1
|
Presley CJ, Grogan M, Compston A, Hock K, Knauss B, Redder E, Arrato NA, Lo SB, Janse S, Benedict J, Hoyd R, Williams N, Hayes S, Wells-Di Gregorio S, Gill TM, Allore H, Focht B, Quist M, Carbone DP, Spakowicz D, Paskett ED, Andersen BL. Resiliency among older adults receiving lung cancer treatment (ROAR-LCT): A novel supportive care intervention for older adults with advanced lung cancer. J Geriatr Oncol 2024; 15:101844. [PMID: 39174449 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2024.101844] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2024] [Revised: 06/28/2024] [Accepted: 07/31/2024] [Indexed: 08/24/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Novel supportive care interventions designed for an aging population with lung cancer are urgently needed. We aimed to determine the feasibility of a novel supportive care physical therapy (PT) plus progressive muscle relaxation (PMR) intervention delivered to older adults with advanced lung cancer in the United States (US). MATERIALS AND METHODS This clinical trial, Resiliency Among Older Adults Receiving Lung Cancer Treatment (ROAR-LCT: NCT04229381), recruited adults aged ≥60 years with unresectable stage III/IV non-small cell (NSCLC) or small cell lung cancer (SCLC) receiving cancer treatment at The James Thoracic Oncology Center (planned enrollment, N = 20). There were no exclusion criteria pertaining to performance status, laboratory values, prior cancer diagnoses, comorbidities, or brain metastases. Participants were evaluated by PT and psychology and given an exercise pedaler, resistance bands, a relaxation voice recording, and instructions at study initiation. Participants were evaluated in-person by PTs and psychologists at the start and end of the 12-session intervention, with the intervening sessions conducted via virtual health. Participants completed self-reported measures of functional status, symptoms, and mood longitudinally with the following instruments: EQ-5D-5L, Patient Health Questionnaire-9, and General Anxiety Disorder-7. PT assessments included the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) and the two-minute walk test. Feasibility was defined as at least 60% of participants completing at least 70% of all intervention sessions. Optional gut microbiome samples and activity monitoring data (ActiGraph®) were also collected. RESULTS The ROAR-LCT study concluded after consenting 22 patients. Among the 22 consented, 18 (81.8%) started the intervention; 11 participants (61.1%) completed at least 70% of all study sessions. All participants with SCLC completed the intervention. Reasons for withdrawal included progression of disease or hospitalization. The majority (88.9%) of patients who started were able to complete at least one virtual health session. Participants' functional status, SPPB, depression, and anxiety scores were stable from pre- to post-intervention. Participants who withdrew had worse baseline scores across domains. Seven microbiome and six ActiGraph® samples were collected. DISCUSSION This is one of the first PT + PMR supportive care interventions using virtual health among older adults with advanced lung cancer to achieve feasibility in the US.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolyn J Presley
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States; The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, James Cancer Hospital, & Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Madison Grogan
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States; The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, James Cancer Hospital, & Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Amy Compston
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, James Cancer Hospital, & Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Karen Hock
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, James Cancer Hospital, & Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Brittany Knauss
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, James Cancer Hospital, & Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Elyse Redder
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, James Cancer Hospital, & Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Nicole A Arrato
- Department of Psychology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Stephen B Lo
- Department of Psychology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Sarah Janse
- Center for Biostatistics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Jason Benedict
- Center for Biostatistics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Rebecca Hoyd
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States; The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, James Cancer Hospital, & Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Nyelia Williams
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States; The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, James Cancer Hospital, & Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Scott Hayes
- Department of Psychology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Sharla Wells-Di Gregorio
- Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Thomas M Gill
- Section of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Heather Allore
- Section of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Brian Focht
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, James Cancer Hospital, & Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH, United States; Division of Kinesiology, Department of Human Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States
| | | | - David P Carbone
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States; The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, James Cancer Hospital, & Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH, United States; Pelotonia Institute for Immuno-Oncology, OSUCCC-James, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Daniel Spakowicz
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States; The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, James Cancer Hospital, & Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH, United States; Pelotonia Institute for Immuno-Oncology, OSUCCC-James, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Electra D Paskett
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, James Cancer Hospital, & Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH, United States; Division of Cancer Control and Prevention, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Barbara L Andersen
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, James Cancer Hospital, & Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH, United States; Department of Psychology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tesio V, Benfante A, Franco P, Romeo A, Arcadipane F, Carlo Iorio G, Bartoncini S, Castelli L. The time course of health-related Quality of Life in rectal cancer patients undergoing combined modality treatment. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2024; 48:100824. [PMID: 39161735 PMCID: PMC11332791 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100824] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2024] [Revised: 06/28/2024] [Accepted: 07/24/2024] [Indexed: 08/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose This exploratory prospective observational study investigated the changes in Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) in rectal cancer patients (RCPs), from diagnosis to one-year-post-surgery follow-up and explored the role of physical symptoms and psychological determinants on HRQoL at the different time points. Materials and methods We assessed HRQoL, psychological distress, coping, affectivity, alexithymia and social support in 43 RCPs treated with preoperative (chemo)radiation and surgery, at three different assessment time points: diagnosis (T0), one month after the end of preoperative treatment (T1), one month after resection surgery (T2), and at follow-up (T3). Results The data showed that HRQoL decreased during active treatments, especially between T1 and T2 (p = 0.005), before increasing again at follow-up (p = 0.002).Baseline intestinal symptoms (p < 0.001) and negative affectivity trait (p = 0.03) significantly predicted HRQoL at T0. Baseline pain (p < 0.001), intestinal (p = 0.003) and urinary (p = 0.009) symptoms at T1 significantly predicted HRQoL at T1. A fatalistic coping style at T1 (p = 0.013), psychological distress (p = 0.003), mouth symptoms (p = 0.001) at T2 significantly predicted HRQoL at T2. Similarly, a fatalistic coping style at T1 (p = 0.006), psychological distress (p = 0.004), mouth (p = 0.002) and pain symptoms (p = 0.002) at T3 significantly predicted HRQoL at T3. Conclusion Several physical and psychological factors are involved in the changes occurring after diagnosis in RCPs' HRQoL. While cancer-related symptoms and treatment-related physical side effects are the main predictors of HRQoL at diagnosis and during active treatments, early psychological reactions have a higher predictive weight in post-treatment HRQoL.These data emphasise the importance of active screening, early diagnosis, and preventive psychological interventions immediately after diagnosis to improve HRQoL and psychological health outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valentina Tesio
- Department of Psychology, University of Turin, Via Verdi 10, 10124, Turin, Italy
| | - Agata Benfante
- Department of Psychology, University of Turin, Via Verdi 10, 10124, Turin, Italy
| | - Pierfrancesco Franco
- Department of Translational Medicine (DIMET), University of Eastern Piedmont, Via Solaroli 17, 28100, Novara, Italy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, "Maggiore della Carità" University Hospital, Corso Mazzini 18, 28100 Novara, Italy
| | - Annunziata Romeo
- Department of Psychology, University of Turin, Via Verdi 10, 10124, Turin, Italy
| | | | - Giuseppe Carlo Iorio
- Department of Oncology - Radiation Oncology, University of Turin, Via Genova 3, 10126 Turin, Italy
| | - Sara Bartoncini
- Department of Oncology - Radiation Oncology, University of Turin, Via Genova 3, 10126 Turin, Italy
| | - Lorys Castelli
- Department of Psychology, University of Turin, Via Verdi 10, 10124, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yuan P, Wang D, Xie D. Anxiety and Depression after Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Short- and Long-Term Outcomes. ALPHA PSYCHIATRY 2024; 25:429-439. [PMID: 39360300 PMCID: PMC11443286 DOI: 10.5152/alphapsychiatry.2024.231359] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2023] [Accepted: 04/16/2024] [Indexed: 10/04/2024]
Abstract
Objective Anxiety and depression commonly afflict colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery patients, but their impact on survival remains uncertain. Methods We systematically reviewed three databases for relevant articles. Data included study and patient characteristics, cancer type, anxiety/depression measures, timing, and prevalence. Meta-analyses, using common- or random-effects models, assessed associations. Subgroup analyses based on follow-up duration and publication bias assessment were performed. Results We analyzed seven cohort studies, examining anxiety and depression's impact on mortality in colorectal cancer patients. Samples ranged from 215 to 567 for anxiety and 215 to 46 710 for depression. Using common- or random-effects models based on heterogeneity, anxiety and depression showed increased mortality risk. Pooled odds ratio (OR) for anxiety was 1.07 (95% CI [confidence interval] 1.05-1.10), depression's OR was 2.76 (95% CI 1.25-6.11; random-effects). Pooled hazard ratio (HR) for anxiety was 1.33 (95% CI 1.28-1.37; common-effects) and 1.30 (95% CI 1.19-1.43; random-effects). HRs for depression were 1.45 (95% CI 1.30-1.61; random-effects) and 1.28 (95% CI 1.25-1.32; common-effects). Subgroup analyses revealed stronger effects on mortality in a shorter follow-up (0-5 years) compared to a longer follow-up (5-28 years). Conclusion This meta-analysis shows that anxiety and depression are linked to increased mortality in patients with CRC. The findings suggested that screening and treating mental distress improve survival and quality of life in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peiwen Yuan
- Department of Hemodialysis Room, Zhejiang Hospital, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Dong Wang
- Department of General Surgery, Zhejiang Hospital, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Dafei Xie
- Department of General Surgery, Zhejiang Hospital, Zhejiang Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zhao JY, Presley C, Madariaga ML, Ferguson M, Merritt RE, Kneuertz PJ. Prehabilitation for Older Adults Undergoing Lung Cancer Surgery: A Literature Review and Needs Assessment. Clin Lung Cancer 2024:S1525-7304(24)00142-6. [PMID: 39122607 DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2024.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2023] [Revised: 04/14/2024] [Accepted: 07/07/2024] [Indexed: 08/12/2024]
Abstract
Early-stage lung cancer patients are increasingly considered for preoperative systemic therapy. Older adults in particular are among the most vulnerable patients, with little known on how preoperative therapies affect the risk-benefit of surgery. We sought to summarize the current literature and elucidate existing evidence gaps on the effects of prehabilitation interventions relative to age-related functional impairments and the unique needs of older patients undergoing lung cancer surgery. A literature review was performed using PubMed and Google Scholar databases, of all scientific articles published through April 2022 which report on the effects of prehabilitation on patients undergoing lung cancer surgery. We extracted current prehabilitation protocols and their impact on physical functioning, resilience, and patient-reported outcomes of older patients. Emerging evidence suggests that prehabilitation may enhance functional capacity and minimize the untoward effects of surgery for patients following lung resection similar to, or potentially even better than, traditional postoperative rehabilitation. The impact of preoperative interventions on surgical risk due to frailty remains ill-defined. Most studies evaluating prehabilitation include older patients, but few studies report on activities of daily living, self-care, mobility activities, and psychological resilience in older individuals. Preliminary data suggest the feasibility of physical therapy and resilience interventions in older individuals concurrent with systemic therapy. Future research is needed to determine best prehabilitation strategies for older lung cancer patients aimed to optimize age-related impairments and minimize surgical risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jane Y Zhao
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN.
