Dormancy in solid tumors: implications for prostate cancer

Abscisic acid signaling through LANCL2 and PPARγ induces activation of p38MAPK resulting in dormancy of prostate cancer metastatic cells

Prostate cancer (PCa) is one the most common malignancies in men. The high incidence of bone metastasis years after primary therapy suggests that disseminated tumor cells must become dormant, but maintain their ability to proliferate in the bone marrow. Abscisic acid (ABA) is a stress response molecule best known for its regulation of seed germination, stomal opening, root shoot growth and other stress responses in plants. ABA is also synthesized by mammalian cells and has been linked to human disease. The aim of the present study was to examine the role of ABA in regulating tumor dormancy via signaling through lanthionine synthetase C‑like protein 2 (LANCL2) and peroxisome proliferator activated receptor γ (PPARγ) receptors. ABA signaling in human PCa cell lines was studied using targeted gene knockdown (KD), western blotting, quantitative PCR, cell proliferation, migration, invasion and soft agar assays, as well as co‑culture assays with bone marrow stromal cells. The data demonstrated that ABA signaling increased the expression of p21, p27 and p16, while inhibiting viability, migration, invasion and colony size in a reversable manner without toxicity. ABA also induced p38MAPK activation and NR2F1 signaling. Targeted gene KD of LANCL2 and PPARγ abrogated the cellular responses to ABA. Taken together, these data demonstrate that ABA may induce dormancy in PCa cell lines through LANCL2 and PPARγ signaling, and suggest novel targets to manage metastatic PCa growth.

How circulating tumor cluster biology contributes to the metastatic cascade: from invasion to dissemination and dormancy

Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are known to be prognostic for metastatic relapse and are detected in patients as solitary cells or cell clusters. Circulating tumor cell clusters (CTC clusters) have been observed clinically for decades and are of significantly higher metastatic potential compared to solitary CTCs. Recent studies suggest distinct differences in CTC cluster biology regarding invasion and survival in circulation. However, differences regarding dissemination, dormancy, and reawakening require more investigations compared to solitary CTCs. Here, we review the current state of CTC cluster research and consider their clinical significance. In addition, we discuss the concept of collective invasion by CTC clusters and molecular evidence as to how cluster survival in circulation compares to that of solitary CTCs. Molecular differences between solitary and clustered CTCs during dormancy and reawakening programs will also be discussed. We also highlight future directions to advance our current understanding of CTC cluster biology.

Tumor removal limits prostate cancer cell dissemination in bone and osteoblasts induce cancer cell dormancy through focal adhesion kinase

BACKGROUND

Disseminated tumor cells (DTCs) can enter a dormant state and cause no symptoms in cancer patients. On the other hand, the dormant DTCs can reactivate and cause metastases progression and lethal relapses. In prostate cancer (PCa), relapse can happen after curative treatments such as primary tumor removal. The impact of surgical removal on PCa dissemination and dormancy remains elusive. Furthermore, as dormant DTCs are asymptomatic, dormancy-induction can be an operational cure for preventing metastases and relapse of PCa patients.

METHODS

We used a PCa subcutaneous xenograft model and species-specific PCR to survey the DTCs in various organs at different time points of tumor growth and in response to tumor removal. We developed in vitro 2D and 3D co-culture models to recapitulate the dormant DTCs in the bone microenvironment. Proliferation assays, fluorescent cell cycle reporter, qRT-PCR, and Western Blot were used to characterize the dormancy phenotype. We performed RNA sequencing to determine the dormancy signature of PCa. A drug repurposing algorithm was applied to predict dormancy-inducing drugs and a top candidate was validated for the efficacy and the mechanism of dormancy induction.

RESULTS

We found DTCs in almost all mouse organs examined, including bones, at week 2 post-tumor cell injections. Surgical removal of the primary tumor reduced the overall DTC abundance, but the DTCs were enriched only in the bones. We found that osteoblasts, but not other cells of the bones, induced PCa cell dormancy. RNA-Seq revealed the suppression of mitochondrial-related biological processes in osteoblast-induced dormant PCa cells. Importantly, the mitochondrial-related biological processes were found up-regulated in both circulating tumor cells and bone metastases from PCa patients' data. We predicted and validated the dormancy-mimicking effect of PF-562,271 (PF-271), an inhibitor of focal adhesion kinase (FAK) in vitro. Decreased FAK phosphorylation and increased nuclear translocation were found in both co-cultured and PF-271-treated C4-2B cells, suggesting that FAK plays a key role in osteoblast-induced PCa dormancy.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study provides the first insights into how primary tumor removal enriches PCa cell dissemination in the bones, defines a unique osteoblast-induced PCa dormancy signature, and identifies FAK as a PCa cell dormancy gatekeeper.

