1
|
Sevier-Guy LJ, Ferreira N, Somerville C, Gillanders D. Psychological flexibility and fear of recurrence in prostate cancer. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2021; 30:e13483. [PMID: 34191379 DOI: 10.1111/ecc.13483] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2020] [Revised: 04/29/2021] [Accepted: 05/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Psychological flexibility and fear of cancer recurrence are important variables that influence psychosocial outcomes in individuals diagnosed with a range of different types of cancer. Their role and how they impact on psychological distress and quality of life in men with prostate cancer specifically have not been established. METHODS A cross-sectional sample of 144 men with prostate cancer was recruited. Multiple regression and conditional process analysis were used to assess whether psychological flexibility moderates the relationship between fear of recurrence and distress and quality of life. RESULTS Psychological flexibility significantly predicted psychological distress (β = -0.56, p < 0.0001) and quality of life (β = 0.21, p < 0.0001), appearing a stronger predictor of psychological distress than fear of recurrence (β = 0.25, p < 0.0001). Fear of recurrence was a stronger predictor of quality of life (β = -0.41, p < 0.0001) than psychological flexibility. Psychological flexibility moderated the relationship between fear of recurrence and psychological distress (β = -0.01, p < 0.001). At low and average levels of psychological flexibility, psychological distress mediated the relationship between fear of recurrence and quality of life (β = -0.33 to -0.16, p < 0.05). At high levels of psychological flexibility, distress no longer mediated this relationship (β = 0.01, ns), supporting the role of psychological flexibility as a moderator. CONCLUSIONS These findings suggest that psychological flexibility might be a useful treatment target, through interventions such as Acceptance and Commitment Therapy, to buffer the effects of fear of recurrence and distress and improve psychosocial outcomes in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsay-Jo Sevier-Guy
- School of Health and Social Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.,Psychology Department, NHS Fife, Kirkcaldy, UK.,Psychology Department, NHS Tayside, Dundee, UK
| | - Nuno Ferreira
- School of Health and Social Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.,School of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Nicosia, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | | | - David Gillanders
- School of Health and Social Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta I, Zhang Y, Brundisini F, Florez ID, Wiercioch W, Nieuwlaat R, Begum H, Cuello CA, Roldan Y, Chen R, Ding C, Morgan RL, Riva JJ, Zhang Y, Charide R, Agarwal A, Balduzzi S, Morgano GP, Yepes-Nuñez JJ, Rehman Y, Neumann I, Schwab N, Baldeh T, Braun C, Rodríguez MF, Schünemann HJ. Patient values and preferences regarding VTE disease: a systematic review to inform American Society of Hematology guidelines. Blood Adv 2020; 4:953-968. [PMID: 32150612 PMCID: PMC7065473 DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2019000462] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2019] [Accepted: 01/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Values and preferences relate to the importance that patients place on health outcomes (eg, bleeding, having a deep venous thrombosis) and are essential when weighing benefits and harms in guideline recommendations. To inform the American Society of Hematology guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism (VTE) disease, we conducted a systematic review of patients' values and preferences related to VTE. We searched Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PsycINFO, and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature from inception to April of 2018 (PROSPERO-CRD42018094003). We included quantitative and qualitative studies. We followed Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) guidance for rating the certainty and presenting findings for quantitative research about the relative importance of health outcomes and a grounded theory approach for qualitative thematic synthesis. We identified 14 quantitative studies (2465 participants) describing the relative importance of VTE-related health states in a widely diverse population of patients, showing overall small to important impact on patients' lives (certainty of the evidence from low to moderate). Additionally, evidence from 34 quantitative studies (6424 participants) and 15 qualitative studies (570 participants) revealed that patients put higher value on VTE risk reduction than on the potential harms of the treatment (certainty of evidence from low to moderate). Studies also suggested a clear preference for oral medication over subcutaneous medication (moderate certainty). The observed variability in health state values may be a result of differences in the approaches used to elicit them and the diversity of included populations rather than true variability in values. This finding highlights the necessity to explore the variability induced by different approaches to ascertain values.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Yuan Zhang
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Francesca Brundisini
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Ivan D Florez
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Antioquia, Medellin, Colombia
| | - Wojtek Wiercioch
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Robby Nieuwlaat
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Housne Begum
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Carlos A Cuello
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- Department of Health Quality Improvement, School of Medicine, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey, Mexico
| | - Yetiani Roldan
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Ru Chen
- National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Chengyi Ding
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Rebecca L Morgan
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - John J Riva
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Yuqing Zhang
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Rana Charide
- GRADE Center, Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Arnav Agarwal
