Acute and acute severe (fulminant) autoimmune hepatitis

Pursuing living donor liver transplantation improves outcomes of patients with autoimmune liver diseases: An intention-to-treat analysis

Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) offers the opportunity to decrease waitlist time and mortality for patients with autoimmune liver disease (AILD), autoimmune hepatitis, primary biliary cholangitis, and primary sclerosing cholangitis. We compared the survival of patients with a potential living donor (pLDLT) on the waitlist versus no potential living donor (pDDLT) on an intention-to-treat basis. Our retrospective cohort study investigated adults with AILD listed for a liver transplant in our program between 2000 and 2021. The pLDLT group comprised recipients with a potential living donor. Otherwise, they were included in the pDDLT group. Intention-to-treat survival was assessed from the time of listing. Of the 533 patients included, 244 (43.8%) had a potential living donor. Waitlist dropout was higher for the pDDLT groups among all AILDs (pDDLT 85 [29.4%] vs. pLDLT 9 [3.7%], p < 0.001). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year intention-to-treat survival rates were higher for pLDLT versus pDDLT among all AILDs (95.7% vs. 78.1%, 89.0% vs. 70.1%, and 87.1% vs. 65.5%, p < 0.001). After adjusting for covariates, pLDLT was associated with a 38% reduction in the risk of death among the AILD cohort (HR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.42-0.93 [ p <0.05]), and 60% among the primary sclerosing cholangitis cohort (HR: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.22-0.74 [ p <0.05]). There were no differences in the 1-, 3-, and 5-year post-transplant survival between LDLT and DDLT (AILD: 95.6% vs. 92.1%, 89.9% vs. 89.4%, and 89.1% vs. 87.1%, p =0.41). This was consistent after adjusting for covariates (HR: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.56-1.68 [ p >0.9]). Our study suggests that having a potential living donor could decrease the risk of death in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis on the waitlist. Importantly, the post-transplant outcomes in this population are similar between the LDLT and DDLT groups.

Outcomes and management in paediatric autoimmune hepatitis presenting as acute liver failure: Individual patient data meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) in children presenting in acute liver failure (ALF) can be fatal and often requires liver transplantation (LTx). This individual patient data meta-analysis (IPD) aims to examine management and outcomes of this population, given the lack of large cohort studies on paediatric AIH first presenting as ALF (AIH-ALF).

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses of IPD statement using PubMed and Excerpta Medica dataBASE, and included English studies published between 2000 and 2020. The study included patients under 21 years of age, diagnosed with type 1 or 2 AIH and presenting with ALF. Data extracted included clinical and biochemical characteristics, interventions, and outcomes.

RESULTS

Three hundred and thirty eligible patients from 61 studies were identified, with an additional five patients from our institution. The majority were female (66.8%), with a median age of 10. Overall, 59.7% achieved native liver survival (NLS), 35% underwent LTx, and 5% died before LTx. The use of corticosteroids with non-steroid immunomodulators increased the likelihood of NLS by 2.5-fold compared to corticosteroids alone. AIH-1 was associated with 3.3-fold odds for NLS, compared to AIH-2. However, on multivariate analysis, only AIH-1 was identified as an independent predictor for NLS (OR 3.8 [95% CI 1.03-14.2], p = .04).

CONCLUSION

While corticosteroids and non-steroid immunomodulators treatment may offer enhanced probability of achieving NLS, treatment regimens for AIH-ALF may need to consider patient-specific factors, especially AIH type. This highlights the potential for NLS in AIH-ALF and suggest a need to identify biomarkers which predict the need for combination immunosuppression to avoid LTx.

Analysis of autoimmune hepatitis with acute presentation in the early stage of illness

BACKGROUND AND AIM

There is no gold standard for making the diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), and the diagnosis of acute onset AIH (A-AIH) is most challenging. A-AIH sometimes develops into acute liver failure with poor prognosis if the diagnosis is delayed. Therefore, it is most important for the better prognosis to diagnose non-severe A-AIH early and treat appropriately. However, features in the early stage of A-AIH are unclear. We examined initial characteristics of non-severe A-AIH in detail and tried to find novel clinical features for the early diagnosis.

METHODS

Clinical, biochemical, immunological, radiological, and histological features of 71 patients (54 women, mean age 57.9 ± 14.3 years) with non-severe A-AIH admitted to community hospitals between 2001 and 2022 were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULT

Forty-six had no symptom on onset and liver injuries were discovered by regular medical checkups. The mean duration from onset to consultation was 25.0 ± 29.3 days. Liver histology showed acute hepatitis in 59% and chronic hepatitis in 41%. Patients with symptoms revealed more male sex (P = 0.039), higher alanine aminotransferase (P < 0.001), higher total bilirubin (P < 0.001), and higher rate of histological acute hepatitis (P = 0.0013) than those without symptoms significantly. Male sex, presence of symptoms on onset, occurrence of jaundice in the course, and histological acute hepatitis were correlated.

CONCLUSIONS

Sixty-five percent of non-severe A-AIH patients were asymptomatic on onset, suggesting that A-AIH would develop insidiously and present a longer clinical course than that reported. Male patients more often revealed true acute hepatitis clinically, biochemically, and histologically than female ones.

Clinical Characteristics of Genuine Acute Autoimmune Hepatitis

Introduction

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) has a spectrum of symptoms ranging from asymptomatic disease to acute severe hepatitis, chronic hepatitis, and decompensated cirrhosis. The acute presentation is not rare and could represent genuine acute AIH (GAAIH) or acute exacerbation of chronic autoimmune hepatitis. We aimed to identify the prevalence, clinical features, and prognostic factors associated with GAAIH and compare these cases with acute exacerbation of chronic AIH.

Methods

This cross-sectional observational study evaluated patients with acute AIH presentation, defined as total bilirubin >5 times the upper limit of normality (xULN) and/or alanine aminotransferase >10 xULN, and no prior history of liver disease. Histology findings of acute disease defined GAAIH. Bivariate analyses were performed to identify factors associated with the GAAIH, when compared with acute exacerbation of chronic AIH.

Results

Seventy-two patients with acute presentation of AIH were included and six (8.3%) of them presented GAAIH. Comparative analysis between patients with GAAIH and patients with acute exacerbation of chronic AIH revealed that prothrombin activity (96% [74-100] vs. 61% [10-100]; p = 0.003) and albumin levels (3.9 ± 0.2 g/dL vs. 3.4 ± 0.5 g/dL; p < 0.001) were higher in patients with GAAIH. The International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group score was higher in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic AIH (18.5 [8-23] vs. 16.5 [15-17]; p = 0.010). Compared to 15.2% of acute exacerbation of chronic AIH, complete therapeutic response to treatment was achieved in 67.7% of cases with GAAIH (p = 0.018).

Conclusions

GAAIH was rare (8.3%), and patients with this presentation exhibited more preserved liver function tests, suggesting that most cases presenting with loss of function are acute exacerbation of chronic AIH. Additionally, patients with GAAIH had a better complete therapeutic response, suggesting a more preserved liver function at presentation, and early diagnosis has a positive therapeutic implication.

