Baricitinib, a Janus kinase inhibitor, in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Efficacy and Safety of JAK Inhibitors for Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Meta-Analysis

Background: More and more trials have been conducted. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of different JAKinibs in RA. Methods: A systematic search of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with JAKinib treatment in RA published in the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases up to May 2021 was performed. Results: 37 trials involving 15,174 patients were identified. Pooled analysis revealed that JAKinibs were associated with significant therapeutic improvement in RA patients as determined by ACR20 (RR = 2.03, 95% CI: 1.85 to 2.28) and HAQ-DI (MD = −0.31, 95% CI: −0.33 to −0.28) over placebo. Compared to placebo, JAKinib treatment was also associated with more adverse events (RR = 1.10, p < 0.001; RR = 1.29, p < 0.001; RR = 1.59, p = 0.02). Baricitinib and upadacitinib were related to more frequent adverse events (RR = 1.10; 95% CI: 1.01, 1.21; RR = 1.19; 95% CI: 1.11, 1.28) and infection (RR = 1.22; 95% CI: 1.09, 1.37; RR = 1.38; 95% CI: 1.22, 1.56), whereas only baricitinib was associated with more herpes zoster (RR = 3.15; 95% CI: 1.19, 8.33). Conclusions: JAKinibs were superior to placebo for improving signs, symptoms, and health-related quality of life in RA patients at short term, whereas the overall risk of adverse events and infections were greater with baricitinib and upadacitinib, and a higher risk of herpes zoster was only associated with baricitinib. More trials are needed to investigate the long-term safety.

Adverse events associated with JAK inhibitors in 126,815 reports from the WHO pharmacovigilance database

Increasing number of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors have been approved for chronic haematopoietic neoplasms and inflammatory/autoimmune diseases. We aimed to assess safety of the first three approved JAK inhibitors: ruxolitinib, tofacitinib and baricitinib. In this retrospective observational study, pharmacovigilance data were extracted from the World Health Organization database. Adverse events are classified according to Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities hierarchy. Until February 28, 2021, all Individual Case Safety Reports [ICSRs] with the suspected drug ruxolitinib, tofacitinib or baricitinib were included. Disproportionality analysis was performed and the information component (IC) was estimated. Adverse events were considered a significant signal if the lower end of the 95% credibility interval of the IC (IC025) was positive. We identified 126,815 ICSRs involving JAK inhibitors. Ruxolitinib, tofacitinib and baricitinib were associated with infectious adverse events (IC025 1.7, especially with viral [herpes and influenza], fungal, and mycobacterial infectious disorders); musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders (IC025 1.1); embolism and thrombosis (IC025 0.4); and neoplasms (IC025 0.8, especially malignant skin neoplasms). Tofacitinib was associated with gastrointestinal perforation events (IC025 1.5). We did not find a significant increase in the reporting of major cardiovascular events. We identified significant association between adverse events and ruxolitinib, tofacinitib and baricitinib in international pharmacovigilance database.

Janus kinase (JAK)-inhibitors and coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Currently, JAK-inhibitors are repurposed for therapy of Covid-19 because of their ability in restraining immune response, yet the corroboration regarding their advantage is still unclear. This study sought to analyze the efficacy of JAK-inhibitors to ameliorate the outcomes of Covid-19 sufferer.Research design and methods: Using specific keywords, we comprehensively go through the potential articles on ClinicalTrials.gov, Europe PMC, and PubMed sources until June 2nd, 2021. All published studies on JAK-inhibitors and Covid-19 were collected.

RESULTS

There were 14 studies with 4,363 Covid-19 patients contained in the meta-analysis. Based on our data, we suggested that JAK-inhibitors corresponded with increased recovery rate (RR 1.17; 95%CI: 1.01-1.36, p= 0.040, I2 = 91%, random-effect modeling); shortened time to recovery (mean difference -0.96; 95%CI: -1.15, -0.77, p< 0.00001, I2 = 28%, random-effect modeling); reduction of clinical deterioration risk (RR 0.66; 95%CI: 0.48-0.89, p= 0.008, I2 = 57%, random-effect modeling); and reduction of Covid-19 mortality (RR 0.52; 95%CI: 0.36-0.76, p= 0.0006, I2 = 33%, random-effect modeling).

