R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score predicts postoperative recurrence of localized renal cell carcinoma treated by radical nephrectomy

Associations between R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score and survival outcomes in renal tumours

OBJECTIVE

The radius-exophytic/endophytic-nearness-anterior/posterior-location nephrometry score could be used to predict surgical outcomes and renal tumour aggressiveness. We aimed to analyse its associations with survival outcomes.

METHODS

We included 1368 patients with sporadic, unilateral and non-metastatic renal tumours who received curative nephrectomy in Zhongshan Hospital from January 2009 to September 2019. Radius-exophytic/endophytic-nearness-anterior/posterior-location nephrometry scores were assigned by three urologists based on preoperative CT/MRI scans. Correlations between parameters or sum of radius-exophytic/endophytic-nearness-anterior/posterior-location nephrometry scores, overall survival and recurrence-free survival were analysed by Kaplan-Meier analyses and the multivariate Cox regression model. We further compared survival outcomes between patients who received partial nephrectomy and patients who received radical nephrectomy.

RESULTS

We observed statistically significant associations between all components of radius-exophytic/endophytic-nearness-anterior/posterior-location nephrometry scores and oncologic outcomes, including R (radius) (overall survival, P < 0.001; recurrence-free survival , P < 0.001), E (exophytic/endophytic) (overall survival, P = 0.003; recurrence-free survival, P < 0.001), N (nearness) (overall survival, P = 0.063; recurrence-free survival, P < 0.001), A (anterior/posterior) (overall survival, P < 0.001; recurrence-free survival, P = 0.005), L (location) (overall survival, P = 0.008; recurrence-free survival, P < 0.001) and suffix 'h' (overall survival, P = 0.237; recurrence-free survival, P = 0.034). Kaplan-Meier curves of overall survival and recurrence-free survival rates were significantly different when stratified by radius-exophytic/endophytic-nearness-anterior/posterior-location nephrometry score complexity group (overall survival, P < 0.001; recurrence-free survival, P < 0.001). After adjusting for tumour stage and grade, radius-exophytic/endophytic-nearness-anterior/posterior-location nephrometry score as continuous variables was an adverse independent risk factor for survival outcomes [P = 0.027, hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) = 1.151 (1.016-1.303)] and recurrence-free survival [P < 0.001, hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) = 1.299 (1.125-1.501)]. For tumours with radius-exophytic/endophytic-nearness-anterior/posterior-location nephrometry scores of 4 and 5, partial nephrectomy showed a survival benefit than radical nephrectomy.

CONCLUSION

Both components and complexity groups of the radius-exophytic/endophytic-nearness-anterior/posterior-location nephrometry score are associated with survival outcomes in renal tumour patients.

Comparison of aggressiveness in central versus peripheral T1a clear-cell renal cell carcinoma

PURPOSE

This study aimed to estimate the difference between peripheral and central small renal lesions in terms of their oncologic potential.

METHODS

Cross-sectional retrospective analysis of patients with small renal masses (T1a) who underwent surgical treatment between January 2008 and July 2019 at the affiliated hospital. Only patients with ccRCC pathology were included. Cases were divided into 2 groups depending on tumor location (central or peripheral) based on the R.E.N.A.L and local nephrometry scoring. Presence of nodal involvement, distant metastases, ISUP grade and endophytic growth were defined as aggressiveness predictors. Statistical analyses was performed using a standard statistical software (IBM SPPS Statistics Ver. 22), with P < 0.05 considered statistically significant. Associations between tumor location and Fuhrman grade, exo-/endophytic growth, TNM classification, and type of operation were tested using the Pearson χ² test and 1-way ANOVA test.

RESULTS

Patients with centrally located tumors had a higher incidence of clinical and pathological lymph node involvement (P = 0.02, χ2 = 5.1). Patients in both groups had an equal number of distant metastases at the time of diagnosis (P = 0.3, χ2 = 0.8). The operation time was significantly longer in patients with central lesions, which obviously showed higher tumor complexity in this group (P < 0.005). Pathological evaluation revealed differences between ISUP grades in both groups (P < 0.005, χ2 = 29.9). Central masses were characterized by higher aggressiveness, indicating a worse prognosis. Furthermore, the cases in the first group were more often endophytic (P = 0.03, χ2 = 0.9). Nevertheless, this did not affect the surgical strategy in most cases with a tendency toward partial nephrectomy. Eventually, organ-sparing treatment was preferable in both groups (P = 0.13, χ2 = 2.29).

