Decreased IGF-1 concentration during the first trimester of pregnancy in women with normal somatotroph function

Genetics of glucose homeostasis in pregnancy and postpartum

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS

Pregnancy is accompanied by maternal metabolic adaptations to ensure fetal growth and development, including insulin resistance, which occurs primarily during the second and third trimesters of pregnancy, and a decrease in fasting blood sugar levels over the course of pregnancy. Glucose-related traits are regulated by genetic and environmental factors and modulated by physiological variations throughout the life course. We addressed the hypothesis that there are both overlaps and differences between genetic variants associated with glycaemia-related traits during and outside of pregnancy.

METHODS

Genome-wide SNP data were used to identify genetic variations associated with glycaemia-related traits measured during an OGTT performed at ~28 weeks' gestation in 8067 participants in the Hyperglycaemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome (HAPO) Study. Associations outside of pregnancy were determined in 3977 individuals who also participated in the HAPO Follow-Up Study at 11-14 years postpartum. A Bayesian classification algorithm was used to determine whether SNPs associated with fasting and 2 h glucose and fasting C-peptide during pregnancy had a pregnancy-predominant effect vs a similar effect during pregnancy and postpartum.

RESULTS

SNPs in six loci (GCKR, G6PC2, GCK, PPP1R3B, PCSK1 and MTNR1B) were significantly associated with fasting glucose during pregnancy, while SNPs in CDKAL1 and MTNR1B were associated with 1 h glucose and SNPs in MTNR1B and HKDC1 were associated with 2 h glucose. Variants in CDKAL1 and MTNR1B were associated with insulin secretion during pregnancy. Variants in multiple loci were associated with fasting C-peptide during pregnancy, including GCKR, IQSEC1, PPP1R3B, IGF1 and BACE2. GCKR and BACE2 were associated with 1 h C-peptide and GCKR, IQSEC1 and BACE2 with insulin sensitivity during pregnancy. The associations of MTNR1B with 2 h glucose, BACE2 with fasting and 1 h C-peptide and insulin sensitivity, and IQSEC1 with fasting C-peptide and insulin sensitivity that we identified during pregnancy have not been previously reported in non-pregnancy cohorts. The Bayesian classification algorithm demonstrated that the magnitude of effect of the lead SNP was greater during pregnancy compared with 11-14 years postpartum in PCSK1 and PPP1R3B with fasting glucose, in three loci, including MTNR1B, with 2 h glucose, and in six loci, including IGF1, with fasting C-peptide.

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION

Our findings support the hypothesis that there are both overlaps and differences between the genetic architecture of glycaemia-related traits during and outside of pregnancy. Genetic variants at several loci, including PCSK1, PPP1R3B, MTNR1B and IGF1, appear to influence glycaemic regulation in a unique fashion during pregnancy. Future studies in larger cohorts will be needed to replicate the present findings, fully characterise the genetics of maternal glycaemia during pregnancy and determine similarities to and differences from the non-gravid state.

Pregnancy and acromegaly: clinical outcomes of retrospectively analysed data from the German acromegaly registry

CONTEXT

Acromegaly is a rare disease caused by excessive growth hormone (GH) secretion, mostly induced by pituitary adenomas. The care of pregnant women with acromegaly is challenging, in part due to existing clinical data being limited and not entirely consistent with regard to potential risks for mother and child.

OBJECTIVE

To retrospectively examine data on pregnancy and maternal as well as neonatal outcomes in patients with acromegaly.

DESIGN & METHODS

Retrospective data analysis from 47 pregnancies of 31 women treated in centers of the German Acromegaly Registry.

RESULTS

87.1% of the studied women underwent transsphenoidal surgery before pregnancy. In 51.1% a combination of dopamine agonists and somatostatin analogs were used before pregnancy. Three women did not receive any therapy for acromegaly. During pregnancy only 6.4% received either somatostatin analogs or dopamine agonists. In total, 70.2% of all documented pregnancies emerged spontaneously. Gestational diabetes was diagnosed in 10.6% and gravid hypertension in 6.4%. Overall, no preterm birth was detected. Indeed, 87% of acromegalic women experienced a delivery without complications.

CONCLUSION

Pregnancies in women with acromegaly are possible and the course of pregnancy is in general safe for mother and child both with and without specific treatment for acromegaly. The prevalence of concomitant metabolic diseases such as gestational diabetes is comparable to the prevalence in healthy pregnant women. Nevertheless, larger studies with more data in pregnant patients with acromegaly are needed to provide safe and effective care for pregnant women with this condition.

