1
|
Jia DD, Xu Y, Li T, Yang JL, Chen Y, Li T. Efficacy of salvage therapies after failure of adjuvant anti-PD-1 monotherapy for melanoma in the Chinese population: a multi-institutional cohort study. Invest New Drugs 2023:10.1007/s10637-023-01348-5. [PMID: 37093349 DOI: 10.1007/s10637-023-01348-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2022] [Accepted: 03/09/2023] [Indexed: 04/25/2023]
Abstract
The majority of melanoma patients experience relapse during adjuvant therapy or after the end of therapy. Sixty-one patients from 3 melanoma centres who experienced recurrence and received adjuvant pembrolizumab for resected stage III/IV melanoma were enrolled. Disease characteristics, recurrence characteristics, subsequent management and outcomes were retrospectively analysed. Sixty-one patients were enrolled in this study. The median time to first relapse from the commencement of adjuvant pembrolizumab was 8 months (1-22 months). The first recurrences were locoregional alone in 25 patients (41%), distant alone in 29 (47.5%) and concurrent locoregional and distant relapse in 7 (11.5%). At the first recurrence, 4 patients (80%) who underwent resection alone experienced further relapse of disease. Three (60%) patients who were treated with adjuvant pembrolizumab following surgery, 2 (100%) patients who were treated with adjuvant chemotherapy, 2 (66.7%) patients who were treated with adjuvant chemotherapy and pembrolizumab combined and 3 (100%) patients who were treated with adjuvant radiotherapy and pembrolizumab combined had further recurrence. Of the three patients treated with adjuvant BRAF/MEKi following the first relapse, none had yet recurred. Of the 8 patients treated with pembrolizumab alone, only one patient (12.5%) who recurred after ceasing adjuvant PD1 had a partial response. The overall response rate to BRAF/MEKi was 75%, 3/4; to pembrolizumab in combination with an oral multitargeted receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, it was 22.2%, 2/9; to chemotherapeutic agents alone, it was 33.3%, 1/3; and to chemotherapeutic agents combined with pembrolizumab, it was 37.5%, 3/8. The patient treated with imatinib had progressive disease after 3 months of treatment. Of the 6 patients who received temozolomide combined with pembrolizumab, 3 (3/6, 50%) had a partial response. The median OS of the patients who relapsed locoregionally only was longer than that of the patients who relapsed distally at the first recurrence (35 months and 14 months, respectively; P < 0.01). The outcomes of the patients with disease recurrence during or after the completion of 1 year of adjuvant anti-PD1 therapy were poor despite multimodality treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dong-Dong Jia
- Department of Bone and Soft-tissue Surgery, The Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310022, China
| | - Yu Xu
- Department of Musculoskeletal Surgery, Department of Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Ting Li
- Departments of Bone and Soft Tissue Tumour, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, 300060, China
| | - Ji-Long Yang
- Departments of Bone and Soft Tissue Tumour, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, 300060, China.