| | - Carolyn Presley
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH
| | - M Lucia Madariaga
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Mark Ferguson
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Robert E Merritt
- Thoracic Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH
| | - Peter J Kneuertz
- Thoracic Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Yan K, Lengacher CA, Dandamrongrak C, Wang HL, Hanson A, Beckie T. The Effect of Self-efficacy-Enhancing Interventions on Quality of Life of Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review. Cancer Nurs 2024:00002820-990000000-00264. [PMID: 38899949 DOI: 10.1097/ncc.0000000000001372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/21/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The influence of self-efficacy-enhancing interventions on quality of life (QOL) is not clear with recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) because current reviews only evaluated self-efficacy as an outcome. OBJECTIVES We conducted a systematic review to examine the effect of self-efficacy-enhancing interventions on QOL among patients with cancer and to summarize the effective determinants for designing self-efficacy-enhancing interventions. METHODS A systematic search was performed on studies published from January 2003 to May 2023 using PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Web of Science. Included studies were RCTs, adults diagnosed with cancer, interventions with explicit self-efficacy components, and QOL as the outcome. RESULTS Nineteen RCTs were included. Risk-of-bias assessment revealed 12 studies with some concerns and 7 with high risk of bias. The mean intervention adherence rate was 88.2%; the most frequently listed reason for dropout was medical conditions and mortality. Self-efficacy interventions were shown to significantly improve at least 1 subscale of QOL in 9 of 19 studies, of which 7 studies used Bandura's 4 sources of self-efficacy. The interventions with between-session intervals shorter than 2 weeks, of 12-week duration, and with an in-person delivery approach were the most effective. CONCLUSIONS Self-efficacy-enhancing interventions show potential beneficial effects on QOL among cancer survivors. Interventions that use Bandura's 4 sources of self-efficacy strategies and have between-session intervals shorter than 2 weeks, an in-person approach, and 12-week intervention duration are recommended. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Properly designed self-efficacy-enhancing interventions can facilitate behavioral change and improve QOL in cancer survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kailei Yan
- Author Affiliations: College of Nursing (Drs Beckie, Lengacher, and Yan and Ms Dandamrongrak) and Shimberg Health Sciences Library (Dr Hanson), University of South Florida, Tampa; and School of Nursing, The University of Alabama at Birmingham (Dr Wang)
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Liang Y, Zhang X, Li S, Wang Z. Comparison of psychological interventions for anxiety, depression, fatigue and quality of life in colorectal cancer survivors: A systematic review and network meta-analysis protocol. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0298589. [PMID: 38557643 PMCID: PMC10984524 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298589] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2023] [Accepted: 01/28/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous studies have found that psychological interventions have a positive effect on improving physical and psychological problems in colorectal cancer survivors. However, there is still a lack of high-quality evidence reviews that summarize and compare the impact of different psychological interventions. The aim of this study was to synthesize existing psychological interventions and use network meta-analysis to explore whether psychological interventions improve anxiety, depression, fatigue and quality of life in colorectal cancer (CRC) survivors. METHODS We will extract relevant randomized controlled trials of psychological interventions for CRC survivors from eight electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CINAHL, PsycInFO, CNKI, and Wanfang database. Two reviewers will independently screen the literature and extract data. The risk of bias of the included studies will be assessed using the RoB2: Revised Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. We will then conduct paired meta-analyses and network meta-analyses of the extracted data, using a frequency-based framework and random effects models. DISCUSSION To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first proposed qualitative and quantitative integration of existing evidence using systematic evaluation and network meta-analysis. This study will inform health policy makers, healthcare providers' clinical intervention choices and guideline revisions, and will help to reduce depression and anxiety in CRC survivors, reduce fatigue, improve quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yujie Liang
- School of Nursing, Jilin Medical University, Jilin, China
| | - Xu Zhang
- School of Nursing, Peking University, Haidian District, Beijing, China
| | - Shan Li
- Xinjiang Second Medical College, Karamay, China
| | - Zhiwen Wang
- School of Nursing, Peking University, Haidian District, Beijing, China
- Peking University Health Science Centre for Evidence Based Nursing a Joanna Briggs Institute Affiliated Group, Haidian District, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zhang X, Liu H, Lin L, Xiao H. Effects of Psycho-education Interventions on Colorectal Cancer Patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER EDUCATION 2023; 38:1413-1419. [PMID: 37620689 DOI: 10.1007/s13187-023-02349-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/26/2023] [Indexed: 08/26/2023]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) patients not only undergo physical symptoms but also psychological suffering. Psycho-education interventions have been implemented widely to improve their psychological well-being. However, the effectiveness of psycho-education is unclear. Therefore, this research evaluates the effectiveness of psycho-education interventions on CRC patient outcomes and identifies effective intervention characteristics. The researchers searched the following databases: PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane, Medline, Web of Science, CINAHL, ProQuest, Wan Fang Data, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese Biomedicine Database, and China Academic Journals Full-Text Database. Additionally, gray literature and bibliographies of the included studies were also searched. Finally, this review included 11 randomized controlled trials and one controlled clinical trial. The results showed that psycho-education interventions exerted positive impacts on relieving anxiety and depression, improving self-efficacy and quality of life for CRC patients either immediately, post-intervention, or at least 2 months after intervention. Despite the variety of psycho-education interventions, health education, stress management, coping skills training, and social support are also essential components. Future research should include multi-center studies with sufficient sample sizes and rigorous designs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- XiaoYing Zhang
- School of Nursing, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - HuangQin Liu
- School of Nursing, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - LiYing Lin
- School of Nursing, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Huimin Xiao
- School of Nursing, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
- Research Center for Nursing Humanity, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Parmet T, Yusufov M, Braun IM, Pirl WF, Matlock DD, Sannes TS. Willingness toward psychosocial support during cancer treatment: a critical yet challenging construct in psychosocial care. Transl Behav Med 2023; 13:511-517. [PMID: 36940406 PMCID: PMC10465092 DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibac121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Psychosocial distress screening, mandated by the American College Surgeons' Commission on Cancer, continues to be implemented across cancer centers nationwide. Although measuring distress is critical to identifying patients who may benefit from additional support, several studies suggest that distress screening may not actually increase patients' utilization of psychosocial services. While various investigators have identified barriers that may impede effective implementation of distress screening, we posit that patients' intrinsic motivation, which we term patients' willingness, may be the biggest predictor for whether cancer patients choose to engage with psychosocial services. In this commentary, we define patient willingness towards psychosocial services as a novel construct, distinct from the intention toward a certain behavior described across pre-existing models of health behavior change. Further, we offer a critical perspective of models of intervention design that focus on acceptability and feasibility as preliminary outcomes thought to encompass the willingness construct described herein. Finally, we summarize several health service models that successfully integrate psychosocial services alongside routine oncology care. Overall, we present an innovative model that acknowledges barriers and facilitators and underscores the critical role of willingness in health behavior change. Consideration of patients' willingness toward psychosocial care will move the field of psychosocial oncology forward in clinical practice, policy initiatives, and study design.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamar Parmet
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
- Division of Adult Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
- Adult and Child Consortium for Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Miryam Yusufov
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
- Division of Adult Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Ilana M Braun
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
- Division of Adult Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - William F Pirl
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
- Division of Adult Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Daniel D Matlock
- Adult and Child Consortium for Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, Aurora, CO, USA
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
- Veteran Affairs (VA) Eastern Colorado Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Timothy S Sannes
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
- Division of Adult Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
- University of Massachusetts Medical School/UMass Memorial Hospital, Worcester, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Waddell O, Mclauchlan J, McCombie A, Glyn T, Frizelle F. Quality of life in early-onset colorectal cancer patients: systematic review. BJS Open 2023; 7:7156601. [PMID: 37151082 PMCID: PMC10165061 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrad030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2022] [Revised: 02/14/2023] [Accepted: 02/20/2023] [Indexed: 05/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is an increasing incidence of early-onset colorectal cancer; however, the psychosocial impacts of this disease on younger adults have been seldom explored. METHODS A systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PubMed, and Scopus were searched, and papers were included if published in English within the last 10 years and if they reported results separately by age (including early-onset colorectal cancer, defined as colorectal cancer diagnosed before the age of 50 years). Critical appraisal of all studies was done using the Joanna Briggs Institute tools. The primary outcome of interest was the global quality of life in patients with early-onset colorectal cancer. Secondary outcomes included the effect on sexual function, body image, finances, career, emotional distress, and social and family functioning. RESULTS The search yielded 168 manuscripts and 15 papers were included in the review after screening. All studies were observational, and included a total of 18 146 patients, of which 5015 were patients with early-onset colorectal cancer. The studies included scored highly using Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools, indicating good quality and a low risk of bias, but data synthesis was not performed due to the wide range of scoring systems that were used across the studies. Six papers reported significant negative impacts on quality of life in patients with early-onset colorectal cancer. Three of the four studies that compared the quality of life in patients with early-onset colorectal cancer with older patients found that the younger group had worse mean quality-of-life scores (P ≤ 0.05). Secondary outcomes measured in five studies in relation to sexual dysfunction, body image, financial and career impacts, and social and family impacts and in eight studies in relation to emotional distress were found to be more severely impacted in those with early-onset colorectal cancer compared with those with late-onset colorectal cancer. CONCLUSION Whilst data are limited, the impact of colorectal cancer is different in patients with early-onset colorectal cancer compared with older patients in relation to several aspects of the quality of life. This is particularly prominent in areas of global quality of life, sexual functioning, family concerns, and financial impacts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver Waddell
- Department of Surgery, University of Otago Christchurch, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Jared Mclauchlan
- Department of Surgery, Te Whatu Ora Health New Zealand Waitaha Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Andrew McCombie
- Department of Surgery, University of Otago Christchurch, Christchurch, New Zealand
- Department of Surgery, Te Whatu Ora Health New Zealand Waitaha Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Tamara Glyn
- Department of Surgery, University of Otago Christchurch, Christchurch, New Zealand
- Department of Surgery, Te Whatu Ora Health New Zealand Waitaha Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Frank Frizelle
- Department of Surgery, University of Otago Christchurch, Christchurch, New Zealand
- Department of Surgery, Te Whatu Ora Health New Zealand Waitaha Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Rutherford C, Ju A, Kim B, Wiltink L, Acret L, White K. How consequences of colorectal cancer treatment are managed: a qualitative study of stakeholder experiences about supportive care and current practices. Support Care Cancer 2023; 31:255. [PMID: 37041401 PMCID: PMC10090022 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-023-07713-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2023] [Indexed: 04/13/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Colorectal cancer (CRC) survivors experience treatment-effects such as symptoms and functional impairments. There is limited evidence about how these are managed and what services or supports are available in the community. We aimed to identify current practice and available supports for managing consequences of treatment from clinician and CRC survivor perspectives. METHODS This qualitative study, informed by an interpretivist constructionist paradigm, included semi-structured interviews. Clinicians with experience of treating CRC patients and adult CRC survivors were recruited across Australia. Interviews explored experiences about problems experienced after CRC treatment and how these were managed. Data collection and analysis, using thematic analysis, was iterative whereby emergent themes during analysis were incorporated into subsequent interviews. RESULTS We interviewed 16 clinicians and 18 survivors. Survivors experienced a range of consequences of treatment amendable to support including allied health, information, and self-management. Barriers to support access included clinicians' worry about patient out-of-pocket expenses, long waitlists, lack of awareness about existing supports, and perception no therapeutic options were available. Healthcare professionals with expertise in CRC were often difficult to identify outside of cancer settings. Survivorship care could be improved with individualised timely information and identification of pathways to access healthcare providers with expertise in managing consequences of CRC treatment within primary care. CONCLUSIONS To improve CRC survivor lives posttreatment, routine assessment of consequences of treatment, individualised care planning involving relevant healthcare professionals, access to supportive care when needed, and improved information provision and engagement of a range of health professionals in follow-up care are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia Rutherford
- Cancer Care Research Unit (CCRU), Susan Wakil School of Nursing, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
- University of Sydney, Faculty Science, School of Psychology, Quality of Life Office, Sydney, Australia.