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sara Balduzzi
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Children and Adults, University of Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Gian Paolo Morgano
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | | | - Yasir Rehman
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Ignacio Neumann
- Department of Internal Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Nicole Schwab
- SickKids Hospital and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Tejan Baldeh
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Cody Braun
- Department of Internal Medicine, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL
| | | | - Holger J Schünemann
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University Health Sciences Centre, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Magnus A, Isaranuwatchai W, Mihalopoulos C, Brown V, Carter R. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prostate Cancer Utility Values of Patients and Partners Between 2007 and 2016. MDM Policy Pract 2019; 4:2381468319852332. [PMID: 31192309 PMCID: PMC6540514 DOI: 10.1177/2381468319852332] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2017] [Accepted: 03/03/2019] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background. There is widespread agreement that both the length and
quality of life matter when assessing new technologies and/or models of care in
the treatment for cancer patients. Quality of life for partners/carers also
matters, particularly for prostate cancer. Purpose. This systematic
review aims to provide up-to-date utility values along the prostate cancer care
continuum (i.e., from prescreening through to palliative care) for use where
future trial-based or modelled economic evaluations cannot collect primary data
from men and/or partners. Data Sources. A protocol was developed
and registered on the international register of systematic reviews—PROSPERO.
Databases searched included EBSCO Information Services (CINAHL, EconLit, Global
Health, HEED, MEDLINE Complete, PsycINFO), Cochrane Database of Systematic
Reviews, Web of Science, and Embase. Study Selection. Study
selection terms included health-related quality of life, prostate cancer, and
partners or carers. Data Extraction. The authors identified
articles published between 2007 and 2016 that provided health state utility
values, with statistical uncertainty, for men with or at risk of prostate cancer
and/or their partner/carers. Data Synthesis and Results. Study
quality and generalizability of utilities was evaluated and meta-analysis
conducted against prespecified criteria. From 906 original articles, 29 recent
primary studies met the inclusion/exclusion criteria. We tabulate all the
utility values with uncertainty, along with considerable methodological detail
and patient population characteristics. Limitations. Utility values
pertaining to carers/partners were limited to one study.
Conclusions. Studies varied in design, measurement instruments
utilized, quality, and generalizability. There is sufficient qualitative and
quantitative detail for the reported utility values to be readily incorporated
into economic evaluations. More research is needed with carers/partners and with
newly developing prostate cancer-specific quality of life tools.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Magnus
- Deakin Health Economics, Centre for Population Health Research, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
| | - Wanrudee Isaranuwatchai
- Centre for Excellence in Economic Analysis Research, St. Michael's Hospital; Institute for Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Cathrine Mihalopoulos
- Deakin Health Economics, Centre for Population Health Research, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
| | - Victoria Brown
- Deakin Health Economics, Centre for Population Health Research, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
| | - Rob Carter
- Deakin Health Economics, Centre for Population Health Research, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Smith-Palmer J, Takizawa C, Valentine W. Literature review of the burden of prostate cancer in Germany, France, the United Kingdom and Canada. BMC Urol 2019; 19:19. [PMID: 30885200 PMCID: PMC6421711 DOI: 10.1186/s12894-019-0448-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2017] [Accepted: 03/07/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prostate cancer is the most frequently reported cancer in males in Europe, and is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. The aim of the current review was to characterize the clinical, economic and humanistic burden of disease associated with prostate cancer in France, Germany, the UK and Canada. METHODS Literature searches were conducted using the PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases to identify studies reporting incidence and/or mortality rates, costs and health state utilities associated with prostate cancer in the settings of interest. For inclusion, studies were required to be published in English in full-text form from 2006 onwards. RESULTS Incidence studies showed that in all settings the incidence of prostate cancer has increased substantially over the past two decades, driven in part by increased uptake of prostate specific antigen (PSA) screening leading to earlier identification of tumors, but which has also led to over-treatment, compounding the economic burden of disease. Mortality rates have declined over the same time frame, driven by earlier detection and improvements in treatment. Both prostate cancer itself, as well as treatment and treatment-related complications, are associated with reduced quality of life. CONCLUSIONS Prostate cancer is associated with a significant clinical and economic burden, whilst earlier detection and aggressive treatment is associated with improved survival, over-treatment of men with indolent tumors compounds the already significant burden of disease and treatment can lead to long-term side effects including impotence and impaired urinary and/or bowel function. There is currently an unmet clinical need for diagnostic and/or prognostic tools that facilitate personalized prostate cancer treatment, and potentially reduce the clinical, economic and humanistic burden of invasive cancer treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Smith-Palmer
- Ossian Health Economics and Communications GmbH, Bäumleingasse 20, 4051, Basel, Switzerland.