Advances in the evaluation and treatment of autoimmune hepatitis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The primary therapy of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) has been established for over three decades. This review focuses on updates in the evaluation and management of patients with AIH.

RECENT FINDINGS

The evaluation of patients has recently been updated to include more definitive screening for other autoimmune diseases, including thyroid disease and celiac disease. Antibody detection by ELISA, an easier and more commonly available method, has been incorporated into the latest iteration of the AIH scoring system. Corticosteroids and AZA remain the backbone of AIH treatment, but there is growing evidence for mycophenolate mofetil as both first-line and second-line therapy, and growing inquiry into calcineurin inhibitors. Noninvasive markers of liver disease have now been validated in AIH, with the strongest evidence for VCTE in patients with minimal hepatic inflammation.

SUMMARY

Recent research of alternative immunosuppressant therapies, noninvasive markers of fibrosis, and updated society guidelines, have improved our ability to evaluate, treat, and follow patients with AIH.

Autoimmune hepatitis: Brighton Collaboration case definition and guidelines for data collection, analysis, and presentation of immunisation safety data

This report introduces a Brighton Collaboration (BC) case definition for autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), which has been classified as a priority adverse event of special interest (AESI), as there were possible cases seen following COVID-19 vaccination. The case definition was developed by a group of subject matter and BC process experts to facilitate safety data comparability across pre- and post-licensure clinical trials, as well as pharmacovigilance activities in multiple settings with diverse resources and healthcare access. The usual BC case definition development process was followed in an expedited manner, and took two months to complete, including finalising the manuscript for publication, instead of the usual 1 year development time. It includes a systematic review of the literature and an expert consensus to define levels of diagnostic certainty for AIH, and provides specific guidelines for data collection and analysis. Histology, serological and biochemical tests and exclusion of alternate diagnosis were considered necessary to define the levels of certainty (definitive, probable and possible). AEFI reports of suspected AIH were independently classified by the WG members to test its useability and these classifications were used to finalise the case definition. The document underwent peer review by external AIH experts and a Reference Group of vaccine safety stakeholders in high-, low- and middle-income countries to ensure case definition useability, applicability, and scientific integrity. The expedited process can be replicated for development of other standardised case definitions for priority AESIs for endemics and epidemics. While applicable to cases reported following immunisation, the case definition is independent of lapsed time following vaccination and, as such, can also be used to determine background incidence for vaccinated and unvaccinated control groups in studies of causal association. While use of this case definition is also appropriate for the study of safety of other products including drugs, it is not meant to guide clinical case management.

Autoimmune Hepatitis: Epidemiology, Subtypes, and Presentation

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a chronic immunologic disorder in which the immune system targets the liver. The disease has a genetic basis and this accounts for the epidemiologic variation observed in serologic testing and clinical presentation across different populations. The incidence of AIH increases with age into the 70s and seems to be increasing in prevalence. Most patients test positive for antinuclear antibody, ASMA, or anti-LKM but about 20% of patients do not have these serologic markers. At clinical presentation, patients may be asymptomatic, symptomatic, have acute liver failure, or decompensated cirrhosis.

Local and systemic autoimmune manifestations linked to hepatitis A infection

Hepatitis A virus (HAV) represents a global burdening infectious agent causing in the majority of cases a self-limiting acute icteric syndrome, the outcome is related to the hepatic substrate and the potential pre-existing damage, whereas a plethora of extra-hepatic manifestations has also been reported. Despite the absence of post- HAV chronicity it has been associated with an additional burden on existing chronic liver diseases. Moreover, the induced immune response and the antigenic molecular mimicry are considered as triggering factors of autoimmunity with regional and distal impact. Diseases such as autoimmune hepatitis, Guillain-Barré syndrome, rheumatoid arthritis, Still's syndrome, Henoch-Schönlein purpura, autoimmune hemolytic anemia, antiphospholipid syndrome, systematic lupus erythematosus or cryoglobulinemic vasculitis have been described in patients with HAV infection. Although the exact mechanisms remain unclear, this review aims to accumulate and clarify the pathways related to this linkage.

Acute Liver Failure Guidelines

Acute liver failure (ALF) is a rare, acute, potentially reversible condition resulting in severe liver impairment and rapid clinical deterioration in patients without preexisting liver disease. Due to the rarity of this condition, published studies are limited by the use of retrospective or prospective cohorts and lack of randomized controlled trials. Current guidelines represent the suggested approach to the identification, treatment, and management of ALF and represent the official practice recommendations of the American College of Gastroenterology. The scientific evidence was reviewed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation process to develop recommendations. When no robust evidence was available, expert opinions were summarized using Key Concepts. Considering the variety of clinical presentations of ALF, individualization of care should be applied in specific clinical scenarios.

Incorporating the Molecular Mimicry of Environmental Antigens into the Causality of Autoimmune Hepatitis

Molecular mimicry between foreign and self-antigens has been implicated as a cause of autoimmune hepatitis in experimental models and cross-reacting antibodies in patients. This review describes the experimental and clinical evidence for molecular mimicry as a cause of autoimmune hepatitis, indicates the limitations and uncertainties of this premise, and encourages investigations that assess diverse environmental antigens as sources of disease-relevant molecular mimics. Pertinent articles were identified in PubMed using multiple search phrases. Several pathogens have linear or conformational epitopes that mimic the self-antigens of autoimmune hepatitis. The occurrence of an acute immune-mediated hepatitis after vaccination for severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)-associated coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has suggested that vaccine-induced peptides may mimic disease-relevant tissue antigens. The intestinal microbiome is an under-evaluated source of gut-derived antigens that could also engage in molecular mimicry. Chaperone molecules may enhance the pathogenicity of molecular mimics, and they warrant investigation. Molecular mimics of immune dominant epitopes within cytochrome P450 IID6, the autoantigen most closely associated with autoimmune hepatitis, should be sought in diverse environmental antigens and assessed for pathogenicity. Avoidance strategies, dietary adjustments, vaccine improvement, and targeted manipulation of the intestinal microbiota may emerge as therapeutic possibilities. In conclusion, molecular mimicry may be a missing causality of autoimmune hepatitis. Molecular mimics of key immune dominant epitopes of disease-specific antigens must be sought in diverse environmental antigens. The ubiquity of molecular mimicry compels rigorous assessments of peptide mimics for immunogenicity and pathogenicity in experimental models. Molecular mimicry may complement epigenetic modifications as causative mechanisms of autoimmune hepatitis.

[Treatment of Autoimmune Hepatitis]

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a chronic liver disease, characterized by elevated levels of transaminases, immunoglobulin G, and positive autoantibodies. The disease course is dynamic and presents heterogeneous disease manifestations at diagnosis. This review summarizes the issues regarding the treatment and monitoring of AIH in adult patients. Glucocorticoids and azathioprine are the first line of treatment. Alternative first-line treatments include budesonide or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). Although no randomized controlled trials have been performed, MMF, cyclosporine, tacrolimus, 6-mercaptopurine, 6-thioguanine, allopurinol, sirolimus, everolimus, infliximab, or rituximab have been attempted in patients not responding to or intolerant to first-line treatments. Most patients require life-long special monitoring, with or without maintenance treatment.