CONCLUSIONS

This study propose that JAK-inhibitors perhaps provide advantageous effects on Covid-19 outcomes. JAK-inhibitors may be given during 1-2 weeks of disease to optimize its beneficial effects in halting the exaggerated immune response.

Potential Drugs for the Treatment of COVID-19: Synthesis, Brief History and Application

Coronaviruses (CoVs) belonging to the Betacoronavirus group, an unusually large RNA genome, are characterized by club-like spikes that project from their surface. An outbreak of a novel coronavirus 2019 (nCOVID-19) showing a unique replication strategy and infection has posed a significant threat to international health and the economy around the globe. Scientists around the world are investigating few previously used clinical drugs for the treatment of COVID-19. This review provides synthesis and mode of action of recently investigated drugs like Chloroquine, Hydroxychloroquine, Ivermectin, Selamectin, Remdesivir, Baricitinib, Darunavir, Favipiravir, Lopinavir/ritonavir and Mefloquine hydrochloride that constitute an option for COVID-19 treatment.

Safety of Baricitinib 4 mg for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated the safety of baricitinib 4 mg at 24 weeks for the treatment of moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

Multiple databases were searched from inception up to November 26, 2019 for randomized controlled trials comparing baricitinib 4 mg with placebo for the treatment of moderate to severe RA. The safety outcomes of interest were the incidence of serious adverse events, adverse events leading to study discontinuation, all infections, and serious infections. Adjusted risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled for safety outcomes. The Cochrane tool was used to assess the risk of bias.

RESULTS

This analysis included four randomized controlled trials with 3106 patients. For serious adverse events, the pooled RR (95% CI) was 1.09 (0.76-1.57). For adverse events leading to study discontinuation, the pooled RR (95% CI) was 1.41 (0.94-2.11). For all reported infections, the pooled RR (95% CI) was 1.24 (1.10-1.40), For serious infections, pooled RR (95% CI) was 0.97 (0.51-2.57).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with RA taking 4 mg baricitinib daily did have an increased risk of infections; however, the incidence of serious adverse events, adverse events leading to study discontinuation, or serious infections were not significantly different in patients treated with baricitinib 4 mg compared with placebo.

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Peficitinib Versus Tofacitinib and Baricitinib for Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Peficitinib, a Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor, is approved for clinical use in Japan, Korea, and Taiwan, but head-to-head comparisons versus other JAK inhibitors are lacking. We indirectly compared peficitinib, tofacitinib, and baricitinib for rheumatoid arthritis treatment.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov, and congress archives up until February 12, 2019, for randomized controlled trials of peficitinib, tofacitinib, and baricitinib. Efficacy (American College of Rheumatology responses, disease activity scores, modified total Sharp score, Simplified Disease Activity Index [SDAI]) and safety outcomes were compared using a Bayesian network meta-analysis. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) consensus was followed for reporting results. A network meta-regression assessed the impact on outcomes of proportions of patients receiving concomitant methotrexate or of Asian ethnicity.

RESULTS

The network meta-analysis included 21 randomized controlled trials. At 12 weeks, all evaluable efficacy outcomes were comparable or improved with peficitinib 150 mg and 100 mg once daily, versus baricitinib 2 and 4 mg once daily and tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily. At 24 weeks, efficacy outcomes were comparable or improved for each peficitinib dose versus baricitinib and tofacitinib. Risk of adverse events and serious adverse events at 12 weeks were similar with peficitinib 100 and 150 mg versus baricitinib and tofacitinib. The proportion of patients receiving concomitant methotrexate had no effect on any outcome analyzed, but Asian ethnicity had a positive effect on multiple efficacy outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Peficitinib had comparable efficacy versus tofacitinib and baricitinib for reduction in disease activity as measured by SDAI, and for reduction in progression of joint damage as measured radiographically. No notable differences in safety outcomes were observed. Further studies are required to better characterize the impact of ethnicity on the efficacy of JAK inhibitors.

