No kidding: low back pain and type of container influence adolescents' perception of load heaviness

The burden of low back pain in children and adolescents with overweight and obesity: from pathophysiology to prevention and treatment strategies

Nonspecific low back pain (LBP) is one of the most common causes of disability, affecting all individuals at least once in their lifetime. Such a condition is also becoming increasingly frequent in the pediatric population, especially in children and adolescents with overweight/obesity. Furthermore, new-onset LBP during adolescence has been demonstrated to be a strong predictor of developing LBP later in life, contributing to poorer outcomes and increasing social and medical costs. Several causes and different mechanisms have been considered for the development of LBP in pediatric individuals affected by obesity. For this reason, planning adequate prevention and treatment strategies, mainly through conservative lifestyle changes, would be crucial to anticipate the negative consequences of persisting LBP in adulthood. The aim of this narrative review was to characterize the relationship between LBP and overweight/obesity in the pediatric population, highlighting epidemiological and pathophysiological aspects. In addition, prevention and treatment approaches will be reviewed considering the need to reduce the burden of LBP on this population. According to our search, LBP was more frequent in children and adolescents with overweight and obesity and has been associated with several anthropometric and lifestyle factors, including lumbar hyperlordosis, sedentary habits, physical inactivity, carrying a heavy schoolbag, low vitamin D levels, psychosocial ill-being, and premature intervertebral disc degeneration. Most of these conditions may be addressed with conservative strategies mainly consisting of dietary adjustments, physical exercise, education programs, and physical therapy.

Neglected problem: Influence of school bag on lumbar segment in children

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

School bag (SB) load causes significant changes in the height and symmetry of the intervertebral discs at each level of the spine from T12-L1 to L5-S1. This study aims to determine the change in the size of the lumbar segment angle at a particularly critical point L3-L4 of the spine in relation to the load of the average weight of SB in healthy male children (students) at standing and after 2-minute gait.

METHODS

47 boys, aged 12.2 ± 0.92 years, underwent photogrammetric measurements in the sagittal plane in statics and dynamics, walking on a laboratory treadmill. Measurements were repeated with the weight of SB with a constant load of 6,251 kg, which represents 13.78% of the average body weight of our sample. The lumbar angle (LA) connecting the point of the big toe, the lumbar point L3-L4 and the processus spinosus C7 was measured. In gait, LA was measured in the phases of the middle support and the initial contact of the heel.

RESULTS

T-test of paired samples was used to estimate the change in LA at standing from 4.953° and walking phases from 6.295° to 7.332° in relation to the unloaded state, and the value of the effect size (ES) indicates that the impact of SB load is significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Cumulatively, microtraumas caused by SB load significantly affect the increase in intervertebral pressure at the L3-L4 point, which is susceptible to degenerative processes and which can be the cause of lumbar syndrome (LS). Preventive measures are needed in order to lighten SB in this population and introduce up to 10% of students' body weight into the safe zone.

Prevalence of Low Back Pain and Associated Risks in School-Age Children

BACKGROUND

Low back pain (LBP) is highly prevalent in children and adolescents, while psychosocial, anthropometric, developmental, and lifestyle factors have been associated. However, the evidence is inconsistent from a biological point of view, so identifying predictors of LBP in the 6-12 years children through physical examination should be appropriate.

AIMS

To estimate the prevalence of LBP and associated factors in schoolchildren in a Brazilian population.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Three schools in Botucatu, Brazil.

PARTICIPANTS/SUBJECTS

377 students from 6-12 years.

METHODS

Data collection consisted of questions regarding personal history, socioeconomic and anthropometric information, kinesiologic evaluation with anthropometry, lumbar biophotogrammetry, and backpack weight and use. Descriptive analyses were performed, and simple and multiple logistic regression models were used for risk factors.

RESULTS

The prevalence of LBP was 27.32% (confidence interval [CI] 95% = 23.07-32.03). The mean age was 8.85 years (± 1.83) in the group with LBP and 8 years (± 1.76) in the group without LBP (p = .006). Variables such as backpack weight (odds ratio [OR] = 1.45, CI 95% = 1.018-2.064) and exceeding 3 hours per day in front of the television (OR = 7.97, CI 95% = 1.957-32.515) increased the chance of LBP in these students.

CONCLUSION

LBP is prevalent in younger schoolchildren, and the factors associated with this outcome can be effectively addressed through the promotion of health measures. LBP in schoolchildren is a musculoskeletal discomfort that negatively affects the quality of life of these individuals and persists in adulthood.

Effects of School Backpacks on Spine Biomechanics During Daily Activities: A Narrative Review of Literature

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this narrative review is to summarize the effects of carrying school backpacks on spine and low-back biomechanics as a risk factor for low back pain in young individuals.

BACKGROUND

Backpacks constitute a considerable daily load for schoolchildren. Consistently, a large number of children attribute their low back pain experience to backpack use.

METHOD

A literature search was conducted using a combination of keywords related to the impact of carrying backpacks on lower back biomechanics. The references of each identified study were further investigated to identify additional studies.

