Radiosurgery and fractionated radiotherapy for cavernous sinus meningioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Recovery of cranial nerve neuropathies after LINAC-based stereotactic radiosurgery for benign cavernous sinus meningioma

PURPOSE

Cranial Nerve Neuropathies (CNNs) often accompany Cavernous Sinus Meningioma (CSM), for which Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSR) are established treatments. This study assesses CNNs recovery in CSM patients treated with LINAC, offering insight into treatment effectiveness.

METHODS

This study was conducted on 128 patients with CSM treated with LINAC-based SRS/FSR between 2005 and 2020 at a single institution. 46 patients presented with CNNs. The study analyzed patients' demographics, clinical parameters, SRS/FSR treatment characteristics, post-treatment CNNs recovery duration, status, and radiological control on their last follow-up.

RESULTS

The median follow-up duration was 53.4 months. Patients were treated with SRS (n = 25) or FSR (n = 21). The mean pretreatment tumor volume was 9.5 cc decreasing to a mean end-of-follow-up tumor volume was 5.1 cc. Radiological tumor control was achieved in all cases. CNN recovery was observed in 80.4% of patients, with specific nerve recoveries documented as follows: extra-ocular nerves (43.2%), trigeminal nerve (32.4%), and optic nerve (10.8%). A higher CNNs recovery rate was associated with a smaller pre-treatment tumor volume (p < 0.001), and the median time-to-improvement was 3.7 months. Patients with tumor volumes exceeding 6.8 cc and those treated with FSR exhibited prolonged time-to-improvement (P < 0.03 and P < 0.04 respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that SRS/FSR for CSM provides good and sustainable CNNs recovery outcomes with excellent long-term radiological control. A higher CNNs recovery rate was associated with a smaller pre-treatment tumor volume. while shorter time-to-improvement was identified in patients treated with SRS compared to FSR, particularly in those with small pre-treatment tumor volume.

Extended Long-Term Outcome After Conservative Decompressive Microsurgery and Routine Adjuvant Fractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Symptomatic Cavernous Sinus Meningiomas

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Cavernous sinus meningiomas (CSM) pose one of the most difficult to treat subgroup of skull base meningiomas. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of an interdisciplinary treatment approach for symptomatic CSM which incorporated conservative function preserving microsurgery and routine adjuvant fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT).

METHODS

A homogenous group of patients with symptomatic primary CSM with extracavernous extension was treated between 2005 and 2012. All patients were available for a minimum follow-up of 5 years. Clinical follow-up included detailed examination of oculomotor deficits, visual status, and endocrinologic function. Radiologic follow-up was conducted by tumor volumetry.

RESULTS

Overall, 23 patients were included in this study (78.3% women; median age 58 years). Diplopia was the most common presenting symptom, followed by headache and visual disturbances. Surgical morbidity was low (3/23; 13%). FSRT was applied after a median of 2 months after surgery. At a median clinical follow-up of 113 months, 70.45% of the presenting symptoms had improved, 25% remained unchanged, and in 2 cases (4.54%), worsening occurred. Overall tumor regression was evident in 19/21 World Health Organization 1 and in 1/2 of World Health Organization 2 CSM, respectively, at a median radiological follow-up of 103 months.

CONCLUSION

Our findings demonstrate the efficacy of an interdisciplinary treatment approach for symptomatic primary CSM with extracavernous extension with decompression of neurovascular elements followed by FSRT. Precise preoperative planning and intraoperative decision making in combination with routine postoperative radiotherapy can achieve excellent tumor control, improve neurologic function, and minimize long-term morbidity.

Grading meningioma resections: the Simpson classification and beyond

Technological (and also methodological) advances in neurosurgery and neuroimaging have prompted a reappraisal of Simpson's grading of the extent of meningioma resections. To the authors, the published evidence supports the tenets of this classification. Meningioma is an often surgically curable dura-based disease. An extent of meningioma resection classification needs to account for a clinically meaningful variation of the risk of recurrence depending on the aggressiveness of the management of the (dural) tumor origin.Nevertheless, the 1957 Simpson classification undoubtedly suffers from many limitations. Important issues include substantial problems with the applicability of the grading paradigm in different locations. Most notably, tumor location and growth pattern often determine the eventual extent of resection, i.e., the Simpson grading does not reflect what is surgically achievable. Another very significant problem is the inherent subjectivity of relying on individual intraoperative assessments. Neuroimaging advances such as the use of somatostatin receptor PET scanning may help to overcome this central problem. Tumor malignancy and biology in general certainly influence the role of the extent of resection but may not need to be incorporated in an actual extent of resection grading scheme as long as one does not aim at developing a prognostic score. Finally, all attempts at grading meningioma resections use tumor recurrence as the endpoint. However, especially in view of radiosurgery/radiotherapy options, the clinical significance of recurrent tumor growth varies greatly between cases.In summary, while the extent of resection certainly matters in meningioma surgery, grading resections remains controversial. Given the everyday clinical relevance of this issue, a multicenter prospective register or study effort is probably warranted (including a prominent focus on advanced neuroimaging).