CONCLUSION

Centrally located kidney cancer has showed in present study a higher incidence of high ISUP grade, regional nodal involvement and endophytic growth type. Endophytic growth type was associated with worse ISUP grading. Distribution of ISUP grade was not age depended, thus showing no difference by this criterion, when comparing different age groups. Higher ISUP grade was strongly associated with presence of distant metastases in T1a kidney tumors. Further analysis is needed to investigate aggressiveness of centrally located T1a RCC, as it may influence current conservative management options.

Nephrometry scores to predict oncological outcomes following partial nephrectomy (UroCCR Study 70)

PURPOSE

Partial nephrectomy (PN) for large or complex renal tumors can be difficult and associated with a higher risk of recurrence than radical nephrectomy. We aim to evaluate the clinical useful of nephrometry scores for predicting oncological outcomes in a large cohort of patients who underwent PN for renal cell carcinomas.

METHODS

Our analysis included patients who underwent PN for renal cell carcinoma in 21 French academic centers (2010-2020). RENAL, PADUA, and SPARE scores were calculated based on preoperative imaging. Uni- and multivariate cox models were performed to identify predictors of recurrence-free survival and overall survival. The area under the curve (AUC) was used to identify models with the highest discrimination. Decision curve analyses (DCAs) determined the net benefit associated with their use.

RESULTS

A total of 1927 patients were analyzed with a median follow-up of 32 months (14-45). RENAL score (p = 0.01), age (p = 0.002), histological type (p = 0.001), high nuclear grade (p = 0.001), necrotic component (p < 0.001), and positive margins (p = 0.005) were significantly related to recurrence in multivariate analyses. The discriminative performance of the 3 radiological scores was modest (65, 63, and 63%, respectively). All 3 scores showed good calibration, which, however, deteriorated with time. Decision curve analysis of the three models for the prediction of overall and recurrence-free survival was similar for all three scores and of limited clinical relevance.

CONCLUSION

The association between nephrometry scores and oncological outcomes after NP is very weak. The use of these scores for predicting oncological outcomes in routine practice is therefore of limited clinical value.

Imaging Tool for Predicting Renal Clear Cell Carcinoma Fuhrman Grade: Comparing R.E.N.A.L. Nephrometry Score and CT Texture Analysis

Background

Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is the most common renal malignant tumor. Preoperative imaging boasts advantages in diagnosing and choosing treatment methods for ccRCC.

Purpose

This study is aimed at building models based on R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score (RNS) and CT texture analysis (CTTA) to estimate the Fuhrman grade of ccRCC and comparing the advantages and disadvantages of the two models.

Materials and Methods

143 patients with pathologically confirmed ccRCC were enrolled. All patients were stratified into Fuhrman low-grade and high-grade groups with complete CT data and R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry scores. CTTA features were extracted from the ROI delineated at the largest tumor level, and RNS and CTTA features were included in the logistic regression model, respectively.

Results

RNS model constructed based on multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that 3 pts for R-scores, 2 pts for E-scores, and 3 pts for L-scores were significant indicators to predict high-grade ccRCC, the AUC of RNS model was 0.911, and the sensitivity and specificity were 71.11% and 83.67%, respectively. The CTTA-model confirmed energy, kurtosis, and entropy as independent predictive factors, and the AUC of CTTA model was 0.941, with an optimal sensitivity and specificity of 84.44% and 93.88%.

Conclusions

R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score has a certain provocative effect on the Fuhrman pathological grading of ccRCC. As a potential emerging technology, CTTA is expected to replace R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score in evaluating patients' Fuhrman classification, and this approach might become an available method for assisting clinicians in choosing appropriate operation.

