1
|
Gray A, Alemohammad SY, Ramírez-Ortiz D, Trepka MJ. A Systematic Review of Factors Associated with COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake, Hesitancy, and Acceptability Among Adults with HIV: Implications for Integrating COVID-19 Immunization into HIV Care. AIDS Patient Care STDS 2024. [PMID: 39058653 DOI: 10.1089/apc.2024.0097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/28/2024] Open
Abstract
The COVID-19 virus, once a public health emergency, is now endemic. Immunization remains an important measure for mitigating high levels of disease, morbidity, and mortality related to COVID-19 infection. People with HIV (PWH), in particular, benefit from COVID-19 vaccination because of increased risk for severe COVID-19 infection. However, previous data suggest vaccine hesitancy among this population. Given this context and the evolving epidemiology of COVID-19, this review examines factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, acceptability, and uptake among adults with HIV. Through a systematic search of electronic databases, we identified 56 peer-reviewed articles published between the years 2020 and 2023 that matched the objectives of our review out of a total of 797 screened citations. Among our final sample of articles, nearly all global regions were represented, and 61% of studies recruited only PWH. We identified eight categories of factors associated with COVID-19 vaccination outcomes, including HIV-specific factors (e.g., CD4 count), vaccine attitudes (e.g., vaccine confidence), factors related to the COVID-19 virus (e.g., concern about infection), factors specific to the COVID-19 vaccine (e.g., accessibility), social norms and peer factors (e.g., subjective norms), mental health (e.g., anxiety/depression) and other psychological factors (e.g., substance use), demographic characteristics (e.g., age), and health factors (e.g., vaccination history). Reflecting on these factors, we discuss populations in need of vaccine promotion, modifiable targets for intervention, and integrating immunization into HIV care. Public health efforts to promote COVID-19 immunization among PWH must include educational/informational, peer, and structural interventions and must now consider uptake of COVID-19 booster doses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaliyah Gray
- Department of Epidemiology, Robert Stempel College of Public Health and Social Work, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Seyedeh Yasaman Alemohammad
- Department of Epidemiology, Robert Stempel College of Public Health and Social Work, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Daisy Ramírez-Ortiz
- Department of Epidemiology, Robert Stempel College of Public Health and Social Work, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Mary Jo Trepka
- Department of Epidemiology, Robert Stempel College of Public Health and Social Work, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, USA
- Research Center in Minority Institutions, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Liu X, Wu Y, Huo Z, Zhang L, Jing S, Dai Z, Huang Y, Si M, Xin Y, Qu Y, Tang S, Su X. COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy Among People Living with HIV: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. AIDS Behav 2024; 28:2183-2192. [PMID: 38625625 DOI: 10.1007/s10461-024-04344-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/05/2024] [Indexed: 04/17/2024]
Abstract
Vaccine hesitancy is one of the top 10 threats to global health, which affects the prevalence and fatality of vaccine-preventable diseases over the world. During the COVID-19 pandemic, people living with HIV (PLWH) may have higher risks of infection, more serious complications, and worse prognosis without the protection of the COVID-19 vaccine. A systematic review and meta-analysis aiming to evaluate the prevalence of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among PLWH was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases for studies published between January 1, 2020, and August 31, 2022. The pooled prevalence with a corresponding 95%CI of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among PLWH was reported. Subgroup analysis was conducted to explore variation in prevalence across different categories. 23 studies with a total of 19,922 PLWH were included in this study. The prevalence of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among PLWH was 34.0%, and the influencing factors included male, influenza vaccination experience, and a CD4 count of more than 200 cells/mm3. Subgroup analysis did not identify significant causes of heterogeneity but showed that the prevalence of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among PLWH varies by study period, region, and race. Although all PLWH are recommended to receive the COVID-19 vaccine, a large proportion of them remain hesitant to be vaccinated. Therefore, governments and relevant institutions should take specific measures to encourage and promote vaccination to improve the coverage of the COVID-19 vaccine among PLWH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xin Liu
- School of Population Medicine and Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yijin Wu
- School of Population Medicine and Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Zhenyu Huo
- State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology and Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Ling Zhang
- School of Population Medicine and Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Shu Jing
- School of Population Medicine and Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Zhenwei Dai
- School of Population Medicine and Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yiman Huang
- School of Population Medicine and Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Mingyu Si
- School of Population Medicine and Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - You Xin
- School of Population Medicine and Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yimin Qu
- School of Population Medicine and Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Shenglan Tang
- Global Health Research Center, Duke Kunshan University, Jiangsu, China
| | - Xiaoyou Su
- School of Population Medicine and Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sulaiman SK, Musa MS, Tsiga-Ahmed FI, Sulaiman AK, Bako AT. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the global prevalence and determinants of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and uptake in people living with HIV. Nat Hum Behav 2024; 8:100-114. [PMID: 37904021 PMCID: PMC10810755 DOI: 10.1038/s41562-023-01733-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2023] [Accepted: 09/26/2023] [Indexed: 11/01/2023]
Abstract
