1
|
Alon I, Bussod I, Ravitsky V. Mapping ethical, legal, and social implications (ELSI) of preimplantation genetic testing (PGT). J Assist Reprod Genet 2024; 41:1153-1171. [PMID: 38512655 PMCID: PMC11143109 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-024-03076-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2024] [Accepted: 02/23/2024] [Indexed: 03/23/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Preimplantation Genetic Testing (PGT) has attracted considerable ethical, legal, and social scrutiny, but academic debate often fails to reflect clinical realities. METHODS Addressing this disconnect, a review of 506 articles from 1999 to 2019 across humanities and social sciences was conducted to synthesize the Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications (ELSI) of PGT. This review mined PubMed, WoS, and Scopus databases, using both MeSH terms and keywords to map out the research terrain. RESULTS The findings reveal a tenfold increase in global research output on PGT's ELSI from 1999 to 2019, signifying rising interest and concern. Despite heightened theoretical discourse on selecting "optimal" offspring, such practices were scarcely reported in clinical environments. Conversely, critical issues like PGT funding and familial impacts remain underexplored. Notably, 86% of the ELSI literature originates from just 12 countries, pointing to a research concentration. CONCLUSION This review underscores an urgent need for ELSI research to align more closely with clinical practice, promoting collaborations among ethicists, clinicians, policymakers, and economists. Such efforts are essential for grounding debates in practical relevance, ultimately steering PGT towards ethical integrity, societal acceptance, and equitable access, aiming to harmonize PGT research with real-world clinical concerns, enhancing the relevance and impact of future ethical discussions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ido Alon
- Department of Development Economics, Autonomous University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
- University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Paul RA, Baldwin A, Johnson K, Manning Peskin S, Tropea TF, Azage M, Bardakjian T, Dratch L. Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Adult-Onset Neurodegenerative Disease: Considerations for Access, Utilization, and Counseling. Neurology 2023; 101:836-841. [PMID: 37596038 PMCID: PMC10663009 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000207736] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2023] [Accepted: 06/20/2023] [Indexed: 08/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic conditions (PGT-M), formerly called preimplantation genetic diagnosis, is a specialized assisted reproduction technique that aims to reduce the risk of a pregnancy inheriting a monogenic condition. Despite calls to increase awareness and prepare neurologists for discussing PGT-M with patients and their families, no guidelines currently exist. When introducing PGT-M to those who may be interested in using it, there are major factors for discussion, including (1) genetic considerations (e.g., requirement for a confirmed genetic diagnosis; timing of genetic test results); (2) practical considerations (e.g., access to PGT-M and genetic services); (3) technical considerations (e.g., factors that can affect the success rate of PGT-M); and (4) psychosocial and ethical considerations (e.g., predictive testing for asymptomatic family members; family dynamics and values). Here, our team of neurologists and specialized genetic counselors discusses the current state of genetic characterization in adult-onset neurodegenerative conditions and highlights the major factors that should be considered when discussing PGT-M with families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel A Paul
- From the Department of Neurology (R.A.P., A.B., K.J., S.M.P., T.F.T., M.A., L.D.), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; and Sarepta Therapeutics (T.B.), Cambridge, MA.
| | - Aaron Baldwin
- From the Department of Neurology (R.A.P., A.B., K.J., S.M.P., T.F.T., M.A., L.D.), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; and Sarepta Therapeutics (T.B.), Cambridge, MA
| | - Kelsey Johnson
- From the Department of Neurology (R.A.P., A.B., K.J., S.M.P., T.F.T., M.A., L.D.), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; and Sarepta Therapeutics (T.B.), Cambridge, MA
| | - Sara Manning Peskin
- From the Department of Neurology (R.A.P., A.B., K.J., S.M.P., T.F.T., M.A., L.D.), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; and Sarepta Therapeutics (T.B.), Cambridge, MA
| | - Thomas F Tropea
- From the Department of Neurology (R.A.P., A.B., K.J., S.M.P., T.F.T., M.A., L.D.), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; and Sarepta Therapeutics (T.B.), Cambridge, MA
| | - Meron Azage
- From the Department of Neurology (R.A.P., A.B., K.J., S.M.P., T.F.T., M.A., L.D.), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; and Sarepta Therapeutics (T.B.), Cambridge, MA
| | - Tanya Bardakjian
- From the Department of Neurology (R.A.P., A.B., K.J., S.M.P., T.F.T., M.A., L.D.), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; and Sarepta Therapeutics (T.B.), Cambridge, MA
| | - Laynie Dratch
- From the Department of Neurology (R.A.P., A.B., K.J., S.M.P., T.F.T., M.A., L.D.), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; and Sarepta Therapeutics (T.B.), Cambridge, MA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Salih M, Austin C, Warty RR, Tiktin C, Rolnik DL, Momeni M, Rezatofighi H, Reddy S, Smith V, Vollenhoven B, Horta F. Embryo selection through artificial intelligence versus embryologists: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Open 2023; 2023:hoad031. [PMID: 37588797 PMCID: PMC10426717 DOI: 10.1093/hropen/hoad031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2023] [Revised: 07/17/2023] [Indexed: 08/18/2023] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION What is the present performance of artificial intelligence (AI) decision support during embryo selection compared to the standard embryo selection by embryologists? SUMMARY ANSWER AI consistently outperformed the clinical teams in all the studies focused on embryo morphology and clinical outcome prediction during embryo selection assessment. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY The ART success rate is ∼30%, with a worrying trend of increasing female age correlating with considerably worse results. As such, there have been ongoing efforts to address this low success rate through the development of new technologies. With the advent of AI, there is potential for machine learning to be applied in such a manner that areas limited by human subjectivity, such as embryo selection, can be enhanced through increased objectivity. Given the potential of AI to improve IVF success rates, it remains crucial to review the performance between AI and embryologists during embryo selection. STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION The search was done across PubMed, EMBASE, Ovid Medline, and IEEE Xplore from 1 June 2005 up to and including 7 January 2022. Included articles were also restricted to those written in English. Search terms utilized across all databases for the study were: ('Artificial intelligence' OR 'Machine Learning' OR 'Deep learning' OR 'Neural network') AND ('IVF' OR 'in vitro fertili*' OR 'assisted reproductive techn*' OR 'embryo'), where the character '*' refers the search engine to include any auto completion of the search term. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING METHODS A literature search was conducted for literature relating to AI applications to IVF. Primary outcomes of interest were accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the embryo morphology grade assessments and the likelihood of clinical outcomes, such as clinical pregnancy after IVF treatments. Risk of bias was assessed using the Modified Down and Black Checklist. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Twenty articles were included in this review. There was no specific embryo assessment day across the studies-Day 1 until Day 5/6 of embryo development was investigated. The types of input for training AI algorithms were images and time-lapse (10/20), clinical information (6/20), and both images and clinical information (4/20). Each AI model demonstrated promise when compared to an embryologist's visual assessment. On average, the models predicted the likelihood of successful clinical pregnancy with greater accuracy than clinical embryologists, signifying greater reliability when compared to human prediction. The AI models performed at a median accuracy of 75.5% (range 59-94%) on predicting embryo morphology grade. The correct prediction (Ground Truth) was defined through the use of embryo images according to post embryologists' assessment following local respective guidelines. Using blind test datasets, the embryologists' accuracy prediction was 65.4% (range 47-75%) with the same ground truth provided by the original local respective assessment. Similarly, AI models had a median accuracy of 77.8% (range 68-90%) in predicting clinical pregnancy through the use of patient clinical treatment information compared to 64% (range 58-76%) when performed by embryologists. When both images/time-lapse and clinical information inputs were combined, the median accuracy by the AI models was higher at 81.5% (range 67-98%), while clinical embryologists had a median accuracy of 51% (range 43-59%). LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION The findings of this review are based on studies that have not been prospectively evaluated in a clinical setting. Additionally, a fair comparison of all the studies were deemed unfeasible owing to the heterogeneity of the studies, development of the AI models, database employed and the study design and quality. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS AI provides considerable promise to the IVF field and embryo selection. However, there needs to be a shift in developers' perception of the clinical outcome from successful implantation towards ongoing pregnancy or live birth. Additionally, existing models focus on locally generated databases and many lack external validation. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS This study was funded by Monash Data Future Institute. All authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42021256333.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Salih
