Acid challenge to the human esophageal mucosa: effects on epithelial architecture in health and disease

Expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase, nitrotyrosine, eosinophilic peroxidase, eotaxin-3, and galectin-3 in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease, eosinophilic esophagitis, and in healthy controls: a semiquantitative image analysis of 3,3'-diaminobenzidine-stained esophageal biopsies

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) share many histopathological features; therefore, markers for differentiation are of diagnostic interest and may add to the understanding of the underlying mechanisms. The nitrergic system is upregulated in GERD and probably also in EoE. Esophageal biopsies of patients with EoE (n = 20), GERD (n = 20), and healthy volunteers (HVs) (n = 15) were exposed to antibodies against inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), nitrotyrosine, eosinophilic peroxidase, eotaxin-3, and galectin-3. The stained object glasses were randomized, digitized, and blindly analyzed regarding the expression of DAB (3,3'-diaminobenzidine) by a protocol developed in QuPath software. A statistically significant overexpression of iNOS was observed in patients with any of the two inflammatory diseases compared with that in HVs. Eotaxin-3 could differentiate HVs versus inflammatory states. Gastroesophageal reflux patients displayed the highest levels of nitrotyrosine. Neither iNOS nor nitrotyrosine alone were able to differentiate between the two diseases. For that purpose, eosinophil peroxidase was a better candidate, as the mean levels increased stepwise from HVs via GERD to EoE. iNOS and nitrotyrosine are significantly overexpressed in patients with EoE and GERD compared with healthy controls, but only eosinophil peroxidase could differentiate the two types of esophagitis. The implications of the finding of the highest levels of nitrotyrosine among gastroesophageal reflux patients are discussed.

Latin American consensus on diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND

Diagnosing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) can be challenging given varying symptom presentations, and complex multifactorial pathophysiology. The gold standard for GERD diagnosis is esophageal acid exposure time (AET) measured by pH-metry. A variety of additional diagnostic tools are available. The goal of this consensus was to assess the individual merits of GERD diagnostic tools based on current evidence, and provide consensus recommendations following discussion and voting by experts.

METHODS

This consensus was developed by 15 experts from nine countries, based on a systematic search of the literature, using GRADE (grading of recommendations, assessment, development and evaluation) methodology to assess the quality and strength of the evidence, and provide recommendations regarding the diagnostic utility of different GERD diagnosis tools, using AET as the reference standard.

KEY RESULTS

A proton pump inhibitor (PPI) trial is appropriate for patients with heartburn and no alarm symptoms, but nor for patients with regurgitation, chest pain, or extraesophageal presentations. Severe erosive esophagitis and abnormal reflux monitoring off PPI are clearly indicative of GERD. Esophagram, esophageal biopsies, laryngoscopy, and pharyngeal pH monitoring are not recommended to diagnose GERD. Patients with PPI-refractory symptoms and normal endoscopy require reflux monitoring by pH or pH-impedance to confirm or exclude GERD, and identify treatment failure mechanisms. GERD confounders need to be considered in some patients, pH-impedance can identify supragrastric belching, impedance-manometry can diagnose rumination.

CONCLUSIONS

Erosive esophagitis on endoscopy and abnormal pH or pH-impedance monitoring are the most appropriate methods to establish a diagnosis of GERD. Other tools may add useful complementary information.

Obesity and its effects on the esophageal mucosal barrier

Obesity is associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and its complications including reflux esophagitis, Barrett's esophagus, and esophageal adenocarcinoma. Traditionally, these associations have been attributed to the mechanical effect of abdominal fat in increasing intra-abdominal pressure, thereby promoting gastroesophageal reflux and causing disruption of antireflux mechanisms at the esophagogastric junction. However, recent studies suggest that visceral adipose tissue (VAT) produces numerous cytokines that can cause esophageal inflammation and impair esophageal mucosal barrier integrity through reflux-independent mechanisms that render the esophageal mucosa especially susceptible to GERD-induced injury. In this report, we review mechanisms of esophageal mucosal defense, the genesis and remodeling of visceral adipose tissue during obesity, and the potential role of substances produced by VAT, especially the VAT that encircles the esophagogastric junction, in the impairment of esophageal mucosal barrier integrity that leads to the development of GERD complications.

