Combined identification of septal flash and absence of myocardial scar by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging improves prediction of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy

Assessment of myocardial strain patterns in patients with left bundle branch block using cardiac magnetic resonance

Recently, a classification with four types of septal longitudinal strain patterns was described using echocardiography, suggesting a pathophysiological continuum of left bundle branch block (LBBB)-induced left ventricle (LV) remodeling. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of classifying these strain patterns using cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), and to evaluate their association with LV remodeling and myocardial scar. Single center registry included LBBB patients with septal flash (SF) referred to CMR to assess the cause of LV systolic dysfunction. Semi-automated feature-tracking cardiac resonance (FT-CMR) was used to quantify myocardial strain and detect the four strain patterns. A total of 115 patients were studied (age 66 ± 11 years, 57% men, 28% with ischemic heart disease). In longitudinal strain analysis, 23 patients (20%) were classified in stage LBBB-1, 37 (32.1%) in LBBB-2, 25 (21.7%) in LBBB-3, and 30 (26%) in LBBB-4. Patients at higher stages had more prominent septal flash, higher LV volumes, lower LV ejection fraction, and lower absolute strain values (p < 0.05 for all). Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) was found in 55% of the patients (n = 63). No differences were found between the strain patterns regarding the presence, distribution or location of LGE. Among patients with LBBB, there was a good association between strain patterns assessed by FT-CMR analysis and the degree of LV remodeling and LV dysfunction. This association seems to be independent from the presence and distribution of LGE.

Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Identifies Responders to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy with an Assessment of Septal Scar and Left Ventricular Dyssynchrony

Background: The response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) depends on septal viability and correction of abnormal septal motion. This study investigates if cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) as a single modality can identify CRT responders with combined imaging of pathological septal motion (septal flash) and septal scar. Methods: In a prospective, multicenter, observational study of 136 CRT recipients, septal scar was assessed using late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) (n = 127) and septal flash visually from cine CMR sequences. The primary endpoint was CRT response, defined as ≥15% reduction in LV end-systolic volume with echocardiography after 6 months. The secondary endpoint was heart transplantation or death of any cause assessed after 39 ± 13 months. Results: Septal scar and septal flash were independent predictors of CRT response in multivariable analysis (both p < 0.001), while QRS duration and morphology were not. The combined approach of septal scar and septal flash predicted CRT response with an area under the curve of 0.86 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.78-0.94) and was a strong predictor of long-term survival without heart transplantation (hazard ratio 0.27, 95% CI: 0.10-0.79). The accuracy of the approach was similar in the subgroup with intermediate (130-150 ms) QRS duration. The combined approach was superior to septal scar and septal flash alone (p < 0.01). Conclusions: The combined assessment of septal scar and septal flash using CMR as a single-image modality identifies CRT responders with high accuracy and predicts long-term survival.

The role of cardiac magnetic resonance in identifying appropriate candidates for cardiac resynchronization therapy - a systematic review of the literature

Despite the strict indications for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) implantation, a significant proportion of patients will fail to adequately respond to the treatment. This systematic review aims to present the existing evidence about the role of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) in identifying patients who are likely to respond better to the CRT. A systematic search in the MedLine database and Cochrane Library from their inception to August 2021 was performed, without any limitations, by two independent investigators. We considered eligible observational studies or randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that enrolled patients > 18 years old with heart failure (HF) of ischaemic or non-ischaemic aetiology and provided data about the association of baseline CMR variables with clinical or echocardiographic response to CRT for at least 3 months. This systematic review was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA Statement). Following our search strategy, 47 studies were finally included in our review. CMR appears to have an additive role in identifying the subgroup of patients who will respond better to CRT. Specifically, the presence and the extent of myocardial scar were associated with increased non-response rates, while those with no scar respond better. Furthermore, existing data show that scar location can be associated with CRT response rates. CMR-derived markers of mechanical desynchrony can also be used as predictors of CRT response. CMR data can be used to optimize the position of the left ventricular lead during the CRT implantation procedure. Specifically, positioning the left ventricular lead in a branch of the coronary sinus that feeds an area with transmural scar was associated with poorer response to CRT. CMR can be used as a non-invasive optimization tool to identify patients who are more likely to achieve better clinical and echocardiographic response following CRT implantation.

