dysfunction (DD).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Evaluation of endomyocardial biopsies from patients with HFpEF (n = 14) revealed that a reduced cardiac PAR2 expression was associated with aggravated DD and increased myocardial fibrosis (r = -0.7336, P = 0.0028). In line, 1-year-old PAR2-knockout (PAR2ko) mice suffered from DD with preserved systolic function, associated with an increased age-dependent α-smooth muscle actin expression, collagen deposition (1.7-fold increase, P = 0.0003), lysyl oxidase activity, collagen cross-linking (2.2-fold increase, P = 0.0008), endothelial activation, and inflammation. In the absence of PAR2, the receptor-regulating protein caveolin-1 was down-regulated, contributing to an augmented profibrotic PAR1 and transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β)-dependent signalling. This enhanced TGF-β/PAR1 signalling caused N-proteinase (ADAMTS3) and C-proteinase (BMP1)-related increased collagen I production from cardiac fibroblasts (CFs). PAR2 overexpression in PAR2ko CFs reversed these effects. The treatment with the PAR1 antagonist, vorapaxar, reduced cardiac fibrosis by 44% (P = 0.03) and reduced inflammation in a metabolic disease model (apolipoprotein E-ko mice). Patients with HFpEF with upstream PAR inhibition via FXa inhibitors (n = 40) also exhibited reduced circulating markers of fibrosis and DD compared with patients treated with vitamin K antagonists (n = 20).

CONCLUSIONS

Protease-activated receptor 2 is an important regulator of profibrotic PAR1 and TGF-β signalling in the heart. Modulation of the FXa/FIIa-PAR1/PAR2/TGF-β-axis might be a promising therapeutic approach to reduce HFpEF.

Coronary microvascular dysfunction in hypertrophy and heart failure

Left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy (LVH) is a growth in left myocardial mass mainly caused by increased cardiomyocyte size. LVH can be a physiological adaptation to physical exercise or a pathological condition either primary, i.e. genetic, or secondary to LV overload. Patients with both primary and secondary LVH have evidence of coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD). The latter is mainly due to capillary rarefaction and adverse remodelling of intramural coronary arterioles due to medial wall thickening with an increased wall/lumen ratio. An important feature of this phenomenon is the diffuse nature of this remodelling, which generally affects the coronary microvessels in the whole of the left ventricle. Patients with LVH secondary to arterial hypertension can develop both heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). These patients can develop HFrEF via a 'direct pathway' with an interval myocardial infarction and also in its absence. On the other hand, patients can develop HFpEF that can then progress to HFrEF with or without interval myocardial infarction. A similar evolution towards LV dysfunction and both HFpEF and HFrEF can occur in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, the most common genetic cardiomyopathy with a phenotype characterized by massive LVH. In this review article, we will discuss both the experimental and clinical studies explaining the mechanisms responsible for CMD in LVH as well as the evidence linking CMD with HFpEF and HFrEF.

Therapeutic approaches in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: past, present, and future

In contrast to the wealth of proven therapies for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), therapeutic efforts in the past have failed to improve outcomes in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Moreover, to this day, diagnosis of HFpEF remains controversial. However, there is growing appreciation that HFpEF represents a heterogeneous syndrome with various phenotypes and comorbidities which are hardly to differentiate solely by LVEF and might benefit from individually tailored approaches. These hypotheses are supported by the recently presented PARAGON-HF trial. Although treatment with LCZ696 did not result in a significantly lower rate of total hospitalizations for heart failure and death from cardiovascular causes among HFpEF patients, subanalyses suggest beneficial effects in female patients and those with an LVEF between 45 and 57%. In the future, prospective randomized trials should focus on dedicated, well-defined subgroups based on various information such as clinical characteristics, biomarker levels, and imaging modalities. These could clarify the role of LCZ696 in selected individuals. Furthermore, sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors have just proven efficient in HFrEF patients and are currently also studied in large prospective clinical trials enrolling HFpEF patients. In addition, several novel disease-modifying drugs that pursue different strategies such as targeting cardiac inflammation and fibrosis have delivered preliminary optimistic results and are subject of further research. Moreover, innovative device therapies may enhance management of HFpEF, but need prospective adequately powered clinical trials to confirm safety and efficacy regarding clinical outcomes. This review highlights the past, present, and future therapeutic approaches in HFpEF.

