The best of two worlds? Pulmonary vein isolation using a novel radiofrequency ablation catheter incorporating contact force sensing technology and 56-hole porous tip irrigation

Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: Current Practice and Future Perspectives

Catheter ablation to perform pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is established as a mainstay in rhythm control of atrial fibrillation (AF). The aim of this review is to provide an overview of current practice and future perspectives in AF ablation. The main clinical benefit of AF ablation is the reduction of arrhythmia-related symptoms and improvement of quality of life. Catheter ablation of AF is recommended, in general, as a second-line therapy for patients with symptomatic paroxysmal or persistent AF, who have failed or are intolerant to pharmacological therapy. In selected patients with heart failure and reduced left-ventricular fraction, catheter ablation was proven to reduce all-cause mortality. Also, optimal management of comorbidities can reduce AF recurrence after AF ablation; therefore, multimodal risk assessment and therapy are mandatory. To date, the primary ablation tool in widespread use is still single-tip catheter radiofrequency (RF) based ablation. Additionally, balloon-based pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) has gained prominence, especially due to its user-friendly nature and established safety and efficacy profile. So far, the cryoballoon (CB) is the most studied single-shot device. CB-based PVI is characterized by high efficiency, convincing success rates, and a beneficial safety profile. Recently, CB-PVI as a first-line therapy for AF was shown to be superior to pharmacological treatment in terms of efficacy and was shown to reduce progression from paroxysmal to persistent AF. In this context, CB-based PVI gains more and more importance as a first-line treatment choice. Non-thermal energy sources, namely pulsed-field ablation (PFA), have garnered attention due to their cardioselectivity. Although initially applied via a basket-like ablation tool, recent developments allow for point-by-point ablation, particularly with the advent of a novel lattice tip catheter.

Comparisons of procedural characteristics and clinical outcomes between SMARTTOUCH SURROUNDFLOW catheter and other catheters for atrial fibrillation radiofrequency catheter ablation: a systematic literature review

BACKGROUND

SMARTTOUCH SURROUNDFLOW (STSF) catheter is the new generation of SMARTTOUCH (ST) catheter with an upgraded irrigation system for radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).

METHODS

This systematic literature review searched the major English and Chinese bibliographic databases from 2016 to 2022 for any original clinical studies assessing the STSF catheter for RFCA in AF patients. Meta-analysis with a random effects model was used for evidence synthesis.

RESULTS

Pooled outcomes from 19 included studies indicated that STSF catheter was associated with a significantly shorter procedure time (weighted mean difference (WMD): -17.4 min, p<0.001), shorter ablation time (WMD: -6.6 min, p<0.001) and lower catheter irrigation fluid volume (WMD: -492.7 mL, p<0.001) than ST catheter. Pooled outcomes from four included studies with paroxysmal AF patients reported that using the STSF catheter for RFCA was associated with a significantly shorter ablation time (WMD: -5.7 min, p<0.001) and a lower risk of 1-year postablation arrhythmia recurrence (rate ratio: 0.504, p<0.001) than the SURROUNDFLOW (SF) catheter. Significant reductions in procedure time and ablation time associated with the STSF catheter were also reported in the other four studies using non-ST/SF catheters as the control. Overall complications of STSF catheter and control catheters were comparable.

CONCLUSIONS

Using the STSF catheter was superior to using the ST catheter to conduct RFCA for AF by significantly reducing procedure time, ablation time, fluoroscopy time and irrigation fluid volume. The superiority of the STSF catheter over the SF catheter and other non-ST/SF catheters for RFCA needs further confirmation.

Porous tip radiofrequency ablation catheter reduced heart failure-related complications and healthcare resource utilization in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation patients

Introduction

A 56-hole porous tip radiofrequency catheter was developed to provide more uniform cooling with less fluid delivery than a prior 6-hole irrigated design. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of contact force (CF) ablation with the porous tip on complications (congestive heart failure [CHF] and non-CHF related), healthcare resource utilization, and procedural efficiency in patients undergoing de novo paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) ablations in a real-world setting.