Potential of Personalized Dendritic Cell-Based Immunohybridoma Vaccines to Treat Prostate Cancer

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most commonly diagnosed cancer and the second most common cause of death due to cancer. About 30% of patients with PCa who have been castrated develop a castration-resistant form of the disease (CRPC), which is incurable. In the last decade, new treatments that control the disease have emerged, slowing progression and spread and prolonging survival while maintaining the quality of life. These include immunotherapies; however, we do not yet know the optimal combination and sequence of these therapies with the standard ones. All therapies are not always suitable for every patient due to co-morbidities or adverse effects of therapies or both, so there is an urgent need for further work on new therapeutic options. Advances in cancer immunotherapy with an immune checkpoint inhibition mechanism (e.g., ipilimumab, an anti-CTLA-4 inhibitor) have not shown a survival benefit in patients with CRPC. Other immunological approaches have also not given clear results, which has indirectly prevented breakthrough for this type of therapeutic strategy into clinical use. Currently, the only approved form of immunotherapy for patients with CRPC is a cell-based medicine, but it is only available to patients in some parts of the world. Based on what was gained from recently completed clinical research on immunotherapy with dendritic cell-based immunohybridomas, the aHyC dendritic cell vaccine for patients with CRPC, we highlight the current status and possible alternatives that should be considered in the future.

Prediction of Biochemical Recurrence Based on Molecular Detection of Lymph Node Metastasis After Radical Prostatectomy

Background

Molecular detection of lymph node (LN) micrometastases by analyzing mRNA expression of epithelial markers in prostate cancer (PC) patients provides higher sensitivity than histopathological examination.

Objective

To investigate which type of marker to use and whether molecular detection of micrometastases in LNs was predictive of biochemical recurrence.

Design, setting, and participants

LN samples from PC patients undergoing radical prostatectomy with extended LN dissection between 2009 and 2011 were examined for the presence of micrometastases by both routine histopathology and molecular analyses.

Outcome measurements and statistical analysis

The mRNA expression of a panel of markers of prostate epithelial cells, prostate stem cell–like cells, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, and stromal activation, was performed by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. The expression levels of these markers in LN metastases from three PC patients were compared with the expression levels in LN from five control patients without PC in order to identify the panel of markers best suited for the molecular detection of LN metastases. The predictive value of the molecular detection of micrometastases for biochemical recurrence was assessed after a follow-up of 10 yr.

Results and limitations

Prostate epithelial markers are better suited for the detection of occult LN metastases than molecular markers of stemness, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, or reactive stroma. An analysis of 1023 LNs from 60 PC patients for the expression of prostate epithelial cell markers has revealed different expression levels and patterns between patients and between LNs of the same patient. The positive predictive value of molecular detection of occult LN metastasis for biochemical recurrence is 66.7% and the negative predictive value is 62.5%. Limitations are sample size and the hypothesis-driven selection of markers.

Conclusions

Molecular detection of epithelial cell markers increases the number of positive LNs and predicts tumor recurrence already at surgery.

Patient summary

We show that a panel of epithelial prostate markers rather than single genes is preferred for the molecular detection of lymph node micrometastases not visible at histopathological examination.

Cancer cell foraging to explain bone-specific metastatic progression

Metastatic cancer is lethal and patients who suffer bone metastases fare especially poorly. Bone-specific metastatic progression in prostate and breast cancers is a highly observed example of organ-specific metastasis, or organotropism. Though research has delineated the sequential steps of the metastatic cascade, the determinants of bone-specific metastasis have remained elusive for decades. Applying fundamental ecological principles to cancer biology models of metastasis provides novel insights into metastatic organotropism. We use critical concepts from foraging theory and movement ecology to propose that observed bone-specific metastasis is the result of habitat selection by foraging cancer cells. Furthermore, we posit that cancer cells can only perform habitat selection if and when they employ a reversible motile foraging strategy. Only a very small percentage of cells in a primary tumor harbor this ability. Therefore, our habitat selection model emphasizes the importance of identifying the rare subset of cancer cells that might exhibit habitat selection, ergo achieve bone-specific metastatic colonization.

Bone Marrow-Derived Cells in Endometrial Cancer Pathogenesis: Insights from Breast Cancer

Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecological cancer, representing 3.5% of all new cancer cases in the United States. Abnormal stem cell-like cells, referred to as cancer stem cells (CSCs), reside in the endometrium and possess the capacity to self-renew and differentiate into cancer progenitors, leading to tumor progression. Herein we review the role of the endometrial microenvironment and sex hormone signaling in sustaining EC progenitors and potentially promoting dormancy, a cellular state characterized by cell cycle quiescence and resistance to conventional treatments. We offer perspective on mechanisms by which bone marrow-derived cells (BMDCs) within the endometrial microenvironment could promote endometrial CSC (eCSC) survival and/or dormancy. Our perspective relies on the well-established example of another sex hormone-driven cancer, breast cancer, in which the BM microenvironment plays a crucial role in acquisition of CSC phenotype and dormancy. Our previous studies demonstrate that BMDCs migrate to the endometrium and express sex hormone (estrogen and progesterone) receptors. Whether the BM is a source of eCSCs is unknown; alternatively, crosstalk between BMDCs and CSCs within the endometrial microenvironment could be an additional mechanism supporting eCSCs and tumorigenesis. Elucidating these mechanisms will provide avenues to develop novel therapeutic interventions for EC.

