1
|
Marathe PN, Suckiel SA, Bonini KE, Kelly NR, Scarimbolo L, Insel BJ, Odgis JA, Sebastin M, Ramos MA, Di Biase M, Gallagher KM, Brown K, Rodriguez JE, Yelton N, Aguiñiga KL, Rodriguez MA, Maria E, Lopez J, Zinberg RE, Diaz GA, Greally JM, Abul-Husn NS, Bauman LJ, Gelb BD, Wasserstein MP, Kenny EE, Horowitz CR. Evaluating parental personal utility of pediatric genetic and genomic testing in a diverse, multilingual population. HGG ADVANCES 2024; 5:100321. [PMID: 38918948 DOI: 10.1016/j.xhgg.2024.100321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2023] [Revised: 06/21/2024] [Accepted: 06/21/2024] [Indexed: 06/27/2024] Open
Abstract
There is increasing evidence of the clinical utility of genetic and genomic testing (GT); however, factors influencing personal utility of GT, especially in diverse, multilingual populations, remain unclear. We explored these factors in a diverse cohort of parents/guardians (participants) whose children received clinical GT through the NYCKidSeq program. A total of 847 participants completed surveys at baseline, post-results disclosure, and 6 months (6m) post-results. The largest population groups were Hispanic/Latino(a) (48%), White/European American (24%), and Black/African American (16%). Personal utility was assessed using the Personal Utility (PrU) scale, adapted for pediatric populations and included on the surveys. Three PrU subscales were identified using factor analysis: practical, educational, and parental psychological utility. Overall personal utility summary score and the three subscales significantly decreased after receiving results and over time. Hispanic/Latino(a) participants identified greater overall personal utility than European American and African American participants at all time points (p < 0.001) as did participants whose children received positive/likely positive results compared with those with negative and uncertain results (post-results: p < 0.001 and p < 0.001; 6m post-results: p = 0.002 and p < 0.001, respectively). Post-results, higher subscale scores were associated with lower education levels (practical, parental psychological: p ≤ 0.02) and higher levels of trust in the healthcare system (practical, parental psychological: p ≤ 0.04). These findings help to understand the perspectives of diverse parents/guardians, which is critical to tailoring pre- and post-test counseling across a variety of populations and clinical settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Priya N Marathe
- Institute for Genomic Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Sabrina A Suckiel
- Institute for Genomic Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA; Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Katherine E Bonini
- Institute for Genomic Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Nicole R Kelly
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Genetic Medicine, Children's Hospital at Montefiore/Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10467, USA
| | - Laura Scarimbolo
- Institute for Genomic Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Beverly J Insel
- Institute for Genomic Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Jacqueline A Odgis
- Institute for Genomic Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Monisha Sebastin
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Genetic Medicine, Children's Hospital at Montefiore/Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10467, USA
| | - Michelle A Ramos
- Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA; Institute for Health Equity Research, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Miranda Di Biase
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Genetic Medicine, Children's Hospital at Montefiore/Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10467, USA
| | - Katie M Gallagher
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Genetic Medicine, Children's Hospital at Montefiore/Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10467, USA
| | - Kaitlyn Brown
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Genetic Medicine, Children's Hospital at Montefiore/Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10467, USA
| | - Jessica E Rodriguez
- Institute for Genomic Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Nicole Yelton
- Institute for Genomic Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Karla Lopez Aguiñiga
- Institute for Genomic Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Michelle A Rodriguez
- Institute for Genomic Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Estefany Maria
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Genetic Medicine, Children's Hospital at Montefiore/Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10467, USA
| | - Jessenia Lopez
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Genetic Medicine, Children's Hospital at Montefiore/Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10467, USA
| | - Randi E Zinberg
- Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Science, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - George A Diaz
- Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - John M Greally
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Genetic Medicine, Children's Hospital at Montefiore/Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10467, USA
| | - Noura S Abul-Husn
- Institute for Genomic Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA; Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA; Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Laurie J Bauman
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10461, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10461, USA
| | - Bruce D Gelb
- Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA; Mindich Child Health and Development Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Melissa P Wasserstein
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Genetic Medicine, Children's Hospital at Montefiore/Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10467, USA
| | - Eimear E Kenny
- Institute for Genomic Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA; Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA; Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA.
| | - Carol R Horowitz
- Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA; Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA; Institute for Health Equity Research, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ellard H, Clarke A, Wynn S, Pichini A, Lewis C. Written communication of whole genome sequencing results in the NHS Genomic Medicine Service: a multi-centre service evaluation. Eur J Hum Genet 2024:10.1038/s41431-024-01636-5. [PMID: 38806663 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-024-01636-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2024] [Revised: 05/07/2024] [Accepted: 05/13/2024] [Indexed: 05/30/2024] Open
Abstract
Whole genome sequencing (WGS) is being used in diagnostic testing for certain clinical indications within the NHS Genomic Medicine Service (GMS) in England. Letter writing is an integral part of delivering results. However, no national guidelines for writing results from WGS exist. This multi-centre service evaluation used mixed methods to understand the content and readability of letters returning diagnostic, variant of uncertain significance (VUS), and no-finding results to paediatric rare disease patients. Eight Regional Genetics Services (response rate 47%) in England provided a total of 37 letters returning diagnostic (n = 13), VUS (n = 10), and no-finding (n = 14) results. Diagnostic and VUS results were usually delivered during an appointment; no-finding results were typically delivered by letter only. Letters were diverse in which content topics they covered and level of detail. No-finding letters (14/14) explained the result but were less likely to cover other topics. Diagnostic letters discussed the result (13/13), the condition (13/13), clinical genetics follow-up (13/13), clinical management (10/13), and adapting to the result (9/13). VUS letters explained the result (10/10), diagnostic uncertainty (10/10), and clinical genetics follow-up (10/10). Uncertainty was a common component of letters (33/37), irrespective of the result. Reanalysis or review after one or more years was suggested in 6/13 diagnostic, 7/10 VUS, and 6/14 no-finding letters. The mean reading level of letters corresponded to 15-17 years. Understanding how WGS results are conveyed to families during appointments, as well as how families interpret that information, is needed to provide a more comprehensive overview of results communication and inform best practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Holly Ellard
- School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, UK.
- Population, Policy and Practice Department, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK.
| | - Angus Clarke
- Division of Cancer & Genetics, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, UK
| | - Sarah Wynn
- Unique, Rare Chromosome Support Group, Oxted, Surrey, UK
| | | | - Celine Lewis
- School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, UK
- Population, Policy and Practice Department, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
- NHS North Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Heath O, Hammerl E, Spitzinger A, Wortmann SB. Ending an Odyssey? The Psychosocial Experiences of Parents after the Genetic Diagnosis of a Mitochondrial Disease in Children. J Pers Med 2024; 14:523. [PMID: 38793105 PMCID: PMC11122152 DOI: 10.3390/jpm14050523] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2024] [Revised: 05/02/2024] [Accepted: 05/09/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Obtaining a genetic diagnosis of a primary mitochondrial disease (PMD) is often framed as a diagnostic odyssey. Yet, even after receiving a diagnosis, parents of affected children experience ongoing therapeutic and prognostic uncertainty and considerable psychosocial challenges. Semi-structured interviews (N = 24) were conducted with parents of 13 children (aged 2-19 years) with a genetically confirmed PMD. Paternal (N = 11) and maternal (N = 13) perspectives were obtained, and thematic analysis was performed on all interviews. A genetic diagnosis was valuable and empowering for parents, despite eliciting varied emotional responses. While the diagnosis helped focus management decisions, families often felt overwhelmed and unsupported in navigating the healthcare system. Most parents reported a serious impact on their romantic relationship. The sources of social support varied, with a preference for established friendship and family support networks over disease-specific community support groups. Most parents favored prenatal genetic testing in the event of a future pregnancy. This study provides insight into the lived experiences of parents after a genetic diagnosis of PMD in their children. The findings draw awareness to supportive care needs and highlight important gaps that should be addressed to ensure that parents feel supported within a holistic framework of management for PMDs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver Heath
- University Children’s Hospital, Salzburger Landeskliniken (SALK), Paracelsus Medical University (PMU), Müllner Hauptstrasse 48, 5020 Salzburg, Austria; (O.H.); (E.H.); (A.S.)
| | - Emma Hammerl
- University Children’s Hospital, Salzburger Landeskliniken (SALK), Paracelsus Medical University (PMU), Müllner Hauptstrasse 48, 5020 Salzburg, Austria; (O.H.); (E.H.); (A.S.)
| | - Anna Spitzinger
- University Children’s Hospital, Salzburger Landeskliniken (SALK), Paracelsus Medical University (PMU), Müllner Hauptstrasse 48, 5020 Salzburg, Austria; (O.H.); (E.H.); (A.S.)
- Institut für Klinische Psychologie der UK für Psychiatrie, Psychotherapie und Psychosomatik der PMU, 5020 Salzburg, Austria
| | - Saskia B. Wortmann
- University Children’s Hospital, Salzburger Landeskliniken (SALK), Paracelsus Medical University (PMU), Müllner Hauptstrasse 48, 5020 Salzburg, Austria; (O.H.); (E.H.); (A.S.)
- Nijmegen Centre for Mitochondrial Disorders (NCMD), Amalia Children’s Hospital, Radboudumc, 6525 Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rivière JG, Soler Palacín P, Butte MJ. Proceedings from the inaugural Artificial Intelligence in Primary Immune Deficiencies (AIPID) conference. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2024; 153:637-642. [PMID: 38224784 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2024.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2023] [Revised: 01/09/2024] [Accepted: 01/11/2024] [Indexed: 01/17/2024]
Abstract
Here, we summarize the proceedings of the inaugural Artificial Intelligence in Primary Immune Deficiencies conference, during which experts and advocates gathered to advance research into the applications of artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning, and other computational tools in the diagnosis and management of inborn errors of immunity (IEIs). The conference focused on the key themes of expediting IEI diagnoses, challenges in data collection, roles of natural language processing and large language models in interpreting electronic health records, and ethical considerations in implementation. Innovative AI-based tools trained on electronic health records and claims databases have discovered new patterns of warning signs for IEIs, facilitating faster diagnoses and enhancing patient outcomes. Challenges in training AIs persist on account of data limitations, especially in cases of rare diseases, overlapping phenotypes, and biases inherent in current data sets. Furthermore, experts highlighted the significance of ethical considerations, data protection, and the necessity for open science principles. The conference delved into regulatory frameworks, equity in access, and the imperative for collaborative efforts to overcome these obstacles and harness the transformative potential of AI. Concerted efforts to successfully integrate AI into daily clinical immunology practice are still needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacques G Rivière
- Infection and Immunity in Pediatric Patients Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain; Pediatric Infectious Diseases and Immunodeficiencies Unit, Hospital Infantil i de la Dona, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain; Jeffrey Modell Diagnostic and Research Center for Primary Immunodeficiencies, Barcelona, Spain; Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Pere Soler Palacín
- Infection and Immunity in Pediatric Patients Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain; Pediatric Infectious Diseases and Immunodeficiencies Unit, Hospital Infantil i de la Dona, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain; Jeffrey Modell Diagnostic and Research Center for Primary Immunodeficiencies, Barcelona, Spain; Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Manish J Butte
- Division of Immunology, Allergy, and Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif; Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Molecular Genetics, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif; Department of Human Genetics, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Modelhart A, Sturz D, Kremslehner L, Prainsack B. Lived experiences of genetic diagnosis for rare disease patients: a qualitative interview study. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2024; 19:68. [PMID: 38355619 PMCID: PMC10868115 DOI: 10.1186/s13023-024-03058-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2023] [Accepted: 01/29/2024] [Indexed: 02/16/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Genetic diagnosis is often understood as a single event within the care pathway of rare disease patients. Legal, policy and ethical scholarship focusing on rare diseases and genetic information discusses questions of how to best deal with the process of genetic diagnosis and the communication of genetic information within a given health system. We co-created a research design with rare disease patients and their families in Austria to explore in-depth the experiences of genetic diagnosis for people affected by rare diseases. Our objective was to trace the whole pathway of genetic testing and understand how rare disease patients experience genetic diagnosis as part of their care pathway in the healthcare system. RESULTS Data was collected through in-depth semi-structured qualitative interviews with 14 patients with a suspected or diagnosed rare disease or their parents, focusing on their perception of the pathway of genetic diagnosis in Austria. This pathway included the initial triggering of genetic diagnosis, the process of testing and its immediate (communication of results, counselling) and long-term, wider aftermath. Patients missed a clear link to already established forms of care such as their primary care/treating physicians. They also advocate for an integrated and interdisciplinary care pathway. CONCLUSIONS Our study underscores the importance of a continuous care and communication pathway spanning from the initial genetic diagnosis process to post-test phases. It further shows the importance of exploring patients' perspectives through qualitative research methods to understand the intricate workings of public health policies and tools. Integrating genetic diagnosis into a broader care trajectory is crucial for a holistic approach to care for rare disease patients who often rely on regular interactions with the healthcare system. Achieving this holistic approach requires collaboration between experts in specific rare disease areas, primary care physicians, and support networks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonia Modelhart
- Department of Political Science, University of Vienna, Universitätsstraße 1, 1010, Vienna, Austria.
- Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Rare and Undiagnosed Diseases, Vienna, Austria.
| | - Dominique Sturz
- Pro Rare Austria - Austrian Rare Disease Alliance, Vienna, Austria
- ePAG (European Patient Advocacy Group) ERN-Eye, Strasbourg, FR, France
- Retina International Usher Syndrome Committee and Genetic Diagnosis Task Force, Dublin, Ireland
- Usher Initiative Austria, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Barbara Prainsack
- Department of Political Science, University of Vienna, Universitätsstraße 1, 1010, Vienna, Austria
- Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Rare and Undiagnosed Diseases, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Siebold D, Denton J, Hurst ACE, Moss I, Korf B. A qualitative evaluation of patient and parent experiences with an undiagnosed diseases program. Am J Med Genet A 2024; 194:131-140. [PMID: 37750194 DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.63417] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2023] [Revised: 07/03/2023] [Accepted: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 09/27/2023]
Abstract
Previous studies have explored patient experiences before being seen or at the beginning of their evaluation by undiagnosed diseases programs. This study provides additional insight into experiences after participation through in-depth, qualitative evaluation, allowing for reflection of current practice and patient/parent needs. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with patients and parents of patients seen at the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB)'s unique, clinically focused Undiagnosed Diseases Program (UDP). Analysis of the interviews was guided by a thematic approach. Participants had undergone a diagnostic odyssey before being evaluated by the UDP and remained hopeful for a diagnosis. They appreciated the opportunity to be seen by the UDP. However, perception of experiences differed based on whether evaluation by the UDP led to a diagnosis. Additionally, while participants were pleased with initial communication, they indicated that there were unmet needs regarding follow-up. Patients and parents of patients believe that participation in an undiagnosed diseases program is the best option for diagnosis. The findings of this study provide a general overview of patient experiences and highlight strengths of the UAB UDP while also emphasizing areas to focus the improvement to optimize the benefit to patients and families with undiagnosed and rare diseases, which could be used helpful in the development of similar clinics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dorothea Siebold
- University of Alabama (UAB), School of Health Professions, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Jessica Denton
- University of Alabama (UAB), School of Health Professions, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | | | - Irene Moss
- UAB Department of Genetics, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Bruce Korf
- UAB Department of Genetics, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kathiresan N, Ramachandran S, Kulanthaivel L. Next-Generation Sequencing to Study the DNA Interaction. Methods Mol Biol 2024; 2719:249-264. [PMID: 37803122 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-3461-5_14] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/08/2023]
Abstract
Next-generation sequencing (NGS) has transformed genomics by allowing researchers to sequence DNA and RNA at highest speed, accuracy, and cost-effectiveness. Researchers investigate DNA interactions with the help next-generation sequencing with a great deal of information. Over the last decade, NGS technologies have advanced significantly, with the development of several platforms, including Illumina, PacBio, and Oxford Nanopore, each offering distinct advantages and uses. The use of next-generation sequencing (NGS) has aided in the discovery of genetic variations, gene expression patterns, and epigenetic modifications connected with a variety of diseases, including cancer, neurological disorders, and infectious diseases. By identifying these regions, we can control the expression of genes, cellular signaling pathways, and other key biological processes. NGS is an effective method for researching DNA interactions that has completely transformed the area of genomics. NGS has also played an important part in personalized medicine, enabling the discovery of disease-causing mutations and the creation of targeted medicines. Finally, NGS has transformed the field of genomics, resulting in new discoveries and applications in medicine, environmental sciences, and other fields.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Langeswaran Kulanthaivel
- Department of Biotechnology, Alagappa University, Karaikudi, Tamil Nadu, India
- Molecular Cancer Biology Laboratory, Department of Biomedical Science, Alagappa University, Karaikudi, Tamil Nadu, India
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sullivan JA, Spillmann RC, Schoch K, Walley N, Alkelai A, Stong N, Shea PR, Petrovski S, Jobanputra V, McConkie-Rosell A, Shashi V. The best of both worlds: Blending cutting-edge research with clinical processes for a productive exome clinic. Clin Genet 2024; 105:62-71. [PMID: 37853563 DOI: 10.1111/cge.14437] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2023] [Revised: 09/29/2023] [Accepted: 10/04/2023] [Indexed: 10/20/2023]
Abstract
Genomic medicine has been transformed by next-generation sequencing (NGS), inclusive of exome sequencing (ES) and genome sequencing (GS). Currently, ES is offered widely in clinical settings, with a less prevalent alternative model consisting of hybrid programs that incorporate research ES along with clinical patient workflows. We were among the earliest to implement a hybrid ES clinic, have provided diagnoses to 45% of probands, and have identified several novel candidate genes. Our program is enabled by a cost-effective investment by the health system and is unique in encompassing all the processes that have been variably included in other hybrid/clinical programs. These include careful patient selection, utilization of a phenotype-agnostic bioinformatics pipeline followed by manual curation of variants and phenotype integration by clinicians, close collaborations between the clinicians and the bioinformatician, pursuit of interesting variants, communication of results to patients in categories that are predicated upon the certainty of a diagnosis, and tracking changes in results over time and the underlying mechanisms for such changes. Due to its effectiveness, scalability to GS and its resource efficiency, specific elements of our paradigm can be incorporated into existing clinical settings, or the entire hybrid model can be implemented within health systems that have genomic medicine programs, to provide NGS in a scientifically rigorous, yet pragmatic setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer A Sullivan
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Medical Genetics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Rebecca C Spillmann
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Medical Genetics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Kelly Schoch
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Medical Genetics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Nicole Walley
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Medical Genetics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Anna Alkelai
- Institute for Genomic Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
- Regeneron Genetics Center, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Tarrytown, New York, USA
| | - Nicholas Stong
- Institute for Genomic Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
- Predictive Sciences, Bristol Myers Squibb, Summit, New Jersey, USA
| | - Patrick R Shea
- Institute for Genomic Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
- Genomics and Bioinformatics Analysis Resource, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Slavè Petrovski
- Institute for Genomic Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Vaidehi Jobanputra
- Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Allyn McConkie-Rosell
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Medical Genetics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Vandana Shashi
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Medical Genetics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Gurasashvili J, Silverio SA, Hill M, Peter M, Stafford-Smith B, Lewis C. The disequilibrium of hope: A grounded theory analysis of parents' experiences of receiving a "no primary finding" result from genome sequencing. J Genet Couns 2023. [PMID: 37929616 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1818] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2023] [Revised: 10/02/2023] [Accepted: 10/04/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023]
Abstract
Genome sequencing (GS) has the potential to reduce the "diagnostic odyssey" that many parents of children with rare undiagnosed conditions experience. While much research has considered the impact of receiving a diagnostic result, research has rarely focused solely on the impact of receiving a "no primary finding" (NPF) result. This study aimed to investigate the experience of parents of children with rare and undiagnosed conditions following an NPF result from GS. Nine parents whose child had an NPF result from GS were recruited through the social media platform of the charity SWAN (Syndromes Without A Name) UK. Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using grounded theory. Analysis led to the emergence of two main themes. The first theme "Striving to Solve the Unsolved Puzzle" concerned the experience of striving to end the "diagnostic odyssey." The second theme "Navigating Hope, Lost then Found" plots the trajectory of hope raised by the promise of a new technology, dashed by the NPF, and the eventual return of small and distant hope for the future. Taken together, these themes allowed for a proposed theory: "The Disequilibrium of Hope," which highlights the dynamic and modifiable experience of hope participants experience in their GS journey. These results suggest GS can be an emotional rollercoaster for parents. While hope plays an important role in coping with the day-to-day life of living with a rare disease, careful management of expectations from GS is important during pre-test counseling, and continued follow-up and support are needed beyond result disclosure. An understanding of the disappointment and distress caused by an NPF result is valuable for healthcare professionals in this field to ensure counseling can be tailored. Further research should consider how to support parents after an NPF result.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jana Gurasashvili
- Centre for Medical Education, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
- NHS North Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Genetics and Genomic Medicine, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - Sergio A Silverio
- Department of Women & Children's Health, School of Life Course & Population Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Melissa Hill
- NHS North Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Genetics and Genomic Medicine, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - Michelle Peter
- NHS North Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Genetics and Genomic Medicine, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - Bethany Stafford-Smith
- NHS North Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Genetics and Genomic Medicine, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - Celine Lewis
- Centre for Medical Education, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
- NHS North Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Population, Policy and Practice Department, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Halley MC, Young JL, Tang C, Mintz KT, Lucas-Griffin S, Maghiro A, Ashley EA, Tabor HK. Genomics Research with Undiagnosed Children: Ethical Challenges at the Boundaries of Research and Clinical Care. J Pediatr 2023; 261:113537. [PMID: 37271495 PMCID: PMC10527480 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2023.113537] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2023] [Revised: 05/25/2023] [Accepted: 05/29/2023] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore the perspectives of parents of undiagnosed children enrolled in genomic diagnosis research regarding their motivations for enrolling their children, their understanding of the potential burdens and benefits, and the extent to which their experiences ultimately aligned with or diverged from their original expectations. STUDY DESIGN In-depth interviews were conducted with parents, audio-recorded and transcribed. A structured codebook was applied to each transcript, after which iterative memoing was used to identify themes. RESULTS Fifty-four parents participated, including 17 (31.5%) whose child received a diagnosis through research. Themes describing parents' expectations and experiences of genomic diagnosis research included (1) the extent to which parents' motivations for participation focused on their hope that it would directly benefit their child, (2) the ways in which parents' frustrations regarding the research process confused the dual clinical and research goals of their participation, and (3) the limited clinical benefits parents ultimately experienced for their children. CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest that parents of undiagnosed children seeking enrollment in genomic diagnosis research are at risk of a form of therapeutic misconception-in this case, diagnostic misconception. These findings indicate the need to examine the processes and procedures associated with this research to communicate appropriately and balance the potential burdens and benefits of study participation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meghan C Halley
- Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.
| | - Jennifer L Young
- Center for Genetic Medicine, Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Charis Tang
- Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | - Kevin T Mintz
- Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | - Sawyer Lucas-Griffin
- Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | | | - Euan A Ashley
- Department of Genetics, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | - Holly K Tabor
- Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA; Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Crellin E, Martyn M, McClaren B, Gaff C. What matters to parents? A scoping review of parents' service experiences and needs regarding genetic testing for rare diseases. Eur J Hum Genet 2023:10.1038/s41431-023-01376-y. [PMID: 37308600 PMCID: PMC10400618 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-023-01376-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2022] [Revised: 02/28/2023] [Accepted: 04/25/2023] [Indexed: 06/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Patient care experiences are key to promoting better outcomes and are an essential consideration for successful implementation of genomics in paediatric care. To understand parents' service experiences and needs regarding testing of their child for rare diseases, we conducted a scoping review. Five databases were searched (2000-2022), with 29 studies meeting the inclusion criteria. Experiences of care wholly delivered by genetic services were most commonly reported (n = 11). Results were synthesised by mapping extracted data to adapted Picker principles of person-centred care. Parents especially valued and emphasised the importance of feeling 'cared for', continuous relationships with clinicians, empathic communication, being kept informed while awaiting genetic test results, linkage with informational and psychosocial resources following results disclosure, and follow-up. Strategies were often proposed by authors to address long-standing unmet needs but evidence from the literature regarding their potential effectiveness was rarely provided. We conclude that 'what matters' to parents regarding genetic testing is not dissimilar to other aspects of care. Paediatric medical specialists have existing skill sets, trusted relationships and can apply familiar principles of 'good' care to enhance experiences of genetic testing. The lack of evidence for service improvement strategies highlights the pressing need to undertake rigorous design and testing of interventions alongside mainstreaming of genomics into paediatric care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin Crellin
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Genomics in Society, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Melissa Martyn
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Genomics in Society, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Melbourne Genomics Health Alliance, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Belinda McClaren
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Genomics in Society, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Melbourne Genomics Health Alliance, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Clara Gaff
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
- Genomics in Society, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
- Melbourne Genomics Health Alliance, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Rosenfeld LE, LeBlanc K, Nagy A, Ego BK, McCray AT. Participation in a national diagnostic research study: assessing the patient experience. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2023; 18:73. [PMID: 37032333 PMCID: PMC10084693 DOI: 10.1186/s13023-023-02695-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2023] [Accepted: 04/02/2023] [Indexed: 04/11/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The Undiagnosed Diseases Network (UDN), a clinical research study funded by the National Institutes of Health, aims to provide answers for patients with undiagnosed conditions and generate knowledge about underlying disease mechanisms. UDN evaluations involve collaboration between clinicians and researchers and go beyond what is possible in clinical settings. While medical and research outcomes of UDN evaluations have been explored, this is the first formal assessment of the patient and caregiver experience. METHODS We invited UDN participants and caregivers to participate in focus groups via email, newsletter, and a private participant Facebook group. We developed focus group questions based on research team expertise, literature focused on patients with rare and undiagnosed conditions, and UDN participant and family member feedback. In March 2021, we conducted, recorded, and transcribed four 60-min focus groups via Zoom. Transcripts were evaluated using a thematic analysis approach. RESULTS The adult undiagnosed focus group described the UDN evaluation as validating and an avenue for access to medical providers. They also noted that the experience impacted professional choices and helped them rely on others for support. The adult diagnosed focus group described the healthcare system as not set up for rare disease. In the pediatric undiagnosed focus group, caregivers discussed a continued desire for information and gratitude for the UDN evaluation. They also described an ability to rule out information and coming to terms with not having answers. The pediatric diagnosed focus group discussed how the experience helped them focus on management and improved communication. Across focus groups, adults (undiagnosed/diagnosed) noted the comprehensiveness of the evaluation. Undiagnosed focus groups (adult/pediatric) discussed a desire for ongoing communication and care with the UDN. Diagnosed focus groups (adult/pediatric) highlighted the importance of the diagnosis they received in the UDN. The majority of the focus groups noted a positive future orientation after participation. CONCLUSION Our findings are consistent with prior literature focused on the patient experience of rare and undiagnosed conditions and highlight benefits from comprehensive evaluations, regardless of whether a diagnosis is obtained. Focus group themes also suggest areas for improvement and future research related to the diagnostic odyssey.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsay E Rosenfeld
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, 10 Shattuck Street, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
- Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Institute for Child, Youth, and Family Policy, Brandeis University, 415 South St., Waltham, MA, 02453, USA
| | - Kimberly LeBlanc
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, 10 Shattuck Street, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Anna Nagy
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, 10 Shattuck Street, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Braeden K Ego
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, 10 Shattuck Street, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