Methods

Consecutive de novo PAF ablations were performed between February 2014 and March 2019 by six operators at a single US academic center. The 6-hole design was used through December 2016 with the 56-hole porous tip adopted in October 2016. The outcomes of interest included symptomatic CHF presentation and CHF-related complications.

Results

Of 174 patients who were included, mean age was 61.1 ± 10.8 years, 67.8% were male, and 25.3% had a history of CHF. Ablation with the porous tip catheter significantly decreased fluid delivery (1177 vs. 1912 mL with the 6-hole design; p < .0001). CHF-related complications within 7 days, particularly fluid overload, were substantially reduced with the porous tip (15.2% vs. 5.3% of patients; p = .0281) and the proportion of patients with symptomatic CHF presentation within 30 days postablation was significantly lower (14.7% vs. 32.5%; p = .0058).

Conclusion

The 56-hole porous tip led to significantly reduced CHF-related complications and healthcare utilization in PAF patients undergoing CF catheter ablation when compared to the prior 6-hole design. This reduction likely results from the significant decrease in fluid delivery during the procedure.

Temperature-controlled ablation of the mitral isthmus line using the novel DiamondTemp ablation system

Background

The novel DiamondTemp™ (DT)-catheter (Medtronic®) was designed for high-power, short-duration ablation in a temperature-controlled mode.

Aim

To evaluate the performance of the DT-catheter for ablation of the mitral isthmus line (MIL) using two different energy dosing strategies.

Materials and methods

Twenty patients with recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) and/or atrial tachycardia (AT) following pulmonary vein (PV) isolation were included. All patients underwent reisolation of PVs in case of electrical reconnection and ablation of a MIL using the DT-catheter. Application durations of 10 (group A, n = 10) or 20 s (group B, n = 10) were applied. If bidirectional block was not reached with endocardial ablation, additional ablation from within the coronary sinus (CS) was conducted.

Results

In 19/20 (95%) patients, DT ablation of the MIL resulted in bidirectional block. Mean procedure and fluoroscopy time, and dose area product did not differ significantly between the two groups. In group B, fewer radiofrequency applications were needed to achieve bidirectional block of the MIL when compared to group A (26 ± 12 vs. 42 ± 17, p = 0.04). Ablation from within the CS was performed in 8/10 patients (80%) of group A and in 5/10 (50%) patients of group B (p = 0.34). No major complication occurred.

Conclusion

Mitral isthmus line ablation with use of the DT-catheter is highly effective and safe. Longer radiofrequency-applications appear to be favorable without compromising safety.

Procedural Efficiency, Efficacy, and Safety of High-Power, Short-Duration Radiofrequency Ablation Delivered by STSF Catheter for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

Objectives

To investigate the procedural efficiency, efficacy, and safety of high-power, short-term radiofrequency ablation delivered by the SmartTouch Surround Flow (STSF) catheter for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF).

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed a total of 72 patients who were admitted with paroxysmal AF, and who underwent radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) for the first time. Of these patients, 36 cases underwent low-power, long-duration (LPLD, (30–35 W/20–40 s) pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) delivered by an SmartTouch (ST) catheter (control group), and the other 36 cases underwent high-power, short-duration (HPSD, (45–50 W/10–20 s) PVI delivered by a STSF catheter (study group). The baseline data, duration of PVI, procedural time, fluoroscopy time, the rate of first-pass isolation, irrigation perfusion, eschar and steam pop occurrences, intraoperative complications, and the rate of stable sinus rhythm maintenance following a blanking period of three months were analyzed between the two groups.

Results

The isolation time of bilateral PVI and procedural time in the study group were markedly less than in controls (p < 0.01). The rate of first-pass isolation in the study group was significantly higher than in the control group (95.8% vs. 84.7%, p = 0.023), while the fluid perfusion in the study group was approximately 20% less than that in the control group (767 ± 171 vs. 966 ± 227 ml, p < 0.001). We observed no severe complications in any patients. The rate of freedom from AF recurrences following a blanking period of three months showed a tendency to be higher than in controls (93.9% vs. 87.1%, p = 0.348).