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Data Science and Artificial Intelligence, Faculty of Information Technology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - C Austin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Data Science and Artificial Intelligence, Faculty of Information Technology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - R R Warty
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - C Tiktin
- School of Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - D L Rolnik
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
- Women’s and Newborn Program, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - M Momeni
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - H Rezatofighi
- Department of Data Science and Artificial Intelligence, Faculty of Information Technology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
- Monash Data Future Institute, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - S Reddy
- School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
| | - V Smith
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - B Vollenhoven
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
- Women’s and Newborn Program, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Monash IVF, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - F Horta
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
- Monash Data Future Institute, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
- City Fertility, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Porto A, Gaber Caffrey R, Crowley-Matoka M, Spencer S, Li M, Propst L. Offering preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders (PGT-M) for conditions with reduced penetrance or variants of uncertain significance: Ethical insight from U.S. laboratory genetic counselors. J Genet Couns 2021; 31:261-268. [PMID: 34347921 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1482] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2020] [Revised: 06/27/2021] [Accepted: 07/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
Preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders (PGT-M) was originally developed to identify embryos affected with serious childhood-onset disorders, but its use has recently broadened. Guidance on the use of PGT-M in the United States (U.S.) is currently limited, with no formal laws or guidelines established on its use. The goals of this study were to determine for which types of conditions U.S. laboratories currently do not offer PGT-M, to explore ethical considerations U.S. laboratory genetic counselors (GCs) take into consideration when deciding to accept or reject a PGT-M request, and to explore whether U.S. laboratory GCs believe PGT-M should be offered for conditions with reduced penetrance or for variants of uncertain significance (VUS). Qualitative analysis of semi-structured interviews with nine genetic counselors, from five different PGT-M laboratories, was conducted. Participants were required to be GCs working at a PGT-M laboratory in the U.S. and either actively counsel patients on PGT-M or determine a patient's eligibility for PGT-M. Two participants reported their separate laboratories have no limitations for allowable PGT-M testing, while the other seven participants representing three other laboratories reported having limitations. The main ethical consideration GCs reported considering when deciding to accept or reject a PGT-M request was patient autonomy, with a focus on the patient understanding risks of the testing. All participants reported believing PGT-M should be allowable for conditions with reduced penetrance and VUS, with all participants stating their respective laboratories allow for this currently. However, all participants reported a lack of sufficient guidelines and that having guidelines from a professional organization would be beneficial to their practice. In conclusion, lack of current guidelines in the United States has created discrepancies between PGT-M laboratories. PGT-M laboratory GCs support the use of PGT-M for conditions with reduced penetrance and VUS with informed consent. The need for guidelines is supported.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony Porto
- Center for Genetic Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.,Reproductive Medicine Associates of Connecticut, Norwalk, CT, USA
| | | | - Megan Crowley-Matoka
- Departments of Medical Education/Anthropology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Sara Spencer
- Department of Ob/Gyn, Northwestern Medical Group, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Mindy Li
- Division of Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Lauren Propst
- Igenomix USA, Torrance, CA, USA.,BillionToOne Inc, Menlo Park, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Liu Y, Calzone K, Fasaye GA, Quillin J. CDH1 variants leading to gastric cancer risk management decision-making experiences in emerging adults: 'I am not ready yet'. J Genet Couns 2021; 30:1091-1104. [PMID: 33655597 PMCID: PMC8358785 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1393] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2020] [Revised: 01/19/2021] [Accepted: 01/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
Pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants (PLPV) in CDH1 are associated with a significantly increased lifetime risk for diffuse gastric cancer, with an average age of onset of 47 years. CDH1 PLPV carriers are recommended to have prophylactic total gastrectomy (PTG) or routine endoscopy surveillance. Emerging adults (EAs) may have unique circumstances that affect their medical management decision-making about PTG versus endoscopy. The study aim was to use qualitative interpretative phenomenological analysis method to understand the lived experience and medical management decision-making process for EAs carrying a CDH1 PLPV. Eligible participants were unaffected CDH1 PLPV carriers, ages 18 to 29, who had not undergone PTG and had discussed CDH1 medical management with a health provider. Semi-structured telephone interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed for major themes. Results show EAs wanted to avoid developing diffuse gastric cancer, but most do not feel they are ready for PTG. They had worries about PTG related to their identity exploration, financial stability, and careers. Most did not want to pass the PLPV to their children; however, the cost of preimplantation genetic testing with in vitro fertilization was a concern. Family medical history and self-understanding of endoscopy and PTG highly influenced medical management decision-making. Understanding of diffuse gastric cancer detection rate using endoscopy was inconsistent among participants. Body image was not a concern for most, but they worry about dietary restrictions after PTG. Lastly, connection to peers having the same experience was important. These findings increase our understanding of the medical management decision-making challenges for EA CDH1 carriers. EAs may take an extended time to decide what option is right for them. Thus, genetic counseling for CDH1 PLPV EA carriers requires long-term support and education.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi Liu
- Genetic Counseling Program, Department of Human and Molecular Genetics, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
- National Cancer Institute, Center for Cancer Research, Genetics Branch, 37 Convent Drive, Building 37, Bethesda, MD 20892
| | - Kathleen Calzone
- National Cancer Institute, Center for Cancer Research, Genetics Branch, 37 Convent Drive, Building 37, Bethesda, MD 20892
| | - Grace-Ann Fasaye
- National Cancer Institute, Center for Cancer Research, Genetics Branch, 37 Convent Drive, Building 37, Bethesda, MD 20892
| | - John Quillin
- Genetic Counseling Program, Department of Human and Molecular Genetics, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Péloquin S, Garcia-Velasco JA, Blockeel C, Rienzi L, de Mesmaeker G, Lazure P, Beligotti F, Murray S. Educational needs of fertility healthcare professionals using ART: a multi-country mixed-methods study. Reprod Biomed Online 2021; 43:434-445. [PMID: 34384693 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2021.06.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2021] [Revised: 05/14/2021] [Accepted: 06/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
RESEARCH QUESTION What are the most pressing educational needs of fertility healthcare professionals using assisted reproductive technologies (ART)? DESIGN This mixed-methods study combined qualitative interviews with quantitative surveys. Participants included physicians and nurses specialized in reproductive endocrinology or in obstetrics/gynaecology, and laboratory specialists, with a minimum of 3 years of experience, practising in Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, France, Germany, India, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Spain or the UK. Maximum variation purposive sampling was used to ensure a mix of experience and settings. Interviews were transcribed and coded through thematic analysis. Quantitative data were analysed using frequency tables, cross-tabulations and chi-squared tests to compare results by reimbursement context. RESULTS A total of 535 participants were included (273 physicians, 145 nurses and 117 laboratory specialists). Knowledge gaps, skills gaps and attitude issues were identified in relation to: (i) ovarian stimulation (e.g. knowledge of treatments and instruction protocols for ovarian stimulation), (ii) embryo culture and cryopreservation/vitrification (e.g. diverging opinions on embryo freezing, (iii) embryo assessment (e.g. performing genetic testing), (iv) support of luteal phase and optimizing pregnancy outcomes (e.g. knowledge of assessment methods for endometrial receptivity), and (v) communication with patients (e.g. reluctance to address emotional distress). CONCLUSIONS This descriptive, exploratory study corroborates previously reported gaps in fertility care and identifies potential causes of these gaps. Findings provide evidence to inform educational programmes for healthcare professionals who use ART in their practice and calls for the development of case-based education and interprofessional training programmes to improve care for patients with fertility issues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Laura Rienzi