The Role of Estrogen Receptors in Cardiovascular Disease

Cardiovascular Diseases (CVDs) are the leading cause of death globally. More than 17 million people die worldwide from CVD per year. There is considerable evidence suggesting that estrogen modulates cardiovascular physiology and function in both health and disease, and that it could potentially serve as a cardioprotective agent. The effects of estrogen on cardiovascular function are mediated by nuclear and membrane estrogen receptors (ERs), including estrogen receptor alpha (ERα), estrogen receptor beta (ERβ), and G-protein-coupled ER (GPR30 or GPER). Receptor binding in turn confers pleiotropic effects through both genomic and non-genomic signaling to maintain cardiovascular homeostasis. Each ER has been implicated in multiple pre-clinical cardiovascular disease models. This review will discuss current reports on the underlying molecular mechanisms of the ERs in regulating vascular pathology, with a special emphasis on hypertension, pulmonary hypertension, and atherosclerosis, as well as in regulating cardiac pathology, with a particular emphasis on ischemia/reperfusion injury, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Optimizing diastolic pressure gradient assessment

Aims

The diastolic pressure gradient (DPG) has been proposed as a marker pulmonary vascular disease in the setting of left heart failure (HF). However, its diagnostic utility is compromised by the high prevalence of physiologically incompatible negative values (DPG_NEG) and the contradictory evidence on its prognostic value. Pressure pulsatility impacts on DPG measurements, thus conceivably, pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP) measurements insusceptible to the oscillatory effect of the V-wave might yield a more reliable DPG assessment. We set out to investigate how the instantaneous PAWP at the trough of the Y-descent (PAWP_Y) influences the prevalence of DPG_NEG and the prognostic value of the resultant DPG_Y.

Methods

Hundred and fifty-three consecutive HF patients referred for right heart catheterisation were enrolled prospectively. DPG, as currently recommended, was calculated. Subsequently, PAWP_Y was measured and the corresponding DPG_Y was calculated.

Results

DPG_Y yielded higher values (median, IQR: 3.2, 0.6–5.7 mmHg) than DPG (median, IQR: 0.9, − 1.7–3.8 mmHg); p < 0.001. Conventional DPG was negative in 45% of the patients whereas DPG_Y in only 15%. During follow-up (22 ± 14 months) 58 patients have undergone heart-transplantation or died. The predictive ability of DPG_Y ≥ 6 mmHg for the above defined end-point events was significant [HR 2.1; p = 0.007] and independent of resting mean pulmonary artery pressure (PAP_M). In contrast, conventional DPG did not comprise significant prognostic value following adjustment for PAP_M.

Conclusion

Instantaneous pressures at the trough of Y-descent yield significantly fewer DPG_NEG than conventional DPG and entail superior prognostic value in HF patients with and without PH.

Graphic abstract

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00392-020-01641-w) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

How to diagnose heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: the HFA-PEFF diagnostic algorithm: a consensus recommendation from the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)

Making a firm diagnosis of chronic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains a challenge. We recommend a new stepwise diagnostic process, the 'HFA-PEFF diagnostic algorithm'. Step 1 (P=Pre-test assessment) is typically performed in the ambulatory setting and includes assessment for heart failure symptoms and signs, typical clinical demographics (obesity, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, elderly, atrial fibrillation), and diagnostic laboratory tests, electrocardiogram, and echocardiography. In the absence of overt non-cardiac causes of breathlessness, HFpEF can be suspected if there is a normal left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction, no significant heart valve disease or cardiac ischaemia, and at least one typical risk factor. Elevated natriuretic peptides support, but normal levels do not exclude a diagnosis of HFpEF. The second step (E: Echocardiography and Natriuretic Peptide Score) requires comprehensive echocardiography and is typically performed by a cardiologist. Measures include mitral annular early diastolic velocity (e'), LV filling pressure estimated using E/e', left atrial volume index, LV mass index, LV relative wall thickness, tricuspid regurgitation velocity, LV global longitudinal systolic strain, and serum natriuretic peptide levels. Major (2 points) and Minor (1 point) criteria were defined from these measures. A score ≥5 points implies definite HFpEF; ≤1 point makes HFpEF unlikely. An intermediate score (2-4 points) implies diagnostic uncertainty, in which case Step 3 (F₁ : Functional testing) is recommended with echocardiographic or invasive haemodynamic exercise stress tests. Step 4 (F₂ : Final aetiology) is recommended to establish a possible specific cause of HFpEF or alternative explanations. Further research is needed for a better classification of HFpEF.