People living with HIV (PLHIV) are at higher risk of poor outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Here we report the pooled prevalence of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance/uptake and determinants among this vulnerable population of PLHIV based on a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies published by 25 August 2023. Among the 54 included studies (N = 167,485 participants), 53 (N = 166,455) provided data on vaccine acceptance rate, while 27 (N = 150,926) provided uptake data. The global prevalences of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and uptake were 67.0% and 56.6%, respectively. Acceptance and uptake rates were 86.6% and 90.1% for the European Region, 74.9% and 71.6% for the Region of the Americas, 62.3% and 78.9% for the South-East Asian Region, 64.6% and 19.3% for the Eastern Mediterranean Region, 58.0% and 35.5% for the African Region, and 57.4% and 44.0% for the Western Pacific Region. The acceptance rate increased from 65.9% in 2020 to 71.0% in 2022, and the uptake rate increased from 55.9% in 2021 to 58.1% in 2022. Men, PLHIV aged ≥40 years and those who had recently received the influenza vaccine were more likely to accept and receive the COVID-19 vaccine. Factors associated with lower uptake included Black race, other races (Latinx/Hispanic/mixed race), low education level and being unemployed. Vaccine-related factors associated with higher acceptance included belief in vaccine effectiveness, vaccine trust, perceived high susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection and fear of potential COVID-19 effect in PLHIV. Sustained efforts and targeted interventions are needed to reduce regional disparities in COVID-19 vaccine uptake among PLHIV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Muhammad Sale Musa
- Department of Medicine, Yobe State University Teaching Hospital, Damaturu, Nigeria
| | | | - Abdulwahab Kabir Sulaiman
- Department of Medicine, Murtala Muhammad Specialist Hospital, Kano, Nigeria
- Kwanar Dawaki COVID-19 Isolation Center, Kano, Nigeria
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hammond K, Lee T, Vulesevic B, Singer J, Needham J, Burchell AN, Samji H, Walmsley S, Hull M, Jenabian MA, Routy JP, Margolese S, Mandarino E, Anis AH, Cooper CL, Costiniuk CT. Preventative behaviours and COVID-19 infection in a Canadian cohort of people living with HIV. AIDS Res Ther 2023; 20:73. [PMID: 37858245 PMCID: PMC10588118 DOI: 10.1186/s12981-023-00571-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2023] [Accepted: 10/05/2023] [Indexed: 10/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Few studies have examined preventative behaviour practices with respect to COVID-19 among people living with HIV (human immunodeficiency virus). Using a cross-sectional survey from a Canadian Institutes of Health Research Canadian HIV Trials Network study (CTN 328) of people living with HIV on vaccine immunogenicity, we examined the relationships between participant characteristics and behavioural practices intended to prevent COVID-19 infection. Participants living in four Canadian urban centers were enrolled between April 2021-January 2022, at which time they responded to a questionnaire on preventative behaviour practices. Questionnaire and clinical data were combined to explore relationships between preventive behaviours and (1) known COVID-19 infection pre-enrolment, (2) multimorbidity, (3) developing symptomatic COVID-19 infection, and (4) developing symptomatic COVID-19 infection during the Omicron wave. Among 375 participants, 49 had COVID-19 infection pre-enrolment and 88 post-enrolment. The proportion of participants reporting always engaging in preventative behaviours included 87% masking, 79% physical distancing, 70% limiting social gatherings, 65% limiting contact with at-risk individuals, 33% self-isolating due to symptoms, and 26% self-quarantining after possible exposure. Participants with known COVID-19 infection pre-enrolment were more likely to self-quarantine after possible exposure although asymptomatic (65.0% vs 23.4%, p < 0.001; Chi-square test). Participants with multiple comorbidities more likely endorsed physical distancing (85.7% vs 75.5%, p = 0.044; Chi-square test), although this was not significant in logistic regression analysis adjusted for age, sex, race, number of household members, number of bedrooms/bathrooms in the household per person, influenza immunization, and working in close physical proximity to others. Overall, participants reported frequent practice of preventative behaviours.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keely Hammond
- Department of Medicine and Division of Infectious Diseases and Chronic Viral Illness Service, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Terry Lee
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) Canadian HIV Trials Network, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Branka Vulesevic
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) Canadian HIV Trials Network, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- The Ottawa Hospital and Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Joel Singer
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) Canadian HIV Trials Network, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Judy Needham
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) Canadian HIV Trials Network, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Ann N Burchell
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Hasina Samji
- British Columbia Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada
| | - Sharon Walmsley
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Mark Hull
- British Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Mohammad-Ali Jenabian
- Department of Biological Sciences, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Jean-Pierre Routy
- Department of Medicine and Division of Infectious Diseases and Chronic Viral Illness Service, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Infectious Diseases and Immunity in Global Health Research Institute of McGill University Health Centre, 1001 Boulevard Decarie, Room EM2.3226, Montréal, QC, H3A 3J1, Canada
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Shari Margolese
- Community Advisory Committee, CIHR Canadian HIV Trials Network, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Enrico Mandarino
- Community Advisory Committee, CIHR Canadian HIV Trials Network, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Aslam H Anis
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) Canadian HIV Trials Network, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Curtis L Cooper
- The Ottawa Hospital and Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Cecilia T Costiniuk
- Department of Medicine and Division of Infectious Diseases and Chronic Viral Illness Service, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, QC, Canada.