- Department of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, 291 Campus Drive, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
| | - Alexa T McCray
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, 10 Shattuck Street, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
- Division of Clinical Informatics, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Abstract
Exome sequencing (ES) and genome sequencing (GS) have radically transformed the diagnostic approach to undiagnosed rare/ultrarare Mendelian diseases. Next-generation sequencing (NGS), the technology integral for ES, GS, and most large (100+) gene panels, has enabled previously unimaginable diagnoses, changes in medical management, new treatments, and accurate reproductive risk assessments for patients, as well as new disease gene discoveries. Yet, challenges remain, as most individuals remain undiagnosed with current NGS. Improved NGS technology has resulted in long-read sequencing, which may resolve diagnoses in some patients who do not obtain a diagnosis with current short-read ES and GS, but its effectiveness is unclear, and it is expensive. Other challenges that persist include the resolution of variants of uncertain significance, the urgent need for patients with ultrarare disorders to have access to therapeutics, the need for equity in patient access to NGS-based testing, and the study of ethical concerns. However, the outlook for undiagnosed disease resolution is bright, due to continual advancements in the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer A Sullivan
- Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA;
| | - Kelly Schoch
- Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA;
| | - Rebecca C Spillmann
- Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA;
| | - Vandana Shashi
- Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Elliott AM, Guimond C. Genetic counseling considerations in cerebral palsy. Mol Genet Metab 2022; 137:428-435. [PMID: 34389249 DOI: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2021.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2021] [Revised: 07/11/2021] [Accepted: 07/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Genome-wide sequencing (exome and whole genome) has transformed our ability to diagnose patients with suspected genetic disorders. Cerebral palsy (CP), although historically thought to be due to birth injury (perinatal hypoxia), represents a clinical spectrum of disorders, many of which have been attributed to a genetic cause. GWS has elucidated the underlying single gene cause for many patients with CP and has important implications for the customization of treatment, management, and genetic counseling. International guidelines recommend genetic counseling for all families considering genome-wide sequencing. Genetic counselors educate and support families and help them to make testing decisions based on their values. They can help families adapt to, and understand the implications of a genomic diagnosis. Here, we review advances in sequencing for CP, clinical features suggestive of a genetic etiology of CP, practice guidelines for GWS, and a practical approach to the genetic counseling of these families. This includes: the content to be addressed in pre-test and post-test genetic counseling sessions, the benefits of a establishing a genetic cause and importantly, the need for ongoing support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alison M Elliott
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Women's Health Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
| | - Colleen Guimond
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Outram SM, Brown J, Ackerman SL. The social value of genomic sequencing for disadvantaged families facing rare disease. Soc Sci Med 2022; 314:115465. [PMID: 36279794 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2022] [Revised: 10/12/2022] [Accepted: 10/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
This study explores parental expectations and value-making processes in respect to pediatric clinical genomic sequencing for socially disadvantaged families. Drawing on interviews and ethnographic observations with parents of children with undiagnosed physical and/or intellectual differences seeking to find whether these differences have a genetic etiology, we explore expectations and parental assessments of the value of genomic sequencing within the context of an ongoing research study. We demonstrate how the value of sequencing to parents goes well beyond finding diagnostic results or receiving prescriptive guidance as to the best care and treatment of their child; instead, value is co-created by parents, clinicians, and genetic counsellors throughout the enrollment and return of results process. Parents in our study found that clinicians and genetic counsellors repeatedly reenforce that parents need to lower their expectations and be prepared to wait for genetic science to provide more definitive answers. At the same time, parents experience that clinical teams validate parents for having made a good choice in their undertaking of genomic sequencing and, no matter the result, that they are not to blame for their child's symptoms. The experience of many parents (although not all) is that genomic science reduces or removes their sense of guilt for their child's condition, providing a platform that affirms them as "good parents." Moreover, rather than being voiceless and isolated, socially disadvantaged parents who enter into diagnostic sequencing find themselves in a familial-biosocial framework wherein they are co-partners in a socially and biologically authoritative vision of the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S M Outram
- Program in Bioethics, Institute for Health & Aging, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| | - Jeh Brown
- Program in Bioethics, Institute for Health & Aging, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - S L Ackerman
- Department of Social & Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Gereis J, Hetherington K, Ha L, Robertson EG, Ziegler DS, Barlow-Stewart K, Tucker KM, Marron JM, Wakefield CE. Parents' understanding of genome and exome sequencing for pediatric health conditions: a systematic review. Eur J Hum Genet 2022; 30:1216-1225. [PMID: 35999452 PMCID: PMC9626631 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-022-01170-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2022] [Revised: 07/13/2022] [Accepted: 07/26/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Genome and exome sequencing (GS/ES) are increasingly being used in pediatric contexts. We summarize evidence regarding the actual and perceived understanding of GS/ES of parents of a child offered testing for diagnosis and/or management of a symptomatic health condition. We searched four databases (2008-2021) and identified 1264 unique articles, of which 16 met inclusion criteria. We synthesized data from qualitative and quantitative studies and organized results using Ayuso et al. (2013)'s framework of key elements of information for informed consent to GS/ES. Many of the parents represented had prior experience with genetic testing and accessed a form of genetic counseling. Parents' understanding was varied across the domains evaluated. Parents demonstrated understanding of the various potential direct clinical benefits to their child undergoing GS/ES, including in relation to other genetic tests. We found parents had mixed understanding of the nature of potential secondary findings, and of issues related to data privacy, confidentiality, and usage of sequencing results beyond their child's clinical care. Genetic counseling consultations improved understanding. Our synthesis indicates that ES/GS can be challenging for families to understand and underscores the importance of equipping healthcare professionals to explore parents' understanding of ES/GS and the implications of testing for their child.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Gereis
- grid.1005.40000 0004 4902 0432School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine & Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW Australia ,grid.414009.80000 0001 1282 788XBehavioural Sciences Unit, Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children’s Hospital, Sydney, NSW Australia
| | - Kate Hetherington
- grid.1005.40000 0004 4902 0432School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine & Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW Australia ,grid.414009.80000 0001 1282 788XBehavioural Sciences Unit, Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children’s Hospital, Sydney, NSW Australia
| | - Lauren Ha
- grid.414009.80000 0001 1282 788XBehavioural Sciences Unit, Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children’s Hospital, Sydney, NSW Australia ,grid.1005.40000 0004 4902 0432School of Health Sciences, UNSW Medicine & Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW Australia
| | - Eden G. Robertson
- grid.1005.40000 0004 4902 0432School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine & Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW Australia
| | - David S. Ziegler
- grid.1005.40000 0004 4902 0432School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine & Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW Australia ,grid.414009.80000 0001 1282 788XKids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children’s Hospital, Sydney, NSW Australia ,grid.1005.40000 0004 4902 0432Children’s Cancer Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW Australia
| | - Kristine Barlow-Stewart
- grid.1005.40000 0004 4902 0432School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine & Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW Australia ,grid.1005.40000 0004 4902 0432Children’s Cancer Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW Australia ,grid.1013.30000 0004 1936 834XNorthern Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW Australia
| | - Katherine M. Tucker
- grid.1005.40000 0004 4902 0432Prince of Wales Clinical School, UNSW Medicine & Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW Australia
| | - Jonathan M. Marron
- grid.65499.370000 0001 2106 9910Department of Pediatric Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA USA ,grid.2515.30000 0004 0378 8438Division of Hematology/Oncology, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA USA ,grid.38142.3c000000041936754XCenter for Bioethics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
| | - Claire E. Wakefield
- grid.1005.40000 0004 4902 0432School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine & Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW Australia ,grid.414009.80000 0001 1282 788XBehavioural Sciences Unit, Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children’s Hospital, Sydney, NSW Australia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Miner SA, Similuk M, Jamal L, Sapp J, Berkman BE. Genomic tools for health: Secondary findings as findings to be shared. Genet Med 2022; 24:2220-2227. [PMID: 35980380 PMCID: PMC9643624 DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2022.07.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2022] [Revised: 07/19/2022] [Accepted: 07/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Whether and how to disclose secondary finding (SF) information to children is ethically debated. Some argue that genetic testing of minors should be limited to preserve the child's future autonomy. Others suggest that disclosure of SFs can occur if it is in the best interests of the child. However, the ways that parents conceptualize and weigh their child's future autonomy against the interests of their child and other family members are unknown. METHODS To explore how parents understand SF disclosure in the context of their child and other family members' lives, we conducted semistructured interviews with 30 families (40 parents in total). All parents had children who were enrolled in a genetic sequencing protocol that returned results by default. RESULTS We found that parents did not routinely conceptualize SFs as distinctive health information. Rather parents saw this information as part of their child's overall health. To make decisions about disclosure, parents weighed their child's ability to understand the SF information and their other family member's need to know. CONCLUSION Because most families desired SF information, we argue that disclosure of SF be reconceptualized to reflect the lived experiences of those who may receive this information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Skye A Miner
- Department of Bioethics, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; Department of Medical Humanities and Bioethics, College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR
| | - Morgan Similuk
- Centralized Sequencing Program, Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Leila Jamal
- Department of Bioethics, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; NHGRI/NCI/JHU Genetic Counseling Training Program, National Human Genome Research Insitute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Julie Sapp
- Center for Precision Health Research, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; Division of Intramural Research, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Benjamin E Berkman
- Department of Bioethics, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; Division of Intramural Research, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Waltz M, Canter C, Bensen JT, Berg JS, Foreman AKM, Grant TL, Lich KH, Navas A, O’Daniel JM, Powell BC, Rini CM, Staley BS, Cadigan RJ. The Burden of COVID-19 on Caregivers of Children with Suspected Genetic Conditions: A Therapeutic Odyssey. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr 2022; 43:257-271. [PMID: 36310386 PMCID: PMC10079636 DOI: 10.1080/01942638.2022.2138734] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2022] [Revised: 09/30/2022] [Accepted: 10/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
AIMS Children with disabilities and rare or undiagnosed conditions and their families have faced numerous hardships of living during the COVID-19 pandemic. For those with undiagnosed conditions, the diagnostic odyssey can be long, expensive, and marked by uncertainty. We, therefore, sought to understand whether and how COVID-19 impacted the trajectory of children's care. METHODS We conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews with 25 caregivers who, prior to the pandemic, were on a diagnostic odyssey for their children. RESULTS Most caregivers did not report any interruptions to their child's diagnostic odyssey. The greatest impact was access to therapy services, including the suspension or loss of their child's in-person therapeutic care and difficulties with virtual therapies. This therapy gap caused caregivers to fear that their children were not making progress. CONCLUSION Although much has been written about the challenges of diagnostic odysseys for children and their families, this study illustrates the importance of expanding the focus of these studies to include therapeutic odysseys. Because therapeutic odysseys continue regardless of whether diagnoses are made, future research should investigate how to support caregivers through children's therapies within and outside of the COVID-19 context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margaret Waltz
- Department of Social Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Courtney Canter
- Department of Anthropology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Jeannette T. Bensen
- Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Jonathan S. Berg
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | | | - Tracey L. Grant
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Kristen Hassmiller Lich
- Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Angelo Navas
- Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Julianne M. O’Daniel
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Bradford C. Powell
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Christine M. Rini
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Brooke S. Staley
- Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - R. Jean Cadigan
- Department of Social Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Alam A, Parfyonov M, Huang CY, Gill I, Connolly MB, Illes J. Targeted Whole Exome Sequencing in Children With Early-Onset Epilepsy: Parent Experiences. J Child Neurol 2022; 37:840-850. [PMID: 35921196 PMCID: PMC9554160 DOI: 10.1177/08830738221113901] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
This study investigated the experiences of 25 caregivers of children with early-onset, treatment-resistant epilepsy who pursued whole exome sequencing to determine the impact of the test results on their child's treatment. Caregivers who consented to be recontacted were recruited from a previous study investigating the diagnostic yield of whole exome sequencing. A semistructured interview addressed questions based on one of 2 study phases. The first phase discussed the decision-making process for genetic testing (15 interviews), which revealed 4 major themes: (1) prognosis, (2) engagement, (3) concerns, and (4) autonomy. The second phase discussed the impact of genetic testing on treatment (10 interviews), which revealed 3 major themes: (1) testing features, (2) emotional impact, and (3) treatment outcomes. Overall, parents pursued genetic testing to obtain a clear prognosis, inform treatment decisions, engage with other families, and exercise autonomy. Caregivers felt that early testing is warranted to inform their child's diagnostic odyssey.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Armaghan Alam
- Neuroethics Canada, Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada,Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Maksim Parfyonov
- Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada,Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neurology, BC Children’s Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Camille Y. Huang
- Neuroethics Canada, Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Inderpal Gill
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neurology, BC Children’s Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Mary B. Connolly
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neurology, BC Children’s Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Judy Illes
- Neuroethics Canada, Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada,Judy Illes, CM, PhD, Professor of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, 2211 Wesbrook Mall, Koerner S124, Vancouver, BC V6T 2B5 Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Martinussen J, Chalk M, Elliott J, Gallacher L. Receiving Genomic Sequencing Results through the Victorian Undiagnosed Disease Program: Exploring Parental Experiences. J Pers Med 2022; 12:jpm12081250. [PMID: 36013198 PMCID: PMC9410238 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12081250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2022] [Revised: 07/15/2022] [Accepted: 07/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Rare diseases cumulatively affect a significant number of people, and for many, a diagnosis remains elusive. The Victorian Undiagnosed Disease Program (UDP-Vic) utilizes deep phenotyping, advanced genomic sequencing and functional studies to diagnose children with rare diseases for which previous clinical testing has been non-diagnostic. Whereas the diagnostic outcomes of undiagnosed disease programs have been well-described, here, we explore how parents experience participation in the UDP-Vic and the impact of receiving both diagnostic and non-diagnostic genomic sequencing results for their children. Semi-structured interviews ranging in length from 25 to 105 min were conducted with 21 parents of children in the program. Ten participants were parents of children who received a diagnosis through the program, and eleven were parents of children who remain undiagnosed. Although the experiences of families varied, five shared themes emerged from the data: (1) searching for a diagnosis, (2) varied impact of receiving a result, (3) feelings of relief and disappointment, (4) seeking connection and (5) moving towards acceptance. The findings demonstrate the shared experience of parents of children with rare disease both before and after a genomic sequencing result. The results have implications for genetic counselors and clinicians offering genomic sequencing and supporting families of children with rare diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jo Martinussen
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3010, Australia; (J.M.); (M.C.)
| | - Michal Chalk
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3010, Australia; (J.M.); (M.C.)
| | - Justine Elliott
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Melbourne 3052, Australia;
| | - Lyndon Gallacher
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3010, Australia; (J.M.); (M.C.)