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Angela Ju
- University of Sydney, Faculty Science, School of Psychology, Quality of Life Office, Sydney, Australia
| | - Bora Kim
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, Australia
| | - Lisette Wiltink
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Louise Acret
- Cancer Care Research Unit (CCRU), Susan Wakil School of Nursing, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, Australia
| | - Kate White
- Cancer Care Research Unit (CCRU), Susan Wakil School of Nursing, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, Australia
- Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Effect of multidisciplinary collaborative empowerment education on psychological distress and quality of life in patients with colorectal cancer undergoing chemotherapy. Support Care Cancer 2023; 31:116. [PMID: 36645505 PMCID: PMC9841143 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-023-07573-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2022] [Accepted: 01/03/2023] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the effects of multidisciplinary collaborative empowerment education on psychological distress and quality of life (QoL) in patients with colorectal cancer undergoing chemotherapy. METHODS A quasi-experimental study was conducted using repeated measures at pre- and post-intervention in the fourth chemotherapy cycle. Sixty patients with colorectal cancer aged 36-84 years were allocated to the intervention and control groups. The intervention group received multidisciplinary empowerment education, while the control group received routine health education. Psychological distress involving depression and anxiety symptoms was assessed using The Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) and QoL was measured using The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTCQLQ-C30). Repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to examine intervention effects. Statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS software (version 26.0). RESULTS Psychological distress was considerably lower and QoL was considerably better in patients following multidisciplinary empowerment education in the intervention group than those in the control group. In addition, psychological distress significantly decreased and QoL improved in the intervention group compared to baseline. CONCLUSION Multidisciplinary collaborative empowerment education was effective in improving the psychological distress and QoL among patients with colorectal cancer undergoing chemotherapy. These findings suggest that the establishment of multidisciplinary collaborative empowerment education might be considered as an innovative means of clinical patient education during combination chemotherapy to improve health outcomes in patients with colorectal cancer. However, our results should be interpreted with caution because of the small sample size. Further validation in a larger sample or randomized controlled design is necessary in the future.
Collapse
|
12
|
Révész D, van Kuijk SMJ, Mols F, van Duijnhoven FJB, Winkels RM, Kant IJ, van den Brandt PA, Smits LJ, Breukink SO, Kampman E, Beijer S, Weijenberg MP, Bours MJL. External validation and updating of prediction models for estimating the 1-year risk of low health-related quality of life in colorectal cancer survivors. J Clin Epidemiol 2022; 152:127-139. [PMID: 36220623 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.09.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2022] [Revised: 08/30/2022] [Accepted: 09/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Timely identification of colorectal cancer (CRC) survivors at risk of experiencing low health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in the near future is important for enabling appropriately tailored preventive actions. We previously developed and internally validated risk prediction models to estimate the 1-year risk of low HRQoL in long-term CRC survivors. In this article, we aim to externally validate and update these models in a population of short-term CRC survivors. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING In a pooled cohort of 1,596 CRC survivors, seven HRQoL domains (global QoL, cognitive/emotional/physical/role/social functioning, and fatigue) were measured prospectively at approximately 5 months postdiagnosis (baseline for prediction) and approximately 1 year later by a validated patient-reported outcome measure (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of life Questionnaire-Core 30). For each HRQoL domain, 1-year scores were dichotomized into low vs. normal/high HRQoL. Performance of the previously developed multivariable logistic prediction models was evaluated (calibration and discrimination). Models were updated to create a more parsimonious predictor set for all HRQoL domains. RESULTS Updated models showed good calibration and discrimination (AUC ≥0.75), containing a single set of 15 predictors, including nonmodifiable (age, sex, education, time since diagnosis, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, stoma, and comorbidities) and modifiable predictors (body mass index, physical activity, smoking, anxiety/depression, and baseline fatigue and HRQoL domain scores). CONCLUSION Externally validated and updated prediction models performed well for estimating the 1-year risk of low HRQoL in CRC survivors within 6 months postdiagnosis. The impact of implementing the models in oncology practice to improve HRQoL outcomes in CRC survivors needs to be evaluated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dóra Révész
- Department of Epidemiology, GROW - School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, P. Debyeplein 1, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Sander M J van Kuijk
- Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, P. Debyelaan 25, PO Box 5800, Maastricht 6202 AZ, The Netherlands
| | - Floortje Mols
- CoRPS - Center of Research on Psychology in Somatic Diseases, Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, Warandelaan 2, 5037 AB Tilburg, The Netherlands; Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Godebaldkwartier 419, 3511 DT Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Fränzel J B van Duijnhoven
- Division of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University & Research, Stippeneng 4, 6708 WE Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Renate M Winkels
- Division of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University & Research, Stippeneng 4, 6708 WE Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - IJmert Kant
- Department of Epidemiology, CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, P. Debyeplein 1, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Piet A van den Brandt
- Department of Epidemiology, GROW - School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, P. Debyeplein 1, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands; Department of Epidemiology, CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, P. Debyeplein 1, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Luc J Smits
- Department of Epidemiology, CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, P. Debyeplein 1, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Stéphanie O Breukink
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Ellen Kampman
- Division of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University & Research, Stippeneng 4, 6708 WE Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Sandra Beijer
- Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Godebaldkwartier 419, 3511 DT Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Matty P Weijenberg
- Department of Epidemiology, GROW - School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, P. Debyeplein 1, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Martijn J L Bours
- Department of Epidemiology, GROW - School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, P. Debyeplein 1, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Amaro-Gahete FJ, Jurado J, Cisneros A, Corres P, Marmol-Perez A, Osuna-Prieto FJ, Fernández-Escabias M, Salcedo E, Hermán-Sánchez N, Gahete MD, Aparicio VA, González-Callejas C, Mirón Pozo B, R. Ruiz J, Nestares T, Carneiro-Barrera A. Multidisciplinary Prehabilitation and Postoperative Rehabilitation for Avoiding Complications in Patients Undergoing Resection of Colon Cancer: Rationale, Design, and Methodology of the ONCOFIT Study. Nutrients 2022; 14:4647. [PMID: 36364908 PMCID: PMC9656780 DOI: 10.3390/nu14214647] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2022] [Revised: 10/24/2022] [Accepted: 10/31/2022] [Indexed: 08/25/2023] Open
Abstract
ONCOFIT is a randomized clinical trial with a two-arm parallel design aimed at determining the influence of a multidisciplinary Prehabilitation and Postoperative Program (PPP) on post-surgery complications in patients undergoing resection of colon cancer. This intervention will include supervised physical exercise, dietary behavior change, and psychological support comparing its influence to the standard care. Primary and secondary endpoints will be assessed at baseline, at preoperative conditions, at the end of the PPP intervention (after 12 weeks) and 1-year post-surgery, and will include: post-surgery complications (primary endpoint); prolonged hospital length of stay; readmissions and emergency department call within 1-year after surgery; functional capacity; patient reported outcome measures targeted; anthropometry and body composition; clinical/tumor parameters; physical activity levels and sedentariness; dietary habits; other unhealthy habits; sleep quality; and fecal microbiota diversity and composition. Considering the feasibility of the present intervention in a real-life scenario, ONCOFIT will contribute to the standardization of a cost-effective strategy for preventing and improving health-related consequences in patients undergoing resection of colon cancer with an important clinical and economic impact, not only in the scientific community, but also in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francisco J. Amaro-Gahete
- PROFITH (PROmoting FITness and Health through Physical Activity) Research Group, Sport and Health University Research Institute (iMUDS), Department of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, 18007 Granada, Spain
- Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, EFFECTS-262 Research Group, University of Granada, 18016 Granada, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición (CIBERobn), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28029 Madrid, Spain
| | - Javier Jurado
- Service of Surgery, Hospital Universitario Clínico San Cecilio, 18016 Granada, Spain
| | - Andrea Cisneros
- Service of Surgery, Hospital Universitario Clínico San Cecilio, 18016 Granada, Spain
| | - Pablo Corres
- Department of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Education and Sport-Physical Activity and Sport Sciences Section, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), 01007 Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain
| | - Andres Marmol-Perez
- PROFITH (PROmoting FITness and Health through Physical Activity) Research Group, Sport and Health University Research Institute (iMUDS), Department of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, 18007 Granada, Spain
| | - Francisco J. Osuna-Prieto
- PROFITH (PROmoting FITness and Health through Physical Activity) Research Group, Sport and Health University Research Institute (iMUDS), Department of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, 18007 Granada, Spain
- Department of Analytical Chemistry, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain
| | - Manuel Fernández-Escabias
- PROFITH (PROmoting FITness and Health through Physical Activity) Research Group, Sport and Health University Research Institute (iMUDS), Department of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, 18007 Granada, Spain
| | - Estela Salcedo
- Service of Clinical Psychology, Hospital Universitario Clínico San Cecilio, 18016 Granada, Spain
| | - Natalia Hermán-Sánchez
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición (CIBERobn), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28029 Madrid, Spain
- Maimónides Biomedical Research Institute of Córdoba, 14004 Córdoba, Spain
- Department of Cell Biology, Physiology and Immunology, University of Córdoba, 14004 Córdoba, Spain
- Reina Sofía University Hospital, 14004 Córdoba, Spain
| | - Manuel D. Gahete
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición (CIBERobn), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28029 Madrid, Spain
- Maimónides Biomedical Research Institute of Córdoba, 14004 Córdoba, Spain
- Department of Cell Biology, Physiology and Immunology, University of Córdoba, 14004 Córdoba, Spain
- Reina Sofía University Hospital, 14004 Córdoba, Spain
| | - Virginia A. Aparicio
- Department of Physiology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Granada, 18016 Granada, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica (CIBM), Instituto de Nutrición y Tecnología de los Alimentos “José Mataix” (INYTA), Universidad de Granada, 18016 Granada, Spain
| | | | - Benito Mirón Pozo
- Service of Surgery, Hospital Universitario Clínico San Cecilio, 18016 Granada, Spain
| | - Jonatan R. Ruiz