Postoperative trigeminal neuropathy outcomes following surgery for tumors involving the trigeminal nerve

OBJECTIVE

To observe the evolution and outcomes of postoperative trigeminal neuropathy following surgery of tumor involving the trigeminal nerve.

METHODS

A prospective observational study was conducted between October 2018 and February 2019 involving 25 patients with tumors confirmed to involve the trigeminal nerve during surgery by senior author. Pre- and postoperative trigeminal nerve function status and clinical data were recorded.

RESULTS

This study included 18 cases of meningioma and seven of trigeminal schwannoma. Among the meningioma cases, 55.6% of the patients reported facial sensory dysfunction before surgery, 33.3% presented ocular discomfort, and 5.6% had masticatory muscle atrophy. Postoperatively, all patients experienced facial paresthesia, 94.4% complained of eye dryness, and one (5.56%) exhibited keratitis. Additionally, one patient (5.56%) showed new-onset masticatory weakness. During follow-up, 50.0% of patients reported improvement in facial paresthesia, and one (5.56%) experienced deterioration. Eye dryness resolved in 35.3% of patients, and keratitis remission was observed in one patient. However, one patient (5.56%) developed neurotrophic keratitis. Overall, 55.6% of patients displayed mild masticatory weakness without muscle atrophy. In the cases of schwannoma, 28.6% of patients had facial paresthesia before surgery, 42.9% showed ocular discomfort, and one (14.3%) complained of masticatory dysfunction. Postoperatively, 85.7% of patients reported facial paresthesia and eye dryness, with one patient (16.7%) experiencing keratitis. During follow-up, 66.7% of patients demonstrated improvement in facial paresthesia, 28.6% showed eye dryness remission, and one patient (16.7%) recovered from keratitis. However, one patient (16.7%) developed new-onset neurotrophic keratitis. One patient (16.7%) experienced relief of masticatory dysfunction, but 42.9% reported mild deterioration. Another patient (14.3%) had facial anesthesia that had not improved.

CONCLUSION

Postoperative trigeminal neuropathy is a common complication with a high incidence rate and poor recovery outcomes after surgery for tumors involving the trigeminal nerve. When trigeminal nerve damage is unavoidable, it is essential to provide a multidisciplinary and careful follow-up, along with active management strategy, to mitigate the more severe effects of postoperative trigeminal neuropathy.

Endoscopic Extended Transsphenoidal Surgery Aiming for Radical Resection of Skull Base Tumors Involving Cavernous Sinus: Assessment of Resectability and Risks of Complications

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Surgical resection of tumors invading the cavernous sinus (CS) still shows therapeutic challenges. For "nonadenomatous" skull base tumors invading in CS, there were only a few reports showing the outcomes of radical resection. Therefore, the outcomes of endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery (ETS) aiming for radical resection thus remain largely unknown regarding resectability and functional results of the cranial nerves.

METHODS

We performed ETS aiming for radical resection in 35 skull base tumors involving CS (17 chondrosarcomas, 12 chordomas, 3 meningiomas, and 3 trigeminal schwannomas; median follow-up 36.5 months ranging from 12 to 91 months). Gross total resection (GTR) is attempted in all the cases for real-time findings from electrophysiological monitoring of the cranial nerves. When the tumor was strongly adherent to the cranial nerves or internal carotid artery, maximum volume reduction of the tumor was attempted.

RESULTS

GTR was achieved in 28 patients (80.0%), subtotal resection in 3 (8.6%), and partial resection in 4 (11.4%). One patient experienced internal carotid artery injury during surgery. After ETS, 15 patients showed symptom improvement (51.7% in all 29 patients with preoperative cranial nerve symptoms, CNS). Four (11.4%) transiently developed abducens nerve palsy, and one required repair surgery for cerebrospinal leakage. In univariate analyses, extension to the lateral compartment of CS ( P = .04) was significantly associated with reduced achievement of GTR. Previous transcranial surgery was associated with reduced possibility of improvement and worsening in CNS. Eleven patients underwent stereotactic radiosurgery, at a median of 12 months after ETS. 32 patients (91.4%) did not show recurrence at the final follow-up.

CONCLUSION

ETS can achieve sufficient surgical resection in most of the patients, with acceptable neurological complications. For patients with CNS, ETS may offer the opportunity for improving CNS. We should also always prioritize avoidance of critical situations by preventing internal carotid artery injury.

Endoscopic Endonasal Biopsy for Diagnosis of Undifferentiated Lesions of the Cavernous Sinus

BACKGROUND

Radiologically undifferentiated lesions of the cavernous sinus can pose a diagnostic challenge. Although radiotherapy is the mainstay for treatment of cavernous sinus lesions, histologic diagnosis allows access to a wide variety of alternative treatment modalities. The region is considered a high-risk area for open transcranial surgical access, and the endoscopic endonasal approach presents an alternative technique for biopsy.

