Evidence supporting recommendations from international guidelines on treatment, diagnosis, and prevention of HAP and VAP in adults

Improvement in Diagnosis and Management of Nosocomial Pneumonias in a Cardiovascular Surgery Intensive Care Unit: A Multidisciplinary Approach

BACKGROUND

While criteria for the diagnosis of nosocomial pneumonias exist, objective definitions are a challenge and there is no gold standard for diagnosis. We analyzed the impact of the implementation of a logical, consensus-based diagnostic and treatment protocol for managing nosocomial pneumonias in the cardiovascular surgery intensive care unit (CVS-ICU).

METHODS

We conducted a quasi-experimental, interrupted time series analysis to evaluate the impact of a diagnostic and treatment protocol for nosocomial pneumonias in the CVS-ICU. Impacts were measured relative to patient outcomes, diagnostic processes, and antimicrobial stewardship improvement. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze results.

RESULTS

Overall, 35 pre-protocol and 39 post-protocol patients were included. Primary clinical variables suggesting pneumonia in pre- and post-protocol patients were new lung consolidation (50% vs. 71%), new leukocytosis (59% vs. 64%), and positive culture (32% vs. 55%). Appropriate diagnostic testing improved (23% vs. 54%, p = 0.008) after protocol implementation. The proportion of patients meeting the criteria for nosocomial pneumonia (77% vs. 87%) was not statistically significant, though more patients in the post-protocol group met probable diagnostic criteria (51% vs. 77%). Duration of therapy was not significantly different (6 days [IQR = 5.0, 10.0] vs. 7 days [IQR = 6.0, 9.0]).

CONCLUSIONS

The implementation of a diagnostic and treatment protocol for management of nosocomial pneumonias in the CVS-ICU resulted in improved diagnostic accuracy, advanced antimicrobial and diagnostic stewardship efforts, and laboratory cost savings without an adverse impact on patient-centered outcomes.

Surveillance and prevention of healthcare-associated infections: best practices to prevent ventilator-associated events

INTRODUCTION

Ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP) leads to an increase in morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. In addition to increased evidence from the latest European and American guidelines (published in 2017 and 2022, respectively), in the last two years, several important clinical experiences have added new prevention tools to be included to improve the management of VAP.

AREAS COVERED

This paper is a narrative review of new evidence on VAP prevention. We divided VAP prevention measures into pharmacological, non-pharmacological, and ventilator care bundles.

EXPERT OPINION

Most of the effective strategies that have been shown to decrease the incidence of complications are easy to implement and inexpensive. The implementation of care bundles, accompanied by educational measures and a multidisciplinary team should be part of optimal management. In addition to ventilator care bundles for the prevention of VAP, it could possibly be beneficial to use ventilator care bundles for the prevention of noninfectious ventilator associated events.

Effectiveness of nonpharmacological interventions to prevent adverse events in the intensive care unit: A review of systematic reviews

BACKGROUND

Different types of interventions have been assessed for the prevention of adverse events. However, determining which patient-safety practice is most effective can be challenging when there is no systematised evidence synthesis. An overview following the best methodological standards can provide the best reliable integrative evidence.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to provide an overview of effectiveness nonpharmacological interventions aimed at preventing adverse events in the intensive care unit.

METHODS

A review of systematic reviews (SRs) was conducted according to the Cochrane Handbook and PRISMA recommendations. PubMed, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library were searched for SRs published until March 2022. Two reviewers independently assessed the study's quality, using AMSTAR-2, and extracted data on intervention characteristics and effect on prevention of adverse events.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven SRs were included, and 27 nonpharmacological interventions were identified to prevent 11 adverse events. Most of the reviews had critically low methodological quality. Among all the identified interventions, subglottic secretion drainage, semirecumbent position, and kinetic bed therapy were effective in preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia; the use of earplugs, early mobilisation, family participation, and music in reducing delirium; physical rehabilitation in improving muscle strength; use of respiratory support in preventing reintubation; the use of a computerised physician order entry system in reducing risk of medication errors; and the use of heated water humidifier was effective in reducing artificial airway occlusion.

