1
|
Belkacemi Y, Moran MS, Ozden BC, Masannat Y, Geara F, Albashir M, To NH, Debbi K, El Tamer M. Post-mastectomy radiation therapy after breast reconstruction: from historic dogmas to practical expert agreements based on a large literature review of surgical and radiation therapy considerations. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2024; 200:104421. [PMID: 38876160 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104421] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2023] [Revised: 06/08/2024] [Accepted: 06/10/2024] [Indexed: 06/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Breast reconstruction (BR) after mastectomy is important to consider for a woman's body image enhancement and psychological well-being. Although post-mastectomy radiation (PMRT) significantly improves the outcome of patients with high-risk breast cancer (BC), PMRT after BR may affect cosmetic outcomes and may compromise the original goal of improving quality of life (QoL). With the lack of practical guidelines, it seems essential to work on a consensus and provide some "expert agreements" to offer patients the best option for PMRT after BR. We report a global "expert agreement" that results from a critical review of the literature on BR and PMRT during the 6th international multidisciplinary breast conference in March 2023.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yazid Belkacemi
- AP-HP, Department of Radiation Oncology and Henri Mondor Breast Center, Henri Mondor University Hospital. University of Paris Est Creteil (UPEC), France; Institut Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale (IMRB), INSERM U955, i-Biot, UPEC, Créteil, France.
| | - Meena S Moran
- Smilow Cancer Center, Yale University School of Medicine. Department of Therapeutic Radiology, New Haven, CT, USA
| | | | - Yazan Masannat
- Broomfield Hospital, Mid and South Essex NHS Trust, England, UK
| | - Fady Geara
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Oncology Institute, Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
| | - Mohamed Albashir
- Levantine Medical Center, Ain Alkhaleej Hospital and Burjeel Royal Hospital, Alain, United Arab Emirates
| | - Nhu Hanh To
- AP-HP, Department of Radiation Oncology and Henri Mondor Breast Center, Henri Mondor University Hospital. University of Paris Est Creteil (UPEC), France; Institut Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale (IMRB), INSERM U955, i-Biot, UPEC, Créteil, France
| | - Kamel Debbi
- AP-HP, Department of Radiation Oncology and Henri Mondor Breast Center, Henri Mondor University Hospital. University of Paris Est Creteil (UPEC), France; Institut Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale (IMRB), INSERM U955, i-Biot, UPEC, Créteil, France
| | - Mahmoud El Tamer
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Medical College at Cornell University, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Salvestrini V, Valzano M, Meattini I, Becherini C, Visani L, Francolini G, Morelli I, Bertini N, Orzalesi L, Bernini M, Bianchi S, Simontacchi G, Livi L, Desideri I. Anatomical assessment of local recurrence site in breast cancer patients after breast reconstruction and post-mastectomy radiotherapy: implications for radiation volumes and techniques. LA RADIOLOGIA MEDICA 2024; 129:845-854. [PMID: 38602657 PMCID: PMC11168998 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-024-01812-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2023] [Accepted: 03/19/2024] [Indexed: 04/12/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Post-mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) improves local control rates and survival in patients with adverse prognostic features. The dose coverage to target volumes is critical to yield maximum benefit to treated patients, increasing local control and reducing risk of toxicity. This study aims to assess patterns of breast cancer relapse in patients treated with mastectomy, breast reconstruction and PMRT. METHODS Breast cancer patients treated with PMRT between 1992 and 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical and pathological characteristics of patients were collected. Recurrences were defined as "in field," "marginal" or "out of field." Survival analyses were performed in relation to progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Correlation between baseline features was explored. RESULTS Data of 140 patients are collected. After a median follow-up time of 72 months, median PFS and OS of 63 and 74 months were detected, respectively. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, lympho-vascular space invasion (LVI) and size of primary tumor were all significantly associated with worst PFS and OS. Ten patients developed local recurrence: 30% "in field," 30% marginal recurrences, 20% "out of field" and 20% both "in field" and "out of field." No recurrence was detected under the expander, 80% above the device and 20% patients relapsed on IMN chain. The mean distant relapse-free survival was 39 months. Overall, 39 of 140 patients developed distant metastases. CONCLUSIONS The onset of local-regional relapses occurred mainly above the expander/prosthesis, underlying the importance of inclusion of the subcutaneous tissues within the target volume. In order to refine new contouring recommendations for PMRT and breast reconstruction, future prospective studies are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Viola Salvestrini
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Careggi University Hospital, Viale Morgagni 85, 50134, Florence, Italy.
| | - Marianna Valzano
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Careggi University Hospital, Viale Morgagni 85, 50134, Florence, Italy
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Icro Meattini
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Careggi University Hospital, Viale Morgagni 85, 50134, Florence, Italy
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Carlotta Becherini
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Careggi University Hospital, Viale Morgagni 85, 50134, Florence, Italy
| | - Luca Visani
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Careggi University Hospital, Viale Morgagni 85, 50134, Florence, Italy
| | - Giulio Francolini
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Careggi University Hospital, Viale Morgagni 85, 50134, Florence, Italy
| | - Ilaria Morelli
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Careggi University Hospital, Viale Morgagni 85, 50134, Florence, Italy
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Niccolò Bertini
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Careggi University Hospital, Viale Morgagni 85, 50134, Florence, Italy
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Orzalesi
- Breast Surgery Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Marco Bernini
- Breast Surgery Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Simonetta Bianchi
- Division of Pathological Anatomy, Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Gabriele Simontacchi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Careggi University Hospital, Viale Morgagni 85, 50134, Florence, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Livi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Careggi University Hospital, Viale Morgagni 85, 50134, Florence, Italy
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Isacco Desideri
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Careggi University Hospital, Viale Morgagni 85, 50134, Florence, Italy
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ren Y, Yu Y, Xu K, Li Z, Wang X. Meta-Analysis of Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Versus Autologous Breast Reconstruction in the Setting of PMRT. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2024; 48:1940-1948. [PMID: 37380747 DOI: 10.1007/s00266-023-03430-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2023] [Accepted: 05/08/2023] [Indexed: 06/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is still a controversial debate that which type of immediate breast reconstruction should be operated on breast cancer patients in the setting of postmastectomy radiotherapy. This meta-analysis compared incidence of complications requiring reoperation (CRR), reconstruction failure (RF) and patient-reported outcome between immediate autologous breast reconstruction (ABR) and immediate implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR), tissue expander/implant reconstruction mostly, in the setting of postmastectomy radiotherapy. METHODS Systematic and thorough research was conducted to search for studies published before August 1, 2022, by using three online databases. Studies that covered complications or reconstruction failure between two cohorts were included. To evaluate the possible bias in the included studies, the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was applied. RESULTS Eight studies presenting 1261 patients were enrolled. The relative risk associated with reconstructive failure favored IBBR (RR = 8.61; 95% CI, 2.84-26.08; P = 0.0001). While the risk for complications requiring reoperation was not significantly different between two groups, either include reconstruction failure (RR = 1.45 95% CI, 0.82-2.55; P = 0.20) or not (RR = 0.63 95% CI, 0.28-1.43; P = 0.27). However, because statistical definitions and methodologies vary, the synthesized result should be taken critically. CONCLUSION Patients with IBBR have more possibility experiencing RF compared that with ABR, while the chance for CRR is not that different between two groups. For the purpose of clinical practice refinement, more high-quality studies are needed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these evidence-based medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yanxin Ren
- Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050018, Hebei Province, People's Republic of China
- Department of Medical Cosmetology, Surgery, Hebei Province General Hospital, 348, West He-Ping Road, Shijiazhuang, 050051, Hebei Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Yan Yu
- Department of Medical Cosmetology, Surgery, Hebei Province General Hospital, 348, West He-Ping Road, Shijiazhuang, 050051, Hebei Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Kexin Xu
- Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050018, Hebei Province, People's Republic of China
- Department of Medical Cosmetology, Surgery, Hebei Province General Hospital, 348, West He-Ping Road, Shijiazhuang, 050051, Hebei Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhoujian Li
- Department of Medical Cosmetology, Surgery, Hebei Province General Hospital, 348, West He-Ping Road, Shijiazhuang, 050051, Hebei Province, People's Republic of China
- Hebei North University, Shijiazhuang, 075000, Hebei Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiao Wang
- Department of Medical Cosmetology, Surgery, Hebei Province General Hospital, 348, West He-Ping Road, Shijiazhuang, 050051, Hebei Province, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Musmann RJ, Andree C, Munder B, Hagouan M, Janku D, Daniels M, Aufmesser-Freyhardt B, Becker K, Oramary A, Bromba A, Stockhausen N, Wolter A, Fertsch S. Secondary solution for breast reconstruction following total DIEP flap loss: A single-center experience after 3270 DIEP flaps. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2024; 92:11-25. [PMID: 38489983 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2024.02.059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2023] [Revised: 02/02/2024] [Accepted: 02/22/2024] [Indexed: 03/17/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Total deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap failure is a significant concern in autologous breast reconstruction. Literature on secondary reconstruction options following total flap failure is limited. This study outlines the outcomes of patients who underwent reconstruction post-DIEP flap failure at our institution. METHODS We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients receiving autologous breast reconstruction between 2004 and 2021. We aimed to identify causes of total DIEP flap failure, outcomes of revision surgery, and outcomes of secondary breast reconstruction procedures. RESULTS From 2004 to 2021, 3456 free flaps for breast reconstruction were performed, with 3270 being DIEP flaps for 2756 patients. DIEP flap failure was observed in 40 cases (1.22%). Bilateral reconstructions had a higher failure rate (2.31%) than unilateral (0.72%). The primary cause was intraoperative complications during flap harvest (18 cases), followed by insufficient arterial perfusion (seven cases). Other causes included postoperative hematoma (seven cases), venous congestion (six cases), and late-onset fat necrosis (two cases). Post-failure, five patients received a second free flap with three cases of repeated flap failure. Twenty patients received implant-based reconstruction with two cases of reconstruction failure, while seven patients received a pedicled latissimus dorsi (LD) flap reconstructions with no cases of reconstruction failure. Eight patients declined further reconstruction. CONCLUSION A second free flap post-DIEP failure was associated with a high risk of reconstruction failure, suggesting the need for careful patient selection. Implant-based and pedicled LD flap seem to be reliable secondary reconstruction options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R J Musmann
- Dept. of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, Sana Krankenhaus Gerresheim, Gräulinger Straße 120, D-40625 Düsseldorf, Germany.