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Melbourne 3052, Australia;
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Bauskis A, Strange C, Molster C, Fisher C. The diagnostic odyssey: insights from parents of children living with an undiagnosed condition. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2022; 17:233. [PMID: 35717227 PMCID: PMC9206122 DOI: 10.1186/s13023-022-02358-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2021] [Accepted: 05/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background People living with rare disease often have protracted journeys towards diagnosis. In the last decade, programs have arisen around the world that are dedicated to ending this ‘diagnostic odyssey’, including the Undiagnosed Diseases Program Western Australia (UDP-WA), which has a focus on finding diagnoses for children and young adults. To explore the lived experience of the diagnostic journey semi-structured interviews were conducted with parents of 11 children at commencement of their involvement in the UDP-WA. Results Thematic analysis revealed three main themes that captured parents’ experiences and perspectives. Parents reported (i) the need to respond to significant care needs of their children, which span not only the health system but other systems such as education and disability services. In doing so, parents become the navigator, expert and advocate for their children. Meanwhile, parents are on (ii) the diagnostic odyssey—the rollercoaster of their journey towards diagnosis, which includes various names applied to their child’s condition, and the impact of no diagnosis. Parents described their views on (iii) the value of a diagnosis and the outcomes they expect to be associated with a diagnosis. Conclusion Analysis showed an overall significant perceived value of a diagnosis. Our study provides new perspectives on the concept of diagnosis and indicates that parents may benefit from supports for their child’s care needs that are beyond the scope of the UDP-WA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alicia Bauskis
- Office of Population Health Genomics, Western Australia Department of Health, 189 Royal Street, East Perth, WA, 6004, Australia.
| | - Cecily Strange
- School of Population and Global Health, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA, 6009, Australia
| | - Caron Molster
- Office of Population Health Genomics, Western Australia Department of Health, 189 Royal Street, East Perth, WA, 6004, Australia
| | - Colleen Fisher
- School of Population and Global Health, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA, 6009, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Kernie CG, Wynn J, Rosenbaum A, de Voest J, Galloway S, Giordano J, Stover S, Westerfield L, Gilmore K, Wapner RJ, Van den Veyver IB, Vora NL, Clifton RG, Caughey AB, Chung WK. Information is power: The experiences, attitudes and needs of individuals who chose to have prenatal genomic sequencing for fetal anomalies. Prenat Diagn 2022; 42:947-954. [PMID: 35476893 DOI: 10.1002/pd.6153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2022] [Revised: 04/17/2022] [Accepted: 04/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study sought to evaluate the experiences of individuals who chose to participate in a study and receive prenatal genomic sequencing (pGS) for fetuses with congenital structural anomalies. METHOD Individuals who received research results of prenatal sequencing were invited to participate in semi-structured interviews about their experiences. A constructivist grounded theory approach was used to code and analyze interviews. RESULTS Thirty-three participants from 27 pregnancies were interviewed. Participants were motivated to enroll in the study to find out more about their fetus' condition and prepare for the future. The waiting period was a time of significant anxiety for participants. Most participants felt relief and closure upon receiving results, regardless of the category of result, and had a clear understanding of the implications of the results. CONCLUSION Participants' experiences with pGS were often intertwined with the experience of having a fetus with an abnormality. Participants were satisfied with the decision to participate in research and the support they received from the healthcare team, although waiting for results was associated with anxiety. The healthcare team plays an integral role in setting expectations and validating feelings of anxiety, fear and uncertainty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine G Kernie
- Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians & Surgeons, New York, New York, USA
| | - Julia Wynn
- Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Allison Rosenbaum
- Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians & Surgeons, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jessica de Voest
- George Washington University Biostatistics Center, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Stephanie Galloway
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jessica Giordano
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Samantha Stover
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Molecular & Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, and Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Lauren Westerfield
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Molecular & Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, and Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Kelly Gilmore
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Ronald J Wapner
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Ignatia B Van den Veyver
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Molecular & Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, and Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Neeta L Vora
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Rebecca G Clifton
- George Washington University Biostatistics Center, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Aaron B Caughey
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Wendy K Chung
- Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.,Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Lacey HP, Lacey SC, Forest C, Blasi D, Dayal P. The role of emotional sensitivity to probability in the decision to choose genetic testing. J Genet Couns 2022; 31:677-688. [PMID: 34873773 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1534] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2021] [Revised: 08/18/2021] [Accepted: 11/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
While the availability of genetic testing is rapidly increasing, many opt out of testing. The decision to test or not is emotionally charged, and both clinical research and theoretical work in psychology show that in emotional decisions, people often struggle to interpret and utilize risk information. Clinical research on genetic testing uptake also shows that feeling overwhelmed by numeric information may be a deterrent to testing. However, recent psychological research indicates that some portion of the population has greater emotional sensitivity to probability, (i.e., the extent to which emotional reactions to risk depend on probabilities) than others. We hypothesize that participants high in emotional sensitivity to probability will be more interested in genetic testing as an opportunity to seek greater precision in risk estimates and that this relationship is moderated by the testing context itself. In an online survey of a nationally representative sample (not recruited as patients), participants were presented with a hypothetical scenario describing a suspected diagnosis with an option for genetic testing. The scenario experimentally varied the pre-test probability estimate of the diagnosis (low or high) and whether the test results would result in certainty (ruling in or ruling out the diagnosis), or reduced uncertainty (providing a more precise individual risk estimate). Results indicated that emotional sensitivity to probability was a strong predictor of intention to test, particularly when the test allowed participants to rule out a diagnosis, reducing an already low probability to zero. These results highlight the way patients' individual characteristics interact with the testing context to guide decision-making and provide important insight into the way patients integrate risk probability information into intensely emotional decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heather P Lacey
- Department of Psychology, Bryant University, Smithfield, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Steven C Lacey
- Carroll School of Management, Boston College, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Caroline Forest
- Department of Psychology, Bryant University, Smithfield, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Dana Blasi
- Department of Psychology, Bryant University, Smithfield, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Prerna Dayal
- Department of Psychology, Bryant University, Smithfield, Rhode Island, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Gorman R, Farsides B. Writing the worlds of genomic medicine: experiences of using participatory-writing to understand life with rare conditions. MEDICAL HUMANITIES 2022; 48:e4. [PMID: 35418508 PMCID: PMC9185826 DOI: 10.1136/medhum-2021-012346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/09/2022] [Indexed: 05/08/2023]
Abstract
The diagnostic and treatment possibilities made possible by the development and subsequent mainstreaming of clinical genomics services have the potential to profoundly change the experiences of families affected by rare genetic conditions. Understanding the potentials of genomic medicine requires that we consider the perspectives of those who engage with such services; there are substantial social implications involved. There are increasing calls to think more creatively, and draw on more participatory approaches, in evoking rich accounts of lived experience. In this article, we discuss our rationale for, and experiences of, using 'participatory-writing' to understand the diverse, variable and multilayered everyday lives of families and how these correspond with the emerging, rapidly changing and complex field of genomic medicine. Participatory-writing has many benefits as a method for social inquiry. Writing can be expressive and self-revelatory, providing insight into personal and sensitive topics. Writing together produces new conversations and relationships. Pieces written by participants have the potential to affect readers, evoking and enlivening research and prompting professional change. Working with a writing tutor, we organised a participatory-writing programme for families touched by genetic conditions. This involved a series of workshops with an emphasis on building confidence in expressing lived experience through experimenting with different writing techniques. Afterwards we arranged reflective interviews with participants. We drew on dialogical narrative analysis to engage with participants' written pieces, and highlight what everyday life is like for the people who live with, and care for, those with genetic conditions. The stories produced through our writing-groups unfold the implications of new genomic technologies, illuminating how genomics acts to (and likewise, fails to) reconfigure aspects of people's lives outside of the clinic, while simultaneously existing as a sociotechnical frame that can eclipse the wider contexts, challenges and liveliness of life with rare genetic conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Gorman
- Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, Brighton and Hove, UK
| | - Bobbie Farsides
- Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, Brighton and Hove, UK
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Costa A, Franková V, Robert G, Macek M, Patch C, Alexander E, Arellanesova A, Clayton-Smith J, Hunter A, Havlovicová M, Pourová R, Pritchard M, Roberts L, Zoubková V, Metcalfe A. Co-designing models for the communication of genomic results for rare diseases: a comparative study in the Czech Republic and the United Kingdom. J Community Genet 2022; 13:313-327. [PMID: 35523996 PMCID: PMC9075921 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-022-00589-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2022] [Accepted: 04/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
The communication of genomic results to patients and families with rare diseases raise distinctive challenges. However, there is little evidence about optimal methods to communicate results to this group of service users. To address this gap, we worked with rare disease families and health professionals from two genetic/genomic services, one in the United Kingdom and one in the Czech Republic, to co-design that best meet their needs. Using the participatory methodology of Experience-Based Co-Design (EBCD), we conducted observations of clinical appointments (n=49) and interviews with family participants (n=23) and health professionals (n=22) to gather their experience of sharing/receiving results. The findings informed a facilitated co-design process, comprising 3 feedback events at each site and a series of meetings and remote consultations. Participants identified a total of four areas of current service models in need of improvement, and co-designed six prototypes of quality improvement interventions. The main finding was the identification of post-test care as the shared priority for improvement for both health professionals and families at the two sites. Our findings indicate the need to strengthen the link between diagnostics (whether or not a pathogenic variant is found) and post-test care, including psychosocial and community support. This raises implications for the reconfigurations of genomic service models, the redefinition of professional roles and responsibilities and the involvement of rare disease patients and families in health care research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessia Costa
- Engagement and Society, Wellcome Connecting Science, Hinxton, CB10 1SA, Cambridgeshire, UK. .,Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, London, SE1 8WA, UK.
| | - Věra Franková
- Department of Paediatrics and Inherited Metabolic Disorders, Charles University, First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic. .,Institute for Medical Humanities, Charles University, First Faculty of Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.
| | - Glenn Robert
- Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, London, SE1 8WA, UK
| | - Milan Macek
- Department of Biology and Medical Genetics, Charles University, Second Faculty of Medicine, and University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Christine Patch
- Engagement and Society, Wellcome Connecting Science, Hinxton, CB10 1SA, Cambridgeshire, UK.,Genomics England, London, EC1M 6BQ, UK
| | - Elizabeth Alexander
- Manchester Centre For Genomic Medicine, University of Manchester, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK
| | - Anna Arellanesova
- Česká asociace pro vzácná onemocnění (ČAVO), Rare Diseases Czech Republic, Bělohorská 19, Praha 6, 169 00, Czech Republic
| | - Jill Clayton-Smith
- Manchester Centre For Genomic Medicine, University of Manchester, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK.,Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences School of Biological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| | - Amy Hunter
- Genetic Alliance UK, London, EC2A 4NE, UK
| | - Markéta Havlovicová
- Department of Biology and Medical Genetics, Charles University, Second Faculty of Medicine, and University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Radka Pourová
- Department of Biology and Medical Genetics, Charles University, Second Faculty of Medicine, and University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic
| | | | - Lauren Roberts
- Genetic Alliance UK, London, EC2A 4NE, UK.,Syndromes Without A Name (SWAN UK), London, EC2A 4NE, UK
| | - Veronika Zoubková
- Department of Biology and Medical Genetics, Charles University, Second Faculty of Medicine, and University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Genetic diagnosis for rare diseases in the Dutch Caribbean: a qualitative study on the experiences and associated needs of parents. Eur J Hum Genet 2022; 30:587-594. [PMID: 35087185 PMCID: PMC9091230 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-022-01039-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2021] [Revised: 12/17/2021] [Accepted: 01/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Research on the perspectives of patients and parents regarding genetic testing and its implications has been performed mostly in Europe, Canada, the United States, Australia and New Zealand, even though genetic testing is becoming increasingly available worldwide. We aimed to fill this knowledge gap by exploring the experiences and needs of parents in the Dutch Caribbean who received a genetic diagnosis for the rare disease of their child. We conducted 23 semi-structured interviews with 30 parents of children diagnosed with various rare genetic diseases in Aruba, Bonaire and Curaçao (ABC-islands). Two researchers independently analyzed the interviews using a thematic approach. Main themes identified were: (1) getting a genetic diagnosis, (2) coping, support and perceived social stigma, (3) living on a small island, and (4) needs regarding genetic services. Our results indicate that, despite reported limitations regarding the availability of healthcare and support services, receiving a genetic diagnosis for their child was valuable for most participants. While some of the participants' experiences with and attitudes towards the genetic diagnosis of their child were similar to those reported in previous studies, we identified a number of aspects that are more specifically related to this Dutch Caribbean setting. These include coping through faith and religion, social stigma and being the only one on the island with a specific genetic disorder. The results of this study and the provided recommendations may be useful when developing genetic testing and counseling services in similar settings.