| | - Yong Chen
- Department of Musculoskeletal Surgery, Department of Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
| | - Tao Li
- Department of Bone and Soft-tissue Surgery, The Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310022, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Li T, Xu Y, Sun W, Yan W, Wang C, Hu T, Zhang X, Luo Z, Liu X, Chen Y. Adjuvant Anti-PD-1 Immunotherapy versus Conventional Therapy for Stage III Melanoma: A Real-World Retrospective Cohort Study. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2022; 16:ph16010041. [PMID: 36678538 PMCID: PMC9867270 DOI: 10.3390/ph16010041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2022] [Revised: 12/22/2022] [Accepted: 12/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
The use of adjuvant therapy has provided survival benefits in patients with advanced melanoma. This study aimed to explore the recurrence and prognosis of the PD-1 inhibitor, conventional interferon (IFN), or observation (OBS) on resected stage III acral and cutaneous melanoma patients through a retrospective analysis. Patients with resected stage III melanoma at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center from 2017 to 2021 were enrolled with all of their clinicopathologic characteristics collected. They were divided into three groups: PD-1 inhibitor, IFN, and OBS. Survival analyses were performed to indicate the significance of different adjuvant therapies. A total of 199 patients were enrolled (PD-1 n = 126; IFN n = 31; and OBS n = 42), with their median follow-up times being 21 months, 24 months, and 49 months, respectively. The PD-1 inhibitor significantly improved relapse-free survival (p = 0.027) and overall survival (p = 0.033) compared with conventional treatment (IFN+OBS). The superiority of the PD-1 inhibitor was witnessed in stage IIIC/D (p = 0.000) acral (p = 0.05) melanoma patients with ulceration (p = 0.011) or lymph node macrometastasis (p = 0.010). The PD-1 inhibitor significantly reduced local recurrence and systemic metastasis compared with conventional therapy (p = 0.002). In conclusion, adjuvant anti-PD-1 immunotherapy can achieve better survival outcomes in acral and cutaneous melanoma patients compared with conventional treatment, without considering adverse events. More clinical benefits were seen in later-stage acral melanoma patients with ulceration or lymph node macrometastasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tong Li
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
- Shanghai Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Shanghai 200032, China
- Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Yu Xu
- Department of Musculoskeletal Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Wei Sun
- Department of Musculoskeletal Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Wangjun Yan
- Department of Musculoskeletal Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Chunmeng Wang
- Department of Musculoskeletal Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Tu Hu
- Department of Musculoskeletal Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Xiaowei Zhang
- Department of Internal Medicine of Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Zhiguo Luo
- Department of Internal Medicine of Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Xin Liu
- Department of Internal Medicine of Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China
- Department of Head and Neck and Neuroendocrine Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Yong Chen
- Department of Musculoskeletal Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mo DC, Liang ZY, Chen L, Huang JF, Luo PH, Wang HL. Efficacy and safety of adjuvant therapy with PD‑1/PD‑L1 inhibitors in cancer. Exp Ther Med 2022; 24:749. [PMID: 36561965 PMCID: PMC9748656 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2022.11685] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2022] [Accepted: 08/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Anti-programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibodies have been widely used in cancers. The present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in human cancers. Studies were searched from Cochrane Library, PubMed and Embase databases. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated adjuvant therapy with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents in solid cancers were eligible for inclusion. As the primary focus of the meta-analysis, clinical outcome measures including overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and adverse events (AEs) were analyzed by Stata 15.0 software. A total of six RCTs (n=4,436) met the inclusion criteria. The DFS [hazard ratio (HR)=0.71; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.63-0.78; P<0.001] and OS (HR=0.66, 95% CI: 0.46-0.86, P<0.001) of patients were significantly prolonged by adjuvant immunotherapy. Subgroup analysis indicated that significantly improved DFS was observed in patients treated with different anti-PD-1/PD-L1 drugs (nivolumab, pembrolizumab, or atezolizumab), as well as in those with different tumors (melanoma, urothelial carcinoma, esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer, or renal cell carcinoma), and PD-L1 status [negative (<1%) or positive (≥1%)]. However, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors was associated with increased ≥ grade 3 treatment-related AEs (odds ratio=1.63; 95% CI: 1.20-2.21; P=0.002). The available evidence suggests that adjuvant therapy with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors provided more survival benefit than placebo for patients with cancer, with increased grade 3 or higher AEs. Prospero registration no. CRD42021290654.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dun-Chang Mo