| | - C Andree
- Dept. of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, Sana Krankenhaus Gerresheim, Gräulinger Straße 120, D-40625 Düsseldorf, Germany; Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Universitätsstraße 1, 40225 Düsseldorf
| | - B Munder
- Dept. of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, Sana Krankenhaus Gerresheim, Gräulinger Straße 120, D-40625 Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - M Hagouan
- Dept. of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, Sana Krankenhaus Gerresheim, Gräulinger Straße 120, D-40625 Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - D Janku
- Dept. of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, Sana Krankenhaus Gerresheim, Gräulinger Straße 120, D-40625 Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - M Daniels
- Dept. of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, Sana Krankenhaus Gerresheim, Gräulinger Straße 120, D-40625 Düsseldorf, Germany; Universität Witten-Herdecke, Fakultät für Gesundheit, Alfred-Herrhausen-Straße 45, 58455 Witten, Germany
| | - B Aufmesser-Freyhardt
- Dept. of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, Sana Krankenhaus Gerresheim, Gräulinger Straße 120, D-40625 Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - K Becker
- Dept. of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, Sana Krankenhaus Gerresheim, Gräulinger Straße 120, D-40625 Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - A Oramary
- Dept. of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, Sana Krankenhaus Gerresheim, Gräulinger Straße 120, D-40625 Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - A Bromba
- Dept. of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, Sana Krankenhaus Gerresheim, Gräulinger Straße 120, D-40625 Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - N Stockhausen
- Dept. of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, Sana Krankenhaus Gerresheim, Gräulinger Straße 120, D-40625 Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - A Wolter
- Dept. of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, Sana Krankenhaus Gerresheim, Gräulinger Straße 120, D-40625 Düsseldorf, Germany; Universität Witten-Herdecke, Fakultät für Gesundheit, Alfred-Herrhausen-Straße 45, 58455 Witten, Germany
| | - S Fertsch
- Dept. of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, Sana Krankenhaus Gerresheim, Gräulinger Straße 120, D-40625 Düsseldorf, Germany; Universität Witten-Herdecke, Fakultät für Gesundheit, Alfred-Herrhausen-Straße 45, 58455 Witten, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zhang H, Song D, Xie L, Zhan N, Xie W, Zhang J. Postmastectomy radiotherapy in breast reconstruction: Current controversies and trends. CANCER INNOVATION 2024; 3:e104. [PMID: 38948530 PMCID: PMC11212305 DOI: 10.1002/cai2.104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2023] [Revised: 09/11/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 07/02/2024]
Abstract
Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women worldwide. Postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) is an essential component of combined therapy for early-stage, high-risk breast cancer. Breast reconstruction (BR) is often considered for patients with breast cancer who have undergone mastectomy. There has been a considerable amount of discussion about the optimal approach to combining PMRT with BR in the treatment of breast cancer. PMRT may increase the risk of complications and prevent good aesthetic results after BR, while BR may increase the complexity of PMRT and the radiation dose to surrounding normal tissues. The purpose of this review is to give a broad overview and summary of the current controversies and trends in PMRT and BR in the context of the most recent literature available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Honghong Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xiang'an Hospital of Xiamen University, Cancer Research Center, School of MedicineXiamen University, Xiang'anXiamenFujianChina
| | - Dandan Song
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xiang'an Hospital of Xiamen University, Cancer Research Center, School of MedicineXiamen University, Xiang'anXiamenFujianChina
| | - Liangxi Xie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xiang'an Hospital of Xiamen University, Cancer Research Center, School of MedicineXiamen University, Xiang'anXiamenFujianChina
| | - Ning Zhan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xiang'an Hospital of Xiamen University, Cancer Research Center, School of MedicineXiamen University, Xiang'anXiamenFujianChina
| | - Wenjia Xie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xiang'an Hospital of Xiamen University, Cancer Research Center, School of MedicineXiamen University, Xiang'anXiamenFujianChina
| | - Jianming Zhang
- Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Intelligent Identification and Control of Complex Dynamic System, Quanzhou Institute of Equipment Manufacturing, Haixi InstitutesChinese Academy of SciencesQuanzhouFujianChina
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Chen YF, Chawla S, Mousa-Doust D, Nichol A, Ng R, Isaac KV. Machine Learning to Predict the Need for Postmastectomy Radiotherapy after Immediate Breast Reconstruction. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN 2024; 12:e5599. [PMID: 38322813 PMCID: PMC10846766 DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000005599] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2023] [Accepted: 12/15/2023] [Indexed: 02/08/2024]
Abstract
Background Post mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) is an independent predictor of reconstructive complications. PMRT may alter the timing and type of reconstruction recommended. This study aimed to create a machine learning model to predict the probability of requiring PMRT after immediate breast reconstruction (IBR). Methods In this retrospective study, breast cancer patients who underwent IBR from January 2017 to December 2020 were reviewed and data were collected on 81 preoperative characteristics. Primary outcome was recommendation for PMRT. Four algorithms were compared to maximize performance and clinical utility: logistic regression, elastic net (EN), logistic lasso, and random forest (RF). The cohort was split into a development dataset (75% of cohort for training-validation) and 25% used for the test set. Model performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), precision-recall curves, and calibration plots. Results In a total of 800 patients, 325 (40.6%) patients were recommended to undergo PMRT. With the training-validation dataset (n = 600), model performance was logistic regression 0.73 AUC [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.65-0.80]; RF 0.77 AUC (95% CI, 0.74-0.81); EN 0.77 AUC (95% CI, 0.73-0.81); logistic lasso 0.76 AUC (95% CI, 0.72-0.80). Without significantly sacrificing performance, 81 predictive factors were reduced to 12 for prediction with the EN method. With the test dataset (n = 200), performance of the EN prediction model was confirmed [0.794 AUC (95% CI, 0.730-0.858)]. Conclusion A parsimonious accurate machine learning model for predicting PMRT after IBR was developed, tested, and translated into a clinically applicable online calculator for providers and patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi-Fu Chen
- From the Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Science, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Sahil Chawla
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Dorsa Mousa-Doust
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Alan Nichol
- Department of Radiation Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Raymond Ng
- From the Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Science, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Kathryn V Isaac
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- From the Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Science, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Mehrabi A, Mousazadeh S, Mollafilabi A, Nafissi N, Milan PB. Synthesis and characterization of a silk fibroin/placenta matrix hydrogel for breast reconstruction. Life Sci 2023; 334:122236. [PMID: 37926297 DOI: 10.1016/j.lfs.2023.122236] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2023] [Revised: 10/29/2023] [Accepted: 10/31/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023]
Abstract
Reconstructive surgery is a complex and demanding interdisciplinary field. One of the major challenges is the production of sizeable, implantable, inexpensive bioprostheses such as breast implants. In this study, porous hybrid hydrogels were fabricated by a combinatorial method using decellularized human placenta (dHplacenta) and silk fibroin. Histology was used to confirm the acellularity of the dHplacenta. The physio-chemical properties of the hydrogels were evaluated using SEM, FTIR, and rheological assays. The synthesized hydrogels exhibited a uniform 3-D microstructure with an interconnected porous network, and the hybrid hydrogels with a 30/70 ratio had improved mechanical properties compared to the other hydrogels. Hybrid hydrogels were also cultured with adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ADSCs). Liposuction was used to obtain adipose tissue from patients, which was then characterized using flow cytometry and karyotyping. The results showed that CD34 and CD31 were downregulated, whereas CD105 and CD90 were upregulated in ADSCs, indicating a phenotype resembling to that of mesenchymal stem cells from the human bone marrow. Moreover, after re-cellularized hydrogel, the live/dead assay and SEM analysis confirmed that most viability and cellular expansion on the hydrogels contained higher ratios of dHplacenta (30/70) than the other two groups. All these findings recapitulated that the 30/70 dHplacenta/silk fibroin hydrogel can perform as an excellent substrate for breast tissue engineering applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arezou Mehrabi
- Student Research Committee, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; Cellular and Molecular Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; Department of Tissue Engineering & Regenerative Medicine, Faculty of Advanced Technologies in Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Sepideh Mousazadeh
- Cellular and Molecular Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; Department of Tissue Engineering & Regenerative Medicine, Faculty of Advanced Technologies in Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Azam Mollafilabi
- Cellular and Molecular Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; Department of Tissue Engineering & Regenerative Medicine, Faculty of Advanced Technologies in Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Nahid Nafissi
- Department of Breast Surgery, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
| | - Peiman Brouki Milan
- Student Research Committee, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; Cellular and Molecular Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; Department of Tissue Engineering & Regenerative Medicine, Faculty of Advanced Technologies in Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bojanic C, Di Pace B, Ghorra DT, Fopp LJ, Rabey NG, Malata CM. A comparison of presentations and outcomes of salvage versus non-salvage abdominal free flap breast reconstructions-Results of a 15-year tertiary referral centre review. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0288364. [PMID: 37910518 PMCID: PMC10619878 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2023] [Accepted: 06/24/2023] [Indexed: 11/03/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Salvage breast reconstruction with autologous tissue is becoming more prevalent due to a resurgence in implant-based procedures. The latter has caused a commensurate rise in failed or treatment-resistant prosthetic cases requiring conversion to free tissue transfers. Salvage reconstruction is often considered more challenging, owing to patient presentation, prior treatments and intraoperative difficulties. The aim of the study was to test this hypothesis by comparing outcomes of salvage versus non-salvage autologous microsurgical breast reconstructions in a retrospective matched cohort study. METHODS The demographics, risk factors, operative details and outcomes of patients who underwent free flap salvage of implant-based reconstructions by a single operator (2005-2019) were retrospectively evaluated. For each salvage reconstruction, the consecutive non-salvage abdominal free flap reconstruction was selected for comparison. The clinical outcomes including intraoperative blood loss, operative time, flap survival and complication rates were compared. RESULTS Of 442 microsurgical patients, 35 (8.0%) had salvage reconstruction comprising 41 flap transfers (29 unilateral, 6 bilateral) and 42 flaps (28 unilateral, 7 bilateral) in nonsalvage reconstruction. Deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps comprised the commonest autologous tissue used in both groups at 74% and 71% respectively. Most patients (83%) underwent salvage reconstruction for severe capsular contractures. There was a significant difference in radiation exposure between groups (salvage reconstruction 89%, non-salvage reconstruction 26%; p<0.00001). All 83 flaps were successful with similar reoperation rates and intraoperative blood losses. Unilateral salvage reconstruction took on average two hours longer than non-salvage reconstruction (p = 0.008). Overall complication rates were similar (p>0.05). CONCLUSION This 15-year study shows that despite salvage autologous free flap breast reconstruction requiring longer operation times, its intra and postoperative outcomes are generally comparable to non-salvage cases. Therefore, salvage breast reconstruction with free flaps provides a reliable option for failed or suboptimal implant-based reconstructions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine Bojanic
- Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Department, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Bruno Di Pace
- Scuola Superiore Meridionale, University of Naples “Federico II”, Naples, Italy
- School of Medicine, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge and Chelmsford, United Kingdom
| | - Dina T. Ghorra
- Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Department, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Alexandria, Alexandria, Egypt
| | - Laura J. Fopp
- Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Department, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Nicholas G. Rabey
- Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Department, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Charles M. Malata
- Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Department, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- School of Medicine, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge and Chelmsford, United Kingdom
- Cambridge Breast Unit, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Tomita S, Nagai K, Matsunaga N, Kerckhove MD, Fujii M, Terao Y. Detailed Analysis of Three Major Breast Reconstructions Using BREAST-Q Responses From 1001 Patients. Aesthet Surg J 2023; 43:NP888-NP897. [PMID: 37392431 DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjad205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2023] [Revised: 06/22/2023] [Accepted: 06/22/2023] [Indexed: 07/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient-reported outcomes have become as important as mortality and morbidity in the postoperative evaluation of breast reconstruction surgery. The BREAST-Q is one of the most widely used patient-reported outcomes for breast reconstruction. OBJECTIVES A comparative analysis of the scores on each of the BREAST-Q modules could help analyze different reconstruction methods. However, few studies have utilized BREAST-Q for this purpose. The aim of this study was therefore to compare breast reconstruction methods in terms of BREAST-Q module ratings. METHODS The authors retrospectively reviewed the data of 1001 patients who had been followed for more than 1 year after breast reconstruction. The 6 BREAST-Q modules were rated on a scale of 0 to 100 and statistically analyzed by multiple regression. In addition, Fisher's exact test was performed after dividing the responses to each question into high- and low-rating groups. RESULTS Microvascular abdominal flap reconstruction scored significantly better than implant-based reconstruction on all modules, except psychosocial and sexual well-being. In terms of satisfaction with the breast, latissimus dorsi flap reconstruction was superior to implant-based reconstruction. However, in terms of the reconstruction method, there were no differences in patients' willingness to make the same choice again or whether they regretted having surgery. CONCLUSIONS The results highlight the superiority of autologous breast reconstruction. Reconstruction methods should only be performed after a thorough explanation of their characteristics to achieve results that meet patient expectations. The findings are useful for facilitating patient decision-making in breast reconstruction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4
Collapse
|
10
|
Harmeling JX, Woerdeman LAE, Ozdemir E, Schaapveld M, Oldenburg HSA, Janus CPM, Russell NS, Koppert LB, Krul IM, van Leeuwen FE, Mureau MAM. Surgical outcomes following breast reconstruction in patients with and without a history of chest radiotherapy for Hodgkin lymphoma: a multicentre, matched cohort study. Int J Surg 2023; 109:2896-2905. [PMID: 37037583 PMCID: PMC10583922 DOI: 10.1097/js9.0000000000000063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2022] [Accepted: 11/12/2022] [Indexed: 04/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast cancer is the most common treatment-related second malignancy among women with previous chest radiotherapy for Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). Little is known about the effects of this kind of radiotherapy on the outcomes of postmastectomy breast reconstruction (BR). This study compared adverse outcomes of BR after HL-related chest radiotherapy to matched controls. METHODS The authors conducted a retrospective, matched cohort study in two expert cancer centres in the Netherlands. BRs after therapeutic or prophylactic mastectomy in HL survivors who received chest radiotherapy were matched with BRs in nonirradiated patients without HL on age at mastectomy date, date of BR, and type of BR. The primary outcome was complication-related BR failure or conversion and secondary outcomes were complication-related re-operation, capsular contracture, major donor-site complications, and complication-related ICU admission. The authors analyzed all outcomes univariably using Fisher's exact tests and the authors assessed reconstruction failure, complication-related re-operation, and capsular contracture with multivariable Cox regression analysis adjusting for confounding and data clustering. RESULTS Seventy BRs in 41 patients who received chest radiotherapy for HL were matched to 121 BRs in 110 nonirradiated patients. Reconstruction failure did not differ between HL survivors (12.9%) and controls (12.4%). The comparison groups showed no differences in number of reoperations, major donor-site complications, or capsular contractures. BR in HL survivors more often let to ICU admission due to complications compared with controls ( P =0.048). CONCLUSIONS We observed no increased risk of adverse outcomes following BR after previous chest radiotherapy for HL. This is important information for counselling these patients and may improve shared decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Ezgi Ozdemir
- Departments of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
| | - Michael Schaapveld
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Cécile P M Janus
- Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Centre Rotterdam
| | | | - Linetta B Koppert
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam
| | - Inge M Krul
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Flora E van Leeuwen
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Fitzpatrick SE, Eaton M, McLeay W, Dean NR. Outcomes of DCIS treated with breast conserving surgery without radiotherapy on recurrence, survival, and health-related quality of life. ANZ J Surg 2023; 93:2208-2213. [PMID: 37062870 DOI: 10.1111/ans.18459] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2022] [Revised: 03/03/2023] [Accepted: 04/06/2023] [Indexed: 04/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sector resection for Ductal Carcinoma in Situ (DCIS) allows wide excision without compromising breast shape. There are concerns that radiotherapy for some DCIS after sector resection is unnecessary and reduces patient satisfaction and quality of life without affecting survival. This study aimed to investigate whether women with DCIS managed with sector resection without radiotherapy had acceptable rates of recurrence and health-related quality of life outcomes. METHODS Retrospective study of patients who underwent sector resection for DCIS without adjuvant radiotherapy from 1992 to 2021. Tumour size, grade, necrosis, margins, follow up and time to ipsilateral recurrence was recorded. Patients were posted a BREAST-Q to assess health-related quality of life. RESULTS One hundred and thirty-eight patients were treated for pure DCIS by two surgeons from 1992 to 2018. One hundred and sixteen patients underwent sector resection, 22 had mastectomy. Average age 61 years. Mean follow up 9.14 years. Recurrence rate after sector resection was 18.97%. 55% were DCIS. Annualized recurrence rate was 2.07%. There were no cancer-related deaths. BREAST-Q completion rate was 44%. Satisfaction with breasts, physical, psychosocial, and sexual well-being scores were significantly higher than normative Australian values and a mixed cohort of women who underwent breast conserving surgery with radiotherapy. CONCLUSION DCIS can be safely managed with sector resection without radiotherapy and regular long-term follow up. This approach results in low annualized recurrence rates, high levels patient satisfaction and health-related quality of life and should be considered a safe alternative for patients with DCIS to minimize morbidity without affecting cancer survival.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Female