- PROFITH (PROmoting FITness and Health through Physical Activity) Research Group, Sport and Health University Research Institute (iMUDS), Department of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, 18007 Granada, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición (CIBERobn), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28029 Madrid, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria, ibs.Granada, 18016 Granada, Spain
| | - Teresa Nestares
- Department of Physiology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Granada, 18016 Granada, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica (CIBM), Instituto de Nutrición y Tecnología de los Alimentos “José Mataix” (INYTA), Universidad de Granada, 18016 Granada, Spain
| | - Almudena Carneiro-Barrera
- PROFITH (PROmoting FITness and Health through Physical Activity) Research Group, Sport and Health University Research Institute (iMUDS), Department of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, 18007 Granada, Spain
- Department of Psychology, Universidad Loyola Andalucía, 41007 Seville, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Hernández-Marín J, Galindo-Vázquez O, Calderillo-Ruíz G, Montero-Pardo X, Costas-Muñiz R, Ortega-Andeane P. [Effect of psychological interventions on psychosocial variables in patients with colorectal cancer: a narrative review of the literature]. PSICOONCOLOGIA 2022; 19:299-318. [PMID: 38756183 PMCID: PMC11097673 DOI: 10.5209/psic.84042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective To describe the effects of psychological interventions on anxiety, depression, emotional distress and/or quality of life (QoL) of patients with colorectal cancer. Methods Narrative literature review in MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL and Cochrane Library, 2011-2021. Results A total of 553 articles were obtained, of which twelve were included. Most were brief, individual, face-to-face interventions. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy was the most reported intervention, showing positive effects on QoL, specifically in stoma patients; Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and solution-focused therapy also identified improvements in QoL. Reminiscence therapy and a self-efficacy intervention reported significant improvements in anxiety and depression. Relaxation and writing training were not proven effective; psychoeducation showed inconsistent effects. Conclusion There is a paucity of studies conducted during the last years, which do not evidence a consensus of the therapeutic model that produces consistent improvements in psychological well-being.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jazmín Hernández-Marín
- Jazmín Hernández-Marín. Facultad de Psicología. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Ciudad de México, México
| | - Oscar Galindo-Vázquez
- Oscar Galindo-Vázquez. Servicio de Psicooncología, Unidad para la Investigación y Desarrollo de la Psicooncología, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología. INCan. Ciudad de México
| | - Germán Calderillo-Ruíz
- Germán Calderillo-Ruíz. Subdirección de Medicina Interna, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología. INCan. Ciudad de México
| | | | - Rosario Costas-Muñiz
- Rosario Costas-Muñiz. Departamento de Psiquiatría y Ciencias del Comportamiento. Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. Cornell Medical College, Estados Unidos
| | - Patricia Ortega-Andeane
- Patricia Ortega-Andeane. Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Ciudad de México, México
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Michnevich T, Pan Y, Hendi A, Oechsle K, Stein A, Nestoriuc Y. Preventing adverse events of chemotherapy for gastrointestinal cancer by educating patients about the nocebo effect: a randomized-controlled trial. BMC Cancer 2022; 22:1008. [PMID: 36138381 PMCID: PMC9502603 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-10089-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2021] [Accepted: 09/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adverse events of chemotherapy may be caused by pharmacodynamics or psychological factors such as negative expectations, which constitute nocebo effects. In a randomized controlled trial, we examined whether educating patients about the nocebo effect is efficacious in reducing the intensity of self-reported adverse events. METHODS In this proof-of-concept study, N = 100 outpatients (mean age: 60.2 years, 65% male, 54% UICC tumour stage IV) starting first-line, de novo chemotherapy for gastrointestinal cancers were randomized 1:1 to a nocebo education (n = 49) or an attention control group (n = 51). Our primary outcome was patient-rated intensity of four chemotherapy-specific and three non-specific adverse events (rated on 11-point Likert scales) at 10-days and 12-weeks after the first course of chemotherapy. Secondary outcomes included perceived control of adverse events and tendency to misattribute symptoms. RESULTS General linear models indicated that intensity of adverse events differed at 12-weeks after the first course of chemotherapy (mean difference: 4.04, 95% CI [0.72, 7.36], p = .02, d = 0.48), with lower levels in the nocebo education group. This was attributable to less non-specific adverse events (mean difference: 0.39, 95% CI [0.04, 0.73], p = .03, d = 0.44) and a trend towards less specific adverse events in the nocebo education group (mean difference: 0.36, 95% CI [- 0.02, 0.74], p = .07, d = 0.37). We found no difference in adverse events at 10-days follow-up, perceived control of adverse events, or tendency to misattribute non-specific symptoms to the chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS This study provides first proof-of-concept evidence for the efficacy of a brief information session in preventing adverse events of chemotherapy. However, results regarding patient-reported outcomes cannot rule out response biases. Informing patients about the nocebo effect may be an innovative and clinically feasible intervention for reducing the burden of adverse events. TRIAL REGISTRATION Retrospectively registered on March 27, 2018 to the German Clinical Trial Register (ID: DRKS00009501).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Michnevich
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
- Present address: Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Y Pan
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - A Hendi
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- Department of Oncology, Asklepios Clinic Barmbek, Hamburg, Germany
| | - K Oechsle
- Center of Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - A Stein
- Center of Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Y Nestoriuc
- Department of Clinical Psychology, Helmut Schmidt University, University of the Federal Armed Forces Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
- Department of Systems Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Wan SW, Chng YJD, Lim SH, Chong CS, Pikkarainen M, He HG. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness of web-based psychosocial interventions among patients with colorectal cancer. J Adv Nurs 2022; 78:1883-1896. [PMID: 35441711 DOI: 10.1111/jan.15258] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2021] [Revised: 02/14/2022] [Accepted: 03/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
AIMS To synthesize the effectiveness of web-based psychosocial interventions on self-efficacy, anxiety, depression, quality of life (QoL), non-specific psychological and cancer-specific distress among patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). DESIGN A systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES Six databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL and CNKI) were searched from inception to December 2021. REVIEW METHODS Experimental/quasi-experimental studies involving patients with CRC for the improvement of aforementioned outcomes were included. Two reviewers screened and extracted the data, and assessed studies' methodological quality using risk of bias tools. Meta-analyses and narrative syntheses were performed. RESULTS Nineteen studies consisting of 1386 participants were identified. Cognitive-behavioural therapy delivered online was the most common trialled web-based psychosocial intervention. Meta-analyses revealed no positive effect for self-efficacy (standardized mean difference 0.93, 95% CI: 0.52 to 1.35, p < .01) and minimal benefit for QoL (mean difference [MD] 2.83, 95% CI: -0.31 to 5.98, p = .08) but significant positive effects for anxiety (MD -2.23, 95% CI: -3.31 to -1.14, p < .01) and depression (MD -2.84, 95% CI: -4.09 to -1.59, p < .01) among CRC survivors in the intervention group as compared with the control group. Narrative synthesis suggested possible benefits in reducing distress. CONCLUSION Web-based psychosocial interventions are promising alternatives to conventional delivery methods in reducing patients' anxiety, depression and distress. However, evidence on self-efficacy and QoL remains inconsistent. More adequately powered, well-designed trials with targeted and theory-based interventions are required to ascertain findings. IMPACT By highlighting the potential of web-based psychosocial interventions in reducing anxiety and depression among CRC survivors, this review has put forth beneficial information supporting the use and acceptance of web-based care delivery in light of COVID-19 restrictions and nationwide lockdowns. Meanwhile, the paucity of empirical support reflects the necessity of more extensive research to test and improve other health outcomes. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42021261396.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Su Wei Wan
- Alice Lee Centre for Nursing Studies, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- National University Health System, Singapore
| | | | - Siew Hoon Lim
- Nursing Division (Research), Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Choon Seng Chong
- National University Health System, Singapore
- Division of Colorectal Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, National University Cancer Institute, National University Hospital, Singapore
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Minna Pikkarainen
- Chalmers University of Technology, Goteborg, Sweden
- Oslomet, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
- University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| | - Hong-Gu He
- Alice Lee Centre for Nursing Studies, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- National University Health System, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Xie M, Huang X, Zhao S, Chen Y, Zeng X. Effect of Psychological Intervention on Pelvic Floor Function and Psychological Outcomes After Hysterectomy. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 9:878815. [PMID: 35547220 PMCID: PMC9081531 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.878815] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2022] [Accepted: 03/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundHysterectomy is one of the most frequently performed operations worldwide. However, postoperative complications and body image changes may induce psychological distress after hysterectomy. The study aimed to evaluate the effect of psychological intervention on pelvic floor function and psychological outcomes following hysterectomy among patients with benign indications.MethodsNinety-nine patients underwent hysterectomy were randomly divided into intervention group (n = 50) and control group (n = 49). Patients in the control group received routine postoperative nursing care, while extra psychological intervention was provided to patients in the intervention group, including psychological support, regular lectures and family support. After 6 months, patient's psychological statuses were assessed by Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7) and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). The pelvic floor function of patients was evaluated using Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7) and Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12). Furthermore, the incidence of postoperative complications, including uracratia, pelvic organ prolapses, sexual dysfunction and chronic pelvic pain, was evaluated.ResultsAfter 6-month intervention, the GAD-7 and PHQ-9 scores were significantly decreased in the intervention group (p < 0.001 and p = 0.018 respectively). Both scored were significantly lower than that in the control group (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001). Compared with control group, the incidence of uracratia, pelvic organ prolapse, sexual dysfunction and chronic pelvic pain for intervention group was significantly lower (p = 0.003, p = 0.027, p = 0.001, p = 0.002 respectively) and the pelvic floor muscle strength was significantly stronger (p = 0.001). Besides, the postoperative Urinary Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (UIQ-7), Pelvic Organ Prolapse Impact Questionnaire (POPIQ-7), and Colorectal-Anal Impact Questionnaire (CRAIQ-7) scores were significantly lower (p = 0.025, p = 0.04, p < 0.001) and PISQ-12 score was significantly higher in intervention group (p < 0.001).ConclusionPsychological intervention could effectively improve the psychological condition of patients with hysterectomy, which may facilitate patients' postoperative recovery in pelvic floor function. These findings emphasized the necessity of psychological intervention in routine postoperative nursing care.