The vulnerable primed cancer stem cells in disguise: demystifying the role of Maspin

Epithelial-specific Maspin is widely known as a tumor suppressor. However, while the level of maspin expression is inversely correlated with tumor grade and stage, emerging clinical evidence shows a correlation between seemingly better differentiated tumor cells that express Maspin in both the nucleus and the cytoplasm, (n + c)Maspin, with a poor prognosis of many types of cancer. Biological studies demonstrate that Maspin plays an essential role in stem cell differentiation. In light of the recently established characterization of primed stem cells (P-SCs) in development, we propose, for the first time, that cancer stem cells (CSCs) also need to undergo priming (P-CSCs) before their transition to various progeny phenotypes. We envisage major differences in the steady state kinetics between P-SCs and P-CSCs. We further propose that P-CSCs of carcinoma are both marked and regulated by (n + c)Maspin. The concept of P-CSCs helps explain the apparent dichotomous relationships of (n + c)Maspin expression with cancer diagnosis and prognosis, and is supported by the evidence from mechanistic studies. We believe that the potential utility of (n + c)Maspin as a molecular marker of P-CSCs may significantly accelerate the advancement in our understanding of the genesis of tumor phenotypic plasticity in response to changes of tumor microenvironments (TME) or drug treatments. The vulnerabilities of the cellular state of (n + c)Maspin-expressing P-CSCs are also discussed as the rationale for future development of P-CSC-targeted chemotherapeutic and immunotherapeutic strategies.

Prostate cancer dormancy and recurrence

Prostate cancer can progress rapidly after diagnosis, but can also become undetectable after curative intent radiation or surgery, only to recur years or decades later. This capacity to lie dormant and recur long after a patient was thought to be cured, is relatively unique to prostate cancer, with estrogen receptor positive breast cancer being the other common and well-studied example. Most investigators agree that the bone marrow is an important site for dormant tumor cells, given the frequency of bone metastases and that multiple studies have reported disseminated tumor cells in patients with localized disease. However, while more difficult to study, lymph nodes and the prostate bed are likely to be important reservoirs as well. Dormant tumor cells may be truly quiescent and in the G0 phase of the cell cycle, which is commonly called cellular dormancy. However, tumor growth may also be held in check through a balance of proliferation and cell death (tumor mass dormancy). For induction of cellular dormancy, prostate cancer cells respond to signals from their microenvironment, including TGF-β2, BMP-7, GAS6, and Wnt-5a, which result in signals transduced in part through p38 MAPK and pluripotency associated transcription factors including SOX2 and NANOG, which likely affect the epi-genome through histone modification. Clinical use of adjuvant radiation or androgen deprivation has been modestly successful to prevent recurrence. With the rapid pace of discovery in this field, systemic adjuvant therapy is likely to continue to improve in the future.

Tumor dormancy as an alternative step in the development of chemoresistance and metastasis - clinical implications

BACKGROUND

The ability of a tumor to become dormant in response to suboptimal conditions has recently been recognized as a key step in tumor progression. Tumor dormancy has been found to be implicated in several tumor types as the culprit of therapy resistance and metastasis development, the deadliest features of a cancer. Several lines of evidence indicate that the development of these traits may rely on the de-differentiation of committed tumor cells that regain stem-like properties during a dormant state. Presently, dormancy is classified into cell- and population-level, according to the preponderance of cellular mechanisms that keep tumor cells quiescent or to a balance between overall cell division and death, respectively. Cellular dormancy is characterized by autophagy, stress-tolerance signaling, microenvironmental cues and, of prime relevance, epigenetic modifications. It has been found that the epigenome alters during cellular quiescence, thus representing the driving force for short-term cancer progression. Population-level dormancy is characterized by processes that counteract proliferation, such as inappropriate blood supply and intense immune responses. The latter two mechanisms are not mutually exclusive and may affect tumor masses both simultaneously and subsequently.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, tumor dormancy may represent an additional step in the acquisition of cancer characteristics, and its comprehension may clarify both theoretical and practical aspects of cancer development. Clinically, only a deep understanding of dormancy may explain the course of tumor development in different patients, thus representing a process that may be targeted to prevent and/or treat advanced-stage cancers. That is especially the case for breast cancer, against which the mTOR inhibitor everolimus displays potent antitumor activity in patients with metastatic disease by impeding autophagy and tumor dormancy onset. Here we will also discuss other targeted therapies directed towards tumor dormancy onset, e.g. specific inhibitors of SFK and MEK, or aimed at keeping tumor cells dormant, e.g. prosaposin derivatives, that may shortly enter clinical assessment in breast, and possibly other cancer types.

Parallel-Reaction-Monitoring-Based Proteome-Wide Profiling of Differential Kinase Protein Expression during Prostate Cancer Metastasis in Vitro

Prostate cancer is the most common type of cancer in men, and kinases are heavily pursued as drug targets for anticancer therapy. In this study, we applied our recently reported parallel-reaction-monitoring (PRM)-based targeted proteomic method to examine the reprogramming of the human kinome associated with bone metastasis of prostate cancer in vitro. The method displayed superior sensitivity over the shotgun-proteomic approach, and it facilitated the quantification of the relative expression of 276 kinase proteins in a pair of bone metastatic prostate cancer cells. Among the differentially expressed kinases, mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase kinase 4 (MAP4K4) stimulates the migration and invasion of cultured prostate cancer cells, partially by modulating the activity of secreted matrix metalloproteinases 9 (MMP-9). We also found that the upregulation of MAP4K4 in metastatic prostate cancer cells is driven by the MYC proto-oncogene. Cumulatively, we identify MAP4K4 as a potential promoter for prostate cancer metastasis in vitro.