- Infectious Diseases and Immunity in Global Health Research Institute of McGill University Health Centre, 1001 Boulevard Decarie, Room EM2.3226, Montréal, QC, H3A 3J1, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Saleem M, Marimuthu J, Gandhi AP. Uptake and impact of COVID-19 vaccination among HIV key populations: a cohort study from Tamil Nadu, India. J Rural Med 2023; 18:215-221. [PMID: 37854511 PMCID: PMC10579930 DOI: 10.2185/jrm.2023-008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2023] [Accepted: 06/12/2023] [Indexed: 10/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Key Populations (KPs) include Female Sex Workers (FSWs), men who have sex with men (MSM), transgender (TG), and transsexual (TS) persons. This study assessed coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine uptake among KPs for HIV in India, adverse events following immunization (AEFI), and breakthrough infections among the vaccinated. Materials and Methods This retrospective cohort study was conducted among 421 KPs enrolled in 41 Targeted Intervention (TI) clusters in 31 districts of the Tamil Nadu State Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS) Control Society (TANSACS), India, from June to September 2022. A semi-structured, bilingual (English and Tamil), interviewer-administered questionnaire was used to collect data on socio-demographic characteristics, vaccination status, AEFIs, and breakthrough infections among the KPs under the TIs. Results Among the KPs, 45.4% were FSWs, 37.1% were MSM, 16.2% were TG, and 1.4% were TS persons. Among them, 4.3% had HIV, and 2.9% had syphilis or other sexually transmitted infections (STIs). The COVID-19 vaccine uptake rate was 96%. Among the KPs, TG/TS persons had the highest vaccine uptake (98.6%), followed by FSWs (96.3%) and MSM (94.2%). AEFIs were reported by 85.4% of the participants. HIV positive status was significantly associated with the incidence of AEFI. The breakthrough infection rate was 5.4% among the vaccinated participants. Conclusion The COVID-19 vaccine uptake among HIV KPs was high in Tamil Nadu. AEFIs and breakthrough infections among COVID-19 vaccinated HIV KPs may be low, with mild AEFIs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Saleem
- Department of Community Medicine, Government Dindigul Medical
College, India
| | - Janakiram Marimuthu
- Department of Community Medicine, Government Dindigul Medical
College, India
- Department of Community Medicine, Government Vellore Medical
College, India
- Targeted Intervention and Strategic Information Management
Unit, Tamil Nadu AIDS Control Society, India
| | - Aravind P Gandhi
- Department of Community Medicine, ESIC Medical College &
Hospital, Hyderabad, India
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
MacGibbon J, Cornelisse VJ, Smith AKJ, Broady TR, Hammoud MA, Bavinton BR, Heath-Paynter D, Vaughan M, Wright EJ, Holt M. Mpox (monkeypox) knowledge, concern, willingness to change behaviour, and seek vaccination: results of a national cross-sectional survey. Sex Health 2023; 20:403-410. [PMID: 37611539 DOI: 10.1071/sh23047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2023] [Accepted: 08/03/2023] [Indexed: 08/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In mid-2022, a global mpox (formerly 'monkeypox') outbreak affecting predominantly gay and bisexual men emerged in non-endemic countries. Australia had never previously recorded mpox cases and there was no prior research on knowledge or attitudes to mpox among gay and bisexual men across Australia. METHODS We conducted a national, online cross-sectional survey between August 2022 and September 2022. Participants were recruited through community organisation promotions, online advertising, and direct email invitations. Eligible participants were gay, bisexual or queer; identified as male (cisgender or transgender) or non-binary; aged 16years or older; and lived in Australia. The main outcome measures were: knowledge and concern about mpox; recognition of mpox symptoms and transmission routes; vaccination history; acceptability of behavioural changes to reduce mpox risk, and willingness to be vaccinated. RESULTS Of 2287 participants, most participants were male (2189/2287; 95.7%) and gay (1894/2287; 82.8%). Nearly all had heard about mpox (2255/2287; 98.6%), and the majority were concerned about acquiring it (1461/2287; 64.4%). Most of the 2268 participants not previously diagnosed with mpox correctly identified skin lesions (2087; 92%), rash (1977; 87.2%), and fever (1647; 72.6%) as potential symptoms, and prolonged and brief skin-to-skin contact as potential ways to acquire mpox (2124, 93.7%; and 1860, 82%, respectively). The most acceptable behavioural changes were reducing or avoiding attendance at sex parties (1494; 65.9%) and sex-on-premises venues (1503; 66.4%), and having fewer sexual partners (1466; 64.6%). Most unvaccinated and undiagnosed participants were willing to be vaccinated (1457/1733; 84.1%). CONCLUSIONS People at risk of mpox should be supported to adopt acceptable risk reduction strategies during outbreaks and to seek vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James MacGibbon
