Beta-Blockers and ACE Inhibitors Are Associated with Improved Survival Secondary to Ventricular Tachyarrhythmia

Characteristics Associated with Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias and Their Prognostic Impact in Heart Failure with Mildly Reduced Ejection Fraction

Background: The occurrence of ventricular tachyarrhythmias represents an established risk factor of mortality in heart failure (HF). However, data concerning their prognostic impact in heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) is limited. Therefore, the present study aims to investigate patient characteristics associated with ventricular tachyarrhythmias and their prognostic impact in patients with HFmrEF. Methods: Consecutive patients hospitalized with HFmrEF (i.e., left ventricular ejection fraction 41-49% and signs and/or symptoms of HF) were retrospectively included at one institution from 2016 to 2022. The prognosis of patients with HFmrEF and different types of ventricular tachyarrhythmias (i.e., non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (nsVT), sustained VT (sVT), and ventricular fibrillation (VF) was investigated for the primary endpoint of long-term all-cause mortality at 30 months. Secondary endpoints included in-hospital all-cause mortality and long-term HF-related rehospitalization at 30 months. Results: From a total of 2184 patients with HFmrEF, 4.4% experienced ventricular tachyarrhythmias (i.e., 2.0% nsVT, 0.7% sVT, and 1.6% VF). The occurrence of nsVT was associated with higher New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, whereas the incidence of sVT/VF was associated with acute myocardial infarction and ischemic heart disease. However, nsVT (25.0%; HR = 0.760; 95% CI 0.419-1.380; p = 0.367) and sVT/VF (28.8%; HR = 0.928; 95% CI 0.556-1.549; p = 0.776) were not associated with a higher risk of long-term all-cause mortality compared to patients with HFmrEF without ventricular tachyarrhythmias (31.5%). In-hospital cardiovascular mortality was more frequently observed in patients with HFmrEF and sVT/VF compared to those with HFmrEF but without sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias (7.7% vs. 1.5%; p = 0.004). Finally, the risk of rehospitalization for worsening HF was not affected by the presence of ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Conclusions: The occurrence of ventricular tachyarrhythmias in patients hospitalized with HFmrEF was low and not associated with long-term prognosis.

Management of patients with an electrical storm or clustered ventricular arrhythmias: a clinical consensus statement of the European Heart Rhythm Association of the ESC-endorsed by the Asia-Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, Heart Rhythm Society, and Latin-American Heart Rhythm Society

Electrical storm (ES) is a state of electrical instability, manifesting as recurrent ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) over a short period of time (three or more episodes of sustained VA within 24 h, separated by at least 5 min, requiring termination by an intervention). The clinical presentation can vary, but ES is usually a cardiac emergency. Electrical storm mainly affects patients with structural or primary electrical heart disease, often with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). Management of ES requires a multi-faceted approach and the involvement of multi-disciplinary teams, but despite advanced treatment and often invasive procedures, it is associated with high morbidity and mortality. With an ageing population, longer survival of heart failure patients, and an increasing number of patients with ICD, the incidence of ES is expected to increase. This European Heart Rhythm Association clinical consensus statement focuses on pathophysiology, clinical presentation, diagnostic evaluation, and acute and long-term management of patients presenting with ES or clustered VA.

Effect of Heart Failure Pharmacotherapies in Patients with Heart Failure with Mildly Reduced Ejection Fraction

OBJECTIVE

The study sought to comprehensively investigate the effect of heart failure (HF) pharmacotherapies in patients with heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF).

BACKGROUND

In the absence of randomized controlled trials, guideline recommendations concerning HF-related therapies in patients with HFmrEF are limited.

METHODS

Consecutive patients hospitalized with HFmrEF were retrospectively included at one institution from 2016 to 2022. The prognostic value of treatment with beta-blockers (BB), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, receptor blockers or receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ACEi/ARB/ARNI), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) and sodium-glucose transport protein 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) was investigated for all-cause mortality at 30 months (median follow-up) and HF-related rehospitalization.

RESULTS

2,109 patients with HFmrEF were included. Treatment with BB (27.0% vs. 35%; HR = 0.737; 95% CI 0.617-0.881; p = 0.001), ACEi/ARB/ARNI (25.9% vs. 37.6%; HR = 0.612; 95% CI 0.517-0.725; p = 0.001) and SGLT2i (11.9% vs. 29.5%; HR = 0.441; 95% CI 0.236-0.824; p = 0.010) was associated with lower risk of 30-months all-cause mortality, which was still demonstrated after multivariable adjustment and propensity score matching. In contrast, MRA treatment was not associated with long-term prognosis. The risk of HF-related rehospitalization was not affected by HF pharmacotherapies. Finally, the lowest risk of long-term all-cause mortality was observed in patients with combined use of BB, ACEi/ARB/ARNI and SGLT2i (HR = 0.456; 95% CI 0.227-0.916; p = 0.027).