Subtypes of minimal residual disease, association with Gleason score, risk and time to biochemical failure in pT2 prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy

INTRODUCTION

The Gleason score is a strong prognostic factor for treatment failure in pathologically organ-confined prostate cancer (pT2) treated by radical prostatectomy (RP). However, within each Gleason score, there is clinical heterogeneity with respect to treatment outcome, even in patients with the same pathological stage and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) at diagnosis. This may be due to minimal residual disease (MRD) remaining after surgery. We hypothesise that the sub-type of MRD determines the risk of and timing of treatment failure, is a biological classification, and may explain in part clinical heterogeneity. We present a study of pT2 patients treated with RP, the subtypes of MRD for each Gleason score and clinical outcomes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with Gleason ≤6 (G6) or Gleason 7 (G7) pT2 cancer participated in the study. One month after surgery, blood was taken for circulating prostate cell (CPCs); mononuclear cells were obtained by differential gel centrifugation and identified using immunocytochemistry with anti-PSA. The detection of one CPC/sample was defined as a positive test. Touch-preparations from bone-marrow biopsies were used to detect micro-metastasis using immunocytochemistry with anti-PSA. Biochemical failure was defined as a PSA >0.2 ng/mL. Patients were classified as: Group A MRD negative (CPC and micro-metastasis negative), Group B (only micro-metastasis positive) and Group C (CPC positive). Biochemical failure-free survival (BFFS) using Kaplan-Meier and time to failure using Restricted Mean Survival Time (RMST) after 10 years of follow-up were calculated for each group based on the Gleason score.

RESULTS

Of a cohort of 253 men, four were excluded for having Gleason 8 or 9 prostate cancer, leaving a study group of 249 men of whom 52 had G7 prostate cancer. G7 patients had a higher frequency of MRD (69% versus 36%) and worse prognosis. G6 and G7 patients negative for MRD had similar BBFS rates, 98% at 10 years, time to failure 9.9 years. Group C, G6 patients had a higher BFFS and longer time to failure compared to G7 patients (19% versus 5% and 7 versus 3 years). Group B showed similar results up to 5 years, thereafter G6 had a lower BFFS 63% versus 90%.

CONCLUSIONS

G7 and G6 pT2 patients have different patterns of MRD and relapse. Risk stratification using MRD sub-types may help to define the need for adjuvant therapy. This needs confirmation with large randomised long-term trials.

Prostate-specific markers to identify rare prostate cancer cells in liquid biopsies

Despite improvements in early detection and advances in treatment, patients with prostate cancer continue to die from their disease. Minimal residual disease after primary definitive treatment can lead to relapse and distant metastases, and increasing evidence suggests that circulating tumour cells (CTCs) and bone marrow-derived disseminated tumour cells (BM-DTCs) can offer clinically relevant biological insights into prostate cancer dissemination and metastasis. Using epithelial markers to accurately detect CTCs and BM-DTCs is associated with difficulties, and prostate-specific markers are needed for the detection of these cells using rare cell assays. Putative prostate-specific markers have been identified, and an optimized strategy for staining rare cancer cells from liquid biopsies using these markers is required. The ideal prostate-specific marker will be expressed on every CTC or BM-DTC throughout disease progression (giving high sensitivity) and will not be expressed on non-prostate-cancer cells in the sample (giving high specificity). Some markers might not be specific enough to the prostate to be used as individual markers of prostate cancer cells, whereas others could be truly prostate-specific and would make ideal markers for use in rare cell assays. The goal of future studies is to use sensitive and specific prostate markers to consistently and reliably identify rare cancer cells.

Dormancy and cancer stem cells: An enigma for cancer therapeutic targeting

Dormancy occurs when cells remain viable but stop proliferating. When most of a cancer population undergoes this phenomenon, the result is called tumor dormancy, and when a single cancer cell undergoes this process, it is termed quiescence. Cancer stem cells (CSCs) share several overlapping characteristics and signaling pathways with dormant cancer cells, including therapy resistance, and an ability to metastasize and evade the immune system. Cancer cells can be broadly grouped into dormancy-competent CSCs (DCCs), cancer-repopulating cells (CRCs), dormancy-incompetent CSCs and disseminated tumor cells (DTCs). The settings in which cancer cells exploit the dormancy phase to survive and adapt are: (i) primary cancer dormancy; (ii) metastatic dormancy; (iii) therapy-induced dormancy; and (iv) immunologic dormancy. Dormancy, therapy resistance and plasticity of CSCs are fundamentally interconnected processes mediated through mechanisms involving reversible genetic alterations. Niches including metastatic, bone marrow, and perivascular are known to harbor dormant cancer cells. Mechanisms of dormancy induction are complex and multi-factorial and can involve angiogenic switching, addictive oncogene inhibition, immunoediting, anoikis, therapy, autophagy, senescence, epigenetic, and biophysical regulation. Therapy can have opposing effects on cancer cells with respect to dormancy; some therapies can induce dormancy, while others can reactivate dormant cells. There is a lack of consensus relative to the value of therapy-induced dormancy, i.e., some researchers view dormancy induction as a beneficial strategy as it can lead to metastasis inhibition, while others argue that reactivating dormant cancer cells and then eliminating them through therapy are a better approach. More focused investigations of intrinsic cell kinetics and environmental dynamics that promote and maintain cancer cells in a dormant state, and the long-term consequences of dormancy are critical for improving current therapeutic treatment outcomes.