The many faces and pathologic diagnostic challenges of autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is an immune-mediated chronic inflammatory liver disease, characterized by hypergammaglobulinemia, the presence of specific autoantibodies, and typical abnormalities in liver histology. Prompt diagnosis and initiation of immunosuppressive treatment are necessary for both chronic and acute onset AIH to prevent progression to end-stage liver disease or fatal liver failure. However, the diagnosis of AIH is challenging mainly because of its heterogeneous clinical, serological and pathological features. Although portal lymphoplasmacytosis and interface hepatitis are the most typical histological features of AIH, many other histological features can be observed in AIH, including emperipolesis, hepatocyte rosettes, and Kupffer cell hyaline globules. Recent studies have questioned emperipolesis and hepatocyte rosette formation as typical features of AIH, and atypical clinical and histological presentations have also been recognized. This led an international working group to propose the modified AIH diagnostic criteria. However, it is well recognized that there are no pathognomonic characteristics that can be used to diagnose AIH and careful clinicopathological correlation is required to arrive at the correct diagnosis. The aim of this review is to summarize the histological features of AIH, its varied histopathologic spectrum, recent updates and major differential diagnoses in routine clinical practice.

Autoimmune Hepatitis with Acute Presentation: Clinical, Biochemical, and Histological Features of 126 Patients

INTRODUCTION

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a chronic liver disease with a relevant inflammatory component and an unknown etiology. Evidence for clinical characteristics and risk factors in large cohorts of patients with acute AIH (AAIH) is lacking. We clinically characterized patients with AAIH, the prevalence of a combined adverse outcome (death or liver transplantation (LT)), and its risk factors.

METHODS

A retrospective study of adult patients diagnosed with AAIH at three centers (Santiago, Chile; 2000-2018) was conducted. Clinical and laboratory characteristics were obtained. A liver biopsy was performed for all patients. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression models were used.

RESULTS

A total of 126 patients were admitted; 77% were female, 33 (26.2%) had a severe presentation, and 14 (11.1%) had a fulminant presentation. Overall, 24 patients (19.0%) lacked typical autoantibodies, and 26.2% had immunoglobulin G levels in the normal range. The most frequent histological findings were plasma cells (86.5%), interface hepatitis (81.7%), and chronic hepatitis (81.0%). Rosettes were uncommon (35.6%). Advanced fibrosis was present in 27% of patients. Combined adverse outcomes occurred in 7.9% of cases, all fulminant with histological cholestasis. Alkaline phosphatase, bilirubin, and prothrombin less than 50% were independent risk factors for in-hospital death or LT (p value <0.05). Although corticosteroid treatment was associated with better outcomes (OR 0.095, p value = 0.013), more severe patients were less likely to receive this therapy. Discussion. In this large cohort of patients with AAIH, clinical characteristics differ from those reported in patients with chronic AIH. Fulminant hepatitis, histological cholestasis, alkaline phosphatase, bilirubin, and prothrombin were associated with death/LT.

Viral Hepatitis and Hepatocellular Carcinoma: State of the Art

Viral hepatitis is one of the main causes leading to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The continued rise in incidence of HCC suggests additional factors following infection may be involved. This review examines recent studies investigating the molecular mechanisms of chronic hepatitis and its association with hepatocarcinogenesis. Hepatitis B virus patients with genotype C display an aggressive disease course leading to HCC more than other genotypes. Furthermore, hepatitis B excretory antigen (HBeAg) seems to be a more sensitive predictive tumor marker exhibiting a six-fold higher relative risk in patients with positive HBsAg and HBeAg than those with HBsAg only. Single or combined mutations of viral genome can predict HCC development in up to 80% of patients. Several mutations in HBx-gene are related with higher HCC incidence. Overexpression of the core protein in HCV leads to hepatocellular lipid accumulation associated with oncogenesis. Reduced number and decreased functionality of natural killer cells in chronic HCV individuals dysregulate their surveillance function in tumor and viral cells resulting in HCC. Furthermore, high T-cell immunoglobulin and mucin 3 levels supress CD8+ T-cells, which lead to immunological dysregulation. Hepatitis D promotes HCC development indirectly via modifications to innate immunity, epigenetic alterations and production of reactive oxygen species with the LHDAg being the most highly associated with HCC development. Summarizing the results, HBV and HCV infection represent the most associated forms of viral hepatitis causing HCC. Further studies are warranted to further improve the prediction of high-risk patients and development of targeted therapeutics preventing the transition from hepatic inflammation–fibrosis to cancer.

Early liver transplantation for corticosteroid non-responders with acute severe autoimmune hepatitis: The SURFASA score

BACKGROUND & AIMS

In acute severe autoimmune hepatitis (AS-AIH), the optimal timing for liver transplantation (LT) remains controversial. The objectives of this study were to determine early predictive factors for a non-response to corticosteroids and to propose a score to identify patients in whom LT is urgently indicated.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, multicenter study (2009-2016). A diagnosis of AS-AIH was based on: i) Definite or probable AIH based on the simplified IAIHG score; ii) international normalized ratio (INR) ≥1.5 and/or bilirubin >200 μmol/L; iii) No previous history of AIH; iv) Histologically proven AIH. A treatment response was defined as LT-free survival at 90 days. The evolution of variables from corticosteroid initiation (day-D0) to D3 was estimated from: Δ%3 = (D3-D0)/D0.

RESULTS

A total of 128 patients were included, with a median age of 52 (39-62) years; 72% were female. Overall survival reached 88%. One hundred and fifteen (90%) patients received corticosteroids, with a LT-free survival rate of 66% at 90 days. Under multivariate analysis, D0-INR (odds ratio [OR] 6.85; 95% CI 2.23-21.06; p <0.001), Δ%3-INR ≥0.1% (OR 6.97; 95% CI 1.59-30.46; p <0.01) and Δ%3-bilirubin ≥-8% (OR 5.14; 95% CI 1.09-24.28; p <0.04) were predictive of a non-response. The SURFASA score: -6.80+1.92∗(D0-INR)+1.94∗(Δ%3-INR)+1.64∗(Δ%3-bilirubin), created by combining these variables, was highly predictive of LT or death (AUC = 0.93) (88% specificity; 84% sensitivity) with a cut-off point of <-0.9. Below this cut-off, the chance of responding was 75%. With a score higher than 1.75, the risk of dying or being transplanted was between 85% and 100%.

CONCLUSION

In patients with AS-AIH, INR at the introduction of corticosteroids and the evolution of INR and bilirubin are predictive of LT or death. Within 3 days of initiating corticosteroids, the SURFASA score can identify non-responders who require a referral for LT. This score needs to be validated in a prospective cohort.

LAY SUMMARY

The management of patients with acute severe autoimmune hepatitis is highly challenging, particularly regarding their early referral for liver transplantation. We found that international normalized ratio at the initiation of corticosteroid therapy and the evolution of international normalized ratio and bilirubin values after 3 days of therapy were highly predictive of liver transplantation or death. We are thus proposing a score that combines these variables and identifies patients in whom liver transplantation is urgently required.