A Review on Rheumatoid Arthritis Interventions and Current Developments

Rheumatoid arthritis is a chronic autoimmune disorder characterized by inflammation, swelling, and joint destruction primarily affecting the peripheral joints. In recent years, RA has become an alarming concern affecting more than 1.5% of the population worldwide. The majority of the drugs in clinical trials for rheumatoid arthritis are immunomodulatory. The development of novel drugs for RA is impending and scientists are exploring new strategies through various innovative approaches for RA drug development. Treat-to-target and window of opportunity hypothesis are the new approaches that are used to treat, improve outcomes, and prevent long-term use of ineffective therapy, respectively. Novel therapeutic agents (e.g. GM-CSF inhibitors, Matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors) and delivery systems (e.g., Liposomes, Superparamagnetic iron oxide nano particles (SPIONs)) are under investigation for more target based therapy with reduced side effects and toxicity. The new drug discovery and repositioning of previously FDA-approved drugs are also being considered for chronic inflammatory disorder. The review encompasses a vast array of information, including genetics, etiology, clinical symptoms, current treatment, and newer therapeutics approaches, focused on the development of RA interventions. The introduction of the bioinformatics-based approach in RA has also been significantly discussed in the review. This review provides a general understanding of the challenges and uncertainties in the treatment of RA and summarizes the evolving scenario as well as innovative approaches taken into consideration for drug development in rheumatoid arthritis.

Nucleoside Analogs and Nucleoside Precursors as Drugs in the Fight against SARS-CoV-2 and Other Coronaviruses

Coronaviruses (CoVs) are positive-sense RNA enveloped viruses, members of the family Coronaviridae, that cause infections in a broad range of mammals including humans. Several CoV species lead to mild upper respiratory infections typically associated with common colds. However, three human CoV (HCoV) species: Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS)-CoV-1, Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS)-CoV, and SARS-CoV-2, are responsible for severe respiratory diseases at the origin of two recent epidemics (SARS and MERS), and of the current COronaVIrus Disease 19 (COVID-19), respectively. The easily transmissible SARS-CoV-2, emerging at the end of 2019 in China, spread rapidly worldwide, leading the World Health Organization (WHO) to declare COVID-19 a pandemic. While the world waits for mass vaccination, there is an urgent need for effective drugs as short-term weapons to combat the SARS-CoV-2 infection. In this context, the drug repurposing approach is a strategy able to guarantee positive results rapidly. In this regard, it is well known that several nucleoside-mimicking analogs and nucleoside precursors may inhibit the growth of viruses providing effective therapies for several viral diseases, including HCoV infections. Therefore, this review will focus on synthetic nucleosides and nucleoside precursors active against different HCoV species, paying great attention to SARS-CoV-2. This work covers progress made in anti-CoV therapy with nucleoside derivatives and provides insight into their main mechanisms of action.

Small-Molecule Kinase Inhibitors for the Treatment of Nononcologic Diseases

Great successes have been achieved in developing small-molecule kinase inhibitors as anticancer therapeutic agents. However, kinase deregulation plays essential roles not only in cancer but also in almost all major disease areas. Accumulating evidence has revealed that kinases are promising drug targets for different diseases, including cancer, autoimmune diseases, inflammatory diseases, cardiovascular diseases, central nervous system disorders, viral infections, and malaria. Indeed, the first small-molecule kinase inhibitor for treatment of a nononcologic disease was approved in 2011 by the U.S. FDA. To date, 10 such inhibitors have been approved, and more are in clinical trials for applications other than cancer. This Perspective discusses a number of kinases and their small-molecule inhibitors for the treatment of diseases in nononcologic therapeutic fields. The opportunities and challenges in developing such inhibitors are also highlighted.