CONCLUSIONS

Some nonpharmacological interventions reduced adverse events in the intensive care setting. These findings should be interpreted carefully due to the low methodological quality. SRs on preventing adverse events in the intensive care unit should adhere to quality assessment tools so that best evidence can be used in decision-making.

Temporal trends in postoperative and ventilator-associated pneumonia in the United States

OBJECTIVE

To determine change in rates of postoperative pneumonia and ventilator-associated pneumonia among patients hospitalized in the United States during 2009-2019.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

PATIENTS

Patients hospitalized for major surgical procedures, acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, and pneumonia.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of data from the Medicare Patient Safety Monitoring System, a chart-abstraction-derived database including 21 adverse-event measures among patients hospitalized in the United States. Changes in observed and risk-adjusted rates of postoperative pneumonia and ventilator-associated pneumonia were derived.

RESULTS

Among 58,618 patients undergoing major surgical procedures between 2009 and 2019, the observed rate of postoperative pneumonia from 2009-2011 was 1.9% and decreased to 1.3% during 2017-2019. The adjusted annual risk each year, compared to the prior year, was 0.94 (95% CI, 0.92-0.96). Among 4,007 patients hospitalized for any of these 4 conditions at risk for ventilator-associated pneumonia during 2009-2019, we did not detect a significant change in observed or adjusted rates. Observed rates clustered around 10%, and adjusted annual risk compared to the prior year was 0.99 (95% CI, 0.95-1.02).

CONCLUSIONS

During 2009-2019, the rate of postoperative pneumonia decreased statistically and clinically significantly in among patients hospitalized for major surgical procedures in the United States, but rates of ventilator-associated pneumonia among patients hospitalized for major surgical procedures, acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, and pneumonia did not change.

Clinical Features and Outcomes of VAP Due to Multidrug-Resistant Klebsiella spp.: A Retrospective Study Comparing Monobacterial and Polybacterial Episodes

VAP due to multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria is a frequent infection among patients in ICUs. Patient characteristics and mortality in mono- and polybacterial cases of VAP may differ. A single-centre, retrospective 3-year study was conducted in the four ICUs of a Lithuanian referral university hospital, aiming to compare both the clinical features and the 60-day ICU all-cause mortality of monobacterial and polybacterial MDR Klebsiella spp. VAP episodes. Of the 86 MDR Klebsiella spp. VAP episodes analyzed, 50 (58.1%) were polybacterial. The 60-day mortality was higher (p < 0.05) in polybacterial episodes: overall (50.0 vs. 27.8%), in the sub-group with less-severe disease (SOFA < 8) at VAP onset (45.5 vs. 15.0%), even with appropriate treatment (41.7 vs. 12.5%), and the sub-group of extended drug-resistant (XDR) Klebsiella spp. (46.4 vs. 17.6%). The ICU mortality (44.0 vs. 22.5%) was also higher in the polybacterial episodes. The monobacterial MDR Klebsiella spp. VAP was associated (p < 0.05) with prior hospitalization (61.1 vs. 40.0%), diabetes mellitus (30.6 vs. 5.8%), obesity (30.6 vs. 4.7%), prior antibiotic therapy (77.8 vs. 52.0%), prior treatment with cephalosporins (66.7 vs. 36.0%), and SOFA cardiovascular ≥ 3 (44.4 vs. 10.0%) at VAP onset. Patients with polybacterial VAP were more likely (p < 0.05) to be comatose (22.2 vs. 52.0%) and had a higher SAPS II score (median [IQR] 45.0 [35.25-51.1] vs. 50.0 [40.5-60.75]) at VAP onset. Polybacterial MDR Klebsiella spp. VAP had distinct demographic and clinical characteristics compared to monobacterial, and was associated with poorer outcomes.

Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia, Multidrug-Resistant Bacteremia and Infection Control Interventions in an Intensive Care Unit: Analysis of Six-Year Time-Series Data

Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) occurs more than 48h after mechanical ventilation and is associated with a high mortality rate. The current hospital-based study aims to investigate the association between VAP rate, incidence of bacteremia from multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens, and infection control interventions in a single case mix ICU from 2013 to 2018. Methods: The following monthly indices were analyzed: (1) VAP rate; (2) use of hand hygiene disinfectants; (3) isolation rate of patients with MDR bacteria; and (4) incidence of bacteremia/1000 patient-days (total cases, total carbapenem-resistant cases, and carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Klebsiella pneumoniae cases separately). Results: Time trends of infection control interventions showed increased rates in isolation of patients with MDR pathogens (p <0.001) and consumption of hand disinfectant solutions (p =0.001). The last four years of the study an annual decrease of VAP rate by 35.12% (95% CI: −53.52 to −9.41; p =0.01) was recorded, which significantly correlated not only with reduced trauma and cardiothoracic surgery patients (IRR:2.49; 95% CI: 2.09−2.96; p <0.001), but also with increased isolation rate of patients with MDR pathogens (IRR: 0.52; 95% CI: 0.27−0.99; p = 0.048), and hand disinfectants use (IRR: 0.40; 95% CI: 0.18−0.89; p =0.024). Conclusions: Infection control interventions significantly contributed to the decrease of VAP rate. Constant infection control stewardship has a stable time-effect and guides evidence-based decisions.

Critical appraisal of international adult bronchiectasis guidelines using the AGREE II tool

BACKGROUND

Guidelines aim to standardize and optimize diagnosis and management. We evaluated the quality of evidence supporting recommendations from different international adult guidelines on bronchiectasis, and classified with the GRADE system.

METHODS

Quality of eligible clinical practice guidelines was assessed for six domains using the AGREE II tool, with ≥ 80% rating as excellent.

RESULTS

Seven guidelines (283 recommendations) were analyzed, and four of them were considered "recommended for use" (three reported after 2017 as excellent). Overall, 144 (50.9%) recommendations were based on low-quality evidence, representing 81.5% in diagnosis and 36.2% in therapy. In contrast, 5/92 (5.4%) and 40/191 (20.9%) recommendations regarding diagnostic and treatment (respectively) were based on high-quality evidence. Quality agreement ratings were significantly (p< 0.05) higher for guidelines delivered after 2015, progressing from 27.7% to 58.3%, qualifying as excellent. Highest scores were documented in the domains of "scope and purpose" followed by "clarifying of presentation" and "editorial independence".

CONCLUSION

Updated guidelines reported after 2017 improved quality, although well-designed randomized clinical trials remain an unmet need. AGREE II quality assessment identified four guidelines qualified as recommended for use. Improvements are required in stakeholder involvement and applicability.

Diagnosis and treatment of pneumonia, a common cause of respiratory failure in patients with neuromuscular disorders

Patients with neuromuscular diseases, during their illness are more susceptible to respiratory infections due to predisposing factors. Ineffective cough and the presence of atelectasis and hypoventilation, dysphagia and drooling can represent risk factors for the development of respiratory infection and fatal respiratory failure.

Infections of respiratory tract with acute respiratory failure are the most common reason for hospitalizations, and pneumonia is among the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. The setting in which pneumonia is acquired heavily influences diagnostic and therapeutic choices. We will focus on aetiopathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment of pneumonia in these subjects, particularly considering the disease severity, rates of antibiotic resistance and the possible complications. In this case consultations with specialized physicians are strongly recommended.