CONCLUSION

BB, ACEi/ARB/ARNI and SGLT2i were independently associated with lower risk of all-cause mortality in patients with HFmrEF, specifically when applied as combined "HF triple therapy". Randomized studies are needed to investigate the effect of HF-related pharmacotherapies in patients with HFmrEF.

Anti-Arrhythmic Effects of Heart Failure Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy and Their Role in the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death: From Beta-Blockers to Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors and Beyond

Sudden cardiac death (SCD) accounts for a substantial proportion of mortality in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), frequently triggered by ventricular arrhythmias (VA). This review aims to analyze the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying VA and SCD in HFrEF and evaluate the effectiveness of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) in reducing SCD. Beta-blockers, angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists have shown significant efficacy in reducing SCD risk. While angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers exert beneficial impacts on the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, their direct role in SCD prevention remains less clear. Emerging treatments like sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors show promise but necessitate further research for conclusive evidence. The favorable outcomes of those molecules on VA are notably attributable to sympathetic nervous system modulation, structural remodeling attenuation, and ion channel stabilization. A multidimensional pharmacological approach targeting those pathophysiological mechanisms offers a complete and synergy approach to reducing SCD risk, thereby highlighting the importance of optimizing GDMT for HFrEF. The current landscape of HFrEF pharmacotherapy is evolving, with ongoing research needed to clarify the full extent of the anti-arrhythmic benefits offered by both existing and new treatments.

Digitalis therapy in patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias

Objective. The study sought to assess the prognostic value of treatment with digitalis on long-term prognosis in patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias and atrial fibrillation (AF) and/or heart failure (HF). Background. Data regarding the outcome of digitalis therapy following ventricular tachyarrhythmias is limited. Methods. A large retrospective registry was used including consecutive patients with episodes of ventricular tachycardia (VT) or fibrillation (VF) from 2002 to 2015. Patients treated with digitalis were compared to patients without. The primary prognostic endpoint was all-cause mortality at 3 years, secondary endpoints comprised a composite arrhythmic endpoint (i.e. recurrences of ventricular tachyarrhythmias, appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapies, sudden cardiac death) and cardiac rehospitalization. Kaplan Mayer survival curves, multivariable cox regression, and time trend analyses were applied for statistics. Results. Eight hundred and thirty-one patients were included (20% treated with digitalis and 80% without). At 3 years, digitalis treatment was not associated with all-cause mortality following ventricular tachyarrhythmias (24 vs. 21%, log-rank p = .736; HR = 1.063; 95% CI 0.746-1.515; p = .736). However, digitalis therapy was associated with an increased risk of the composite arrhythmic endpoint (38 vs. 23%; log-rank p = .001; HR = 1.719; 95% CI 1.279-2.311; p = .001) and cardiac rehospitalization (31 vs. 18%; log-rank p = .001; HR = 1.829; 95% CI 1.318-2.538; p = .001), which was still evident within multivariable Cox regression analyses. Finally, digitoxin may be associated with a worse prognosis than digoxin. Conclusion. Digitalis therapy was not associated with mortality in patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias, but with increased risk of the composite arrhythmic endpoint and cardiac rehospitalization at 3 years.

Carvedilol versus Metoprolol in Patients with Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias

The study investigates the prognostic role of treatment with carvedilol as compared to metoprolol in patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias. A large retrospective registry was used including consecutive patients on beta-blocker (BB) treatment with episodes of ventricular tachycardia (VT) or fibrillation (VF) from 2002 to 2015. Patients treated with carvedilol were compared to patients with metoprolol. The primary prognostic outcome was all-cause mortality at three years. Secondary endpoints comprised a composite arrhythmic endpoint (i.e., recurrences of ventricular tachyarrhythmias, appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapies) and cardiac rehospitalization. Kaplan–Meier survival curves, multivariable Cox regression analyses, and propensity score matching were applied for statistics. There were 1098 patients included, 80% treated with metoprolol and 20% with carvedilol. Patients with carvedilol were older, more often presenting with VT (78% vs. 62%; p = 0.001) and with more advanced stages of heart failure. Treatment with carvedilol was associated with comparable all-cause mortality compared to metoprolol (20% vs. 16%, log rank p = 0.234; HR = 1.229; 95% CI 0.874–1.728; p = 0.235). However, secondary endpoints (i.e., composite arrhythmic endpoint: 32% vs. 17%; p = 0.001 and cardiac rehospitalization: 25% vs. 14%; p = 0.001) were more frequently observed in patients with carvedilol, which was still evident after multivariable adjustment. After propensity score matching (n = 194 patients with carvedilol and metoprolol), no further differences regarding the distribution of baseline characteristics were observed. Within the propensity-score-matched cohort, higher rates of the composite arrhythmic endpoint were still observed in patients treated with carvedilol, whereas the risk of cardiac rehospitalization was not affected by the type of beta-blocker treatment. In conclusion, carvedilol and metoprolol are associated with comparable all-cause mortality in patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias, whereas the risk of the composite arrhythmic endpoint was increased in patients with carvedilol therapy.

Prognostic Value of Cardiac Troponin I in Patients with Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias

Besides the diagnostic role in acute myocardial infarction, cardiac troponin I levels (cTNI) may be increased in various other clinical conditions, including heart failure, valvular heart disease and sepsis. However, limited data are available regarding the prognostic role of cTNI in the setting of ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Therefore, the present study sought to assess the prognostic impact of cTNI in patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias (i.e., ventricular tachycardia (VT) and fibrillation (VF)) on admission. A large retrospective registry was used, including all consecutive patients presenting with ventricular tachyarrhythmias from 2002 to 2015. The prognostic impact of elevated cTNI levels was investigated for 30-day all-cause mortality (i.e., primary endpoint) using Kaplan–Meier, receiver operating characteristic (ROC), multivariable Cox regression analyses and propensity score matching. From a total of 1104 patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias and available cTNI levels on admission, 46% were admitted with VT and 54% with VF. At 30 days, high cTNI was associated with the primary endpoint (40% vs. 22%; log rank p = 0.001; HR = 2.004; 95% CI 1.603–2.505; p = 0.001), which was still evident after multivariable adjustment and propensity score matching (30% vs. 18%; log rank p = 0.003; HR = 1.729; 95% CI 1.184–2.525; p = 0.005). Significant discrimination of the primary endpoint was especially evident in VT patients (area under the curve (AUC) 0.734; 95% CI 0.645–0.823; p = 0.001). In contrast, secondary endpoints, including all-cause mortality at 30 months and a composite arrhythmic endpoint, were not affected by cTNI levels. The risk of cardiac rehospitalization was lower in patients with high cTNI, which was no longer observed after propensity score matching. In conclusion, high cTNI levels were associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality at 30 days in patients presenting with ventricular tachyarrhythmias.

Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors versus Receptor Blockers in Patients with Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias

Data investigating the prognostic value of treatment with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) and receptor blockers (ARB) usually focusses on patients presenting with heart failure (HF) or acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, by preventing adverse cardiac remodeling, ACEi/ARB may also decrease the risk of ventricular tachyarrhythmias and sudden cardiac death (SCD). Although ventricular tachyarrhythmias are associated with significant mortality and morbidity, only limited data are available focusing on the prognostic role of ACEi/ARB, when prescribed for secondary prevention of SCD. Therefore, this study comprehensively investigates the role of ACEi versus ARB in patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias. A large retrospective registry was used including consecutive patients with episodes of ventricular tachycardia (VT) or fibrillation (VF) from 2002 to 2015. The primary prognostic outcome was all-cause mortality at three years, secondary endpoints comprised a composite arrhythmic endpoint (i.e., recurrences of ventricular tachyarrhythmias, ICD therapies and sudden cardiac death) and cardiac rehospitalization. A total of 1236 patients were included (15% treated with ARB and 85% with ACEi) and followed for a median of 4.0 years. At three years, ACEi and ARB were associated with comparable long-term mortality (20% vs. 17%; log rank p = 0.287; HR = 0.965; 95% CI 0.689–1.351; p = 0.835) and comparable risk of the composite arrhythmic endpoint (HR = 1.227; 95% CI 0.841–1.790; p = 0.288). In contrast, ACEi was associated with a decreased risk of cardiac rehospitalization at three years (HR = 0.690; 95% CI 0.490–0.971; p = 0.033). Within the propensity score matched cohort (i.e., 158 patients with ACEi and ARB), ACEi and ARB were associated with comparable long-term outcomes at three years. In conclusion, ACEi and ARB are associated with comparable risk of long-term outcomes in patients presenting with ventricular tachyarrhythmias.

