Acute spinal implant infection treated with debridement: does extended antibiotic treatment improve the prognosis?

Microbiological Profile of Instrumented Spinal Infections: 10-Year Study at a French Spine Center

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to compare the microbiological characteristics and treatment of early and late surgical site infections (SSIs) in instrumented spinal surgery.

METHODS

Those patients admitted for SSIs in a single center between January 2010 and December 2022 were included. The subjects were divided into early (eSSIs) and late (lSSIs) SSIs, and demographic, microbiological, treatment, and follow-up data were collected.

RESULTS

Instrumented spinal surgery was performed in 2136 patients. Ninety-six cases of infections were identified (prevalence = 4.5%), with 47.9% eSSIs and 52.1% lSSIs. In 58.7% of the cases, the eSSIs were monomicrobial: Staphylococcus aureus (37%) and Enterobacterales (33.3%) were the main bacteria involved. In 66% of the cases, the lSSIs, were monomicrobial: Cutibacterium acnes (30.3%) and staphylococci were predominant. Enterobacterales were isolated in more than 70% of the polymicrobial samples in both the eSSIs and lSSIs. The treatment of the eSSIs mostly consisted of lavage-debridement surgery associated with antibiotic treatment, while the treatment of the lSSIs combined hardware removal or replacement and long-duration antibiotic treatment. A negative outcome was observed in 17.1% of the eSSIs and 5.7% of the lSSIs. Enterobacterales were associated with negative outcomes of eSSIs.

CONCLUSIONS

Enterobacterales were found in most of the polymicrobial infections regardless of the time of infection onset. Further large studies should be conducted to precisely determine the management and prevention regarding the increasing Gram-negative bacteria SSIs.

Is Aggressive Surgery Always Necessary for Suspected Early-Onset Surgical Site Infection after Lumbar Surgery? A 10-Year Retrospective Analysis

OBJECTIVE

Surgical site infection (SSI) after spinal surgery is still a persistent worldwide health concern as it is a worrying and devastating complication. The number of samples in previous studies is limited and the role of conservative antibiotic therapy has not been established. This study aims to evaluate the clinical efficacy and feasibility of empirical antibiotic treatment for suspected early-onset deep spinal SSI.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study to identify all cases with suspected early-onset deep SSI after lumbar instrumented surgery between January 2009 and December 2018. We evaluated the potential risks for antibiotic treatment, examined the antibiotic treatment failure rate, and applied logistic regression analysis to assess the risk factors for empirical antibiotic treatment failure.

RESULTS

Over the past 10 years, 45 patients matched the inclusion criteria. The success rate of antibiotic treatment was 62.2% (28/45). Of the 17 patients who failed antibiotic treatment, 16 were cured after a debridement intervention and the remaining one required removal of the internal fixation before recovery. On univariate analysis, risk factors for antibiotic treatment failure included age, increasing or persisting back pain, wound dehiscence, localized swelling, and time to SSI (cut-off: 10 days). Multivariate analysis revealed that infection occurring 10 days after primary surgery and wound dehiscence were independent risk factors for antibiotic treatment failure.

CONCLUSION

Appropriate antibiotic treatment is an alternative strategy for suspected early-onset deep SSI after lumbar instrumented surgery. Antibiotic treatment for suspected SSI occurring within 10 days after primary surgery may improve the success rate of antibiotic intervention. Patients with wound dehiscence have a significantly higher likelihood of requiring surgical intervention.

[Translated article] Descriptive study of spinal instrumentation-related infections in a tertiary hospital

INTRODUCTION

Spinal instrumentation-related infections (SIRI) are one of the main causes of post-surgical complication and comorbidity. Our objective was to describe the clinical and microbiological characteristics, treatment and prognosis of these infections.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study in our institution (2011-2018) including adult patients undergoing spinal instrumentation who met the diagnostic criteria for confirmed infection. Superficial surgical wound and deep intraoperative samples were processed for microbiological culture. The medical and orthopaedic team was always the same.

RESULTS

Forty-one cases were diagnosed of which 39 patients (95.1%) presented early infection (<3 months after initial surgery) with symptoms in the first two weeks, mean CRP at diagnosis was 133mg/dl and 23% associated bacteremia. The remaining two patients (4.8%) were chronic infections (symptoms >3 months after surgery). The treatment of choice in early infections was the Debridement, Antibiotics and Implant Retention (DAIR) strategy without removal of the bone graft, which successfully resolved 84.2% of the infections. The main aetiology was gram-positive (Staphylococcus aureus: 31.7%), followed by gram-negative and polymicrobial flora. Antibiotics were optimised according to cultures with a mean duration of 12 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

In early infections, early diagnosis and DAIR strategy (with bone graft retention) demonstrated a healing rate higher than 80%.