Conclusions

The HPSD strategy delivered by the STSF catheter was superior to conventional LPLD ablation through the ST catheter with respect to efficiency, acute procedural effectiveness, short-term safety, and the risk of heart failure in patients with paroxysmal AF.

Catheter ablation using advanced porous tip contact force–sensing radiofrequency catheter: Impact on health care utilization among patients with persistent atrial fibrillation

Background

Catheter ablation (CA) is an effective treatment for patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (PsAF); however, little is known about its impact on health care utilization for patients with PsAF. The ThermoCool SmartTouch SF (STSF) catheter (Biosense Webster) incorporates an advanced porous tip and contact force–sensing technology.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to determine health care utilization among patients with PsAF who underwent ablation with the STSF catheter.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study using the Premier Healthcare Database identified patients with PsAF undergoing CA with the STSF catheter in inpatient and outpatient settings. The proportion of patients experiencing AF-related inpatient admissions, outpatient admissions, emergency department (ED) visits, electrical cardioversion, and a composite outcome in the 12 months pre- vs postablation were compared using the McNemar test. Subanalyses were performed on study outcomes by race/ethnicity.

Results

The final sample included 3077 patients (mean age 65.9 years; 31.7% female). Among patients with PsAF undergoing ablation with the STSF catheter, relative reductions in health care utilization in the 12 months post- vs preablation included 55.3% in AF-related inpatient admissions (P <.0001), 38.9% in outpatient admissions (P <.0001), 52.4% in ED visits (P <.0001), and 61.2% in electrical cardioversions (P <.0001). Composite outcome utilization in the 12 months post- vs preablation declined by 40.2% (P <.0001) for the overall cohort, 40.0% for White patients (P <.0001), 52.2% for Black patients (P <.0001), and 50.1% for Asian patients (P = .032).

Conclusion

Significant improvements in health care utilization were observed among PsAF patients who underwent ablation using the STSF catheter. Improvements were particularly marked in underrepresented racial and ethnic groups.

Revival of the Forgotten

Pulmonary vein (PV) isolation (PVI) by continuous, transmural and durable lesions is decisive for ensuring long-term freedom from atrial fibrillation (AF). AF ablation requires irrigated tip catheters to reduce thromboembolic complications. This precluded temperature-controlled delivery of radiofrequency (RF) energy.The aim of this study was to evaluate feasibility, acute efficacy, and safety of an irrigated, temperature-controlled ablation catheter [DiamondTemp™ (DT) Medtronic^®] for PVI.Consecutive patients with AF underwent PVI using the DT catheter combined with high-power short-duration RF applications. Ablation settings were (1) a catheter tip temperature limit of 60°C, (2) a temperature-controlled power of 50 W, and (3) application duration of 10 seconds. The primary endpoint was acute isolation of PVs, reassessed after a 30-minute waiting period. Secondary endpoints included procedural parameters (defined as a catheter tip temperature of 50°C > 3 seconds, an impedance drop of 5-10 Ω) and the occurrence of serious adverse events.Fifty consecutive patients [mean age 66 ± 12 years, 38 (76%) women, 24 patients with paroxysmal AF (48%)] were included. Median procedure and left atrial dwell time was 89 [68; 107] and 63 [52; 79] minutes, respectively. Mean number of RF applications was 59 ± 20, and mean total RF duration was 14 ± 6 minutes. Acute PVI was achieved in all patients solely using DT ablation. Acute PV reconnection within the waiting period occurred in five patients; all reconnected PVs were successfully reisolated. One major complication occurred.In this study, the DT ablation system demonstrated high acute efficacy for PVI. Temperature-controlled ablation in conjunction with high-power short-duration applications might be effectively supported.

