Patient's point of view on the use of telemedicine in multiple sclerosis: a web-based survey

Telemedicine and Neurology: A Survey of Neurology Patients in a Nigerian Tertiary Hospital

Background Telemedicine has been recognized as a viable solution for addressing the shortage of medical professionals in developing countries such as Nigeria. Tele-neurology has the potential to provide remote consultations and care for patients with neurological conditions, thereby reducing the burden of travel and improving access to medical care. Despite its growing popularity, there is a lack of research on patient's views on this mode of care delivery in Nigeria. This study was conducted to investigate patient's perspectives on the use of tele-neurology in Nigeria. Methodology A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among 398 neurology patients at Olabisi Onabanjo University Teaching Hospital, Sagamu, Ogun State, Nigeria. The data obtained were analyzed using descriptive statistics and a chi-square test using p < 0.05. Results Only 3% of our respondents had previously used telemedicine, with 78.1% of the respondents open to using telemedicine as a means of consultation. The disadvantages of telemedicine noted include limitations in assessing neurological status (94.7%), difficulty in explaining health conditions (84.4%), and lack of technical support (14.6%). The majority of respondents (96.5%) believed telemedicine will help in saving time. There was a statistically significant association between propensity to use telemedicine and time spent in the hospital (0.045) and time off work (<0.001). The propensity to use telemedicine was statistically significant to the use of email (0.001) and type of email address (0.001). Conclusion The findings suggested that there is a need for healthcare providers and policymakers to invest in developing telemedicine to improve access to care.

Occupational outcomes of people with multiple sclerosis during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review with meta-analysis

Background

People with Multiple Sclerosis (PwMS) are vulnerable to unfavorable occupational outcomes and the COVID-19 pandemic brought major consequences on people's professional lives. In this view, we decided to investigate the occupational outcomes of PwMS during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods

We performed a systematic review with meta-analysis searching key terms in four databases. We initially included any peer-reviewed original article that enrolled adult patients with the diagnosis of MS and assessed any occupational variable during the COVID-19 pandemic. There were no time limits and no language restrictions. The primary outcomes were the prevalence of unemployment, retirement and employment status change among people with MS during the COVID-19 pandemic. Other outcomes included the modality and characteristics of work: type of work, full-time work, part-time work and remote work. We also searched for data from studies that addressed any change in the work status due to the COVID-19 outbreak.

Results

We identified 49 eligible articles comprising a total sample size of 17,364 individuals with MS. The pooled prevalence of unemployment and retirement was 0.47 (95% CI = 0.42-0.53). The pooled prevalence of PwMS who were unemployed or retired was positively associated with the progressive phenotype of the disease (p = 0.017) and the use of glatiramer acetate (p = 0.004), but negatively associated with hospitalization due to COVID-19 (p = 0.008) and the use of immunosuppressants (p = 0.032), siponimod (p < 0.001), and cladribine (p = 0.021). The pooled proportion of PwMS that reported any change of the employment status during the COVID-19 pandemic was 0.43 (95% CI = 0.36-0.50) while the pooled prevalence of PwMS who worked remotely during this period was 0.37 (95% CI = 0.15-0.58). The change in employment status was negatively associated with the duration of MS (p = 0.03) but positively associated with the progressive phenotype of the disease (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Our seminal review may serve as an example of how patients with neurological diseases or disabilities in general may have their jobs impacted in a pandemic and foster the context of global socio-economic crisis.

Quality of care provided by Multiple Sclerosis Centers during Covid-19 pandemic: Results of an Italian multicenter patient-centered survey

BACKGROUND

Covid-19 pandemic impacted on management of people with Multiple Sclerosis (pwMS). Level of satisfaction of pwMS regarding the care received by the staff of Multiple Sclerosis Centers (MSCs) during the pandemic was not fully investigated. In a large patient-centered multicenter study, the therapeutic adherence and quality of care of MSCs was assessed.

METHODS

In April-May 2021, an online survey was widespread by 16 Italian MSCs. Frequencies, percentages and/or means and standard deviations were calculated to describe the sample. ANOVAs were performed to evaluate the effect of sociodemographic and clinical variables on overall pwMS' rating of MSC assistance.

RESULTS

1670 pwMS completed the survey (67.3% women). During the pandemic, 88% did not change their disease modifying therapy schedule, and 89.1% reached their MSCs with no or little difficulties. Even if only 1.3% of participants underwent a tele-health follow-up visit with their MSC staff, the 80.1% believed that tele-health services should be improved regardless of pandemic. 92% of participants were satisfied of how their MSC took charge of their needs; ANOVAs revealed an effect of disease duration on pwMS' level of satisfaction on MSCs management during the pandemic.

