Adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and S-1 after surgical resection for advanced biliary carcinoma: outcomes and prognostic factors

Prognostic impact of pre- and postoperative tumor markers in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

PURPOSE

The present study assessed the impact of pre- and postoperative tumor markers on the survival of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

METHODS

Medical records of 73 patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma were reviewed retrospectively. The pre- and postoperative carcinoembryonic antigen and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 levels were assessed. Patient characteristics, clinicopathological factors, and prognostic factors were analyzed.

RESULTS

The median recurrence-free survival and overall survival were 30.0 and 90.9 months, respectively. A multivariate survival analysis revealed that elevated postoperative carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (p = 0.023) was the only independent poor prognostic factor. The median overall survival of patients with normal and elevated postoperative carbohydrate antigen 19-9 levels was 101.4 and 15.7 months (p < 0.001), respectively. Multivariate logistic regression identified elevated preoperative carbohydrate antigen 19-9 as an independent preoperative risk factor for elevated postoperative carbohydrate antigen 19-9. The optimal cutoff value of preoperative carbohydrate antigen 19-9 for predicting elevated postoperative carbohydrate antigen 19-9 was 40 U/mL, with a sensitivity and specificity of 92% and 87%, respectively (area under curve = 0.915).

CONCLUSIONS

Elevated postoperative carbohydrate antigen 19-9 was an independent poor prognostic factor. Preoperative predictors, such as elevated preoperative carbohydrate antigen 19-9, may indicate the need for neoadjuvant therapies to improve the survival.

Survival Outcomes of Gemcitabine Plus S-1 Adjuvant Chemotherapy after Surgical Resection for Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer

INTRODUCTION

The usefulness of adjuvant chemotherapy in biliary tract cancer (BTC) is poorly reported. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of adjuvant gemcitabine plus S-1 (GS) chemotherapy after curative surgical resection for BTC.

METHODS

225 BTC patients who underwent surgical resection between January 2006 and May 2019 were enrolled in this study. Twenty-seven patients received adjuvant chemotherapy with GS (GS group), whereas 67 patients underwent surgery alone (S group). Twenty-three matching pairs were derived through propensity score (PS) matching analysis. Patients received 12 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy (70 mg/m2 oral S-1 for 7 consecutive days plus intravenous gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 on day 7). The primary end point was recurrence-free survival (RFS). The secondary end points were the 1-, 2-, and 3-year RFS and overall survival (OS) rates, tolerability, and frequency of grade 3/4 toxicity.

RESULTS

The completion rate was 81.5%; no treatment-related deaths were observed. Grade 3/4 adverse events were seen in 40.7% of the patients. RFS (3-year RFS rate: 59.3% vs. 39.1%, p = 0.049) and OS (3-year OS rate: 71.7% vs. 53.4%, p = 0.008) were significantly better in the GS group than in the S group among PS-matched pairs.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION

GS chemotherapy after curative surgery was well tolerated, showed better clinical benefit in the adjuvant setting, and can effectively reduce BTC recurrence.

Pitfalls, challenges, and updates in adjuvant systemic treatment for resected biliary tract cancer

Introduction: Unfortunately, potentially curative surgical resection is possible in approximately the 25% of biliary tract cancer (BTC) patients at diagnosis, and even following radical surgery, relapse rates remain high. Thus, the role of adjuvant systemic treatment has been widely explored in this setting over the last decades, with the hope of lowering recurrence rates and improving outcomes of BTC patients.Areas covered: In this review, we provide an overview of available evidence regarding adjuvant systemic therapy in resected BTC, critically discussing the pros and cons of recently published clinical trials such as the BILCAP, the BCAT, and the PRODIGE-12/ACCORD-18 phase III studies.Expert opinion: Although the BILCAP trial has established adjuvant capecitabine for 6 months following radical resection as a novel standard of care, the role of adjuvant systemic chemotherapy is the object of debate and controversy in the BTC medical community. Although most of the international guidelines on BTC management have not yet been updated, the recently published ASCO guidelines support the use of capecitabine in this setting. Several phase I to III clinical trials are currently evaluating the role of novel therapeutic approaches in patients with resected BTC, and the results of these studies are highly awaited.

Adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy for biliary tract cancer: a review of clinical trials

Cancer originating in the biliary tract can be classified as bile duct cancer (cholangiocarcinoma), gallbladder cancer, or ampullary cancer. Bile duct cancer is further divided to intrahepatic, perihilar and distal bile duct subtypes according to the anatomical location of the tumor. The biological characteristics of each tumor are heterogeneous. However, because of the rarity of each disease, the efficacy of new drugs has been tested in groups of patients with different biliary tract cancers. In patients with metastatic or recurrent biliary tract cancer, recent randomized clinical trials revealed the non-inferiority of gemcitabine + S-1 and the superiority of gemcitabine + cisplatin + S-1 compared with gemcitabine + cisplatin in terms of overall survival, thereby establishing a new standard treatment. In the field of adjuvant therapy for biliary tract cancer, the British BILCAP (capecitabine compared with observation in resected biliary tract cancer) study revealed longer median overall survival in the capecitabine group than in the observation group in the per-protocol analysis (but not in the intention-to-treat analysis), bringing a shift toward postoperative management. Several other studies of adjuvant therapy are ongoing, and they may lead to reforms in treatment strategy for resectable biliary tract cancer in the future. The use of neoadjuvant therapy for biliary tract cancer is in its infancy, but it is expected to overcome the limitations of adjuvant therapy for this malignancy. In this review, we summarized the evidence available from clinical trials of adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy for biliary tract cancer and described ongoing clinical trials.

Current standards and future perspectives in adjuvant treatment for biliary tract cancers

Biliary tract cancer, including cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) and gallbladder cancer (GBC) are rare tumours with a rising incidence. Prognosis is poor, since most patients are diagnosed with advanced disease. Only ~20% of patients are diagnosed with early-stage disease, suitable for curative surgery. Despite surgery performed with potentially-curative intent, relapse rates are high, with around 60-70% of patients expected to have disease recurrence. Most relapses occur in the form of distant metastases, with a predominance of liver spread. In view of high tumour recurrence, adjuvant strategies have been explored for many years, in the form of radiotherapy, chemo-radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Historically, few randomised trials were available, which included a variety of additional tumours (e.g. pancreatic and ampullary tumours); most evidence relied on phase II and retrospective studies, with no high-quality evidence available to define the real benefit derived from adjuvant strategies. Since 2017, three randomised phase III clinical trials have been reported; all recruited patients with resected biliary tract cancer (CCA and GBC) who were randomised to observation alone, or chemotherapy in the form of gemcitabine (BCAT study; included patients diagnosed with extrahepatic CCA only), gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (PRODIGE-12/ACCORD-18; included patients diagnosed with CCA and GBC) or capecitabine (BILCAP; included patients diagnosed with CCA and GBC). While gemcitabine-based chemotherapy failed to show an impact on patient outcome (relapse-free survival (RFS) or overall survival (OS)), the BILCAP study showed a benefit from adjuvant capecitabine in terms of OS (pre-planned sensitivity analysis in the intention-to-treat population and in the per-protocol analysis), with confirmed benefit in terms of RFS. Based on the BILCAP trial, international guidelines recommend adjuvant capecitabine for a period of six months following potentially curative resection of CCA as the current standard of care for resected CCA and GBC. However, BILCAP failed to show OS benefit in the intention-to-treat (non-sensitivity analysis) population (primary end-point), and this finding, as well as some inconsistencies between studies has been criticised and has led to confusion in the biliary tract cancer medical community. This review summarises the adjuvant field in biliary tract cancer, with evidence before and after 2017, and comparison between the latest randomised phase III studies. Potential explanations are presented for differential findings, and future steps are explored.