Collapse
|
27
|
Participant experiences of genome sequencing for rare diseases in the 100,000 Genomes Project: a mixed methods study. Eur J Hum Genet 2022; 30:604-610. [PMID: 35264738 PMCID: PMC9091267 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-022-01065-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2021] [Revised: 01/17/2022] [Accepted: 02/01/2022] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
In this mixed methods study, a survey and in-depth interviews were used to explore whether decision regret and the psychological impact of receiving genome sequencing (GS) results differed between parents and patients, and between those who received a genetic diagnosis and those who did not. Participants (n = 77) completed a survey that included the Decisional Regret Scale (DRS) and an adaptation of the Multidimensional Impact of Cancer Risk Assessment (MICRA) at least 12 months after consenting for GS for rare disease diagnosis in the 100,000 Genomes Project. Survey participants were invited to take part in an interview and 39 agreed; 12 with a diagnosis, 5 with variants of uncertain significance, and 19 with no pathogenic findings identified. Both survey and interview findings indicated that decision regret was low. DRS scores revealed no differences in levels of regret between parents and patients, or between those with a diagnosis and those without. Though MICRA scores indicated minimal evidence of negative psychological impacts of receiving GS results, subscale analysis revealed greater distress and uncertainty for parents compared to patients. Receiving a diagnosis was found not to influence MICRA scores, supporting interview findings of both positive and negative emotional and psychological impacts irrespective of a genetic diagnosis. Our findings have implications for policy and practice as GS is integrated into the UK and worldwide; notably, that expectation-setting is critical when offering GS, and that post-test counselling is important regardless of the GS result received, with parents perhaps needing additional emotional support.
Collapse
|
28
|
Kisiangani I, Mohamed SF, Kyobutungi C, Tindana P, Ghansah A, Ramsay M, Asiki G. Perspectives on returning individual and aggregate genomic research results to study participants and communities in Kenya: a qualitative study. BMC Med Ethics 2022; 23:27. [PMID: 35300680 PMCID: PMC8932129 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-022-00767-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2021] [Accepted: 03/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A fundamental ethical challenge in conducting genomics research is the question of what and how individual level genetic findings and aggregate genomic results should be conveyed to research participants and communities. This is within the context of minimal guidance, policies, and experiences, particularly in Africa. The aim of this study was to explore the perspectives of key stakeholders' on returning genomics research results to participants in Kenya. METHODS This qualitative study involved focus group discussions (FGDs) and in-depth interviews (IDIs) with 69 stakeholders. The purposively selected participants, included research ethics committee (REC) members (8), community members (44), community resource persons (8), and researchers (9). A semi-structured interview guide was used to facilitate discussions. Six FGDs and twenty-five (IDIs) were conducted among the different stakeholders. The issues explored in the interviews included: (1) views on returning results, (2) kind of results to be returned, (3) value of returning results to participants, and (4) challenges anticipated in returning results to participants and communities. The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and coded in Nvivo 12 pro. Thematic and content analysis was conducted. RESULTS Participants agreed on the importance of returning genomic results either as individual or aggregate results. The most cited reasons for returning of genomic results included recognizing participants' contribution to research, encouraging participation in future research, and increasing the awareness of scientific progress. Other aspects on how genomic research results should be shared included sharing easy to understand results in the shortest time possible and maintaining confidentiality when sharing sensitive results. CONCLUSIONS This study identified key stakeholders' perspectives on returning genomic results at the individual and community levels in two urban informal settlements of Nairobi. The majority of the participants expect to receive feedback about their genomic results, and it is an obligation for researchers to see how to best fulfil it.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isaac Kisiangani
- African Population and Health Research Center (APHRC), P.O. Box 10787, Nairobi, 00100, Kenya.
| | - Shukri F Mohamed
- African Population and Health Research Center (APHRC), P.O. Box 10787, Nairobi, 00100, Kenya
| | - Catherine Kyobutungi
- African Population and Health Research Center (APHRC), P.O. Box 10787, Nairobi, 00100, Kenya
| | - Paulina Tindana
- School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, University of Ghana, Legon, Ghana
| | - Anita Ghansah
- Noguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research, College of Health Sciences, University of Ghana, Legon, Ghana
| | - Michele Ramsay
- Sydney Brenner Institute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Witwatersrand, The Mount, 9 Jubilee Rd, Parktown, Johannesburg, 2193, South Africa
| | - Gershim Asiki
- African Population and Health Research Center (APHRC), P.O. Box 10787, Nairobi, 00100, Kenya
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
McConkie-Rosell A, Schoch K, Sullivan J, Spillmann RC, Cope H, Tan QKG, Palmer CGS, Hooper SR, Shashi V. Clinical application of a scale to assess genomic healthcare empowerment (GEmS): Process and illustrative case examples. J Genet Couns 2022; 31:59-70. [PMID: 34115423 PMCID: PMC8664895 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1451] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2020] [Revised: 05/04/2021] [Accepted: 05/09/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
The Genome Empowerment Scale (GEmS), developed as a research tool, assesses perspectives of parents of children with undiagnosed disorders about to undergo exome or genome sequencing related to the process of empowerment. We defined genomic healthcare empowerment as follows: perceived ability to understand and seek new information related to the genomic sequencing, manage emotions related to the diagnostic process and outcomes, and utilize genomic sequencing information to the betterment of the individual/child and family. The GEmS consists of four scales, two are primarily emotion-focused (Meaning of a Diagnosis, and Emotional Management of the Process) and two are action-oriented (Seeking Information and Support, and Implications and Planning). The purpose of this research was to provide a strategy for interpreting results from the GEmS and present illustrative cases. These illustrations should serve to facilitate use of the GEmS in the clinical and research arena, particularly with respect to guiding genetic counseling processes for parents of children with undiagnosed conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allyn McConkie-Rosell
- Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Kelly Schoch
- Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jennifer Sullivan
- Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Rebecca C. Spillmann
- Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Heidi Cope
- Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Queenie K.-G. Tan
- Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Christina G. S. Palmer
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, Department of Human Genetics, Institute for Society and Genetics, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | - Stephen R. Hooper
- Department of Allied Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Vandana Shashi
- Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Omorodion J, Dowsett L, Clark RD, Fraser J, Abu-El-Haija A, Strong A, Wojcik MH, Bryant AS, Gold NB. Delayed diagnosis and racial bias in children with genetic conditions. Am J Med Genet A 2022; 188:1118-1123. [PMID: 35037400 PMCID: PMC10064482 DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.62626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2021] [Accepted: 12/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
As more therapeutics for genetic conditions become available, the need for timely and equitable genetic diagnosis has become urgent. Using clinical cases, we consider the health system-, provider-, and patient-level factors that contribute to the delayed diagnosis of genetic conditions in pediatric patients from minority populations, leading to health disparities between racial groups. We then provide suggestions to address these factors, with the aim of improving minority health and access to genetic care for all children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacklyn Omorodion
- Boston Combined Residency Program, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Harvard Medical School Genetics Training Program, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Leah Dowsett
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Hawai'i John A. Burns School of Medicine, Honolulu, Hawai'i, USA.,Kapi'olani Medical Specialists, Honolulu, Hawai'i, USA
| | - Robin D Clark
- Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, California, USA
| | - Jamie Fraser
- Division of Genetics and Metabolism, Rare Disease Institute, Children's National Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Aya Abu-El-Haija
- Division of Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Alanna Strong
- Division of Human Genetics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Monica H Wojcik
- Division of Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Division of Newborn Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Allison S Bryant
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Nina B Gold
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Division of Medical Genetics and Metabolism, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Halley MC, Young JL, Fernandez L, Kohler JN, Bernstein JA, Wheeler MT, Tabor HK. Perceived utility and disutility of genomic sequencing for pediatric patients: Perspectives from parents with diverse sociodemographic characteristics. Am J Med Genet A 2022; 188:1088-1101. [PMID: 34981646 DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.62619] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2021] [Revised: 11/04/2021] [Accepted: 12/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Given the limited therapeutic options for most rare diseases diagnosed through genomic sequencing (GS) and the proportion of patients who remain undiagnosed even after GS, it is important to characterize a broader range of benefits and potential harms of GS from the perspectives of families with diverse sociodemographic characteristics. We recruited parents of children enrolled in the Undiagnosed Diseases Network. Parents completed an in-depth interview, and we conducted a comparative content analysis of the data. Parents (n = 30) were demographically diverse, with 43.3% identifying as Hispanic, 33.3% primarily Spanish-speaking, and widely variable household income and education. Parents reported minimal changes in their child's health status following GS but did report a range of other forms of perceived utility, including improvements in their child's healthcare management and access, in their own psychological well-being, and in disease-specific social connections and research opportunities. Parents who received a diagnosis more frequently perceived utility across all domains; however, disutility also was reported by both those with and without a diagnosis. Impacts depended on multiple mediating factors, including parents' underlying expectations and beliefs, family sociodemographic characteristics, individual disease characteristics, and prior healthcare access. Our study suggests that the perceived utility of GS varies widely among parents and may depend on multiple individual, sociodemographic, and contextual factors that are relevant for pre- and post-GS counseling, for value assessment of GS, and for policymaking related to access to new genomic technologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meghan C Halley
- Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Jennifer L Young
- Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Liliana Fernandez
- Stanford Center for Undiagnosed Diseases, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Jennefer N Kohler
- Stanford Center for Undiagnosed Diseases, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | | | - Jonathan A Bernstein
- Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Matthew T Wheeler
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Holly K Tabor
- Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.,Department of Medicine (and by courtesy, Department of Epidemiology), Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Lewis C, Buchanan J, Clarke A, Clement E, Friedrich B, Hastings-Ward J, Hill M, Horn R, Lucassen AM, Patch C, Pickard A, Roberts L, Sanderson SC, Wynn SL, Vindrola-Padros C, Lakhanpaul M. Mixed-methods evaluation of the NHS Genomic Medicine Service for paediatric rare diseases: study protocol. NIHR OPEN RESEARCH 2021; 1:23. [PMID: 35098132 PMCID: PMC7612282 DOI: 10.3310/nihropenres.13236.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Background A new nationally commissioned NHS England Genomic Medicine Service (GMS) was recently established to deliver genomic testing with equity of access for patients affected by rare diseases and cancer. The overarching aim of this research is to evaluate the implementation of the GMS during its early years, identify barriers and enablers to successful implementation, and provide recommendations for practice. The focus will be on the use of genomic testing for paediatric rare diseases. Methods This will be a four-year mixed-methods research programme using clinic observations, interviews and surveys. Study 1 consists of qualitative interviews with designers/implementers of the GMS in Year 1 of the research programme, along with documentary analysis to understand the intended outcomes for the Service. These will be revisited in Year 4 to compare intended outcomes with what happened in practice, and to identify barriers and facilitators that were encountered along the way. Study 2 consists of clinic observations (pre-test counselling and results disclosure) to examine the interaction between health professionals and parents, along with follow-up interviews with both after each observation. Study 3 consists of a longitudinal survey with parents at two timepoints (time of testing and 12 months post-results) along with follow-up interviews, to examine parent-reported experiences and outcomes. Study 4 consists of qualitative interviews and a cross-sectional survey with medical specialists to identify preparedness, facilitators and challenges to mainstreaming genomic testing. The use of theory-based and pre-specified constructs will help generalise the findings and enable integration across the various sub-studies. Dissemination We will disseminate our results to policymakers as findings emerge, so any suggested changes to service provision can be considered in a timely manner. A workshop with key stakeholders will be held in Year 4 to develop and agree a set of recommendations for practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Celine Lewis
- Population, Policy and Practice, UCL GOS Institute of Child Health, London, UK
- London North Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - James Buchanan
- Health Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford,, Oxford, UK
- NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK
| | - Angus Clarke
- Division of Cancer and Genetics, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK
| | - Emma Clement
- Clinical Genetics and Genomic Medicine, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Bettina Friedrich
- Population, Policy and Practice, UCL GOS Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | | | - Melissa Hill
- London North Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Genetics and Genomic Medicine, UCL GOS Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - Ruth Horn
- The Ethox Centre and the Wellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities, Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Anneke M. Lucassen
- Clinical Ethics and Law, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Chris Patch
- Genomics England, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
- Counselling, Society and Ethics Research, Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | | | | | | | - Sarah L. Wynn
- Unique – the Rare Chromosome Disorder Support Group, Oxted, UK
| | - Cecilia Vindrola-Padros
- Department of Targeted Intervention and Rapid Research Evaluation and Appraisal Lab (RREAL),, University College London, London, UK
| | - Monica Lakhanpaul
- Population, Policy and Practice, UCL GOS Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Lee W, Luca S, Costain G, Snell M, Marano M, Curtis M, Dunsmore K, Veenma D, Walker S, Cohn RD, Marshall CR, Cohen E, Meyn MS, Orkin J, Hayeems RZ. Genome sequencing among children with medical complexity: What constitutes value from parents' perspective? J Genet Couns 2021; 31:523-533. [PMID: 34674352 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1522] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2021] [Revised: 10/02/2021] [Accepted: 10/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Genome sequencing (GS) has demonstrated high diagnostic yield in pediatric patients with complex, clinically heterogeneous presentations. Emerging evidence shows generally favorable experiences for patients and families receiving GS. As a result, implementation of GS in pediatrics is gaining momentum. To inform implementation, we conducted a qualitative study to explore the personal utility of GS for parents of children with medical complexity (CMC). GS was performed at an academic tertiary-care center for CMC for whom a genetic etiology was suspected. Following the return of GS results, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 14 parents about their child's diagnostic journey. Of the children whose parents were interviewed, six children received a diagnosis, two received a possible diagnosis, and six did not receive a diagnosis. A predominantly deductive thematic analysis approach to the interview data was used by applying Kohler's personal utility framework to understand affective, cognitive, behavioral and social impacts of GS. Both the diagnosed and undiagnosed groups experienced enhanced emotion-focused coping (affective). The diagnosed group experienced favorable utility related to knowledge of condition (cognitive) and communication with relatives (behavioral). A domain beyond Kohler's framework related to the presence or absence of GS impact on medical management was also described by parents. The deployment of GS late in the diagnostic odyssey and the limited knowledge available for the rare genetic disorders diagnosed in this cohort appeared to diminish the perceived utility of GS. As GS capabilities continue to evolve at a rapid pace and become available earlier in the diagnostic journey, it is important to consider the impact and timing of testing on parents of CMC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Whiwon Lee
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Division of Clinical and Metabolic Genetics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Stephanie Luca
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gregory Costain
- Division of Clinical and Metabolic Genetics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,The Centre for Applied Genomics and Genetics and Genome Biology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Genetics & Genome Biology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Meaghan Snell
- Division of Clinical and Metabolic Genetics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Maria Marano
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Service de pédiatrie générale, CHU Sainte-Justine, Montreal, Québec, Canada
| | - Meredith Curtis
- Division of Clinical and Metabolic Genetics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kourtney Dunsmore
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Danielle Veenma
- Division of Clinical and Metabolic Genetics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Pediatrics: Developmental and Genetics, Erasmus MC Sophia, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Susan Walker
- The Centre for Applied Genomics and Genetics and Genome Biology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Genomics England, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Ronald D Cohn
- Division of Clinical and Metabolic Genetics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Christian R Marshall
- The Centre for Applied Genomics and Genetics and Genome Biology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Division of Paediatric Laboratory Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Eyal Cohen
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - M Stephen Meyn
- Center for Human Genomics and Precision Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Julia Orkin
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Robin Z Hayeems