CONCLUSIONS

The results revealed an efficient MSCs response to Covid-19 pandemic and provided the basis for the implementing of tele-health services that would further improve the taking charge of patients, particularly those with longer disease, higher disability, and/or living far from their MSC.

Use of Telemedicine Among People with Multiple Sclerosis Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Introduction: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is the most common progressive neurological condition with onset in young adulthood. Because people with MS (PwMS) are often separated from specialty care by distance or disability, telemedicine can help alleviate that burden by removing obstacles to accessing care. Methods: We surveyed 762 PwMS in the iConquerMS research network about their use of in-person and telemedicine services prepandemic (January-February 2020) and during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic (September-November 2020). The survey asked PwMS about their use of in-person and telemedicine services, technology access, perceptions and preferences of telemedicine, their most recent telemedicine encounter, and reasons for not using telemedicine. Results: Prepandemic, the most cited reason for not using telemedicine was providers not offering remote visits. During the pandemic, there was a decrease in the use of in-person health care (100% to ∼78%) and an increase in telemedicine utilization (25% to ∼80%). Most participants had access to telemedicine-enabling technologies and a large portion indicated a preference for using telemedicine for some or most/all of their MS health care (41-57%). Before the pandemic, telemedicine utilization was highest for primary care, while during the pandemic, utilization of telemedicine was greatest for general MS care. Mental health telemedicine encounters increased during the pandemic. Discussion: The dramatic increase in telemedicine utilization during the COVID-19 pandemic has provided access for PwMS to multispecialty care. Maintaining the policy changes that enabled remote health care to expand during the pandemic will be critical for sustained access to MS specialty care for this vulnerable population.

Aging in multiple sclerosis: from childhood to old age, etiopathogenesis, and unmet needs: a narrative review

Multiple sclerosis (MS) primarily affects adult females. However, in the last decades, rising incidence and prevalence have been observed for demographic extremes, such as pediatric-onset MS (POMS; occurring before 18 years of age) and late-onset MS (corresponding to an onset above 50 years). These categories show peculiar clinical-pathogenetic characteristics, aging processes and disease courses, therapeutic options, and unmet needs. Nonetheless, several open questions are still pending. POMS patients display an important contribution of multiple genetic and environmental factors such as EBV, while in LOMS, hormonal changes and pollution may represent disease triggers. In both categories, immunosenescence emerges as a pathogenic driver of the disease, particularly for LOMS. In both populations, patient and caregiver engagement are essential from the diagnosis communication to early treatment of disease-modifying therapy (DMTs), which in the elderly population appears more complex and less proven in terms of efficacy and safety. Digital technologies (e.g., exergames and e-training) have recently emerged with promising results, particularly in treating and following motor and cognitive deficits. However, this offer seems more feasible for POMS, being LOMS less familiar with digital technology. In this narrative review, we discuss how the aging process influences the pathogenesis, disease course, and therapeutic options of both POMS and LOMS. Finally, we evaluate the impact of new digital communication tools, which greatly interest the current and future management of POMS and LOMS patients.

Communication between persons with multiple sclerosis and their health care providers: A scoping review

OBJECTIVES

This study undertakes a scoping review of research about communication between persons with MS and their health care providers.

DESIGN

PubMed, PsycInfo, Communication Source, Socindex, Sociological Abstracts, Cinahl, and Proquest Dissertations and Theses were used to identify studies since each database's inception. Research team members engaged in study selection, coding for communication issues, and data extraction for descriptive information.

RESULTS

Of the 419 empirical articles identified, 175 were included. Codes represented all elements of ecological and pathway models, emphasizing emerging technologies for facilitating communication, uncertainty and anxiety for persons with MS, and communication issues surrounding diagnosis, information seeking, and decision making.

CONCLUSION

This review synthesizes and organizes influences on communication, communication processes, and health outcomes of communication for persons with MS and their providers. Findings extend the ecological model with illness context and the pathway model with communication breakdowns and provider outcomes.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Health care providers should consider the complexity of communication when interacting with persons with MS, including the larger context in which it occurs, communication processes and their purposes, and short-term and long-term consequences of interactions. Ecological and pathway models can be frameworks for developing educational materials, as they succinctly capture key communication issues and outcomes.