- Centre for Social Research in Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Vincent J Cornelisse
- Kirby Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; and NSW Health, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Anthony K J Smith
- Centre for Social Research in Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Timothy R Broady
- Centre for Social Research in Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | - Edwina J Wright
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Alfred Hospital and Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic., Australia; and Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Vic., Australia; and The Peter Doherty Institute of Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - Martin Holt
- Centre for Social Research in Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lin YJ, Chang YP, Yen CF. Predicting the Influences of Depression and Sexual Stigma on Motivation to Get Vaccinated against COVID-19 in Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Young Adults: A 4-Year Follow-Up Study. Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11:1430. [PMID: 37766107 PMCID: PMC10536742 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11091430] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2023] [Revised: 08/18/2023] [Accepted: 08/25/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Vaccination is a crucial preventive measure against COVID-19. However, limited research has focused on identifying the factors predicting motivation to get vaccinated against COVID-19 (MoVAC-19) among lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) individuals. This study examined the predictive effects of depression and sexual stigma (i.e., perceived sexual stigma from family members, perceived sexual orientation microaggression, and internalized sexual stigma) before the COVID-19 pandemic on MoVAC-19 among LGB individuals 4 years later during the COVID-19 pandemic in Taiwan. Baseline data related to depression and sexual stigma were collected in 2018 and 2019. Depression was assessed using the 20-item Mandarin Chinese version of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale. Perceived sexual stigma from family members was assessed using the Homosexuality-Related Stigma Scale. Internalized sexual stigma was assessed using the Measure of Internalized Sexual Stigma for Lesbians and Gay Men. Perceived sexual orientation microaggression was assessed using the Sexual Orientation Microaggression Inventory. Participant MoVAC-19 during the pandemic was assessed using the nine-item Motors of COVID-19 Vaccination Acceptance Scale. The associations of depression and sexual stigma at baseline with MoVAC-19 at follow-up were examined through multivariate linear regression analysis. Internalized sexual stigma was negatively associated with MoVAC-19, whereas perceived sexual orientation microaggression was positively associated with MoVAC-19. Depression and perceived sexual stigma from family members were not significantly associated with MoVAC-19. Although male sex and older age were positively associated with increased MoVAC-19, sex and age did not moderate the relationship between sexual stigma and motivation to get vaccinated. Among LGB individuals, sexual stigma experiences should be considered when developing intervention strategies aimed at enhancing MoVAC-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yen-Ju Lin
- Department of Psychiatry, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Ping Chang
- School of Nursing, The State University of New York, University at Buffalo, New York, NY 14214-8013, USA
| | - Cheng-Fang Yen
- Department of Psychiatry, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan
- College of Professional Studies, National Pingtung University of Science and Technology, Pingtung 91201, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ogaz D, Allen H, Reid D, Brown JRG, Howarth AR, Pulford CV, Mercer CH, Saunders J, Hughes G, Mohammed H. COVID-19 infection and vaccination uptake in men and gender-diverse people who have sex with men in the UK: analyses of a large, online community cross-sectional survey (RiiSH-COVID) undertaken November-December 2021. BMC Public Health 2023; 23:829. [PMID: 37147609 PMCID: PMC10161154 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-15779-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2023] [Accepted: 04/28/2023] [Indexed: 05/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Men and gender-diverse people who have sex with men are disproportionately affected by health conditions associated with increased risk of severe illness due to COVID-19 infection. METHODS An online cross-sectional survey of men and gender-diverse people who have sex with men in the UK recruited via social networking and dating applications from 22 November-12 December 2021. Eligible participants included self-identifying men, transgender women, or gender-diverse individuals assigned male at birth (AMAB), aged ≥ 16, who were UK residents, and self-reported having had sex with an individual AMAB in the last