- Clinica Valle Giulia, GENERA Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Rome, Italy
| | - Guy de Mesmaeker
- Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussels, Belgium
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Grant P, Langlois S, Lynd LD, Austin JC, Elliott AM. Out-of-pocket and private pay in clinical genetic testing: A scoping review. Clin Genet 2021; 100:504-521. [PMID: 34080181 DOI: 10.1111/cge.14006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2021] [Revised: 05/26/2021] [Accepted: 05/31/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Full coverage of the cost of clinical genetic testing is not always available through public or private insurance programs, or a public healthcare system. Consequently, some patients may be faced with the decision of whether to finance testing out-of-pocket (OOP), meet OOP expenses required by their insurer, or not proceed with testing. A scoping review was conducted to identify literature associated with patient OOP and private pay in clinical genetic testing. Seven databases (EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsychINFO, PAIS, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and the JBI Evidence-Based Practice database) were searched, resulting in 83 unique publications included in the review. The presented evidence includes a descriptive analysis, followed by a narrative account of the extracted data. Results were divided into four groups according to clinical indication: (1) hereditary breast and ovarian cancer, (2) other hereditary cancers, (3) prenatal testing, (4) other clinical indications. The majority of studies focused on hereditary cancer and prenatal genetic testing. Overall trends indicated that OOP costs have fallen and payer coverage has improved, but OOP expenses continue to present a barrier to patients who do not qualify for full coverage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Grant
- Department of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia (BC), Canada
| | - Sylvie Langlois
- Department of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia (BC), Canada
| | - Larry D Lynd
- Collaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (CORE), Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Jehannine C Austin
- Department of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia (BC), Canada.,Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,BC Mental Health and Substance Use Services Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Alison M Elliott
- Department of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia (BC), Canada.,BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,Women's Health Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hughes T, Bracewell-Milnes T, Saso S, Jones BP, Almeida PA, Maclaren K, Norman-Taylor J, Johnson M, Nikolaou D. A review on the motivations, decision-making factors, attitudes and experiences of couples using pre-implantation genetic testing for inherited conditions. Hum Reprod Update 2021; 27:944-966. [PMID: 33969393 DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmab013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2020] [Revised: 02/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In pre-implantation genetic testing (PGT), fertile couples undergo IVF with genetic testing of embryos to avoid conceptions with a genetic condition. There is an exponentially increasing uptake with over 600 applications listed by the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority in the UK. The psychological aspects of the decision-making process and the experience of PGT, however, are relatively underevaluated, with the potential to leave patients unsupported in their journeys. OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE In this review, we aim to comprehensively report on every aspect of couples' experiences of PGT. We consider what motivates users, the practical and ethical decisions involved and how couples navigate the decision-making process. Additionally, we report on the social and psychological impact on couples who are actively undergoing or have completed the PGT process. SEARCH METHODS A systematic search of English peer-reviewed journals of three computerized databases was undertaken following PRISMA guidelines. Studies that examined the motivations, attitudes, decision-making factors and experiences of patients who have been actively engaged in the PGT process were included. No restrictions were placed on study design or date of publication. Studies examining patients using PGT in a hypothetical context or solely using PGT for aneuploidy were excluded. Qualitative data were extracted using thematic analysis. OUTCOMES The main outcomes were patient motivations, deciding factors and attitudes, as well as the patient experience of coming to a decision and going through PGT.Patients were primarily motivated by the desire to have a healthy child and to avoid termination of pregnancy. Those with a sick child or previous experience of termination were more likely to use PGT. Patients also felt compelled to make use of the technology available, either from a moral responsibility to do so or to avoid feelings of guilt if not. The main factors considered when deciding to use PGT were the need for IVF and the acceptability of the technology, the financial cost of the procedure and one's ethical standpoint on the creation and manipulation of embryos. There was a general consensus that PGT should be applied to lethal or severe childhood disease but less agreement on use for adult onset or variable expression conditions. There was an agreement that it should not be used to select for aesthetic traits and a frustration with the views of PGT in society. We report that couples find it difficult to consider all of the benefits and costs of PGT, resulting in ambivalence and prolonged indecision. After deciding on PGT use, we found that patients find the process extremely impractical and psychologically demanding. WIDER IMPLICATIONS This review aimed to summarize the current knowledge on how patients decide to use and experience PGT and to make suggestions to incorporate the findings into clinical practice. We cannot stress enough the importance of holistic evaluation of patients and thorough counselling prior to and during PGT use from a multidisciplinary team that includes geneticists, IVF clinicians, psychologists and also patient support groups. Large prospective studies using a validated psychological tool at various stages of the PGT process would provide an invaluable database for professionals to better aid patients in their decision-making and to improve the patient experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tara Hughes
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Developmental Reproductive & Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital Campus, London, UK
| | - Timothy Bracewell-Milnes
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Developmental Reproductive & Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital Campus, London, UK
| | - Srdjan Saso
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Reproductive & Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, London, UK
| | - Benjamin P Jones
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Reproductive & Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, London, UK
| | - Paula A Almeida
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Developmental Reproductive & Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital Campus, London, UK
| | - Katherine Maclaren
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Developmental Reproductive & Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital Campus, London, UK
| | - Julian Norman-Taylor
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Developmental Reproductive & Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital Campus, London, UK
| | - Mark Johnson
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Developmental Reproductive & Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital Campus, London, UK
| | - Dimitrios Nikolaou
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, Institute of Developmental Reproductive & Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital Campus, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Löwy I. ART with PGD: Risky heredity and stratified reproduction. REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE & SOCIETY ONLINE 2020; 11:48-55. [PMID: 33305026 PMCID: PMC7710505 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbms.2020.09.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2020] [Revised: 09/12/2020] [Accepted: 09/29/2020] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) was developed to allow women/couples at risk of having a child with 'severe and incurable' hereditary disease to produce embryos through in-vitro fertilization, followed by implantation of embryos devoid of mutated genes, allowing the birth of children free of the pathology present in the family. This article examines the highly regulated practice of PGD in France, the highly deregulated practice of PGD in the USA and Brazil, and the extensive use of this biomedical technology in Israel, and highlights the ways that distinct national policies produce distinct definitions of risk and different norms, standards and rules. PGD, this article argues, is a situated practice. Shaped to an important extent by legal and economic constraints, it displays the ways that new technologies continuously reframe our definitions of the normal and the pathological.
