1
|
Birgin E, Heibel M, Hetjens S, Rasbach E, Reissfelder C, Téoule P, Rahbari NN. Robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy for liver malignancies (ROC'N'ROLL): a single-centre, randomised, controlled, single-blinded clinical trial. THE LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH. EUROPE 2024; 43:100972. [PMID: 39210947 PMCID: PMC11360176 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.100972] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2024] [Revised: 06/01/2024] [Accepted: 06/05/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024]
Abstract
Background Robotic hepatectomy (RH) has been increasingly adopted for the treatment of liver malignancies despite lacking evidence from randomised trials. We aimed to determine the effect of RH compared to laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) on quality of life in patients undergoing minimally invasive hepatectomy for liver malignancies. Methods This single-blinded, randomised trial was conducted at a tertiary care academic centre (DRKS00027531). Patients with resectable liver malignancies were assessed for eligibility and randomly assigned to either RH or LH with stratification by type of malignancy and difficulty of resection. Patients were blinded to the treatment allocation. The primary outcome was the mean quality of life within 90 days after surgery, measured with the role functioning scale of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 questionnaire. Secondary outcomes included operating time, morbidity, blood loss, conversion rate, postoperative recovery, and resection margin status. Findings Between February 21, 2022, and Sep 18, 2023, 80 patients (RH: n = 41, LH: n = 39) were included and analysed on an intention-to-treat basis. Role functioning scores did not differ between RH and LH (mean [SD], 74.3 [23.3] versus 79.6 [22.3]; mean difference -5.3, 95% CI -15.6 to 5.1, p = 0.547). The comprehensive complication index was not significantly different between the study groups (8.9 [23.1] versus 15.5 [23.9], p = 0.137). There were no differences in other perioperative outcomes. Interpretation RH yielded similar outcomes in quality of life and can be considered a safe alternative to LH. Funding None.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emrullah Birgin
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
- Department of Surgery, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Marie Heibel
- Department of Surgery, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Svetlana Hetjens
- Department of Medical Statistics and Biomathematics, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Erik Rasbach
- Department of Surgery, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Christoph Reissfelder
- Department of Surgery, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Patrick Téoule
- Department of Surgery, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Nuh N. Rahbari
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
- Department of Surgery, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fukushima T, Suzuki K, Tanaka T, Okayama T, Inoue J, Morishita S, Nakano J. Global quality of life and mortality risk in patients with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Qual Life Res 2024:10.1007/s11136-024-03691-3. [PMID: 38811448 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-024-03691-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/20/2024] [Indexed: 05/31/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to examine the impact of global quality of life (QOL) on mortality risk in patients with cancer, considering cancer type and timepoint of QOL assessment. METHODS A systematic search was conducted using Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PubMed/MEDLINE, and Scopus databases from inception to December 2022. Observational studies that assessed QOL and examined mortality risk in patients with cancer were extracted. Subgroup analyses were performed for cancer types and timepoints of QOL assessment. RESULTS Overall, global QOL was significantly associated with mortality risk (hazard ratio: 1.06, 95% confidence interval: 1.05-1.07; p < 0.00001). A subgroup analysis based on cancer type demonstrated that lung, head and neck, breast, esophagus, colon, prostate, hematologic, liver, gynecologic, stomach, brain, bladder, bone and soft tissue, and mixed type cancers were significantly associated with mortality risk; however, melanoma and pancreatic cancer were not significantly associated with mortality risk. Additionally, global QOL was associated with mortality risk at all timepoints (pretreatment, posttreatment, and palliative phase); pretreatment QOL had the largest impact, followed by posttreatment QOL. CONCLUSION These findings provide evidence that QOL is associated with mortality risk in patients with cancer at any timepoint. These results indicate the importance of evaluating the QOL and supportive interventions to improve QOL in any phase.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takuya Fukushima
- Faculty of Rehabilitation, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan.