Incidence, Outcomes and Sex-Related Disparities in Pneumonia: A Matched-Pair Analysis with Data from Spanish Hospitals (2016-2019)

(1) Background: the purpose of this study is to analyze the incidence and in-hospital mortality (IHM) of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) needing hospital admission and hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) in Spain (2016–2019). (2) Methods: using the Spanish Register of Specialized Care-Basic Minimum Database, we estimated the incidence of CAP and HAP. We matched each woman with a man with an identical age, according to comorbidities. (3) Results: we analyzed 518,838 cases of CAP and 38,705 cases of HAP, and 5192 ventilator-associated HAPs (13.4%). The incidence of CAP increased over time in both men (from 384.5 to 449.8 cases/105 population) and women (from 244.9 to 301.2 cases/105 population). Men showed a 47% higher adjusted incidence of CAP than women. The incidence of HAP increased over time in both men (from 302.3 to 342.2 cases/105 population) and women (from 139.2 to 167.6 cases/105 population). Men showed a 98% higher adjusted incidence of HAP than women. IHM was higher in men admitted for CAP than in women (12.9% vs. 12.2%; p < 0.001), but not in men who developed HAP (28.9% vs. 28.0%; p = 0.107). Men admitted for CAP (OR: 1.13; 95% CI: 1.10–1.15) and men who developed HAP (OR: 1.05; 95% CI: 1.01–1.10) had higher IHM than women. (4) Conclusions: men had higher incidence rates of CAP and HAP than women. Men admitted for CAP and men who developed HAP had higher IHM than women.

Antibiotic Use and Fatal Outcomes among Critically Ill Patients with COVID-19 in Tacna, Peru

Overuse of antibiotics during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic could increase the selection of extensively resistant bacteria (XDR). However, it is unknown what impact they could have on the evolution of patients, particularly critically ill patients. This study aimed to evaluate the characteristics and impact of ICU-acquired infections in patients with COVID-19. A retrospective cohort study was conducted, evaluating all patients with critical COVID-19 admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) of a hospital in Southern Peru from 28 March 2020 to 1 March 2021. Of the 124 patients evaluated, 50 (40.32%) developed a healthcare-associated infection (HAI), which occurred at a median of 8 days (IQR 6-17) after ICU admission. The proportion of patients with HAI that required ceftriaxone was significantly higher; the same was true for the use of dexamethasone. Forty bacteria isolations (80%) were classified as XDR to antibiotics, with the most common organisms being Acinetobacter baumannii (54%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (22%); 33% (41/124) died at the ICU during the follow-up. In the adjusted analysis, healthcare-associated infection was associated with an increased risk of mortality (aHR= 2.7; 95% CI: 1.33-5.60) and of developing acute renal failure (aRR = 3.1; 95% CI: 1.42-6.72). The incidence of healthcare infection mainly by XDR pathogens is high in critically ill patients with COVID-19 and is associated with an increased risk of complications or death.

The application of plan, do, check, act (PDCA) quality management in reducing nosocomial infections in endoscopy rooms: It does work

BACKGROUND

The role of plan, do, check, act (PDCA) cycle quality management in reducing nosocomial infections in endoscopy rooms remains unclear; we aimed to evaluate the effects of PDCA in the nosocomial infections control of endoscopy rooms.

METHODS

This present study was a before and after design. The patients treated in our endoscopy room from 1 January 2019 to 31 December 2019 were included in the control group, which were managed according to current department practice. The patients from 1 January 2020 to 31 December 2020 were included in the PDCA group, which were managed according to PDCA cycle quality management including formulation of cleaning and disinfection process, establishment of an infection control team and improvement of inspection standards. The nosocomial infections of patients, the pass rate of medical staff's knowledge on the nosocomial infection and hand hygiene, the pass rate of disinfection of endoscope cavity and surface, the incidence of sharp injury and biological pollution were compared between two groups.

RESULTS

A total of 1020 patients were included, with 512 patients in PDCA group and 508 patients in the control group. The incidence of nosocomial infections in PDCA group was significantly lower than that of control group (0.98% vs. 2.76%, P = .002). The pass rate of medical staff's knowledge on the nosocomial infection and hand hygiene was significantly higher than that of control group (all P < .05). The pass rate of disinfection of endoscope cavity in PDCA group was significantly higher than that of control group (P = .037). The incidence of sharp injury and biological pollution in PDCA group were significantly lower than that of control group (all P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

PDCA cycle management is beneficial to reduce the risk of nosocomial infection, enhance the awareness of infection control and reduce the risk of occupational exposure of medical staff in the endoscopy room.