Atrial fibrillation ablation with advanced radiofrequency catheter versus second-generation cryoballoon catheter

Aim: To compare cost and readmissions among atrial fibrillation (AF) patients undergoing ablation using the THERMOCOOL SMARTTOUCH™ SF (STSF) radiofrequency catheter versus the Arctic Front Advance™ (AFA) cryoballoon catheter. Patients & methods: The Premier Healthcare Database was used for the study purposes. Propensity score matching was used to match patients in the two groups. Costs and readmissions were assessed. A regression model was used for outcome assessment. Results: After propensity matching, 2767 patients were identified in each of the STSF and AFA cohorts. In the matched cohort, STSF patients had significantly lower supply costs than AFA patients. STSF patients had significantly lower 4-12-month AF-related inpatient readmissions compared with AFA patients (2.58% vs 3.99%; p = 0.0402). Costs of care summing index procedure and readmission costs were also lower for the STSF patients versus AFA patients. Conclusions: Patients who underwent AF ablation using the STSF catheter versus the AFA catheter had lower cost and AF-related readmissions.

Impact of corrected sinus node recovery time in predicting recurrence in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

Objective

Atrial fibrillation (AF) and sinus node dysfunction (SND) have common underlying pathophysiological mechanisms. As an index of SND, corrected sinus node recovery time (CSNRT) may also reflect atrial function. The aim of the present study was to determine whether CSNRT predicts AF recurrence in patients undergoing AF ablation.

Methods

Consecutive patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) who underwent radiofrequency catheter ablation between January 2017 and December 2018 were enrolled. Clinical data, CSNRT, and other electrophysiology indices were collected and analysed between patients with or without AF recurrence.

Results

A total of 159 patients with PAF who underwent the same radiofrequency catheter ablation procedure were enrolled, including 25 patients with SND. During the one-year follow-up period, 22 patients experienced AF recurrence. Patients with recurrence had a significantly longer CSNRT and a larger left atrial volume index (LAVI) than patients without AF recurrence. SND (CSNRT > 550 ms) and a larger LAVI were independently associated with AF recurrence after ablation. A statistically significant CSNRT cut-off value of 550 ms predicted AF recurrence with 73% sensitivity and 85% specificity.

Conclusion

CSNRT and LAVI are independent predictors of PAF recurrence following ablation.

Keeping it Simple: Balloon Devices for Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Therapy

Atrial fibrillation is a common disease of increasing prevalence. Catheter ablation has evolved into an established therapeutic option that mainly aims to electrically isolate the pulmonary veins from atrial myocardium. The traditional method comprises point-by-point radiofrequency current ablation guided by electroanatomical mapping and has proven to be effective and safe in experienced hands. However, this approach is technically highly demanding and associated with a long learning curve, limiting its widespread utilization. To address these shortcomings, simplified ablation tools for pulmonary vein isolation are needed. In this context, balloon devices promise to ease the procedure by approaching the entire orifice of a targeted pulmonary vein in a single maneuver. This requires less catheter manipulation in the left atrium and often allows ablation of a large volume of tissue with a single application of ablative energy. Two balloon devices-one using cryoenergy, the other laser energy-have already been established in clinical routine and have demonstrated noninferiority when compared with radiofrequency ablation in large randomized trials. More balloon devices are on the verge of being introduced into clinical practice and bear the potential to expand the interventional electrophysiologist's armamentarium when treating atrial fibrillation. The authors review the use of the established balloon devices available for atrial fibrillation ablation and provide a detailed outlook on upcoming balloon technologies, including 3 different balloons utilizing radiofrequency energy as well as a novel cryoballoon.

Real-world outcomes comparison among adults with atrial fibrillation undergoing catheter ablation with a contact force porous tip catheter versus a second-generation cryoballoon catheter: a retrospective analysis of multihospital US database

OBJECTIVE

To compare real-world clinical and economic outcomes among atrial fibrillation (AF) patients undergoing cardiac ablation with the contact force-sensing porous tip THERMOCOOL SMARTTOUCH SF (STSF) catheter versus the Arctic Front Advance Cryoballoon (AFA-CB) catheter.