Tracking Early Systolic Motion for Assessing Acute Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Real Time

An abnormal systolic motion is frequently observed in patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB), and it has been proposed as a predictor of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Our goal was to investigate if this motion can be monitored with miniaturized sensors feasible for clinical use to identify response to CRT in real time. Motion sensors were attached to the septum and the left ventricular (LV) lateral wall of eighteen anesthetized dogs. Recordings were performed during baseline, after induction of LBBB, and during biventricular pacing. The abnormal contraction pattern in LBBB was quantified by the septal flash index (SFI) equal to the early systolic shortening of the LV septal-to-lateral wall diameter divided by the maximum shortening achieved during ejection. In baseline, with normal electrical activation, there was limited early-systolic shortening and SFI was low (9 ± 8%). After induction of LBBB, this shortening and the SFI significantly increased (88 ± 34%, p < 0.001). Subsequently, CRT reduced it approximately back to baseline values (13 ± 13%, p < 0.001 vs. LBBB). The study showed the feasibility of using miniaturized sensors for continuous monitoring of the abnormal systolic motion of the LV in LBBB and how such sensors can be used to assess response to pacing in real time to guide CRT implantation.

Septal Flash as a Predictor of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Response: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in heart failure patients has been shown to improve patient outcomes in some but not all patients. A few studies have identified that septal flash on imaging is associated with response to CRT, but there has yet to be systematic review to evaluate the consistency of the finding across the literature. A search of MEDLINE and EMBASE was conducted to identify studies, which evaluate septal flash and its association with CRT response. Studies that met the inclusion criteria were statistically pooled with random-effects meta-analysis and heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic. A total of nine studies were included with 2307 participants (mean age 76 years, 67% male). Septal flash on imaging before CRT implantation was seen in 53% of patients and the proportion of CRT responders from the included studies varied from 52% to 77%. In patients who were CRT responders, septal flash was seen in 40% of patients compared to 10% in those deemed to be CRT nonresponders. Meta-analysis of eight of the nine included studies suggests that the presence of septal flash at preimplant was associated with an increased likelihood of CRT response (relative risk 2.55 95% confidence interval 2.04-3.19, P < 0.001, I2 = 51%). Septal flash was also reported to be associated with left ventricular reverse remodeling, but the association with survival and symptomatic improvement was less clear. Septal flash is a well-defined and distinctive contraction pattern that is easily recognizable on cardiac imaging. Septal flash may be associated with CRT response and should be evaluated in the patients that are considered for CRT devices.

Differentiation between left bundle branch block (LBBB) preceded dilated cardiomyopathy and dilated cardiomyopathy preceded LBBB by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging

BACKGROUND

Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) may be a result of or the cause of left bundle branch block (LBBB) in patients with DCM and LBBB. It is almost impossible from the history alone to know which came first in clinical work.

METHODS

Patients with LBBB and DCM who had cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) examination were analyzed. Occurrence sequence of DCM and LBBB was determined by chart reviewing. Diastolic lateral/septal wall thickness ratio (DLSWTR) and lateral wall thickening (LWT) were compared between patients with different time sequences. Response to CRT was analyzed according to medical history and CMR manifestation.

RESULTS

Sixty-three patients were divided into two groups by cluster analysis. DLSWTR and LWT were significantly higher in group 1 (preserved lateral wall thickness and function), compared to those in group 2 (reduced lateral wall thickness and function) (1.06 ± 0.13 vs. 0.8 ± 0.12, 34.57 ± 11.48% vs. 11.18 ± 5.56%, respectively, both P < .001). Occurrence sequence was clear in 14 patients and further analyzed. In group 1, seven patients were clearly having no evidence of DCM when LBBB was first diagnosed (defined as LBBB-precede-DCM) and in group 2, seven patients did not have LBBB when DCM was diagnosed (defined as DCM-precede-LBBB). Among 10 patients who received CRT therapy, all seven patients in group 1 responded well whereas none of three patients in group 2 responded well.