A comparison of DAP and RENAL scoring systems in the achievement of trifecta in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy

PURPOSE

The concept of 'trifecta' outcome postulated for radical prostatectomy has been adopted for partial nephrectomy, the gold standard for management of small renal masses. We sought to evaluate the role of nephrometry scores in predicting outcomes in terms of the trifecta. We compared two scoring systems for renal tumour complexity (RENAL and DAP) in the prediction of trifecta outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty-nine patients who underwent laparoscopic PN (LPN) were evaluated in a single-centre retrospective study (2010-2017). RENAL and DAP scores were measured. Parameters relevant to the trifecta were tabulated.

RESULTS

When comparing the two scoring systems in terms of warm ischaemia time (WIT), the DAP score could predict with statistically significant accuracy the completion of resection within 25 mins of WIT. Tumours were more evenly distributed according to anatomical characteristics with the DAP scoring system than with the RENAL scoring system. When comparing these systems in terms of complications, neither predicted complications based on complexity with significant accuracy. A low RENAL score predicted trifecta achievement in three-fourth (71.4%) of patients, while a medium RENAL score predicted trifecta achievement in half (54%) of patients. DAP score predicted trifecta achievement in all tumours with a low score, two-third (66%) in medium and less than half (42%) with a high score. Predictions based on DAP were accurate and significantly so (p = 0.024).

CONCLUSIONS

DAP score predicted the outcomes of LPN in terms of trifecta significantly better than the RENAL score. In our experience, the DAP score was able to distribute tumour complexity among its groups more effectively than the RENAL score. There is early evidence that the DAP score may be more useful than the RENAL score for decision-making in nephron sparing surgery. This is especially pertinent for small renal masses at the upper limits of tumour complexity for which minimally invasive techniques can be safely applied.

Acute kidney injury promotes development of papillary renal cell adenoma and carcinoma from renal progenitor cells

Acute tissue injury causes DNA damage and repair processes involving increased cell mitosis and polyploidization, leading to cell function alterations that may potentially drive cancer development. Here, we show that acute kidney injury (AKI) increased the risk for papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC) development and tumor relapse in humans as confirmed by data collected from several single-center and multicentric studies. Lineage tracing of tubular epithelial cells (TECs) after AKI induction and long-term follow-up in mice showed time-dependent onset of clonal papillary tumors in an adenoma-carcinoma sequence. Among AKI-related pathways, NOTCH1 overexpression in human pRCC associated with worse outcome and was specific for type 2 pRCC. Mice overexpressing NOTCH1 in TECs developed papillary adenomas and type 2 pRCCs, and AKI accelerated this process. Lineage tracing in mice identified single renal progenitors as the cell of origin of papillary tumors. Single-cell RNA sequencing showed that human renal progenitor transcriptome showed similarities to PT1, the putative cell of origin of human pRCC. Furthermore, NOTCH1 overexpression in cultured human renal progenitor cells induced tumor-like 3D growth. Thus, AKI can drive tumorigenesis from local tissue progenitor cells. In particular, we find that AKI promotes the development of pRCC from single progenitors through a classical adenoma-carcinoma sequence.

Computed tomography features predicting aggressiveness of malignant parenchymal renal tumors suitable for partial nephrectomy

The aim of this study was to identify and standardize computed tomography (CT) features having a potential role in predicting aggressiveness of malignant parenchymal renal tumors suitable for partial nephrectomy (PN). We performed a non-systematic review of the recent literature to evaluate the potential impact of CT variables proposed by the Society of Abdominal Radiology Disease-Focused Panel on Renal Cell Carcinoma in predicting aggressiveness of newly diagnosed malignant parenchymal renal tumors. The analyzed variables were clinical tumor size, tumor growth rate, enhancement characteristics, amount of cystic component, polar and capsular location, tumor margins and distance between tumor and renal sinus. Unfavorable behavior was defined as: 1) renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with stage ≥pT3; 2) nuclear grade 3 or 4; 3) presence of sarcomatoid de-differentiation; or 4) non-clear cell subtypes with unfavorable prognosis (type 2 papillary RCC, collecting duct or renal medullary carcinoma, unclassified RCC). Beyond clinical tumor size, tumor growth rate, enhancement characteristics, amount of cystic component, tumor margins and distance between tumor and renal sinus are highly relevant features predicting an unfavorable behavior. Moreover, several studies supported the role of necrosis as preoperative predictor of tumor aggressiveness. Peritumoral and intratumoral vasculature as well as capsule status are emerging variables that need to be further evaluated. Tumor size, enhancement characteristics, tumor margins and distance to the renal sinus are highly relevant CT features predicting biological aggressiveness of malignant parenchymal renal tumors. Combination of these parameters might be useful to generate tools to predict the unfavorable behavior of renal tumors suitable for PN.