A reduced esophageal epithelial integrity in a subgroup of healthy individuals increases with proton pump inhibitor therapy

INTRODUCTION

Approximately 30% of healthy volunteers (HVs) show dilated intercellular spaces in the esophageal epithelium suggesting a functionally reduced epithelial integrity. We aimed to evaluate the presence of an altered epithelial integrity in HVs and whether physiological acid could explain such a difference.

METHODS

Biopsies for Ussing chamber experiments were taken between 3 cm and 5 cm proximal to the gastroesophageal junction. Twenty-four-hour impedance-pH (MII-pH) monitoring was performed in the same 15 HVs. MII-pH tracings from 24 HVs before and after treatment with esomeprazole (40 mg b.i.d., two weeks), a proton pump inhibitor, were analyzed. Reflux parameters and impedance baseline (IB) at different levels of the esophagus were calculated.

RESULTS

Epithelial integrity in the distal esophagus presents a large variability in vivo and in vitro (transepithelial electrical resistance 196.9 ± 16.27Ω. cm2; IB measurements 2022 ± 143.5Ω). Esomeprazole highly suppressed the total acid exposure time (AET) (1.9 (0.8-3.1) vs 0 (0-0)%, p < 0.0001). After splitting our participants into "high" and "low" IB, based on the median value, we observed only in the distal esophagus a higher total AET before (2.8 (1.6-4.8) vs 1.0 (0.5-2.2), p = 0.04) and increased IB values after esomeprazole (1620 (1347-1898) vs 2192 (1784-2503)Ω, p = 0.002) in the "low" IB group.

CONCLUSION

A subgroup of HVs presents a low epithelial integrity in the distal esophagus probably due to the increased presence of physiological acid reflux. Whether these individuals have a higher chance to develop gastroesophageal reflux disease is unknown. The role of epithelial integrity in symptom perception needs to be further explored.

Bioimpedance spectroscopy: a new tool to assess early esophageal changes linked to gastroesophageal reflux disease?

Bioimpedance spectroscopy can identify pathological changes related to precancerous lesions of the cervix uteri and esophagus. It therefore has the potential to detect early reflux-related changes in the esophageal mucosa, such as dilated intercellular spaces. The reliable detection of dilated intercellular spaces at the time of endoscopy would yield a significant diagnostic advantage for separating patients with functional heartburn from the large proportion of patients with gastroesophageal reflux symptoms but no macroscopic esophagitis or pathological acid exposure. The bioimpedance of the esophageal mucosa, measured with a small caliber probe, was evaluated in a series of preclinical experiments. First, sections of rabbit esophageal epithelium were mounted in Ussing chambers and exposed to solutions at pH 7.4 or pH 1.5 for 45 minutes. Impedance measurements were taken at varying probe pressures. Second, rabbit esophageal epithelia were perfused for 45 minutes in situ with pH 1.1 or control solutions and impedance measurements taken. Samples from both in vitro and in situ experiments were taken for morphological examination by light microscopy. Finally, esophageal bioimpedance was measured in awake dogs with permanent esophagocutaneous stoma. The in situ experiments demonstrated that morphological changes in the esophageal mucosa could be discerned by the use of bioimpedance spectroscopy. The variability in resistivity was species-independent but was affected by the pressure applied to the probe. The results suggest that evaluation of bioimpedance spectroscopy for use in a clinical setting is warranted. Small morphological differences in the esophageal mucosa may be detected by the use of bioimpedance spectroscopy.

Role of E-cadherin in the pathogenesis of gastroesophageal reflux disease

OBJECTIVES

An early event in the pathogenesis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is an acid-induced increase in junctional (paracellular) permeability in esophageal epithelium (EE). The molecular events that account for this change are unknown. E-cadherin is a junctional protein important in barrier function in EE. Therefore, defects in barrier function in EE were sought in GERD as well as whether their presence correlated with abnormalities in e-cadherin.

METHODS

Endoscopic biopsies of EE from GERD (n=20; male 10; female 10; mean age 50 ± 10 years) and subjects with a healthy esophagus (controls; n=23; male 11; female 12; mean age 51 ± 11 years) were evaluated in mini-Ussing chambers and by western blot and immunochemistry; and serum analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). A role for e-cadherin was also assessed using a unique conditional knockout of e-cadherin in adult mouse esophagus.