Speckle-tracking echocardiography combined with imaging mass spectrometry assesses region-dependent alterations

Left ventricular (LV) contraction is characterized by shortening and thickening of longitudinal and circumferential fibres. To date, it is poorly understood how LV deformation is altered in the pathogenesis of streptozotocin (STZ)-induced type 1 diabetes mellitus-associated diabetic cardiomyopathy and how this is associated with changes in cardiac structural composition. To gain further insights in these LV alterations, eight-week-old C57BL6/j mice were intraperitoneally injected with 50 mg/kg body weight STZ during 5 consecutive days. Six, 9, and 12 weeks (w) post injections, echocardiographic analysis was performed using a Vevo 3100 device coupled to a 30-MHz linear-frequency transducer. Speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE) demonstrated impaired global longitudinal peak strain (GLS) in STZ versus control mice at all time points. 9w STZ animals displayed an impaired global circumferential peak strain (GCS) versus 6w and 12w STZ mice. They further exhibited decreased myocardial deformation behaviour of the anterior and posterior base versus controls, which was paralleled with an elevated collagen I/III protein ratio. Additionally, hypothesis-free proteome analysis by imaging mass spectrometry (IMS) identified regional- and time-dependent changes of proteins affecting sarcomere mechanics between STZ and control mice. In conclusion, STZ-induced diabetic cardiomyopathy changes global cardiac deformation associated with alterations in cardiac sarcomere proteins.

Amplified P-wave duration predicts new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) increases morbidity and mortality in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), yet identification of HFpEF-patients at risk for new-onset AF is challenging. Amplified P-wave duration (APWD) non-invasively detects arrhythmogenic atrial substrate with high accuracy. We hypothesized that APWD may help in the prediction of new-onset AF in HFpEF.

METHODS

Patients with suspected HFpEF (n = 99, left ventricular ejection fraction > 50%, no evidence of valvulopathy, coronary artery disease, or non-cardiac dyspnea) underwent exercise testing with concomitant right-heart catheterization. Normal resting pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP; < 12 mmHg) with an increase during exercise > 25.5 mmHg/W/kg defined early HFpEF. Advanced HFpEF was diagnosed with PCWP > 12 mmHg at rest. Arrhythmogenic atrial substrate (defined as APWD > 150 ms) was investigated on digitized standard 12-lead ECGs and patients were followed for new-onset AF at 6-month intervals.

RESULTS

Forty-seven patients had normal exercise haemodynamics and served as controls. Early and advanced HFpEF was diagnosed in 29 and 23 patients, respectively. Eighty-seven per cent of patients with advanced HFpEF had evidence of arrhythmogenic atrial substrate, (APWD 175 ± 29 ms vs. 132 ± 14 ms in controls, p < 0.0001), which was associated with a tenfold increased risk for new-onset AF during 4.6 years of follow-up (hazard ratio [HR] 9.684, 95% CI 2.61-35.89, p < 0.0001). Early HFpEF was neither related to APWD (p = 0.395), nor to a higher risk for AF (HR 3.44, 95% CI 0.57-20.72, p = 0.178). Importantly, the presence of arrhythmogenic substrate was independent of left atrial indexed volume.

CONCLUSION

The analysis of amplified P-wave duration (APWD) allows for the prediction of new-onset AF in patients with advanced HFpEF.

Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF) and Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF): The Diagnostic Value of Circulating MicroRNAs

Circulating microRNAs offer attractive potential as epigenetic disease biomarkers by virtue of their biological stability and ready accessibility in liquid biopsies. Numerous clinical cohort studies have revealed unique microRNA profiles in different disease settings, suggesting utility as markers with diagnostic and prognostic applications. Given the complex network of microRNA functions in modulating gene expression and post-transcriptional modifications, the circulating microRNA landscape in disease may reflect pathophysiological status, providing valuable information for delineating distinct subtypes and/or stages of complex diseases. Heart failure (HF) is an increasingly significant global health challenge, imposing major economic liability and health care burden due to high hospitalization, morbidity, and mortality rates. Although HF is defined as a syndrome characterized by symptoms and findings on physical examination, it may be further differentiated based on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and categorized as HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). The presenting clinical syndromes in HFpEF and HFrEF are similar but mortality differs, being somewhat lower in HFpEF than in HFrEF. However, while HFrEF is responsive to an array of therapies, none has been shown to improve survival in HFpEF. Herein, we review recent HF cohort studies focusing on the distinct microRNA profiles associated with HF subtypes to reveal new insights to underlying mechanisms and explore the possibility of exploiting these differences for diagnostic/prognostic applications.