Neural Transcription Factors in Disease Progression

Progression to the malignant state is fundamentally dependent on transcriptional regulation in cancer cells. Optimum abundance of cell cycle proteins, angiogenesis factors, immune evasion markers, etc. is needed for proliferation, metastasis or resistance to treatment. Therefore, dysregulation of transcription factors can compromise the normal prostate transcriptional network and contribute to malignant disease progression.The androgen receptor (AR) is considered to be a key transcription factor in prostate cancer (PCa) development and progression. Consequently, androgen pathway inhibitors (APIs) are currently the mainstay in PCa treatment, especially in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). However, emerging evidence suggests that with increased administration of potent APIs, prostate cancer can progress to a highly aggressive disease that morphologically resembles small cell carcinoma, which is referred to as neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC), treatment-induced or treatment-emergent small cell prostate cancer. This chapter will review how neuronal transcription factors play a part in inducing a plastic stage in prostate cancer cells that eventually progresses to a more aggressive state such as NEPC.

Development and Characterization of a Spontaneously Metastatic Patient-Derived Xenograft Model of Human Prostate Cancer

Here we describe the establishment and characterization of an AR+, PSMA+, ERG+, PTEN^-/-, CHD1^+/- patient-derived xenograft (PDX) model termed 'C5', which has been developed from a 60 years old patient suffering from castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). The patient underwent radical prostatectomy, showed early tumor marker PSA recurrence and, one year after surgery, abiraterone resistance. Subcutaneous C5 tumors can be serially transplanted between mice and grow within ~90 days to 1.5-2 cm³ tumors in SCID Balb/c mice (take rate 100%), NOD-scid IL2Rg^null (NSG) mice (100%) and C57BL/6 pfp^-/-/rag2^-/- mice (66%). In contrast, no tumor growth is observed in female mice. C5 tumors can be cryopreserved and show the same growth characteristics in vivo afterwards. C5 tumor cells do not grow stably in vitro, neither under two- nor three-dimensional cell culture conditions. Upon serial transplantation, some C5 tumors spontaneously disseminated to distant sites with an observable trend towards higher metastatic cell loads in scid compared to NSG mice. Lung metastases could be verified by histology by means of anti-PSMA immunohistochemistry, exclusively demonstrating single disseminated tumor cells (DTCs) and micro-metastases. Upon surgical resection of the primary tumors, such pulmonary foci rarely grew out to multi-cellular metastatic colonies despite doubled overall survival span. In the brain and bone marrow, the metastatic cell load present at surgery even disappeared during the post-surgical period. We provide shallow whole genome sequencing and whole exome sequencing data of C5 tumors demonstrating the copy number aberration/ mutation status of this PCa model and proving genomic stability over several passages. Moreover, we analyzed genomic and transcriptomic alterations during metastatic progression achieved by serial transplantation. This study describes a novel PCa PDX model that enables future research on several aspects of metastatic PCa, particularly for the AR+ , ERG+ , PTEN^-/- PCa subtype.

Interleukin-23 receptor signaling mediates cancer dormancy and radioresistance in human esophageal squamous carcinoma cells via the Wnt/Notch pathway

Abstract

In the tumor microenvironment, inflammatory cells and molecules influence almost every process; among them, interleukin-23 (IL-23) is a pro-inflammatory molecule that exhibits pro- or anti-tumor properties, but both activities remain poorly understood. In this study, we investigated the effect of extracellular IL-23 in IL-23 receptor-positive (IL-23R⁺) esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and explored the mechanisms underlying this effect. We analyzed ESCC tumor tissues by immunohistochemical and immunofluorescence staining and found that IL-23, which was highly expressed, co-localized with Oct-4A in IL-23R⁺ ESCC cells. In addition, IL-23 treatment significantly increased the accumulation of CD133⁺ cells and activated the Wnt and Notch signaling pathways in CD133⁻IL-23R⁺ ESCC cell lines. Consistently, CD133⁻IL-23R⁺ cells pretreated with IL-23 showed stronger anti-apoptosis activity when exposed to radiation and higher survival than untreated groups. Moreover, the inhibition of Wnt/Notch signaling by a small-molecule inhibitor or siRNA abolished the effect of IL-23-induced dormancy and consequent radioresistance. Taken together, these results suggested that IL-23 facilitates radioresistance in ESCC by activating Wnt/Notch-mediated G0/1 phase arrest, and attenuating these detrimental changes by blocking the formation of dormancy may prove to be an effective pretreatment for radiotherapy.

Key messages

IL-23/IL-23R is correlated with the acquisition of stem-like potential in ESCC.

CD133⁻IL-23R⁺ ESCCs acquired dormancy via IL-23.

