1
|
von Ahlen C, Geissler A, Vogel J. Comparison of the effectiveness of open, laparoscopic, and robotic-assisted radical prostatectomies based on complication rates: a retrospective observational study with administrative data from Switzerland. BMC Urol 2024; 24:215. [PMID: 39375695 PMCID: PMC11457412 DOI: 10.1186/s12894-024-01597-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2024] [Accepted: 09/19/2024] [Indexed: 10/09/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radical prostatectomies can be performed using open retropubic, laparoscopic, or robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery. The literature shows that short-term outcomes (in particular, inpatient complications) differ depending on the type of procedure. To date, these differences have only been examined and confirmed in isolated cases based on national routine data. METHODS The data was based on the Swiss Medical Statistics from 2016 to 2018 from a national survey of administrative data from all Swiss hospitals. Cases with the coded main diseases neoplasm of the prostate (ICD C61) and the main treatments of laparoscopic (CHOP 60.5X.20) or retropubic (CHOP 60.5X.30) radical prostatectomies were included, resulting in a total sample size of 8,593 cases. RESULTS A procedure-related complication occurred in 998 cases (11.6%). By surgical procedure, complication rates were 10.1% for robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy 9.0% for conventional laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and 17.1% for open retropubic radical prostatectomy (p < 0.001). Conventional and robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomies had a significantly lower risk of complications than retropubic procedures. Moreover, the risk of a procedure-related complication was almost twice as high in cases operated on retropubically; however, no significant difference was found between conventional and robotic-assisted laparoscopic cases. DISCUSSION The use of a surgical robot showed no advantages in radical prostatectomies regarding procedure-related during the hospital stay. However, both conventional and robotic-assisted laparoscopically operated radical prostatectomies show better results than open retropubic procedures. Further studies on the long-term course of patients based on claims data are needed to confirm the inherent benefits of surgical robots in tandem with them being increasingly employed in hospitals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine von Ahlen
- Technische Universität Berlin (WHO Collaborating Centre for Health Systems Research and Management), Berlin, Germany.
- Spital Männedorf AG/Zürich, Männedorf, Switzerland.
| | - Alexander Geissler
- Chair of Health Economics, Policy and Management, School of Medicine, University of St.Gallen, St. Jakob-Strasse 21, St. Gallen, 9000, Switzerland
| | - Justus Vogel
- Chair of Health Economics, Policy and Management, School of Medicine, University of St.Gallen, St. Jakob-Strasse 21, St. Gallen, 9000, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hong CC, Seow D, Koh JH, Rammelt S, Pearce CJ. Paratenon preserving repair of the midsubstance acute Achilles tendon rupture: a systematic review and meta-analysis with best- and worst-case analyses for rerupture rates. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2024; 144:3379-3391. [PMID: 39153101 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-024-05486-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2024] [Accepted: 06/12/2024] [Indexed: 08/19/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Paratenon preserving techniques to facilitate acute Achilles tendon rupture repair (AATR) functions by maintaining vascularity and biology for optimal healing response. Therefore, the purpose is to evaluate the outcomes following paratenon preserving repair of the midsubstance AATR. The hypothesis was that paratenon-preserving techniques demonstrate high return to play rates and low complication rates for the repair of the midsubstance AATR. MATERIALS AND METHODS A systematic review of the PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases was performed by two authors using specific search terms and eligibility criteria. The assessment of the evidence was two-fold: level and quality of evidence. A meta-analysis of proportions for the various complication rates was performed using the restricted maximum likelihood method following the Freeman-Tukey double-arcsine transformation. Fixed effects models were employed if I2 < 25% (low heterogeneity), and random effects models were employed if I2 ≥ 25% (moderate to high heterogeneity). RESULTS The pooled return to play rate was 90.3%. The pooled rerupture rate as reported was 0.9% (best-case scenario 0.8% and worst-case scenario 6.8%). No meaningful subgroup analysis for rerupture rates could be performed based on the meta-regression. The pooled complication rate other than reruptures was 4.8%. The pooled infection rates were 0.3%, DVT rates were 1.6%, and sural nerve injury rates were 0.3%. CONCLUSIONS Paratenon preserving techniques that are minimally invasive in nature demonstrated safe and favorable outcomes with high return to play rates and low complication rates for the repair of the midsubstance AATR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Choon Chiet Hong
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National University Hospital, National University Health System, 1E Kent Ridge Road, 119228, Singapore, Singapore.