Systemic adjuvant chemotherapy for cholangiocarcinoma surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The role of adjuvant therapy for biliary tract cancer is not clearly defined with conflicting results demonstrated across nonrandomized and randomized studies. We report a systematic review and meta-analysis to delineate the effect of AT on overall survival.

METHODS

Eligible studies were identified from MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane and PubMed. Studies comparing adjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy after curative-intent surgery with curative surgery only for biliary tract cancer were included. Data pertaining to tumours of the gallbladder and bile ducts were included. The primary outcome assessed was overall survival. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed, as well as pooling of unadjusted Kaplan-Meier curve data.

RESULTS

35 studies involving 42,917 patients were analysed. There was a significant improvement in overall survival with any adjuvant therapy after surgery compared with surgery only (HR 0.74; 95% CI, 0.67 to 0.83; P < 0.001). There was a significant benefit for adjuvant therapy in those with margin positive surgery (RR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.77 to 0.91; P < 0.001) and node-positive disease (RR 0.82; 95% CI 0.76 to 0.89; P < 0.001) CONCLUSION: Our review advocates the use of adjuvant therapy in bile duct cancer after curative intent resection. Further prospective studies are needed to determine the optimal regime and timing of an adjuvant approach.

Cytoplasmic Hu-Antigen R (HuR) Expression is Associated with Poor Survival in Patients with Surgically Resected Cholangiocarcinoma Treated with Adjuvant Gemcitabine-Based Chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Hu-antigen R (HuR) is an RNA-binding protein that regulates the stability, translation, and nucleus-to-cytoplasm translocation of messenger RNAs (mRNAs).

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic significance of HuR in cholangiocarcinoma patients who received adjuvant gemcitabine-based chemotherapy (AGC) after surgical resection.

METHODS

Nuclear and cytoplasmic HuR expression was investigated immunohistochemically in 131 patients with resected cholangiocarcinoma, including 91 patients administered AGC and 40 patients who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy. The correlation between HuR expression and survival was evaluated by statistical analysis.

RESULTS

High nuclear and cytoplasmic HuR expression was observed in 67 (51%) and 45 (34%) patients, respectively. Cytoplasmic HuR expression was significantly associated with lymph node metastasis (p < 0.01), while high cytoplasmic HuR expression was significantly associated with poor disease-free survival [DFS] (p = 0.03) and overall survival [OS] (p = 0.001) in the 91 patients who received AGC, but not in the 40 patients who did not receive AGC (DFS p = 0.17; OS p = 0.07). In the multivariate analysis of patients who received AGC, high cytoplasmic HuR expression was an independent predictor of poor DFS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.77; p = 0.04) and OS (HR 2.09; p = 0.02). Nuclear HuR expression did not affect the survival of enrolled patients.

CONCLUSIONS

High cytoplasmic HuR expression was closely associated with the efficacy of AGC in patients with cholangiocarcinoma. The current findings warrant further investigations to optimize adjuvant chemotherapy regimens for resectable cholangiocarcinoma.

Randomized clinical trial of adjuvant gemcitabine chemotherapy versus observation in resected bile duct cancer

BACKGROUND

Although some retrospective studies have suggested the value of adjuvant therapy, no recommended standard exists in bile duct cancer. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that adjuvant gemcitabine chemotherapy would improve survival probability in resected bile duct cancer.

METHODS

This was a randomized phase III trial. Patients with resected bile duct cancer were assigned randomly to gemcitabine and observation groups, which were balanced with respect to lymph node status, residual tumour status and tumour location. Gemcitabine was given intravenously at a dose of 1000 mg/m2 , administered on days 1, 8 and 15 every 4 weeks for six cycles. The primary endpoint was overall survival, and secondary endpoints were relapse-free survival, subgroup analysis and toxicity.