CONCLUSIONS

Occurrence sequence of DCM and LBBB can be discriminated by CMR. Preserved lateral wall morphology and function in CMR suggested LBBB preceded to DCM. Such features may be predictors of good response to CRT.

Current role of echocardiography in cardiac resynchronization therapy

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an established treatment for patients with heart failure and left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Patients are usually assessed by echocardiography, which provides a number of anatomical and functional information used for cardiac dyssynchrony assessment, prognostic stratification, identification of the optimal site of pacing in the left ventricle, optimization of the CRT device, and patient follow-up. Compared to other cardiac imaging techniques, echocardiography has the advantage to be non-invasive, repeatable, and safe, without exposure to ionizing radiation or nefrotoxic contrast. In this article, we review current evidence about the role of echocardiography before, during, and after the implantation of a CRT device.

The interaction of QRS duration with cardiac magnetic resonance derived scar and mechanical dyssynchrony in systolic heart failure: Implications for cardiac resynchronization therapy

Background

Trials using echocardiographic mechanical dyssynchrony (MD) parameters in narrow QRS patients have shown a negative response to CRT. We hypothesized MD in these patients may relate to myocardial scar rather than electrical dyssynchrony.

Methods

We determined the prevalence of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) derived measures of MD in 130 systolic heart failure patients with both broad (≥ 130 ms - BQRS) and narrow QRS duration (< 130 ms - NQRS). We assessed whether late gadolinium enhancement derived scar might explain the presence of MD amongst narrow QRS patients. Dyssynchrony was calculated on the basis of a systolic dyssynchrony index (SDI).

Results

Fifty-nine patients (45%) had a NQRS and the remaining had QRS ≥ 130 ms (BQRS group). 25% of NQRS patients had MD based on SDI. In all narrow and broad QRS patients with MD there was a significantly lower scar volume than those without MD (7.4 ± 10.5% vs 13.7 ± 13.3% vs. p < 0.01). This was the case in the BQRS group with a significantly lower scar burden in patients with MD (5.0 ± 7.7% vs 15.4 ± 15.6%, p < 0.01). Notably in the NQRS group this difference was absent with an equal scar burden in patients with MD 13.3 ± 13.9% and without MD 12.5 ± 11%, p = 0.92.

Conclusions

25% of patients with systolic heart failure and a NQRS (< 130 ms) have CMR derived mechanical dyssynchrony. Our findings suggest MD in this group may be secondary to myocardial scar rather than electrical dyssynchrony and therefore not amenable to correction by CRT. This may give insight into non-response and potential harm from CRT in this group.

Left ventricular scar and the acute hemodynamic effects of multivein and multipolar pacing in cardiac resynchronization

Background

We sought to determine whether presence, amount and distribution of scar impacts the degree of acute hemodynamic response (AHR) with multisite pacing.

Multi-vein pacing (MVP) or multipolar pacing (MPP) with a multi-electrode left ventricular (LV) lead may offer benefits over conventional biventricular pacing in patients with myocardial scar.

Methods

In this multi-center study left bundle branch block patients underwent an hemodynamic pacing study measuring LV dP/dt_max. Patients had cardiac magnetic resonance scar imaging to assess the effect of scar presence, amount and distribution on AHR.

Results

24 patients (QRS 171 ± 20 ms) completed the study (83% male). An ischemic etiology was present in 58% and the mean scar volume was 6.0 ± 7.0%. Overall discounting scar, MPP and MVP showed no significant AHR increase compared to an optimized “best BiV” (BestBiV) site. In a minority of patients (6/24) receiver-operator characteristic analysis of scar volume (cut off 8.48%) predicted a small AHR improvement with MPP (sensitivity 83%, specificity 94%) but not MVP. Patients with scar volume > 8.48% had a MPP-BestBiV of 3 ± 6.3% vs. −6.4 ± 7.7% for those below the cutoff. There was a significant correlation between the difference in AHR and scar volume for MPP-BestBiV (R = 0.49, p = 0.02) but not MVP-BestBiV(R = 0.111, p = 0.62). The multielectrode lead positioned in scar predicted MPP AHR improvement (p = 0.04).