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
| | - Dexter Seow
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National University Hospital, National University Health System, 1E Kent Ridge Road, 119228, Singapore, Singapore
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Jin Hean Koh
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Stefan Rammelt
- University Center for Orthopaedics & Traumatology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | - Christopher J Pearce
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National University Hospital, National University Health System, 1E Kent Ridge Road, 119228, Singapore, Singapore
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ramadanov N, Voss M, Jóźwiak K, Prill R, Hakam HT, Salzmann M, Dimitrov D, Becker R. Indirect comparison in network meta-analysis between SuperPATH, direct anterior and conventional approach hemiarthroplasty in patients with femoral neck fracture. Medicine (Baltimore) 2024; 103:e39068. [PMID: 39058802 PMCID: PMC11272366 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000039068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2023] [Accepted: 07/03/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of the study was to compare the short-term outcome of SuperPATH, direct anterior (DAA) and conventional approach (CA) hemiarthroplasty (HA) in patients with femoral neck fractures using a network meta-analysis. METHODS PubMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Epistemonikos, and Embase were searched until May 31, 2024. In a network meta-analysis, mean differences with 95% confidence intervals were calculated using the Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method and a fixed/random effects model for continuous outcomes, and odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated using the Mantel-Haenszel method and a fixed/random effects model for dichotomous outcomes. RESULTS The literature search identified a total of 9 randomized controlled trials on SuperPATH with 762 patients and 8 randomized controlled trials on DAA with 641 patients. In the overall ranking, SuperPATH was placed first, DAA second and CA third. SuperPATH HA was best in 7, second best in 2 and third best in 1 of the 10 outcome parameters. DAA HA was best in 2 and second best in 8 of the 10 outcome parameters. CA HA was best in 1 and third best in 9 of the 10 outcome parameters. In the indirect comparison between SuperPATH HA and DAA HA, SuperPATH HA had a 1.36 point lower visual analog scale at 2 to 7 days postoperatively and a 0.17 lower overall complication rate compared to DAA. CONCLUSION For the treatment of patients with femoral neck fractures, SuperPATH HA ranked first, DAA HA ranked second and CA HA ranked third. Based on the results, we recommend that trauma surgeons increase their use of minimally invasive hip HA techniques. It should be noted that SuperPATH HA had a significantly lower overall complication rate compared to DAA HA when the minimally invasive technique was chosen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikolai Ramadanov
- Center of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Hospital Brandenburg/Havel, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Brandenburg/Havel, Germany
- Faculty of Health Science Brandenburg, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Brandenburg/Havel, Germany
| | - Maximilian Voss
- Center of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Hospital Brandenburg/Havel, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Brandenburg/Havel, Germany
| | - Katarzyna Jóźwiak
- Institute of Biostatistics and Registry Research, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Neuruppin, Germany
| | - Robert Prill
- Center of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Hospital Brandenburg/Havel, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Brandenburg/Havel, Germany
- Faculty of Health Science Brandenburg, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Brandenburg/Havel, Germany
| | - Hassan Tarek Hakam
- Center of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Hospital Brandenburg/Havel, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Brandenburg/Havel, Germany
- Faculty of Health Science Brandenburg, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Brandenburg/Havel, Germany
| | - Mikhail Salzmann
- Center of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Hospital Brandenburg/Havel, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Brandenburg/Havel, Germany
| | - Dobromir Dimitrov
- Department of Surgical Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Pleven, Pleven, Bulgaria
| | - Roland Becker
- Center of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Hospital Brandenburg/Havel, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Brandenburg/Havel, Germany
- Faculty of Health Science Brandenburg, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Brandenburg/Havel, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ramadanov N, Voss M, Hable R, Prill R, Hakam HT, Salzmann M, Dimitrov D, Becker R. Patient-related Predictors for the Functional Outcome of SuperPATH Hemiarthroplasty versus Conventional Approach Hemiarthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-regression Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Orthop Surg 2024; 16:791-801. [PMID: 38298174 PMCID: PMC10984811 DOI: 10.1111/os.14006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2023] [Revised: 01/09/2024] [Accepted: 01/09/2024] [Indexed: 02/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Specialist literature lacks evidence that explores associations between patient characteristics and the beneficial treatment effect of SuperPATH hemiarthroplasty (HA) compared with conventional approach (CA) HA. To investigate and identify patient-related predictors of the effect size of the short-term functional outcome of SuperPATH HA and CA HA by performing a systematic review and meta-regression analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). A systematic search of literature was performed in PubMed, CNKI, CENTRAL of The Cochrane Library, Clinical trials, and Google Scholar until August 25, 2023. For the continuous outcome parameter Harris hip score (HHS) ≤1 week and 3 months postoperatively, mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. A meta-regression analysis was based on random-effects meta-analysis using the Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method for continuous covariates. A total of five RCTs with 404 patients were found. The following predictors of HHS ≤1 week postoperatively were identified: patient age (predictor estimate = 1.29; p < 0.01), patient age groups (predictor estimate = 14.07; p < 0.01), time to mobilization (predictor estimate = 5.51; p < 0.01). The following predictors of HHS 3 months postoperatively were identified: incision length (predictor estimate = -2.12; p < 0.01); intraoperative blood loss (predictor estimate = 0.02; p < 0.01). Patient age, time to mobilization, incision length, and intraoperative blood loss were identified as predictors of the effect size of early postoperative functional outcome as measured by HHS. Elderly patients, particularly those over 70 years of age, appear to benefit from SuperPATH HA. Based on these findings, and taking into account our limitations, we recommend that the use of minimally invasive SuperPATH HA in elderly patients should be more widely considered and not limited to elective THA patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikolai Ramadanov
- Center of Orthopedics and TraumatologyUniversity Hospital Brandenburg an der Havel, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor FontaneBrandenburg an der HavelGermany
- Faculty of Health Science BrandenburgBrandenburg Medical School Theodor FontaneBrandenburg an der HavelGermany
| | - Maximilian Voss
- Center of Orthopedics and TraumatologyUniversity Hospital Brandenburg an der Havel, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor FontaneBrandenburg an der HavelGermany