METHODS

A retrospective case series was performed of all patients undergoing endoscopic endonasal biopsy of isolated cavernous sinus lesions at 2 tertiary institutions. The primary outcomes were the percentage of patients in whom a histologic diagnosis was achieved and the proportion of patients in whom therapy differed from radiotherapy alone. Secondary outcomes included preoperative and postoperative 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test symptom scores, as well as perioperative adverse outcomes.

RESULTS

Eleven patients underwent endoscopic endonasal biopsy, with a diagnosis achieved in 10 patients. The most common diagnosis was perineural spread of squamous cell carcinoma, followed by perineuroma and single cases of metastatic melanoma, metastatic adenoid cystic carcinoma, mycobacterium lepri infection, neurofibroma, and lymphoma. Six patients had treatments other than radiotherapy, including immunotherapy, antibiotics, corticosteroids, chemotherapy, and observation alone. There was no significant difference in prebiopsy and postbiopsy 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test scores. There was 1 case of epistaxis requiring return to theater for cautery of the sphenopalatine artery and there were no mortalities.

CONCLUSIONS

In a limited case series, endoscopic endonasal biopsy was safe and effective in obtaining diagnosis for cavernous sinus lesions and had a significant impact on therapeutic decision making.

Outcomes and predictors of response to fractionated radiotherapy as primary treatment for intracranial meningiomas

Background

Surgery is the primary treatment for most meningiomas. However, primary fractionated radiotherapy (fRT) remains an option for patients with larger meningiomas in challenging anatomic locations or patients at prohibitively high surgical risk. Outcome prediction for these patients is uncertain and cannot be guided by histopathology without available tumor tissue from surgery. Therefore, we aimed to assess the clinical factors that contribute to treatment failure in a large cohort of meningiomas consecutively treated with fRT as primary therapy, with the goal of identifying predictors of response.

Methods

Patients treated with primary fRT for intracranial meningiomas from 1998 to 2017 were reviewed. Those who received primary surgical resection, radiosurgery, previous fRT, or had <6 months of clinical follow-up were excluded. We applied logistic regression and Cox regression modeling to ascertain key predictors of treatment failure, progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse events (AE) following fRT.

Results

Our cohort included 137 meningiomas, 21 of which progressed after fRT (median PFS 3.45 years). Progressive meningiomas had a larger median gross tumor volume (GTV) compared to those that remained stable (19.1 cm³ vs 9.6 cm³, p = 2.86 × 10^-2). GTV > 11.27 cm³ was independently predictive of progression and larger GTV was associated with higher risk of significant (grades 3/4) AE following fRT. Cavernous sinus and optic nerve sheath meningiomas had overall excellent outcomes post-fRT.

Conclusions

We present a large cohort of meningiomas treated with primary fRT and find GTV and anatomic location to be key predictors of outcome, adding to the complex treatment considerations for this heterogeneous disease.

Radiotherapy and radiosurgery for meningiomas

Meningiomas comprise a histologically and clinically diverse set of tumors arising from the meningothelial lining of the central nervous system. In the past decade, remarkable progress has been made in deciphering the biology of these common neoplasms. Nevertheless, effective systemic or molecular therapies for meningiomas remain elusive and are active areas of preclinical and clinical investigation. Thus, standard treatment modalities for meningiomas are limited to maximal safe resection, radiotherapy, or radiosurgery. This review examines the history, clinical rationale, and future directions of radiotherapy and radiosurgery as integral and effective treatments for meningiomas.

Skull Base Meningiomas

Skull base meningiomas are among the most challenging meningiomas to treat clinically due to their deep location, involvement or encasement of adjacent essential neurovascular structures (such as key arteries, cranial nerves, veins, and venous sinuses), and their often-large size prior to diagnosis. Although multimodal treatment strategies continue to evolve with advances in stereotactic and fractionated radiotherapy, surgical resection remains the mainstay of treatment for these tumors. Resection of these tumors however is challenging from a technical standpoint, and requires expertise in several skull-base surgical approaches that rely on adequate bony removal, minimization of brain retraction, and respect for nearby neurovascular structures. These skull base meningiomas originate from a variety of different structures including, but are not limited to: the clinoid processes, tuberculum sellae, dorsum sellae, sphenoid wing, petrous/petroclival area, falcotentorial region, cerebellopontine angle, and foramen magnum. In this chapter, we will cover the common anatomical areas in the skull base from which these tumors arise, and the specific or optimal surgical approaches and other treatment modalities for meningiomas in these such locations.

Stereotactic radiosurgery for pituitary and cavernous sinus metastases

PURPOSE

Metastases extending to the pituitary gland and cavernous sinus are extremely rare; however, advances in neuroimaging have increased the reported incidence. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) affords the precise delivery of focused radiation to minimize adverse radiation effects. This study assessed the efficacy and safety of SRS in the treatment of pituitary and cavernous sinus metastases.