RESULTS

Some 225 patients were included (117 gemcitabine, 108 observation). Baseline characteristics were well balanced between the gemcitabine and observation groups. There were no significant differences in overall survival (median 62·3 versus 63·8 months respectively; hazard ratio 1·01, 95 per cent c.i. 0·70 to 1·45; P = 0·964) and relapse-free survival (median 36·0 versus 39·9 months; hazard ratio 0·93, 0·66 to 1·32; P = 0·693). There were no survival differences between the two groups in subsets stratified by lymph node status and margin status. Although haematological toxicity occurred frequently in the gemcitabine group, most toxicities were transient, and grade 3/4 non-haematological toxicity was rare.

CONCLUSION

The survival probability in patients with resected bile duct cancer was not significantly different between the gemcitabine adjuvant chemotherapy group and the observation group. Registration number: UMIN 000000820 (http://www.umin.ac.jp/).

Combined gemcitabine and S-1 chemotherapy for treating unresectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a randomized open-label clinical trial

Although the combination of cisplatin and gemcitabine (GEM) is considered the standard first-line chemotherapy against unresectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HC), its efficacy is discouraging. The present randomized open-label clinical trial aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the GEM plus S-1 (GEM-S-1) combination against unresectable HC. Twenty-five patients per group were randomly assigned to receive GEM, S-1 or GEM-S-1. Neutropenia (56%) and leukopenia (40%) were the most common chemotherapy-related toxicities in the GEM-S-1 group. Median overall survival (OS) in the GEM-S-1, GEM and S-1 groups was 11, 10 and 6 months, respectively. GEM plus S-1 significantly improved OS compared to S-1 monotherapy (OR=0.68; 95%CI, 0.50–0.90; P=0.008). Median progression-free survival (PFS) times in the GEM-S-1, GEM and S-1 groups were 4.90, 3.70 and 1.60 months, respectively. GEM plus S-1 significantly improved PFS compared to S-1 monotherapy (OR=0.50; 95%CI, 0.27–0.91; P=0.024). Response rates were 36%, 24% and 8% in the GEM-S-1, GEM and S-1 groups, respectively. A statistically significant difference was found in response rates between the gemcitabine-S-1 and S-1 groups (36% vs 8%, P=0.017). Patients with CA19-9<466 U/ml were more responsive to chemotherapeutic agents than those with CA19-9≥571 U/ml (88.9% vs 0%, P<0.001). We conclude that the combination of GEM plus S-1 provides a better OS, PFS and response rate than S-1 monotherapy, but it did not significantly differ from GEM monotherapy. (ChiCTR-TRC-14004733).

Low Incidence of Lymph Node Metastasis After Resection of Hepatitis Virus-Related Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

We determined the rates of initial lymph node metastasis following curative resection of mass-forming type-intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) in patients with and without hepatitis virus infection.

METHODS

We enrolled 87 patients between January 2000 and December 2013 with ICC without preoperative lymph node metastasis and without lymph node dissection. Patients included 32 who were seropositive for hepatitis B or C virus (virus group) and 55 who had no evidence of hepatitis virus infection (nonvirus group). Postsurgical outcomes and initial recurrence of the groups were compared, and we identified the risk factors for lymph node metastasis as initial recurrence.

RESULTS

Platelet counts and prothrombin activities were significantly lower in the virus group compared with those of the nonvirus group. The number of patients with chronic hepatitis or liver cirrhosis was significantly higher in the virus group compared with the nonvirus group as well as their respective rates of recurrence-free survival. One patient (3%) in the virus group and 14 patients (25%) in the nonvirus group had lymph node metastasis as initial recurrence (p = 0.007). Multivariate analysis revealed that the absence of hepatitis virus infection as an independent risk factor (p = 0.047).

CONCLUSION

Hepatitis virus-associated mass-forming-type ICC confers a low risk of lymph node metastasis as initial postoperative recurrence.