Radioresistance depends on IL-23-mediated Wnt/Notch pathway activation in vitro and vivo.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00109-018-1724-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Effectiveness of Pelvic Floor Muscle Training Alone and in Combination With Biofeedback, Electrical Stimulation, or Both Compared to Control for Urinary Incontinence in Men Following Prostatectomy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) alone and in combination with biofeedback (BFB), electrical stimulation (ES), or both for urinary incontinence in men following prostatectomy is inconclusive.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to determine whether PFMT works well alone or in combination with BFB, ES, or both in comparison with a control.

DATA SOURCES

The databases Ovid Medline, EMBASE, CENTRAL, Scopus, and Web of Science, and the specialized register of the Citroen Incontinence Review Group were searched from study inception to August 2017. Abstract proceedings from urological meetings, including the European Association of Urology and the American Urological Association, were also searched.

STUDY SELECTION

Randomized controlled trials that compared PFMT alone and PFMT with ES, BFB, or both and no treatment, placebo, or sham were included in the review.

DATA EXTRACTION, SYNTHESIS, AND QUALITY

Two independent reviewers completed data extraction and quality appraisal. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation tool was used for quality appraisal. Meta-analysis was done with software used for preparing and maintaining Cochrane reviews.

LIMITATIONS

Methodological flaws in the included studies limited internal validity.

CONCLUSIONS

PFMT alone, PFMT plus BFB and ES, and PFMT plus ES were more effective than the control for urinary incontinence following prostatectomy. The effect of PFMT plus BFB on postprostatectomy incontinence remains uncertain.

Minimum Residual Disease in Patients Post Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer: Theoretical Considerations, Clinical Implications and Treatment Outcome

Introduction:

Minimal residual disease (MRD) remaining after curative therapy for prostate cancer has the potential for growth and can result in metastasis. Circulating prostate cells (CPCs) and bone marrow micro-metastasis (mM) could represent different types of MRD. We here determined; biochemical failure free survival rates; time to BF after 10 years follow-up; and the presence of CPCs and mM in patients treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer.

Methods and Patients:

One month after RP, blood and bone marrow were sampled for assessment of CPCs and mM. Cases were classified as: group A, CPC negative and mM negative; group B, CPC negative and mM positive; Group C, CPC positive and mM negative; and Group D, CPC positive and mM positive. Subjects were followed with serial determination of PSA levels, recording the time at which BF occurred defined as a serum PSA >0.2ng/ml. After ten years of follow-up Kaplan-Meier survival curves were generated and the restricted mean survival time (RMST) for each group calculated.

Results:

A total of 321 men participated, 140 in group A with survival of 92.7% (86.3 to 96.2), 39 in group B with 55.8% (37.2 to 70.9); 54 in group C with 6.41% (1.19 to 18.21) and 88 in group D with 4.96%(1.64 to 11.13%. The RMST (in years) were: group A, 9.47 (9.24 to 9.69); group B, 9.23 (8.87 to 9.58); group C, 4.62 (4.46 to 4.77); and group D, 3.57 (3.52 and 3.63) (p-value<0.001 between groups: A versus C and D, B versus C and D).

Conclusions:

CPC positive men have more aggressive disease, with increased early failure; men who are only positive for mM are at greater risk of late failure. These two forms of MRD represent different clinical entities with respect to biochemical failure and could be used to guide clinical treatment decisions.

Treatment of Minimal Residual Disease in Breast Cancer: A Longitudinal Case Study

The presence of micrometastatic disease will ultimately determine the breast cancer-specific mortality of patients treated according to current guidelines. Minimal residual disease (i.e., occult tumor, not detected by conventional tests) may exist in two forms: a dormant form of only micrometastasis and a more aggressive “awakened” form where CTCs (circulating tumor cells) are actively disseminating. The hypothesis is that patients with CTCs have a more advanced or aggressive disease (that the cancer has “awoken” and there is active dissemination), whereas those patients with only micrometastasis have “dormant” disease and, although at risk of future relapse, may not do so for many years. This case study shows how determining the presence of both CTCs and bone marrow micrometastasis could be used to monitor disease activity and determine treatment changes before the appearance of metastatic disease.

Presented is the case of a 53-year-old postmenopausal woman who presented with a T2N1M0 invasive ductal breast cancer. She had been treated with partial mastectomy, axillary dissection, local radiotherapy, and adjuvant chemotherapy. As the cancer was estrogen receptor-positive, she was taking tamoxifen. Two years into treatment, she was assessed for minimal residual disease and was found to be positive for CTCs and bone marrow micrometastasis. Her treatment was changed to letrozole and differing bisphosphonates. The minimal residual disease was finally eliminated, and at 16 years post-initial treatment, there was no evidence of relapse.

The detection of minimal residual disease can be used to monitor treatment effect and change therapy in order to maintain the asymptomatic status of the patient and prevent disease progression.

Cellular determinants and microenvironmental regulation of prostate cancer metastasis

Metastasis causes more than 90% of cancer-related deaths and most prostate cancer (PCa) patients also die from metastasis. The 'metastatic cascade' is a complex biological process that encompasses tumor cell dissociation (from the primary tumor), local invasion, intravasation, transport in circulation, extravasation, colonization, and overt growth in end organs. It has become clear that successful metastasis not only involves many tumor cell-intrinsic properties but also depends on productive interactions between cancer cells and the tumor microenvironment. In this Review, we begin with a general summary on cancer metastasis and a specific discussion on PCa metastasis. We then discuss recent advances in our knowledge of the cellular determinants of PCa metastasis and the importance of tumor microenvironment, especially an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, in shaping metastatic propensities. We conclude with a presentation of current and future therapeutic options for patients with PCa metastasis, emphasizing the development of novel, mechanism-based combinatorial strategies for treating metastatic and castration-resistant PCa.