Prognostic value of beta-blocker doses in patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias

The study investigates the prognostic significance of beta-blocker (BB) dose in patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Limited data regarding the prognostic impact of BB dose in ventricular tachyarrhythmias is available. A large retrospective registry was used including consecutive patients on BB treatment with episodes of ventricular tachycardia (VT) or fibrillation (VF) from 2002 to 2015. Discharge BB doses were grouped as > 0–12.5%, > 12.5–25%, > 25–50%, and > 50% according to doses used in randomized trials. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality at three years. Secondary endpoints comprised of a composite arrhythmic endpoint (i.e., recurrences of ventricular tachyarrhythmias and appropriate ICD therapies) and cardiac rehospitalization. Kaplan–Meier survival curves and multivariable Cox regression analyses were applied for statistics. A total of 1313 patients with BB were included; most patients were discharged with > 25–50% of BB target dose (59%). At three years, > 12.5–25% of BB target dose was associated with improved long-term mortality as compared to the > 0–12.5% group (HR = 0.489; 95% CI 0.297–0.806; p = 0.005), whereas higher BB doses did not improve survival (> 25–50%: HR = 0.849; p = 0.434; > 50%: HR = 0.735; p = 0.285). In contrast, the composite endpoint and risk of rehospitalization were not affected by BB target dose. In conclusion, > 12.5–25% of BB target dose is associated with best long-term survival among patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias. In contrast, risk of the composite arrhythmic endpoint and risk of cardiac rehospitalization were not affected by BB dose.

Effect of Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists on the Prognosis of Patients with Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias

INTRODUCTION

The study sought to assess the effect of treatment with mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) on long-term prognosis of patients with systolic heart failure (HF) surviving index episodes of ventricular tachyarrhythmias.

METHODS

A large retrospective registry was used including consecutive HF patients with left ventricular ejection fraction <45% and index episodes of ventricular tachyarrhythmias from 2002 to 2015. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality at 3 years and secondary endpoints were rehospitalization, as well as the composite endpoint consisting of recurrent ventricular tachyarrhythmias, sudden cardiac death and appropriate implantabe cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapies at 3 years.

RESULTS

748 patients were included, 20% treated with MRA and 80% without. At 3 years, treatment with MRA was not associated with improved all-cause mortality (22% vs. 24%, log-rank p = 0.968; hazard ratio (HR) = 1.008; 95% CI 0.690-1.472; p = 0.968). Accordingly, risk of the composite endpoint (28% vs. 27%; HR = 1.131; 95% CI 0.806-1.589; p = 0.476) and first cardiac rehospitalization (24% vs. 22%; HR = 1.139; 95% CI 0.788-1.648; p = 0.489) were not affected by treatment with MRA.

CONCLUSION

In patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias, treatment with MRA was not associated with improved all-cause mortality at 3 years. The therapeutic effect of MRA treatment in patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias needs to be reinvestigated within further randomized controlled trials.

Atrial Fibrillation and Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias: Advancements for Better Outcomes

Cardiac arrhythmias are associated with several cardiac diseases and are prevalent in people with or without structural and valvular abnormalities. Ventricular arrhythmias (VA) can be life threating and their onset require immediate medical attention. Similarly, atrial fibrillation and flutter lead to stroke, heart failure and even death. Optimal treatment of VA is variable and depends on the medical condition associated with the rhythm disorder (which includes reversible causes such as myocardial ischemia or pro-arrhythmic drugs). While an implanted cardioverter defibrillator is often indicated in secondary prevention of VA. This review highlights the newest advancements in these techniques and management of ventricular and atrial tachyarrhythmias, along with pharmacological therapy.