| | - Katsuyoshi Suzuki
- Division of Rehabilitation Medicine, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Takashi Tanaka
- Department of Rehabilitation, Hyogo Medical University Hospital, Nishinomiya, Japan
| | - Taro Okayama
- Division of Rehabilitation Medicine, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Junichiro Inoue
- Division of Rehabilitation Medicine, Kobe University Hospital International Clinical Cancer Research Center, Kobe, Japan
| | - Shinichiro Morishita
- Department of Physical Therapy, School of Health Science, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Jiro Nakano
- Faculty of Rehabilitation, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Beutter CNL, Zeller K, Martens UM, Pfleiderer B, Fegeler C. User-Centered Development of a Mobile App to Assess the Quality of Life of Patients With Cancer: Iterative Investigation and Usability Testing. JMIR Cancer 2023; 9:e44985. [PMID: 37751285 PMCID: PMC10565618 DOI: 10.2196/44985] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2022] [Revised: 06/15/2023] [Accepted: 08/24/2023] [Indexed: 09/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The treatment for cancer can have a negative impact not only on physical well-being but also on mental health and the quality of life (QoL). Health apps enable the monitoring of different parameters, but to date, there are only few that support patients with cancer and none that focuses on the assessment of QoL. Furthermore, patients as stakeholders are often only integrated at the late stage of the development process, if at all. OBJECTIVE The aim of this research was to develop and evaluate a smartphone app (Lion-App) to enable patients with cancer to autonomously measure the QoL with an iterative, user-centered approach. METHODS Patients with cancer were involved in a 3-stage process from conceptualization to the point when the app was available on the tester's private device. First, focus groups with members (N=21) of cancer support groups were conducted to understand their expectations and needs. Thereafter, individual tests were performed. After developing a prototype that incorporated findings from the focus groups, a second test cycle was conducted, followed by a beta test lasting 2 months. In our app, the QoL can be assessed via a patient diary and an integrated questionnaire. Through all stages, usability was evaluated using the modular extended version of the User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ+), including the calculation of a key performance indicator (KPI). If possible, the impact of sex on the results was evaluated. As part of the beta test, usage rates as well as age-dependent differences were also assessed. RESULTS A total of 21 participants took part in the initial 3 focus groups. In the subsequent usability testing (N=18), 17 (94%) participants rated their impression through the UEQ+, with a mean KPI of 2.12 (SD 0.64, range: -3 to 3). In the second usability test (N=14), the mean KPI increased to 2.28 (SD=0.49). In the beta test, the usage rate of 19 participants was evaluated, of whom 14 (74%) also answered the UEQ+ (mean KPI 1.78, SD 0.84). An influence of age on the number of questionnaire responses in Lion-App was observed, with a decrease in responses with increasing age (P=.02). Sex-dependent analyses were only possible for the first usability test and the beta test. The main adjustments based on user feedback were a restructuring of the diary as well as integration of a shorter questionnaire to assess the QoL. CONCLUSIONS The iterative, user-centered approach for development and usability testing resulted in positive evaluations of Lion-App. Our app was rated as suitable for everyday use to monitor the QoL of patients with cancer. Initial results indicated that the sex and age of participants seem to play only a minor role.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chantal N L Beutter
- MOLIT Institute gGmbH, Heilbronn, Germany
- Clinic for Radiology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | | | - Uwe M Martens
- MOLIT Institute gGmbH, Heilbronn, Germany
- Internal Medicine III for Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine, SLK Clinics GmbH, Heilbronn, Germany
| | | | - Christian Fegeler
- MOLIT Institute gGmbH, Heilbronn, Germany
- University of Applied Science Heilbronn, Heilbronn, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Serper M, Parikh ND, Thiele G, Ovchinsky N, Mehta S, Kuo A, Ho C, Kanwal F, Volk M, Asrani SK, Ghabril MS, Lake JR, Merriman RB, Morgan TR, Tapper EB. Patient-reported outcomes in HCC: A scoping review by the Practice Metrics Committee of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Hepatology 2022; 76:251-274. [PMID: 34990516 PMCID: PMC10648308 DOI: 10.1002/hep.32313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2021] [Revised: 12/20/2021] [Accepted: 12/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS HCC is a leading cause of mortality in patients with advanced liver disease and is associated with significant morbidity. Despite multiple available curative and palliative treatments, there is a lack of systematic evaluation of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in HCC. APPROACH AND RESULTS The American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases Practice Metrics Committee conducted a scoping review of PROs in HCC from 1990 to 2021 to (1) synthesize the evidence on PROs in HCC and (2) provide recommendations on incorporating PROs into clinical practice and quality improvement efforts. A total of 63 studies met inclusion criteria