year. We calculated self-reported COVID-19 test-positivity, proportion reporting long COVID, and COVID-19 vaccination uptake anytime from pandemic start to survey completion (November/December 2021). Logistic regression was used to assess sociodemographic, clinical, and behavioural characteristics associated with SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) test positivity and complete vaccination (≥ 2 vaccine doses). RESULTS Among 1,039 participants (88.1% white, median age 41 years [interquartile range: 31-51]), 18.6% (95% CI: 16.3%-21.1%) reported COVID-19 test positivity, 8.3% (95% CI: 6.7%-10.1%) long COVID, and 94.5% (95% CI: 93.3%-96.1%) complete COVID-19 vaccination through late 2021. In multivariable models, COVID-19 test positivity was associated with UK country of residence (aOR: 2.22 [95% CI: 1.26-3.92], England vs outside England) and employment (aOR: 1.55 [95% CI: 1.01-2.38], current employment vs not employed). Complete COVID-19 vaccination was associated with age (aOR: 1.04 [95% CI: 1.01-1.06], per increasing year), gender (aOR: 0.26 [95% CI: 0.09-0.72], gender minority vs cisgender), education (aOR: 2.11 [95% CI: 1.12-3.98], degree-level or higher vs below degree-level), employment (aOR: 2.07 [95% CI: 1.08-3.94], current employment vs not employed), relationship status (aOR: 0.50 [95% CI: 0.25-1.00], single vs in a relationship), COVID-19 infection history (aOR: 0.47 [95% CI: 0.25-0.88], test positivity or self-perceived infection vs no history), known HPV vaccination (aOR: 3.32 [95% CI: 1.43-7.75]), and low self-worth (aOR: 0.29 [95% CI: 0.15-0.54]). CONCLUSIONS In this community sample, COVID-19 vaccine uptake was high overall, though lower among younger age-groups, gender minorities, and those with poorer well-being. Efforts are needed to limit COVID-19 related exacerbation of health inequalities in groups who already experience a greater burden of poor health relative to other men who have sex with men.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dana Ogaz
- Blood Safety, Hepatitis, STI & HIV Division, UK Health Security Agency, 61 Colindale Avenue, London, NW9 5EQ, UK.
- The National Institute for Health and Care Research Health Protection Research Unit in Blood Borne and Sexually Transmitted Infections at University College London in partnership with the, UK Health Security Agency, London, UK.
| | - Hester Allen
- COVID-19 Vaccines and Epidemiology Division, UK Health Security Agency, London, UK
| | - David Reid
- The National Institute for Health and Care Research Health Protection Research Unit in Blood Borne and Sexually Transmitted Infections at University College London in partnership with the, UK Health Security Agency, London, UK
- Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK
- Sigma Research, Public Health, Environments and Society, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Jack R G Brown
- The National Institute for Health and Care Research Health Protection Research Unit in Blood Borne and Sexually Transmitted Infections at University College London in partnership with the, UK Health Security Agency, London, UK
- Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Alison R Howarth
- The National Institute for Health and Care Research Health Protection Research Unit in Blood Borne and Sexually Transmitted Infections at University College London in partnership with the, UK Health Security Agency, London, UK
- Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Caisey V Pulford
- Blood Safety, Hepatitis, STI & HIV Division, UK Health Security Agency, 61 Colindale Avenue, London, NW9 5EQ, UK
- The National Institute for Health and Care Research Health Protection Research Unit in Blood Borne and Sexually Transmitted Infections at University College London in partnership with the, UK Health Security Agency, London, UK
| | - Catherine H Mercer
- The National Institute for Health and Care Research Health Protection Research Unit in Blood Borne and Sexually Transmitted Infections at University College London in partnership with the, UK Health Security Agency, London, UK
- Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - John Saunders
- Blood Safety, Hepatitis, STI & HIV Division, UK Health Security Agency, 61 Colindale Avenue, London, NW9 5EQ, UK
- The National Institute for Health and Care Research Health Protection Research Unit in Blood Borne and Sexually Transmitted Infections at University College London in partnership with the, UK Health Security Agency, London, UK
- Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Gwenda Hughes
- Blood Safety, Hepatitis, STI & HIV Division, UK Health Security Agency, 61 Colindale Avenue, London, NW9 5EQ, UK
- The National Institute for Health and Care Research Health Protection Research Unit in Blood Borne and Sexually Transmitted Infections at University College London in partnership with the, UK Health Security Agency, London, UK
- UK Public Health Rapid Support Team, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Hamish Mohammed
- Blood Safety, Hepatitis, STI & HIV Division, UK Health Security Agency, 61 Colindale Avenue, London, NW9 5EQ, UK
