Retroperitoneal Aortic Aneurysm Repair: Long-Term Follow-Up Regarding Wound Complications and Erectile Dysfunction

Permanent Flank Bulge after Flank Incision: Patient- and Physician-Reported Outcome

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to determine the incidence and risk factors for postoperative flank bulging and associated physiologic/psychologic consequences as well as to establish a clinical flank bulge classification system after open retroperitoneal surgery.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, a postal patient survey was sent to 240 patients who underwent open retroperitoneal surgery between 2007 and 2017. Patients, who reported a flank bulge, were invited for further evaluation, which included a clinical examination and standardized photo documentation.

RESULTS

Forty-three of 120 patients (35.8%) reported a flank bulging after retroperitoneal surgery. During clinical examination, a flank bulge could be confirmed in 25 patients, whereas in 18 patients, no bulging could be detected, leading to a corrected rate of flank bulge-positive patients of 20.8%. The corresponding relaxation values ranged from 1 to 1.44 and correlated with the clinical degree of bulging. A body mass index of ≥25 was identified as a risk factor. No correlation was found regarding age, gender, surgery side, access to the retroperitoneum, surgical procedure, and pathology. Thirty-seven patients complained about chronic pain or suffered from the cosmetic impact of bulging. Thirteen of those patients had shown a flank bulge during clinical examination, resulting in a symptomatic bulge rate of 10.8% (13/120 patients).

CONCLUSION

Chronic pain and postoperative flank bulging are 2 of the most common long-term complications after open retroperitoneal access. If an open retroperitoneal approach is required, particularly obese patients should be thoroughly informed about the risk of flank bulging and chronic pain.

Incisional Lumbodorsal Hernias Following Retroperitoneal Robotic Partial Nephrectomies for Small Renal Masses at a High-Volume Tertiary Referral Center

Introduction: Herein we evaluate the incidence of incisional lumbodorsal hernia (ILDH) after retroperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy (RRPN) and associated patient-specific and tumor-specific risk factors. Furthermore, we aim to evaluate the role of routine lumbodorsal fascial closure for the prevention of ILDH. Methodology: This is a retrospective review of our robotic partial nephrectomy database of all RRPNs performed at Washington University School of Medicine from 2000 to 2020. Postoperative imaging was reviewed for evidence of ILDH. A clinically significant hernia was defined as the protrusion of visceral organ(s) through the lumbodorsal fascia. Patient and tumor characteristics, and fascial closure techniques were analyzed to determine predictors of ILDH. Results: In total, 150 patients underwent RRPN between 2007 and 2020 with an average follow-up of 4.9 (1-37) months. Twelve (8%) ILDHs were identified. Ten (6.7%) patients had herniated retroperitoneal fat whereas 2 (1.3%) patients had herniated colon. All were asymptomatic and managed conservatively. On matched cohort comparison, patients with ILDH had larger tumors than patients without an incisional hernia (3.9 cm vs 2.8 cm, p = 0.029). In general, patient factors were no different between patients with and without ILDH. However, coronary artery disease (CAD) was more prevalent in patients with ILDH (33.3% vs 10.9%, p = 0.028). Patients with ILDH were more likely to have a port site extended for specimen extraction (66.7% vs 38.2%, p = 0.069). Lumbodorsal fascial closure and type of suture material were not associated with prevention of ILDH (p = 0.545, p = 0.637). Conclusion: The radiographic incidence of lumbar incisional hernias after RRPN without routine fascial closure of the extraction incision was 8%. All were asymptomatic and did not require surgical repair. Larger tumor size and CAD were associated with ILDH.

Patient-reported outcome measures of abdominal wall morbidity after flank incision for open partial nephrectomy

OBJECTIVE

To compare patient-reported outcome measures in patients with and without abdominal wall complications after open partial nephrectomy (OPN) via flank incision.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patient-reported outcome measures were collected in 2017 from all patients operated on with OPN via flank incision between 2004 and 2016 in Västerbotten County, Sweden. Patients were mailed the ventral hernia pain questionnaire (VHPQ) and an abdominal wall asymmetry (AWA) questionnaire to evaluate postoperative AWA, attributed to bulge or incisional hernia. Demographic and follow-up data were retrieved from patient records.