- Humans
- Middle Aged
- Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/radiotherapy
- Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/surgery
- Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/pathology
- Mastectomy, Segmental/methods
- Mastectomy/methods
- Treatment Outcome
- Retrospective Studies
- Breast Neoplasms/radiotherapy
- Breast Neoplasms/surgery
- Quality of Life
- Follow-Up Studies
- Australia/epidemiology
- Radiotherapy, Adjuvant
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/epidemiology
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/surgery
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siobhan Elizabeth Fitzpatrick
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Michael Eaton
- Department of Surgery, Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - William McLeay
- Department of Surgery, Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Nicola R Dean
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Zaborowski AM, Heeney A, Walsh S, Barry M, Kell MR. Immediate breast reconstruction. Br J Surg 2023; 110:1039-1042. [PMID: 36972211 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znad064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 02/12/2023] [Indexed: 08/12/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Anna Heeney
- Department of Breast Surgery, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Siun Walsh
- Department of Breast Surgery, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Mitchel Barry
- Department of Breast Surgery, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Malcolm R Kell
- Department of Breast Surgery, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Wenger R, Retrouvey H, Metcalfe K, Semple JL. Patient Outcomes after Fat Grafting to the Radiated Chest Wall before Delayed Two-stage Alloplastic Breast Reconstruction. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN 2023; 11:e5119. [PMID: 37448766 PMCID: PMC10337707 DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000005119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2022] [Accepted: 05/30/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023]
Abstract
Two-stage alloplastic breast reconstruction in patients having received mastectomy and radiation is associated with a high rate of complications. Fat grafting has been shown to mitigate the effects of radiation on the chest wall to allow for alloplastic reconstruction. In this study, we assess the outcomes (after a mean follow-up of 28 months), including complications and revisional procedures, of women who had fat grafting to the radiated chest wall before two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction. Methods A retrospective chart review was performed on consecutive patients seeking delayed implant-based reconstruction after simple mastectomy and postmastectomy radiation therapy between 2011 and 2015. All patients underwent two sessions of fat grafting to the radiated chest wall before inserting a tissue expander and subsequent exchange to a silicone implant. Results Twenty patients were included in the study. No reconstructive failures were recorded. The short-term complication rate was 5%, with one hematoma leading to a revisional procedure. The mean follow-up after reconstruction was 28 months. During follow-up, two patients (10%) developed capsular contracture grade IV with implant malposition, leading to capsular revision and implant exchange. Four patients (20%) underwent additional fat grafting for contour deformities. Conclusions Fat grafting before two-stage alloplastic breast reconstruction in patients treated with mastectomy and postmastectomy radiation therapy may provide an alternate method of alloplastic reconstruction in a select group of patients who are not suitable for autogenous reconstruction. Follow-up data show that additional surgery may be required for correction of implant malposition and capsular contracture.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Wenger
- From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Toronto, Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Helene Retrouvey
- From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Toronto, Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kelly Metcalfe
- Women’s College Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario
| | - John L. Semple
- From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Toronto, Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Aldarragi A, Farah N, Warner CM, Ghasemi AM, Ekakitie OT, Jabr Y, Rahman S. The Duration of Postoperative Antibiotics in Autologous Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cureus 2023; 15:e40631. [PMID: 37476125 PMCID: PMC10355167 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.40631] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/19/2023] [Indexed: 07/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Although prophylactic antibiotic use following autologous breast reconstruction post-mastectomy is a common practice, there is no consensus in the literature regarding its duration. Antibiotic stewardship is important to minimise multi-resistant organisms as well as mitigate the associated side effects. Currently, there are no published guidelines regarding the duration of prophylactic antibiotics in autologous breast reconstruction surgery following mastectomy. The authors searched the online literature regarding the administration of antibiotics for autologous breast reconstruction surgery post-mastectomy. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines were followed. The primary outcome measure was the incidence of surgical site infections (SSIs). Three studies met the inclusion criteria and included a total of 1,400 patients. Overall, 101 (7.2%) SSIs were observed. There was no significant difference in the rate of SSIs when comparing the use of antibiotics for less than or longer than 24 hours postoperatively (odds ratio = 1.434, p = 0.124). There is no significant difference between SSIs with the use of antibiotics for longer than 24 hours when compared to less than 24 hours. Further studies in the form of randomised controlled trials are required to assess the effects of prophylactic antibiotic duration in autologous breast reconstruction following mastectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ameer Aldarragi
- Trauma and Orthopaedics, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, GBR
| | - Nima Farah
- Plastic Surgery, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, GBR
| | - Christian M Warner
- Trauma and Orthopaedics, Stepping Hill Hospital, Stockport NHS Foundation Trust, Stockport, GBR
- Trauma and Orthopaedics, Manchester Shoulder and Elbow Unit, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, GBR
| | - Ali M Ghasemi
- Otolaryngology, Doncaster Royal Infirmary, Leeds, GBR
| | | | - Yamen Jabr
- Trauma and Orthopaedics, Countess of Chester Hospital, Chester, GBR
| | - Shafiq Rahman
- Plastic Surgery, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield, GBR
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Malekpour M, Malekpour F, Wang HTH. Breast reconstruction: Review of current autologous and implant-based techniques and long-term oncologic outcome. World J Clin Cases 2023; 11:2201-2212. [PMID: 37122510 PMCID: PMC10131028 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i10.2201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2022] [Revised: 02/13/2023] [Accepted: 03/15/2023] [Indexed: 03/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Implant-based reconstruction is the most common method of breast reconstruction. Autologous breast reconstruction is an indispensable option for breast reconstruction demanding keen microsurgical skills and robust anatomical understanding. The reconstructive choice is made by the patient after a discussion with the plastic surgeon covering all the available options. Advantages and disadvantages of each technique along with long-term oncologic outcome are reviewed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahdi Malekpour
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78229, United States
| | - Fatemeh Malekpour
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78229, United States
| | - Howard Tz-Ho Wang
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78229, United States
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Analysis of Breast Aesthetic Revision Procedures after Unilateral Abdominal-based Free-flap Breast Reconstruction: A Single-center Experience with 1251 Patients. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN 2023; 11:e4861. [PMID: 36910732 PMCID: PMC9995106 DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000004861] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2022] [Accepted: 01/24/2023] [Indexed: 03/11/2023]
Abstract
Although autologous free-flap breast reconstruction is the most durable means of reconstruction, it is unclear how many additional operations are needed to optimize the aesthetic outcome of the reconstructed breast. The present study aimed to determine the average number of elective breast revision procedures performed for aesthetic reasons in patients undergoing unilateral autologous breast reconstruction and to analyze variables associated with undergoing additional procedures. Methods A retrospective review of all unilateral abdominal-based free-flap breast reconstructions performed from 2000 to 2014 was undertaken at a tertiary academic center. Results Overall, 1251 patients were included in the analysis. The average number of breast revision procedures was 1.1 ± 0.9, and 903 patients (72.2%) underwent at least one revision procedure. Multiple logistic regression analysis demonstrated that younger age, higher body mass index, and prior oncologic surgery on the reconstructed breast were factors associated with increased likelihood of undergoing a revision procedure. The probability of undergoing at least one revision increased by 4% with every 1-unit (kg/m2) increase in a patient's body mass index. Multiple Poisson regression modeling demonstrated that younger age, prior oncologic surgery on the reconstructed breast, and bipedicle flap reconstruction were significant factors associated with undergoing a greater number of revision procedures. Conclusions Most patients who undergo unilateral autologous breast reconstruction require at least one additional operation to optimize their breast aesthetic results. Young age and obesity increase the likelihood of undergoing additional operations. These findings can aid reconstructive microsurgeons in counseling patients and establishing patient expectations prior to their undergoing microvascular breast reconstruction.
Collapse
|
17
|
Arnautovic A, Karinja S, Olafsson S, Carty MJ, Erdmann-Sager J, Caterson SA, Broyles JM. Optimal Timing of Delayed Microvascular Breast Reconstruction after Radiation Therapy. J Reconstr Microsurg 2023; 39:165-170. [PMID: 35714622 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1750125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to determine the optimal timing of delayed microvascular breast reconstruction after completion of postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT). The authors evaluated whether the timing of reconstruction after PMRT completion affects the development of major postoperative complications. We hypothesize that delayed microvascular breast reconstruction can be safely performed within 12 months of PMRT completion. METHODS A retrospective chart review of microvascular, autologous breast reconstructions at Brigham and Women's Hospital from 2007 to 2019 was performed. Logistic regression analysis and marginal estimation methods were used to estimate the probability of any major complication (flap compromise requiring operative intervention, hematoma formation requiring evacuation, infection requiring readmission, and flap necrosis requiring operative debridement) occurring in 2-month intervals after PMRT. Patients were classified as having undergone reconstruction 0 to 12 months after PMRT (group 1), 12 to 18 months after PMRT (group 2), or 18 to 50 months after PMRT (group 3). RESULTS A total of 303 patients were identified. All patients received postmastectomy radiation (n = 143 group 1, n = 57 group 2, n = 103 group 3). Mean follow-up time was 71.4 ± 38 months. Patients in group 1 were significantly younger and more likely to have undergone neoadjuvant chemotherapy (p < 0.05). Major complications occurred in 10% of patients. There was no significant difference in the development of major complications between the three groups (p = 0.57). Although not statistically significant, the probability of any major complication peaked 2 to 6 months after PMRT completion. CONCLUSION There was no significant difference in major complications among patients who underwent delayed, microvascular breast reconstruction within versus beyond 1 year of PMRT completion. These findings suggest that delayed microvascular breast reconstruction can be safely performed beginning 6 months after PMRT completion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aska Arnautovic
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Sarah Karinja
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Soley Olafsson
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Matthew J Carty
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jessica Erdmann-Sager
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Stephanie A Caterson
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Justin M Broyles
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Decreasing Time Intervals in Recurring Capsular Contracture? A Single Center Retrospective Study over 6 Years. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN 2023; 11:e4872. [PMID: 36910725 PMCID: PMC10005826 DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000004872] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2022] [Accepted: 01/26/2023] [Indexed: 03/12/2023]
Abstract
Although breast implants of the current generation can, in principle, remain in the body for life, follow-up operations of the augmented or reconstructed breasts are regularly necessary. Capsular contracture is the leading cause for revisional surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate indications and changes in time intervals between consecutive implant replacements with a focus on capsular contracture. Methods In the period from 2012 to 2017, all patients with breast implant replacements or removals at our institution were identified. From the medical file, the time of the first implantation and earlier replacements were analyzed for indication and timing of surgery. Results A total of 498 operations for implant replacement or removal were analyzed in 323 patients. Including prior operations, 717 procedures could be evaluated. If capsular contracture was the indication, revision surgery was performed on average 14.3 years or 8.4 years in aesthetic or reconstructive cases, respectively. In patients with more than one implant removal or replacement, we saw a reduction in the time interval between the first, second, and third follow-up operation. Conclusions The main indication to perform implant replacements or removals was capsular contracture recurring at increasingly shorter intervals. Patients must be informed about this possible progression when changing implants, but also before the first operation. If capsular contracture occurs after a rather short time period in reconstructive cases, the opportunity of an alternative approach (eg, autologous reconstruction) instead of a renewed implant change should be discussed with the patient.
Collapse
|
19
|
Porosnicu AL, Riza SM, Stanculescu IA, Parasca SV, Jecan CR, Sinescu RD. Outcomes and Economic Evaluation in Delayed Two-Stage Breast Reconstruction in Romania: The Influence of Radiotherapy. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:1916-1923. [PMID: 36826110 PMCID: PMC9955691 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30020149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2022] [Revised: 12/13/2022] [Accepted: 02/03/2023] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
The current paper is a retrospective cohort study conducted on sixty-seven patients who underwent two-stage breast reconstruction over a 5-year period (2015-2020). Forty-one (61.2%) patients received radiotherapy (RT group), and twenty-six (38.8%) did not (non-RT group). Data regarding patients, oncological therapies, type of reconstruction, time of hospitalization, complications, and costs were collected. The statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics 25. General complications were noted for 18 patients (43.9%) in the RT group and for 7 patients (26.9%) in the non-RT group. Major complications were observed only in the first group (five patients-12.2%). The mean time of hospitalization in the RT group was 14.83 days for patients with complications versus 9.83 days for those without complications and 15.5 days versus 8.63 days, respectively, in the non-RT group. The mean cost for patients without complications was 235.64 euros, whereas the cost for patients with complications was 330.24 euros (p = 0.001). Radiation therapy can affect the overall outcome by increasing the risk of complications and increasing costs; however, our paper shows that the association of alloplastic reconstruction in patients with radiotherapy can be performed safely and with low costs in carefully selected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrei Ludovic Porosnicu
- Department of Plastic Surgery and Reconstructive Microsurgery, Elias Emergency University Hospital, 011461 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Stefania Mihaela Riza
- Department of Plastic Surgery and Reconstructive Microsurgery, Elias Emergency University Hospital, 011461 Bucharest, Romania
- Department of Plastic Surgery and Reconstructive Microsurgery, ‘Carol Davila’ University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +40-770935946
| | - Ioana Antonia Stanculescu
- Department of Plastic Surgery and Reconstructive Microsurgery, Elias Emergency University Hospital, 011461 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Sorin Viorel Parasca
- Department of Plastic Surgery and Reconstructive Microsurgery, ‘Carol Davila’ University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
- Clinical Emergency Hospital of Plastic Surgery and Burns of Bucharest, 010713 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Cristian Radu Jecan
- Department of Plastic Surgery and Reconstructive Microsurgery, ‘Carol Davila’ University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
- Clinical Department of Plastic Surgery and Reconstructive Microsurgery, “Prof. Dr. Agrippa Ionescu” Emergency Clinical Hospital, 011356 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Ruxandra Diana Sinescu
- Department of Plastic Surgery and Reconstructive Microsurgery, Elias Emergency University Hospital, 011461 Bucharest, Romania
- Department of Plastic Surgery and Reconstructive Microsurgery, ‘Carol Davila’ University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Surgical Outcomes of Implant versus Autologous Breast Reconstruction in Patients with Previous Breast-Conserving Surgery and Radiotherapy. Plast Reconstr Surg 2023; 151:190e-199e. [PMID: 36332081 DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000009826] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postmastectomy breast reconstruction in patients with a history of breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and radiotherapy is challenging, with a paucity of literature on the outcomes of different breast reconstructive techniques. The authors hypothesized that implant-based breast reconstruction (IBR) would be associated with higher complication rates compared to either IBR combined with latissimus dorsi (LD) or free flap breast reconstruction (FFBR). METHODS The authors conducted a retrospective review of patients who underwent mastectomy with a history of BCS and radiotherapy between January of 2000 and March of 2016. Surgical and patient-reported outcomes (BREAST-Q) were compared between IBR versus IBR/LD versus FFBR. RESULTS The authors identified 9473 patients who underwent BCS and radiotherapy. Ninety-nine patients (105 reconstructions) met the authors' inclusion criteria, 29% ( n = 30) of whom underwent IBR, 26% ( n = 27) of whom underwent IBR/LD, and 46% ( n = 48) of whom underwent FFBR. The overall complication rate was not significantly different between the three groups (50% in IBR versus 41% in IBR/LD versus 44% in FFBR; P = 0.77), whereas reconstruction failures were significantly lower in the FFBR group (33% in IBR versus 19% in IBR/LD versus 0% in FFBR; P < 0.0001). The time between the receipt of radiotherapy and reconstruction was not a significant predictor of overall complications and reconstruction failure. No significant differences were identified between the three study cohorts in any of the three studied BREAST-Q domains. CONCLUSIONS In patients with prior BCS and radiotherapy, FFBR was associated with lower probability of reconstruction failure compared to IBR but no significant difference in overall and major complication rates. The addition of LD flap to IBR did not translate into lower complication rates but may result in decreased reconstruction failures. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic, III.