METHODS

Analysis was performed on 23 patients with pituitary and cavernous sinus metastases who underwent treatment using SRS between 1996 and 2021. The cohort was categorized into 2 groups in terms of metastasis location: pituitary involvement (Group 1, n = 11) and cavernous sinus involvement (Group 2, n = 12). Overall survival, local tumor control, and distal tumor control rates were compared between the two groups using Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

The median age of the cohort was 52.2 years and the median tumor volume was 4.5 mL. Overall survival rates were as follows: 1 year (72.9%), 2 years (51.8%), and 3 years (45.3%). Local tumor control rates were as follows: 1 year (82.3%), 2 years (82.3%), and 3 years (65.9%). Visual deficit and hypopituitarism were the most common presentations in Group 1, whereas cranial nerve deficit was the most common presentation in Group 2.

CONCLUSIONS

SRS appears to be a safe and effective therapy for the treatment of pituitary and cavernous sinus metastases. GKRS is a relatively simple procedure, which places minimal stress on the patient, thereby facilitating further anti-cancer treatment. Considering the limited survival duration in cases of metastasis, it is very likely that post-GKRS complications (e.g., new onset cranial nerve deficit and hypopituitarism) would not become an issue before patient passes away.

Stereotactic Therapies for Meningiomas

Although surgery remains the mainstay of treatment for most meningiomas, radiotherapy, specifically stereotactic radiosurgery, has become more commonplace as first-line therapy for select meningioma cases, particularly small meningiomas in challenging or high-risk anatomic locations. Radiosurgery for specific groups of meningiomas have been found to provide local control rates comparable to surgery alone. In this chapter stereotactic techniques for the treatment of meningiomas such as stereotactic radiosurgery by using Gamma knife or Linear Accelerator-based techniques (modified LINAC, Cyberknife, etc.) as well as stereotactically guided implantation or radioactive seeds for brachytherapy are introduced.

Radiotherapy for meningiomas

Meningiomas are the most common primary central nervous system neoplasm. Despite promising recent progress in elucidating the genomic landscape and underlying biology of these histologically, molecularly, and clinically diverse tumors, the mainstays of meningioma treatment remain maximal safe resection and radiation therapy. The aim of this review of meningioma radiotherapy is to provide a concise summary of the history, current evidence, and future for application of radiotherapy in meningioma treatment.

Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Benign Cavernous Sinus Meningiomas: A Multicentre Study and Review of the Literature

Simple Summary

Meningiomas are the most common tumours of the central nervous system (CNS). Despite their benign histology, proximity to critical neurovascular structures may lead to significant morbidity with tumour growth. This is the case for cavernous sinus meningiomas (CSMs), as their growth may surround critical neuro-vascular structures and cause significant morbidity. Radical microsurgical resection carries a high risk of additional neurological deficits, as well as the risk of death. Current management of these tumours, where treatment is indicated, has moved away from radical surgery towards radiotherapy/radiosurgery. This is particularly the case for patients who have residual or recurring tumours after previous surgery. There are many reports that describe the effectiveness of using stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for CSMs; however, large cohort analyses are lacking. This multicentre analysis reports the outcome data of over 1000 patients with CSMs who were treated with SRS. SRS shows a high local tumour control rate with few complications. These results agree with previous reports in the literature. SRS is a valuable primary or adjuvant treatment option for CSMs.

Abstract

Cavernous sinus meningiomas (CSMs) remain a surgical challenge due to the intimate involvement of their contained nerves and blood vessels. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a safe and effective minimally invasive alternative for the treatment of small- to medium-sized CSMs. Objective: To assess the medium- to long-term outcomes of SRS for CSMs with respect to tumour growth, prevention of further neurological deterioration and improvement of existing neurological deficits. This multicentric study included data from 15 European institutions. We performed a retrospective observational analysis of 1222 consecutive patients harbouring 1272 benign CSMs. All were treated with Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Clinical and imaging data were retrieved from each centre and entered into a common database. All tumours with imaging follow-up of less than 24 months were excluded. Detailed results from 945 meningiomas (86%) were then analysed. Clinical neurological outcomes were available for 1042 patients (85%). Median imaging follow-up was 67 months (mean 73.4, range 24–233). Median tumour volume was 6.2 cc (+/−7), and the median marginal dose was 14 Gy (+/−3). The post-treatment tumour volume decreased in 549 (58.1%), remained stable in 336 (35.6%) and increased in only 60 lesions (6.3%), yielding a local tumour control rate of 93.7%. Only 27 (2.8%) of the 60 enlarging tumours required further treatment. Five- and ten-year actuarial progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 96.7% and 90.1%, respectively. Tumour control rates were higher for women than men (p = 0.0031), and also for solitary sporadic meningiomas (p = 0.0201). There was no statistically significant difference in outcome for imaging-defined meningiomas when compared with histologically proven WHO Grade-I meningiomas (p = 0.1212). Median clinical follow up was 61 months (mean 64, range 6–233). Permanent morbidity occurred in 5.9% of cases at last follow-up. Stereotactic radiosurgery is a safe and effective method for treating benign CSM in the medium term to long term.