RESULTS

EE from GERD patients had lower electrical resistance and higher fluorescein flux than EE from controls; and the findings in GERD associated with cleavage of e-cadherin. Cleavage of e-cadherin in GERD was documented in EE by the presence of a 35-kDa, C-terminal fragment of the molecule on western blot and by an increase in soluble N-terminal fragments of the molecule in serum. Activation of the membrane metalloproteinase, A Disintegrin And Metalloproteinase (ADAM-10), was identified as a likely cause for cleavage of e-cadherin by western blot and immunostaining and a role for e-cadherin in the increased junctional permeability in EE from GERD supported by showing increased permeability after deletion of e-cadherin in mouse EE.

CONCLUSIONS

The EE in GERD has increased junctional permeability and this is in association with proteolytic cleavage of e-cadherin. As loss of e-cadherin can, alone, account for the increase in junctional permeability, cleavage of e-cadherin likely represents a critical molecular event in the pathogenesis of GERD, and identification of cleaved fragments may, if confirmed in larger studies, be valuable as a biomarker of GERD.

Role of corticotrophin-releasing factor in the stress-induced dilation of esophageal intercellular spaces

Corticotrophin-releasing factor (CRF) plays a major role in coordinating stress responses. We aimed to test whether blocking endogenous CRF activity can prevent the stress-induced dilation of intercellular spaces in esophageal mucosa. Eighteen adult male rats were divided into 3 groups: 1) a non-stressed group (the non-stressed group), 2) a saline-pretreated stressed group (the stressed group), 3) and an astressin-pretreated stressed group (the astressin group). Immediately after completing the experiments according to the protocol, distal esophageal segments were obtained. Intercellular space diameters of esophageal mucosa were measured by transmission electron microscopy. Blood was sampled for the measurement of plasma cortisol levels. Mucosal intercellular spaces were significantly greater in the stressed group than in the non-stressed group. Mucosal intercellular spaces of the astressin group were significantly smaller than those of the stressed group. Plasma cortisol levels in the stressed group were significantly higher than in the non-stressed group. Pretreatment with astressin tended to decrease plasma cortisol levels. Acute stress in rats enlarges esophageal intercellular spaces, and this stress-induced alteration appears to be mediated by CRF. Our results suggest that CRF may play a role in the pathophysiology of reflux-induced symptoms or mucosal damage.

The integrity of the esophageal mucosa. Balance between offensive and defensive mechanisms

Heartburn is the most common and characteristic symptom of gastroesophageal reflux disease. It ultimately results from contact of refluxed gastric acid with nociceptors within the esophageal mucosa and transmission of this peripheral signal to the central nervous system for cognition. Healthy esophageal epithelium provides an effective barrier between refluxed gastric acid and esophageal nociceptors; but this barrier is vulnerable to attack and damage, particularly by acidic gastric contents. How gastric acid is countered by defensive elements within the esophageal mucosa is a major focus of this discussion. When the defense is successful, the subject is asymptomatic and when unsuccessful, the subject experiences heartburn. Those with heartburn commonly fall into one of three endoscopic types: nonerosive reflux disease, erosive esophagitis and Barrett's esophagus. Although what determines endoscopic type remains unknown; it is proposed herein that inflammation plays a key, modulating role.

Dilated intercellular spaces and chronic cough as an extra-oesophageal manifestation of gastrooesophageal reflux disease

Chronic cough is one of the extra-oesophageal manifestations of gastrooesophageal reflux disease (GORD). It is presumed to occur either directly by microaspiration of acidic gastric contents into the airway or indirectly by a reflex triggered by contact of acidic refluxates with the oesophageal epithelium in GORD. How contact of the oesophageal epithelium with acidic refluxates promotes sensitization for chronic cough is unknown, but like heartburn, which is a necessary accompaniment, it requires acid activation of nociceptors within the oesophageal mucosa. Dilated intercellular spaces within the oesophageal epithelium, a reflection of an increase in paracellular permeability, is a histopathologic feature of both erosive and non-erosive forms of GORD. Since it correlates with the symptom of heartburn, it is hypothesized herein that the increase in paracellular permeability to acid reflected by dilated intercellular spaces in oesophageal epithelium also serves as mediator of the signals that produce the reflex-induced sensitization for cough--a sensitization that can occur centrally within the medullary Nucleus Tractus Solitarius or peripherally within the tracheobronchial tree.