Crossroad of infection and autoimmunity in acute liver failure: a case report

Background

Acute liver failure (ALF) is a syndromic diagnosis, consisting of jaundice, coagulopathy, and any degree of encephalopathy in a patient without pre-existing liver disease within 26 weeks of the onset of symptoms. Autoimmune hepatitis has a wide range of presentations and can rarely present as ALF, which frequently tends to be autoantibody negative. Tropical infections like dengue, malaria, and leptospirosis, which present as mimickers of ALF, always remain a differential diagnosis of ALF and mandate an etiology specific management. In rare cases, such infections themselves act as a trigger for autoimmunity. We report a case of diagnostic crossroads of infection and autoimmunity, presenting as acute liver failure and describe the challenges in management.

Case presentation

A 25-year-old female presented with a syndromic diagnosis of acute liver failure with possibility of tropical illness-related ALF mimic on account of positive Leptospira serology. After initial improvement, there was a rebound worsening of liver functions which prompted a liver biopsy. Biopsy narrowed the differential to Leptospira-associated hepatitis and severe auto-immune hepatitis. Trial of low dose steroid was given which led to dramatic improvement.

Conclusion

Tropical infections can present as ALF mimics and can themselves act as triggers for autoimmunity. Distinguishing such cases from de-novo acute severe autoimmune hepatitis is difficult and requires therapeutic brinksmanship. An early trial of steroid is mandated but comes with its own challenges.

Limitation of the simplified scoring system for the diagnosis of autoimmune Hepatitis with acute onset

Autoimmune Hepatitis (AIH) is a chronic inflammatory liver disease of unknown aetiology characterized by the presence of autoantibodies, hypergammaglobulinaemia with specific IgG increase and interface hepatitis on liver histology. The clinical course of AIH is classically characterized by fluctuating periods of decreased or increased disease activity and therefore its clinical spectrum is variable ranging from no symptoms to severe acute hepatitis and even fulminant hepatic failure. Acute presentation may not differ from acute hepatitis of other causes and diagnosis can be difficult. We describe our experience on diagnostic performance of the two AIH scoring systems in acute onset of AIH and found that revised version of the original criteria (1999) achieves the diagnosis in about 30% of patients who presented with normal IgG serum levels and lower frequency of autoantibody positivity in whom the simplified score did not allow the diagnosis.

Clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of acute severe autoimmune hepatitis

Background and aim

Acute severe autoimmune hepatitis (AS-AIH) is a rare cause of acute liver failure (ALF), which is often neglected and delayed in treatment. The purpose of this study was to analyze the clinical characteristics and therapeutic effects of AS-AIH.

Methods

Retrospective analysis was performed. AIH was diagnosed according to the International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group (IAIHG) criteria revised in 1999. AS-AIH was defined as an acute presentation (onset of symptoms to presentation of ≤ 26 weeks) and INR of ≥ 1.5, and no histologic evidence of cirrhosis.

Results

Twelve patients were diagnosed as AS-AIH. At baseline, median immunoglobulin G was 28.35 g/L (range, 11.4–49.2). Ten (83.3%) patients were antinuclear antibodies and/or anti-smooth muscle antibodies positive. The prominent histologic characteristics were lobular necrosis/inflammation (91.7%) and plasma cell infiltration (100%). All patients received corticosteroid therapy. Death occurred in 2 (16.7%) patients within 30 days resulted from ALF. The average interval between the onset of symptoms and initiation of corticosteroid therapy in deceased patients was 65 days, compared with 19 days for survivors.

Conclusions

AS-AIH is an uncommon disease with poor outcomes. Patients with acute severe hepatitis of unknown cause should be minded the possibility of AS-AIH and corticosteroids should be considered as soon as possible.

Recent updates on the management of autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is an immunoinflammatory chronic liver disease with dynamic and rather heterogeneous disease manifestations. A trend of increasing prevalence of AIH has been observed worldwide, along with a relative increase in the percentage of male patients. AIH is characterized and diagnosed based on serum biochemistry and liver histology: elevated aminotransferases and serum immunoglobulin G (IgG), the presence of serum anti-nuclear antibody or anti-smooth muscle antibody, and interface lympho-plasmacytic hepatitis. Clinical manifestations differ among disease subtypes with distinct time-frames, i.e., AIH with a chronic insidious onset, and acute-onset AIH (the diagnosis of which is often challenging due to the lack of typical serum findings). The absence of disease-specific biomarkers or histological findings may expand the disease phenotype into drug-induced AIH-like liver injury. Corticosteroids and azathioprine are recommended first-line treatments for AIH. The complete normalization of aminotransferases and serum IgG is an essential treatment response to ensure long-term overall survival. An incomplete response or intolerance to these drugs is considered an indication for second-line treatment, especially with mycophenolate mofetil. Life-long maintenance treatment is required for the majority of patients, but the few who achieve prolonged and stringent biochemical remission with lower alanine aminotransferase and IgG within the normal range may be able to discontinue the medications. In the future, the quality of life of AIH patients should be managed by personalized medicine, including the appropriate selection and dosing of first-line therapy and perhaps alternating with potential therapeutics, and the prediction of the success of treatment withdrawal.

Histopathological analysis of autoimmune hepatitis with "acute" presentation: Differentiation from drug-induced liver injury

AIM

Presently, no standardized definition or acceptable diagnostic criteria have been established for acute presentation of autoimmune hepatitis (AP-AIH), making it difficult to differentiate that condition from drug-induced liver injury (DILI). This study aimed to characterize clinical and histological features for distinguishing between AP-AIH and DILI.

METHODS

Clinical, biochemical, and histological characteristics of AP-AIH and DILI in clinically well-characterized cases were compared in a standardized manner to clarify differences.

RESULTS

In clinical evaluations, immunoglobulin G level and rate of anti-nuclear antibody positivity were greater in AP-AIH than DILI cases. As for diagnosis of each condition, significant (P < 0.01) differences were found for 10 features: lobular necrosis/inflammation, cobblestone appearance of hepatocytes, plasma cell infiltration in liver parenchyma, centrilobular fibrosis, hepatic rosette formation in areas with cobblestone appearance, portal inflammation, interface hepatitis, prominent plasma cells in portal areas, bile duct injury, and hepatic rosette formation in periportal areas. The area under the curve and cut-off values for the combination of these 10 features were 0.95 and 9 (sensitivity 86%, specificity 90%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Combinations of histological features were found to be helpful for differentiating AP-AIH from DILI, but we were not able to statistically identify an individual feature as definitive.

Infectious complications and timing for liver transplantation in autoimmune acute liver failure in Japan: a subanalysis based on nationwide surveys between 2010 and 2015

BACKGROUND

The prognosis of autoimmune acute liver failure (ALF) without liver transplantation (LT) is poor worldwide. We subanalyzed infectious complications of autoimmune ALF using data of nationwide surveys between 2010 and 2015 retrospectively and tried to determine when to evaluate the efficacy of corticosteroid (CS) treatment or abandon it for LT based on objective data.

METHODS

One hundred and forty-four patients with autoimmune ALF, comprising 79 ALF with coma ≤ I, 52 ALF with coma ≥ II and 13 late onset hepatic failure (LOHF), were analyzed.