Collapse
|
18
|
Dun L, Xian-Yi W, Si-Ting H. Effects of Cognitive Training and Social Support on Cancer-Related Fatigue and Quality of Life in Colorectal Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Integr Cancer Ther 2022; 21:15347354221081271. [PMID: 35225053 PMCID: PMC8891882 DOI: 10.1177/15347354221081271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Few studies have evaluated the effects of cognitive training and social support on cancer-related fatigue and quality of life. We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to examine the efficacy of cognitive training and social support in colorectal cancer patients and survivors. Methods: The PubMed, Ovid, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases were searched from database establishment until August 2021 to identify suitable studies according to relevant key words, taking cancer-related fatigue and quality of life as the outcomes. The Jadad scale was used to evaluate the methodological quality of the studies. Stata 15.1 software was used for statistical analyses, and sensitivity analyses were performed. Results: Eleven studies (6 published in English and 5 published in Chinese) involving 980 patients and survivors were included in the meta-analysis. All studies had Jadad scores ≥3. Statistically significant effects of cognitive training and social support were detected for cancer-related fatigue within 14 weeks (SMD = −1.13, P < .001) and after 14 weeks (SMD = −0.56, P < .001), overall quality of life within 14 weeks (SMD = 0.73, P < .001) and after 14 weeks (SMD = 0.54, P = .003). However, no statistically significant effects of the combination intervention were detected on long-term QOL (SMD = 0.50, P = .435). Conclusions: Distinct cognitive interventions and a combination of cognitive and social support interventions can help to alleviate long-term and short-term CRF and short-term QOL. Further studies are needed to examine the mechanisms of cognitive training and social support for cancer-related fatigue and overall quality of life in patients and survivors with colorectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liu Dun
- Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Wu Xian-Yi
- Fujian Medical University Affiliated College of oncology clinical medicine and Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Khoo AMG, Lau J, Loh XS, Ng CWT, Griva K, Tan KK. Understanding the psychosocial impact of colorectal cancer on young-onset patients: A scoping review. Cancer Med 2022; 11:1688-1700. [PMID: 35150052 PMCID: PMC8986148 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.4575] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2021] [Revised: 12/09/2021] [Accepted: 01/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective The incidence of young‐onset (<50 years) colorectal cancer (CRC) has been increasing internationally. The psychosocial experience of younger cancer patients is vastly different from older patients, especially in domains such as financial toxicity, body image, and sexual dysfunction. What is unknown is the cancer type‐specific experience. The aim of the current scoping review was to examine (1) the psychosocial factors and/or outcomes associated with young‐onset CRC and (2) other determinants that influences these outcomes. Methods A systematic search was conducted on four databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus and PsycINFO) from inception to December 2020 using key terms and combinations. Primary literature that examined the psychosocial (e.g., quality‐of‐life, emotional, social, sexual) impact of young‐onset CRC were included. Results A total of 1389 records were assessed by four reviewers, with a total of seven studies meeting inclusion criteria (n = 5 quantitative, n = 1 qualitative and n = 1 case series). All studies indicated there was significant psychosocial impact in younger CRC patients, including emotional impact, social impact, physical burden, sexual impact, work impact, unmet needs, financial impact and global quality of life. Three studies explored other determinants that influenced the psychosocial experience and found that socioeconomic background (e.g., being female, lower education), CRC treatment (e.g., chemotherapy) and health status were associated with worse psychosocial impact. Conclusions Young‐onset CRC patients face severe psychosocial impact unique to this age group, such as self‐image and sexual impact. Social support services and resources needs to be uniquely tailored. More empirical investigations are required to understand its long‐term impact and influence of other psychosocial domains. This scoping review of psychosocial impact in young‐onset colorectal cancer patients uncovered significant psychosocial impact which are in‐line with previous studies on young cancer (e.g., emotional impact, social impact, physical burden) as well as impact unique to colorectal cancer (e.g., self‐image, embarrassment with bowel movements and the impact of stoma). More empirical investigations are required to understand its long‐term impact and influence of other psychosocial domains.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Athena Ming-Gui Khoo
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Jerrald Lau
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.,Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Xin-Sheng Loh
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Celeste Wen-Ting Ng
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Konstadina Griva
- Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Ker-Kan Tan
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Wan SW, Chong CS, Toh EL, Lim SH, Loi CT, Lew YFH, Chua MCH, Jee XP, Liu G, Zhu L, Pikkarainen M, He HG. A Theory-Based, Multidisciplinary Approach to Cocreate a Patient-Centric Digital Solution to Enhance Perioperative Health Outcomes Among Colorectal Cancer Patients and Their Family Caregivers: Development and Evaluation Study. J Med Internet Res 2021; 23:e31917. [PMID: 34878991 PMCID: PMC8693179 DOI: 10.2196/31917] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2021] [Revised: 09/10/2021] [Accepted: 10/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Elective colorectal cancer (CRC) surgeries offer enhanced surgical outcomes but demand high self-efficacy in prehabilitation and competency in self-care and disease management postsurgery. Conventional strategies to meet perioperative needs have not been pragmatic, and there remains a pressing need for novel technologies that could improve health outcomes. Objective The aim of this paper was to describe the development of a smartphone-based interactive CRC self-management enhancement psychosocial program (iCanManage) in order to improve health outcomes among patients who undergo elective CRC surgeries and their family caregivers. Methods A multidisciplinary international team comprising physicians, specialist nurses, a psychologist, software engineers, academic researchers, cancer survivors, patient ambassadors, and ostomy care medical equipment suppliers was formed to facilitate the development of this patient-centric digital solution. The process occurred in several stages: (1) review of current practice through clinic visits and on-site observations; (2) review of literature and findings from preliminary studies; (3) content development grounded in an underpinning theory; (4) integration of support services; and (5) optimizing user experience through improving interface aesthetics and customization. In our study, 5 participants with CRC performed preliminary assessments on the quality of the developed solution using the 20-item user version of the Mobile App Rating Scale (uMARS), which had good psychometric properties. Results Based on the collected uMARS data, the smartphone app was rated highly for functionality, aesthetics, information quality, and perceived impact, and moderately for engagement and subjective quality. Several limiting factors such as poor agility in the adoption of digital technology and low eHealth literacy were identified despite efforts to promote engagement and ensure ease of use of the mobile app. To overcome such barriers, additional app-training sessions, an instruction manual, and regular telephone calls will be incorporated into the iCanManage program during the trial period. Conclusions This form of multidisciplinary collaboration is advantageous as it can potentially streamline existing care paths and allow the delivery of more holistic care to the CRC population during the perioperative period. Should the program be found to be effective and sustainable, hospitals adopting this digital solution may achieve better resource allocation and reduce overall health care costs in the long run. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04159363; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04159363
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Su Wei Wan
- Alice Lee Centre for Nursing Studies, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.,National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Choon Seng Chong
- National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.,Division of Colorectal Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, National University Cancer Institute, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.,Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Ee-Lin Toh
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.,Department of Colorectal Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.,Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Siew Hoon Lim
- Division of Nursing, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Carol Tt Loi
- Centre of Psychosocial Support, Singapore Red Cross Academy, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Yuen Foong Henry Lew
- Department of Psychology, School of Humanities and Behavioural Science, Singapore University of Social Sciences, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Matthew Chin Heng Chua
- Medical and Cybernetics Systems, Institute of Systems Science, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Xin Pei Jee
- National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.,Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Nursing, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Guangyu Liu
- Alice Lee Centre for Nursing Studies, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Lixia Zhu
- Alice Lee Centre for Nursing Studies, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Minna Pikkarainen
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Faculty of Technology, Art and Design, Oslomet - Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Electrical Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Faculty of Medicine and Oulu Business School, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| | - Hong-Gu He
- Alice Lee Centre for Nursing Studies, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.,National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Check DK, Winger JG, Jones KA, Somers TJ. Predictors of Response to an Evidence-Based Behavioral Cancer Pain Management Intervention: An Exploratory Analysis From a Clinical Trial. J Pain Symptom Manage 2021; 62:391-399. [PMID: 33387606 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.12.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2020] [Revised: 12/03/2020] [Accepted: 12/24/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Interventions that teach patients cognitive and behavioral strategies for managing cancer pain have demonstrated effectiveness. Systematic reviews of such interventions call for research to inform their implementation in practice, including investigations into which patients are most likely to benefit. OBJECTIVES We aimed to identify predictors of response to an evidence-based behavioral intervention for cancer pain, pain coping skills training (PCST). METHODS We conducted an exploratory secondary analysis of a randomized noninferiority trial comparing in-person to videoconference-based PCST. Using modified Poisson regression, we estimated the adjusted associations of patient characteristics with clinically meaningful reductions (≥30%) in pain severity and pain interference. RESULTS Of the 178 patients who were randomized, 135 completed at least one follow-up assessment and were included in this analysis. Proportions of patients experiencing reductions in pain severity and pain interference were 34% and 46%, respectively. In multivariable analysis, education level was associated with a reduction in pain severity (adjusted relative risk, some college or technical school vs. college or higher: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.26-0.93). Patients with colorectal cancer were 61% more likely to experience a reduction in pain interference than patients with breast cancer (95% CI:1.21-2.34). Marital status was also statistically significantly associated with pain interference reduction, with married patients less likely to experience a reduction in pain interference (adjusted relative risk, married vs. not: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.49-0.98). CONCLUSION Our findings elucidate several subgroups of patients who may be especially likely to benefit from PCST, informing both targeted implementation efforts and opportunities to improve delivery for diverse patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Devon K Check
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
| | - Joseph G Winger
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Kelley A Jones
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Tamara J Somers
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Abu Sharour L. Translation and Validation of the Arabic Version of the Caring Nurse-Patient Interaction Scale-Patient Version (CNPI-23P). Cancer Nurs 2021; 44:E62-E67. [PMID: 31651463 DOI: 10.1097/ncc.0000000000000755] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Importantly, little is known about the cancer patients' perceptions about nurses' caring behaviors in Arab countries (Jordan specifically). This is mainly related to a lack of short Arabic instruments that measure nurse-patient interaction from a caring perspective. OBJECTIVE To translate and validate an Arabic version of the Caring Nurse-Patient Interaction Scale-Patient Version (CNPI-23P). METHODS The CNPI-23 was translated into Arabic using Brislin's model of translation. A cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric testing were used to collect the data from patients with cancer through a self-administered questionnaire, which included the Arabic version of CNPI-23P and demographic characteristics. Descriptive statistics, inferential statistics, and exploratory factor analysis were used. RESULTS One hundred fifty patients were recruited. A content validity involving experts and 20 patients indicated that the statements were clear, understandable, and in logical and easy order. Reliability analysis of CNPI-23P subscales ranged between 0.71 to 0.91 and 0.95 for the total Arabic version of CNPI-23P. Results of the exploratory factor analysis showed that the 23-item scale score reflecting 4 caring domains with Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin was 0.896, and Bartlett test of sphericity was significant (P < .001). CONCLUSION The Arabic version of CNPI-23P is reliable and valid and can be used in research, clinical, and educational settings in Arabic countries. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE The Arabic version of CNPI-23P may increase our understanding of cancer patients' perceptions about nurses' caring behaviors in Arab countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Loai Abu Sharour