Impact of Secreted Protein Acidic and Rich in Cysteine (SPARC) Expression on Prognosis After Surgical Resection for Biliary Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine (SPARC) is a matricellular protein that influences chemotherapy effectiveness and prognosis. The aim of this study was to investigate whether SPARC expression correlates with the postoperative survival of patients treated with surgical resection for biliary carcinoma.

METHODS

SPARC expression in resected biliary carcinoma specimens was investigated immunohistochemically in 175 patients. The relationship between SPARC expression and prognosis after surgery was evaluated using univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

High SPARC expression in peritumoral stroma was found in 61 (35%) patients. In all patients, stromal SPARC expression was significantly associated with overall survival (OS) (P = 0.006). Multivariate analysis revealed that high stromal SPARC expression was an independent risk factor for poor OS (HR 1.81, P = 0.006). Moreover, high stromal SPARC expression was independently associated with poor prognosis in a subset of 118 patients treated with gemcitabine-based adjuvant chemotherapy (HR 2.04, P = 0.010) but not in the 57 patients who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy (P = 0.21).

CONCLUSIONS

Stromal SPARC expression correlated with the prognosis of patients with resectable biliary carcinoma, and its significance was enhanced in patients treated with adjuvant gemcitabine-based chemotherapy.

Curative resection of carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater with lymph node metastases around the abdominal aorta after chemotherapy: A case report

•

Curative resection of carcinoma with lymphnode metastasis around the aorta.

•

Conversion surgical strategy for unresectable case after chemotherapy.

•

Rare case of biliary tract cancer with distant metastasis.

Introduction

For carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater, lymph node metastasis around the abdominal aorta is an inoperable factor equivalent to distant metastasis, such as hepatic metastasis or peritoneal carcinomatosis, making the cancer unresectable.

Presentation of case

A 53-year-old man was referred to our hospital and was diagnosed as having carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater with lymph node metastases around the abdominal aorta. Although only chemotherapy was initially scheduled, the chemotherapy was effective, and the metastases were dramatically reduced after 4 cycles of chemotherapy. Curative surgical resection was performed.

Discussion

There were only eight case reports describing curative resections of initially unresectable biliary tract carcinomas excluding intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma after chemotherapy.

Conclusion

Curative surgical resection after chemotherapy may be a feasible treatment plan in patients with unresectable biliary tract cancer.

Nerve Growth Factor Expression Is Not Associated with Perineural Invasion in Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Although the presence of perineural invasion has been recognized as a poor prognostic factor in extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, the molecular mechanisms of perineural invasion in extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma remain unclear. Nerve growth factor has been reported to be a candidate predictive biomarker of perineural invasion in some cancers.

AIM

To investigate the impact of intratumoral nerve growth factor expression in resected extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma on survival.

METHODS

Intratumoral nerve growth factor expression was investigated immunohistochemically in 112 patients with resected extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Associations between nerve growth factor expression and clinicopathological factors were statistically evaluated, and risk factors for poor survival were analyzed using univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

High and low nerve growth factor expression was observed in 62 (55%) and 50 (45%) patients, respectively. For all 112 patients, no significant correlation was found between nerve growth factor expression and presence of perineural invasion (P = 0.942). Moreover, nerve growth factor expression was not associated with recurrence-free survival (P = 0.861) and overall survival (P = 0.973). In multivariate analysis, lymph node metastasis (P = 0.004) was identified as an independent risk factor for early recurrence and the presence of perineural invasion (P = 0.002) and lymph node metastasis (P < 0.001) was identified as independent risk factors for poor survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Intratumoral nerve growth factor expression is not associated with perineural invasion or recurrence-free and overall survival in patients with resected extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Evaluation and management of intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

Cholangiocarcinomas are rare biliary tract tumors that are often challenging to diagnose and treat. Cholangiocarcinomas are generally categorized as intrahepatic or extrahepatic depending on their anatomic location. The majority of patients with cholangiocarcinoma do not have any of the known or suspected risk factors and present with advanced disease. The optimal evaluation and management of patients with cholangiocarcinoma requires thoughtful integration of clinical information, imaging studies, cytology and/or histology, as well as prompt multidisciplinary evaluation. The current review focuses on recent advances in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with cholangiocarcinoma and, in particular, on the role of endoscopy, surgery, transplantation, radiotherapy, systemic therapy, and liver-directed therapies in the curative or palliative treatment of these individuals. Cancer 2016;122:1349-1369. © 2016 American Cancer Society.

