1
|
Rodrigues B, Encantado J, Franco S, Silva MN, Carraça EV. Psychosocial correlates of physical activity in cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cancer Surviv 2024:10.1007/s11764-024-01559-6. [PMID: 38448768 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-024-01559-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2023] [Accepted: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 03/08/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Physical activity (PA) is a non-pharmacological approach to optimize health benefits in cancer survivors and is recommended as part of care. However, most cancer survivors fail to meet PA recommendations. The current systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to identify psychosocial correlates of free-living PA in cancer survivors. METHODS Three electronic databases were searched (PubMed, PsycINFO, and SportDiscus). Meta-analyses were conducted for psychosocial correlates tested ≥ 3 times. RESULTS Sixty-four articles were included. Eighty-eight different free-living PA correlates were identified. Meta-analyses (n = 32 studies) tested 23 PA correlates, of which 16 were significant (p < 0.05). Larger effect sizes (0.30 < ES > 0.45) were found for exercise self-efficacy, perceived behavioral control, intention, lower perceived barriers for exercise, enjoyment, perceived PA benefits, and attitudes. Small-to-moderate effects (0.18 < ES < 0.22) were found for subjective norms, physical functioning, quality of life, depression, and mental health. These findings were generally in line with narrative results. CONCLUSIONS This systematic review highlights important psychosocial correlates of free-living PA that can be targeted in future PA promotion interventions for cancer survivors. Constructs mainly from SCT and TPB were the most studied and appear to be associated with free-living PA in this population. However, we cannot currently assert which frameworks might be more effective. Further studies of better methodological quality, per correlate and theory, exploring longer-term associations and across different types of cancer, are needed. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS Having higher exercise self-efficacy, perceived behavioral control, intention, enjoyment and perceived PA benefits, more positive attitudes towards PA, and lower perceived barriers for exercise, can help increase PA in cancer survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bruno Rodrigues
- Faculty of Sport, University of Porto (Research Centre in Physical Activity, Health and Leisure), R. Dr. Plácido da Costa 91, 4200-450, Porto, Portugal.
| | - Jorge Encantado
- Faculdade de Motricidade Humana, CIPER, Universidade de Lisboa, Cruz Quebrada, Portugal
| | - Sofia Franco
- CIDEFES, Universidade Lusófona, Lisboa & CIFI2D, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Universidade Lusófona and Universidade do Porto, Lisbon and Porto, Portugal
| | - Marlene N Silva
- CIDEFES, Universidade Lusófona, Lisboa & CIFI2D, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Universidade Lusófona and Universidade do Porto, Lisbon and Porto, Portugal
| | - Eliana V Carraça
- CIDEFES, Universidade Lusófona, Lisboa & CIFI2D, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Universidade Lusófona and Universidade do Porto, Lisbon and Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kompf J, Rhodes R. Differential correlates for aerobic physical activity and resistance training: a systematic review. PSYCHOL HEALTH MED 2023; 28:2777-2797. [PMID: 36373398 DOI: 10.1080/13548506.2022.2142617] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2022] [Accepted: 10/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Worldwide, physical inactivity is a major public health concern. Both aerobic physical activity (PA) and resistance training (RT) are forms of exercise that provide numerous health benefits. The present systematic review aimed to examine the evidence among studies that have formally compared the correlates of both aerobic PA and RT in the same sample. Literature searchers were concluded in April 2022 using four common databases. Eligible studies were selected from English language peer-reviewed journals which reported at least a bivariate correlation between the correlate and aerobic PA and RT. Findings were grouped by the correlate in accordance with the capability, opportunity, motivation, behavior (COM-B) model. The analysis identified 18 studies with 16 independent samples. Overall, evidence suggest that there are many similarities between aerobic PA and RT participation. There were positive associations for both aerobic PA and RT for physical and psychological capabilities, reflective and reflexive motivation. There were mixed associations for environmental opportunities, and social opportunities had no association for aerobic PA but mixed evidence for RT. The analyses emphasized that comparative research is lacking in certain areas, principally for environmental opportunity and reflexive motivation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ryan Rhodes
- University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sadler RC, Larsen K. Mapping the Way to Good Health: The Interdisciplinary Challenges of Geographers in Medical Research. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:12419. [PMID: 36231725 PMCID: PMC9564750 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191912419] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2022] [Revised: 09/27/2022] [Accepted: 09/28/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