DESIGN

Retrospective, observational cohort study.

SETTING

Premier Healthcare Database (PHD), between 1 September 2016 and 30 June 2018.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with AF (≥18 years) were included if they had an index ablation procedure performed using the STSF catheter or AFA-CB catheter at a US hospital that consistently provided inpatient and outpatient data to PHD in the 12-month preindex period. Using 1:1 propensity score matching, patient groups were matched on study covariates.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Cost, length of stay (LOS), readmissions, direct current cardioversion (DCCV) and reablation outcomes were compared between matched cohorts of STSF and AFA-CB patients.

RESULTS

A total of 3015 patients with AF met the study criteria, of which 1720 had ablation using the STSF catheter and 1295 had ablation using the AFA-CB catheter. In the propensity-matched sample, patients receiving ablation with the STSF catheter had ~17% lower total costs (US$23 096 vs US$27 682, p≤0.0001) and ~27% lower supply costs (US$10 208 vs US$13 816, p≤0.0001) versus patients receiving ablation with the AFA-CB catheter. A significantly lower likelihood of 4-month to 6-month cardiovascular-related readmission (OR 0.460, 95% CI 0.220 to 0.959) was associated with the STSF catheter versus the AFA-CB catheter. No significant differences in LOS, room and board cost, 4-month to 6-month all-cause and AF-related readmissions, DCCV and reablation were observed among technologies. Sensitivity analysis restricting patient sample by provider ablation volume demonstrated similar results.

CONCLUSION

Lower index ablation total and supply costs were observed among patients with AF undergoing cardiac catheter ablation using the STSF catheter versus the AFA-CB catheter.

Long-term safety and effectiveness of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation using a porous tip contact force-sensing catheter from the SMART SF trial

Purpose

The prospective, multicenter SMART SF trial demonstrated the acute safety and effectiveness of the 56-hole porous tip irrigated contact force (CF) catheter for drug-refractory paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) ablation with a low primary adverse event rate (2.5%), leading to FDA approval of the catheter. Here, we are reporting the long-term effectiveness and safety results that have not yet been reported.

Methods

Ablations were performed using the 56-hole porous tip irrigated CF catheter guided by the 3D mapping system stability module. The primary effectiveness endpoint was freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia (including atrial fibrillation, atrial tachycardia, and/or atrial flutter), based on electrocardiographic data at 12 months. Atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence occurring 3 months post procedure, acute procedural failures such as lack of entrance block confirmation of all PVs, and undergoing repeat procedure for atrial fibrillation in the evaluation period (91 to 365 days post the initial ablation procedure) were considered to be effectiveness failures.

Results

Seventy-eight patients (age 64.8 ± 9.7 years; male 52.6%; Caucasian 96.2%) participated in the 12-month effectiveness evaluation. Mean follow-up time was 373.5 ± 45.4 days. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of freedom from 12-month atrial tachyarrhythmia was 74.9%. Two procedure-related pericardial effusion events were reported at 92 and 180 days post procedure. There were no pulmonary vein stenosis complications or deaths reported through the 12-month follow-up period.

Conclusions

The SMART SF 12-month follow-up evaluation corroborates the early safety and effectiveness success previously reported for PAF ablation with STSF.

Safety and efficacy of the ThermoCool SmartTouch SurroundFlow catheter for atrial fibrillation ablation: A meta-analysis

Background

The ThermoCool Smarttouch Surroundflow catheter (STSFc) is an advanced catheter, which integrating contact force sensing and surroundflow technology. However, comparative data between STSFc and contact force sensing catheter (Thermocool SmartTouch catheter [STc]) are limited.

Hypothesis

We thought that STSFc might bring more clinical benefits. The aim of this meta‐analysis was to compare the safety and efficiency between the STSFc and the STc for treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF).

Methods

The Medline, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for studies comparing STSFc and STc.