Identification and Management of Aggressive Meningiomas

Meningiomas are common primary central nervous system tumors derived from the meninges, with management most frequently entailing serial monitoring or a combination of surgery and/or radiation therapy. Although often considered benign lesions, meningiomas can not only be surgically inaccessible but also exhibit aggressive growth and recurrence. In such cases, adjuvant radiation and systemic therapy may be required for tumor control. In this review, we briefly describe the current WHO grading scale for meningioma and provide demonstrative cases of treatment-resistant meningiomas. We also summarize frequently observed molecular abnormalities and their correlation with intracranial location and recurrence rate. We then describe how genetic and epigenetic features might supplement or even replace histopathologic features for improved identification of aggressive lesions. Finally, we describe the role of surgery, radiotherapy, and ongoing systemic therapy as well as precision medicine clinical trials for the treatment of recurrent meningioma.

Volumetric growth rates of untreated cavernous sinus meningiomas

OBJECTIVE

Meningiomas that arise primarily within the cavernous sinus are often believed to be more indolent in their growth pattern. Despite this perceived growth pattern, disabling symptoms can arise even with small tumors. While research has been done on cavernous sinus meningiomas (CSMs) and their treatment, very little is known about their natural growth rates. With a better understanding of the growth rate of CSM, patient treatment and guidance can be can optimized and individualized. The goal of this study was to determine volumetric growth rates of untreated CSMs.

METHODS

Thirty-seven patients with 166 MR images obtained between May 2004 and September 2019 were reviewed, with a range of 2-13 MR images per patient (average of 4.5 MR images per patient). These scans were obtained over an average follow-up period of 45.9 months (median 33.8, range 2.8-136.9 months). All imaging prior to any intervention was included in this analysis. Volumetric measurements were performed and assessed over time.

RESULTS

The estimated volumetric growth rate was 23.3% per year (95% CI 10.2%-38.0%, p < 0.001), which is equivalent to an estimated volume doubling time (VDT) of 3.3 years (95% CI 2.1-7.1 years). There was no significant relationship between growth rate and patient age (p = 0.09) or between growth rate and patient sex (p = 0.78). The median absolute growth rate was 41% with a range of -1% to 1793%. With a definition of "growth" as an increase of greater than 20% during the observed period, 65% of tumors demonstrated growth within their observation interval. Growth rates for each tumor were calculated and tumors were segmented based on growth rate. Of 37 patients, 22% (8) demonstrated no growth (< 5% annual growth, equivalent to a VDT > 13.9 years), 32% (12) were designated as slow growth (annual growth rate 5%-20%, VDT 3.5-13.9 years), 38% (14) were found to have medium growth (annual growth rate 20%-100%, VDT 0.7-3.5 years), and 8% were considered fast growing (annual growth rate > 100%, VDT < 0.7 years).

CONCLUSIONS

This study evaluated CSM volumetric growth rates. A deeper understanding of the natural history of untreated CSMs allows for better counseling and management of patients.

Long-term outcomes of stereotactic radiosurgery for skull base tumors involving the cavernous sinus

PURPOSE

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an effective and less invasive therapeutic option for cavernous sinus (CS) tumors. However, its long-term effectiveness and neurological outcomes have yet to be fully elucidated. We aimed to examine the long-term outcomes of SRS for CS tumors.

METHODS

Overall, a cohort of 113 patients with benign CS tumors, including 91 with meningioma, 14 with trigeminal schwannoma (TS), and eight with cavernous hemangioma, treated with SRS at our institution from 1990 to 2018, was included. Tumor control and functional preservation/recovery were evaluated in detail.

RESULTS

The median post-SRS follow-up period was 77 months (interquartile range, 39-177). Progression-free survival (PFS) was 97% at 5 years, 89% at 10 years, and 87% at 15 years for the entire cohort; 96% at 5 years and 87% at 10 years for meningiomas; and 100% at 10 years for the other tumors. No significant difference was observed between meningiomas and non-meningiomas (log-rank test, p = 0.107). Improvement in cranial nerve (CN) function was observed in 35 (27%) patients. TSs tended to show CN improvements more often than meningiomas did (total improvements, 62% vs. 23%; p = 0.004; eye movement function, 100% vs. 20%; p = 0.002). CN deterioration or development of new CN deficits was observed in 11 (10%) patients.

CONCLUSION

SRS provides good tumor control and acceptable long-term outcome with sufficient preservation of CN function in patients with benign CS tumors.

A case series of percutaneous transforamen ovale biopsies in cavernous sinus lesions

BACKGROUND

The majority of cavernous sinus lesions are meningiomas, for which treatment (fractioned radiotherapy or radiosurgery), if indicated, is usually initiated upon image-based diagnosis. However, this region can be affected by a wide variety of pathological processes and the risk of misdiagnosis exists. As pathological diagnosis can be obtained by biopsy through the foramen ovale in selected cases, we asked the question as to whether systematically performing this procedure before treatment would provide additional, relevant diagnostic information.