Long-term outcome of microscopic esophagitis in chronic GERD patients treated with esomeprazole or laparoscopic antireflux surgery in the LOTUS trial

OBJECTIVES

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)-associated changes in esophageal histology have been reported mainly after short-term medical antireflux therapy, and few individual lesions have been examined. We report detailed histological findings from the LOTUS study, at baseline and at 1 and 3 years after laparoscopic antireflux surgery (LARS) or esomeprazole treatment in patients with chronic GERD.

METHODS

LOTUS is a long-term, open, parallel-group, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial conducted in 11 European countries that compared LARS (n=248) with esomeprazole 20-40 mg daily (n=266). Biopsies from the distal esophagus 2 cm above the Z-line and at the Z-line were taken at baseline, and 1 and 3 years. The following lesions were assessed: basal cell hyperplasia (BCH), papillary elongation (PE), intercellular space dilatations (ISDs), intraepithelial eosinophils (EOSs), neutrophils, and necrosis/erosion. A severity score (SS, range 0-2) was calculated by taking the average score of all assessable lesions.

RESULTS

All lesions were more severe on Z-line biopsies than at 2 cm, and almost all improved significantly from baseline to 1 and 3 years. The average SS (from 2 cm to Z-line) changed from 0.95 to 0.57 (1 year) and to 0.49 (3 years) on esomeprazole, and from 0.91 to 0.56 (1 year) and to 0.52 (3 years) after LARS (P<0.001 for both treatments at 1 and 3 years, with no significant difference between treatments). The proportions of patients with severe histological changes decreased from approximately 50% at baseline to 11% at 3 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Both continuous esomeprazole treatment and laparoscopic fundoplication are associated with significant and similar overall improvement in microscopic esophagitis after 1 year that is maintained at 3 years.

Reactive nitrogen oxide species induce dilatation of the intercellular space of rat esophagus

OBJECTIVE

Dilatation of the intercellular space (DIS) of the esophageal epithelium is recognized as one of the earliest histological changes in gastroesophageal reflux disease patients. At the human gastroesophageal junction, reactive nitrogen oxide species (RNOS) are generated luminally through the entero-salivary re-circulation of dietary nitrate. In cases with gastroesophageal reflux, the site of luminal RNOS generation may shift to the distal esophagus. The aim of this study was to investigate whether luminal RNOS exposure could be involved in the pathogenesis of DIS.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Rat esophageal mucosa was studied with an Ussing chamber model. On the luminal side of the chamber, RNOS were generated by the acidification of physiologic concentrations of sodium nitrite (1.0 or 5.0 mM). Esophageal barrier function was assessed by means of electrophysiological transmembrane resistance and membrane permeability by means of (3)H-mannitol flux. The dimensions of the intercellular spaces were assessed by using transmission electron microscopy.

RESULTS

Administration of acid plus sodium nitrite induced DIS of the esophageal epithelium, and this ultrastructural morphological change was accompanied by a concomitant decrease in the transmembrane resistance and an increase in the epithelial permeability. The DIS induced by luminal RNOS was also confirmed in an in vivo exposure model.

CONCLUSIONS

The present animal study indicates that the RNOS generated by the acidification of salivary nitrite in the presence of refluxed gastric acid in the esophagus could be a luminal factor that is responsible for the induction of DIS. Further studies are warranted to investigate the clinical relevance of the present findings to the human situation.

Development of consensus guidelines for the histologic recognition of microscopic esophagitis in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease: the Esohisto project