Outcome of patients with heart failure after transcatheter aortic valve implantation

AIMS

Patients with aortic stenosis (AS) may have concomitant heart failure (HF) that determines prognosis despite successful transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). We compared outcomes of TAVI patients with low stroke volume index (SVI) ≤35 ml/m2 body surface area in different HF classes.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients treated by transfemoral TAVI at our center (n = 1822) were classified as 1) 'HF with preserved ejection fraction (EF)' (HFpEF, EF ≥50%), 2) 'HF with mid-range EF' (HFmrEF, EF 40-49%), or 3) 'HF with reduced EF' (HFrEF, EF <40%). Patients with SVI >35 ml/m2 served as controls. The prevalence of cardiovascular disease and symptoms increased stepwise from controls (n = 968) to patients with HFpEF (n = 591), HFmrEF (n = 97), and HFrEF (n = 166). Mortality tended to be highest in HFrEF patients 30 days post-procedure, and it became significant after one year: 10.2% (controls), 13.5% (HFpEF), 13.4% (HFmrEF), and 23.5% (HFrEF). However, symptomatic improvement in survivors of all groups was achieved in the majority of patients without differences among groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with AS and HF benefit from TAVI with respect to symptom alleviation. TAVI in patients with HFpEF and HFmrEF led to an identical, favorable post-procedural prognosis that was significantly better than that of patients with HFrEF, which remains a high-risk population.

Quality of life assessment in patients with heart failure: validity of the German version of the generic EQ-5D-5L™

BACKGROUND

Chronic heart failure patients typically suffer from tremendous strain and are managed mainly in primary care. New care concepts adapted to the severity of heart failure are a challenge and need to consider health-related quality of life aspects. This is the first psychometric validation of the German EQ-5D-5L™ as a generic instrument for assessing health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in a primary care heart failure patient sample.

METHODS

Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was performed on the baseline EQ-5D-5L™ data from the RECODE-HF study (responses to all items from n = 3225 of 3778 patients). Basic CFA models for HRQOL were calculated based on the EQ-5D-5L™ items using the maximum likelihood (ML) and the asymptotic distribution-free method. In an extended CFA, physical activity and depression were added. The basic CFA ML model was verified for the reduced number of cases of the extended CFA model (n = 3064). In analyses of variance the association of the EQ-5D-5L™ visual analogue scale (VAS) and both the German and the British EQ-5D-5L™ crosswalk index with the SF-36 measure of general health were examined. The discriminant validity was analysed using Pearson's chi-squared tests applying the New York Heart Association classification, for the VAS and indices analyses of variance were calculated.

RESULTS

In the basic CFA models the root mean square error of approximation was 0.095 with the ML method, and 0.081 with the asymptotic distribution-free method (Comparative Fit Index > 0.90 for both). Physical activity and depression were confirmed as influential factors in the extended model. The VAS and indices were strongly associated with the SF-36 measure of general health (partial eta-squared 0.525/0.454/0.481; all p <  0.001; n = 3155/3210/3210, respectively), also for physical activity and depression when included together (partial eta-squared 0.050, 0.200/0.047, 0.213/0.051 and 0.270; all p <  0.001; n = 3015/n = 3064/n = 3064, respectively). The discriminant validity analyses showed p-values < 0.001 and small to moderate effect sizes for all EQ-5D-5L™ items. Analyses of variance demonstrated moderate effect sizes for the VAS and indices (0.067/0.087/0.084; all p <  0.001; n = 3110/3171/3171).

CONCLUSION

The German EQ-5D-5L™ is a suitable method for assessing HRQOL in heart failure patients.