investigating factors associated with PROs, the relationship between PROs and survival, and associations between HCC therapy and PROs. Studies recruited heterogeneous populations, and most were cross-sectional. Poor PROs were associated with worse prognosis after adjusting for clinical factors and with more advanced disease stage, although some studies showed better PROs in patients with HCC compared to those with cirrhosis. Locoregional and systemic therapies were generally associated with a high symptom burden; however, some studies showed lower symptom burden for transarterial radiotherapy and radiation therapy. Qualitative studies identified additional symptoms not routinely assessed with structured questionnaires. Gaps in the literature include lack of integration of PROs into clinical care to guide HCC treatment decisions, unknown impact of HCC on caregivers, and the effect of palliative or supportive care quality of life and health outcomes. CONCLUSION Evidence supports assessment of PROs in HCC; however, clinical implementation and the impact of PRO measurement on quality of care and longitudinal outcomes need future investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marina Serper
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Section of Gastroenterology, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Neehar D Parikh
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Grace Thiele
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Nadia Ovchinsky
- Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Children's Hospital at Montefiore-Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA
| | - Shivang Mehta
- Hepatology, Baylor All Saints, Fort Worth, Texas, USA
| | - Alexander Kuo
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Chanda Ho
- Department of Transplantation, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Fasiha Kanwal
- Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
- Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, Texas, USA
- Section of Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Michael Volk
- Division of Gastroenterology and Transplantation Institute, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, California, USA
| | - Sumeet K Asrani
- Hepatology, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Marwan S Ghabril
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - John R Lake
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | | | | | - Elliot B Tapper
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
- Gastroenterology Section, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hassanin IA, Salih RFM, Fathy MHM, Hassanin EA, Selim DH. Implications of inappropriate prescription of oral nutritional supplements on the quality of life of cancer outpatients: a cross-sectional comparative study. Support Care Cancer 2022; 30:4149-4155. [PMID: 35075490 PMCID: PMC8942909 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-022-06837-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2021] [Accepted: 01/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Background and aims Oral nutritional supplements (ONS) are considered a cornerstone in the treatment plan of malnutrition in cancer patients. However, the prevalence of inappropriate prescription of ONS is high. In this study, we aim to investigate the effect of inappropriate oral nutritional supplementation (consisting of prescription of ONS without evident clinical indication, or the absence of ONS when at risk of malnutrition) on the quality of life of cancer outpatients. Methods A cross-sectional comparative study was conducted in 104 cancer outpatients, receiving ONS without prior malnutrition risk screening (n = 51), and patients not receiving ONS (n = 53). Nutritional risk screening was performed using the abridged patient-generated subjective global assessment (ab-PG-SGA). The quality of life was assessed using EORTC QLQ-C30 version 3.0 questionnaire. Multivariate analysis was conducted to determine the predictors of quality-of-life scales. Age (years), malnutrition (ab-PG-SGA scores), BMI (kg/m2), TSF (mm), MUAC (cm), ONS (yes, no) were entered into the linear regression analysis as predictors (backward stepwise linear regression analysis). Results The prevalence of malnutrition risk (ab-PG-SGA ≥ 6) was 74%. The median score of the ab-PG-SGA for ONS receiving group was significantly higher (p = 0.045). Furthermore, univariate analysis showed that the scores of the global health status (QoL) and the role functioning (RF) scales were significantly lower for the ONS receiving group (p = 0.020 and p = 0.016, respectively). Multivariately, malnutrition, inappropriate ONS prescription, and triceps skin fold were found to be predictors of the RF scale, while malnutrition was the only predictor for the QoL. Conclusion The inappropriate ONS prescription does not improve nutritional status or quality of life of cancer outpatients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Islam A Hassanin
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Alexandria University, Alexandria, 21521, Egypt
| | - Reem F M Salih
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Alexandria University, Alexandria, 21521, Egypt
| | - Marwa H M Fathy
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Alexandria University, Alexandria, 21521, Egypt
| | - Eman A Hassanin
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Alexandria University, Alexandria, 21521, Egypt
| | - Dina H Selim
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Alexandria University, Alexandria, 21521, Egypt.