Results

Four trials involving 727 patients were included in the study. Pool‐analyses demonstrated that, as compared STc ablation, STSFc ablation was more beneficial in terms of procedural times (standard mean difference [SMD]: −0.22; 95% confidence interval [CI], −0.37 to −0.07, P = .005) and irrigation fluid volume (SMD: −1.94; 95% CI, −2.65 to −1.22, P < .0001). There was no significant difference between STSFc and STc (risk ratio [RR]: 1.02; 95% CI: 0.86 to 1.21, P = .79) for free from AF. Evidence of complications were low and similar for both groups (RR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.19‐3.55, P = .80). Additionally, patients administered STSFc ablation tended to have shorter fluoroscopic times (SMD: −0.20; 95% CI, −0.63‐0.23, P = .21).

Conclusions

STSFc ablation was associated with reducing procedural times and irrigation fluid volume. Further, STSFc ablation tended to shorten fluoroscopic times. Therefore, STSFc ablation would be a better choice for AF patients especially in patients with heart failure.

Association of NT-proBNP and GDF-15 with markers of a prothrombotic state in patients with atrial fibrillation off anticoagulation

Abstract

We investigated whether growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15), also known as macrophage inhibitory cytokine-1 (MIC-1), levels are associated with a prothrombotic state in atrial fibrillation (AF) as compared to N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (cTnI-hs). In 103 patients with AF assessed off anticoagulation (age: 71.0 [65.0–76.0] years; CHA₂DS₂-VASc score: 4.6 ± 1.7), we measured endogenous thrombin potential (ETP), plasma fibrin clot permeability (K_s, a measure of clot density) and clot lysis time (CLT) and other hemostatic parameters, along with GDF-15, NT-proBNP, and cTnI-hs. GDF-15 positively correlated with ETP and CLT (r = 0.25, P = 0.01 and R = 0.56, P < 0.0001, respectively) but not with K_s, von Willebrand factor, thrombin-activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor, plasminogen, antiplasmin or tissue-type plasminogen activator antigen. NT-proBNP showed a stronger association with ETP (r = 0.60, P < 0.0001) and a similar correlation with CLT (R = 0.53, P < 0.0001), while cTnI-hs correlated solely with CLT (R = 0.25, P = 0.01). After adjustment for clinical and laboratory parameters, GDF-15 was a better independent predictor of CLT (unstandardized coefficient B 0.009; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.006–0.012) than NT-proBNP (B 0.007; 95% CI 0.004–0.010, R (2) = 0.51; P < 0.0001); while among the three biomarkers, only NT-proBNP was an independent predictor of ETP. Elevated GDF-15 and NT-proBNP independently predict impaired fibrin clot lysability, while NT-proBNP is a key predictor of heightened thrombin formation in AF. Our findings suggest that a predictive value of NT-proBNP and GDF-15 in AF could be in part attributed to their association with prothrombotic blood alterations.

Graphic Abstract

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00392-019-01522-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Association between atrial fibrillation and Helicobacter pylori

The connection between atrial fibrillation (AF) and H. pylori (HP) infection is still matter of debate. We performed a systematic review and metanalysis of studies reporting the association between AF and HF. A systematic review of all available reports in literature of the incidence of HP infection in AF and comparing this incidence with subjects without AF were analysed. Risk ratio and 95% confidence interval (CI) and risk difference with standard error (SE) were the main statistics indexes. Six retrospective studies including a total of 2921 were included at the end of the selection process. Nine hundred-fifty-six patients (32.7%) were in AF, whereas 1965 (67.3%) were in normal sinus rhythm (NSR). Overall, 335 of 956 patients with AF were HP positive (35%), whereas 621 were HP negative (65%). In addition, 643 of 1965 NSR patients (32.7%) were HP positive while 1,322 were negative (67.3%; Chi-square 2.15, p = 0.21). The Cumulative Risk Ratio for AF patients for developing an HP infection was 1.19 (95% CI 1.08-1.41). In addition, a small difference risk towards AF was found (0.11 [SE = 0.04]). Moreover, neither RR nor risk difference were influenced by the geographic area at meta-regression analysis. Finally, there was a weak correlation between AF and HP (coefficient = 0.04 [95% CI -0.01-0.08]). We failed to find any significant correlation between H. pylori infection and AF and, based on our data, it seems unlikely than HP can be considered a risk factor for AF. Further larger research is warranted.