| | - Robert Hable
- Faculty of Applied Computer ScienceDeggendorf Institute of TechnologyDeggendorfGermany
| | - Robert Prill
- Center of Orthopedics and TraumatologyUniversity Hospital Brandenburg an der Havel, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor FontaneBrandenburg an der HavelGermany
- Faculty of Health Science BrandenburgBrandenburg Medical School Theodor FontaneBrandenburg an der HavelGermany
| | - Hassan Tarek Hakam
- Center of Orthopedics and TraumatologyUniversity Hospital Brandenburg an der Havel, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor FontaneBrandenburg an der HavelGermany
- Faculty of Health Science BrandenburgBrandenburg Medical School Theodor FontaneBrandenburg an der HavelGermany
| | - Mikhail Salzmann
- Center of Orthopedics and TraumatologyUniversity Hospital Brandenburg an der Havel, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor FontaneBrandenburg an der HavelGermany
- Faculty of Health Science BrandenburgBrandenburg Medical School Theodor FontaneBrandenburg an der HavelGermany
| | - Dobromir Dimitrov
- Department of Surgical Propedeutics, Faculty of MedicineMedical University of PlevenPlevenBulgaria
| | - Roland Becker
- Center of Orthopedics and TraumatologyUniversity Hospital Brandenburg an der Havel, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor FontaneBrandenburg an der HavelGermany
- Faculty of Health Science BrandenburgBrandenburg Medical School Theodor FontaneBrandenburg an der HavelGermany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Xu TQ, Higgins RM. The Minimally Invasive Inguinal Hernia: Current Trends and Considerations. Surg Clin North Am 2023; 103:875-887. [PMID: 37709393 DOI: 10.1016/j.suc.2023.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/16/2023]
Abstract
Inguinal hernias are one of the most common surgical pathologies faced by the general surgeon in modern medicine. The cumulative incidence of an inguinal hernia is around 25% in men and 3% in women. The majority of inguinal hernias can be repaired minimally invasively, utilizing either robotic or laparoscopic approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Q Xu
- Division of Minimally Invasive and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Road, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA
| | - Rana M Higgins
- Division of Minimally Invasive and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Road, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Davey MG, Ryan ÉJ, Donlon NE, Ryan OK, Al Azzawi M, Boland MR, Kerin MJ, Lowery AJ. Comparing surgical outcomes of approaches to adrenalectomy - a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2023; 408:180. [PMID: 37145303 PMCID: PMC10163131 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-023-02911-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2022] [Accepted: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND No randomised clinical trials (RCTs) have simultaneously compared the safety of open (OA), transperitoneal laparoscopic (TLA), posterior retroperitoneal (PRA), and robotic adrenalectomy (RA) for resecting adrenal tumours. AIM To evaluate outcomes for OA, TLA, PRA, and RA from RCTs. METHODS A NMA was performed according to PRISMA-NMA guidelines. Analysis was performed using R packages and Shiny. RESULTS Eight RCTs with 488 patients were included (mean age: 48.9 years). Overall, 44.5% of patients underwent TLA (217/488), 37.3% underwent PRA (182/488), 16.4% underwent RA (80/488), and just 1.8% patients underwent OA (9/488). The mean tumour size was 35 mm in largest diameter with mean sizes of 44.3 mm for RA, 40.9 mm for OA, 35.5 mm for TLA, and 34.4 mm for PRA (P < 0.001). TLA had the lowest blood loss (mean: 50.6 ml), complication rates (12.4%, 14/113), and conversion to open rates (1.3%, 2/157), while PRA had the shortest intra-operative duration (mean: 94 min), length of hospital stay (mean: 3.7 days), lowest visual analogue scale pain scores post-operatively (mean: 3.7), and was most cost-effective (mean: 1728 euros per case). At NMA, there was a significant increase in blood loss for OA (mean difference (MD): 117.00 ml (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.41-230.00)) with similar blood loss observed for PRA (MD: - 10.50 (95% CI: - 83.40-65.90)) compared to TLA. CONCLUSION LTA and PRA are important contemporary options in achieving favourable outcomes following adrenalectomy. The next generation of RCTs may be more insightful for comparison surgical outcomes following RA, as this approach is likely to play a future role in minimally invasive adrenalectomy. PROSPERO REGISTRATION CRD42022301005.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew G Davey
- Discipline of Surgery, The Lambe Institute for Translational Research, National University of Ireland, Galway, Galway, H91YR71, Ireland.
- Department of Surgery, Galway University Hospitals, Galway, H91YR71, Republic of Ireland.
| | - Éanna J Ryan
- Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, 123 St. Stephens Green, Dublin 2, D02YN77, Ireland
| | - Noel E Donlon
- Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, 123 St. Stephens Green, Dublin 2, D02YN77, Ireland
| | - Odhrán K Ryan
- Surgical Professorial Unit, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin 4, D04 T6F4, Ireland
| | - Mohammed Al Azzawi
- Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, 123 St. Stephens Green, Dublin 2, D02YN77, Ireland
| | - Michael R Boland
- Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, 123 St. Stephens Green, Dublin 2, D02YN77, Ireland
| | - Michael J Kerin
- Discipline of Surgery, The Lambe Institute for Translational Research, National University of Ireland, Galway, Galway, H91YR71, Ireland
| | - Aoife J Lowery
- Discipline of Surgery, The Lambe Institute for Translational Research, National University of Ireland, Galway, Galway, H91YR71, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Mothes AR, Kather A, Cepraga I, Esber A, Kwetkat A, Runnebaum IB. Robotic-assisted Gynecological Surgery in Older Patients - a Comparative Cohort Study of Perioperative Outcomes. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2023; 83:437-445. [PMID: 37153652 PMCID: PMC10155232 DOI: 10.1055/a-1902-4577] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2022] [Accepted: 11/28/2022] [Indexed: 05/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Study design Because of current demographic developments, a hypothesis was proposed whereby older female patients aged > 65 years can be safely operated using minimally invasive, robotic-assisted surgery, despite having more preoperative comorbidities. A comparative cohort study was designed to compare the age group ≥ 65 years (older age group, OAG) with the age group < 65 years (younger age group, YAG) after robotic-assisted gynecological surgery (RAS) in two German centers. Patients and methods Consecutive RAS procedures performed between 2016 and 2021 at the Women's University Hospital of Jena and the Robotic Center Eisenach to treat benign or oncological indications were included in the study. The age groups were compared according to their preoperative comorbidities (ASA, Charlson comorbidity index [CCI], cumulative illness rating scale - geriatric version [CIRS-G]) and perioperative parameters such as Clavien-Dindo (CD) classification of surgical complications. Analysis was performed using Welch's t -test, chi 2 test, and Fisher's exact test. Results A total of 242 datasets were identified, of which 63 (73 ± 5 years) were OAG and 179 were YAG (48 ± 10 years). Patient characteristics and the percentage of benign or oncological indications did not differ between the two age groups. Comorbidity scores and the percentage of obese patients were higher in the OAG group: CCI (2.7 ± 2.0 vs. 1.5 ± 1.3; p < 0.001), CIRS-G (9.7 ± 3.9 vs. 5.4 ± 2.9; p < 0.001), ASA class II/III (91.8% vs. 74.1%; p = 0.004), obesity (54.1% vs. 38.2%; p = 0.030). There was no difference between age groups, even grouped for benign or oncological indications, with regard to perioperative parameters such as duration of surgery (p = 0.088; p = 0.368), length of hospital stay (p = 0.786; p = 0.814), decrease in Hb levels (p = 0.811; p = 0.058), conversion rate (p = 1.000; p = 1.000) and CD complications (p = 0.433; p = 0.745). Conclusion Although preoperative comorbidity was higher in the group of older female patients, no differences were found between age groups with regard to perioperative outcomes following robotic-assisted gynecological surgery. Patient age is not a contraindication for robotic gynecological surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anke R. Mothes