- Author Affiliation: Faculty of Nursing, Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan, Amman
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Meng X, Wang X, Dong Z. Impact of non-pharmacological interventions on quality of life, anxiety, and depression scores in patients with colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Support Care Cancer 2021; 29:5635-5652. [PMID: 33786669 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-021-06185-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2020] [Accepted: 03/24/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Different non-pharmacological interventions have been considered and applied to patients with colorectal cancer to improve their quality of life and distress symptoms; however, there is little evidence comparing the effectiveness of these strategies. This review aimed at assessing the effect of non-pharmacological interventions on quality of life, anxiety, and depression scores among patients with colorectal cancer. METHODS A systematic search for articles published until August 1, 2020, in the English language was performed in Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library; the reference lists of eligible articles were scanned for other potentially eligible publications. A meta-analysis was performed using random-effects models to estimate pooled effect sizes. RESULTS Twenty studies were included, representing a total of 3438 patients with colorectal cancer. Non-pharmacological interventions were associated with a significant reduction in anxiety (standardized mean difference [SMD] = - 0.157; 95% confidence interval [CI], - 0.312-[- 0.002]) and depression (SMD = - 0.207; 95% CI, - 0.390-[- 0.024]) scores during 5-8 months of follow-up. Subgroup analyses revealed that interventions delivered face-to-face improved patients' quality of life during 1-4 months of follow-up. Moreover, interventions delivered face-to-face but without a behavioral component were associated with improved anxiety scores, whereas interventions with a behavioral component improved the depression scores during 5-8 months of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Non-pharmacological interventions were associated with reduced anxiety and depression scores, whereas interventions delivered face-to-face were associated with improved quality of life scores in patients with colorectal cancer. Given the few studies and patients included in this meta-analysis, these conclusions should be interpreted with caution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xinyu Meng
- West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Xiaodong Wang
- Gastrointestinal Surgery Center of West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Zaiquan Dong
- Mental Health Center of West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
van Wijk L, van der Snee L, Buis CI, Hentzen JEKR, Haveman ME, Klaase JM. A prospective cohort study evaluating screening and assessment of six modifiable risk factors in HPB cancer patients and compliance to recommended prehabilitation interventions. Perioper Med (Lond) 2021; 10:5. [PMID: 33593437 PMCID: PMC7887817 DOI: 10.1186/s13741-020-00175-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2020] [Accepted: 12/28/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Despite improvements in perioperative care, major abdominal surgery continues to be associated with significant perioperative morbidity. Accurate preoperative risk stratification and optimisation (prehabilitation) are necessary to reduce perioperative morbidity. This study evaluated the screening and assessment of modifiable risk factors amendable for prehabilitation interventions and measured the patient compliance rate with recommended interventions. Method Between May 2019 and January 2020, patients referred to our hospital for HPB surgery were screened and assessed on six modifiable preoperative risk factors. The risk factors and screening tools used, with cutoff values, included (i) low physical fitness (a 6-min walk test < 82% of patient’s calculated norm and/or patient’s activity level not meeting the global recommendations on physical activity for health). Patients who were unfit based on the screening were assessed with a cardiopulmonary exercise test (anaerobic threshold ≤ 11 mL/kg/min); (ii) malnutrition (patient-generated subjective global assessment ≥ 4); (iii) iron-deficiency anaemia (haemoglobin < 12 g/dL for women, < 13 g/dL for men and transferrin saturation ≤ 20%); (iv) frailty (Groningen frailty indicator/Robinson frailty score ≥ 4); (v) substance use (smoking and alcohol use of > 5 units per week) and (vi) low psychological resilience (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale ≥ 8). Patients had a consultation with the surgeon on the same day as their screening. High-risk patients were referred for necessary interventions. Results One hundred consecutive patients were screened at our prehabilitation outpatient clinic. The prevalence of high-risk patients per risk factor was 64% for low physical fitness, 42% for malnutrition, 32% for anaemia (in 47% due to iron deficiency), 22% for frailty, 12% for smoking, 18% for alcohol use and 21% for low psychological resilience. Of the 77 patients who were eventually scheduled for surgery, 53 (68.8%) needed at least one intervention, of whom 28 (52.8%) complied with 100% of the necessary interventions. The median (IQR) number of interventions needed in the 77 patients was 1.0 (0–2). Conclusion It is feasible to screen and assess all patients referred for HPB cancer surgery for six modifiable risk factors. Most of the patients had at least one risk factor that could be optimised. However, compliance with the suggested interventions remains challenging. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13741-020-00175-z.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura van Wijk
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Medical Centre Groningen, PO Box 30001, 9700, RB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | - Lizzel van der Snee
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Medical Centre Groningen, PO Box 30001, 9700, RB, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Carlijn I Buis
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Medical Centre Groningen, PO Box 30001, 9700, RB, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Judith E K R Hentzen
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Medical Centre Groningen, PO Box 30001, 9700, RB, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Marjolein E Haveman
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Medical Centre Groningen, PO Box 30001, 9700, RB, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Joost M Klaase
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Medical Centre Groningen, PO Box 30001, 9700, RB, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Döking S, Koulil SSV, Thewes B, Braamse AM, Custers JA, Prins JB. Combined Face-to-Face and Online Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for High Distress of Colorectal Cancer Survivors: A Case Study. COGNITIVE AND BEHAVIORAL PRACTICE 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpra.2020.06.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
|
26
|
Reiter M, Gerken M, Lindberg-Scharf P, Fuerst A, Liebig-Hörl G, Ortmann O, Eberl I, Bartholomeyczik S. Health services research in colorectal cancer: a quasi-experimental interventional pilot study on in- and outpatient oncology. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2020; 147:1789-1802. [PMID: 33373026 PMCID: PMC8076149 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-020-03454-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2020] [Accepted: 11/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
Introduction Due to frequent treatment side effects and weight loss, colorectal cancer patients require oncologic care and nutritional counseling both during and after hospitalization. The current study evaluated differences in discharge and side effects management and nutritional behavior between colorectal cancer patients of a control group without systematic counseling and of an intervention group with access to structured in- and outpatient oncology nurse and nutritional counseling. Methods The presented explorative, quantitative, single-center, interventional pilot study is a health services research project with a quasi-experimental design. Using a self-designed standardized questionnaire, data were collected from the control group (n = 75) before and from the intervention group (n = 114) after the introduction of in- and outpatient oncology nurse and structured systematic nutritional counseling. The in- and outpatient counseling services were developed and evaluated in the form of a structured nurse-led counseling concept. Results Intervention group patients profited significantly from inpatient oncology nurse counseling in seven different areas of discharge management. No differences were observed concerning patient-reported general and gastrointestinal side effects except for xerostomia and dysphagia, but of the patients participating in both in- and outpatient oncology nurse counseling, 90.0% were better able to cope with general side effects of treatment. Patients with in- and outpatient structured systematic nutritional counseling more frequently received nutritional information (p = 0.001), were better at gauging food intolerances (p = 0.023), and followed the dietician's advice in cases of gastrointestinal side effects significantly more often (p = 0.003) than control patients. Counselor-reported outcomes concerning gastrointestinal side effects showed improvement in most of the patients taking part in systematic in- and outpatient nutritional counseling, except for weight loss in 4 patients. Conclusion In- and outpatient counseling in discharge and side effects management and nutrition improve the outcomes of colorectal cancer patients. Outpatient counseling should be further developed and evaluated in future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margarete Reiter
- Diplom-Kauffrau, Faculty of Health, School of Nursing Science, PhD Student at the Witten/Herdecke University, Stockumer Straße 12, 58453, Witten, Germany. .,Caritas-Hospital Sankt Josef, Landshuter Straße 65, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.
| | - Michael Gerken
- Tumor Center Regensburg-Institute of Quality Management and Health Services Research of the University of Regensburg, Coordination, Epidemiology, Am Biopark 9, 93053, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Patricia Lindberg-Scharf
- Tumor Center Regensburg-Institute of Quality Management and Health Services Research of the University of Regensburg, Section Quality of Life, Am Biopark 9, 93053, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Alois Fuerst
- Director of the Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Caritas-Hospital Sankt Josef, Landshuter Straße 65, 93053, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Gudrun Liebig-Hörl
- Medical Coordinator of Colon Cancer Center, Caritas-Hospital Sankt Josef, Landshuter Straße 65, 93053, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Olaf Ortmann
- Director of the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Center Regensburg, Caritas-Hospital Sankt Josef, Landshuter Straße 65, 93053, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Ingeborg Eberl
- Faculty of Social Work, Catholic University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, Kapuzinergasse 2, 85072, Eichstätt, Germany
| | - Sabine Bartholomeyczik
- Faculty of Health, School of Nursing Science, Witten/Herdecke University, Stockumer Straße 12, 58453, Witten, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Teo I, Tan YP, Finkelstein EA, Yang GM, Pan FT, Lew HYF, Tan EKW, Ong SYK, Cheung YB. The Feasibility and Acceptability of a Cognitive Behavioral Therapy-Based Intervention for Patients With Advanced Colorectal Cancer. J Pain Symptom Manage 2020; 60:1200-1207. [PMID: 32574657 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.06.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2020] [Revised: 06/09/2020] [Accepted: 06/12/2020] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Advanced colorectal cancer and its treatment can bring about challenges associated with psychological distress. OBJECTIVES The primary aims of this study were to examine the feasibility and acceptability of a cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT)-based intervention to improve coping with the disease. The secondary aim is to evaluate preliminary intervention efficacy. METHODS Patients with advanced colorectal cancer in Singapore (N = 60) were randomized to either receive a four-session CBT intervention immediately or be waitlisted. Intervention feasibility (i.e., recruitment and intervention adherence) and acceptability (i.e., participant satisfaction and cultural sensitivity) were assessed. Changes in psychological distress and self-efficacy were examined. RESULTS The study successfully recruited the intended sample (mean age 61; 62% men). A proportion (12%) reported Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale scores indicative of distress at baseline. Most (88%) completed all sessions. Participants reported high rates of satisfaction (97%), helpfulness (96%), and cultural sensitivity (95%) of the intervention. The intervention group did not show decrease in psychological distress; however, self-efficacy in cancer-related coping (information seeking: effect size [ES] = 0.64; 95% CI = 0.17, 0.85; coping with side effects: ES = 0.69; 95% CI = 0.33, 0.82; and maintaining positive attitude: ES = 0.45; 95% CI = 0.19, 0.79) increased in the intervention group compared with the waitlisted group. CONCLUSION The CBT-based intervention was feasible and acceptable to patients in Singapore. There is no sufficient evidence to warrant a larger trial in this sample with low baseline distress. Future work should identify and target those who are most in need of support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irene Teo
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore; Department of Psychosocial Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore; Programme in Health Services & Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.