- Radiotherapy Department, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi 530000, P.R. China,Correspondence to: Professor Dun-Chang Mo, Radiotherapy Department, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, 13 Dan-Cun Road, Nanning, Guangxi 530000, P.R. China
| | - Zi-Yu Liang
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi 530000, P.R. China
| | - Long Chen
- Ear, Nose and Throat and Head and Neck Surgery Department, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi 530000, P.R. China
| | - Jian-Feng Huang
- Radiotherapy Department, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi 530000, P.R. China
| | - Peng-Hui Luo
- Radiotherapy Department, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi 530000, P.R. China
| | - Han-Lei Wang
- Radiotherapy Department, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi 530000, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Falotico JM, Lipner SR. The pharmacotherapeutic management of nail unit and acral melanomas. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2022; 23:1273-1289. [PMID: 35702037 DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2022.2088279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2022] [Accepted: 06/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Acral and nail unit melanomas are rare subtypes of melanoma, which have poor prognoses. Current guidelines for optimal treatment are lacking. Recent clinical trials have evaluated new pharmacotherapeutic agents for melanoma treatment, with dramatically improved survival rates; however, studies on acral and nail unit melanomas are limited in comparison to trials on cutaneous melanoma. AREAS COVERED This is a comprehensive review of the literature regarding the available treatment options for acral and nail unit melanomas, with consideration of safety and tolerability. EXPERT OPINION Programmed cell death protein 1 inhibitors are more efficacious than cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 blockers in acral and nail unit melanomas, although both are well-tolerated. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors have good clinical activity, however, data on safety is relatively limited. There is minimal data on high dose interferon α-2b and cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors, and efficacy and safety must be evaluated in future trials before they can be recommended for use in this patient population. Prospective clinical trials on acral and nail unit melanomas are lacking, and must be performed in large patient populations, with international collaboration likely necessary in order to enroll adequate participants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julianne M Falotico
- Renaissance School of Medicine at Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Shari R Lipner
- Department of Dermatology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Cao J, Yang X, Chen S, Wang J, Fan X, Fu S, Yang L. The predictive efficacy of tumor mutation burden in immunotherapy across multiple cancer types: A meta-analysis and bioinformatics analysis. Transl Oncol 2022; 20:101375. [PMID: 35339028 PMCID: PMC8956924 DOI: 10.1016/j.tranon.2022.101375] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2022] [Accepted: 02/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The FDA has approved pembrolizumab in all cancers with TMB > 10Mut/Mb based on the findings from the phase 2 KEYNOTE-158 study. However, predictive efficacy of TMB is greeted with many skepticisms. Cancer patients with high TMB have a better prognosis. Notably, there is no evidence shown whether the good prognosis is caused by the tumor itself or by immunotherapy. We compared the meta subgroup analysis by tumor types with non-ICIs from TCGA database and found that immunotherapy can increase, not reduce, cancer patients’ OS with high TMB. TMB is a promising therapeutic and prognostic biomarker for immunotherapy, which indicates a better ORR, DCB, OS and PFS.
Purpose To explore the predictive efficacy of tumor mutation burden (TMB) as a potential biomarker for cancer patients treated with Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Methods We systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase and Web of Science for clinical studies (published between Jan 1, 2014 and Aug 30, 2021) comparing immunotherapy patients with high TMB to patients with low TMB. Our main endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), durable clinical benefit (DCB), overall survival (OS) and progress-free Survival (PFS). Moreover, we downloaded simple nucleotide variation (SNV) data of 33 major cancer types from the TCGA database as non-ICIs group, and compared the high TMB patients’ OS between the non-ICIs group and meta-analysis results. Results Of 10,450 identified studies, 41 were eligible and were included in our analysis (7713 participants). Compared with low TMB patients receiving ICIs, high TMB yielded a better ORR (RR = 2.73; 95% CI: 2.31–3.22; P = 0.043) and DCB (RR = 1.93; 95% CI: 1.64–2.28; P = 0.356), and a significantly increased OS (HR =0.24; 95% CI: 0.21–0.28; P < 0.001) and PFS (HR = 0.38; 95% CI: 0.34–0.42; P < 0.001). Furthermore, compared with non-ICIs group from the TCGA database, immunotherapy can improve OS in some cancer types with high TMB and better prognosis, including colorectal cancer, gastric cancer, lung cancer, melanoma and pan-cancer. Conclusion TMB is a promising therapeutic and prognostic biomarker for immunotherapy, which indicates a better ORR, DCB, OS and PFS. If there is a standard for TMB assessment and cut-off, it could improve the management of different cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinlong Cao
- Department of Urology, The Second Hospital of Lanzhou University, No.82 Cuiyingmen, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, China; Key Laboratory of Urological Diseases of Gansu Provincial, Lanzhou 730000, China.