METHODS

All the cases referred to our department between January 2008 and December 2019 for cavernous sinus lesions that were considered for treatment and anatomically suitable for transforamen ovale biopsy were included. Outcomes and subsequent treatment or follow-up data were collected.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients were included. Twenty-six were highly suspected to have meningioma or schwannoma at imaging, among whom biopsy allowed diagnosis confirmation in 17 cases (65%). For the nine patients for whom biopsy was indicated upon suspected malignancy or inflammatory disease on imaging, biopsy revealed three meningiomas and one lymphoma and was not contributory in five cases (56%), three of which underwent open surgery. Three patients (8.5%) had persistent neuralgia at the last follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

When cavernous sinus meningioma or schwannoma is highly suspected upon predefined imaging criteria by an experienced neuroradiologist, invasive exploration before treatment does not seem to be indicated. Otherwise, transforamen ovale biopsy might be consider in selected cases as a minimally invasive option to obtain pathological analysis.

Management of cavernous sinus meningiomas: Consensus statement on behalf of the EANS skull base section

Introduction

The evolution of cavernous sinus meningiomas (CSMs) might be unpredictable and the efficacy of their treatments is challenging due to their indolent evolution, variations and fluctuations of symptoms, heterogeneity of classifications and lack of randomized controlled trials. Here, a dedicated task force provides a consensus statement on the overall management of CSMs.

Research question

To determine the best overall management of CSMs, depending on their clinical presentation, size, and evolution as well as patient characteristics.

Material and methods

Using the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, we included literature from January 2000 to December 2020. A total of 400 abstracts and 77 titles were kept for full-paper screening.

Results

The task force formulated 8 recommendations (Level C evidence). CSMs should be managed by a highly specialized multidisciplinary team. The initial evaluation of patients includes clinical, ophthalmological, endocrinological and radiological assessment. Treatment of CSM should involve experienced skull-base neurosurgeons or neuro-radiosurgeons, radiation oncologists, radiologists, ophthalmologists, and endocrinologists.

Discussion and conclusion

Radiosurgery is preferred as first-line treatment in small, enclosed, pauci-symptomatic lesions/in elderly patients, while large CSMs not amenable to resection or WHO grade II-III are candidates for radiotherapy. Microsurgery is an option in aggressive/rapidly progressing lesions in young patients presenting with oculomotor/visual/endocrinological impairment. Whenever surgery is offered, open cranial approaches are the current standard. There is limited experience reported about endoscopic endonasal approach for CSMs and the main indication is decompression of the cavernous sinus to improve symptoms. Whenever surgery is indicated, the current trend is to offer decompression followed by radiosurgery.

•

A thorough evaluation of cavernous sinus meningiomas by a multidisciplinary team is mandatory.

•

Microsurgery should be considered for aggressive lesions in young patients.

•

Extended endoscopic approaches can be effective when combined with radiotherapy.

•

Stereotaxic radiotherapy and stereotaxic radiosurgery offer excellent tumour control in small/asymptomatic lesions .

Surgical management of anterior clinoidal meningiomas: consensus statement on behalf of the EANS skull base section

BACKGROUND

The optimal management of clinoidal meningiomas (CMs) continues to be debated.

METHODS

We constituted a task force comprising the members of the EANS skull base committee along with international experts to derive recommendations for the management of these tumors. The data from the literature along with contemporary practice patterns were discussed within the task force to generate consensual recommendations.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

This article represents the consensus opinion of the task force regarding pre-operative evaluations, patient's counselling, surgical classification, and optimal surgical strategy. Although this analysis yielded only Class B evidence and expert opinions, it should guide practitioners in the management of patients with clinoidal meningiomas and might form the basis for future clinical trials.

Long-term disease control and treatment outcomes of stereotactic radiosurgery in cavernous sinus meningiomas

BACKGROUND

Most of the current knowledge on the clinical effects of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) on the treatment of cavernous sinus meningiomas (CSM) is based on series with limited follow-up. However, determining the role of radiation in a tumor with slow disease progression such as CSM necessitates long term follow up.

OBJECTIVE

To review and pool metadata in the literature to determine the long-term outcomes of SRS with respect to clinical and radiographic tumor control of CSM.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted following MOOSE guidelines. Results were screened against predefined criteria, which excluded studies with a median follow-up less than 5 years. The incidences of each outcome were calculated using random-effects metanalysis of proportions.

RESULTS

Seven studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising 645 patients. The median follow-up was 74 months (range 62-87). Progression-free-survival at 5, 10, and 15 years was 93.4% (95% CI 89.1-96.7%), 84.9% (95% CI 77-91.4%), and 81.3% (95% CI 74-87.7%), respectively. Clinical response to SRS at last follow-up defined as improvement of cranial nerve deficits was found in in 36.4% (95% CI 26.3-47.1%) of patients, while worsening or onset of new cranial nerve deficits was found in 11.5% (95% CI 7.9-15.7%). Radiological regression was found in 57.8% (95% CI 43-71.8%), while tumor progression was found in 8.5% (95% CI 5.2-12.6%).