Baricitinib for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a common inflammatory disease with several implications on health, disability and economy. Conventional treatment for RA centers on anti-inflammatory drugs and specific targeting of tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) and interleukin 6 (IL-6). Baricitinib is a novel, Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved, once daily oral drug that is effective in combination with current treatment and results in significantly reduced symptoms with good safety profile. Further studies are required to find rare side effects and evaluate the long term efficacy in disease modulation and patient symptom reduction. This is a comprehensive review of the literature on baricitinib for the treatment of RA.

This review provides an update on the pathophysiology, diagnosis and conventional treatment of RA, then proceeds to introduce baricitinib and the data that exists to support or refute its use in RA. The presented study also indicated clinical trials confirming the effectiveness of baricitinib in this indication.

Effects of Biological Therapies on Molecular Features of Rheumatoid Arthritis

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an autoimmune and chronic inflammatory disease primarily affecting the joints, and closely related to specific autoantibodies that mostly target modified self-epitopes. Relevant findings in the field of RA pathogenesis have been described. In particular, new insights come from studies on synovial fibroblasts and cells belonging to the innate and adaptive immune system, which documented the aberrant production of inflammatory mediators, oxidative stress and NETosis, along with relevant alterations of the genome and on the regulatory epigenetic mechanisms. In recent years, the advances in the understanding of RA pathogenesis by identifying key cells and cytokines allowed the development of new targeted disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). These drugs considerably improved treatment outcomes for the majority of patients. Moreover, numerous studies demonstrated that the pharmacological therapy with biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) promotes, in parallel to their clinical efficacy, significant improvement in all these altered molecular mechanisms. Thus, continuous updating of the knowledge of molecular processes associated with the pathogenesis of RA, and on the specific effects of bDMARDs in the correction of their dysregulation, are essential in the early and correct approach to the treatment of this complex autoimmune disorder. The present review details basic mechanisms related to the physiopathology of RA, along with the core mechanisms of response to bDMARDs.

Baricitinib, a drug with potential effect to prevent SARS-COV-2 from entering target cells and control cytokine storm induced by COVID-19

In December 2019, a novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) suddenly broke out in China and rapidly spread all over the world. Recently, a cell surface protein, known as angiotensin-converting enzyme II (ACE2), has been identified to be involved in receptor-mediated endocytosis for SARS-CoV-2 entry to the cells. Many studies have reported the clinical characteristics of COVID-19: sudden deterioration of disease around 1-2 weeks after onset; much lower level of lymphocytes, especially natural killer (NK) cells in peripheral blood; extremely high pro-inflammatory cytokines and C reactive protein (CRP). About 15.7% of patients develop severe pneumonia, and cytokine storm is an important factor leading to rapid disease progression. Currently, there are no specific drugs for COVID-19 and the cytokine storm it causes. Baricitinib intracellularly inhibits the proinflammatory signal of several cytokines by suppressing Janus kinase (JAK) JAK1/JAK2. It has been demonstrated clinical benefits for the patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), active systemic lupus erythematosus and atopic dermatitis with good efficacy and safety records. Baricitinib is expected to interrupt the passage and intracellular assembly of SARS-CoV-2 into the target cells mediated by ACE2 receptor, and treat cytokine storm caused by COVID-19. Several clinical trials are currently investigating the drug, and one of which has been completed with encouraging results. In this paper, we will elaborate the role of cytokine storm mediated by JAK-STAT pathway in severe COVID-19, the possible mechanisms of baricitinib on reducing the viral entry into the target cells and cytokine storm, the key points of pharmaceutical care based on the latest research reports, clinical trials progress and drug instruction from the US FDA, so as to provide reference for the treatment of severe COVID-19.