RESULTS

CS was administered to 140 (97%) patients. Thirty-seven (26%) patients had infectious complications. Patients with infection revealed more advanced disease type (p < 0.001) and poorer spontaneous survival (p < 0.001) than those without infection. Median (interquartile range) duration between diagnosis of ALF and onset of infection was 18.5 (11-36) days, and that between introduction of CS and onset of infection was 17 (10.5-36) days. Seventy-nine (55%) recovered without LT, 14 (10%) received LT and 51 (35%) died without LT. Dead or transplanted patients were older (p = 0.0057), and revealed more advanced liver failure (p < 0.001) and more occurrence of infection (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

A critical point for evaluating the efficacy of CS treatment and switching to LT is at most 2-week after diagnosis of ALF and introduction of CS. More important, we should accelerate the point and prepare for LT in cases of ALF with coma ≥ II and LOHF, and we should have performed LT by then at the latest in case of failure to improve.

Postinfectious Autoimmune Hepatitis-Induced Liver Failure: A Consequence of Hepatitis A Virus Infection

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a chronic inflammatory immune-mediated hepatic pathology of unclear etiology. The mechanisms initiating and driving autoimmune inflammation of the liver and the loss of hepatic tolerance are still elusive. Several studies have documented the involvement of genetic factors and triggering agents such as toxic injury, treatment with immune-modifying drugs, or previous viral infections with perhaps strongest evidence for the hepatitis C virus. Rarely, AIH has been reported to develop after hepatitis A virus infection. We describe a case of de novo AIH in a patient with a history of recent hepatitis A virus infection.

Acute onset autoimmune hepatitis: Clinical presentation and treatment outcomes

INTRODUCTION AND AIM

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) may present acutely, which can rapidly progress to fulminant type. This pattern has been described worldwide but is generally under-reported. We aim to describe the clinical presentation and treatment outcomes of patients with acute onset AIH.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A multicenter retrospective cohort study of patients with acute onset AIH. Clinical, biochemical, and histological data were analyzed and the outcomes were reported.

RESULTS

Seventy patients were included. The mean age was 33.8±1.5 years and 58.6% were female. Upon initial presentation, 94% had jaundice, 44% had fatigue, 31% had pruritus, and 29% had abdominal pain. Biochemical analysis revealed elevated alanine transaminase (733±463.6), aspartate transaminase (699±423), and total bilirubin (210±181.8). Antinuclear antibody (ANA) was positive in 61% of patients, anti-smooth muscle antibody (ASMA) in 69%, and both in 31%; immunoglobulin G (IgG) was elevated in 86% of patients. Advanced fibrosis was found in 39%. Complete remission was achieved in 74.3%, two patients required liver transplants and six died. No specific biomarkers were identified as predictive of remission; however, advanced age was associated with poor prognosis.

CONCLUSION

Acute onset AIH is a disease that requires early diagnosis and management. We confirmed that elevated transaminases are the hallmark of biochemical presentation of acute AIH. High IgG, ANA and ASMA are typically present in such patients upon presentation, however, their absence does not totally exclude the diagnosis. Initial response to treatment was excellent; however, the long-term mortality was higher than the general patient population.

Current concepts in acute liver failure

Acute liver failure (ALF) is a severe condition secondary to a myriad of causes associated with poor outcomes. The prompt diagnosis and identification of the aetiology allow the administration of specific treatments plus supportive strategies and to define the overall prognosis, the probability of developing complications and the need for liver transplantation. Pivotal issues are adequate monitoring and the institution of prophylactic strategies to reduce the risk of complications, such as progressive liver failure, cerebral oedema, renal failure, coagulopathies or infections. In this article, we review the main aspects of ALF, including the definition, diagnosis and complications. Also, we describe the standard-of-care strategies and recent advances in the treatment of ALF. Finally, we include our experience of care patients with ALF.

CLIF-C Organ Failure Score and Liver Volume Predict Prognosis in Steroid-Treated Severe Acute Autoimmune Hepatitis

Controversies and debates remain regarding the best management of severe acute‐onset autoimmune hepatitis (SA‐AIH) due to the lack of useful outcome or complication prediction systems. We conducted this clinical practice‐based observational study to clarify whether Chronic Liver Failure Consortium Organ Failure scores (CLIF‐C OFs) and the computed tomography–derived liver volume to standard liver volume (CTLV/SLV) ratio at admission to a tertiary transplant center can predict outcomes and complications due to infection. Thirty‐four consecutive corticosteroid‐treated patients with SA‐AIH from 2007 to 2018 were included. Severe hepatitis was defined as an international normalized ratio (of prothrombin time) over 1.3 any time before admission. Of the 34 corticosteroid‐treated patients with SA‐AIH inclusive of 25 (73.5%) acute liver failure cases, transplant‐free survival was observed in 24 patients (70.6%). Any infection was noticed in 10 patients (29.4%). CLIF‐C OFs, at the cutoff of 9, significantly predicted survival (P = 0.0002, log‐rank test), outperformed the Model for End‐stage Liver Disease system in predicting outcome (P = 0.0325), and significantly discriminated between liver transplant and death in a competing risk analysis. SA‐AIH was characterized as having decreased CTLV/SLV, which was also predictive of survival (P < 0.0001). Interestingly, CLIF‐C OFs, especially the subscores for respiratory dysfunction, also predicted infection (P = 0.007). Conclusion: In corticosteroid‐treated patients with SA‐AIH, CLIF‐C OFs and CTLV/SLV ratios predicted both survival outcome and complications due to infection. Further investigation is warranted to determine whether making decisions based on CLIF‐C OFs or CTLV/SLV ratios is useful.

Acute onset of autoimmune hepatitis in children and adolescents

BACKGROUND

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a rare progressive liver disease, which manifests as acute hepatitis in 40%-50% of pediatric cases. This refers predominantly to spontaneous exacerbations of previously unrecognized subclinical AIH with laboratory and histological signs of chronic hepatitis, or to acute exacerbations of known chronic disease. Only a few of these patients fulfill criteria for acute liver failure (ALF).

METHODS

Forty children diagnosed with AIH in our center between 2000 and 2018 were included in this study. All of them fulfilled revised diagnostic criteria of the International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group (IAIHG) for probable or confirmed AIH, and other etiologies of liver diseases were excluded. Patients were divided into two groups: acute AIH (A-AIH) or chronic AIH (C-AIH).

RESULTS

Acute onset of AIH occurred in 19/40 children (48%). Six of them fulfilled the criteria of ALF with coagulopathy and encephalopathy. Five of 6 children with ALF suffered from exacerbation of previously undiagnosed chronic AIH, among which 4 children were histologically confirmed as micronodular cirrhosis. The remaining one patient had fulminant AIH with centrilobular necrosis, but no histological signs of previous chronic liver damage. We observed significantly lower levels of albumin, higher levels of aminotransferases, bilirubin, INR, IgG, higher IAIHG score and more severe histological findings in A-AIH than in C-AIH. No differences in patient age and presence of autoantibodies were observed between A-AIH and C-AIH. All children, including those with ALF and cirrhosis, were treated with corticosteroids, and are alive and achieved AIH remission. Liver transplant was not indicated in any patient.