- The National Institute for Health and Care Research Health Protection Research Unit in Blood Borne and Sexually Transmitted Infections at University College London in partnership with the, UK Health Security Agency, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Krause KD, Pérez-Figueroa RE, Halkitis PN. Barriers and facilitators related to COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and uptake among people living with HIV. Curr Opin HIV AIDS 2023; 18:142-147. [PMID: 36943471 DOI: 10.1097/coh.0000000000000788] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/23/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This review reports on the myriad barriers and facilitators related to COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and factors contribution to uptake among people living with HIV (PLWH) globally published over the past year (2021-2022). RECENT FINDINGS Across the literature, participants indicated concerns about the safety, efficacy and overall rapid development of the COVID-19 vaccine as a reason for delaying or not being vaccinated. Medical mistrust and perceptions about the risk of COVID-19 immune response and severity also played a role in COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among PLWH. Almost every study examined different sociodemographic characteristics associated with COVID-19 vaccination acceptance and uptake, and although strong themes emerged around race/ethnicity, sex and educational attainment, the results were mixed across other characteristics, including age. Some studies also examined medical factors specifically related to PLWH including CD4 + cell count and adherence to antiretroviral therapy. SUMMARY The findings highlight individual, structural and social differences in COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and uptake among PLWH, which are varied throughout the world. We call on researchers and interventionists to not just consider the role of medical mistrust and disinformation, but also how emotional, financial and political vulnerability plays into making decisions around COVID-19 vaccine uptake and overall healthcare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristen D Krause
- Center for Health, Identity, Behavior, and Prevention Studies (CHIBPS)
- Department of Urban-Global Health
| | - Rafael E Pérez-Figueroa
- Center for Health, Identity, Behavior, and Prevention Studies (CHIBPS)
- Department of Urban-Global Health
| | - Perry N Halkitis
- Center for Health, Identity, Behavior, and Prevention Studies (CHIBPS)
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Rutgers School of Public Health, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kabir Sulaiman S, Sale Musa M, Isma'il Tsiga-Ahmed F, Muhammad Dayyab F, Kabir Sulaiman A, Dabo B, Idris Ahmad S, Abubakar Haruna S, Abdurrahman Zubair A, Hussein A, Usman S, Usman Wada J, Yekeen Ayodele A, Wulgo Ali M, Tijjani Makama B, Tijjani Bako A, Garba Ismail A, Tijjani Makama B, Dalhatu Abdulkadir A, Jamal Abdulnasir N, Zakar Gambo B, Usman Mustapha M, Mohammed M, Ibrahim G, Adamu Dogo H, Ishaq Abubakar F, kurugu Y, Auwal Yusufari G, Saleh S, Yakubu A, Sulaiman S, Tijjani Bako A. COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among people living with HIV in a low-resource setting: A multi-center study of prevalence, correlates and reasons. Vaccine 2023; 41:2476-2484. [PMID: 36932032 PMCID: PMC9946883 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.02.056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2022] [Revised: 01/31/2023] [Accepted: 02/15/2023] [Indexed: 02/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hesitancy to COVID-19 vaccine may worsen the burden of COVID-19 among people living with HIV (PLHIV), who are at a higher risk of COVID-19-related hospitalization and death, compared to HIV non-infected individuals. Therefore, we evaluate the predictors and reasons for COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among unvaccinated PLHIV in six antiretroviral therapy (ART) clinics across northern Nigeria. METHODOLOGY In this cross-sectional study, conducted between October 2021 and February 2022 in six hospitals across two geopolitical regions of Nigeria, we utilized interviewer-administered questionnaires to assess COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among a convenience sample of 790 eligible adult PLHIV. Hesitancy was defined as answering 'no' or 'maybe' to a question asking participants their willingness to accept the COVID-19 vaccine. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to estimate the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of the factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among PLHIV. RESULTS Of the total 660 unvaccinated participants included in the analysis (61.82% female, mean age [SD] of 39.76 [10.75]), 381 (57.72%) were hesitant to COVID-19 vaccine. Being 50 years and older (aOR: 0.43; 95% CI: 0.21-0.89), being unemployed (aOR: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.34-0.95), experiencing the adverse effects of ART (aOR: 0.36; 95% CI: 0.15-0.86), and perception of being at high risk of contracting COVID-19 (aOR: 0.22; 95% CI: 0.13-0.37) were associated with significantly lower odds of hesitancy. Conversely, being female (aOR: 1.64; 95% CI: 1.02-2.61) and attending ART clinics at state administrative capital cities (IIDH Kano [aOR: 2.40; 95% CI: 1.10-5.25], MMSH Kano [aOR: 5.59; 95% CI: 1.97-10.66], YSSH Damaturu [aOR: 9.88; 95% CI: 4.02-24.29] vs. GH Gashua) were associated with significantly higher odds of hesitancy. The most common reasons for hesitancy include fear of potential adverse effects, skepticism about vaccine efficacy, the rapid development of the COVID-19 vaccine, and the perceived lack of effort to develop a cure or vaccine for HIV/AIDS. CONCLUSION Interventions aimed at combating misperceptions and misinformation regarding the COVID-19 vaccination program may reduce the prevalence of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among unvaccinated PLHIV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Muhammad Sale Musa
- Department of Medicine, Yobe State University Teaching Hospital, Damaturu, Nigeria
| | | | - Farouq Muhammad Dayyab
- Infectious Diseases Hospital, Kano, Nigeria; Department of Medicine, Kwanar Dawaki COVID-19 Isolation Center, Kano, Nigeria
| | - Abdulwahab Kabir Sulaiman
- Department of Medicine, Kwanar Dawaki COVID-19 Isolation Center, Kano, Nigeria; Department of Medicine, Murtala Muhammad Specialist Hospital, Kano, Nigeria
| | - Bashir Dabo
- Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Saidu Idris Ahmad
- Department of Medicine, Murtala Muhammad Specialist Hospital, Kano, Nigeria
| | - Salisu Abubakar Haruna
- Department of Family Health, Kano State Primary Healthcare Management Board, Kano, Nigeria
| | | | - Aminu Hussein
- Department of Family Medicine, Yobe State University Teaching Hospital, Damaturu, Nigeria
| | - Sadiya Usman
- HIV Clinic, General Hospital Gashua, Gashua Yobe State, Nigeria
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Bashir Zakar Gambo
- Department of Nursing, Yobe State University Teaching Hospital, Damaturu, Nigeria
| | | | - Mustapha Mohammed
- Department of Nursing, Yobe State University Teaching Hospital, Damaturu, Nigeria
| | - Gambo Ibrahim
- Department of Nursing, Yobe State University Teaching Hospital, Damaturu, Nigeria
| | - Hadiza Adamu Dogo
- Department of Nursing, Yobe State University Teaching Hospital, Damaturu, Nigeria
| | | | - Yakubu kurugu
- Department of Nursing, General Hospital Geidam, Yobe State
| | | | | | - Abubakar Yakubu
- College of Health Sciences, Bayero University Kano, Kano, Nigeria
| | - Saeed Sulaiman
- College of Health Sciences, Bayero University Kano, Kano, Nigeria
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
MacGibbon J, Bavinton BR, Drysdale K, Murphy D, Broady TR, Kolstee J, Molyneux A, Power C, Paynter H, de Wit J, Holt M. Explicit Relationship Agreements and HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Use by Gay and Bisexual Men in Relationships. ARCHIVES OF SEXUAL BEHAVIOR 2023; 52:761-771. [PMID: 35939159 PMCID: PMC9360633 DOI: 10.1007/s10508-022-02382-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2022] [Revised: 07/04/2022] [Accepted: 07/12/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Relationship agreements are important for HIV prevention among gay and bisexual men (GBM) in relationships, with research earlier in the HIV epidemic often finding that agreements specified monogamy or condom use with casual partners. There is evidence that HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has shifted sexual practices among some men in relationships, such as allowing condomless sex with casual partners, but there has been little attention paid to relationship agreements among GBM who use PrEP. In this paper, we analyzed national, Australian, cross-sectional data from an online survey completed by non-HIV-positive GBM in 2021 (N = 1,185). Using logistic regression, we identified demographic characteristics, sexual practices and the types of relationship agreement that were associated with PrEP use among GBM in relationships. Using Pearson's chi-squared tests, we explored whether PrEP users in relationships reported similar sexual practices to PrEP users not in relationships. PrEP use among GBM in relationships was independently associated with older age, identifying as gay, being in a non-monogamous relationship, having a spoken (explicit) relationship agreement, having a primary HIV-negative partner taking PrEP or a primary partner living with HIV, reporting recent condomless casual sex, reporting an STI diagnosis in the past year, and knowing at least one other PrEP user. We found that PrEP users in relationships had similar sexual practices to PrEP users not in relationships. GBM in relationships who have casual sex and who meet PrEP suitability criteria may be good candidates for PrEP. Our findings suggest that explicit relationship agreements remain important for HIV prevention, and they support PrEP use among GBM in relationships.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James MacGibbon
- Centre for Social Research in Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, 2052, Australia.