Descriptive study of spinal instrumentation-related infections in a tertiary hospital

INTRODUCTION

Spinal instrumentation-related infections (SIRI) are one of the main causes of post-surgical complication and comorbidity. Our objective was to describe the clinical and microbiological characteristics, treatment and prognosis of these infections.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study in our institution (2011-2018) including adult patients undergoing spinal instrumentation who met the diagnostic criteria for confirmed infection. Superficial surgical wound and deep intraoperative samples were processed for microbiological culture. The medical and orthopaedic team was always the same.

RESULTS

Forty-one cases were diagnosed of which 39 patients (95.1%) presented early infection (<3 months after initial surgery) with symptoms in the first two weeks, mean CRP at diagnosis was 133mg/dl and 23% associated bacteremia. The remaining two patients (4.8%) were chronic infections (symptoms >3 months after surgery). The treatment of choice in early infections was the Debridement, Antibiotics and Implant Retention (DAIR) strategy without removal of the bone graft, which successfully resolved 84.2% of the infections. The main etiology was gram-positive (Staphylococcus aureus: 31.7%), followed by gram-negative and polymicrobial flora. Antibiotics were optimized according to cultures with a mean duration of 12 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

In early infections, early diagnosis and DAIR strategy (with bone graft retention) demonstrated a healing rate higher than 80%.

Vertebral osteomyelitis after spine instrumentation surgery: risk factors and management

BACKGROUND

Vertebral osteomyelitis after spine instrumentation surgery (pVOM) is a rare complication. Most cases of infection occur early after surgery that involve skin and soft tissue and can be managed with debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR).

AIM

To identify pVOM risk factors and evaluate management strategies.

METHODS

From a multicentre cohort of deep infection after spine instrumentation (IASI) cases (2010-2016), pVOM cases were compared with those without vertebral involvement. Early and late infections were defined (<60 days and >60 days after surgery, respectively). Multivariate analysis was used to explore risk factors.

FINDINGS

Among 410 IASI cases, 19 (4.6%) presented with pVOM, ranging from 2% (7/347) in early to 19.1% (12/63) in late IASIs. After multivariate analysis, age (adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 1.10; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.03-1.18), interbody fusion (aOR: 6.96; 95% CI: 2-24.18) and coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) infection (aOR: 3.83; 95% CI: 1.01-14.53) remained independent risk factors for pVOM. Cases with pVOM had worse prognoses than those without (failure rate; 26.3% vs 10.8%; P = 0.038). Material removal was the preferred strategy (57.9%), mainly in early cases, without better outcomes (failure rate; 33.3% vs 50% compared with DAIR). Late cases managed with removal had greater success compared with DAIR (failure rate; 0% vs 40%; P = 0.067).

CONCLUSION

Risk factors for pVOM are old age, use of interbody fusion devices and CoNS aetiology. Although the diagnosis leads to a worse prognosis, material withdrawn should be reserved for late cases or when spinal fusion is achieved.

Cutibacterium spp. Infections after Instrumented Spine Surgery Have a Good Prognosis Regardless of Rifampin Use: A Cross-Sectional Study

Infection after spinal instrumentation (IASI) by Cutibacterium spp. is being more frequently reported. The aim of this study was to analyse the incidence, risk factors, clinical characteristics, and outcome of a Cutibacterium spp. IASI (CG) compared with non-Cutibacterium IASI (NCG) infections, with an additional focus on the role of rifampin in the treatment. All patients from a multicentre, retrospective, observational study with a confirmed IASI between January 2010 and December 2016 were divided into two groups: (CG and NCG) IASI. Baseline, medical, surgical, infection treatment, and follow-up data were compared for both groups. In total, 411 patients were included: 27 CG and 384 NCG. The CG patients were significantly younger. They had a longer median time to diagnosis (23 vs. 13 days) (p = 0.025), although 55.6% debuted within the first month after surgery. Cutibacterium patients were more likely to have the implant removed (29.6% vs. 12.8%; p = 0.014) and received shorter antibiotic regimens (p = 0.014). In 33% of Cutibacterium cases, rifampin was added to the baseline therapy. None of the 27 infections resulted in treatment failure during follow-up regardless of rifampin use. Cutibacterium spp. is associated with a younger age and may cause both early and late IASIs. In our experience, the use of rifampin to improve the outcome in the treatment of a Cutibacterium spp. IASI is not relevant since, in our series, none of the cases had therapeutic failure regardless of the use of rifampin.

Postoperative Spinal Implant Infections (PSII)-A Systematic Review: What Do We Know So Far and What is Critical About It?