Collapse
|
21
|
Chang-Azancot L, Abizanda P, Gijón M, Kenig N, Campello M, Juez J, Talaya A, Gómez-Bajo G, Montón J, Sánchez-Bayona R. Age and Breast Reconstruction. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2023; 47:63-72. [PMID: 35927500 DOI: 10.1007/s00266-022-03024-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2022] [Accepted: 07/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast reconstruction is frequently offered to cancer patients who undergo mastectomy. Older women tend to have lower rates of reconstruction mostly due to an age-based discretion. We aimed to assess the safety of this surgery in this population. METHODS We conducted a single-center retrospective analysis of patients who underwent breast reconstruction following mastectomy between 2015 and 2020 at "Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete." Patients were classified according to age when the reconstruction process began (group A: < 65 years-group B: > 65 years). Differences in demographics and clinical data were analyzed using Student's t test and Chi-square test. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to estimate odds ratio (OR) and confidence intervals (CIs) for surgical complications according to age group. Propensity-score matching was used as a sensitivity analysis to test consistency among results. RESULTS We included 304 women (266: group A-38: group B). Complete reconstruction was achieved in 48.1% of patients in group A vs 10.5% in group B (P < 0.001). After adjusting for potential confounders, age was not associated with an increased risk of surgical complications, neither overall (OR 0.88, 95%CI 0.40-1.95), early (OR 1.35, 95%CI 0.58-3.13) nor late (OR 1.05, 95%CI 0.40-2.81). Radiotherapy and smoking history were significant predictors for complications in every setting. CONCLUSIONS In our cohort, age at breast reconstruction is not associated with a higher risk of surgical complications, in contrast to radiotherapy and smoking history. Therefore, age should not be a limiting factor when considering breast reconstruction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luis Chang-Azancot
- Plastic Surgery Department, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete, 02006, Albacete, Spain.
| | - Pedro Abizanda
- Geriatrics Department, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario of Albacete, Albacete, Spain.,CIBERFES, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - María Gijón
- Plastic Surgery Department, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete, 02006, Albacete, Spain
| | - Nitzan Kenig
- Plastic Surgery Department, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete, 02006, Albacete, Spain
| | - Manuel Campello
- Plastic Surgery Department, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete, 02006, Albacete, Spain
| | - Jessica Juez
- Plastic Surgery Department, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete, 02006, Albacete, Spain
| | - Antonio Talaya
- Plastic Surgery Department, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete, 02006, Albacete, Spain
| | - Gregorio Gómez-Bajo
- Plastic Surgery Department, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete, 02006, Albacete, Spain
| | - Javier Montón
- Plastic Surgery Department, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete, 02006, Albacete, Spain.,Anatomy and Embryology Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Castilla-La Mancha (UCLM), Albacete, Spain
| | - Rodrigo Sánchez-Bayona
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, 28041, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Emanuele Lisa AV, Salgarello M, Huscher A, Corsi F, Piovani D, Rubbino F, Andreoletti S, Papa G, Klinger F, Tinterri C, Testori A, Scorsetti M, Veronesi P, Leonardi MC, Rietjens M, Cortinovis U, Summo V, Rampino Cordaro E, Parodi PC, Persichetti P, Barone M, De Santis G, Murolo M, Riccio M, Aquinati A, Cavaliere F, Vaia N, Pagura G, Dalla Venezia E, Bassetto F, Vindigni V, Ciuffreda L, Bocchiotti MA, Sciarillo A, Renzi N, Meneghini G, Kraljic T, Loreti A, Fortunato L, Pino V, Vinci V, Klinger M. The Effect of Adjuvant Radiotherapy on One- and Two-Stage Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction and on Autologous Reconstruction: A Multicenter Italian Study among 18 Senonetwork Breast Centres. Breast J 2023; 2023:6688466. [PMID: 37205012 PMCID: PMC10188256 DOI: 10.1155/2023/6688466] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2022] [Revised: 04/07/2023] [Accepted: 04/15/2023] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
Purpose In modern breast cancer treatment, a growing role has been observed for breast reconstruction together with an increase in clinical indications for postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT). Choosing the optimum type of reconstructive technique is a clinical challenge. We therefore conducted a national multicenter study to analyze the impact of PMRT on breast reconstruction. Methods We conducted a retrospective case-control multicenter study on women undergoing breast reconstruction. Data were collected from 18 Italian Breast Centres and stored in a cumulative database which included the following: autologous reconstruction, direct-to-implant (DTI), and tissue expander/immediate (TE/I). For all patients, we described complications and surgical endpoints to complications such as reconstruction failure, explant, change in type of reconstruction, and reintervention. Results From 2001 to April 2020, 3116 patients were evaluated. The risk for any complication was significantly increased in patients receiving PMRT (aOR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.33-2.24; p < 0.001). PMRT was associated with a significant increase in the risk of capsular contracture in the DTI and TE/I groups (aOR, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.57-3.20; p < 0.001). Comparing type of procedures, the risk of failure (aOR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.06-3.12, p=0.030), explant (aOR, 3.34; 95% CI, 3.85-7.83, p < 0.001), and severe complications (aOR, 2.54; 95% CI, 1.88-3.43, p < 0.001) were significantly higher in the group undergoing DTI reconstruction as compared to TE/I reconstruction. Conclusion Our study confirms that autologous reconstruction is the procedure least impacted by PMRT, while DTI appears to be the most impacted by PMRT, when compared with TE/I which shows a lower rate of explant and reconstruction failure. The trial is registered with NCT04783818, and the date of registration is 1 March, 2021, retrospectively registered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Vittorio Emanuele Lisa
- Reconstructive and Aesthetic Plastic Surgery School, Department of Medical Biotechnology and Translational Medicine BIOMETRA-Plastic Surgery Unit, University of Milan, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Marzia Salgarello
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Director of the Residency Program of Plastic Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico Gemelli, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandra Huscher
- Department of Radiotherapy, Fondazione Poliambulanza “Guido Berlucchi” Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Fabio Corsi
- Breast Unit, Department of Surgery, IRCCS Istituti Clinici Maugeri, Pavia, Italy
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Daniele Piovani
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, IRCCS Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Federica Rubbino
- Laboratory of Molecular Gastroenterology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefania Andreoletti
- Reconstructive and Aesthetic Plastic Surgery School, Department of Medical Biotechnology and Translational Medicine BIOMETRA-Plastic Surgery Unit, University of Milan, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Giovanni Papa
- Department of Plastic Surgery, UCO, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | | | - Corrado Tinterri
- Breast Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Testori
- Breast Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Marta Scorsetti
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Veronesi
- Division of Senology, Department of Oncology and Oncohematology, IEO, IRCCS European Institute of Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Mario Rietjens
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, IEO, IRCCS European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Umberto Cortinovis
- Department of Plastic Reconstructive Surgery, IRCCS National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Valeria Summo
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale (ASUFC), Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Udine, Italy
| | - Emanuele Rampino Cordaro
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale (ASUFC), Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Udine, Italy
| | | | | | - Mauro Barone
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Policlinico di Modena, University of Modena and Reggio, Modena, Italy
| | - Giorgio De Santis
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Policlinico di Modena, University of Modena and Reggio, Modena, Italy
| | - Matteo Murolo
- Department of Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria-Ospedali Riuniti, Ancona, Italy
| | - Michele Riccio
- Department of Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria-Ospedali Riuniti, Ancona, Italy
| | - Angelica Aquinati
- Department of Breast Surgery and Integrated Senology Centre, Belcolle Hospital, Viterbo, Italy
| | - Francesco Cavaliere
- Department of Breast Surgery and Integrated Senology Centre, Belcolle Hospital, Viterbo, Italy
| | - Nicola Vaia
- Department of Breast Surgery, AULSS 3 Veneziana, Venice, Italy
| | - Giulia Pagura
- Department of Breast Surgery, AULSS 3 Veneziana, Venice, Italy
| | - Erica Dalla Venezia
- Unit of Plastic Surgery, Department of Neurosciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Franco Bassetto
- Unit of Plastic Surgery, Department of Neurosciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Vindigni
- Department of Breast Surgery and Breast Unit, Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza Hospital, San Giovanni Rotondo, Foggia, Italy
| | - Luigi Ciuffreda
- Department of Breast Surgery and Breast Unit, Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza Hospital, San Giovanni Rotondo, Foggia, Italy
| | | | - Alberto Sciarillo
- Department of Plastic Surgery, ASUGI Cattinara Hospital, Trieste, Italy
| | - Nadia Renzi
- Department of Plastic Surgery, ASUGI Cattinara Hospital, Trieste, Italy
| | - Graziano Meneghini
- Functional Department Transmural Breast Surgery, AULSS 8 Berica, Vicenza, Italy
| | - Tajna Kraljic
- Department of Breast Surgery, AULSS 8 Berica, Vicenza, Italy
| | - Andrea Loreti
- Department of Plastic Surgery, San Giovanni Addolorata Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Lucio Fortunato
- Department of Breast Surgery and Breast Unit, San Giovanni Addolorata Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Valentina Pino
- Istituto di Clinica Chirurgica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Valeriano Vinci
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, IRCCS Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Klinger
- Reconstructive and Aesthetic Plastic Surgery School, Department of Medical Biotechnology and Translational Medicine BIOMETRA-Plastic Surgery Unit, University of Milan, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Dai L, Cui H, Bao Y, Hu L, Zhou Z, Lin S, Zhang X, Wu H, Kang H, Ma X. Prognostic effect of radiotherapy in breast cancer patients underwent immediate reconstruction after mastectomy. Front Oncol 2022; 12:1010088. [PMID: 36408183 PMCID: PMC9667104 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1010088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2022] [Accepted: 10/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION It is still unclear whether radiotherapy affects the long-term survival of breast cancer (BC) patients after immediate breast reconstruction (IBR). This study aims to evaluate the actual prognostic impact of radiotherapy on BC patients undergoing IBR, and to construct survival prediction models to predict the survival benefit of radiotherapy. METHODS Data on eligible BC patients were retrieved from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Competing risk models were used to assess breast cause-specific death (BCSD) and non-breast cancer cause-specific death (NBCSD). Kaplan-Meier curve, Cox risk regression model and forest map were used to evaluate and demonstrate overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS). Survival prediction nomograms were used to predict OS and BCSS probabilities. RESULTS A total of 22,218 patients were selected, 24.9% received radiotherapy and 75.1% were without radiotherapy. Competing risk models showed that whether BCSD or NBCSD, the cumulative long-term risk of death in the radiotherapy group was higher than that in the non-radiotherapy group. The Kaplan-Meier curve showed that patients with different lymph node metastasis had different radiotherapy benefits. Multivariate stratified analysis showed that radiotherapy after autologous reconstruction was associated with poor BCSS in patients with stage N0, and radiotherapy after autologous reconstruction and combined reconstruction improved OS and BCSS in patients with stage N3. The C-indexes of nomogram (between 0.778 and 0.847) and calibration curves showed the good prediction ability of survival prediction model. CONCLUSIONS Radiotherapy can improve OS and BCSS in N3 stage BC patients undergoing immediate autologous reconstruction after mastectomy. The practical nomograms can be used to predict OS and BCSS of patients with or without radiotherapy, which is helpful for individualized treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luyao Dai
- Department of Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Hanxiao Cui
- Department of Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Yuanhang Bao
- Department of Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Liqun Hu
- Department of Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Zhangjian Zhou
- Department of Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Shuai Lin
- Department of Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Xin Zhang
- Department of Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Hao Wu
- School of Basic Medical Sciences, Xi’an Key Laboratory of Immune Related Diseases, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China,*Correspondence: Hao Wu, ; Huafeng Kang, ; Xiaobin Ma,
| | - Huafeng Kang
- Department of Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China,*Correspondence: Hao Wu, ; Huafeng Kang, ; Xiaobin Ma,
| | - Xiaobin Ma
- Department of Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China,*Correspondence: Hao Wu, ; Huafeng Kang, ; Xiaobin Ma,
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
de Boniface J, Coudé Adam H, Frisell A, Oikonomou I, Ansarei D, Ljung Konstantinidou A, Liu Y, Abo Alniaj B, Wallmon P, Halle M, Johansson ALV, Sackey H. Long-term outcomes of implant-based immediate breast reconstruction with and without radiotherapy: a population-based study. Br J Surg 2022; 109:1107-1115. [PMID: 35949111 PMCID: PMC10364787 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znac283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2022] [Revised: 06/11/2022] [Accepted: 07/20/2022] [Indexed: 08/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radiotherapy (RT) is a risk factor for impaired outcomes after implant-based immediate breast reconstruction (IBR). Large studies including long-term follow-up are relatively scarce. The purpose of this analysis was to assess long-term effects of RT in implant-based IBR, distinguishing between implant removal because of postoperative complications versus patient preference. METHODS This population-based cohort study included all patients with breast cancer who underwent implant-based IBR in Stockholm between 2005 and 2015. Data were collected through national registers and medical charts. The main endpoint was implant removal owing to postoperative complications (wound breakdown, infection, bleeding) or patient preference (dissatisfaction, pain, capsular contracture), with or without conversion to autologous reconstruction. RESULTS Some 1749 implant-based IBRs in 1687 women were included. Median follow-up was 72 (range 1-198) months. Reconstructions were divided according to receipt of RT: No RT (n = 856, 48.9 per cent), adjuvant RT (n = 749, 42.8 per cent), and previous RT (n = 144, 8.2 per cent). Implant removal occurred after 266 reconstructions (15.2 per cent); 68 (7.9 per cent) in the no RT, 158 (21.1 per cent) in the adjuvant RT, and 40 (27.8 per cent) in the previous RT group. Implant removal was because of postoperative complications in 152 instances (57.1 per cent) and was most common in the first 3 years. This was especially observed in the previous RT group, where 15 of 23 implant removals occurred during the first 6 months. Implant removal owing to patient preference (114 of 266, 42.9 per cent) became more common with increasing follow-up. CONCLUSION Implant removal after implant-based IBR is significantly associated with RT. The reason for implant removal shifts over time from postoperative complications to patient preference.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jana de Boniface