CONCLUSION

SRS achieves excellent disease control and radiographic response in CSM. Although the risk of long-term cranial neuropathies is minimal, it is relatively higher to what has been previously reported in early series with limited follow-up.

Multimodal therapy of cavernous sinus meningioma: Impact of surgery and 68Ga-DOTATATE PET-guided radiation therapy on tumor control and functional outcome

BACKGROUND

Functional preservation in patients with WHO grade I meningioma involving the cavernous sinus (CSM) is crucial for long-term tumor control. Concise data on the functional outcome of an interdisciplinary, multimodal treatment are scarce. We analyzed functional outcome and tumor control in CSM patients following maximal safe resection (MSR), fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT), or combination of them, retrospectively.

METHODS

Patients with WHO grade I CSM treated between 2003 and 2017 were included. Prior to FSRT, a 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT was performed for radiation planning. Progression-free survival (PFS) was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test was performed to test differences between groups. Visual function was analyzed at baseline and follow-up.

RESULTS

Eighty-five patients were included. MSR alone was performed in 48 patients (group A), MSR followed by FSRT in 25 patients (group B), and FSRT alone in 12 patients (group C). Intracranial tumor volumes were higher in A and B compared to C (median 9.2/10.8/4.3 ccm for A/B/C, P = .023). Median follow-up was 47/46/45 months and PFS at 5 years 55.7%, 100%, and 100% in A/B/C, respectively (P < .001). Optic nerve compression was more common in A (91.7%) and B (84.0%) than C (16.7%), P < .001. Post-therapeutic new onset or deterioration of double vision was observed in 29% (A), 17% (B), and 0% (C).

CONCLUSION

Personalized treatment strategies for CSM are essential to control space-occupying or functionally compromising lesions. The additional potential side effect of radiotherapy seems to be justified under the aspect of longer tumor control with low functional risk. Without space-occupying effect of CSM, FSRT alone is reasonably possible.

An Overview of Managements in Meningiomas

Meningioma is the most frequent primary tumor of the central nervous system. Important advances have been achieved in the treatment of meningioma in recent decades. Although most meningiomas are benign and have a good prognosis after surgery, clinicians often face challenges when the morphology of the tumor is complicated or the tumor is close to vital brain structures. At present, the longstanding treatment strategies of meningioma are mainly surgery and radiotherapy. The effectiveness of systemic therapy, such as chemotherapy or targeted therapy, has not been confirmed by big data series, and some clinical trials are still in progress. In this review, we summarize current treatment strategies and future research directions for meningiomas.

Parasellar Meningiomas

Parasellar spaces remain particularly singular, comprising the most important neurovascular structures such as the internal carotid artery and optic, oculomotor, and trigeminal nerves. Meningiomas are one of the most frequent tumors arising from parasellar spaces. In this location, meningiomas remain mostly benign tumors with WHO grade I and a meningothelial subtype. Progestin intake should be investigated and leads mostly to conservative strategies. In the case of benign nonsymptomatic tumors, observation should be proposed. Tumor growth will lead to the proposition of surgery or radiosurgery. In the case of an uncertain diagnosis and an aggressive pattern, a precise diagnosis is required. For cavernous sinus and Meckel's cave lesions, complete removal is rarely considered, leading to the proposition of an endoscopic endonasal or transcranial biopsy. Optic nerve decompression could also be proposed via these approaches. A case-by-case discussion about the best approach is recommended. A transcranial approach remains necessary for tumor removal in most cases. Vascular injury could lead to severe complications. Cerebrospinal fluid leakage, meningitis, venous sacrifice, visual impairment, and cranial nerve palsies are more frequent complications. Pituitary dysfunctions are rare in preoperative assessment and in postoperative follow-up but should be assessed in the case of meningiomas located close to the pituitary axis. Long-term follow-up is required given the frequent incomplete tumor removal and the risk of delayed recurrence. Radiosurgery is relevant for small and well-limited meningiomas or intra-cavernous sinus postoperative residue, whereas radiation therapy and proton beam therapy are indicated for large, extended, nonoperable meningiomas. The place of the peptide receptor radionuclide therapyneeds to be defined. Targeted therapy should be considered in rare, recurrent, and aggressive parasellar meningiomas.

Benign Intracranial Lesions - Radiotherapy: An Overview of Treatment Options, Indications and Therapeutic Results

BACKGROUND

Radiation Therapy (RT) is an established treatment option for benign intracranial lesions. The aim of this study is to display an update on the role of RT concerning the most frequent benign brain lesions and tumors.

METHODS

Published articles about RT and meningiomas, Vestibular Schwannomas (VSs), Pituitary Adenomas (PAs), Arteriovenous Malformations (AVMs) and craniopharyngiomas were reviewed and extracted data were used.