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Robotisches Zentrum, St. Georg Klinikum Eisenach, Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus des Universitätsklinikums Jena, Eisenach, Germany
| | - Angela Kather
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Frauenheilkunde und Fortpflanzungsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Irina Cepraga
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Robotisches Zentrum, St. Georg Klinikum Eisenach, Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus des Universitätsklinikums Jena, Eisenach, Germany
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Frauenheilkunde und Fortpflanzungsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Anke Esber
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Robotisches Zentrum, St. Georg Klinikum Eisenach, Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus des Universitätsklinikums Jena, Eisenach, Germany
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Frauenheilkunde und Fortpflanzungsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Anja Kwetkat
- Klinik für Geriatrie und Palliativmedizin, Klinikum Osnabrück GmbH, Osnabrück, Germany
| | - Ingo B. Runnebaum
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Frauenheilkunde und Fortpflanzungsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Germany
- Correspondence Prof. Dr. Ingo B. Runnebaum, MBA Klinik und Poliklinik für Frauenheilkunde und Fortpflanzungsmedizin,
Universitätsklinikum JenaAm Klinikum 107747
JenaGermany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Mattingly AS, Chen MM, Divi V, Holsinger FC, Saraswathula A. Minimally Invasive Surgery in the United States, 2022: Understanding Its Value Using New Datasets. J Surg Res 2023; 281:33-36. [PMID: 36115146 PMCID: PMC9691544 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2022] [Revised: 06/09/2022] [Accepted: 08/17/2022] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION While minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has transformed the treatment landscape of surgical care, its utilization is not well understood. The newly released Nationwide Ambulatory Surgery Sample allows for more accurate estimates of MIS volume in the United States-in combination with inpatient datasets. MATERIALS AND METHODS Multiple nationwide databases from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) were used: the Nationwide Ambulatory Surgery Sample and National Inpatient Sample. The volume of MIS and robotic procedures were calculated from 2016 to 2018. An online query system, HCUPNet, was queried for inpatient stays from 1993 to 2014. RESULTS In 2017, 9.8 million inpatient major operating room procedures were analyzed, of which 11.1% were MIS and 2.5% were robotic-assisted, compared with 9.6 million inpatient operating room procedures (11.2% MIS and 2.9% robotic-assisted) in 2018. There were 10.6, 10.6, and 10.7 million ambulatory procedures in 2016, 2017, and 2018, respectively. Ambulatory MIS procedures showed an increasing trend across years, representing 16.9%, 17.4%, and 18%, respectively. HCUPNet data revealed an increase in inpatient MIS cases from 529,811 (8.9%) in 1993 to 1,443,446 (20.7%) in 2014. CONCLUSIONS This study is the first to estimate national MIS volume across specialties in both inpatient and ambulatory hospital settings. We found a trend toward a higher proportion of MIS and robotic cases from 1997 to 2018. These data may help contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of MIS value within surgery and highlight limitations of current databases, especially when categorizing robotic cases on a national scale.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aviva S Mattingly
- Division of Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Michelle M Chen
- Department of Otolaryngology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Vasu Divi
- Division of Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - F Christopher Holsinger
- Division of Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
| | - Anirudh Saraswathula
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Gil LA, Asti L, Apfeld JC, Sebastião YV, Deans KJ, Minneci PC. Perioperative outcomes in minimally-invasive versus open surgery in infants undergoing repair of congenital anomalies. J Pediatr Surg 2022; 57:755-762. [PMID: 35985848 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2022.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2021] [Revised: 07/22/2022] [Accepted: 08/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study compared perioperative outcomes among infants undergoing repair of congenital anomalies using minimally invasive (MIS) versus open surgical approaches. METHODS The ACS NSQIP Pediatric (2013-2018) was queried for patients undergoing repair of any of the following 9 congenital anomalies: congenital lung lesion (LL), mediastinal mass (MM), congenital malrotation (CM), anorectal malformation (ARM), Hirschsprung disease (HD), congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH), tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF), hepatobiliary anomalies (HB), and intestinal atresia (IA). Inverse probability of treatment weights (IPTW) derived from propensity scores were utilized to estimate risk-adjusted association between surgical approach and 30-day outcomes. RESULTS 12,871 patients undergoing congenital anomaly repair were included (10,343 open; 2528 MIS). After IPTW, MIS was associated with longer operative time (difference; 95% CI) (16 min; 9-23) and anesthesia time (13 min; 6-21), but less postoperative ventilation days (-1.0 days; -1.4- -0.6) and shorter postoperative length of stay (-1.4 days; -2.4- -0.3). MIS repairs had decreased risk of any surgical complication (risk difference: -6.6%; -9.2- -4.0), including hematologic complications (-7.3%; -8.9- -5.8). There was no significant difference in risk of complication when hematologic complications were excluded (RD -2.3% [-4.7%, 0.1%]). There were no significant differences in the risk of unplanned reoperation (0.4%; -1.5-2.2) or unplanned readmission (0.2%; -1.2-1.5). CONCLUSIONS MIS repair of congenital anomalies is associated with improved perioperative outcomes when compared to open. Additional studies are needed to compare long-term functional and disease-specific outcomes. MINI-ABSTRACT In this propensity-weighted multi-institutional analysis of nine congenital anomalies, minimally invasive surgical repair was associated with improved 30-day outcomes when compared to open surgical repair. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsay A Gil
- Center for Surgical Outcomes Research, Abigail Wexner Research Institute and Department of Surgery, Nationwide Children's Hospital, 700 Children's Dr., Columbus, OH 43205, USA; Center for Child Health Equity and Outcomes Research, Abigail Wexner Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, 700 Children's Dr., Columbus, OH 43205, USA
| | - Lindsey Asti
- Center for Surgical Outcomes Research, Abigail Wexner Research Institute and Department of Surgery, Nationwide Children's Hospital, 700 Children's Dr., Columbus, OH 43205, USA; Center for Child Health Equity and Outcomes Research, Abigail Wexner Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, 700 Children's Dr., Columbus, OH 43205, USA