Mangiferin functionalized radioactive gold nanoparticles (MGF-198AuNPs) in prostate tumor therapy: green nanotechnology for production, in vivo tumor retention and evaluation of therapeutic efficacy

We report here production of MGF-¹⁹⁸AuNPs and its application for prostate tumor therapy.

Modeling selective elimination of quiescent cancer cells from bone marrow

Patients with many types of malignancy commonly harbor quiescent disseminated tumor cells in bone marrow. These cells frequently resist chemotherapy and may persist for years before proliferating as recurrent metastases. To test for compounds that eliminate quiescent cancer cells, we established a new 384-well 3D spheroid model in which small numbers of cancer cells reversibly arrest in G1/G0 phase of the cell cycle when cultured with bone marrow stromal cells. Using dual-color bioluminescence imaging to selectively quantify viability of cancer and stromal cells in the same spheroid, we identified single compounds and combination treatments that preferentially eliminated quiescent breast cancer cells but not stromal cells. A treatment combination effective against malignant cells in spheroids also eliminated breast cancer cells from bone marrow in a mouse xenograft model. This research establishes a novel screening platform for therapies that selectively target quiescent tumor cells, facilitating identification of new drugs to prevent recurrent cancer.

SMAD signaling and redox imbalance cooperate to induce prostate cancer cell dormancy

Metastasis involves the dissemination of single or small clumps of cancer cells through blood or lymphatic vessels and their extravasation into distant organs. Despite the strong regulation of metastases development by a cell dormancy phenomenon, the dormant state of cancer cells remains poorly characterized due to the difficulty of in vivo studies. We have recently shown in vitro that clonogenicity of prostate cancer cells is regulated by a dormancy phenomenon that is strongly induced when cells are cultured both at low cell density and in a slightly hypertonic medium. Here, we characterized by RT-qPCR a genetic expression signature of this dormant state which combines the presence of both stemness and differentiation markers. We showed that both TFGβ/BMP signaling and redox imbalance are required for the full induction of this dormancy signature and cell quiescence. Moreover, reconstruction experiments showed that TFGβ/BMP signaling and redox imbalance are sufficient to generate a pattern of genetic expression displaying all characteristic features of the dormancy signature. Finally, we observed that low cell density was sufficient to activate TGFβ/BMP signaling and to generate a slight redox imbalance thus priming cells for dormancy that can be attained with a co-stimulus like hypertonicity, most likely through an increased redox imbalance. The identification of a dual regulation of dormancy provides a framework for the interpretation of previous reports showing a restricted ability of BMP signaling to regulate cancer cell dormancy in vivo and draws attention on the role of oxidative stress in the metastatic process.

Hes1: a key role in stemness, metastasis and multidrug resistance

Hes1 is one mammalian counterpart of the Hairy and Enhancer of split proteins that play a critical role in many physiological processes including cellular differentiation, cell cycle arrest, apoptosis and self-renewal ability. Recent studies have shown that Hes1 functions in the maintenance of cancer stem cells (CSCs), metastasis and antagonizing drug-induced apoptosis. Pathways that are involved in the up-regulation of Hes1 level canonically or non-canonically, such as the Hedgehog, Wnt and hypoxia pathways are frequently aberrant in cancer cells. Here, we summarize the recent data supporting the idea that Hes1 may have an important function in the maintenance of cancer stem cells self-renewal, cancer metastasis, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) process induction, as well as chemotherapy resistance, and conclude with the possible mechanisms by which Hes1 functions have their effect, as well as their crosstalk with other carcinogenic signaling pathways.

Characterization of single disseminated prostate cancer cells reveals tumor cell heterogeneity and identifies dormancy associated pathways

Cancer dormancy refers to the prolonged clinical disease-free time between removal of the primary tumor and recurrence, which is common in prostate cancer (PCa), breast cancer, esophageal cancer, and other cancers. PCa disseminated tumor cells (DTC) are detected in both patients with no evidence of disease (NED) and advanced disease (ADV). However, the molecular and cellular nature of DTC is unknown. We performed a first-in-field study of single DTC transcriptomic analyses in cancer patients to identify a molecular signature associated with cancer dormancy. We profiled eighty-five individual EpCAM⁺/CD45⁻ cells from the bone marrow of PCa patients with NED or ADV. We analyzed 44 DTC with high prostate-epithelial signatures, and eliminated 41 cells with high erythroid signatures and low prostate epithelial signatures. DTC were clustered into 3 groups: NED, ADV_1, and ADV_2, in which the ADV_1 group presented a distinct gene expression pattern associated with the p38 stress activated kinase pathway. Additionally, DTC from the NED group were enriched for a tumor dormancy signature associated with head and neck squamous carcinoma and breast cancer. This study provides the first clinical evidence of the p38 pathway as a potential biomarker for early recurrence and an attractive target for therapeutic intervention.