- Educational and Medical Complex, Al Mawasah University Hospital, Alexandria University, Alexandria, 21526, Egypt.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wohlleber K, Heger P, Probst P, Engel C, Diener MK, Mihaljevic AL. Health-related quality of life in primary hepatic cancer: a systematic review assessing the methodological properties of instruments and a meta-analysis comparing treatment strategies. Qual Life Res 2021; 30:2429-2466. [PMID: 34283381 PMCID: PMC8405513 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-021-02810-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Patient-reported outcomes including health-related quality of life (HRQoL) are important oncological outcome measures. The validation of HRQoL instruments for patients with hepatocellular and cholangiocellular carcinoma is lacking. Furthermore, studies comparing different treatment options in respect to HRQoL are sparse. The objective of the systematic review and meta-analysis was, therefore, to identify all available HRQoL tools regarding primary liver cancer, to assess the methodological quality of these HRQoL instruments and to compare surgical, interventional and medical treatments with regard to HRQoL. METHODS A systematic literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, the Cochrane library, PsycINFO, CINAHL and EMBASE. The methodological quality of all identified HRQoL instruments was performed according to the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurements INstruments (COSMIN) standard. Consequently, the quality of reporting of HRQoL data was assessed. Finally, wherever possible HRQoL data were extracted and quantitative analyses were performed. RESULTS A total of 124 studies using 29 different HRQoL instruments were identified. After the methodological assessment, only 10 instruments fulfilled the psychometric criteria and could be included in subsequent analyses. However, quality of reporting of HRQoL data was insufficient, precluding meta-analyses for 9 instruments. CONCLUSION Using a standardized methodological assessment, specific HRQoL instruments are recommended for use in patients with hepatocellular and cholangiocellular carcinoma. HRQoL data of patients undergoing treatment of primary liver cancers are sparse and reporting falls short of published standards. Meaningful comparison of established treatment options with regard to HRQoL was impossible indicating the need for future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kerstin Wohlleber
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Patrick Heger
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- The Study Centre of the German Surgical Society (SDGC), University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Pascal Probst
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- The Study Centre of the German Surgical Society (SDGC), University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christoph Engel
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology (IMISE), University of Leipzig, Härtelstraße 16-18, 04107, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Markus K Diener
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- The Study Centre of the German Surgical Society (SDGC), University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - André L Mihaljevic
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
- The Study Centre of the German Surgical Society (SDGC), University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Buranupakorn T, Thangsuk P, Patumanond J, Phinyo P. Emulation of a Target Trial to Evaluate the Causal Effect of Palliative Care Consultation on the Survival Time of Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13050992. [PMID: 33673534 PMCID: PMC7956840 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13050992] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2021] [Revised: 02/22/2021] [Accepted: 02/24/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common and aggressive liver cancer. As most patients are diagnosed during an incurable stage of the disease, they usually face great suffering during the end-of-life period. Palliative care can improve the patient’s quality of life and alleviate both physical and psychological symptoms. However, the discipline is underutilized due to a common misconception that it will accelerate the patient’s death. We emulated a hypothetical target trial to evaluate the causal effect of palliative care consultation on the survival time of patients diagnosed with HCC from retrospective observational data of a Thai tertiary care center. Although no clear survival benefit or harm was identified, palliative care consultation significantly reduced the use of unnecessary life-sustaining intervention, healthcare costs, and the risk of dying in the hospital among patients with HCC during their end-of-life period. Abstract Palliative care has the potential to improve the quality of life of patients with incurable diseases or cancer, such as hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A common misconception of palliative care with respect to the patient’s survival remains a significant barrier to the discipline. This study aimed to provide causal evidence for the effect of palliative care consultation on the survival time after diagnosis among HCC patients. An emulation of a target trial was conducted on a retrospective cohort of HCC patients from January 2017 to August 2019. The primary endpoint was the restricted mean survival time (RMST) at 12 months after HCC diagnosis. We used the clone–censor–weight approach to account for potential immortal time bias. In this study, 86 patients with palliative care consultation and 71 patients without palliative care consultation were included. The adjusted RMST difference was −29.7 (95% confidence interval (CI): −81.7, 22.3; p-value = 0.263) days in favor of no palliative care consultation. However, palliative care consultation was associated with an increase in the prescription of symptom control medications, as well as a reduction in life-sustaining interventions and healthcare costs. Our findings suggest that palliative care consultation was associated with neither additional survival benefit nor harm in HCC patients. The misconception that it significantly accelerates the dying process should be disregarded.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tassaya Buranupakorn
- Department of Family Medicine, Chiang Rai Prachanukroh Hospital, Chiang Rai 57000, Thailand; (T.B.); (P.T.)
| | - Phaviga Thangsuk
- Department of Family Medicine, Chiang Rai Prachanukroh Hospital, Chiang Rai 57000, Thailand; (T.B.); (P.T.)