| | | | - Kerryn Drysdale
- Centre for Social Research in Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, 2052, Australia
| | - Dean Murphy
- The Kirby Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Timothy R Broady
- Centre for Social Research in Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, 2052, Australia
| | | | | | - Cherie Power
- New South Wales Ministry of Health, Sydney, Australia
| | - Heath Paynter
- Australian Federation of AIDS Organisations, Sydney, Australia
| | - John de Wit
- Centre for Social Research in Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, 2052, Australia
- Department of Interdisciplinary Social Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Martin Holt
- Centre for Social Research in Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, 2052, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
A Scoping Review on COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy among the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, Intersex and Asexual (LGBTQIA+) Community and Factors Fostering Its Refusal. Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 11:healthcare11020245. [PMID: 36673613 PMCID: PMC9859126 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11020245] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2022] [Revised: 01/07/2023] [Accepted: 01/08/2023] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The ramifications of the existing crisis caused by the coronavirus pandemic are sensed in all walks of life. Among the various efforts made to curb the spread of this novel infection, the development of COVID-19 vaccines had a profound role in flattening the pandemic curve. Even though the rapid vaccine drive received a highly welcoming response among people, the reluctance and ignorance of a part of the population towards available safe vaccines stand as impediments to achieving the desired outcome. The LGBTQIA+ (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, Intersex and Asexual) communities are the least studied groups in this regard. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study is to extensively review and report on COVID-19 vaccine uptake and refusal among the LGBTQIA+ population and enumerate the factors contributing to vaccine hesitancy. The study extends further to outline a conceptual framework for interventions to enhance COVID-19 vaccine acceptance among the LGBTQIA+ population. METHODS We performed a systematic search using key terms on Google Scholar and PubMed. The obtained results were filtered using the eligibility criteria framed for this study. The initial search provided an extensive result of 4510 articles which were later screened at various levels to arrive at the final inclusive collection of manuscripts adding to 17. The studies were analyzed by the authors individually, and the data were categorized using variables. The results are interpreted using charts and graphs. The whole manuscript has been structured in accordance with the PRISMA extension for scoping reviews. RESULT The comprehensive search yielded 17 eligible articles for this review. Most of the studies were conducted in the United States (n = 17), and predominantly cross-sectional studies have been conducted. The major comparative factor was the HIV status of the LGBTQIA+ population. HIV-affected patients were more willing to take up COVID-19 vaccination. However, social stigma, discrimination, lack of access and non-prioritization in vaccine drives were found to be the major factors contributing to vaccine hesitancy among this population. CONCLUSION The invention of the COVID-19 vaccination revolutionized the healthcare systems burdened with COVID-19. Although this is a breakthrough scientific contribution, many factors are associated with the rate of vaccine acceptance, especially among sexual and gender minorities. The reviewed studies have revealed numerous factors that influence vaccine uptake and refusal with the commonest being concerns on discrimination, social stigma, inequitable access to healthcare, vaccine safety, efficacy, potency, side effects and lack of trust in medical workers. These impediments in vaccine coverage should be meticulously addressed to ensure optimum LGBTQIA+ physical and mental health as well as for providing non-discriminative, equitable and quality healthcare service regardless of the gender or sexual orientation of individuals.
Collapse
|
13
|
Muhindo R, Okoboi S, Kiragga A, King R, Arinaitwe WJ, Castelnuovo B. COVID-19 vaccine acceptability, and uptake among people living with HIV in Uganda. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0278692. [PMID: 36459514 PMCID: PMC9718389 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278692] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2022] [Accepted: 11/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite being a priority population for COVID-19 vaccination, limited data are available regarding acceptability of COVID-19 vaccines among people living with HIV (PLWH) in Sub-Saharan Africa. We described COVID-19 vaccine acceptability and factors associated with vaccine acceptability among PLWH in Uganda. METHODS This was a cross-sectional study conducted among PLWH, aged ≥18 years, enrolled participants who were seeking HIV care from six purposely selected accredited ART clinics in Kampala. We obtained data on vaccine acceptability defined as willingness to accept any of the available COVID-19 vaccines using interviewer-administered questionnaires. In addition, we assessed vaccination status, complacency regarding COVID-19 disease, vaccine confidence, and vaccine convenience. Factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine acceptability were evaluated using modified Poisson regression with robust standard errors. RESULTS We enrolled 767 participants of whom 485 (63%) were women. The median age was 33 years [interquartile range (IQR) 28-40] for women and 40 years [IQR], (34-47) for men. Of the respondents 534 (69.6%,95% confidence interval [CI]: 66.3%-72.8%) reported receiving at least one vaccine dose, with women significantly more likely than men to have been vaccinated (73% vs. 63%; p = 0.003). Among the unvaccinated 169 (72.7%, 95% CI: 66.6%-78.0%) were willing to accept vaccination, had greater vaccine confidence (85.9% had strong belief that the vaccines were effective; 81.9% that they were beneficial and 71% safe for PLWH; 90.5% had trust in health care professionals or 77.4% top government officials), and believed that it would be easy to obtain a vaccine if one decided to be vaccinated (83.6%). Vaccine acceptability was positively associated with greater vaccine confidence (adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR] 1.44; 95% CI: 1.08-1.90), and positive perception that it would be easy to obtain a vaccine (aPR 1.57; 95% CI: 1.26-1.96). CONCLUSION vaccine acceptance was high among this cohort of PLWH, and was positively associated with greater vaccine confidence, and perceived easiness (convince) to obtained the vaccine. Building vaccine confidence and making vaccines easily accessible should be a priority for vaccination programs targeting PLWH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Muhindo
- Department of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Stephen Okoboi
- Infectious Diseases Institute, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Agnes Kiragga
- Infectious Diseases Institute, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Rachel King
- University of California, San Francisco, California, United states of America
| | - Walter Joseph Arinaitwe
- Infectious Diseases Institute, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Barbara Castelnuovo
- Infectious Diseases Institute, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
| |
Collapse
|