| | - Yee Pin Tan
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Eric A Finkelstein
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore; Programme in Health Services & Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Grace Meijuan Yang
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore; Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Fang Ting Pan
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | | | | | | | - Yin Bun Cheung
- Programme in Health Services & Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore; Centre for Quantitative Medicine, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore; Centre for Child Health Research, Tampere University, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Husebø AML, Karlsen B, Husebø SE. Health professionals' perceptions of colorectal cancer patients' treatment burden and their supportive work to ameliorate the burden - a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res 2020; 20:661. [PMID: 32680491 PMCID: PMC7367378 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-020-05520-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2019] [Accepted: 07/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Support is pivotal for patients in managing colorectal cancer treatment, as they might be overwhelmed by the burden of treatment. There is scarce knowledge regarding health professionals' perceptions of colorectal cancer patients' burdens and supportive needs. The study aims to describe health professionals' perspectives on treatment burden among patients receiving curative surgical treatment for colorectal cancer during the hospital stay and how they support patients to ameliorate the burden. METHODS This study has a descriptive and explorative qualitative design, using semi-structured interviews with nine health professionals recruited from a gastrointestinal-surgery ward at a university hospital in Norway. Data were analysed by using systematic text condensation. RESULTS Data analysis identified the themes "capturing patients' burdens of colorectal cancer treatment" and "health professionals' support to ameliorate the burden". Patients with colorectal cancer had to face burdens related to a challenging emotional situation, treatment complications and side effects, and an extensive need for information. A trusting patient-carer relationship was therefore perceived as the essence of health professionals' support. Health professionals focused their support on safeguarding patients, motivating patients to self-manage, and involving family and peers as supporters. Patients' journey characteristics and illness severity challenged health professionals' supportive work. CONCLUSION Support from health professionals includes providing patients emotional support and relevant treatment-related information and motivating patients for early post-surgical mobilisation. Health professionals should be aware of identifying colorectal cancer patients' information needs according to the specific treatment stages, which may ameliorate the burden of colorectal cancer treatment and enable patients to self-manage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Marie Lunde Husebø
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, N-4019, Stavanger, Norway.
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, N-4036, Stavanger, Norway.
| | - Bjørg Karlsen
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, N-4036, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Sissel Eikeland Husebø
- Department of Quality and Health Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, N-4036, Stavanger, Norway
- Department of Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, N-4011, Stavanger, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Pudkasam S, Pitcher M, Fisher M, O'Connor A, Chinlumprasert N, Stojanovska L, Polman R, Apostolopoulos V. The PAPHIO study protocol: a randomised controlled trial with a 2 x 2 crossover design of physical activity adherence, psychological health and immunological outcomes in breast cancer survivors. BMC Public Health 2020; 20:696. [PMID: 32414347 PMCID: PMC7227193 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-08827-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2019] [Accepted: 05/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The PAPHIO study; a randomized controlled trial with 2X2 crossover design will implement a self-directed physical activity program in which participants will engage in self-monitoring and receive motivational interviewing to enhance physical activity adherence. The study aims to determine the effects of 24 weeks self-directed activity combined with motivational interviewing (MI) on (i) psychological health, (ii) quality of life (QoL) and (iii) immune function in female breast cancer survivors. METHODS The study will recruit 64 female breast cancer survivors within 3 years of diagnosis and at least 6 months post primary treatments at Western Health Sunshine Hospital, Melbourne, Australia. They will be randomly allocated to immediate intervention (IIG group) or delayed intervention groups (DIG group) in a 1:1 ratio. All participants will be given a wearable device (Fitbit Alta HR) and undertake self-directed physical activity for 24 weeks and will receive MI for 12 weeks (IIG; during week 0 to week 12 and DIG; during week 13 to week 24). Participants' daily step count and the changes of immune cell functionality will be assessed at the beginning (week 1: T1), week 12 (T2) and week 24 (T3) of the program. Physical activity adherence will be assessed at T2 and T3. Participants will also complete four questionnaires assessing exercise self-regulation (BREQ2), exercise barrier and task self-efficacy, mental health (DASS-21) and QoL (FACT-B) at three time points (T1 to T3). Linear-mixed models will be used to assess the relationship between physical activity volume by step counting and mental health (DASS-21), QoL (FACT-B), immune biomarkers, self-regulation (BREQ2) and self-efficacy at T1, T2 and T3;between 2 groups. DISCUSSION We expect this physical activity intervention to be acceptable and beneficial to the participants in terms of psychological and immunological well-being with the potential outcomes to be implemented more widely at relatively low cost to these or other patient populations. TRIAL REGISTRATION Australian New Zealand Clinical trials Registry- ACTRN12619001271190. Prospectively registered on 13 September 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Supa Pudkasam
- Institute for Health and Sport, Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
- Bernadette de Lourdes School of Nursing Science, Assumption University, Bangkok, Thailand.
| | - Meron Pitcher
- Breast Cancer Service, Western Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Melanie Fisher
- Breast Cancer Service, Western Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Anne O'Connor
- IPC Health Altona Meadows, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | | | - Lily Stojanovska
- Institute for Health and Sport, Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Food, Nutrition and Health, College of Food and Agriculture, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, UAE
| | - Remco Polman
- School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Révész D, van Kuijk SMJ, Mols F, van Duijnhoven FJB, Winkels RM, Hoofs H, Kant IJ, Smits LJ, Breukink SO, van de Poll-Franse LV, Kampman E, Beijer S, Weijenberg MP, Bours MJL. Development and internal validation of prediction models for colorectal cancer survivors to estimate the 1-year risk of low health-related quality of life in multiple domains. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2020; 20:54. [PMID: 32164641 PMCID: PMC7068880 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-020-1064-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2019] [Accepted: 02/23/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Many colorectal cancer (CRC) survivors experience persisting health problems post-treatment that compromise their health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Prediction models are useful tools for identifying survivors at risk of low HRQoL in the future and for taking preventive action. Therefore, we developed prediction models for CRC survivors to estimate the 1-year risk of low HRQoL in multiple domains. Methods In 1458 CRC survivors, seven HRQoL domains (EORTC QLQ-C30: global QoL; cognitive, emotional, physical, role, social functioning; fatigue) were measured prospectively at study baseline and 1 year later. For each HRQoL domain, scores at 1-year follow-up were dichotomized into low versus normal/high. Separate multivariable logistic prediction models including biopsychosocial predictors measured at baseline were developed for the seven HRQoL domains, and internally validated using bootstrapping. Results Average time since diagnosis was 5 years at study baseline. Prediction models included both non-modifiable predictors (age, sex, socio-economic status, time since diagnosis, tumor stage, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, stoma, micturition, chemotherapy-related, stoma-related and gastrointestinal complaints, comorbidities, social inhibition/negative affectivity, and working status) and modifiable predictors (body mass index, physical activity, smoking, meat consumption, anxiety/depression, pain, and baseline fatigue and HRQoL scores). Internally validated models showed good calibration and discrimination (AUCs: 0.83–0.93). Conclusions The prediction models performed well for estimating 1-year risk of low HRQoL in seven domains. External validation is needed before models can be applied in practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dóra Révész
- Department of Epidemiology, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, P. Debyeplein 1, 6200, MD, Maastricht, the Netherlands. .,Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, CoRPS - Center of Research on Psychology in Somatic diseases, Tilburg University, Warandelaan 2, 5037, AB, Tilburg, the Netherlands.
| | - Sander M J van Kuijk
- Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, P. Debyelaan 25, PO Box 5800, Maastricht, 6202, AZ, the Netherlands
| | - Floortje Mols
- Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, CoRPS - Center of Research on Psychology in Somatic diseases, Tilburg University, Warandelaan 2, 5037, AB, Tilburg, the Netherlands.,Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Godebaldkwartier 419, 3511, DT, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Fränzel J B van Duijnhoven
- Division of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University & Research, Stippeneng 4, 6708, WE, Wageningen, the Netherlands
| | - Renate M Winkels
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Penn State Cancer Institute, 500 University, Hershey, PA, 17033, USA
| | - Huub Hoofs
- Department of Epidemiology, CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, P. Debyeplein 1, 6200, MD, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - I Jmert Kant
- Department of Epidemiology, CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, P. Debyeplein 1, 6200, MD, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Luc J Smits
- Department of Epidemiology, CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, P. Debyeplein 1, 6200, MD, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Stéphanie O Breukink
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229, HX, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Lonneke V van de Poll-Franse
- Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, P. Debyelaan 25, PO Box 5800, Maastricht, 6202, AZ, the Netherlands.,Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Godebaldkwartier 419, 3511, DT, Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066, CX, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ellen Kampman
- Division of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University & Research, Stippeneng 4, 6708, WE, Wageningen, the Netherlands
| | - Sandra Beijer
- Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Godebaldkwartier 419, 3511, DT, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Matty P Weijenberg
- Department of Epidemiology, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, P. Debyeplein 1, 6200, MD, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Martijn J L Bours
- Department of Epidemiology, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, P. Debyeplein 1, 6200, MD, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Zhang X, Liu J, Zhu H, Zhang X, Jiang Y, Zhang J. Effect of Psychological Intervention on Quality of Life and Psychological Outcomes of Colorectal Cancer Patients. Psychiatry 2020; 83:58-69. [PMID: 31614095 DOI: 10.1080/00332747.2019.1672440] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Objective: This study was undertaken to evaluate the effect of psychological interventions on quality of life (QOL) and psychological outcomes in colorectal cancer patients. Methods: Three components-the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), cancer-related distress, and QOL-were assessed at admission (T0/baseline), three-month follow-up (T1), and six-month follow-up (T2). Results: The general characteristics of participants were well balanced between the psychological intervention group and control group. Psychological intervention significantly improved the anxiety measured by HADS in the psychological intervention group at T1 and T2 compared with the control group (T1 = -2.83 versus 0.33, p = .002; T2 = -2.64 versus 0.13, p = .045). Both total and avoidance scores of cancer-related distress decreased significantly in the psychological intervention group at T1, and the amelioration maintained until T2. However, the psychological intervention group and the control group did not show any significant differences between global QOL and cognitive function. While the psychological intervention greatly improved physical function at T1 (4.30 versus -4.28, p = .012), the difference was not significant at T2 (3.36 versus -3.41, p = .116). However, the fatigue score in the psychological intervention group was reduced significantly compared with that in control group at T2 (-4.94 versus 3.61, p = .027). Conclusion: Our results suggest that psychological intervention benefits QOL and psychological outcomes of patients with colorectal cancer.