- Correspondence to: Jana de Boniface, Breast Centre, Capio St Göran’s Hospital, Mariebergsporten 2, SE-11219 Stockholm, Sweden (e-mail: )
| | - Hannah Coudé Adam
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Axel Frisell
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Dermatology and Venerology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ira Oikonomou
- Department of Surgery, South General Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Dhirar Ansarei
- Department of Surgery, South General Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Anna Ljung Konstantinidou
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Surgery, Breast Centre, Capio St Göran’s Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Yihang Liu
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Basel Abo Alniaj
- Department of Breast, Endocrine Tumours and Sarcoma, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Paula Wallmon
- Department of Surgery, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Martin Halle
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Reconstructive Plastic Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Anna L V Johansson
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - Helena Sackey
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Breast, Endocrine Tumours and Sarcoma, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Weinzierl A, Schmauss D, Harder Y. [The Significance of Oncoplastic Breast Reconstruction After Tumorectomy in Surgical Breast Cancer Therapy]. HANDCHIR MIKROCHIR P 2022; 54:305-313. [PMID: 35944535 DOI: 10.1055/a-1773-0968] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Breast-conserving therapy (BCT), meaning tumorectomy in combination with systemic therapy and locoregional radiation therapy has become the preferred method to treat early-stage breast cancer. With excellent long-term recurrence-free and overall survival rates, breast surgeons today must deliver du- rable and aesthetically appealing results that guarantee a good quality of life to meet the high patient expectations. Oncoplas- tic breast surgery (OPBS) is an innovative approach to improve the overall results of BCT. Often carried out by a team of a plastic surgeon and an oncologic breast surgeon, OPBS can actively prevent breast deformities without compromising oncological safety. In the following, an overview of the principles and techniques of oncoplastic breast surgery will be given due to its ever-increasing significance and its advantages and dis- advantages will be discussed in the context of reconstructive breast surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Weinzierl
- Institut für Klinisch-Experimentelle Chirurgie, Universität des Saarlandes, Homburg/Saar, Deutschland
| | - Daniel Schmauss
- Klinik für Plastische, Rekonstruktive und Ästhetische Chirurgie, Ospedale Regionale di Lugano (ORL), Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), Lugano, Schweiz.,Fakultät der Biomedizinischen Wissenschaften, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Schweiz
| | - Yves Harder
- Klinik für Plastische, Rekonstruktive und Ästhetische Chirurgie, Ospedale Regionale di Lugano (ORL), Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), Lugano, Schweiz.,Fakultät der Biomedizinischen Wissenschaften, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Schweiz
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Wolter A, Fertsch S, Lisboa BW, Andree C. [Breast Reconstruction Strategies in Case of Planned Radiotherapy]. HANDCHIR MIKROCHIR P 2022; 54:279-296. [PMID: 35728602 DOI: 10.1055/a-1826-2992] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The ideal technical and chronological approach of breast reconstruction in case of planned radiotherapy after mastectomy (post-mastectomy radiotherapy, PMRT) continues to be controversially discussed. METHODS The authors analysed the MEDLINE Database PubMed for relevant studies concerning PMRT and breast reconstruction. The main theses from these publications were extracted and summarised. RESULTS An implant-based approach is the least invasive technique for immediate breast-mound formation in a PMRT setting. Reconstruction in a PMRT setting with a two-stage expander-implant technique or expander-implant-autologous procedure can provide good to excellent cosmetic outcomes. In contrast to the implant-based approach, autologous reconstruction methods provide an improved quality of life as well as haptic and sensory advantages and are usually associated with lower complication rates. PMRT after autologous reconstruction can have a negative impact on the autologous tissue. A delayed autologous approach can be advantageous and should be generally favoured in high-risk patients. CONCLUSION Factors influencing a meticulous planning of breast reconstruction including PMRT are surgical, aesthetic and patient characteristics, quality of life, preference and expectation. Ideally, PMRT is completed before autologous reconstruction to avoid radiation-associated side-effects on the final reconstructive result. If PMRT is likely, but potentially not necessary, an immediate-delayed procedure may be of advantage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Wolter
- Plastische und Ästhetische Chirurgie, Sana Krankenhaus Gerresheim, Düsseldorf, Germany.,Fakultät für Gesundheit, Universität Witten/Herdecke, Witten, Germany
| | - Sonia Fertsch
- Plastische und Ästhetische Chirurgie, Sana Krankenhaus Gerresheim, Düsseldorf, Germany.,Fakultät für Gesundheit, Universität Witten/Herdecke, Witten, Germany
| | | | - Christoph Andree
- Plastische und Ästhetische Chirurgie, Sana Krankenhaus Gerresheim, Düsseldorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Kooijman MML, Hage JJ, Scholten AN, Vrancken Peeters MJTFD, Woerdeman LAE. Short-Term Surgical Complications of Skin-Sparing Mastectomy and Direct-to-Implant Immediate Breast Reconstruction in Women Concurrently Treated with Adjuvant Radiotherapy for Breast Cancer. Arch Plast Surg 2022; 49:332-338. [PMID: 35832162 PMCID: PMC9142242 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1748648] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background
Postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) is allegedly associated with a higher risk of complications of combined nipple-sparing or skin-sparing mastectomy and subpectoral direct-to-implant immediate breast reconstruction ([N]SSM/SDTI-IBR). For this reason, this combination is usually advised against or, even, refused in women who need to undergo PMRT. Because this advice has never been justified, we assessed the short-term complications that may potentially be associated with PMRT after [N]SSM/SDTI-IBR.
Methods
We compared the complications requiring reintervention and implant loss occurring after 273 [N]SSM/SDTI-IBR that were exposed to PMRT within the first 16 postoperative weeks (interventional group) to those occurring in 739 similarly operated breasts that were not (control group). Additionally, we compared the fraction of complications requiring reintervention occurring after the onset of radiotherapy in the interventional group to that occurring after a comparable postoperative period in the control group.
Results
The fraction of breasts requiring unscheduled surgical reinterventions for complications and the loss of implants did not differ significantly between both groups but significantly more reinterventions were needed among the controls (
p
= 0.00). The fraction of events after the onset of radiotherapy in the interventional group was higher than the fraction of events after 6.2 weeks in the control group, but not significantly so.
Conclusion
We found no prove for the alleged increase of short-term complications of adjuvant radiotherapy. Therefore, we advise that these should not be considered valid arguments to advice against [N]SSM/SDTI-IBR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Merel M. L. Kooijman
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J. Joris Hage
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Astrid N. Scholten
- Department of Radiotherapy, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marie-Jeanne T. F. D. Vrancken Peeters
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Leonie A. E. Woerdeman
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Clement Z, Egbeare D, Kollias J, Gill G, Whitfield R, Bingham J, Bochner M. Safety and efficacy of immediate autologous breast reconstruction after mastectomy in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced breast cancer. Breast Dis 2022; 41:267-272. [PMID: 35599461 DOI: 10.3233/bd-210062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Immediate autologous breast reconstruction (IABR) offers fewer surgeries with better psychosocial, quality of life and aesthetic outcomes. In high-risk patients or those with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC), adjuvant postmastectomy radiotherapy decreases local recurrence and improves survival. However, it has negative effects on the reconstructed flap. Reversing the treatment protocol using neoadjuvant radiotherapy may minimise the negative effects on the reconstructed breast in women requesting IABR. We assessed the safety and efficacy of women who underwent mastectomy and IABR post-neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) for LABC. METHODOLOGY A cohort study using a retrospective and prospective analysis was performed on women with LABC who underwent mastectomy and IABR post-NACRT between 1998 and 2018. All reconstructions were performed by oncoplastic breast surgeons from a single unit. Outcome measures analysed included surgical complications, flap failure, loco-regional recurrence, overall and disease-free survival. This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (as revised in 2013). This study was approved by the institutional review board. RESULTS A total of 28 women with a median age of 50 (33-64) were included. 25% underwent TRAM flap and 75% underwent LD flap reconstruction. The median period of follow-up was 61 months. Post-NACRT, 35.7% achieved complete pathological response (PCR). 3/28 (10.7%) had early complications (2 implant and 1 donor site infection). 7% underwent revision surgery. There was no flap loss. 1/28 (3.5%) had loco-regional recurrence, 3.2% had distant metastasis, and 2.5% had breast cancer related mortality. CONCLUSION In women with LABC, NACRT followed by mastectomy and IABR is safe and may not compromise oncological and cosmetic outcomes. If offers the benefits of immediate breast reconstruction and avoids delaying adjuvant therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zackariah Clement
- Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, South Australia, Australia.,Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, The Tweed Hospital, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Donna Egbeare
- Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, South Australia, Australia
| | - Jim Kollias
- Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, South Australia, Australia
| | - Grantley Gill
- Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, South Australia, Australia
| | - Robert Whitfield
- Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, South Australia, Australia
| | - Janne Bingham
- Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, South Australia, Australia
| | - Melissa Bochner
- Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Letsiou E, Tsakatikas S, Vakis G, Tsapakidis K, Charalampakis N, Diamantis A, Poultsidi A, Michelakis D, de Bree E, Mauri D, Tsoukalas N, Antoniades C, Tolia M. Radiotherapy and Breast Reconstruction: What Is the Ideal Timing? A Narrative Review. Rev Recent Clin Trials 2022; 17:73-85. [PMID: 35289255 DOI: 10.2174/1574887117666220314161609] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2021] [Revised: 11/13/2021] [Accepted: 12/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Women undergoing mastectomy choose to pursue breast reconstruction (BR) in order to reduce their body image distress.Adjuvant chest wall irradiation is associated with a negative cosmetic outcome. The aim of our review was to identify the optimal timing of BR relating to radiotherapy delivery. MATERIALS AND METHODS Using Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, Springer, Wanfang and CNKI, we performed a non-systematic review of articles published up to August 2021. RESULTS There is no hard evidence in favor of immediate, delayed or 2-stage BR when post-mastectomy radiation is indicated. Immediate and 2-stage BR seem to be valid alternatives to delayed BR. CONCLUSIONS Further research is essential in order to assess clinician and patient reported aesthetic outcomes and determine the optimal timing of BR in view of post-mastectomy radiotherapy, in breast cancer survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sergios Tsakatikas
- Department of Medical Oncology, Metaxa Cancer Hospital, 185 37 Athens, Greece
| | - George Vakis
- Plastic Surgery Clinic, Evangelismos General Hospital, Ipsilantou 45-47, 106 76, Athens, Greece
| | - Konstantinos Tsapakidis
- Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, Biopolis, 41500, Larisa, Greece
| | | | - Alexandros Diamantis
- Department of Surgery, Medical School, University of Thessaly, 415 00 Larissa, Greece
| | - Antigoni Poultsidi
- Department of Surgery, Medical School, University of Thessaly, 415 00 Larissa, Greece
| | - Dimosthenis Michelakis
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Medical School of Crete University Hospital, 711 10 Heraklion, Greece
| | - Eelco de Bree
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Medical School of Crete University Hospital, 711 10 Heraklion, Greece
| | - Davide Mauri
- Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.,Department of Medical, Oncology, Greece Society for Study of Clonal Heterogeneity of Neoplasia (EMEKEN), University Hospital of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
| | - Nikolaos Tsoukalas
- Department of Oncology, 401 General Military Hospital of Athens, 115 25, Athens, Greece
| | - Chrysostomos Antoniades
- Department of Radiotherapy, School of Medicine, University of Crete, 711 10, Heraklion, Greece
| | - Maria Tolia
- Department of Radiotherapy, School of Medicine, University of Crete, 711 10, Heraklion, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Tomita S, Matsunaga N, Fujita Y, de Kerckhove M, Fujii M, Honda Y, Tokisawa H, Aruga T, Terao Y. Safety evaluation of immediate breast reconstruction for locally advanced breast cancer in Japanese patients. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2022; 75:2526-2534. [PMID: 35599220 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2022.04.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2021] [Revised: 02/27/2022] [Accepted: 04/12/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND While breast reconstruction often improves the quality of life of patients with locally advanced breast cancer, there is still no consensus on its safety. This retrospective report aimed to verify the safety of immediate breast reconstruction for locally advanced breast cancer. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed 500 breast cancer surgeries performed between January 2005 and December 2019 at our hospital, including 120 immediate breast reconstructions. The following five items were analyzed: the patients' choice of reconstruction method, rate of chemotherapy and radiotherapy, surgical margin positivity rate, complications associated with surgery, overall survival rate, and breast cancer-free survival rate. RESULTS Sixty-three of the 120 patients underwent autologous breast reconstruction. Of those who underwent reconstruction surgery, 95.8% received chemotherapy and 78.3% underwent post-mastectomy radiation therapy. Reconstruction failed in 8 cases with tissue expander and in 1 case with free TRAM flap. Breast reconstruction surgery was not a factor in delaying adjuvant therapy, but complications requiring intervention tended to increase the duration of adjuvant therapy. There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of surgical margin positivity, overall survival rate, or breast cancer-free survival rate. CONCLUSIONS Although complications associated with reconstructive surgery occurred, appropriate intervention prevented delays in breast cancer treatment, and the complications did not negatively affect the overall or breast cancer-free survival rates. Our study found no evidence to avoid primary breast reconstruction in patients with locally advanced breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shoichi Tomita
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center, Komagome Hospital, 3-18-22 Honkomagome, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8677, Japan.