Remote vs. conventional navigation for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: insights from prospective registry data

BACKGROUND

Robotic (RNS) or magnetic navigation systems (MNS) are available for remotely performed catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF).

OBJECTIVE

The present study compares remotely assisted catheter navigation (RAN) to standard manual navigation (SMN) and both systems amongst each other.

METHODS

The analysis is based on a sub-cohort enrolled by five hospitals from the multicenter German ablation Registry.

RESULTS

Out of 2442 patients receiving catheter ablation of AF, 267 (age 61.4 ± 10.4, 69.7% male) were treated using RAN (RNS n = 187, 7.7% vs. MNS n = 80, 3.3%). Fluoroscopy time [RNS median 17 (IQR 12-25) min vs. MNS 22 (16-32) min; p < 0.001] and procedure duration [RNS 180 (145-220) min vs. MNS 265 (210-305) min; p < 0.001] were significantly different. Comparing RAN (11%) to SMN (89%) fluoroscopy time (RAN 19 (13-27) min, vs. SMN 25 (16-40) min; p < 0.001), energy delivery (RAN 3168 (2280-3840) s vs. SMN 2640 (IQR 1799-3900) s; p = 0.008) and procedure duration [RAN 195 (150-255) min vs. SMN 150 (120-150) min; p = 0.001] differed significantly. In terms of acute and 12 months outcome, no differences were seen between the two systems or in comparison to SMN.

CONCLUSION

AF ablation can be performed safely, with high acute success rates using RAN. RNS results in less fluoroscopy burden and shorter procedure durations. Compared to SMN, a reduced fluoroscopy burden, prolonged procedure and ablation duration were observed using RAN. Overall, the number of RAN procedures is small suggesting low impact on clinical routine of AF ablation.

Exclusion of left atrial thrombus by dual-source cardiac computed tomography prior to catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation

OBJECTIVES

Thromboembolic complications during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation due to mobilisation of a pre-existing thrombus formation (TF) in the left atrium (LA) are devastating. The gold standard to exclude LA TF is transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). The present study compares sensitivity and specificity of a dual-source cardiac-computed tomography (DS-CT) with TEE for TF exclusion prior to AF ablation. In addition, CT protocols with and without ECG synchronized were evaluated.

METHODS

In 622 patients, DS-CT as well as TEE to exclude TF was performed less than 48 h prior to AF ablation. Mean age of patients was 60 ± 10 years (69% males, 61% paroxysmal AF). During DS-CT, 280 patients (45%) were in AF. An ECG-synchronized DS-CT was performed in 332 patients, whereas 290 patients underwent DS-CT without ECG synchronization.

RESULTS

In all patients without suspected TF on DS-CT (n = 552; 88.7%), no thrombus was found on TEE. A TF was suspected on DS-CT in 70 patients, of whom only three patients showed TF on TEE. No TF was detected in the other 67 patients (Fig. 1). Overall, sensitivity for TF detection in DS-CT was 100% and specificity was 89.2% (positive predictive value 4.3%, negative predictive value 100%). The CT protocol (ECG-synchronized versus non-ECG-synchronized) had no significant influence on diagnostic accuracy. Mean dose length product during DS CT was 282 ± 287 mGy cm (synchronized) versus 136 ± 55 mGy cm (non-synchronized) with p < 0.0001.

CONCLUSIONS

DS-CT is a highly sensitive method for LA thrombus detection in patients undergoing AF ablation. It delivers additional anatomic details of pulmonary veins and LA anatomy with an acceptable radiation exposure. Non-ECG-synchronized DS-CT showed a significantly lower radiation exposure, whereas diagnostic accuracy was comparable. Therefore, DS-CT might serve as primary method to exclude LA TF in patients undergoing AF ablation.