Western Diet-Fed, Aortic-Banded Ossabaw Swine: A Preclinical Model of Cardio-Metabolic Heart Failure

The development of new treatments for heart failure lack animal models that encompass the increasingly heterogeneous disease profile of this patient population. This report provides evidence supporting the hypothesis that Western Diet-fed, aortic-banded Ossabaw swine display an integrated physiological, morphological, and genetic phenotype evocative of cardio-metabolic heart failure. This new preclinical animal model displays a distinctive constellation of findings that are conceivably useful to extending the understanding of how pre-existing cardio-metabolic syndrome can contribute to developing HF.

Age-dependent differences in clinical phenotype and prognosis in heart failure with mid-range ejection compared with heart failure with reduced or preserved ejection fraction

BACKGROUND

HFmrEF has been recently proposed as a distinct HF phenotype. How HFmrEF differs from HFrEF and HFpEF according to age remains poorly defined. We aimed to investigate age-dependent differences in heart failure with mid-range (HFmrEF) vs. preserved (HFpEF) and reduced (HFrEF) ejection fraction.

METHODS AND RESULTS

42,987 patients, 23% with HFpEF, 22% with HFmrEF and 55% with HFrEF, enrolled in the Swedish heart failure registry were studied. HFpEF prevalence strongly increased, whereas that of HFrEF strongly decreased with higher age. All cardiac comorbidities and most non-cardiac comorbidities increased with aging, regardless of the HF phenotype. Notably, HFmrEF resembled HFrEF for ischemic heart disease prevalence in all age groups, whereas regarding hypertension it was more similar to HFpEF in age ≥ 80 years, to HFrEF in age < 65 years and intermediate in age 65-80 years. All-cause mortality risk was higher in HFrEF vs. HFmrEF for all age categories, whereas HFmrEF vs. HFpEF reported similar risk in ≥ 80 years old patients and lower risk in < 65 and 65-80 years old patients. Predictors of mortality were more likely cardiac comorbidities in HFrEF but more likely non-cardiac comorbidities in HFpEF and HFmrEF with < 65 years. Differences among HF phenotypes for comorbidities were less pronounced in the other age categories.

CONCLUSION

HFmrEF appeared as an intermediate phenotype between HFpEF and HFrEF, but for some characteristics such as ischemic heart disease more similar to HFrEF. With aging, HFmrEF resembled more HFpEF. Prognosis was similar in HFmrEF vs. HFpEF and better than in HFrEF.

Proenkephalin and prognosis in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a GREAT network study

Background

Proenkephalin (PENK), a stable endogenous opioid biomarker related to renal function, has prognostic utility in acute and chronic heart failure. We investigated the prognostic utility of PENK in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), and its relationship to renal function, Body Mass Index (BMI), and imaging measures of diastolic dysfunction.

Methods

In this multicentre study, PENK was measured in 522 HFpEF patients (ejection fraction > 50%, 253 male, mean age 76.13 ± 10.73 years) and compared to 47 age and sex-matched controls. The primary endpoint was 2-years composite of all-cause mortality and/or heart failure rehospitalisation (HF). A subset (n = 163) received detailed imaging studies.

Results

PENK levels were raised in HFpEF (median [interquartile range] 88.9 [62.1–132.0]) compared to normal controls (56.3 [47.9–70.5]). PENK was correlated to urea, eGFR, Body Mass Index and E/e′ (r_s 0.635, − 0.741, − 0.275, 0.476, respectively, p < 0.0005). During 2 years follow-up 144 patients died and 220 had death/HF endpoints. Multivariable Cox regression models showed PENK independently predicted 2 year death/HF [hazard ratio (for 1 SD increment of log-transformed biomarker) HR 1.45 [95% CI 1.12–1.88, p = 0.005]], even after adjustment for troponin (HR 1.59 [1.14–2.20, p = 0.006]), and Body Mass Index (HR 1.63 [1.13–2.33, p = 0.009]). PENK showed no interaction with ejection fraction status for prediction of poor outcomes. Net reclassification analyses showed PENK significantly improved classification of death/HF outcomes for multivariable models containing natriuretic peptide, troponin and Body Mass Index (p < 0.05 for all).