RESULTS

Twenty-two studies met inclusion criteria. A total of 1,159 people aged 7 to 27 years were included in the studies. The added load of a backpack and the changes in spinal posture when carrying a backpack impose considerable demand on internal tissues and likely result in considerable spinal loads. The findings included results related to the effects of backpack weight and position on trunk kinematics and spine posture as well as trunk muscle activity during upright standing, walking, and ascending and descending stairs.

CONCLUSION

Backpack-induced changes in trunk kinematics for a given activity reflect alterations in mechanical demand of the activity on the lower back that should be balanced internally by the active and passive responses of lower back tissues. Although the reported alterations in trunk muscle activities and lumbar posture are indications of changes in the active and passive response of the lower back tissues, the resultant effects on spinal load, that is, an important causal factor for low back pain, remains to be investigated in the future. A knowledge of backpack-induced changes in spinal loads can inform design of interventions aimed at reduction of spinal load via improved backpack design or limitation on carrying duration.

APPLICATION

This narrative review is intended to serve as an educational article for students and trainees in ergonomics and occupational biomechanics.

The effects of backpack type on lumbo-pelvic coordination during trunk bending and return tasks

Backpacks with ergonomic features are recommended to mitigate the risk of developing low back pain due to carrying a heavy school backpack. A repeated measure study was conducted on 40 college-age students to investigate the immediate changes in magnitude and timing aspects of lumbo-pelvic coordination when carrying an ergonomically modified vs. a normal backpack relative to no backpack condition during trunk forward bending and backward return tasks. We found a smaller reduction in the thoracic range of rotation, an increase vs. a decrease in pelvic range of rotation and a larger reduction in lumbar flexion for a modified vs. a normal backpack. Furthermore, during the forward bending, a less in-phase motion for the modified backpack was observed. Our results suggest that participants have likely experienced larger spinal loads with the modified backpack; a conclusion that should be investigated in future to determine whether ergonomic backpacks can reduce the risk of low back pain in children. Practitioner summary: Research participants performed trunk bending and return closer to their habitual way under modified versus normal school backpack. From an equilibrium point of view, therefore, individuals are likely experiencing larger spinal loads during activities of daily living with a modified backpack. However, such a conclusion may change when considering stability requirements.

Do schoolbags cause back pain in children and adolescents? A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether characteristics of schoolbag use are risk factors for back pain in children and adolescents.

DATA SOURCES

Electronic searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL databases up to April 2016.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES

Prospective cohort studies, cross-sectional and randomised controlled trials conducted with children or adolescents. The primary outcome was an episode of back pain and the secondary outcomes were an episode of care seeking and school absence due to back pain. We weighted evidence from longitudinal studies above that from cross-sectional. The risk of bias of the longitudinal studies was assessed by a modified version of the Quality in Prognosis Studies tool.

RESULTS

We included 69 studies (n=72 627), of which five were prospective longitudinal and 64 cross-sectional or retrospective. We found evidence from five prospective studies that schoolbag characteristics such as weight, design and carriage method do not increase the risk of developing back pain in children and adolescents. The included studies were at moderate to high risk of bias. Evidence from cross-sectional studies aligned with that from longitudinal studies (ie, there was no consistent pattern of association between schoolbag use or type and back pain). We were unable to pool results due to different variables and inconsistent results.

SUMMARY/CONCLUSION

There is no convincing evidence that aspects of schoolbag use increase the risk of back pain in children and adolescents.

The relationship between back pain and schoolbag use: a cross-sectional study of 5,318 Italian students

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Back pain at a young age is considered to be predictive of chronicity. Several studies have investigated the relationship between the use of a schoolbag and back pain, although some aspects are still unclear.

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate back pain due to schoolbag use in terms of (1) prevalence and intensity, (2) differences between male and female pupils, and (3) predisposing factors.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a cross-sectional study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

The sample was composed of 5,318 healthy pupils aged 6 to 19 years (classified according to three age groups: children, younger adolescents, and older adolescents).

OUTCOME MEASURES

Schoolbag-related pain was assessed by means of an ad hoc questionnaire. The intensity of pain was assessed using the Wong scale.

METHODS

Subjects underwent a face-to-face interview using an ad hoc questionnaire. The intensity of pain was assessed using the Wong scale. On the basis of the prevalence and intensity of back pain, we divided our population into two groups: (1) no or mild pain group and (2) moderate or severe pain group. The "schoolbag load" (ratio between schoolbag and pupil weight multiplied by 100) was calculated for each subject.

RESULTS

More than 60% of the subjects reported pain. Although the schoolbag load decreased from children to young and older adolescents, schoolbag-related pain significantly increased (p<.001). Girls reported significantly more frequent and more severe pain than boys. The logistic model confirmed that adolescent girls are the group at greatest risk of suffering from intense pain. The schoolbag load had a weak impact on back pain, whereas the schoolbag carrying time was a strong predictor.

CONCLUSIONS

Adolescent girls have the highest risk of experiencing severe back pain, regardless of schoolbag load. This suggests that other factors (anatomical, physiological, or environmental) might play an important role in pain perception. These aspects should be investigated to plan appropriate preventive and rehabilitative strategies.