Geography has an important role to play in shaping the direction of medical research. In particular, its tools and theory provide essential understanding to the impacts of place on health behaviors and outcomes. Understanding some of its evolution-particularly into the subfield of medical geography-is therefore useful both for geographers and medical researchers. In this paper, we present some of the debates that geographers have grappled with, the growth of GIS (particularly in the context of medical research), some important methodological considerations that geographers help center, and some recommendations for future work at this nexus. Throughout, we speak from the perspective of geographers who have worked nearly exclusively in the health sciences since obtaining our PhDs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Casey Sadler
- Division of Public Health, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, Flint, MI 48502, USA
- Department of Family Medicine, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
| | - Kristian Larsen
- CAREX Canada, School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
- Department of Geography and Planning, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 1G6, Canada
- Department of Geography and Environmental Studies, Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Arthuso FZ, Courneya KS. Physical activity in patients with kidney cancer: A scoping review. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2022; 20:e369-e379. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2022.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2022] [Revised: 03/16/2022] [Accepted: 04/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|
5
|
Changes in physical activity and associations with quality of life among a global sample of cancer survivors during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Cancer Surviv 2022:10.1007/s11764-021-01156-x. [PMID: 35079964 PMCID: PMC8789373 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-021-01156-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2021] [Accepted: 12/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Meeting physical activity (PA) guidelines (i.e., ≥ 150 min/week of aerobic PA and/or 2 days/week of resistance training) is beneficial for maintaining cancer survivors' well-being. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on PA participation in cancer survivors and its association on quality of life (QoL) remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to compare PA levels prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic, and examine the association between changes in PA and QoL in cancer survivors. METHODS A global sample of cancer survivors participated in a cross-sectional, online survey. Participants self-reported their PA participation before and during the pandemic using the Godin Leisure Time Exercise Questionnaire and QoL with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) scales. Paired t-tests compared PA before and during the pandemic. Analysis of covariance examined differences in QoL between PA categories: non-exercisers, inactive adopters, complete and partial relapsers, single and combined guideline maintainers. RESULTS PA participation of cancer survivors (N = 488) significantly decreased during the pandemic (p's < .001). Cancer survivors were classified as non-exercisers (37.7%), inactive adopters (6.6%), complete (13.1%) and partial (6.1%) relapsers, and single (23.8%) or combined (12.7%) guideline maintainers. Partial relapsers had significantly lower QoL and fatigue than inactive adopters, and combined guideline maintainers (p's < .05) that were clinically meaningful. CONCLUSION PA decreased during the pandemic which has negative implications for QoL and fatigue in cancer survivors. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS PA is critical for maintaining QoL during the pandemic; therefore, behavioral strategies are needed to help cancer survivors adopt and maintain PA.
Collapse
|
6
|
Namin S, Zhou Y, Neuner J, Beyer K. Neighborhood Characteristics and Cancer Survivorship: An Overview of the Current Literature on Neighborhood Landscapes and Cancer Care. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 18:7192. [PMID: 34281129 PMCID: PMC8297243 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18137192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2021] [Revised: 06/21/2021] [Accepted: 07/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
There is a growing literature on the association between neighborhood contexts and cancer survivorship. To understand the current trends and the gaps in the literature, we aimed to answer the following questions: To what degree, and how, has cancer survivorship research accounted for neighborhood-level effects? What neighborhood metrics have been used to operationalize neighborhood factors? To what degree do the neighborhood level metrics considered in cancer research reflect neighborhood development as identified in the Leadership for Energy and Environmental Design for Neighborhood Development (LEED-ND) guidelines? We first conducted a review guided by PRISMA extension for scoping review of the extant literature on neighborhood effects and cancer survivorship outcomes from January 2000 to January 2021. Second, we categorized the studied neighborhood metrics under six main themes. Third, we assessed the findings based on the LEED-ND guidelines to identify the most relevant neighborhood metrics in association with areas of focus in cancer survivorship care and research. The search results were scoped to 291 relevant peer-reviewed journal articles. Results show that survivorship disparities, primary care, and weight management are the main themes in the literature. Additionally, most articles rely on neighborhood SES as the primary (or only) examined neighborhood level metric. We argue that the expansion of interdisciplinary research to include neighborhood metrics endorsed by current paradigms in salutogenic urban design can enhance the understanding of the role of socioecological context in survivorship care and outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sima Namin
- Institute for Health & Equity, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA; (Y.Z.); (K.B.)
| | - Yuhong Zhou
- Institute for Health & Equity, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA; (Y.Z.); (K.B.)