Feasibility and efficacy of gemcitabine plus cisplatin combination therapy after curative resection for biliary tract cancer

BACKGROUND

The aim of this multi-institutional study was to assess the feasibility and the efficacy of gemcitabine plus cisplatin (CDDP) combination therapy (GC therapy) for biliary tract cancer (BTC) in the adjuvant setting.

METHODS

Eligible patients identified between January 2008 and January 2013 were enrolled. GC therapy at 1,000 mg/m(2) of gemcitabine and 25 mg/m(2) of CDDP on days 1 and 8 repeated every 3 weeks was performed for 6 months. The primary endpoint was the feasibility and the adverse events, and the secondary endpoint was recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Among 29 evaluable patients, the protocol was completed in 21 (72%) patients. Relative dose intensity (RDI) of gemcitabine and CDDP was 77% and 81%, respectively. There was no difference in the completion rate and the RDI between patients who underwent resection with vs. without major hepatectomy. Grade 3-4 toxicities included leukopenia (14%) and neutropenia (27%). Two-year RFS and 2-year OS was 59% and 90%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Standard dose of GC therapy is tolerable in patients with BTC who underwent curative resection either with or without major hepatectomy. The survival effect of this regimen is promising, but further comparative study is needed.

The role of adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy for cholangiocarcinoma

Cholangiocarcinomas are rare cancers arising from the epithelia of the biliary tract. The only prospect of curative therapy is with surgery. However, relapse rates are high with five-year survival rates typically around 20-30%. Involved resection margins and spread to local lymph nodes are associated with a higher risk of relapse. Such poor outcomes provide a rationale for adjuvant strategies to improve survival. However, there is little randomised data to support the use of adjuvant therapy; the available evidence base is based mostly on retrospective case series and results are often conflicting. This review evaluates the available evidence. Adjuvant therapy may be considered on an individual patient basis after discussion of the limitations of our knowledge. The results of prospective, randomised clinical trials of adjuvant therapy are eagerly awaited. Progress will require collaboration of basic science and clinical oncology and the execution of well-designed clinical trials.

Treatment outcomes of chemotherapy between unresectable and recurrent biliary tract cancer

AIM: To evaluate the differences in the treatment outcomes between the unresectable and recurrent biliary tract cancer patients who received chemotherapy.

METHODS: Patients who were treated with gemcitabine and S-1 combination therapy in the previous prospective studies were divided into groups of unresectable and recurrent cases. The tumor response, time-to-progression, overall survival, toxicity, and dose intensity were compared between these two groups.

RESULTS: Response rate of the recurrent group was higher than that of the unresectable group (40.0% vs 25.5%; P = 0.34). Median time-to-progression of the recurrent and unresectable groups were 8.7 mo (95%CI), 1.2 mo, not reached) and 5.7 mo (95%CI: 4.0-7.0 mo), respectively (P = 0.14). Median overall survival of the recurrent and the unresectable groups were 16.1 mo (95%CI: 2.0 mo-not reached) and 9.6 mo (95%CI: 7.1-11.7 mo), respectively (P = 0.10). Dose intensities were significantly lower in the recurrent groups (gemcitabine: recurrent group 83.5% vs unresectable group 96.8%; P < 0.01, S-1: Recurrent group 75.9% vs unresectable group 91.8%; P < 0.01). Neutropenia occurred more frequently in recurrent group (recurrent group 90% vs unresectable group 55%; P = 0.04).