Collapse
|
10
|
Bormann CL, Kanakasabapathy MK, Thirumalaraju P, Gupta R, Pooniwala R, Kandula H, Hariton E, Souter I, Dimitriadis I, Ramirez LB, Curchoe CL, Swain J, Boehnlein LM, Shafiee H. Performance of a deep learning based neural network in the selection of human blastocysts for implantation. eLife 2020; 9:e55301. [PMID: 32930094 PMCID: PMC7527234 DOI: 10.7554/elife.55301] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2020] [Accepted: 09/01/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Deep learning in in vitro fertilization is currently being evaluated in the development of assistive tools for the determination of transfer order and implantation potential using time-lapse data collected through expensive imaging hardware. Assistive tools and algorithms that can work with static images, however, can help in improving the access to care by enabling their use with images acquired from traditional microscopes that are available to virtually all fertility centers. Here, we evaluated the use of a deep convolutional neural network (CNN), trained using single timepoint images of embryos collected at 113 hr post-insemination, in embryo selection amongst 97 clinical patient cohorts (742 embryos) and observed an accuracy of 90% in choosing the highest quality embryo available. Furthermore, a CNN trained to assess an embryo's implantation potential directly using a set of 97 euploid embryos capable of implantation outperformed 15 trained embryologists (75.26% vs. 67.35%, p<0.0001) from five different fertility centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles L Bormann
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical SchoolBostonUnited States
- Harvard Medical SchoolBostonUnited States
| | - Manoj Kumar Kanakasabapathy
- Division of Engineering in Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical SchoolBostonUnited States
| | - Prudhvi Thirumalaraju
- Division of Engineering in Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical SchoolBostonUnited States
| | - Raghav Gupta
- Division of Engineering in Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical SchoolBostonUnited States
| | - Rohan Pooniwala
- Division of Engineering in Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical SchoolBostonUnited States
| | - Hemanth Kandula
- Division of Engineering in Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical SchoolBostonUnited States
| | - Eduardo Hariton
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical SchoolBostonUnited States
| | - Irene Souter
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical SchoolBostonUnited States
- Harvard Medical SchoolBostonUnited States
| | - Irene Dimitriadis
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical SchoolBostonUnited States
- Harvard Medical SchoolBostonUnited States
| | | | - Carol L Curchoe
- San Diego Fertility CenterSan DiegoUnited States
- Colorado Center for Reproductive Medicine IVF Laboratory NetworkEnglewoodUnited States
| | - Jason Swain
- Colorado Center for Reproductive Medicine IVF Laboratory NetworkEnglewoodUnited States
| | - Lynn M Boehnlein
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of WisconsinMadisonUnited States
| | - Hadi Shafiee
- Harvard Medical SchoolBostonUnited States
- Division of Engineering in Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical SchoolBostonUnited States
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Skrovanek E, Dunbar-Jacob J, Dunwoody C, Wesmiller S. Integrative Review of Reproductive Decision Making of Women Who Are BRCA Positive. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2020; 49:525-536. [PMID: 32926832 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogn.2020.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/01/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To synthesize research findings about reproductive decision making among women who are BRCA positive. DATA SOURCES PubMed and CINAHL. STUDY SELECTION Articles published in English between 2000 and June 28, 2020, about the reproductive decision making of women with a confirmed BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. DATA EXTRACTION We extracted data about participants, study design, analysis, follow-up, and results. We used the modified Downs and Black checklist and Kennelly's qualitative data analysis to rate studies for quality and applicability by using. DATA SYNTHESIS We included five of 257 screened articles in our synthesis. The total sample size of the five studies was 1,468 women. The most prevalent factors related to reproductive decision making were the impending decisions regarding childbearing and family choices, including decisions about biological children, preventive surgery, preimplantation genetic diagnosis, and prenatal diagnosis to prevent further transmission of a BRCA mutation, and family planning. CONCLUSION A lack of knowledge exists about the reproductive decision-making processes of women who are BRCA positive. A better understanding of this process would provide nurses and other clinicians with the knowledge needed to support these women through their reproductive life choices.
Collapse
|
12
|
Al-Kharusi K, Bruwer Z, Wessels TM. The experience of Preimplantation Genetic Testing (PGT) among Muslim couples in Oman in the Middle East. J Genet Couns 2020; 30:121-131. [PMID: 32578356 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1300] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2019] [Revised: 07/11/2019] [Accepted: 05/05/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) is an alternative reproductive technology integrated with in vitro fertilization (IVF). It is a well-established technique offering a reproductive option for families at a high risk of transmitting a genetic disorder, allowing them to avoid making a decision about termination of an affected pregnancy (TOP). In Arab communities and particularly in Oman, where TOP is not favored under the majority of implemented Muslim law, termination of pregnancy for fetal indications is not always possible. As these communities are in favor of consanguineous marriage, they are at increased risk of serious and lethal autosomal recessive conditions, and as a result, PGT is a feasible option as a TOP decision can be avoided. However, undergoing PGT is relatively new in the Arab Muslim countries and Omani patients have only recently had access to the service. This qualitative study utilized a phenomenological approach to explore the experience of Omani families who had selected to undergo PGT as a means of reducing the risk of having a child affected with a genetic disorder. Fourteen participants from eight families who underwent PGT were interviewed. Data collected were analyzed using thematic analysis. The research identified four main themes: Anxiously waiting 'Taraqub'; Unforeseen; Secrecy; and Me and My Partner. The findings of the research have provided insight into the PGT experiences of Omani families. Unique cultural and religious perspectives should be considered when counseling Omani Muslim couples.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khalsa Al-Kharusi
- Genetics and Developmental Medicine Clinic, Sultan Qaboos University Hospital, Muscat, Oman
| | - Zandre Bruwer
- Genetics and Developmental Medicine Clinic, Sultan Qaboos University Hospital, Muscat, Oman
| | - Tina-Marié Wessels
- Division of Human Genetics, Department of Pathology Faculty of Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Wild EJ, Tabrizi SJ. One decade ago, one decade ahead in huntington's disease. Mov Disord 2020; 34:1434-1439. [PMID: 31769087 DOI: 10.1002/mds.27849] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2019] [Revised: 08/13/2019] [Accepted: 08/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Edward J Wild
- UCL Huntington's Disease Centre, Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | - Sarah J Tabrizi