Conclusions

Multisite pacing with MPP and MVP shows no AHR benefit in all-comers compared to optimized BestBiV pacing. There was a minority of patients with significant scar volume in relation to the LV site that exhibited a small AHR improvement with MPP.

(Study identifier NCT01883141)

The incidence and outcomes of delayed response to cardiac resynchronization therapy

BACKGROUND

The incidence and clinical outcomes of delayed response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) have not been well clarified. We aimed to observe the incidence and prognosis of delayed response and to identify its possible mechanisms.

METHODS

A total of 115 CRT patients were retrospectively analyzed in our study. Patients who met the enrollment criteria were divided into two groups: group A, conventional responders who showed response at 1-year follow-up, and group B, delayed responders who showed response after 1-year follow-up. CRT response was defined as an absolute increase of ≥10% in left ventricular ejection fraction.

RESULTS

Fifty-two patients (61 ± 12 years, 37 male) experienced conventional response to CRT and 17 patients (63 ± 11 years, 10 male) experienced delayed response. The mean follow-up time was 5.2 ± 2.4 years. The incidence of delayed response was 14.8% (17/115). All-cause mortality and hospitalization rates for heart failure were similar for delayed and conventional responders. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that scar burden > 35% was an independent predictor of CRT delayed response (odds ratio 8.794, P  =  0.038).

CONCLUSIONS

A significant proportion of patients demonstrated delayed response to CRT. The delayed responders had a good prognosis that was similar to that of conventional responders. More scar burden might be related to the incidence of delayed response.

Myocardial strain computed at multiple spatial scales from tagged magnetic resonance imaging: Estimating cardiac biomarkers for CRT patients

Abnormal cardiac motion can indicate different forms of disease, which can manifest at different spatial scales in the myocardium. Many studies have sought to characterise particular motion abnormalities associated with specific diseases, and to utilise motion information to improve diagnoses. However, the importance of spatial scale in the analysis of cardiac deformation has not been extensively investigated. We build on recent work on the analysis of myocardial strains at different spatial scales using a cardiac motion atlas to find the optimal scales for estimating different cardiac biomarkers. We apply a multi-scale strain analysis to a 43 patient cohort of cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) patients using tagged magnetic resonance imaging data for (1) predicting response to CRT, (2) identifying septal flash, (3) estimating QRS duration, and (4) identifying the presence of ischaemia. A repeated, stratified cross-validation is used to demonstrate the importance of spatial scale in our analysis, revealing different optimal spatial scales for the estimation of different biomarkers.

Improvement of Right Ventricular Hemodynamics with Left Ventricular Endocardial Pacing during Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Background

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with biventricular epicardial (BV‐CS) or endocardial left ventricular (LV) stimulation (BV‐EN) improves LV hemodynamics. The effect of CRT on right ventricular function is less clear, particularly for BV‐EN. Our objective was to compare the simultaneous acute hemodynamic response (AHR) of the right and left ventricles (RV and LV) with BV‐CS and BV‐EN in order to determine the optimal mode of CRT delivery.

Methods

Nine patients with previously implanted CRT devices successfully underwent a temporary pacing study. Pressure wires measured the simultaneous AHR in both ventricles during different pacing protocols. Conventional epicardial CRT was delivered in LV‐only (LV‐CS) and BV‐CS configurations and compared with BV‐EN pacing in multiple locations using a roving decapolar catheter.

Results

Best BV‐EN (optimal AHR of all LV endocardial pacing sites) produced a significantly greater RV AHR compared with LV‐CS and BV‐CS pacing (P < 0.05). RV AHR had a significantly increased standard deviation compared to LV AHR (P < 0.05) with a weak correlation between RV and LV AHR (Spearman r_s = −0.06). Compromised biventricular optimization, whereby RV AHR was increased at the expense of a smaller decrease in LV AHR, was achieved in 56% of cases, all with BV‐EN pacing.