| | - Noriko Matsunaga
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center, Komagome Hospital, 3-18-22 Honkomagome, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8677, Japan
| | - Yoshihiko Fujita
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center, Komagome Hospital, 3-18-22 Honkomagome, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8677, Japan
| | - Maiko de Kerckhove
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center, Komagome Hospital, 3-18-22 Honkomagome, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8677, Japan
| | - Miwako Fujii
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center, Komagome Hospital, 3-18-22 Honkomagome, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8677, Japan
| | - Yayoi Honda
- Department of Breast Surgery, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center, Komagome Hospital, 3-18-22 Honkomagome, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8677, Japan
| | - Hiromi Tokisawa
- Department of Breast Surgery, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center, Komagome Hospital, 3-18-22 Honkomagome, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8677, Japan
| | - Tomoyuki Aruga
- Department of Breast Surgery, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center, Komagome Hospital, 3-18-22 Honkomagome, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8677, Japan
| | - Yasunobu Terao
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center, Komagome Hospital, 3-18-22 Honkomagome, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8677, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Paredes H, Murature SG, Aliaga N, Donaire JM, Lira MT, Sola A. Lipotransferencia de protección en pacientes con implantes irradiados: análisis preliminar de complicaciones inmediatas. REVISTA MÉDICA CLÍNICA LAS CONDES 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rmclc.2022.03.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022] Open
|
32
|
Ticha P, Mestak O, Wu M, Sukop A. Early postoperative complications of breast reconstruction by history of radiotherapy and reconstruction approach. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/s00238-021-01918-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
33
|
Hall J, Fried D, Marks LB, Gupta GP, Jones E, Elmore S, Pearlstein K, Downs-Canner S, Gallagher K, Spanheimer PM, Carr J, Ogunleye AA, Casey DL. Dosimetric and Clinical Factors Associated with Breast Reconstruction Complications in Patients Receiving Post-Mastectomy Radiation. Pract Radiat Oncol 2021; 12:e169-e176. [PMID: 34920164 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2021.11.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2021] [Revised: 11/01/2021] [Accepted: 11/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S) Approximately 30% of women who receive post-mastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) in the setting of breast reconstruction suffer from reconstruction complications. This study aims to assess clinical and dosimetric factors associated with the risk of reconstruction complications after PMRT, with the ultimate goal of identifying a dosimetric constraint that can be utilized clinically to limit this risk. MATERIALS/METHODS We retrospectively identified 41 patients who underwent modified radical (MRM) or total mastectomy followed by immediate or delayed reconstruction (autologous or implant-based) and radiation at a single institution from 2014-2020. Reconstruction complications were defined as flap or implant failure, necrosis, capsular contracture, cellulitis/infection, implant rupture, implant malposition, leakage/rupture, unplanned operation, and hematoma/seroma. Clinical and dosimetric variables associated with complications were assessed with univariate analyses. RESULTS 12 patients (29%) suffered reconstruction complications which led to flap or implant failure in 5 patients. Median time to complication following reconstruction was 8 months. 32% of patients with immediate and 20% with delayed reconstruction suffered a complication, respectively. There were no local failures. Smoking (p=0.02), use of bolus (p=0.03), and V107 > 11% (p=0.03) were associated with increased complication rates. The complication rates were 42% when V107 > 11% versus 12% when V107 < 11%; 58% in smokers versus 17% in nonsmokers; and 42% with bolus versus 7% without. CONCLUSION Plan heterogeneity appears to be associated with the risk of reconstruction complications. Pending further validation, V107 < 11% may serve as a reasonable guide to limit this risk. Further consideration should be given to the selective use of bolus in this setting and optimization of clinical factors such as smoking cessation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob Hall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - David Fried
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Lawrence B Marks
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Gaorav P Gupta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Ellen Jones
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Shekinah Elmore
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Kevin Pearlstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Stephanie Downs-Canner
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Kristalyn Gallagher
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Philip M Spanheimer
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Jennifer Carr
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Adeyemi A Ogunleye
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Dana L Casey
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
“Warning on “sacred areas” preservation in breast cancer patient's path”. CURRENT PROBLEMS IN CANCER: CASE REPORTS 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cpccr.2021.100115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
|
35
|
The Impact of Adjuvant Radiotherapy on Immediate Implant-based Breast Reconstruction Surgical and Satisfaction Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN 2021; 9:e3910. [PMID: 34765389 PMCID: PMC8575424 DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000003910] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2021] [Accepted: 09/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Adjuvant radiotherapy could be a necessary step in the oncological treatment for breast cancer. However, radiotherapy may have negative effects on implant-based immediate breast reconstruction. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of adjuvant radiation therapy on surgical results and patient-reported satisfaction outcomes in women undergoing immediate implant-based breast reconstruction. Methods A systematic search in PubMed was conducted on September 2019 and updated on April 2021. The risk of bias of the included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Form for Observational Studies. RevMan 5 was used for statistical analysis. We obtained relative risks to determine the complication incidence and mean differences for 2-year BREAST-Q scores. Results Fourteen studies were included. A total of 11,958 implant-based immediate reconstructions were performed, 2311 received postmastectomy radiation therapy, and 9647 were considered as control group. Surgical complications, reoperation rates, and reconstruction failure were significantly higher among irradiated breasts. Significantly lower BREAST-Q scores were reported by irradiated women receiving radiotherapy. Conclusions This systematic review and meta-analysis combines reconstruction complication rates with aesthetic and patient-reported satisfaction outcomes. Adjuvant radiotherapy is consistently associated with greater complication rates and poorer aesthetic and satisfaction outcomes. The magnitude of association is significantly lower when the reconstruction is based on autologous tissues.
Collapse
|
36
|
Coudé Adam H, Frisell A, Liu Y, Sackey H, Oikonomou I, Docherty Skogh AC, Frisell J, de Boniface J. Effect of radiotherapy on expanders and permanent implants in immediate breast reconstruction: long-term surgical and patient-reported outcomes in a large multicentre cohort. Br J Surg 2021; 108:1474-1482. [PMID: 34694356 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znab333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2021] [Accepted: 08/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Current evidence for the effects of radiotherapy (RT) on implant-based immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) is limited by short follow-up and lack of patient-reported outcomes (PROs). It is central to integrate long-term comprehensive outcome data into the preoperative decision-making process. The aim of the present study was to determine long-term surgical outcomes and PROs in relation to RT after implant-based IBR. METHODS This was a longitudinal cohort study of PRO data obtained in surveys conducted in 2012 and 2020 using the BREAST-Q questionnaire. All women undergoing therapeutic mastectomy and implant-based IBR between 1 January 2007 and 31 December 2011 at four breast centres in Stockholm, Sweden, were identified. The endpoint was implant removal owing to surgical complications or patient preference. RESULTS Median follow-up was 120 (range 1-171) months. After 754 IBRs in 729 women, implant removal occurred in 128 (17 per cent): 34 of 386 (8.8 per cent) in the no-RT group, 20 of 64 (31.3 per cent) in the group with previous RT, and 74 of 304 (24.3 per cent) in the postoperative RT group (P < 0.001). Implant removal was because of surgical complications in 60 instances (7.9 per cent), and patient preference in 68 (9.0 per cent). The BREAST-Q response rate was 72.2 per cent. Women with previous RT scored lower than those without RT on all scales, apart from psychosocial well-being. Women with postoperative RT scored lower only on physical well-being. No scores in the two RT groups had deteriorated between the survey time points, whereas satisfaction with breasts and overall outcome had decreased in the no-RT group. CONCLUSION Although RT was significantly associated with higher implant removal rates, PROs remained stable over 8 years despite irradiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah Coudé Adam
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Axel Frisell
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Yihang Liu
- Department of Surgery, Capio St Göran's Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Helena Sackey
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ira Oikonomou
- Department of Surgery, South General Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Clinical Science and Education, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ann-Charlot Docherty Skogh
- Department of Surgery, South General Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Clinical Science and Education, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jan Frisell
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jana de Boniface
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Surgery, Capio St Göran's Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Staged Chest Wall Reconstruction for Radiation-induced Costochondritis. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN 2021; 9:e3718. [PMID: 34476146 PMCID: PMC8395594 DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000003718] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2021] [Accepted: 06/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Costochondritis after breast reconstruction and radiation therapy is rarely reported. Moreover, it is difficult to diagnose using computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging; as such, wound debridement and reconstruction must be performed in several stages. A 51-year-old woman was diagnosed with invasive cancer of the right breast, and she underwent nipple sparing mastectomy and direct-to-implant breast reconstruction in November 2007. Thirteen years later, in September 2020, she experienced pain and swelling on her right breast. Incisional drainage and implant removal were performed in another clinic; however, the infection was not controlled. An implant-induced infection was suspected, and debridement was performed to a level where fresh tissue appeared in the upper layer of the intercostal muscle. Antibiotics and open dressing were used for 10 days; however, yellowish debris was noted, and third to fifth ribs and costal cartilages turned dark brown. Radiation-induced costochondritis was diagnosed based on clinical findings from the intraoperative field, wound course, and cartilage biopsy. Radical chest wall resection and reconstruction was performed using Teflon (Dupont/Chemours, Wilmington, Del.) and latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap. The patient was discharged 2 weeks after surgery without any complications. Costochondritis should be clinically diagnosed while performing the first debridement in staged operation. Radical chest wall resection is essential with chest wall reconstruction using Teflon and a latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap.
Collapse
|
38
|
Rojas DP, Leonardi MC, Frassoni S, Morra A, Gerardi MA, La Rocca E, Cattani F, Luraschi R, Fodor C, Zaffaroni M, Rietjens M, De Lorenzi F, Veronesi P, Galimberti VE, Intra M, Bagnardi V, Orecchia R, Dicuonzo S, Jereczek-Fossa BA. Implant risk failure in patients undergoing postmastectomy 3-week hypofractionated radiotherapy after immediate reconstruction. Radiother Oncol 2021; 163:105-113. [PMID: 34419507 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2021] [Revised: 08/05/2021] [Accepted: 08/12/2021] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
AIM To evaluate reconstruction failure (RF) rate in patients receiving implant-based immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) and hypofractionated (HF) postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT). MATERIALS AND METHODS Stage II-III breast cancer patients, treated with HF-PMRT using intensity modulated radiotherapy were stratified in two groups according to IBR: single-stage direct-to-implant (DTI-group) and two-stage expander and implant (TE/I-group). Irradiated patients were matched with non-irradiated ones who underwent the same IBR during the same period. Prescription dose was 40.05 Gy/15 fractions to chest wall and infra/supraclavicular nodal region. Primary endpoint was RF defined as the need of major revisional surgery (MaRS) for implant removal or conversion to autologous reconstruction. Secondary endpoint was the rate of minor revisional surgeries (MiRS) including implant repositioning or substitution with another implant. RESULTS One hundred and seven irradiated patients (62 in TE/I-group, 45 in DTI-group) were matched with 107 non-irradiated subjects. Median follow-up was 4.2 years (0.1-6.1) In the TE/I setting, MaRS was performed in 8/62 irradiated patients (12.9%) of the irradiated TE/I group compared to 1/62 (1.6%) non-irradiated subjects (p = 0.015). In the DTI setting, MaRs occurred in 3/45 irradiated patients (6.7%) compared to 1/45 non-irradiated ones (2.2%) (p = 0.35). Overall MaRS rate was 10.3% in the irradiated group. MiRS was performed in 35.6% and 31.1% of the irradiated and non-irradiated DTI-groups (p = 0.65), respectively, and in 12.9% and 8.1% of the irradiated and non-irradiated TE/I groups (p = 0.38), respectively. CONCLUSIONS Compared to the non-irradiated counterparts, the TE/I group showed higher rate of RF, while no statistically significant difference was observed for the DTI group. The use of hypofractionation and IMRT to implant-based IBR did not seem to increase the risk of RF which appeared to be in line with the literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Samuele Frassoni
- Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milan-Bicocca, Italy
| | - Anna Morra
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Eliana La Rocca
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Italy
| | - Federica Cattani
- Unit of Medical Physics, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Rosa Luraschi
- Unit of Medical Physics, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Cristiana Fodor
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Mattia Zaffaroni
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Mario Rietjens
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesca De Lorenzi
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Veronesi
- Division of Breast Surgery, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Italy
| | | | - Mattia Intra
- Division of Breast Surgery, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Bagnardi
- Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milan-Bicocca, Italy
| | - Roberto Orecchia
- Scientific Direction, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Samantha Dicuonzo
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
O'Donnell JPM, Murphy D, Ryan ÉJ, Gasior SA, Sugrue R, O'Neill BL, Boland MR, Lowery AJ, Kerin MJ, McInerney NM. Optimal reconstructive strategies in the setting of post-mastectomy radiotherapy - A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol 2021; 47:2797-2806. [PMID: 34301444 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2021] [Revised: 05/17/2021] [Accepted: 07/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A third of breast cancer patients require mastectomy. In some high-risk cases postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) is indicated, threatening reconstructive complications. Several PMRT and reconstruction combinations are used. Autologous flap (AF) reconstruction may be immediate (AF→PMRT), delayed-immediate with tissue expander (TE [TE→PMRT→AF]) or delayed (PMRT→AF). Implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR) includes immediate TE followed by PMRT and conversion to permanent implant (PI [TE→PMRT→PI]), delayed TE insertion (PMRT→TE→PI), and prosthetic implant conversion prior to PMRT (TE→PI→PMRT). AIM Perform a network metanalysis (NMA) assessing optimal sequencing of PMRT and reconstructive type. METHODS A systematic review and NMA was performed according to PRISMA-NMA guidelines. NMA was conducted using R packages netmeta and Shiny. RESULTS 16 studies from 4182 identified, involving 2322 reconstructions over three decades, met predefined inclusion criteria. Studies demonstrated moderate heterogeneity. Multiple comparisons combining direct and indirect evidence established AF-PMRT as the optimal approach to avoid reconstructive failure, compared with IBBR strategies (versus PMRT→TE→PI; OR [odds ratio] 0.10, CrI [95% credible interval] 0.02 to 0.55; versus TE→PMRT→PI; OR 0.13, CrI 0.02 to 0.75; versus TE→PI→PMRT OR 0.24, CrI 0.05 to 1.05). PMRT→AF best avoided infection, demonstrating significant improvement versus PMRT→TE→PI alone (OR 0.12, CrI 0.02 to 0.88). Subgroup analysis of IBBR found TE→PI→PMRT reduced failure rates (OR 0.35, CrI 0.15-0.81) compared to other IBBR strategies but increased capsular contracture. CONCLUSION Immediate AF reconstruction is associated with reduced failure in the setting of PMRT. However, optimal reconstructive strategy depends on patient, surgeon and institutional factors. If IBBR is chosen, complication rates decrease if performed prior to PMRT. PROSPERO REGISTRATION CRD 42020157077.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J P M O'Donnell
- Department of Plastics and Reconstructive Surgery, Galway University Hospitals, Galway, Ireland; Department of Surgery, Galway University Hospitals, Galway, Ireland.