- UCL Huntington's Disease Centre, Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Rothwell E, Lamb B, Johnson E, Gurtcheff S, Riches N, Fagan M, Sabatello M, Johnstone E. Patient perspectives and experiences with in vitro fertilization and genetic testing options. Ther Adv Reprod Health 2020; 14:2633494119899942. [PMID: 32518912 PMCID: PMC7254585 DOI: 10.1177/2633494119899942] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2019] [Accepted: 12/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: Decision-making and patient experiences with embryo selection during in vitro fertilization often include genetic testing options. The purpose of this study was to gain insight about the experiences and perspectives of women using in vitro fertilization and genetic technologies. Methods: Interviews (n = 37) were conducted among female patients who had undergone in vitro fertilization, underwent expanded carrier screening, and were offered pre-implantation genetic testing for aneuploidy between July 2016 and July 2017. The interviews were transcribed and a content analysis was conducted on the transcripts. Results: Categories that emerged from the data analysis included unexpected outcomes, uncertainty, unanticipated emotional consequences, too much emphasis on the woman’s contributions and questions about embryo viability. Patient experiences with genetic technologies during in vitro fertilization played a significant role within these results. Conclusion: The emotional and psychological impacts of infertility during in vitro fertilization were the primary concerns discussed by participants. Future research is needed to identify ways to help manage unexpected outcomes and continuous uncertainty, including the increasing use of genetic technologies, to not add to the psychological burden of infertility. There is a need to explore more support options or counseling services for patients struggling with infertility during in vitro fertilization treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin Rothwell
- Associate Vice President for Research, Integrity and Compliance, The University of Utah, 75 South 2000 East, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
| | - Brandy Lamb
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Erin Johnson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | | | - Naomi Riches
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Melinda Fagan
- Department of Philosophy, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Maya Sabatello
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Erica Johnstone
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Early ML, Kumar P, Marcell AV, Lawson C, Christianson M, Pecker LH. Literacy assessment of preimplantation genetic patient education materials exceed national reading levels. J Assist Reprod Genet 2020; 37:1913-1922. [PMID: 32472448 PMCID: PMC7468013 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-020-01837-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2020] [Accepted: 05/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE In vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic testing (IVF+PGT-M) reduces the risk of having a child affected by a heritable condition, yet only one-third of eligible patients are aware of this reproductive option. Access to education materials written at appropriate literacy levels could raise patients' awareness, but there is a mismatch between patient reading ability and the literacy demand of most materials. This study aimed to systematically identify written education materials on IVF+PGT-M and evaluate their literacy levels. We hypothesized that materials would fail to meet standards set by the Joint Commission and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). METHODS To identify patient education materials about IVF+PGT-M from academic databases and public-facing sources, an environmental scan was performed. Materials were analyzed using three validated scales: Simple Measure of Gobbledygook, Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool, and Clear Communication Index. RESULTS Seventeen patient education materials about IVF+PGT-M were identified from patient education databases, a consumer search engine, and professional organizations. The median reading level was 14.5 grade, median understandability was 74.2%, and median comprehensibility was 73.3%. CONCLUSIONS For most American adults, materials about IVF+PGT-M are not readable, understandable, or clear. The Joint Commission requires patient education materials be written at or below 5th grade reading level and the CDC recommends a 90% minimum score for comprehensibility. No evaluated material met these guidelines. Patient education materials that exceed average American literacy skills may perpetuate disparities in the utilization of IVF+PGT-M. Materials that communicate this complicated subject at an understandable level are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Macy L Early
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| | - Priyanka Kumar
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Arik V Marcell
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.,Division of General Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Cathleen Lawson
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.,Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Mindy Christianson
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.,Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Baltimore, MD, USA.,Division of Reproductive Endocrinology/Infertility, Lutherville, MD, USA
| | - Lydia H Pecker
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.,Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Baltimore, MD, USA.,Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
What Results Should Be Returned from Opportunistic Screening in Translational Research? J Pers Med 2020; 10:jpm10010013. [PMID: 32121581 PMCID: PMC7151595 DOI: 10.3390/jpm10010013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2020] [Revised: 02/16/2020] [Accepted: 02/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Increasingly, patients without clinical indications are undergoing genomic tests. The purpose of this study was to assess their appreciation and comprehension of their test results and their clinicians' reactions. We conducted 675 surveys with participants from the Vanderbilt Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) cohort. We interviewed 36 participants: 19 had received positive results, and 17 were self-identified racial minorities. Eleven clinicians who had patients who had participated in eMERGE were interviewed. A further 21 of these clinicians completed surveys. Participants spontaneously admitted to understanding little or none of the information returned to them from the eMERGE study. However, they simultaneously said that they generally found testing to be "helpful," even when it did not inform their health care. Primary care physicians expressed discomfort in being asked to interpret the results for their patients and described it as an undue burden. Providing genetic testing to otherwise healthy patients raises a number of ethical issues that warrant serious consideration. Although our participants were enthusiastic about enrolling and receiving their results, they express a limited understanding of what the results mean for their health care. This fact, coupled the clinicians' concern, urges greater caution when educating and enrolling participants in clinically non-indicated testing.
Collapse
|
17
|
Eno CC, Barton SK, Dorrani N, Cederbaum SD, Deignan JL, Grody WW. Confidential genetic testing and electronic health records: A survey of current practices among Huntington disease testing centers. Mol Genet Genomic Med 2019; 8:e1026. [PMID: 31701651 PMCID: PMC6978271 DOI: 10.1002/mgg3.1026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2019] [Revised: 09/17/2019] [Accepted: 09/25/2019] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Clinical care teams providing presymptomatic genetic testing often employ advanced confidentiality practices for documentation and result storage. However, patient requests for increased confidentiality may be in conflict with the legal obligations of medical providers to document patient care activities in the electronic health record (EHR). Huntington disease presents a representative case study for investigating the ways centers currently balance the requirements of EHRs with the privacy demands of patients seeking presymptomatic genetic testing. Methods We surveyed 23 HD centers (53% response rate) regarding their use of the EHR for presymptomatic HD testing. Results Our survey revealed that clinical care teams and laboratories have each developed their own practices, which are cumbersome and often include EHR avoidance. We found that a majority of HD care teams record appointments in the EHR (91%), often using vague notes. Approximately half of the care teams (52%) keep presymptomatic results of out of the EHR. Conclusion As genetic knowledge grows, linking more genes to late‐onset conditions, institutions will benefit from having professional recommendations to guide development of policies for EHR documentation of presymptomatic genetic results. Policies must be sensitive to the ethical differences and patient demands for presymptomatic genetic testing compared to those undergoing confirmatory genetic testing.