Efficacy and Safety of Tofacitinib, Baricitinib, and Upadacitinib for Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and safety profiles of different dosing regimens of tofacitinib, baricitinib, and upadacitinib, novel selective oral Janus activated kinase inhibitors, in rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials of tofacitinib (5 and 10 mg twice daily) baricitinib (2 and 4 mg daily), and upadacitinib (15 and 30 mg daily) in RA were identified from MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases through December 11, 2019. Random-effects models were used to estimate pooled mean differences and relative risks (RRs). American College of Rheumatology 20%, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index, adverse events, risk for infection, venous thromboembolic events, and malignancy were calculated.

RESULTS

Twenty trials with an overall low risk of bias involving 8982 patients were identified. Tofacitinib, baricitinib, and upadacitinib improved RA control as determined by American College of Rheumatology 20% (RR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.87 to 2.20) and Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index scores (mean differences, -0.31; 95% CI, -0.34 to -0.28) compared with placebo. Adverse events were more frequent with upadacitinib, 30 mg, daily (RR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.30); upadacitinib, 15 mg, daily (RR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.27); and baricitinib, 4 mg, daily (RR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.24). The risk for infection was highest with tofacitinib, 10 mg, twice daily (RR, 2.75; 95% CI, 1.72 to 4.41), followed by upadacitinib, 15 mg, daily (RR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.14 to 1.60) and baricitinib, 4 mg, daily (RR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.12 to 1.45). Data for venous thromboembolic events were not available for tofacitinib or baricitinib, but there was no increase in risk with upadacitinib (15 mg daily: RR, 2.34; 95% CI, 0.34 to 15.92).

CONCLUSION

Tofacitinib, baricitinib, and upadacitinib significantly improve RA control. Head-to-head Janus activated kinase inhibitor clinical trials are needed to further inform decision making.

JAK inhibitors and infections risk: focus on herpes zoster

Currently, there is a growing interest in Janus kinase (JAK) intracellular signalling since targeted inhibitors against these pathways are proving effective in the treatment of a range of immune-mediated diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis (PsA), inflammatory bowel disease and atopic dermatitis. In particular, post marketing experience and the increasing development of new pharmacological inhibitors of broad and increasingly selective JAK pathways provide new insights into the JAK pathway role in viral infections as well as their pathogenic role in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. Herein we provide an overview of the biological role of JAK signalling and its role in immunity against viruses, with particular regard to herpes zoster reactivation. Thereafter, we will discuss the evidence currently available on the principal JAK inhibitors and their association with viral infections.

BARICITINIB: NEW PHARMACOTHERAPY OPTIONS FOR RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS AND OTHER IMMUNE-MEDIATED INFLAMMATORY RHEUMATIC DISEASES

Deciphering the mechanisms of the pathogenesis of immune-mediated inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IMIRDs) in conjunction with designing a wide range of biological agents is one of the major medical advances in the 21st century. A new promising area of pharmacotherapy for IMIRDs is associated with the design of the so-called targeted oral medications that primarily include Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors. The review presents new data on the efficacy and safety of the new JAK inhibitor baricitinib in treating rheumatoid arthritis and other IMIRDs.

The Rationale for Potential Pharmacotherapy of COVID-19

On 11 March 2020, the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) was defined by the World Health Organization as a pandemic. Severe acute respiratory syndrome-2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the newly evolving human coronavirus infection that causes COVID-19, and it first appeared in Wuhan, China in December 2019 and spread rapidly all over the world. COVID-19 is being increasingly investigated through virology, epidemiology, and clinical management strategies. There is currently no established consensus on the standard of care in the pharmacological treatment of COVID-19 patients. However, certain medications suggested for other diseases have been shown to be potentially effective for treating this infection, though there has yet to be clear evidence. Therapies include new agents that are currently tested in several clinical trials, in addition to other medications that have been repurposed as antiviral and immune-modulating therapies. Previous high-morbidity human coronavirus epidemics such as the 2003 SARS-CoV and the 2012 Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) prompted the identification of compounds that could theoretically be active against the emerging coronavirus SARS-CoV-2. Moreover, advances in molecular biology techniques and computational analysis have allowed for the better recognition of the virus structure and the quicker screening of chemical libraries to suggest potential therapies. This review aims to summarize rationalized pharmacotherapy considerations in COVID-19 patients in order to serve as a tool for health care professionals at the forefront of clinical care during this pandemic. All the reviewed therapies require either additional drug development or randomized large-scale clinical trials to be justified for clinical use.