CONCLUSION

Rapid and accurate diagnosis of A-AIH may be difficult. However, timely start of immunosuppressive therapy improves prognosis and decreases number of indicated liver transplantations in children with AIH.

Unfavorable prognosis of patients with acute liver injury due to drug-induced liver injury and acute exacerbation of hepatitis B virus infection

AIM

Acute liver injury (ALI) has a favorable prognosis, whereas acute liver failure (ALF) leads to organ failure and thus has an unfavorable prognosis. The effect of each etiology on the clinical course of ALI remains unclear. This study aimed to determine how each etiology and glucocorticoid on the unfavorable etiology affects the clinical course of ALI.

METHODS

This prospective observational study enrolled 522 patients with ALI/ALF from 2004 and 2017. To evaluate the influence of etiology on prognosis, decision tree analysis was carried out using age, disease type, etiology, and the presence of hepatic encephalopathy.

RESULTS

Of 522 patients, 398 patients satisfied the ALI criteria at registration in this study. The ALI etiologies were as follows: viral hepatitis through oral infection (n = 54), acute hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection (n = 24), acute exacerbation of HBV infection (n = 30), de novo hepatitis due to HBV (n = 5), autoimmune hepatitis (n = 59), drug-induced liver injury (DILI; n = 85), other viruses (n = 12), and undetermined (n = 129). ALI in 46 patients progressed to ALF after registration. Of 11 patients (age >52 years) with ALF due to acute exacerbation of HBV infection or DILI, seven patients (63.6%) died. Whether glucocorticoid affected the clinical course of ALI due to acute exacerbation of HBV infection or DILI was evaluated using propensity score matching (age, sex, alanine aminotransferase, total bilirubin, and prothrombin time-international normalized ratio). Glucocorticoid did not improve the prognosis of ALI patients due to the two etiologies.

CONCLUSIONS

Progression of ALI due to DILI or acute exacerbation of HBV infection to ALF showed a poor prognosis.

UPDATE OF THE BRAZILIAN SOCIETY OF HEPATOLOGY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR DIAGNOSIS AND MANAGEMENT OF AUTOIMMUNE DISEASES OF THE LIVER

ABSTRACT New data concerning the management of autoimmune liver diseases have emerged since the last single-topic meeting sponsored by the Brazilian Society of Hepatology to draw recommendations about the diagnosis and treatment of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), overlap syndromes of AIH, PBC and PSC and specific complications and topics concerning AIH and cholestatic liver diseases. This manuscript updates those previous recommendations according to the best evidence available in the literature up to now. The same panel of experts that took part in the first consensus document reviewed all recommendations, which were subsequently scrutinized by all members of the Brazilian Society of Hepatology using a web-based approach. The new recommendations are presented herein.

Acute Severe Autoimmune Hepatitis: Corticosteroids or Liver Transplantation?

Acute severe presentations of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) represent a challenge for the transplant community. As a disease, it is poorly characterized, and there is a weak evidence base to guide diagnosis and treatment. Early identification of acute severe AIH is key because it determines the initiation of corticosteroids, which can be lifesaving. However, their use in this setting remains controversial. The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score, severity of coagulopathy, and grade of encephalopathy may be predictors of outcome with corticosteroid therapy. The optimal timing of liver transplantation (LT) can be difficult to determine and, as such, the decision to proceed to transplantation should not be delayed by protracted courses of corticosteroids. The aim of this review is to better characterize this subset of patients; to differentiate them clinically, serologically, and histologically from chronic AIH and other causes of acute liver failure; and to present the role, predictors, and optimal timings of corticosteroid therapy and LT. Although this review is specific to adults, many principles hold true for the pediatric population.

Autoimmune hepatitis in patients with multiple sclerosis: The role of immunomodulatory treatment

BACKGROUND

Development of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) has been sporadically reported in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) either concurrently or after treatment with immunomodulatory drugs, including interferon-beta (IFN-β) and steroids.

AIM

To report a large cohort of 14 patients with MS diagnosed with AIH during an assessment of deranged liver function tests (LFTs).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From 2005 to 2017, we prospectively identified 14 (13 women) patients with MS who suffered also from AIH after investigation in our department for the presence of deranged LFTs. Age at diagnosis of MS was 36.7 ± 9.3 years while at diagnosis of AIH 43.1 ± 12 years.

RESULTS

AIH diagnosis was based on elevation of aminotransferases in all patients [alanine aminotransferase: 520 IU/L (range: 115-1219)], elevation of IgG in 6, compatible autoantibody profile in all, including 5 patients with liver-specific autoantibodies and typical or compatible histological features in 11 patients. 5 patients were under treatment with IFN-β plus methylprednisolone pulses, 3 with IFN-β plus oral steroids, 1 with IFN-β, 4 with methylprednisolone pulses whereas 1 patient was free of treatment. The median time from IFN-β initiation to the development of hepatitis was 12 months (range:1-120). Treatment for AIH was initiated in 13 patients with prednisolone (0.5-1 mg/kg/day) plus mycophenolate myfetil (2 g/day) in 10 and prednisolone plus azathioprine in 3 with complete and partial response in 11 and 2 patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The differential diagnosis of hepatitis in MS patients should include AIH and in particular when immunomodulatory treatment has been preceded. Autoantibody testing and liver histology play fundamental role in establishing a prompt diagnosis of AIH in these patients. Treatment of AIH in patients with MS seems safe and efficient as complete or partial response was recorded in all of our patients.

Clinical narrative: autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is an inflammatory liver disease that is characterized by circulating autoantibodies, hypergammaglobulinemia, and a lymphoplasmocytic infiltration with interface hepatitis on liver biopsy. Treatment with corticosteroids and other immunosuppressive agents is effective and early diagnosis can result in near-normal life expectancy. Untreated patients, however, can progress to cirrhosis and liver failure. The clinical presentation is heterogeneous and may pose diagnostic and therapeutic dilemmas. This case-based review will address the diagnosis and management of this disease, in addition to difficult but commonly encountered clinical scenarios.

Clinical and prognostic implications of acute onset of Autoimmune Hepatitis: An Italian multicentre study

Autoimmune Hepatitis (AIH) can present under clinical profile as acute hepatitis of unexplained cause. We analyzed clinical, therapeutical and prognostic implications of AIH presenting as acute hepatitis in a cohort of patients admitted to 3 referral Centres in Italy. AIH onset was considered acute when transaminases were higher than 10 times the normal limit and/or bilirubin higher than 5 mg/ml (irrespectively from the histology, available only in 62% of cases). Among 479 patients diagnosed as AIH, 202 (43%) met the criteria of acute onset. This former group of patients on the basis of the histology has been subdivided in the "genuine" acute onset (83 pts) and acute "on chronic" onset (45 pts) At onset, clinical acute AIH showed significantly higher ALT, bilirubin and INR levels (p < 0.001 for all), lower albumin values (p = 0.001), similar IgG levels; Response to treatment was similar between the two groups. The progression to liver cirrhosis or its complications was significantly less frequent in acute onset AIH (13% vs. 22%, p = 0.02). The "genuine" acute patients showed a higher albumin serum levels (40 vs. 36, p = 0.001), lower INR levels (1.12 vs. 1.26, p = 0.002) and less tendency to the progression of liver disease (7% vs. 12%, p = NS) with respect to acute "on chronic" onset patients. Clinical acute hepatitis represents a common presentation of AIH, responds to standard immunosuppression regimen and would seem to be correlated with a better long-term prognosis.