| | - Xin Yang
- Reproductive Medicine Center, The Second Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China
| | - Siyu Chen
- Department of Urology, The Second Hospital of Lanzhou University, No.82 Cuiyingmen, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, China; Key Laboratory of Urological Diseases of Gansu Provincial, Lanzhou 730000, China
| | - Jirong Wang
- Department of Urology, The Second Hospital of Lanzhou University, No.82 Cuiyingmen, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, China; Key Laboratory of Urological Diseases of Gansu Provincial, Lanzhou 730000, China
| | - Xinpeng Fan
- Department of Urology, The Second Hospital of Lanzhou University, No.82 Cuiyingmen, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, China; Key Laboratory of Urological Diseases of Gansu Provincial, Lanzhou 730000, China
| | - Shengjun Fu
- Department of Urology, The Second Hospital of Lanzhou University, No.82 Cuiyingmen, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, China; Key Laboratory of Urological Diseases of Gansu Provincial, Lanzhou 730000, China
| | - Li Yang
- Department of Urology, The Second Hospital of Lanzhou University, No.82 Cuiyingmen, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, China; Key Laboratory of Urological Diseases of Gansu Provincial, Lanzhou 730000, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Huang T, Chen X, Zhang H, Liang Y, Li L, Wei H, Sun W, Wang Y. Prognostic Role of Tumor Mutational Burden in Cancer Patients Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Oncol 2021; 11:706652. [PMID: 34395281 PMCID: PMC8358612 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.706652] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2021] [Accepted: 07/12/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Immunotherapy is regarded as the most promising treatment for cancer. However, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are not effective for all patients. Herein, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore whether tumor mutational burden (TMB) can be used as a potential prognostic biomarker for cancer patients treated with ICIs. Methods We systematically retrieved relevant literature published in the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases up to December 28, 2020. All cohort studies and clinical trials that reported hazard ratios (HRs) for overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), as well as the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of high and low TMB patients, were included. All statistical analyses were performed using the R software. Results Pooled results from a total of 32 studies with 6,131 participants showed significantly increased OS (HR: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.53–0.71; P <0.01) and PFS (HR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.44–0.60; P <0.01) for the high TMB group receiving ICIs as compared to the low TMB group. Particularly, results were found to be more significant in studies with larger sample sizes (≥30), Western patients, higher TMB cutoff values (≥20 mut/Mb), anti–PD-1 therapy, and when the sample source was tissue and tumor type was either melanoma, small cell lung cancer, or gastric cancer. Conclusion TMB is a promising independent prognostic biomarker for cancer patients receiving ICIs, which could provide a new potential therapeutic strategy for high TMB patients who have failed traditional therapy. Furthermore, consistency in the key aspects of TMB assessment is expected in the future. Systematic Review Registration [https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO], Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO), identifier: CRD42021229016.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taobi Huang
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Clinical Medical College, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.,Department of Gastroenterology, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.,Key Laboratory for Gastrointestinal Diseases of Gansu Province, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Xia Chen
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Clinical Medical College, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.,Department of Gastroenterology, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.,Key Laboratory for Gastrointestinal Diseases of Gansu Province, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Huiyun Zhang
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Clinical Medical College, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.,Department of Gastroenterology, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.,Key Laboratory for Gastrointestinal Diseases of Gansu Province, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Yuan Liang
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Clinical Medical College, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.,Department of Gastroenterology, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.,Key Laboratory for Gastrointestinal Diseases of Gansu Province, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Longquan Li
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Clinical Medical College, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.,Department of Gastroenterology, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.,Key Laboratory for Gastrointestinal Diseases of Gansu Province, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Hui Wei
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Clinical Medical College, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.,Department of Gastroenterology, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.,Key Laboratory for Gastrointestinal Diseases of Gansu Province, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Weiming Sun