| | - Jordan C Apfeld
- Center for Surgical Outcomes Research, Abigail Wexner Research Institute and Department of Surgery, Nationwide Children's Hospital, 700 Children's Dr., Columbus, OH 43205, USA; Center for Child Health Equity and Outcomes Research, Abigail Wexner Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, 700 Children's Dr., Columbus, OH 43205, USA
| | - Yuri V Sebastião
- Center for Surgical Outcomes Research, Abigail Wexner Research Institute and Department of Surgery, Nationwide Children's Hospital, 700 Children's Dr., Columbus, OH 43205, USA; Center for Child Health Equity and Outcomes Research, Abigail Wexner Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, 700 Children's Dr., Columbus, OH 43205, USA; Division of Global Women's Health, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27514, USA
| | - Katherine J Deans
- Center for Surgical Outcomes Research, Abigail Wexner Research Institute and Department of Surgery, Nationwide Children's Hospital, 700 Children's Dr., Columbus, OH 43205, USA; Center for Child Health Equity and Outcomes Research, Abigail Wexner Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, 700 Children's Dr., Columbus, OH 43205, USA
| | - Peter C Minneci
- Center for Surgical Outcomes Research, Abigail Wexner Research Institute and Department of Surgery, Nationwide Children's Hospital, 700 Children's Dr., Columbus, OH 43205, USA; Center for Child Health Equity and Outcomes Research, Abigail Wexner Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, 700 Children's Dr., Columbus, OH 43205, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Stereotactic radiosurgery with or without surgical resection for pituitary adenoma: Insights from the National Cancer Database. INTERDISCIPLINARY NEUROSURGERY 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.inat.2022.101653] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
|
11
|
Minimally invasive versus open duodenal switch: a nationwide retrospective analysis. Surg Endosc 2022; 36:7000-7007. [DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09020-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2021] [Accepted: 01/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
12
|
Jiang W, Lokuhetty N, Mohan HM, Larach JT, Waters P, Heriot AG, Warrier SK. How to do a robotic lateral pelvic side wall dissection for rectal cancer. ANZ J Surg 2022; 92:540-542. [PMID: 35029304 DOI: 10.1111/ans.17465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2021] [Accepted: 12/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Our article describes the anatomy, technical steps, common pitfalls, and our recommendations for performing a successful robotic lateral pelvic side wall dissection for rectal cancer. This is supplemented with videos and an image to clearly demonstrate our technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William Jiang
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Naradha Lokuhetty
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of General Surgery, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Helen M Mohan
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - José Tomás Larach
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Digestive Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Peadar Waters
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Alexander G Heriot
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Gastrointestinal Institute, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Satish K Warrier
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of General Surgery, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Gastrointestinal Institute, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Surgery, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Rai ZL, Feakins R, Pallett LJ, Manas D, Davidson BR. Irreversible Electroporation (IRE) in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Review of Current Clinical Outcomes, Mechanism of Action and Opportunities for Synergistic Therapy. J Clin Med 2021; 10:1609. [PMID: 33920118 PMCID: PMC8068938 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10081609] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2021] [Revised: 04/04/2021] [Accepted: 04/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) accounts for 30% of patients with pancreatic cancer. Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is a novel cancer treatment that may improve survival and quality of life in LAPC. This narrative review will provide a perspective on the clinical experience of pancreas IRE therapy, explore the evidence for the mode of action, assess treatment complications, and propose strategies for augmenting IRE response. A systematic search was performed using PubMed regarding the clinical use and safety profile of IRE on pancreatic cancer, post-IRE sequential histological changes, associated immune response, and synergistic therapies. Animal data demonstrate that IRE induces both apoptosis and necrosis followed by fibrosis. Major complications may result from IRE; procedure related mortality is up to 2%, with an average morbidity as high as 36%. Nevertheless, prospective and retrospective studies suggest that IRE treatment may increase median overall survival of LAPC to as much as 30 months and provide preliminary data justifying the well-designed trials currently underway, comparing IRE to the standard of care treatment. The mechanism of action of IRE remains unknown, and there is a lack of data on treatment variables and efficiency in humans. There is emerging data suggesting that IRE can be augmented with synergistic therapies such as immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zainab L. Rai
- Centre of Surgical Innovation, Organ Regeneration and Transplantation, University College London (UCL), London NW3 2QG, UK;
- Wellcome/EPSRC Center for Interventional and Surgical Sciences (WEISS), London W1W 7TY, UK
- Royal Free NHS Foundation Trust, London NW3 2QG, UK;
| | - Roger Feakins
- Royal Free NHS Foundation Trust, London NW3 2QG, UK;
| | - Laura J. Pallett
- Division of Infection and Immunity, Institute of Immunity and Transplantation, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK;
| | - Derek Manas
- Newcastle Upon Tyne NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle-Upon-Tyne NE7 7DN, UK;
| | - Brian R. Davidson
- Centre of Surgical Innovation, Organ Regeneration and Transplantation, University College London (UCL), London NW3 2QG, UK;
- Royal Free NHS Foundation Trust, London NW3 2QG, UK;
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Aly S, de Geus SWL, Carter CO, Hess DT, Tseng JF, Pernar LIM. Laparoscopic versus open ventral hernia repair in the elderly: a propensity score-matched analysis. Hernia 2020; 25:673-677. [PMID: 32495047 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-020-02243-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2020] [Accepted: 05/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ventral hernia repair is common in the expanding aging population, but remains challenging due to their frequent comorbidities. The purpose of this study is to compare the surgical outcomes of open vs. laparoscopic ventral hernia repair in elderly patients. METHODS Patients ≥ 65 years of age that underwent elective open or laparoscopic ventral hernia repair were identified from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (NSQIP) database. To reduce potential selection bias, propensity scores were created for the likelihood of undergoing laparoscopic surgery based on patients' demographics and comorbidities. Patients were matched based on the logit of the propensity scores. Thirty-day surgical outcomes were compared after matching using Chi-square test for categorical variables and the Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test for continuous variables. RESULTS 35,079 (71.1%) and 14,270 (28.9%) patients underwent open and laparoscopic ventral hernia repairs, respectively. Laparoscopic surgery was associated with a lower overall morbidity (5.9% vs. 9.1%; p < 0.001) compared to open repair. The incidence of surgical site infections (1.1% vs. 3.5%; p < 0.001), post-operative infections (2.7% vs. 3.6%; p < 0.001), and reoperation (1.7% vs. 2.1%; p = 0.009) were all lower after laparoscopic repair. All other major surgical outcomes were either better with laparoscopy or comparable between both treatment groups except for operative time. CONCLUSION Although open surgery remains the most prevalent in the elderly population, the results of this study suggest that laparoscopic surgery is safe and associated with a lower risk of overall morbidity, surgical site infections, and reoperation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Aly