No gold standard test exists for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Diagnostic difficulties are greatest when reflux symptoms occur without visible esophageal mucosal damage at conventional endoscopy. However, two thirds of such patients do have microscopic esophageal lesions. This study aimed to develop and standardize criteria for recognizing these microscopic esophageal lesions in GERD. Draft histologic criteria were developed and tested by an international group of 5 independent gastrointestinal pathologists using 167 biopsy specimens from GERD patients and healthy controls (phase I). Draft criteria were refined and reassessed using 250 photographs of biopsy specimens (phase II). Histologic lesions evaluated were basal cell hyperplasia, papillary elongation, intraepithelial eosinophil, neutrophil and mononuclear cell number, necrosis/erosion, healed erosion, and dilated intercellular spaces. Interobserver agreement and kappa values increased significantly from phase I to II. When tested in annotated photographs (phase II), mean pairwise agreements were 74%, 89%, 93%, 97%, 81%, 97%, 94%, and 74%, respectively. Mean pairwise kappa estimates (+/-SD) were 0.49 (0.16), 0.81 (0.05), 0.87 (0.05), 0.84 (0.09), 0.60 (0.09), 0.90 (0.04), 0.73 (0.14), and 0.61 (0.08), respectively. Estimated intraclass correlation coefficients for basal cell layer thickness and papillary length increased from 0.38 and 0.56 to 0.69 and 0.95, respectively, when revised criteria were used. The draft criteria achieved promising levels of agreement when assessed independently by 5 pathologists. Further steps include evaluation of lesions without indicating the area to be assessed and exploring the correlation of microscopic esophagitis with symptoms and esophageal acid exposure.

Dilated intercellular spaces as a marker of GERD

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is typically heralded by the substernal burning pain of heartburn. On endoscopic examination, about one third of GERD subjects with heartburn have erosive disease, and the remainder have nonerosive reflux disease (NERD). Unlike patients with erosive disease, those with NERD (approximately 50%) often do not respond to therapy with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), raising the question of whether they have NERD and, if they do, whether the cause of their symptoms is similar to those who respond to PPIs. Recently, biopsies established that subjects with heartburn and PPI-responsive NERD, like those with erosive esophagitis, have lesions within the esophageal epithelium known as dilated intercellular space (DIS). In this article, we discuss the physicochemical basis for DIS in acid-injured esophageal epithelium and its significance in GERD. Although DIS is not pathognomic of GERD, it is a marker of a break in the epithelial (junctional) barrier reflecting an increase in paracellular permeability.

Variation of the intercellular space in the esophageal epithelium in response to hydrochloridric acid infusion in patients with erosive esophagitis

The purpose of this study was to compare esophageal infusion with 0.1 N hydrochloric acid (HCl) to esophageal infusion with saline in patients presenting with typical gastroesophageal reflux symptoms and erosive esophagitis.

METHODS

Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy was performed on 44 prospective subjects, 29 of whom were included in the study. Eighteen patients presented with normal esophagi (Control Group "C"), nine of whom were infused with HCl and nine with saline. Eleven patients presented with erosive esophagitis (Lesion Group "L"), five of whom were infused with HCl and six with saline. Biopsies of the esophageal mucosa were collected before and after infusions.

RESULTS

No statistically significant difference was found between the two types of infusions in terms of the dilation of the intercellular space of the esophageal epithelium, regardless of the status of the patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Response to HCl infusion cannot be used as a marker for gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Physicochemical basis for dilated intercellular spaces in non-erosive acid-damaged rabbit esophageal epithelium

Dilated intercellular spaces (DIS) within esophageal epithelium (EE) is a histopathologic feature of non-erosive reflux disease and early lesion in acid-damaged rabbit EE associated with increased paracellular permeability. Its cause remains unknown, but the lesion's morphology suggests a significant fluid shift into the intercellular spaces (ICS). Since water follows osmotic forces and consequently ion movements, we explored the role of active (ion) transport and ion gradients in its pathogenesis. This was done by quantifying the effect of inhibited active transport and altered ion gradients on electrical resistance (R(T)) and ICS diameter in acid-exposed Ussing-chambered rabbit EE. Compared with normal Ringer, pH 7.5, 30 minutes of luminal HCl (100 mmol/L), pH 1.1, increased permeability (R(T): +5 +/- 4% vs-52 +/- 4%) and ICS diameter (0.25 +/- 0.01 microm vs 0.42 +/- 0.02 microm), but had no effect on cell morphology or diameter. Ouabain pretreatment significantly reduced active transport but had no effect on the acid-induced changes. However, negating the chloride gradient created by luminal HCl either by adding choline chloride, 100 mmol/L, serosally or by replacing luminal HCl, pH 1.1, with luminal H(2)SO(4), pH 1.1, prevented the development of DIS while maintaining the increase in permeability. DIS was also prevented in the presence of a 100 mmol/L (choline) chloride gradient by luminal exposure at neutral pH. DIS in HCl-damaged EE is caused by an H(+)-induced increase in epithelial permeability; this enables Cl(-) to diffuse along its gradient into the ICS, creating an osmotic force for water movement into and (hydrostatic) dilation of the ICS.