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Division of Clinical and Metabolic Genetics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Smith HS, Morain SR, Robinson JO, Canfield I, Malek J, Rubanovich CK, Bloss CS, Ackerman SL, Biesecker B, Brothers KB, Goytia CN, Horowitz CR, Knight SJ, Koenig B, Kraft SA, Outram S, Rini C, Shipman KJ, Waltz M, Wilfond B, McGuire AL. Perceived Utility of Genomic Sequencing: Qualitative Analysis and Synthesis of a Conceptual Model to Inform Patient-Centered Instrument Development. PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2021; 15:317-328. [PMID: 34658003 PMCID: PMC9013723 DOI: 10.1007/s40271-021-00558-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Successful clinical integration of genomic sequencing (GS) requires evidence of its utility. While GS potentially has benefits (utilities) or harms (disutilities) across multiple domains of life for both patients and their families, there is as yet no empirically informed conceptual model of these effects. Our objective was to develop an empirically informed conceptual model of perceived utility of GS that captures utilities and disutilities for patients and their families across diverse backgrounds. METHODS We took a patient-centered approach, in which we began with a review of existing literature followed by collection of primary interview data. We conducted semi-structured interviews to explore types of utility in a clinically and sociopolitically diverse sample of 60 adults from seven Clinical Sequencing Evidence-Generating Research (CSER) consortium projects. Interviewees had either personally received, or were parents of a child who had received, GS results. Qualitative data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Findings from interviews were integrated with existing literature on clinical and personal utility to form the basis of an initial conceptual model that was refined based on expert review and feedback. RESULTS Five key utility types that have been previously identified in qualitative literature held up as primary domains of utility and disutility in our diverse sample. Interview data were used to specify and organize subdomains of an initial conceptual model. After expert refinement, the five primary domains included in the final model are clinical, emotional, behavioral, cognitive, and social, and several subdomains are specified within each. CONCLUSION We present an empirically informed conceptual model of perceived utility of GS. This model can be used to guide development of instruments for patient-centered outcome measurement that capture the range of relevant utilities and disutilities and inform clinical implementation of GS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hadley Stevens Smith
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Stephanie R Morain
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.,Berman Institute of Bioethics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jill Oliver Robinson
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Isabel Canfield
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Janet Malek
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Caryn Kseniya Rubanovich
- San Diego State University/University of California San Diego Joint Doctoral Program in Clinical Psychology, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Cinnamon S Bloss
- Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Sara L Ackerman
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - Kyle B Brothers
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, USA
| | - Crispin N Goytia
- Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Carol R Horowitz
- Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.,Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Institute for Health Equity Research, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sara J Knight
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Barbara Koenig
- Program in Bioethics, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Stephanie A Kraft
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Research Institute and Hospital, Seattle, WA, USA.,Division of Bioethics and Palliative Care, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Simon Outram
- Program in Bioethics, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Christine Rini
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.,Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Kelly J Shipman
- Palliative Care and Resilience Lab, Seattle Children's, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Margaret Waltz
- Department of Social Medicine, UNC-Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Benjamin Wilfond
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Research Institute and Hospital, Seattle, WA, USA.,Division of Bioethics and Palliative Care, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Amy L McGuire
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Pollard S, Weymann D, Dunne J, Mayanloo F, Buckell J, Buchanan J, Wordsworth S, Friedman JM, Stockler-Ipsiroglu S, Dragojlovic N, Elliott AM, Harrison M, Lynd LD, Regier DA. Toward the diagnosis of rare childhood genetic diseases: what do parents value most? Eur J Hum Genet 2021; 29:1491-1501. [PMID: 33903739 PMCID: PMC8484431 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-021-00882-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2020] [Revised: 01/18/2021] [Accepted: 03/23/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Genomic testing is becoming routine for diagnosing rare childhood genetic disease. Evidence underlying sustainable implementation is limited, focusing on short-term endpoints such as diagnostic yield, unable to fully characterize patient and family valued outcomes. Although genomic testing is becoming widely available, evidentiary and outcomes uncertainty persist as key challenges for implementation. We examine whether the current evidence base reflects public tolerance for uncertainty for genomics to diagnose rare childhood genetic disease. We conducted focus groups with general population parents in Vancouver, Canada, and Oxford, United Kingdom, to discuss expectations and concerns related to genomic testing to diagnose rare childhood genetic disease. Applying a purposive sampling technique, recruitment continued until thematic saturation was reached. Transcripts were analysed using thematic analysis. Thirty-three parents participated across four focus groups. Participants valued causal diagnoses alongside management strategies to improve patient health and wellbeing. Further, participants valued expanding the evidence base to reduce evidentiary uncertainty while ensuring security of information. Willingness to pay out of pocket for testing reflected perceived familial health benefit. Diagnostic yield fails to fully capture valued outcomes, and efforts to resolve uncertainty better reflect public priorities. Evaluations of genomic testing that fully integrate valued endpoints are necessary to ensure consistency with best practices and public willingness to accept the uncertain familial benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samantha Pollard
- Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control, BC Cancer, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Deirdre Weymann
- Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control, BC Cancer, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Jessica Dunne
- Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control, BC Cancer, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Fatemeh Mayanloo
- Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control, BC Cancer, Vancouver, Canada
| | - John Buckell
- grid.4991.50000 0004 1936 8948Nuffield Department of Population Health, Health Economics Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - James Buchanan
- grid.4991.50000 0004 1936 8948Nuffield Department of Population Health, Health Economics Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Sarah Wordsworth
- grid.4991.50000 0004 1936 8948Nuffield Department of Population Health, Health Economics Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Jan M. Friedman
- grid.17091.3e0000 0001 2288 9830Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada ,grid.414137.40000 0001 0684 7788BC Children’s Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Sylvia Stockler-Ipsiroglu
- grid.414137.40000 0001 0684 7788BC Children’s Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, Canada ,grid.17091.3e0000 0001 2288 9830Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada ,grid.414137.40000 0001 0684 7788Division of Biochemical Genetics, BC Children’s Hospital, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Nick Dragojlovic
- grid.17091.3e0000 0001 2288 9830Collaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Alison M. Elliott
- grid.17091.3e0000 0001 2288 9830Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada ,grid.414137.40000 0001 0684 7788BC Children’s Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Mark Harrison
- grid.17091.3e0000 0001 2288 9830Collaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada ,Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcomes Sciences, Providence Health Research Institute, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Larry D. Lynd
- grid.17091.3e0000 0001 2288 9830Collaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada ,Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcomes Sciences, Providence Health Research Institute, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Dean A. Regier
- Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control, BC Cancer, Vancouver, Canada ,grid.17091.3e0000 0001 2288 9830School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Margolin A, Helm BM, Treat K, Prucka SK, Halverson CME. Assessing parental understanding of variant reclassification in pediatric neurology and developmental pediatrics clinics. J Community Genet 2021; 12:663-670. [PMID: 34558037 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-021-00552-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2021] [Accepted: 09/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Improvements in technology used for genetic testing have yielded an increased numbers of variants that are identified, each with a potential to return uninformative results. While some genetics providers may expect patients to be responsible for staying abreast of updates to their genetic testing results, it is unknown whether patients are even aware of the possibility of variant reclassification. Little research has assessed the comprehension and attitudes of parents of pediatric patients regarding reclassification of variants of uncertain significance (VUS). Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with parents (n = 15) whose children received a VUS from genetic testing in either the pediatric neurogenetics or developmental pediatrics clinics at Riley Hospital for Children in Indianapolis, Indiana. Most participants expressed understanding of the uncertainty surrounding their child's VUS test result. However, nearly half of participants shared that they had no prior knowledge of its potential reclassification. When asked whose responsibility it is to keep informed about changes to their child's VUS status, some participants stated that it belonged solely to healthcare providers - a distinctive finding of our study - whereas others felt that it was a joint responsibility between providers and the parents. We additionally found that some patients desire a support group for individuals with VUS. These results provide insight into the importance of pretest genetic counseling and the need for increased social and informational support for parents of children who receive inconclusive genetic testing results. We conclude that relying solely on the patient or guardian to manage uncertain results may be insufficient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Margolin
- Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Benjamin M Helm
- Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Kayla Treat
- Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Sandra K Prucka
- Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Colin M E Halverson
- Center for Bioethics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, 410 W. 10th St., HITS 3131, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Eichinger J, Elger BS, Koné I, Filges I, Shaw D, Zimmermann B, McLennan S. The full spectrum of ethical issues in pediatric genome-wide sequencing: a systematic qualitative review. BMC Pediatr 2021; 21:387. [PMID: 34488686 PMCID: PMC8420043 DOI: 10.1186/s12887-021-02830-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2021] [Accepted: 08/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The use of genome-wide sequencing in pediatric medicine and research is growing exponentially. While this has many potential benefits, the normative and empirical literature has highlighted various ethical issues. There have not been, however, any systematic reviews of these issues. The aim of this systematic review is to determine systematically the spectrum of ethical issues that is raised for stakeholders in in pediatric genome-wide sequencing. Methods A systematic review in PubMed and Google Books (publications in English or German between 2004 and 2021) was conducted. Further references were identified via reference screening. Data were analyzed and synthesized using qualitative content analysis. Ethical issues were defined as arising when a relevant normative principle is not adequately considered or when two principles come into conflict. Results Our literature search retrieved 3175 publications of which 143 were included in the analysis. Together these mentioned 106 ethical issues in pediatric genome-wide sequencing, categorized into five themes along the pediatric genome-wide sequencing lifecycle. Most ethical issues identified in relation to genome-wide sequencing typically reflect ethical issues that arise in general genetic testing, but they are often amplified by the increased quantity of data obtained, and associated uncertainties. The most frequently discussed ethical aspects concern the issue of unsolicited findings. Conclusion Concentration of the debate on unsolicited findings risks overlooking other ethical challenges. An overarching difficulty presents the terminological confusion: both with regard to both the test procedure/ the scope of analysis, as well as with the topic of unsolicited findings. It is important that the genetics and ethics communities together with other medical professions involved work jointly on specific case related guidelines to grant the maximum benefit for the care of the children, while preventing patient harm and disproportionate overload of clinicians and the healthcare system by the wealth of available options and economic incentives to increase testing. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12887-021-02830-w.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johanna Eichinger
- Institute for Biomedical Ethics, University of Basel, Bernoullistrasse 28, 4056, Basel, Switzerland. .,Institute of History and Ethics in Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
| | - Bernice S Elger
- Institute for Biomedical Ethics, University of Basel, Bernoullistrasse 28, 4056, Basel, Switzerland.,Center for legal medicine (CURML), University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Insa Koné
- Institute for Biomedical Ethics, University of Basel, Bernoullistrasse 28, 4056, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Isabel Filges
- Medical Genetics, Institute of Medical Genetics and Pathology, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.,Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - David Shaw
- Institute for Biomedical Ethics, University of Basel, Bernoullistrasse 28, 4056, Basel, Switzerland.,Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Bettina Zimmermann
- Institute for Biomedical Ethics, University of Basel, Bernoullistrasse 28, 4056, Basel, Switzerland.,Institute of History and Ethics in Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Stuart McLennan
- Institute for Biomedical Ethics, University of Basel, Bernoullistrasse 28, 4056, Basel, Switzerland.,Institute of History and Ethics in Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Donohue KE, Dolan SM, Watnick D, Gallagher KM, Odgis JA, Suckiel SA, Teitelman N, Gelb BD, Kenny EE, Wasserstein MP, Horowitz CR, Bauman LJ. Hope versus reality: Parent expectations of genomic testing. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2021; 104:2073-2079. [PMID: 33640235 PMCID: PMC8679507 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.01.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2020] [Revised: 01/26/2021] [Accepted: 01/27/2021] [Indexed: 05/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Genomics is increasingly used for diagnostic testing in children. This study describes the expectations of parents whose child received genomic testing and whether or not they were met. METHODS A diverse stratified, purposive sample of parents of 22 children in New York City was interviewed using a semi-structured guide. Genomic test results were positive, negative, or uncertain. RESULTS Parents expressed their expectations in narrative and numeric fashion. Parents expected that their child's test would have a direct effect on their child's diagnosis. Some believed that results would be definitive, while others recognized testing limitations. Expectations reflected parents' hope to find a diagnosis and led to disappointment when results were uninformative or did not impact clinical management. CONCLUSION Results suggest pre-test genetic counseling emphasize the low likelihood of actionable results; however, parents' expectations of genomics' diagnostic capabilities are strongly rooted in their need to end the diagnostic odyssey and may be difficult to manage. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Parents' hope for a resolution and effective treatment for their child is a powerful context in which genetic counseling is heard. Clinicians who provide genomic testing should continue to acknowledge parents' preconceptions. Additional research in other settings will help understand how to best address and manage parent expectations of genomic medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine E Donohue
- Institute for Genomic Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Siobhan M Dolan
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Science, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Dana Watnick
- Department of Pediatrics, Montefiore Medical Center / Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, United States
| | - Katie M Gallagher
- Department of Pediatrics, Montefiore Medical Center / Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, United States
| | - Jacqueline A Odgis
- Institute for Genomic Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Sabrina A Suckiel
- Institute for Genomic Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Nehama Teitelman
- Department of Pediatrics, Montefiore Medical Center / Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, United States
| | - Bruce D Gelb
- Mindich Child Health and Development Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States; Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States; Department of Pediatrics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Eimear E Kenny
- Institute for Genomic Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States; Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States; Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Melissa P Wasserstein
- Department of Pediatrics, Montefiore Medical Center / Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, United States
| | - Carol R Horowitz
- Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States; Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States; Institute for Health Equity Research, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Laurie J Bauman
- Department of Pediatrics, Montefiore Medical Center / Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, United States; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Montefiore Medical Center / Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Exome and genome sequencing for pediatric patients with congenital anomalies or intellectual disability: an evidence-based clinical guideline of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG). Genet Med 2021; 23:2029-2037. [PMID: 34211152 DOI: 10.1038/s41436-021-01242-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 214] [Impact Index Per Article: 71.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2021] [Revised: 05/26/2021] [Accepted: 05/26/2021] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To develop an evidence-based clinical practice guideline for the use of exome and genome sequencing (ES/GS) in the care of pediatric patients with one or more congenital anomalies (CA) with onset prior to age 1 year or developmental delay (DD) or intellectual disability (ID) with onset prior to age 18 years. METHODS The Pediatric Exome/Genome Sequencing Evidence-Based Guideline Work Group (n = 10) used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) evidence to decision (EtD) framework based on the recent American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) systematic review, and an Ontario Health Technology Assessment to develop and present evidence summaries and health-care recommendations. The document underwent extensive internal and external peer review, and public comment, before approval by the ACMG Board of Directors. RESULTS The literature supports the clinical utility and desirable effects of ES/GS on active and long-term clinical management of patients with CA/DD/ID, and on family-focused and reproductive outcomes with relatively few harms. Compared with standard genetic testing, ES/GS has a higher diagnostic yield and may be more cost-effective when ordered early in the diagnostic evaluation. CONCLUSION We strongly recommend that ES/GS be considered as a first- or second-tier test for patients with CA/DD/ID.