| | - Jayanton Patumanond
- Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Clinical Statistics, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand;
| | - Phichayut Phinyo
- Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Clinical Statistics, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand;
- Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
- Musculoskeletal Science and Translational Research (MSTR) Cluster, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +66-53-935-180
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Firkins JL, Tarter R, Driessnack M, Hansen L. A closer look at quality of life in the hepatocellular carcinoma literature. Qual Life Res 2021; 30:1525-1535. [PMID: 33625648 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-021-02789-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/04/2021] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Adults with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have a high symptom burden. Their quality of life (QOL) has been shown to be significantly impacted by both the disease and its treatment, adding to the high symptom burden that these patients experience. The primary aims of this paper are as follows: (1) to identify how QOL is being defined in HCC literature and (2) to identify how QOL is being measured in the HCC literature using Ferrell's model of QOL. METHODS A systematic review was completed of relevant studies published after 2014, using PubMed, CINHAL, and PsycInfo. Relevant studies were reviewed by 2 reviewers using PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS From a total of 1312 papers obtained in the initial database search, 30 met inclusion criteria and are included in this review. From the included articles, 10% included a definition of QOL and 3% addressed the spiritual domain of QOL. Majority of study participants were in the early stage of HCC, though the majority of adults with HCC are diagnosed in the advanced stage. Only 3% of included studies included greater than 22% population of advanced stage of HCC. CONCLUSION The results of this systematic review demonstrate the need for future research into QOL in the advanced stage of QOL. It also identified gap in the literature concerning the definition of QOL in HCC and the spiritual domain of QOL in HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenny L Firkins
- School of Nursing, Oregon Health & Science University, 3455 SW US Veterans Hospital Road, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
| | - Robin Tarter
- School of Nursing, Oregon Health & Science University, 3455 SW US Veterans Hospital Road, Portland, OR, 97239, USA
| | - Martha Driessnack
- School of Nursing, Oregon Health & Science University, 3455 SW US Veterans Hospital Road, Portland, OR, 97239, USA
| | - Lissi Hansen
- School of Nursing, Oregon Health & Science University, 3455 SW US Veterans Hospital Road, Portland, OR, 97239, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kang D, Shim S, Cho J, Lim HK. Systematic Review of Studies Assessing the Health-Related Quality of Life of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients from 2009 to 2018. Korean J Radiol 2020; 21:633-646. [PMID: 32410403 PMCID: PMC7231617 DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2019.0808] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2019] [Revised: 02/22/2020] [Accepted: 02/25/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
We reviewed all studies assessing the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) between 2009 and 2018 (n = 45). Most studies assessed HRQoL as an outcome, and evaluated or compared the HRQoL of HCC patients depending on the type of treatment or stage of disease. HCC patients had a worse HRQoL than the general population, including in those with early-stage HCC. Patients commonly experienced pain, fatigue, sleep disturbance, distress, and lack of appetite, and these symptoms remained problematic even a few years after treatment. TNM classification of malignant tumors stage, tumor stage, presence of cirrhosis, being Asian, being female, living alone, or being unemployed were associated with a poor HRQoL. While recent studies have included a more diverse patient population, various topics, and different study designs, there were limited studies on supportive interventions. Given the increase in HCC cases and HCC survivors, addressing the HRQoL of HCC patients requires more attention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danbee Kang
- Department of Clinical Research Design and Evaluation, SAISHT, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea.,Center for Clinical Epidemiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sungkeun Shim
- Center for Clinical Epidemiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.,Department of Digital Health, SAISHT, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Juhee Cho
- Department of Clinical Research Design and Evaluation, SAISHT, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea.,Center for Clinical Epidemiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.,Department of Digital Health, SAISHT, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea.,Department of Health Sciences and Technology, SAISHT, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyo Keun Lim