Safety of pregnancy in acromegaly patients and maternal and infant outcomes after pregnancy: single-center experience from China and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Pregnancy in acromegaly is uncommon and still in debate for fear of tumor progression or potential threat to both mother and fetus's health. Besides, the data for pregnancy complications in uncontrolled acromegaly is limited. Thus, the objective of this study was to summarize pregnancy safety and disease courses after pregnancy in acromegalic patients and review their clinical characteristics based on disease activity in the literature.

METHODS

An evaluation of eight acromegalic women from Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH) with 11 pregnancies was conducted. We also summarized a literature review of 82 disease-active pregnancies and 63 disease-controlled pregnancies with acromegaly. A second analysis was conducted to compare pregnancy courses and outcomes in different disease activities.

RESULTS

Before pregnancy, all patients had macroadenomas and underwent pituitary surgery. Pregnancy occurred at a median of 6 years (4-10) after the diagnosis of acromegaly. Assisted reproductive therapy was needed in 42.9% of participants. No cases had a premature birth or congenital malformations. Biochemical control was achieved in 50% of females before pregnancy and 75% at the last follow-up after delivery. Data analysis showed no differences in the prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) or pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH) between acromegaly-active or acromegaly-controlled groups. The GDM prevalence in patients diagnosed during pregnancy (33.3%) was higher than that in patients diagnosed before pregnancy (4.8%) (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Pregnancy without biochemical control in acromegaly and receiving medical treatment during pregnancy are not rare and generally safe for the fetus. There could be a higher prevalence of PIH in acromegalic pregnancies. The treatment of acromegaly and related complications can be managed with regular follow-up after pregnancy.

Approach of Acromegaly during Pregnancy

Acromegaly-related sub/infertility, tidily related to suboptimal disease control (1/2 of cases), correlates with hyperprolactinemia (1/3 of patients), hypogonadotropic hypogonadism—mostly affecting the pituitary axis in hypopituitarism (10−80%), and negative effects of glucose profile (GP) anomalies (10−70%); thus, pregnancy is an exceptional event. Placental GH (Growth Hormone) increases from weeks 5−15 with a peak at week 37, stimulating liver IGF1 and inhibiting pituitary GH secreted by normal hypophysis, not by somatotropinoma. However, estrogens induce a GH resistance status, protecting the fetus form GH excess; thus a full-term, healthy pregnancy may be possible. This is a narrative review of acromegaly that approaches cardio-metabolic features (CMFs), somatotropinoma expansion (STE), management adjustment (MNA) and maternal-fetal outcomes (MFOs) during pregnancy. Based on our method (original, in extenso, English—published articles on PubMed, between January 2012 and September 2022), we identified 24 original papers—13 studies (3 to 141 acromegalic pregnancies per study), and 11 single cases reports (a total of 344 pregnancies and an additional prior unpublished report). With respect to maternal acromegaly, pregnancies are spontaneous or due to therapy for infertility (clomiphene, gonadotropins or GnRH) and, lately, assisted reproduction techniques (ARTs); there are no consistent data on pregnancies with paternal acromegaly. CMFs are the most important complications (7.7−50%), especially concerning worsening of HBP (including pre/eclampsia) and GP anomalies, including gestational diabetes mellitus (DM); the best predictor is the level of disease control at conception (IGF1), and, probably, family history of 2DM, and body mass index. STE occurs rarely (a rate of 0 to 9%); some of it symptoms are headache and visual field anomalies; it is treated with somatostatin analogues (SSAs) or alternatively dopamine agonists (DAs); lately, second trimester selective hypophysectomy has been used less, since pharmaco-therapy (PT) has proven safe. MNA: PT that, theoretically, needs to be stopped before conception—continued if there was STE or an inoperable tumor (no clear period of exposure, preferably, only first trimester). Most data are on octreotide > lanreotide, followed by DAs and pegvisomant, and there are none on pasireotide. Further follow-up is required: a prompt postpartum re-assessment of the mother’s disease; we only have a few data confirming the safety of SSAs during lactation and long-term normal growth and developmental of the newborn (a maximum of 15 years). MFO seem similar between PT + ve and PT − ve, regardless of PT duration; the additional risk is actually due to CMF. One study showed a 2-year median between hypophysectomy and pregnancy. Conclusion: Close surveillance of disease burden is required, particularly, concerning CMF; a personalized approach is useful; the level of statistical evidence is expected to expand due to recent progress in MNA and ART.