Collapse
|
32
|
Głowacka-Mrotek I, Tarkowska M, Nowikiewicz T, Jankowski M, Mackiewicz-Milewska M, Hagner W, Zegarski W. Prospective evaluation of the quality of life of patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer depending on the surgical technique. Int J Colorectal Dis 2019; 34:1601-1610. [PMID: 31396708 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-019-03357-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/25/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Monitoring of the quality of life of patients in addition to satisfactory survival indexes in order to choose an optimal treatment method is a trend in contemporary oncological surgery. The goal of the study was to prospectively evaluate the quality of life of patients treated for colorectal cancer depending on the type of surgical technique (open surgery (OS) vs. laparoscopic surgery (LS)). METHODS The quality of life was evaluated thrice in the study groups (on the day of admission to the ward (I), 6 months (II), and 18 months after the procedure (III)). The following questionnaires were used in this evaluation: QLQ-C30 European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, QLQ-CR29 Quality of Life Questionnaire (module-colorectal cancer), and Acceptance of Illness Scale (AIS). RESULTS Sixty-seven patients completed this prospective clinical cohort study (LS-32; OS-35). The QLQ-C30 questionnaire demonstrated improvement in functional scales among patients treated with LS technique (p < 0.05) as well as with regard to overall quality of life 6 months after surgery (p < 0,001), while at 18 months postsurgery, statistically significant differences were noted for physical function (p = 0.001) and overall quality of life (p < 0.0001). AIS scale analysis demonstrated that patients treated with laparoscopy were characterized by better acceptance of illness (p < 0.05). Statistically significant differences between OS and LS groups were noted based on the QLQ-CR29 questionnaire with regard to the following scales: body image (p = 0.041) and body mass problem (p = 0.024)-patients treated with LS technique had better scores. CONCLUSIONS Laparoscopic surgery gives patients a chance for better quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iwona Głowacka-Mrotek
- Chair and Department of Rehabilitation, Ludwik Rydygier's Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Maria Curie-Skłodowskiej Street 9, 85-094, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
| | - Magdalena Tarkowska
- Department of Laser Therapy and Physiotherapy, Ludwik Rydygier's Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Bydgoszcz, Poland
| | - Tomasz Nowikiewicz
- Chair and Department of Surgical Oncology, Ludwik Rydygier's Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Oncology Centre - Prof. Franciszek Łukaszczyk Memorial Hospital in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Bydgoszcz, Poland
| | - Michał Jankowski
- Department of Laser Therapy and Physiotherapy, Ludwik Rydygier's Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Bydgoszcz, Poland
| | - Magdalena Mackiewicz-Milewska
- Chair and Department of Rehabilitation, Ludwik Rydygier's Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Maria Curie-Skłodowskiej Street 9, 85-094, Bydgoszcz, Poland
| | - Wojciech Hagner
- Chair and Department of Rehabilitation, Ludwik Rydygier's Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Maria Curie-Skłodowskiej Street 9, 85-094, Bydgoszcz, Poland
| | - Wojciech Zegarski
- Department of Laser Therapy and Physiotherapy, Ludwik Rydygier's Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Bydgoszcz, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Sharour LA, Omari OA, Salameh AB, Yehia D. Health-related quality of life among patients with colorectal cancer. J Res Nurs 2019; 25:114-125. [PMID: 34394615 DOI: 10.1177/1744987119846177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Up to 35% of cancer patients have clinically significant levels of psychological distress during their treatment. Accordingly, better understanding of health-related quality of life and its predictors will help oncology nurses plan appropriate interventions to improve health-related quality of life. Aims This study was conducted to investigate the relationship between hope, depression and anxiety and health-related quality of life among Jordanian cancer patients during their treatment period. Methods Cross-sectional descriptive correlational design was conducted using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Herth Hope Index and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal surveys. Results 260 Jordanian patients with cancer from three Jordanian hospitals completed the study survey. The bivariate analysis indicated significant positive relationships between hope and quality of life (r = .57, p < .0001). A significant negative relationship was found between anxiety and depression and quality of life (r = -.76, p < .0001). A multiple regression analysis indicated that hope, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and time since diagnosis were predictors of quality of life, and explained 66% of the variance in the quality of life for this sample. Conclusions The assessment of psychosocial elements including hope, depression, anxiety, and quality of life should be a part of daily nurse-caring behaviours and practices. Implement education programmes to increase nurses' competencies in the psychosocial assessment are recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Loai Abu Sharour
- Associate Professor, Faculty of Nursing, Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan, Jordan
| | - Omar Al Omari
- Associate Professor, School of Nursing, Sultan Qaboos University, Oman
| | - Ayman Bani Salameh
- Assistant Professor, Faculty of Nursing, Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan, Amman-Jordan
| | - Dalal Yehia
- Assistant Professor, Faculty of Nursing, Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan, Amman-Jordan
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Leermakers L, Döking S, Thewes B, Braamse AMJ, Gielissen MFM, de Wilt JHW, Collette EH, Dekker J, Prins JB. Study protocol of the CORRECT multicenter trial: the efficacy of blended cognitive behavioral therapy for reducing psychological distress in colorectal cancer survivors. BMC Cancer 2018; 18:748. [PMID: 30021555 PMCID: PMC6052704 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-018-4645-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2017] [Accepted: 06/28/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Approximately one third of the colorectal cancer survivors (CRCS) experience high levels of psychological distress. Common concerns experienced by CRCS include distress related to physical problems, anxiety, fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) and depressive symptoms. However, psychological interventions for distressed CRCS are scarce. Therefore, a blended therapy was developed, combining face-to-face cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) with online self-management activities and telephone consultations. The aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of this blended therapy in reducing psychological distress in CRCS. METHODS/DESIGN The CORRECT study is a two-arm multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT). A sample of 160 highly distressed CRCS (a score on the Distress Thermometer of 5 or higher) will be recruited from several hospitals in the Netherlands. CRCS will be randomized to either the intervention condition (blended CBT) or the control condition (care as usual). The blended therapy covers approximately 14 weeks and combines five face-to-face sessions and three telephone consultations with a psychologist, with access to an interactive self-management website. It includes three modules which are individually-tailored to patient concerns and aimed at decreasing: 1) distress caused by physical consequences of CRC, 2) anxiety and FCR, 3) depressive symptoms. Patients can choose between the optional modules. The primary outcome is general distress (Brief Symptom Inventory-18). Secondary outcomes are quality of life and general psychological wellbeing. Assessments will take place at baseline prior to randomization, after 4 and 7 months. DISCUSSION Blended CBT is an innovative and promising approach for providing tailored supportive care to reduce high distress in CRCS. If the intervention proves to be effective, an evidence-based intervention will become available for implementation in clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION This trial is registered in the Netherlands Trial Register ( NTR6025 ) on August 3, 2016.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L. Leermakers
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Medical Psychology Radboud University Medical Center, (840), P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - S. Döking
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Medical Psychology Radboud University Medical Center, (840), P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - B. Thewes
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Medical Psychology Radboud University Medical Center, (840), P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - A. M. J. Braamse
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC, location AMC, P.O. Box 22660, 1100 DD Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M. F. M. Gielissen
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of primary and community care, Radboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Siza (disability service) Arnhem, P.O. Box 532, 6800 AM Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - J. H. W. de Wilt
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Radboud university medical center, (725), P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - E. H. Collette
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J. Dekker
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J. B. Prins
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Medical Psychology Radboud University Medical Center, (840), P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Son H, Son YJ, Kim H, Lee Y. Effect of psychosocial interventions on the quality of life of patients with colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2018; 16:119. [PMID: 29884182 PMCID: PMC5994008 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-018-0943-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2017] [Accepted: 05/22/2018] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Background We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials examining the effect of psychosocial interventions on the quality of life of patients with colorectal cancer. Methods We searched the main health-related databases for relevant papers. Then, we examined the titles and abstracts of the retrieved papers, applying exclusion criteria to filter out irrelevant papers; a more in-depth filtering process was then conducted by reading the full texts. Eight studies remained at the end of this process. Next, we performed data extraction and assessed the methodological quality of the selected studies. This was followed by computation of effect sizes and the heterogeneity of the results, and then an assessment of the potential bias. Results The systematic review found that most of the interventions in these eight studies did not have a significant effect on quality of life. Meanwhile, the meta-analysis, the overall effect of psychosocial interventions at the post-intervention period was found to be statistically significant but small. Conclusions This meta-analysis provides evidence for the beneficial effect of face-to-face psychosocial interventions on the quality of life of colorectal cancer patients. It is, however, suggested that further studies be conducted on this topic to assess the roles of physical functioning and severity of symptoms before utilizing such face-to-face interventions. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12955-018-0943-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heesook Son
- Red Cross College of Nursing, Chung-Ang University, 84 Heukseok-Ro, Dongjak-Gu, Seoul, 06974, Republic of Korea
| | - Youn-Jung Son
- Red Cross College of Nursing, Chung-Ang University, 84 Heukseok-Ro, Dongjak-Gu, Seoul, 06974, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyerang Kim
- Red Cross College of Nursing, Chung-Ang University, 84 Heukseok-Ro, Dongjak-Gu, Seoul, 06974, Republic of Korea
| | - Yoonju Lee
- College of Nursing, Pusan National University, 49 Busandaehak-ro, Mulgeum-eup, Yangsan-si, Gyeongsangnam-do, 50612, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Boucher NA, Johnson KS, LeBlanc TW. Acute Leukemia Patients' Needs: Qualitative Findings and Opportunities for Early Palliative Care. J Pain Symptom Manage 2018; 55:433-439. [PMID: 28935132 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.09.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2017] [Revised: 09/08/2017] [Accepted: 09/10/2017] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Patients with acute leukemias likely have needs that palliative care can respond to, yet little is known about specific challenges they face, particularly during active treatment. We examined acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients' expressed challenges and supports after intensive induction chemotherapy. OBJECTIVES We aimed to understand opportunities for palliative care interventions in this population. METHODS We conducted a qualitative study of AML patients with high-risk disease at Duke University Hospital, Durham, NC. Patients were interviewed about care experiences approximately 3 months after treatment initiation. Multiple coders used descriptive content analysis to identify common and recurrent themes. RESULTS We analyzed 22 patient transcripts. Sample demographics included 10 (45.5%) females, 12 (54.5%) males, mean age 62 (SD 10.9), 19 (86.4%) non-Hispanic white, and three (13.6%) nonwhite/non-Hispanic. All had high-risk disease, by age, relapse status, or molecular markers. We identified four themes in our analysis: physical symptoms, psychological issues, uncertainty regarding prognosis, and patients' sources of support. Specific challenges noted by patients included feelings of helplessness/hopelessness, activity restriction, fatigue, fevers, caregiver stress, and lack of clarity regarding treatment decision making. CONCLUSION AML patients face substantial challenges regarding physical symptoms, psychological distress, and uncertainty regarding prognosis. These challenges signal needs for which palliative care in high-risk AML patients may help. Our findings highlight opportunities to develop targeted palliative care interventions addressing unmet needs in AML patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan A Boucher
- Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Kimberly S Johnson
- Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Thomas W LeBlanc
- Division of Hematologic Malignancies and Cellular Therapy, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
| |
Collapse
|