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

OBJECTIVES

Postoperative spinal implant infections (PSII) are an increasing challenge in the daily clinical routine. This review summarizes existing knowledge in the field of PSII, including definitions, epidemiology, classifications, risk factors, pathogenesis, symptoms, diagnosis, and treatment.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed using a structured PubMed analysis, based on the PRISMA criteria. The search terminology was set as: "spinal implant associated infection OR spinal implant infection OR spinal instrumentation infection OR peri spinal implant infection." PubMed search was limited to the categories randomized controlled trials (RCT), clinical trials, meta-analysis and (systematic) reviews, whereas case reports were excluded. Studies from January 2000 to December 2020 were considered eligible. A total of 572 studies were identified, 82 references included for qualitative synthesis, and 19 for detailed sub analysis (12 meta-analysis, 7 prospective RCT).

RESULTS

Structural problems in the field of PSII were revealed, including (1) limited level of evidence in clinical studies (missing prospective RCT, metanalyzes), (2) small patient numbers, (3) missing standardized definitions, (4) heterogeneity in patient groups, and (5) redundancy in cited literature.

CONCLUSION

Evidence-based knowledge about spinal implant-associated infections is lacking. All involved medical fields should come together to define the term PSII and to combine their approaches toward research, training, and patient care.

Infections after spine instrumentation: effectiveness of short antibiotic treatment in a large multicentre cohort

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Available information about infection after spine instrumentation (IASI) and its management are scarce. We aimed to analyse DAIR (debridement, antibiotics and implant retention) prognosis and evaluate effectiveness of short antibiotic courses on early forms.

METHODS

Multicentre retrospective study of patients with IASI managed surgically (January 2010-December 2016). Risk factors for failure were analysed by multivariate Cox regression and differences between short and long antibiotic treatment were evaluated with a propensity score-matched analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 411 IASI cases, 300 (73%) presented in the first month after surgery, 48 in the second month, 22 in the third and 41 thereafter. Infections within the first 2 months (early cases) occurred mainly to older patients, with local inflammatory signs and predominance of Enterobacteriaceae, unlike those in the later periods. When managed with DAIR, prognosis of early cases was better than later ones (failure rate 10.4% versus 26.1%, respectively; P = 0.02). Risk factors for DAIR failure in early cases were female sex, Charlson Score, large fusions (>6 levels) and polymicrobial infections (adjusted HRs of 2.4, 1.3, 2.6 and 2.26, respectively). Propensity score matching proved shorter courses of antibiotics (4-6 weeks) as effective as longer courses (failure rates 11.4% and 10.5%, respectively; P = 0.870).

CONCLUSIONS

IASIs within the first 2 months could be managed effectively with DAIR and shorter antibiotic courses. Clinicians should be cautious when faced with patients with comorbidities, large fusions and/or polymicrobial infections.

Hematology and Culture Assessment of Cranially Implanted Rhesus Macaques (Macaca mulatta)

The use of percutaneous cranial implants in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) has long been a valuable tool for neuroscience research. However, when treating and assessing these animals, veterinarians are required to make assumptions about diagnostic results due to a lack of research into how these implants affect physiology. Microbial cultures of cranial implant sites show an abundance of colonizing bacteria, but whether these microbes affect animal health and wellbeing is poorly understood. In addition, microbial antibiotic resistance can present significant health concerns for both the animals and the researchers. To help elucidate the relationship between percutaneous cranial implants and blood parameters, complete blood cell counts and serum chemistry results were assessed on 57 nonhuman primates at our institution from September 2001 to March 2017. Generalized estimating equations were used to compare the results before and after an animal's first implant surgery. This modelling showed that cranial implants were a significant predictor of alterations in the number of neutrophils, lymphocytes, and red blood cells, and in the concentration of hemoglobin, alkaline phosphatase, creatinine, calcium, phos- phorus, total protein, albumin, and globulin. Anaerobic and aerobic bacterial cultures were performed to identify bacteria associated with cranial implants. Staphylococcus spp., Streptococcus spp., and Corynebacterium spp. comprised the majority of the aerobic bacterial isolates, while Fusobacterium spp., Peptostreptococcus spp. and Bacterioides fragilis comprised the majority of anaerobic bacterial isolates. Using a Pearson r correlation for statistical analysis, we assessed whether any of these bacterial isolates developed antibiotic resistances over time. Cefazolin, the most frequently used antibiotic in monkeys in this study, was the only antimicrobial out of 41 agents tested to which bacteria developed resistance over time. These results indicate that percutaneous implants are associated with a generalized inflammatory state, multiple bacterial species are present at the implant site, and these bacteria may contribute to the inflammatory response.