Comparable risk of recurrent ventricular tachyarrhythmias in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator recipients treated with single beta-blocker or combined amiodarone

This study sought to assess the prognostic impact of treatment with single beta-blocker (BB) compared to combined therapy with BB plus amiodarone (BB-AMIO) on recurrences of ventricular tachyarrhythmias in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) recipients. A large retrospective registry was used including consecutive ICD recipients with index episodes of ventricular tachyarrhythmias from 2002 to 2016. Patients treated with BB were compared to patients treated with BB-AMIO. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were applied for the evaluation of the primary end-point defined as first recurrences of ventricular tachyarrhythmias at five years. Secondary end-points comprised first appropriate ICD therapies, first cardiac rehospitalization and all-cause mortality at five years. Among 512 ICD recipients, 81% were treated with BB and 19% with BB-AMIO. BB and BB-AMIO were associated with comparable risk of first recurrences of ventricular tachyarrhythmias (46% vs. 43%; log rank P = .941; HR = 1.013; 95% CI 0.725-1.415; P = .941) and appropriate ICD therapies (35% vs. 37%; log rank P = .389; HR = 0.852; 95% CI 0.591-1.228; P = .390). BB was associated with decreased long-term all-cause mortality within an univariable analysis only (20% vs. 28%; log rank p = 0.023). In conclusion, BB and BB-AMIO were associated with comparable risks regarding recurrences of ventricular tachyarrhythmias at five years.

Prognostic impact of potassium levels in patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias

BACKGROUND

The study sought to assess the prognostic impact of potassium levels (K) in patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias.

METHODS

A large retrospective registry was used including all consecutive patients presenting with ventricular tachyarrhythmias on admission from 2002 to 2016. Patients with hypokalemia (i.e., K < 3.3 mmol/L), normokalemia (i.e., K 3.3-4.5 mmol/L), and hyperkalemia (i.e., K > 4.5 mmol/L) were compared applying multi-variable Cox regression models and propensity-score matching for evaluation of the primary endpoint of all-cause mortality at 3 years. Secondary endpoints were early cardiac death at 24 h, in-hospital death, death at 30 days, as well as the composite endpoint of early cardiac death at 24 h, recurrences of ventricular tachyarrhythmias, and appropriate ICD therapies at 3 years.

RESULTS

In 1990 consecutive patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias, 63% of the patients presented with normokalemia, 30% with hyperkalemia, and 7% with hypokalemia. After propensity matching, both hypokalemic (HR = 1.545; 95% CI 0.970-2.459; p = 0.067) and hyperkalemic patients (HR = 1.371; 95% CI 1.094-1.718; p = 0.006) were associated with the primary endpoint of all-cause mortality at 3 years compared to normokalemic patients. Hyperkalemia was associated with even worse prognosis directly compared to hypokalemia (HR = 1.496; 95% CI 1.002-2.233; p = 0.049). In contrast, potassium measurements were not associated with the composite endpoint at 3 years.

CONCLUSION

In patients presenting with ventricular tachyarrhythmias, normokalemia was associated with best short- and long-term survival, whereas hyperkalemia and hypokalemia were associated with increased mortality at 30 days and at 3 years.

Cardiac arrest and sudden cardiac death registries: a systematic review of global coverage

Background

Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is a major global health problem, accounting for up to 20% of deaths in Western societies. Clinical quality registries have been shown in a range of disease conditions to improve clinical management, reduce variation in care and improve outcomes.

Aim

To identify existing cardiac arrest (CA) and SCD registries, characterising global coverage and methods of data capture and validation.

Methods

Biomedical and public search engines were searched with the terms ‘registry cardio*’; ‘sudden cardiac death registry’ and ‘cardiac arrest registry’. Registries were categorised as either CA, SCD registries or ‘other’ according to prespecified criteria. SCD registry coordinators were contacted for contemporaneous data regarding registry details.

Results

Our search strategy identified 49 CA registries, 15 SCD registries and 9 other registries (ie, epistries). Population coverage of contemporary CA and SCD registries is highly variable with registries densely concentrated in North America and Western Europe. Existing SCD registries (n=15) cover a variety of age ranges and subpopulations, with some enrolling surviving patients (n=8) and family members (n=5). Genetic data are collected by nine registries, with the majority of these (n=7) offering indefinite storage in a biorepository.

Conclusions

Many CA registries exist globally, although with inequitable population coverage. Comprehensive multisource surveillance SCD registries are fewer in number and more challenging to design and maintain. Challenges identified include maximising case identification and case verification.

Trial registration number

CRD42019118910.