CONCLUSION: Not only the efficacy but also the toxicity and dose intensity were significantly different between unresectable and recurrent biliary tract cancer.

Survival outcomes and progonostic factors of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients following surgical resection: Adjuvant therapy is a favorable prognostic factor

This study was conducted to investigate survival and prognostic factors for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ECC) following surgical resection and evaluate the effects of postoperative adjuvant therapy (AT) on overall survival (OS). We retrospectively collected clinical and pathological data between March, 2008 and December, 2013. The Kaplan-Meier method and the COX regression model were used to evaluate the OS and prognostic factors of 105 postoperative ECC patients, of whom 32 had received AT. The patients were stratified into seven risk subgroups and the survival rates were compared within each subgroup between patients who received AT and those who did not. The results demonstrated a median OS of 17.6 months, with 1- and 3-year survival rates of 67.9 and 19.5%, respectively, for the entire cohort. On univariate analysis, preoperative cholangitis, non-R0 surgical margins, poor differentiation grade, stage 3/4 and lymphatic metastasis were identified as adverse prognostic factors. AT was not significantly associated with improved OS. However, the subgroup analysis revealed that the effect of AT was significant only in the lymphatic metastasis group (median OS, 21.6 vs. 10.4 months; and 3-year OS, 16.6 vs. 0%, respectively; P=0.02). The survival curves of the AT and non-AT groups were significantly different only for node-positive patients. The COX regression model identified lymphatic metastasis, surgical margins and AT as independent prognostic factors for ECC. A negative resection margin may reduce the mortality rate following surgery by 47%. By contrast, lymph node metastasis was associated with a 2.18-fold higher mortality rate for ECC patients. Postoperative AT contributed to a 0.45-fold mortality rate compared to non-AT ECC patients. Therefore, we concluded that AT is a favorable prognostic factor for ECC patients and it may prolong the survival of patients with lymphatic metastasis. Our data suggest that postoperative AT should be recommended for node-positive ECC patients.

Concurrent analysis of human equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1 and ribonucleotide reductase subunit 1 expression increases predictive value for prognosis in cholangiocarcinoma patients treated with adjuvant gemcitabine-based chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to investigate the predictive and prognostic values of intratumoural human equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1 (hENT1) and ribonucleotide reductase subunit 1 (RRM1) expression in advanced cholangiocarcinoma patients treated with adjuvant gemcitabine-based chemotherapy (AGC).

METHODS

Intratumoural hENT1 and RRM1 expression levels were investigated immunohistochemically in 127 patients with advanced cholangiocarcinoma who underwent surgical resection (68 with AGC and 59 without AGC). The impacts of hENT1 and RRM1 expression on survival were evaluated.

RESULTS

High intratumoural hENT1 and RRM1 expression levels were observed in 86 (68%) and 67 (53%) patients, respectively. In a multivariate analysis of 68 patients who received AGC, high hENT1 (P=0.044) and low RRM1 expression (P=0.009) were independently associated with prolonged disease-free survival (DFS), whereas low RRM1 expression (P=0.024) was independently associated with prolonged overall survival (OS). Moreover, concurrent high hENT1 and low RRM1 expression was a powerful independent predictor of prolonged DFS (P<0.001) and OS (P=0.001) when the combined classification of hENT1 and RRM1 was introduced.

CONCLUSIONS

Concurrent analysis of hENT1 and RRM1 expression may increase the predictive value of these biomarkers for survival of advanced cholangiocarcinoma patients treated with AGC.

Temporal trends in liver-directed therapy of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in the United States: a population-based analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Data on outcomes after liver-directed therapy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) are limited due to the rarity of the disease. We sought to define overall utilization and temporal trends of liver-directed therapy for ICC.