| | - C Takizawa
- Genomic Health International, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - W Valentine
- Ossian Health Economics and Communications GmbH, Bäumleingasse 20, 4051, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kvrgic Z, Asiedu GB, Crowson CS, Ridgeway JL, Davis JM. "Like No One Is Listening to Me": A Qualitative Study of Patient-Provider Discordance Between Global Assessments of Disease Activity in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2018; 70:1439-1447. [PMID: 29266857 PMCID: PMC6013318 DOI: 10.1002/acr.23501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2017] [Accepted: 12/12/2017] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore the perspectives and experiences of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) whose assessments of their disease differ from those of their rheumatology care provider. METHODS A total of 20 adult RA patients with patient-provider discordance at their most recent rheumatology appointment (within 4 weeks) were recruited. Discordance was defined by an absolute difference of 25 or more between patient and provider global assessments on a visual analog scale (VAS) of disease activity. For descriptive purposes, participants completed the Health Assessment Questionnaire II, pain VAS, and Patient Health Questionnaire 9 depression scale. Interviews were conducted in person and individually with each patient with a semistructured interview guide. Topics ranged widely, including participants' perspectives and experiences with living with RA, clinical disease assessments, patient-provider communication, and psychosocial or other needs. Data from the interviews were analyzed using interpretive phenomenological analysis. RESULTS Six major themes emerged from the patient interviews describing patient-provider discordance and disease assessment: being misunderstood by others, limitations of provider assessments, discrepancy with provider findings, inadequate active listening on the part of health care providers, unmet psychosocial needs, and lack of patient empowerment. CONCLUSION Patients described discordance in terms of symptom assessment and understanding how RA affects everyday life. Typical clinical assessments did not capture their experience. The resulting conceptual framework should inform future interventional studies seeking to enhance concordance of patient-physician communication and to optimize satisfaction with care and health-related quality-of-life outcomes for patients with RA.
Collapse
|
6
|
Tomlinson G, Bremner KE, Ritvo P, Naglie G, Krahn MD. Development and validation of a utility weighting function for the patient-oriented prostate utility scale (PORPUS). Med Decis Making 2011; 32:11-30. [PMID: 21653804 DOI: 10.1177/0272989x11407203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previously, we developed a prostate cancer (PC)-specific health state classification system, the Patient Oriented Prostate Utility Scale (PORPUS). In this study, we developed a scoring system to allow indirect calculation of utilities from the PORPUS. METHODS We interviewed 234 PC outpatients, including those with newly diagnosed and metastatic disease, to obtain rating scale (RS) values on 4 to 6 levels of each of the 10 attributes of the PORPUS, and on 10 corner states (worst level on 1 attribute, best on 9). Patients also completed standard gamble (SG) and RS tasks on 4 multiattribute states (impotence and pain corner states, mild and severe PC symptoms). We used the RS and SG scores for multiattribute states to determine a risk aversion function for mapping values to utilities. We then tested 15 different strategies to estimate the multiattribute utility function (MAUF), using the single attribute disutilities for each level of the 10 PORPUS attributes, and the disutilities for the corner states. The root mean squared error (RMSE) of prediction of the SG on the 4 multiattribute states was used to identify the optimal strategy and scoring system. RESULTS The optimal strategy gave an RMSE of 0.06. Comparison of mean MAUF-predicted utilities to directly elicited SG utilities for the 2 multiattribute states from patients in 2 previously published studies (n = 248 and n = 141) supported the validity of the MAUF. CONCLUSIONS The scoring system together with the PORPUS comprise an indirect utility instrument, the PORPUS-U, which can be used in clinical and research settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- George Tomlinson
- Department of Medicine and Department of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (GT, GN, MDK),Toronto General Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (GT, KEB, MDK),Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment Collaborative (THETA), Toronto, Ontario, Canada (GT, KEB, MDK),Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (GT)
| | - Karen E Bremner
- Toronto General Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (GT, KEB, MDK),Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment Collaborative (THETA), Toronto, Ontario, Canada (GT, KEB, MDK)
| | - Paul Ritvo
- Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, and Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (PR)
| | - Gary Naglie
- Department of Medicine and Department of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (GT, GN, MDK),Baycrest Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (GN)
| | - Murray D Krahn