Identification of Target Genes of Antiarrhythmic Traditional Chinese Medicine Wenxin Keli

Wenxin Keli (WXKL) is a traditional Chinese medicine drug approved for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases. This study aimed to identify WXKL-targeting genes involved in antiarrhythmic efficacy of WXKL. The Traditional Chinese Medicine Systems Pharmacology (TCMSP) technology platform was used to screen active compounds of WXKL and WXKL-targeting arrhythmia-related genes. A pig model of myocardial ischemia (MI) was established by balloon-expanding the endothelium of the left coronary artery. Pigs were divided into the model group and WXKL group (n = 6). MI, QT interval, heart rate, and arrhythmia were recorded, and the mRNA expression of target genes in myocardial tissues was detected by PCR. Eleven active ingredients of WXKL and eight WXKL-targeting arrhythmia-related genes were screened. Five pathways were enriched, and an "ingredient-gene-path" network was constructed. WXKL markedly decreased the incidence of arrhythmia in the MI pig model (P < 0.05). The QT interval was significantly shortened, and the heart rate was slowed down in the WXKL group compared with the model group (P < 0.05). In addition, the expression of sodium channel protein type 5 subunit alpha (SCN5A) and beta-2 adrenergic receptor (ADRB2) was downregulated, while muscarinic acetylcholine receptor M2 (CHRM2) was upregulated in the WXKL group (P < 0.05). In conclusion, WXKL may shorten the QT interval and slow down the heart rate by downregulating SCN5A and ADRB2 and upregulating CHRM2 during MI. These findings provide novel insight into molecular mechanisms of WXKL in reducing the incidence of ventricular arrhythmia.

Prognostic impact of beta-blocker compared to combined amiodarone therapy secondary to ventricular tachyarrhythmias

OBJECTIVE

The study sought to assess the prognostic impact of treatment with beta-blocker (BB) compared to combined BB plus amiodarone (BB-AMIO) on long-term survival in patients surviving ventricular tachyarrhythmias on admission.

BACKGROUND

Data regarding the prognostic outcome of patients presenting with ventricular tachyarrhythmias treated with BB and BB-AMIO is limited.

METHODS

A large retrospective registry was used including consecutive patients surviving index episodes of ventricular tachyarrhythmias from 2002 to 2016. Patients treated with BB were compared to patients with BB-AMIO. The primary prognostic endpoint was long-term all-cause death at 3 years. Kaplan-Meier, multivariable Cox regression and propensity score matching analyses were applied.

RESULTS

A total of 1354 patients was included, 85% treated with BB, 15% with BB-AMIO. Within the unmatched real-life cohort, uni- and multivariable Cox regression models revealed BB associated with improved long-term survival compared to BB-AMIO (univariable: HR = 0.550; p = 0.001, multivariable: HR = 0.712; statistical trend, p = 0.052). After propensity-score matching (n = 186 matched pairs), BB therapy was still associated with improved survival compared to BB-AMIO (mortality rate 18% versus 26%; log rank p = 0.042; HR = 0.634; 95% CI = 0.407-0.988; p = 0.044). Prognostic superiority of BB was mainly observed in patients with LVEF ≥ 35% (HR = 0.463; 95% CI = 0.215-0.997; p = 0.049) and in those without atrial fibrillation (non-AF) (HR = 0.415; 95% CI = 0.202-0.852; p = 0.017).

CONCLUSION

BB therapy is associated with improved secondary long-term prognosis compared to BB-AMIO in patients surviving index episodes of ventricular tachyarrhythmias.

Prognostic Impact of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Receptor Blockers on Recurrent Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias and Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Therapies

This study sought to assess the prognostic impact of treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) on recurrences of ventricular tachyarrhythmias in recipients of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD). Using a large retrospective registry including consecutive ICD recipients with documented episodes of ventricular tachycardia (VT) or fibrillation (VF) from 2002 to 2016, those patients treated with ACEi/ARB were compared with patients without. The primary prognostic endpoint was the first recurrence of ventricular tachyarrhythmias and related ICD therapies at 5 years. Multivariable Cox regression analyses were applied within the entire cohort, and thereafter, Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed in propensity-matched subgroups. A total of 592 consecutive ICD recipients were included (81% treated with ACEi/ARB and 19% without). Although ACEi/ARB was associated with no differences in overall recurrence of ventricular tachyarrhythmias, ACEi/ARB was associated with improved freedom from appropriate ICD therapy within multivariable Cox regressions (hazard ratio = 0.666; P = 0.043), especially in patients with index episodes of VF, left ventricular ejection fraction <35%, coronary artery disease, secondary preventive ICD, and glomerular filtration rate <45 mL/min/1.73 m. In the propensity-matched subgroup, ACEi/ARB still prolonged freedom from appropriate ICD therapies (hazard ratio = 0.380; 95% confidence interval 0.193-0.747; P = 0.005). In conclusion, ACEi/ARB therapy was associated with improved freedom from appropriate ICD therapies.