RESULTS

In meningiomas RT is applied as an adjuvant therapy, in case of patientrefusing surgery or in unresectable tumors. The available techniques are External Beam RT (EBRT) and stereotactic ones such as Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS), Fractionated Stereotactic RT (FSRT), Intensity Modulated RT (IMRT) and proton-beam therapy. The same indications are considered in PAs, in which SRS and FSRT achieve excellent tumor control rate (92-100%), acceptable hormone remission rates (>50%) and decreased Adverse Radiation Effects (AREs). Upon tumor growth or neurological deterioration, RT emerges as alone or adjuvant treatment against VSs, with SRS, FSRT, EBRT or protonbeam therapy presenting excellent tumor control growth (>90%), facial nerve (84-100%), trigeminal nerve (74-99%) and hearing (>50%) preservation. SRS poses an effective treatment modality of certain AVMs, demonstrating a 3-year obliteration rate of 80%. Lastly, a combination of microsurgery and RT presents equal local control and 5-year survival rate (>90%) but improved toxicity profile compared to total resection in case of craniopharyngiomas.

CONCLUSION

RT comprises an effective treatment modality of benign brain and intracranial lesions. By minimizing its AREs with optimal use, RT projects as a potent tool against such diseases.

Stereotactic radiosurgery versus stereotactic radiotherapy in the management of intracranial meningiomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) have been used as a primary treatment or adjuvant to resection in the management of intracranial meningiomas (ICMs). The aim of this analysis is to compare the safety and long-term efficacy of SRS and SRT in patients with primary or recurrent ICMs.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature comparing SRT and SRS in the same study was conducted using PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and EMBASE from January 1980 to December 2018. Randomized controlled trials, case-control studies, and cohort studies (prospective and retrospective) analyzing SRS versus SRT for the treatment of ICMs in adult patients (age > 16 years) were included. Pooled and subgroup analyses were based on the fixed-effect model.

RESULTS

A total of 1736 patients from 12 retrospective studies were included. The treatment modality used was: 1) SRS (n = 306), including Gamma Knife surgery (n = 36), linear accelerator (n = 261), and CyberKnife (n = 9); or 2) SRT (n = 1430), including hypofractionated SRT (hFSRT, n = 268) and full-fractionated SRT (FSRT, n = 1162). The median age of patients at the time of treatment was 59 years. The median follow-up duration after treatment was 35.5 months. The median tumor volumes at the time of treatment with SRS, hFSRT, and FSRT were 2.84 cm3, 5.45 cm3, and 12.75 cm3, respectively. The radiographic tumor control at last follow-up was significantly worse in patients who underwent SRS than SRT (odds ratio [OR] 0.47, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.27–0.82, p = 0.007) with 7% less volume of tumor shrinkage (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.61–1.40, p = 0.72). Compared to SRS, the radiographic tumor control was better achieved by FSRT (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.26–0.80, p = 0.006) than by hFSRT (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.21–3.17, p = 0.76). Moreover, SRS leads to a significantly higher risk of clinical neurological worsening during follow-up (OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.06–4.06, p = 0.03) and of immediate symptomatic edema (OR 4.58, 95% CI 1.67–12.56, p = 0.003) with respect to SRT. SRT could produce a better progression-free survival at 4–10 years compared to SRS, but this was not statistically significant (p = 0.29).

CONCLUSIONS

SRS and SRT are both safe options in the management of ICMs. However, SRT carries a better radiographic tumor control rate and a lower incidence of posttreatment symptomatic worsening and symptomatic edema, with respect to SRS. However, further prospective studies are still needed to validate these results.

Gamma knife radiosurgery for the treatment of cavernous sinus meningiomas: post-treatment long-term clinical outcomes, complications, and volume changes

PURPOSE

To evaluate the outcomes of patients who underwent Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) for the treatment of cavernous sinus (CS) meningiomas.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical and radiological outcomes of 95 patients with CS meningiomas at Taipei Veterans General Hospital between 1993 and 2011. The study cohort comprised 27 men and 68 women with a median age of 50 years (range 29-79 years). The median pre-GKRS tumor volume was 6.6 ml (range 0.9-35.7 ml). The median margin dose was 12 Gy (range 11-21 Gy). The clinical factors related to favorable outcomes were assessed.

RESULTS

The median follow-up period was 59 (range 12-209) months. At the final follow-up, the tumor volume regressed in 70 patients (74%) and progressed in eight (8%). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that the progression-free survival rates at 5 and 10 years were 92.7% and 81.2%, respectively. Three patients (3.2%) experienced exacerbated cranial nerve dysfunction following radiosurgery. Confined tumors were found to be an independent prognostic factor for tumor control and shorter times to regression in the multivariable analyses. No risk factor for tumor progression was identified in either the univariate or multivariate analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

GKRS provides good long-term tumor control and is associated with low cranial nerve-related morbidity development rates in patients with small- to medium-sized CS meningiomas. Confined tumor could be an independent prognostic factor for tumor control and shorter times to regression in multivariate analysis. Life-long follow-up is mandatory in such settings, even for outpatients with shrunken or stabilized tumors.