Nephron-Sparing Surgery for Adult Xp11.2 Translocation Renal Cell Carcinoma at Clinical T1 Stage: A Multicenter Study in China

Purpose

To evaluate the oncologic efficacy and feasibility of nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) in adult Xp11.2 translocation renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

Patients and Methods

Seventy patients with Xp11.2 translocation RCC and 273 with conventional RCC from five institutions in Nanjing were retrospectively studied. All patients were older than 18 years and were categorized into clinical T1 (cT1) stage using preoperative imaging. Using the preoperative imaging and electronic medical records, anatomical and pathological features were collected and analyzed.

Results

Among patients with Xp11.2 translocation RCC, 18/36 (50.0%) with cT1a and 12/34 (35.3%) with cT1b tumors underwent NSS. The respective proportions in the conventional RCC group were 121/145 (83.4%) and 93/128 (72.7%). Among cT1a tumors, the Xp11.2 translocation RCCs tended to be adjacent to the collecting system, sinus, and axial renal midline compared with conventional RCCs. Patients with Xp11.2 translocation RCCs who underwent NSS had comparable progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival to radical nephrectomy (RN) patients (P > 0.05). Among cT1b tumors, surgical margin positivity and pelvicalyceal, vascular, and region lymphatic involvement were more likely to occur in the Xp11.2 translocation RCCs (P < 0.05). Patients with Xp11.2 translocation RCC who underwent RN had a more favorable PFS than those who underwent NSS (P = 0.048). However, multivariate analysis of PFS did not identify surgical method as a risk factor (P = 0.089).

Conclusions

Among adults with Xp11.2 translocation RCC, NSS can be an alternative for patients with cT1a tumor but should be performed with more deliberation in patients with cT1b tumors.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1245/s10434-020-08813-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Role of R.E.N.A.L. Nephrometry Score in Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy

Background:

Preoperative anatomical scoring system is conducive to comparison between treatment options and evaluation of postoperative outcomes in patients with small renal tumors. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical application efficacy of the R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score (RNS) in predicting perioperative outcomes in patients with renal tumor who underwent laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN).

Methods:

The clinical data of 139 patients with renal tumors who underwent LPN between 2009 and 2015 were collected and analyzed. Patients were divided into three groups according to their RNS (low, moderate, and high). Clinical characteristics including perioperative variables, complications, and RNS were compared to evaluate the differences between the three groups. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the risk factors of postoperative complications.

Results:

According to the RNS, there were 74, 50, and 15 patients in the low, moderate, and high RNS groups, respectively. There were significant differences in estimated blood loss (EBL; χ² = 7.285, P = 0.026), warm ischemia time (WIT; χ² = 13.718, P = 0.001), operation time (OT; χ² = 6.882, P = 0.032), perioperative creatinine clearance change (PCCC; χ² = 6.206, P = 0.045), and number of patients with complications (NPC; P = 0.002) among the three groups. The values for EBL, WIT, OT, PCCC, and NPC for patients in the high RNS group were higher than those for patients in the low RNS group. After adjustment for OT, WIT, and EBL, RNS was statistically significantly associated with the risk of postoperative complications in a multivariable logistic regression model (odds ratio = 1.541, 95% confidence interval: 1.059–2.242, P = 0.024).

Conclusions:

The RNS is a valuable tool for evaluating the complexity of renal tumor anatomy. It can aid surgeons in preoperative decision-making concerning management therapy. Future multicenter, large sample size studies are warranted for evaluating its predicting performance of perioperative outcomes.

Nephron sparing surgery in tumours greater than 7cm

INTRODUCTION

Partial nephrectomy (PN) is the gold standard treatment for renal cell carcinomas under 4cm. No robust data exists to recommend PN for tumours>7cm (cT2). The objective of this work is to evaluate the results of PN for cT2 tumours.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All patients who underwent PN or radical nephrectomy (RN) for cT2 tumours between 2000 and 2013 at our institution have been included. Patient demographics, postoperative data including renal function, morbidity, mortality and oncologic outcomes were reviewed retrospectively and compared using χ² test, Mann-Whitney test, Kaplan-Meier method and log rank test.