The expression level of mir-21-3p in platelet-rich plasma: A potential effective factor and predictive biomarker in recurrent implantation failure

Recurrent implantation failure (RIF) is the most important complication associated with in vitro fertilization (IVF). Despite the good quality of the transferred embryo, the success rate is rather disappointing. Therefore, predictive biomarkers for implantation are critical to making decisions about transferring high-quality embryos or cryopreserving them for cycles with a higher chance of implantation. Recently, intrauterine infusion of autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has been proposed to increase the endometrial receptivity in RIF patients. PRP is rich in both growth factors and microRNAs (miRNAs). We investigated the possible association of mir-21-3p, mir-21-5p, mir-494-3p, mir-145-5p, and insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) levels in PRP and platelet-poor plasma (PPP) samples with the pregnancy outcomes in RIF patients. The miRNA expression level and IGF-I concentration were assessed using real-time PCR and chemiluminescence methods respectively. Mir-21-3p was upregulated in PRP samples of the pregnant group in comparison to the nonpregnant group. There was no difference in the expression of mir-21-3p in PPP samples of these groups. The concentration of IGF-I was higher in PRP and PPP samples of the nonpregnant in comparison to the pregnant group. Receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis showed that mir-21-3p can be a valuable biomarker for the prediction of pregnancy chance in RIF patients treated with PRP.

Adult growth hormone deficiency: diagnostic and treatment journeys from the patients’ perspective

Adult growth hormone deficiency (AGHD) is a rare and serious condition associated with significant morbidity, including reduced quality of life, and is underdiagnosed and often missed in patients. Although the onset of AGHD can occur in either childhood or adulthood, adult-onset AGHD is more difficult to identify as it lacks the auxologic signs caused by GHD during childhood, includes symptoms that tend to be nonspecific, and lacks reliable, simple biomarker testing options. A panel of 9 patients with AGHD (3 with childhood onset; 6 with adult onset) was assembled to share their first-hand experiences, to help reveal important areas of need, increase health literacy, and to raise awareness about GHD among patients, caregivers, and healthcare practitioners. Interviews with patients yielded valuable insights from the patient perspective to supplement prior knowledge about AGHD symptomatology, biomarker testing, and treatment outcomes. Some patients described a burdensome and ineffective screening process that sometimes included many visits to different specialists, repeated rounds of biomarker testing, and, in some cases, excessive delays in AGHD diagnosis. All patients expressed frustration with insurance companies that often resist and/or delay treatment authorization and reimbursement and frequently require additional testing to verify the diagnosis, often leading to treatment gaps. These findings emphasize the necessity of more efficient identification and screening of patients with possible AGHD, better recognition by clinicians and insurance providers of the importance of sustained GH replacement therapy during adulthood, and better patient support for accessing and maintaining uninterrupted GH replacement therapy for patients with documented AGHD.

Course and outcomes of pregnancy in women treated for acromegaly: Discerning a contemporary cohort

OBJECTIVE

To analyze pregnancy course and outcomes in women treated for acromegaly and compare outcomes based on disease activity at the time of conception.

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

PATIENTS

Women with acromegaly diagnosed prior to or during pregnancy from 2010 to 2019, representing cases (14 pregnancies in 12 cases), were later stratified based on active (n = 5) or controlled disease (n = 9) at time of conception. Female acromegalic patients over the same period constituted the 'acromegaly cohort' (AC) (n = 75).

RESULTS

All cases had macroadenomas with nadir GH of 15.06 ng/ml (IQR 9-30), IGF-I index of 3.04 (1.96-3.82), for which they had undergone pituitary surgery; except two patients diagnosed during pregnancy, who received pharmacotherapy followed by surgery 4 months postpartum. Adjuvant pharmacotherapy was required in 71.4% patients and radiotherapy in 35.7%. Pregnancy occurred at a median of 2 (0.8-5.1) years after surgery and 21.4% required assisted reproduction. All had term delivery with normal APGAR except one case with gestational hypertension, who delivered a preterm baby. None had congenital malformations. Despite higher baseline IGF-I, GH and tumor volume in those with pre-conceptional active acromegaly, materno-fetal outcomes were not different from those with controlled disease (p > 0.05). Similar or greater proportion of cases had normal GH and no residual tumor postpartum, even in those with pre-conceptional active acromegaly.

CONCLUSION

The current study showed conducive outcomes of gestation in women treated for acromegaly and no higher rates of pregnancy parameters or complications than non-acromegaly pregnancies in the same population. Active acromegaly does not seem to have an adverse bearing on outcomes.