- Department of Health Sciences and Technology, SAISHT, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea.,Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Aly A, Ronnebaum S, Patel D, Doleh Y, Benavente F. Epidemiologic, humanistic and economic burden of hepatocellular carcinoma in the USA: a systematic literature review. Hepat Oncol 2020; 7:HEP27. [PMID: 32774837 PMCID: PMC7399607 DOI: 10.2217/hep-2020-0024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2020] [Accepted: 07/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM To describe the epidemiologic, humanistic and economic burdens of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the USA. MATERIALS & METHODS Studies describing the epidemiology and economic burden from national cohorts, any economic models, or any humanistic burden studies published 2008-2018 were systematically searched. RESULTS HCC incidence was 9.5 per 100,000 person-years in most recent data, but was ∼100-times higher among patients with hepatitis/cirrhosis. Approximately a third of patients were diagnosed with advanced disease. Patients with HCC experienced poor quality of life. Direct costs were substantial and varied based on underlying demographics, disease stage and treatment received. Between 25-77% of patients did not receive surgical, locoregional or systemic treatment. CONCLUSION Better treatments are needed to extend survival and improve quality of life for patients with HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Dipen Patel
- Pharmerit – an OPEN Health Company, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
A Prospective Evaluation of the Reliability and Utility of Quality of Life Measures in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Am J Clin Oncol 2020; 42:555-563. [PMID: 31135382 DOI: 10.1097/coc.0000000000000555] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Little is known about how quality of life (QOL) can assist clinical decision-making for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study aimed to investigate the reliability and validity of QOL as well as its prognostic value and utility. MATERIALS AND METHODS A prospective cohort of 300 HCC patients at various stages was recruited from 2015 to 2017 in Korea. The subjects answered the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Core-30 (QLQ-C30) and QLQ-HCC18 and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Hepatobiliary (FACT-Hep) questionnaire. Prognostic nomograms including the QOL scales were developed. The prediction performance of the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) and the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging systems when they were incorporated with QOL was investigated. RESULTS The EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-HCC18 subscales showed higher reliability than FACT-Hep subscales. With regard to the validity, both questionnaires discriminated the patients by stages, treatment modalities, and performance status effectively. Multivariable analysis revealed that EORTC role functioning and EORTC appetite loss subscales were statistically associated with overall survival and disease progression. The developed nomograms accurately estimated the 1-year overall survival and disease progression-free rates. Incorporating the EORTC role functioning subscale or Hepatobiliary Cancer Subscale of FACT-Hep with the BCLC and AJCC systems improved the prognostic classification. Incorporating QOL into the AJCC system showed better predictive accuracy than incorporating performance status into it did. CONCLUSIONS The findings suggest that QOL data can serve as a reliable predictive factor and assist prognostic calculation for HCC patients.
Collapse
|
12
|
Influence of pretreatment quality of life on prognosis in patients with urothelial carcinoma. Int J Clin Oncol 2019; 25:362-369. [PMID: 31655941 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-019-01563-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2019] [Accepted: 10/14/2019] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We investigated the association between the pretreatment quality of life (QOL) and overall survival (OS) in patients with urothelial carcinoma (UC), as the influence of pretreatment QOL on prognosis remains unclear in patients with localized and metastatic UC. METHODS Between June 2013 and May 2019, we retrospectively investigated 205 patients with UC who received radical cystectomy or nephroureterectomy for non-metastatic UC (M0 group) or systemic chemotherapy for metastatic UC (M1 group). Patients answered the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire C30 (QLQ-C30) before the treatments. Patients were stratified into two groups: QOL high and low according to the optimal cutoff scores which were defined by receiver operating characteristic curve. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW)-adjusted multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to investigate the clinical implication of pretreatment QOL score on OS in patients with UC. RESULTS The number of patients in the M0 and M1 groups was 125 and 80, respectively. Optimal cutoff values in global, fatigue, pain, appetite loss, physical, and role scores were < 50, > 33, > 33, > 16, < 80, and < 67, respectively. IPTW-adjusted multivariate Cox regression analyses revealed that appetite loss score indicated a significantly poorer OS in the M1 group. No significant association of QOL with OS was observed in the M0 group. CONCLUSION Pretreatment QOL of appetite loss may predict poor prognosis of patients with metastatic UC.