Cellular Adhesion Promotes Prostate Cancer Cells Escape from Dormancy

Dissemination of prostate cancer (PCa) cells to the bone marrow is an early event in the disease process. In some patients, disseminated tumor cells (DTC) proliferate to form active metastases after a prolonged period of undetectable disease known as tumor dormancy. Identifying mechanisms of PCa dormancy and reactivation remain a challenge partly due to the lack of in vitro models. Here, we characterized in vitro PCa dormancy-reactivation by inducing cells from three patient-derived xenograft (PDX) lines to proliferate through tumor cell contact with each other and with bone marrow stroma. Proliferating PCa cells demonstrated tumor cell-cell contact and integrin clustering by immunofluorescence. Global gene expression analyses on proliferating cells cultured on bone marrow stroma revealed a downregulation of TGFB2 in all of the three proliferating PCa PDX lines when compared to their non-proliferating counterparts. Furthermore, constitutive activation of myosin light chain kinase (MLCK), a downstream effector of integrin-beta1 and TGF-beta2, in non-proliferating cells promoted cell proliferation. This cell proliferation was associated with an upregulation of CDK6 and a downregulation of E2F4. Taken together, our data provide the first clinically relevant in vitro model to support cellular adhesion and downregulation of TGFB2 as a potential mechanism by which PCa cells may escape from dormancy. Targeting the TGF-beta2-associated mechanism could provide novel opportunities to prevent lethal PCa metastasis.

RANK-mediated signaling network and cancer metastasis

Cancer metastasis is highly inefficient and complex. Common features of metastatic cancer cells have been observed using cancer cell lines and genetically reconstituted mouse and human tumor xenograft models. These include cancer cell interaction with the tumor microenvironment and the ability of cancer cells to sense extracellular stimuli and adapt to adverse growth conditions. This review summarizes the coordinated response of cancer cells to soluble growth factors, such as RANKL, by a unique feed forward mechanism employing coordinated upregulation of RANKL and c-Met with downregulation of androgen receptor. The RANK-mediated signal network was found to drive epithelial to mesenchymal transition in prostate cancer cells, promote osteomimicry and the ability of prostate cancer cells to assume stem cell and neuroendocrine phenotypes, and confer the ability of prostate cancer cells to home to bone. Prostate cancer cells with activated RANK-mediated signal network were observed to recruit and even transform the non-tumorigenic prostate cancer cells to participate in bone and soft tissue colonization. The coordinated regulation of cancer cell invasion and metastasis by the feed forward mechanism involving RANKL, c-Met, transcription factors, and VEGF-neuropilin could offer new therapeutic opportunities to target prostate cancer bone and soft tissue metastases.

The epigenetic/noncoding origin of tumor dormancy

Cancer stem cells (CSCs) have been implicated as the seeds of treatment resistance and metastasis, which are the most deadly features of a neoplasm. However, an unequivocal definition of the CSC phenotype is still missing. A common feature of normal and aberrant stem cells is their ability to enter a prolonged dormant state. Cancer dormancy is a key mechanism for treatment resistance and metastasis. Here we propose a unified definition of dormancy-competent CSCs (DCCs) as the neoplastic subpopulation that can plastically alternate periods of dormancy and rapid growth. Irreversible DNA mutations can hardly account for this versatile behavior, and based on emerging evidence we propose that cancer dormancy is a nongenetic disease driven by the flexible nature of the epigenetic/noncoding interactome.

The role of the microenvironment-dormant prostate disseminated tumor cells in the bone marrow

Disseminated tumor cells (DTC) leave the primary tumor and reside in distant sites (e.g. bone) early in prostate cancer. Patients may harbor dormant DTC which develop into clinically overt metastasis years after radical prostatectomy. We will describe recent evidence suggesting high p38/ERK ratio, bone morphogenetic proteins, and tumor growth factor-beta 2 promote dormancy in solid tumors. Furthermore, we will discuss the possible regulation of dormancy by hematopoietic stem cell and vascular niches, and describe novel models recapitulating bone marrow metastatic latency and out- growth, 3D microvascular networks, and 3D biomatrix supportive niches in the studies of tumor cell dormancy.

Very late recurrence (after more than 20 years) of epithelial ovarian carcinoma: case report and literature review

PURPOSE

To present a case of very late (more than 20 years) recurrence of epithelial ovarian carcinoma and to review the pertinent literature. We encountered a 50-year-old patient who, at the age of 22, underwent cytoreductive surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III serous ovarian carcinoma. She recurred after 28 years and underwent secondary surgery and chemotherapy.

METHOD

A PubMed search of the English literature containing the following key words: ovarian cancer, late recurrence, late relapse, late metastasis was performed.

RESULTS

Only five cases (including the present one) with recurrence after more than 20 years are so far on record. Of these, four patients were 33 years old or younger and had advanced stage at diagnosis. Time to recurrence ranged from 21 to 28 years. All patients had serous carcinoma and three had recurrence in lymph nodes.

CONCLUSIONS

Very late recurrence is an extremely rare event and may result from either regrowth of dormant tumor cells or from development of a new cancer. Lifelong follow-up is critically important for ovarian cancer patients.