An update on clinical care for pregnant women with acromegaly

INTRODUCTION

As pregnancy is rare in women with acromegaly, only case reports and few series have been published.

AREAS COVERED

All case reports and publications dealing with pregnancy in patients with acromegaly were collated. Information concerning the effects of acromegaly on pregnancy outcomes, the impact of pregnancy on GH/IGF-I measurements, acromegaly comorbidity and pituitary adenoma size, the effects of treatment of acromegaly on fetus outcomes were retrieved and analyzed.

EXPERT COMMENTARY

Based on the small number of reported cases, pregnancy is generally uneventful, except for a potential increased incidence of gestational hypertension and diabetes mellitus. Medical therapy of acromegaly (dopamine agonists, somatostatin analogs, growth hormone-receptor antagonists) is generally interrupted before or at diagnosis of pregnancy. In very rare patients with a pituitary adenoma, particularly a macroadenoma that has not been surgically treated before pregnancy, or if a surgical remnant persists, or when acromegaly is revealed during pregnancy, tumor volume may increase and cause symptoms through a mass effect. Close monitoring of clinical manifestations and imaging are necessary during pregnancy in these cases. In the rare cases of symptomatic tumor enlargement during pregnancy, medical treatment with dopamine agonists or eventually somatostatin analogs may be attempted before resorting to transsphenoidal surgery.

Inoperable Giant Growth Hormone-secreting Pituitary Adenoma: Radiological Aspects, Clinical Management and Pregnancy Outcome

Methods:

We report on a young woman with acromegaly due to an inoperable giant GH-secreting pituitary adenoma extending to right cavernous sinus, right orbital cavity, ethmoid, right maxillary sinus, sphenoid sinus, clivus and right temporal fossa, in which medical treatment with Octreotide- LAR was able to promptly relieve headache and bilateral hemianopsia due to optic chiasm involvement, improve acromegaly symptoms and, over the time, control tumor expansion, improving fertility and therefore allowing the patient to become pregnant.

Results:

Octreotide-LAR therapy was withdrawn during pregnancy and the patient did not experience complications and gave birth to a healthy son. On magnetic resonance, the size of the tumor at the end of pregnancy and in the subsequent follow up was not increased.

Conclusion:

The history we report, therefore, confirms previous experiences reporting a possible favourable outcome of pregnancy in patients affected by acromegaly and adds further information about the behaviour of giant pituitary tumors in patients underwent pregnancy.

Temporal relationships of GH, IGF-I and fructosamine concentrations in pregnant Spanish Purebred mares: A substantial contribution from the hormonal standpoint

Growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor (IGF-I) exert essential functions to maintain an adequate metabolic activity for correct placental and fetal development. Although fructosamine (FRUCT) is used in clinical evaluation to assess the glycaemic state, the relationships between GH, IGF-I and FRUCT remain unknown in the mare. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to evaluate the relationships among these parameters in pregnant mares. A total of 30 healthy Spanish Purebred mares, with an age range of 9.33 ± 3.31 years, were studied during the 11 months of gestation. Serum concentrations of GH, IGF-I and FRUCT were analyzed by EIA, competition ELISA and spectrophotometry, respectively. GH showed a biphasic pattern, the first occurred during 4th and 5th month and the second which was higher than the 1st one during the 7th, 8th and 9th month (P < 0.05). Compared to the 1st month, the IGF-I concentrations increased in the 2nd month (P < 0.05), decreased in the 3rd and 4th month and increased to reach the maximum average value in the 5th month (P < 0.05); after slight oscillations between the 6th and 8th month, IGF-I concentrations increased in the 9th month (P < 0.05), decreasing until the end of gestation. FRUCT increased progressively and significantly from the 6th month of gestation, reaching the maximum values in the last month of gestation (P < 0.05). These results suggest that alternative mechanisms other than GH and IGF-I could be involved in the regulation of glycaemic metabolism in pregnant mare.