Conclusions

BV‐EN pacing produces significant increases in both LV and RV AHR, above that achievable with conventional epicardial pacing. RV AHR cannot be used as a surrogate for optimizing LV AHR; however, compromised biventricular optimization is possible. The beneficial effect of endocardial LV pacing on RV function may have important clinical benefits beyond conventional CRT.

Impact of septal flash and left ventricle contractile reserve on positive remodeling during 1 year cardiac resynchronization therapy: the multicenter ViaCRT study

INTRODUCTION

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has been shown to improve outcomes in patients with systolic heart failure (HFREF). However, the relatively high non-responder rate results in a need for more precise qualification for CRT. The ViaCRT study was designed to determine the role of contractile reserve and dyssynchrony parameters in predicting CRT response. The purpose of this analysis was to determine the effect of baseline septal flash and contractile reserve (CR) on clinical and echocardiographic parameters of response to CRT in 12-month follow-up.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

One hundred thirty-three guideline-selected CRT candidates (both ischemic and non-ischemic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction) were enrolled in the study. Baseline study population characteristics were: left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) 25 ±6%, QRS 165 ±25 ms, NYHA class III (90%) and IV (10%).

RESULTS

In subjects with septal flash (SF) registered before CRT implantation improvement in LVEF (14 ±2% vs. 8 ±1%, p < 0.05) and left ventricle (LV) systolic (63 ±10 ml vs. 36 ±6 ml, p < 0.05) and diastolic (46 ±10 ml vs. 32 ±7, p < 0.05) volumes was more pronounced than in patients without SF. In patients with CR (defined as LVEF increase by 20% or 4 viable segments) improvement in echo parameters was not significantly different then in the CR- group. Neither SF nor CR was associated with improvement in NYHA class. Subgroup analysis revealed that only in non-ischemic HF patients is presence of septal flash associated with LV function improvement after CRT.

CONCLUSIONS

In non-ischemic HF patients septal flash is a helpful parameter in prediction of LV remodeling after 12 months of resynchronization therapy.

Septal flash and septal rebound stretch have different underlying mechanisms

Abnormal left-right motion of the interventricular septum in early systole, known as septal flash (SF), is frequently observed in patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB). Transseptal pressure gradient and early active septal contraction have been proposed as explanations for SF. Similarities in timing (early systole) and location (septum) suggest that SF may be related to septal systolic rebound stretch (SRSsept). We aimed to clarify the mechanisms generating SF and SRSsept. The CircAdapt computer model was used to isolate the effects of timing of activation of the left ventricular free wall (LVFW), right ventricular free wall (RVFW), and septum on SF and SRSsept. LVFW and septal activation times were varied by ±80 ms relative to RVFW activation time. M-mode-derived wall motions and septal strains were computed and used to quantify SF and SRSsept, respectively. SF depended on early activation of the RVFW relative to the LVFW. SF and SRSsept occurred in LBBB-like simulations and against a rising transseptal pressure gradient. When the septum was activated before both LVFW and RVFW, no SF occurred despite the presence of SRSsept. Computer simulations therefore indicate that SF and SRSsept have different underlying mechanisms, even though both can occur in LBBB. The mechanism of leftward motion during SF is early RVFW contraction pulling on and straightening the septum when unopposed by the LVFW. SRSsept is caused by late LVFW contraction following early contraction of the septum. Changes in transseptal pressure gradient are not the main cause of SF in LBBB.

Echocardiography and cardiac resynchronisation therapy, friends or foes?