| | - D Murphy
- Department of Plastics and Reconstructive Surgery, Galway University Hospitals, Galway, Ireland; Department of Surgery, Galway University Hospitals, Galway, Ireland
| | - É J Ryan
- Department of Surgery, Galway University Hospitals, Galway, Ireland
| | - S A Gasior
- University of Limerick School of Medicine, University of Limerick, Ireland
| | - R Sugrue
- Department of Plastics and Reconstructive Surgery, Galway University Hospitals, Galway, Ireland; Department of Surgery, Galway University Hospitals, Galway, Ireland
| | - B Lane O'Neill
- Department of Plastics and Reconstructive Surgery, Galway University Hospitals, Galway, Ireland; Department of Surgery, Galway University Hospitals, Galway, Ireland
| | - M R Boland
- Department of Surgery, The Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, 123 St Stephen's Green, Dublin, Ireland
| | - A J Lowery
- Department of Surgery, Galway University Hospitals, Galway, Ireland; The Lambe Institute for Translational Research, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland
| | - M J Kerin
- Department of Surgery, Galway University Hospitals, Galway, Ireland; The Lambe Institute for Translational Research, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland
| | - N M McInerney
- Department of Plastics and Reconstructive Surgery, Galway University Hospitals, Galway, Ireland; Department of Surgery, Galway University Hospitals, Galway, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Huang Y, Sanz J, Rodríguez N, Foro P, Reig A, Membrive I, Zhao M, Li X, Martínez A, Algara M. Effects of radiation on toxicity, complications, revision surgery and aesthetic outcomes in breast reconstruction: An argument about timing and techniques. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2021; 74:3316-3323. [PMID: 34229955 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2021.05.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2020] [Revised: 12/23/2020] [Accepted: 05/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radiotherapy (RT) combined with breast reconstruction can reduce the risk of cancer recurrence and increase the survival rate. However, this approach seems to worsen aesthetic outcomes and increase complication rates. The impact of breast reconstruction timing and techniques on clinical outcomes, however, remains unclear. For this reason, we aimed to perform a more comprehensive analysis of a series of patients undergoing RT and breast reconstruction. METHODS Patients were divided into 4 groups according to the timing of reconstruction (before RT and after RT) and surgical technique (heterologous reconstruction and autologous reconstruction (AR)). The median time between RT and reconstruction, number of revision surgeries, incidence of complications, toxicity, aesthetics and associated clinical risk factors were used to assess the clinical outcomes. An objective system of skin toxicity evaluation was performed. RESULTS Ninety-five patients were included in this study. No significant differences in the median time between RT and reconstruction, incidence of complications, toxicity or aesthetics were noted between different timings or techniques of reconstruction. Patients undergoing AR needed more revision surgeries to complete reconstruction. However, the total number of surgical procedures was similar between the groups. In a comparison between the treated and untreated breasts by an objective system, RT produced an increase in erythema and pigmentation and a decrease in elasticity in the treated breast (p<0.05 for all parameters). On multivariate analysis, smoking was a significant predictor associated with complications. CONCLUSIONS Combined breast reconstruction and RT seem to be successful regardless of the order of treatment or the type of reconstruction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y Huang
- Radiation Oncology Department. Hospital del Mar, Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona, Spain; Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J Sanz
- Radiation Oncology Department. Hospital del Mar, Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona, Spain; Radiation Oncology Research Group, Institut Municipal d'Investigació Médica (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain; Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
| | - N Rodríguez
- Radiation Oncology Department. Hospital del Mar, Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona, Spain; Radiation Oncology Research Group, Institut Municipal d'Investigació Médica (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain; Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
| | - P Foro
- Radiation Oncology Department. Hospital del Mar, Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona, Spain; Radiation Oncology Research Group, Institut Municipal d'Investigació Médica (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain; Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
| | - A Reig
- Radiation Oncology Department. Hospital del Mar, Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona, Spain; Radiation Oncology Research Group, Institut Municipal d'Investigació Médica (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain
| | - I Membrive
- Radiation Oncology Department. Hospital del Mar, Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona, Spain; Radiation Oncology Research Group, Institut Municipal d'Investigació Médica (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain
| | - M Zhao
- Radiation Oncology Department. Hospital del Mar, Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | - X Li
- Radiation Oncology Department. Hospital del Mar, Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | - A Martínez
- Radiation Oncology Department. Hospital del Mar, Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | - M Algara
- Radiation Oncology Department. Hospital del Mar, Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona, Spain; Radiation Oncology Research Group, Institut Municipal d'Investigació Médica (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain; Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Prantl L, Moellhoff N, von Fritschen U, Giunta R, Germann G, Kehrer A, Thiha A, Ehrl D, Zeman F, Broer PN, Heidekrueger PI. Effect of Radiation Therapy on Microsurgical Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Breast Reconstructions: A Matched Cohort Analysis of 4577 Cases. Ann Plast Surg 2021; 86:627-631. [PMID: 33346536 DOI: 10.1097/sap.0000000000002628] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Breast reconstruction with autologous tissue is a state-of-the art procedure. Several patient-related factors have been identified with regard to the safety and efficacy of these reconstructions. The presented study investigates the impact of prereconstruction radiation on outcomes of deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) free-flap breast reconstructions using largest database available in Europe. MATERIALS AND METHODS Between 2011 and 2019, 3926 female patients underwent 4577 DIEP flap breast reconstructions in 22 different German breast cancer centers. The cases were divided into a no-radiation (NR) and a radiation (R) group, according to radiation status before reconstruction. Groups were compared with regard to surgical complications and free-flap outcome. RESULTS Overall, there was no significant difference between the groups regarding the rate of total flap loss [1.9% (NR) vs 2.1% (R), P = 0.743], partial flap loss [0.9% (NR) vs 1.5 (R), P = 0.069], and revision surgery [vascular revision: 4.4% (NR) vs 4.1% (R), P = 0.686; wound revision: 7.6% (NR) vs 9.4% (R), P = 0.122]. However, the patients had a significantly higher risk of developing wound healing disturbances at the recipient site [1.2% (NR) vs 2.1% (R), P = 0.035] and showed significantly longer hospitalization {8 [SD, 8.4 (NR)] vs 9 [SD, 15.4 {R}] days, P = 0.006} after prereconstruction radiation. CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that DIEP flap reconstruction after radiation therapy is feasible. Women with a history of radiation therapy should, however, be informed in detail about the higher risk for wound healing disturbances at the recipient site.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lukas Prantl
- From the Centre of Plastic, Aesthetic, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Regensburg, Regensburg
| | - Nicholas Moellhoff
- Division of Hand, Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich
| | - Uwe von Fritschen
- Department of Plastic and Esthetic Surgery, Hand Surgery, Helios Hospital Emil von Behring, Berlin
| | - Riccardo Giunta
- Division of Hand, Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich
| | - Guenter Germann
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, Esthetic and Handsurgery, ETHIANUM Klinik Heidelberg, Heidelberg
| | - Andreas Kehrer
- From the Centre of Plastic, Aesthetic, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Regensburg, Regensburg
| | - Aung Thiha
- From the Centre of Plastic, Aesthetic, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Regensburg, Regensburg
| | - Denis Ehrl
- Division of Hand, Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich
| | - Florian Zeman
- Center for Clinical Studies, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg
| | - Peter Niclas Broer
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, Hand and Burn Surgery, Bogenhausen Academic Teaching Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Paul Immanuel Heidekrueger
- From the Centre of Plastic, Aesthetic, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Regensburg, Regensburg
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
A Study on Breast Reconstruction in a Developing Country: A Comprehensive Evaluation of the Techniques and Oncologic Outcomes. Ann Plast Surg 2021; 84:512-517. [PMID: 31800564 DOI: 10.1097/sap.0000000000002125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast cancer, with an incidence of 33.2 per 100,000 in Iranian population, is considered as the most common cancer in Iranian women. Nowadays, with the increasing survival rates, breast reconstruction has been integrated into surgical techniques of breast cancer treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the current status of breast reconstruction in Iranian population. PATIENTS AND METHODS This retrospective study was conducted in Imam Hospital between January 2008 and June 2018. All the patients underwent breast reconstruction surgery. The trend of reconstruction and complication rates were 2 major outcomes. Logistic regression model was used to predict complications. Student t test was used to compare means. RESULTS Fifty-five patients underwent 60 autologous breast reconstruction surgeries and 152 patients underwent 193 prosthesis-based reconstruction surgeries. Most of cases were invasive ductal carcinoma ± ductal carcinoma in situ (126 cases, 68%). Among 253 surgeries in 207 patients, 98 cases (38.7%) were 2-stage implant, 91 (36.0%) were 1-stage implant, 3 (1.2%) were acellular dermal matrix + prosthesis, 31 (12.2%) were pedicled transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap, 25 (9.8%) were latissimus dorsi flap ± prosthesis, and 4 (15.8%) were latissimus dorsi flap. Among prosthesis-based reconstructions, chemotherapy could predict the occurrence of complications (odds ratio, 2.87; 95% CI, 1.07-7.68), whereas none of these factors could predict the occurrence of complications in autologous reconstructions. The most prevalent complication was seroma formation (48.5% of all complications). Overall complication rates (including major and minor) were higher among autologous reconstructions compared with prosthesis-based reconstructions (45.8% and 21.1%, respectively, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS The trend of breast reconstruction is changing in Islamic Republic of Iran as a developing country. Implant-based reconstruction has surpassed autologous reconstructions in recent years. In terms of complications, we observed higher rates among autologous reconstructions.
Collapse
|
43
|
Gilmour A, Cutress R, Gandhi A, Harcourt D, Little K, Mansell J, Murphy J, Pennery E, Tillett R, Vidya R, Martin L. Oncoplastic breast surgery: A guide to good practice. Eur J Surg Oncol 2021; 47:2272-2285. [PMID: 34001384 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.05.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2021] [Revised: 04/18/2021] [Accepted: 05/05/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Oncoplastic Breast Surgery has become standard of care in the management of Breast Cancer patients. These guidelines written by an Expert Advisory Group; convened by the Association of Breast Surgery (ABS) and the British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons (BAPRAS), are designed to provide all members of the breast cancer multidisciplinary team (MDT) with guidance on the best breast surgical oncoplastic and reconstructive practice at each stage of a patient's journey, based on current evidence. It is hoped they will also be of benefit to the wide range of professionals and service commissioners who are involved in this area of clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Gilmour
- Canniesburn Plastic Surgery Unit, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, United Kingdom
| | - R Cutress
- University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - A Gandhi
- Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre & Manchester University Hospitals NHS Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - D Harcourt
- Centre for Appearance Research, University of the West of England, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - K Little
- Liverpool Breast Unit, Liverpool University Foundation Trust, United Kingdom
| | - J Mansell
- Gartnavel General Hospital, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - J Murphy
- Manchester University Hospitals NHS Trust, United Kingdom
| | | | - R Tillett
- Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Trust, Exeter, United Kingdom
| | - R Vidya
- The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, United Kingdom
| | - L Martin
- Liverpool Breast Unit, Liverpool University Foundation Trust, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Chidley P, Foroudi F, Tacey M, Khor R, Yeh J, Bevington E, Hyett A, Loh SW, Chew G, McCracken J, Neoh D, Yeo B, Baker C, Jassal S, Law M, Zantuck N, Cokelek M, Guerrieri M, Brown B, Stoney D, Ng M, Chao M. Neoadjuvant radiotherapy for locally advanced and high-risk breast cancer. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2021; 65:345-353. [PMID: 33821576 DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.13180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2020] [Accepted: 03/08/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Neoadjuvant radiotherapy (NART) as part of a multi-modality approach for locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) requires further investigation. Importantly, this approach may allow for a single-staged surgical procedure, with mastectomy and immediate autologous reconstruction. Multiple other potential benefits of NART include improved pathological downstaging of breast disease, reduced overall treatment time, elimination of time period with breast tissue deficit and improved patient satisfaction. METHODS This is a retrospective multi-institutional review of patients with LABC and high-risk breast disease undergoing NART. Eligible patients sequentially underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) with or without HER2-targeted therapy, NART, followed by mastectomy with immediate autologous breast reconstruction (BR) 4- to 6 weeks post-completion of radiotherapy. Patient and tumour characteristics were analysed using descriptive statistics. Surgical complications were assessed using the Clavien-Dindo Classification (Ann Surg 2004; 240: 205). RESULTS From 3/2013 to 9/2019, 153 patients were treated with NART. The median age was 47 years (IQR 42-52), with median body mass index of 27. Eighteen patients experienced Grade 3 acute surgical complications. This included 13 Grade 3B breast-site events and 9 Grade 3B donor-site events, where further surgical intervention was required for management of wound infection, wound dehiscence, flap or mastectomy skin necrosis, haematoma and internal mammary venous anastomotic thrombosis. No autologous flap loss was observed. CONCLUSION Neoadjuvant radiotherapy facilitates a single-stage surgical procedure with mastectomy and immediate autologous BR, eliminating the delay to reconstructive surgery and thus shortening a woman's breast cancer journey. The findings of this review support the use of NART, with comparable rates of surgical complications to standard sequencing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Phoebe Chidley
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Farshad Foroudi
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.,University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Mark Tacey
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.,Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Richard Khor
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Janice Yeh
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Elaine Bevington
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Anthony Hyett
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Su Wen Loh
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Grace Chew
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - James McCracken
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Derek Neoh
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Belinda Yeo
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Caroline Baker
- St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Michael Law
- Eastern Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Margaret Cokelek
- Genesis Care Victoria, Ringwood Private Hospital, Ringwood East, Victoria, Australia
| | - Mario Guerrieri
- Genesis Care Victoria, Ringwood Private Hospital, Ringwood East, Victoria, Australia
| | | | | | - Michael Ng
- Genesis Care Victoria, Ringwood Private Hospital, Ringwood East, Victoria, Australia
| | - Michael Chao
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.,University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Eastern Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Genesis Care Victoria, Ringwood Private Hospital, Ringwood East, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Casella D, Nanni J, Lo Torto F, Barellini L, Redi U, Kaciulyte J, Cassetti D, Ribuffo D, Marcasciano M. Extended Latissimus Dorsi Kite Flap (ELD-K Flap): Revisiting an Old Place for a Total Autologous Breast Reconstruction in Patients with Medium to Large Breasts. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2021; 45:390-401. [PMID: 33057755 DOI: 10.1007/s00266-020-01990-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2020] [Accepted: 09/19/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The latissimus dorsi (LD) flap represents one of the most reliable methods for autologous breast reconstruction. However, in many patients, the exclusive use of this technique may not guarantee the restoration of an adequate volume and projection. We report our experience with the extended latissimus dorsi kite flap (ELD-K flap), an alternative surgical approach to maximize the volume of the fleur-de-lis pattern LD flap, for total autologous breast reconstruction. METHODS Between 2016 and 2018, 23 patients were subjected to mastectomy and immediate autologous reconstruction with "extended latissimus dorsi kite flap" (ELD-K flap), technique that employs an extended version of the LD musculocutaneous flap, based on the skeletonized thoracodorsal pedicle and a trilobate skin incision with an inferiorly based vertical branch. The BREAST-Q questionnaire was administered preoperatively, and one year after surgery to evaluate the quality of life results of the patients. BREAST-Q latissimus dorsi module was also provided. RESULTS Average body mass index was 29.7 kg/m2 (range 25-40 kg/m2). Mild complications occurred in only six cases, and eight patients underwent treatment to improve the donor site scar outcome. Patients indicated high scores in quality of life measures with an increase in all BREAST domains from the preoperative to the postoperative period. A statistically significant increase (p < 0.05) was noted in: "overall satisfaction with breasts" (p < 0.05), "psychosocial well-being" (p < 0.05), "physical impact of the surgery" (p < 0.05). Within the LD module, participants reported a mean score of, respectively, 73.8 and 67.9 for "satisfaction with back" and "satisfaction with shoulder and back function" domains. CONCLUSIONS The extended incision allows the recruitment of additional tissue to provide enough volume to complete the reconstruction without implants. The isolation of the vascular pedicle allows for extreme freedom and mobilization of the flap, ensuring adequate filling of the breast. ELD-K flap may expand the indications for a total autologous LD immediate breast reconstruction, representing an additional and reliable alternative in selected cohorts of patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donato Casella