Gender in Endocrine Diseases: Role of Sex Gonadal Hormones

Gender- and sex- related differences represent a new frontier towards patient-tailored medicine, taking into account that theoretically every medical specialty can be influenced by both of them. Sex hormones define the differences between males and females, and the different endocrine environment promoted by estrogens, progesterone, testosterone, and their precursors might influence both human physiology and pathophysiology. With the term Gender we refer, instead, to behaviors, roles, expectations, and activities carried out by the individual in society. In other words, "gender" refers to a sociocultural sphere of the individual, whereas "sex" only defines the biological sex. In the last decade, increasing attention has been paid to understand the influence that gender can have on both the human physiology and pathogenesis of diseases. Even the clinical response to therapy may be influenced by sex hormones and gender, but further research is needed to investigate and clarify how they can affect the human pathophysiology. The path to a tailored medicine in which every patient is able to receive early diagnosis, risk assessments, and optimal treatments cannot exclude the importance of gender. In this review, we have focused our attention on the involvement of sex hormones and gender on different endocrine diseases.

MANAGEMENT OF ENDOCRINE DISEASE: Acromegaly and pregnancy: a contemporary review

Although fertility is frequently impaired in women with acromegaly, pregnancy is apparently becoming more common due to improvement in acromegaly treatment as well as in fertility therapy. As a result, several studies on pregnancy in patients with acromegaly have been published in recent years adding new and relevant information to the preexisting literature. Also, new GH assays with selective specificities and the knowledge of the expression of the various GH genes have allowed a better understanding of somatotrophic axis function during pregnancy. In this review, we show that pregnancy in women with acromegaly is generally safe, usually with tumoral and hormonal stability. Although the paucity of data limits evidence-based recommendations for preconception counseling and pregnancy surveillance, controlling tumor size and hormonal activity before pregnancy is highly recommended to ensure better outcomes, and surgical control should be attempted when feasible. Treatment interruption at pregnancy confirmation has also proven to be safe, as drugs are not formally allowed to be used during pregnancy. Drug exposure (somatostatin analogs) during early or whole pregnancy might increase the chance of a lower birth weight. Aggressive disease is uncommon and may urge individual decisions such as surgery or drug treatment during pregnancy or lactation.

Pregnancy and acromegaly

INTRODUCTION

Acromegaly is a rare disorder in which, due to the high incidence of secondary hypogonadism, pregnancies are relatively rare. However, some women with acromegaly do get pregnant, which brings along questions about medication, complications and follow-up. This review tries to address these issues and provide the reader with practical information.

METHODS

This review summarizes published data.

CONCLUSIONS

Acromegaly is a disorder that is characterized by changes in growth hormone (GH), insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) and insulin concentrations and actions. All these hormones are important in pregnancy as well. In principle, the fetal-placental collaboration between mother and child more-or-less takes over the control over GH and IGF-1, not only in normal physiology but also to a certain extend in acromegaly. When medication for the high GH levels or actions is continued during pregnancy, both dopamine agonists, somatostatin analogs and GH receptor antagonists have been used and the available data suggest that there are no adverse consequences on mother or fetus to date. However, it is strongly advised to stop any medical intervention during pregnancy until more data are available on the safety of these compounds. Also, medical treatment is not needed as tumor size and disease activity are not reported to escape.

Early pregnancy IGF-I and placental GH and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer: A nested case-control study

Insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) signaling may promote ovarian tumor development by exerting mitotic, antiapoptotic and proangiogenic effects. During pregnancy, maternal production of IGF-I is regulated by placental growth hormone (GH). Parity is an established protective factor for ovarian cancer, however, no prior study has evaluated placental GH and IGF-I in pregnancy and epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Prior prospective studies on the association between IGF-I and EOC in nonpregnant populations were inconclusive and did not address associations in subtypes of EOC. Among members of the Finnish Maternity Cohort and the Northern Sweden Maternity Cohort, we identified 1,045 EOC cases, diagnosed after recruitment (1975-2008) and before March 2011 and 2,658 individually matched controls. Placental GH and IGF-I were measured in serum from the last pregnancy before EOC diagnosis or selection as control. We used conditional logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for tertiles and a doubling of hormone concentrations. Higher IGF-I was associated with a nonsignificant decrease in risk for invasive [ORT3 vs. T1 : 0.79 (0.62-1.02); ptrend  = 0.07] and endometrioid tumors [ORT3 vs. T1 : 0.55 (0.28-1.07); ptrend  = 0.07]. The protective association between higher IGF-I levels and risk of invasive EOC was stronger in analyses limited to women aged <55 years at diagnosis [ORT3 vs. T1 : 0.74 (0.57-0.96); ptrend  = 0.03]. Our study provides the first data on placental GH and IGF-I in pregnancy and EOC risk overall and by subtype. Our data suggest higher IGF-I levels in pregnancy may be associated with lower risk of invasive and endometrioid EOC.