Collapse
|
18
|
Pastore LM, Cordeiro Mitchell CN, Rubin LR, Nicoloro-SantaBarbara J, Genoff Garzon MC, Lobel M. Patients' preimplantation genetic testing decision-making experience: an opinion on related psychological frameworks. Hum Reprod Open 2019; 2019:hoz019. [PMID: 31598567 PMCID: PMC6777985 DOI: 10.1093/hropen/hoz019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2019] [Revised: 06/24/2019] [Accepted: 07/01/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The process of deciding whether to pursue preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) of an embryo is highly stressful for individuals and couples and has adverse emotional consequences (e.g. distress and uncertainty). PGT influences patients’ lives in both positive and negative ways and is experienced at an individual level, as a dyadic unit, as a family member and as part of the society. Here, we argue that providing a conceptual framework with which to understand the `experience of decision making’ about PGT for monogenic disease (PGT-M) testing specifically, as well as the factors contributing to `decisional distress’ and `uncertainty’ that patients endure as a result—apart from what decision they make—is crucial to optimizing patient counseling, satisfaction and outcomes in the field of ART. Derived from psychological theory, the framework proposed here identifies three categories of contributing factors to decisional distress and uncertainty in considering PGT-M; namely, ‘intraindividual’, ‘interpersonal’ and ‘situational’ factors. We reviewed evidence from the PGT literature to inform our framework. Well-accepted theories of stress and health decision making were also reviewed for their relevance to PGT-M decision making, focusing on potential distress and uncertainty. Our novel conceptual framework can be used to inform clinical practice, to advance research and to aid the development of interventions for individuals and couples who are deciding whether or not to use PGT-M. Alleviating emotional distress and uncertainty can improve patients’ well-being during their reproductive journey.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L M Pastore
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Stony Brook Medicine, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - C N Cordeiro Mitchell
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - L R Rubin
- Department of Psychology, The New School for Social Research, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - M C Genoff Garzon
- Department of Psychology, The New School for Social Research, New York, NY, USA
| | - M Lobel
- Department of Psychology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Carzis B, Wainstein T, Gobetz L, Krause A. Review of 10 years of preimplantation genetic diagnosis in South Africa: implications for a low-to-middle-income country. J Assist Reprod Genet 2019; 36:1909-1916. [PMID: 31350724 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-019-01537-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2019] [Accepted: 07/19/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) service, for the period of January 2006 to December 2016, through a South African academic and diagnostic Human Genetics Unit, and to assess the outcomes and cost of PGD. METHODS A retrospective review of PGD files available at the Human Genetics Unit was performed. Data was collected from genetic counseling, fertility, and PGD-specific records. RESULTS Amongst the 22 couples who had PGD, 42 in vitro fertilisation cycles were completed with 228 embryos biopsied and included in the analysis. Most (59%) of the conditions for which PGD was requested were autosomal recessive. Of the biopsied embryos, 71/228 (31.1%) were suitable for transfer and 41/71 (57.7%) were transferred. Of these, 14/41 (34.0%) successfully implanted and 11/14 (78.6%) resulted in a liveborn infant. The clinical pregnancy rate per embryo transfer was 29.3%. Overall, 10/22 (45.5%) couples had a successful cycle resulting in a liveborn infant. On average, one cycle of PGD costs USD 9525. CONCLUSIONS This is the first study to assess the success rates and the cost of PGD in South Africa and provides evidence for the feasibility in a low-to-middle-income country. The success rates in this sample are comparable to those achieved globally. South Africa has the infrastructure and expertise to provide PGD; the limiting factor is the lack of funding initiatives for PGD. Although the sample size was small, the findings from this study will enable genetic counselors to offer couples in South Africa evidence-based and locally accurate information regarding outcomes, success rates, and costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bianca Carzis
- Division of Human Genetics, School of Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa. .,Division of Human Genetics, National Health Laboratory Service, Johannesburg, South Africa.
| | - Tasha Wainstein
- Division of Human Genetics, School of Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.,Division of Human Genetics, National Health Laboratory Service, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Lawrence Gobetz
- Vitalab Centre for Assisted Conception, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Amanda Krause
- Division of Human Genetics, School of Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.,Division of Human Genetics, National Health Laboratory Service, Johannesburg, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Goh ESY, Miller FA, Marshall DA, Ungar WJ. Genetic counselors' preferences for coverage of preimplantation genetic diagnosis: A discrete choice experiment. Clin Genet 2019; 95:684-692. [PMID: 30859557 DOI: 10.1111/cge.13531] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2018] [Revised: 03/08/2019] [Accepted: 03/08/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) allows couples to test for a genetically affected embryo prior to implantation. Patient access to this ethically complex and expensive technology differs markedly across jurisdictions, with differences in private/public insurance coverage and variations in patient inclusion and diagnostic criteria. The objective of the study was to identify trade-offs regarding PGD coverage decisions amongst genetic counselors. To quantify stated preferences for PGD coverage, we conducted a discrete choice experiment with Canadian genetic counselors (GC) considering attributes regarding the scope of testing (PGD indication, risk of the condition and number of cycles covered) and patient inclusion criteria (fertility status and family history). Multinomial logit regression was used to estimate trade-offs amongst attributes using part-worth utilities and importance scores. The completed response rate was 41% with 126 GC completing the survey. Risk of the genetic condition was the most important attribute. Overall, GC were more responsive to the scope of testing criteria including the condition's risk (importance score of 42%) and PGD indication (31%) rather than family history (11%) and fertility status (8%). Based on this study's attributes and levels, condition characteristics are prioritized even above patient characteristics for PGD coverage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elaine Suk-Ying Goh
- Trillium Health Partners, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Genetics, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.,Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Fiona A Miller
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Deborah A Marshall
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Wendy J Ungar
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children (Sickkids) Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Di Gioacchino V, Langlois S, Elliott AM. Canadian genetic healthcare professionals' attitudes towards discussing private pay options with patients. Mol Genet Genomic Med 2019; 7:e00572. [PMID: 30712332 PMCID: PMC6465662 DOI: 10.1002/mgg3.572] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2018] [Revised: 11/12/2018] [Accepted: 12/02/2018] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Just as there is inconsistency with respect to coverage of genomic testing with insurance carriers, there is interprovincial discrepancy in Canada. Consequently, the option of private pay (e.g., self pay) arises, which can lead to inequities in access, particularly when patients may not be aware of this option. There are currently no published data regarding how the Canadian genetics community handles discussions of private pay options with patients. The purpose of this study was to assess the attitudes of genetic healthcare professionals (GHPs: medical geneticists, genetic counselors, and genetic nurses) practicing in Canada toward these discussions. Methods An online survey was distributed to members of the Canadian College of Medical Geneticists and the Canadian Association of Genetic Counsellors to assess frequencies, rationale, and ethical considerations regarding these conversations. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results Of 144 respondents, 95% reported discussing private pay and 65% reported working in a clinic without a policy on this issue. There were geographic and practice‐specific differences. The most common circumstance for these discussions was when a test was clinically indicated (e.g., but funding was denied) followed by when the patient initiated the conversation. The most frequently discussed tests included: multi‐gene panels (73% of respondents), noninvasive prenatal testing (62%), and pre‐implantation genetic diagnosis (58%). Although 65% felt it was ethical to discuss private pay, 35% indicated it was “sometimes” ethical. Conclusion With the increasing availability of genomic technologies, these findings inform how we practice and demonstrate the need for policy in this area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vanessa Di Gioacchino
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Sylvie Langlois
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,Women's Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Alison M Elliott
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,Women's Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Mor P, Brennenstuhl S, Metcalfe KA. Uptake of Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis in Female BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers. J Genet Couns 2018; 27:1386-1394. [DOI: 10.1007/s10897-018-0264-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2017] [Accepted: 05/22/2018] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
|
23
|