Nosocomial pneumonia diagnosis revisited

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Nosocomial pneumonia represents a significant burden even for the most resilient healthcare systems. Timely and reliable diagnosis is critical but remains a deficient field. This review critically revises the latest literature on the diagnosis of nosocomial pneumonia, including advances in imaging techniques, as well as the utility of rapid microbiological tests in establishing the etiological diagnosis.

RECENT FINDINGS

Studies on low radiation computed tomography (CT) and lung ultrasound (LUS) have shown promising results for early nosocomial pneumonia diagnosis; however, further data on their sensitivity and specificity are needed, especially for picking up subtle and nonspecific radiographic findings. Moreover, data supporting their superiority in pneumonia diagnosis is still limited. As for microbiological diagnosis, several culture-independent molecular diagnostic techniques have been developed, identifying both causative microorganisms as well as determinants of antimicrobial resistance, but more studies are needed to delineate their role in nosocomial pneumonia diagnosis.

SUMMARY

The development of nonculture dependent tests has launched a new era in microbiological nosocomial pneumonia diagnosis. These modalities along with the use of LUS and/or low radiation CT might improve the sensitivity and specificity of nosocomial pneumonia diagnosis, enhance early detection and guide the antimicrobial therapy but more studies are needed to further evaluate them and determine their role for the routine clinical practice.

Individualized Care Is Superior to Standardized Care for the Majority of Critically Ill Patients

Tools for standardizing patient care can take many forms, including but not limited to, bundles, quality improvement and performance measures, guidelines, and protocols. Each is intended to improve compliance with interventions believed to be supported by the best available evidence, ensuring consistency of management across all patients with the ultimate goal of improving outcomes. However, in the ICU, patients typically present with complex acute illnesses and accompanying comorbidities, requiring careful tailoring of interventions and treatments for each individual patient. The rapidly changing nature of the underlying conditions also demands continuous reassessment and modification of each patient’s management on a frequent and sometimes moment-by-moment basis. Disrupting this individualized treatment approach by imposing prescriptive, overly restrictive, “one-size-fits-all” standardized treatments in the critical care setting may prevent the clinician from meeting individual patients’ needs and decrease care quality (1 ). This problem is compounded if the standardization tools adopted are not only inflexible but also have a poorly supported or entirely absent scientific basis. Importantly, identifiable patient subcategories often exist that fit poorly into the populations for which many interventions were developed and tested. Of equal concern, critical care trainees may become dependent on a standardized/cookbook approach to care and fail to recognize and learn how treatments must be tailored for the unique needs of each critically ill patient. Rather than rigidly standardizing critical care, approaches that recognize this complexity and are both scientifically sound and responsive to patient differences should be readily available to critical care clinicians without replacing sensible clinical judgment. Such strategies that acknowledge the limitations of available evidence hold more hope of improving, rather than inadvertently worsening, the outcome.

Evaluation of the quality of evidence supporting guideline recommendations for the nutritional management of critically ill adults

AIMS

The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the quality of evidence supporting the 2019 European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN) and 2016 American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN) recommendations for medical nutrition therapy in critically ill patients. Secondary objectives are to assess the differences between 2019 ESPEN and 2016 ASPEN recommendations and to inform relevant stakeholders of areas requiring improvement in the research.

METHODS

The 2019 ESPEN and 2016 ASPEN guidelines were identified and downloaded from the official websites. The level of evidence and strength of recommendations from the guidelines were standardised to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. Level of evidence was classified as high-quality (randomised controlled trials (RCTs) without important limitations), moderate-quality (downgraded RCTs or upgraded observational studies) or low-quality (observational studies without specific strengths or important limitations, case series, case reports). In addition, good practice points (GPP; recommendations based on the clinical experience of the guideline development group) were considered. Strength of recommendation was reported as strong or weak.