Collapse
|
13
|
Sternby Eilard M, Hagström H, Mortensen KE, Wilsgaard T, Vagnildhaug OM, Dajani O, Stål P, Rizell M. Quality of life as a prognostic factor for survival in hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Int 2018; 38:885-894. [PMID: 28941130 DOI: 10.1111/liv.13593] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2017] [Accepted: 09/16/2017] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Prognostication in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is demanding. Not only tumour extent and performance status are to be considered, but also liver function, which is often limiting for both survival itself and for treatment possibilities. This study was conducted to assess whether patient-reported questionnaires containing general and liver-specific questions could improve prognostication of survival. METHODS 185 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in Norway and Sweden were prospectively included. Patients completed the quality-of-life questionnaires EORTC QLQ C30 and HCC18, and clinical, radiological and laboratory parameters were registered. Multivariate Cox regression and Harrell's C-statistics were used to identify the model that best predicted mortality. RESULTS Quality-of-life data were prognostic for overall survival. Fatigue and nutrition scales were prognostic in the multivariable analyses alone and in combination with clinical parameters. The prognostic value of established scoring systems was increased by the addition of QoL data. The best prognostic power was achieved by combining HCC18 nutrition scale with selected background parameters. CONCLUSION Quality-of-life questionnaires can prognosticate mortality in HCC patients. When combined with established scoring systems, both the general cancer questionnaire EORTC QLQ C30, and the additional liver cancer-specific HCC18 increased the prognostic accuracy slightly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Malin Sternby Eilard
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Hannes Hagström
- Unit of Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Center for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska Institute, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Tom Wilsgaard
- Department of Community Medicine, The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | | | - Olav Dajani
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Per Stål
- Unit of Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Center for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska Institute, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Magnus Rizell
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Health Related Quality of Life of Cancer Patients in Ethiopia. JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY 2018; 2018:1467595. [PMID: 29849628 PMCID: PMC5925207 DOI: 10.1155/2018/1467595] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2017] [Accepted: 03/08/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Background Neoplasm, AKA cancer (Ca), is associated with major morbidity and mortality. Aim Measurement of health related quality of life (HRQoL) of Ca patients is uncommon in Ethiopia. The present study determined the HRQoL and its determinants among people living with Ca in north Ethiopia. Methods A prospective hospital based study was conducted from 1 January 2017 to 30 August 2017 on Ca patients attending cancer treatment center of University of Gondar Teaching Hospital. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire version 3 was utilized to collect the data. The rate of QoL was presented using means with standard deviation (±SD). Binary logistic regression was employed to determine factors associated with HRQoL. Result The present study is based on the findings from 150 subjects. The rate of QoL was 52.7 (20.1) (mean ± SD). The highest functional status was emotional functioning 61 (25.5). Patients with no disease metastasis, 92.1 (5.1), had high QoL as compared to metastasis, 22.1 (18.9) (p = 0.03). Patients with affected physical functioning have a 20% reduction in QoL and Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR) of 0.794 [0.299-891]. Patients with low satisfaction level with the provided care, 0.82 [0.76-0.93], and those with unmet needs, 0.85 [0.80-0.95], experienced reduced level of HRQoL. Conclusion Health related quality of life of cancer patients was found to be low in Ethiopia. Patients with limited rate of disease metastasis had improved HRQoL. Further, the unmet needs of Ca patients and the level of satisfaction with the overall care were found to influence the extent of HRQoL. Therefore, early detection of neoplasm to arrest metastasis is warranted in order to achieve better QoL. In addition, addressing the unmet needs of these patients and ensuring higher satisfaction rate are recommended to maintain adequate HRQoL.
Collapse
|
15
|
Kensinger CD, Feurer ID, O'Dell HW, LaNeve DC, Simmons L, Pinson CW, Moore DE. Patient-reported outcomes in liver transplant recipients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Transplant 2016; 30:1036-45. [PMID: 27291713 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.12785] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/08/2016] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The effect of awarding MELD exception points for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) is unknown. We evaluated the physical and mental health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and symptoms of anxiety and depression in liver transplant recipients with HCC compared to patients without HCC. METHODS The single-center sample measured PROs before and after transplant, which included 1521 multisurvey measurement points among 502 adults (67% male, 28% HCC, follow-up time: <1-131 months). Data were analyzed using multivariable mixed-effects models. RESULTS Longitudinal PRO values did not differ between persons who received HCC exception points and those who did not have HCC. Patients with HCC who did not receive exception points had reduced physical HRQOL (P=.016), a late decline in mental HRQOL, and delayed reduction in anxiety (time-by-outcome interaction P<.050) compared to patients with HCC who received exception points. CONCLUSION Transplant recipients who received HCC exception points had PROs that were comparable to those of patients without HCC, and reported better physical HRQOL and reduced symptoms of anxiety compared to patients with HCC who did not receive exception points. These analyses demonstrate the impact of HCC exception points on PROs, and may help inform policy regarding HCC exception point allocation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clark D Kensinger
- Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.,Vanderbilt Transplant Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Irene D Feurer
- Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.,Vanderbilt Transplant Center, Nashville, TN, USA.,Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA
| | | | | | | | - C Wright Pinson
- Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.,Vanderbilt Transplant Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Derek E Moore
- Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA. .,Vanderbilt Transplant Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|