| | - Joan Neuner
- General Internal Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA;
| | - Kirsten Beyer
- Institute for Health & Equity, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA; (Y.Z.); (K.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Mama SK, Bhuiyan N, Foo W, Segel JE, Bluethmann SM, Winkels RM, Wiskemann J, Calo WA, Lengerich EJ, Schmitz KH. Rural-urban differences in meeting physical activity recommendations and health status in cancer survivors in central Pennsylvania. Support Care Cancer 2020; 28:5013-5022. [PMID: 32036469 PMCID: PMC7415488 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-020-05342-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2019] [Accepted: 02/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study explored rural-urban differences in meeting physical activity (PA) recommendations and health status in cancer survivors in central Pennsylvania and associations between PA and health status. METHODS Cancer survivors (N = 2463) were identified through a state cancer registry and mailed questionnaires assessing PA and health status. Rural-urban residence was based on county of residence at diagnosis. Participants self-reported frequency and duration of leisure-time PA and were classified as meeting: (1) aerobic recommendations (≥ 150 min/week), (2) muscle-strengthening recommendations (≥ 2 times/week), (3) both aerobic and muscle-strengthening recommendations, or (4) neither recommendation. Logistic regression models examined associations between rural-urban residence and meeting PA recommendations and associations between PA and health status, adjusting for age, cancer type, gender, and income. RESULTS Nearly 600 (N = 591, 24.0%) cancer survivors returned completed questionnaires (rural 9.5%, urban 90.5%). Half (50.0%) of rural cancer survivors reported no leisure-time PA compared to 35.2% of urban cancer survivors (p = 0.020), and urban cancer survivors were 2.6 times more likely to meet aerobic PA recommendations (95% CI 1.1-6.4). Odds of reporting good physical and mental health were 2.3 times higher among survivors who reported meeting aerobic recommendations compared to those who did not meet PA recommendations (95% CI 1.1-4.5), adjusting for rurality and covariates. CONCLUSIONS Results demonstrate persistent rural-urban differences in meeting PA recommendations in cancer survivors and its association with self-reported health. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS Findings underscore the need for interventions to increase PA in rural cancer survivors in an effort to improve health status and reduce cancer health disparities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scherezade K Mama
- Department of Kinesiology, The Pennsylvania State University, 268J Recreation Building, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
- Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA, USA.
| | - Nishat Bhuiyan
- Department of Kinesiology, The Pennsylvania State University, 268J Recreation Building, University Park, PA, 16802, USA
| | - Wayne Foo
- Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA, USA
- Department of Public Health Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Joel E Segel
- Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA, USA
- Department of Public Health Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA
- Department of Health Policy and Administration, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
| | - Shirley M Bluethmann
- Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA, USA
- Department of Public Health Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Renate M Winkels
- Department of Public Health Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA
- Human Nutrition & Health, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Joachim Wiskemann
- Department of Public Health Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - William A Calo
- Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA, USA
- Department of Public Health Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Eugene J Lengerich
- Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA, USA
- Department of Public Health Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Kathryn H Schmitz
- Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA, USA
- Department of Public Health Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Simkin J, Erickson AC, Otterstatter MC, Dummer TJB, Ogilvie G. Current State of Geospatial Methodologic Approaches in Canadian Population Oncology Research. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2020; 29:1294-1303. [PMID: 32299848 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-20-0092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2020] [Revised: 03/25/2020] [Accepted: 04/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Geospatial analyses are increasingly used in population oncology. We provide a first review of geospatial analysis in Canadian population oncology research, compare to international peers, and identify future directions. Geospatial-focused peer-reviewed publications from 1992-2020 were compiled using PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. Abstracts were screened for data derived from a Canadian cancer registry and use of geographic information systems. Studies were classified by geospatial methodology, geospatial unit, location, cancer site, and study year. Common limitations were documented from article discussion sections. Our search identified 71 publications using data from all provincial and national cancer registries. Thirty-nine percent (N = 28) were published in the most recent 5-year period (2016-2020). Geospatial methodologies included exposure assessment (32.4%), identifying spatial associations (21.1%), proximity analysis (16.9%), cluster detection (15.5%), and descriptive mapping (14.1%). Common limitations included confounding, ecologic fallacy, not accounting for residential mobility, and small case/population sizes. Geospatial analyses are increasingly used in Canadian population oncology; however, efforts are concentrated among a few provinces and common cancer sites, and data are over a decade old. Limitations were similar to those documented internationally, and more work is needed to address them. Organized efforts are needed to identify common challenges, develop leading practices, and identify shared priorities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Simkin
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. .,BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,Women's Health Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Anders C Erickson
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,Office of the Provincial Health Officer, Government of British Columbia, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Michael C Otterstatter
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,BC Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Trevor J B Dummer
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Gina Ogilvie
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,Women's Health Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,BC Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|