- Department of Surgery, One Boston Medical Center Drive, Boston University School of Medicine, Collamore 501, Boston, MA, 02118, USA
| | - S W L de Geus
- Department of Surgery, One Boston Medical Center Drive, Boston University School of Medicine, Collamore 501, Boston, MA, 02118, USA
| | - C O Carter
- Department of Surgery, One Boston Medical Center Drive, Boston University School of Medicine, Collamore 501, Boston, MA, 02118, USA
| | - D T Hess
- Department of Surgery, One Boston Medical Center Drive, Boston University School of Medicine, Collamore 501, Boston, MA, 02118, USA
| | - J F Tseng
- Department of Surgery, One Boston Medical Center Drive, Boston University School of Medicine, Collamore 501, Boston, MA, 02118, USA
| | - L I M Pernar
- Department of Surgery, One Boston Medical Center Drive, Boston University School of Medicine, Collamore 501, Boston, MA, 02118, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Yuce TK, Ellis RJ, Chung J, Merkow RP, Yang AD, Soper NJ, Tanner EJ, Schaeffer EM, Bilimoria KY, Auffenberg GB. Association between surgical approach and survival following resection of abdominopelvic malignancies. J Surg Oncol 2020; 121:620-629. [PMID: 31970787 DOI: 10.1002/jso.25841] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2019] [Accepted: 01/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Recent studies demonstrating decreased survival following minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for cervical cancer have generated concern regarding oncologic efficacy of MIS. Our objective was to evaluate the association between surgical approach and 5-year survival following resection of abdominopelvic malignancies. METHODS Patients with stage I or II adenocarcinoma of the prostate, colon, rectum, and stage IA2 or IB1 cervical cancer from 2010-2015 were identified from the National Cancer Data Base. The association between surgical approach and 5-year survival was assessed using propensity-score-matched cohorts. Distributions were compared using logistic regression. Hazard ratio for death was estimated using Cox proportional-hazard models. RESULTS The rate of deaths at 5 years was 3.4% following radical prostatectomy, 22.9% following colectomy, 18.6% following proctectomy, and 6.8% following radical hysterectomy. Open surgery was associated with worse survival following radical prostatectomy (HR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.05-1.33; P = .005), colectomy (HR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.39-1.51; P < .001), and proctectomy (HR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.10-1.50; P = .002); however, open surgery was associated with improved survival following radical hysterectomy (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.44-0.82; P = .003). CONCLUSIONS These results suggest that MIS is an acceptable approach in selected patients with prostate, colon, and rectal cancers, while concerns regarding MIS resection of cervical cancer appear warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tarik K Yuce
- Department of Surgery, Surgical Outcomes and Quality Improvement Center (SOQIC), Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.,Northwestern Institute for Comparative Effectiveness Research in Oncology (NICER-Onc), Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Ryan J Ellis
- Department of Surgery, Surgical Outcomes and Quality Improvement Center (SOQIC), Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.,Northwestern Institute for Comparative Effectiveness Research in Oncology (NICER-Onc), Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Jeanette Chung
- Department of Surgery, Surgical Outcomes and Quality Improvement Center (SOQIC), Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.,Northwestern Institute for Comparative Effectiveness Research in Oncology (NICER-Onc), Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Ryan P Merkow
- Department of Surgery, Surgical Outcomes and Quality Improvement Center (SOQIC), Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.,Northwestern Institute for Comparative Effectiveness Research in Oncology (NICER-Onc), Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Anthony D Yang
- Department of Surgery, Surgical Outcomes and Quality Improvement Center (SOQIC), Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.,Northwestern Institute for Comparative Effectiveness Research in Oncology (NICER-Onc), Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Nathaniel J Soper
- Northwestern Institute for Comparative Effectiveness Research in Oncology (NICER-Onc), Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Edward J Tanner
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Edward M Schaeffer
- Department of Urology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Karl Y Bilimoria
- Department of Surgery, Surgical Outcomes and Quality Improvement Center (SOQIC), Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.,Northwestern Institute for Comparative Effectiveness Research in Oncology (NICER-Onc), Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Gregory B Auffenberg
- Department of Surgery, Surgical Outcomes and Quality Improvement Center (SOQIC), Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.,Department of Urology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Sahara K, Paredes AZ, Tsilimigras DI, Hyer JM, Merath K, Wu L, Mehta R, Beal EW, White S, Endo I, Pawlik TM. Impact of Liver Cirrhosis on Perioperative Outcomes Among Elderly Patients Undergoing Hepatectomy: the Effect of Minimally Invasive Surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 2019; 23:2346-2353. [PMID: 30719676 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-019-04117-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2018] [Accepted: 01/09/2019] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The impact of cirrhosis on perioperative outcomes for elderly patients undergoing hepatectomy remains not well defined. We sought to determine the influence of underlying cirrhosis and minimally invasive surgery (MIS) on postoperative outcomes among elderly patients who underwent a hepatectomy. METHODS Patients who underwent hepatectomy between 2013 and 2015 were identified using the Center for Medicare Services (CMS) 100% Limited Data Set (LDS) Standard Analytic Files (SAFs). Short-term outcomes after hepatectomy, stratified by the presence of cirrhosis and MIS, were examined. RESULTS Among 7452 patients who underwent a hepatectomy, a minority had cirrhosis (n = 481, 6.5%) whereas the vast majority did not (n = 6971, 93.5%). Overall, median patient age was 72 years (IQR 68-76) and preoperative Charlson comorbidity score was 6 (IQR 2-8). Patients with cirrhosis were more likely to be younger (median age 71 [67-76] vs 72 [IQR 68-76] years), male (64.4% vs 50%), African American (8.1% vs 6.4%) and have a malignant diagnosis (87.1% vs 78.7%) compared to non-cirrhotic patients (all p < 0.001). There was no difference among patients with and without cirrhosis regarding type of hepatectomy or surgical approach (open vs MIS) (both p > 0.05). Patients with versus without cirrhosis had similar complication rates (24.1% vs 22.3%, p = 0.36), as well as 30-day (6.2% vs 5%, p = 0.25) and 90-day (10.4% vs 8.5%, p = 0.15) mortality. MIS reduced the length-of-stay in non-cirrhotic patients (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.62-0.99, p < 0.05), yet was not associated with morbidity or mortality (both p > 0.05). CONCLUSION The presence of cirrhosis did not generally impact outcomes in elderly patients undergoing hepatectomy for benign and malignant diseases. MIS hepatectomy in the elderly Medicare beneficiary population reduced LOS among patients without cirrhosis, yet was not associated with differences in morbidity or mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kota Sahara
- Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA.,Gastroenterological Surgery Division, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Anghela Z Paredes
- Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Diamantis I Tsilimigras
- Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - J Madison Hyer
- Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Katiuscha Merath
- Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Lu Wu
- Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Rittal Mehta
- Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Eliza W Beal
- Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Susan White
- Division of Health Information Management and Systems, The Ohio State Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Itaru Endo
- Gastroenterological Surgery Division, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Timothy M Pawlik
- Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA. .,Department of Surgery, The Urban Meyer III and Shelley Meyer Chair for Cancer Research, The Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center, 395 W. 12th Ave., Suite 670, Columbus, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Manabe H, Tezuka F, Yamashita K, Sugiura K, Ishihama Y, Takata Y, Sakai T, Maeda T, Sairyo K. Operating Costs of Full-endoscopic Lumbar Spine Surgery in Japan. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2019; 60:26-29. [PMID: 31619601 PMCID: PMC6970067 DOI: 10.2176/nmc.oa.2019-0139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
For full-endoscopic lumbar discectomy, operating costs are also important because expensive equipment are necessary. We surveyed the operating costs of surgical equipment necessary for full-endoscopic surgery together with surgical procedure reimbursement fees. A total of 295 cases of full-endoscopic surgery via a transforaminal approach were retrospectively analyzed. We calculated the frequency of damage and the unit purchase price of devices such as endoscopes, and surgical instruments such as grasping forceps for nucleotomy, high-speed drill bar, and bipolar forceps, and examined the operating costs in Japanese yen against the procedure fee per case. Endoscope breakage occurred seven times, and a payment of ¥760,000 was necessary for trade-in and purchase of a new endoscope. The total breakage number of grasping forceps was 58, and the purchase price per unit was ¥116,000. Therefore, a total of ¥12,020,000 was required for the 295 cases, and the calculated operating cost that accompanies equipment breakage was ¥40,000 per case. In addition, about ¥118,000 was required for disposable bipolar forceps and high-speed drill bar to be used intraoperatively for each case. Thus, for one case it is calculated that total ¥158,000 is utilized for equipment from the surgical reimbursement fee per case specified by the Japanese Ministry of Health being ¥303,900. Minimally invasive procedures provide great benefit to patients; however, the eventual contribution to hospital profits is small and may not be sufficient. To resolve this issue, the cost of surgical equipment should be lowered and/or the surgical reimbursement fee of the full-endoscopic surgery should be raised.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroaki Manabe
- Department of Orthopedics, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University Graduate School
| | - Fumitake Tezuka
- Department of Orthopedics, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University Graduate School
| | - Kazuta Yamashita
- Department of Orthopedics, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University Graduate School
| | - Kosuke Sugiura
- Department of Orthopedics, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University Graduate School
| | - Yoshihiro Ishihama
- Department of Orthopedics, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University Graduate School
| | - Yoichiro Takata
- Department of Orthopedics, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University Graduate School
| | - Toshinori Sakai
- Department of Orthopedics, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University Graduate School
| | - Toru Maeda
- Department of Orthopedics, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University Graduate School
| | - Koichi Sairyo
- Department of Orthopedics, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University Graduate School
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Richmond BK, Totten C, Roth JS, Tsai J, Madabhushi V. Current strategies for the management of inguinal hernia: What are the available approaches and the key considerations? Curr Probl Surg 2019; 56:100645. [PMID: 31581983 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpsurg.2019.100645] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Bryan K Richmond
- Division of General Surgery, West Virginia University - Charleston Division, Charleston, WV.
| | - Crystal Totten
- Division of Gastrointestinal and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY
| | - John Scott Roth
- Division of Gastrointestinal and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Center for Advanced Training and Simulation, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY
| | - Jonathon Tsai
- Charleston Area Medical Center, West Virginia University - Charleston Division, Charleston, WV
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Hughes BD, Hancock KJ, Shan Y, Thakker RA, Maharsi S, Tyler DS, Mehta HB, Senagore AJ. Cost of benign versus oncologic colon resection among fee-for-service Medicare enrollees. J Surg Oncol 2019; 120:280-286. [PMID: 31134661 DOI: 10.1002/jso.25511] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2019] [Accepted: 05/04/2019] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Reimbursement for colonic pathology by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) are grouped in the Medicare Severity-Diagnosis Related Groups (MS-DRG). With limited available data, we sought to compare the relative impact of malignant vs benign colonic pathology on reimbursement under the MS-DRG system. METHODS We used 5% national Medicare data from 2011 to 2014. Patients were classified as having benign disease or malignancy. Descriptive statistics and multivariate regression analysis were used to evaluate the surgical approach and health resource utilization. RESULTS Of 10 928 patients, most were Non-Hispanic White women. The majority underwent open colectomy in both cohorts (P < .001). Colectomy for benign disease was associated with higher total charges (P < .001) and a longer length of stay (P = .0002). Despite higher charges, payments were not significantly different between the cohorts (P = .434). Both inpatient mortality and discharge to a rehab facility were higher in the oncologic group (P < .001). CONCLUSION Payment methodology for colectomy under the CMS MS-DRG system does not appear to accurately reflect the episode cost of care. The data suggest that inpatient costs are not fully compensated. A transition to value-based payments with expanded episode duration will require a better understanding of unique costs before adoption.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Byron D Hughes
- Department of Surgery, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas
| | - Kevin J Hancock