RESULTS

From 152 total recommendations, only five (3.3%) were supported by high-quality evidence, with 14 being strong recommendations. A total of 79 (52.0%) recommendations were GPPs. Overall, the proportion of recommendations supported by high-quality (7% [ESPEN] vs. 1.1% [ASPEN], p < 0.05) and moderate-quality evidence (33.3% [ESPEN] vs. 8.4% [ASPEN], p < 0.01) was significantly higher in ESPEN guidelines. On the other hand, ASPEN guidelines reported a greater proportion of recommendations supported by GPPs (58.9% [ASPEN] vs. 40.4% [ESPEN], p = 0.03). In enteral and parenteral nutrition, the proportion of recommendations supported by moderate-quality evidence (50% [ESPEN] vs. 15.8% [ASPEN], p < 0.01) was significantly higher in ESPEN guidelines.

CONCLUSION

Published guideline recommendations for the nutritional management of critically ill adults remain largely supported by expert opinion and only a minority by high-quality evidence. An urgent unmet clinical need for high-quality clinical trials is warranted.

Quality of evidence supporting Surviving Sepsis Campaign Recommendations

Introduction

The Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) guidelines, released in 2017, are a combination of expert opinion and evidence-based medicine, adopted by many institutions as a standard of practice. The aim was to analyse the quality of evidence supporting recommendations on the management of sepsis.

Methods

The strength and quality of evidence (high, moderate, low-very low and best practice statements) of each recommendation were extracted. Randomised controlled trials were required to qualify as high-quality evidence.

Results

A total of 96 recommendations were formulated, and 87 were included. Among thirty-one (43%) strong recommendations, only 15.2% were supported by high-quality evidence. Overall, thirty-seven (42.5%) recommendations were based on low-quality evidence, followed by 28 (32.2%) based on moderate-quality, 15 (17.2%) were best practice statements and only seven (8.0%) were supported by high-quality evidence. Randomised controlled trials supported 21.4%, 9.5% and 8.6% recommendations on mechanical ventilation, resuscitation, and management/adjuvant therapy, respectively. In contrast, none high-quality evidence recommendation supported antimicrobial/source control (82.4% were low-very low evidence or best practice statements), and nutrition.

Conclusions

In the SSC guidelines most recommendations were informed by indirect evidence and non-systematic observations. While awaiting trials results, Delphi-like approaches or multi-criteria decision analyses should guide recommendations.

Levels of evidence supporting clinical practice guidelines on invasive aspergillosis

Invasive aspergillosis (IA) is a severe life-threatening infection with challenges in therapy. The aim was to evaluate the level of evidence (LOE) supporting recommendations in clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) of IA and changes over time. Search on CPG on IA released between 2000 and 2019 was done. Last versions were evaluated and compared with previous versions. Recommendations were classified by LOE as A (multiple randomized controlled trial (RCT) or meta-analysis), B (data from a single RCT or observational studies), or C (observational studies with limitations, case series, or expert opinion). Diagnosis recommendations were excluded. Five CPG from three groups of scientific societies were identified: the 2016 Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society (IDSA/ATS), 2017 European Society of Clinical Microbiology Infectious Diseases/European Confederation of Medical Mycology/European Respiratory Society (ESCMID/ECMM/ERS), 2018 Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (SEIMC) CPGs, and their previous versions (2008 IDSA/ATS and 2011 GEMICOMED/SEIMC). ECMID/ECMM/ERS have not published any previous version. From 511 recommendations analyzed, 80 were classified as LOE A (15.7%), 223 LOE B (43.6%), and 208 LOE C (40.7%). Among 238 strong recommendations, only 57 (24.0%) were supported by LOE A. When comparing recent CPGs with previous versions, the proportion of recommendations supported by LOE A did not significantly increase over time (IDSA/ATS: 13.3% [2016] vs. 14.8% [2008], p = 0.798; and SEIMC: 22.6% [2018] vs. 19% [2011], p = 0.568). In conclusion, IA is a condition with an urgent unmet clinical need for more high-quality randomized trials.