- UOC Chirurgia Oncologica Della Mammella, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese, Siena, Italy
| | - Jacopo Nanni
- Department of Surgery, "P. Valdoni", Unit of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Federico Lo Torto
- Department of Surgery, "P. Valdoni", Unit of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Leonardo Barellini
- Unità Di Oncologia Chirurgica Ricostruttiva Della Mammella, "Spedali Riuniti" Di Livorno, "Breast Unit" Integrata Di Livorno Cecina, Piombino Elba, Azienda USL Toscana Nord Ovest, Livorno, Italy
| | - Ugo Redi
- Department of Surgery, "P. Valdoni", Unit of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Juste Kaciulyte
- Department of Surgery, "P. Valdoni", Unit of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Dario Cassetti
- UOC Chirurgia Oncologica Della Mammella, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese, Siena, Italy
| | - Diego Ribuffo
- Department of Surgery, "P. Valdoni", Unit of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Marcasciano
- Department of Surgery, "P. Valdoni", Unit of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
- Unità Di Oncologia Chirurgica Ricostruttiva Della Mammella, "Spedali Riuniti" Di Livorno, "Breast Unit" Integrata Di Livorno Cecina, Piombino Elba, Azienda USL Toscana Nord Ovest, Livorno, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Kelling JA, Meade A, Adkins M, Zhang AY. Risk of Pneumothorax With Internal Mammary Vessel Utilization in Autologous Breast Reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2021; 86:S184-S188. [PMID: 33470623 DOI: 10.1097/sap.0000000000002643] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Complications associated with autologous breast reconstruction are well reported in the literature. Regardless of the type of free flap harvested, the anastomosis is most commonly performed to the recipient internal mammary vessels. Although pneumothorax is a known possible complication of breast surgery, incidence of pneumothorax in breast reconstruction involving the use of the internal mammary vessels is rarely discussed. The aim of our study was to determine the incidence of pneumothorax in deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction. METHODS A single-institution review was performed examining the incidence of pneumothorax in cases of DIEP flap breast reconstruction with anastomosis to the internal mammary vessels over a 4-year period. Intraoperative irrigation was used to visually assess for evidence of pneumothorax during recipient vessel dissection and anastomosis. Anteroposterior chest radiographs were obtained on the first postoperative day to assess for pneumothorax. Additional variables analyzed included type of retractor used during recipient vessel dissection and history of radiation. RESULTS A total of 180 patients underwent autologous DIEP breast reconstruction at our institution. The overall incidence of pneumothorax was 1.4 per 100 recipient vessel dissections and 2.2 per 100 patients undergoing breast reconstruction. There was a total of 4 cases of pneumothorax. Three were attributed to unknown causes, and 1 was due to direct injury to the parietal pleura via electrocautery. CONCLUSION The use of the internal mammary artery and vein as recipient vessels continues to be the most common and reliable recipient for autologous breast reconstruction. Based on our data, pneumothorax does not seem to be a common complication of this procedure. If concern for iatrogenic injury to the pleura arises intraoperatively, we suggest the use of a saline bubble test to investigate the possible injury. Routine postoperative radiographs are not indicated unless the patient develops symptoms suggestive of pneumothorax.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph A Kelling
- From the Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas at Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Kooijman MML, Hage JJ, Oldenburg HSA, Stouthard JM, Woerdeman LAE. Surgical Complications of Skin-Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction in Women Concurrently Treated With Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer. Ann Plast Surg 2021; 86:146-150. [PMID: 32568758 DOI: 10.1097/sap.0000000000002435] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM To date, studies on adjuvant chemotherapy as a risk factor for the surgical outcome of combined mastectomy and breast reconstruction were hampered by the inclusion of mixed reconstructive cohorts of both delayed and immediate timing and of both autologous and implant-based techniques. Consequently, there is a paucity of data on the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy on surgical complication rates after combined skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate implant-based breast reconstruction. METHODOLOGY We compared the postoperative complications that occurred within 16 weeks after this combined procedure in 131 women (139 breasts) treated with adjuvant chemotherapy with those in a control group of 491 women (517 breasts) not receiving any adjuvant therapy within 16 weeks. RESULTS In line with the clinically indicated selection of women to undergo adjuvant chemotherapy, the interventional group differed significantly from the control group in 7 of the 12 patient- and procedure-related characteristics. The prevalence of minor complications (13.7% and 12.4%, respectively, P = 0.68) and major complications (31.7% and 29.4%, respectively, P = 0.60) did not differ significantly between the interventional group and the controls. The fraction of breasts that needed unscheduled surgery (0.29 and 0.24, respectively, P = 0.20), the fraction of total number of interventions (0.34 and 0.33, respectively, P = 0.24), and the fraction of implants lost (0.72 and 0.67, respectively, P = 0.86) did not differ significantly between both groups. The onset of chemotherapy, furthermore, seemed not to influence the occurrence or severity of complications. CONCLUSIONS Like other women who have to undergo mastectomy, women who need to undergo adjuvant chemotherapy can potentially benefit from combined skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate implant-based breast reconstruction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - J Joris Hage
- From the Departments of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
| | | | - Jacqueline M Stouthard
- Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Chung SY, Chang JS, Shin KH, Kim JH, Park W, Kim H, Kim K, Lee IJ, Yoon WS, Cha J, Lee KC, Kim JH, Choi JH, Ahn SJ, Ha B, Lee SY, Lee DS, Lee J, Shin SO, Lee SW, Choi J, Kim MY, Kim YJ, Im JH, Suh CO, Kim YB. Impact of radiation dose on complications among women with breast cancer who underwent breast reconstruction and post-mastectomy radiotherapy: A multi-institutional validation study. Breast 2021; 56:7-13. [PMID: 33517043 PMCID: PMC7848800 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2021.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2020] [Revised: 01/11/2021] [Accepted: 01/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Emerging data suggest that higher radiation doses in post-mastectomy radiotherapy may be associated with an increased risk of reconstruction complications. This study aimed to validate previous findings regarding the impact of radiation dose on complications among women with breast cancer using a multi-center dataset. Methods Fifteen institutions participated, and women with breast cancer who received radiotherapy after either autologous or prosthetic breast reconstruction were included. The primary endpoint was major post-radiation therapy complications requiring re-operation for explantation, flap failure, or bleeding control. Results In total, 314 patients were included. Radiotherapy was performed using both conventional fractionation and hypofractionation in various schedules. The range of the radiation therapy dose in Equivalent Dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2; α/β = 3.5) varied from 43.4 to 71.0 Gy (median dose: 48.6 Gy). Boost radiation therapy was administered to 49 patients. Major post-radiation therapy complications were observed in 24 (7.6%) patients. In multivariate analysis, an increasing EQD2 per Gy (odds ratio [OR]: 1.58, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.26–1.98; p < 0.001), current smoking status (OR: 25.48, 95% CI: 1.56–415.65; p = 0.023), and prosthetic breast reconstruction (OR: 9.28, 95% CI: 1.84–46.70; p = 0.007) were independently associated with an increased risk of major complications. Conclusion A dose-response relationship between radiation dose and the risk of complications was validated in this multi-center dataset. In this context, we hypothesize that the use of hypofractionated radiotherapy (40 Gy in 15 fractions) may improve breast reconstruction outcomes. Our multi-center prospective observational study (NCT03523078) is underway to further validate this hypothesis. Radiation dose is associated with the risk of breast reconstruction complications. We conducted a retrospective multi-center observational study of 314 women in Korea. Complication-related risk factors were identified using multivariate analysis. Use of hypofractionated radiation therapy may improve breast reconstruction outcomes. A prospective multi-center study is under way to further validate our findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seung Yeun Chung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Department of Radiation Oncology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea
| | - Jee Suk Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Kyung Hwan Shin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| | - Jin Ho Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Won Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Haeyoung Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Kyubo Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ik Jae Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Won Sup Yoon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Korea University Medical College, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jihye Cha
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Republic of Korea
| | - Kyu-Chan Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Jin Hee Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Jin Hwa Choi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sung-Ja Ahn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Chonnam National University Medical School, Hwasun, Republic of Korea
| | - Boram Ha
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hallym University Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hwasung, Republic of Korea
| | - Sun Young Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, Republic of Korea
| | - Dong Soo Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Uijeongbu, Republic of Korea
| | - Jeongshim Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inha University Hospital, Inha University of Medicine, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Sei One Shin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Andong Medical Group Andong Hospital, Andong, Republic of Korea
| | - Sea-Won Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Eunpyeong St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jinhyun Choi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jeju National University Hospital, Jeju, Republic of Korea
| | - Mi Young Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Yeon Joo Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jung Ho Im
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Seongnam, Republic of Korea
| | - Chang-Ok Suh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Seongnam, Republic of Korea
| | - Yong Bae Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Rattay T, Seibold P, Aguado-Barrera ME, Altabas M, Azria D, Barnett GC, Bultijnck R, Chang-Claude J, Choudhury A, Coles CE, Dunning AM, Elliott RM, Farcy Jacquet MP, Gutiérrez-Enríquez S, Johnson K, Müller A, Post G, Rancati T, Reyes V, Rosenstein BS, De Ruysscher D, de Santis MC, Sperk E, Stobart H, Symonds RP, Taboada-Valladares B, Vega A, Veldeman L, Webb AJ, West CM, Valdagni R, Talbot CJ. External Validation of a Predictive Model for Acute Skin Radiation Toxicity in the REQUITE Breast Cohort. Front Oncol 2020; 10:575909. [PMID: 33216838 PMCID: PMC7664984 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.575909] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2020] [Accepted: 09/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Acute skin toxicity is a common and usually transient side-effect of breast radiotherapy although, if sufficiently severe, it can affect breast cosmesis, aftercare costs and the patient's quality-of-life. The aim of this study was to develop predictive models for acute skin toxicity using published risk factors and externally validate the models in patients recruited into the prospective multi-center REQUITE (validating pREdictive models and biomarkers of radiotherapy toxicity to reduce side-effects and improve QUalITy of lifE in cancer survivors) study. Methods: Patient and treatment-related risk factors significantly associated with acute breast radiation toxicity on multivariate analysis were identified in the literature. These predictors were used to develop risk models for acute erythema and acute desquamation (skin loss) in three Radiogenomics Consortium cohorts of patients treated by breast-conserving surgery and whole breast external beam radiotherapy (n = 2,031). The models were externally validated in the REQUITE breast cancer cohort (n = 2,057). Results: The final risk model for acute erythema included BMI, breast size, hypo-fractionation, boost, tamoxifen use and smoking status. This model was validated in REQUITE with moderate discrimination (AUC 0.65), calibration and agreement between predicted and observed toxicity (Brier score 0.17). The risk model for acute desquamation, excluding the predictor tamoxifen use, failed to validate in the REQUITE cohort. Conclusions: While most published prediction research in the field has focused on model development, this study reports successful external validation of a predictive model using clinical risk factors for acute erythema following radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery. This model retained discriminatory power but will benefit from further re-calibration. A similar model to predict acute desquamation failed to validate in the REQUITE cohort. Future improvements and more accurate predictions are expected through the addition of genetic markers and application of other modeling and machine learning techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tim Rattay
- Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom
| | - Petra Seibold
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Miguel E Aguado-Barrera
- Fundación Pública Galega Medicina Xenómica, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.,Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Manuel Altabas
- Radiation Oncology Department, Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain
| | - David Azria
- Fédération Universitaire d'Oncologie Radiothérapie d'Occitanie Méditérranée, Département d'Oncologie Radiothérapie, ICM Montpellier, INSERM U1194 IRCM, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Gillian C Barnett
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Renée Bultijnck
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Jenny Chang-Claude
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,University Cancer Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Ananya Choudhury
- Translational Radiobiology Group, Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Charlotte E Coles
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Alison M Dunning
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, Strangeways Research Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Rebecca M Elliott
- Translational Radiobiology Group, Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Marie-Pierre Farcy Jacquet
- Fédération Universitaire d'Oncologie Radiothérapie d'Occitanie Méditérranée, Département d'Oncologie Radiothérapie, CHU Carémeau, Nîmes, France
| | - Sara Gutiérrez-Enríquez
- Hereditary Cancer Genetics Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Vall d'Hebron Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Kerstie Johnson
- Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom
| | - Anusha Müller
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Giselle Post
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Tiziana Rancati
- Prostate Cancer Program, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Victoria Reyes
- Radiation Oncology Department, Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Barry S Rosenstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Dirk De Ruysscher
- MAASTRO Clinic, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven/KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Maria C de Santis
- Department of Radiation Oncology 1, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Elena Sperk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Hilary Stobart
- Independent Cancer Patients' Voice, London, United Kingdom
| | - R Paul Symonds
- Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom
| | - Begoña Taboada-Valladares
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago, Servizo Galego de Saúde (SERGAS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Ana Vega
- Fundación Pública Galega Medicina Xenómica, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.,Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Liv Veldeman
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Adam J Webb
- Department of Genetics and Genome Biology, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom
| | - Catharine M West
- Translational Radiobiology Group, Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Riccardo Valdagni
- Hereditary Cancer Genetics Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Vall d'Hebron Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain.,Department of Radiation Oncology 1, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.,Department of Hematology and Hemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Christopher J Talbot
- Department of Genetics and Genome Biology, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Papas Y, Bou-Merhi J, Odobescu A, Retchkiman M, Danino MA. Partial DIEP flap loss in a patient with history of abdominal liposuction. ANN CHIR PLAST ESTH 2020; 66:257-260. [PMID: 32948374 DOI: 10.1016/j.anplas.2020.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2020] [Revised: 08/23/2020] [Accepted: 08/30/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Classically, history of prior abdominal liposuction has been considered a relative contraindication for breast reconstruction using deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap. The rationale for this is based on the fact that liposuction can possibly damage perforating vessels, which could compromise flap survival. However, multiple recently published reports have shown that imaging using CT angiography or colour Duplex ultrasonography could be used to accurately assess the adequacy of the perforating vessels before DIEP flap harvest. This contraindication is currently being reconsidered in the scientific literature. We present a case of partial DIEP flap loss in a patient with history of abdominal liposuction that happened despite preoperative identification of adequate perforators using CT angiography and intraoperative clear evidence of patent anastomoses. This occurrence reopens in our view the question of whether DIEP flaps can be safely performed on patients with a history of abdominal liposuction, even in the presence of adequate perforators on regular CT angiography or Doppler ultrasonography. While abdominal liposuction may not injure perforating vessels, its detrimental effect on linking micro-vessels within the flap cannot be fully evaluated using CT Angiography. Therefore, the use of another imaging modality, such as the indocyanine green laser angiography, to assess perfusion before DIEP flap harvesting is performed and could be considered in patients with history of abdominal liposuction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y Papas
- Centre hospitalier universitaire de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - J Bou-Merhi
- Centre hospitalier universitaire de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - A Odobescu
- Centre hospitalier universitaire de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - M Retchkiman
- Centre hospitalier universitaire de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - M A Danino
- Centre hospitalier universitaire de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|