Differential Diagnosis of Hepatic Necrosis Encountered at Autopsy

The liver is subject to a variety of extrinsic and intrinsic insults that manifest with both specific and nonspecific patterns of necrosis. In the autopsy setting, these patterns are often encountered as incidental findings or even causes of death. There are several etiologies of hepatic necrosis, including toxins, drug injuries, viral infections, ischemic injuries, and metabolic disease, all of which possess overlapping gross and histologic presentations. Nonetheless, patterned necrosis in the context of clinical and demographic history allows for the forensic pathologist to develop a differential diagnosis, which may then be pruned into a specific or likely cause. The aim of the following review is to elucidate these patterns in the context of the liver diseases from which they arise with the goal developing a differential diagnosis and ultimate determination of etiology. Acad Forensic Pathol. 2018 8(2): 256-295.

Emerging therapeutic biomarkers of autoimmune hepatitis and their impact on current and future management

Autoimmune hepatitis lacks a quantifiable biomarker that is close to its pathogenic mechanisms and that accurately reflects inflammatory activity, correlates with treatment response, and ensures inactive disease before treatment withdrawal. Areas covered: Micro-ribonucleic acids, programmed death-1 protein and its ligands, macrophage migration inhibitory factor, soluble CD163, B cell activating factor, and metabolite patterns in blood were considered the leading candidates as therapeutic biomarkers after search of PubMed from August 1981 to August 2017 using the search words 'biomarkers of autoimmune hepatitis'. Expert commentary: Each of the candidate biomarkers is close to the putative pathogenic mechanisms of autoimmune hepatitis, and each has attributes that support its potential role as a surrogate marker of inflammatory activity that can be monitored during treatment. Future studies must demonstrate the superiority of each biomarker to conventional indices of inflammatory activity and validate their correlation with treatment response and outcome. A reliable therapeutic biomarker would facilitate the individualization of current management algorithms, ensure that pathogenic mechanisms were disrupted or eliminated prior to treatment withdrawal, and reduce the frequency of relapse or unnecessary protracted therapy. The biomarker might also prove to be a target of next-generation therapies.

Nonviral or Drug-Induced Etiologies of Acute Liver Failure

Acute liver failure (ALF) is a rare but highly fatal condition. The most common causes include drug-induced and viral hepatitis, but other less common etiologies, especially autoimmune hepatitis, Budd-Chiari syndrome, and Wilson disease, need to be considered. Because diagnosis is frequently tied to potential for reversibility of ALF and prognosis, early identification in a timely manner is crucial. Other causes of ALF are more easily recognizable based on specific circumstances, such as ALF in pregnancy or ischemic hepatitis. Ultimately, maintaining a wide differential diagnosis in patients with ALF is essential to identifying the proper treatment and prognosis.

CD4+Foxp3+CD25+/- Tregs characterize liver tissue specimens of patients suffering from drug-induced autoimmune hepatitis: A clinical-pathological study

BACKGROUND

The diagnosis of drug-induced autoimmune hepatitis (DIAIH) and its differentiation from idiopathic autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is challenging. This study aimed to differentiate DIAIH from AIH by comparing the biochemical changes, histological features, and frequencies of CD4⁺Foxp3⁺CD25^+/- regulatory T cells (Tregs) in liver tissues or peripheral blood lymphocytes.

METHODS

A total of 15 DIAIH patients and 24 AIH patients who underwent liver biopsies at initial presentation were enrolled in this study. The liver histological changes were assessed by HE staining. The phenotypic recognition and distribution of CD4⁺Foxp3⁺CD25^+/- Tregs in liver tissues were evaluated by single/double immunostains in serial sections. The CD4⁺Foxp3⁺CD25^+/- Tregs in peripheral blood were analyzed by flow cytometry.

RESULTS

The median values of ALT and AST were 404.50 U/L and 454.10 U/L in DIAIH patients and 309.50 U/L and 315.00 U/L in AIH patients, respectively. More importantly, for the first time we found that patients with DIAIH had higher levels of serum ALT and AST, more severe degree of lobular inflammation, higher frequencies of zone 3 necrosis and higher number of lobular CD4⁺Foxp3⁺CD25^-Tregs compared with AIH (P < 0.05). Furthermore, there were positive correlations in DIAIH between the degree of lobular inflammation and either the AST/ALT level or the number of lobular CD4⁺Foxp3⁺CD25^- Tregs (P < 0.05). However, the frequency of peripheral blood CD4⁺Foxp3⁺CD25^+/- Tregs were not significantly different between DIAIH and AIH.

CONCLUSIONS

The differences of ALT, AST and the number of lobular CD4⁺Foxp3⁺CD25^- Tregs between patients with DIAIH and those with AIH are clinically helpful in differentiating these two diseases in their early stage.

Clinical and Pathological Characteristics of Autoimmune Hepatitis with Acute Presentation

Aim. To study the differences between acute presentation-autoimmune hepatitis (A-AIH) and chronic autoimmune hepatitis (C-AIH). Methods. Through long-term follow-up, 80 patients were included in our study by using the revised international autoimmune hepatitis group (IAIHG) score and were divided into acute and chronic groups for comparison. Results. No significant difference was found in the gender, age, IAIHG score (pretreatment/posttreatment), definite diagnosis rate, extrahepatic autoimmune disease, onset time, or treatment before biopsy between the acute and chronic groups. In terms of clinical symptoms, A-AIH patients were more prone to jaundice, anorexia, yellow urine, and detesting oil than C-AIH patients, but melena only occurred in chronic group (P < 0.05). The acute group exhibited more severe injury upon histological evaluation, with lobular inflammation and bile duct injury, especially central necrosis of the lobule, more pronounced in this group (P < 0.05). Conclusion. A-AIH had manifestations of acute hepatitis and presented cholestasis. Serum indicators could preliminarily distinguish A-AIH and C-AIH. Histologically, the primary manifestation of A-AIH was lobular inflammation, which was usually accompanied by lobular central necrosis. For the diagnosis of A-AIH, more attention should be paid to long-term follow-up. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT02994537).

Clinical features of pediatric autoimmune hepatitis in Japan: A nationwide survey

AIM

The purpose of this study was to determine the characteristics of children with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) in Japan.

METHODS

Questionnaires that asked about patients newly diagnosed with AIH from 2009 to 2013 were sent to hospitals certified as training facilities for pediatrics in January 2015.