RESULTS

A total of 198 patients were eligible for the study, and 146 questionnaires were returned (74%). Forty-five patients (31%) reported postoperative AWA and 27 (18%) reported ongoing pain. Three patients who reported AWA had a known incisional hernia. Pain and abdominal wall stiffness were more common in patients with AWA than in those without (P < 0.01 and P < 0.01, respectively). Of the 45 patients with AWA, 25 (56%) reported this as being negative cosmetically and 16 (36%) as negative regarding activities. Patients that reported AWA were younger and had a higher body mass index at surgery (P = 0.03 and 0.04, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Abdominal wall asymmetry is a common sequel of flank incision for OPN and is associated with a higher incidence of chronic pain and abdominal stiffness compared to absence of postoperative AWA. Some patients reported that the effect on daily activities and the cosmetic effect caused by AWA had a negative impact on their quality of life.

Single- vs multiple-layer wound closure for flank incisions: results of a prospective, randomised, double-blinded multicentre study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the incidence of postoperative flank bulges between patients with multiple-layer closure and single superficial-layer closure after retroperitoneal surgery via open flank incision in the SIngle versus MUltiple-LAyer wound Closure for flank incision (SIMULAC) trial.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study was a randomised controlled, patient- and assessor-blinded, multicentre trial. Between May 2015 and February 2017, 225 patients undergoing flank incisions were randomised 1:1 to a multiple-layer closure (SIMULAC-I) or a single superficial-layer closure (SIMULAC-II) group. The primary outcome was the occurrence of a flank bulge 6 months after surgery.

RESULTS

Overall, 177 patients (90 in SIMULAC-I, 87 in SIMULAC-II) were eligible for final assessment. The cumulative incidence of a flank bulge was significantly higher in the SIMULAC-II group (51.7%) compared to the SIMULAC-I group [34.4%; odds ratio (OR) 2.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.11-3.73; P = 0.02]. Rate of severe postoperative complications (4.4% SIMULAC-I vs 10.3% SIMULAC-II; P = 0.21) or hernia (6.7% SIMULAC-I vs 10.3% SIMULAC-II; P = 0.59) was similar between the groups. There was no difference in pain (visual analogue scale) and the requirement for pain medication at 6 months postoperatively. Quality of life assessed with the European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions Questionnaire was higher in the SIMULAC-I group compared to the SIMULAC-II group at 6 months postoperatively, with a (median range) score of 80 (30-100) vs 75 (5-100) (P = 0.012).

CONCLUSION

The overall risk of a flank bulge after flank incision is high. Multiple-layer closure after flank incision should be performed as a standard procedure.

Vascular Surgeons' Views on Ejaculation Disorders After Abdominal Aortic Surgery: Results of a Dutch Survey

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study is to evaluate vascular surgeons' knowledge and appreciation of ejaculatory dysfunction after open aortic aneurysm repair and the knowledge of possible nerve-preserving techniques.

METHODS

A Dutch national survey was conducted on sexual counseling in the case of open aortic surgery. For this purpose, a designed questionnaire based on a review of the literature in the field and on other surveys aiming to analyze care for sexual health by medical specialists was used.

RESULTS

The response rate was almost 60%. All responders were familiar with the occurrence of postoperative neurogenic complications. Sixty percent preoperatively informs their patients, but only one-third inquires whether such complications have occurred postoperatively. Most respondents estimated the incidence of postoperative neurogenic complications due to dissection of the periaortic tissues between 5% and 25%. Almost 75% take nerve anatomy into consideration when exposing the abdominal aorta, but only 29% mention the correct structures, and only 37% mention possible correct nerve-sparing techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

Dutch vascular surgeons are well aware of the occurrence of postoperative sexual disorders after infrarenal aortic reconstruction. A gap in knowledge of pathophysiology and anatomy exists. Furthermore, a significant part of vascular surgeons seems to lack skills in sexual counseling. Therefore, more education should be offered during vascular surgical training.

WHAT THIS ARTICLE ADDS

This article addresses iatrogenic neurogenic complications affecting sexual health following open aortic surgery. It opens the discussion on possible gaps in modern training of vascular surgeons and on sexual health in relation to postoperative quality of life and shared decision-making.

Surgical Complications after Open Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair: Intestinal Ischemia, Buttock Claudication and Sexual Dysfunction

While surgical treatment for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a standard operation, prevention of complication is important. Intestinal ischemia of the sigmoid colon and/or rectum after AAA surgery is severe and has a high mortality rate although occurrence frequency is low. The most important thing to prevent is the preoperative and intraoperative evaluation of the left hemicolon and rectal circulation. Measurement of inferior mesenteric artery stump pressure is also useful. From the viewpoint of prevention of buttock claudication, it is desirable that internal iliac artery (IIA) blood flow is preserved, but aggressive IIA reconstruction adaptation is considered to be low. For erectile function, it is important that the antegrade blood flow from the IIA to the internal pudendal artery on at least one side is preserved or reconstructed. To prevent retrograde ejaculation, it is important to preserve the superior hypogastric plexus and one side of the lumbar splanchnic nerve, and the hypogastric nerve. Understanding and mastering local anatomy and pathophysiology is important in preventing complications, and we must also remember that we always keep watchful surgical operations in mind in order to prevent tissue damage. (This is a translation of Jpn J Vasc Surg 2019; 28: 99-103.).