- Department of Medicine and Department of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (GT, GN, MDK),Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (MDK),Toronto General Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (GT, KEB, MDK),Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment Collaborative (THETA), Toronto, Ontario, Canada (GT, KEB, MDK)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lati C, Guthrie LC, Ward MM. Comparison of the construct validity and sensitivity to change of the visual analog scale and a modified rating scale as measures of patient global assessment in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 2010; 37:717-22. [PMID: 20194445 DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.090764] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Patient global assessment (PGA) is commonly measured using a visual analog scale (VAS). The VAS asks patients to integrate many dimensions of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) activity, yet its scope is poorly defined and its endpoints are vague. We investigated whether a modified Rating Scale that used marker states and more defined endpoints would provide a more valid measure of PGA. METHODS In our prospective longitudinal study, 164 patients with active RA rated their global arthritis activity using the VAS and Rating Scale before and after treatment. To compare construct validity, we correlated each score with 2 reference measures of RA activity, the 28-joint count Disease Activity Score (DAS28) and the physician global assessment, and examined how each measure was associated with different aspects of RA activity, including pain, functioning, and depressive symptoms, in multivariate regression analyses. We also examined sensitivity to change. RESULTS Both measures were correlated with the DAS28 (r = 0.39 for VAS; r = 0.35 for Rating Scale) and physician global assessment (r = 0.41 for VAS; r = 0.26 for Rating Scale) at the baseline visit. Pain and depressive symptoms had the strongest association with the VAS, while functional limitations and depressive symptoms had the strongest association with the Rating Scale. Residual analysis showed no differences in heterogeneity of patients' ratings. VAS was more sensitive to change than the Rating Scale (standardized response means of 0.55 and 0.45). CONCLUSION As measures of PGA, the VAS and Rating Scale had comparable construct validity, but differed in which aspects of arthritis activity influenced scores. VAS was more sensitive to change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chili Lati
- Intramural Research Program, National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, Maryland 20892-1468, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Waldmann A, Rohde V, Bremner K, Krahn M, Kuechler T, Katalinic A. Measuring prostate-specific quality of life in prostate cancer patients scheduled for radiotherapy or radical prostatectomy and reference men in Germany and Canada using the Patient Oriented Prostate Utility Scale-Psychometric (PORPUS-P). BMC Cancer 2009; 9:295. [PMID: 19698163 PMCID: PMC2739225 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-9-295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2009] [Accepted: 08/23/2009] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The PORPUS-P is a short questionnaire for measuring prostate-specific quality of life (QoL), which was designed in Canada for use in prostate cancer (PC) patients. We aimed to generate a German version and compare PORPUS-P scores of German reference men from the general population, and German and Canadian patients with newly diagnosed PC who were scheduled to receive radical prostatectomy (RP) or radiotherapy (RT). METHODS The study sample consisted of 988 reference men, 121 German and 66 Canadian PC patients scheduled for RT, and 371 German and 68 Canadian PC patients scheduled for RP. All men completed the PORPUS-P (German postal questionnaire, Canada personal interview). Data were gathered from PC patients before the start of therapy. RESULTS Canadian patients were better educated than the German patients, and fewer were retired. Patients scheduled to receive RT were older and more were retired. German RT patients had lower D'Amico risk scores and pre-treatment Gleason scores than RP patients, and Canadian RT patients had higher pre-treatment PSA than RP patients. Urinary and sexual dysfunction were seen in PC patients (especially RT patients), but were also common in the German reference men. Crude mean PORPUS-P scores differed statistically significant between German RT and RP and Canadian RP and RT patients, with RT patients having higher QoL scores. The differences in age-adjusted mean PORPUS-P scores between reference men and RP patients were not clinically significant, while RT patients had (clinically) significantly lower scores than the reference men. CONCLUSION The German translation of the PORPUS-P appears to be a short and feasible tool for assessing prostate-specific QoL. Although we found a similar response pattern, Canadian and German PC patients scheduled to receive RT or RP rated their pre-treatment quality of life on different levels, which reveals the need for national reference data. Problems in several QoL domains exist before treatment, and differ between PC patients scheduled for RT and RP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annika Waldmann
- Institute of Cancer Epidemiology, University Luebeck, Beckergrube 43-47, 23552 Luebeck, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|