- Department of Endocrinology, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Yuping Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.,Key Laboratory for Gastrointestinal Diseases of Gansu Province, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Li J, Wang J, Li D, Wen X, Ding Y, Liu X, Jiang H, Huang F, Zhang X. Adjuvant PD-1 inhibitor versus high-dose interferon α-2b for Chinese patients with cutaneous and acral melanoma: A retrospective cohort analysis. Dermatol Ther 2021; 34:e15067. [PMID: 34302318 DOI: 10.1111/dth.15067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2021] [Accepted: 07/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
The clinical efficacy of PD-1 inhibitors as an adjuvant treatment for Asian melanoma patients has not yet been determined. This retrospective study analyzed the clinical data of 90 Chinese patients with completely resected, stage III cutaneous or acral melanoma who received either adjuvant PD-1 inhibitor or high-dose interferon α-2b (HDI). Anti-PD-1 treatment resulted in significantly longer RFS and DMFS than HDI in cutaneous melanoma patients, with hazard ratios (HRs) (anti-PD-1 versus HDI) of 0.402 (95% CI, 0.183-0.886) and 0.324 (95%CI, 0.122 to 0.861) for RFS and DMFS, respectively. However, adjuvant anti-PD-1 treatment had no advantage over HDI in acral melanoma patients with HRs (anti-PD-1 versus HDI) of 1.204 (95% CI, 0.521 to 2.781) and 1.968(95% CI, 0.744-5.209) for RFS and DMFS, respectively. Adjuvant anti-PD-1 treatment yielded a significantly better prognosis than HDI in Chinese patients with stage IIIB/C cutaneous melanoma, but a significant difference was not observed in those with acral melanoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jingjing Li
- Biotherapy Center, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,Biotherapy Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, China.,Biotherapy Center, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jiuhong Wang
- Biotherapy Center, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,Biotherapy Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, China.,Biotherapy Center, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Dandan Li
- Biotherapy Center, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,Biotherapy Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, China.,Biotherapy Center, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xizhi Wen
- Biotherapy Center, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,Biotherapy Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, China.,Biotherapy Center, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ya Ding
- Biotherapy Center, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,Biotherapy Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, China.,Biotherapy Center, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xing Liu
- Biotherapy Center, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,Biotherapy Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, China.,Biotherapy Center, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hang Jiang
- Biotherapy Center, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,Biotherapy Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, China.,Biotherapy Center, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Fuxue Huang
- Biotherapy Center, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,Biotherapy Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, China.,Biotherapy Center, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiaoshi Zhang
- Biotherapy Center, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,Biotherapy Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, China.,Biotherapy Center, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Chulpanova DS, Kitaeva KV, Green AR, Rizvanov AA, Solovyeva VV. Molecular Aspects and Future Perspectives of Cytokine-Based Anti-cancer Immunotherapy. Front Cell Dev Biol 2020; 8:402. [PMID: 32582698 PMCID: PMC7283917 DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2020.00402] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2019] [Accepted: 05/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Cytokine-based immunotherapy is a promising field in the cancer treatment, since cytokines, as proteins of the immune system, are able to modulate the host immune response toward cancer cell, as well as directly induce tumor cell death. Since a low dose monotherapy with some cytokines has no significant therapeutic results and a high dose treatment leads to a number of side effects caused by the pleiotropic effect of cytokines, the problem of understanding the influence of cytokines on the immune cells involved in the pro- and anti-tumor immune response remains a pressing one. Immune system cells carry CD makers on their surface which can be used to identify various populations of cells of the immune system that play different roles in pro- and anti-tumor immune responses. This review discusses the functions and specific CD markers of various immune cell populations which are reported to participate in the regulation of the immune response against the tumor. The results of research studies and clinical trials investigating the effect of cytokine therapy on the regulation of immune cell populations and their surface markers are also discussed. Current trends in the development of cancer immunotherapy, as well as the role of cytokines in combination with other therapeutic agents, are also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daria S Chulpanova
- Institute of Fundamental Medicine and Biology, Kazan Federal University, Kazan, Russia
| | - Kristina V Kitaeva
- Institute of Fundamental Medicine and Biology, Kazan Federal University, Kazan, Russia
| | - Andrew R Green
- Nottingham Breast Cancer Research Centre, Division of Cancer and Stem Cells, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham Biodiscovery Institute, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Albert A Rizvanov
- Institute of Fundamental Medicine and Biology, Kazan Federal University, Kazan, Russia.,Nottingham Breast Cancer Research Centre, Division of Cancer and Stem Cells, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham Biodiscovery Institute, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Valeriya V Solovyeva
- Institute of Fundamental Medicine and Biology, Kazan Federal University, Kazan, Russia
| |
Collapse
|