A Network Meta-Analysis to Compare Effectiveness of Baricitinib and Other Treatments in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients with Inadequate Response to Methotrexate

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

This article compares the effectiveness of baricitinib (BARI) 4 mg (oral, Janus kinase [JAK] 1/2 inhibitor) versus other targeted synthetic/biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, in combination with methotrexate (MTX), in moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis patients with inadequate response (IR) to MTX.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of the interventions of interest. Bayesian network meta-analyses (NMA) were used to compare American College of Rheumatology (ACR) responses at 24 weeks. A series of prespecified sensitivity analyses addressed the potential impact of, among others, baseline risk, treatment effect modifiers, and trial design on treatment response.

RESULTS

Nineteen RCTs were included in the NMA (primary analysis). For ACR20, BARI 4 mg + MTX was found to be more effective than adalimumab (ADA) 40 mg + MTX (Odds Ratio [OR] 1.33), abatacept (ABA) 10 mg + MTX (IV/4 weeks) (OR 1.45), infliximab (IFX) 3 mg + MTX (IV/8 wks) (OR 1.63), and rituximab (RTX) 1000 mg + MTX (OR 1.63). No differences were found on ACR50. For ACR70, BARI 4 mg + MTX was more effective than ADA 40 mg + MTX (OR 1.37), ABA 10 mg + MTX (OR 1.86), and RTX 1000 mg + MTX (OR 2.26). Sensitivity analysis including 10 additional RCTs with up to 20% of patients with prior biologic use showed BARI 4 mg + MTX to be more effective than tocilizumab (TCZ) 8 mg + MTX on ACR20 (OR 1.44). Results for all sensitivity analyses were consistent with the direction and magnitude of the primary results. Key limitations include the time span in which trials were conducted (1999-2017), during which patient characteristics and treatment approaches might have changed.

CONCLUSION

This NMA suggests that BARI 4 mg + MTX is an efficacious treatment option in the MTX-IR population as evidenced by the robustness of results.

The safety of baricitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Introduction: Despite improvement in disease outcomes and prognosis, a substantial number of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) still require a novel agent for effective treatment. Baricitinib is a targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (tsDMARDs) that selectively inhibits Janus kinase (JAK1/JAK2), an important enzyme in the pathogenesis of RA.Areas covered: This paper aimed to evaluate the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of baricitinib while reviewing its safety and efficacy in the treatment of RA.Expert opinion: Randomized controlled trials of baricitinib showed its efficacy and safety in patients with active RA who were methotrexate (MTX)-naïve or were not adequately responsive to MTX, conventional synthetic DMARDs, or tumor necrosis factor inhibitors. Baricitinib may be suitable in patients who prefer oral therapy and do not have a history of severe renal impairment, recent history of malignancy, or risk factors for adverse events (AEs) such as venous thromboembolism, opportunistic infection, and diverticulitis. Dose adjustment of baricitinib, based on the assessment of patient conditions including their renal function and disease activity, is an important strategy for successful and safe treatment. However, long-term post-marketing surveillance studies with a larger sample size are required to evaluate the overall safety and AEs with low incidence rates in clinical settings.

Clinical significance of Janus kinase inhibitors in the therapy of rheumatoid arthritis: achievements and prospects

Significant successes in the use of biological agents (BA) have been achieved in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA); nonetheless, about 36% of patients cannot respond to therapy or achieve the expected effect. A new area in the treatment of RA is the use of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (chemical molecules with a molecular weight <1 kDa for oral administration) that inhibit the activity of intracellular signaling systems. The authors consider the clinical achievements and prospects, which open the use of JAK inhibitors in the treatment of RA.