RESULTS

We included 130 patients, 49 (38%) in the PN group and 81 (62%) in the RN group, with a median follow-up of 42 months [19-69]. Variation of postoperative renal function at day 5 and last recorded value was significantly different between the groups (P=0.03 and P<0.001). The PN group had a significantly higher complication rate as compared with RN group (37% versus 14%, P=0.002). There were no significant differences between the two groups for overall, recurrence free and specific survival (P=0.55, P=0.55, P=0.24, respectively). In univariate analysis, the type of surgery (PN versus RN) was not associated with a significant difference of oncologic outcome (margins, survival).

CONCLUSION

PN can be offered for cT2 tumours with oncological outcomes similar to RN. Despite an increased morbidity, it remains acceptable with the demonstrated advantage of preservation of renal function.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Obesity as defined by waist circumference but not body mass index is associated with higher renal mass complexity

OBJECTIVES

Obesity, typically defined as a body mass index (BMI)≥30kg/m², is an established risk factor for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) but is paradoxically linked to less advanced disease at diagnosis and improved outcomes. However, BMI has inherent flaws, and alternate obesity-defining metrics that emphasize abdominal fat are available. We investigated 3 obesity-defining metrics, to better examine the associations of abdominal fat vs. generalized obesity with renal tumor stage, grade, or R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

In a prospective cohort of 99 subjects with renal masses undergoing resection and no evidence of metastatic disease, obesity was assessed using 3 metrics: body mass index (BMI), radiographic waist circumference (WC), and retrorenal fat (RRF) pad distance. R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry scores were calculated based on preoperative CT or MRI. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify associations between obesity metrics and nephrometry score, tumor grade, and tumor stage.

RESULTS

In the 99 subjects, surgery was partial nephrectomy in 51 and radical nephrectomy in 48. Pathology showed benign masses in 11 and RCC in 88 (of which 20 had stage T3 disease). WC was positively correlated with nephrometry score, even after controlling for age, sex, race, and diabetes status (P = 0.02), whereas BMI and RRF were not (P = 0.13, and P = 0.57, respectively). WC in stage T2/T3 subjects was higher than in subjects with benign masses (P = 0.03). In contrast, subjects with Fuhrman grade 1 and 2 tumors had higher BMI (P<0.01) and WC (P = 0.04) than subjects with grade 3 and 4 tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that obesity measured by WC, but not BMI or RRF, is associated with increased renal mass complexity. Tumor Fuhrman grade exhibited a different trend, with both high WC and BMI associated with lower-grade tumors. Our findings indicate that WC and BMI are not interchangeable obesity metrics. Further evaluation of RCC-specific outcomes using WC vs. BMI is warranted to better understand the complex relationship between general vs. abdominal obesity and RCC characteristics.

Evaluation of the Clinical Use of Robot-Assisted Retroperitoneal Laparoscopy and Preoperative RENAL Scoring for Nephron Sparing Surgery in Renal Tumor Patients

The present study aims to compare the operative outcomes following the use of robot-assisted retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy (RARPN) with radius, exophytic/endophytic, nearness to sinus, anterior/posterior, and location (RENAL) scoring or laparoscopic retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy (LRPN) for the treatment of renal tumors. Eighty-three nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) procedures performed between January 2013 and December 2015 were reviewed. The study set consisted of 26 robot-assisted retroperitoneal laparoscopes, of which 3 were high risk (RENAL score ≥10), 11 were medium risk (RENAL score ≥7 < 9), and 12 were low risk (RENAL score <7) and 57 laparoscopic retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy procedures (7 high, 22 medium, and 28 low risk). All surgeries were successful in the absence of conversion or transfusion. Operative times were 96.0 ± 16.9 and 110.0 ± 19.4 min for RARPN and LRPN, respectively (P < 0.05). Warm ischemia times (WITs) were 17.6 ± 3.1 and 22.8 ± 3.5 min, respectively (P < 0.05). Estimated blood losses (EBLs) were 45 ± 15 and 97 ± 25 mL, respectively (P < 0.05). No statistical significance was found in duration of drainage, intestinal recovery time, hospital stay, serum creatinine, and perioperative complications (P > 0.05). RARPN affords significant advantages in outcomes of WIT, EBL, and recovery time over conventional LRPN owing to an increased accuracy in excision and suturing. Patients bearing high-risk renal tumors (RENAL score ≥10) are suitable candidates for RARPN.