- Department of Surgery, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas
| | - Yong Shan
- Department of Surgery, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas
| | - Ravi A Thakker
- School of Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas
| | - Safa Maharsi
- School of Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas
| | - Douglas S Tyler
- Department of Surgery, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas
| | - Hemalkumar B Mehta
- Department of Surgery, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas
| | - Anthony J Senagore
- Department of Surgery, Western Michigan University Homer Stryker MD School of Medicine Kalamazoo, Michigan
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Chen Q, Merath K, Bagante F, Akgul O, Dillhoff M, Cloyd J, Pawlik TM. A Comparison of Open and Minimally Invasive Surgery for Hepatic and Pancreatic Resections Among the Medicare Population. J Gastrointest Surg 2018; 22:2088-2096. [PMID: 30039449 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-018-3883-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2018] [Accepted: 07/10/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has become standard of care for many gastrointestinal surgical procedures. Despite possible clinical benefits, MIS may be underutilized in some populations. The aim of this study was to access the utilization of MIS among Medicare patients undergoing hepatopancreatic procedures and define clinical outcomes, as well as costs, of minimally invasive techniques compared with the conventional open approach. METHODS The Medicare Provider Analysis and Review (MEDPAR) Inpatient Files were reviewed to identify Medicare patients who underwent pancreatic and liver procedures between 2013 and 2015. Primary outcomes of the analysis included perioperative clinical outcomes such as rates of complications, index hospitalization length-of-stay (LOS), failure-to-rescue, rates, and causes of 90-day readmission, as well as 90-day mortality. Secondary outcomes were Medicare payments for index hospitalization and readmission. Multivariable logistic regression was used to investigate the impact of MIS on clinical outcomes and health expenditures. RESULTS A total of 13,716 (90.6%) patients underwent open resection, while MIS was performed in 1424 (9.4%) patients. LOS was shorter among patients undergoing MIS (mean 7.3 ± SD 7.3) versus open (mean 9.3 ± SD 9.1) surgery (p < 0.001). The incidence of perioperative complications was lower following MIS (open 25.5%, n = 3492 vs. MIS 17.2%, n = 245) (p < 0.001). Rates of failure-to-rescue were similar among patients undergoing an open versus MIS pancreatic procedure (open 19.4%, n = 271 vs. MIS 13.4%, n = 17) (p = 0.09). In contrast, 90-day readmission (open 31.1%, n = 1630 vs. MIS 24.1%, n = 201, p < 0.001), as well as 90-day mortality (open 7.7%, n = 404 vs. MIS 4.2%, n = 35, p < 0.001) were lower among patients undergoing pancreatic resections via an MIS approach. In contrast, failure-to-rescue and readmission, as well as mortality, were all comparable among patients undergoing a liver resection, regardless as to whether the operation was performed open or via an MIS approach (all p > 0.05). Mean total payments for open pancreatic surgery were on average $1421 higher in the open versus MIS pancreatic group (p = 0.01); in contrast, there was no difference in the overall payment for hepatic resection (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION The MIS approach was underutilized among patients undergoing liver and pancreatic procedures. MIS was associated with lower complication and readmission and shorter LOS, as well as comparable/slightly lower Medicare payments, compared with the open approach. The MIS approach should strongly be considered among older patients undergoing liver and pancreatic procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qinyu Chen
- Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Katiuscha Merath
- Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Fabio Bagante
- Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA.,Department of Surgery, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Ozgur Akgul
- Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Mary Dillhoff
- Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Jordan Cloyd
- Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Timothy M Pawlik
- Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA. .,Department of Surgery, The Urban Meyer III and Shelley Meyer Chair for Cancer Research, Department of Oncology, Health Services Management and Policy, The Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center, 395 W. 12th Ave., Suite 670, Columbus, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Aloisi A, Tseng JH, Sandadi S, Callery R, Feinberg J, Kuhn T, Gardner GJ, Sonoda Y, Brown CL, Jewell EL, Barakat RR, Leitao MM. Is Robotic-Assisted Surgery Safe in the Elderly Population? An Analysis of Gynecologic Procedures in Patients ≥ 65 Years Old. Ann Surg Oncol 2018; 26:244-251. [PMID: 30421046 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-018-6997-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The elderly population is expanding worldwide but is underrepresented in clinical trials. We sought to assess the safety of robotic gynecologic surgery in an elderly cohort and to identify factors associated with unfavorable outcomes. METHODS All patients ≥ 65 years who underwent a robotically assisted procedure at a single institution between May 2007 to December 2016 were divided into three age groups: 65-74 (Group 1); 75-84 (Group 2); ≥ 85 (Group 3). Perioperative outcomes were recorded in patients who did not require conversion to laparotomy. We compared clinical variables among groups and performed multivariate logistic regression to detect variables associated with major complications (≥ Grade 3) or 90-day mortality. RESULTS We retrospectively identified 982 cases: 685 in Group 1; 249 in Group 2; 48 in Group 3. Median age = 71 years. Median BMI = 28.9. Malignancy was documented in 72.8% of cases; the majority were endometrial cancer (61.8%). Thirty-four patients (3.5%) were readmitted within 30 days. Seventy-seven (7.8%) had a postoperative complication, and 23 (2.3%) had a major complication. Ninety-day mortality was 0.5%. There was significant difference between groups with respect to body mass index (P = 0.026), ECOG PS (P ≤ 0.001), > 5 comorbidities (P = 0.005), hospital stay (P < 0.001), major complications (P = 0.001), and 90-day mortality (P < 0.001). On multivariable logistic regression, age ≥ 85 years was associated with major complications. Body mass index, age ≥ 85 years, and major complications were significantly associated with 90-day mortality. CONCLUSIONS Robotic-assisted surgery appears to be safe in an elderly cohort. The incidence of overall and major complications is consistent with those reported in the literature. Patients ≥ 85 years old appear to be at higher risk of unfavorable outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessia Aloisi
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jill H Tseng
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Samith Sandadi
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ryan Callery
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Theresa Kuhn
- Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA
| | - Ginger J Gardner
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Yukio Sonoda
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Carol L Brown
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Elizabeth L Jewell
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Richard R Barakat
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,Northwell Health Cancer Institute, New Hyde Park, NY, USA.,Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra University, Hempstead, NY, USA
| | - Mario M Leitao
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. .,Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|