Esophageal dilated intercellular spaces (DIS) and nonerosive reflux disease

Esophageal mucosal dilated intercellular spaces (DIS) are frequently observed in patients with nonerosive reflux disease (NERD) and patients with esophagitis. The specificity of DIS is questionable, as it is present in up to 30% of asymptomatic healthy subjects and in patients with other esophageal disorders. DIS occurs in parallel with a drop in potential difference, diminished transepithelial resistance, and increased esophageal mucosal permeability. These alterations arise with exposure to acid and pepsin during gastroesophageal reflux, but the exact pathway of damage to the intercellular junctions remains unclear and seems to be multifactorial. Other noxious contents of the refluxate, such as bile acids, are harmful and DIS can also be induced by acute psychological stress. DIS can be assessed quantitatively with electron microscopy (EM), but it is also recognizable with light microscopy (LM). DIS can disappear after treatment with proton pump inhibitors (PPI); however, this is not the case in all NERD patients. A recent study showed that patients with NERD who are refractory to PPI might still have DIS; and animal experiments showed that persistence of DIS might be due to esophageal mucosal exposure to bile acids and/or psychological stress. In conclusion, DIS is a frequent but nonspecific histological feature of NERD. It can be caused by acid reflux, but bile acids in the refluxate and/or psychological stress can modulate the development or persistence of DIS. Although a causal relationship between DIS and heartburn has been proposed, it still needs to be proven and the underlying mechanisms investigated before considering DIS as a target for treatment of NERD.

Microscopic esophageal mucosal injury in nonerosive reflux disease

This review evaluates the current knowledge about the recognition of histologic esophageal mucosal changes in patients with nonerosive gastroesophageal reflux disease and analyzes the technical factors relevant to their interpretation. Studies investigating histologic changes in individuals with nonerosive reflux disease were identified by systematic Medline/PubMed searches from January 1966 to October 2005. Dilation of intercellular spaces was the most consistently reported histologic change in the esophageal mucosa of patients with nonerosive reflux disease, being observed in 41%-100% of patients and 0%-30% of controls. The mean intercellular space width was at least 2 times greater in patients than in controls, irrespective of esophageal acid exposure. Basal cell hyperplasia was observed in 9%-90% of patients compared with 10%-55% of controls. Papillary elongation was observed in 0%-85% of patients and 5%-20% of controls. Both of these features were more prevalent in reflux disease patients with abnormal esophageal acid exposure. All histologic changes responded to acid-suppressive therapy. Inflammatory cell infiltration was seldom observed or had a similar prevalence in patients and controls. Disparities in reported frequencies of change among studies were most likely caused by methodologic factors, most importantly the use of different methods for identifying patients and controls, for histologic sampling, and for biopsy scoring. The reviewed studies suggest that at least two thirds of patients with nonerosive reflux disease have histologic evidence of esophageal injury. Additional work is needed to assess the potential of these histologic changes for the diagnosis and assessment of reflux disease.

Novel developments in non-erosive and erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Despite being clinically important and highly prevalent, several aspects of gastroesophageal reflux disease are incompletely understood. Research activity remains high, however, and we shall review some highlights from last year's publications.

RECENT FINDINGS

Community based epidemiological studies have elucidated the risk factors for gastroesophageal reflux disease and demonstrated a significant risk for developing complications over time. New histological parameters such as distended intercellular spaces in the epithelium will detect minor signs of reflux damage. The esophageal endoscopic capsule has been studied as a way of screening for esophageal disease. Wireless pH-metry and impedance-pH-metry have increased our insight into the pathophysiology and improved the diagnostic work-up in atypical and therapy resistant cases. At the molecular level, the role of cytokines has been elucidated and there is increased support for the nitrosative stress theory for epithelial damage at the cardia. Endoscopic therapies have shown disappointing long-term results or safety concerns, leading to withdrawal of several methods.

SUMMARY

The last year has brought significant development in diagnostic modalities, and increased our insight in the molecular events involved in the pathogenesis of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Ultimately, this may and must lead to new therapeutic modalities which will supplement proton pump inhibitors in medical therapy for gastroesophageal reflux disease.