RESULTS

A total of 35 patients were enrolled. The median age at diagnosis was 10 years (range, 3 months-15 years), and the male-to-female ratio was 2:3. Female patients were more prevalent among those older than 10 years and male patients were more prevalent in those younger than 10 years. Fifteen patients had jaundice as a subjective symptom, and 5 had hepatic coma grade II. Liver histology classified 20 as chronic hepatitis, 8 as acute hepatitis, and 4 as cirrhosis. Liver histology was not described in 4 patients. Among the 35 patients, 32 were treated with corticosteroids and 29 were initially treated with methylprednisolone pulse therapy. Corticosteroid therapy was effective in 27 patients and ineffective in 1 patient. Plasma exchange with continuous i.v. infusion of cyclosporine A was given to 7 patients with acute hepatitis. Of these, 4 patients presented with fulminant hepatitis and received high-flow, continuous hemodiafiltration.

CONCLUSIONS

This survey clarified that the clinical profile of pediatric AIH in Japan is not only different from that of adult AIH in Japan but is also different from that of pediatric AIH in other countries.

Association of interleukin (IL)-4 variable number of tandem repeats (VNTRs) and IL-4-590 promoter polymorphisms with susceptibility to pediatric autoimmune hepatitis type 1

OBJECTIVE

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a chronic inflammatory liver disease mediated by an autoimmune reaction to hepatocytes, the present study aimed to assess the possible associations between interleukin-4 (IL-4) variable number of tandem repeats (VNTRs) and IL-4-590 promoter polymorphisms and susceptibility to autoimmune hepatitis type 1 in children.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

The study was performed on 101 children diagnosed with AIH and 104 apparently healthy, age and sex-matched control children, diagnosis of AIH was based on the simplified score for the diagnosis of AIH. Genotyping for the IL-4 VNTR and IL-4-590 were performed using PCR-RFLP.

RESULTS

The distribution of genotype frequencies of IL-4 gene intron 3 VNTR polymorphism were not significantly different between AIH patients and controls for 3R/2R and 2R/2R genotypes, while the 2R allele distribution was significantly higher among AIH patients than the control group. The frequency of IL-4-590 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) CT and TT genotypes was statistically higher among AIH patients than controls.

CONCLUSION

This study revealed the presence of an association between IL-4 -590 TT genotype and T alleles with increased AIH risk in pediatric patients, also assess its severity as they were detected with Child Plugh scores B and C.

Autoimmune hepatitis - update on clinical management in 2017

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a progressive immune mediated liver disease of unknown origin. Key diagnostic features include hypergammaglobulinemia/elevated serum-IgG, characteristic circulating autoantibodies, periportal hepatitis with interface activity on liver biopsy and the exclusion of hepatotropic viruses. However, the diagnosis is challenging in cholestatic and severe presentations. It can be difficult to differentiate AIH from drug-induced liver injury. Although many patients initially respond to standard immunosuppressive therapy, a significant proportion experiences intolerable side effects or insufficient treatment response. This underlines the need for effective alternative treatment options, which are still very limited and based on rather poor evidence. This review summarises core aspects of the clinical management of AIH with focus on recent achievements and unmet needs.

Immunoserological and histological differences between autoimmune hepatitis with acute presentation and chronic autoimmune hepatitis

AIM

The histological features of clinically chronic autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) have been well established, with interface hepatitis and plasma cell infiltration as hallmark lesions, however, the immunoserological and histological features of recent-onset and acute AIH remain undefined. The goal of this study was to define the immunoserological and histological differences between AIH with acute presentation and chronic AIH.

METHODS

Thirty-two consecutive patients with well-characterized AIH who had undergone a liver biopsy were identified at our institution. These patients were divided into two groups. Sixteen patients whose liver dysfunction had persisted for at least 12 months were defined as chronic AIH (C-AIH) patients, and 16 patients whose liver dysfunction had been within normal limits for >12 months previously, and had only recently been found to have abnormal function for the first time, were defined as AIH with acute presentation (AIH-a) patients. Various biological and histological characteristics were compared between these two patient groups.

RESULTS

No significant differences were found between the groups for age, body mass index, serum levels of total bilirubin, transaminase, alkaline phosphatase, prothrombin activity, immunoglobulin, titers of antinuclear antibody, or diagnostic scores between the groups. Histologically, there was no significant difference in the degree of interface hepatitis, plasma cell infiltration, or centrilobular necrosis between AIH-a and C-AIH patients. However, histological active findings such as activity, lobular inflammation, rosette formation, spotty necrosis, seroid-laden macrophages, and single cell necrosis were significantly more frequent in AIH-a patients, whereas portal fibrosis was significantly more frequent in C-AIH patients. Only one case among the 16 AIH-a patients was confirmed as acute AIH, showing massive centrilobular necrosis with a mild degree of portal inflammation and interface hepatitis. All patients with AIH-a and C-AIH responded well to corticosteroid or ursodeoxycholic acid treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with AIH-a could not be distinguished from C-AIH patients clinically or immunoserologically. Based on the histopathological findings of the liver, almost all cases of AIH-a might be exacerbations of non-symptomatic pre-existing C-AIH.

Autoimmune acute liver failure and seronegative autoimmune liver disease in children: Are they different from classical disease?

OBJECTIVES

Presentation as autoimmune acute liver failure (AI-ALF) and seronegative autoimmune liver disease (SN-AILD) represents two uncommon variants of AILD. We compared the clinical profile and outcome of AI-ALF with autoimmune-non-acute liver failure (AI-non-ALF) and also SN-AILD with seropositive autoimmune liver disease (SP-AILD).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Children managed as AI-ALF and AI-non-ALF including SN-AILD and SP-AILD were enrolled and compared. AI-non-ALF was diagnosed by simplified diagnostic criteria and AI-ALF by Pediatric Acute Liver Failure Study Group criteria with positive autoantibody, exclusion of other etiologies, elevated immunoglobulin G and histology when available.

RESULTS

Seventy children [AI-ALF=15 and AI-non-ALF=55 (SN-AILD=11, SP-AILD=44)] were evaluated. Age at presentation [7 (1.2-16) vs. 9 (2-17) years] percentage of female patients (67 vs. 62%), and AILD type (type II, 53 vs. 31%) were similar in AI-ALF and AI-non-ALF patients], respectively. 8/15 AI-ALF cases were treated with steroids (improved-4, liver transplant-1, and death-3) and 7/15 died before initiation of therapy. Hepatic encephalopathy (100 vs. 16.3%; P<0.001), massive hepatic necrosis (60 vs. 0%; P<0.001), and higher pediatric end-stage liver disease [n=53, 29.9 (13.1-56.9) vs. 9.8 (-10-28.7) P<0.001], model for end-stage liver disease [n=17, 38.5 (24-46) vs. 18 (6-24); P=0.005], and Child-Turcotte-Pugh [n=70, 13 (8-13) vs. 9 (5-13); P<0.001] scores were features of AI-ALF. Poorer response to immunosuppression (4/8 vs. 48/55; P=0.02) and higher mortality (11/15 vs. 4/55; P=0.0001) were seen in AI-ALF than in AI-non-ALF patients. Clinicolaboratory profile, therapeutic response, and outcome were similar in SN-AILD and SP-AILD.

CONCLUSION

AI-ALF is characterized by poorer liver function, lower response to immunosuppression, and higher mortality compared with SP or SN AI-non-ALF, which are similar.