Conclusions

In HFpEF, PENK levels are related to BMI, and measures of diastolic dysfunction and are prognostic for all-cause mortality and heart failure rehospitalisation.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00392-019-01424-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Cardiac contractility modulation improves long-term survival and hospitalizations in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

AIMS

Cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) improves symptoms and exercise tolerance and reduces heart failure (HF) hospitalizations over 6-month follow-up in patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III or IV symptoms, QRS < 130 ms and 25% ≤ left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 45% (FIX-HF-5C study). The current prospective registry study (CCM-REG) aimed to assess the longer-term impact of CCM on hospitalizations and mortality in real-world experience in this same population.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 140 patients with 25% ≤ LVEF ≤ 45% receiving CCM therapy (CCM-REG_25-45 ) for clinical indications were included. Cardiovascular and HF hospitalizations, Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) and NYHA class were assessed over 2 years. Mortality was tracked through 3 years and compared with predictions by the Seattle Heart Failure Model (SHFM). A separate analysis was performed on patients with 35% ≤ LVEF ≤ 45% (CCM-REG_35-45 ) and 25% ≤ LVEF < 35% (CCM-REG_25-34 ). Hospitalizations decreased by 75% (from 1.2/patient-year the year before, to 0.35/patient-year during the 2 years following CCM, P < 0.0001) in CCM-REG_25-45 and by a similar amount in CCM-REG_35-45 (P < 0.0001) and CCM-REG_25-34 . MLHFQ and NYHA class improved in all three cohorts_, with progressive improvements over time (P < 0.002). Three-year survival in CCM-REG_25-45 (82.8%) and CCM-REG_24-34 (79.4%) were similar to those predicted by SHFM (76.7%, P = 0.16; 78.0%, P = 0.81, respectively) and was better than predicted in CCM-REG_35-45 (88.0% vs. 74.7%, P = 0.046).

CONCLUSION

In real-world experience, CCM produces results similar to those of previous studies in subjects with 25% ≤ LVEF ≤ 45% and QRS < 130 ms; cardiovascular and HF hospitalizations are reduced and MLHFQ and NYHA class are improved. Overall mortality was comparable to that predicted by the SHFM but was lower than predicted in patients with 35% ≤ LVEF ≤ 45%.

Cardiac contractility modulation: mechanisms of action in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and beyond

Heart failure (HF) is responsible for substantial morbidity and mortality and is increasing in prevalence. Although there has been remarkable progress in the treatment of HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), morbidity and mortality are still substantial. Cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) signals, consisting of biphasic high-voltage bipolar signals delivered to the right ventricular septum during the absolute refractory period, have been shown to improve symptoms, exercise tolerance and quality of life and reduce the rate of HF hospitalizations in patients with ejection fractions (EF) between 25% and 45%. CCM therapy is currently approved in the European Union, China, India, Australia and Brazil for use in symptomatic HFrEF patients with normal or slightly prolonged QRS duration. CCM is particularly beneficial in patients with baseline EF between 35% and 45%, which includes half the range of HF patients with mid-range EFs (HFmrEF). At the cellular level, CCM has been shown in HFrEF patients to improve calcium handling, to reverse the foetal myocyte gene programme associated with HF, and to facilitate reverse remodelling. This review highlights the preclinical and clinical literature related to CCM in HFrEF and HFmrEF and outlines the potential of CCM for HF with preserved EF, concluding that CCM may fill an important unmet need in the therapeutic approach to HF across the range of EFs.

Left atrial strain improves estimation of filling pressures in heart failure: a simultaneous echocardiographic and invasive haemodynamic study

Aims

Left ventricular diastolic pressure estimation is essential for characterization of heart failure (HF). Patients with normal resting left atrial (LA) pressures (LAP), but steep LAP elevation on exertion, pose a particular diagnostic challenge. Current recommendations on echocardiographic LAP estimation have limited accuracy. Our aim was to investigate whether LA mechanical alterations assessed by LA strain (LA-GS) can contribute to non-invasive LAP diagnostics.

Methods and results

Simultaneous echocardiographic and right heart catheterization (RHC) data at rest and during exercise was analyzed in 164 prospectively enrolled patients, referred for RHC due to HF symptoms. 56% had preserved ejection fraction (pEF). At rest, 97 patients displayed elevated mean pulmonary arterial wedge pressure (PAWP_M); further 32 patients had normal resting, but elevated PAWP_M during exercise. LA-GS demonstrated a stronger relationship with resting PAWP_M (r = − 0.61, p < 0.001) than any of the indices (E/e′, LAVi, TRV_max) incorporated in the currently recommended diagnostic algorithm. The diagnostic ability of LA-GS for detecting elevated resting PAWP_M (AUC: 0.80, p < 0.001) outperformed that of the recommended algorithm (AUC: 0.69). Importantly, resting LA-GS performed even better in identifying patients with pathological PAWP_M either at rest or during stress (AUC: 0.90, p < 0.001), whereas the diagnostic potential of the current algorithm was modest and limited to pEF patients (AUC = 0.72). Finally, among the non-invasive indices, LA-GS entailed the strongest prognostic value for death or heart transplantation (OR: 2.7; p < 0.05).