Murphy EL, Droher ML, DiMaio MS, Dahl NK. Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis Counseling in Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease. Am J Kidney Dis 2018; 72:866-872. [PMID: 29606500 DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2018.01.048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2017] [Accepted: 01/19/2018] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is one of the most common hereditary forms of chronic kidney disease. Mutations within PKD1 or PKD2 lead to innumerable fluid-filled cysts in the kidneys and in some instances, end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Affected individuals have a 50% chance of passing the mutation to each of their offspring. Assisted reproductive technology using preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) allows these individuals to reduce this risk to 1% to 2%. We assess the disease burden of 8 individuals with ADPKD who have undergone genetic testing in preparation for PGD. Clinical features that predict high risk for progression to ESRD in patients with ADPKD include genotype, early onset of hypertension, a urologic event before age 35 years, and a large height-adjusted total kidney volume. Patients may have a family history of intracranial aneurysms or complications involving hepatic cysts, which may further influence the decision to pursue PGD. We also explore the cost, risks, and benefits of using PGD. All patients with ADPKD of childbearing potential, regardless of risk for progression to ESRD or risk for a significant disease burden, will likely benefit from genetic counseling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin L Murphy
- Section of Nephrology, Yale University School of Medicine, North Haven, CT
| | - Madeline L Droher
- Section of Nephrology, Yale University School of Medicine, North Haven, CT
| | - Miriam S DiMaio
- Department of Medical Sciences, Frank H. Netter, MD School of Medicine, Quinnipiac University, North Haven, CT
| | - Neera K Dahl
- Section of Nephrology, Yale University School of Medicine, North Haven, CT.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Genoff Garzon MC, Rubin LR, Lobel M, Stelling J, Pastore LM. Review of patient decision-making factors and attitudes regarding preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Clin Genet 2018; 94:22-42. [PMID: 29120067 DOI: 10.1111/cge.13174] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2017] [Revised: 10/31/2017] [Accepted: 11/01/2017] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
The increasing technical complexity and evolving options for repro-genetic testing have direct implications for information processing and decision making, yet the research among patients considering preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) is narrowly focused. This review synthesizes the literature regarding patient PGD decision-making factors, and illuminates gaps for future research and clinical translation. Twenty-five articles met the inclusion criteria for evaluating experiences and attitudes of patients directly involved in PGD as an intervention or considering using PGD. Thirteen reports were focused exclusively on a specific disease or condition. Five themes emerged: (1) patients motivated by prospects of a healthy, genetic-variant-free child, (2) PGD requires a commitment of time, money, energy and emotions, (3) patients concerned about logistics and ethics of discarding embryos, (4) some patients feel sense of responsibility to use available technologies, and (5) PGD decisions are complex for individuals and couples. Patient research on PGD decision-making processes has very infrequently used validated instruments, and the data collected through both quantitative and qualitative designs have been inconsistent. Future research for improving clinical counseling is needed to fill many gaps remaining in the literature regarding this decision-making process, and suggestions are offered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M C Genoff Garzon
- Department of Psychology, The New School for Social Research, New York, NY
| | - L R Rubin
- Department of Psychology, The New School for Social Research, New York, NY
| | - M Lobel
- Department of Psychology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY
| | - J Stelling
- Reproductive Specialists of NY, Stony Brook, NY.,Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Stony Brook Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY
| | - L M Pastore
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Stony Brook Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Klitzman R. Challenges, Dilemmas and Factors Involved in PGD Decision-Making: Providers’ and Patients’ Views, Experiences and Decisions. J Genet Couns 2017; 27:909-919. [DOI: 10.1007/s10897-017-0173-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2017] [Accepted: 11/06/2017] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
|
26
|
Girardet A, Ishmukhametova A, Viart V, Plaza S, Saguet F, Verriere G, Hamamah S, Coupier I, Haquet E, Anahory T, Willems M, Claustres M. Thirteen years' experience of 893 PGD cycles for monogenic disorders in a publicly funded, nationally regulated regional hospital service. Reprod Biomed Online 2017; 36:154-163. [PMID: 29203382 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.10.113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2017] [Revised: 10/20/2017] [Accepted: 10/27/2017] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
This study provides an overview of preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for single gene diseases and the management of expanding indications in the context of a fully financially covered service at Montpellier's regional hospital centre. Within the framework of a restrictive law ruling PGD in France, only the parental genetic risk can be studied in embryos (concurrent aneuploidy screening is not allowed). PCR-based techniques were developed combining mutation detection and closely linked short tandem repeat markers within or flanking the affected genes, and set up more than 100 different robust fluorescent multiplex assays for 61 monogenic disorders. This strategy was used to analyse blastomeres from cleavage-stage embryos. Overall, 893 cycles were initiated in 384 couples; 727 cycles proceeded to oocyte retrieval and 608 cycles to embryo transfer, resulting in 184 deliveries. Clinical pregnancy rate per transfer, implantation and miscarriage rates were 33.6%, 25.1% and 8.8%, respectively. Our PGD programme resulted in the birth of 214 healthy babies for 162 out of 358 couples (45.3%), constituting a relevant achievement within an organizational framework that does not allow aneuploidy screening but provides equal access to PGD, both geographically and socioeconomically. This is a rare example of a fully free-of-charge PGD service.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Girardet
- Laboratory of Molecular Genetics, CHU and University of Montpellier, 34095 Montpellier, France.
| | - Aliya Ishmukhametova
- Laboratory of Molecular Genetics, CHU and University of Montpellier, 34095 Montpellier, France
| | - Victoria Viart
- Laboratory of Molecular Genetics, CHU and University of Montpellier, 34095 Montpellier, France
| | - Stéphanie Plaza
- Laboratory of Molecular Genetics, CHU and University of Montpellier, 34095 Montpellier, France
| | - Florielle Saguet
- Laboratory of Molecular Genetics, CHU and University of Montpellier, 34095 Montpellier, France
| | - Garance Verriere
- Laboratory of Molecular Genetics, CHU and University of Montpellier, 34095 Montpellier, France
| | - Samir Hamamah
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, CHU and University of Montpellier, 34095 Montpellier, France
| | - Isabelle Coupier
- Departement of Medical Genetics, CHU of Montpellier, 34095 Montpellier, France
| | - Emmanuelle Haquet
- Departement of Medical Genetics, CHU of Montpellier, 34095 Montpellier, France
| | - Tal Anahory
- Departement of Gynecology, CHU of Montpellier, 34095 Montpellier, France
| | - Marjolaine Willems
- Departement of Medical Genetics, CHU of Montpellier, 34095 Montpellier, France
| | - Mireille Claustres
- Laboratory of Molecular Genetics, CHU and University of Montpellier, 34095 Montpellier, France
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Olesen AP, Mohd Nor SN, Amin L, Che Ngah A. Public Perceptions of Ethical, Legal and Social Implications of Pre-implantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD) in Malaysia. SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS 2017; 23:1563-1580. [PMID: 27995446 DOI: 10.1007/s11948-016-9857-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2016] [Accepted: 11/28/2016] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
Pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) became well known in Malaysia after the birth of the first Malaysian 'designer baby', Yau Tak in 2004. Two years later, the Malaysian Medical Council implemented the first and only regulation on the use of Pre-implantation Genetic Diagnosis in this country. The birth of Yau Tak triggered a public outcry because PGD was used for non-medical sex selection thus, raising concerns about PGD and its implications for the society. This study aims to explore participants' perceptions of the future implications of PGD for the Malaysian society. We conducted in-depth interviews with 21 participants over a period of one year, using a semi-structured questionnaire. Findings reveal that responses varied substantially among the participants; there was a broad acceptance as well as rejection of PGD. Contentious ethical, legal and social issues of PGD were raised during the discussions, including intolerance to and discrimination against people with genetic disabilities; societal pressure and the 'slippery slope' of PGD were raised during the discussions. This study also highlights participants' legal standpoint, and major issues regarding PGD in relation to the accuracy of diagnosis. At the social policy level, considerations are given to access as well as the impact of this technology on families, women and physicians. Given these different perceptions of the use of PGD, and its implications and conflicts, policies and regulations of the use of PGD have to be dealt with on a case-by-case basis while taking into consideration of the risk-benefit balance, since its application will impact the lives of so many people in the society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angelina P Olesen
- Pusat Citra UKM, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600, Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia.