Collapse
|
40
|
Liang NSY, Adam S, Elliott AM, Siemens A, du Souich C, Friedman JM, Birch P. After genomic testing results: Parents' long-term views. J Genet Couns 2021; 31:82-95. [PMID: 34165210 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1454] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2020] [Revised: 05/07/2021] [Accepted: 05/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Many parents are motivated to pursue genome-wide (exome or genome) sequencing to find a diagnosis for their child with a suspected but undiagnosed genetic condition. However, the impact of the genomic test extends beyond the provision of results and the so-called 'diagnostic odyssey'. Our goal was to quantify post-test decisional regret and characterize long-term, post-test experiences and unmet needs of the parents of children with suspected genetic diseases after they had received the results of genome-wide sequencing. Study participants were parents of children who underwent trio genome-wide sequencing as part of the CAUSES research study at Children's & Women's Health Centre of British Columbia. About half of the participants received a definite or likely genetic diagnosis after clinical interpretation of the genome-wide sequencing results. Parents who participated in the current study (n = 121) completed the Decisional Regret Scale four weeks after receiving results. A subset of these parents (n = 32) had semi-structured interviews a median of 7 months (range 3-20 months) after results disclosure and post-test genetic counseling. Most parents expressed either no regret or mild regret about having undergone genome-wide sequencing on both the Decisional Regret Scale and in the interviews. Parents whose children did not receive a genetic diagnosis were slightly more likely to have decisional regret on this quantitative scale. Analysis of transcribed interviews revealed the following major themes: (a) a lack of decisional conflict around having the testing; (b) a lack of decisional regret post-testing; (c) expressions of both relief and continued uncertainty around the meaning of a genetic diagnosis; (d) expression of initial disappointment and evolving interpretation surrounding a result yielding no genetic diagnosis; and (e) needing time to absorb the test results. Our results suggest that parents need time to absorb the testing results and that long-term post-test counseling, including acknowledging feelings of relief, loss, and disappointment, may help parents adapt to the genomic test results and assist families to anticipate and plan for the next steps in their child's medical trajectory, whether or not a diagnosis is found.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole Si Yan Liang
- Department of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Shelin Adam
- Department of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.,BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Alison M Elliott
- Department of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.,BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada.,Women's Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Angela Siemens
- Department of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Christèle du Souich
- Department of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.,BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | | | - Jan M Friedman
- Department of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.,BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Patricia Birch
- Department of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.,BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Harvey S, King MD, Gorman KM. Paroxysmal Movement Disorders. Front Neurol 2021; 12:659064. [PMID: 34177764 PMCID: PMC8232056 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.659064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2021] [Accepted: 04/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Paroxysmal movement disorders (PxMDs) are a clinical and genetically heterogeneous group of movement disorders characterized by episodic involuntary movements (dystonia, dyskinesia, chorea and/or ataxia). Historically, PxMDs were classified clinically (triggers and characteristics of the movements) and this directed single-gene testing. With the advent of next-generation sequencing (NGS), how we classify and investigate PxMDs has been transformed. Next-generation sequencing has enabled new gene discovery (RHOBTB2, TBC1D24), expansion of phenotypes in known PxMDs genes and a better understanding of disease mechanisms. However, PxMDs exhibit phenotypic pleiotropy and genetic heterogeneity, making it challenging to predict genotype based on the clinical phenotype. For example, paroxysmal kinesigenic dyskinesia is most commonly associated with variants in PRRT2 but also variants identified in PNKD, SCN8A, and SCL2A1. There are no radiological or biochemical biomarkers to differentiate genetic causes. Even with NGS, diagnosis rates are variable, ranging from 11 to 51% depending on the cohort studied and technology employed. Thus, a large proportion of patients remain undiagnosed compared to other neurological disorders such as epilepsy, highlighting the need for further genomic research in PxMDs. Whole-genome sequencing, deep-sequencing, copy number variant analysis, detection of deep-intronic variants, mosaicism and repeat expansions, will improve diagnostic rates. Identifying the underlying genetic cause has a significant impact on patient care, modification of treatment, long-term prognostication and genetic counseling. This paper provides an update on the genetics of PxMDs, description of PxMDs classified according to causative gene rather than clinical phenotype, highlighting key clinical features and providing an algorithm for genetic testing of PxMDs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan Harvey
- Department of Paediatric Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Children's Health Ireland at Temple Street, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Mary D King
- Department of Paediatric Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Children's Health Ireland at Temple Street, Dublin, Ireland.,School of Medicine and Medical Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Kathleen M Gorman
- Department of Paediatric Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Children's Health Ireland at Temple Street, Dublin, Ireland.,School of Medicine and Medical Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Amir N, McCarthy HJ, Tong A. A working partnership: A review of shared decision-making in nephrology. Nephrology (Carlton) 2021; 26:851-857. [PMID: 34010487 DOI: 10.1111/nep.13902] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2021] [Accepted: 05/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Patients with chronic kidney disease are required to make difficult decisions, negotiating between the risks, burdens and benefits for any proposed course. This process can be extremely challenging, since these decisions involve inherent risks, which can impact on survival and quality of life. Shared decision-making offers a patient-centred approach in partnering with patients to make decisions about their treatment, which reflect their values and preferences. Shared decision-making can improve patient preparedness, motivation, satisfaction, and adherence to the treatment or decision agreed upon. In this review article, we outline the key principles of shared decision-making, and provide a framework with communication strategies to facilitate shared decision-making. We highlight the broad range and context of decisions faced by patients in several areas of nephrology care and discuss patient-important outcomes, priorities and motivations that underpin their decision-making. Preserving patient autonomy through shared decision-making ensures close consideration of patient preferences to enhance satisfaction with the decision reached and optimize outcomes important to patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noa Amir
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Hugh J McCarthy
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Allison Tong
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Hayeems RZ, Luca S, Assamad D, Bhatt A, Ungar WJ. Utility of Genetic Testing from the Perspective of Parents/Caregivers: A Scoping Review. CHILDREN (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2021; 8:259. [PMID: 33801725 PMCID: PMC8067127 DOI: 10.3390/children8040259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2021] [Revised: 03/23/2021] [Accepted: 03/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
In genomics, perceived and personal utility have been proposed as constructs of value that include the subjective meanings and uses of genetic testing. Precisely what constitutes these constructs of utility and how they vary by stakeholder perspective remains unresolved. To advance methods for measuring the value of genetic testing in child health, we conducted a scoping review of the literature to characterize utility from the perspective of parents/caregivers. Peer reviewed literature that included empiric findings from parents/caregivers who received genetic test results for an index child and was written in English from 2016-2020 was included. Identified concepts of utility were coded according to Kohler's construct of personal utility. Of 2142 abstracts screened, 33 met inclusion criteria. Studies reflected a range of genetic test types; the majority of testing was pursued for children with developmental or neurodevelopmental concerns. Coding resulted in 15 elements of utility that mapped to Kohler's four domains of personal utility (affective, cognitive, behavioural and social) and one additional medical management domain. An adapted construct of utility for parents/caregivers may enable specific and standardized strategies for researchers to use to generate evidence of the post-test value of genetic testing. In turn, this will contribute to emerging methods for health technology assessment and policy decision making for genomics in child health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robin Z. Hayeems
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada; (S.L.); (D.A.); (A.B.); (W.J.U.)
- Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, The University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 3M6, Canada
| | - Stephanie Luca
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada; (S.L.); (D.A.); (A.B.); (W.J.U.)
| | - Daniel Assamad
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada; (S.L.); (D.A.); (A.B.); (W.J.U.)
| | - Ayushi Bhatt
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada; (S.L.); (D.A.); (A.B.); (W.J.U.)
- Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON N6A 5C1, Canada
| | - Wendy J. Ungar
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada; (S.L.); (D.A.); (A.B.); (W.J.U.)
- Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, The University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 3M6, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Jeffrey JS, Leathem J, King C, Mefford HC, Ross K, Sadleir LG. Developmental and epileptic encephalopathy: Personal utility of a genetic diagnosis for families. Epilepsia Open 2021; 6:149-159. [PMID: 33681658 PMCID: PMC7918330 DOI: 10.1002/epi4.12458] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2020] [Revised: 11/22/2020] [Accepted: 11/30/2020] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives Identifying genetic pathogenic variants improves clinical outcomes for children with developmental and epileptic encephalopathy (DEE) by directing therapy and enabling accurate reproductive and prognostic information for families. We aimed to explore the additional personal utility of receiving a genetic diagnosis for families. Methods Semi-structured interviews were conducted with fifteen families of children with a DEE who had received a genetic diagnosis. The interviews stimulated discussion focusing on the impact of receiving a genetic diagnosis for the family. Interview transcripts were analyzed using the six-step systematic process of interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA). Results Three key themes were identified: "Importance of the label," "Relief to end the diagnostic journey," and "Factors that influence personal utility." Families reported that receiving a genetic label improved their knowledge about the likely trajectory of the DEE, increased their hope for the future, and helped them communicate with others. The relief of finally having an answer for the cause of their child's DEE alleviated parental guilt and self-blame as well as helped families to process their grief and move forward. Delay in receipt of a genetic diagnosis diluted its psychological impact. Significance To date, the factors associated with the personal utility of a genetic diagnosis for DEEs have been under appreciated. This study demonstrates that identifying a genetic diagnosis for a child's DEE can be a psychological turning point for families. A genetic result has the potential to set these families on an adaptive path toward better quality of life through increased understanding, social connection, and support. Early access to genetic testing is important as it not only increases clinical utility, but also increases personal utility with early mitigation of family stress, trauma, and negative experiences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Janet Leathem
- School of PsychologyMassey UniversityWellingtonNew Zealand
| | - Chontelle King
- Department of Paediatrics and Child HealthUniversity of OtagoWellingtonNew Zealand
| | - Heather C. Mefford
- Department of PediatricsDivision of Genetic MedicineUniversity of WashingtonSeattleWAUSA
| | - Kirsty Ross
- School of PsychologyMassey UniversityWellingtonNew Zealand
| | - Lynette G. Sadleir
- Department of Paediatrics and Child HealthUniversity of OtagoWellingtonNew Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Watnick D, Odgis JA, Suckiel SA, Gallagher KM, Teitelman N, Donohue KE, Gelb BD, Kenny EE, Wasserstein MP, Horowitz CR, Dolan SM, Bauman LJ. "Is that something that should concern me?": a qualitative exploration of parent understanding of their child's genomic test results. HGG ADVANCES 2021; 2. [PMID: 33884375 PMCID: PMC8057699 DOI: 10.1016/j.xhgg.2021.100027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Genetic counselors are trained to deliver complicated genomic test results to parents of pediatric patients. However, there is limited knowledge on how parents perceive this information and what they understand about the results. This research aims to qualitatively explore parents’ experiences receiving genomic test results for their children. As part of formative research for the NYCKidSeq Study, we recruited a purposive sample of parents of 22 children stratified by child race/ethnicity and test result classification (positive, uncertain, or negative) and conducted in-depth interviews using a semi-structured guide. Analysis was conducted using grounded theory’s constant comparative method across cases and themes. Parents described different elements of understanding: genetics knowledge; significance and meaning of positive, uncertain, or negative results; and implications for the health of their child and family. Parents reported challenges understanding technical details and significance of their child’s results but gladly allowed their providers to be custodians of this information. However, of the different elements of understanding described, parents cared most deeply about being able to understand implications for their child’s and family’s health. These findings suggest that a counseling approach that primarily addresses parents’ desire to understand how to best care for their child and family may be more appropriate than an information-heavy approach focused on technical details. Further research is warranted to confirm these findings in larger parent cohorts and to explore ways genetic counseling can support parents’ preferences without sacrificing important components of parent understanding and overall satisfaction with their experiences with genomic medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dana Watnick
- Department of Pediatrics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10461, USA
| | - Jacqueline A Odgis
- Institute for Genomic Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Sabrina A Suckiel
- Institute for Genomic Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Katie M Gallagher
- Department of Pediatrics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10461, USA
| | - Nehama Teitelman
- Department of Pediatrics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10461, USA
| | - Katherine E Donohue
- Institute for Genomic Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Bruce D Gelb
- Mindich Child Health and Development Institute, Departments of Pediatrics and Genetics & Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Eimear E Kenny
- Institute for Genomic Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA.,Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA.,Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | | | - Carol R Horowitz
- Departments of Population Health Science and Policy and Medicine, Institute for Health Equity Research, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA.,Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Siobhan M Dolan
- Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA.,Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Science, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Laurie J Bauman
- Department of Pediatrics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10461, USA.,Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10461, USA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Tibben A, Dondorp W, Cornelis C, Knoers N, Brilstra E, van Summeren M, Bolt I. Parents, their children, whole exome sequencing and unsolicited findings: growing towards the child's future autonomy. Eur J Hum Genet 2021; 29:911-919. [PMID: 33456055 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-020-00794-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2020] [Revised: 10/07/2020] [Accepted: 11/26/2020] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
In a previous study we found that parents of children with developmental delay (DD) favoured acceptance of unsolicited findings (UFs) for medically actionable conditions in childhood, but that preferences diverged for UFs with no medical actionability, or only in adulthood, and regarding carrier status. Sometimes the child's future autonomy formed a reason for withholding UFs for the present, despite an unfavourable prognosis concerning the child's cognitive capabilities. This might be different for children undergoing whole exome sequencing (WES) for reasons other than DD and who are expected to exert future autonomy. This is the focus of the current study. We conducted nine qualitative, semi-structured interviews with parents of children, ages <1-15, after consenting to WES, but prior to feedback of results, and with three adolescent children. Several parents wished to receive any information that might in whatever way be relevant to the health and well-being of their child, and to a lesser extent wished the inclusion of information about non-actionable disorders and information concerning carrier status of autosomal recessive disorders. Although parents understood the rationale behind the centre's UFs disclosure policy, they also felt that they needed this information in order to be able to exert their parental responsibility and take good care of a child still dependent on them. Parents reason from their notion of parental responsibility but are also inclined to take adolescent children's preferences seriously and acknowledge the child's incipient autonomy as a ground for granting an increasing degree of self-determination on the road to adulthood.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aad Tibben
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
| | - Wybo Dondorp
- Department of Health, Ethics & Society, Research School for Public Health & Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Candice Cornelis
- Ethics Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Department of Medical Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Nine Knoers
- Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Eva Brilstra
- Department of Medical Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Marieke van Summeren
- Department of General Pediatrics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Ineke Bolt
- Ethics Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Department of Medical Ethics, Philosophy and History of Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Aldridge CE, Osiovich H, Hal Siden H, Elliott AM. Rapid genome-wide sequencing in a neonatal intensive care unit: A retrospective qualitative exploration of parental experiences. J Genet Couns 2020; 30:616-629. [PMID: 33131147 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1353] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2020] [Revised: 09/26/2020] [Accepted: 10/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Genome-wide sequencing (GWS) is increasingly being used in neonatal intensive care units. While studies have explored its clinical utility, little is known about parental experiences with this testing post-return of results. We conducted a qualitative study, using an interpretive description framework and thematic analysis, to gain further insight into parents' perceptions of the value and utility of GWS for their infant. We sought to explore whether parents' perceptions differ if their child received a diagnosis or not, and whether their child is living or deceased. Semi-structured, telephone interviews were conducted with parents of infants who had rapid exome sequencing while in the neonatal intensive care unit at BC Women's Hospital in Vancouver, Canada. Interviews addressed perceived benefits and harms of GWS and included an evaluation of decisional regret. Parents of 27 probands were approached and 14 (52%; 13 mothers and 1 father) participated in interviews. On average, 26 months had elapsed from the time of results to the interview. Six themes were identified. Firstly, parents had a positive regard for GWS. The results of GWS helped provide context for their child's admission to the NICU, and all parents experienced relief following receiving the results. A diagnosis by GWS enabled parents to picture the future, form connections with other parents, and coordinate their child's care. Lastly, some parents experienced discomfort with the concept of a genetic diagnosis, and interestingly felt lack of a genomic diagnosis indicated a reduced severity of their infant's condition. Decisional regret post-results was found to be low. Our results highlight how parents cope with the results of GWS and suggest that a genetic counselor can have an important role in helping families understand and adjust to these results in the neonatal intensive care unit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caitlin E Aldridge
- Department of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Horacio Osiovich
- Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.,BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada.,Women's Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Harold Hal Siden
- Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.,BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | | | - Alison M Elliott
- Department of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.,BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada.,Women's Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Studwell CM, Kelley EG, Sinsheimer JS, Palmer CGS, LeBlanc K. Family genetic result communication in rare and undiagnosed disease communities: Understanding the practice. J Genet Couns 2020; 30:439-447. [PMID: 33108040 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1329] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2020] [Revised: 08/11/2020] [Accepted: 08/12/2020] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Genetic results have implications not only for the individual, but also for their family members. Research on family communication of genetic results has primarily focused on families affected by adult-onset, dominant conditions as well as more common genetic conditions such as familial hypercholesterolemia, cardiomyopathies, and genetic hearing loss. This study therefore aimed to characterize genetic result communication in families with rare and undiagnosed conditions and identify factors that influence communication. One hundred and forty-two individuals who received a diagnosis from the Undiagnosed Diseases Network (UDN), a study focused on providing diagnoses to individuals with undiagnosed conditions, were eligible to complete a survey assessing genetic results communication. Survey items assessed if communication was discussed with healthcare providers, with whom participants communicated genetic testing, why they chose to communicate with these family members, and what information they communicated. All respondents (5 adult UDN participants, 38 parents/guardians of UDN participants, and 2 identifying as both) shared genetic results with at least one family member. Individuals who identified as both were considered exclusively adult participants for the purpose of these analyses. Adult participants and parents/guardians of participants reported high levels of understanding (96%), utility (96%), and comfort communicating genetic results (89%). Additionally, parents/guardians were more likely to disclose genetic results due to a general desire to share (60% of parents/guardians vs. 14% adult participants), while adult participants reported that they shared results to communicate risk to family members (86% of adult participants vs. 24% of parents/guardians). Many respondents did not recall discussing with a healthcare provider how (64%) or what (42%) to communicate about results. The results of this study provide insight into the practice of result communication by individuals with rare and previously undiagnosed conditions, which can ideally inform development of more effective counseling strategies and guidelines to aid family communication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Courtney M Studwell
- Department of Graduate Medical Sciences, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.,Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Emily G Kelley
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Janet S Sinsheimer
- Departments of Human Genetics and Computational Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Department of Biostatistics, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Christina G S Palmer
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Department of Human Genetics, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Institute for Society and Genetics, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Kimberly LeBlanc
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Brett GR, Martyn M, Lynch F, de Silva MG, Ayres S, Gallacher L, Boggs K, Baxendale A, Schenscher S, King-Smith S, Fowles L, Springer A, Lunke S, Vasudevan A, Krzesinski E, Pinner J, Sandaradura SA, Barnett C, Patel C, Wilson M, Stark Z. Parental experiences of ultrarapid genomic testing for their critically unwell infants and children. Genet Med 2020; 22:1976-1985. [PMID: 32719395 DOI: 10.1038/s41436-020-0912-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2020] [Accepted: 07/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To explore parental experiences of ultrarapid genomic testing for their critically unwell infants and children. METHODS Parents of critically unwell children who participated in a national ultrarapid genomic diagnosis program were surveyed >12 weeks after genomic results return. Surveys consisted of custom questions and validated scales, including the Decision Regret Scale and Genomics Outcome Scale. RESULTS With 96 survey invitations sent, the response rate was 57% (n = 55). Most parents reported receiving enough information during pretest (n = 50, 94%) and post-test (n = 44, 83%) counseling. Perceptions varied regarding benefits of testing, however most parents reported no or mild decision regret (n = 45, 82%). The majority of parents (31/52, 60%) were extremely concerned about the condition recurring in future children, regardless of actual or perceived recurrence risk. Parents whose child received a diagnostic result reported higher empowerment. CONCLUSION This study provides valuable insight into parental experiences of ultrarapid genomic testing in critically unwell children, including decision regret, empowerment, and post-test reproductive planning, to inform design and delivery of rapid diagnosis programs. The findings suggest considerations for pre- and post-test counseling that may influence parental experiences during the testing process and beyond, such as the importance of realistically conveying the likelihood for clinical and/or personal utility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gemma R Brett
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia. .,The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
| | - Melissa Martyn
- The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.,Melbourne Genomics Health Alliance, Melbourne, Australia.,Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Fiona Lynch
- The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.,Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.,Australian Genomics Health Alliance, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Michelle G de Silva
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.,The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.,Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.,Australian Genomics Health Alliance, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Samantha Ayres
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.,Australian Genomics Health Alliance, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Lyndon Gallacher
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.,The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Kirsten Boggs
- Australian Genomics Health Alliance, Melbourne, Australia.,Sydney Children's Hospitals Network-Randwick, Sydney, Australia.,Sydney Children's Hospitals Network-Westmead, Sydney, Australia
| | - Anne Baxendale
- Australian Genomics Health Alliance, Melbourne, Australia.,Paediatric and Reproductive Genetics Unit, South Australian Clinical Genetics Service, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Sarah Schenscher
- Australian Genomics Health Alliance, Melbourne, Australia.,Paediatric and Reproductive Genetics Unit, South Australian Clinical Genetics Service, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Sarah King-Smith
- Australian Genomics Health Alliance, Melbourne, Australia.,Centre for Cancer Biology, SA Pathology, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Lindsay Fowles
- Australian Genomics Health Alliance, Melbourne, Australia.,Genetic Health Queensland, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Amanda Springer
- Monash Genetics, Monash Health, Melbourne, Australia.,Department of Paediatrics, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Sebastian Lunke
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.,The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.,Australian Genomics Health Alliance, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | - Emma Krzesinski
- Monash Genetics, Monash Health, Melbourne, Australia.,Department of Paediatrics, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jason Pinner
- Sydney Children's Hospitals Network-Randwick, Sydney, Australia
| | - Sarah A Sandaradura
- Sydney Children's Hospitals Network-Westmead, Sydney, Australia.,Discipline of Child and Adolescent Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Christopher Barnett
- Paediatric and Reproductive Genetics Unit, South Australian Clinical Genetics Service, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Chirag Patel
- Genetic Health Queensland, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Meredith Wilson
- Sydney Children's Hospitals Network-Westmead, Sydney, Australia
| | - Zornitza Stark
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.,The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.,Australian Genomics Health Alliance, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Hitchcock EC, Study C, Elliott AM. Shortened consent forms for genome-wide sequencing: Parent and provider perspectives. Mol Genet Genomic Med 2020; 8:e1254. [PMID: 32383361 PMCID: PMC7336726 DOI: 10.1002/mgg3.1254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2020] [Revised: 03/12/2020] [Accepted: 03/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Consent forms for exome and/or genome sequencing, collectively called genome-wide sequencing (GWS), frequently contain detailed information on complex topics such as sequencing analysis and incidental findings. Considering recent endeavors by the health care community to simplify GWS consent forms, it is important to gain stakeholders' perspectives on the content, length, and use of consent forms. METHODS Thematic analysis was conducted on data obtained from focus groups with two participant cohorts: parents who previously provided consent for trio-based GWS as part of the translational pediatric GWS CAUSES Study, and genetic health care providers (HCP) who provide pre-test counseling for GWS. RESULTS Genetic HCP indicated that consent forms cannot replace pre-test counseling, and as such, a simplified consent form focusing on the implications of GWS would be beneficial to both patients and HCP. Although parents' primary concerns varied when considering GWS, they all highly valued information. Parents also indicated the need for community and support after the return of GWS results. Both participant cohorts recommended that consent forms be available online and include an appendix for supplementary information. CONCLUSION It is important to include both parents and HCP in the design of GWS consent forms, and also, to help connect families who have a shared diagnosis after the post-test counseling session.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma C Hitchcock
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Causes Study
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Alison M Elliott
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,Women's Health Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|