A systematic review of the correlates and management of nonpremature ejaculatory dysfunction in heterosexual men

INTRODUCTION

A better understanding of ejaculatory disorders has led to an increasing interest in nonpremature ejaculatory dysfunction (non-PE EjD). Current reviews on the subject use a symptom-based classification to describe ejaculatory dysfunction even when it is a single case report. While these reviews provide important information on the disorder, a clearer picture of the prevalence of non-PE EjD in relation to the community and various pathophysiologic states is needed.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to provide a systematic review of studies of non-PE EjD excluding single case reports.

METHODS

A systematic review of Medline for terms including ejaculation, orgasm or hematospermia. Association with terms delay, pain or headache was made. The search was restricted to male gender and articles written in English. Abstracts were reviewed and those mainly concerned with premature ejaculation were excluded.

RESULTS

A total of 333 articles on non-PE EjD were identified. The condition was reported in community-based studies. In certain patient populations, non-PE EjD was commonly reported in association with antidepressant and antipsychotic treatments, in patients with chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome, patients with lower urinary tract symptoms particularly in association with medical or surgical treatment, patients with retroperitoneal surgery and in patients with neurological diseases. Few articles were concerned with treatment options.

CONCLUSION

There is a significant prevalence of non-PE EjD in the community and in association with particular disease states or as a side effect of medical or surgical interventions. There is a need to direct efforts to prevent and treat these conditions.

Avoiding abdominal flank bulge after anterolateral approaches to the thoracolumbar spine: cadaveric study and electrophysiological investigation

Object

The thoracolumbar junction is frequently accessed through an anterolateral approach with the incision and muscle dissection extending from the lower thoracic region to the lateral border of the rectus abdominis muscle. This approach is frequently associated with the subsequent development of an unsightly and uncomfortable relaxation of the ipsilateral abdominal wall, or flank bulge, caused by denervation injury to the intercostal nerves. However, the etiology of this complication is not widely recognized by spine surgeons. The object of this study was to better define the relevant anatomy and innervation of the anterolateral abdominal wall musculature.

Methods

The authors performed 32 cadaveric dissections and 6 intraoperative electromyography (EMG) evaluations.

Results

The cadaveric dissection studies and intraoperative EMG evaluations provided detailed anatomy of the anterolateral abdominal wall and its innervation. Cadaveric dissections revealed that the most significant intercostal nerve contributions to the anterolateral abdominal wall arise from T11 and T12. Electrophysiological confirmation of these findings was accomplished through intraoperative stimulation in 6 patients undergoing anterolateral retroperitoneal approaches to the thoracolumbar junction. The authors confirmed T11 and T12 innervation of the anterolateral abdominal wall musculature by direct intraoperative EMG recording in all 6 patients.

Conclusions

The authors classified the 3 potential zones of injury that can be affected during an anterolateral approach to the thoracolumbar junction. Modifications to the operative technique are suggested to avoid the complication of flank bulge. The most significant intercostal nerve contributions to the anterolateral abdominal wall arise from T11 and T12.

Retroperitoneal repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms offers postoperative benefits to male patients in the Veterans Affairs Health System

BACKGROUND

Transperitoneal (TP) and retroperitoneal (RP) approaches have equal efficacy in elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. The effect of open operative approach on patient-specific outcomes after AAA repair was tested.

METHODS

Consecutive patients undergoing open AAA repair at the Veterans Affairs Tennessee Valley Healthcare System between January 2000 and August 2008 were retrospectively reviewed. Analysis was performed to examine the effects of demographic and clinical covariates on postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 106 patients were identified: 54 with TP approach and 52 with RP approach. Demographics and preoperative comorbidities were equivalent (p > or = 0.10), with the exception of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease which was more prevalent in the TP group (61 vs. 40%). Operative times were longer in the TP group (4.6 vs. 3.5 hours; p < 0.01); however, significantly more TP patients had reconstruction with a bifurcated graft (72 vs. 2%; p < 0.01). Postoperative nasogastric tube decompression times were shorter in the RP group (1 vs. 3 days; p < 0.01), and RP approach led to a quicker return to preoperative diet (4 vs. 6 days; p = 0.05). Patients undergoing RP repair developed fewer incisional hernias (2 vs. 15%; p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

RP approach to AAA repair offers patients faster return of bowel function and is associated with fewer incisional hernias.