| | - Siti Nurani Mohd Nor
- Faculty of Science (Department of Science and Technology), University of Malaya, 50460, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Latifah Amin
- Pusat Citra UKM, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600, Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia
| | - Anisah Che Ngah
- Faculty of Law, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600, Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Kakourou G, Vrettou C, Moutafi M, Traeger-Synodinos J. Pre-implantation HLA matching: The production of a Saviour Child. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2017; 44:76-89. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2017.05.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2017] [Revised: 04/09/2017] [Accepted: 05/03/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
29
|
Hershberger PE, Kavanaugh K. Comparing appropriateness and equivalence of email interviews to phone interviews in qualitative research on reproductive decisions. Appl Nurs Res 2017; 37:50-54. [PMID: 28985920 DOI: 10.1016/j.apnr.2017.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2017] [Revised: 07/11/2017] [Accepted: 07/30/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite an increasing use of qualitative email interviews by nurse researchers, there is little understanding about the appropriateness and equivalence of email interviews to other qualitative data collection methods, especially on sensitive topics research. PURPOSE The purpose is to describe our procedures for completing asynchronous, email interviews and to evaluate the appropriateness and equivalency of email interviews to phone interviews in two qualitative research studies that examined reproductive decisions. METHODS Content analysis guided the methodological appraisal of appropriateness and equivalency of in-depth, asynchronous email interviews to single phone interviews. Appropriateness was determined by: (a) participants' willingness to engage in email or phone interviews, (b) completing data collection in a timely period, and (c) participants' satisfaction with the interview. Equivalency was evaluated by: (a) completeness of the interview data, and (b) insight obtained from the data. RESULTS Of the combined sample in the two studies (N=71), 31% of participants chose to participate via an email interview over a phone interview. The time needed to complete the email interviews averaged 27 to 28days and the number of investigator probe-participant response interchanges was 4 to 5cycles on average. In contrast, the phone interviews averaged 59 to 61min in duration. Most participants in both the email and phone interviews reported they were satisfied or very satisfied with their ability to express their true feelings throughout the interview. Regarding equivalence, 100% of the email and phone interviews provided insight into decision processes. Although insightful, two of the email and one phone interview had short answers or, at times, underdeveloped responses. Participants' quotes and behaviors cited within four published articles, a novel evaluation of equivalency, revealed that 20% to 37.5% of the citations about decision processes were from email participants, which is consistent with the percent of email participants. CONCLUSIONS In-depth, asynchronous email interviews were appropriate and garnered rich, insightful data that augmented the phone interviews. Awareness of the procedures, appropriateness, and nuances when carrying out email interviews on sensitive topics may provide nurse researchers with the ability to obtain thick, rich data that can best advance clinical practice and direct future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patricia E Hershberger
- College of Nursing and College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, United States.
| | - Karen Kavanaugh
- Children's Hospital of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Sharpe A, Avery P, Choudhary M. Reproductive outcome following pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) in the UK. HUM FERTIL 2017; 21:120-127. [PMID: 28602104 DOI: 10.1080/14647273.2017.1336259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
In 2013, the National Health Service Commissioning board centralized the funding in England for up to three cycles of pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for couples who have, or are carriers of, a specific genetic disorder. This study presents the historical data of PGD cycles and their clinical outcomes in UK as extrapolated from the national data registry. Retrospective analysis of outcome of cycles undergoing pre-implantation genetic diagnosis in the UK over the past 20 years was performed from the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority database (n = 2974). Binary logistic regression was used to determine trends over time and adjusted for maternal age. Briefly, the number of PGD cycles has risen 127-fold from 1991 to 2012 with 3.6-fold increase (360% rise) from 2004 to 2012. A total of one in four embryos following pre-implantation genetic diagnosis did not reach embryo transfer and 92% of these were due to a failure to survive. The live birth rate has risen over 20 years and there has been a steady decline in reported incidence of congenital abnormalities (p < 0.07). PGD has thus emerged as a safe and effective alternative to prenatal diagnosis but with ever evolving technological advances, a robust system of data collection that incorporates techniques used and reporting of mutation-specific clinical outcomes is suggested.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abigail Sharpe
- a Newcastle Fertility Centre, International Centre for Life , Newcastle upon Tyne , UK
| | - Peter Avery
- b School of Mathematics and Statistics , Newcastle University , Newcastle upon Tyne , UK
| | - Meenakshi Choudhary
- a Newcastle Fertility Centre, International Centre for Life , Newcastle upon Tyne , UK
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Dagan E, Birenbaum-Carmeli D, Friedman E, Feldman B. Performing and Declining PGD: Accounts of Jewish Israeli Women Who Carry a BRCA1/2 Mutation or Partners of Male Mutation Carriers. J Genet Couns 2017; 26:1070-1079. [PMID: 28265801 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-017-0087-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2015] [Accepted: 02/21/2017] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
To describe factors associated with preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) decisions among Jewish Israeli BRCA1/2 carriers or spouses of a male carrier, we contacted all women who initiated PGD consultation for embryonic BRCA1/2 mutation detection at Sheba Medical Center, prior to March 2014. Applying a qualitative approach, we asked women to elaborate on the factors they considered in either opting for PGD or discontinuing the screening procedure. Participants were 18 Jewish Israeli women; 14 were carriers of one of the Ashkenazi founder mutations in BRCA1/2, and four were spouses of male mutation carriers, who underwent at least one cycle of PGD. Prior to seeking PGD, ten of the women had no children. At the time of the interview, all but three had at least one child. Three factors emerged as key motivators for PGD: having witnessed the disease in a close relative (n = 12); prior IVF treatment for infertility (n = 12); and having pre-existing frozen embryos (n = 6). Ten women withdrew from the PGD process due to clinical, logistical, and financial reasons. In conclusion, most women decided to withdraw from PGD instead of continuing until a successful conception was achieved. Those who opted for PGD attributed their discontinuation of further screening to the emotional burden that is greatly intensified by practical difficulties.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Efrat Dagan
- Department of Nursing, University of Haifa, PO Box 3498838, Haifa, Israel.
| | | | - Eitan Friedman
- The Susanne-Levy Gertner Oncogenetics Unit, Sheba Medical Center, PO Box 52621, Tel Aviv, Israel.,Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, PO Box 39040, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Baruch Feldman
- Sheba Medical Center, The Danek Gertner Institute of Human Genetics, PO Box 52621, Tel Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Stevenson EL, Hershberger PE, Bergh PA. Evidence-Based Care for Couples With Infertility. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2015; 45:100-10; quiz e1-2. [PMID: 26815804 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogn.2015.10.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/01/2015] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
When couples cannot achieve pregnancy, they often seek health care from medical and nursing specialists. The care the couple receives begins with a thorough assessment to determine the possible cause of infertility and to plan appropriate care to ensure the best chance for the couple to have a biological child. In this article, we provide an overview of the etiology and evaluation of infertility, the various treatment options available, and the appropriate clinical implications.
Collapse
|
33
|
Hershberger PE, Stevenson EL. In support of equitable infertility health insurance. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2014; 43:401-2. [PMID: 24980203 DOI: 10.1111/1552-6909.12473] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
|