Echocardiography is used in cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) to assess cardiac function, and in particular left ventricular (LV) volumetric status, and prediction of response. Despite its widespread applicability, LV volumes determined by echocardiography have inherent measurement errors, interobserver and intraobserver variability, and discrepancies with the gold standard magnetic resonance imaging. Echocardiographic predictors of CRT response are based on mechanical dyssynchrony. However, parameters are mainly tested in single-centre studies or lack feasibility. Speckle tracking echocardiography can guide LV lead placement, improving volumetric response and clinical outcome by guiding lead positioning towards the latest contracting segment. Results on optimisation of CRT device settings using echocardiographic indices have so far been rather disappointing, as results suffer from noise. Defining response by echocardiography seems valid, although re-assessment after 6 months is advisable, as patients can show both continuous improvement as well as deterioration after the initial response. Three-dimensional echocardiography is interesting for future implications, as it can determine volume, dyssynchrony and viability in a single recording, although image quality needs to be adequate. Deformation patterns from the septum and the derived parameters are promising, although validation in a multicentre trial is required. We conclude that echocardiography has a pivotal role in CRT, although clinicians should know its shortcomings.

Factors determining the magnitude of the pre-ejection leftward septal motion in left bundle branch block

Aims

An abnormal large leftward septal motion prior to ejection is frequently observed in left bundle branch block (LBBB) patients. This motion has been proposed as a predictor of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Our goal was to investigate factors that influence its magnitude.

Methods and results

Left (LVP) and right ventricular (RVP) pressures and left ventricular (LV) volume were measured in eight canines. After induction of LBBB, LVP and, hence, the transmural septal pressure (P_LV–RV = LVP–RVP) increased more slowly (P < 0.01) during the phase when septum moved leftwards. A biventricular finite-element LBBB simulation model confirmed that the magnitude of septal leftward motion depended on reduced rise of P_LV–RV. The model showed that leftward septal motion was decreased with shorter activation delay, reduced global or right ventricular (RV) contractility, septal infarction, or when the septum was already displaced into the LV at end diastole by RV volume overload. Both experiments and simulations showed that pre-ejection septal hypercontraction occurs, in part, because the septum performs more of the work pushing blood towards the mitral valve leaflets to close them as the normal lateral wall contribution to this push is lost.

Conclusions

Left bundle branch block lowers afterload against pre-ejection septal contraction, expressed as slowed rise of P_LV–RV, which is a main cause and determinant of the magnitude of leftward septal motion. The motion may be small or absent due to septal infarct, impaired global or RV contractility or RV volume overload, which should be kept in mind if this motion is to be used in evaluation of CRT response.

Prediction of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy using left ventricular pacing lead position and cardiovascular magnetic resonance derived wall motion patterns: a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Despite marked benefits in many heart failure patients, a considerable proportion of patients treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) fail to respond appropriately. Recently, a "U-shaped" (type II) wall motion pattern identified by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) has been associated with improved CRT response compared to a homogenous (type I) wall motion pattern. There is also evidence that a left ventricular (LV) lead localized to the latest contracting LV site predicts superior response, compared to an LV lead localized remotely from the latest contracting LV site.

METHODS

We prospectively evaluated patients undergoing CRT with pre-procedural CMR to determine the presence of type I and type II wall motion patterns and pre-procedural echocardiography to determine end systolic volume (ESV). We assessed the final LV lead position on post-procedural fluoroscopic images to determine whether the lead was positioned concordant to or remote from the latest contracting LV site. CRT response was defined as a ≥ 15% reduction in ESV on a 6 month follow-up echocardiogram.

RESULTS

The study included 33 patients meeting conventional indications for CRT with a mean New York Heart Association class of 2.8 ± 0.4 and mean LV ejection fraction of 28 ± 9%. Overall, 55% of patients were echocardiographic responders by ESV criteria. Patients with both a type II pattern and an LV lead concordant to the latest contracting site (T2CL) had a response rate of 92%, compared to a response rate of 33% for those without T2CL (p = 0.003). T2CL was the only independent predictor of response on multivariate analysis (odds ratio 18, 95% confidence interval 1.6-206; p = 0.018). T2CL resulted in significant incremental improvement in prediction of echocardiographic response (increase in the area under the receiver operator curve from 0.69 to 0.84; p = 0.038).

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of a type II wall motion pattern on CMR and a concordant LV lead predicts superior CRT response. Improving patient selection by evaluating wall motion pattern and targeting LV lead placement may ultimately improve the response rate to CRT.