New treatments for atopic dermatitis targeting beyond IL-4/IL-13 cytokines

OBJECTIVE

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is an increasingly common inflammatory skin disease undergoing significant revolution in recent years. New data on disease pathogenesis advanced the developments of novel therapeutics, mainly for patients with moderate to severe conditions, for whom treatment options have been largely insufficient for many years.

DATA SOURCES

Review of recent studies investigating systemic treatments for AD.

STUDY SELECTIONS

Relevant literature concerning novel therapeutics for AD beyond targeted monoclonal antibodies antagonizing selectively interleukin (IL)-4 or IL-13 was obtained from a PubMed and clinicaltrials.gov search and summarized.

RESULTS

Multiple clinical trials of both nonspecific as well as specific agents revealed favorable outcomes in AD, including JAK inhibitors, a dual JAK/SYK inhibitor, a histamine H4R antagonist, antagonists of the TSLP/OX40L axis, an IL-22 inhibitor, and IL-33 and IL-17C antagonists. Importantly, negative trials were published as well (eg, phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, apremilast).

CONCLUSION

In this rapidly evolving field of AD treatments, a completely new treatment paradigm will be available in the near future.

[Infections]

The individual risk assessment concerning infections in patients with rheumatic diseases is based on the detailed personalized documentation of relevant risk factors, such as the underlying disease itself, the intensity of immunosuppressive therapy and the severity of any comorbidities. From the perspective of infectiology, the history of repeated and severe infections as well as previous illnesses, such as (latent) tuberculosis and chronic hepatitis B or C need to be considered. In some instances prophylactic antibiotic therapy might be required, which should otherwise be avoided in order to prevent selection of resistant pathogens. Furthermore, vaccinations are particularly suitable to specifically minimize the risk for frequent infectious diseases.

[New directions of pharmacotherapy of immune - inflammatory rheumatic diseases]

Deciphering immunopathogenesis, expanding the scope of diagnostics and developing new methods for treating human autoimmune diseases are among the priority areas of XXI century medicine. Particularly widely autoimmune pathology is presented in immunoinflammatory rheumatic diseases (IIRD), such as rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, systemic scleroderma, systemic vasculitis associated with the synthesis of antineutrophilic cytoplasmic antibodies, Sjogren's syndrome, idiopathic inflammatory myopathies and other other types of others. Deciphering the pathogenesis mechanisms of IIRD created the prerequisites for improving pharmacotherapy, which in the future should lead to a dramatic improvement in the prognosis for these diseases. The review discusses new approaches to IIRD pharmacotherapy associated with the inhibition of tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin-6 (IL-6), IL-1β, IL-17, IL-23, and the prospects for using Janus kinase inhibitors, depending on the prevailing pathogenesis mechanisms - autoimmunity or autoinflammation.

Update of the Mexican College of Rheumatology Guidelines for the Pharmacological Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis, 2018

Therapeutic advances in rheumatoid arthritis require periodic review of treatment guidelines.

OBJECTIVE

To update the Mexican College of Rheumatology guidelines on the pharmacological treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.

METHOD

Board certified rheumatologists from different health institutions and regions of the country participated. Work teams were formed that reviewed the previous guidelines, elaborated new questions, reviewed the literature, and scored the evidence that was presented and discussed in plenary session. The conclusions were presented to infectologists, gynaecologists and patients. Recommendations were based on levels of evidence according to GRADE methodology.

RESULTS

Updated recommendations on the use of available medications for rheumatoid arthritis treatment in Mexico up to 2017 are presented. The importance of adequate and sustained control of the disease is emphasized and relevant safety aspects are described. Bioethical conflicts are included, and government action is invited to strengthen correct treatment of the disease.

CONCLUSIONS

The updated recommendations of the Mexican College of Rheumatology on the pharmacological treatment of rheumatoid arthritis incorporate the best available information to be used in the Mexican health care system.