Conclusion

LA-GS comprises a robust method for PAWP_M assessment at rest. More importantly, it reliably discerns pathological PAWP_M rise on exertion despite normal resting pressures.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00392-018-1399-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The prevalence of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in men and women with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Type 2 diabetes is a risk factor for the development of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Our aim was to provide a summary estimate of the prevalence of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in type 2 diabetes patients and to investigate sex disparities.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A systematic search of the databases Medline and Embase was conducted for studies reporting the prevalence of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction or heart failure with preserved ejection fraction among type 2 diabetes patients. Studies were only included if echocardiography was performed. Prevalence estimates were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. A total of 28 studies were included. Data on the prevalence of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction were available in 27 studies. The pooled prevalence for left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in the hospital population (2959 type 2 diabetes participants) and in the general population (2813 type 2 diabetes participants) was 48% [95% confidence interval: 38%-59%] and 35% (95% confidence interval: 24%-46%), respectively. Heterogeneity was high in both populations, with estimates ranging from 19% to 81% in the hospital population and from 23% to 54% in the general population. For women and men, the pooled prevalence estimates of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction were 47% (95% confidence interval: 37%-58%) and 46% (95% confidence interval: 37%-55%), respectively. Only two studies presented the prevalence of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; 8% (95% confidence interval: 5%-14%) in a hospital population and 25% (95% confidence interval: 21%-28%) in the general population [18% in men (mean age: 73.8; standard deviation: 8.6) and 28% in women (mean age: 74.9; standard deviation: 6.9)].

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction among type 2 diabetes patients is similarly high in men and women, while heart failure with preserved ejection fraction seems to be more common in women than men, at least in community people with type 2 diabetes.

Test-retest reliability of new and conventional echocardiographic parameters of left ventricular systolic function

Background

Reliability of left ventricular function measurements depends on actual biological conditions, repeated registrations and their analyses.

Objective

To investigate test–retest reliability of speckle-tracking-derived strain measurements and its determinants compared to the conventional parameters, such as ejection fraction (EF), LV volumes and mitral annular plane systolic excursion (MAPSE).

Methods

In 30 patients with a wide range of left ventricular function (mean EF 46.4 ± 16.4%, range 14–73%), standard echo views were acquired independently in a blinded fashion by two different echocardiographers in immediate sequence and analyzed off-line by two independent readers, creating 4 data sets per patient. Test–retest reliability of studied parameters was calculated using the smallest detectable change (SDC) and a total, inter-acquisition and inter-reader intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC).

Results

The smallest detectable change normalized to the mean absolute value of the measured parameter (SDCrel) was lowest for MAPSE (10.7%). SDCrel for EF was similar to GLS (14.2 and 14.7%, respectively), while SDCrel for CS was much higher (35.6%). The intra-class correlation coefficient was excellent (> 0.9) for all measures of the left ventricular function. Intra-patient inter-acquisition reliability (ICCacq) was significantly better than inter-reader reliability (ICCread) (0.984 vs. 0.950, p = 0.03) only for EF, while no significant difference was observed for any other LV function parameter. Mean intra-subject standard deviations were significantly correlated to the mean values for CS and LV volumes, but not for the other studied parameters.

Conclusions

In a test–retest setting, both with normal and impaired left ventricular function, the smallest relative detectable change of EF, GLS and MAPSE was similar (11–15%), but was much higher for CS (35%). Surprisingly, reliability of GLS was not superior to that of EF. Acquisition and reader to a similar extent influenced the reliability of measurements of all left ventricular function measures except for ejection fraction, where the reliability was more dependent on the reader than on the acquisition.