MSProDiscuss™ Clinical Decision Support Tool for Identifying Multiple Sclerosis Progression

This article describes the rationale for the development of the MSProDiscuss™ clinical decision support (CDS) tool, its development, and insights into how it can help neurologists improve care for patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). MS is a progressive disease characterized by heterogeneous symptoms and variable disease course. There is growing consensus that MS exists on a continuum, with overlap between relapsing–remitting and secondary progressive phenotypes. Evidence demonstrates that neuroaxonal loss occurs from the outset, that progression can occur independent of relapse activity, and that continuous underlying pathological processes may not be reflected by inflammatory activity indicative of the patient’s immune response. Early intervention can benefit patients, and there is a need for a tool that assists physicians in rapidly identifying subtle signs of MS progression. MSProDiscuss, developed with physicians and patients, facilitates a structured approach to patient consultations. It analyzes multidimensional data via an algorithm to estimate the likelihood of progression (the MSProDiscuss score), the contribution of various symptoms, and the impact of symptoms on daily living, enabling a more personalized approach to treatment and disease management. Data from CDS tools such as MSProDiscuss offer new insights into disease course and facilitate informed decision-making and a holistic approach to MS patient care.

Disparities in Telehealth Care in Multiple Sclerosis

Background and Objectives:

The COVID-19 pandemic has dramatically increased telehealth use. We assessed access to and use of telehealth care including videoconferencing, and usability of videoconferencing among persons with multiple sclerosis (MS).

Methods:

In Fall 2020, we surveyed participants in the North American Research Committee on Multiple Sclerosis (NARCOMS) Registry. Participants reported availability and receipt of MS care or education through telehealth. Participants who completed ≥1 live videoconferencing visit completed the Telehealth Usability Questionnaire (TUQ). We tested factors associated with access to and receipt of telehealth care using logistic regression. We tested factors associated with TUQ scores using quantile regression.

Results:

Of the 8434 participants to whom the survey was distributed, 6043 responded (71.6%); 5403 were eligible for analysis. Of the respondents, 4337 (80.6%) were women, and they had a mean (SD) age of 63.2 (10.0) years. Overall, 2889 (53.5%) reported access to MS care via telehealth, 2110 (39.1%) reported receipt of MS care via telehealth including 1523 (28%) via videoconference. Among participants who reported telehealth was available, older age was associated with decreased odds of having a telehealth video visit; higher income and being physically active were associated with increased odds. Older age and moderate to very severe visual symptoms were associated with lower perceived usability of telehealth.

Conclusion:

Older age, lower socioeconomic status and disease-related impairments are associated with less access to and use of telehealth services in people with MS. Barriers to telehealth should be addressed to avoid aggravating health care disparities when using digital medicine.

Accessibility to Telerehabilitation Services for People With Multiple Sclerosis: Analysis of Barriers and Limitations

BACKGROUND

In multiple sclerosis (MS), telemedicine improves access to specialized medical care; however, barriers remain, including universal access and effective implementation. Focusing on telerehabilitation, ie, remotely delivered physical therapy, our goal was to identify barriers to telerehabilitation implementation and factors associated with patients completing telerehabilitation physical therapy treatment.

METHODS

Quantitative data included a review of electronic health records of patients with MS treated at the University of California San Francisco Physical Therapy Faculty Practice. We extracted demographic, clinical, and transit-related factors. For patients who scheduled an initial evaluation, we recorded the number of follow-ups, cancellations, completed physical therapy goals, and discharges. Qualitative data included interviews with 3 board-certified neurologic physical therapists and patients' perspectives recorded in the subjective portion of physical therapy notes.

RESULTS

We identified 111 patients with at least 1 visit (in-person or telerehabilitation) to physical therapy (82 women; mean ± SD age, 54.2 ± 12.7 years). Patients with no disability (Expanded Disability Status Scale [EDSS] score, 0) were 73% less likely to schedule a follow-up appointment (in-person or telerehabilitation) than those with some disability (EDSS score, >0) (odds ratio, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.09-0.75; P = .012). Neurologic physical therapists identified reduced travel burden and scheduling flexibility as benefits of telerehabilitation vs in-person visits. Barriers to telerehabilitation included low technological literacy, cognitive impairment, and fall risk. Patients described scheduling conflicts and pain/illness as barriers to telerehabilitation.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with no disability were least likely to complete physical therapy treatment via telerehabilitation. Although both benefits and barriers to completing physical therapy via telerehabilitation are present, the neurologic physical therapists were supportive of a hybrid model for physical therapy.