Challenges in the treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis

Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory disease characterized by a heterogeneous clinical response to the different treatments. Some patients are difficult to treat and do not reach the treatment targets as clinical remission or low disease activity. Known negative prognostic factors, such as the presence of auto-antiantibodies and joint erosion, the presence of a genetic profile, comorbidities and extra-articular manifestations, pregnancy or a pregnancy wish may concur to the treatment failure. In this review we aimed at identify difficult to treat RA patients and define the optimal therapeutic and environmental targets. Genetic markers of severity such as HLA-DRB1, TRAF1, PSORS1C1 and microRNA 146a are differently associated with joint damage; other gene polymorphisms seem to be associated with response to biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs). The presence of comorbidities and/or extra-articular manifestations may influence the therapeutic choice; overweight and obese patients are less responsive to TNF inhibitors. In this context the patient profiling can improve the clinical outcome. Targeting different pathways, molecules, and cells involved in the pathogenesis of RA may in part justify the lack response of some patients. An overview of the future therapeutic targets, including bDMARDs (inhibitors of IL-6, GM-CSF, matrix metalloproteinases, chemokines) and targeted synthetic DMARDs (filgotinib, ABT-494, pefacitinib, decernotinib), and environmental targets is addressed. Environmental factors, such as diet and cigarette smoke, may influence susceptibility to autoimmune diseases and interfere with inflammatory pathways. Mediterranean diet, low salt intake, cocoa, curcumin, and physical activity seem to show beneficial effects, however studies of dose finding, safety and efficacy in RA need to be performed.

Malignancy and rheumatoid arthritis: Epidemiology, risk factors and management

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory condition that can result in pain and functional disability. It is also associated with an increased occurrence of comorbidities, including an increased risk of certain cancers such as lung cancer and lymphoma. The aetiopathogenesis of this increased cancer risk is likely multifactorial and includes shared risk factors as well as chronic inflammation. There is also a concern that the treatment for RA itself may increase this risk further, particularly treatment with biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs). This paper aims to review the evidence for the increased risk of cancer in RA as well as the latest evidence for the association between DMARDs and tumorigenesis. It also discusses the evidence for the management of patients with biologic DMARDs in the setting of existing cancer.

JAK Inhibitors for Atopic Dermatitis: An Update

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is one of the most common inflammatory skin diseases. AD is driven by barrier dysfunction and abnormal immune activation of T helper (Th) 2, Th22, and varying degrees of Th1 and Th17 among various subtypes. The Janus kinase (JAK)-signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) and spleen tyrosine kinase (SYK) pathways are involved in signaling of several AD-related cytokines, such as IFN-γ, IL-4, IL-13, IL-31, IL-33, IL-23, IL-22, and IL-17, mediating downstream inflammation and barrier alterations. While AD is primarily Th2-driven, the clinical and molecular heterogeneity of AD endotypes highlights the unmet need for effective therapeutic options that target more than one immune axis and are safe for long-term use. The JAK inhibitors, which target different combinations of kinases, have overlapping but distinct mechanisms of action and safety profiles. Several topical and oral JAK inhibitors have been shown to decrease AD severity and symptoms. A review of the JAK and SYK inhibitors that are currently undergoing evaluation for efficacy and safety in the treatment of AD summarizes available data on a promising area of therapeutics and further elucidates the complex molecular interactions that drive AD.

Janus kinase inhibitors in immuno-inflammatory rheumatic diseases: new opportunities and prospects

Despite the great success in the diagnosis and treatment of immuno-inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IIRD), which led to a significant improvement in the prognosis in many patients, the fundamental medical problems of this pathology – the restoration of quality of life and reduction of mortality to the population level – are far from solution. This served as a powerful impetus to the study of new approaches to pharmacotherapy of IIRD, one of which is associated with the use of low-molecular synthetic drugs that inhibit intracellular "signal" molecules-Janus kinase (JAK), the socalled Jakinibs. The current achievements and trends concerning the use of JAK inhibitors in the treatment of IIRD are considered.