Genetic and Tissue Engineering Approaches to Modeling the Mechanics of Human Heart Failure for Drug Discovery

Heart failure is the leading cause of death in the western world and as such, there is a great need for new therapies. Heart failure has a variable presentation in patients and a complex etiology; however, it is fundamentally a condition that affects the mechanics of cardiac contraction, preventing the heart from generating sufficient cardiac output under normal operating pressures. One of the major issues hindering the development of new therapies has been difficulties in developing appropriate in vitro model systems of human heart failure that recapitulate the essential changes in cardiac mechanics seen in the disease. Recent advances in stem cell technologies, genetic engineering, and tissue engineering have the potential to revolutionize our ability to model and study heart failure in vitro. Here, we review how these technologies are being applied to develop personalized models of heart failure and discover novel therapeutics.

Body mass index and all-cause mortality in heart failure patients with normal and reduced ventricular ejection fraction: a dose-response meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

For patients with heart failure, there is an inverse relation between body mass index (BMI) and mortality, sometimes called the obesity-paradox. However, the relationship might be either U- or J-shaped and might differ between patients with reduced (HFrEF) or preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (HFpEF). We sought to investigate this further in a dose-response meta-analysis of published studies.

METHODS

PubMed and Embase from June 1980 to April 2017 were searched for prospective cohort studies evaluating associations between BMI and all-cause mortality in patients with HFrEF (LVEF < 40%) or HFpEF (LVEF ≥ 50%). Summary estimated effect sizes were obtained by using a random-effects model. Potential non-linear relationships were evaluated by using random-effects restricted cubic spline models.

RESULTS

Ten studies were identified that included 96,424 patients of whom 59,263 had HFpEF (mean age 68 years of whom 38% were women) and 37,161 had HFrEF (mean age 60 years of whom 17% were women). For patients with HFpEF, the summary hazard ratio (HR) for all-cause mortality was: 0.93 (95% CI 0.89-0.97) per 5 units increase in BMI (I² = 75.8%, p for heterogeneity = 0.01 and Begg's test, p = 1.0, Egger's test, p = 0.29) but the association was U-shaped (p for non-linearity < 0.01) with the nadir of risk at a BMI of 32-33 kg/m². For patients with HFrEF, the summary HR for all-cause mortality was: 0.96 (95% CI 0.92-0.99) (I² = 95%, p for heterogeneity < 0.001 and Begg's test, p = 0.45, Egger's test, p = 0.01). The relationship was also U-shaped (p < 0.01), although 'flatter' than for HFpEF, with the nadir at a BMI of 33 kg/m².

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with heart failure, the relation between BMI and mortality is U-shaped with a similar nadir of risk for HFpEF and HFrEF at a BMI of 32-33 kg/m². Whether interventions that alter weight in either direction can alter risk is unknown.

Long-term effects of device-guided slow breathing in stable heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction

Background

Slow breathing (SLOWB) alleviates symptoms of chronic heart failure (HF) but its long-term effects are unknown. We examined the acute and long-term impact of device-guided breathing on hemodynamics and prognostic parameters in HF patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).

Methods and results

Twenty-one patients with HFrEF (23.9 ± 5.8%, SD ± mean) on optimal medical therapy underwent blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), HR variability, 6-min walk test (6MWT), cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET), and echocardiography measurements before and 3 months after SLOWB home training (30 min daily). After 3 months, all patients were assigned to continue SLOWB (Group 1) or no-SLOWB (Group 2). All tests were repeated after 6 months. Acute SLOWB (18 ± 5 vs 8 ± 2 breaths/min, P < 0.001) had no influence on BP and HR but improved saturation (97 ± 2 vs 98 ± 2%, P = 0.01). Long-term SLOWB reduced office systolic BP (P < 0.001) but not central or ambulatory systolic BP. SLOWB reduced SDNN/RMSSD ratio (P < 0.05) after 3 months. One-way repeated measures of ANOVA revealed a significant increase in 6MWT and peak RER (respiratory exchange ratio) from baseline to 6-month follow-up in group 1 (P < 0.05) but not group 2 (P = 0.85 for 6MWT, P = 0.69 for RER). No significant changes in echocardiography were noted at follow-up. No HF worsening, rehospitalisation or death occurred in group 1 out to 6-month follow-up. Two hospitalizations for HF decompensation and two deaths ensued in group 2 between 3- and 6-month follow-up.

Conclusions

SLOWB training improves cardiorespiratory capacity and appears to slow the progression of HFrEF. Further long-term outcome studies are required to confirm the benefits of paced breathing in HFrEF.