METHODS

We identified 5,388 patients with ICC using the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database between 1983 and 2010. Patients were characterized based on the type of liver-directed therapy received: surgical resection, ablation therapy, and radiation therapy.

RESULTS

The majority of patients did not undergo liver-directed therapy (n = 4,156, 77.1%). Among those undergoing liver-directed therapy, surgical resection was most commonly performed (n = 672, 54.5%) and its utilization increased threefold over time (P = 0.001). The use of ablation therapy alone was used in 5.2% of patients and increased nearly sixfold over time (P = 0.39) whereas the use of radiation therapy alone decreased by nearly half (P < 0.001). Overall median survival was 10 months. Poor predictors of survival include tumor-based factors such as regional and distant disease, as well as poorly differentiated and large tumors (>5 cm).

CONCLUSION

There was a moderate improvement in overall survival in patients with ICC between 1983 and 2010. The majority of patients with ICC are not undergoing liver-directed therapy. Among those who do undergo liver-directed therapy, the use of ablation therapy and surgery are increasing with nearly three in five patients undergoing resection.

Adjuvant chemotherapy in resectable cholangiocarcinoma patients

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Cholangiocarcinoma patients usually have poor treatment outcome and a high mortality rate. The role of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) is controversial. Our study aimed to evaluate benefits of AC in resectable cholangiocarcinoma patients.

METHODS

A retrospective study included 263 patients who underwent curative resection in Srinakarind University Hospital. These patients had pathological reports showing a clear margin (R0) or microscopic margin (R1) of lesion-free tissue.

RESULTS

There were 138 patients who received AC. This group had a significantly lower mean age than patients not receiving adjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) group (57.7 ± 8.5 vs 60.4 ± 9.0 years, P = 0.01). The level of serum albumin above 3 g/dL was more common in AC group than the NAC one (87.7% vs 79.2%, P = 0.04). Patients who received AC had significantly longer overall median survival time (21.6 vs 13.4 months, P = 0.01). Patients with a combination of gemcitabine and capecitabine regimen had the longest survival time (median overall survival time of gemcitabine and capecitabine 31.5, 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin 17.3, 5-fluorouracil alone 22.2, capecitabine alone 21.6, and gemcitabine alone 7.9 months, P = 0.02). Benefits of AC were likely to be found in patients who had high-risk features, that is, high level of carbohydrate antigen 19-9, advanced stage, T4 stage, lymph node involvement, and R1 margin.

CONCLUSIONS

AC significantly prolongs survival time in resectable cholangiocarcinoma patients, particularly in the high risk group.

Perineural invasion in extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: prognostic impact and treatment strategies

BACKGROUND

The significance of perineural invasion in extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma has not been fully elucidated. This study aims to determine the prognostic impact of and optimal treatment strategy for perineural invasion in patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

METHODS

Medical records of 133 patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma who underwent curative resection were reviewed retrospectively. Ninety-eight patients had perineural invasion and 35 patients did not. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses were performed to clarify the prognostic impact of and optimal treatment strategy for perineural invasion.

RESULTS

Only tumor differentiation (P=0.024) was independently associated with perineural invasion in the multivariate logistic regression model. Multivariate survival analysis revealed that perineural invasion (P=0.002), resection margin status(P=0.016), and International Union Against Cancer (UICC) pT factor (P=0.015) were independent prognostic factors of overall survival. Overall 5-year survival rates for patients with and without perineural invasion were 28 and 74 %, respectively. Among 98 patients with perineural invasion, the use of adjuvant chemotherapy (P=0.003), lymph node status (P=0.015), resection margin status (P=0.008), and UICC pT factor (P=0.016) were independently associated with overall survival by multivariate analysis. Overall 5-year survival rates for patients with perineural invasion who did and did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy were 33 and 21 %, respectively (P=0.023).

CONCLUSIONS

Perineural invasion is a potent prognostic factor in extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Adjuvant chemotherapy may improve the overall survival of patients with perineural invasion.