Utility of the RENAL index -Radius; Exophytic/endophytic; Nearness to sinus; Anterior/posterior; Location relative to polar lines- in the management of renal masses

CONTEXT

The growing incidence of renal masses and the wide range of available treatments require predictive tools that support the decision making process. The RENAL index -Radius; Exophytic/endophytic; Nearness to sinus; Anterior/posterior; Location relative to polar lines- helps standardise the anatomy of a renal mass by differentiating 3 groups of complexity. Since the introduction of the index, there have been a growing number of studies, some of which have been conflicting, that have evaluated the clinical utility of its implementation.

OBJECTIVE

To analyse the scientific evidence on the relationship between the RENAL index and the main strategies for managing renal masses.

ACQUISITION OF THE EVIDENCE

A search was conducted in the Medline database, which found 576 references on the RENAL index. In keeping with the PRISM Declaration, we selected 100 abstracts and ultimately reviewed 96 articles.

SYNTHESIS OF THE EVIDENCE

The RENAL index has a high degree of interobserver correlation and has been validated as a predictive nomogram of histological results. In active surveillance, the index has been related to the tumour growth rate and probability of nephrectomy. In ablative therapy, the index has been associated with therapeutic efficacy, complications and tumour recurrence. In partial nephrectomy, the index has been related to the rate of complications, conversion to radical surgery, ischaemia time, function preservation and tumour recurrence, a finding also observed in radical nephrectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

The RENAL index is an objective, reproducible and useful system as a predictive tool of highly relevant clinical parameters such as the rate of complications, ischaemia time, renal function and oncological results in the various currently accepted treatments for the management of renal masses.

R.E.N.A.L. Score Outperforms PADUA Score, C-Index and DAP Score for Outcome Prediction of Nephron Sparing Surgery in a Selected Cohort

PURPOSE

Several nephrometry scores have been proposed to predict perioperative outcomes in renal surgery. We evaluated which nephrometry score correlates best with the MIC (margin, ischemia and complications) score and quantitative perioperative outcomes in nephron sparing surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data on 188 patients undergoing nephron sparing surgery were retrospectively investigated for patient, operative and tumor characteristics. Nephrometry scores, including R.E.N.A.L. (radius, exophytic/endophytic properties, nearness of tumor to collecting system or sinus, anterior/posterior, hilar tumor touching the main renal artery or vein and location relative to polar lines), PADUA (preoperative aspects and dimensions used for an anatomical), C-index (concordance index) and DAP (diameter-axial-polar), were measured on preoperative computerized tomography or magnetic resonance imaging and coded continuously and categorically. Parameters pertaining to tumor margin, ischemia and complications were recorded as binary scores and classified as MIC achievement. Operative time, estimated blood loss, warm ischemia time and hospital stay were recorded as quantitative perioperative outcomes.

RESULTS

The R.E.N.A.L. score correlated best with MIC and quantitative perioperative outcomes. The continuously coded R.E.N.A.L. score was predictive of MIC on univariate analysis (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.58-0.97, p = 0.03) and it had the best predictive value on multivariate logistic regression analysis (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.18-0.82, p = 0.03). The C-index but not the PADUA or the DAP score was predictive of MIC on univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. MIC achievement rates were significantly higher for low than for high complexity tumors as assessed by categorically coded R.E.N.A.L. score, C-index and DAP scores. Continuously coded R.E.N.A.L. and PADUA scores positively correlated with operative time, warm ischemia time and hospital stay. The C-index and the DAP score correlated with warm ischemia time.

CONCLUSIONS

Of 4 nephrometry scores the R.E.N.A.L. score correlated best with MIC achievement and quantitative perioperative outcomes of nephron sparing surgery.